DOCSLIB.ORG

Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Pre-Aspiration In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Pre-Aspiration In Poster Print Size: Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Pre-aspiration in Aberystwyth English Change Color This poster template is 21” Theme: high by 45” wide and is printed at 200% for a 42” high Michaela Hejná This template is designed to use by 90” wide poster. It can be Department of Linguistics and English Language, University of Manchester [email protected]; misprdlina.wordpress.com the built-in color themes in the used to print any poster with newer versions of PowerPoint. a 7:15 aspect ratio. To change the color theme, select Introduction Vowel height Place of articulation of the plosive Optional application the Design tab, then select the Placeholders: Colors drop-down list. Analyses of Aberystwyth English (AE) show that pre-aspiration has both Is pre-aspiration dependent on phonological height or phonetic (acoustic) - pre-aspiration is conditioned by place of articulation - distributions show a categorical distinction between presence and absence The various elements included in gradient and categorical aspects. I argue that the categorical aspects must height? - shortest before /p/; longest variable with /t/ or /k/ (observed in [2], [7]) be represented discretely in the phonology. this poster are ones we often see - intra-phonemic correlations between F1 and pre-aspiration duration were In Icelandic, pre-aspiration is a phonological phenomenon and its obligatory, examined in medical, research, and scientific categorical presence in specific environments is not questioned [1]. Other - in general, no correlations were found (Figure 3), direction sometimes languages have more variable (‘non-normative’, e.g. [2-5]) pre-aspiration. posters. Feel free to edit, move, inconsistent However, optional presence of a phenomenon can still be phonological (e.g. add, and delete items, or change [6] for variation in phonology). - /ɪ/, /e/, and /æ/; /ʊ/ and /ɒ/ were contrasted (Figure 2) the layout to suit your needs. - the higher the vowel category, the shorter the pre-aspiration (2 speakers My findings concerning the interplay of categorical and gradient effects in AE Always check with your conference pre-aspiration raise questions about the phonological representation of for [+front]) - no difference between /e/ and /æ/, or /ʊ/ and /ɒ/, for some respondents organizer for specific laryngeal contrasts in general, and pre-aspiration in particular. requirements. Methodology Image Quality: RESPONDENTS On the left, figure 7: pre-aspiration and place of articulation illustrated on ABE14(90yrs) in -8 women born and raised in Aberystwyth monosyllables in isolation. On the right, figure 8: distribution of pre-aspiration duration depending on the place of articulation of the following plosive, illustrated on ABE31(72ys); the vast majority of -most with parents also from mid-Wales The default color theme for this You can place digital photos or conditions (isolation, carrier sentence, monosyllabic, disyllabic) gave significant values; p < 0.0001. -L1 Welsh speakers, proficient in English (Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test, t-test, Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient) logo art in your poster file by Figure 10: distribution of the duration of pre-aspiration for ABE33(32yrs), representative of all template is “Office”, so you can -three age groups - consonantal place is a discrete variable speakers except the youngest one. selecting the Insert, Picture always return to that after trying - both phonologically (different feature specifications) - 24, 28, 32 years - Is this because impossible environments have been included? No, some of the alternatives. command, or by using standard - and phonetically (different articulators) - 48, 54, 58 years - only 2 speakers show some impossible environments in the first place copy & paste. For best results, all - 72, 90 years */ɪp/ and /ep/ for 90yrs - Does its effect on pre-aspiration take place in phonetics, in the graphic elements should be at */ɪp/ in disyllables for 54yrs Printing Your phonology, or both? least 150-200 pixels per inch in - Is it phonetics which is responsible for the duration cline in Figure 7? On the left, Figure 2: vowel height analysed phonologically shown for [+front] vowels; p < 0.0001 – - contexts for obligatory presence vary across the speakers - Is it phonology which is responsible for the bimodal pattern in Figures 8 Poster: their final printed size. For DEFINING PRE-ASPIRATION 0.04968. On the right, Figure 3: correlations of F1 and pre-aspiration duration within /ɪ/ in monosyllabic - each speaker shows contexts where pre-aspiration is optional items; Nearey normalisation method was used, speakers subsequently merged for more robust results; and 10? Narrow sense of the term used here: a period of voiceless friction following a - the youngest speaker (24yrs) has almost reached obligatory presence instance, a 1600 x 1200 pixel p = 0.002 – 0.035; rho = -0.19 - +0.34. (Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test, t-test, Spearman’s Correlation Once your poster file is ready, visit vowel and preceding a voiceless plosive: Coefficient) photo will usually look fine up to www.genigraphics.com to order 8“-10” wide on your printed Vowel length Pre- and post-aspiration Discussion a high-quality, affordable poster poster. Is pre-aspiration dependent on phonological length or phonetic duration? Does pre-aspiration correlate with post-aspiration, which is a cue to fortis- - clearly bimodal distribution = optional application; represented in the print. Every order receives a free - /ɑː/ - /æ/, and /oː/ - /ɒ/ contrasted in monosyllables lenis contrast in plosives in AE? output of the phonology design review and we can deliver To preview the print quality of - both short and long Vs followed by pre-aspiration - youngest respondent = nearly obligatory application; still in the output of images, select a magnification of - pre-aspiration is shorter following long vowel: - post- and pre-aspiration durations correlate positively the phonology because as fast as next business day within *no difference for 1 respondent (90yrs) - speakers however vary in the strength of the correlation the US and Canada. 100% when previewing your *both pairs different for 2 respondents (54, 48yrs, in isolation - 24yrs) - phonologically conditioned by poster. This will give you a good *only /æ/ - /ɑː/ different for 1 respondent (58yrs) - vowel height */æ/ - /ɑː/ different only in a carrier sentence (72, 32yrs) Figure 9: correlations between Genigraphics® has been idea of what it will look like in post- and pre-aspiration - has a phonological representation On the left, Figure 4: phonological length, illustrated on ABE12(54yrs). - vowel length (for some speakers) producing output from p = 0.0001 – 0.04, for ABE24(48yrs) print. If you are laying out a large 90yrs, 54yrs: rho = 0.27-0.65, - has a phonological representation PowerPoint® longer than anyone representative for most of the respondents. p < 0.0001 – 0.02; 72yrs, 32yrs: On the bottom left, Figure 5: phonologically poster and using half-scale rho = 0.21-0.46, p < 0.0001 – - pre-aspiration should be specified in AE phonology in the industry; dating back to short vowels; p < 0.0001 – 0.035; rho = 0.19 0.004; 24yrs, disyllables; rho = dimensions, be sure to preview Figure 1: segmentation procedure showing the voiceless pre-aspiration and the voiced breathy transition. - 0.61, for ABE33(32yrs) – other respondents 0.21-0.3, p = 0.01; 58yrs, when we helped Microsoft® less strong but still positive correlations. On 1 significant condition: Questions: your graphics at 200% to see them Breathy transition was excluded as the duration of breathy periods before the right, Figure 6: phonologically long monosyllables, carrier sentence; - Do 1 or 2 features cover both pre- and post-aspiration in pre-aspirating design the PowerPoint® software. plosives was found to be conditioned by different factors than the duration vowels for all speakers merged reflecting a rho = 0.23, p = 0.01; 48yrs, 28yrs at their final printed size. tendency for all respondents; carrier no significant results. languages? of voiceless pre-aspiration. sentence, p < 0.0001; rho = -0.32. (Kruskal- (Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test) - If pre- and post-aspiration correlate, are both represented by [+spread US and Canada: 1-800-790-4001 Wallis Rank Sum Test, t-test, Spearman’s glottis]? Please note that graphics from Correlation Coefficient) Email: [email protected] DATA - How strong should the correlation be to suggest this is the case? websites (such as the logo on your - all short vowels and two long vowels in stressed syllables [This sidebar area does not print.] hospital's or university's home - combined with a following /p/, /t/, /k/ - both pre- and post-aspiration represented by the same feature? - Which of the numerous phonetic cues to (fortis-lenis) contrast are in the page) will only be 72dpi and not - monosyllabic & disyllabic items: bap, bat, back; lapper, latter, lacquer - But how strong should the correlation be? output of the phonology? - Would R2 suggest which the most important cue is, and would this mean suitable for printing. - 550-615 tokens per speaker in isolation and a carrier sentence there is just one cue in the output of the phonology? Say ___ once. [This sidebar area does not print.] - 1 speaker (28yrs) glottalises obligatorily in monosyllables (monosyllables References excluded) - for 1 speaker (24yrs) glottalised items included as they were pre-aspirated 1. Thráinsson, H. (1978) “On the Phonology of Icelandic Preaspiration”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1. 3-54. as well 2. Morris, J. (2010) “Phonetic variation in Northern Wales: preaspiration”. Proceedings of the Second Summer School of Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. 3. Helgason, P. (2003) “Faroese Preaspiration”. Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. 2517-20. - otherwise glottalised items or items with ambiguous glottal activity were 4. McRobbie-Utasi, Z. (2003) “Normative preaspiration in Skolt Sami in relation to the distribution of duration in the disyllabic stress group”. Honti-Festschrift. Budapest: Hungarian excluded - the longer the short vowel phonetically, the longer the pre-aspiration Academy of Sciences, Institute of Linguistics. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Icphs 2007 Proceedings
    ICPhS XVI ID 1319 Saarbrücken, 6-10 August 2007 TOWARDS A PHONETIC CONSPECTUS OF PREASPIRATION: ACOUSTIC EVIDENCE FROM SIENESE ITALIAN Mary Stevens and John Hajek School of Languages, University of Melbourne [email protected] and [email protected] ABSTRACT in any Romance variety, has shown that geminate voiceless stops /pp tt kk/ are frequently realized Preaspiration, i.e. [hC], is a rare feature of stop with preaspiration in spontaneous speech. Sienese production in the world’s languages that has been Italian is unusual in allowing preaspiration both recently found to occur in Sienese Italian. We word-medially and at word boundaries. At present, present a qualitative acoustic-phonetic description native speakers are unaware of preaspiration per of voiceless geminate stops /p: t: k:/ with se, perceiving preaspirated voiceless stops [hp ht preaspiration that occurred in a corpus of hk] as phonetically long plain stops [p: t: k:]. There spontaneous Sienese Italian speech (6 speakers). is evidence that the fine-grained realization of We outline the different fine-grained realizations preaspiration can impact upon the perceptual of preaspiration and discuss the findings in the salience, and ultimate survival of the phenomenon context of our general knowledge of the in a language [7]. With this in mind, the present phenomenon across languages. overview also aims to shed light on the potential Keywords: preaspiration, geminate, voiceless stability of preaspiration as a feature within stop, Italian Sienese Italian. 1. INTRODUCTION & AIMS 2. BACKGROUND This study aims to (1) contribute to our general As noted above, preaspiration is a rare knowledge of the phonetics of preaspiration, by phenomenon: within Europe it is only reported to providing a first qualitative acoustic overview of occur in languages spoken in the geographical area variability within the phenomenon; and (2) to extending from Northern England and Ireland to provide a first detailed picture of preaspiration in a Northern Scandinavia (see [4] for more detail).
    [Show full text]
  • Preaspiration in Modern and Old Mongolian
    Jan-Olof Svantesson & Anastasia Karlsson Lund University Preaspiration in Modern and Old Mongolian Background The problem of how to analyse the two contrasting manners of articulation for Mongolian stops and affricates has been debated since Mongolian phonetics first came to be studied. To date, there remains no consensus about the phonetic correlates of the two manners of articulation found in the literature. In phone- mic transcriptions, the two series have often been rendered with symbols for voiceless and voiced consonants. The Cyrillic Mongolian script also treats them in this way. Most Mongolists have used terms such as fortis ~ lenis, strong ~ weak, or tense ~ lax; see the review in our book, The Phonology of Mongolian (Svantesson et al. 2005: 220–221). In that book, we presented data showing that the difference is one of the presence vs. the absence of aspiration. Aspirated consonants are preaspirated in all positions except utterance-initially, while they are postaspirated word-in- itially. Here we will present more data to support this analysis. (An analysis of this kind was already proposed by the Finland-Swedish scholar John Ramstedt in his pioneering 1902 description of Halh Mongolian phonetics.) The stop and affricate phonemes are shown in (1). Minimal pairs show- ing that they contrast are given in Svantesson et al. (2005: 26–27). In phonemic transcription, we write aspirated stops and affricates as /pʰ/, /tʰ/, etc.; although the aspiration sign is written after the consonant, it is intended as a symbol for (pre- or post-) aspiration in general. In close phonetic transcription, we differen- tiate between pre- and postaspiration [ʰt, tʰ].
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Voiced and Voiceless Geminates in Sienese Italian: What Role Does Preaspiration Play?
    PAGE 340 Comparing voiced and voiceless geminates in Sienese Italian: what role does preaspiration play? Mary Stevens & John Hajek Department of French, Italian & Spanish Studies University of Melbourne, Australia [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract This paper compares the acoustic phonetic appearance of voiced & voiceless geminate stops in Sienese Italian. In our spontaneous speech data voiceless geminate stops are frequently preaspirated, which is an extremely rare phenomenon cross-linguistically. Preaspiration of voiceless stops has been associated in other languages with devoicing of voiced stops. We compare the acoustic appearance & duration of voiceless /VC:/ sequences (with & without preaspiration) with voiced /VC:/ sequences in our language. Results indicate that long voiced stops in Sienese Italian are often partially devoiced – a phenomenon that has not been reported previously for any variety of Italian. We suggest that preaspiration & devoicing are likely related, & attempt to provide an articulatory explanation as to why they occur. ‘abacus’ v. /babbo/ ‘dad’. Stressed vowels are predictably short preceding geminate consonants & in other closed syllables, but are fully long in open 1. Introduction syllables i.e. ['fat.to] v. ['fa:.to]. As a result, stressed rhymes are always phonologically heavy or bimoraic. In this paper we compare the acoustic appearance of phonologically voiced & voiceless geminate stops in 2.2. Preaspiration Sienese Italian. Previously, we have uncovered unexpected variability in the articulation of long Preaspiration is a very rare phenomenon across the voiceless stops in this variety of Italian (see eg. Stevens world's languages, occurring most often in Scandinavia 2004; Stevens & Hajek 2004), whereby they show but elsewhere in a handful of languages elsewhere (see frequent preaspiration & other glottal effects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life Cycle of Preaspiration in the Gaelic Languages
    Chapter Ten The life cycle of preaspiration in the Gaelic languages Pavel Iosad University of Edinburgh This chapter represents (yet another) contribution to the vexed issue of the role of Old Norse in the history of Scottish Gaelic. The historical, archaeological, and cultural evidence for the interaction between Norse and Gaelic speakers in the period between the start of the Viking Age in the North Atlantic and the (re-)Gaelicization of Scotland, is incontrovertible; so is the presence of numerous traces of language contact, particularly in the lexicon and toponomasticon. As for structural influence, probably the most controversial has been the proposal that the preaspiration of medial stops in the ‘voiceless’ /p t k/ series – a pervasive feature of Gaelic – shows a special connection to the very similar phenomenon in (especially Insular) North Germanic. Scholars have attributed the connection to a Norse substrate that influenced Gaelic in the later medieval period, to Gaelic influence on North Germanic in a contact situation, and to membership in a northern European ‘linguistic landscape’ – and some have denied that the connection actually exists. In this chapter I argue that we can approach a resolution of the conun- drum if we take seriously the results achieved in theoretical historical phono- logy. In particular, the theory of the life cycle of phonological processes allows us to reconstruct a course for the development of Gaelic preaspiration that has important implications for the contact theory of preaspiration origins. This approach, which provides a conceptual foundation for the traditional dialectological association of innovation with central areas and archaisms with peripheries, provides a remarkably good fit with what we know about the diatopic variability of Gaelic preaspiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Superscript Diacritics for Prenasalization, Preglottalization, and Preaspiration
    1 Proposal for superscript diacritics for prenasalization, preglottalization, and preaspiration Patricia Keating Department of Linguistics, UCLA [email protected] Daniel Wymark Department of Linguistics, UCLA [email protected] Ryan Sharif Department of Linguistics, UCLA [email protected] ABSTRACT The IPA currently does not specify how to represent prenasalization, preglottalization, or preaspiration. We first review some current transcription practices, and phonetic and phonological literature bearing on the unitary status of prenasalized, preglottalized and preaspirated segments. We then propose that the IPA adopt superscript diacritics placed before a base symbol for these three phenomena. We also suggest how the current IPA Diacritics chart can be modified to allow these diacritics to be fit within the chart. 2 1 Introduction The IPA provides a variety of diacritics which can be added to base symbols in various positions: above ([a͂ ]), below ([n̥ ]), through ([ɫ]), superscript after ([tʰ]), or centered after ([a˞]). Currently, IPA diacritics which modify base symbols are never shown preceding them; the only diacritics which precede are the stress marks, i.e. primary ([ˈ]) and secondary ([ˌ]) stress. Yet, in practice, superscript diacritics are often used preceding base symbols; specifically, they are often used to notate prenasalization, preglottalization and preaspiration. These terms are very common in phonetics and phonology, each having thousands of Google hits. However, none of these phonetic phenomena is included on the IPA chart or mentioned in Part I of the Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (IPA 1999), and thus there is currently no guidance given to users about transcribing them. In this note we review these phenomena, and propose that the Association’s alphabet include superscript diacritics preceding the base symbol for prenasalization, preglottalization and preaspiration, in accord with one common way of transcribing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Riessler/Wilbur: Documenting the Endangered Kola Saami Languages
    BERLINER BEITRÄGE ZUR SKANDINAVISTIK Titel/ Språk og språkforhold i Sápmi title: Autor(in)/ Michael Riessler/Joshua Wilbur author: Kapitel/ »Documenting the endangered Kola Saami languages« chapter: In: Bull, Tove/Kusmenko, Jurij/Rießler, Michael (Hg.): Språk og språkforhold i Sápmi. Berlin: Nordeuropa-Institut, 2007 ISBN: 973-3-932406-26-3 Reihe/ Berliner Beiträge zur Skandinavistik, Bd. 11 series: ISSN: 0933-4009 Seiten/ 39–82 pages: Diesen Band gibt es weiterhin zu kaufen. This book can still be purchased. © Copyright: Nordeuropa-Institut Berlin und Autoren. © Copyright: Department for Northern European Studies Berlin and authors. M R J W Documenting the endangered Kola Saami languages . Introduction The present paper addresses some practical and a few theoretical issues connected with the linguistic field research being undertaken as part of the Kola Saami Documentation Project (KSDP). The aims of the paper are as follows: a) to provide general informa- tion about the Kola Saami languages und the current state of their doc- umentation; b) to provide general information about KSDP, expected project results and the project work flow; c) to present certain soft- ware tools used in our documentation work (Transcriber, Toolbox, Elan) and to discuss other relevant methodological and technical issues; d) to present a preliminary phoneme analysis of Kildin and other Kola Saami languages which serves as a basis for the transcription convention used for the annotation of recorded texts. .. The Kola Saami languages The Kola Saami Documentation Project aims at documenting the four Saami languages spoken in Russia: Skolt, Akkala, Kildin, and Ter. Ge- nealogically, these four languages belong to two subgroups of the East Saami branch: Akkala and Skolt belong to the Mainland group (together with Inari, which is spoken in Finland), whereas Kildin and Ter form the Peninsula group of East Saami.
    [Show full text]
  • Faroese Preaspiration
    Faroese Preaspiration Pétur Helgason Department of Linguistics University of Stockholm E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT analysis addresses the issue of the expression of the fortis vs. lenis contrast in the Tórshavn dialect of Faroese. The This paper presents findings on the phonological distribu- data are also analysed with regard to the variation present tion and phonetic realization of Faroese stops, with parti- in the phonetic expression of preaspiration in the dialect. cular emphasis on preaspiration. Spontaneous speech data from 4 speakers of the Tórshavn dialect were recorded, and their stop production was analyzed. The data show 2. METHOD that the somewhat contradictory accounts of the phono- logical distribution of preaspiration in previous works The Faroese data come from four subjects, two male (SG partly reflect a lack of uniformity among subjects in the and EI) and two female (MS and BJ), all speakers of the phonological distribution of preaspirated variants. Further, Tórshavn dialect. Spontaneous speech interaction between the production of preaspiration was found to have a high the subjects was elicited using map tasks ([3]). The degree of contextual variation. Lastly, when compared subjects were recorded in pairs on separate channels. EI with preaspiration in other Scandinavian languages, the and MS formed one pair, SG and BJ another. The data detailed phonological distribution of preaspiration was were recorded on a DAT recorder, using directional found to differ considerably between languages, although microphones to minimize overlap between channels. This some central characteristics are shared between all of overlap was further reduced by placing the subjects so that them. The implications of these data for historical sound they faced away from one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects
    Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages Synchronic and diachronic aspects Pétur Helgason PhD dissertation Department of Linguistics Stockholm University November 2002 Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages Synchronic and diachronic aspects Pétur Helgason PhD dissertation Stockholm University Department of Linguistics November 2002 PhD dissertation November 2002 Department of Linguistics Stockholm University 106 91 Stockholm Sweden © Pétur Helgason ISBN 91–7265–535–6 Cover Design: Christine Ericsdotter and Pétur Helgason. Front cover map: Evropa Recens Descripta by Guiliemo (Willem) Blaeu, 1649. Back cover map: Nova Totius Terrarum Orbis, by Frederik De Wit, 1660. Printed by Akademitryck AB, Edsbruk 2002 Abstract Preaspiration—the production of glottal friction at the juncture of a vowel and a consonant—appears to be typologically rare but is an areal lin- guistic feature of Northwestern Europe. This study contains a survey of the known geographical spread of preaspirated stops, their phonological distribution and phonetic expressions in some Nordic dialects. The study also suggests a reconstruction of the phonetics of the Proto-Nordic stop contrasts based on synchronic data as well as a more general framework of historical sound change. Following an introduction (Chapter 1), Chapter 2 deals with the definition and typology of preaspiration presenting a global overview of the known geographical spread of preaspiration. The apparent rarity of preaspiration is considered. Proposed, perceptually based explanations of this rarity are evaluated. Chapter 3 offers a fairly detailed account of the known areal spread of pre- aspiration in Europe. Stop systems of several dialects in which preaspira- tion occurs are analysed in terms of voicing conditions. These analyses are based mainly on descriptions provided in the dialectological literature.
    [Show full text]
  • PREASPIRATION in SKOLT SÁMI 1. INTRODUCTION Preaspiration Is A
    PREASPIRATION IN SKOLT SÁMI 1. INTRODUCTION Preaspiration is a well-known feature associated with several Northern European languages.1 It has also long been acknowledged that preaspiration occurs in several North-American Indian languages.2 The phenomenon of preaspiration itself is recognized as being one of the pronunciation characteristics of voiceless stops in these languages. The phonetic correlates of preaspiration are quite varied, for preaspiration may be manifested as [x], [f] sometimes, even an [C ]-like sound in addition to the most obvious [h]-like manifestations.3 But what they are precisely, and what the durational and intensity characteristics of preaspiration depend on, are questions not as yet studied in sufficient depth. In his paper on preaspiration in a Norwegian dialect4 Wolter rightly quotes Haugen5 who claims: "The phoneticians have had their eyes trained too exclusively on the end of the sound where aspiration traditionally occurs."6 Although Sámi (or Lappish),7 a Finno-Ugric language, is well- documented as containing preaspiration, it has not been sufficiently studied as yet with regard to its phonetic properties. The term "preaspiration" has been denoted by such terms as "the voiceless vowel"8 or "voice offset time"9: both terms needing to be reviewed 1 In addition to Icelandic, which is probably one of the most thoroughly studied languages with regard to preaspiration, Farose, Scottish Gaelic and certain Norwegian dialects are also known to contain preaspirated voiceless stops (Péturson 1972, Shuken 1979, Ni Chasaide 1985, Wolter 1965). 2 Trubetzkoy (1939) refers to Fox and Hopi when analyzing preaspirated consonants. 3 Wolter (1965:595), Hasselbrink 1944:102-104.
    [Show full text]
  • Icelandic Phonetic Transcription
    A Short Overview of the Icelandic Sound System Pronunciation Variants and Phonetic Transcription IPA Version Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson SÍM 2020 This document was written in December 2019 and January 2020 for the SÍM consortium as a part of the Icelandic National Language Technology Program. The document is made in two versions – one using the IPA transcription system and the other using the X-SAMPA transcription system. This is the IPA version. Both versions begin with a table showing the mappings between the two systems. The document is distributed under the CC BY 4.0 license. 2 1 An Overview of the Icelandic Sound System Icelandic speech sounds can be divided into two main groups; consonants and vowels. Icelandic consonants can be further divided into four classes: plosives (stops), fricatives (and approximants), nasals, and liquids (laterals and trills/taps). Within the vowel group, a further distinction can be made between monophthongs and diphthongs. The following table gives an overview of the phonemes of the Icelandic IPA and X- SAMPA symbol set, grouped by the phoneme classes to which they belong (according to the manner of their articulation). Consonants IPA SAMPA Orthography IPA SAMPA Gloss Plosives p p bera [pɛːra] /pE:ra/ ‘carry’ pʰ p_h pera [pʰɛːra] /p_hE:ra/ ‘pear’ t t dalur [taːlʏr] /ta:lYr/ ‘valley’ tʰ t_h tala [tʰaːla] /t_ha:la/ ‘talk’ c c gera [cɛːra] /cE:ra/ ‘do’ cʰ c_h kæla [cʰaiːla] /c_hai:la/ ‘cool off’ k k galdur [kaltʏr] /kaltYr/ ‘magic’ kʰ k_h kaldur [kʰaltʏr] /k_haltYr/ ‘cold’ Fricatives v v vera [vɛːra] /vE:ra/ ‘be’
    [Show full text]
  • Icelandic Preaspiration and the Moraic Theory of Geminates
    Draft: to appear in Proceedings of the Xth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics Edward Keer Icelandic Preaspiration and the Moraic Theory of Geminates In this paper I provide an Optimality Theoretic (OT) account of Icelandic preaspiration that relies on both the moraic theory of geminates (Hayes 1986, McCarthy & Prince 1986) as well as the bisegmental theory of aspiration proposed by Steriade (1993, 1994). The main claim of the anlaysis is that preaspiration is a type of metathesis between the stop and the aspiration. Following Thráinsson (1978) and Hermans (1985) I assume that preaspiration is contingent on lengthening of consonants in stressed syllables. This restriction is captured in an OT grammar through relative ranking of constraints. The analysis is further supported by a typology of preaspiration processes. 0. Introduction Selkirk (1990) argues that Icelandic preaspiration is a case of laryngeal fission which supports the two-root theory of geminates. Since consonant clusters and geminates are both targeted by this process the representation of both should be similar. The two-root theory captures this similarity since it states that geminates are consonant clusters at the root level. However, Selkirk’s analysis rests on the assumption that post-aspirated stops are single segments. Here I argue against that assumption and for a single melody theory of geminates. Following Thráinsson (1978) and Hermans (1985) I propose that preaspiration is directly tied to lengthening of consonants in closed syllables. Furthermore, I argue (following Steriade 1993, 1994) that aspirated stops are in fact bisegmental. Rather than preaspiration targeting geminates and clusters, I analyze preaspiration as being blocked in the case of singletons.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions from Vowels to Voiceless Stops in Swedish, Italian and German
    TRANSITIONS FROM VOWELS TO VOICELESS STOPS IN SWEDISH, ITALIAN AND GERMAN Mechtild Tronnier Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Sweden [email protected] ABSTRACT speakers [10, 4] is not only based on socio-phonetic factors, but on physiological ones [5, 7]. Segmentation of running speech and placing a boundary between a vowel and a following voiceless Figure 1: Example of preaspiration (highlighted) in stop seems to be a trivial task., Segmentation criteria, the Swedish word gata (“street”, /ɡaːta/, [ɡɑːʰta]). however, varied in an international cooperation, as different realisations of V+voiceless stop sequences occurred between comparable recorded material of speakers of German, Italian and Swedish. It appeared that Swedish speakers produced V+voiceless stop- sequences frequently with a transitional phase in between, similar to preaspiration in Icelandic. In this study, elicited data from speakers of Swedish, German and Italian was analysed and the general number of occurrence of preaspiration ɡ ɑː ʰ t a according to languages was counted and compared in 0 0.5813 the first place. Time (s) The previous observation – that preaspiration Based on discussions about segmentation criteria in a predominantly occurs in Swedish speech – was previous cross-linguistic project [2] – due to presence confirmed, and further, detailed inspections were vs. absence of preaspiration in V+voiceless stop- carried out. Occurrence of preaspiration in both sequences –, an attempt is made here, to shed some vocalic and consonantal contexts, status of quantity light into the distribution of preaspiration in were analysed and correlated with the general degree comparable data produced by native speakers of of breathiness of individual speaker’s voices.
    [Show full text]