Final Revision

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Revision Negotiating the Sharing Economy: Challenges and Opportunities for Democracy in the Era of Neoliberal Capitalism By Geoffrey C. Upton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Wendy L. Brown, Chair Professor Sarah Song Professor Robin L. Einhorn Fall 2017 © Copyright by Geoffrey C. Upton 2017 All Rights Reserved Abstract Negotiating the Sharing Economy: Challenges and Opportunities for Democracy in the Era of Neoliberal Capitalism by Geoffrey C. Upton Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Wendy L. Brown, Chair Since its emergence in 2008, the “sharing economy,” which includes such platform companies as Uber, Airbnb, and TaskRabbit among many others, has transformed entire industries and changed the lives of millions of workers, commuters, and tourists worldwide. It has also introduced new opportunities for and challenges to democracy. Foremost among the opportunities is the sharing economy’s potential to increase personal encounters between strangers in the semi-private, semi- commercial spaces it creates. Such encounters offer the possibility of enhanced mutual trust and understanding among citizens, each of which is critical to successful self-government in a pluralistic society. Yet the commercial sharing economy also threatens democracy, in three main ways: first, by requiring participants to rate and review, and thus engage in mutual surveillance of, each other; second, by creating new avenues for often hidden discrimination against others, circumventing existing anti-discrimination law, and third, by perpetuating a notion of the individual as a competitive, maximizing, economic being, even as the companies often couch their services in the language of sharing. This dissertation investigates these opportunities for and challenges to democracy, and considers the way in which the pressures and incentives of financial capitalism have caused the sharing economy to develop, over its first decade, in a manner that has exacerbated the challenges while diminishing the opportunities. !1 Negotiating the Sharing Economy: Challenges and Opportunities for Democracy in the Era of Neoliberal Capitalism CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. iv Introduction: Pinning Down and Opening Up the Sharing Economy ............................. v 1. The Sharing Economy’s First Decade ........................................................................ vi 2. On a Sharing Spectrum ............................................................................................... xii 3. The Economic, Social and Political Context: Neoliberalism and Financialization .... xv 4. Aims and Method........................................................................................................ xviii I. Sharing in the Wake of Financial Crisis: New Channels for Capital, New Avenues for Austerity ........................................................................................................................... 1 1. After the Financial Crisis: Austerity and the Sharing Economy ................................. 2 2. A Spare Room for Financial Capital .......................................................................... 8 3. Standardization Under the Sway of Venture Capital ................................................. 11 4. Abandoning the Peer, Embracing the Marketplace ................................................... 17 II. Win One for Yourself: Sharing Platforms and the Neoliberal Game of Life ............ 27 1. What Neoliberalism Thinks the Self Is, and Wants it To Be ...................................... 29 2. Don’t Stop Calculatin’: Maximizing the Self Through ‘Sharing’ ............................... 35 3. By Hook and By Crook: How the Sharing Economy Ensnares the Self .................... 39 4. The Challenges of Coming Together in the Sharing Economy .................................. 42 III. The Dark Side of Trust: Horizontal, Vertical, and Liquid Surveillance in the Sharing Economy ....................................................................................................... 49 1. Building Trust Through Ratings ................................................................................. 49 2. Scoring the Person: What Reputation Systems Are Really Doing ............................. 55 3. If You See Something, Say Something (But Only in a Rating or Review) ............... 63 4. Surveillance from Up Above ..................................................................................... 66 IV. Talking to Strangers in the Sharing Economy: The Promise and Perils of the Face-to-Face Encounter ....................................................................................................... 73 1. Levinas and the Encounter with the Other ................................................................. 75 2. Hospitality, Risk, and Reciprocity: The Problem of Stranger Danger ....................... 87 3. Commerce and the Encounter ..................................................................................... 91 4. Sites of the Encounter: The Agora and the Modern City............................................ 95 !i V. Anti-Discrimination Law in a Semi-Private Space: Sharing Platforms, Equality, and the Encounter with Diversity ....................................................................................... 100 1. Discrimination by Users of Sharing Economy Platforms .......................................... 101 2. Applying American Anti-Discrimination Law ........................................................... 106 3. Questioning American Anti-Discrimination Law ....................................................... 112 4. The Trade-Off Between Association and Equality ..................................................... 118 VI. Conclusion: Negotiating the Sharing Economy from Inside and Out: Small Steps to Revitalize Democracy and Temper the Ills of Neoliberalism .................. 123 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................... 131 !ii For my mother and grandmother !iii Acknowledgments This project would not have been begun or completed without the support, guidance, caring, and patience of Professor Wendy Brown. Its completion may well have been delayed by my lack of eagerness to leave her warm, welcoming, and (needless to say) intellectually stimulating orbit at UC Berkeley. Likewise, Professor Sarah Song has been a source of unending personal and intellectual assistance and inspiration, generously advising me as to my graduate school career even before I had applied to Berkeley, and continuing to do so for all the years since; her astute suggestions immeasurably improved this project. Professor Robin Einhorn was also of vital importance to this dissertation, providing incisive, critical comments that caused me to rethink my approach and to substantially improve both its content and style. A number of fellow graduate students at UC Berkeley have been steady friends and colleagues over the years, including Ali Bond, Adam Hill, Jack Jackson, and Ryan Phillips. In particular, I am tremendously grateful to Nina Hagel, whose constant encouragement and unending willingness to answer all of my questions about graduate school—including concerning all aspects of the dissertation writing and job search processes in recent months—was essential to the completion of this project and degree program. I am thankful for the support, financial and otherwise, of the Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science, and would especially like to recognize the staff in the department office, some of whom have been especially helpful over the years: Maria Castelli, Michelle Dylla, and Charlotte Merriwether most recently, and earlier, Suzan Nunes, Janet Newhall, and Andrea Rex. Thanks also to Professors Kinch Hoekstra, Shannon Stimson, Nadesan Permaul, and Eric Schickler for their assistance and advice; to the Berkeley Center for the Study of Value, the Metro New York Leaders’ Fellowship Fund, and UC Berkeley’s Graduate Division and Graduate Assembly for financial support; and to the many hard-working, spirited, and engaging Berkeley undergraduates I have been fortunate to have met and taught over the years. (As the saying goes, the kids are all right.) I am also very thankful for the consistent care and encouragement provided by Karen Harber, Nancy Kaplan, Jamie Moran, and Annie Hope. I would be remiss not to thank the many friends outside of Berkeley who have urged me on from near and far, with a combination of patience and well-meaning impatience (i.e., needling)—especially Tanya Barnes, Gary Chow, Michael Dang, Katie Gallagher, Tom Pyun, Boris Rapaport, Wendy Kai Sung, and, above all, Althea Wasow, whose words of encouragement (and morning phone calls) were critical to getting this project done. My family has also been steadfast in their support, including my father Elliott and stepmother Sally, my brother Jack, and my loving aunts, uncles, and cousins. My mother Helen and grandmother Edith would doubtless have been proudest of all
Recommended publications
  • You Get What You Share: Incentives for a Sharing Economy
    The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-19) You Get What You Share: Incentives for a Sharing Economy Sreenivas Gollapudi Kostas Kollias Debmalya Panigrahi Google Research Google Research Duke University Abstract their individual resources. The platform allows the agents to In recent years, a range of online applications have facilitated list and search for available resources, which enables them resource sharing among users, resulting in a significant in- to identify partners and form sharing groups. More specif- crease in resource utilization. In all such applications, shar- ically, in workforce and educational applications, there are ing one’s resources or skills with other agents increases so- groups that work to complete a task or a project, while in cial welfare. In general, each agent will look for other agents ride sharing and room sharing applications, the notion of a whose available resources complement hers, thereby form- group appears when agents get together to use a provided ing natural sharing groups. In this paper, we study settings resource, e.g., a ride or a house. where a large population self-organizes into sharing groups. A natural goal is to partition the users into sharing groups In many cases, centralized optimization approaches for creat- ing an optimal partition of the user population are infeasible that maximize the overall utility or social welfare of the because either the central authority does not have the neces- system. One may model this as an optimization problem, sary information to compute an optimal partition, or it does where a centralized authority computes the optimal parti- not have the power to enforce a partition.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment
    Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment Benjamin Edelman Michael Luca Dan Svirsky Working Paper 16-069 Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment Benjamin Edelman Harvard Business School Michael Luca Harvard Business School Dan Svirsky Harvard Business School Working Paper 16-069 Copyright © 2015, 2016 by Benjamin Edelman, Michael Luca, and Dan Svirsky Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: † Evidence from a Field Experiment Benjamin Edelman,* Michael Luca,** and Dan Svirsky*** September 4, 2016 Abstract Online marketplaces increasingly choose to reduce the anonymity of buyers and sellers in order to facilitate trust. We demonstrate that this common market design choice results in an important unintended consequence: racial discrimination. In a field experiment on Airbnb, we find that requests from guests with distinctively African-American names are roughly 16% less likely to be accepted than identical guests with distinctively White names. The difference persists whether the host is African-American or White, male or female. The difference also persists whether the host shares the property with the guest or not, and whether the property is cheap or expensive. We validate our findings through observational data on hosts’ recent experiences with African-American guests, finding host behavior consistent with some, though not all, hosts discriminating. Finally, we find that discrimination is costly for hosts who indulge in it: hosts who reject African- American guests are able to find a replacement guest only 35% of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideal Solution for Schools and Nurseries
    The ideal solution for schools and nurseries. Dear customers, Be inspired by tasty recipe ideas. The SelfCookingCenter® offers countless possibilities for producing dishes. This cookbook presents a selection of elegant base recipes put together by the RATIONAL chefs for you to try. You will certainly find a few new ideas for your menu plan. Are you interested in other national and international recipes, tips and tricks? Then visit our Club RATIONAL – our Internet platform for all SelfCookingCenter® users. You will find interesting information and suggestions for your kitchen on the site. Simply log in at www.clubrational.com. We hope you enjoy your new SelfCookingCenter® and we look forward to staying in contact with you. Your RATIONAL chefs 02 04 Roasted, BBQ chicken drumsticks 06 Fried rice 38 Chef Louie's ratatouille 08 Fries, wedges & croquettes 40 Cheese ravioli 10 Scrambled eggs 42 Macaroni & cheese 12 Kale chips 45 Whole grain pasta with tomato & 14 Grilled cheese sandwich basil 16 Italian turkey meatballs 47 Savory roasted pumpkin or butternut squash 18 Cinnamon-raisin bread pudding 49 BBQ pulled pork 21 Corn crusted cod (or catfish) 51 Ground Beef cooked overnight 23 Dehydrated fruits & vegetables 53 Steamed rice 25 Steamed yummy broccoli 55 Alphabet Soup Meatloaf 27 Roasted turkey 57 Roasted pork loin with apples 29 Beef jerky, made in-house 60 Braised brisket with apricot (sub 31 Kid-friendly kale salad pork shoulder) 34 Easy & eggceptional egg 62 Maple Sweet Potato Mash sandwiches 36 Western omelette frittata with cheese 03 Roasted, BBQ chicken drumsticks List of ingredients (Number of portions: 90) 90 pieces of chicken legs 8 oz.
    [Show full text]
  • RATIONAL Serviceplus. Always There for You. Serviceplus
    RATIONAL ServicePlus. Always there for you. ServicePlus. Questions are answered before they are even asked. New cooking system, new employees and new ideas. Support, help, service There is always a reason to try out our RATIONAL services Relax and enjoy your that come with every iCombi and iVario unit. RATIONAL day in the kitchen. ServicePlus ensures that you always get the most from you cooking systems, that your investment pays off and that you never run out of ideas. 2 3 First things first. Installation and unit introduction training. Delivery, assembly and installation - it is always best to Individual support invest in the professional support of a RATIONAL Certified To enable you to start easily Service Partner. RATIONAL’s Certified Partners are achieving your goals from regularly trained and are familiar with the latest technology maximizing your uptime. While RATIONAL cooking the very first day. systems are self-explanatory, a couple of tips and tricks can sometimes help. RATIONAL Certified Service Partners are here to help. 4 5 ChefLine. Your direct line to RATIONAL. Here for you 365 days a year: RATIONAL ChefLine. Just call us Questions on preparation methods, settings and cooking and we'll turn your challenges paths, or even on planning a banquet? RATIONAL chefs into solutions. are only a telephone call away. It's their pleasure to provide advice on how to get the most from your cooking system. Fast, uncomplicated and free of charge. Reach the ChefLine at: 866-306-CHEF (2433) 6 7 Always up-to-date. Free updates. The RATIONAL cooking systems continue to progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perfect Cooking System for the Hotel Industry. Ideas That Change the World
    The perfect cooking system for the hotel industry. Ideas that change the world. For more than forty years now, we have had one goal: to offer you the best and most powerful cooking equipment possible. A tool that offers you a wealth of new options for making your ideas a reality. One that ensures consistent superior quality, no matter how much and what you are preparing. And one that pays for itself in no time. 2 3 Unparalleled quality. Easily and efficiently. Successful hotel gastronomy The goal: thoroughly satisfied concepts feature a wide variety customers who look forward to of top food quality, fast service, and returning and will recommend the efficient processes. Whether large- establishment to others. For them, or small-scale, events in particular it’s all about enjoyment. For you, require that creatively plated meals, it’s about producing excellent food with the same consistent superior easily and efficiently. But how do quality, reach the table quickly. you bring all of those things together? The new RATIONAL SelfCookingCenter® prepares food measurably faster and to the perfect degree of doneness, while yielding more flavorful results. Easy, safe controls ensure that the results are always perfect – no matter who’s operating the appliances and what quantities you’re producing. And you’ll also save dramatically on time, energy, water, and raw materials. 4 5 4 Fits into any kitchen. Grilling, roasting, baking, steaming – all with a single appliance. In the past, preparing a good meal You can use it to grill, roast, bake, steam, stew, poach, and much Our SelfCookingCenter® is now also available in required a wide range of special more, on roughly 11 ft2 (1 m2).
    [Show full text]
  • Luxury Low Countries
    LUXURY LUXURY in the LOW LUXURY COUNTRIES the in in the e superflu, chose très nécessaire”, wrote Voltaire 1736 in COUNTRIES LOW LOW his poem Le mondain. Needless to say that luxury is much Lmore than merely materialised/solidified redundancy. Offering a first panoramic view on various manifestations of conspicuous material culture in a Netherlandish context from 1500 until the present, this study – rather than investigating self- COUNTRIES evident cases of luxury – aims to explore its boundaries and the different stages in which luxury is fabricated or sometimes only simulated. Thematically, the volume focuses on two major issues, i.e. collections and foodways as means of expression of prosperity and splendour, which will be discussed by an international group of scholars, emanating from disciplines such as archaeology, history, book and media studies, art history, linguistics, and historical (ed.) Rittersma Rengenier ethnology. With an afterword by Maxine Berg. MIScellaneous RefleCtions on NETHERlandish MaTERial CULTURE, 1500 to the PRESENT Rengenier Rittersma (ed.) www.vubpress.be 9 789054 875406 Miscellaneous Reflections on Netherlandish Material Culture, 1500 to the Present Rengenier C. Rittersma (ed.) © 2010 FARO. Flemish interface for cultural heritage Cover image: Adriaan de Lelie, De kunstgalerij van Jan Priemstraat 51, B-1000 Brussels Gildemeester Jansz in zijn huis aan de Herengracht te www.faronet.be Amsterdam, 1794-1795 www.pharopublishing.be © Rijksmuseum Amsterdam Editorial board: Marc Jacobs, Rengenier C. Rittersma, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be Peter Scholliers, Ans Van de Cotte reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, Final editors: Frederik Hautain & Ans Van de Cotte recording, or on any information, storage or retrieval system without permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Overaccumulation, Public Debt, and the Importance of Land
    Overaccumulation, Public Debt, and the Importance of Land Stefan Homburg Discussion Paper No. 525 ISSN 0949-9962 Published: German Economic Review 15 (4), pp. 411-435. doi:10.1111/geer.12053 Institute of Public Economics, Leibniz University of Hannover, Germany. www.fiwi.uni-hannover.de. Abstract: In recent contributions, Weizsäcker (2014) and Summers (2014) maintain that mature economies ac- cumulate too much capital. They suggest large and last- ing public deficits as a remedy. This paper argues that overaccumulation cannot occur in an economy with land. It presents novel data of aggregate land values, analyzes the issue within a stochastic framework, and conducts an empirical test of overaccumulation. Keywords: Dynamic efficiency; overaccumulation; land; fiscal policy; public debt JEL-Classification: D92, E62, H63 Thanks are due to Charles Blankart, Friedrich Breyer, Johannes Hoffmann, Karl-Heinz Paqué, and in particu- lar to Marten Hillebrand and Wolfram F. Richter for very helpful suggestions. 2 1. Introduction In a recent article, Carl-Christian von Weizsäcker (2014) challenged the prevailing skepti- cal view of public debt. In a modernized Austrian framework, he argues that the natural real rate of interest, i.e. the rate that would emerge in the absence of public debt, has be- come negative in OECD economies and China. Because nominal interest rates are posi- tive, governments face an uneasy choice between price stability and fiscal prudence: They must either raise inflation in order to make negative real and positive nominal interest rates compatible, or lift the real interest rate into the positive region via deficit spending. To substantiate his point, Weizsäcker claims that the average waiting period, the ratio of private wealth and annual consumption, has risen historically whereas the average produc- tion period, the ratio of capital and annual consumption, has remained constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of the Sharing Economy 2 | Sharing Or Paring? Growth of the Sharing Economy | 3
    www.pwc.com/hu Sharing or paring? Growth of the sharing economy 2 | Sharing or paring? Growth of the sharing economy | 3 Contents Executive summary 5 Main drivers 9 Main features of sharing economy companies 12 Business models 13 A contender for the throne 14 Emergence of the model in certain key sectors 16 I. Mobility industry 16 II. Retail and consumer goods 18 III. Tourism and hotel industry 19 IV. Entertainment, multimedia and telecommunication 20 V. Financial sector 21 VI. Energy sector 22 VII. Human resources sector 23 VIII. Peripheral areas of the sharing economy 24 Like it or lump it 25 What next? 28 About PwC 30 Contact 31 4 | A day in the life of the sharing economy While he does his Yesterday Peter applied for an online Nearby a morning workout, Peter data gathering distance young mother 8:00 listens to his work assignment 12:30 offers her Cardio playlist on Spotify. on TaskRabbit. home cooking So he can via Yummber, 9:15 concentrate better, and Peter jumps he books ofce at the space in the opportunity. Kaptár coworking ofce. On Skillshare, 13:45 16:00 he listens to the Nature Photography On the way home for Beginners course. he stops to pick up the foodstuffs he 15:45 To unwind, he starts ordered last week from watching a lm on Netflix, the shopping community but gets bored of it and reads Szatyorbolt. his book, sourced from A friend shows him Rukkola.hu, instead. a new Hungarian board game under development, on Kickstarter. Next week he’s going on holiday in Italy 18:00 He likes it so much with his girlfriend.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on the Sharing Economy
    Perspectives on the Sharing Economy Perspectives on the Sharing Economy Edited by Dominika Wruk, Achim Oberg and Indre Maurer Perspectives on the Sharing Economy Edited by Dominika Wruk, Achim Oberg and Indre Maurer This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Dominika Wruk, Achim Oberg, Indre Maurer and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3512-6 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-3512-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Perspectives on the Sharing Economy Dominika Wruk, Achim Oberg and Indre Maurer 1. Business and Economic History Perspective 1.1 .............................................................................................................. 30 Renaissance of Shared Resource Use? The Historical Honeycomb of the Sharing Economy Philipp C. Mosmann 1.2 .............................................................................................................. 39 Can the Sharing Economy Regulate Itself? A Comparison of How Uber and Machinery Rings Link their Economic and Social
    [Show full text]
  • Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50
    Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 1 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 2 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 3 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 4 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 5 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 6 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 7 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 8 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 9 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 10 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 11 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 12 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 13 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 14 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 15 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 16 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50 Main Document Page 17 of 17 Case 16-11179 Doc 1-1 Filed 05/20/16 Entered 05/20/16 17:25:50
    [Show full text]
  • Accumulation Regimes Agnès Labrousse, Sandrine Michel
    Accumulation regimes Agnès Labrousse, Sandrine Michel To cite this version: Agnès Labrousse, Sandrine Michel. Accumulation regimes. Tae-Hee Jo; Lynne Chester; Carlo D’Ippoliti. The Routledge Handbook of Heterodox Economics Theorizing, Analyzing, and Trans- forming Capitalism, pp.54-69, 2017, 978-1-138-89994-0 (hbk) 978-1-315-70758-7 (ebk). hal-01719977 HAL Id: hal-01719977 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01719977 Submitted on 28 Feb 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accumulation Regimes Agnès Labrousse and Sandrine Michel Introduction Historical observation shows that accumulation undergoes long periods of stability, followed by long periods of instability and crisis, so the economist has to explain why an episode of growth, based on a seemingly ‘virtuous’ accumulation process, can enter into crisis. Accumulation regimes grasp the dynamic compatibility of production, income sharing, and demand dynamics: “the set of regularities that ensure the general and relatively coherent progress of capital accumulation, that is, which allow the resolution or postponement of the distortions and disequilibria to which the process continually gives rise” (Boyer & Saillard 2002: 334). Two institutional theories, French Régulation theory (RT) and the American Social Structure of Accumulation (SSA) theory, are particularly relevant to the investigation of accumulation processes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Theory of Capitalism: a Critical Review of Itoh and the Uno School
    The Basic Theory of Capitalism: A Critical Review of Itoh and the Uno School Simon Clarke Makoto Itoh: The Basic Theory of Capitalism: The Forms and Substance of the Capitalist Economy, Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1988. 1 The Uno Approach and the Pure Theory of Cap- italism Makoto Itoh's work is well-known to readers of Capital and Class through his long-standing involvement in the CSE. He has now brought together his contributions to the debates on the theory of value and the theory of crisis within a systematic exposition of Marxist theory which brings out clearly the roots of his perspective in the work of Uno. The Uno School is one of the major schools of post-war Japanese Marxism, which came to prominence in the 1960s.1 The Uno approach is marked by a radical neo-Kantian separation of theory from politics, and a fierce opposition to logical-historical interpretations of Capital in favour of a sharp distinction between theoretical and historical analysis. Itoh's book is important in making the Uno approach more accessible to an English speaking readership by relating its perspective directly to the recent English language debates. Although Itoh revises and develops the Uno approach, particularly in his concern to give the theory a greater political and historical relevance, he retains the essential methodological and theoretical foundations of the Uno approach. While Itoh's contribution is of considerable interest in its own right, in this article I intend to focus on these foundations as the basis of a critique of Itoh's book. The methodological foundations of the Uno school lie in the radical sepa- ration of three levels of analysis.
    [Show full text]