Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 774-780

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 6 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com

Review Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.906.099

Natural Farming: New Horizon of the Agricultural Sector

Hardik N. Lakhani*, Rohit K. jalu, Kalpeshkumar J. Parmar, Jaydip U. Patoliya and Mukesh M. Kasondra

Agricultural Technology Management Agency, Junagadh, ,

*Corresponding author

ABSTRACT

K eyw or ds Chemical farming is not good for the soil health and the soil is becoming unfertile day by day. Chemical farming also harms to the environment. Natural farming, Bijamruta, People's health is also deteriorating due to chemical farming product. Such Jivamuta, Achhadan farming is also causing economic loss to the so the natural farming and Wapsa is only way to recover from this type of severe problems. Most of the things

Article Info in natural farming are made by the farmers using the residue of their

Accepted: and . The four main principles used in natural farming are 15 May 2020 Bijamruta, Jivamuta, Achhadan and Wapsa. In natural farming, different

Available Online: leaf extracts are used for pest control. Thus the quality of produce is 10 June 2020 also increased as the farm is completely chemical free.

Introduction among the farmers is Natural Farming, also called Zero Budget The policy of new liberalization of India's Natural Farming (ZBNF). It had its first economy is inaccessible and costly for small success in India, especially in and marginal farmers to privatized , where it was first developed (Kumar, 2016) and farm implements. Expensive and is now spreading rapidly across in India. hybrid seeds, pesticides, rising fuel costs and Natural farming is a new approach of farming volatile market prices are currently a major where the cost from growing the plants to concern for Indian farmers. Small and harvesting is minimum. Natural farming marginal farmers having debt and many promises to reduce farmers' dependence on farmers are committing suicide because of it. farm credit and production costs and ending This is a big problem for Indian farmers and a the debt cycle for frustrated farmers. Thus in serious issue for the agro-industry. People's natural farming farmers cultivate using the health is also deteriorating due to chemical residue of their own farm and animal farming. In view of the harmful effects of husbandry. So that farmers do not have to chemical farming, the newly introduced take expensive seeds, pesticides from market.

774

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 774-780

This method of farming was introduced by pulse flour, jaggery and fertile soil which was Shri Subhash Palekar for which he was given the name Jivamruta by him. The cow awarded Padma Shri in 2016. Subhash having less milk production, the more Palekar natural farming campaign was started beneficial its dung is towards soil in the state of Karnataka by the Karnataka’s regeneration (Babu, 2008). One acre of land Rajya Raita Sangha (KRRS). Subhas Palekar requires 10 kg of dung per month. The was trained in natural farming by Tao in this average cow gives 11 kg of dung per day, so campaign and most of the farmers of the dung from one cow can be enough to Sangha were engaged in natural farming and fertilized in 30 acres of land per month encouraged other farmers to do natural (Palekar, 2014). Thus the cost of farming is farming as well. In which a model farm has reduced. been prepared by the progressive farmers of the union who are seeing other farmers taking Saurabh Tripathi et al., (2018) revealed that inspiration to do such farming. It can be said natural farming is resource efficient as it that the farmers of the organization are minimises the use of financial and natural promoting natural farming and trying to reach resources while increasing crop yield. By out to every in the state. Palekar was restoring the quality of soil and water-related invited for training in this state of Gujarat , it decouples agricultural during the year 2019 by the state government productivity and growth from in which seven farmers from each block and degradation and . one ATMA project staff were trained and this training programme was live broadcasted The big problem for Indian farmers is that through BISAG. One farmer from each they are constantly mired in debt due to high village of Gujarat state prepared as master production costs. In such times natural trainer and they are promoting natural farming will help farmers to overcome their farming on their own villages. dependence on loans and sharply reduce production costs so that a ray of hope appears What is natural farming? in the mental stress of farmers (Mural, 2016). Palekar has written and published books in 60 The concept of natural farming was put different languages. As mentioned four pillars forward by Mr. Subhas Palekar. Mr. Subhas in natural farming are basically, Bijamrut, Palekar is a native of Amravati, a small Jivamut, Achhadan and Vapsa which are village in the state of . Palekar is mentioned in the table 1. also entitled as "Krishi Ka Rishi" by many farmers of Mysore. Primary success in Palekar also gave the formulas of Agnistra, is encouraging. Who Brahmastra, Nimastra for pest control, which conducted experiments on his farm and stated are mentioned in Table 2. that the constant use of chemicals affects the fertility of the soil and makes the farm Other important principles are , unfertile. In 1966-88, Palekar conducted Contours and bunds, local species of many experiments on his farm and after a lot earthworms. which are mentioned in Table 3. of hard work, he introduced natural farming to the farmers in which he showed that barren Panwar et al., (2013) reported that the use of land could be recovered by using the dung FYM 5 t / ha + vermicompost 2.5 t / ha + and urine of Deshi (Indian) cows. So he jivamruta 2 times (30 and 45 days) has prepared a solution using cow dung, urine, resulted in significant increase in production

775

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 774-780

of sweet corn and green fodder. Jannora et al., value gaps, i.e., how large they are, where (2014) reported that the use of organic they occur, and what their biophysical and increased nodules, plant weight, socioeconomic causes are, is needed at sub photosynthesis rate, as well national and local levels. Progress has as nitrogen levels in many crops. Ramesh and recently been made in establishing better Rao (2009) have also reported that organic methodologies for yield gap analysis, nutrition can maintain soil health due to mapping the yield gaps of major crops at various micro-organisms in the soil. Rao et global and regional scales, and understanding al., (2013) observed that the mobility of their different contexts. Although this is various soil fertility parameters such as soil encouraging, a lot more remains to be done to organic carbon, available phosphorus, obtain a deep understanding of yield and available potassium was observed to efficiency gaps in the world’s major significantly increase the use of organic agricultural systems, at a scale that enables manure in maize and sunflower crops. Khadse people to use this knowledge for concrete et al., (2017) surveyed 97 farmers who adopt action in farmers’ fields. Advantages of natural farming and the reasons for adopting natural farming has low cost, no chemical subsistence farming include family health consumption, use of local seeds, low water (54%), environmental factors 2%, reduction requirement, zero budget facilitates income in production costs (38%), reduction in throughout the year and reduces risk. It is also financial debt ( 30%) and many other reasons. mentioned here that natural farming Reduces pathogen infestation by up to 3%, exemplifies agro-. A survey production costs by 21% and credit conducted by suggests that natural farming requirements by 93%. The Andhra Pradesh not only works from an agronomic point of government (GOAP) had invited Palekar to view, but also brings a variety of social and conduct training camps in January, 2016 and economic benefits. Most of the adopters September 2016. 48565 farmers were respond that by using natural farming, they participated for natural farming training. have seen improvements in yield, soil GOAP, 2017 reported that paddy production conservation, diversity, product quality, in natural farming increased to 6416 kg / ha as domestic food autonomy, income and health. compared to 5816 kg / ha in non-natural farming. And the cost has been reduced to Palekar does not use the term '' 5000-15000, so the net additional income for natural farming. Yet we believe that from natural farming in paddy is 14000- natural farming exemplifies the principles of 25000 kg / ha. The highest positive balance of . As La Via Campesina soil nitrogen was associated with application points out. A number of names exist for of neem leaf manure followed by neem leaf natural farming. It is based on almost all the manure + Panchagavya spraying. Reduced same principles. We are concerned with the losses of N from neem leaf manuring due to key ecological and political principles that presence of nitrification inhibitors in neem underlie Natural Farming, and we find those leaf manure. Nitrification inhibiting alkaloids to be consonant with agroecology (La Via released from neem leaf manuring checks the Campesina 2013). faster rate of N mineralization (Srinivasulu Reddy, 1988). Tittonell and Giller, (2013) Because agroecology is based on careful revealed that the right Natural Farming observation of ecological processes. Natural strategy in a country, a precise understanding farming does not support local farming which of yield, efficiency and/or product quality and includes a cropping system that may involve

776

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 774-780

different types of inputs. Every farmer should natural farming promotes the substitution of adopt the principles of natural farming chemical inputs with others (Rosette and through their own cultural and ecological Altiari, 1997). context (La Via Campesina, 2013). While

Table.1 Basic pillars of natural farming

Sr. No. Method Preparation Benefits 1. Jivamrita It is made from cow-dung (20kg), It provides nutrients, but it also acts a catalytic urine (5-10 L), jiggery (20kg) and agent which promotes activity of flour (2kg) and is applied to crops with microorganisms in soil, as well as increases each irrigation cycle. earthworm activity. It also helps to prevent from fungal and bacterial diseases. 2. Bijamrita It is basically made up of water (20 L), It is a seed treatment, equipped in protecting cow dung (5kg), urine (5 L), lime young roots from as well as from soil- (50g) and a handful soil. borne and seed-borne diseases. 3. Acchadana- It can be done by soil , It conserves soil moisture, by reducing Mulching mulch. evaporation. 4. Wapsa The irrigation should be reduced and It is condition where air molecules and water moisture irrigation should be practiced at noon molecules present in soil. in alternate furrows.

Table.2 Pest management in natural farming

Sr. Name of Pest Composition Benefits No. Mgt. Formulae 1. Agniastra It composed of 10 L local cow urine, 1 kg Tobacco, It is effective against the 500gm of Green Chilli, 500gm of Local Garlic, 5kg pests like leaf roller, stem Neem leaves pulp (crushed in urine). For spraying, 2 borer, fruit borer, pod L Brahmastra is taken in 100 L water. borer. 2. Brahmastra It is prepared by neem leaves, custard apple leaves, It is used to control all of guava leaves, lantern camellia leaves, pomegranate sucking pests, fruit borer, leaves, papaya leaves and white dhatura leaves pod borer. crushed and boiled in urine. 3. Neemastra It is made up of local cow urine (5 L), cow dung (5kg) It is used for sucking and neem leaves and neem pulp (5kg) fermented for pests and mealy bug. 24 hrs. 4. Dashparni Ark Neem leaves–5 kg, Vitex negundo leaves-2 kg, It can be applied as a Aristolochia leaves - 2 kg, Papaya (Carica papaya)- 2 foliar spray to control kg, Tinospora cordifolia leaves- 2kg, Annona pest. squamosal (Custard apple) leaves- 2kg, Pongamia pinnata (Karanja)leaves- 2kg, Ricinus communis (Castor) leaves- 2 kg, Nerium indicum- 2 kg, Calotropis procera leaves-2 kg, Green chili paste- 2 kg, Garlic paste-250 g, Cow dung-3 kg, Cow urine-5 lit, Water-200 lit. 777

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 774-780

Table.3 Other important principles of natural farming

Sr. Name of Benefits No. principle 1. Intercropping This is primarily how Natural Farming gets its “Zero Budget” name. It doesn’t mean that the farmer is going to have no costs at all, but rather that any costs will be compensated for by income from intercrops, making farming a close to zero budget activity. Palekar explains in detail the crop and tree associations that work well for the south Asian context. 2. Contours and To preserve rain water, Palekar explains in detail how to make the contours and bunds bunds, which promote maximum efficacy for different crops 3. Local species Palekar opposes the use of vermicompost. He claims that the revival of local of deep soil earthworms through increased organic matter is most recommended. earthworms 4. Cow dung Accroding to Palekar, dung from the Bos indicus (humped cow) is most beneficial and has the highest concentrations of micro-organisms as compared to European cow breeds such as Holstein. The entire Natural Farming method is centred on the Indian cow, which historically has been part of Indian rural life.

Fig.1 The four-wheels of natural farming

Jivamrut Ensuring soil fertility through cow dung and cow urine .

Beejamrut Mulching Seed treatment with Trees, cover crops, and cow dung and urine crop residue based formulation

Wapsa Water vapour condensation for better soil moisture

In conclusion, the experience of studying brings a variety of social and economic farmers and field observations during the benefits. Most of the adopters reported that by period gives the following conclusion adopting natural farming, over time they saw suggests that natural farming not only works an improvement in yield, soil conservation, from an agronomic point of view, but also seed diversity, quality production. The natural 778

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 774-780

farming system is mainly suitable for small peasant movement in Karnataka, India. and marginal farmers mainly due to its ease, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–28. adaptability and drastic reduction in Kumar N, (2012). “Subash Palekar’s zero production cost. Treatment of bijamruta and budget no-till farming”. jivamruta provides adequate protection La Via Campesina, (2016). Zero Budget against pests and diseases during the early Natural Farming in India, stages of . In conclusion, the cost www.fao.org/3/a-bl990e.pdf of seeds, fertilizers and plant protection La Via Campesina. 2013. From Maputo to chemicals are significantly reduced. It is Jakarta: 5 years of agroecology in La assumed that natural farming will relieve the Via Campesina. Jakarta: International economic burden of the farmers and will give Commission on Sustainable Peasant economic backing to the farming. This . farming has benefited millions of farmers in Murall, S. 2016. “Natural farming can rescue India and more and more farmers are now farmers”, THE HINDU. adopting in natural farming. Naresh RK, Shukla AK, Kumar Mukesh, Kumar Arvind, Gupta RK, Vivek, et al., References Cowpathy and Vedic Krishi to Empower Food and Nutritional Security Anonymous. 2013. Case study provided by and Improve Soil Health: A Review, J La Via Campesina Contact Pharmacognosy Phytochem. 2018; 7(1): lvcweb@viacampesina. Org. 560-575. Peasant Studies, 1–28. ATMA Gujarat News Letter 2020 Vol. 49 Palekar S, (2014). Babu RY, (2008). Action Research Report on http://www.palekarzerobudgetspiritual Subhash Palekar‟s “Zero Budget farming.org/ Natural Farming”. Palekar S, (2014). Davinder Pal Singh Badwal, Mandeep http://www.palekarzerobudgetspiritualf Kumar, Harjinder Singh, Simran and arming.org/ Pawar VR, Tambe AD, Sandeep Kaur. 2019. Zero Budget Patil SP, Suryawanshi SU, (2013). Natural Farming in India- A Review Effect of different organic inputs on Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 8(12): yield, economics and microbial count of 869-873. doi: Sweet Corn (Zea mays Var. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.81 Saccharata). Eco. Environ. Conser. 2.111 19(3):865-868. GOAP, (2017). Status Note on Zero Budget Ramesh P, Rao AS, (2009). : Natural Farming (ZBNF) in A.P. Status and Research achievements. (mimeo), personal communication. Indian Institute of Soil Science Bhopal, Jannoura R, Joergensen GR, Bruns C. 74. Organic effects on growth, Ramesh P, Rao AS. Organic farming: Status crop yield, and soil microbial biomass and Research achievements. Indian indices in sole and intercropped peas Institute of Soil Science Bhopal, 2009, and oats under organic farming 74. conditions. Eur. J Apron. 2014; 52(B): Reddy D Srinivasulu. Integrated nitrogen 259-270. management in rice based cropping Khadse, A., P. Rosset, H. Morales, and B. G. system. Ph.D. Thesis, Ferguson. 2017. Taking agroecology to Agricultural University Coimbatore TN, scale: the Zero Budget Natural Farming India, 1988.

779

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(6): 774-780

Rosset, P., and M.A. Altieri. 1997. The Montpellier Panel. Sustainable Agroecology versus input substitution: intensification: a new paradigm for A fundamental contradiction of African agriculture. Agriculture for . Society & Impact, Imperial College, London, Natural Resources, 10, no. 3: 283–95. 2013. Saurabh Tripathi, Shruti Nagbhushan, Tittonell P, Giller KE. When yield gaps are Tauseef Shahidi. Zero Budget Natural poverty traps: The paradigm of Farming, for the Sustainable ecological intensification in African Development Goals, Andhra Pradesh, smallholder agriculture. Field Crops India, 2018. Res. 2013; 143:76-90.

How to cite this article:

Hardik N. Lakhani, Rohit K. jalu, Kalpeshkumar J. Parmar, Jaydip U. Patoliya and Mukesh M. Kasondra. 2020. Natural Farming: New Horizon of the Agricultural Sector. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9(06): 774-780. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.906.099

780