DOCSLIB.ORG

The South Carolina Legislative Committee System 1719–1776

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The South Carolina Legislative Committee System 1719–1776 University of Kentucky UKnowledge United States History History 1970 Laboratory for Liberty: The South Carolina Legislative Committee System 1719–1776 George Edward Frakes Santa Barbara City College Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Frakes, George Edward, "Laboratory for Liberty: The South Carolina Legislative Committee System 1719–1776" (1970). United States History. 61. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_united_states_history/61 Laboratory for Liberty This page intentionally left blank ,J,l• 4-UI f '. t(,r, • ' ' ' 'Ill) GEORGE EDW A.RD FRAKES Laboratory for Liberty fJlie South Carolina Legislative Committee System 1719-1776 THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Lexington 1970 FRONTISPIECE: Page 213 of the Journal of the Commons House of Assembly of South Carolina for December 15, I737· From The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly, edited by ]ames Harrold Easterby. Courtesy of the South Carolina Department of Archives and History Copyright© 1970 by The University Press of Kentucky Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 74-94066 ISBN: 978-0-8131-5232-5 The University Press of Kentucky is a statewide cooperative scholarly publishing agency serving Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, Kentucky State College, Morehead State University, Murray State University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky 40506 TO CATHERINE DAVIES FRAKES Contents FOREWORD page ix CHAPTER I The Background of the Legislative Committee System page I CHAPTER II The Development of Legislative Committees in the Commons House of Assembly page 2I CHAPTER III The Legislative Committee System in the Early Royal Period, 1719-1725 page 38 CHAPTER IV The Legislative Committee System in a Period of Western Expansion, 1727-1737 page 53 CHAPTER V The Legislative Committee System in Peace and Frontier Conflict, 1737-1748 page 68 CHAPTER VI Committees and Legislative Supremacy in a Second Era of Frontier Conflict, 1749-1764 page 81 CHAPTER VII Legislative Committees and the Road to Revolution, 1764-1774 page IOO CHAPTER VIII Revolutionary Committee Activity, 1774-1776 page n8 APPENDIX I Committee Assignments and Memberships in the South Carolina Commons House of Assembly under the Revolutionary Government, 172o-172I page 131 APPENDIX II Committee Assignments and Memberships in the South Carolina Commons House of Assembly during Selected Segments of the Royal Period, 172I-r776 page 136 APPENDIX III Geographic Distribution of, Assignments to, and Membership of Selected Important Legislative Committees of the South Carolina Commons House of Assembly, 1736-1739 page 175 BIBLIOGRAPHY page 182 INDEX page 195 Foreword This study of the South Carolina legislative committee system is an attempt to illuminate the role of committees in the growth of colonial self­ government. Partly because of frontier developments, the legislative com­ mittee became an institution which helped to solve many governmental problems of a New-World community. In a sense, the committees provided workshops for ideas that were to bring about legislative supremacy and, finally, independence. Origins of the committee system can be traced, in part, to the parliamen­ tary committees of medieval England. In r67o Englishmen brought the committee system to South Carolina. Thereafter provincial legislative com­ mittees played a vital role in solving the problems of frontier economy and defense as well as in the emergence of self-government from 1719 to 1776. One of the first steps toward greater home rule, the South Carolina revolution of 1719 against proprietary control, was largely a product of legislative and extralegal committee activity. In the decades of royal rule that followed, important developments occurred within the committee sys­ tem. Among them was the elimination of royally appointed councilors from certain types of joint legislative committees. The dominance of joint com­ mittees by the Commons House of Assembly demonstrated that the colonists gradually increased control over their own affairs. Events on the frontier associated with Indian affairs and land development help explain this transition. Expansion of the legislative committee system resulted in Commons ix Foreword House control of important governmental functions related to expenditure of money. Often these expenditures were made during periods of inter­ colonial and frontier warfare. Other types of committees-commissions, vestries, grand juries, and other boards-were used throughout South Carolina and had an important voice in local government. Most of the leading provincial South Carolinians became acquainted with problems of self-government in this frontier colony through experience on legislative or local government committees. After 1761, when royal officials began to tighten their control over the colony, Commons House committees steadfastly opposed attempts to reduce their legislative power. The result of this struggle was a political deadlock which almost paralyzed constitutional government after 1769. Powerful extralegal organizations controlled by executive committees appeared in the 176os, both in Charles Town and on the frontier. These extralegal bodies rallied South Carolinians to their cause. Political leaders formed "general committees" that gave direction to the independence move­ ment, and Commons members used their experience in leading home-rule forces. By 1775, a province-wide network of local extralegal committees augmented the General Committee's power. The new Provincial Congress which was formed in 1775 relied upon a committee, the Council of Safety, as its executive body. South Carolina colonists had modified an Old-World parliamentary institution in a frontier environment to make it a vital part of their legislative program. Committees of the Provincial Congress helped bring about the colony's declaration of independence and first state con­ stitution. This study of South Carolina's legislative committee system thus illus­ trates the development of an institution which was vitally important in the growth of representative government in America. A number of primary materials are of particular value in studying the politics and institutions of colonial South Carolina. The journals of the Commons House and those of the Upper House and the Council are ex­ cellent sources of information. The student of South Carolina history is fortunate to have the fine collection of the South Carolina Archives as well as the materials of the South Caroliniana Library of the University of South Carolina, the Charleston Library Society collections, and the resources of the South Carolina Historical Society in Charleston to assist him. Although the number of additional public and private papers that have been published is not great, numerous materials from British archives have been copied and are now available at the South Carolina Archives Depart- X Foreword ment in Columbia, and at the Library of Congress. A number of these sources are now duplicated on microfilm. In addition, selected volumes of the journals of both houses of the South Carolina General Assembly have been published, edited by Charles Lee, James H. Easterby, Alexander S. Salley, and others. Some of the information drawn from these primary materials should be clarified. A major source of misunderstanding in colonial history is the existence of the Julian or "Old Style" calendar and the modern calendar. I have converted all Old Style dates into the modern dating system through­ out the text. However, when authorities I cite use Old Style dates in primary sources, I have retained the Old Style dates in my notes. A recently published study of South Carolina political history by the late M. Eugene Sirmans was particularly helpful to me in clarifying the political aspects of my subject. His book differs from mine in that his is a chrono­ logical investigation of politics before 1763. My study is basically an institutional treatment of the internal operations of the assembly and in­ fluential extralegal bodies with particular emphasis on the period following the French and Indian War. This study grew out of research for my doctoral dissertation. I am in­ debted to my teachers at the University of California, Santa Barbara, for their help in the preparation of this work, especially the members of my doctoral committee, Professors Henry M. Adams, A. Russell Buchanan, Rollin W. Quimby, and Robert Norris. In particular, I am grateful for the assistance of my adviser, Dr. Wilbur R. Jacobs, whose criticism and guid­ ance have been invaluable. Many other persons, too numerous to mention, have assisted me in my work. Of these, I would like to thank my classmates Professor David Kamens, Dr. Yasuhidi Kawashima, Professor Allan Rogers, Mr. Frank Bunker, Dr. Thomas Reeves, and Dr. Marvin Zahniser, who have given me excellent suggestions on this subject. I am also indebted to colleagues at Santa Barbara City College and the University of California, Santa Bar­ bara, especially Mrs. Ruth Little, Mr. Donald Sawyer, Dr. Curtis Solberg, Mr. Raymond Loynd, Mr. Robert Easton, Miss Donna
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon
    The Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon Standards Addressed: Social Studies 3-3: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the American Revolution and South Carolina’s role in the development of the new American nation. 3-3.1 Summarize the causes of the American Revolution, including Britain’s passage of the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, and the Intolerable Acts; the rebellion of the colonists; and the writing of the Declaration of Independence. 3-3.3 Summarize the course of the American Revolution in South Carolina, including the role of William Jasper and Fort Moultrie; the occupation of Charles Town by the British; the partisan warfare of Thomas Sumter, Andrew Pickens, and Francis Marion; and the battles of Cowpens, Kings Mountain, and Eutaw Springs. Visual Arts Standard 1: The student will demonstrate competence in the use of ideas, materials, techniques, and processes in the creation of works of visual art. Indicators VA3-1.1 Use his or her own ideas in creating works of visual art. VA3-1.3 Use and combine a variety of materials, techniques, and processes to create works of visual art. Objectives: 1. Students will demonstrate their understanding of four historical, South Carolina figures and how their roles during the Revolution contributed to Charleston history. 2. Students will make a connection between the four historical accounts and the history/role of the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon. Materials: Teacher lesson: Write-up- “History of the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon” Pictures- Labeled A, B, C, D, and E Online virtual
    [Show full text]
  • Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict Along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City
    Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City by Craig Thomas Marin BA, Carleton College, 1993 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2007 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Craig Thomas Marin It was defended on December 4, 2007 and approved by Dr. Seymour Drescher, University Professor, Department of History Dr. Van Beck Hall, Associate Professor, Department of History Dr. John Markoff, Professor, Department of Sociology Dissertation Director: Dr. Marcus Rediker, Professor, Department of History ii Copyright © by Craig Thomas Marin 2007 iii Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City Craig Thomas Marin, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2007 This dissertation argues that the economic demands of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world made Charleston, South Carolina, a center of significant sailor, slave, and servant resistance, allowing the working people of the city’s waterfront to permanently alter both the plantation slave system and the export economy of South Carolina. It explores the meanings and effects of resistance within the context of the waterfront, the South Carolina plantation economy, and the wider Atlantic World. Focusing on the period that began with the major slave rebellion along the Stono River in 1739 and culminated with the 1785 incorporation of Charleston, this dissertation relies on newspapers, legislative journals, court records, and the private correspondence and business papers of merchants and planters to reveal the daily activities of waterfront workers as they interacted with each other, and with their employers and masters.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    • dfcll Nations.: Library Bibliotheque nationale of Canada du Canada Canadian Theses Service Service des theses canadiennes Ottawa, Canada K1A0N4 NOTICE AVIS The quality of this microform is heavily dependent upon the La quality de cette microforme depend grandement de la quality of the original thesis submitted for microfilming. qualite" de la these soumise au microfilmage. Nous avons Every effort has been made to ensure the highest quality of tout fait pour assurer une quality supe>ieure de reproduc­ reproduction possible. tion. If pages are missing, contact the university which granted S'il manque des pages, veuillez communiquer avec the degree. I'universite qui a confe>6 le grade Some pages may have indistinct print especially if the La qualite d'impression de certaines pages peut laisser a original pages were typed with a pcor typewriter ribbon or d^sirer, surtout si les pages originales ont et6 dactylogra­ if the university sent us an inferior pnotocopy. phies a I'aide d'un ruban use" ou si I'universite nous a fait parvenir une photocopie de qualite inferieure. Reproduction in full or in part of this microform is governed La reproduction, meme partielle, de cette microforme est by the Canadian Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-30, and soumise a la Loi canadienne sur le droit d'auteur, SRC subsequent amendments. 1970, c. C-30, et ses amendements subsequents. NL-339 (r. 88/04) c Canada Public Celebrations in Victorian Saint John and Halifax by Bonnie L. Huskins Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August, 1991 (tjCopyright by Bonnie L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cochran-Inglis Family of Halifax
    ITOIBUoRA*r| j|orooiio»BH| iwAWMOTOIII THE COCHRAN-INGLIS FAMILY Gift Author MAY 22 mo To the Memory OF SIR JOHN EARDLEY WILMOT INGLIS, K.C. B. HERO OF LUCKNOW A Distinguished Nova Scotian WHO ARDENTLY LOVED HIS Native Land Press or J. R. Finduy, 111 Brunswick St., Halifax, n.6. THE COCHRAN-INGLIS FAMILY OF HALIFAX BY EATON, REV. ARTHUR WENTWORTH HAMILTON «« B. A. AUTHOB 07 •' THE CHUBCH OF ENGLAND IN NOVA SCOTIA AND THE TOET CLEBGT OF THE REVOLUTION." "THE NOVA SCOTIA BATONS,'" 1 "THE OLIVEBTOB HAHILTONS," "THE EI.MWOOD BATONS." THE HON. LT.-COL. OTHO HAMILTON OF 01XVE8T0B. HIS 80NS CAFT. JOHN" AND LT.-COL. OTHO 2ND, AND BIS GBANDSON SIB EALPH," THE HAMILTONB OF DOVSB AND BEHWICK," '"WILLIAM THOBNE AND SOME OF HIS DESCENDANTS." "THE FAMILIES OF EATON-SUTHEBLAND, LATTON-HILL," AC., AC. HALIFAX, N. S. C. H. Ruggi.es & Co. 1899 c^v GS <\o to fj» <@ifi Aatkair unkj «¦' >IJ COCHRAN -IMJLIS Among Nova Scotia families that have risen to a more than local prominence it willhardly be questioned that the Halifax Cochran "family withits connections, on the whole stands first. In The Church of England inNova Scotia and the Tory Clergy of the Revolution", and in a more recent family monograph entitled "Eaton —Sutherland; I,ayton-Hill," the Cochrans have received passing notice, but in the following pages for the first time a connected account of this important family willbe found. The facts here given are drawn chiefly from parish registers, biographical dictionaries, the British Army Lists, tombstones, and other recognized sources of authority for family history, though some, as for example the record of the family of the late Sir John Inglis, given the author by Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Et Gouvernement
    CONSTITUTION ET GOUVERNEMENT. 33 GOUVERNEURS GÉNÉRAUX DE LA PUISSANCE DU CANADA ET SES ADMINISTRATEURS. 1867. Vicomte Monk. 1893. Comte d'Aberdeen. 1868. Sir Chas. A. Windham (adm.) 1893. (15 juillet) lieut.-général Alex. Mont- 1868. Sir John Young Bart (adm. ) gomery-Moore (adm.) 1869. Sir John Young (baron Lisgar de nov. 1893. (13oct.) lieut.-général Alex. Mont- 1870). gomery-Moore (adm.) 1872. Lieu t.-général sir C. Hastings Doyle 1894. (29 nov.) lieut.-général Alex. Mont- (adm.) gomery-Moore (adm.) 1872. Comte de Duffeiïn. 1897. (13fév.) lieut.-général Alex. Mont- 1874. Lieut.-gén. W. O'Grady Haly (adm. ) gomery-Moore (adm.) 1878. Gén. sir Patrick McDougall (adm.) 1897. (20 oct.) lieut.-général Alex. Mont- 1878. Sir John Campbell (Marquis de Lomé). gomery-Moore (adm.) 1881. Gén. sir Patrick McDougall (adm.) 1898. (28 juin) général lord William Sey- 1883. Marquis de Lansdowne. mour (adm. ) 1886. Gén. lord Alex. Russell (adm.) 1898. Comte de Minto. 1888. Lieut.-gén. sir John Ross (adm.) 1899. (14 oct.) général lord William Sey- 1888. Baron Stanley de Preston. mour (adm. ) 1893. Lt.-gén. Alex. Montgomery-Moore (adm.) GOUVERNEURS GÉNÉRAUX DE LA NOUVELLE-ECOSSE. (/) A PORT-ROYAL. A HALIFAX. 1603. Pierre de Monts. 1749. L'hon. E. Cornwallis. 1610. Baron de Poutrincourt. 1752. Colonel Peregïine Hopson. 1611. Charles de Biencourt. 1753. Colonel C. Lawrence. 1623. Charles de la Tour. 1760. J. Belcher (faisant fonction). 1632. Isaac de Razilly. 1763. Montagu Wilmot. 1641. Charles d'Aunay Charnisay. 1766. Lord William Campbell. 1651. Chas, de la Tour. 1773. F. Legge. 1657. Sir Thomas Temple (g) 1776. Mariot Arbuthnot. 1670.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in South Carolina
    Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in South Carolina Tradition and continuity were hallmarks of South Carolina government and politics in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and South Carolinians modeled their governmental institutions on earlier practices. Revolutionary legislator, physician, and historian David Ramsay claimed that when the state adopted a new constitution in 1776, “the policy of the rulers in departing as little as possible from ancient forms and names, made the change of sovereignty less perceptible.”1 Despite changes wrought by the Revolution, maintenance or appeals to old forms continued throughout the debate over the Constitution. In its first regular session after ratification, the state House of Representatives ordered a new gown for its speaker, “ornamented with velvet tassels, richly fringed” that was “an exact pattern of that worn by the speaker of the British house of commons.”2 Yet despite efforts to maintain “ancient forms and names,” the legacy of the Revolution, the rapid growth of the upcountry, and the economic challenges of the postwar era slowly brought change. Under the Lords Proprietors The roots of South Carolina’s institutions were planted in the West Indian islands of Barbados and Jamaica. Established as a proprietary colony in the 1620s, Barbados offered a few elite white men the opportunity to accumulate great wealth on sugar plantations worked by black slaves who, by 1652, constituted a majority of the island’s population. In 1663, when King Charles II granted a charter for a new North American colony south of Virginia to eight Lords Proprietors, some of whom were investors in the Barbadian enterprise, they had a colonial model at hand that could readily be applied to the new mainland colony that became South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLOCH and STOBO IRVINE of CULTS
    A HISTORY and GENEALOGY OF THE FAMILIES OF BULLOCH and STOBO AND OF IRVINE of CULTS By Dr. J. G. B. BULLOCH PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY CHANCELLOR AND HISTORIAN OF ORDER OF WASHINGTON EX-CHANCELLOR OF ARYAN ORDER CHIEF REGENT OF IMPERIAL ORuER 01' YELLOW ROSE MEMBER OF SONS OF REVOLUTION OF GEORGIA EX-PRESIDENT OF SONS OF REVOLUTION OF FLORIDA .Author of The Bulloch Family and Copncctions; The Family of Bellinger and Deveaux and other Southern Families; The Stewart, Elliott and Dunwody Families; Baillie of Dunain; The Habersham and other Southern Families; Biographical .Sketch of Hon. Archibald Bulloch and other Articles; f.lf vcral Stories and M cdical and Sanitary A rticlcs. PREFACE. The study of genealogy and the compilation of articles on family history can be made very interesting if the genealogist looks upon himself not only as such but as an historian and scientist, for I maintain that the study of genealogy is not the mere tabulating of a lot of names, but embraces the study of history, eugenics-eugenics which of course takes into consideration not only heredity, peculiarities, and disease in­ cident thereto, but also enables one to compile a true history of events. Therefore the college and university should have a chair devoted to this study. We all know that one who merely takes a birdseye view of a battle can only see the general trend of the conflict, but that he who visits all parts of the field can study the salient features of the conflict and the parts taken by the individual and can deduce therefrom the reason why the enemy has been successful or has met defeat.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine, Began Its Career with the January Number
    THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL M AGAZINE. PUBLISHED Q UARTERLY BY* » THE S OUTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CHARLESTON, S. C. EDITEDY B A.. S SALLEY, JR., SECRETARY A ND TREASURER OF THE SOCIETY. VOLUME I . Printed f or the Society by THE WALKER. EVANS A COOSWELL CO., Charleston, S. C. I900. OFFICERS OFHE T South C arolina Historical Society President, G en. Edward MoCbady. 1st V ice-President, Hon. Joseph W. Barnwell. 2nd V ice-President, Col. Zimmerman Davis. Secretary a nd Treasurer and Librarian, A.. S Salley) Jr. Curators : Lang d on Cheves, Henry. A M. Smith, D. E. Huger Smith, Theodore D. Jervey, S. Prioleau Ravenel, Thomas della Torre. Charles. W Kollock, M. D. Boardf o Managers. All of the foregoing officers. Publication C ommittee. Joseph W. Barnwell, Henry A. M. Smith. A.. S Salley, Jr. THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL M AGAZINE PUBLISHED Q UARTERLY BY THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY, CHARLESTON, S. C. VOL-— I No. 1. JANUARY, 10OO- Printed l or the Society by THE WALKER. EVAN5 & COOS WELL CO., Charleston, S. C. CONTENTS Letter f rom Thomas Jefferson to Judge William Johnson 3 The M ission of Col. John Laurens to Europe in 1781 ... 13 Papersf o the First Council of Safety ±1 The B ull Family of South Carolina 76 Book R eviews and Notes 91 Notes a nd Queries 98 The S outh Carolina Historical Society 107 N.. B The price of a single number of this Magazine is one d ollar to any one other than a member of the South Carolina H istorical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Charleston Through the Eighteenth Century: Archaeology at the Heyward- Washington House Stable
    Charleston through the Eighteenth Century: Archaeology at the Heyward- Washington House Stable By Martha A. Zierden And Elizabeth J. Reitz With contributions from John Jones John E. Fosse Bruce L. Manzano Prepared for The Charleston Museum Archaeological Contributions 39 The Charleston Museum May 2007 ii Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction . 1 Introduction . 1 Previous Research . 3 Role of the Present Project . 4 Research Issues . 5 Chapter II: Historical Development . 11 The Settling of Charles Town . 11 Development of the Heyward-Washington Property . 13 The Revolutionary Era . 15 The Heyward Property before and after the Revolution . 17 Agricultural Prosperity . 22 The Civil War . 25 Church Street in the 19th Century . 27 Chapter III: Fieldwork . 29 Fieldwork . 29 Description of Excavated Proveniences . 30 Construction Monitoring . 40 Features from the 1970s Project . 45 Chapter IV: Material Culture . 49 Laboratory Methods . 49 Analysis . 50 1730-1740: John Milner, Gunsmith . 52 1740-1760s: the 1740 Fire and John Milner Jr. 59 1770-1820: the Heyward and Grimke periods . 68 Late 19th century Assemblage . 76 Materials from the 1970s excavations . 81 Chapter V: Interpretation of the Site . 93 Site Formation Processes . 94 Construction and Evolution of the Stable . 98 The late Colonial Landscape . 101 The early Landscape . 111 Chapter VI: Interpretation of the Artifacts . 115 Temporal Analysis . 115 Refinement and the Consumer Revolution . 127 Chapter VII: Interpretation of the Animals . 133 Animal Remains from the Heyward-Washington Stable . 133 iii Animal Use and the Urban Environment . 152 References . 169 Appendicies I. Data tables, Animal Remains from the Heyward Washington Stable . 201 Elizabeth J. Reitz and Carol Colaninno II.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine
    THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL M AGAZINE PUBLISHED Q UARTERLY BY THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CHARLESTON, S. C. EDITEDY B A.. S SALLEY, JR., SECRETARY A ND TREASURER OF THE SOCIETY. VOLUME I I. Printed f or the Society by THE WALKER. EVANS & COGSWELL CO., Charleston, S. C. I90I. OFFICERS OFHE T South C arolina Historical Society President, G en. Edwakd McChauy. 1st V ice-President, Hon. Joseph W. Barnwell. %nd V 'u-e- President, Col. Zimmerman Davis. 3rd V ice • President , Henry A. M. Smith, Esy. -i-th V ice-President, Hon. F. H. Weston. Secretary a nd Treasurer and Librarian, A. S. Salley, Jr. Curators : Langdon C heves, D.. E IIuger Smith, S. P rioleai: Ravenel, Theodore I). Jervey, Charles. W Kollock, M. D. Rev. C. S. Vedder, I). D., Rev. John Johnson, D. D. Rev. Robkrt Wilson, D D. Boardf o Managers. kAll o the korkgoino offioeks. Publication Committee. Joseph. W Barnwell, Henry. A M. Smith, A.. S Salley, Jr, THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL M AGAZINE PUBLISHED Q UARTERLY BY THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CHARLESTON, S. C. VOL.I— I NO. 1. JANUARY. lQOl. Entered a t the Postoffice at Charleston, S. C, as Second-class Matter. Printed f or (he Society by THE WALkER. EVANS & COGSWELL CO., Charleston, S. C 1901. .Joseph W Barnwell, Henry A. M. Smith, A. S S alley, Jr. EDITORF O THE MAGAZINE. A. S. S.vi.i.kv. .Ik. CONTENTS fPapers o the First Council of Safety 3 The M ission of Col.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
    [Show full text]
  • The ''Havoc of War'' and Its Aftermath in Revolutionary South Carolina
    The ''Havoc of War'' and its Aftermath in Revolutionary South Carolina by Jerome NADELHAFT* The approach of war between England and America inspired many privileged South Carolinians to announce their willingness to suffer for freedom's sake. They would move, disown America, or fight "rather than submit to tyranny.'' They did not ignore the possibility of dying, but since their cause was just, death would be noble, "generous", preferable to servitude. 1 That vision was shared by Richard Hutson, who wrote of the "awfully pleasing sight" of the British army and navy "most shamefully repulsed" when they attacked Charleston in 1776. Romantically, perhaps not inaccurately, he spread the tale of one sergeant, "McDougal by name," who "rivals Epaminondas in fame; when breathing his last, 'My brave lads,' he cries, 'I am just expiring, but for heaven's sake let not sweet liberty expire with me."' 2 Few Carolinians expressed an awareness that warfare consisted of more than noble gestures and deeds ; few seemed worried that military death could be inglorious. Josiah Smith, who was unwilling to submit "to the will & controul of a haughty and abaondoned sett of rulers," might have had such gloomy prospects in mind when he wrote that "horrible consequences" attended bloodshed. 3 So might Henry Laurens, whose son returned from England to fight and die in and for South Carolina. Ready "to hazard all ... [his] estate," Laurens worried that the British, encoura­ ging Indian attacks and slave insurrections, would cause the "most horri­ ble butcheries of innocent women & children," and that "civil discord between fellow citizens & neighbour Farmers" would lead to "fraud per­ jury & assassination." 4 Probably few people had the knowledge, or even willingness, to imagine the nature of South Carolina's Revolutionary War.
    [Show full text]