Short-Rotation Forestry – a Complement to “Conventional” Forestry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Short-Rotation Forestry – a Complement to “Conventional” Forestry 34 Short-rotation forestry – a complement to “conventional” forestry .%JTKUVGTUUQPCPF-8GTOC *KIJFGPUKV[UWUVCKPCDNG ack of wood is common in many and abiotic damage. Short-rotation for- RNCPVCVKQPUQHHCUVITQYKPI countries – particularly for forest estry excludes as many of these limit- VTGGURGEKGUUJQYRQVGPVKCN Lindustries in developed countries ing factors as possible. Irrigation and HQTFGXGNQRGFCPFFGXGNQRKPI and for fuel in developing countries. fertilization are often used, but only in EQWPVTKGUCNKMG Greater attention to short-rotation for- an ecologically and economically sound estry on agricultural land and on fertile way. Plantations are weeded and com- forest soils could offer a way to pro- peting tree species are removed. Spe- vide forest industries with enough wood cies, provenances and clones with high resources and people in the developing water-use efficiency or high resistance world with enough fuel, while conserving to frost, insects, fungi and bacteria are natural forests (Christersson, 2005). planted. Fencing prevents browsing by Short-rotation forestry is defined in animals. Plantations are harvested when this article as the silvicultural practice the yearly growth rate no longer exceeds under which high-density, sustainable the mean annual increment. plantations of fast-growing tree species The present article summarizes observa- produce woody biomass on agricultural tions made at a session on “Wood produc- land or on fertile but degraded forest tion in agroforestry and in short-rotation land. Trees are grown either as single forestry systems – synergies for rural stems or as coppice systems, with a rota- development” at the XXII International tion period of less than 30 years and with Union of Forest Research Organizations an annual woody production of at least 10 (IUFRO) World Conference in Brisbane, tonnes of dry matter or 25 m3 per hectare. Australia, in August 2005. It describes The practice should optimize the use of cases in which as many limiting factors as natural resources, environmentally and possible are taken away to achieve maxi- economically, through the application mum growth rate of trees, demonstrating of biological, physical, theoretical and the potential of the practice. Examples practical knowledge (Landsberg GVCN, include poplar in the United States, Can- 1997). The biomass produced is used ada and India, willows in Sweden, bamboo for construction, pulp and paper, fodder in China and Ethiopia and eucalypts in and energy. Wood from short-rotation Australia and Brazil. Examples from some forestry may replace wood from tropical other countries recognize further oppor- forests and from protected forest areas tunities for short-rotation forestry. and thus help conserve valuable natural forests for future generations. ':#/2.'5(41/&'8'.12'& In what is considered “conventional” %17064+'5 forestry in the northern hemisphere, the *[DTKFRQRNCTRNCPVCVKQPUKP0QTVJ entire growth potential of a tree species #OGTKEC Lars Christersson is in the Department of Short is not fully utilized for various reasons: The outstanding growth potential of Rotation Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Swedish economic and ecological difficulties in 2QRWNWU VTKEJQECTRC and 2QRWNWU University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden. creating optimal water and nutrient con- FGNVQKFGU has been realized in Canada -CTVCT8GTOC works in the College of Forestry, ditions; competition from herbaceous and the United States by growing to Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and plants and other tree species; and biotic some extent the pure species, but mostly Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India. 7PCU[NXCVol. 57, 2006 35 In Australia, short-rotation forestry could be used to lower elevated saline ground-water levels, which frustrate the cultivation of all types of vegetation forestry to replace fossil fuels included the existence of well-developed district heating systems in almost all towns and villages and the already widespread use of wood energy (up to 20 percent of all L. CHRISTERSSON energy) in Sweden. Other driving forces hybrids of the two (Dickmann GVCN, ments with plantations of 'WECN[RVWU included overproduction in agriculture, 2001). Hybrids of other poplar spe- species carefully selected for rapid which made land available for forest cies from Europe and Japan have also growth, irrigated with effluent waste- plantations, the high cost of imported been introduced (Steenackers, 1990). water from towns and industries, annual oil and gas, and concern about the green- In Canada and the United States, com- production of up to 40 tonnes of dry house effect of CO2 emissions resulting mercial establishment of poplar plan- matter per hectare has been reported in from combustion of fossil fuels. tations began for the most part in the southeastern Australia (Baker, Duncan In this type of silviculture, 20 cm 5CNKZ 1980s. Spacing varies from 2 × 2 to and Stackpole, 2005). cuttings are planted on agricultural land 3×3m and rotation time from six to In many sites in southwestern Australia, in a double-rowed coppice system, with seven years. Most of the plantations are the saline ground-water table had become repeated harvests after two to four years located in the provinces of Alberta and elevated through replacement of forest (Verwijst, 2001). There are 16 000 ha of British Columbia in Canada and in the with agricultural crops. Strips of care- energy forestry plantations in Sweden Mississippi River Valley and the state of fully selected, deep-rooted, salt-tolerant, today, but based on the overproduction in Washington in the United States. Annual fast-growing 'WECN[RVWU spp., with spa- agriculture and the government’s goal to production reaches 10 to 15 tonnes per cing of 6 to 10 m in rows 50 to 100 m make Sweden independent of imported hectare (Stanton GVCN, 2002). Even in apart, have been planted on agricultural oil, the potential could be estimated at the semi-desert near the Columbia River, land to lower the ground-water table 500 000 to 1 million hectares. irrigated and fertilized hybrid poplars enough for successful agriculture (Wildy Single-stem plantations of introduced achieve an annual production of 15 to 20 GVCN, 2000). The total above-ground 2QRWNWUVTKEJQECTRC and 2FGNVQKFGU and tonnes per hectare (Heilman and Stettler, biomass production, including leaves, hybrids of these have also achieved large 1985). Initially poplar wood was used for is about 10 tonnes per hectare annually woody biomass production (Karacic, paper and pulp, but in some plantations, and is used in the production of charcoal Verwijst and Weih, 2003; Christersson, wider spacing and longer rotations are powder, eucalyptus oil and energy. 2006). Only a few hundred hectares used (sometimes in conjunction with have been planted, but the results are thinning), and some companies now use 'PGTI[HQTGUVT[KP5YGFGP so impressive that many farmers are it for timber, wall panelling, fruit boxes Energy forestry – short rotation planta- showing an interest in planting more. and furniture. tions of carefully selected 5CNKZ species The wood will be used for paper as well and hybrids in coppice systems for pro- as energy. +TTKICVGFEucalyptusRNCPVCVKQPUKP duction of biomass for energy production Utilization of short-rotation forests Australia – was developed in Sweden after the oil as vegetation filters for waste prod- In the homeland of the genus, irrigated crises in 1973 and 1979 (Sirén GVCN, ucts is strongly supported in Sweden plantations of 'WECN[RVWU species have 1983). Factors that enabled the successful (Perttu and Obarska-Pempkowiak, 1998; shown real growth potential. In experi- introduction of this type of short-rotation Dimitriou and Aronsson, 2004).Waste 7PCU[NXCVol. 57, 2006 36 Salix viminalis energy plantation in Sweden, with one-year-old shoots on four-year-old roots reach 30 to 40 tonnes of dry matter per hectare at different rotations (Scurlock, Dayton and Hames, 2000). Organic and inorganic fertilizers are used systemati- cally. Commonly used organic fertilizers are compost, human waste and barnyard manure. These are applied at the rate L. CHRISTERSSON of 1.5 to 4 tonnes per hectare per year, water and sewage sludge, which contain spp. are producing about 300 to 350 m3 buried in 5 to 10 cm-deep channels large amounts of nitrogen and phospho- per hectare in seven years. On the best between the bamboo plants (MOST, rus, are used to fertilize and irrigate soils in this area, without irrigation, INBAR and INFORTRACE, 2002). plantations of willows and poplars. The annual production of 60 to 90 m3 per hec- waste products can also contain pollut- tare has been reported. Despite annual 9QQFRTQFWEVKQPCITQHQTGUVT[CPF ing heavy metals, which some willow precipitation of 1 300 to 1 400 mm, UKVGCOGNKQTCVKQPKP+PFKC clones are able to absorb efficiently. experiments have shown that irrigation As a result of restrictions on felling in nat- When wood from this type of plantation with effluents from communities and ural forests imposed by the Indian Gov- is burned, heavy metals can be extracted industry can double production. Most ernment, fast-growing, short-rotation from the fly ash and bottom ash. How- of the Aracruz plantations are on later- ever, this process is not yet economical, ite soils, and all such forest plantations so today most of the ashes are deposited are limed with dolomite and calcium Seven-year-old Eucalyptus plantation at city waste disposal sites. carbonate and fertilized, particularly in Brazil, ready for harvesting; research
Recommended publications
  • The Forest Sector in Chile: an Overview and Current Challenges
    J. For. 114(5):562–571 REVIEW ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-062 Copyright © 2016 Society of American Foresters international forestry The Forest Sector in Chile: An Overview and Current Challenges Christian Salas, Pablo J. Donoso, Rodrigo Vargas, Cesar A. Arriagada, Rodrigo Pedraza, and Daniel P. Soto Chile has a strong forest sector based on plantations of exotic species and an extensive area of temperate Among the first English peer-reviewed pub- rainforests with unique ecological features and a wealth of biodiversity and endemism. We present an overview lications on the forest sector of Chile are of the forest sector of Chile focused on forest resources, silviculture, economy, social and environmental aspects, those of Recart (1973), Husch (1982), Je´lvez and forestry education and research. The Chilean forest sector is internationally known for its success. Although et al. (1990), and Gwynne (1993). These this is one of the most important economic activities of Chile, management between exotic species plantations mostly focused on forestry plantations and and natural forests is very asymmetric. Currently, highly intensive silviculture is applied to forest plantations of did not pay much attention to natural forests Pinus radiata (radiata pine) and Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus, Eucalyptus nitens) but only limited operational and the social aspects of forestry in Chile. silviculture is applied to natural forests, even though there is considerable research to support it. There are still Later, Lara and Veblen (1993) focused on unresolved issues related to: conversion from natural forests to other land uses; pulp mills, and new efforts are the levels of substitution of natural forest ar- needed from the government and large forestry companies to account for social and environmental demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Download
    The Revolution Transforming Agriculture & Environment Biochar: Ancient Origins, Modern Solution A Biochar Timeline Author Paul Taylor PhD This complete book is available at www.TheBiocharRevolution.com Biochar: Ancient Origins, Modern Solution A Biochar Timeline Author Paul Taylor PhD This complete book is available at www.TheBiocharRevolution.com FIRST EDITION 2010 Copyright 2010 NuLife Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing–in–Publishing entry: Taylor, Paul, 1945– The Biochar Revolution: Transforming Agriculture & Environment. 1st ed. ISBN: 978 1 921630 41 5 (pbk.) 1. Ashes as fertilizer. 2. Carbon sequestration. 3. Charcoal. 4. Soil amendments 631.4 Published by NuLife Publishing PO Box 9284 GCMC Qld 9726 Australia Email: [email protected] For further information about orders: Email: [email protected] Website: www.thebiocharrevolution.com ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for the interest, support, patience, and effort expressed consistently— yet in unique ways—by each and every author, as we went though many revisions together. They are listed in the front of the book, with their bios in the back, under contributing authors. I owe special thanks to Hugh McLaughlin and Paul Anderson for their belief, interest, advice and support in the book as a whole. Both read, and offered valuable editing suggestions on, diverse chapters. Hugh reviewed most of the final manuscript. Gary Levi played a crucial role as chief editor and editorial advisor. He edited every chapter numerous times, and stayed with the project as it extended from 5 weeks to 5 months, working generously and meticulously to shape and organize the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings IUFRO: Evaluation and Planning of Forestry Research
    united States oepartment of Agriculture Proceedings Forest Service Northeastern IUFRO Station NE-GTR-111 Evaluation and Planning 1986 of Forestry Research S6.06 - S6.06.01 Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 July 25-26, 1985 IUFRO PROCEEDINGS EVALUATION AND PLANNING OF FORESTRY RESEARCH S6.06 - S6.06.01 Compiled by Denver P. Burns Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA July 25-26, 1985 Sponsored by INTERNATIONAL UNION OF FORESTRY RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS and NORTHEASTERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION, USDA FOREST SERVICE Papers are published in this proceedings in camera-ready form as submitted by the authors. The authors are responsible for the content of their papers. PROGRAM July 25, 1985 Introduction: Denver P. Burns, Director, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Broanall, PA SESSION I - RESB.Alial FRONTIERS Moderator: Dr. Eldon Ross Resear·ch Frontiers. W. Franklin Harr·is, Deputy Division Director, Biotic Systems and Resources, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. SESSION II - RESBARQI FROIITIBRS FOR FORESTRY Applying Frontier Biotechnologies to Tree Improvement: Opportunities and Limitations. F. Thomas Ledig, Project Leader, Institute of Forest Genetics, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA For·est Service, Berkeley, CA Biotechnologies - The Potential Role of Somaclonal Variation in Forestry. Darroll D. Skilling and Michael E. Ostry, Principal Plant Pathologists, Nor·th Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN Frontiers in Wood Utilization Research in the United States. John R. Erickson, Director·, Forest Products Laboratory, USDA For·est Service, �.adison, WI Fr·ontiers in Handling Wood. C. R. Silversides, Forestry Consultant, Prescott, Ontar·io SESSION III - IDBIITIFIING RBSBARal NEEDS Moderator: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees for Farm Forestry: 22 Promising Species
    Forestry and Forest Products Natural Heritage Trust Helping Communities Helping Australia TREES FOR FARM FORESTRY: 22 PROMISING SPECIES Forestry and Forest Products TREES FOR FARM FORESTRY: Natural Heritage 22 PROMISING SPECIES Trust Helping Communities Helping Australia A report for the RIRDC/ Land & Water Australia/ FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program Revised and Edited by Bronwyn Clarke, Ian McLeod and Tim Vercoe March 2009 i © 2008 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 821 0 ISSN 1440-6845 Trees for Farm Forestry: 22 promising species Publication No. 09/015 Project No. CSF-56A The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Rotation Forestry and Agroforestry in CDM Countries and Europe
    Kenya Brazil China Europe India Short Rotation Forestry and Agroforestry in CDM Countries and Europe The BENWOOD project is funded by the European Union under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 1 KENYA BRAZIL CHINA EUROPE INDIA Short Rotation Forestry and Agroforestry in CDM Countries and Europe Kenya Brazil China Europe India Short Rotation Forestry and Agroforestry in CDM Countries and Europe The BENWOOD The DVD is also available project is for a small fee which covers funded by shipping cost. See details the European Union on how to obtain it from the under the 7th BENWOOD website Framework Programme www.benwood.eu. The BENWOOD consortium for Research and Innovation Compiled by Falko Kaufmann, Genevieve Lamond, Marco Lange, Jochen Schaub, Christian Siebert and Torsten Sprenger KENYA BRAZIL CHINA EUROPE INDIA Foreword As the Head of Unit for ‘Agriculture, Forestry, countries where increased investment will occur. Fisheries and Aquaculture’ within the European In addition, it should lead not only to increased Commission DG Research and Innovation, investment in forestry, but also to increasing mar- I am very pleased to introduce this summarized kets for equipment linked to biomass processing findings presenting the results of the BENWOOD as well as generating markets for forest products project. with a focus on biofuel producers. Project Coordinator BENWOOD The BENWOOD project has been funded by I hope that the outputs from the project, concen- Thomas Lewis the European Commission under the Seventh trated in this summarized findings, will help to energieautark consulting gmbh Research Programme (FP7) Theme addressing support a new era for the production of renew- Hauptstrasse 27/3 ‘Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, and Biotechno- able, carbon-neutral alternatives to non-renewable 1140 Wien – Austria logy’ in order to make relevant information on fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Forestry Exemplar Trials Establishment
    Energy Forestry Exemplar Trials Establishment Guidelines Energy Forestry Exemplar Trials Energy Forestry Exemplar Trials Contents Page INTRODUCTION… ....................................................................................2 2. AIMS..................................................................................................2 3. THE TRIAL SITES .................................................................................2 4. GENERAL SITE MANAGEMENT................................................................3 5. SRC and SRF.......................................................................................4 6. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MONITORING.........................................4 6.1. Environmental Research..............................................................5 6.2. Silviculture - Short Rotation Forestry (SRF) ...................................7 6.3. Silviculture - Short Rotation Coppice (SRC).................................. 10 6.4. Carbon balance........................................................................ 11 6.5. Regeneration or reinstatement................................................... 11 7. CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 11 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................... 12 APPENDICES: Appendix 1: Experiment plans and protocols ............................... 15 - 52 a. Soil sampling and analysis ........................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • Short Rotation Forestry (SRF) Versus Rapeseed Plantations: Insights from Soil Respiration and Combustion Heat Per Area
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 76 ( 2015 ) 398 – 405 European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2015, EGU Division Energy, Resources & Environment, ERE Short Rotation Forestry (SRF) versus rapeseed plantations: Insights from soil respiration and combustion heat per area כ,Kamal Zurbaa, Jörg Matschullata aTU Bergakademie Freiberg, Interdisciplinary Environmental Research Centre, Freiberg 09599, Germany Abstract Bioenergy crops may be an important contributor to mitigating global warming risks. A comparison between willow and poplar Short Rotation Forestry and rapeseed cultivation was designed to evaluate the ratio between soil respiration and the combustion heat obtained from the extracted products per hectare. A manual dynamic closed chamber system was applied to measure CO2 emissions at the SRF and rapeseed sites during the growing season. Our results show that poplar and willow SRF has a very low ratio compared to rapeseed. We thus recommend poplar and willow SRF as renewable sources for bioenergy over the currently prevalent rapeseed production. © 20152015 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by Elsevierby Elsevier Ltd. Ltd.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Peer-reviewhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ under responsibility of the GFZ German). Research Centre for Geosciences. Peer-review under responsibility of the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Keywords: Soil respiration; manual dynamic closed chamber; SEMACH-FG; bioenergy crops; climate change mitigation * Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 3731 39-3399; fax: +49 3731 39-4060. E-mail address: [email protected] Nomenclature ha 104 m2 t 103 kg d.w. dry weight yr year MJ 106 joules PAR Photosynthetically active radiation eq equivalent 1876-6102 © 2015 The Authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Rotation Forestry, Short Rotation Coppice and Perennial Grasses in the European Union: Agro-Environmental Aspects, Present Use and Perspectives"
    "Short Rotation Forestry, Short Rotation Coppice and perennial grasses in the European Union: Agro-environmental aspects, present use and perspectives" 17 and 18 October 2007, Harpenden, United Kingdom Editors J. F. Dallemand , J.E. Petersen, A. Karp EUR 23569 EN - 2008 The Institute for Energy provides scientific and technical support for the conception, development, implementation and monitoring of community policies related to energy. Special emphasis is given to the security of energy supply and to sustainable and safe energy production. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy Contact information Address: Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy Renewable Energy Unit TP 450 I-21020 Ispra (Va) Italy E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: 39 0332 789937 Fax: 39 0332 789992 http://ie.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC 47547 EUR 23569 EN ISSN 1018-5593 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities © European Communities, 2008 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Italy Proceedings of the Expert Consultation: "Short Rotation Forestry, Short Rotation Coppice and perennial grasses in the European Union: Agro-environmental aspects, present use and perspectives" 17 and 18 October 2007, Harpenden, United Kingdom Editors J.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Sequestration in Short-Rotation Forestry Plantations and in Belgian Forest Ecosystems
    Carbon sequestration in short-rotation forestry plantations and in Belgian forest ecosystems ir. Inge Vande Walle to S. and J. Promoter : Prof. dr. Raoul LEMEUR Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Biology, Laboratory of Plant Ecology Dean : Prof. dr. ir. Herman VAN LANGENHOVE Rector : Prof. dr. Paul VAN CAUWENBERGE ir. Inge VANDE WALLE Carbon sequestration in short-rotation forestry plantations and in Belgian forest ecosystems Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor (PhD) in Applied Biological Sciences Koolstofvastlegging in plantages met korte omloopstijd en in Belgische bosecosystemen Illustrations on the cover : Front : birch trees at a short-rotation plantation (Zwijnaarde) Back : Maskobossen (Jabbeke) Illustrations between chapters : Page 15 : short-rotation plantation (Zwijnaarde), washing of roots (greenhouse at the Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Gent) Page 115 : Aelmoeseneiebos (Gontrode), Maskobossen (Jabbeke), Merkenveld (Zedelgem), domain Cellen (Oostkamp) Page 245 : Merkenveld (Zedelgem) Citation : Vande Walle, I. 2007. Carbon sequestration in short-rotation forestry plantations and in Belgian forest ecosystems. Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, 244 p. ISBN-number : 978-90-5989-161-6 The author and the promoter give the authorization to consult and to copy parts of this work for personal use only. Every other use is subject to the copyright laws. Permission to reproduce any material contained in this work should be obtained from the author. Woord vooraf In principe is het schrijven van een 'Woord vooraf' niet zo'n moeilijke opdracht. Er is immers geen statistiek voor nodig, er moet niets bewezen worden, en verwijzingen naar andere publicaties zijn ook al niet van toepassing. In de praktijk echter is het niet zo eenvoudig om in enkele woorden of zinnen alle mensen te bedanken die er toe bijgedragen hebben dat ik de afgelopen tien jaar met veel plezier wetenschappelijk onderzoek heb uitgevoerd, en dat ik er in geslaagd ben het boek dat nu voor u ligt af te werken.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Mid Term Review of the Irish Forestry Programme 2014-2020
    Evaluation of the Mid Term Review of the Irish Forestry Programme 2014-2020. Report 1 - Forestry in Ireland. Gerry Lawson MICFor CBiol Forest Transitions, Calle Morera 5, Castillo de Bayuela, Toledo 45641, Spain. ​ Environmental Consultancy Services Consultancy Report for Luke Ming Flanagan MEP | 20 September 2018 1. Introduction 2 2. MTR - Call for Submissions March 2017 3 3. MTR - Comparison with EU Common Evaluation Principles. 7 4. MTE - EU State Aid to Forestry Rules 7 4.1 EU Guidelines for state aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas 2014-2020 7 4.2 European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), as described in Regulations 1305/2013 and 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council 9 5. MTR - submissions and responses (TOR 4 & 6). 10 5.1 Afforestation and Creation of Woodland (76.2% of total budget) 14 5.1.1 How to increase the species diversity and the proportion of broadleaves? 14 5.1.2 How to achieve the targets for new planting? 16 5.1.3 How to increase the average size of new planting blocks? 19 5.1.4 How to make the Forestry for Fibre scheme more attractive? 19 5.1.5 How to make the agroforestry scheme more attractive?y systems 20 5.2 NeighbourWood Scheme (0.4% of total budget) 22 5.3 Forest Roads (10.5% of total budget) 24 5.4 Reconstitution Scheme (1.8% of total budget) 26 5.5 Woodland Improvement Scheme (2.6% of total budget) 27 5.6 Native Woodland Conservation Scheme (2.8% of total budget) 29 5.7 Knowledge Transfer Measure (3.3% of total budget) 32 5.8 Producer Groups (0.1% of total budget) 33 5.9 Innovative Forest Technology (0.3% of total budget) 34 5.10 Forest Genetic Reproductive Material (0.2% of total budget) 35 5.11 Forest Management Plans (0.7% of total budget) 37 5.12 General Issues 38 5.12.1 How to enhance environment, biodiversity, climate? 38 5.12.2 How to change land use policies? 41 5.12.3 How to enhance the species mix in planting schemes? 43 5.12.4 How to increase collaboration between forest owners? 45 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Storage and Sequestration Potential of Selected Tree Species in India
    Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change (2010) 15:489–510 DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9230-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India Meenakshi Kaul & G. M. J. Mohren & V. K. Dadhwal Received: 19 November 2009 /Accepted: 19 April 2010 / Published online: 30 April 2010 # The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract A dynamic growth model (CO2FIX) was used for estimating the carbon sequestration potential of sal (Shorea Robusta Gaertn. f.), Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus Tereticornis Sm.), poplar (Populus Deltoides Marsh), and teak (Tectona Grandis Linn. f.) forests in India. The results indicate that long-term total carbon storage ranges from 101 to 156 Mg Cha−1, with the largest carbon stock in the living biomass of long rotation sal forests (82 Mg Cha−1). The net annual carbon sequestration rates were achieved for fast growing short rotation poplar (8 Mg Cha−1yr−1) and Eucalyptus (6 Mg Cha−1yr−1) plantations followed by moderate growing teak forests (2 Mg Cha−1yr−1) and slow growing long rotation sal forests (1 Mg Cha−1yr−1). Due to fast growth rate and adaptability to a range of environments, short rotation plantations, in addition to carbon storage rapidly produce biomass for energy and contribute to reduced greenhouse gas emissions. We also used the model to evaluate the effect of changing rotation length and thinning regime on carbon stocks of forest ecosystem (trees+soil) and wood products, respectively for sal and teak forests. The carbon stock in soil and products was less sensitive than carbon stock of trees to the change in rotation length.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Rotation Coppice of Willows for the Production of Biomass in Eastern Canada
    Chapter 17 Short-Rotation Coppice of Willows for the Production of Biomass in Eastern Canada Werther Guidi, Frédéric E. Pitre and Michel Labrecque Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/51111 1. Introduction The production of energy by burning biomass (i.e. bioenergy), either directly or through transformation, is one of the most promising alternative sources of sustainable energy. Contrary to fossil fuels, bioenergy does not necessarily result in a net long-term increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases, particularly when production methods take this concern into account. Converting forests, peatlands, or grasslands to production of food-crop based biofuels may release up to 400 times more CO2 than the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions that these biofuels would provide by displacing fossil fuels. On the other hand, biofuels from biomass grown on degraded and abandoned agricultural lands planted with perennials do not have a negative effect on carbon emissions [1]. In addition, when properly managed, bioenergy can enhance both agricultural and rural development by increasing agricultural productivity, creating new opportunities for revenue and employment, and improving access to modern energy services in rural areas, both in developed and developing countries [2]. Biofuels constitute a very broad category of materials that can be derived from sources including municipal by-products, food crops (e.g. maize, sugar cane etc.), agricultural and forestry by-products (straws, stalks, sawdust, etc.) or from specifically-conceived fuel crops. Our analysis focuses on agricultural biofuel crops that can be grown in temperate regions. These crops can be divided into four main categories (Table 1).
    [Show full text]