12-Month Finding on a Petition to List Sierra Nevada Red Fox As an Endangered Or Threatened Species; Proposed Rule

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

12-Month Finding on a Petition to List Sierra Nevada Red Fox As an Endangered Or Threatened Species; Proposed Rule Vol. 80 Thursday, No. 195 October 8, 2015 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List Sierra Nevada Red Fox as an Endangered or Threatened Species; Proposed Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Oct 07, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\08OCP3.SGM 08OCP3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3 60990 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 195 / Thursday, October 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR normal business hours at the U.S. Fish any petition to revise the Federal Lists and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Fish and Wildlife Service and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, and Plants that contains substantial Room W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825. scientific or commercial information 50 CFR Part 17 Please submit any new information, suggesting that listing a species may be [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0103; materials, comments, or questions warranted, we make a finding within 12 4500030113] concerning this finding to the above months of the date of receipt of the street address. petition. In this finding, we will Endangered and Threatened Wildlife FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: determine that the petitioned action is: and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Jennifer Norris, Field Supervisor, U.S. (1) Not warranted, (2) warranted, or (3) Petition To List Sierra Nevada Red Fox Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento warranted, but the immediate proposal as an Endangered or Threatened Fish and Wildlife Office (see of a regulation implementing the Species ADDRESSES); by telephone at 916–414– petitioned action is precluded by other pending proposals to determine whether AGENCY: 6600; or by facsimile at 916–414–6712. Fish and Wildlife Service, species are endangered or threatened, Interior. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the and expeditious progress is being made ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition to add or remove qualified species from finding. Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. the Federal Lists of Endangered and SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Threatened Wildlife and Plants Wildlife Service (Service), announce a (‘‘warranted but precluded’’). Section 12-month finding on a petition to list Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in 4(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires that we Sierra Nevada red fox (Vulpes vulpes This Document treat a petition for which the requested necator) as an endangered or threatened We use many acronyms and action is found to be warranted but species under the Endangered Species abbreviations throughout this 12-month precluded as though resubmitted on the Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After finding. To assist the reader, we provide date of such finding, that is, requiring a review of the best available scientific a list of these here for easy reference: subsequent finding to be made within and commercial information, we find 12 months. We must publish these 12- Act = Endangered Species Act of 1973, as month findings in the Federal Register. that listing the entire Sierra Nevada red amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) fox subspecies is not warranted. We BWRA = Bridgeport Winter Recreation Area Previous Federal Actions were also petitioned to evaluate two CBD = Center for Biological Diversity On April 27, 2011, we received a populations within the subspecies’ CDFG = California Department of Fish and petition dated April 27, 2011, from the range as potential distinct population Game (see below) Center for Biological Diversity, segments (DPSs). We find that both the CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife (formerly CDFG) requesting that Sierra Nevada red fox be Southern Cascades and Sierra Nevada CESA = California Endangered Species Act listed as endangered or threatened, and population segments of the Sierra CFR = Code of Federal Regulations that critical habitat be designated under Nevada red fox meet the Service’s DPS dbh = diameter at breast height the Act. The petition also requested that policy criteria, and therefore are valid DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid we evaluate two populations within the DPSs. After review of the best available DPS = distinct population segment subspecies’ range as potential distinct scientific and commercial information EFF = elokomin fluke fever population segments (DPSs) under the for these two DPSs, we find that listing Forest Service = U.S. Forest Service Service’s DPS Policy: One in the the Southern Cascades DPS is not FR = Federal Register INRMP = integrated natural resources Southern Cascades (south of the warranted at this time, and listing the management plan Columbia River) and the other in the Sierra Nevada DPS is warranted. IPCC = Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Sierra Nevada Mountains. The petition Currently, however, listing the Sierra Change clearly identified itself as such and Nevada DPS is precluded by higher ISAB = Independent Scientific Advisory included the requisite identification priority actions to amend the Lists of Board LRMP = land and resource management plan information for the petitioner, as Endangered and Threatened Wildlife required by title 50 of the Code of and Plants. Upon publication of this 12- MWTC = Marine Warfare Training Center mtDNA = mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic Federal Regulations (CFR) at section month finding, we will add the Sierra acid 424.14(a). In a May 24, 2011, letter to Nevada DPS of the Sierra Nevada red NFMA = National Forest Management Act the petitioner, we responded that we fox to our candidate species list. We (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.) reviewed the information presented in will develop a proposed rule to list the NMFS = National Marine Fisheries Service the petition and determined that issuing Sierra Nevada DPS as our priorities NPS = National Park Service NWFP = Northwest Forest Plan an emergency regulation temporarily allow. We will make a determination on listing the species under section 4(b)(7) critical habitat during development of ODFW = Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife of the Act was not warranted. We also the proposed listing rule. In the interim OHV = off-highway vehicle stated that we were required to period, we will address the status of the OPLMA = Omnibus Public Land complete a significant number of listing candidate DPS through our annual Management Act (Pub. L. 111–11) and critical habitat actions in Fiscal candidate notice of review (CNOR). Service = U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Year 2011 pursuant to court orders, DATES: The finding announced in this SPD = salmon poisoning disease judicially approved settlement document was made on October 8, 2015. SNFPA = Sierra Nevada Forest Plan agreements, and other statutory Amendment ADDRESSES: This finding is available on SPR = significant portion of [a species’] range deadlines, but that we had secured the Internet at http:// USDA = U.S. Department of Agriculture funding for Fiscal Year 2011 to allow www.regulations.gov at Docket Number USDI = U.S. Department of the Interior publication of a finding in the Federal FWS–R8–ES–2011–0103. Supporting Register in early Fiscal Year 2012. documentation we used in preparing Background On January 3, 2012, we published in this finding is available for public Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 the Federal Register a 90-day finding inspection, by appointment, during U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for (77 FR 45) that the petition presented VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Oct 07, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08OCP3.SGM 08OCP3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 195 / Thursday, October 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules 60991 substantial information indicating that 1981, p. 938; Larivie´re and characterized by specialized adaptations listing may be warranted and that Pashitschniak-Arts 1996, pp. 1–2; Aubry to cold areas (Sacks et al. 2010a, p. initiated a status review. This notice 1997, p. 55; Sacks et al. 2010a, pp. 1523, 1524). Such adaptations include a constitutes the 12-month finding on the 1535; ITIS 2014, p. 1). The Sierra particularly thick and deep winter coat April 27, 2011, petition to list the Sierra Nevada red fox can be distinguished (Grinnell et al. 1937, p. 377) and small Nevada red fox as an endangered or from lowland-dwelling red fox toe pads (4 millimeters (mm) (0.2 inches threatened species. subspecies based on its smaller size and (in)) across or less) that are completely This finding is based upon the use of high-elevation, snow-covered covered in winter by dense fur to Species Report titled ‘‘Species Report, habitat (Roest 1977, p. 13; Perrine et al. facilitate movement over snow (Grinnell Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes 2010, p. 5). The Sierra Nevada red fox et al. 1937, pp. 378, 393; Sacks 2014a, necator)’’ (Service 2015) (Species was first described by Merriam (1900, p. 30). The Sierra Nevada red fox and Report), a scientific analysis of available pp. 662, 664) as the species Vulpes other montane subspecies also tend to information prepared by a team of necator, but was redesignated as a be smaller than other red foxes (Perrine Service biologists from the Service’s subspecies of North American red fox et al. 2010, p. 5), which may facilitate Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, (Vulpes fulva necator) in 1936 (Bailey movement over snow by lowering Yreka Fish and Wildlife Office, Klamath 1936, pp. 272, 317), and then as a weight supported per square centimeter Falls Fish and Wildlife Office, Roseburg subspecies of a single red fox species of footpad (Quinn and Sacks 2014, p. Fish and Wildlife Office, Pacific stretching across Europe, Asia, and 17). Southwest Regional Office, Pacific North America (Vulpes vulpes necator) Sierra Nevada red fox use multiple Regional Office, and National in 1957 (Churcher 1957, p.
Recommended publications
  • LUNAR INTERACTIONS ABSTRACTS of PAPERS PRESENTED at the CONFERENCE on INTERACTIONS of the INTERPLANETARY PLASMA with the MODERN and ANCIENT MOON
    LUNAR INTERACTIONS ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIONS OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA with the MODERN AND ANCIENT MOON ORGANIZED BY THE I. N 3 LUNAR SCIENCE INSTITUTE m I 3 AND THE I- 2 SPACE PHYSICS DEPARTMENT RICE UNIVERSITY sponsored by the NATIONAL AERONAUTICS m m AND 0 .. I-( OIW mrl SPACE ADMINISTRATION ZX CV OH IOI H WclU AND THE uux- V&H 0 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION g,,,, wm. WWO@W u u ? ZZLOX€e HW5H vlOHU ffiMHrnfC 4 ffi H 2.~4~4a Edited by 3 dz ,.aV)ffiuJO ffiwcstn WPt.4" DAVID R. CRISWELL ,!a !a Pl r 4 W Pa4 %- rn ZW. and Or=4OcC+J fO Hi4 r WWF I rnU2.M ffiBZ* JOHN W. FREEMAN UUW4aJ I amor 0 alffiwffi E REPRODUCTION RESTRICTIONS OVERRIDDEN 2Z~OZ E 2 2 .: u Bmscientific ma Technical Information FaciLitX -eu $4 to) Copyright O 1974 by the Lunar Science Institute Conference held at George Williams College Lake Geneva Campus Williams Bay, Wisconsin 30 September - 4 October 1974 Compiled by and available from The Lunar Science Institute 3303 Nasa Road 1 Houston, Texas 77058 PREFACE The field of lunar science has essentially completed a period of exponential growth promoted by the national efforts of the 1960's to land on the moon. As normally happens in a diverse scientific community, the interpretations of specialized lunar data have reflected the precepts in the various specialized fields. Constant promotion of the broadest overviews between these diverse fields is appropriate to identify processes or phenomenon recog- nized in one avenue of investigation which may have great importance in explaining the data of other specialities.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared
    Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1987. 15:245-70 Copyright([;; /987 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved TERRESTRIAL IMI!ACT STRUCTURES ··- Richard A. F. Grieve Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OY3, Canada INTRODUCTION Impact structures are the dominant landform on planets that have retained portions of their earliest crust. The present surface of the Earth, however, has comparatively few recognized impact structures. This is due to its relative youthfulness and the dynamic nature of the terrestrial geosphere, both of which serve to obscure and remove the impact record. Although not generally viewed as an important terrestrial (as opposed to planetary) geologic process, the role of impact in Earth evolution is now receiving mounting consideration. For example, large-scale impact events may hav~~ been responsible for such phenomena as the formation of the Earth's moon and certain mass extinctions in the biologic record. The importance of the terrestrial impact record is greater than the relatively small number of known structures would indicate. Impact is a highly transient, high-energy event. It is inherently difficult to study through experimentation because of the problem of scale. In addition, sophisticated finite-element code calculations of impact cratering are gen­ erally limited to relatively early-time phenomena as a result of high com­ putational costs. Terrestrial impact structures provide the only ground truth against which computational and experimental results can be com­ pared. These structures provide information on aspects of the third dimen­ sion, the pre- and postimpact distribution of target lithologies, and the nature of the lithologic and mineralogic changes produced by the passage of a shock wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Tazewell County Warren County Westmoreland~CO~Tt~~'~Dfla
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. Tazewell County Warren County Westmoreland~CO~tt~~'~dfla Bedford Bristol Buena Vista Charl~esville ~ake clnr(~ F:Org I Heights Covington Danville Emporia Fairfax Falls ~.~tur.~~l~).~ ~urg Galax Hampton HarrisonburgHopj~ll~l Lexingtor~ynchburgl~'~assa ~ anassas Martinsville Newport News Norfolk Norton PetersbutrgPoque~o~ .Portsmouth Radford Richmond Roano~l~~ Salem ~th Bostor~t~nto SuffoLk Virginia Beach Waynesboro Williamsburg Winchester ~a~:~ingham Ceuul~ Carroll County Charlotte County Cra~ Col~ty Roar~ County~cco~Lac= Albemarle County Alleghany County Amelia County#~rlb~ ~NJ~/Ly,~ll~iatt~ County Arlington CountyAugula County Bath i~nty BerJ~rd Cd~t B.I.... ~1 County Botetourt County Brunswick County Buchanal~C~ut~ ~~wrtty Caroline County Charles City C~nty Ch~erfield~bunty C~rrke Co~t CT~-~eperCounty Dickenson County Dinwiddie County~ ~~~ r-'luvanneCounty Frederick County C~ucester (~unty C~yson (j~nty Gre~=~ County Greensville County Halifax County Hanover County ~ .(D~I~ I~liry Cottnty Highland County Isle of *~.P-.o.~t~l~me~y C~ ~county King George County King William County~r .(~,t~ ~ (~'~ Loudoun County Louisa County M~ Mat~s Cot]1~l~~ qt... ~ Montgomery County New Kent County North~ur~d County N~y County Page County Pittsylvania CouniY--Powhatan]~.~unty Princ~eorg, oC'6-~ty Prince William County Rappahannock County Richmol~l 0~)1~1=I~Woo~ Gi0ochtandCounty Lunenburg County Mecklenburl~nty Nelson Count Northampton CountyOrange County Patrick CountyPdn¢~
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planet Bulletin
    THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 36, NUMBER 3, A.D. 2009 JULY-SEPTEMBER 77. PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF 343 OSTARA Our data can be obtained from http://www.uwec.edu/physics/ AND OTHER ASTEROIDS AT HOBBS OBSERVATORY asteroid/. Lyle Ford, George Stecher, Kayla Lorenzen, and Cole Cook Acknowledgements Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire We thank the Theodore Dunham Fund for Astrophysics, the Eau Claire, WI 54702-4004 National Science Foundation (award number 0519006), the [email protected] University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, and the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (Received: 2009 Feb 11) Blugold Fellow and McNair programs for financial support. References We observed 343 Ostara on 2008 October 4 and obtained R and V standard magnitudes. The period was Binzel, R.P. (1987). “A Photoelectric Survey of 130 Asteroids”, found to be significantly greater than the previously Icarus 72, 135-208. reported value of 6.42 hours. Measurements of 2660 Wasserman and (17010) 1999 CQ72 made on 2008 Stecher, G.J., Ford, L.A., and Elbert, J.D. (1999). “Equipping a March 25 are also reported. 0.6 Meter Alt-Azimuth Telescope for Photometry”, IAPPP Comm, 76, 68-74. We made R band and V band photometric measurements of 343 Warner, B.D. (2006). A Practical Guide to Lightcurve Photometry Ostara on 2008 October 4 using the 0.6 m “Air Force” Telescope and Analysis. Springer, New York, NY. located at Hobbs Observatory (MPC code 750) near Fall Creek, Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment
    Recent Slprt•• books World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1979 World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbooks 1968-1979, Cumulative Index Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation Other related •• 8lprt books Ecological Consequences of the Second Ihdochina War Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Environment Publish~d on behalf of SIPRI by Taylor & Francis Ltd 10-14 Macklin Street London WC2B 5NF Distributed in the USA by Crane, Russak & Company Inc 3 East 44th Street New York NY 10017 USA and in Scandinavia by Almqvist & WikseH International PO Box 62 S-101 20 Stockholm Sweden For a complete list of SIPRI publications write to SIPRI Sveavagen 166 , S-113 46 Stockholm Sweden Stoekholol International Peace Research Institute Warfare in a Fragile World Military Impact onthe Human Environment Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of disarmament and arms regulation. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden's 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed by the Swedish Parliament. The staff, the Governing Board and the Scientific Council are international. As a consultative body, the Scientific Council is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Dr Rolf Bjornerstedt, Chairman (Sweden) Professor Robert Neild, Vice-Chairman (United Kingdom) Mr Tim Greve (Norway) Academician Ivan M£ilek (Czechoslovakia) Professor Leo Mates (Yugoslavia) Professor
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • DMAAC – February 1973
    LUNAR TOPOGRAPHIC ORTHOPHOTOMAP (LTO) AND LUNAR ORTHOPHOTMAP (LO) SERIES (Published by DMATC) Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Scale: 1:250,000 Projection: Transverse Mercator Sheet Size: 25.5”x 26.5” The Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Series are the first comprehensive and continuous mapping to be accomplished from Apollo Mission 15-17 mapping photographs. This series is also the first major effort to apply recent advances in orthophotography to lunar mapping. Presently developed maps of this series were designed to support initial lunar scientific investigations primarily employing results of Apollo Mission 15-17 data. Individual maps of this series cover 4 degrees of lunar latitude and 5 degrees of lunar longitude consisting of 1/16 of the area of a 1:1,000,000 scale Lunar Astronautical Chart (LAC) (Section 4.2.1). Their apha-numeric identification (example – LTO38B1) consists of the designator LTO for topographic orthophoto editions or LO for orthophoto editions followed by the LAC number in which they fall, followed by an A, B, C or D designator defining the pertinent LAC quadrant and a 1, 2, 3, or 4 designator defining the specific sub-quadrant actually covered. The following designation (250) identifies the sheets as being at 1:250,000 scale. The LTO editions display 100-meter contours, 50-meter supplemental contours and spot elevations in a red overprint to the base, which is lithographed in black and white. LO editions are identical except that all relief information is omitted and selenographic graticule is restricted to border ticks, presenting an umencumbered view of lunar features imaged by the photographic base.
    [Show full text]
  • Icebreaker: a Lunar South Pole Exploring Robot Cmu-Ri-Tr-97-22
    ICEBREAKER: A LUNAR SOUTH POLE EXPLORING ROBOT CMU-RI-TR-97-22 Matthew C. Deans Alex D. Foessel Gregory A. Fries Diana LaBelle N. Keith Lay Stewart Moorehead Ben Shamah Kimberly J. Shillcutt Professor: Dr. William Whittaker The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA 15213 Spring 1996-97 Executive Summary Icebreaker: A Lunar South Pole Exploring Robot Due to the low angles of sunlight at the lunar poles, craters and other depressions in the polar regions can contain areas which are in permanent darkness and are at cryogenic temperatures. Many scientists have theorized that these cold traps could contain large quantities of frozen volatiles such as water and carbon dioxide which have been deposited over billions of years by comets, meteors and solar wind. Recent bistatic radar data from the Clementine mission has yielded results consistent with water ice at the South Pole of the Moon however Earth based observations from the Arecibo Radar Observatory indicate that ice may not exist. Due to the controversy surrounding orbital and Earth based observations, the only way to definitively answer the question of whether ice exists on the Lunar South Pole is in situ analysis. The discovery of water ice and other volatiles on the Moon has many important benefits. First, this would provide a source of rocket fuel which could be used to power rockets to Earth, Mars or beyond, avoiding the high cost of Earth based launches. Secondly, water and carbon dioxide along with nitrogen from ammonia form the essential elements for life and could be used to help support human colonies on the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES REPORT Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes Necator)
    SPECIES REPORT Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes necator) U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE August 14, 2015 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 ACRONYMS AND SUBSTITUTIONS USED ............................................................................. 4 SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ 5 TAXONOMY AND GENETICS ................................................................................................... 6 Taxonomic History and Relationship to Other Fox Subspecies ........................................... 6 Genetics ...................................................................................................................................... 7 RANGE AND DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................... 8 Historical Range ........................................................................................................................ 8 Map 1: SNRF Historical Range in California .................................................................... 9 Current Distribution ............................................................................................................... 10 Map 2: SNRF Sighting Areas............................................................................................. 12 Table 1: SNRF Sighting Areas ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT PENGUIN Robotic Lunar Crater Resource Prospecting VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY Kevin T
    PROJECT PENGUIN Robotic Lunar Crater Resource Prospecting VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY Kevin T. Crofton Department of Aerospace & Ocean Engineering TEAM LEAD Allison Quinn STUDENT MEMBERS Ethan LeBoeuf Brian McLemore Peter Bradley Smith Amanda Swanson Michael Valosin III Vidya Vishwanathan FACULTY SUPERVISOR AIAA 2018 Undergraduate Spacecraft Design Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Competition Submission i AIAA Member Numbers and Signatures Ethan LeBoeuf Brian McLemore Member Number: 918782 Member Number: 908372 Allison Quinn Peter Bradley Smith Member Number: 920552 Member Number: 530342 Amanda Swanson Michael Valosin III Member Number: 920793 Member Number: 908465 Vidya Vishwanathan Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Member Number: 608701 Member Number: 25807 ii Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................................vi List of Symbols ........................................................................................................................................................... vii I. Team Structure ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]