DOCSLIB.ORG

Georgia Department of Corrections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Georgia Department of Corrections eRFP (Event) Number 46700‐GDC0000669 Additional Scored Response Document Attachment K June 9, 2015 Submitted By: Global Tel*Link Corporation 12021 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 100 Reston, VA 20190 Primary Contact: Alternate Contact: Don Eades, Account Executive Larry Eveslage , RFP Director Telephone: 770‐329‐2113 Telephone: 972‐215‐0133 Email: [email protected] Fax: 972‐506‐8783 Email: [email protected] Georgia Department of Corrections eRFP Number 46700‐GDC0000669 Inmate Telephone Service STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ADDITIONAL SCORED RESPONSE DOCUMENT Attachment K GDC is requesting additional information regarding potential value‐added technologies, solutions and support. Contractors are encouraged (but not required) to provide a complete written response to each of the additional scored items listed in Attachment K of the eRFP. Several of the additional scored items may require Contractor to provide exhibits and/or visual aids which clearly reference the specific eRFP section. All information contained in Contractor’s response shall be relevant to the section or specified item of the eRFP. Please note, GDC will not be a “beta test site” for any unproven technology. DO NOT INCLUDE ANY COST/PRICING/REVENUE SHARE INFORMATION IN YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS ATTACHMENT K – ADDITIONAL SCORED RESPONSE DOCUMENT. AS1: Continuous Voice Biometric Technology: Contractor shall provide an overview of its continuous voice biometric technology, detail the enrollment process and the continuous verification of the inmate’s voice. This feature must be an integrated part of the ITS and shall include analytical tools and reporting. Response: GTL understands and complies. Voice Biometric Verification GTL’s ITS includes integrated voice biometric identification. This feature can be used to validate the inmate using a PIN to place a call is the valid owner of the PIN. Two levels of voice biometric identification are available: Initial Voice Biometric Verification –verifies the PIN/inmate combination at the beginning of the call before the call continue. GTL has been awarded Patent 7,403,766 for this feature. Voice IQ™ Continuous Voice Biometric Inmate Identification – continuously analyzes the inmate voice throughout the call to ensure the inmate does not “hand‐off” the call to a different speaker. GTL has been awarded Patent 8,509,736 for this feature. GTL is proposing both initial and continuous inmate verification for the GDC. Both features are an integrated part of our ITS and include analytical tools and reporting. Highlights of our Voice Biometric Solution Operates in Real‐Time as opposed to other voice biometric products which are strictly post production. Resides as an integral component of the hosted inmate telephone system and does not require 3rd party software to be opened outside of the hosted inmate telephone system user interface. GDC Inmate Telephone Service RFP Additional Scored Response Document Page 2 © 2015 Global Tel*Link Corporation All Rights Reserved. Georgia Department of Corrections eRFP Number 46700‐GDC0000669 Inmate Telephone Service Technology is working throughout the call and will prevent fraudulent handover of the handset to a different inmate. In addition, as we have described below, this will utilize our state‐of‐the‐art technology to positively identify all additional voice prints for each and every call. Where Deployed? As noted in Attachment M, this technology is deployed for both Michigan DOC and North Carolina DOC and pending implementation for the Ohio Department of Corrections. Initial Voice Biometric Verification GTL’s voice biometric solution is a unique biometric speaker verification system that enables initial verification and identification of an inmate in real time, using a simple spoken pass phrase. This voice biometric solution is an integral component of the ITS and does not require 3rd party software to be opened outside of the ITS user interface. Totally language and accent independent, The GTL Initial Voice Biometric Verification feature provides a secure, efficient and extremely convenient method to initially verify an inmate’s identity. Our voice biometric solution is fully integrated and is easy to deploy. Designed exclusively to meet strict global security standards, GTL’s voice biometric solution has successfully passed independent security audits. Our state‐of‐the‐art voice biometric feature is used to allow inmates to securely access to the ITS phones while combating fraud and compromising the inmate’s calling account. GTL’s voice biometric solution has been selected as the verification platform of choice by leading correction industry and security organizations. Features Language and accent independent State‐of‐the‐art accuracy Fully Integrated with the GTL ITS Straightforward deployment Integrated security Convenient and non‐intrusive (no personal information required) Secure multi‐factor authentication How It Works GTL’s voice biometric solution is an integrated component of GTL’s ITS which provides secure access to initiate the verification process. The inmate's pass phrase is created and stored in the system’s voiceprint repository where it is used to verify the inmate’s identity. A verification result is then returned to confirm the inmate’s identity. Enrollment Enrollment in GTL’s voice biometric solution is accomplished by the inmate stating three consecutive renderings of the selected pass phrase, creating a unique voiceprint. GDC Inmate Telephone Service RFP Additional Scored Response Document Page 3 © 2015 Global Tel*Link Corporation All Rights Reserved. Georgia Department of Corrections eRFP Number 46700‐GDC0000669 Inmate Telephone Service Verification GTL’s voice biometric solution verifies the inmate’s identity by comparing a single repetition of the enrolled pass phrase to the voiceprint stored in the system’s voiceprint repository. GTL Voice IQ™ ‐ Continuous Voice Biometric Inmate Identification GTL Voice IQ™ is GTL’s latest addition to our powerful Voice Biometrics toolset for inmate identification and fraud prevention. Using one of the most comprehensive, natural language speaker verification tools in the industry, GTL Voice IQ™ enrolls the inmate voice print and builds a voice print profile for comparison in future calls. During the inmate call, GTL Voice IQ™ will continuously compare snippets of the live inmate calls to the recorded voice print to verify the inmate’s identity. GTL Voice IQ™ is the GDC’s solution for inmate and called party phone swap control and prevention. GTL Voice IQ™ will be used in conjunction with GTL’s Initial Voice Verification feature. The GTL Voice IQ™ continuous voice biometric solution is a fully integrated; state‐of‐the‐art component of the GTL hosted inmate telephone system. This feature is able to be deployed in conjunction with GTL’s initial inmate voice verification biometric feature. With this feature enabled, line‐monitoring modules continuously and independently track the voices to detect a Speaker Change Event, once detected it triggers an alert. Alerts are capable of performing any combination of the following actions: Alert both parties that a “Speaker Change Event” has occurred. Terminate the call. Store Speaker Change Event information in the hosted inmate telephone system (ITS) database. This is in ‘stealth mode’ – no indication is given to call parties about detection. The inmate’s identity is shown for each Speaker Change Event on each call. Alert designated GDC personnel (email or text message). GTL Voice IQ™ continuous inmate identification compares the voice prints of inmates which have been enrolled in the system with the voices on the call. With this the software can identify the inmate who is attempting to use another inmate's PIN number. Actions discussed for the continuous voice analysis are triggered in real time, which is a GTL exclusive feature. After call completion, the Speaker Change Events collected during the call are stored in the ITS database. All Speaker Change Events for all inmate calls at the GDC’s facilities will be stored collectively in the ITS database for further search and retrieval. GDC Inmate Telephone Service RFP Additional Scored Response Document Page 4 © 2015 Global Tel*Link Corporation All Rights Reserved. Georgia Department of Corrections eRFP Number 46700‐GDC0000669 Inmate Telephone Service With GTL’s Voice IQ™ solution, investigators will be able to efficiently identify calls of interest and virtually eliminate the time it takes to search for and listen to calls pertaining to inmate phone fraud. Additional Features: Speaker Change Events are stored separately, not altering the original recording. The system requires 20 to 40 seconds, which is configurable, after speaker change to determine an event. This buffer is intentional to protect against false positives caused by a laugh, cough, cry or emotional speech. Search calls for specific voice print by inmate**. Voice IQ™ Call Detail Reporting Filter: From the Call Detail Reporting Screen, users can chose the “Return VIQ Detect Status Records” box. When checked, search results will be limited to call records where Voice IQ™ has detected possible changes in the inmate speaking during the call. Voice IQ™ in the Call Detail Results Screen: A. Voice IQ™ detection is shown in the column headings of the Call Detail Results Screen. B. Any call records where three‐way calling activity (Energy) or Voice IQ™ speaker changes have been detected will be highlighted in yellow. For calls where Energy activity has been detected, an E icon will be displayed with a time stamp (MM:SS) where the Energy activity was detected. For calls where Voice IQ Speaker Change Event has been detected, a V icon will be displayed with a time stamp (MM:SS) where the Voice IQ™ speaker change activity was detected. C. When a user hovers the cursor over the E or V icons, a tool tip will display whether an Energy or Voice Change was detected. GDC Inmate Telephone Service RFP Additional Scored Response Document Page 5 © 2015 Global Tel*Link Corporation All Rights Reserved. Georgia Department of Corrections eRFP Number 46700‐GDC0000669 Inmate Telephone Service Voice IQ™ in the Call Analyzer: A.
Recommended publications
  • Faculty & Staff Service Recognition Dinner With

    Faculty & Staff Service Recognition Dinner With

    Faculty & Staff Service Recognition Dinner with Service Dates January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 Service Entity Last Name First Name Award Job Title Department Reports to Name Executive Leader AUMC Ryans Sharon 20 Unit Clerk 3 West Neurology Roslyn Marshall Brower, Laura AUMC Schwartz Carolyn 20 Senior Staff Nurse 3C PICU Carol Neal Brower, Laura AUMC Carter Rosa Lee 20 Patient Care Technician 4 West Surgery Endia Veal Brower, Laura AUMC Ware Katherine 20 Staff Nurse-PRN 7 West Labor/Delivery Barbara Wallom Brower, Laura AU Crail Glenn 20 Director of Development Advancement Michael Kessler Keen, Russell AU Cheatham Amanda 20 Program Manager I CAHS-Physical Therapy Tonya Ryans Pretlow,Lester AU Chong Kwong 20 Professor CAHS-Physical Therapy Charlotte Chatto Pretlow,Lester AU Ness Robert 20 Lecturer CAHSS-Sociology, Criminal Justice & Social Work Green, Elna Green, Elna AUMC Albert Shannon 20 Senior Staff Nurse Cancer Clinic Tracey Slagle Thornton, Joe AUMC Ferguson Jamaica 20 Resource Specialist CARE Facilitation Carla Saunders Brower, Laura AUMC Spence Leslie 20 Centralized Scheduling Specialist II Centralized Scheduling Sara Gorrell Thornton, Joe AU Navarre Sammy 20 Hazardous Materials Officer Chemical Safety Office Kenneth Erondu Rush, Jim AUMC Dye Teresa 20 Senior Staff Nurse CHOG Anesthesia Ann Hayes Brower, Laura AUMC Bynes Barbara 20 Senior Staff Nurse CHOG OR Ann Hayes Brower, Laura AUMC Gurley Susan 20 Senior Staff Nurse CHOG OR Ann Hayes Brower, Laura AUMC Blalock Russell 20 Medical Technologist Clinical Pathology Kellie Foss
  • THE DOC EAGLE Summer, 2003 “Soaring to Greater Heights of Excellence”

    THE DOC EAGLE Summer, 2003 “Soaring to Greater Heights of Excellence”

    Volume 2, Issue 1 THE DOC EAGLE Summer, 2003 “Soaring to Greater Heights of Excellence” Message From the Acting Commissioner... Georgia, its taxpayers, and its state agencies are facing a difficult time due to the economy. Our de- partment, in particular, faces the challenges of providing public safety by ensuring that we do not let even one of the 47,000 prisoners in our custody escape and that we provide effective supervision to the 125,000 probationers on our caseloads. We are doing this in Fiscal Year 2004 with $41 million less than we had last year. We can only perform our important mission, even in the best of times, with good leadership. Leadership is even more important during difficult times. And the kind of leadership we need must exist all the way from the commissioner’s office to the folks doing the front line work in our facilities and on the street. During my military duty in Washington, D.C., this summer, I have had the opportunity to visit some historic sites and many of the memorials in this city, from Mt. Vernon to the Lincoln Memorial. They Joe Ferrero have all reminded me of the leadership that our Founders and those who followed brought to our Acting Commissioner country during its difficult times. I have also had the opportunity to study while stationed here. Dur- ing my studies, I came across a quote from Colonel John Boyd, USAF (retired), who said that leader- ship is “the art of inspiring people to cooperate and enthusiastically take action toward the achieve- ment of uncommon goals.” (Cont.
  • Maintenance of State Prisons

    Maintenance of State Prisons

    Special Examination 11-38 February 2012 Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Operations Russell Hinton, State Auditor Leslie McGuire, Director Maintenance of State Prisons Why we did this review This special examination was conducted at the request of the House Better performance information needed to Appropriations Committee. The Committee requested that we review evaluate GDC’s maintenance efforts GDC’s provision of maintenance services at its correctional facilities. What we found The objectives of the examination The Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) should improve were to: the data it collects to monitor the efficiency and effectiveness of its Determine if GDC has adopted maintenance program. However, GDC does emphasize to facility policies and procedures that emphasize the completion of personnel the importance of preventive maintenance and conducts preventive work. quarterly and annual audits to check compliance with Document the frequency and maintenance schedules. reasons that GDC uses contractors and inmates for maintenance Regarding performance measurement, GDC should provide activities. additional guidance and training to facility staff who are Determine whether GDC has responsible for counting and classifying maintenance activities, as adequate information to manage well as staff responsible for classifying maintenance expenditures. program operations. Current differences in how state prisons track these items make the information unreliable for gauging performance. To better manage operations, GDC should also collect additional information, such as the frequency or cost of repairs to equipment, the extent to which maintenance is outsourced to contractors, Who we are maintenance expenditures per prison and per square foot, and the The Performance Audit Operations level and cost of deferred maintenance.
  • Case 7:08-Tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 96

    Case 7:08-Tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 96

    Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 96 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION ASTANIEL JARVIS MANN, CIVIL ACTION NO. PIP HENG, ELIJAH ADCOCK, RONNY N. ASKEW, RICKIE LEE FOX, JODRPH DANIEL FINCHER, and SHEDRICK D. ROSS, Plaintiffs, Vs. CLASS ACTION COMMISSIONER JAMES DONALD, RICK JACOBS, SARAH DRAPER, DR. SHARON LEWIS, MD., WARDEN HART, DEPUTY WARDEN MCLAUGHLIN, ALBERT JONES, CAPTAIN MORRIS, LT. MAINE, OFFICER POWELL, OFFICER JESSE HOWELL, OFFICER T. BROWN, OFFICER YANCEY, OFFICER CANNON, OFFICER SNAKE, OFFICER SMITH, OFFICER SHANE, OFFICER GRAINGER, OFFICER RADCLIFF, SERGEANT BOND, OFFICER PAGE, OFFICER DANIEL, OFFICER BATES, OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 1, and OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 2, Defendants. Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 2 of 96 COMPLAINT – CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, Astaniel Jarvis Mann, (“Mann”), Pip Heng (“Heng”), Elijah Adcock (“Adcock”), Ronnie N. Askew (“Askew”), Ricky Lee Fox (“Fox”), Joseph Daniel Fincher (“Fincher”), and Shedrick D. Ross (“Ross”) file this Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in accordance with FRCP Rule 23, and show the Court as follows: PLAINTIFFS 1. Plaintiffs Mann, Heng, Adcock, Askew, Fox, Fincher, and Ross were incarcerated in the Georgia Department of Corrections and at all times relevant were inmates at the Valdosta State Prison or at Lowndes State Prison in Valdosta, Georgia which is within the Middle District of Georgia. DEFENDANTS 2. Defendant James E. Donald (“ Commissioner Donald”) was at all times relevant and is currently Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Rick Jacobs (“ Jacobs”) was at all times relevant and is currently Director of Special Operations Sections of the Corrections Divisions of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Sarah Draper (“Draper”) was at all times relevant and currently Director of Internal Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 3 of 96 Investigations of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Dr.
  • Two Thousand Twelve Mission & Vision Statements

    Two Thousand Twelve Mission & Vision Statements

    two thousand twelve Mission & Vision Statements....................................1 Year In Review..........................................................8-15 • Administration Letter from the Commissioner..............................2 • Engineering & Construction Services • Georgia Correctional Industries Our Agency........................................................................3 • Human Resources • Office of Investigations & Compliance Budget................................................................................... 4 • Operations, Planning & Training • Facilities Operations Offender Demographics............................................5 • Probation Operations Strategic Vision Timeline........................................16 Reentry Program...........................................................6 Contacts.............................................................................17 MissionMission The Department of Corrections creates a safer Georgia by effectively managing offenders and providing opportunities for positive change. Vision To be recognized as the best corrections organization in the nation. he Department of Corrections operates our facilities and manages offenders under the concept of Exceptional is TStandard. The agency’s team is comprised of 12,000 dedicated employees who strive to implement our mission of protecting the public through our unwavering commitment to manage our 60,000 inmates and 160,000 probationers. The Department has made many strides throughout Fiscal Year 2012. In November
  • Case 5:15-Cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 1 of 72

    Case 5:15-Cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 1 of 72

    Case 5:15-cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 1 of 72 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ________________________________ ) TIMOTHY GUMM, on behalf of ) himself and a class of similarly ) situated persons, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION v. ) ) NO. 5:15-CV-41-MTT-CHW TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant ) Commissioner, Georgia Department ) SECOND AMENDED of Corrections, ) COMPLAINT ) RICKY MYRICK, Assistant ) CLASS ACTION Commissioner, Georgia Department ) of Corrections, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) STEVE UPTON, Director of Field ) Operations, Georgia Department of ) Corrections, ) ) RICK JACOBS, Former Director of ) Facilities Operations, Georgia ) Department of Corrections, ) ) RANDY TILLMAN, Former Director ) of Facilities Operations, Georgia ) Department of Corrections, ) ) ERIC SELLERS, Warden, Georgia ) Diagnostic & Classification Prison, ) ) BRUCE CHATMAN, Former Warden, ) Georgia Diagnostic & Classification ) Prison, ) ) Case 5:15-cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 2 of 72 MICHAEL CANNON, Superintendent, ) Special Management Unit, ) ) RODNEY MCCLOUD, Former ) Superintendent, Special Management ) Unit, ) ) WILLIAM POWELL, Deputy Warden ) of Security, Special Management Unit, ) ) JUNE BISHOP, Former Deputy ) Warden of Security, Special ) Management Unit, ) ) RUFUS LOGAN, Former Unit ) Manager, Special Management Unit, ) ) DWAIN WILLIAMS, Chief of ) Security, Special Management Unit, ) ) MARGARET WASHINGTON, ) Former Food Service Director, ) Georgia Diagnostic & Classification ) Prison, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Timothy Gumm respectfully files this amended complaint for damages and declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated prisoners. In support thereof, Gumm alleges the following: 2 Case 5:15-cv-00041-MTT-CHW Document 73 Filed 03/11/17 Page 3 of 72 INTRODUCTION 1.
  • 2019 Directory

    2019 Directory

    2019 Directory Page 1 Page 2 Georgia Sheriffs’ Association Annual Directory Table of Contents Georgia Sheriffs’ Association Ads - alphabetically listed Welcome .................................................................................................. 4 Brannen Motor Company .......................................outside back cover Officers ..................................................................................................... 5 Combined Public Communications .................................................. 42 Active Past Presidents ............................................................................ 6 Concerns of Police Survivors, Georgia Chapter ............................... 93 Regional Vice Presidents ....................................................................... 7 CorrectHealth ......................................................................................... 1 Regional Map .......................................................................................... 8 Correctional Resource Group ............................................................... 2 Board of Directors .................................................................................. 9 Eagle Advantage Solutions ........................................ inside back cover Ed’s Public Safety .................................................................................. 58 Georgia Sheriffs’ Youth Homes Georgia Sheriffs’ Association Chaplains Division .............................. 2 Mission ..................................................................................................
  • History Today Stations

    History Today Stations

    GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT History • Certifications: Firefighter 1 and First Aid • Serves Butts, Monroe, Lamar, Spalding and Henry The program was established by Chief Buddy Brooks in 1963 counties at the Georgia Industrial Institute, which is now Lee Arrendale State Prison. The program consisted of one fire station, eight in- DODGE STATE PRISON, Station No. 3 mate firefighters and one part-time staff person assigned to the • Established in 1985 and renamed Melvin Alfonso Stephens station. Memorial Fire Station in 2004 • Responds to an average of 125 calls per year Today • Certifications: Firefighter 1, First Aid, Hazardous Materi- als, Crash Victim Extrication, and Emergency Medical The Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) operates: Responder • 19 Fire Stations in State facilities, six in county facilities • Serves Bleckley, Dodge and Laurens counties • Seven boot camps and probation detention centers have trained wildfire teams who assist the Georgia Forestry GEORGIA STATE PRISON, Station No. 4 Commission on wildfires in the North Georgia Mountains. • Established in 1965 • Responds to an average of 115 calls per year More than 220 offenders participate in the offender firefighter • Certifications: Firefighter 1 and First Aid program. GDC fire stations respond to more than 3,000 calls • Serves Tattnall, Toombs, Long and Candler counties annually. Responses have increased over 600% since 1993. LEE STATE PRISON, Station No. 5 • Established in 1986 MISSION • Responds to an average of 230 calls per year The fire services program provides fire protection to state • Certifications: Firefighter 1, First Aid and Hazardous property and the community surrounding the prisons. Materials Awareness and Operations CAREER OPPORTUNITIES • Serves Lee county Georgia legislature amended the firefighter certification require- MONTGOMERY STATE PRISON, Station No.
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cj970ps Author Reiter, Keramet A. Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 By Keramet A. Reiter A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Franklin E. Zimring, Chair Professor Jonathon Simon Professor Marianne Constable Professor David Sklansky Spring 2012 Abstract The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976 - 2010 by Keramet A. Reiter Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Franklin E. Zimring, Chair Concrete, steel, artificial light, complete technological automation, near-complete sensory deprivation, and total isolation – these are the basic conditions of supermaximum security prisons in the United States. “Supermax” prisoners remain alone twenty-three to twenty-four hours a day, under fluorescent lights that are never turned off. Meals arrive through a small slot in an automated cell door. Prisoners have little to no human contact for months, years, or even decades at a time, save brief interactions with correctional officers, who place hand, ankle, and waist cuffs on each prisoner before removing him from his cell.
  • Thompson Ehle Company MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING

    Thompson Ehle Company MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING

    Thompson Ehle Company engineering excellence for 40 years MEP/FP, CIVIL, TSYS ENGINEERING PORTFOLIO A COLLECTION OF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE WHO WE ARE Our History Our Philosophy Our Approach & Executive Summary Sustainable Design 1Our Capabilities Our History Founded in 1977 by W. L. Thompson, Thompson Ehle Company offers a comprehensive package of engineering services including: Mechanical Engineering Civil Engineering + Water Features Design Electrical Engineering + Lighting Design Technology Infrastructure Design Plumbing/Fire Protection Engineering Commissioning + Facility Assessment Our Philosophy Our business, consulting engineering, is a balance of art and science based on a foundation of knowledge and skills acquired through years of study and practical experience. To be successful, any Project must subscribe to total organizational loyalty. The 3-tier commitment includes: • Designing to ethical and professional standards • Providing the client with engineering solutions • Delivering a quality product on time and in budget The design approach includes planning, organization, proper staffing, effective direction, and control over the decision-making process. In order to provide proper up-front planning of a project, six planning elements must be considered and implemented at the beginning of the project. These elements must be maintained and/or adjusted as needed as the project moves through development. The six planning elements include: Establish realistic objective Budget efforts to accomplish tasks Program tasks to achieve objectives Identify and resolve constraints to design process Schedule tasks in a sequential time-frame Devise strategies to ensure profitability and success Our Approach In the TEC organization it is the Project Manager’s task to establish realistic objectives to be accomplished by the Team during the development of a project.
  • 2020 Service Recognition List of Honorees by Supervisor April 21, 2020

    2020 Service Recognition List of Honorees by Supervisor April 21, 2020

    2020 Service Recognition List of Honorees by Supervisor April 21, 2020 A B C D E F G H I J K L 2 AUMC King Taylor 2/23/2015 12/31/2020 5 2/23/2020 Nurse Navigator Ped Hem/Onc Clinic Bales Amy Bella, Beverly 3 AUHS Morris Constance 8/10/2015 12/31/2020 5 8/10/2020 Dir, Care Center Bus. Ops.
  • Inmate Statistical Profile

    Inmate Statistical Profile

    Inmate Statistical Profile Inmates Admitted During CY 2007 for Any Drug Crime Produced for General Distribution Georgia Department of Corrections Operations, Planning, and Training Division Planning and Analysis Section 01-DEC-10 Georgia Dept of Corrections Inmate Statistical Profile 01-DEC-10 Contents Inmates Admitted During Cy 2007 For Any Drug Crime Produced for General Distribution Table of Contents Demographic information 5 Race group 6 Hispanic Origin 7 Marital status, self-reported at entry to prison 8 Number of children, self-reported at entry to prison 9 Religious affiliation, self-reported at entry to prison 10 Home county - self-reported at entry to prison 15 Socioeconomic class, self-reported at entry to prison 16 Environment to age 16, self-reported at entry to prison 17 Guardian status to age 16, self-reported at entry to prison 18 Employment status before prison, self-reported at entry to prison 19 Age at admission 21 Height, measured at entry to prison 22 Weight, measured at entry to prison 24 Military service Correctional information 25 Type of admission to prison 26 Current / last security status 27 Current / last institution type 28 Institution type - transitional centers 29 Institution type - county prisons 30 Institution type - state prisons 32 Institution type - private prisons 33 Institution type - prison annexes 34 Institution type - pre-release centers 35 Institution type - inmate boot camp 36 Number of disciplinary reports 37 Number of transfers 38 Number of escapes 39 Probable future release type of still active