Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc. AmeriVision Communications, Inc. dba Affinity 4 and Lifeline Communications Airnex Communications, Inc. Allvoi Americatel Corporation ANPI Business, LLC fka Zone Telecom, LLC AT Conference, Inc. AT&T Corp. BA Telecom, Inc. BBG Communications, Inc. Billing Concepts, Inc. (Refered us to AT&T as provider) Birch Telcom of the West Inc. dba Birch Communications BullsEye Telecom Cbeyond Communications LLC Century Link Communications Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Consumer Cellular Convergia Cox California Telecom, LLC Cricket Communications, Inc./AT&T Mobility Earthlink Business, LLC ‐ Earthlink, LLC ‐ Earthlink, Inc. Enhanced Communications Network INC. E. / Everything Wireless First Communications Flash Wireless Globalstar USA LLC Granite Telecommunications LLC GreatCall, Inc. dba Jitterbug IBM Global Network Systems IDT Domestic Telecom inContact, Inc. Intellicall Operator Services Intelafone LLC Intermedia Voice Services I‐Wireless LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. Level 3 Communications LightYear Network Solutions Lingo, Inc Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Matrix Telecom, Inc. Mitel Net Solutions Page 1 of 2 Telecommunication Provider MCI Communications Services, Inc. Mpower Communications Corp. Network Innovations New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC NTT Docomo USA Nextel of California nexVortex, Inc. Nobel Tel, LLC OnStar LLC Ooma, Inc. Opex Communications, Inc. Pacific Bell Telephone Company PAETEC Communications Payment One Corp Phone.com, Inc. Pioneer Telephone PNG Telecommunications, Inc. Primus Telecommunications Ready Wireless SBC Long Distance, LLC Securus Technologies, Inc. Sonic Telecom, LLC Sprint Communications Company, L.P. Sprint Nextel/Spectrum Sprint Telephony PCS, LP Talk America, Inc. Telscape Communications, Inc. TING Globalinx Enterprise, Inc. fka Tri‐M Communications, Inc. T‐Mobile West LLC Metro PCS California, LLC Total Call International, Inc. Total Holdings, Inc. TracPhone Wireless TWC Digital Phone LLC U.S. TelePacific Corp. dba TelePacific Communicaitons UVNV INC Verizon California Inc. Verizon Enterprise Solutions, LLC Verizon Long Distance, LLC Verizon Select Services VoIPStreet Inc. dba VolP Innovations Vonage America Wholesale Carrier Services, Inc. Working Assets Funding Service XO Communications Services, LLC Page 2 of 2.
Recommended publications
  • Level 3 Communications, LLC Contract Number: GS-35F-0177J
    Authorized Federal Acquisition Service Information Technology Schedule Pricelist General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software and Services General Description of the Commodities and Services Offered Services include Managed Internet Access and Value Added Network Services supporting Electronic Commerce applications for Government agencies. Application SIN, DESCRIPTION, FSC Classes and FPDS Codes SIN DESCRIPTION FSC CLASS/FPDS CODE SIN 132-51 Information Technology - Professional Services SIN 132-52 Electronic Commerce Services D304 Value Added Network Services SIN 132-52 Electronic Commerce Services D304 Internet Access Services Note 1: All non-professional labor categories must be incidental to and used solely to support hardware, software and/or professional services, and cannot be purchased separately. Note 2: Offerors and Agencies are advised that the Group 70 – Information Technology Schedule is not to be used as a means to procure services which properly fall under the Brooks Act. These services include, but are not limited to, architectural, engineering, mapping, cartographic production, remote sensing, geographic information systems, and related services. FAR 36.6 distinguishes between mapping services of an A/E nature and mapping services which are not connected nor incidental to the traditionally accepted A/E Services. Note 3: This solicitation is not intended to solicit for the reselling of IT Professional Services, except for the provision of implementation, maintenance, integration, or training services in direct support of a product. Under such circumstances the services must be performance by the publisher or manufacturer or one of their authorized agents. NOTE: Electronic Commerce Services are not intended to supersede or be a substitute for any voice requirements of FTS2001.
    [Show full text]
  • SC01-2050 Level 3 Communications Vs
    SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC01-2050 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Appellant, v. E. LEON JACOBS, JR., et al. Appellees. AMENDED INITIAL BRIEF OF LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Michael R. Romano, Esq. Kenneth A. Hoffman, Esq. Greg L. Rogers, Esq. Florida Bar No. 307718 Level 3 Communications, LLC Martin P. McDonnell, Esq. 1025 Eldorado Boulevard Florida Bar No. 301728 Broomfield, Colorado 80021 Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell & (720) 888-7015 (Telephone) Hoffman, P.A. (720) 888-5134 (Telecopier) P. O. Box 551 Tallahassee, Florida 323302 (850) 681-6788 (Telephone) (850) 681-6515 (Telecopier) Attorneys for Level 3 Communications, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CITATIONS ........................................iii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS ......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................... 12 ARGUMENT ................................................ 16 I. The Standard of Review ............................... 16 II. The Commission Exceeded its Statutory Authority by Imposing Regulatory Assessment Fees on Level 3’s Collocation Revenues ................................. 18 A. Section 350.113(3), Florida Statutes, limits the imposition of regulatory assessment fees to revenues derived from regulated services. .............. 18 B. The Commission erroneously failed to consider the entire statutory scheme in determining that revenues collected from Level 3's collocation agreements constitute “intrastate business” subject to regulatory assessment fees ................................. 26 C. In 1995, the Legislature
    [Show full text]
  • Funding for the Telecommunications Relay
    COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of: FUNDING FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) CASE NO. RELAY SERVICE ) 2017 -00358 ORDER On September 14, 2017, the Commission issued an Order in this proceeding requiring that the Telecommunications Relay Service ("TRS") fund surcharge be reduced by one cent ($0.01) to one cent ($0.01) per month effective January 1, 2018. In addition, the Commission established a deadline to receive comments regarding a frequency schedule for the Commission to review the TRS fund and related surcharge in the future. The Commission received no comments. The Commission finds that it will conduct a formal review of the TRS fund and the surcharge on an annual basis. Annual reviews of the TRS fund should reduce the potential for large balance shortfalls and overages. Annual reviews will commence approximately 120 days from the end of the calendar year, with the goal of implementing any changes on the first day of the following calendar year. The goal would also be to issue an order within 60 days of the initiation of the annual review so that providers will have ample time to implement any changes, if ordered. These annual formal reviews would be in addition to ongoing monitoring and would not prevent the Commission from making any changes in the interim period. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. The Commission annually will conduct a fo rmal review of the TRS fund to determine if a change in the surcharge is warranted. 2. This case is closed and removed from the Commission's docket.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet and "Telecommunications Services," Universal Service Mechanisms, Access Charges, and Other Flotsam of the Regulatory System
    The Internet and "Telecommunications Services," Universal Service Mechanisms, Access Charges, and Other Flotsam of the Regulatory System Jonathan Weinbergt In troduction .............................................................................................. 2 11 I. B ackground ...................................................................................... 2 14 A . InternetA rchitecture................................................................ 215 B . Telephone Regulation .............................................................. 217 1. The Federal-State Divide ................................................. 218 2. Comp uter II ...................................................................... 220 3. The 1996 Telecommunications Act ................................. 222 II. The Internet and Universal Service Mechanisms ............................ 225 A. The Report to Congress on Universal Service ......................... 225 B. The Breakdown of the Telecommunications/InformationService D istinction................................................................................ 227 C. Why the Telecommunications/InformationService D istinction Doesn't Work ........................................................ 232 D. Universal Service Redux .......................................................... 234 III. The Internet and Access Charges .................................................... 239 A . The Status Q uo ......................................................................... 239 B . Beyond the
    [Show full text]
  • MCI Communications Services, Inc. D/B/A Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No
    MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) Effective August 8, 2016 Fourth Revision MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) This Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) sets forth the rates, terms and conditions of certain recent offerings available to enterprise customers (i.e., non-mass markets) of Verizon Business which are not otherwise described in the Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 3 (Enterprise Non-Current Services), or described in the tariff on file with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Where applicable, the retail services described in this document were previously set forth in the Ohio Interexchange Services Tariff No. 2 of MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services. For ease of reference, where applicable the prior section numbers contained in the prior Tariff No. 2 has been retained. Also, the term “tariff” as used in this document, refers to this Catalog Schedule, unless context indicates otherwise. Any questions regarding this Catalog Schedule, please call 1-866-665-7586. ____________________________________ MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) Effective August 8, 2016 CHANGE SHEET This sheet details the most recent revisions made to this Catalog Schedule. Any questions regarding this Catalog Schedule, please call 1-866-665-7586. Revisions to Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2, Effective 8/8/16 Sections 1, 2, 3, 3.1 and 5 Effective on or after August 8, 2016, MCI Communications Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA DOCKET NO. 2013-239-C - ORDER NO. 2013-674 OCTOBER I, 2013 IN RE: Application of Tempo Telecom, LLC for ) ORDER GRANTING Designation as an Eligible ) EXPEDITED REVIEW Telecommunications Carrier in the State of ) AND APPROVING South Carolina ) APPLICATION FOR ) DESIGNATION AS AN ) ETC TO PROVIDE ) LIFELINE SERVICE Introduction This matter comes before the Public Service Commission of South Carolina (the "Commission") pursuant to 10 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 103-690 and 103-690.1 (Supp. 2012), 47 U.S.C. tJ 214(e)(2) and 47 C.F.R. tJ 54.101, on the Application of Tempo Telecom, LLC ("Tempo Telecom" or the "Company") for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier ("ETC") in the State of South Carolina filed on June 13, 2013 (the "Application") as amended. Tempo Telecom has asked the Commission to designate it as an ETC throughout the proposed service area in South Carolina for the limited purpose of offering Lifeline support to its qualifying customers and drawing from the low income fund of the federal Universal Service Fund ("USF") in connection with those services. For the reasons explained in this Order, the Commission has concluded that the Application should be approved and that designation of Tempo Telecom as an ETC on the terms provided in this Order would serve the public interest. DOCKET NO. 2013-239-C — ORDER NO. 2013-674 OCTOBER I, 2013 PAGE 2 B~kd As directed by the Commission, Notice of Filing and Hearing was published in newspapers of general circulation in the areas affected by the Application.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS Tariff FCC No. 1 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Sheet 1
    BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS Tariff FCC No. 1 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF Original Sheet 1 This tariff, Birch Communications Tariff FCC No. 1, replaces in its entirety, Access Integrated Networks d/b/a Birch Communications Tariff FCC No. 3 TITLE PAGE ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF OF BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS This tariff contains the descriptions, regulations, and rates applicable to the furnishing of service and facilities for telecommunications services provided by Birch Communications. This tariff is on file with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Copies may be inspected during normal business hours at the Company's principal place of business at 2300 Main St. Suite 600, Kansas City, MO 64108. Wherever in this Tariff or its headings, the term “Company” or the name “Birch” appears, that shall mean and shall refer to Birch Communications. Issued: October 23, 2008 Effective: October 24, 2008 by: Christopher J. Bunce, Vice President Legal and General Counsel 2300 Main St. Suite 600 Kansas City, MO 64108 BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS Tariff FCC No. 1 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF 5th Revised Sheet 2 th Cancels 4 Revised Sheet 2 CHECK SHEET Sheets of this tariff are effective as of the date shown at the bottom of the respective sheet(s). Original and revised sheets as named below comprise all changes from the original tariff and are currently in effect as of the date on the bottom of this page. SHEET REVISION 1 Original 2 5th Revised* 3 5th Revised* 3.1 Original 4 1st Revised 5 Original 6 Original 7 Original 8 Original 9 Original 10 Original 11 Original 12 Original 13 Original 14 Original 15 Original 16 Original 17 Original 18 Original 19 Original 20 Original 21 Original 22 Original 23 Original 24 Original 25 Original 26 Original 27 Original 28 Original 29 Original 30 Original 31 Original 32 Original 33 Original 34 Original 35 Original 36 Original 37 Original 38 Original 39 Original *Indicates pages submitted with most recent filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator
    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau February 2003 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information and the types of services sold by 5,364 telecommunications providers. The last report was released November 27, 2001.1 All information in this report is drawn from providers’ April 1, 2002, filing of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-A).2 This report can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.3 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. Information from filings received after November 22, 2002, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from the tables. Although many telecommunications providers offer an extensive menu of services, each filer is asked on Line 105 of FCC Form 499-A to select the single category that best describes its telecommunications business.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    Harnessing Strengths Annual Report 2013 Year Ended March 31, 2013 Contents 01 DOCOMO’s Strengths in Action 08 Business Overview 08 About NTT DOCOMO 09 Mobile Phone Market in Japan 10 11-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data 12 Financial Highlights 14 To Our Stakeholders President Kaoru Kato discusses the challenges faced by DOCOMO in a period of tremendous change and the Company’s determination to achieve growth in the years ahead. 21 Special Feature: 22 DOCOMO’s Resolutions: Boosting Competitiveness DOCOMO’s Management Strategies 24 Customer Satisfaction Improvement Project Reinforcing Strengths, 26 DOCOMO’s Challenges: Expanding New Business Areas Pursuing New Businesses 28 Commerce Business 30 Review of Operations 30 Financial Review from the CFO 32 Management Indicators in Fiscal 2012 34 Operating Data 36 At a Glance 38 Main Initiatives 38 Networks and Billing Plans 41 Handsets 43 New Business Fields: Services 47 New Business Fields: Partnerships 50 Supporting Tohoku Reconstruction and Revitalization Initiatives 51 Contributing to Society and the Environment through Our Business Activities 52 Management System 52 Corporate Governance 56 Internal Control 57 Information Management 58 Risk Factors 60 Organizational Structure 61 Subsidiaries and Affi liates 62 Financial Data 62 Consolidated Financial Statements 68 Reconciliations of the Disclosed Non-GAAP Financial Measures to the Most Directly Comparable GAAP Financial Measures 69 Corporate Data 69 Corporate Information 69 Stock Information Forward-Looking Statements This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current predictions, plans, expectations, acknowledgements and estimates based on the information obtained by us until the date of this annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthlink Inc
    EARTHLINK INC FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 02/27/09 for the Period Ending 12/31/08 Address 1375 PEACHTREE STREET SUITE 400 ATLANTA, GA 30309 Telephone 4048150770 CIK 0001102541 Symbol ELNK SIC Code 7370 - Computer Programming, Data Processing, And Industry Computer Services Sector Technology Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2009, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-15605 EARTHLINK, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 58 -2511877 (State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1375 Peachtree St., Atlanta, Georgia 30309 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (404) 815-0770 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Fibertech Networks Leading the Way Dark Fiber Optic Networks Are Designed, Built and Operated Within Mid-Size Ci
    Fibertech Networks Leading the way dark fiber optic networks are designed, built and operated within mid-size ci CMTAUZE ON YOUR INVESTMEWS In tcday's capitalionstrained telemm market, there's a premium on lowering costs and tempering risks. Yet carriers must balance these challenges against raised revenue targets, speed-to-market and increased facilities-based deployment. That's where Fibertech mmes in. Our dark fiber metro networks can provide you with a myriad of cost-cutb'ng benefits induding: >> Virtually unlimited bandwidth at a fixed cost >> A flexible, competitive and customizable network configuration and cost structure s The ability to utilize technological advances to better manage traffic demand View or Download our Capabilities Brochure (PDF/776KB) * Access to metro networks that indude connections to virtually all central offices, POPS and data centers, and that are a short distance from its major office to see a Sample Network Pli! buildings and business parks s The advantage of being facilities-based, which can improve both margins and enterprise value s Increased provisioning times resulting in faster revenue realization Competitive carriers must continue to invest in their business in order to exceed future growth expectations. So, whether you're interested in entering a market as a facilities-based provider or simply looking to bolster your serviceable footprint, a Fibertech dark fiber network can be your differentiator. To learn more about our dark fiber connections, please complete our sales inauiw form and a Fibertech representative will contact you shortly. F!krtecl?Netwar&, LCC / 140 hllens C :k Kwd / Rochester NY 14616 555 697 5100 tnfoCfibertech.com Terms of Use/Privaq FPL FiberNet A Leading Provider of Fiber-optic Technology Wholesale service I One of the laraest metrowlitan fiber-odic networks in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • To Link Telephones with Cable TV
    TOP OF THE WEEK t said the impact of the CRT's action would that cable should pay for the use of pro- they can get away with it -for originating be minimal -at least as far as United graming it imports. or terminating the long- distance traffic." Video is concerned. Although WGN -TV Carolyn Chambers, an executive vice He said MCI now pays the local telephone would be dropped by a few systems, he president at Liberty Communications, companies $200 million a year to dis- said, most cable operators faced with drop- Eugene, Ore., said Liberty is looking at tribute its long- distance calls. ping signals would dump signals imported paying $4.50 per subscriber per year in McGowan said MCI will launch a major from nearby cities and towns rather than royalty payments for a distant signal on a public relations campaign bound to stimu- any of the superstations. $10 basic tier. Liberty is taking a long hard late interest in cable television. He said The executives at Turner Broadcasting look, she said, at the signals it intends to MCI will demonstrate the potential of ca- System, owner of superstation wTBS(TV) keep. While 1.5% of its revenue now ble systems as a means by which Atlanta, were not as sanguine as Bliss. TBS goes to pay for distant signals, under the customers can reach the company's net- head Ted Turner called the CRT action a new rates the figure would jump to 7 %. work without having to go through "the "devastating decision." Unless the CRT uneconomic networks of the monopoly decision is modified or overturned, said held by local phone companies." TBS Vice President Terry McGuirk, wTBs MCI hopes At present, he said MCI customers "are may lose 100,000 to 200,000 viewers subjected to unnecessary expense and has- across the country.
    [Show full text]