DOCSLIB.ORG

Opening Canadian Communications to the World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opening Canadian Communications to the World HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA OPENING CANADIAN COMMUNICATIONS TO THE WORLD Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Walt Lastewka, M.P. Chair April 2003 The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 OPENING CANADIAN COMMUNICATIONS TO THE WORLD Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Walt Lastewka, M.P. Chair April 2003 STANDING COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CHAIR Walt Lastewka, M.P. St. Catharines, Ontario VICE-CHAIRS Dan McTeague, M.P. Pickering―Ajax―Uxbridge, Ontario James Rajotte, M.P. Edmonton Southwest, Alberta MEMBERS André Bachand, M.P. Richmond—Arthabaska, Québec Larry Bagnell, M.P. Yukon, Yukon Paul Crête, M.P. Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup— Témiscouata—Les Basques, Québec Brian Fitzpatrick, M.P. Prince Albert, Saskatchewan Cheryl Gallant, M.P. Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, Ontario Jocelyne Girard-Bujold, M.P. Jonquière, Québec Serge Marcil, M.P. Beauharnois―Salaberry, Québec Brian Masse, M.P. Windsor West, Ontario The Hon. Gilbert Normand, M.P. Bellechasse—Etchemins— Montmagny—L’Islet, Québec Andy Savoy, M.P. Tobique―Mactaquac, New Brunswick Brent St. Denis, M.P. Algoma—Manitoulin, Ontario Paddy Torsney, M.P. Burlington, Ontario Joseph Volpe, M.P. Eglinton—Lawrence, Ontario CLERK OF THE COMMITTEE Jean-François Pagé FROM THE RESEARCH BRANCH OF THE LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Lalita Acharya, Analyst Geoffrey Kieley, Analyst Daniel Shaw, Analyst iii THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY has the honour to present its THIRD REPORT Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology proceeded to a study on the Foreign Investment Restrictions Applicable to Telecommunications Common Carriers. After hearing evidence, the Committee agreed to report to the House as follows: v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAIR’S FOREWORD .................................................................................................ix TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND BROADCASTING LANDSCAPE IN CANADA ........xi LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ xiii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: FOREIGN OWNERSHIP RULES AND RATIONALE ............................. 5 The Foreign Ownership Policy Decision and the Telecommunications Act ............. 5 Canada and the World............................................................................................. 7 The ABT and WTO Negotiations ............................................................................. 9 CHAPTER 2: FOREIGN OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS AND INVESTMENT: IS THERE A CONNECTION? ............................................................................... 11 Foreign Ownership Restrictions and Foreign Direct Investment............................ 12 A The Statistical Evidence .............................................................................. 12 B. The Anecdotal Evidence.............................................................................. 14 Cost of Capital and Financial Stability ................................................................... 18 Investment, Industry Structure, Legislative Framework and the Regulatory Environment........................................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC POLICY OBJECTIVES AND INSTRUMENTS: A BALANCED APPROACH .................................................................................. 27 Policy Objectives and Options ............................................................................... 27 Status Quo: Canadian Control............................................................................... 27 Canadian Majority Ownership: The 51%/49% Rule .............................................. 29 Incumbent Provider Restrictions: Tiering .............................................................. 30 Licensing with “Public Interest” Conditions: The Discretionary Approach.............. 32 No Foreign Ownership Restrictions: The Free Entry Approach ............................. 34 Objectives and Instruments: Striking a Balance .................................................... 36 CHAPTER 4: THE CHANGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS LANDSCAPE AND CONVERGENCE................................................................................................... 39 The Canadian Telecommunications Landscape.................................................... 40 New Entrants and Access to New Technologies and Services.............................. 41 Universal Access to Services................................................................................. 42 vii The Internet and Broadband Access ..................................................................... 43 Convergence and Broadcasting Distribution Undertakings.................................... 46 Canadian Content and the Role of the CRTC ....................................................... 51 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 55 APPENDIX 1: GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY TERMS ............................................................................................... 57 APPENDIX 2: MAJOR EVENTS IN CANADIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS............. 65 APPENDIX 3: QUESTIONS ON THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS .................................................................................................... 67 APPENDIX 4: SUMMARY OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS IN OTHER OECD COUNTRIES................................................................................. 69 APPENDIX 5: LIST OF WITNESSES ........................................................................ 73 REQUEST FOR GOVERNMENT RESPONSE........................................................... 77 DISSENTING OPINIONS BLOC QUÉBÉCOIS .............................................................................................. 79 NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY ................................................................................ 83 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS................................................................................... 87 viii CHAIR’S FOREWORD Canada’s economic structure is changing rapidly as the country becomes part of the global knowledge-based, networked economy. Since this economy depends heavily on the efficient communication of information, a modern telecommunications infrastructure and a robust telecommunications sector are essential to Canada’s economic success. In recent years, advances in information and communications technologies (ICTs) and the diffusion of ICTs throughout the economy have increased the efficiency of industry and boosted productivity growth in many industrialized nations, including Canada. Much of the growth in ICT markets is attributable to the telecommunications sector, an industry in which Canada is a world-leader. Expansion and innovation in the telecommunications services sector do not come cheaply; large amounts of capital are required to finance new and enhanced infrastructure. Accessing sufficient levels of high-risk capital on Canada’s domestic markets has proven difficult. Attracting foreign capital is, therefore, vital for expansion of the telecommunications sector in Canada. Canada’s restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) applicable to telecommunications common carriers are intended to ensure that there is a balance between encouraging investment in the sector, and maintaining Canada’s sovereignty policy objectives. Concerns have been raised, however, that these restrictions are limiting the telecommunications sector’s access to capital and acting as a barrier to innovation and growth in the sector. In response to these concerns, and in the interests of maintaining a modern and competitive telecommunications sector, the Minister of Industry recently called for a review of the FDI restrictions applicable to telecommunications common carriers. The call for such a review also forms part of the federal government’s efforts, as presented in its Canada’s Innovation Strategy, to improve Canada’s regulatory environment in order to promote innovation. In response to the Minister’s request, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology immediately undertook an intensive study of the issue of FDI restrictions applicable to telecommunications common carriers, and heard a wide range of views on this and related issues. The Committee believes that implementing the recommendations contained in this report will help to improve investment and innovation in the Canadian telecommunications sector, provide better services to consumers, and achieve the government’s telecommunications policy goals. I would like to thank the individuals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    News Release For immediate release (All figures are in Cdn$, unless otherwise indicated) BCE REPORTS 2004 YEAR-END AND FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS Montréal, Québec, February 2, 2005 — For the full year 2004 BCE Inc. (TSX, NYSE: BCE) reported revenue of $19.2 billion, up 2.4 per cent and EBITDA1 of $7.6 billion, an increase of 2.1 per cent over the full year 2003. For the fourth quarter of 2004, the company reported revenue of $5.0 billion, up 3.5 per cent, and EBITDA of $1.8 billion, down 0.9 per cent when compared to the same period last year. In 2004, before restructuring BCE achieved its free cash flow2 target of approximately $1 billion and earnings per share (EPS)3 of $2.02 which was up 6.3 per cent. “The past year was important for BCE as we laid the foundation to position Bell Canada for a new era of communications,” said Michael Sabia, President and Chief Executive Officer of BCE Inc. “We delivered on our key strategic initiatives and met our guidance for financial performance in 2004. Overall, our progress in the year gives us confidence in the forward momentum of the company as outlined at our annual investor conference in mid- December.” The company’s performance in 2004 and the outlook for 2005 and beyond were among the factors that led BCE in December to increase its common share annual dividend by $0.12, or 10 per cent. In the fourth quarter, the company’s revenue growth rate continued to improve. The quarter saw continued subscriber growth in wireless, video and DSL.
    [Show full text]
  • GASOLINE PRICES in CANADA Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA GASOLINE PRICES IN CANADA Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Walt Lastewka, M.P. Chair November 2003 The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 GASOLINE PRICES IN CANADA Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Walt Lastewka, M.P. Chair November 2003 STANDING COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CHAIR Walt Lastewka, M.P. St. Catharines, Ontario VICE-CHAIRS Dan McTeague, M.P. Pickering―Ajax―Uxbridge, Ontario James Rajotte, M.P. Edmonton Southwest, Alberta MEMBERS André Bachand, M.P. Richmond—Arthabaska, Québec Larry Bagnell, M.P. Yukon, Yukon Paul Crête, M.P. Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup— Témiscouata—Les Basques, Québec Brian Fitzpatrick, M.P. Prince Albert, Saskatchewan Cheryl Gallant, M.P. Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, Ontario Jocelyne Girard-Bujold, M.P. Jonquière, Québec Serge Marcil, M.P. Beauharnois―Salaberry, Québec Brian Masse, M.P. Windsor West, Ontario The Hon. Gilbert Normand, M.P. Bellechasse—Etchemins— Montmagny—L’Islet, Québec Andy Savoy, M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..170 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 182 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 3, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 11161 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 3, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. We must, however, take care not to go to the opposite extreme and enact legislation with potential negative impact on the rights and freedoms of those we wish to protect, under the guise of fighting Prayers terrorism. We do not have to go far back in time to recall the late unlamented Bill C-42, so criticized for its negative effects on Ï (1010) fundamental rights and freedoms. [English] At the time, the government was busy boasting right and left of BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE what an ardent promoter of public security it was, rejecting the criticisms that were being made from this side of the House. Now The Deputy Speaker: It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order here we are again, starting off a new debate on a similar bill, 81 to inform the House that the motion to be considered Monday although a few changes have been made. during consideration of the business of supply is as follows: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should cease and desist its Why are we having this new debate? Simply because the public, sustained legislative and political attacks on the lives and livelihoods of rural Canadians and the communities where they live.
    [Show full text]
  • A Canadian Perspective on the International Film Festival
    NEGOTIATING VALUE: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL by Diane Louise Burgess M.A., University ofBritish Columbia, 2000 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the School ofCommunication © Diane Louise Burgess 2008 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or by other means, without permission ofthe author. APPROVAL NAME Diane Louise Burgess DEGREE PhD TITLE OF DISSERTATION: Negotiating Value: A Canadian Perspective on the International Film Festival EXAMINING COMMITTEE: CHAIR: Barry Truax, Professor Catherine Murray Senior Supervisor Professor, School of Communication Zoe Druick Supervisor Associate Professor, School of Communication Alison Beale Supervisor Professor, School of Communication Stuart Poyntz, Internal Examiner Assistant Professor, School of Communication Charles R Acland, Professor, Communication Studies Concordia University DATE: September 18, 2008 11 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection (currently available to the public at the "Institutional Repository" link of the SFU Library website <www.lib.sfu.ca> at: <http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/112>) and, without changing the content, to translate the thesis/project or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..156 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 112 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 5, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 6883 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, June 5, 2003 The House met at 10 a.m. national security. As parliamentarians, we have a duty to the people of Canada to represent, to serve and to debate. As a minister I have a responsibility to inform and that is my purpose here today. Prayers We live in a world still scarred by the events of September 11, 2001. Since then, the world and Canada have taken great strides to enhance security. Terrorist networks have been disrupted, but they ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS are still capable of striking. The attacks in Bali, Saudi Arabia and Morocco are proof of this. That is why it is more important than ever Ï (1005) to ensure we do whatever we can to protect Canadians, our countries, [English] and our friends from the threat of terrorism. That is why it is as INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS important to understand what is going on halfway around the world as it is to understand what is happening in Canada. The Speaker: I have the honour to lay upon the table the report of the Canadian parliamentary delegation concerning its visit to Morocco and Egypt from April 13 to 23, 2003. Canada is not immune from the threat of terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan September 2001 to December 2002
    FIRST DRAFT - FOR REVIEW ACTION PLAN SEPTEMBER 2001 TO DECEMBER 2002 PRESENTED TO THE COALITION TO RENEW CANADA'S INFRASTRUCTURE (CRCI) Montréal, February 7, 2004 CURRENT GGA CONTRACT The stated current objective by the Coalition to Renew Canada's Infrastructure (CRCI) (TRIP/CANADA) to GGA Communications Inc. (GGA) is to secure federal investment into Canada's National Highway System by way of a National Highway Program. The current contract pays GGA a $7,500/month retainer fee, and runs from June to September 2001. All related expenses are included in this monthly retainer. The contract can be terminated by either party providing a one month notice of termination. For this retainer fee, the CRCI receives the following services: ! General government relations assistance. ! Access to Québec-based cabinet ministers, members of Parliament (MPs) and Senator not contacted or easily accessed before. ! Coordination and execution of a MPs meeting blitz. This blitz will target Québec based MPs at first, followed by MPs in Ontario. GGA will coordinate the attendance of local contractors, issue a news release and coordinate any other necessary details with CRCI and member associations. The CRCI has experienced success with cabinet ministers and MPs outside Québec. However, when appropriate, GGA will assist in making contact with MPs and ministers outside of Québec. ! Access to key political staff and people of influence in both circle of friends of the Prime Minister as well as the Federal Minister of Finance. ! Media relations assistance. GGA has provided the resources of Mr. Jean-René Gagnon, Senior Vice-President & Partner, Mr. Pablo Rodriguez, Vice-President & Partner and Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    News Release BCE Reaches Definitive Agreement to be Acquired By Investor Group Led by Teachers, Providence and Madison BCE Board Recommends Shareholders Accept C$42.75 (US$40.13) Per Share Offer • Offer is 40% premium over “undisturbed share price” • Closing targeted for first quarter, 2008 MONTREAL, Quebec, June 30, 2007 – BCE (TSX/NYSE: BCE) today announced that the company has entered into a definitive agreement for BCE to be acquired by an investor group led by Teachers Private Capital, the private investment arm of the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan, Providence Equity Partners Inc. and Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC. The all-cash transaction is valued at C$51.7 billion (US$48.5 billion), including C$16.9 billion (US$15.9 billion) of debt, preferred equity and minority interests. The BCE Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote to accept the offer. Under the terms of the transaction, the investor group will acquire all of the common shares of BCE not already owned by Teachers for an offer price of C$42.75 per common share and all preferred shares at the prices set forth in the attached schedule. Financing for the transaction is fully committed through a syndicate of banks acting on behalf of the purchaser. The purchase price represents a 40% premium over the undisturbed average trading price of BCE common shares in the first quarter of 2007, prior to the possibility of a privatization transaction surfacing publicly. The transaction values BCE at 7.8 times EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 139 Ï NUMBER 020 Ï 3rd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 27, 2004 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1145 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 27, 2004 The House met at 10 a.m. Equalization, as hon. members know, is the federal government's most important program for reducing fiscal disparities among Prayers provinces. It ensures that the less prosperous provinces have the capacity to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation. GOVERNMENT ORDERS This is not about the level of equalization. This is about the payment of equalization and extending legislative authority to carry Ï (1000) on with payments of equalization. [English] [Translation] FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL FISCAL ARRANGEMENTS ACT Bill C-18 supports these two important programs and makes it Hon. Judy Sgro (for the Minister of Finance) moved that Bill possible to reach two goals. C-18, an act respecting equalization and authorizing the Minister of Finance to make certain payments related to health, be read the third [English] time and passed. First, it provides the Minister of Finance with the authority to continue to make equalization payments according to the current Ï (1005) formula for up to a year in the event that the renewal legislation is not in place by April 1, 2004. Hon. John McKay (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance, Lib.): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy
    Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy Annual Report 2019–20 2 munk school of global affairs & public policy About the Munk School Table of Contents About the Munk School ...................................... 2 Student Programs ..............................................12 Research & Ideas ................................................36 Public Engagement ............................................72 Supporting Excellence ......................................88 Faculty and Academic Directors .......................96 Named Chairs and Professorships....................98 Munk School Fellows .........................................99 Donors ...............................................................101 1 munk school of global affairs & public policy AboutAbout the theMunk Munk School School About the Munk School The Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy is a leader in interdisciplinary research, teaching and public engagement. Established in 2010 through a landmark gift by Peter and Melanie Munk, the School is home to more than 50 centres, labs and teaching programs, including the Asian Institute; Centre for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies; Centre for the Study of the United States; Centre for the Study of Global Japan; Trudeau Centre for Peace, Conflict and Justice and the Citizen Lab. With more than 230 affiliated faculty and more than 1,200 students in our teaching programs — including the professional Master of Global Affairs and Master of Public Policy degrees — the Munk School is known for world-class faculty, research leadership and as a hub for dialogue and debate. Visit munkschool.utoronto.ca to learn more. 2 munk school of global affairs & public policy About the Munk School About the Munk School 3 munk school of global affairs & public policy 2019–20 annual report 3 About the Munk School Our Founding Donors In 2010, Peter and Melanie Munk made a landmark gift to the University of Toronto that established the (then) Munk School of Global Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 119 Synthesis Iof Comments on the Review.Pdf
    i ii Synthesis of Public Comment on the Forthcoming Review by the Federal Governments of Canada and the United States of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement A Report to the Governments of the United States and Canada January 2006 The views expressed in this synthesis are those of the individuals and organizations who participated in the public comment process. They are not the views of the International Joint Commission. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis Herb Gray Dennis Schornack Chair, Canadian Section Chair, United States Section Robert Gourd Irene Brooks Commissioner Commissioner Jack Blaney Allen Olson Commissioner Commissioner International Joint Commission Offices Canadian Section United States Section 234 Laurier Ave. West, 22nd Floor 1250 23rd Street, NW, Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1P 6K6 Washington, D.C. 20440 Phone: (613) 995-2984 Phone: (202) 736-9000 Fax: (613) 993-5583 Fax: (202) 467-0746 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Great Lakes Regional Office 100 Ouellette Avenue, 8th Floor Windsor, ON N9A 6T3 or P.O. Box 32869, Detroit, MI 48232 Phone: (519) 257-6700 or (313) 226-2170 Fax: (519) 257-6740 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The International Joint Commission thanks the people from the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence River and beyond who took part in the public comment process and whose voices are echoed in this report. ISBN 1-894280-60-1 This report is available online at www.ijc.org.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Digitization and the Politicization of Canadian Heritage
    The Rhetoric of Digitization and the Politicization of Canadian Heritage Mary Kandiuk Abstract Canadian heritage institutions are perceived as being used as political instruments of nation-branding to advance a government ideological agenda. Faced with budget reductions and increased federal govern- ment oversight, the national library and archives of Canada, titled Library and Archives Canada (LAC), has, in the eyes of stakeholders, abdicated its stewardship role and responsibility for all of the nation’s collections and records to focus on government priorities. Behind what has been described as a “smokescreen” of digitization, a “mod- ernization” approach at LAC has resulted in the loss of expertise, a moratorium on acquisitions, and the elimination of national archival development and interlibrary loan programs. This paper examines the new strategic priorities of LAC with respect to digitization and resource allocation against a failed digital strategy, which has im- pacted its ability to fulfill its legislated responsibility for acquisition, preservation, and access; explores the ramifications and barriers created by the digital priorities and strategy of LAC for underserved populations, with a focus on Canada’s Indigenous peoples; and con- cludes with a discussion of the findings and recommendations of the 2014 Royal Society of Canada’s expert panel’s report, The Future Now: Canada’s Libraries, Archives, and Public Memory. Introduction “War on knowledge”; “Assault on the past”; “Knowledge massacre”; “Li- brary destruction”; “Libricide.”1 The language of war has entered the lexi- con of librarians and archivists in Canada. However, unlike the politically turbulent regions of the world, where libraries and archives are destroyed through violent acts, in this case the destruction is seen as being silently LIBRARY TRENDS, Vol.
    [Show full text]