Mask-Wa Oo-Ta-Ban Bear Train

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mask-Wa Oo-Ta-Ban Bear Train MASK-WA OO-TA-BAN BEAR TRAIN PASSENGER TRAIN SERVICE BUSINESS PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS MASK-WA OO-TA-BAN BEAR TRAIN PASSENGER TRAIN SERVICE BUSINESS PLAN CONTENTS 06 Executive Summary 56 Economic, Employment & Tax 08 First Nations Reconciliation Generation Impact Initiative 58 Appendix 1 10 Benefits of the Bear Train 60 Appendix 2 Service 62 Appendix 3 Impact of the Lack of 12 64 Appendix 4 Passenger Rail Service 66 Appendix 5 16 Impact on Local Business 68 Appendix 6 17 Remote Communities 69 Appendix 7 20 Mitigating Climate Change 72 Appendix 8 21 Governance & Management of Mask-wa Transportation Inc. 74 Appendix 9 26 Operations Plan 76 Appendix 10 35 Inter-Community Travel 77 Appendix 11 36 Tourism 78 Appendix 12 48 Events 80 Appendix 13 49 Marketing 84 Resolutions of Support 52 Five Year Financial Projection 99 Glossary of Acronyms MISSANABIE CREE FIRST NATION 726 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie ON P6A 2A9 T: 705-254-2702 | [email protected] | www.missanabiecreefn.com 2 BUSINESS PLAN MASK-WA OO-TA-BAN (BEAR TRAIN) PASSENGER SERVICE Cover photo: Virgil Knapp LETTER: RICHARD LANDE LETTER FROM RICHARD LANDE LANDE LANGFORD AVOCATS/BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS TRANSPORT LAW Richard Lande, B.A., LL.L. F.C.I.T., Ph.D. Honorary Consul General Union of the Comoros 5375 Blind Line, Burlington, ON L7P 0B1 phone: 905-319-1244 fax: 905-331-8580 email: [email protected] Michel Langford, LL., B. 6020 Jean Talon East, 700, Montreal, QC H1S 3B1 phone: 514-257-9999 fax: 514-257-7339 To the Bear Train Working Group: Our firm has reviewed and updated the financial analysis and business plan which was provided by BDO in 2018. We have also reviewed the corporate strategy plan which was drafted with the assistance of Al Errington in 2016. In fulfilling this more recent mandate, our firm’s railway and accounting expertise included: Gerry Gionet who has worked in railway operations for over 40 years and is presently CEO of GIO Rail and Trillium Railway which operates short line trains in Port Colborne and Orangeville. He worked as a trainman, conductor and locomotive engineer, road foreman, manager of road operations and then superintendent at CP Rail from 1971 to 2014. Richard Lande, railway lawyer who has worked for BNSF, CN, CP, Wisconsin Central and Soo Line for 44 years. He was President of Quebec Central Railway and Massawippi Railway. For the past 20 years he has been the Administrator of the Orangeville to Brampton Rail Access Group which operates twice a week on what was the former CP Rail Owen Sound Subdivision. Frank Lekivetz is a financial expert who has decades of experience in analyzing financial statements and preparing economic forecasts. Frank has his MBA from Queen’s University and worked for multinational accounting firms such as Arthur Andersen and Deloitte and Touche from 1988 to 2015. The Missanabie Cree First Nation (MCFN) hired Kevin McKinnon who was formerly with the Railway Association of Canada to lead the project of successfully applying for a Railway Operating Certificate (ROC). Kevin started his railway carrier in 1977 with CP in Sudbury, Ontario and served as a conductor, engineer, train master and instructor of operating practices in North Bay. He then served as the general manager of the Goderich Exeter Railway and the regional manager of safety and operating practices for Rail America (Eastern Canada region). He was the director of regulatory affairs for the Railway Association of Canada until 2015. Under Chief Gauthier’s instructions, Mr. McKinnon worked with CN and Transport Canada in 2017 and 2018 to obtain the ROC. Therefore, as soon as the Missanabie Cree First Nation receive the necessary funding from Transport Canada, the Algoma passenger train service will be ready to commence operations in Northern Ontario. The Missanabie Cree First Nation also engaged the services of Ken Bitten who has been the president of Northern Central Railway, Indian Head Central Railway and Mid Atlantic Rail Car. He has also worked MISSANABIE CREE FIRST NATION for the Iowa Pacific as a passenger car mechanic, locomotive engineer, director of passenger services 726 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie ON P6A 2A9 and general manager. Ken contributed the sourcing for the passenger equipment which is available for T: 705-254-2702 | [email protected] | www.missanabiecreefn.com purchase or lease in the summer of 2019. Cover photo: Virgil Knapp BUSINESS PLAN MASK-WA OO-TA-BAN (BEAR TRAIN) PASSENGER SERVICE 3 LETTER: RICHARD LANDE Chief Gauthier has met several times with senior executives at CN Rail, who have assured him that CN respects the rights of the First nations and will cooperate with regards to the transition to reactivate the Algoma passenger service, provided their requirements regarding insurance and the selection of an experienced GM are met. This rail line between Sault Ste. Marie and Hearst is already operating for CN freight trains every week. Therefore, it is not necessary for the Missanabie Cree First Nation to maintain the track, signals, bridges, crossings. By paying CN the rental of the right of way, this would therefore forego any of the requirements for the Missanabie Cree First Nation to oversee the capital expenditures on the line as well as to manage the safety requirements of the line such as evaluating the results of a track geometry car, replacing ties, inspecting bridges, and complying with Transport Canada safety regulations pertaining to the track. We have vetted the financial and business plan of BDO, and we have further reviewed the train schedule which was included in the corporate strategy plan as well as the operations plan. We are of the view that the Algoma passenger rail service can be reinstituted according to the attached report. There is no technical or structural reason why this service which existed 102 years, cannot be revived as soon as the federal government gives the necessary funding. The Algoma Passenger Train provided an essential public service for Canadians in Northern Ontario for 102 years. It was originally owned and operated by the Algoma Central Railway until 2000, then by Wisconsin Central, and since 2003 by CN. When CN purchased Wisconsin Central, they acquired all the obligations to provide regular rail services which were an integral part of Wisconsin Central and formerly Algoma charter. If the charter of the ACR required it to provide passenger service in exchange for land grants, then CN retains those same legal obligations. There is no other way, other than by the rail line, of accessing a multitude of remote Northern Ontario communities along this corridor. Residents of these communities depend upon the rail line to get their food and supplies and to access their properties and businesses. CN received a Remote Rail Subsidy of $ 2.2 million per year to support their passenger operations on the Algoma line from Sault Ste. Marie to Hearst. In addition, CN would have received all the revenues of the passengers. It is important to consider that CN currently operates a profitable freight service on the Algoma line. Therefore, they are maintaining the line according to the Canadian Transport Agency and railway safety regulations irrespective of whether there is a passenger service. It would clearly be in the better interests of the stake holders of Northern Ontario to have an operator who had the requisite experience and long-term motivation to operate this service which is essential to the community of First Nations and other residents and communities of the affected regions. Since the discontinuation of the Algoma Passenger Train in 2014, there have been hundreds of people who have been disenfranchised. Some have had to abandon their homes; others have had to risk unsafe passage on the logging roads to get to their properties. The commercial lodges and outfitter businesses have been decimated. Those who venture to use the private industrial roads often have to travel in on an all-terrain truck and carry buzz-saws with them, since the logging companies do not regularly maintain their roads. In fact, use of these private industrial roads is not open to the public. They are marked with “No Trespassing” signage. The Provincial and Federal governments have exhibited an inconsistent support for passenger traffic in Northern Canada. For example, VIA Rail has this year been given $2.5 million to support the rail line from Mattawagan to The Pas in Manitoba. Ironically, a government contribution of $5 million was recently authorized for a new rail passenger station in Sault Ste. Marie. This begs the question of why a new passenger rail station is being subsidized by Canadian taxpayers if there is no passenger service, other than a seasonal tour train to Agawa Canyon. 4 BUSINESS PLAN MASK-WA OO-TA-BAN (BEAR TRAIN) PASSENGER SERVICE LETTER: RICHARD LANDE The five-year budget which has been presented herein, has been drafted in an intentionally conservative manner. For example, the ridership on the Algoma Passenger Service is only estimated to commence at an average of 15 passengers paying $100 for a round trip. By contrast, the VIA Passenger Service between Sudbury and White River, Ontario reported 6,312 passengers last year, generating revenues of $233, 000. Both lines are almost identical in length (the VIA line is 480 km and the Algoma line is 476 km) and travel through very similar remote territories. This in turn prompts two questions. First, why would a similar line also in Northern Ontario, exhibit such popular usage, if not for the demand of residents, tourism, Indigenous communities and mining and forestry workers being the same as the discontinued Algoma Passenger Line? Second, why should these communities have rail access when the Indigenous First Nations on the Algoma line have none? In summary, the burgeoning demand for rail service between Sault Ste.
Recommended publications
  • Fire Department Members in Good Standing Addington Highlands Fire
    Fire Department Members in good standing Addington Highlands Fire Adelaide Metcalfe Fire Department Adjala-Tosorontio Fire Department Y Ajax Fire Y Alberton Fire Alfred & Plantagenet Y Algonquin Highlands Fire Alnwick/Haldlmand Fire Y Amherstburg Fire Department Y Arcelor-Mittal Dofasco Argyle Fire Armstrong Fire Arnprior Fire Arran Elderslie (Chelsey) Fire Arran Elderslie (Paisley) Fire Arran Elderslie (Tara) Fire Asphodel-Norwood Fire Assiginack Fire Athens Fire Y Atikokan Fire Augusta Fire Y Aviva Insurance Canada Y Aweres Fire Aylmer Fire Department Y Baldwin Fire Barrie Fire & Emergency Services Y Batchawana Bay Fire Bayfield Fire Bayham Fire & Emergency Services Y Beausoleil Fire Beckwith Twp. Fire Belleville Fire Y Biddulph-Blanshard Fire Billings & Allan Fire Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Black River Matheson Fire Blandford - Blenheim Fire Blind River Fire Bonfield Volunteer Fire Department Bonnechere Valley Fire Department Bracebridge Fire Department Y Bradford West Gwillinbury Fire & Emergency Services Y Brampton Fire Department Y Brantford Fire Department Y Brighton District Fire Department Britt Fire Department Brock Twp. Fire Department Y Brockton Fire Department Y Brockville Fire Department Y Brooke-Alvinston District Fire Department Y Bruce Mines Bruce Mines Fire Department Y Bruce Power Brucefield Area Fire Department Brudenell, Lyndoch & Raglan Fire Department Burk's Falls & District Fire Department Y Burlington Fire Department Y Burpee & Mills Fire Department Caledon Fire & Emergency Services Y Callander Fire Department
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 — Appendices © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, As Represented by the Minister of Transport 2012
    Pathways: Connecting Canada’s Transportation System to the World Volume 2 — Appendices © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Transport 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the Department of Transport, Canada. Please contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre at 1 800 305-2059 (EST) for assistance. The information in this publication is to be considered solely as a guide and should not be quoted as or considered to be a legal authority. It may become obsolete in whole or in part at any time without notice. ISSN T22-216/2015E-PDF Catalogue No. 978-0-660-03926-8 TP 15316E (12/2015) TC-1005770 Publié aussi en français sous le titre : Parcours : Brancher le système de transport du Canada au reste du monde – Annexes Canada Transportation Act Review Pathways: Connecting Canada’s Transportation System to the World – Appendices Issued also in French under title : Parcours : Brancher le système de transport du Canada au reste du monde – Annexes Volume Two — Appendices 3 Appendix A: Economic Context 21 Appendix B: Governance 42 Appendix C: Linking Trade and Transportation 59 Appendix D: The North 71 Appendix E: Innovation 77 Appendix F: Climate Change 89 Appendix G: Access and Accessibility 103 Appendix H: Freight Rail 115 Appendix I: Transport of Grain 132 Appendix J: Passenger Rail 140 Appendix K: Air Transport 175 Appendix L: Marine Transport 200 Appendix M: Canadian Transportation Agency 204 Appendix N: Mandate and Terms of Reference 207 Appendix O: Submissions and Consultations 215 Appendix P: The Team 217 Appendix Q: Glossary Appendix A Economic Context 3 Historically, population and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have been shown to be strongly linked to growth rates for passenger and freight transport volumes, and these indicators are used as the basic drivers when forecasting aggregate demand for transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2018 – 2022 Corporate Plan and 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets
    p SUMMARY OF THE 2018 – 2022 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS SUMMARY OF THE 2018-2022 CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 MANDATE ...................................................................................................................................... 14 CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ................................................... 14 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ............................................................................................ 14 2.2 Governance and Accountability .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting ........................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Audit Regime .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.4 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................. 17 2.2.5 Canada Transportation Act Review ................................................................................. 18 2.3 Overview of VIA Rail’s Business .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service
    Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 13, 2014 To: Algoma Central Railway (ACR) Passenger Service Working Group c/o Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive – Level Three Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 From: BDO Canada LLP 747 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5N7 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................. 2 Revenue and Ridership ................................................................................ 2 Stakeholders ............................................................................................. 3 Socio-Economic Impact ................................................................................ 4 Economic Impact ........................................................................................... 4 Social Impact ............................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Algoma Central Railway Wilderness Tourism by Rail
    Algoma Central Railway Wilderness Rail Tourism Corridor Coalition for Algoma Passenger Trains www.captrains.ca AALLGGOOMMAA CCEENNTTRRAALL RRAAIILLWWAAYY:: WWIILLDDEERRNNEESSSS TTOOUURRIISSMM BBYY RRAAIILL October 2007 Page 1 Coalition for Algoma Passenger Trains Algoma Central Railway Wilderness Rail Tourism Corridor BUILDING BLOCKS The Algoma District has the building blocks to develop a world class wilderness tourism-by-rail corridor. ≤ The Algoma Central Railway (ACR)—a functioning rail line since 1899—with links to the Ontario Northland, Canadian National and Canadian Pacific railways ≤ The ACR is a north-south line linking Highways 11 and 17, the two major trans-Canada highways ≤ The ACR travels through 300 miles/475 kilometres of arguably the most beautiful wilderness landscape in Ontario—much of it still without road access ≤ The ACR journey begins in Sault Ste Marie, crosses lakes and rivers flowing south to Lake Superior (the world’s largest fresh water lake) and then crosses into the watershed of lakes and rivers flowing north to Hudson Bay ≤ The ACR revisits the iconic Canadian art history landscape where the Group of Seven painted much of their best known works—while living in boxcars and train stations on the ACR line ≤ The ACR serves some 35 towns and hamlets, including Sault Ste. Marie, Searchmont, Trout Lake, Spruce Lake, Frater, Eton, Sand Lake, Hawk Junction, Dubreuilville, Franz, Wabatong, Oba and Hearst ≤ The ACR goes through cultural communities representing the three founding peoples of Canada: First Nations, Francophone and Anglophone ≤ The ACR travels through the Chapleau Crown Game Preserve— the world’s largest game preserve—and Lake Superior Provincial Park ≤ The ACR is one of North America’s few remaining “flag stop” trains where passengers can disembark or flag down the train anywhere along the line.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year in Review
    2019 A Year In Review Your Marine Carrier of Choice Table of Contents CEO Message 1 About Algoma 3 Celebrating 120 Years 5 Financial Highlights 7 Delivering Our Strategy 9 Strategic Focus 2020 10 Segment Highlights 11 Outlook 2020 15 Sustainability 17 Vision & Values Marine Carrier of Choice TEAMWORK PASSION INTEGRITY We are stronger We are committed We are honest, we together. in heart and mind, are courageous we are driven and and we always we are proud. strive to make the right choice. OWNERSHIP SUSTAINABILITY We take We believe in our accountability for people, we care for our actions and we our planet and we are empowered to work to ensure the initiate change. prosperity of our stakeholders. 1 Algoma Central Corporation Year In Review A Message From Our CEO As fiscal 2019 drew to a close, the senior leadership team of Algoma met away from the work-a-day demands of the office with one purpose in mind – consider the Company’s existing vision statement and corporate values and update them to reflect our current goals and priorities. This meeting led to a new vision and values. While the words may be new, I am happy to say they are fully consistent with the business strategy we adopted four years ago. Marine Carrier of Choice Our new vision statement verbalizes something that Our values describe how we do the things we must has always been a goal for Algoma. It emphasizes do to be the marine carrier of choice. Our values, a fact we know well – all stakeholders have choices simply put, are: and we want Algoma to be at the top of their list.
    [Show full text]
  • T H E T H E a Mt R a K a Mt R a K Syst E M Syst
    TT H H E E AA M M T T R R A A K K® SS Y Y S S T T E E M M serving over 500 destinations plus 400 destinations served by VIA Rail Canada Kitwanga Prince New Hazelton Churchill Rupert Cedarvale Smithers Tidal Kwinitsa Usk Digges Terrace Telkwa Gillam NEWFOUNDLAND Fort Fraser Pukatawagan Houston VanderhoofAleza Lake Wivenhoe Burns Lake Endako Hutton ALBERTA Keewatin Railway Company Bridgar Prince Penny Thompson Pit Siding George Dome Creek Sherridon Arnot McBride Hinton Edson Wabowden BRITISH Dunster Evansburg Sipiwesk COLUMBIA Edmonton Cranberry Portage Valemount Turnbull Jasper Viking SASKATCHEWAN Dering QUÉBEC NEWFOUNDLAND Blue River The Pas Whistler Wainwright PembertonAshcroft Clearwater Unity Hudson Bay MANITOBA Courtenay Squamish Biggar Reserve Kamloops North Endeavour ONTARIO Moosonee Gaspé Parksville North Bend Saskatoon Sturgis Moose River Percé Nanaimo Boston Bar Ontario Northland Mont-Joli Vancouver Canora Roblin Chandler North Grandview Railway Coral Amqui Watrous Dauphin Rimouski Matapédia PRINCE EDWARD Victoria Bellingham Cascades ISLAND Port Angeles Nat. Park Glacier Trois- Sydney Mount Vernon Nat. Melville McCreary ArmstrongAuden Kapuskasing Fraserdale Jonquière Pistoles Olympic Nat. Park Everett Omak Park Sioux Lookout Nakina Hearst Chambord Charlottetown Seattle Portage la Prairie Redditt Smooth Rock Falls Bathurst Rogersville WASHINGTON SandpointLibby Elma Brereton Lake Caramat Cochrane Campbellton West Glacier Longlac SenneterreClova Parent Windigo Sainte- Moncton Olympia-Lacey BrowningCut Bank SavantLake Oba Matheson Rivière-du-Loup Tacoma WentacheeEphrata Shelby Rivers Hornepayne Timmins Foy Amherst Centralia Whitefish Brandon Winnipeg Minaki Red Lake Algoma Central Railway Swastika Sussex Astoria Mt. Rainier Moses Lake North Road La Tuque Québec Nat. Park Spokane Essex White River Foleyet Englehart Forsythe Hibbard Hervey Truro Kelso-Longview Colfax East Glacier Havre Stanley Rugby Saint John Halifax Bingen-White Salmon Pullman Gogama New Liskeard MAINE Vancouver Park Malta Devils Lake Voyageurs Franz Grand’Mère Charny Wishram Moscow Nat.
    [Show full text]
  • How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic
    How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan for Superior East and Neighbouring Communities Final Strategy May 2019 Page Left Blank How we Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategy Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan ....................................................... 9 Research Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 10 Background & Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................................. 13 Economic Analysis and Target Sector Assessment – Key Findings ................................................... 13 Target Sector Trends and Best Practices .......................................................................................... 14 Commercial Gap Assessment – Key Findings ................................................................................... 28 One-on-One Interviews – Key Findings ............................................................................................ 27 Random Sample Business Survey – Key Findings ............................................................................. 28 Focus Group Discussions – Key Findings .......................................................................................... 34 SOARR Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Stronger Ties: a Shared Commitment to Railway Safety
    STRONGER TIES: A S H A R E D C O M M I T M E N T TO RAILWAY SAFETY Review of the Railway Safety Act November 2007 Published by Railway Safety Act Review Secretariat Ottawa, Canada K1A 0N5 This report is available at: www.tc.gc.ca/tcss/RSA_Review-Examen_LSF Funding for this publication was provided by Transport Canada. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department. ISBN 978-0-662-05408-5 Catalogue No. T33-16/2008 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Transport, 2007 This material may be freely reproduced for non-commercial purposes provided that the source is acknowledged. Photo Credits: Chapters 1-10: Transport Canada; Appendix B: CP Images TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................1 1.1 Rationale for the 2006 Railway Safety Act Review . .2 1.2 Scope . 2 1.3 Process ....................................................................................3 1.3.1 Stakeholder Consultations . .4 1.3.2 Research . 6 1.3.3 Development of Recommendations .......................................6 1.4 Key Challenges for the Railway Industry and the Regulator.................7 1.5 A Word of Thanks .................................................................... 10 2. STATE OF RAIL SAFETY IN CANADA ...................................11 2.1 Accidents 1989-2006 ................................................................. 12 2.2 Categories of Accidents . 13 2.2.1 Main Track Accidents...................................................... 14 2.2.2 Non-Main Track Accidents ............................................... 15 2.2.3 Crossing and Trespasser Accidents . 15 2.2.4 Transportation of Dangerous Goods Accidents and Incidents . 17 2.3 Normalizing Accidents . 18 2.4 Comparing Rail Safety in Canada and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]