DOCSLIB.ORG

Semiotics and Semiology Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Semiotics and Semiology Pdf Semiotics and semiology pdf Continue Semiology and semiotics are two related disciplines that study the sevenzos, the link of signification involving a sign, object and mind, and the classification of signs. Morris classified three dimensions of the sevenosis: 1) syntax dimension, i.e. the relationship between signs, 2) semantic dimension, i.e. the relationship between signs and objects, and 3) a pragmatic dimension, i.e. the relationship between a sign and an interpreter. Sheperson and Tomaselli tried to describe the differences between semiology and semiotics in relation to European and African culture. In the next we try to present the main ideas of semiology and semiotics. See also Lema Semionomic. Semiology Semiology has its basis in the Cantian dichotomy of phenomenal (mental) and numenal (material) worlds, which corresponds to the classic European dichotomy of subjective and objective. De Sossur (1857-1913) founded the idea of semiology as a science of signs. A sign is a conceptual object that consists of a sign (the name of the sign) and means (mentioned ideas in the mind, concept or meaning). In addition, there are perceptual objects or references (real objects), but the signs do not apply to them, but only concepts in our mind. The purpose of semiology is to define the relationship between a symbol and a marked language in this context. De Sossur argues that the names (signs) and their attitudes to the ideas that are marked are purely arbitrary, and there are no fixed universal ideas, but they are also arbitrary and dependent on language. Shepperson and Tomaselli recall that semilogy can easily lead to a solipsistic view: semiology itself is only a linguistic structure, and we are caught by it without any reference to the real world. Semiotics Pierce (see also building a belief) rejected the dualistic ontology behind semilogy and constucted a triadical view of the world that is represented in semiotics. He studied the triadic relationship between sign, object and mind. He argued that we could not fully achieve the material reality of our experience. Signs build a link between mind and experience, and they fully denote when they cause changes in the habit of the translator (we might call it deep learning). The most effective change in habit can also lead to new signs or new uses of signs. Thus, the signs only matter in relation to the mind and habits. (The question: What does Pierce think about the connection between a sign and real objects? The triadic nature is also about understanding. If a sign means something, it requires someone (mind) to denote something (object) that means. In addition, the signs themselves are triadic in nature, and Pierce lists several triads. Icon, index and symbol trichotomy way of recognizing the signs. Another trichotomy is qualisign, sinsign and legisign classify the marks according to the kind of act of signing that happens. The qualisin, the sinsin and the legitim also correspond to the levels of understanding: qualisign - the environment of the subject (phaneronone), sinsign - something that can be separated from the general context, and legisign - the relationship between what has been separated. (I have to admit that it's all very obscure and I don't fully understand that!) The literature of Shepperson, A. and Tomaselli, K.: Semiotics in the African context: Science vs. the artisan priest - semiology vs. semiotics. Act of Semiotic Fennik II: On the border of semiose. Edited by E. Tarasti. Publications of the International Institute of Semiotics in Imatra, No. 4, 1993, page 159-175. Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Editor-in-chief R. Audi. Cambridge University Press, 1999. Exploring the Signs and Signs of The Processes of Semiotics Common Concepts Sign (relational complex) Code Confabulation Connotation / Coding Annotations / Decoding Lexical Modality Representation Salience Semiospheric Semiosphere Semiotic Theory Pier Umvelt Value Field Biosequics Cognitive Semiotics Computing Semiotics Literary Semiotics Semiotics Semiotics Semiotics Semiotics Culture Social Semiotics Switching Techniques Test Paradigmatic Analysis of Syntagmatic Analysis of Semiotics Michael Bakhtin Roland Bart Marcel Danesi Danesi John Deeley Umberto Eco Gottlob Frege Algirdas Julien Greymas Felix Guadagnari Louis Hjelmslev Vyacheslav Ivanov Roman Jacobson Robert Kevelson Calvi Kull Pierce Susan Petrilli Augusto Ponzio Ferdinand de Sossur Thomas Sebeok Michael Silverstein Eero Tarasti Vladimir Toporov Jacob von Uexk'll Victoria Lady Welby Related Topics Copenhagen-Tartu School Tartu-Moscow Semiotic School Structure Of PoststructuralIsm Destructionism Post-Reconstructionism Postmodernism Vte Semiotics (also called Semiotics) is a study of the study of any behavior, or any process that involves signs, including the production of meaning. A sign is everything that conveys meaning, that is, not the sign itself, the translator of the sign. The meaning may be intentional, such as a word spoken with a certain meaning, or unintentional, for example, a symptom is a sign of a particular disease. Signs can communicate through any of the senses, visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, or tasteful. The semiotic tradition explores the study of signs and symbols as an important part of communication. Unlike linguistics, semiotics also study non-linguine traits. Semiotics include the study of signs and signs of processes, indication, designation, likeness, analogy, allegory, metonymy, metaphor, symbolism, marking, and communication. Semiotics are often seen as important anthropological and sociological aspects; for example, Italian semiotician and writer Umberto Eco suggested that every cultural phenomenon could be studied as communication. However, some semiotics focus on the logical dimensions of science. They study areas also belonging to life sciences, such as how organisms make predictions about, and adapt to, their semiotic niche in the world (see semiose). In general, semiotic theories accept the signs or sign of the system as the object of the study: the communication of information in living organisms is covered with biosemiotics (including zoozemiotics and phytosomeotics). Semiotics should not be confused with the Southsur tradition called semiology, which is a subset of semiotics. The history and terminology of the importance of signs and signs has been recognized for most of the history of philosophy as well as in psychology. The term comes from the Greek language: z, romanticized: s'mei'ttikos, observant signs (from σημεῖον s'meion, sign, sign). For the Greeks, signs took place in the natural world and symbols in the world of culture. Thus, Plato and Aristotle explored the relationship between the signs and the world. Only after Augustine Hippo will the nature of the sign be taken into account within the normal system. Augustine presented a thematic proposal to combine these two species under the concept of signum as briding the gap between nature and culture and identifying symbols as nothing more than the species (or under species) signum to be officially proposed. A monographic study on the subject will be done by Manetti (1987). These theories had a long-term effect in Western philosophy, especially through the scholasticism of philosophy. A general study of the signs, which began in Latin with Augustine culminating in the 1632 Treatise de Signis John Poinsot, and then began anew at the end of modernity with an attempt in 1867 by Charles Sanders Pierce to compile a new list of categories. More recently, Umberto Eco, in his semiotics and philosophy of language, argued that semiotic theories are implied in the work of most, perhaps all, major thinkers. John Locke John Locke (1690), himself a man of medicine, was familiar with this family as the name of a specialized industry in medical science. In his personal library there were two editions of 1579 Scapula in the abbreviation OfLicus Stephanus ' Thesaurus Graecae Linguae, who listed σημειωτική as the name for diagnosis, a 10 branch of medicine related to the interpretation of the symptoms of the disease (symptomatology). Indeed, physician and scientist Henry Stubb (1670) translitescribed this term of specialized science into English as family, noting the first use of the term in English: and there is nothing to rely on in Physics, but an accurate knowledge of medicinal physiology (based on observation, not principles), semeiotics, method of curing, and tried (not excogitated, not commanding) medicines.... Locke would use the term sem (e)iotike in an essay on human understanding (book IV, chapter 21), B in which he explains how science can be divided into three parts: being either, first, the nature of things as they are by themselves, their relationships, and their way of working: or secondly, what a person himself must do as a rational and voluntary agent, to achieve the end of any , especially happiness: or, thirdly, the ways and means by which knowledge of both of them is achieved and transmitted; I think science can be divided properly into these three species. Locke then details the nature of this third category, calling it Σημειωτική (Semeiotike), and explaining it as the doctrine of the signs in the following terms: 13:175 Third, the third branch (science) can be called σημειωτικὴ, or the doctrine of the signs, the most common of which are the words, it is rather aptly called also Λογικὴ, logic; business, of which is to consider the nature of the marks the mind uses to understand things, or transfer their knowledge to others. As the title for the subtitle, which he founded at the University of Tartu in Estonia in 1964 in the first journal on semiotics, in Σημειωτική as the title for the subtitle of his founding at the University of Tartu in Estonia in 1964 in the first semiotics of the magazine Sign Systems Studies, he will introduce to Eastern Europe. Ferdinand de Sossur Ferdinand de Sossur founded his semiotics, which he called semiology, in social sciences: one can imagine a science that studies the role of signs as part of public life. It will become a part of social psychology, and therefore general psychology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • {DOWNLOAD} Semiotics: the Basics
    SEMIOTICS: THE BASICS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Daniel Chandler | 328 pages | 01 Jul 2007 | Taylor & Francis Ltd | 9780415363754 | English | London, United Kingdom semiotics | Definition, Theory, Examples, & Facts | Britannica Get exclusive access to content from our First Edition with your subscription. Subscribe today. Learn More in these related Britannica articles:. The current usage was recommended especially by Rudolf Carnap—see his Introduction to Semantics and…. Each of these semiotic systems may in turn be represented by a notational system, a system for representing the semiotic system. Thus, writing can be defined formally as a notational system…. History at your fingertips. Sign up here to see what happened On This Day , every day in your inbox! Topics from this paper. Interaction Information. Chandler software Literal mathematical logic. Citation Type. Has PDF. Publication Type. More Filters. The semiotic perspectives of peirce and saussure: A brief comparative study. Open Access. Research Feed. View 1 excerpt, cites background. These insights brought Barthes very much in line with similar Marxist theory. Algirdas Julien Greimas — developed a structural version of semiotics named, "generative semiotics", trying to shift the focus of discipline from signs to systems of signification. Thomas A. Sebeok — , a student of Charles W. Morris, was a prolific and wide-ranging American semiotician. Although he insisted that animals are not capable of language, he expanded the purview of semiotics to include non-human signaling and communication systems, thus raising some of the issues addressed by philosophy of mind and coining the term zoosemiotics. Sebeok insisted that all communication was made possible by the relationship between an organism and the environment in which it lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Sanders Peirce - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 9/2/10 4:55 PM
    Charles Sanders Peirce - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 9/2/10 4:55 PM Charles Sanders Peirce From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Charles Sanders Peirce (pronounced /ˈpɜrs/ purse[1]) Charles Sanders Peirce (September 10, 1839 – April 19, 1914) was an American philosopher, logician, mathematician, and scientist, born in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Peirce was educated as a chemist and employed as a scientist for 30 years. It is largely his contributions to logic, mathematics, philosophy, and semiotics (and his founding of pragmatism) that are appreciated today. In 1934, the philosopher Paul Weiss called Peirce "the most original and versatile of American philosophers and America's greatest logician".[2] An innovator in many fields (including philosophy of science, epistemology, metaphysics, mathematics, statistics, research methodology, and the design of experiments in astronomy, geophysics, and psychology) Peirce considered himself a logician first and foremost. He made major contributions to logic, but logic for him encompassed much of that which is now called epistemology and philosophy of science. He saw logic as the Charles Sanders Peirce formal branch of semiotics, of which he is a founder. As early as 1886 he saw that logical operations could be carried out by Born September 10, 1839 electrical switching circuits, an idea used decades later to Cambridge, Massachusetts produce digital computers.[3] Died April 19, 1914 (aged 74) Milford, Pennsylvania Contents Nationality American 1 Life Fields Logic, Mathematics, 1.1 United States Coast Survey Statistics, Philosophy, 1.2 Johns Hopkins University Metrology, Chemistry 1.3 Poverty Religious Episcopal but 2 Reception 3 Works stance unconventional 4 Mathematics 4.1 Mathematics of logic C.
    [Show full text]
  • OH MY GOD, THAT NIGGER SAID GUN!”: Use of Ethnic Humor in Modern Stand-Up Comedy
    ”OH MY GOD, THAT NIGGER SAID GUN!”: Use of ethnic humor in modern stand-up comedy Master’s thesis Ville Jakoaho and Sami Marjamäki University of Jyväskylä Department of Languages English February 2012 JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO Tiedekunta – Faculty Laitos – Department Humanistinen tiedekunta Kielten laitos Tekijä – Author Ville Jakoaho ja Sami Marjamäki Työn nimi – Title “OH MY GOD, THAT NIGGER SAID GUN!”: Use of ethnic humor in modern stand-up comedy Oppiaine – Subject Työn laji – Level englanti Pro gradu -tutkielma Aika – Month and year Sivumäärä – Number of pages helmikuu 2012 117 sivua Tiivistelmä – Abstract Tutkielman tavoitteena oli selvittää, miten etninen huumori ilmenee modernissa stand-up komediassa. Tarkemmin sanottuna tutkielman kiinnostuksen kohde oli tutkia mihin tai keneen etninen huumori kohdistuu, ja mitä eri funktioita sillä saattaa olla. Tutkielmassa analysoitiin seitsemää eri stand-up esitystä viideltä eri amerikkalaiselta koomikolta, joista kaikki kuuluvat etnisiin vähemmistöryhmiin. Tutkielmassa käytetyt esitykset ovat live-esityksiä, jotka ovat julkaistu DVD formaattina. Tutkielma pohjautuu kriittiseen diskurssintutkimukseen ja keskeisenä metodina käytettiin Norman Fairclough:n kolmiulotteista diskurssimallia. Kriittisen diskurssintutkimuksen avulla pyrimme selvittämään sekä kielenkäytön tehtäviä että niiden vaikutuksia vitseissä, ja mitä mahdollisia implikaatioita koomikoiden vitseissä käyttämillä metodeilla on joko etnisten stereotypioiden vahvistamiseen tai heikentämiseen. Tutkielmassa havaittiin, että koomikoiden
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenological Principles of Global Innovative Logosphere of Computer Being Construction (Based on Europeаn and Oriental Languages)
    Загальне мовознавство UDC 811.111: 81’42 DOI https://doi.org/10.32838/2710-4656/2021.1-1/34 Makhachashvili R. К. Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Semenist I. V. Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University PHENOMENOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF GLOBAL INNOVATIVE LOGOSPHERE OF COMPUTER BEING CONSTRUCTION (BASED ON EUROPEАN AND ORIENTAL LANGUAGES) The paper main focus is the inquiry into the phenomenological premises of comprehensive structuring of the global innovative linguistic sphere of modern digital technologies (Global Innovative Logosphere of Computer Being as construed by the transformative neological strata of modern European and Oriental languages of international communication – English, Spanish, French, Chinese, Japanese, accordingly). The problem of theoretical and methodological substantiation of cross-cutting principles, directions, mechanisms, and results of qualitative dynamics of linguistic macro- and microstructures of vocabulary in the realm of computer being, as a consolidated linguistic object, is investigated in depth. Consideration of this issue requires the involvement of the phenomenological perspective of the study of complex linguistic objects, such as the Global Innovative Logosphere of Computer Being. Mosaic, simulation, and multidimensional approaches to understanding complex dynamic linguistic phenomena and entities, prioritized by this methodological context, allowed us to identify the ontological nature of computer lexical innovations of the European and Oriental languages (namely, the ability to embody and structure elements
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook-Of-Semiotics.Pdf
    Page i Handbook of Semiotics Page ii Advances in Semiotics THOMAS A. SEBEOK, GENERAL EDITOR Page iii Handbook of Semiotics Winfried Nöth Indiana University Press Bloomington and Indianapolis Page iv First Paperback Edition 1995 This English­language edition is the enlarged and completely revised version of a work by Winfried Nöth originally published as Handbuch der Semiotik in 1985 by J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. ©1990 by Winfried Nöth All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses' Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition. Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging­in­Publication Data Nöth, Winfried. [Handbuch der Semiotik. English] Handbook of semiotics / Winfried Nöth. p. cm.—(Advances in semiotics) Enlarged translation of: Handbuch der Semiotik. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. ISBN 0­253­34120­5 1. Semiotics—handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Communication —Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Title. II. Series. P99.N6513 1990 302.2—dc20 89­45199 ISBN 0­253­20959­5 (pbk.) CIP 4 5 6 00 99 98 Page v CONTENTS Preface ix Introduction 3 I. History and Classics of Modern Semiotics History of Semiotics 11 Peirce 39 Morris 48 Saussure 56 Hjelmslev 64 Jakobson 74 II. Sign and Meaning Sign 79 Meaning, Sense, and Reference 92 Semantics and Semiotics 103 Typology of Signs: Sign, Signal, Index 107 Symbol 115 Icon and Iconicity 121 Metaphor 128 Information 134 Page vi III.
    [Show full text]
  • Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Lotman: Towards a Theory of Communication in the Horizon of the Other
    Semiotica 2016; 213: 75–90 Laura Gherlone* Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Lotman: Towards a theory of communication in the horizon of the other DOI 10.1515/sem-2015-0031 Abstract: Shortly before his death, Yuri Lotman (1922–1993), by now blind, dictated some considerations on the concept of ‘alien,’‘stranger’ (chuzhdoe): a concept that de facto weaves all of his thirty-year reflections on the relationship between language, meaning, and culture and that, until the end, appears as the mark of a speculative orientation focused on the ethics of otherness. A profound influence on Lotman’s thinking in this direction was exercised by two leading figures of the Russian intellectual tradition: the psychologist Lev Vygotsky (1896–1934) and the philosopher, critic, and literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin (1895–1975). It is no wonder the Tartu-Moscow Semiotic School dedicated to them volumes IV (1969) and VI (1973), respectively, of the Trudy po znakovym sistemam, the review on sign systems launched in 1964 by the Department of Russian Literature of the University of Tartu. The horizon of otherness, and the consequent emphasis on the relational nature of man, fill in fact as much of Vygotsky’s theoretical reflection on the human mind as does Bakhtin’son literary creation (slovesnost’). This article intends to explore the concept of “dialog” as thematized in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s studies, theoretical roots of the Lotmanian idea of communication as a dialogical semiotic act. Keywords: Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Lotman, language, communication, dialogicity 1 Introduction Lotman’s attention to the idea of an “others’ world” (chuzhoi mir)1 as a cultural problem became very intense beginning in the second half of the 1980s, when he framed Vygotsky’s studies on the historical-cultural dimension of the mental processes of socialization and Bakhtin’s studies on the aesthetic-existential 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Transdisciplinary Theory of Mexican Agricultural Knowledge: Semiotics, Communication and Anthropology 72
    Graciela S´anchezGuevara and Jos´eCort´esZorrilla Transdisciplinary Theory of Mexican Agricultural Knowledge: Semiotics, Communication and Anthropology 72 Transdisciplinary Theory of Mexican Agricultural Knowledge: Semiotics, Communication and Anthropology Graciela Sanchez´ Guevara1 and Jose´ Cortes´ Zorrilla2, 1Universidad Autonoma´ de la Ciudad de Mexico;´ 2Universidad Autonoma´ Metropolitana-Iztapalapa E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received 7 January, 2019; Revised February 28, 2019 Accepted 5 March, 2019 Copyright c 2019 Graciela Sanchez´ Guevara and Jose´ Cortes´ Zorrilla. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Available online 7 March, 2019 at www.atlas-journal.org, doi: 10.22545/2019/0118 his paper proposes a transdisciplinary model to have been able to survive in a world destroyed by explain the process of Mexican agriculture. It genetically modified crops and food imports. Tpresents the results of a transdisciplinary study on wetland agriculture undertaken by the indigenous Keywords: Transdisciplinary, levels of real- peoples of Xochimilco and San Gregorio south of ity, agri-culture, anthropology, food identity. Mexico City. The model also engages in a dialogue with three different types of knowledge: the first, 1 Introduction corresponding to traditional or empirical knowledge, includes the three levels of reality (complex thinking); Corn is one; the milpa many. Corn lectures; while scientific and technical knowledge corresponds the milpa converses. Corn is autarkic; the to the second level of reality (simple thinking). milpa, supportive. Corn is a one-stringed When the three sets of knowledge create synergy, instrument; the milpa is polyphonic Corn they produce the great semiotic system that explains is singular; the milpa, plural.
    [Show full text]
  • Geese As Icons and the Implications for Formulating a Semiotics Between the Literal and the Figurative
    ltGEESE ARE LIKE HUNTERS. THEY KNOW THE LAND.lt GEESE AS ICONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR FORMULATING A SEMIOTICS BETWEEN THE LITERAL AND THE FIGURATIVE by Christine M. Chun McMaster University ABSTRACT The author exami nes the probl em of the 1 i terallfigurati ve di chotomy in various semiotic theories of systems of knowledge and the man-animal distinction. It is proposed that theories of iconici ty and forms of iconicity may help us to understand this dichotomy. An analysis is made of Cree hunti ng of geese usi ng theori es of i coni ci ty, the i nterpretant point of view and conventions of reading. Finally, a suggestion is made as to how understanding Cree conventions of hunting may help semioticians transform the spatial typology between the two poles of the literal and figurative into a 'quality space'. ABSTRAIT ltLes oies sont comme les chasseurs: elles connaissent l'habitat." Les oi es comme i cones et 1es i mpl i cati ons qui en decoul ent pour enoncer cune semiotique entre le literal et le figuratif. L'auteur examine le problE~me de la dichotomie litteralitel figurativite de plusieurs theories semiotiques de systemes d'apprentissage et de la difference homme-animal. 11 propose que les theories d'iconicite et les formes d'iconicite peuvent nous aider a comprendre cette dichotomie. Une analyse de la chasse aux oies chez les Cree est faite, utilisant les theories d'iconicite, le point de vue de l'interpretation et 'des conventi ons de 1 ecture. Final ement, une suggesti on apparait montrant comment la comprehension des conventions de chasse chez les Cree peut aider les semioticiens a transformer la typologie spatiale entre les deux poles litteralite/figurativite en 'qualite de l'espace'.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanie Van Der Elsen S4353471/ 1
    Melanie van der Elsen s4353471/ 1 Melanie van der Elsen s4353471/ 2 ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE Teacher who will receive this document: Professor F. Mehring Title of document: License to Laugh: The Stand-Up Comedian in Relation to American Normative Values Name of course: Bachelor Thesis American Studies Date of submission: 15 June, 2016 Word count: 14.801 The work submitted here is the sole responsibility of the undersigned, who has neither committed plagiarism nor colluded in its production. Signed Name of student: Melanie van der Elsen Student number: s4353471 Melanie van der Elsen s4353471/ 3 Abstract Humor is considered an essential feature of human culture and has always held up a mirror to society. One form of humor that has gained momentum in recent decades is American stand- up comedy. This thesis sets out to locate the function of the stand-up comedian in relation to American normative values. It does so in three steps. First, the three leading theories of humor are reviewed in relation to stand-up, which leads to an amalgamated version of the superiority theory and the incongruity theory based on the notion of incongruous superiority. Next, this notion paves the way for theorizing the construction of the comedian’s license, which is a crucial concept in relation to normative values. The license is argued to depend specifically on self-deprecatory humor and performed marginality. Finally, the set out theoretical framework is applied to the case studies of Louis C.K. and Chris Rock. The first affirms the theory of the license and the second shows the complexity of its construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand-Up Comedy and Progressive Social Change David M
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2015 Was It Something They Said? Stand-up Comedy and Progressive Social Change David M. Jenkins University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Communication Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Sociology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Jenkins, David M., "Was It Something They aidS ? Stand-up Comedy and Progressive Social Change" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5710 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Was It Something They Said? Stand-up Comedy and Progressive Social Change by David M. Jenkins A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a concentration in Performance Studies Department of Communication College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Elizabeth Bell, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: A. David Payne, Ph.D. Mahuya Pal, Ph.D. John Barnshaw, Ph.D. Date of Approval: June 26, 2015 Keywords: Culture, Humor, Performance, Rhetoric Copyright © 2015, David M. Jenkins DEDICATION This project is dedicated to many, all of whom are partially responsible for getting me here. First, the educators: Dr. Lee Beger, Dr. Patrick Finelli, David Frankel, Dr. Ralf Remshardt, Dr. Mikell Pinkney, Dr. David Shelton, Dr. Stacy Holman Jones, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Do Things with Jokes: Relocating the Political Dimension of Performance Comedy
    Chow, D.V.B. How to do things with jokes: relocating the political dimension of performance comedy Dick Veloso (Broderick) Chow PhD in Drama by practice-as-research Central School of Speech & Drama University of London Embassy Theatre, Eton Avenue, London NW3 3HY July 2010 1 Chow, D.V.B. I understand the School’s definition of plagiarism and declare that all sources drawn on have been formally acknowledged Signed: Dick Veloso (Broderick) Chow Date: 30 June 2010 2 Chow, D.V.B. Abstract How to do things with jokes: relocating the political dimension of performance comedy This practice-as-research PhD examines the possibility of 'political comedy' in performance and its constitution within the ideological situation of global capitalism. The project is comprised of a written submission, documented practice, and live performance. The practice incorporates elements of stand-up comedy, installation and 'relational art,' and participatory performance. The possibility of a 'radical democratic comedy' includes two elements: (a) a break with ideology, and (b) the creation of an affective, relational space conducive to the formation of an 'attachment.' I argue that satirical, carnivalesque, and transgressive modes of political critique in comic performance operate ideologically, and in spite of appearances and intentions may be bound up in dominant ideology. A political comedy in the present day must therefore somehow break with the dominant logic of a situation. This thesis argues thus that the political dimension of the joke (the basic unit of comedy in performance) is not located in its content, but in the incommensurable gap between set-up and punch-line, which is incompatible with common sense.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Mediatized Stand-Up Comedy: Investigating Para-Performances on Television, Film, and Youtube
    The Evolution of Mediatized Stand-Up Comedy: Investigating Para-Performances on Television, Film, and YouTube by Mirali Almaula A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Literary/Theatre Studies in English Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Mirali Almaula, September, 2015 ABSTRACT THE EVOLUTION OF MEDIATIZED STAND-UP COMEDY: INVESTIGATING PARA-PERFORMANCES ON TELEVISION, FILM, AND YOUTUBE Mirali Almaula Advisor: University of Guelph, 2015 Professor A. Filewod Although the majority of today’s performances are accessible on multiple platforms, performance analysis often continues to focus on the live event or to discuss the recorded event as if it were live. This thesis explores the influence of various mediatizations on a performance form. In order to better understand changes in power, control, and authority that are produced on differing mediums, it develops a form of analysis that views the performance event as comprised of two aspects. It argues that a performance event is comprised of the performance proper, which is a performance that is identifiable as being for entertainment purposes, and the para- performance, which arises due to the intention and/or execution of the performance proper. For example, the performance text of a theatrical work is the performance proper whereas the audience’s reactions, the architecture of the performance space, and the promotional materials and reviews are part of the para-performance. A para- performance analysis thus reads both the performance proper and the para- performance “as” performance. This thesis is an investigation of the process of adapting live performance to media platforms.
    [Show full text]