DOCSLIB.ORG

VEGETATIVE MORPHOLOGY of FLOWERING PLANTS Stems, Roots, and Leaves Are the Vegetative Parts of Vascular Plants. Stems Are the B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VEGETATIVE MORPHOLOGY of FLOWERING PLANTS Stems, Roots, and Leaves Are the Vegetative Parts of Vascular Plants. Stems Are the B VEGETATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF FLOWERING PLANTS Stems, roots, and leaves are the vegetative parts of vascular plants. Stems are the basic organs, as they give rise to other plant organs, such as roots, leaves, and flowers. Both aerial and subterranean stems are divided into nodes (the places where leaves arise) and internodes (the regions between adjacent nodes). Stems may be simple or variously branched, either at the base or along the length of the stem, and either herbaceous (leaflike in texture; non-woody) or woody. The soft tissues found in stems of herbaceous plants result from primary, not secondary, growth. Woody plants, however, exhibit primary growth in their first year followed in subsequent years by secondary stem growth, which involves the addition of vascular tissue each year around the previous year's vascular tissue. The yearly increment of vascular tissue can be recognized in many plants by annual rings. When evident, the annual rings can be counted to determine the age of the plant. herbaceous stem woody stem The stem structure of a plant is usually responsible for its overall manner of growth or habit, which may be described as herbaceous, shrubby, or arborescent. Herbaceous plants may live only one year (annuals) or persist for two (biennials) or more years (perennials). The annual condition is one that permits a plant to complete its life cycle in one growing season, thereby avoiding extreme environmental conditions, particularly high temperatures and low rainfall. Suffrutescent plants are herbaceous perennials with herbaceous above-ground parts that die back annually to a woody base. Other herbaceous perennials exist with persistent above-ground stems. A shrubby plant is woody, considerably branched, and usually less than ten meters tall, and an arborescent plant is one that is treelike. Using the following terms and illustrations, identify the stem types on plants you see on campus. Note that the term 'rootstock' frequently has been used to include a rhizome or a caudex. A caudex is a short, woody, persistent stem at or just beneath the surface of the ground; its anatomy merges stem with root tissue and is often difficult to define precisely. Subterranean stems obviously must be dug up before they can be identified. Make sure you can interpret and recognize the following stem types and conditions since these frequently are of great diagnostic value and are used in plant identification. ABOVE-GROUND STEM TYPES AND CONDITIONS Ascendent aerial stem horizontal to the ground only near the base, being mostly erect Decumbent aerial stem horizontal to the ground, ascending only near the stem apex Erect and upright aerial stem with the leaves Caulescent arising from all or some of the nodes on the above-ground stems Erect and upright aerial stem (=scape) with Acaulescent the leaves arising directly from an (Scapose) underground stem structure Procumbent aerial stem horizontal to the ground but not rooting at the nodes Repent aerial stem horizontal to the ground and rooting at the nodes Stolon elongate above-ground stem horizontal to the ground (may be procumbent or repent) Thorn stiff, woody, modified stem with a sharp point UNDERGROUND STEM TYPES Bulb short and narrow underground stem surrounded by several to many thick, fleshy, nutritive, protective leaves (common example: onion) Corm short, thick, and nutritive underground stem surrounded by two to several pairs of membranous, protective leaves (common example: gladiolus) Rhizome common underground stem; usually long, slender, and creeping Tuber short, thick and nutritive underground stem; usually a shortened part of a rhizome (common example: potato) Roots anchor plants in soil, often store carbohydrates, and serve as the principal organs for absorption of water and nutrients. Primary roots are those derived from the primary root of a seedling. These include a fibrous root system in which the branches are all about the same size, and a taproot system in which the central root is larger than the branches. When water-absorbing structures arise from a stem, they form an adventitious root system. Most monocots and seedless vascular plants (ferns and their allies) and some dicots have a fibrous adventitious root system. Many dicots and most gymnosperms have a root system that is either fibrous or taproot. Leaves are the primary photosynthetic organs of plants, and are borne only at the nodes of a stem. Leaves usually consist of a blade (lamina) and a petiole (except when sessile), and may be either simple or compound. If compound, the individual units of the leaf are called leaflets, which are either pinnately or palmately arranged. On either side of the petiole or leaf base, there are often stipules subtending the leaf; these may be leaflike, or modified as bristles or sheaths. In the axil, or angle between each simple or compound leaf and stem, there is an axillary bud that will develop into a shoot system (branch) if not inhibited by plant hormones (auxins). Pruning or removing the terminal parts of branches of shrubs or trees usually is a good way to release the hormonal inhibition of axillary buds located lower on the branches, thus permitting new branches to develop and resulting in a diffuse branching system. Leaves that persist on a plant for several years or growing seasons are called evergreen, while those that fall after one growing season are deciduous. Leaves vary in shape, margin, apex, base, and vestiture (refers to covering of glands or hairs; when surface is smooth, without hairs or glands, the condition is called glabrous). Leaves also vary by their arrangement on a stem (phyllotaxy). The common leaf arrangements are alternate, opposite, whorled, and spiral. On the following pages, you will find examples of the common features of leaves. Become acquainted with these terms. Use plants in your own surroundings to study and identify leaf characteristics: duration (evergreen or deciduous), leaf arrangement, leaf type (simple or compound), pattern of leaf venation, shape, nature of apex and base, and margin. Vegetative morphology worksheet. Describe the stem and leaf morphology of the unknown plants on display in the lab. Unknown Leaf Venation Leaf type Shape Apex/base Margin Arrange- pattern ment 1 2 3 4 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shrubs, Trees and Contingent Evolution of Wood Anatomical Diversity Using Croton (Euphorbiaceae) As a Model System
    Annals of Botany 119: 563–579, 2017 doi:10.1093/aob/mcw243, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Force of habit: shrubs, trees and contingent evolution of wood anatomical diversity using Croton (Euphorbiaceae) as a model system Rafael Are´valo1,2,*, Benjamin W. van Ee3, Ricarda Riina4, Paul E. Berry5 and Alex C. Wiedenhoeft1,2 1Center for Wood Anatomy Research, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI 53726, USA, 2Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA, 3University of Puerto Rico at Mayagu¨ez Herbarium, Department of Biology, Universidad de Puerto Rico, Call Box 9000, Mayagu¨ez, 00680, Puerto Rico, 4Real Jardın Botanico, RJB-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014 Madrid, Spain and 5University of Michigan, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department and Herbarium, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 7 July 2016 Returned for revision: 3 September 2016 Accepted: 5 October 2016 Published electronically: 8 January 2017 Background and Aims Wood is a major innovation of land plants, and is usually a central component of the body plan for two major plant habits: shrubs and trees. Wood anatomical syndromes vary between shrubs and trees, but no prior work has explicitly evaluated the contingent evolution of wood anatomical diversity in the context of these plant habits. Methods Phylogenetic comparative methods were used to test for contingent evolution of habit, habitat and wood anatomy in the mega-diverse genus Croton (Euphorbiaceae), across the largest and most complete molecular phy- logeny of the genus to date. Key Results Plant habit and habitat are highly correlated, but most wood anatomical features correlate more strongly with habit.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Weeds of the Appalachian Region
    $10 $10 PB1785 PB1785 Invasive Weeds Invasive Weeds of the of the Appalachian Appalachian Region Region i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………...i How to use this guide…………………………………ii IPM decision aid………………………………………..1 Invasive weeds Grasses …………………………………………..5 Broadleaves…………………………………….18 Vines………………………………………………35 Shrubs/trees……………………………………48 Parasitic plants………………………………..70 Herbicide chart………………………………………….72 Bibliography……………………………………………..73 Index………………………………………………………..76 AUTHORS Rebecca M. Koepke-Hill, Extension Assistant, The University of Tennessee Gregory R. Armel, Assistant Professor, Extension Specialist for Invasive Weeds, The University of Tennessee Robert J. Richardson, Assistant Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, North Caro- lina State University G. Neil Rhodes, Jr., Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, The University of Ten- nessee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank all the individuals and organizations who have contributed their time, advice, financial support, and photos to the crea- tion of this guide. We would like to specifically thank the USDA, CSREES, and The Southern Region IPM Center for their extensive support of this pro- ject. COVER PHOTO CREDITS ii 1. Wavyleaf basketgrass - Geoffery Mason 2. Bamboo - Shawn Askew 3. Giant hogweed - Antonio DiTommaso 4. Japanese barberry - Leslie Merhoff 5. Mimosa - Becky Koepke-Hill 6. Periwinkle - Dan Tenaglia 7. Porcelainberry - Randy Prostak 8. Cogongrass - James Miller 9. Kudzu - Shawn Askew Photo credit note: Numbers in parenthesis following photo captions refer to the num- bered photographer list on the back cover. HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE Tabs: Blank tabs can be found at the top of each page. These can be custom- ized with pen or marker to best suit your method of organization. Examples: Infestation present On bordering land No concern Uncontrolled Treatment initiated Controlled Large infestation Medium infestation Small infestation Control Methods: Each mechanical control method is represented by an icon.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterospory: the Most Iterative Key Innovation in the Evolutionary History of the Plant Kingdom
    Biol. Rej\ (1994). 69, l>p. 345-417 345 Printeii in GrenI Britain HETEROSPORY: THE MOST ITERATIVE KEY INNOVATION IN THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF THE PLANT KINGDOM BY RICHARD M. BATEMAN' AND WILLIAM A. DiMlCHELE' ' Departments of Earth and Plant Sciences, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford OXi 3P/?, U.K. {Present addresses: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburiih, Inverleith Rojv, Edinburgh, EIIT, SLR ; Department of Geology, Royal Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EHi ijfF) '" Department of Paleohiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC^zo^bo, U.S.A. CONTENTS I. Introduction: the nature of hf^terospon' ......... 345 U. Generalized life history of a homosporous polysporangiophyle: the basis for evolutionary excursions into hetcrospory ............ 348 III, Detection of hcterospory in fossils. .......... 352 (1) The need to extrapolate from sporophyte to gametophyte ..... 352 (2) Spatial criteria and the physiological control of heterospory ..... 351; IV. Iterative evolution of heterospory ........... ^dj V. Inter-cladc comparison of levels of heterospory 374 (1) Zosterophyllopsida 374 (2) Lycopsida 374 (3) Sphenopsida . 377 (4) PtiTopsida 378 (5) f^rogymnospermopsida ............ 380 (6) Gymnospermopsida (including Angiospermales) . 384 (7) Summary: patterns of character acquisition ....... 386 VI. Physiological control of hetcrosporic phenomena ........ 390 VII. How the sporophyte progressively gained control over the gametophyte: a 'just-so' story 391 (1) Introduction: evolutionary antagonism between sporophyte and gametophyte 391 (2) Homosporous systems ............ 394 (3) Heterosporous systems ............ 39(1 (4) Total sporophytic control: seed habit 401 VIII. Summary .... ... 404 IX. .•Acknowledgements 407 X. References 407 I. I.NIRODUCTION: THE NATURE OF HETEROSPORY 'Heterospory' sensu lato has long been one of the most popular re\ie\v topics in organismal botany.
    [Show full text]
  • Categorical Versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches To
    [Palaeontology, 2020, pp. 1–16] CATEGORICAL VERSUS GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC APPROACHES TO CHARACTERIZING THE EVOLUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL DISPARITY IN OSTEOSTRACI (VERTEBRATA, STEM GNATHOSTOMATA) by HUMBERTO G. FERRON 1,2* , JENNY M. GREENWOOD1, BRADLEY DELINE3,CARLOSMARTINEZ-PEREZ 1,2,HECTOR BOTELLA2, ROBERT S. SANSOM4,MARCELLORUTA5 and PHILIP C. J. DONOGHUE1,* 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia, C/ Catedratic Jose Beltran Martınez 2, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain; [email protected], [email protected] 3Department of Geosciences, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA 30118, USA; [email protected] 4School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK; [email protected] 5School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Riseholme Hall, Lincoln, LN2 2LG, UK; [email protected] *Corresponding authors Typescript received 2 October 2019; accepted in revised form 27 February 2020 Abstract: Morphological variation (disparity) is almost aspects of morphology. Phylomorphospaces reveal conver- invariably characterized by two non-mutually exclusive gence towards a generalized ‘horseshoe’-shaped cranial mor- approaches: (1) quantitatively, through geometric morpho- phology and two strong trends involving major groups of metrics;
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Vegetative Morphology of Plants Vegetative Morphology of Plants
    Chapter 2. Vegetative morphology of plants Vegetative morphology of plants INTRODUCTION: THE PLANT’S BASIC BODY PLAN Most plants are photosynthetic machines: they capture the energy contained in sunlight and transform solar radiation into chemical energy stored the form of bonds in chains of carbon molecules. Through the process of photosynthesis, light and atmospheric CO2 are combined in the leaves of green plants to form simple carbohydrates, which are then used to build other organic molecules such as cellulose, starch, oils, waxes, proteins, or DNA. Six molecules of CO2 (and some 72 photons of light) are needed to form one molecule of glucose: sunlight 6 CO2 + 6 H2O → C6H12O6 + 6 O2 As a byproduct of the process, six molecules of oxygen are formed and dissipated from the leaf tissue into the atmosphere. To achieve this remarkable feat of turning atmospheric carbon dioxide into living molecules while releasing oxygen into the earth’s atmosphere, plants have evolved highly specialized organs. The light-intercepting structure par excellence is the leaf. The set of leaves in the upper aerial part of the plant form the plant’s canopy, where the plant exchanges gases with the atmosphere and intercepts light from the sun. But in order to work its chemical wonder up in the leaves, the plant also needs water and mineral nutrients such as phosphorus, essential for the synthesis of DNA, or nitrogen, essential for manufacturing proteins. In order to obtain these, plants have developed the root —a complex network of underground stem-like organs— whose role is the absorption of water and mineral nutrients from the soil, and, in doing so, anchoring the plant to the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extent and Genetic Basis of Phenotypic Divergence in Life History Traits in Mimulus Guttatus
    Molecular Ecology (2014) doi: 10.1111/mec.13004 The extent and genetic basis of phenotypic divergence in life history traits in Mimulus guttatus JANNICE FRIEDMAN,* ALEX D. TWYFORD,*† JOHN H. WILLIS‡ and BENJAMIN K. BLACKMAN§ *Department of Biology, Syracuse University, 110 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA, †Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK, ‡Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708, USA, §Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Box 400328, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA Abstract Differential natural selection acting on populations in contrasting environments often results in adaptive divergence in multivariate phenotypes. Multivariate trait divergence across populations could be caused by selection on pleiotropic alleles or through many independent loci with trait-specific effects. Here, we assess patterns of association between a suite of traits contributing to life history divergence in the common monkey flower, Mimulus guttatus, and examine the genetic architecture underlying these corre- lations. A common garden survey of 74 populations representing annual and perennial strategies from across the native range revealed strong correlations between vegetative and reproductive traits. To determine whether these multitrait patterns arise from pleiotropic or independent loci, we mapped QTLs using an approach combining high- throughput sequencing with bulk segregant analysis on a cross between populations with divergent life histories. We find extensive pleiotropy for QTLs related to flower- ing time and stolon production, a key feature of the perennial strategy. Candidate genes related to axillary meristem development colocalize with the QTLs in a manner consistent with either pleiotropic or independent QTL effects. Further, these results are analogous to previous work showing pleiotropy-mediated genetic correlations within a single population of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato Lesson.Indd
    What’s Going On Down Under the Ground? Michigan Potatoes: Nutritious and delicious www.miagclassroom.org Table of Contents Activity Pages Outline........................................................................3 Introduction to Potatoes.........................................4 Not all potatoes.........................................................5-7 are the same! How do potatoes grow?...........................................8-10 What makes potatoes...............................................11-15 good for you? Conclusion..................................................................16 Script...........................................................................17-18 2 www.miagclassroom.org Lesson Outline Objective Students will Introduction 1. Learn about the different 1. Not all potatoes are the same varieties of potatoes. • Activity- Students will be given 3 different varieties of potatoes (i.e. 2. Understand how potatoes are Michigan russet, yellow, red skin, fingerling, purple, etc.), they will grown. list the characteristics of each variety and complete a Venn diagram or chart comparing and contrasting the varieties. Discussion on how 3. Learn of the many uses of potato different potatoes are good for different purposes. products. 2. How do potatoes grow? 4. Understand the ways that potatoes can be a part of our • Activity- After showing students a seed potato, they will look at a daily diet. diagram of a potato plant and label the parts. Discussion on how food can come from all different parts of a plant,
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Endophytes Promote Growth and Alleviate Salt Stress in Arabidopsis Thaliana Di Fan, Sowmyalakshmi Subramanian & Donald L
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Plant endophytes promote growth and alleviate salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana Di Fan, Sowmyalakshmi Subramanian & Donald L. Smith* Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are a functionally diverse group of microbes having immense potential as biostimulants and stress alleviators. Their exploitation in agro-ecosystems as an eco-friendly and cost-efective alternative to traditional chemical inputs may positively afect agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. The present study describes selected rhizobacteria, from a range of origins, having plant growth promoting potential under controlled conditions. A total of 98 isolates (ectophytic or endophytic) from various crop and uncultivated plants were screened, out of which four endophytes (n, L, K and Y) from Phalaris arundinacea, Solanum dulcamara, Scorzoneroides autumnalis, and Glycine max, respectively, were selected in vitro for their vegetative growth stimulating efects on Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 seedlings with regard to leaf surface area and shoot fresh weight. A 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis of the strains indicated that these isolates belong to the genera Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Mucilaginibacter and Rhizobium. Strains were then further tested for their efects on abiotic stress alleviation under both Petri-plate and pot conditions. Results from Petri-dish assay indicated strains L, K and Y alleviated salt stress in Arabidopsis seedlings, while strains K and Y conferred increases in fresh weight and leaf area under osmotic stress. Results from subsequent in vivo trials indicated all the isolates, especially strains L, K and Y, distinctly increased A. thaliana growth under both normal and high salinity conditions, as compared to control plants. The activity of antioxidant enzymes (ascorbate peroxidase, catalase and peroxidase), proline content and total antioxidative capacity also difered in the inoculated A.
    [Show full text]
  • Auxins for Hardwood Cuttings: Effect of Root-Promoting Hormones
    Auxins for Hardwood Cuttings effect of root-promoting hormones in propagating fruit trees by hardwood cuttings studied during past three seasons H. T. Hartmann Hardwood cuttings of five species of fruit trees, Marianna 2624 plum, Angers quince, Stockton Morello cherry, Mal- ling-Merton 793 apple, and Mission olive, were used in propagation tests to study the effects of various root-promot- ing hormones-auxins-applied under several different conditions. Marianna 2624 plum is a commonly used rootstock for a number of the stone fruit species; the 2624 selection is a seedling of the parent Marianna plum, presumably an open-pollinated cross of Prunus cerasifera and P. munsoniana. This rootstock is propagated commer- cially by hardwood cuttings, but in heavy soils considerable difficulty is often experienced in obtaining satisfac- tory rooting. Angers quince4ydonia oblong- has long been used as a dwarfing root- stock for certain of the pear varieties. It is commercially propagated by hard- wood cuttings. Stockton Morello cherry-Prunus cer- asus-is used to a considerable extent in California as a semidwarfing rootstock for the sweet cherry and is propagated commercially by suckers arising around the base of older trees. It would be de- sirable to be able to propagate this stock by cuttings. In all the tests conducted with this variety, however, not one hard- wood cutting was induced to root. Later studies have shown that it can be easily rooted under mist humidification by softwood cuttings taken from actively growing shoots if treated with indolebu- tyric acid. The Malling-Merton 793 apple-Ma- lus sylwstris-is a newly developed clonal apple rootstock from’ England which is usually propagated by some method of layering.
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Microbiota and Neuroplasticity
    cells Review Gut Microbiota and Neuroplasticity Julia Murciano-Brea 1,2, Martin Garcia-Montes 1,2, Stefano Geuna 3 and Celia Herrera-Rincon 1,2,* 1 Department of Biodiversity, Ecology & Evolution, Biomathematics Unit, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (J.M.-B.); [email protected] (M.G.-M.) 2 Modeling, Data Analysis and Computational Tools for Biology Research Group, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain 3 Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-91394-4888 Abstract: The accumulating evidence linking bacteria in the gut and neurons in the brain (the microbiota–gut–brain axis) has led to a paradigm shift in the neurosciences. Understanding the neurobiological mechanisms supporting the relevance of actions mediated by the gut microbiota for brain physiology and neuronal functioning is a key research area. In this review, we discuss the literature showing how the microbiota is emerging as a key regulator of the brain’s function and behavior, as increasing amounts of evidence on the importance of the bidirectional communication between the intestinal bacteria and the brain have accumulated. Based on recent discoveries, we suggest that the interaction between diet and the gut microbiota, which might ultimately affect the brain, represents an unprecedented stimulus for conducting new research that links food and mood. We also review the limited work in the clinical arena to date, and we propose novel approaches for deciphering the gut microbiota–brain axis and, eventually, for manipulating this relationship to boost mental wellness.
    [Show full text]
  • Date: 26/05/20 [09:01:30 IST] From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Class 8 A,B&C Biology (Ms.Mona Lama) Class 8 A,B&C Biology
    5/26/2020 Class 8 A,B&C Biology (Ms.Mona Lama) Date: 26/05/20 [09:01:30 IST] From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Class 8 A,B&C Biology (Ms.Mona Lama) Class 8 A,B&C Biology Assignment-12 Date-26/5/2020 Chapter-2 Reproduction in Plant and Animals. *** Read the instructions properly and follow it accordingly. Read the page number 31 to 36, take the help of the explanation given in the WhatsApp group and do the assignment. A. Do the following given below in your Biology copy. 1. Define the term reproduction.2. Define the term sexual reproduction.3. State three advantages of vegetative propagation in plants.4. State three disadvantages of vegetative propagation in plants.5. Picture study 5 a,b,c and d. (Please do copy the diagram in your copy). B. Copy the following questions given below in your Biology copy. 1. State the function of the following.a. Spore- It helps in vegetative propagation of fungus,ferns and moss. b. Tuber- It is the swollen apical part of an underground stem of potato that contains nodes or eyes through which buds develop that grow into a new plant. 2. Give reasons for the following.a. In asexual reproduction, gametes are not involved.Ans. In asexual reproduction the offsprings are produced by division or differentiation of a single parent body thus gametes are not involved. b. Corms, rhizomes,tubers and bulb are swollen structures. Ans. Corms, rhizomes,tubers and bulb are swollen structures that are used to store food and also help in vegetative propagation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Different Hormones and Their Doses on Rooting of Stem Cuttings in Anatolian Sage (Salvia Fruticosa Mill.)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect APCBEE Procedia 8 ( 2014 ) 348 – 353 2013 4th International Conference on Agriculture and Animal Science (CAAS 2013) 2013 3rd International Conference on Asia Agriculture and Animal (ICAAA 2013) The Effects of Different Hormones and Their Doses on Rooting of Stem Cuttings in Anatolian Sage (Salvia Fruticosa Mill.) A.Canan SAĞLAM a,*, Seviye YAVERa, İsmet BAŞERa, Latif CİNKILIÇb, aNamık Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Tekirdağ bNamık Kemal Üniversitesi Çorlu meslek Yüksek Okulu, Tekirdağ Abstract In this research, three different hormones and five different hormone dosages were applied on cuttings were taken from Anatolian sage plants (Salvia fruticosa Mill.) before flowering period. NAA, IBA (0, 60, 120, 180, 240 ppm) and IAA hormones (0, 100, 200, 300, 400 ppm) were prepared by dissolving in distilled water. Stem cuttings were kept in hormone solution for 24 hours and they were planted in perlit medium under greenhouse conditions. After a month, the number of rooted stem cutting, the number of root per stem cuttings, root length and root weight were determined on stem cuttings. Rooting was observed in all of the cuttings for both samples to which hormone was applied and to which hormone was not applied. According to the result of the variance analysis, the effects of the hormones and hormone doses on the examined characters were found significant as statistically. According to the results obtained, IAA application increased root number considerably. While high hormone dose applications caused the notable increase in root weight and root number in all of three hormones, low hormone applications did not affect root length.
    [Show full text]