Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One The Artios Home Companion Series Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One Teacher Overview AS FEUDALISM died out and people began demanding more rights, they naturally encountered opposition from rulers determined to retain their power. King John’s abuses of power stirred the people of England to the point of revolt, and he was at last forced to set his seal to the Magna Carta, a document which established rights for people of all classes and laid the foundation for modern government. Simon de Montfort followed this with the establishment of a council with representative members drawn from the local towns, which paved the way for the elected lawmaking bodies that democratic governments have today. Reading and Assignments In this unit, students will: Complete two lessons in which they will learn about the Magna Carta, and the barons’ wars against Henry III, journaling and answering discussion questions as they read. Define vocabulary words. Visit www.ArtiosHCS.com for additional resources. Leading Ideas Godly rulers are a blessing to the people. When one rules justly over men, ruling in the fear of God, he dawns on them like the morning light, like the sun shining forth on a cloudless morning, like rain that makes grass to sprout from the earth. — 2 Samuel 23:3-4 Seek godly leaders to represent you. Look for able men from all the people, men who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens. And let them judge the people at all times. The 1225 version of the Magna Carta issued by Henry III of England — Exodus 18:21-22 Medieval to Renaissance: Middle School Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One Page 204 Vocabulary Key People, Places, and Lesson 1: Events interdict hallowed King John excommunicated deposed The Signing of the Magna Carta – 1215 fief expedition Great Council levied Henry III Simon de Montfort Lesson 2: Prince Edward calamity Engraved facsimile of the original text of the 1215 Magna Carta, surrounded by a series of 25 coats of hand-colored arms of the barons, panel at foot containing notes and a representation (hand-colored) of the remains of King John’s Great Seal, all panels surrounded by oak leaf and acorn borders Medieval to Renaissance: Middle School Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One Page 205 L e s s o n O n e History Overview and Assignments The Magna Carta “The Magna Carta established that the King’s power is restricted, and that he could be deposed if he disobeyed the laws it set forth. This great document established the rights of all the people, including churchmen, nobles, and townsmen. Since that day, the Charter has been repeatedly confirmed and now stands as part of the foundation of English law. Its principles are part of the constitution of every English-speaking nation.” – Samuel Bannister Harding Reading and Assignments Review the discussion questions and vocabulary, then read the article: King John and the Great Charter. Narrate about today’s reading using the appropriate notebook page. Be sure to answer the discussion questions and include key people, events, and dates within the narration. Define each vocabulary word in the context of the reading and put the word and its definition in the vocabulary section of your history notebook. Visit www.ArtiosHCS.com for additional resources. Vocabulary King John of England signing Magna Carta on June 15, 1215, interdict at Runnymede; colored wood engraving hallowed deposed fief Key People, Places, and Events expedition King John levied The Signing of the Magna Carta – 1215 excommunicated Great Council Medieval to Renaissance: Middle School Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One Page 206 Discussion Questions 1. Who had greatest right to the throne 6. What was John’s response to the nobles after the death of King Richard? Whom demand for a charter confirming their did King Richard recommend to the liberties? throne? 7. What did the contents of the Magna 2. Describe King John’s rule. Carta do for the people of England? 3. What eventually happened to Arthur? 8. What are the chief provisions of the 4. Describe the conflict between King John Magna Carta? and the Pope. 9. When King John died, who became King 5. How did the second great struggle of England? between the Pope and King John end? Adapted for Middle School from the book: The Story of England by Samuel Bannister Harding King John and the Great Charter Richard the Lion Heart’s younger bring about political liberty, and to make brother John, who had caused him so much such tyranny impossible for the future. trouble during his absence on the Crusade, First, you must know, within five years succeeded him as King of England and ruler John lost the greater part of England’s of the English possessions in France. possessions in France, including Another brother, named Geoffrey, who was Normandy, the homeland of William the older than John, had died, leaving a son, Conqueror. Arthur, who was now ten years old. Ever since the Norman dukes had ruled According to the rules which today govern England, the kings of France had seized the succession to crowns, Arthur had a every opportunity to stir up trouble in the better right to the throne than John had; but English royal family, in order to weaken the nobles of England, acting on Richard’s these powerful vassals of theirs. Philip recommendation, chose John, who was a Augustus now aided young Arthur in man of full age, in preference to Arthur, who attacking the French possessions of his was but a boy. uncle John. Also, John had injured one of Long before John’s reign was over, every his own vassals in Aquitaine, by seizing and class in the kingdom had cause to repent of carrying off his promised bride, whom John that choice, for King John proved to be one married; and this vassal carried his of the worst rulers that England ever had — grievance to King Philip. Philip summoned cruel, faithless, lazy, and reckless of John to appear before his court and defend everything save his own pleasure. Yet, his himself. When John refused, judgment was very wickedness and tyranny, by spurring given against him, and he was condemned all classes to resistance, helped much to to lose his possessions in France. The Medieval to Renaissance: Middle School Unit 16: England in the Middle Ages, Part One Page 207 judgment was strictly according to feudal The descendants of the conquering law; and with the law now on his side, King Normans and of the conquered English had Philip II set about conquering John’s fiefs. for many years been growing more and In the course of this war, young Arthur more alike, and more and more ready to act was captured and imprisoned by King John, together in all that concerned the kingdom. and soon mysteriously disappeared. There The people during the reigns of Henry II can be no doubt that he was put to death, and Richard had been allowed to carry on and ugly rumors whispered that John had their local governments according to done the wicked deed with his own hands. ancient custom. London, as well as many On every side John’s vassals and followers other towns, had received charters from the deserted him, and Philip made rapid gains. King which permitted them to manage their “Let him go on,” boasted John, while own affairs, and as a result the townsmen doing nothing to prevent this. “Whatever he had become self-reliant and interested in takes, I shall retake it in a single day.” public matters. This was easier said than done. At last Now that the Norman barons were the “Saucy Castle,” built by Richard with so obliged to give up their lands in France, they many pains and much expense, was taken, looked upon themselves as Englishmen. and all of Normandy passed into the hands Thus, when the loss of his Norman of the French. Most of Aquitaine, which lay possessions compelled the King to give his south of the river Loire, remained true to attention solely to England, he found the English rule — not because of any love for nobles and the common people ready to act John, but because the nobles dreaded to together for the interests of the whole lose their independent position if their country. lands were annexed to the French crown, Soon after John’s return to England, the and because of loyalty to John’s mother, Archbishop of Canterbury died, and for Eleanor, their old mistress. nearly eight years afterward John engaged in a great quarrel with the Pope over the filling of the vacancy. The monks of Canterbury had the right to choose the archbishop, but it had been the custom for the King to name the man whom the monks should elect. On this occasion the monks, without consulting John, elected one of their own number and sent him to Rome to be confirmed by the Pope. When John learned what had been done, he compelled the monks to elect Château Gaillard (“Saucy Castle”) another man, a favorite of his own, who also The loss of Normandy seemed to the went to Rome and appealed to the Pope. English people of that day a great disaster, After considering the matter for a year, the but we can see now that it was a good thing Pope declared that neither candidate had for England, as well as for France.
Recommended publications
  • Trilingualism and National Identity in England, from the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Fall 2015 Three Languages, One Nation: Trilingualism and National Identity in England, From the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century Christopher Anderson Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Christopher, "Three Languages, One Nation: Trilingualism and National Identity in England, From the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century" (2015). WWU Graduate School Collection. 449. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/449 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Three Languages, One Nation Trilingualism and National Identity in England, From the Mid-Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Century By Christopher Anderson Accepted in Partial Completion Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School Advisory Committee Chair, Dr. Peter Diehl Dr. Amanda Eurich Dr. Sean Murphy Master’s Thesis In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Thomas Phd Thesis
    'WE HAVE NOTHING MORE VALUABLE IN OUR TREASURY': ROYAL MARRIAGE IN ENGLAND, 1154-1272 Elizabeth Thomas A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2001 This item is protected by original copyright Declarations (i) I, Elizabeth Thomas, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September, 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in September, 2005, the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2009. Date: Signature of candidate: (ii) I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date: Signature of supervisor: (iii) In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews we understand that we are giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby.
    [Show full text]
  • •Œso Hard Was It to Release Princes Whom Fortuna Had Put In
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Iowa Research Online “So Hard was it to Release Princes whom Fortuna had put in her Chains:”1 Queens and Female Rulers as Hostage- and Captive-Takers and Holders Colleen Slater ostage- and captive-taking2 were fundamental processes in medieval warfare and medieval society in general. Despite this H importance, however, only recently have these practices received significant scholarly attention, and certain aspects of these customs have been overlooked; in particular, the relationship of women to these prac- tices, which has been explored by only one scholar, Yvonne Friedman.3 Friedman’s work on female captives, while illuminating, only focuses on women as passive victims of war; that is, as captives to be taken, sold, or traded. In fact, the idea that women could only be victims of hostage- and captive-taking is almost universally assumed in the scholarship. But some women from the highest echelons of medieval society figure in the story as a good deal more than passive victims. The sources are littered with examples that not only illuminate the importance of women and gender to the customs/practices associated with hostages and captives, but also how women used them to exercise power and independence militarily, politically, and socially. Able to take matters into their own hands, these women played the game of politics, ruled their own or their husbands’ lands, and participated in the active taking and holding of hostages and captives. Examining these women is essential not only for expanding our knowledge of the more general processes of hostage- and captive-taking and holding, but also for understanding how and why women were able (or unable) to navigate them.
    [Show full text]
  • Discoveries and Major Changes
    i DISCOVERIES AND MAJOR CHANGES Many important new discoveries and major changes are included in this book. For convenience sake, the most significant items are listed below, with reference to the individual accounts in which they are found in the text. Many of the items are the result of the author’s own research. A few discoveries are the product of joint efforts between the author and other researchers. In the case of Joan Hastings, the identification of her parentage has been provided by John Ravilious, of Maryland. Other contributions have been noted in the text. Two unique discoveries found in this book involve a Bohun aunt and niece, namely Eleanor de Bohun, wife of John de Verdun, and Margery de Bohun, wife of Thebaud de Verdun. Eleanor’s existence was previously known, but she had no identifiable descendants. New research indicates that Eleanor left a daughter, Maud de Verdun, wife of John de Grey, ancestors of the later Lords Grey of Ruthin and Wilton.1 As for Margery de Bohun, her husband is known to have owned a capital messuage at Bisley, Gloucestershire, which he held “in free marriage” of the Earl of Hereford. A contemporary medieval lawsuit has been located which indicates that Margery was the sister of Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of Hereford.2 A rare discovery was the marriage license of Margaret Mowbray, wife of Reginald Lucy, Knt., of Dallington, co. Northampton. The license reads as follows: "Kal. Jul. [1 July] 1369. At Heywod. To Reginald de Lucy, son of Sir Geoffrey de Lucy, and Margaret, daughter of Sir John de Moubrey, to be married in the chapel within Bretteby [Bretby] Castle [co.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • British Royal Ancestry Book 6, Kings of England from King Alfred the Great to Present Time
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY BRITISH ROYAL ANCESTRY, BOOK 6 Kings of England INTRODUCTION The British ancestry is very much a patchwork of various beginnings. Until King Alfred the Great established England various Kings ruled separate parts. In most cases the initial ruler came from the mainland. That time of the history is shrouded in myths, which turn into legends and subsequent into history. Alfred the Great (849-901) was a very learned man and studied all available past history and especially biblical information. He came up with the concept that he was the 72nd generation descendant of Adam and Eve. Moreover he was a 17th generation descendant of Woden (Odin). Proponents of one theory claim that he was the descendant of Noah’s son Sem (Shem) because he claimed to descend from Sceaf, a marooned man who came to Britain on a boat after a flood. (See the Biblical Ancestry and Early Mythology Ancestry books). The book British Mythical Royal Ancestry from King Brutus shows the mythical kings including Shakespeare’s King Lair. The lineages are from a common ancestor, Priam King of Troy. His one daughter Troana leads to us via Sceaf, the descendants from his other daughter Creusa lead to the British linage. No attempt has been made to connect these rulers with the historical ones. Before Alfred the Great formed a unified England several Royal Houses ruled the various parts. Not all of them have any clear lineages to the present times, i.e. our ancestors, but some do. I have collected information which shows these. They include; British Royal Ancestry Book 1, Legendary Kings from Brutus of Troy to including King Leir.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynastic Marriage in England, Castile and Aragon, 11Th – 16Th Centuries
    Dynastic Marriage in England, Castile and Aragon, 11th – 16th Centuries Lisa Joseph A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Masters of Philosophy The University of Adelaide Department of History February 2015 1 Contents Abstract 3 Statement of Originality 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 7 I. Literature Review: Dynastic Marriage 8 II. Literature Review: Anglo-Spanish Relations 12 III. English and Iberian Politics and Diplomacy, 14 – 15th Centuries 17 IV. Sources, Methodology and Outline 21 Chapter I: Dynastic Marriage in Aragon, Castile and England: 11th – 16th Centuries I. Dynastic Marriage as a Tool of Diplomacy 24 II. Arranging Dynastic Marriages 45 III. The Failure of Dynastic Marriage 50 Chapter II: The Marriages of Catherine of Aragon I. The Marriages of the Tudor and Trastámara Siblings 58 II. The Marriages of Catherine of Aragon and Arthur and Henry Tudor 69 Conclusion 81 Appendices: I. England 84 II. Castile 90 III. Aragon 96 Bibliography 102 2 Abstract Dynastic marriages were an important tool of diplomacy utilised by monarchs throughout medieval and early modern Europe. Despite this, no consensus has been reached among historians as to the reason for their continued use, with the notable exception of ensuring the production of a legitimate heir. This thesis will argue that the creation and maintenance of alliances was the most important motivating factor for English, Castilian and Aragonese monarchs. Territorial concerns, such as the protection and acquisition of lands, as well as attempts to secure peace between warring kingdoms, were also influential elements considered when arranging dynastic marriages. Other less common motives which were specific to individual marriages depended upon the political, economic, social and dynastic priorities of the time in which they were contracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Power in the Sources
    Reading Power in the Sources Student Research on Political Figures in the Thirteenth Century Edited by: J. Lucien D. Houle Cover Image courtesy of a Wikimedia Creative Commons License: ACA. Canc. Pergamins de Jaume I d'Aragó. n 935 d. Accessed March 28, 2018 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quia_super_limitibus_Cathalonie_et_Aragonum.jpg. 2018, University of Florida Institutional Resources, Gainesville, FL. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or sold without prior written permission of the editor, except that the authors retain all rights to their work. For my parents and parents-in-law, David and Cathy Houle, Jo Ann Alderman, and George Alderman. Table of Contents Introduction 1 J. Lucien D. Houle Isabella of England: the Forgotten Diplomat 3 Errol Nelson Blanche of Castile and the Role of the Queen-Regent 11 Madeline Fine Religion and Family: Louis IX and Rulership in Medieval Europe 18 Kelly Northcraft Richard Marshall: Political and Social Ideology 24 Cameron Rough Pope Gregory IX Enforces Conformity in Medieval Western Europe 30 Lainey Williams 1 Introduction J. Lucien D. Houle When Thomas Bisson, one of the foremost scholars in the field of medieval lordship, wrote about medieval power and politics, he mused about how the study of this kind of history changed from one generation to the next. Between the time of his parents’ generation and that of his own, historians who were concerned with power began to recognize the importance of women and started to ask questions about regular people, not just kings. His awakening came when he read the primary sources themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Ancestors of the Chicago Rodger's
    \ t11- r;$1,--ff" :fi-',v--q-: o**-o* *-^ "n*o"q "I-- 'Ita^!cad$l r.rt.H ls $urq1 uodi uoFour) puE au^l ete)S d-- u.uicnv ls 000'988'Z: I reJo+ uodn oi*cflaN llrprPa srE " 'sauepuno8 laqlo n =-^-Jtos,or lluunspue0NvrulsflnHlu0N -'- 'NVeU0nvt! 0twr0t ---" """ 'salrepuno8 rluno3 i ,- e s(llv1st leNNVtrc sr3tm3 a^nPnsu upr aqt 3'NVEI -__-,,sau?puno6leuorlPL.arLt ] tsF s!-d: ' 6@I Si' Wales and England of Map 508 409 8597 409 508 pue puel0L rrsl'19N9 salen om [email protected] -uv*t' please contact David Anderson at: Anderson David contact please 1,N For additional information, additional For + N 'r'oo"' lojr!rB "tA^ .*eq\M ""t \uir - s ,s *'E?#'lj:::",,X. ."i",i"eg"'. Wo, r rii': Fl?",:ll.jl,r ,s *,,^ . l"lfl"'" 1SVo! s.p, ;eG-li? ol.$q .:'N" avl r'/ !',u l.ltll:,wa1 H'. P " o r l\);t; !ff " -oNv P-9 . \ . ouorrufq 6 s 'dM .ip!que3 /,.Eer,oild.,.r-ore' uot-"'j SIMOd ) .,,i^.0'"i'"'.=-1- 4.1 ...;:,':J f UIHS i";,.i*,.relq*r -l'au8.rs.rd1'* tlodtiod * 1- /I!!orq8,u! l&l'p4.8 .tr' \ Q '-' \ +lr1: -/;la-i*iotls +p^ .) fl:Byl''uo$!eH l''",,ili"l,"f \ ,uoppor .q3norcq.trrv i ao3!ptDj A rarre;'a\ RUPqpuou^M. L,.rled. diulMoo / ) n r".c14!k " *'!,*j ! 8il5 ^ris!€i<6l-;"qrlds qteqsu uiraoos' \u,.".',"u","on". ' \. J$Pru2rl 3rEleril. I ubFu isiS. i'i. ,,./ rurHSNtoiNll AM-l' r- 'utqlnx i optow tstuuqlt'" %,.-^,r1, ;i^ d;l;:"f vgs "".'P"r;""; --i'j *;;3,1;5lt:r*t*:*:::* HTVON *",3 r.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelso Abbey Timeline
    Kelso Abbey Timeline British Monarchy Historical Events Scottish Monarchy Kelso and the Environs English Monarchy 1153 David succeeded by his 1128 grandson Malcolm IV who Monks moved to Kelso soon after confirmed the just across the river abbey’s charter from David’s Royal Alexander I Burgh of Roxburgh 1107-1124 1178 William I Arbroath Abbey David I Henry II “the Lion” founded by monks 1100 1124-1153 1154-1189 1165-1214 from Kelso 1200 Henry I Stephen Malcolm IV Richard I 1100-1135 1135-1154 1153-1165 “Lion Heart” C 1170 1189-1199 Abbot John travelled to 1138 Rome and was David I intervened in the civil awarded right 1113 1124 1152 John war in England - defeated at of abbots to Prince David, Earl of David succeeded David’s only son 1199-1216 the Battle of the Standard wear mitre Cumbria brought monks his brother Henry buried from Tiron to Selkirk Alexander as before high altar King of Scotland of Kelso Abbey 1175 1191 William the Lion, captured Abbey of Lindores in battle did homage to founded by monks Henry II - later bought it from Kelso back from Richard I Kelso Abbey Timeline British Monarchy Historical Events Scottish Monarchy Kelso and the Environs English Monarchy 1295 King John signed alliance with France against England - the “Auld Alliance” 1263 1214 Battle of Largs 1290 recovered Hebrides Abbot Henry attended Abbot Richard of Kelso for Scotland General Church Council supported claim of John in Rome Balliol to Scottish throne 1215 Alexander III 1286 King John of England 1249-1286 Accidental death 1200 signed the Magna Carta
    [Show full text]
  • Download Free At
    People, texts and artefacts Cultural transmission in the medieval Norman worlds People, texts and artefacts Cultural transmission in the medieval Norman worlds Edited by David Bates, Edoardo D’Angelo and Elisabeth van Houts LONDON INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Published by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WCE HU First published in print in (ISBN ----) is book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives . International (CC BY- NCND .) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN ---- (PDF edition) DOI: ./. Contents Editors’ preface vii List of contributors ix List of plates and gures xiii Abbreviations xv Introduction 1 David Bates and Elisabeth van Houts . Harness pendants and the rise of armory 17 John Baker . e transmission of medical culture in the Norman worlds c.1050–c.1250 47 Elma Brenner . Towards a critical edition of Petrus de Ebulo’s De Balneis Puteolanis: new hypotheses 65 Teolo De Angelis . A Latin school in the Norman principality of Antioch 77 Edoardo D’Angelo 5. Culti e agiograe d’età normanna in Italia meridionale 89 Amalia Galdi . e landscape of Anglo-Norman England: chronology and cultural transmission 105 Robert Liddiard . e medieval archives of the abbey of S. Trinità, Cava 127 G. A. Loud . Écrire la conquête: une comparaison des récits de Guillaume de Poitiers et de Georoi Malaterra 153 Marie-Agnès Lucas-Avenel . Bede’s legacy in William of Malmesbury and Henry of Huntingdon 171 Alheydis Plassmann v People, texts and artefacts: cultural transmission in the medieval Norman worlds .
    [Show full text]
  • WOMEN, HOSTAGESHIP, CAPTIVITY, and SOCIETY in the ANGLO-FRENCH WORLD, C. 1000- C.1300
    ‘VIRILE STRENGTH IN A FEMININE BREAST:’ WOMEN, HOSTAGESHIP, CAPTIVITY, AND SOCIETY IN THE ANGLO-FRENCH WORLD, c. 1000- c.1300 A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Colleen Elizabeth Slater August 2009 © 2009 Colleen Elizabeth Slater ‘VIRILE STRENGTH IN A FEMININE BREAST:’ WOMEN, HOSTAGESHIP, CAPTIVITY, AND SOCIETY IN THE ANGLO-FRENCH WORLD, c. 1000- c.1300 Colleen Elizabeth Slater, Ph. D. Cornell University 2009 Hostage and captive-taking were fundamental to medieval warfare and medieval society in general. Despite their importance, however, until recently, these practices have received very little scholarly attention. In particular, the relationship between gender and these practices has been virtually ignored. The evidence, however, belies this neglect, and the sources are littered with examples that not only illuminate the importance of women and gender to these customs, but also how women used them to exercise power and independence militarily, politically, socially, and religiously. Moreover, women worked within a patriarchal society that was often deeply distrustful of their participation in hostage and captive situations in any capacity. This thesis attempts to fill the gaps in the scholarship and illuminate the importance of considering gender when examining hostage- and captiveship. It pulls together evidence from a wide variety of historical and literary sources to suggest that women were not only victims of these processes as hostages and captives themselves, but were also active participants in them as hostage and captive takers, ransomers, and holders. Moreover, they were sometimes but not always accepted in such roles.
    [Show full text]