DOCSLIB.ORG

Crown Copyright Catalogue Reference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

(c) crown copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/23/63 Image Reference:0004 (THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S gMT ) oECRST.- CO M J:?o. / CABINET 4(50) eting of the Cabinet to be Held at No,10, Downing Street, S.W.1., on Wednesday, 22nd January, 1930, at 10,0 a.o. 1. PQRBIfiN AFFAIRS . If required. 2 ' ^VAL^CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME, 1029,* (To be raised by the Prime Minister) . 3. SINGAPORE BABE * MALAY STATES CONTRIBUTION. Memorandum by the First Lord of the Admiralty. (CP. 20(30) - circulated herewith) . 4. UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY.. Memorandum by the Lord Privy Seal. (CP.21 (30) - Circulated herewith) TO TAKE NO 12! OF;­ 5 * SPEECH TO BE ISLIYIERED. BY THE GOVERNOR. GENERAL OF INDIA AT THE OPENING OF THE INDIAN LEGISLATURE ON 25TH JANUARY/ 1930.. Memorandum by the Secretary Q.f State for India. (CP, 19(50) - Circulated herewith) C PRIVATE MEMBERS' BILLS. Friday,,, .24th January... 1. Blasphemy Laws (Am&v) 2nd Reading. (Mrk Thurtle (LA)] 3-, Ho using: 2nd Reading, (Sir R. G-ower (C)) FridajyVi 51st January^. 3. Cahal Boats: 2nd Reading. (Mr, Gosling (LA)) 4. Blind Persons: 2nd Reading. (Mr, Groves (LA)). (Sgd.) T* JONES, Deputy Secretary, Cabinet, I, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1, 20th January, 1930. (THIS-DOCUMEMT IS' THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY.' S GOVERNMENT) . S E C R B T. Copy No. /* CABINET 4(50). Meeting of the Cabinet held at 10, Downing Street, S.W.I. on Wednesday January 22nd, 1930, at 10 a,tn. PRESENT: - The Right Hon. J. Ramsay MacDonald, M.P., Prime Minister. (In the Chair The Right Hon The Right Hon. Philip Snowdeni M.P., Arthur Henderson, M.P., Chancellor of the Secretary of fitate for Exche qn er. Foreign Affairs. The Right; Hon. The Right Hon. J.H. Thomas, M.P., Lord Passfield, Secretary Lord Privy Seal. of State for Dominion Affairs and Secretary of State for the Colonies. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. Lord Parmoor of Frleth, Lord Sankey, G.B.E.., K.C.V.O., K.C., Lord Lord Chancellor. President of the Council. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. J.R. Clynes, M.P., W. Wedgwood Benn, D.S.O.,. Secretary of State for D.F.C., M.P., Secretary of Home Affairs. State for India. The Right Hon.. Brig,-Gen, The Right Hon. Tom Shaw, C.B.E., M.P*, Lord Thomson, C.B.E., D.S.O. Secretary of State for Secretary of State for War. Air. The Right Hon. The Right, Hon. Arthur Greenwood, M.P., Margaret Bondfield, M.P., Minister of Health. Minister 4f Labour. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. Noel Buxton, M.P., Sir Charles Trevelyan, BT-, Minister of Agriculture M.P., President of the and Fisheries.. Board of Education. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. William Graham, M.P., A.V. Alexander, M.P., President of the Board First Lord of the of Trade. Admiralty. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. William Adamson, M.P.., George Lansbury, M. F., Secretary of State for First Commissioner of Scotland , Works. Sir .M.P...A. Hanker, G..C..B., G.C.M..G. * * * * . ,.....Secretary. CABINET 1. The Prime Minister said, he hoped to be able to BUSINESS Cabinet DURING THE NAVAL CON- k-eep in touch with/business during the progress of PERENCE. the London Naval Conference, but he asked the (Previous Chancellor of the Exchequer to assist him by keeping Reference: Cabinet 1 ­ a close watch on the business in general. (SO), Con­ elusion^.) -1­ 2* The Prime Minister reported that he had received a letter from the First. Lord of the Admiralty, dated January 15, 1930, enclosing a Memorandum from the First Sea Lord setting forth the views of the Naval Lords of the Admiralty which they were anxious the Prime Minister should have before him In connection with the decision to be taken on the Navy Estimates for 1930. Extracts from the Memorandum were read to the Cabinet. The Cabinet took note of the letter and Memorandum, which it was decided should be attached as an Appendix to these Conclusions. THE SINGAPORE 3. The Cabinet had before them a Memorandum by the NAVAL BASE. — First Lord of the Admiralty (Paper CP.-20 (30)) on The Malay States' Contribution. the subject of the Malay States' contribution to the cost of the Singapore Naval Base. In this Memorandum (Previ cue Reference: it was pointed out that if the payment of the contri­ Cabinet 47 (29), Con­ bution during the next ten weeks, as proposed by the elusion 7.) High Commissioner for the Malay States, cannot be counted on, a supplementary Estimate for the Navy would be necessary. The deficit would have to be explained as resulting from the loss of the Malay money, and an embarrassing Debate on Singapore in the middle of the Naval Conference would probably result. On the other hand, a discussion in Malaya as to whether the consideration for the contribution has failed or no is only slightly less undesirable. The Memorandum contained the suggestion that a further telegram should be sent to the High Commissioner from the Colonial Office to the following effect:­ "Have referred your telegram of 1st January to His Majesty's Government, who think position cannot be fully understood. No decision has been taken affecting scope of scheme or date of completion. The precautionary slowing down of work pending Naval Conference can have no effect on that date. Decision to withhold contribution, therefore, appears premature unless it is precautionary on supposition that money would be lost in the event of results of Naval Conference leading to entire change of policy regarding Base. On this I am to assure you that His Majesty's Govern­ ment recognise that if scheme were abandoned or altered fundamentally contributions would have to be refunded or adjusted as mighrbe mutually agreed. In those circumstances it is thought no question of consultation ttith Rulers or Federal Council about present payment need arise. In opinion of His Majesty's Government it would be very undesirable for such a discussion on Base to arise in Malaya while Naval Conference is sitting and still more undesirable to have Parlia­ mentary Debate here as would be unavoidable if contribution actually budgeted for is not received" . -3­ After a short discussion the Cabinet agreed - That the Secretary of State for the Colonies should send a telegram to the High Commissioner of the Federated Malay States on the lines proposed by the Admiralty, accompanied, at his discretion, by a private tele­ gram . UNEMPLOYMENT 4. The Cabinet had before them a Memorandum by POLICY. the Lord Privy Seal (Paper CP.-21 (30)) on the (Previous subject of a speech he recently made at Manchester Reference: Cabinet 3 in which, after describing the general Unemployment (30), Con­ cltision 5.) Policy of the Government, he made an announcement as to the readiness of the City to consider sympathet­ ically the proposals that may be put forward for assisting the re-organisation of industry on sound lines. The Memorandum also contained particulars of the action the Lord Privy Seal is taking to follow up this pronouncement, and concluded by a statement that in certain quarters the over-riding cause of the rather sombre outlook in Employment is the fear that the Eudget may be an unfavourable one. The Lord Privy Seal informed the Cabinet that since circulating his Memorandum he had been in touch with the Presidents of the principal Banks, four out of five of whom were supporting his policy. He communicated the names of a very strong Committee of Bankers which had been set up and which would assist him on the financial side, as well as of an equally strong Committee on the industrial side. Both Committees would meet twice a week. The Prime Minister instructed the Secretary to keep the Lord Privy Seal*s Memorandum on the Agenda, with a view to a discussion as soon as convenient. INDIA. 5. The Cabinet had before them the following Situation in. documents relating to the situation in India:- A Memorandum by the Secretary of State (Previous for India (Paper CP.-18 (30)) circu­ Reference: lating for the information of his Cabinet 3 colleagues a copy of a telegram from (30), Con­ the Government of India summarising elusion 7.) the political situation which "results from the meeting of the All-India National Congress held at Lahore at the end of December, and outlining the policy which they recommend should be pursued to deal with the violent move­ ments revolutionary activities and campaign of civil disobedience which they apprehend may result? also a copy of the reply which, after consult­ ing the Lord Chancellor and the President of the Board of Education, and obtaining the approval of the Prime Minister, the Secretary of State had despatched to the Government of India on the 17th January; as well as private telegrams to the Viceroy: A Memorandum by the Secretary of State for India (Paper CP,-19 (30)) covering a copy of a speech to be delivered by the Governor-General of India on the 25th January, 1930, at the formal opening of the Indian Legislature, together with certain alterations which the Secretary of State had suggested. In this connec­ tlon the Secretary of State informed his colleagues that all his proposed amend­ ments had now been accepted by the Viceroy: A Memorandum by the Secretary of State for India (Paper CP.-22 (30)) on the subject of the reaction of the Indian political situation on Indian Government securities, including the draft of a reply on the subject to a letter received froix Mr H.W.Holloway, of which a copy was also enclosed.
Recommended publications
  • Note to Users

    Note to Users

    NOTE TO USERS Page(s) not included in the original manuscript are unavailable from the author or university. The manuscript was microfilmed as received. This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI The Labour Party, the Labour Movement, Zionism and Jewish Identity during the 1920's and 1930's Deborah M. Osmond Submitted in partial fulfdlmerit of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 1999 O Copyright by Deborah M. Osmond, 1999 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, nie Wellington ottawaON KlAW OctawaON K1A üN4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive Licence aiiowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. This thesis is dedicated to Sarah Eugenia OstrovsS, 1 908- 1998 Contents Abstract ........................................... vi Glossary .......................................... vii Introduction ......................................
  • In the Name of Socialism: Zionism and European Social Democracy in the Inter-War Years

    In the Name of Socialism: Zionism and European Social Democracy in the Inter-War Years

    In the Name of Socialism: Zionism and European Social Democracy in the Inter-War Years PAUL KELEMEN* Summary: Since 1917, the European social democratic movement has given fulsome support to Zionism. The article examines the ideological basis on which Zionism and, in particular, Labour Zionism gained, from 1917, the backing of social democratic parties and prominent socialists. It argues that Labour Zionism's appeal to socialists derived from the notion of "positive colonialism". In the 1930s, as the number of Jewish refugees from Nazi persecution increased considerably, social democratic pro-Zionism also came to be sustained by the fear that the resettlement of Jews in Europe would strengthen anti-Semitism and the extreme right. The social democratic movement was an important source of political support for the setting up of a Jewish state in Palestine. Yet its attitude to Zionism has been noted mostly en passant in works tracing the socialist, and in particular the Marxist, interpretations of the Jewish question.1 The lack of attention accorded to this issue stems partly from the pre-1914 socialist theoreticians themselves, most of whom considered Zionism, simultaneously, as a diversion from the class struggle and a peripheral issue. In the inter-war years, however, prominent socialists, individual social democratic parties and their collective organizations established a tradition of pro-Zionism. The aim, here, is to trace the ideas and political factors which shaped this tradition. Before World War I, sympathy for Zionism in the socialist movement was confined to its fringe: articles favourable to Jewish nationalism appeared, from 1908, in Sozialistische Monatshefte, a journal edited by Joseph Bloch and influential on the revisionist right wing of the German Social Democratic Party.2 Bloch's belief that the sense of national com- munity transcended class interest as a historical force, accorded with interpreting the Jewish question in national rather than class terms.
  • The Labour Party Is More Than the Shadow Cabinet, and Corbyn Must Learn to Engage with It

    The Labour Party Is More Than the Shadow Cabinet, and Corbyn Must Learn to Engage with It

    The Labour Party is more than the shadow cabinet, and Corbyn must learn to engage with it blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-labour-party-is-more-than-the-shadow-cabinet/ 1/11/2016 The three-day reshuffle of the shadow cabinet might have helped Jeremy Corbyn stamp his mark on the party but he needs to do more to ensure his leadership lasts, writes Eunice Goes. She explains the Labour leader must engage with all groups that have historically made up the party, while his rhetoric should focus more on policies that resonate with the public. Doing so will require a stronger vision of what he means by ‘new politics’ and, crucially, a better communications strategy. By Westminster standards Labour’s shadow cabinet reshuffle was ‘shambolic’ and had the key ingredients of a ‘pantomime’. At least, it was in those terms that it was described by a large number of Labour politicians and Westminster watchers. It certainly wasn’t slick, or edifying. Taking the best of a week to complete a modest shadow cabinet reshuffle was revealing of the limited authority the leader Jeremy Corbyn has over the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Against the wishes of the Labour leader, the Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn and the Shadow Chief Whip Rosie Winterton kept their posts. However, Corbyn was able to assert his authority in other ways. He moved the pro-Trident Maria Eagle from Defence and appointed the anti-Trident Emily Thornberry to the post. He also imposed some ground rules on Hillary Benn and got rid of Michael Dugher and Pat McFadden on the grounds of disloyalty.
  • The Identification of Radicals in the British Parliament

    The Identification of Radicals in the British Parliament

    1 HANSEN 0001 040227 名城論叢 2004年３月 31 THE IDENTIFICATION OF ‘RADICALS’ IN THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT, 1906-1914 P.HANSEN INTRODUCTION This article aims to identify the existence of a little known group of minority opinion in British society during the Edwardian Age. It is an attempt to define who the British Radicals were in the parliaments during the years immediately preceding the Great War. Though some were particularly interested in the foreign policy matters of the time,it must be borne in mind that most confined their energies to promoting the Liberal campaign for domestic welfare issues. Those considered or contemporaneously labelled as ‘Radicals’held ‘leftwing’views, being politically somewhat just left of centre. They were not revolutionaries or communists. They wanted change through reforms carried out in a democratic manner. Their failure to carry out changes on a significant scale was a major reason for the decline of the Liberals,and the rise and ultimate success of the Labour Party. Indeed, following the First World War, many Radicals defected from the Liberal Party to join Labour. With regard to historiography,it can be stated that the activities of British Radicals from the turn of the century to the outbreak of the First World War were the subject of interest to the most famous British historian of the second half of the 20century, A. J. P. Taylor. He wrote of them in his work The Troublemakers based on his Ford Lectures of 1956. By the early 1970s’A.J.A.Morris had established a reputation in the field with his book Radicalism Against War, 1906-1914 (1972),and a further publication of which he was editor,Edwardian Radical- ism 1900-1914 (1974).
  • Radical Nostalgia, Progressive Patriotism and Labour's 'English Problem'

    Radical Nostalgia, Progressive Patriotism and Labour's 'English Problem'

    Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour©s ©English problem© Article (Accepted Version) Robinson, Emily (2016) Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem'. Political Studies Review, 14 (3). pp. 378-387. ISSN 1478-9299 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61679/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Author’s Post-Print Copy Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem' Emily Robinson, University of Sussex ABSTRACT ‘Progressive patriots’ have long argued that Englishness can form the basis of a transformative political project, whether based on an historic tradition of resistance to state power or an open and cosmopolitan identity.
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J

    Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J

    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
  • The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin

    The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin

    THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND ZIONISM: 1917 - 1947 FRED LENNIS LEPKIN BA., University of British Columbia, 196 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ Fred Lepkin 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1986 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name : Fred Lennis Lepkin Degree: M. A. Title of thesis: The British Labour Party and Zionism, - Examining Committee: J. I. Little, Chairman Allan B. CudhgK&n, ior Supervisor . 5- - John Spagnolo, ~upervis&y6mmittee Willig Cleveland, Supepiso$y Committee -Lenard J. Cohen, External Examiner, Associate Professor, Political Science Dept.,' Simon Fraser University Date Approved: August 11, 1986 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917 - 1947.
  • The Theological Socialism of the Labour Church

    The Theological Socialism of the Labour Church

    ‘SO PECULIARLY ITS OWN’ THE THEOLOGICAL SOCIALISM OF THE LABOUR CHURCH by NEIL WHARRIER JOHNSON A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham May 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The thesis argues that the most distinctive feature of the Labour Church was Theological Socialism. For its founder, John Trevor, Theological Socialism was the literal Religion of Socialism, a post-Christian prophecy announcing the dawn of a new utopian era explained in terms of the Kingdom of God on earth; for members of the Labour Church, who are referred to throughout the thesis as Theological Socialists, Theological Socialism was an inclusive message about God working through the Labour movement. By focussing on Theological Socialism the thesis challenges the historiography and reappraises the significance of the Labour
  • The Labour Party and the Idea of Citizenship, C. 193 1-1951

    The Labour Party and the Idea of Citizenship, C. 193 1-1951

    The Labour Party and the Idea of Citizenship, c. 193 1-1951 ABIGAIL LOUISA BEACH University College London Thesis presented for the degree of PhD University of London June 1996 I. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the development and articulation of ideas of citizenship by the Labour Party and its sympathizers in academia and the professions. Setting this analysis within the context of key policy debates the study explores how ideas of citizenship shaped critiques of the relationships between central government and local government, voluntary groups and the individual. Present historiographical orthodoxy has skewed our understanding of Labour's attitude to society and the state, overemphasising the collectivist nature and centralising intentions of the Labour party, while underplaying other important ideological trends within the party. In particular, historical analyses which stress the party's commitment from the 1930s to achieving the transition to socialism through a strategy of planning, (of industrial development, production, investment, and so on), have generally concluded that the party based its programme on a centralised, expert-driven state, with control removed from the grasp of the ordinary people. The re-evaluation developed here questions this analysis and, fundamentally, seeks to loosen the almost overwhelming concentration on the mechanisms chosen by the Labour for the implementation of policy. It focuses instead on the discussion of ideas that lay behind these policies and points to the variety of opinions on the meaning and implications of social and economic planning that surfaced in the mid-twentieth century Labour party. In particular, it reveals considerable interest in the development of an active and participatory citizenship among socialist thinkers and politicians, themes which have hitherto largely been seen as missing elements in the ideas of the interwar and immediate postwar Labour party.
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
  • The Following Telegram Was Sent Today by Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister

    The Following Telegram Was Sent Today by Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister

    . No. 1. MR. ARTHUR GREENWOOD'S MESSAGE TO SEAMEN'S UNION. The following telegram was sent today by Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister Without Portfolio, to a meeting of the National Union of Seamen at Brighton!- Deeply regret unable to be with you today. I pay my tribute to the magnificent courage and fortitude of the Mercantile Marine. I feel confident that it will continue to play its full part in the grim struggle on which we are engaged. There is a grave call to-day to all our people to gird themselves for a mighty effort in order that victory shall be swift and sure,. 1REASURY.. 1 1 J'·l O J'\ !- • nu1lJ _ .r I..J E: -''J. ]·~ l'··T l J\j·- -o • 726 ,, _._ ___ ..._ ~-- - ------- The Air Ministry regrets to ~nnounce the following cauuulties on vari ous aates:- KILLED_J_~ACTION. ADAMS 27100 Flying Officer w.s.c. BEAUMONT 5521J,.L~3 Aircraf tmo.n 2nd Class O.Ro CI-IARL E '110 N 628854 Aircrnftman 1st Class R .. ECHLIN 77117 Pilot Officer R.W.H. JOHNSON 39533 Flying Officer N. PICKARD 539009 Aircro.ftman 1st Class J.G. ROONEY 541-i-996 Loading Aircraftman J. SKELTON 29147 Fli ght Lieutenant G.F.A. VAGG 70825 Pilot Officer E.A. WEBB 4315Ll, Pilot Officer H.G. WOLSTENHO LME 5801-i-46 Sergeant D. HAITHWAITE 524167 Sergeant N. HAYES 580893 Sergeant J.F. HORRIGAN 39525 Flying Officer OoGo WHITLEY 632190 Aircraftrnnn 2nd Class C.C. 1!1/0UNDED OR INJURED IN ACTION. BARRON 580276 Sergeant H.. J.
  • A History of Women in the Civil Service

    A History of Women in the Civil Service

    A History of Women in the UK Civil Service This paper draws heavily on research carried out by Bea Morgan when working with Home Office Women. She now works in DCMS where she can be emailed at [email protected] . Bea in turn acknowledges the support of her partner who passed on her love of history and gave Bea confidence in herself, and also the support of Home Office Women who allowed her time to carry out this research. The 1700s and Early 1800s The general view in this period was that women should remain passive and docile and in the home, where she would be treated as subordinate to men. Any woman away from the domestic sphere and not behaving in this way was considered to be unfeminine and therefore in moral danger. Women were considered to be not much more than children with decisions made for them by fathers; husbands and when a woman was in service, her employers. There were few opportunities open to women at the time and these would have been limited to; governess; needlework; mill industry; laundry and domestic service. All work required women to be unmarried except for factory or home working for the working classes. The title of Mrs for the cook in a large household was an honorary title. Work was not considered a possibility for middle class married women. In the lower classes, married women did work, of necessity, in the mills and factories or take in ‘home working’, which would include making matchboxes, needlework or laundry. Where women did work they were considered to be a cheap and flexible labour force.