DOCSLIB.ORG

The Influences of Prey, Predators and Habitat Variables on Drought-Affected Forest Preference in a Darling Range Endemic Skink

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Influences of Prey, Predators and Habitat Variables on Drought-Affected Forest Preference in a Darling Range Endemic Skink The influences of prey, predators and habitat variables on drought-affected forest preference in a Darling Range endemic skink Sean Andrew Smithies, BSc This thesis is presented for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Conservation and Wildlife Biology with Honours June 2016 School of Veterinary and Life Sciences Murdoch University i Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research or is appropriately acknowledged, and contains as its main content work, which has not been previously submitted for a degree at any tertiary educational institution Sean Andrew Smithies Date: 06/06/2016 ii Abstract Large-scale canopy collapse occurred within the northern jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest of southwest WA following a record hot and dry year/summer in 2010/11. The forest die-off had noted effects on the reptile communities. The endemic lizard Ctenotus delli (Scincidae) was recorded more frequently within drought-affected sites compared with adjacent apparently healthy intact regions. The present study investigated possible drivers for this apparent preference, quantifying: 1) leaf litter invertebrate assemblages and termite activity (prey influence); 2) predatory bird assemblages (predator influence); and 3) the effect of black and white disruptive markings on concealment of skinks in leaf litter (primary antipredatory response) between drought-affected and healthy sites. Leaf litter invertebrate assemblages did not differ across drought-affected and healthy sites, however, predatory bird assemblages varied significantly between drought-affected and healthy sites (P = 0.009) with greater numbers of predatory birds observed within healthy sites. Plasticine models of three variations (side-striped, back- striped, and plain) placed among various leaf litter densities revealed that side-striped models were attacked less severely (P =0.039) than back-striped models, although there were no differences in the total numbers of attacks recorded. Therefore, side-stripes (as found on C. delli) did not minimise detection but may increase survivorship. Further implementation of invertebrate trapping coupled with behavioural studies in avian predators across drought-affected and healthy sites may conclusively determine the selective pressures behind drought-affected site preferences of C. delli. iii Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge and thank my supervisors, family and friends for their contributions and support given throughout the course of the past year. A massive thank you extends out to my supervisors Associate Professor Trish Fleming, Dr Bill Bateman, Professor Giles Hardy and Dr Shannon Dundas for their advice and guidance given throughout the year. I am extremely grateful for all the time and interest that was invested in the project and all the assistance given in planning, the field, with statistics and writing. The constant support and reassurance provided by my supervisors throughout the year, especially when stress levels ran high, was greatly appreciated. Special acknowledgements extend out to: Dr Katinka Ruthrof and Emma Steel for showing me around the field sites. Josh Collard for assisting me in the field on multiple occasions, whether it be setting up or retrieving models or cameras, burying toilet rolls or collecting leaf litter. All my field assistants: Josh Collard, Hannah Ashbil, Michael Childs, Nicki Miglori, and Jack Banister. Everyone in “The Dungeon” and “Bat cave” for the constant support and for making such a friendly, positive workspace. Special thanks extend to Narelle, Nicki and Meg. Lastly, I would like to thanks my family and partner for their support. To Dr Lynne and Dr Hugh Smithies for all your assistance in the field, general feedback and support throughout the year. To Hannah Ashbil for your assistance in the moulding and painting of the plasticine models and help out in the field. Thank you all for being there for me iv throughout the year no matter what, and your constant support, especially during the most stressful times. Murdoch University approval for this study was attained from the fieldwork safety plan and Risk Assessment Murdoch Project (RAMP) form (RAMP0321). It was also approved by the Murdoch University ethics committee (RW2769/15). The Department of Agriculture and Food (DAFWA) were provided with a Notification Form – Licence to use animals for scientific purposes, scientific number (U6 2014-2016), scientific establishment name (Murdoch University). v Table of Contents Declaration ........................................................................................................................ ii Abstract ............................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. vi List of Tables.................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. ix Glossary ........................................................................................................................... xi 1 General Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Physiography, vegetation and climate ....................................................... 2 1.1.1 The southwest region of Western Australia .............................................. 2 1.1.2 The drought ............................................................................................... 5 1.2 Lizards of the northern jarrah forest and the study species: Ctenotus delli 7 1.3 Project Aims .............................................................................................. 9 2 Does drought influence the leaf litter invertebrate communities? ......................... 12 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 12 2.2 Methods ................................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................ 14 2.2.2 Leaf litter availability .............................................................................. 16 2.2.3 Leaf litter invertebrate surveys ................................................................ 16 2.2.4 Termite activity index.............................................................................. 17 2.2.5 Data analyses ........................................................................................... 18 2.3 Results ..................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Discussion................................................................................................ 23 2.4.1 Limitations of this study .......................................................................... 26 2.4.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 26 3 Does drought influence predatory bird communities?........................................... 28 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 28 3.2 Methods ................................................................................................... 31 3.2.1 Bird surveys ............................................................................................. 31 3.2.2 Data analyses ........................................................................................... 32 3.3 Results ..................................................................................................... 32 3.4 Discussion................................................................................................ 41 3.4.1 Limitations of this study .......................................................................... 45 3.4.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 46 4 Do body stripes on Ctenotus delli provide camouflage under different leaf litter conditions? .................................................................................................... 47 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 47 4.2 Methods ................................................................................................... 50 4.2.1 Plasticine models ..................................................................................... 51 4.2.2 Camera Traps........................................................................................... 52 4.2.3 Model placement ..................................................................................... 52 4.2.4 Scoring attacks......................................................................................... 53 4.2.5 Statistical analyses ................................................................................... 54 4.3 Results ..................................................................................................... 55 4.3.1 Whether models were attacked or not ....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogeny and Morphological
    Zootaxa 3390: 1–18 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular phylogeny and morphological revision of the Ctenotus labillardieri (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) species group and a new species of immediate conservation concern in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot GEOFFREY M. KAY & J. SCOTT KEOGH 1 Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Ctenotus is the largest and most diverse genus of skinks in Australia with at least 97 described species. We generated large mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data sets for 70 individuals representing all available species in the C. labillardieri species- group to produce the first comprehensive phylogeny for this clade. The widespread C. labillardieri was sampled extensively to provide the first detailed phylogeographic data set for a reptile in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot. We supplemented our molecular data with a comprehensive morphological dataset for the entire group, and together these data are used to revise the group and describe a new species. The morphologically highly variable species C. labillardieri comprises seven well-supported genetic clades that each occupy distinct geographic regions. The phylogeographic patterns observed in this taxon are consistent with studies of frogs, plants and invertebrates, adding strength to emerging biogeographic hypotheses in this iconic region. The species C. catenifer, C. youngsoni, and C. gemmula are well supported, and despite limited sampling both C. catenifer and C. gemmula show substantial genetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site
    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Kowari Monitoring in Sturts Stony Desert 2008
    Kowari Dasycercus byrnei Distribution Monitoring in Sturts Stony Desert, South Australia, Spring 2007 Peter Canty & Robert Brandle – Science & Conservation, SA Dept Environment & Heritage, 2008 For SA Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board i Contents Page Summary iii List of Figures, Photos and Tables iv Acknowledgments vi Project Aims 1 Methods 1 Results 8 Discussion 12 Conclusions 14 Recommendations 15 Bibliography 16 Appendices 17 1. The Kowari Habitat Assessment Datasheet 18 2. Satellite Images of Trapsites 19 3. Key Healthy Sand Mound Indicators 25 4. Other Mammal Species Likely to be Confused with Kowaris 43 5. Kowari Survey – Clifton Hills and Pandie Pandie Station December 2007 (Pedler & Read) 47 ii Summary: This paper reports on a presence/absence population status and distribution survey primarily for the Kowari (Dasycercus byrnei) in areas of known or likely habitat in Sturts Stony Desert, north-eastern South Australia. The survey was carried out between 27th August to 11th September 2007 on Mulka, Cowarie, Pandie Pandie, Innamincka and Cordillo Downs pastoral leases. The Kowari’s major habitat areas on Clifton Hills Pastoral Lease were not sampled as access was not approved by the property manager. Monitoring traplines followed typical Kowari survey standards with aluminium box/treadle traps (Elliott Type A) placed 100 metres apart on 10 kilometre long transects sampling ideal habitat over two trap-nights. The only variation from this standard was the pairing of traps at each station, one having bait specifically for Kowaris and other carnivorous species, the other baited for general sampling. Trapping was carried out at 6 locations over 12 nights with an approximate intensity of 400 trap-nights per sample.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 8. Location of Potential Nest Trees As Classified According to Hollow-Score
    Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 8. Location of potential nest trees as classified according to hollow-score. See Appendix 11 for four finer scale maps. BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 41 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 9. DBH profile of the potential black-cockatoo nesting trees surveyed. 4.3.1.1 Extrapolation of tree data The VSA areas presented in Table 7 were multiplied by the mean tree densities (Table 11) to estimate the total numbers of each (major) hollow-bearing tree species in the survey area. These values are presented in Table 13. Approximately 18 000 trees may support black-cockatoo nests within the entire survey area. Table 13. The estimated number of potential hollow-bearing trees (± SE) in the survey area. Note that not all VSAs were sampled. Vegetation and Substrate Jarrah Marri Wandoo Total Association > 500mm DBH > 500mm DBH >300mm DBH VSA 3. Marri-Jarrah woodland. 1664 ± 260 1366 ± 327 0 3030 ± 587 VSA 4. Marri-Jarrah woodland with little to no remnant 1702 ± 187 915 ± 46 0 2617 ± 233 understorey (e.g. grazed). VSA 5. Wandoo woodland (with 26 ± 26 1010 ± 616 2497 ± 700 3533 ± 1342 or without understorey). VSA 8. Paddocks with large 4535 ± 3354 3402 ± 1174 916 ± 916 8853 ± 5444 remnant trees. Overall 7927 ± 3827 6693 ± 2163 3413 ± 1616 18033 ± 7606 BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 42 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment 4.3.2 Foraging The distribution of foraging habitat is mapped for Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo and Forest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo in Figure 10 and Figure 11 respectively (with finer scale maps presented in Appendix 12 and Appendix 13 respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK
    Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK APRIL 2015 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Document Verification Project Title: MEELUP REGIONAL PARK Project Number: 5354 Project File Name: Meelup Regional Park Level 2 Fauna Survey v20150115 Revision Date Prepared by (name) Reviewed by (name) Approved by (name) DRAFT 27/03/15 Shane Priddle Nick Graham-Higgs Nick Graham-Higgs (SW Environmental) and Greg Harewood Final 17/04/15 Shane Priddle Shane Priddle Shane Priddle (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) nghenvironmental prints all documents on environmentally sustainable paper including paper made from bagasse (a by- product of sugar production) or recycled paper. nghenvironmental is a registered trading name of NGH Environmental Pty Ltd; ACN: 124 444 622. ABN: 31 124 444 622 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK CONTENTS LEVEL 2 FAUNA SURVEY .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)
    GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LIMITED GRUYERE PROJECT EPA REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT APPENDIX 5: LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEY OF THE GRUYERE GOLD PROJECT BOREFIELDS (HAREWOOD 2016) Gruyere EPA Ref Support Doc Final Rev 1.docx Fauna Assessment (Level 1) Gruyere Borefield Project Gold Road Resources Limited January 2016 Version 3 On behalf of: Gold Road Resources Limited C/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...............................................................................................1 3. RELEVANT LEGISTALATION ................................................................................2 4. METHODS...............................................................................................................3 4.1 POTENTIAL VETEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP SURVEY ............. 3 4.1.1 Database Searches.......................................................................................3 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................................3 4.1.3 Existing Publications .....................................................................................5 4.1.4 Fauna
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Animal Keepers Species List
    Revised NSW Native Animal Keepers’ Species List Draft © 2017 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290,
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 115–132 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.115-132 An annotated type catalogue of the dragon lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J. Ellis Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Western Australian Museum holds a vast collection of specimens representing a large portion of the 106 currently recognised taxa of dragon lizards (family Agamidae) known to occur across Australia. While the museum’s collection is dominated by Western Australian species, it also contains a selection of specimens from localities in other Australian states and a small selection from outside of Australia. Currently the museum’s collection contains 18,914 agamid specimens representing 89 of the 106 currently recognised taxa from across Australia and 27 from outside of Australia. This includes 824 type specimens representing 45 currently recognised taxa and three synonymised taxa, comprising 43 holotypes, three syntypes and 779 paratypes. Of the paratypes, a total of 43 specimens have been gifted to other collections, disposed or could not be located and are considered lost. An annotated catalogue is provided for all agamid type material currently and previously maintained in the herpetological collection of the Western Australian Museum. KEYWORDS: type specimens, holotype, syntype, paratype, dragon lizard, nomenclature. INTRODUCTION Australia was named by John Edward Gray in 1825, The Agamidae, commonly referred to as dragon Clamydosaurus kingii Gray, 1825 [now Chlamydosaurus lizards, comprises over 480 taxa worldwide, occurring kingii (Gray, 1825)].
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 KALAMUNDA LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Technical Report October 2020
    Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 City of Kalamunda Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan 2020 – 2030 2020 KALAMUNDA LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Technical Report October 2020 Prepared by Nam Natura Consulting 0 City of Kalamunda 852 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 Document Tracking Item Detail Project Name Review and update of the City of Kalamunda Local Biodiversity Strategy Client City of Kalamunda Prepared by Renata Zelinova Status Draft Technical Report Version 4 Number Last saved on Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between the City of Kalamunda and Nam Natura Consulting. The scope of services was defined in consultation with the client, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Nam Natura Consulting accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. 1 City of Kalamunda 853 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................... 4 1 INTRODUCTION – WHY HAVE A LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY? ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Abundances in Primary and Secondary Growths in Papua New Guinea: a Preliminary Assessment
    Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science Vol.3 (4):373-388, 2010 Research Article Bird abundances in primary and secondary growths in Papua New Guinea: a preliminary assessment Kateřina Tvardíková1 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ- 370 05 České Budějovice. Email: <[email protected] Abstract Papua New Guinea is the third largest remaining area of tropical forest after the Amazon and Congo basins. However, the growing intensity of large-scale slash-and-burn agriculture and logging call for conservation research to assess how local people´s traditional land-use practices result in conservation of local biodiversity, of which a species-rich and diverse component is the avian community. With this in mind, I conducted a preliminary survey of birds in small-scale secondary plots and in adjacent primary forest in Wanang Conservation Area in Papua New Guinea. I used mist-netting, point counts, and transect walks to compare the bird communities of 7-year-old secondary growth, and neighboring primary forest. The preliminary survey lasted 10 days and was conducted during the dry season (July) of 2008. I found no significant differences in summed bird abundances between forest types. However, species richness was higher in primary forest (98 species) than in secondary (78 species). The response of individual feeding guilds was also variable. Two habitats differed mainly in presence of canopy frugivores, which were more abundant (more than 80%) in primary than in secondary forests. A large difference (70%) was found also in understory and mid-story insectivores. Species occurring mainly in secondary forest were Hooded Butcherbird (Cracticus cassicus), Brown Oriole (Oriolus szalayi), and Helmeted Friarbird (Philemon buceroides).
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Biodiversity and Climate Change
    Australia’s Biodiversity and Climate Change A strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change A report to the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council commissioned by the Australian Government. Prepared by the Biodiversity and Climate Change Expert Advisory Group: Will Steffen, Andrew A Burbidge, Lesley Hughes, Roger Kitching, David Lindenmayer, Warren Musgrave, Mark Stafford Smith and Patricia A Werner © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN 978-1-921298-67-7 Published in pre-publication form as a non-printable PDF at www.climatechange.gov.au by the Department of Climate Change. It will be published in hard copy by CSIRO publishing. For more information please email [email protected] This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney-General's Department 3-5 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] Or online at: http://www.ag.gov.au Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. Citation The book should be cited as: Steffen W, Burbidge AA, Hughes L, Kitching R, Lindenmayer D, Musgrave W, Stafford Smith M and Werner PA (2009) Australia’s biodiversity and climate change: a strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]