Prosecuting High-Level Political Corruption. Mapping Judicial Investigations in Three Italian Cabinets (2008-2013)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prosecuting High-Level Political Corruption. Mapping Judicial Investigations in Three Italian Cabinets (2008-2013) Prosecuting high-level political corruption. Mapping judicial investigations in three Italian cabinets (2008-2013). Cristina Dallara (Irsig-CNR/ Università di Bologna)1 Very first draft, please do not cite or circulate Introduction While a growing body of research examines the causes and consequences of corruption, using sociological, economic, political and anthropological approaches (Mungiu-Pippidi, 2006; Holmes 2006; Vachudova, 2009; De Ridder, 2009; Kostadinova, 2012) less has been written about the institutions and the judicial procedures applied to tackle high-level political corruption. For this reason, we propose to shift the attention from the causes and effects of corruption to the state’s action to curb it, through criminal prosecution. Until now, no systematic studies have been specifically developed on high-level corruption prosecution and very few and reliable information are available on the amount investigations involving high-level politicians, on the timing of such investigations and on the number of indictments for political corruption crimes. We believe that shedding light specifically on the prosecution side could offer relevant information for studying corruption as a whole. As an example, a pilot study focusing on the prosecution of cabinet ministers in Eastern and Southern Europe (Popova and Post 2013) has generated some hypotheses about those factors that could be associated with a higher probability of investigation for corruption charges. With this paper, we propose a pilot study mapping judicial investigations in Italy, using primarily media sources, for corruption related charges against cabinet ministers, deputy ministers and undersecretaries form 2008 to 2013. Our goal is to map out the entire corruption prosecution process, from the appearance of the first allegations to the opening of a formal investigation, to the filing of an indictment by the public prosecution, and finally to the court proceedings during a trial. The aim of the paper is to assess in the Italian case some hypotheses developed in the literature on political corruption, concerning factors that could be associated with a higher probability of indictment on corruption charges, such as: type of ministerial portfolios, affiliation to a strong/weak party and timing of investigative action (before/during/after tenure). To this end, we will proceed as follow: the first section offers a brief introduction about corruption in Italy and its relevance of this topic for the whole relation between justice and politics (§1); then, some reflections on how to deal with data and sources for measuring corruption will be presented (§2); finally, the last section presents and focuses on the mapping exercise we have conducted on the Italian 1 This paper has been written with the collaboration of Luigi Rullo (internship student of the University of Bologna). He specifically accomplished the analysis of the judicial investigations in relation to deputy-ministers and under-secretaries of the IV Berlusconi government and the Monti executive. He also has co-written the paragraph 1. 1 case, following the study of Popova and Post (2013) and analyzing, using media sources, all the corruption-related investigations involving cabinet-ministers, deputy-ministers and undersecretaries or of three executives: the center-left II Prodi government (2006-2008), the center-right IV Berlusconi government (2008- 2011) and the technocratic government led by Monti (2011-2013). The information drawn from this mapping exercise, such as timing of the investigations, portfolio of the minister or vice-minister investigated and party of the minister or vice-minister investigate, will allow us to test some relevant hypothesis developed by the study of Popova and Post (2013). 1. Political corruption in Italy and the M-factor2 Italy enjoys the reputation of having one of the biggest and hugest problems of corruption among Western Democracies. Nevertheless, the corruption issue did not have a strong impact on politics until the Tangentopoli scandal in the early nineties. In fact, the media coverage of Tangentopoli's scandal and the investigative action called Clean Hands' “pushed the issues of corruption and public ethics to prominence” (Hine 2015, 608). However, as Heywood (1997, 418) points out “the fact that corruption should have generated such public concern cannot be divorced from the wider political context within which it was uncovered”. In fact, the crisis of Italian parties is strictly connected with the weakening of their social and ideological bases caused by the end of the cold-war order (Vannucci 2009). The latter assured political actors with ideological reference points providing the Italian political system an high degree of stability, with the monopoly of Christian Democrats in government. Yet, the fall of the Berlin wall and the dissolution of the Soviet Union undermined the ideological bases of citizens' support that characterized the Italian party sistem in the post-war world (Di Virgilio 2006). In such a scenario, the Tangentopoli scandal acted as detonators of the crisis, bringing out an unprecedented corruptive system (della Porta 2001). It is quite telling that in the summer of 1993, 205 out of 630 deputies and 81 out of 326 senators were under judicial investigation, and “at the end of 1994 the number of individuals involved had already reached more than 7000, including 338 ex- deputies, 100 ex-senators, 331 regional, 122 provincial and 1525 municipal administrators, and 1373 public functionaries” (della Porta and Vannucci 1997, 516), with over 4000 preventive custody orders. Yet, the crisis of the party system paved the way to Berlusconi’s decision “to enter into politics” in 1994 and to the establishment of the so-called Second Republic. The media certainly played an essential role in this transition (Campus 2010). In fact the mediatization of politics (Mazzoleni and Schulz 1999; Esser et al. 2014) transformed the media into amplifiers and brokers of ideas. Indeed, it displayed a centralization, professionalisation, and personalization of the political messages, with a greater emphasis on the leaders. In such a scenario, Berlusconi encouraged 2 This section has been written with the collaboration of Luigi Rullo. 2 “the establishment of a trust relationship between the leader and the voters that bypass the traditional intermediary role of parties” (Campus 2010, 227). Substantially, the personalization of politics led to a more and more direct and immediate relationship between the institutional apices and the citizens, enabling the path towards the predominance of “personal leaders” (Musella 2015). Another result of the transition from the First to the Second Republic has been an increasing judicialization of politics (Guarnieri 2001, Della Porta 2001, Tate and Vallinder 1995), complemented by an already lasting expansion of the judicial function's (Guarnieri and Pederzoli 2002; Newell 2011). The judicialization of politics is often confused with, or used as a synonym for, the concept of judicial activism. The latter is a term coined to refer to the behavioural patterns followed by American judges appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court in the area of constitutional interpretation. It initially referred to the tendency of these judges to go beyond the literal meaning of constitutional provisions and expand the meaning of the rights that they offer. In spite of this generalization, it is worth mentioning that the concept of judicial activism refers more to the single actor side of the phenomenon, whereas that of the judicialization of politics refers principally to its systemic side (Dallara 2015). The empowerment of judicial institutions is explained as the result or a consequence of the expansion of judicial power “at the expense of the politicians and/or administrators” (Tate and Vallinder, 1995, p.13). judges are increasingly making decisions that have significant political implications, and they are assuming a progressively more central role in political controversies. This growing demand for justice entrusts judges for resolving problems that other institutions are unable or unwilling to deal with effectively (Guarnieri and Pederzoli 2002). According to Guarnieri and Pederzoli (1997), there are a number of factors that have contributed to a significant increase in the role of the judiciary in Italy. These factors are rooted in the constitutional arrangements that establish the institutional power of the judiciary. The features of the 1948 Constitution that most contributed to strengthening the judiciary in Italy are the principle of compulsory criminal prosecution, 3 powerful guarantees of external and internal institutional independence, and the establishment of the High Judicial Council (CSM – the Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura), 4 and the rules on its composition. Della Porta (2001) added that the growing legitimation of the magistracy was favoured by the action she had fought against mafia and terrorism, and by a “weakening complicity of some judges with those political forces which had partly hindered the activities of the magistracy” (della Porta 2001, 5). This trend was further supported by the increasing role of the media, during the 1990s, in shaping public opinion in the area of justice and the relations between judicial and political actors. judges and prosecutors saw the media as a new channel to gain legitimacy and visibility during a period (the 1990s) in which the power of the judicial hierarchy decreased rapidly (Catino
Recommended publications
  • Government of Change’
    Policy Polarisation in Italy: The Short and Conflictual Life of the ‘Government of Change’ (2018-2019) ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN SOUTH EUROPEAN SOCIETY AND POLITICS Nicolò Conti, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, [email protected] Andrea Pedrazzani, Department of Social and Political Science, University of Milan, [email protected] (corresponding author) Federico Russo, Department of History, Society and Human Studies of the University of Salento, [email protected] Abstract This paper uses the concept of policy polarisation to understand the short and conflictual life of the Conte I cabinet which remained in office in Italy from June 2018 to September 2019. We show how policy polarisation in parliament and between coalition parties shaped the formation and termination of the so-called ‘government of change’. When investigating the implementation of the government agenda, we also assess the role of the coalition contract as an (ineffective) institutional solution to problems stemming from policy divisions between the Five Star Movement and the Lega. We argue that, despite some policy accomplishments of the government, the Five Star Movement-Lega coalition appears more as a temporary experiment, whose legacy may not represent a new course of action. Keywords: Government coalition, Government agenda, Populism, Coalition agreement, Party manifestos, Parliamentary questions, Five Star Movement, Lega 1 Policy polarisation is a crucial factor influencing the entire life cycle of governments in contemporary democracies. It is not only a key aspect of party competition during the electoral campaign (Downs 1957; Sartori 1976). As the comparative literature has pointed out, polarisation which sets the two sides of the party system at polar opposites can also increase the complexity of the bargaining environment after the elections, thus delaying the formation of governments and affecting the type of cabinets eventually formed.
    [Show full text]
  • 302 Marco Bassini* Abstract the Spread of Fake News on the Internet
    RISE OF POPULISM AND THE FIVE STAR MOVEMENT MODEL: AN ITALIAN CASE STUDY Marco Bassini* Abstract The spread of fake news on the Internet, the educational divide, the adverse effects of the economic crisis and the emergence of international terrorism are often ranked among the factors that led to the rise of populism. However, quite rarely it is called into question whether (and how) the distrust of mainstream political parties had an impact on the rise of populism across the Western democracies. Adopting a constitutional law perspective requires looking at the rise of populism through the lenses of the crisis of democratic representation. The paper aims at exploring the Italian scenario, where the anti-establishment Five Star Movement has grown up as leading populist force fostering a direct political participation of voters through the use of the Internet that is supposed to bring, in the long run, to political disintermediation. In this respect, the goal of the paper is to explore from a constitutional law perspective the grounds on which the rise of this anti-establishment movement has relied and the constraints that the Constitution may place on the populist surge. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.....................................................................................303 2. Political parties in the Italian Constitution..................................305 3. How the Five Star Movement entered the political arena........312 4. Some key factors behind the rise of populism in Italy..............316 5. Pars destruens – Some critical remarks on the Five Star Movement................................................................323 6. Pars construens – Making political parties democratic again?..329 *Postdoctoral Researcher in Constitutional Law, University of Milan “Bocconi” 302 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies Giulia Pastorella A thesis submitted to the European Institute of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, February 2016 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86852 words, excluding bibliography, appendix and annexes. Statement of joint work Chapter 3 is based on a paper co-authored with Christopher Wratil. I contributed 50% of this work. 2 Acknowledgements This doctoral thesis would have not been possible without the expert guidance of my two supervisors, Professor Sara Hobolt and Doctor Jonathan White. Each in their own way, they have been essential to the making of the thesis and my growth as an academic and as an individual. I would also like to thank the Economic and Social Research Council for their generous financial support of my doctoral studies through their scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2016 • ISSN 1801-3422
    POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association Volume 12 • Number 2 • September 2016 • ISSN 1801-3422 ESSAYS Volume 12 • Number 2 • September 2016 2 • September 12 • Number Volume Three technocratic cabinets in the Czech Republic: a symptom of party failure? Miloš Brunclík The rise of person -based politics in the new democracies: the Czech Republic and Slovenia Ladislav Cabada and Matevž Tomšič Much more than Economy: Assessing electoral POLITICS IN CENTRAL IN POLITICS EUROPE Accountability in the CEE Member States Andrea Fumarola Anti -Romani Terrorism in Europe Miroslav Mareš DISCUSSION Czech Protest Movements in the 2014 European Parliament Elections Petr Just POLITICS in Central Europe The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association Volume 12 Number 2 September 2016 ISSN 1801-3422 EDITORIAL ESSAYS Three technocratic cabinets in the Czech Republic: a symptom of party failure? Miloš Brunclík The rise of person ‑based politics in the new democracies: the Czech Republic and Slovenia Ladislav Cabada and Matevž Tomšič Much more than Economy: Assessing electoral Accountability in the CEE Member States Andrea Fumarola Anti ‑Romani Terrorism in Europe Miroslav Mareš DISCUSSION Czech Protest Movements in the 2014 European Parliament Elections Petr Just Politics in Central Europe – The Journal of Central European Political Science Association is the official Journal of the Central European Political Science Association (CEPSA). Politics in Central Europe is a biannual (June and December), double­‑blind, peer­‑reviewed publication. Publisher: Metropolitan University Prague Press Dubečská 900/10, 100 31 Praha 10-Strašnice (Czech Republic) Printed by: Togga, s. r. o., Volutová 2524/12, 158 00 Praha (Czech Republic) Copyright © by Metropolitan University Prague, v.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Democracy Under the Coronavirus Can a Global Pandemic Reconfigure Politics?
    Italian Democracy Under the Coronavirus Can a global pandemic reconfigure politics? By Alessandro Mulieri Since Italy has been a laboratory of recent global political developments, it is important to keep a close eye on how anti-elite and souverainist tendencies fare in the Coronavirus crisis that has hit Italy hard and how party lines have been reshuffled in the current reconciliation with technocracy. In a way much of what has been happening with this terrible crisis in Italy is about democracy, or as many scholars1 like to put it, about the crisis or crises of democracy, especially in this Southern European country. In recent years, Italy has been an interesting laboratory to track the developments of three important political patterns that have been prevalent in other Western countries as well. First a technocratic government was appointed in the midst of one of the worst financial crises that the country and the EU had experienced: the Monti Cabinet that was in charge from November 2011 to April 2013. Second, Italy has seen the rise of a movement, the Five Star Movement, which transcends traditional party classifications and is also described by many as populist because of its opposition to traditional 1 Wolfgang Merkel, "Is there a crisis of democracy?", Democratic Theory, vol. 1, no. 2,2014, pp. 11-25; Adam Przeworski, A. Crises of democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019. representative democracy. Third, a particularly strong right-wing populist party, Matteo Salvini’s League, which is probably among the most successful anti-EU and populist forces in Europe, has risen dramatically in the opinion polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Intelligence on the World, Europe, and Italy 46Th Edition
    Forum Intelligence on the World, Europe, and Italy 46th Edition Friday, Saturday and Sunday, September 4, 5 and 6, 2020 Proceedings will begin at 8:45 a.m. sharp on Friday, Sept. 4 and will conclude at 13:30 p.m. on Sunday, Sept. 6 (a luncheon will follow). Villa d’Este (Via Regina, 40) - Cernobbio (Lake Como, Italy) __________________________________________________________________________________________________ The decision to carry out the Forum could only be made once the pandemic situation was clarified, the Italian government gave the green light to hold seminar activities, and Villa d’Este opened its doors to visitors (it just reopened on June 18). Consequently, the decisions from many speakers are still outstanding. We are working hard to obtain the additional confirmations that will certainly arrive and will send updates on the situation in a timely fashion. The program, as it currently stands, will address the following topics: • The World after the Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Impacts on Business • The Good News – The Positive Narrative the World Needs • The Peres Heritage Initiative: Building the Future Through Young Talents • The Economic Outlook • Today the World of Tomorrow – Scientific and Technological Developments - Focus on Pandemic Risks and Lessons Learned from the Coronavirus Outbreak • The 2020 US Presidential Election: Possible Scenarios • The Agenda to Change Europe - Ways Ahead for the European Union and Strategies for Recovery - The Green New Deal after the Covid-19 Tsunami - An Update on Brexit - Policy
    [Show full text]
  • The Selectorate Model of Government Stability: an Application to Italy
    Department of Political Science Chair of Political Science The Selectorate Model of Government Stability: an Application to Italy Prof. ID 082702 De Sio Pierluigi Gagliardi SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Academic Year 2018/2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 1 - History of the Italian Political System anD Government Stability ...................... 7 1.1 The Liberal State .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1.1 The Historical Right and Left ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1.2 The Giolitti Era ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Fascism and the transition to Democracy ...................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Fascism ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Transition to democracy ................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2.3 The end of Fascism (1943-1945) ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caretaker Governments in Czech Politics: What to Do About a Government Crisis
    Europe-Asia Studies ISSN: 0966-8136 (Print) 1465-3427 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ceas20 Caretaker Governments in Czech Politics: What to Do about a Government Crisis Vít Hloušek & Lubomír Kopeček To cite this article: Vít Hloušek & Lubomír Kopeček (2014) Caretaker Governments in Czech Politics: What to Do about a Government Crisis, Europe-Asia Studies, 66:8, 1323-1349, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2014.941700 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.941700 Published online: 17 Sep 2014. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 130 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ceas20 Download by: [Masarykova Univerzita v Brne] Date: 20 February 2017, At: 05:13 EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES Vol. 66, No. 8, October 2014, 1323–1349 Caretaker Governments in Czech Politics: What to Do about a Government Crisis VI´T HLOUSˇEK & LUBOMI´R KOPECˇ EK Abstract Czech politics suffers from a low durability of most of its governments, and frequent government crises. One of the products of this situation has been the phenomenon of caretaker governments. This article analyses why political elites have resorted to this solution, and discusses how this has reflected an older Czech tradition. Two cases of such governments are analysed in detail. The Tosˇovsky´ government was characterised by the ability of the Czech president to advance his agenda through this government at a time when the party elites were divided. The Fischer government was characterised by the considerably higher role of parties that shaped and limited the agenda of the cabinet, and the president played a more static role.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences and Incentives for EU Politicization in the Domestic
    Convegno SISP 2016, Milano 15-17 Settembre 2016 Section: Politica e politiche dell’Unione Europea (Politics and Policies of the European Union) Panel: Parties and policies in the European crisis Chair: Maurizio Cotta, Università di Siena Discussant: Pierangelo Isernia, Università di Siena ________________________________________________________________________________ Consequences and incentives for EU politicization in the domestic parliamentary arena: new quest for democracy in times of economic crisis? Sabrina Cavatorto (Università di Siena) [email protected] [Draft Version 7/9/2016 - English not proofread] 1. Introduction This paper examines the relationship between the economic crisis and the politicization of the EU at the domestic level in the parliamentary arena, the main institutional connection to decision- making that most European countries provide their citizens with. In consideration of the traditional and quite diffuse lack of attention devoted by national parliamentarians to EU affairs, especially in the most pro-Europe countries (Hooghe and Marks 2009; Green-Pedersen 2012), the research is aimed at investigating incentives for parliamentary party actors activation towards Brussels in times of economic crisis, being considered crises - as referenda - important opportunity structures for politicising the EU (De Wilde & Zürn 2012). Concentrating on a country like Italy well known for its identity Europeanism, which corresponds to a strong a priori support for European integration both among elites and public opinion,
    [Show full text]
  • The Monti Government and the Downgrade of Italian Parties
    IntroductIon: the MontI GovernMent and the downGrade of ItalIan PartIes Anna Bosco and Duncan McDonnell The year 2011 seems likely to be remembered not only as the year when Silvio Berlusconi’s government fell after three years in office, but as the year when the Italian Second Republic entered its final phase. Having been dominated since 1994 by the pro-/anti-Berlusconi cleav- age, Italian politics and its party system at the end of 2011 appeared to be moving, or at least stumbling, toward a new and uncertain con- figuration. The obvious immediate reason for this was the resignation of the government on 12 November in the face of a financial crisis that was rendering the country’s debt unsustainable and its party politi- cal leaders ever less internationally credible. Nonetheless, the simple conclusion that the Berlusconi government was replaced by Mario Monti’s technocratic executive due to pressure from the markets and the European Union (EU) is not sufficient to understand either why this event occurred or what its effects might be. As the chapters in this volume show, the financial crisis impacted on a party political system that was already debilitated and capable only of reacting (slowly and poorly) to events. It is therefore no sur- prise that key actors both inside and outside Italy had little faith in the ability of the country’s politicians to tackle such a major emergency. In this sense, 2011 can be seen as the year when Italy avoided default- ing on its public debt, but when its party political class failed to avoid Italian Politics: From Berlusconi to Monti 27 (2012): 37–56 © Berghahn Books doi:10.3167/ip.2012.270103 38 Anna Bosco and Duncan McDonnell a very public downgrade.
    [Show full text]
  • Government in the Time of Crisis
    mini dossier Government in the Time of Crisis A comparison of the Berlusconi, Monti, Letta and Renzi Cabinets Number 2 | February 2015 GOVERNMENT IN THE TIME OF CRISIS A comparison of the Berlusconi, Monti, Letta and Renzi Cabinets mini dossier Summary 3 INTRODUCTION 5 THE COMPOSITION OF GOVERNMENTS From average age, to offices held by ministers under 40, as well as the gender issue • Number of members • Presence of women • Which office for women Ministers • Average age • Amount of under 40 • Offices held by Ministers under 40 11 THE PARLIAMENTARY MAJORITY How the Numbers of the coalition in power change • Parties in the Cabinet • Technocrats: amount and offices • Numbers of the majority in key votes • Council of Ministers: changes in time • Politicians with most postings throughout the 4 Governments 16 THE ACTIVITY OF CABINETS Legislative production and votes of confidence • Legislative acts • Decrees not transposed in law • Approved laws: Government and Parliament proposals • Success rate according to initiative • Time for approval • Votes of confidence • Impact of votes of confidence on approved laws • Approved laws with most votes of confidence • How much do Ministers reply to parliamentary inquiries • How much do Governments reply to parliamentary inquiries • Attendance of MPs that are part of the Government 23 POLITICAL AGENDA Discussed themes and debates issues • Main topics • 5 themes in time, a comparison 2 mini dossier 240 politicians in power Introduction 170 Decress 136 Dealing with the economic crisis has been the main concern for Votes of confidence world politics in recent years. In Italy - where social groups were particularly hit - this period happened to coincide with the XVI and XVII parliamentary Legislatures, in which 4 different Governments 490 followed one another: Berlusconi IV, Monti, Letta and Renzi.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Steps Forward and One Step Back: the Majority Principle in the Italian Parliament Since 1994
    Two steps forward and one step back: the majority principle in the Italian Parliament since 1994. Federico Russo, University of Siena [email protected] ABSTRACT Since the early nineties political actors, journalists and scholars are describing the evolution of the parliamentary arena to spot sings of adaptation to the majority logic that characterize the electoral arena. However, this process has been slow and discontinuous, because some of the consensual practices dominating the parliamentary arena have proved to be extremely resilient. The hung parliament resulting from the 2013 general election, with the emergence of the Five Stars Movement as a significant third electoral pole, has questioned the same applicability of the transition framework and terminology. This paper analyses the evolution of the main aspects of parliamentary politics in the last two decades, with special emphasis to the starting months of the XVII legislature. In particular fragmentation of the parliamentary arena and the character of the government formation process are analysed. Finally, this paper provides an assessment of the majority and consensual features of the Italian Parliament after two decades from the collapse of the post-war party system. Paper prepared for the SISP annual conference, University of Perugia/University for foreigners of Perugia, 11-13 September 2014. 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to analyze the changes that have been affecting Italian parliamentary politics in the last two decades, or more precisely in the twenty years following Tangentopoli and the collapse of the old party system. Between the end of the eighties and the beginning of the nineties several social and political forces advocated the demise of the proportional electoral system, in the belief that several problems of the country depended on its consociative features.
    [Show full text]