The World's Most Active Telecommunication Professionals
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cincinnati Bell-Hawaiian Telcom Merger Receives Hawaii PUC
Cincinnati Bell-Hawaiian Telcom Merger Receives Hawaiʻi PUC Approval CINCINNATI and HONOLULU, May 4, 2018 – Cincinnati Bell Inc. (NYSE: CBB) (the “Company”) announced that it has received unanimous approval from the Hawaiʻi Public Utilities Commission (“PUC” or the “Commission”) with respect to its pending acquisition of Honolulu-based Hawaiian Telcom (NASDAQ: HCOM), the leading integrated communications provider serving Hawaiʻi and the state’s fiber-centric technology leader. In approving the merger, the Commission concludes that net benefits will result from the transaction. “We greatly appreciate the support of the Hawaiʻi PUC and are pleased that the Commission has acknowledged that our combination with Hawaiian Telcom is expected to bring benefits to Hawaiʻi consumers as we continue to invest in next-generation fiber,” said Leigh Fox, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cincinnati Bell. “This marks a key milestone as we work to create a stronger communications and technology company that builds upon the complementary strengths of Cincinnati Bell and Hawaiian Telcom, allowing us to deliver more competitive products and services to customers.” The combination, previously announced on July 10, 2017, will accelerate Cincinnati Bell’s overarching strategy to create a diversified and balanced revenue mix by expanding the Company’s high-speed, high- bandwidth fiber optic network while building a complementary IT solutions and cloud services business. By leveraging Hawaiian Telcom’s local knowledge and continuing to invest in its deep fiber infrastructure, the combined company will be well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for strategic fiber offerings. Hawaiʻi PUC approval satisfies one of the conditions for the closing of the transaction. -
Level 3 Communications, LLC Contract Number: GS-35F-0177J
Authorized Federal Acquisition Service Information Technology Schedule Pricelist General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software and Services General Description of the Commodities and Services Offered Services include Managed Internet Access and Value Added Network Services supporting Electronic Commerce applications for Government agencies. Application SIN, DESCRIPTION, FSC Classes and FPDS Codes SIN DESCRIPTION FSC CLASS/FPDS CODE SIN 132-51 Information Technology - Professional Services SIN 132-52 Electronic Commerce Services D304 Value Added Network Services SIN 132-52 Electronic Commerce Services D304 Internet Access Services Note 1: All non-professional labor categories must be incidental to and used solely to support hardware, software and/or professional services, and cannot be purchased separately. Note 2: Offerors and Agencies are advised that the Group 70 – Information Technology Schedule is not to be used as a means to procure services which properly fall under the Brooks Act. These services include, but are not limited to, architectural, engineering, mapping, cartographic production, remote sensing, geographic information systems, and related services. FAR 36.6 distinguishes between mapping services of an A/E nature and mapping services which are not connected nor incidental to the traditionally accepted A/E Services. Note 3: This solicitation is not intended to solicit for the reselling of IT Professional Services, except for the provision of implementation, maintenance, integration, or training services in direct support of a product. Under such circumstances the services must be performance by the publisher or manufacturer or one of their authorized agents. NOTE: Electronic Commerce Services are not intended to supersede or be a substitute for any voice requirements of FTS2001. -
Hawaiian Telcom Terms of Service for Residential Customers
Hawaiian Telcom Terms of Service & Acceptable Use Policy Hawaiian Telcom Terms of Service and Acceptable Use Policy For Residential Customers WELCOME TO HAWAIIAN TELCOM. THESE TERMS OF SERVICE AND ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS (“TERMS OF SERVICE”) CONTAIN IMPORTANT REQUIREMENTS REGARDING YOUR USE OF HAWAIIAN TELCOM'S HIGH SPEED INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES AND YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH HAWAIIAN TELCOM AND ITS THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS. READ THESE TERMS OF SERVICE CAREFULLY AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR RIGHTS AS WELL AS THOSE OF HAWAIIAN TELCOM. 1. These Terms of Service are entered into by and between the subscriber ("you", "your", or "Subscriber") and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc. or its affiliate providers of this Agreement ("Hawaiian Telcom", "us" or "we"). Any terms or conditions included on any Service Quotation(s) ("Quotation"), Work Order, Service Agreement, point-of-sale purchase receipt, E-SIGN recording of a non-written contract, Promotional Offer Terms and Conditions, Broadband Policy, Acceptable Use Policy (attached as Appendix A), or Privacy Policy are incorporated into and made a part of these Terms of Service, which collectively form the Agreement between you and Hawaiian Telcom (the “Agreement”). The Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which you agree to use the Service (defined below), and under which Hawaiian Telcom agrees to provide the Service to you. By accessing and using the Service, you represent and agree that you have read, understand, and consent to be bound by the Agreement. If you do not consent to be bound by the Agreement, you must not use the Service or register as a subscriber of the Service, and must promptly call the Hawaiian Telcom customer service at (808) 643-3456 or (877)482-2211 to cancel the Service. -
PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th St., S.W
PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: https://www.fcc.gov Washington, D.C. 20554 TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 17-889 Released: September 14, 2017 MEDIA BUREAU EXTENDS DEADLINE FOR MVPDs TO FILE EEO PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORTS (FCC FORM 396-C) TO OCTOBER 16, 2017, AND IDENTIFIES THOSE THAT MUST RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION QUESTIONS Pursuant to Section 76.77 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 76.77, by September 30 of each year multi-channel video program distributors (“MVPDs”) must file with the Commission an FCC Form 396-C, Multi-Channel Video Programming Distributor EEO Program Annual Report, for employment units with six or more full-time employees. By this Notice we remind all MVPDs of this recurring obligation, provide details on the filing process, and identify those MVPDs that must complete the Supplementary Investigation Sheet portion of the form. Because of technical difficulties in preparing for the filing, we extend the deadline to October 16, 2017. In addition, if filers, particularly those in hurricane-damaged areas, need more time to file, they can email [email protected] and request an extension of time. Users can access the electronic filing system via the Internet from the Commission’s website at: https://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts. Paper versions of the form will not be accepted unless accompanied by an appropriate request for waiver of the electronic filing requirement. The Commission has recognized the need for limited waivers of that requirement in light of the “burden that electronic filing could place upon some [entities] who are seeking to serve the public interest, with limited resources, and succeed in a highly competitive local environment.” Streamlining of Mass Media Applications, Rules and Processes, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 23056, 23061 (1998). -
KEEP AMERICANS CONNECTED PLEDGE 185 Providers Have Now Agreed to Take Specific Steps to Promote Connectivity for Americans During the Coronavirus Pandemic
Media Contact: Tina Pelkey, (202) 418-0536 [email protected] For Immediate Release 116 MORE BROADBAND AND TELEPHONE SERVICE PROVIDERS TAKE CHAIRMAN PAI’S KEEP AMERICANS CONNECTED PLEDGE 185 Providers Have Now Agreed to Take Specific Steps to Promote Connectivity for Americans During the Coronavirus Pandemic WASHINGTON, March 16, 2020—Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai announced today that 116 more broadband and telephone service providers have taken his Keep Americans Connected Pledge. Chairman Pai launched the Keep Americans Connected Pledge on Friday with 69 broadband and telephone providers across the country agreeing to take specific steps to help Americans stay connected for the next 60 days. This afternoon’s announcement means that 185 companies in total have now taken the Pledge. “It’s critical that Americans stay connected throughout the coronavirus pandemic so that they can remain in touch with loved ones, telework, engage in remote learning, participate in telehealth, and maintain the social distancing that is so important to combatting the spread of the virus,” said Chairman Pai. “The Keep Americans Connected Pledge is a critical step toward accomplishing that goal, and I thank each one of these additional companies that have made commitments to ensure that Americans can remain connected as a result of these exceptional circumstances.” New pledge-takers include Advanced Communications Technology, Agri-Valley Communications, Alaska Communications, Appalachian Wireless, ATMC, Ben Lomand Connect, BEVCOMM, Blackfoot -
180726 CTIA Comments on Mobile Wireless Competition.Pdf
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ) WT Docket No. 18-203 Seeks Comment on the State of Mobile ) Wireless Competition ) COMMENTS OF CTIA Thomas C. Power Senior Vice President and General Counsel Scott K. Bergmann Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Dr. Robert Roche Vice President, Research Public Affairs Krista L. Witanowski Assistant Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Kara R. Graves Director, Regulatory Affairs CTIA 1400 Sixteenth Street, NW Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 785-0081 July 26, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................2 II. COMPETITION IN THE WIRELESS MARKETPLACE IS BRINGING MYRIAD BENEFITS TO CONSUMERS AND TO THE U.S. ECONOMY. .............3 A. Today’s Consumers Lead a Mobile-First Lifestyle. ................................................4 B. The Wireless Industry is Increasingly Focused on Delivering High-Quality Services and Products to Consumers with Diverse Needs, Income Levels, and Abilities. ............................................................................................................8 C. Wireless Consumers Are Obtaining Greater Value from Their Service Providers. ...............................................................................................................15 D. The Wireless Industry Adds Billions of Dollars to Our Economy and Supports Millions of American Jobs......................................................................16 -
SC01-2050 Level 3 Communications Vs
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC01-2050 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Appellant, v. E. LEON JACOBS, JR., et al. Appellees. AMENDED INITIAL BRIEF OF LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Michael R. Romano, Esq. Kenneth A. Hoffman, Esq. Greg L. Rogers, Esq. Florida Bar No. 307718 Level 3 Communications, LLC Martin P. McDonnell, Esq. 1025 Eldorado Boulevard Florida Bar No. 301728 Broomfield, Colorado 80021 Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell & (720) 888-7015 (Telephone) Hoffman, P.A. (720) 888-5134 (Telecopier) P. O. Box 551 Tallahassee, Florida 323302 (850) 681-6788 (Telephone) (850) 681-6515 (Telecopier) Attorneys for Level 3 Communications, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CITATIONS ........................................iii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS ......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................... 12 ARGUMENT ................................................ 16 I. The Standard of Review ............................... 16 II. The Commission Exceeded its Statutory Authority by Imposing Regulatory Assessment Fees on Level 3’s Collocation Revenues ................................. 18 A. Section 350.113(3), Florida Statutes, limits the imposition of regulatory assessment fees to revenues derived from regulated services. .............. 18 B. The Commission erroneously failed to consider the entire statutory scheme in determining that revenues collected from Level 3's collocation agreements constitute “intrastate business” subject to regulatory assessment fees ................................. 26 C. In 1995, the Legislature -
Hadley, Ryan E **** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders Or
Hadley, Ryan E From: Liane Steffes <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 4:56 PM To: Comments, Urc; Heline, Beth E. Cc: Jeremy Fetty; [email protected] Subject: IUSF-Broadband Study - Comments of INECA Attachments: INECA - GAO 2018-3 - Comments of INECA with Attachments.PDF **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** Good Afternoon: Attached please find the comments of INECA responsive to the study topics set forth in the Commission’s GAO 2018-3 (IUSF-Broadband Study). Kind regards, Liane K. Steffes 251 N. Illinois Street, Suite 1800 | Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Phone: 317-269-2500 | www.parrlaw.com This email originated from the law firm Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP. The information contained in this email may be privileged and confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) indicated above. Anyone receiving this email in error should notify the sender by telephone and destroy the original. 1 COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF INDIANA EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOCIATION, INC. TO THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION REGARDING IUSF-BROADBAND STUDY Comments of Indiana Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. Page 1 of 12 COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF INDIANA EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOCIATION, INC. TO THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION REGARDING IUSF-BROADBAND STUDY The Indiana Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (“INECA”) and its member companies are dedicated to the promotion of state-of-the-art telecommunications facilities and services throughout rural Indiana. The purpose of INECA is to advocate for its member companies on federal and state issues, to educate government leaders, as well as the public at large, on the importance of modern telecommunications to rural communities and to ensure that voice, broadband and video services comparable to those available in urban and suburban areas are available in the rural areas of Indiana at affordable prices. -
Vanishing Starlight by David Clarkson
Multicultural characters in tragic conflict during the 1950s. Vanishing Starlight By David Clarkson Order the book from the publisher Booklocker.com https://www.booklocker.com/p/books/2579.html?s=pdf or from your favorite neighborhood or online bookstore. Copyright © 2006-2020 David Clarkson ISBN: 978-1-59113-990-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the author. Printed in the United States of America. All characters and events depicted in this novel are fictitious, except: (1) The portrayal of Elvis Presley’s actual appearance in Paris, Texas, is based on documentation provided by The Paris News, to which the author extends heartfelt thanks; and by eye-witness accounts. (2) The depictions of Alexander White Neville are based on archival data and on the author’s recollections. (3) Descriptions of the 1916 fire and of the 1893 lynching, two events that occurred in Paris, Texas, are taken from a cross section of sources; they are historically factual. (4) The football games, including all players named, were both witnessed and researched by the author. (5) The lunch counter scene that took place in Dallas, Texas, April 25, 1960, is derivative of a true incident. Any similarities to other happenings, and to other persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental. Booklocker.com, Inc. 2020 Prologue: Meteors Retrospect. The night of falling stars. At four hours before dawn, the vast arc of heaven burst aflame. -
Location Provider E-Mail to SMS Address Format
To create an e-mail address for your cell phone number, simply locate your cell phone carrier in the list below and replace the word number with your cell phone number. US and North American Carriers Location Provider E-mail to SMS address format United States Alaska Communications number @msg.acsalaska.com Bluegrass Cellular number @sms.bluecell.com Cincinnati Bell Wireless number @gocbw.com Cricket number @sms.mycricket.com C Spire Wireless number @cspire1.com Edge Wireless number @sms.edgewireless.com General Communications Inc. number @msg.gci.net Qwest Wireless number @qwestmp.com Southern LINC number @page.southernlinc.com Teleflip number @teleflip.com Telus number @msg.telus.com Unicel number @utext.com West Central Wireless number @sms.wcc.net XIT Communications number @sms.xit.net Aruba Setar Mobile number @mas.aw Bermuda Mobility number @ml.bm Canada Aliant number @wirefree.informe.ca Bell Mobility number @txt.bellmobility.ca Fido number @fido.ca MTS Mobility number @text.mtsmobility.com President’s Choice number @mobiletxt.ca Rogers Wireless number @pcs.rogers.com Sasktel Mobility number @pcs.sasktelmobility.com Telus number @msg.telus.com Virgin Mobile Canada number @vmobile.ca Puerto Rico Claro number @vtexto.com International Carriers Location Provider E-mail to SMS address format Argentina Claro number @sms.ctimovil.com.ar Movistar number @sms.movistar.net.ar Nextel TwoWay.11number @nextel.net.ar Australia Telstra number @sms.tim.telstra.com T-Mobile/Optus Zoo number @optusmobile.com.au Austria T-Mobile number @sms.t-mobile.at -
Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc
Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc. AmeriVision Communications, Inc. dba Affinity 4 and Lifeline Communications Airnex Communications, Inc. Allvoi Americatel Corporation ANPI Business, LLC fka Zone Telecom, LLC AT Conference, Inc. AT&T Corp. BA Telecom, Inc. BBG Communications, Inc. Billing Concepts, Inc. (Refered us to AT&T as provider) Birch Telcom of the West Inc. dba Birch Communications BullsEye Telecom Cbeyond Communications LLC Century Link Communications Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Consumer Cellular Convergia Cox California Telecom, LLC Cricket Communications, Inc./AT&T Mobility Earthlink Business, LLC ‐ Earthlink, LLC ‐ Earthlink, Inc. Enhanced Communications Network INC. E. / Everything Wireless First Communications Flash Wireless Globalstar USA LLC Granite Telecommunications LLC GreatCall, Inc. dba Jitterbug IBM Global Network Systems IDT Domestic Telecom inContact, Inc. Intellicall Operator Services Intelafone LLC Intermedia Voice Services I‐Wireless LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. Level 3 Communications LightYear Network Solutions Lingo, Inc Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Matrix Telecom, Inc. Mitel Net Solutions Page 1 of 2 Telecommunication Provider MCI Communications Services, Inc. Mpower Communications Corp. Network Innovations New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC NTT Docomo USA Nextel of California nexVortex, Inc. Nobel Tel, LLC OnStar LLC Ooma, Inc. Opex Communications, Inc. Pacific Bell Telephone Company PAETEC Communications Payment One Corp Phone.com, Inc. Pioneer Telephone PNG Telecommunications, Inc. Primus Telecommunications Ready Wireless SBC Long Distance, LLC Securus Technologies, Inc. Sonic Telecom, LLC Sprint Communications Company, L.P. Sprint Nextel/Spectrum Sprint Telephony PCS, LP Talk America, Inc. Telscape Communications, Inc. TING Globalinx Enterprise, Inc. fka Tri‐M Communications, Inc. T‐Mobile West LLC Metro PCS California, LLC Total Call International, Inc. -
In the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO STEELHEAD LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Num.________________ v. TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED CLARO PUERTO RICO, PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., and TELECOMUNICACIONES DE PUERTO RICO, INC., AMERICA MOVIL S.A.B. de C.V. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Steelhead Licensing LLC (“Steelhead”), by and through its undersigned counsel, for its Complaint against Claro Puerto Rico (“Claro”), Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. (“PRTC”), Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. (“TELPRI”) and América Móvil S.A.B. d C.V. (“América Móvil”), (collectively, “Defendants”), alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code (“U.S.C.”) to prevent and enjoin Defendants from infringing and profiting, in an illegal and unauthorized manner and without authorization and/or consent from Steelhead, from U.S. Patent No. 5,491,834 (the “‘834 Patent”), (attached hereto as Exhibit A) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §271, and to recover damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Steelhead is a Delaware limited liability with its principal place of business at 222 Delaware Avenue, PO Box 25130, Wilmington, DE 19899. 3. Defendants PRTC and TELPRI are wholly owned by América Móvil and are doing business as Claro, and have offices located in 562 Ponce de León Avenue, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918. 4. Defendant América Móvil is a company organized in Mexico with its principal place of business at Lago Zurich 245, Colonia Ampliación Granada, México, D.F., C.P.