DOCSLIB.ORG

SHELL OIL a Record of Environmental and Corporate Malfeasance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SHELL OIL a Record of Environmental and Corporate Malfeasance SHELL OIL A record of environmental and corporate malfeasance June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................3 BRAZEN DISREGARD FOR WORKER SAFETY................................................................................................................6 US Workforce Deaths and Labor Violations ...........................................................................................................6 International Workforce Deaths and Safety Concerns ...........................................................................................6 UK’s North Sea ....................................................................................................................................................7 Norway ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE RIGHTS OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES ......................................................................... 17 Ogoniland, Nigeria ............................................................................................................................................... 17 United States ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 Pre-Arranged Crude Oil Trades on NYS Exchange ........................................................................................... 20 Overstatement of Oil Reserves Caused International Scandal ........................................................................ 20 Underpaying US Royalties on Federal Lands ................................................................................................... 21 Price Gouging in Poor Neighborhoods in the United States ........................................................................... 21 WORLDWIDE RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONS ..................................................................................... 23 International Environmental Violations .............................................................................................................. 23 Ogoniland, Nigeria ........................................................................................................................................... 23 Canada ............................................................................................................................................................. 26 North Sea ......................................................................................................................................................... 28 Harris County, Texas ........................................................................................................................................ 29 Deep South ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 Puerto Rico ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 Western Washington State ............................................................................................................................. 30 Ridgewood, New Jersey ................................................................................................................................... 31 Riverside County, California ............................................................................................................................ 31 FINES, LAWSUITS AND PENALTIES ........................................................................................................................... 32 OSHA Violations – Washington State .................................................................................................................. 32 Exposing Employees to Fire, Explosion and Toxic Release Hazards ................................................................ 33 Failure to Appropriately Provide Safety Tools and Unsafe Working Conditions............................................. 33 Failure to Appropriately Train Employees ....................................................................................................... 34 Failure to Appropriately Test, Document and Implement Safety Measures .................................................. 35 OSHA Violations – California ............................................................................................................................... 37 1990s: Settling lawsuits, denying responsibility .................................................................................................. 40 SHELL UNPREPARED FOR POTENTIAL SPILLS IN AMERICA’S ARCTIC OCEAN .......................................................... 42 Limited Resources and No Proven Method to Clean Up Arctic Oil Spills ............................................................ 42 Shell Repeatedly Makes Unrealistic and Dubious Claims about Potential Arctic Drilling ................................... 44 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Shell Oil Company cannot be trusted to safely drill in the Arctic Ocean, an extreme yet delicate and irreplaceable American treasure. Behind the company’s slick public relations campaign is a disturbing history that cannot be ignored as they rush to drill in one of the country’s last wild frontiers. An examination of Shell’s operations around the world makes it clear that the company operates with a brazen disregard for the safety of its own workers, the needs of local communities both here in the United States and internationally, and the long-term impact of drilling on the environment. Instead of taking responsibility for its actions, Shell simply pays fines and settles lawsuits. It seems that Shell considers lawsuits and clean-up costs just part of doing business, consequences to be paid while avoiding substantive changes to its operations that might interfere with the company’s efforts to maximize its already immense profits. Brazen Disregard for Worker Safety BY THE NUMBERS Shell Oil has one of the worst safety records of any company operating in either the United States or the United #1 mortality rate of any large western company Kingdom, with high fatality rates and inadequate safety in the US in 2007 preparation and planning. i £1 Million ($1.5 million) paid in fines and legal United States. A review of 2007 data found that Shell had costs in the UK from 2005 to 2011 the highest mortality rate of any large western oil company in the United States. In Washington state, after a blast at 25 violations of safety rules over six years in UK Puget Sound refinery killed six workers in 1998, Shell Investigated 207 times from 2006 to 2008 -- claimed to clean up their act. However, a review of Shell’s more than any other oil company in the UK workforce safety and health record in Washington shows repeated problems with employees exposed to fire, Fined at least $141,450 by OSHA since 2002. explosions and toxic release hazards, and a lack of proper safety equipment and training. In California, a series of personal injuries to Shell and contract workers that included serious burns from hot slurry oil - show a brazen disregard for safety. International. Shell’s international operations have come under scrutiny as well. The company’s North Sea operations have one of the worst safety records of any oil company operating in the UK, violating safety rules 25 times from 2005 to 2011 and spending at least £1 million ($1.5 million)i in fines and legal costs. Shell’s irresponsibility led to at least two preventable deaths, and forced a safety consultant hired by the company to publicly state that unless improvements were made “another major accident is inevitable.” The consultant noted that the company’s operations in the North Sea encouraged “a behavior of non-compliance” with safety rules and regulations. The company’s UK operations were investigated 207 times from 2006 to 2008. The company’s inadequate international safety efforts were highlighted more recently in December 2010, when an accident at Shell’s Draugen well in Norway damaged the well’s valve tree and left it with only one barrier remaining to prevent an oil spill. Though Shell claimed that the incident was not “serious” or in need of further scrutiny, an investigation by the Norwegian Petroleum Safety Authority found a series of safety concerns, including inadequate management, risk assessment, well barriers, well 3 barrier sketches, well control and daily reporting of drilling and well activities, all of which led to what the agency termed a “major accident situation.” Shell followed a “quick-fix philosophy,” Ole-Johan Faret, spokesperson for Norway’s Petroleum Safety Authority, said in an interview. “It is very clear that this is not an appropriate way to plan.” ii Blatant Disregard for the Rights of Local Communities Shell has a long track record of human rights violations and corporate malfeasance, both internationally and domestically. Ogoniland, Nigeria. The best example of Shell’s blatant disregard for the rights of local communities and human dignity is in Ogoniland, Nigeria, where the company’s close and complicated relationship with the Nigerian police and military led to a wide range of human rights violations. In
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 I Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 i Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction CONTENTS ABOUT SHELL INTRODUCTION Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies employing 90,000 people in more than 80 i ABOUT SHELL countries. Our aim is to help meet the energy needs of 1 INTRODUCTION FROM THE CEO society in ways that are economically, environmentally and socially responsible. OUR APPROACH Upstream 2 BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FUTURE Upstream consists of two organisations, Upstream International and Upstream Americas. Upstream searches for and recovers oil 3 SD AND OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY and natural gas, extracts heavy oil from oil sands for conversion 4 SAFETY into synthetic crudes, liqueƂ es natural gas and produces synthetic oil products using gas-to-liquids technology. It often works in joint 5 COMMUNITIES ventures, including those with national oil companies. Upstream 6 CLIMATE CHANGE markets and trades natural gas and electricity in support of its business. Our wind power activities are part of Upstream. Upstream 8 ENVIRONMENT International co-ordinates sustainable development policies and 9 LIVING BY OUR PRINCIPLES social performance across Shell. Downstream OUR ACTIVITIES Downstream manufactures, supplies and markets oil products and 10 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION chemicals worldwide. Our Manufacturing and Supply businesses include reƂ neries, chemical plants and the supply and distribution 11 KEY PROJECTS of feedstocks and products. Marketing sells a range of products 12 DELIVERING ENERGY RESPONSIBLY including fuels, lubricants, bitumen and liqueƂ ed petroleum 12 Natural gas gas for home, transport and industrial use. Chemicals markets 15 The Arctic petrochemicals for industrial customers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Annual General Meeting and Proxy Statement 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report and Proxyand Statement 2021 Annual General Meeting Meeting General Annual 2021 Transocean Ltd. • 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT COMPENSATION REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ABOUT TRANSOCEAN LTD. Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters. In addition, Transocean is constructing two ultra-deepwater drillships. Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RIG. OUR GLOBAL MARKET PRESENCE Ultra-Deepwater 27 Harsh Environment 10 The symbols in the map above represent the company’s global market presence as of the February 12, 2021 Fleet Status Report. ABOUT THE COVER The front cover features two of our crewmembers onboard the Deepwater Conqueror in the Gulf of Mexico and was taken prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, our priorities remain keeping our employees, customers, contractors and their families healthy and safe, and delivering incident-free operations to our customers worldwide. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Any statements included in this Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding future market trends and results of operations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law.
    [Show full text]
  • Transocean Ltd. Provides Quarterly Fleet Status Report
    Transocean Ltd. Provides Quarterly Fleet Status Report STEINHAUSEN, Switzerland—February 12, 2021—Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) today issued a quarterly Fleet Status Report that provides the current status of, and contract information for, the company’s fleet of offshore drilling rigs. As of February 12, the company’s total backlog is approximately $7.8 billion. This quarter’s report includes the following updates: Deepwater Corcovado – Customer exercised a 680-day option in Brazil; Deepwater Mykonos – Customer exercised a 815-day option in Brazil; Development Driller III – Awarded a one-well contract extension in Trinidad; Development Driller III – Awarded a one-well contract, plus a one-well option in Trinidad; Transocean Norge – Awarded a one-well contract in Norway; Transocean Barents – Awarded a three-well contract in Norway; Paul B Loyd, Jr. – Awarded a 78-day contract extension in the U.K. North Sea; Dhirubhai Deepwater KG1– Customer exercised a seven-well option in India; and Deepwater Nautilus – Customer provided notice of termination of its drilling contract in Malaysia. Additionally, the company has retired the Leiv Eiriksson. The rig is classified as held for sale. The report can be accessed on the company’s website: www.deepwater.com. About Transocean Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of, 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Oil and Gas Challenges
    Order Code RL33212 Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Updated June 20, 2007 Robert Pirog Specialist in Energy Economics and Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Summary Russia is a major player in world energy markets. It has more proven natural gas reserves than any other country, is among the top ten in proven oil reserves, is the largest exporter of natural gas, the second largest oil exporter, and the third largest energy consumer. Energy exports have been a major driver of Russia’s economic growth over the last five years, as Russian oil production has risen strongly and world oil prices have been very high. This type of growth has made the Russian economy dependent on oil and natural gas exports and vulnerable to fluctuations in oil prices. The Russian government has moved to take control of the country’s energy supplies. It broke up the previously large energy company Yukos and acquired its main oil production subsidiary. The Duma voted to give Gazprom, the state- controlled natural gas monopoly the exclusive right to export natural gas; Russia moved to limit participation by foreign companies in oil and gas production and Gazprom gained majority control of the Sakhalin energy projects. Russia has agreed with Germany to supply Germany and, eventually, the UK by building a natural gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea, bypassing Ukraine and Poland. In late 2006 and early 2007, Russia cut off and/or threatened to cut off gas or oil supplies going to and/or through Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, and Belarus in the context of price and/or transit negotiations — actions that damaged its reputation as a reliable energy supplier.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Inference of Related Trading Between Two Securities: Detecting Pairs Trading, Merger Arbitrage, and Strategy Rules*
    Empirical inference of related trading between two securities: Detecting pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and strategy rules* Keith Godfrey The University of Western Australia Working paper: 5 September 2013 The traditional approach to studying pairs trading is to simulate profitability using ex-post historical prices. I study the actual trades reported anonymously in security pairs and build statistical inferences of related trading. The approach is based on the time differences between trades. It can distinguish intrinsically related securities from pseudo-random sets, find stocks involved in merger arbitrage in massive sets of paired index constituents, and infer dominant trading rules of mean reversion algorithms. Empirical inference of related trading can enable further studies into pairs trading, strategy rules, merger arbitrage, and insider trading. Keywords: Inferred trading, empirical inference, pairs trading, merger arbitrage. JEL Classification Codes: G00, G10, C10, C40, C60 The availability of intraday trading or “tick” data with time resolution of a millisecond or finer is opening many avenues of research into financial markets. Analysis of two or more streams of tick data concurrently is becoming increasingly important in the study of multiple-security trading including index tracking, pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and market-neutral strategies. One of the greatest challenges in empirical trading research is the anonymity of reported trades. Securities exchanges report the dates, times, prices, and volumes traded, without identifying the traders. In studies of a single security, this introduces uncertainty of whether each market order that caused a trade was the buy or sell order, and there are documented approaches of inference such as Lee and Ready (1991).
    [Show full text]
  • For Our Customers, Shareholders, Employees and Stakeholders
    for our customers, shareholders, employees and stakeholders 2005 Annual Report Creating Value In 2005, we continued to accelerate Celanese toward greater growth and profitability. We started the year with a successful initial public offering and ended 2005 as a leaner, faster and more agile company with strong business results. We also strengthened our leading global positions in key regions. Celanese’s combined net sales were $6.1 billion, up 22% from the previous year. As a global hybrid chemical company, we executed our strategy, grew our businesses and built on our track record of productivity and operational excellence. Our 9,300 associates delivered terrific results. Here are some of our more significant achievements in 2005: > Completed an initial public offering and, through the private equity sponsorship of The Blackstone Group, transformed our company from a German based company with a dual listing to a U.S. headquartered company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. > Acquired Acetex and Vinamul and began integration activities. > Made steady progress on our China strategy and announced plans to develop our Nanjing site into an integrated, chemical complex. > Restructured our Acetate Products segment and expanded its China ventures. > Continued to optimize our portfolio through divestitures of non-core applications or businesses. > Lowered our purchasing and underlying SG&A expenses through cost reductions and headquarters consolidation. > Received recognition for our improved performance with an upgrade from a credit rating agency. We have made tremendous progress and have identified a clear path to build on our success. Celanese has six key drivers to increase value: > Utilize our attractive, hybrid structure of basic and higher value-added downstream businesses to reduce cyclicality and provide more stable earnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal-Dutch-Shell-Fra-Oljemuseets-Årbok-2018.Pdf
    Nor sk oljemuseum årbok 201 7 Årboken er Norsk Oljemuseums viktigste, årlige publikasjon. Den tar for seg et bredt spekter av aktuelle tema knyttet til petroleumsnæringen og museets virksomhet. Artiklene er skrevet både av museets egne ansatte og eksterne bidragsytere. Museets årsmelding og regnskap er også å finne i årboken. Norsk Oljemuseumoljemuseum Årbokårbok 20172018 Royal Dutch/Shell av Trude Meland hell har drevet sin verdensomspennende En gryende globalisering Svirksomhet i over 100 år og har bygget opp en Det hele startet i 1833 da Marcus Samuel sr. av verdens mest kjente merkevarer. Royal Dutch/ åpnet en liten forretning i Londons East End Shell som i dag er et multinasjonalt selskap med hvor han handlet med antikviteter, rariteter, hovedkontor i Haag og forretningsadresse i konkylier og dekorative skjell. Skjell og konkylier London, startet som en allianse i 1907. Da slo det var på moten i det viktorianske Storbritannia, og nederlandske Royal Dutch Petroleum Company forretningen var lukrativ.2 og britiske The «Shell» Transport and Trading Company seg sammen. Dette er historien om Den vokste til et blomstrende import- og hvordan Royal Dutch/Shell Group vokste seg eksportfirma, og Samuel organiserte en toveis til å bli et av verdens største foretak, men også handel mellom Storbritannia og det fjerne østen. om de to som startet det – den ene fra Londons Tekstiler og maskiner til å bygge opp en industri østkant, jødisk opprinnelse og ambisiøs. Den gikk fra Storbritannia, og i retur kom ris, kull, andre nederlender, med en hang for detaljer og silke, kobber og porselen. Antall handelspartnere tall. Mennene var Marcus Samuel jr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wreck of the Exxon Valdez: a Case of Crisis Mismanagement
    THE WRECK OF THE EXXON VALDEZ: A CASE OF CRISIS MISMANAGEMENT by Sarah J. Clanton A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Communication Division of Communication UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT Stevens Point, Wisconsin January 1993 FORMD Report on Oral Defense of Thesis TITLE: __T_h_e_w_r_ec_k_o_f_t_h_e_E_x_x_o_n_v_a_ia_e_z_: _A_c_a_s_e_o_f_c_r_i_·s_i_· s_ Mismanagement AUTHOR: __s_a_r_a_h_J_._c_l_a_n_t_o_n _____________ Having heard an oral defense of the above thesis, the Advisory Committee: ~) Finds the defense of the thesis to be satisfactory and accepts the thesis as submitted, subject to the following recommendation(s), if any: __B) Finds the defense of the thesis to be unsatisfactory and recommends that the defense of the thesis be rescheduled contingent upon: Date: r;:1;;2.- 95' Committee: _....._~__· ___ /_. _....l/AA=--=-'- _ _____,._~_ _,, Advisor ~ J h/~C!.,)~ THE WRECK OF THE EXXON VALDEZ: A CASE OF CRISIS MISMANAGEMENT INDEX I. Introduction A. Exxon's lack of foresight and interest B. Discussion of corporate denial C. Discussion of Burkean theory of victimage D. Statement of hypothesis II. Burke and Freud -Theories of Denial and Scapegoating A. Symbolic interactionism B. Burke's theories of human interaction C. Vaillant's hierarchy D. Burke's hierarchy E. Criteria for a scapegoat F. Denial defined G. Denial of death III. Crisis Management-State of the Art A. Organizational vulnerability B. Necessity for preparation C. Landmark cases-Wisconsin Electric D. Golin Harris survey E. Exxon financial settlement F. Crisis management in higher education G. Rules of crisis management H. Tracing issues and content analysis I.
    [Show full text]
  • Enquest Announces the Appointment of Neil Mcculloch As Head of Its North Sea Business
    ENQUEST ANNOUNCES THE APPOINTMENT OF NEIL MCCULLOCH AS HEAD OF ITS NORTH SEA BUSINESS EnQuest PLC is pleased to announce the appointment of Neil McCulloch as President, North Sea, with effect from 1 April 2014. Neil has held a number of senior positions in the oil and gas sector, and joins EnQuest from international oil and gas company OMV AG, where he held the global role of Senior Vice President Production & Engineering. Prior to this, Neil spent 11 years with BG Group in a range of senior UK and international roles, most recently as Vice President & Asset General Manager, UK Upstream, with accountability for the delivery of BG’s UK North Sea business. Neil will succeed David Heslop, who retires from his role as Managing Director UKCS on 1 April 2014. Thereafter David will continue to support EnQuest in an advisory capacity or on special projects. Amjad Bseisu, Chief Executive of EnQuest said: “I am delighted to welcome Neil as head of our North Sea business. With his wealth of technical and management experience in the oil and gas industry and in the UK North Sea in particular, I am confident that Neil will be an excellent member of EnQuest’s senior management team and will make a valuable contribution to the growth and development of EnQuest over the coming years. “The Board and I would also like to express our sincere gratitude to David for his contribution to EnQuest in our formative years; his leadership, knowledge and experience have been key to many of EnQuest’s successes and achievements, and have helped us to build a world class organisation in Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCUSSION GROUP 1 on TURBOMACHINERY OPERATION and MAINTENANCE
    DISCUSSION GROUP 1 on TURBOMACHINERY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Charles R. (Charlie) Rutan, Coordinator, is an Engineering Fellow for Lyondell/Equistar Chemicals, LP, at the Chocolate Bayou Chemical Complex, in Alvin, Texas. Initially, he was a Project Engineer for Monsanto Company, then moved into equipment specification, installation, startup, and problem solving. After Monsanto, Mr. Rutan worked for Conoco Chemicals, DuPont, and Cain Chemicals. He was a Mechanical Area Maintenance Manager at the Chocolate Bayou facility prior to being promoted to his present position. Mr. Rutan received his B.S. degree from Texas Tech University (1973). He was appointed to the Texas Tech University Department of Mechanical Engineering Academy of Mechanical Engineers and is a member of the Turbomachinery Symposium Advisory Committee. He has been active in ASME, the Turbomachinery and the International Pump User’s Symposia, the Southern Gas Compression Conference, the Hydraulic Institute, and AIChE. Richard Beck, Coordinator, has been the Equipment Reliability Group Supervisor at Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, Cedar Bayou Plant, in Baytown, Texas, since 1990. He has been employed with Chevron since May 1980, primarily in the equipment inspection and machinery reliability fields. Mr. Beck serves as the team leader of the Chevron Phillips Chemical Machinery Best Practice team and is one of the implementation coordinators for a company-wide reliability software system. His previous Chevron assignments include work at the Pascagoula, Mississippi, refinery; the Belle Chasse, Louisiana, chemical plant; and the Maua, Brazil, chemical facility. Mr. Beck completed his undergraduate studies at Mississippi State University (Education, 1979) and taught high school mathematics prior to his career with Chevron.
    [Show full text]
  • Due Diligence and Stronger Preventative Measures
    1/5/2016 Dow Jones Risk & Compliance Dow Jones Risk & Compliance Date of Search : 05‐Jan‐2016 16:12:46 (05‐Jan‐2016 16:12:42 GMT) Profile ID Number: 1118594 Record Type: Entity Names Primary Name Name Suffix Royal Dutch Shell plc Also Known As Royal Dutch Shell Royal Dutch Shell PLC Country Details Country of Registration United Kingdom Addresses Address City State Zip Code Country URL Carel van Bylandtlaan 30 The Hague South Holland 2596 HR Netherlands Shell Centre London England SE1 7NA United Kingdom http://www.shell.com/ Dates Type Date of Registration 05‐Feb‐2002 Dow Jones Intelligent Indexing Industry Industry Name Crude Petroleum Extraction ID Number Types Type Number Company Identification No. 04366849 DUNS Number 407888804 National Tax No. NLOO47QOQQOB58 List References Name Since To Other Official Lists 04‐Nov‐ SEC ‐ Administrative Proceedings 2010 https://djrc.dowjones.com/EntityDetailsPrintPreview.aspx?PersonEntityId=QTMSOYRLnQLwzr0sJpkYw3qLJMB3fUJ9Hf+Z6n/xBJgEpVx+Loo=%20&Pr… 1/12 1/5/2016 Dow Jones Risk & Compliance GAO (US) Report on Exporters of Refined Petroleum Products to Iran Sep‐2010 GAO (US) Report on firms to have Engaged in Commercial Activities in 23‐Mar‐ 03‐Aug‐ Iran’s Energy Sector 2010 2011 New Jersey Report to the Legislature regarding Investments in Iran ‐ 01‐Mar‐ 03‐Mar‐ Prohibited List 2012 2014 Close Associates/Related Entities Name Type Relation Raízen Combustiveis SA Entity Asset A/S Dansk Shell Entity Subsidiary CRI Catalyst Company Belgium NV Entity Subsidiary Equilon Enterprises Limited Liability Entity Subsidiary Company Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij BV Entity Subsidiary Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation Entity Subsidiary Shell Australia Limited Entity Subsidiary Shell Bulgaria Single Person Joint Stock Entity Subsidiary Company Shell Canada Limited Entity Subsidiary Shell Compañía Argentina De Petróleo SA Entity Subsidiary Shell E&P Ireland Limited Entity Subsidiary Shell Eastern Petroleum (Private) Limited Entity Subsidiary Shell Energy North America (US) L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: 10-K (10-K)
    Section 1: 10-K (10-K) Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _________________________________________________________________________ Form 10-K þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Commission File Number) 001-32410 CELANESE CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Delaware 98-0420726 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 222 West Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 900N, Irving, TX 75039-5421 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (972) 443-4000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share New York Stock Exchange 3.250% Senior Notes due 2019 New York Stock Exchange 1.125% Senior Notes due 2023 New York Stock Exchange 1.250% Senior Notes due 2025 New York Stock Exchange 2.125% Senior Notes due 2027 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
    [Show full text]