DOCSLIB.ORG

6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 09/23/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law View Online ‘16 for 16: 16 Reasons for Votes at 16.’ [n.d.]. (Electoral Reform Society) <https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/latest-news-and-research/publications/16-reasons-for -votes-at-16/> ‘A British Bill of Rights: Informing the Debate.’ 2007. (JUSTICE Constitution Committee) <http://www.statewatch.org/news/2007/nov/uk-justice-bill-of-rights-rep.pdf> Adonis, Andrew. 1993a. Parliament Today, 2nd ed (Manchester: Manchester University Press) ———. 1993b. Parliament Today, 2nd ed (Manchester: Manchester University Press) ———. 1993c. Parliament Today, 2nd ed (Manchester: Manchester University Press) ‘A Future Fair for All.’ 2010. (The Labour Party) <http://www.cpa.org.uk/cpa_documents/TheLabourPartyManifesto-2010.pdf> Aharon Barak. 2006a. The Judge in a Democracy (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press) ———. 2006b. The Judge in a Democracy (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press) ‘A House for Teh Future.’ 2000. (Report of the Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords) <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/266061/pr elims.pdf> Aileen Kavanagh. 2009. Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) Alex Brazier. [n.d.-a]. New Politics, New Parliament? (Hansard Society) ———. [n.d.-b]. New Politics, New Parliament? (Hansard Society) ———. [n.d.-c]. New Politics, New Parliament? (Hansard Society) Allen, Graham. 2003. The Last Prime Minister: Being Honest about the UK Presidency, [2nd ed.] (Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic) An Elected Second Chamber. 2008. White Paper, Cm 7438 (Ministry of Justice) <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228706/7 1/26 09/23/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 438.pdf> Anson, William Reynell, and Arthur Berriedale Keith. 1935. The Law and Custom of the Constitution: Vol.2: The Crown, 4th ed (Oxford: Clarendon Press) Audi, Robert. 2011. Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State (New York: Oxford University Press) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796083.001.0001> Australia. Republic Advisory Committee. 1993. An Australian Republic: The Options : The Report of the Republic Advisory Committee (Canberra: Commonwealth Govt. Printer) ‘Backbench Business Committee - UK Parliament.’ [n.d.]. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/backben ch-business-committee/> Bagehot, Walter. 1928a. The English Constitution (London: Oxford University Press) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163835> ———. 1928b. The English Constitution (London: Oxford University Press) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163835> Bailey, S. H., N. W. Taylor, Aileen McColgan, D. J. Harris, and D. C. Ormerod. 2009. Bailey, Harris & Jones Civil Liberties: Cases, Materials, and Commentary, 6th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press) Baker, Amy. 2000. Prime Ministers and the Rule Book ([London]: Politico’s Publishing) Baldwin, Nicholas. 2005a. Parliament in the 21st Century (London: Politico’s) ———. 2005b. Parliament in the 21st Century (London: Politico’s) ———. 2005c. Parliament in the 21st Century (London: Politico’s) Baldwin, Nicholas, and Donald Shell. 2013. Second Chambers (Florence: Taylor and Francis) <http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3061037> Ballinger, Chris. 2006. Democracy and Voting (London: Hansard Society) Barber, N. W. 2010. The Constitutional State (Oxford: Oxford University Press) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585014.001.0001> Barnett, Anthony, and Charter 88 (Movement). 1994. Power and the Throne (London: Vintage in association with Charter 88) Barnett, Hilaire. 2017. Constitutional & Administrative Law, Twelfth edition (London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=4917664> Barnett, Hilaire A. 2002. Britain Unwrapped: Government and Constitution Explained ([London]: Penguin Books) 2/26 09/23/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London Baronness Hale of Richmond. 12AD. ‘The Supreme Court in the UK Constitution’ (Justice of the Supreme Court) <https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-121012.pdf> Beith, Sir Alan, and Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Liaison Committee. 2013. Select Committee Effectiveness, Resources and Powers: Responses to the Committee’s Second Report of Session 2012-13, Report, with Appendices, Together with Formal Minutes (London: TSO), mmxii–13 911 Benn, Tony, Andrew Hood, and Ruth Winstone. 1993a. Common Sense: A New Constitution for Britain (London: Hutchinson) ———. 1993b. Common Sense: A New Constitution for Britain (London: Hutchinson) ———. 1993c. Common Sense: A New Constitution for Britain (London: Hutchinson) Benn, Tony, and Chris Mullin. 1981. Arguments for Democracy (London: Cape) Bingham, T. H. 2011. The Rule of Law (London: Penguin) Blackburn. 2008. ‘The Crown and the Royal Family’, in Halsbury’s Laws of England, 5th ed (London: Butterworths), 12(1) Blackburn, Robert. 1990a. The Meeting of Parliament: A Study of the Law and Practice Relating to the Frequency and Duration of the United Kingdom Parliament (Aldershot: Dartmouth) ———. 1990b. The Meeting of Parliament: A Study of the Law and Practice Relating to the Frequency and Duration of the United Kingdom Parliament (Aldershot: Dartmouth) ———. 1992. Constitutional Studies: Contemporary Issues and Controversies (London: Mansell) ———. 1993. Rights of Citizenship (London: Mansell) ———. 1995a. The Electoral System in Britain (London: Macmillan) ———. 1995b. The Electoral System in Britain (London: Macmillan) ———. 1995c. The Electoral System in Britain (London: Macmillan) ———. 1995d. The Electoral System in Britain (London: Macmillan) ———. 1995e. The Electoral System in Britain (London: Macmillan) ———. 1995f. The Electoral System in Britain (London: Macmillan) ———. 1999a. Towards a Constitutional Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom: Commentary and Documents (London: Pinter) ———. 1999b. Towards a Constitutional Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom: Commentary and Documents (London: Pinter) 3/26 09/23/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London ———. 1999c. Towards a Constitutional Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom: Commentary and Documents (London: Pinter) ———. 2001. ‘The United Kingdom’, in Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and Its Member States, 1950-2000 ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press) ———. 2003. ‘The Royal Assent to Legislation and a Monarch’s Fundamental Human Rights’, Public Law <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docgui d=I79607000E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A> ———. 2004. ‘Monarchy and the Personal Prerogatives’, Public Law (Westlaw) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docgui d=ID0F9CDA0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028> ———. 2006a. King and Country: Monarchy and the Future King Charles III ([London]: Politico’s) ———. 2006b. King and Country: Monarchy and the Future King Charles III ([London]: Politico’s) ———. 2006c. King and Country: Monarchy and the Future King Charles III ([London]: Politico’s) ———. 2011a. ‘Laying the Foundations of the Modern Voting System: The Representation of the People Act 1918’, in A Century of Constitutional Reform (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell) ———. 2011b. ‘The 2010 General Election Outcome and Formation of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government’, Public Law (Westlaw) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docgui d=I212CB60008C611E0A451F66F817AC0EE> Blackburn, Robert, and Raymond Plant. 1999a. Constitutional Reform: The Labour Government’s Constitutional Reform Agenda (London: Longman) ———. 1999b. Constitutional Reform: The Labour Government’s Constitutional Reform Agenda (London: Longman) ———. 1999c. Constitutional Reform: The Labour Government’s Constitutional Reform Agenda (London: Longman) Blackburn, Robert, and Jörg Polakiewicz. 2001. Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and Its Member States, 1950-2000 ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press) Blair, Tony. 14AD. ‘Democracy’s Second Age’, The Economist: 33–35 <http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=SP00&amp;sw=w&amp;u=kings&amp;v=2.1&amp;it =r&amp;id=GALE%7CA18675338&amp;sid=classroomWidget&amp;asid=1fd8324f> Blanpain, R., and Herman Nys. 1993. International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Medical Law / 4/26 09/23/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London Editor Herman Nys (The Hague: Kluwer Law International) Blaustein, A.P., and G.H. Flanz (eds.). 1971. Constitutions of the Countries of the World (Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications) Blick, Andrew, and G. W. Jones. 2010. Premiership: The Development, Nature and Power of the British Prime Minister (Exeter: Imprint Academic) <http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=4393907> Bogdanor, Vernon. 1984. What Is Proportional Representation?: A Guide to the Issues (Oxford: Martin Robertson) ———. 1995a. The Monarchy and the Constitution (Oxford: Clarendon Press) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198293348.001.0001> ———. 1995b. The Monarchy and the Constitution (Oxford: Clarendon Press) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198293348.001.0001> ———. 1997a. Power and the People: A Guide to Constitutional Reform (London: Gollancz) ———. 1997b. Power and the People: A Guide to Constitutional Reform (London: Gollancz) ———. 2009a. The New British Constitution (Oxford: Hart)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Select Committee on the Reduction of Standing Committees of Tynwald
    REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REDUCTION OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF TYNWALD t i I. • REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REDUCTION OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF TYNWALD To the Honourable Noel Q Cringle, President of Tynwald, and the Honourable Members of the Council and Keys in Tynwald assembled PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Background At the sitting of Tynwald Court on 21st May 2002 it was resolved that a Select Committee of five members be established to - "investigate and report by no later than July 2003 on the feasibility of reducing the number of Standing Committees of Tynwald along with any recommendations as to the responsibilities and membership and any proposals for change." 2. Mr Karran, Mr Lowey, Mr Quayle, Mr Quine and Mr Speaker were elected. At 4, the first meeting Mr Speaker was unanimously elected as Chairman. 3. The Committee has held four meetings. C/RSC/02/plb PART 2 STRATEGY 2.1 The Committees of Tynwald that would be examined were determined as: Committee on Constitutional Matters; Committee on the Declaration of Members' Interests, Ecclesiastical Committee; Committee on Economic Initiatives; Joint Committee on the Emoluments of Certain Public Servants; Committee on Expenditure and Public Accounts; Tynwald Ceremony Arrangements Committee; Tynwald Honours Committee; Tynwald Management Committee; Tynwald Members' Pension Scheme Management Committee; and Tynwald Standing Orders Committee of Tynwald. A brief summary of the membership and terms of reference of each standing committee is attached as Appendix 1. 2 C/RSC/02/plb 2.2 In order to facilitate its investigation your Committee also decided that - (a) Comparative information on committee structures in adjacent parliaments should be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • New Peers Created Have Fallen from 244 Under David Cameron’S Six Years As Prime Minister to Only 37 to Date Under Theresa May
    \ For more information on DeHavilland and how we can help with political monitoring, custom research and consultancy, contact: +44 (0)20 3033 3870 [email protected] Information Services Ltd 2018 0 www.dehavilland.co.uk INTRODUCTION & ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 2 CONSERVATIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Diana Barran MBE .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 The Rt. Hon. Sir Edward Garnier QC ........................................................................................................................... 5 The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Haselhurst.................................................................................................................................. 7 The Rt. Hon. Peter Lilley ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Catherine Meyer CBE ................................................................................................................................................... 10 The Rt. Hon. Sir Eric Pickles ........................................................................................................................................ 11 The Rt. Hon. Sir John
    [Show full text]
  • 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London
    09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law View Online 1 Bradley AW, Ewing KD, Knight C. Constitutional and administrative law. Seventeenth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=5418645 2 De Smith SA, Brazier R. Constitutional and administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Penguin 1998. 3 Turpin CC, Tomkins A. British government and the constitution: text and materials. 7th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=775039 4 Le Sueur AP, Sunkin M, Murkens JE. Public law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016. 5 McEldowney JF. Public law. 3rd ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2002. 6 Phillips OH, Jackson P, Leopold P. O. Hood Phillips & Jackson’s constitutional and 1/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2001. 7 Loveland I. Constitutional law, administrative law, and human rights: a critical introduction. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018. 8 Barnett H. Constitutional & administrative law. Twelfth edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=4917664 9 Jowell JL, Oliver D. The changing constitution. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015. 10 Munro CR. Studies in constitutional law. 2nd ed. London: : Butterworths 1999. 11 Tomkins A. Public law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003. 12 Marshall G. Constitutional conventions: the rules and forms of political accountability. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198762027.001.0001 13 Griffith JAG, Ryle M, Wheeler-Booth MAJ, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking out of Britain's Neo-Liberal State
    cDIREoCTIONmFOR THE pass DEMOCRATIC LEFT Breaking out of Britain’s Neo-Liberal State January 2009 Gerry Hassan and Anthony Barnett 3 4 r Tr hink e b m m u N PIECES 3 4 Tr hink e b m u N PIECES Breaking out of Britain’s Neo-Liberal State Gerry Hassan and Anthony Barnett “In the big-dipper of UK politics, the financial crisis suddenly re-reversed these terms. Gordon Brown excavated a belief in Keynesian solutions from his social democratic past and a solidity of purpose that was lacking from Blair’s lightness of being” Compass publications are intended to create real debate and discussion around the key issues facing the democratic left - however the views expressed in this publication are not a statement of Compass policy. Breaking out of Britain’s Neo-Liberal State www.compassonline.org.uk PAGE 1 Breaking out of Britain’s reduced for so many, is under threat with The British Empire State Building Neo-Liberal State no state provisions in place for them. The political and even military consequences England’s “Glorious Revolution” of 1688 Gerry Hassan and Anthony Barnett could well be dire. created a framework of compromise between monarchy and Parliament. It was Nonetheless we should celebrate the followed by the union of England with possible defeat of one aspect of neo- Scotland of 1707, which joined two he world we have lived in, liberal domination. It cheered the different countries while preserving their created from the twin oil-price destruction of a communist world that distinct legal traditions. Since then the T shockwaves of 1973 and 1979 was oppressive and unfree.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Reflection
    All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group TIME FOR REFLECTION A REPORT OF THE ALL-PARTY PARLIAMENTARY HUMANIST GROUP ON RELIGION OR BELIEF IN THE UK PARLIAMENT The All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group acts to bring together non-religious MPs and peers to discuss matters of shared interests. More details of the group can be found at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/190508/humanist.htm. This report was written by Cordelia Tucker O’Sullivan with assistance from Richy Thompson and David Pollock, both of Humanists UK. Layout and design by Laura Reid. This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the Group. © All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group, 2019-20. TIME FOR REFLECTION CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 INTRODUCTION 6 Recommendations 7 THE CHAPLAIN TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS 8 BISHOPS IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 10 Cost of the Lords Spiritual 12 Retired Lords Spiritual 12 Other religious leaders in the Lords 12 Influence of the bishops on the outcome of votes 13 Arguments made for retaining the Lords Spiritual 14 Arguments against retaining the Lords Spiritual 15 House of Lords reform proposals 15 PRAYERS IN PARLIAMENT 18 PARLIAMENT’S ROLE IN GOVERNING THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND 20 Parliamentary oversight of the Church Commissioners 21 ANNEX 1: FORMER LORDS SPIRITUAL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 22 ANNEX 2: THE INFLUENCE OF LORDS SPIRITUAL ON THE OUTCOME OF VOTES IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 24 Votes decided by the Lords Spiritual 24 Votes decided by current and former bishops 28 3 All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group FOREWORD The UK is more diverse than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2001 Campaign Spending We Are an Independent Body That Was Set up by Parliament
    Election 2001 Campaign spending We are an independent body that was set up by Parliament. We aim to gain public confidence and encourage people to take part in the democratic process within the United Kingdom by modernising the electoral process, promoting public awareness of electoral matters, and regulating political parties. On 1 April 2002, The Boundary Committee for England (formerly the Local Government Commission for England) became a statutory committee of The Electoral Commission. Its duties include reviewing local election boundaries. © The Electoral Commission 2002 ISBN: 1-904363-08-3 1 Contents List of tables, appendices and returns 2 Conclusions 45 Preface 5 Political parties 45 Executive summary 7 Third parties 46 Spending by political parties 7 Candidates’ expenses 46 Spending by third parties 7 Future work programme 47 Spending by candidates 7 Introduction 9 Appendices The role of The Electoral Commission 10 Appendix 1 49 Campaign expenditure by political parties 11 Appendix 2 50 The spending limit 12 Appendix 3 87 Interpretation of legislation 12 Appendix 4 89 Public and media interest in the campaign 13 Appendix 5 90 Commission guidance 13 Appendix 6 97 Completing and reviewing the expenditure returns 13 Candidates’ election expenses at the Analysis of returns 14 2001 general election 99 Northern Ireland analysis 15 Great Britain analysis 17 Problems in categorising expenditure 18 Breakdown of total expenditure: the main three British parties 18 Other parties and trends 19 Apportionment and spending in England, Scotland
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Political & Constitutional Studies King's College London
    CODIFYING – OR NOT CODIFYING – THE UNITED KINGDOM CONSTITUTION: THE EXISTING CONSTITUTION Centre for Political & Constitutional Studies King’s College London Series paper 2 2 May 2012 1 Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies The Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies is a politically non-aligned body at King’s College London, engaged in and promoting interdisciplinary studies and research into contemporary political and constitutional issues. The Centre’s staff is led by Professor Robert Blackburn, Director and Professor of Constitutional Law, and Professor Vernon Bogdanor, Research Professor, supported by a team of funded research fellows and academic staff at King’s College London specialising in constitutional law, contemporary history, political science, comparative government, public policy, and political philosophy. www.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/groups/ich/cpcs/index. Authorship This report of the Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies was written by Dr Andrew Blick, Senior Research Fellow, in consultation with Professor Robert Blackburn, Director, and others at the Centre, as part of its impartial programme of research for the House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee into Mapping the Path towards Codifying – or Not Codifying – the United Kingdom Constitution, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and the Nuffield Foundation. Previous publications in this series Codifying – or Not Codifying – the United Kingdom Constitution: A Literature Review, Series Paper 1, February 2011 ©
    [Show full text]
  • Why Have a Bill of Rights?
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 26 Number 1 Symposium: The Bill of Rights Yesterday and Today: A Bicentennial pp.1-19 Celebration Symposium: The Bill of Rights Yesterday and Today: A Bicentennial Celebration Why Have a Bill of Rights? William J. Brennan Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William J. Brennan Jr., Why Have a Bill of Rights?, 26 Val. U. L. Rev. 1 (1991). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol26/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Brennan: Why Have a Bill of Rights? Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 26 Fall 1991 Number 1 ARTICLES WHY HAVE A BILL OF RIGHTS? WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR.- It is a joy as well as an honor to speak to you today about a subject that has been at the heart of my service on the Supreme Court. The American Bill of Rights, guaranteeing freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and the press, along with other important protections against arbitrary or oppressive government action, provides a noble expression and shield of human dignity. Together with the Civil War Amendments, outlawing slavery and involuntary servitude and ensuring all citizens equal protection of the laws and due process of law, the Bill of Rights stands as a constant guardian of individual liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords
    Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords Laid before the House by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2013 PREFACE This is the 23rd edition of the Companion to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords since Sir John Shaw-Lefevre, then Clerk of the Parliaments, compiled his first edition for private circulation in 1862. It is issued with the authority of the Procedure Committee. The Companion is the authoritative guide to procedure, but it is by no means the only source of information for members. A summary of key elements of procedure is given in the Brief Guide on Procedure and Practice in the House and Grand Committee, while general services are covered in the Handbook on facilities and services for Members. Members may also consult the Guide to the Code of Conduct, the Guide to Financial Support for Members (from the Finance Department) and the booklets on participation in legislative business issued by the Legislation Office. All such guidance is available online. The Table Clerks and procedural offices are always available to advise members. DAVID BEAMISH Clerk of the Parliaments 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: THE HOUSE AND ITS MEMBERSHIP ................................ 14 Composition of the House ...............................................................................................14 Disqualification for membership.....................................................................................14 Membership of the House under SOs 9 and 10 ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomy, Community, and Traditions of Liberty: the Contrast of British and American Privacy Law
    AUTONOMY, COMMUNITY, AND TRADITIONS OF LIBERTY: THE CONTRAST OF BRITISH AND AMERICAN PRIVACY LAW INTRODUCTION I give the fight up: let there be an end, A privacy, an obscure nook for me. I want to be forgotten even by God. -Robert Browning1 Although most people do not wish to be forgotten "even by God," individuals do expect their community to refrain from intrusive regula- tion of the intimate aspects of their lives. Thus, the community must strike a balance between legitimate community concerns and the individ- ual's interest in personal autonomy. In free societies, the community os- tensibly speaks through a popularly constituted government. Thus, government protection of privacy rights is a measure of a society's com- mitment to liberty and, in a broader sense, autonomy. Privacy law re- flects the tolerance of a nation. Although privacy is only one example of 2 autonomy, privacy rights are a substantial subset of personal autonomy. Thus, examining privacy rights is one way to evaluate the general mea- sure of liberty a society confers on its members. But, even if one recognizes the need for privacy, the right of privacy cannot be absolute. The existence of political community requires the relinquishment of certain rights, prerogatives, and freedoms.3 As John Locke described, individuals must cede some rights and prerogatives that 1. Paracelsus,in 1 THE POEMS 118, 127 (J. Pettigrew ed. 1981). 2. The autonomy/privacy relation is a difficult matter. Privacy relates to personal autonomy, but they are not coextensive. For example, autonomy would reach public acts such as one's public dress or a speech given at a public gathering, acts that are not encompassed in any notion of privacy.
    [Show full text]
  • William Cobbett, His Children and Chartism
    This is a repository copy of William Cobbett, his children and Chartism. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82896/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Chase, MS (2015) William Cobbett, his children and Chartism. In: Grande, J and Stevenson, J, (eds.) William Cobbett, Romanticism and the Enlightenment: Contexts and Legacy. The Enlightenment World, 31 . Pickering & Chatto . ISBN 9781848935426 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 COBBETT, HIS CHILDREN AND CHARTISM Malcolm Chase William Cobbett was part of the ‘mental furniture’ of the Chartists, contrary to one biographer’s claim that they had ‘little in common’ with him.1 James Watson, one of London’s leading radical publishers remembered his mother ‘being in the habit of reading Cobbett’s Register’.2 Growing up in a Chartist home, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments and the Pandemic (PDF)
    Parliaments and the Pandemic Study of Parliament Group January 2021 Preface The Study of Parliament Group (SPG) was formed in 1964. It arose following the publication of Bernard Crick’s seminal book, 'The Reform of Parliament'. A senior clerk in the House of Commons, Michael Ryle, impressed by the work, but feeling that the author may have benefited from more informed knowledge of the actual operation of parliament, contacted Crick. Both felt that meetings between academics and clerks may be of mutual benefit and, with Sir Edward Fellowes, former Clerk of the House of Commons, they sent a memorandum to various parliamentary officers and academics with an interest in parliament. A meeting was organised in October 1964 at which it was agreed to form a body to promote understanding of the way parliament worked and how it may be more effective. The Study of Parliament Group was born. Since its formation, the Group has held conferences and seminars, formed various working groups and been responsible for publishing books and articles. Submissions have also been made to various parliamentary committees, not least those concerned with procedure and reform. The membership has expanded over the years, encompassing clerks from other legislatures in the United Kingdom as well as some with a scholarly interest in parliament without themselves being academics. To encourage frank exchanges of views, MPs and journalists are excluded from membership, though they are regular speakers at Group events. Publications have included substantial volumes such as 'The House of Commons in the Twentieth Century' (1979), 'The New Select Committees' (revised edn.
    [Show full text]