Trilingualism and National Identity in England, from the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trilingualism and National Identity in England, from the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Fall 2015 Three Languages, One Nation: Trilingualism and National Identity in England, From the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century Christopher Anderson Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Christopher, "Three Languages, One Nation: Trilingualism and National Identity in England, From the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century" (2015). WWU Graduate School Collection. 449. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/449 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Three Languages, One Nation Trilingualism and National Identity in England, From the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century By Christopher Anderson Accepted in Partial Completion Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School Advisory Committee Chair, Dr. Peter Diehl Dr. Amanda Eurich Dr. Sean Murphy Master’s Thesis In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of this work, including but not limited to the right to use all or part of this work in future works, such as articles or books. Library users are granted permission for individual, research and non-commercial reproduction of this work for educational purposes only. Any further digital posting of this document requires specific permission from the author. Any copying or publication of this thesis for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, is not allowed without my written permission. Christopher Anderson November 12, 2015 Three Languages, One Nation Trilingualism and National Identity in England, From the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century A Thesis Present to The Faculty of Western Washington University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Christopher Anderson November 2015 Abstract The present study examines the question of pre-modern national identity and its association with language in medieval England from the mid-twelfth to early fourteenth century, particularly the use of language to express collective identity. In doing so, the use and meaning associated with the three languages of medieval England (English, French, and Latin) are explored through an interdisciplinary approach, using typical historical sources, while also drawing on primary and secondary source material from literary history. Chapter one looks at the changing and reshaping of English national identity following the Norman Conquest of 1066, focusing on assimilation and identity conflict from the mid-twelfth to the early thirteenth century. It concludes by illustrating the development of a collective English identity, the sense of which shared a commonality presented by writers in all three languages. In this chapter, each language is treated separately so as to examine the specific social, cultural, and political associations with the languages and how they inform on matters of identity formation and change over time. The second chapter focuses on the personal reign of Henry III and the baronial reforms and rebellions of the 1260s. Here, the questions of national identity and the meaning of being an Englishman are examined through primary sources written in all three languages of England. Through this, the chapter highlights a moment in the 1260s that represents the collectiveness of the English nation represented in terms of a shared commonality, primarily through a shared history, culture, and customs, but also through their shared English language. The third and final chapter explores changes to English national identity present in the three languages in the reign of Edward I (r. 1272-1307). During his reign, French and Latin writers increasingly expressed their English national identity through the “otherness” of the peoples that surrounded them: most important for this study the French, Welsh, and Scots. In comparison, English vernacular writers began to frame their own sense of English national identity by way of social division, represented by status and education. What is termed the “divided community” is examined through the reading of French and Latin chronicles that speak to the separation of the English people through imperialist conquests as the hallmark of national identity, and English vernacular sources which illustrate an internal separateness, one that is not new, but different from the division present after the Norman Conquest. Overall, the study highlights the discrepant experience of English national identity during the period and how the choice of using one language over the other two implied and actively emphasized different senses of English identity. iv Acknowledgements Every scholar accumulates a significant amount of indebtedness to those who have shaped, guided, and acted as inspiration for their work. This work, itself, is no exception, but it also warrants a particularly lengthy list of acknowledgements considering the amount of time I spent on this project and the journey I went through for its completion. Over the course of my research and writing I moved across the country, was given a life-changing medical diagnosis that significant inhibited my ability to work for months at a time, and tested the resolve and dedication of not only myself, but those who I relied on most directly for support and guidance. Firstly, I would like to extend my most sincere gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr. Peter Diehl, who perhaps has endured the worst of it with me. Not only did he prove to be an exceptional advisor and a much needed guide through the process, but also a great friend. Despite all of the setbacks we faced, his support was unwavering, and his dedication to my future as an academic proved to be absolute. From visiting me in the hospital, working with me from a distance, and spending countless hours on the phone discussing the ins and outs of my interests and the shape of the present work, Dr. Diehl exhibits an interest and sincerity with his students that is truly steadfast and enduring. The two members of my thesis committee also deserve recognition, not only for their help, but certainly for their patience. Dr. Sean Murphy served as a critical but necessary voice that challenged my conceptions and pushed me to engage with my work more deeply and thoughtfully. My only regret is that we could not have worked together more closely. Likewise, Dr. Amanda Eurich’s encouragement and support was always needed and much appreciated during the most trying aspect of my medical treatment. Several members of the faculty at Western Washington University also contributed to both the direction and completion of this thesis. I would like to thank the chair of the History Department Dr. Kevin Leonard, Dr. Steven Garfinkle, Dr. Roger Thompson and Dr. Johann Neem. For his years of help and guidance, I thank Dr. Leonard Helfgott who will continue to be an inspiration. I am also greatly indebted to my colleagues at Western Washington University, many of whom have moved on to PhD programs during the course of my work, but continued to provide feedback and support. First among them is Loren Cowdery, my academic sparring partner. Over the six years it took me to complete this work Mr. Cowdery acted as not only a voice of reason and criticism, but a voice of everlasting encouragement. I would also like to thank Christopher “Nof” Nofziger, Aaron George, and Cara Bertram. Lastly, I have a couple of more personal acknowledgements to make. Firstly, I would like to thank my father-in-law Dr. Richard Wakefield. While I certainly owe gratitude for his love and support, he reviewed and provided editorial feedback for a considerable amount of the present work. Perhaps my greatest gratitude goes to my wife Mary Wakefield. She has been my rock and my guiding light through the years of struggle, moments of uncertainty, and late nights in the study. Her eyes have been over every line of the study below, from which she has given me invaluable feedback and provided me with direction when I was convinced there was none. Her love and support saw me through perhaps the most challenge period of my life. The production of this piece of scholarship would have been impossible without her. There is an infinite amount of thanks. Clearly, brevity is not my forte, but I hope it suffices as I draw this to a conclusion to extend my most profound and sincere thanks to the countless individuals who have influenced and support me over the last six years. You all know who you are and have my undying love and appreciation. v Table
Recommended publications
  • Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One
    The Artios Home Companion Series Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One Teacher Overview AS FEUDALISM died out and people began demanding more rights, they naturally encountered opposition from rulers determined to retain their power. King John’s abuses of power stirred the people of England to the point of revolt, and he was at last forced to set his seal to the Magna Carta, a document which established rights for people of all classes and laid the foundation for modern government. Simon de Montfort followed this with the establishment of a council with representative members drawn from the local towns, which paved the way for the elected lawmaking bodies that democratic governments have today. Reading and Assignments In this unit, students will: Complete two lessons in which they will learn about the Magna Carta, and the barons’ wars against Henry III, journaling and answering discussion questions as they read. Define vocabulary words. Visit www.ArtiosHCS.com for additional resources. Leading Ideas Godly rulers are a blessing to the people. When one rules justly over men, ruling in the fear of God, he dawns on them like the morning light, like the sun shining forth on a cloudless morning, like rain that makes grass to sprout from the earth. — 2 Samuel 23:3-4 Seek godly leaders to represent you. Look for able men from all the people, men who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens. And let them judge the people at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Thomas Phd Thesis
    'WE HAVE NOTHING MORE VALUABLE IN OUR TREASURY': ROYAL MARRIAGE IN ENGLAND, 1154-1272 Elizabeth Thomas A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2001 This item is protected by original copyright Declarations (i) I, Elizabeth Thomas, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September, 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in September, 2005, the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2009. Date: Signature of candidate: (ii) I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date: Signature of supervisor: (iii) In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews we understand that we are giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby.
    [Show full text]
  • Ievgen A. Khvalkov European University Institute, Florence’ S the 14Th - 15Th Century Genoese Colonies on the Black Sea
    The Department of Medieval Studies of Central European University cordially invites you to the public lecture of the Faculty Research Seminar Ievgen A. Khvalkov European University Institute, Florence’ s The 14th - 15th Century Genoese Colonies on the Black Sea 17:30 p.m. on Wednesday, October 2, 2013 CEU–Faculty Tower #409 Budapest, V. Nádor u. 9. Self-portrait of notary Giacomo from Venice (ASV. NT. 733; notaio Iacobus quondam Guglielmi de Veneciis, capellanus ecclesie Sancti Simeoni) The thirteenth to fifteenth centuries were times of significant economic and social progress international long-distance trade. From its emergence around 1260s – 1270s and up to in the history of Europe. The development of industry and urban growth, the increasing role its fall to the Ottomans in 1475, the city was the main Genoese pivot in the area. This of trade and the increase in geographical knowledge resulted in an époque of Italian colonial resulted in the emergence of a mixed and cosmopolitan ethnic and cultural expansion. The Italian maritime republics, Genoa and Venice, became cradles of capitalism environment that gave birth to a new multicultural society comprising features and represent an early modern system of international long-distance trade. Besides being the characteristic of Western Europe, the Mediterranean area and the Near East as well as motherland of capitalism, Italy also introduced the phenomenon of colonialism into those of Central and Eastern Europe. The history of these societies and cultures may be European, and indeed world, history, since the patterns and models established by Italian regarded as one of the histories of unrealized potentials of intercultural exchange that colonialists later influenced the colonial experiences of other nations in the époque of Great began with the penetration of Italians to the Black Sea basin and stopped soon after the Geographic Discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • King George Iv
    KING GEORGE IV “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project King George IV HDT WHAT? INDEX KING GEORGE IV KING GEORGE IV 1283 King Edward I of England conquered Wales. DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. King George IV “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX KING GEORGE IV KING GEORGE IV 1701 The Act of Settlement declared that those royals who chose to get married with Roman Catholics were to become ineligible for the line of succession to the throne of England. ANTI-CATHOLICISM HDT WHAT? INDEX KING GEORGE IV KING GEORGE IV 1762 August 12, Thursday: George Augustus Frederick was born at St James’s Palace in London, the eldest son of King George III. At birth he automatically became Duke of Cornwall and Duke of Rothesay. He would become popularly known as “Prinny” because a few days later the infant would be anointed as Prince of Wales, Earl of Chester, and heir apparent to the British throne. George, the eldest son of George III, was born in 1762. George rebelled against his father’s strict discipline. At the age of eighteen he became involved with an actress, Mrs. Perdita Robinson. This was followed by a relationship with Lady Melbourne. The Prince of Wales also rebelled against his father’s political views. Whereas George III preferred Tory ministers, George, Prince of Wales, was friendly with the Whigs, Charles Fox and Richard Sheridan. In 1784 the Prince of Wales, met a fell in love with Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cymmrodorion Vol 25.Indd
    8 THE FAMILY OF L’ESTRANGE AND THE CONQUEST OF WALES1 The Rt Hon The Lord Crickhowell PC Abstract The L’Estrange family were important Marcher lords of Wales from the twelfth century to the Acts of Union in the sixteenth century. Originating in Brittany, the family made their home on the Welsh borders and were key landowners in Shropshire where they owned a number of castles including Knockin. This lecture looks at the service of several generations of the family to the English Crown in the thirteenth century, leading up to the death of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd in 1282. With its practice of intermarriage with noble Welsh families, the dynasty of L’Estrange exemplifies the hybrid nature of Marcher society in the Middle Ages. Two points by way of introduction: the first to explain that what follows is taken from my book, The Rivers Join.2 This was a family history written for the family. It describes how two rivers joined when Ann and I married. Among the earliest tributaries traced are those of my Prichard and Thomas ancestors in Wales at about the time of the Norman Conquest; and on my wife’s side the river representing the L’Estranges, rising in Brittany, flowing first through Norfolk and then roaring through the Marches to Wales with destructive force. My second point is to make clear that I will not repeat all the acknowledgements made in the book, except to say that I owe a huge debt of gratitude to the late Winston Guthrie Jones QC, the author of the paper which provided much of the material for this lecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Erin and Alban
    A READY REFERENCE SKETCH OF ERIN AND ALBAN WITH SOME ANNALS OF A BRANCH OF A WEST HIGHLAND FAMILY SARAH A. McCANDLESS CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. PART I CHAPTER I PRE-HISTORIC PEOPLE OF BRITAIN 1. The Stone Age--Periods 2. The Bronze Age 3. The Iron Age 4. The Turanians 5. The Aryans and Branches 6. The Celto CHAPTER II FIRST HISTORICAL MENTION OF BRITAIN 1. Greeks 2. Phoenicians 3. Romans CHAPTER III COLONIZATION PE}RIODS OF ERIN, TRADITIONS 1. British 2. Irish: 1. Partholon 2. Nemhidh 3. Firbolg 4. Tuatha de Danan 5. Miledh 6. Creuthnigh 7. Physical CharacteriEtics of the Colonists 8. Period of Ollaimh Fodhla n ·'· Cadroc's Tradition 10. Pictish Tradition CHAPTER IV ERIN FROM THE 5TH TO 15TH CENTURY 1. 5th to 8th, Christianity-Results 2. 9th to 12th, Danish Invasions :0. 12th. Tribes and Families 4. 1169-1175, Anglo-Norman Conquest 5. Condition under Anglo-Norman Rule CHAPTER V LEGENDARY HISTORY OF ALBAN 1. Irish sources 2. Nemedians in Alban 3. Firbolg and Tuatha de Danan 4. Milesians in Alban 5. Creuthnigh in Alban 6. Two Landmarks 7. Three pagan kings of Erin in Alban II CONTENTS CHAPTER VI AUTHENTIC HISTORY BEGINS 1. Battle of Ocha, 478 A. D. 2. Dalaradia, 498 A. D. 3. Connection between Erin and Alban CHAPTER VII ROMAN CAMPAIGNS IN BRITAIN (55 B.C.-410 A.D.) 1. Caesar's Campaigns, 54-55 B.C. 2. Agricola's Campaigns, 78-86 A.D. 3. Hadrian's Campaigns, 120 A.D. 4. Severus' Campaigns, 208 A.D. 5. State of Britain During 150 Years after SeveTus 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of the Catholic School Ethos Or Four Men in a Bateau
    THE AMERICAN COVENANT, CATHOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY AND EDUCATING FOR AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL ETHOS OR FOUR MEN IN A BATEAU A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ruth Joy August 2018 A dissertation written by Ruth Joy B.S., Kent State University, 1969 M.S., Kent State University, 2001 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Natasha Levinson _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Averil McClelland _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Catherine E. Hackney Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Foundations, Leadership and Kimberly S. Schimmel Administration ........................ _________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health and Human Services James C. Hannon ii JOY, RUTH, Ph.D., August 2018 Cultural Foundations ........................ of Education THE AMERICAN COVENANT, CATHOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY AND EDUCATING FOR AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL ETHOS. OR, FOUR MEN IN A BATEAU (213 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Natasha Levinson, Ph. D. Dozens of academic studies over the course of the past four or five decades have shown empirically that Catholic schools, according to a wide array of standards and measures, are the best schools at producing good American citizens. This dissertation proposes that this is so is partly because the schools are infused with the Catholic ethos (also called the Catholic Imagination or the Analogical Imagination) and its approach to the world in general. A large part of this ethos is based upon Catholic Anthropology, the Church’s teaching about the nature of the human person and his or her relationship to other people, to Society, to the State, and to God.
    [Show full text]
  • Purgatoire Saint Patrice, Short Metrical Chronicle, Fouke Le Fitz Waryn, and King Horn
    ROMANCES COPIED BY THE LUDLOW SCRIBE: PURGATOIRE SAINT PATRICE, SHORT METRICAL CHRONICLE, FOUKE LE FITZ WARYN, AND KING HORN A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Catherine A. Rock May 2008 Dissertation written by Catherine A. Rock B. A., University of Akron, 1981 B. A., University of Akron, 1982 B. M., University of Akron, 1982 M. I. B. S., University of South Carolina, 1988 M. A. Kent State University, 1991 M. A. Kent State University, 1998 Ph. D., Kent State University, 2008 Approved by ___________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Susanna Fein ___________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Don-John Dugas ___________________________________ Kristen Figg ___________________________________ David Raybin ___________________________________ Isolde Thyret Accepted by ___________________________________, Chair, Department of English Ronald J. Corthell ___________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Jerry Feezel ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………viii Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Significance of the Topic…………………………………………………..2 Survey of the State of the Field……………………………………………5 Manuscript Studies: 13th-14th C. England………………………...5 Scribal Studies: 13th-14th C. England……………………………13 The Ludlow Scribe of Harley 2253……………………………...19 British Library
    [Show full text]
  • Llywelyn the Last
    LLYWELYN THE LAST KEY STAGE 3 Medieval Wales was a place of warring kings who often met violent deaths, sometimes at the hands of members of their own family! These struggles were usually over local power and influence. All these rulers thought of themselves as Welsh, but their main concern was usually their own small kingdom (and staying alive long enough to help it flourish). The fortunes of these different Welsh kingdoms had risen and fallen over time, but in the thirteenth century the land of Gwynedd in north-west Wales became particularly powerful under the leadership of Llywelyn Fawr (‘Llywelyn the Great’). A skilled military leader, he defeated many rival Welsh rulers and at his death controlled much of Wales. Gwynedd’s power would reach its height, however, under Llywelyn Fawr’s grandson, Llywelyn ap Gruffudd (‘Llywelyn the Last’). Llywelyn ap Gruffudd conquered several Welsh kingdoms, and soon claimed to be ruler over the whole of Wales, calling himself ‘Prince of Wales’. Many Welsh leaders swore loyalty to Llywelyn and recognised his authority, although even now some Welsh lords opposed him. The troubles experienced by a weakened English crown at this time saw Henry III sign the Treaty of Montgomery in 1267 which recognised Llywelyn’s title as Prince of Wales and ensured it would be passed on to his successors. ‘Wales’ now had a leader and a hereditary office he could occupy. Llywelyn had squeezed concessions out of Henry III who was a relatively ineffective English king, but the next king, Edward, was a different prospect. Edward I came to the throne in 1272.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exploits of Two Dorset Knights at the Battle of Lewes and on the Fine Roll
    THE EXPLOITS OF TWO DORSET KNIGHTS AT THE BATTLE OF LEWES AND ON THE FINE ROLL By Huw Ridgeway [January 2012] It is always interesting to have independent confirmation of those who were present at the Battle of Lewes, May 14th 1264. The Chroniclers tend to be interested only in the great and good, the earls and barons. But what information can be gleaned about lesser men who participated in this historic battle, the knights? The Fine Roll for 1263-4 provides us with just that. On 21st July it records an extraordinary grant: two Dorset knights, Robert Fitz Payn and William de Goviz, were excused payment of relief as two-thirds co-heirs of the Dorset Baron Alfred (IV) of Lincoln ‘pro laudabili servicio que Regi impenderunt et pro dampnis que sustinuerunt in servicio Regis apud Lewes in conflictu ibidem’ ( for the praiseworthy service which they rendered to the king, and for the losses they sustained in the king’s service at Lewes in the battle there).1 Later on, the Fine Roll has more on other knights who took part in the battle: it records relief on Jewish debts for Walter Maureward who was with Roger de Huntingfield ‘at Lewes’ and a similar concession to Gervase de Bestenour whom John de la Haye, one of Montfort’s trustiest lieutenants, testified ‘ before the whole Council’ had been ‘at Lewes’.2 But it is the Dorset knights who are the focus of the present investigation. Who were they, and what had they done to merit such a notable concession, worth a handsome 50 marks (£33) each, a huge and welcome additional sum for men of their social circumstances? On the face of it, the case is simple enough: both had been summoned by the king in March 1264 to muster with his forces at Oxford prior to an onslaught on his Montfortian enemies in April.3 Both may well have fought for the king at Lewes and distinguished themselves in his service somehow in the battle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the Family, the Fief and the Feudal Monarchy*
    © K.S.B. Keats-Rohan 1991. Published Nottingham Mediaeval Studies 36 (1992), 42-78 The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the family, the fief and the feudal monarchy* In memoriam R.H.C.Davis 1. The Problem (i) the non-Norman Conquest Of all the available studies of the Norman Conquest none has been more than tangentially concerned with the fact, acknowledged by all, that the regional origin of those who participated in or benefited from that conquest was not exclusively Norman. The non-Norman element has generally been regarded as too small to warrant more than isolated comment. No more than a handful of Angevins and Poitevins remained to hold land in England from the new English king; only slightly greater was the number of Flemish mercenaries, while the presence of Germans and Danes can be counted in ones and twos. More striking is the existence of the fief of the count of Boulogne in eastern England. But it is the size of the Breton contingent that is generally agreed to be the most significant. Stenton devoted several illuminating pages of his English Feudalism to the Bretons, suggesting for them an importance which he was uncertain how to define.1 To be sure, isolated studies of these minority groups have appeared, such as that of George Beech on the Poitevins, or those of J.H.Round and more recently Michael Jones on the Bretons.2 But, invaluable as such studies undoubtedly are, they tend to achieve no more for their subjects than the status of feudal curiosities, because they detach their subjects from the wider question of just what was the nature of the post-1066 ruling class of which they formed an integral part.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative European Institutions and the Little Divergence, 1385-1800*
    n. 614 Nov 2019 ISSN: 0870-8541 Comparative European Institutions and the Little Divergence, 1385-1800* António Henriques 1;2 Nuno Palma 3;4;5 1 FEP-UP, School of Economics and Management, University of Porto 2 CEPESE, Centre for the Study of Population, Economics and Society 3 University of Manchester 4 ICS-UL, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon 5 CEPR, Centre for Economic Policy Research COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS AND THE LITTLE DIVERGENCE, 1385-1800 ? Ant´onioHenriques (Universidade do Porto and CEPESE) Nuno Palma (University of Manchester; Instituto de CiˆenciasSociais, Universidade de Lisboa; CEPR) Abstract Why did the countries which first benefited from access to the New World – Castile and Portugal – decline relative to their followers, especially England and the Nether- lands? The dominant narrative is that worse initial institutions at the time of the opening of Atlantic trade explain Iberian divergence. In this paper, we build a new dataset which allows for a comparison of institutional quality over time. We consider the frequency and nature of parliamentary meetings, the frequency and intensity of extraordinary taxation and coin debasement, and real interest spreads for public debt. We find no evidence that the political institutions of Iberia were worse until at least the English Civil War. Keywords: Atlantic Traders, New Institutional Economics, the Little Divergence JEL Codes: N13, N23, O10, P14, P16 ?We are grateful for comments from On´esimoAlmeida, Steve Broadberry, Dan Bogart, Leonor Costa, Chris Colvin, Leonor Freire Costa, Kara Dimitruk, Rui P. Esteves, Anton´ıFuri´o,Oded Galor, Avner Grief, Phillip Hoffman, Julian Hoppit, Saumitra Jha, Kivan¸cKaraman, Mark Koyama, Nuno Monteiro, Patrick K.
    [Show full text]