Implementation of the Classification System of Forest Habitats in Accordance with the 'Natura2000' Standards in the Georgian Legislation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Implementation of the Classification System of Forest Habitats in Accordance with the 'Natura2000' Standards in the Georgian Legislation Implementation of the classification system of forest habitats in accordance with the 'Natura2000' standards in the Georgian Legislation Maia Akhalkatsi , Mariam Kimeridze Abstract Georgia is made up of two separate mountain systems: the Greater Caucasus lying between the Black and Caspian Seas; and the Lesser Caucasus, which runs parallel to the greater range. Two thirds of the country's territory (69700km²) is mountainous. One third of it is covered by forests, 70% of which are mountain forests spread from lower montane belt up to the treeline ecotone. The classification of forest plant communities was done by A. Dolukhanov (1989). However, the different methodology used by European and Soviet schools caused differences in nomenclature. Natura2000 habitat directives based on CORINE biotope classification system developed legislative basis for conservation of natural habitats in EU. To join this system it was necessary to conduct inventory and develop new schema of habitat types according to Natura2000 standards in Georgia. We have undertaken an attempt to classify Georgian forest area to the habitat types and have achieved the following results. 18 forest habitat types are identified to belong to the biogeographical region - Forests of Temperate Europe. Beech forest is represented by 7 types. 2 of which are characterized only for Georgia. 5 of 6 habitat types belonging to Mediterranean deciduous forests are typical only for the Caucasus. 1. Introduction Georgia is located in the Caucasus region, which is among the planet’s 25 most diverse and endangered hotspots designated as conservation priorities because the Caucasus is a region of remarkably rich vegetation with a very high level of endemism (Myers et al., 2000). Georgia has an extremely varied topography and climate that produce a mosaic of habitat types ranging from see level up to alpine vegetation near the snowline; and, from warm, humid lowlands at the Black See to dry, continental areas in the Eastern Georgia covered by forests of different kinds, steppes, and semi-deserts. 4,400 species of vascular plants, including 380 endemic species, occur in Georgia’s 69,700 kilometres2 (Nakhutsrishvili, 1999). The Caucasian mountain region is made up of three separate mountain systems (the Greater and Lesser Caucasus and Talysh mountains) and the lowlands of the Transcaucasian depression located between Black and Caspian Sees (Neidze, 2003). Georgian territory covers parts of the Greater Caucasus mountain range, Transcaucasian depression and the Lesser Caucasus Mountains, which run parallel to the greater range, at a distance averaging about 100 kilometres south, between 40º and 47º latitude east, and 42º and 44º longitude north. Two thirds of the country is mountainous with an average height of 1,200 m.a.s.l., with highest peaks of Mount Shkhara (5,184 m.a.s.l.) at the Western Greater Caucasus and Mount Didi Abuli (3,301 m.a.s.l.) in the Lesser Caucasus. Ilia State University, Institute of Ecology, Tbilisi, Georgia. [email protected], Georgian Society of Nature Explorers, "Orchis", Tbilisi, Georgia, [email protected] 6 The core of the Great Caucasus mountain range is composed of Precambrian and Paleozoic crystalline rocks, mostly granites and gneiss. The mountains of the southern macroslope are made of Jurassic and Triassic slates, sandstones, allevrolites, argellites, massive limestone and tuffs (Romanika, 1977). The Lesser Caucasus at Javakheti Plateau is composed of Upper Cretaceous and Tertiary igneous rocks including lavas and shallow intrusive rocks such as andesite, basalt and dolerite (Klopotovski, 1950). The soils of the southern macroslope of the Great Caucasus mountain range belong to the Western Transcaucasian Mountain Province (Ivanova et al, 1963). Within the lower vertical zone (up to 300-500 m above sea level), either mountain zheltozems or gray forest soils predominate. Higher, up to 1800-2000 m, the soils belong to the brown mountain-forests acid non-podzolized type. Most soils within the forest belt correspond to either Inceptisols or Ultisols. The Lesser Caucasus including Javakheti, Tsalka-Dmanisi and Erusheti uplands is covered with the mountain chernozems (which are formed at altitudes from 1200-2200m) and meadow chernozem-like soils. In highlands they are replaced by mountain-meadow soils. Besides, the alluvial soils, redzinas, brown as well as the meadow-brown soils occur here, with the predominance of brown forest type of soil in the mountain forest belt (Neidze, 2003). Climate is temperate but fluctuates by elevation, that varies from 0 to 5184 m (air temperature is changed on the average of 0.65 °C per 100 m altitude); and by regions from humid western Georgia to arid zones in the Eastern Iori Plateau (annual precipitation varies from 1500-2000 and up to 4500 millimetres in the western, Kolkhic part to 600-1000 mm in drier parts of eastern and southern regions; Neidze, 2003). One third of the Georgian territory is covered by forests, 70% of which are mountain forests spread from lower montane belt up to the treeline ecotone. The Caucasus forests have one of the highest levels of endemism in the temperate world (Kvachakidze, 2001). 23 percent of vascular plants are endemic to the region. According to Dolukhanov (2010) the Caucasus forest belt can be subdivided into three major elevation zones: broad-leaved forests (50-900 m), coniferous forests (900-1700 m), and high mountain krummholz forests (1700-2000 m). The overstory is frequently dominated by beech, hornbeam, chestnut, oak, and fir. Georgian vegetation is well studied by Georgian botanists (Grossheim et al., 1928; Ketskhoveli, 1959; Dolukhanov, 1989, 2010; Nakhutsrishvili, 1999, Kvachakidze, 2001, 2009). The classification of forest plant communities was done by A. Dolukhanov (1989). However, the different methodology used by European and Soviet schools caused differences in nomenclature. Natura2000 habitat directives based on CORINE biotope classification system developed legislative basis for conservation of natural habitats in EU. To join this system it was necessary to conduct inventory and develop new schema of habitat types according to Natura2000 standards in Georgia. We have undertaken an attempt to classify Georgian forest area to the habitat types. 2. Materials and Methods The classification of forest habitats of Georgia is based on the Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27. The "Habitats" Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, O.J. L206) is a Community legislative instrument in the field of nature conservation that establishes a common framework for the conservation of wild animal and plant species and natural habitats of Community importance; it provides for the creation of a network of special areas of conservation, called 'Natura2000'. 7 The Directive is developed on the bases of CORINE biotope classification (1989, 1991) determining codes and habitat types of Europe, in particular involving the division of the latter into sub-types. According to Interpretation Manual habitat classification is based on plant community types. This information is obtained from literature data of botanists working in Georgia since 18th century (Grossheim et al., 1928; Ketskhoveli, 1959; Dolukhanov, 1989, 2010; Nakhutsrishvili, 1999, Kvachakidze, 2001, 2009; etc.). The description of each habitat types is composed by sections: 1) General description of distribution area and environmental conditions; 2) Species of plants including dominant, rare and endemic species; 3) Corresponding categories in other countries of Europe; 4) Associated habitats, which occupy adjacent territories; 5) Bibliography. 3. Results 24 forest habitat types are identified for Georgia (Table 1). 18 belong to the biogeographical region - Forests of Temperate Europe. 6 habitat types belong to Mediterranean deciduous forests. The main difference from the European habitats is existence of different dominant species of the plant community. Species composition on generic level is very similar, but on species level the Caucasus differs from European vegetation. There are species, which are related with European species but are endemics for the Caucasus: Abies nordmanniana, Picea orientalis, Pinus kochiana, Fagus orientalis, Quercus iberica, Betula litwinowii, etc. Beech forest group is represented by 7 habitat types. 2 of them: (1) Beech forests with Kolkhic understory (Fageta fruticosa colchica); and (2) Beech forests without understory (Fageta sine fruticosa) are characterized only for Georgia. 4 other habitats differ from European related habitat types (Table 1): 1) Dark-coniferous forest (Piceeta orientale-Abieta nordmanniana); 2) Pine forest (Pinus kochiana); 3) Yew forest (Taxus baccata); 4) Hornbeam forest (Carpinus caucasica). 5 habitat types of the Mediterranean deciduous forests are typical only for the Caucasus (Table 1). Most outstanding and typical only for Caucasus and namely Georgia are the following forest habitats: 3.1 Beech forests with Kolkhic understory (Fageta fruticosa colchica) The existence of the dense understory differentiates the beech forest of Georgia from the one in the rest of Europe. The beech forest with the Kolkhic understory (Fig.1) is the composing part of the ecoregion of Kolkhic mixed broad leaved forest. It is widespread in west Georgia on Northern-western slopes of Great Caucasus and the Ajara-Imereti Range. The climate is moist with about 2500 mm of annual precipitation.
Recommended publications
  • Plant Expedition to the Republic of Georgia
    PLANT EXPEDITION TO THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA — CAUCASUS MOUNTAINS AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 11, 2010 SPONSORED BY THE DANIEL F. AND ADA L. RICE FOUNDATION PLANT COLLECTING COLLABORATIVE (PCC) Chicago Botanic Garden Missouri Botanical Garden The Morton Arboretum New York Botanical Garden University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum 1 Table of Contents Summary 3 Georgia’s Caucasus 4-6 Expedition, Expedition Route & Itinerary 7-10 Collaboration 11 Observations 12-13 Documentation 14 Institutional review 14-15 Acknowledgements 16 Maps of the Republic of Georgia and PCC member locations 17 Photo Gallery Collecting 18-19 Collections 20-24 Seed Processing 25 Landscapes 26-29 Transportation 30 Dining 31 People 32-33 Georgia Past and Present 34 Georgia News 35-36 Appendix I – Germplasm Collections Listed by Habit Appendix II – Germplasm Collections Listed Alphabetically Appendix III – Weed Risk Assessment Appendix IV – Field Notes 2 Summary With generous support from the Daniel F. and Ada L. Rice Foundation, Galen Gates and the Plant Collecting Collaborative (PCC) team made outstanding progress through an expedition in the Republic of Georgia. On this recent trip into the Caucasus Moun- tains, a record was set for the most collections made on any Chicago Botanic Garden and PCC expedition to date. The trip, door to door, was 26 days with field collecting most days; nearly every night‘s activity included seed cleaning. We made three hundred collections at 60 sites. Most were seeds from 246 types of trees, shrubs, and perennials, 14 were bulb taxa and four were in the form of perennial roots. Remarkably, 53 taxa are new to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final Report
    Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Tbilisi 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature review ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution: EG: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Burs
    Subgenus Lasius Fabricius, 1804 53. L. (Lasius) alienus (Foerster, 1850) Distribution: E.G.: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Bursachili, Gardabani, Grakali, Gudauri, Gveleti, Igoeti, Iraga, Kasristskali, Kavtiskhevi, Kazbegi, Kazreti, Khrami gorge, Kianeti, Kitsnisi, Kojori, Kvishkheti, Lagodekhi Reserve, Larsi, Lekistskali gorge, Luri, Manglisi, Mleta, Mtskheta, Nichbisi, Pantishara, Pasanauri, Poladauri, Saguramo, Sakavre, Samshvilde, Satskhenhesi, Shavimta, Shulaveri, Sighnaghi, Taribana, Tbilisi (Mushtaidi Garden, Tbilisi Botanical Garden), Tetritskaro, Tkemlovani, Tkviavi, Udabno, Zedazeni (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1964a, b, 1966, 1967b, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Abasha, Ajishesi, Akhali Atoni, Anaklia, Anaria, Baghdati, Batumi Botanical Garden, Bichvinta Reserve, Bjineti, Chakvi, Chaladidi, Chakvistskali, Eshera, Grigoreti, Ingiri, Inkiti Lake, Kakhaberi, Khobi, Kobuleti, Kutaisi, Lidzava, Menji, Nakalakebi, Natanebi, Ochamchire, Oni, Poti, Senaki, Sokhumi, Sviri, Tsaishi, Tsalenjikha, Tsesi, Zestaponi, Zugdidi Botanical Garden (Ruzsky, 1905; Karavaiev, 1926; Jijilashvili, 1974b); S.G.: Abastumani, Akhalkalaki, Akhaltsikhe, Aspindza, Avralo, Bakuriani, Bogdanovka, Borjomi, Dmanisi, Goderdzi Pass, Gogasheni, Kariani, Khanchali Lake, Ota, Paravani Lake, Sapara, Tabatskuri, Trialeti, Tsalka, Zekari Pass (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1967a, 1974a). 54. L. (Lasius) brunneus (Latreille, 1798) Distribution: E.G.: Bolnisi, Gardabani, Kianeti, Kiketi, Manglisi, Pasanauri (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Akhali Atoni, Baghdati,
    [Show full text]
  • Carpinus Orientalis
    Carpinus orientalis Carpinus orientalis in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats R. Sikkema, G. Caudullo Carpinus orientalis Mill., commonly known as oriental hornbeam, is a small tree or shrub commonly found on dry and rocky slopes of low elevation mountains in South-East Europe. Its wide distribution range reaches through the Black Sea to the Caucasus region. It is a frugal and drought-resistant species, which prefers calcareous soils and is frequently found in disturbed sites. Thanks to its strong suckering capacity and hard wood, it is often managed in coppiced stands for the production of quality firewood and charcoal. No significant pests or diseases are recorded for this tree. The oriental hornbeam (Carpinus orientalis Mill.), is a large shrub or small tree, 1-5 metres tall, rarely up to 15 m, with a grey irregularly ribbed stem. The leaves are -elliptic with evident Frequency ovate < 25% veins, tomentose, with serrate margins and short petioles 5-8 mm 25% - 50% 50% - 75% long. This tree is monoecious with unisexual flowers blossoming > 75% in April. The male flowers are dense in short catkins 2-3 cm long, Chorology whereas the female catkins are 3-8 cm long with leaf-like un-lobed Native and coarsely toothed bracts that reach 12-18 mm size at maturity, The elliptical leaves have toothed margins and show evident veins. 1-4 and which cover the flowers and later the nuts . (Copyright Stefano Zerauschek, www.flickr.com: AP) Distribution regions coppiced stands are also used as a food resource for The oriental hornbeam is a tree species native to south- livestock in drought summers, when grasslands are completely 11, 18 east Europe, the Pontic region and western Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Georgian Species of the Carabus Linnaeus, 1758 Subgenus
    Евразиатский энтомол. журнал 13(6): 522–526 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2014 A study on Georgian species of the Carabus Linnaeus, 1758 subgenus Neoplectes Reitter, 1885 (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with description of a new species Èññëåäîâàíèå ãðóçèíñêèõ âèäîâ ïîäðîäà Neoplectes Reitter, 1885 ðîäà Carabus Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) ñ îïèñàíèåì íîâîãî âèäà A.S. Zamotajlov*, D.D. Fominykh** À.Ñ. Çàìîòàéëîâ*, Ä.Ä. Ôîìèíûõ** * Kuban State Agrarian University, Kalinina Str. 13, Krasnodar 350044 Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. * Кубанский государственный аграрный университет, ул. Калинина 13, Краснодар 350044 Россия. ** Russian Entomological Society, Kuban Branch, Kalinina Str. 13, Krasnodar 350044 Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. ** Кубанское отделение Русского энтомологического общества, ул. Калинина 13, Краснодар 350044 Россия. Key words: Coleoptera, Carabidae, Carabus, Neoplectes, Caucasus, Georgia, distribution, ecology, iconography, a new species. Ключевые слова: Coleoptera, Carabidae, Carabus, Neoplectes, Кавказ, Грузия, распространение, эколо- гия, иконография, новый вид. Abstract. Basing on the material, collected mainly in 2014 other vicinal ones and differs from the other known in Central Georgia, further distribution and morphological congeners in some essential features, it is described data on the Carabus subgenus Neoplectes Reitter, 1885 are below as a new species C. (Neoplectes) titarenkoi given and a new species C. (Neoplectes) titarenkoi sp.n. is sp.n. Noteworthy, its objective taxonomic status re- described from Khvamli Mountain. quires probably a precision, this being only possible in Резюме. На основании материала, собранного в ос- the course of the exhaustive revision of the entire sub- новном в 2014 г. в Центральной Грузии, приводятся genus in question. новые данные о распространении и морфологии жужелиц Detailed bibliography and synonymy for each form подрода Neoplectes Reitter, 1885 рода Carabus и описыва- listed below are omitted, being already summarized or ется новый вид C.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Cone Formation Stage of Caucasian Fir (Abies Nordmanniana Ssp
    Kastamonu Üni., Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 2012, Özel Sayı: 228-233 Kastamonu Univ., Journal of Forestry Faculty, 2012, Special Issue Study on Cone Formation Stage of Caucasian Fir (Abies nordmanniana ssp. nordmanniana) Deniz GÜNEY1, Şemsettin KULAÇ2, İbrahim TURNA1 1Department of Forest Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, TURKEY 2Department of Forest Engineering, Duzce, 81620 Düzce, TURKEY Abstract Determination of the good seed year is important to obtain high quality and quantity seeds from stands. Also, pollination and fertilization need to be done without problems. Tree quality, health and good seed bearing capacity is related to climatic factors during flowering and seeding stage and related to site conditions. Healthy, high quality and enough number of seeds are required in order to have a successful natural regeneration. Observing the morphological characteristics of trees in the stand or as single trees is the fastest, easiest and cheapest way to characterize their health status. In this study, a tree species, Caucasian fir, from the Karadeniz Technical University campus was observed. Phenological changes of the male and female flowers will be observed periodically and photos of these changes will be provided. During the early months observations will be weekly but on later periods observations will be bi-weekly. Caucasian fir’s pollination, fertilization, cone formation, cone growth and seed fall will be determined based on observations and the study results. Key Words: Fir taxa, cone formation stages, male and female flowers Introduction high quality seed and seedlings along with Forests cover one third of the lands on intensive cultivation techniques should be Earth and also form more than three fourths used.
    [Show full text]
  • Demirköy, Kırklareli) Turkey
    Işın Z. Ursavaş S. 2018. Anatolian Bryol……………………………………………………………….92 Anatolian Bryology http://dergipark.gov.tr/anatolianbryology Anadolu Briyoloji Dergisi Research Article DOI: 10.26672/anatolianbryology.472405 e-ISSN:2458-8474 Online The Moss Flora of İğneada Floodplain Forests National Park (Demirköy, Kırklareli) Turkey Zeki IŞIN (Orcid: 0000-0002-7637-061X)1, *Serhat URSAVAŞ (Orcid: 0000-0001-5480-5590)2 1Department of Forest Engineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Çankırı Karatekin University, 18200, Çankırı, TURKEY; 2Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Forestry, Çankırı Karatekin University, 18200, Çankırı, TURKEY Received: 19.10.2018 Revised: 01.11.2018 Accepted: 30.11.2018 Abstract In this study, the moss flora of İğneada Floodplain Forest National Park (Kırklareli-Demirköy) in Turkey were investigated between the years of 2015-2016. As a result of examination of six hundred thirty moss samples, which collected from İğneada Floodplain Forest National Park, were examined 24 families, 55 genera, 102 taxa species or subspecies. In terms of taxa number, the richest six families are; Pottiaceae (20), Brachytheciaceae (14), Polytrichaceae (9), Orthotrichaceae (8), Hypnaceae (6), Bryaceae (6). Atrichum crispum (James) Sull., and Bryum gemmiferum (R. Wilczek & Demaret.) (in press), marked with a black diamond (♦) sign are new records for the Turkish bryophyte flora. According to Henderson (1961) grid square system, 17 moss taxa marked with an asterisk (*) sing are new records for A1 square. While acrocarpous taxa (70) represent 68 % of the whole flora, the ratio of pleurocarpous ones (32) is 32 %. Key words: Atrichum crispum, Bryum gemmiferum, new record, Kırklareli-Demirköy, national park, moss, flora, Turkey İğneada Longoz Ormanları Milli Parkı (Demirköy, Kırklareli) Karayosunu Florası Öz Bu çalışmada, 2015-2016 yılları arasında İğneada Longoz Ormanları, Milliparkında (Kırklareli- Demirköy) alanın karayosunu florası araştırılmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival of Live Christmas Trees Profile: Nordmann Fir This Pot-In-Pot Nursery in Denmark Produces 90,000 to 100,000 Showing the Flag
    volume 2 | number 4 fall 2007 survival of live christmas trees profile: nordmann fir This Pot-in-Pot nursery in Denmark produces 90,000 to 100,000 Showing the flag. Nordmann fir are marketed in Europe under container-grown Nordmann fir each year. the “Original Nordmann” label. Christmas Tree Species Profile: Nordmann fir Abies nordmanniana By: Bert Cregg, Ph.D. Michigan State University, Department of Horticulture and Department of Forestry Photos by Rick Bates, Ph.D. Pennsylvania State University, Department of Horticulture One of the great things about working with Christmas trees is that we get to work with some beautiful and fascinating plants. Over the years, many species of pines, spruces, firs, and even cedars have been used as Christmas trees. Each species has its unique appeal and every species has a story. Beginning with this issue of the Great Lake Christmas Tree Journal, I will present profiles of interesting Christmas tree species used in the Great Lakes region and elsewhere. I’ll discuss the basic biology and ecology of the species, highlight some of the advantages or concerns of the species for Christmas tree production, and throw in a little trivia or other titillating tidbits. Nordmann fir Abies nordmanniana not given to feint praise, calls Nordmann popularity of this species is due to sever- Beauty, as they say, is in the eye of the fir,“stately, elegant, perhaps the hand- al factors. First and foremost are the beholder, but few can argue that somest of the firs.” Nordmann fir is by far glossy, dark green needles, which are Nordmann fir is among the most beauti- the most popular Christmas tree species darker than almost any fir except for ful conifers found anywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to Identify the Level of Threat to Plants
    Ex-Situ Conservation at Scott Arboretum Public gardens and arboreta are more than just pretty places. They serve as an insurance policy for the future through their well managed ex situ collections. Ex situ conservation focuses on safeguarding species by keeping them in places such as seed banks or living collections. In situ means "on site", so in situ conservation is the conservation of species diversity within normal and natural habitats and ecosystems. The Scott Arboretum is a member of Botanical Gardens Conservation International (BGCI), which works with botanic gardens around the world and other conservation partners to secure plant diversity for the benefit of people and the planet. The aim of BGCI is to ensure that threatened species are secure in botanic garden collections as an insurance policy against loss in the wild. Their work encompasses supporting botanic garden development where this is needed and addressing capacity building needs. They support ex situ conservation for priority species, with a focus on linking ex situ conservation with species conservation in natural habitats and they work with botanic gardens on the development and implementation of habitat restoration and education projects. BGCI uses the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to identify the level of threat to plants. In-depth analyses of the data contained in the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List are published periodically (usually at least once every four years). The results from the analysis of the data contained in the 2008 update of the IUCN Red List are published in The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; see www.iucn.org/redlist for further details.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Conservation in European Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.)
    Bocconea 7 - 1997 367 Gene conservation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Ladislav Paule Abstract Paule, L.: Gene conservation in European beech (Faf!.us sylva/ica L.). - Bocconea 7: 367- 381. 1997. - ISSN 1120-4060. The European beech is one of the mOSl important broadleaved forest lree species in Europe occun'ing in vanous ecological conditions. After the establishment of numerolls provenance experirnents in this species (the last one containing 188 provenances and 23 trials), extensive genetic inventories in most part of ElIrope has been carri ed out. In si/u and ex si/u gene conservation in European beech is olltlined. Introduction The European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) is considered at present as the most common economically important broadleaved tree species in Europe. The extent of beech forests (Fagus sylvatica and F. orientalis together) in Europe andAsia Minor is estimated to be between 17 and 20 million ha (e.g. Milescu & al. 1967 estimate 16.8 million ha) and represents approximately IO % of European forests. The proportions of beech forests in individuaI regions represent frequently up to 30% of the total forest area (e.g the former Yugoslavia, Slovakia, Romania etc.) Both Fagus sylvatica and F. orientalis belong to the forest tre e species with the widest natural range in the western part of Eurasia (Fig. I). F. sylvatica is distributed in western, centrai and southern Europe with individuaI occurrences in southern England and southern Scandinavia. F. orientalis is distributed in Asia Minor, in Caucasus, in the Amanus mountains (Syria), and in the Elburz mountains (Iran). Contact zone between the natural ranges of both species runs in northern Greece and Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Beech at the “Montagna Di Torricchio”, Marche Region, Central Italy
    Available online: www.notulaebotanicae.ro Print ISSN 0255-965X; Electronic 1842-4309 Notulae Botanicae Horti AcademicPres Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2019, 47(3):860-866. DOI:10.15835/nbha47311583 Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca Original Article The Red Beech at the “Montagna di Torricchio”, Marche Region, Central Italy Kevin CIANFAGLIONE 1,2 *, Franco PEDROTTI 1 1University of Camerino, School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, Camerino (MC), Italy; [email protected] (*corresponding author); [email protected] 2Université de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7462-Geoarchitecture, Brest, France Abstract For many centuries, red beech [( Fagus sylvatica L. var. purpurea (Ait.) Schneid.] was known as a botanical abnormality in botanical gardens and arboretums. Widespread artificially, red beech trees have been exploited for cultural, landscaping and botanical purposes, showing a wide horticultural, silvicultural and arboricultural interest. Over time, they may have escaped from cultivations or have been incorporated into forests by secondary successions, showing an important ecological and forestry interest. Red beeches represent a complex of phenotypes described under systematic critical taxa, showing an important floristic and taxonomic interest. Samples of red beech were found in nature, in central Adriatic Italy, in a fully protected area, namely the “Riserva Naturale Statale Montagna di Torricchio”. In order to analyse the origin of this odd shape beech variation, an interdisciplinary study was carried out integrating geography, ecology and forestry, analysing the bibliography, archival data, leaf traits, potential vegetation and the issues concerning the human-ecology relation. The results we obtained showed no evidence of artificial or accidental introduction for these specimens, suggesting treating them as a native and natural mutation in the beech forest secondary succession.
    [Show full text]