DOCSLIB.ORG

Could Joseph Smith Have Drawn on Ancient Manuscripts When He Translated the Story of Enoch?: Recent Updates on a Persistent Question

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Could Joseph Smith Have Drawn on Ancient Manuscripts When He Translated the Story of Enoch?: Recent Updates on a Persistent Question INTERPRETER§ A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship Volume 33 · 2019 · Pages 305 - 374 Could Joseph Smith Have Drawn on Ancient Manuscripts When He Translated the Story of Enoch?: Recent Updates on a Persistent Question Jeffrey M. Bradshaw and Ryan Dahle Offprint Series © 2019 The Interpreter Foundation. A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. ISSN 2372-1227 (print) ISSN 2372-126X (online) The goal of The Interpreter Foundation is to increase understanding of scripture through careful scholarly investigation and analysis of the insights provided by a wide range of ancillary disciplines, including language, history, archaeology, literature, culture, ethnohistory, art, geography, law, politics, philosophy, etc. Interpreter will also publish articles advocating the authenticity and historicity of LDS scripture and the Restoration, along with scholarly responses to critics of the LDS faith. We hope to illuminate, by study and faith, the eternal spiritual message of the scriptures—that Jesus is the Christ. Although the Board fully supports the goals and teachings of the Church, The Interpreter Foundation is an independent entity and is neither owned, controlled by nor affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or with Brigham Young University. All research and opinions provided are the sole responsibility of their respective authors, and should not be interpreted as the opinions of the Board, nor as official statements of LDS doctrine, belief or practice. This journal is a weekly publication of the Interpreter Foundation, a non-profit organization located at InterpreterFoundation.org. You can find other articles published in our journal at MormonInterpreter.com.Journal.InterpreterFoundation.org. You may subscribeYou may subscribeto this journal to this at journalMormonInterpreter.com/annual- at InterpreterFoundation. print-subscription.org/annual-print-subscription. Could Joseph Smith Have Drawn on Ancient Manuscripts When He Translated the Story of Enoch?: Recent Updates on a Persistent Question Jeffrey M. Bradshaw and Ryan Dahle Abstract: In this article, we offer a general critique of scholarship that has argued for Joseph Smith’s reliance on 1 Enoch or other ancient pseudepigrapha for the Enoch chapters in the Book of Moses. Our findings highlight the continued difficulties of scholars to sustain such arguments credibly. Following this general critique, we describe the current state of research relating to what Salvatore Cirillo took to be the strongest similarity between Joseph Smith’s chapters on Enoch and the Qumran Book of Giants — namely the resemblance between the name Mahawai in the Book of Giants and Mahujah/Mahijah in Joseph Smith’s Enoch account. We conclude this section with summaries of conversations of Gordon C. Thomasson and Hugh Nibley with Book of Giants scholar Matthew Black about these names. Next, we explain why even late and seemingly derivative sources may provide valuable new evidence for the antiquity of Moses 6–7 or may corroborate details from previously known Enoch sources. By way of example, we summarize preliminary research that compares passages in Moses 6–7 to newly available ancient Enoch texts from lesser known sources. We conclude with a discussion of the significance of findings that situate Joseph Smith’s Enoch account in an ancient milieu. Additional work is underway to provide a systematic and detailed analysis of ancient literary affinities in Moses 6–7, including an effort sponsored by Book of Mormon Central in collaboration with The Interpreter Foundation. 306 • Interpreter 33 (2019) Figure 1. George Campfield, fl. 1861: Enoch, Creation Window, All Saints Church, Selsley, England, 1861.1 This stained glass window, commissioned from the company of craftsmen headed by William Morris, shows Enoch standing in heaven following his final ascension. oth in the expansive nature of its content and the eloquence of Bits expression, Terryl and Fiona Givens consider the account of Enoch in chapters 6 and 7 of the Book of Moses as perhaps the “most remarkable religious document published in the nineteenth century.”2 It was produced early in Joseph Smith’s ministry — in fact in the same year as the publication of the Book of Mormon — as part of a divine commission to “retranslate” the Bible.3 Writing the account of Enoch appears to have occupied a few days of the Prophet’s attention sometime between 30 November and 31 December 1830. According to Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Joseph Smith’s “Book of Enoch” provides “eighteen times as many column inches about Enoch … than we have in the few verses on him in the Bible. Those scriptures not only contain greater quantity [than the Bible] but also … contain … [abundant] new material about Enoch on which the Bible is silent.”4 Current scholarship casts doubt on the assertion that this new material was derived from deep study of the scriptures5 or absorbed in significant measure from Masonic or hermetical influences.6 Hence, the most common naturalistic explanation for the account is that Joseph Smith drew the major themes in the Latter-day Saint stories of Enoch from exposure to ancient Enoch manuscripts from outside the Bible.7 Bradshaw and Dahle, Moses 6–7 and Ancient Enoch Texts • 307 Of these Enoch manuscripts, the best-known is 1 Enoch, a Jewish compilation of five originally separate books thought to have been written between about 200 BCE and 100 CE. 1 Enoch is one of the most important Jewish works of pseudepigrapha, highly valued in the early Christian community and explicitly8 (and implicitly9) cited in New Testament epistles. However, apart from the shared prominence of selected themes in its Book of Parables (in particular a “Son of Man” motif), there are relatively few specific and unique resemblances to Moses 6–7, especially considering the great length of 1 Enoch. Commonalities of equal or perhaps greater interest are also to be found in 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch (e.g., detailed descriptions of Enoch’s heavenly ascent and its characterization of the prophet as a “lad”) as well as the Aramaic Book of Giants (particularly the stories of Enoch’s preaching mission and his battles with formidable adversaries). In addition, scattered passages in late Jewish and Islamic documents provide unique correspondences and sometimes corroborate earlier Enoch sources. Yet none of these sources, except Richard Laurence’s 1821 English translation of 1 Enoch, were published in English prior to Joseph Smith’s translation of the Book of Moses. Pioneering insights on the relationship between ancient Enoch writings and the Book of Moses can be found in the writings of Hugh W. Nibley, who wrote a series of articles on the subject for the Ensign magazine in 1975–1977. Unfortunately, Nibley received one of the most important manuscripts relevant to his study — Józef Milik and Matthew Black’s 1976 publication of the first English translation of the Book of Giants — only days before the publication deadline for the last article in the series.10 As a result, of the more than 300 pages Nibley devoted to Enoch in the volume that gathered his writings on the subject, only a relative handful were dedicated to these significant Aramaic “Enoch” fragments.11 Regrettably, after Nibley completed his initial research for the Ensign articles, he turned his attention to other subjects and never again took up a sustained study of the relationships between Moses 6–7 and ancient writings on Enoch. In collaboration with David J. Larsen, Bradshaw published a verse- by-verse commentary on Moses 6–7 that includes extensive discussion of related themes in Enoch pseudepigrapha, including the Book of Giants. In the present article, we do not attempt to duplicate what has already been written on this subject.12 Rather, our intent is to summarize and update selected findings from the previous study. 308 • Interpreter 33 (2019) Figure 2. Book of Enoch P, Chester Beatty XII, leaf 3 (Verso), 4th century.13 The leaf shown includes the portions of1 Enoch cited in Jude 1:14–15. Could Joseph Smith Have Borrowed from 1 Enoch? As a starting point for the answer to this question, we observe that since Joseph Smith was well aware that the biblical book of Jude explicitly quotes 1 Enoch,14 the most obvious thing he could have done to bolster his case for the authenticity of the Book of Moses (if he were a conscious deceiver) would have been to include the relevant verses from Jude somewhere within his revelations on Enoch. But this the Prophet did not do. Bradshaw and Dahle, Moses 6–7 and Ancient Enoch Texts • 309 As a second anchor point, the question also requires that we assess the likelihood that Joseph Smith knew about the 1821 publication of Laurence’s translation of 1 Enoch. In his 2010 master’s thesis from Durham University, Salvatore Cirillo15 cites and amplifies the arguments of Michael Quinn,16 arguing that the available evidence that the Prophet had access to this translation of 1 Enoch has moved “beyond probability — to fact.” He sees no other explanation for the substantial similarities that he finds between the Book of Moses and the pseudepigraphal Enoch literature.17 However, Cirillo’s confidence is at odds with the views of other scholars who have addressed this issue. For example, as a result of his study of the potential availability to the Prophet of the 1821 printing of 1 Enoch, renowned Latter-day Saint historian Richard L. Bushman concluded:18 “It is scarcely conceivable that Joseph Smith knew of Laurence’s Enoch translation.”19 Because Joseph Smith’s access to the 1821 printing is unlikely, some scholars have argued that he may have seen a purported 1828 American edition of the work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2011 Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C. Skinner D. Morgan Davis Carl Griffin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Skinner, Andrew C.; Davis, D. Morgan; and Griffin,a C rl, "Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown" (2011). Maxwell Institute Publications. 17. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. bountiful harvest bountiful harvest essays in honor of s. kent brown Edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin Cover design by Stephen Hales Creative, Inc. Frontispiece by Mark A. Philbrick Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 maxwellinstitute.byu.edu © 2011 The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bountiful harvest : essays in honor of S. Kent Brown / edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8425-2804-7 (alk. paper) 1. Theology. 2. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I. Brown, S. Kent. II. Skinner, Andrew C., 1951- III.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Cain and Gain Matthew L
    Getting Cain and Gain Matthew L. Bowen [Page 115]Abstract: The biblical etiology (story of origin) for the name “Cain” associates his name with the Hebrew verb qny/qnh, “to get,” “gain,” “acquire,” “create,” or “procreate” in a positive sense. A fuller form of this etiology, known to us indirectly through the Book of Mormon text and directly through the restored text of the Joseph Smith Translation, creates additional wordplay on “Cain” that associates his name with murder to “get gain.” This fuller narrative is thus also an etiology for organized evil—secret combinations “built up to get power and gain” (Ether 8:22–23; 11:15). The original etiology exerted a tremendous influence on Book of Mormon writers (e.g., Nephi, Jacob, Alma, Mormon, and Moroni) who frequently used allusions to this narrative and sometimes replicated the wordplay on “Cain” and “getting gain.” The fuller narrative seems to have exerted its greatest influence on Mormon and Moroni, who witnessed the destruction of their nation firsthand — destruction catalyzed by Cainitic secret combinations. Moroni, in particular, invokes the Cain etiology in describing the destruction of the Jaredites by secret combinations. The destruction of two nations by Cainitic secret combinations stand as two witnesses and a warning to latter-day Gentiles (and Israel) against building up these societies and allowing them to flourish. “Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.” — Proverbs 4:7 Etiologies are stories of origins.1 The biblical account of Cain and Abel offers a story of origin for the name “Cain” (Genesis 4:1) and [Page 116]an account of the beginning of murder — homicide and fratricide — in this world.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Textual Criticism in the Study of Early Mormon Texts and History
    Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies Volume 10 Number 1 Fall 2019 Article 6 2019 Returning to the Sources: Integrating Textual Criticism in the Study of Early Mormon Texts and History Colby Townsend Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/imwjournal Recommended Citation Townsend, Colby "Returning to the Sources: Integrating Textual Criticism in the Study of Early Mormon Texts and History." Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies 10, no. 1 (2019): 58-85. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/imwjournal/vol10/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOWNSEND: RETURNING TO THE SOURCES 1 Colby Townsend {[email protected]} is currently applying to PhD programs in early American literature and religion. He completed an MA in History at Utah State University under the direction of Dr. Philip Barlow. He previously received two HBA degrees at the University of Utah in 2016, one in compartibe Literary and Culture Studies with an emphasis in religion and culture, and the other in Religious Studies—of the latter, his thesis was awarded the marriot Library Honors Thesis Award and is being revised for publication, Eden in the Book of Mormon: Appropriation and Retelling of Genesis 2-4 (Kofford, forthcoming). 59 INTERMOUNTAIN WEST JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES Colby Townsend† Returning to the Sources: Integrating Textual Criticism in the Study of Early Mormon Texts and History As historians engage with literary texts, they should ask a few important questions.
    [Show full text]
  • It Is Not the Design of This Paper Is Not to Argue That Joseph Smith Stole
    1 BCC Papers 5/1, January 2010 http://bycommonconsent.com/2010/01/06/bcc-papers-51-cranney-josephus/ Josephus and Joseph: A Brief Comparative Study of Mormon Scripture and the Antiquities of the Jews. Stephen Cranney Much of the information known about the ancient Jewish world comes from the writings of the Pharisee Flavius Josephus. When Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70, Josephus left Palestine for Rome, where he began his now-famous works. The first was Wars of the Jews, an account of the struggles of the Jewish nation against imperial Roman rule from the time of Maccabees to A.D. 70, which includes his personal experiences with the destruction of Jerusalem. After his completion of Wars of the Jews, Josephus wrote Antiquities of the Jews, an account of Jewish history from the time of Adam down to his own time.i Antiquities of the Jews provides expanded accounts of some of the events of the biblical era. It is the purpose of this paper to show some of the similarities between uniquely held Mormon beliefs about this era and what Josephus had to say in Antiquities of the Jews concerning: the daughters of Adam and Eve, the eventual fate of Cain, the attempt on the life of Noah, the astronomical knowledge of Abraham, the blessing given to Joseph by his father Jacob, and the translation of Moses. It is not the intent of this paper to argue that Joseph Smith plagiarized theological ideas from Josephus, nor is it the intent to try and prove the truthfulness of the Mormon faith through parallelism.
    [Show full text]
  • God and Others in Mormonism and Heterodox Christianity
    SUNSTONE 2007 R. L. “Buzz” Capener Memorial Contest in Comparative Religious Studies First Place Winner OF TIME AND ALL ETERNITY GOD AND OTHERS IN MORMONISM AND HETERODOX CHRISTIANITY By James McLachlan For it must needs be, that there is an opposition in all [With the Fall], the eternal free will has introduced itself things. If not so, . righteousness could not be brought to into the darkness, pain, and source; and so also through pass, neither wickedness, neither holiness nor misery, nei- the darkness into the fire and light, even into a kingdom of ther good nor bad. Wherefore, all things must needs be a joy; in order that the Nothing might be known in the compound in one; . having no life neither death, nor cor- Something, and that it might have a sport with its contra- ruption nor incorruption, happiness nor misery . will, that the free will of the abyss might be manifest to it- Wherefore . there would have been no purpose in the self in the byss [ground or foundation], for without evil end of its creation. Wherefore, this thing must needs de- and good there could not be any byss. stroy the wisdom of God and . also the power, and the —JACOB BOEHME, mercy, and the justice of God. Mystérium Magnum 26:37 —2 NEPHI 2:11–12 NLIKE THE MAINSTREAM CHRISTIAN VIEW THAT this notion became firmly established in the creeds. Especially there is one Absolute God who by very definition en- troubling is how this view implies that human evil and suf- U joys the blissful perfection of ultimate Being, fering are illusory, that they have no ultimate reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 “Do You Consecrate Everything…?”: Mormonism and the Economy
    Chapter 5 “Do you consecrate everything…?”: Mormonism and the Economy Imagine for a moment a form of government in which every important decision is made at the top. The ultimate source of power in this government resides with a centralized group we’ll call the “Politburo.” The government has a Head of State, but the Head of State is chosen by, and largely controlled by the Politburo. The members of the Politburo are “elected,” but it is hardly a democratic election because they usually run unopposed, the voters overwhelmingly support the incumbents, and, besides, only members of the ruling class are allowed to vote anyway. This government has complete control over the economic life of the community. There is no private property in this community. Everyone in the community works for the government and the government has complete control of one’s income, benefits (if any), medical care (if any), housing, and retirement (again, if any). The government decides if you have safe working conditions, tells you what to wear, and even tells you when you can take a potty break. In this community, all information is controlled by the government. The newspaper is filled with pro-government propaganda, the post office is intended only for official government business, phone conversations are monitored and email is read by agents of the government. The government maintains a well-funded and sophisticated “Ministry of Information” whose purpose is to create a positive, benevolent public image of the government, regardless of the facts. Periodically the government calls the community together for indoctrination sessions wherein the glories of the government are extolled and community production targets for the next five years are imposed on the workers.
    [Show full text]
  • IMW Journal of Religious Studies Volume 10 Number 1
    Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies Volume 10 Number 1 Fall 2019 Article 1 2019 IMW Journal of Religious Studies Volume 10 Number 1 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/imwjournal Recommended Citation "IMW Journal of Religious Studies Volume 10 Number 1." Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies 10, no. 1 (2019). https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/imwjournal/vol10/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inter mountain west journal of Religious Studies Foreword Christopher James Blythe From Loving to Obergefell and Beyond: Plural Marriage as the Next Next Sexual Justice Issue Philippa Juliet Meek Heavenly Mother in the Vernacular Religion of Latter-day Saint Women Charlotte Shurtz Returning to the Sources: Integrating Textual Criticism in the Study of Early Mormon Texts and History Colby Townsend Book Reviews Interviews with Philip Barlow and Patrick Q Mason Mormon Women and Art Curated by Christine Elyse Blythe Vol. 10 No. 1 Special Issue Mormon Studies The Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies is designed to promote the academic study of religion at the graduate and undergraduate levels. The journal is a student initiative affiliated with the Religious Studies Program and the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at Utah State University. Our academic review board includes professional scholars specializing in Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and Mormonism, as well as specialists in the fields of History, Philosophy, Psychology, Anthropology, Sociology, and Religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles of Faith Addenda
    BOTH “NEW” AND “EVERLASTING:” LAW AND RELIGION IN THE CREATION OF NEO-MORMON DOCTRINE ON (HOMO)SEXUALITY Robert J. Morris, J.D.1 [T]he Christian consigns all to perdition who cannot bow to his creed, and submit to his ipse dixit. --Joseph Smith (1805-1844)2 PART I: “WHAT DO THE LATTER-DAY SAINTS BELIEVE IN?” Introduction and Background [1] No doctrine of homophobia existed in pristine Mormonism, which was founded in 1830. The founder of Mormonism, Joseph Smith (1805-1844), never taught such a doctrine, and it does not occur in the volumes of scripture and revelation he produced, i.e., Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price.3 They contain no homophobic passages; they are utterly silent on the subject.4 Neither do his 1 B.A. and M.A., Brigham Young University 1972 and 1973; Juris Doctor, University of Utah 1980; PhD candidate, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law. I am grateful to James Cartwright of the University of Hawaii and to Lavina Fielding Anderson for their assistance and comments in the preparation of earlier drafts of this article. 2 JOSEPH FIELDING SMITH, TEACHINGS OF THE PROPHET JOSEPH SMITH 217 (Joseph Fielding Smith ed., Deseret Book Co., 1989), available at TEACHINGS OF THE PROPHET JOSEPH SMITH www.helpingmormons.org/Teachings%20of%20the%20Prophet%20Joseph%20Smith.ht m. 3 These works, along with the King James Bible, constitute the Mormon “four Standard Works” of scripture. Official on-line copies of each of these works are available at http://www.scriptures.lds.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Love the Pearl of Great Price ______
    Learning to Love the Pearl of Great Price ____________________________________________________________ Contents Introduction to the Pearl of Great Price 2 • Some Unique Doctrinal Contributions of the Book of Moses 392 The Book of Moses • Some Unique Contributions of Overview of the Book of Moses 3 the Book of Abraham 395 Brief Early History of the Prophet Moses 8 • The Book of Abraham Facsimiles 399 Moses Chapter 1 9 • Moses Chapter 2 29 The History of the Coming Forth of the Pearl of Great Price 403 Moses Chapter 3 46 Moses Chapter 4 60 • The Joseph Smith Papyri and Their Relationship to the Book of Abraham 413 Moses Chapter 5 78 Moses Chapter 6 103 • Moses and Mount Sinai 428 Moses Chapter 7 139 Moses Chapter 8 170 The Book of Abraham Abraham Chapter 1 184 Abraham Chapter 2 207 Abraham Chapter 3 219 Abraham Chapter 4 241 Abraham Chapter 5 257 Facsimiles of the Book of Abraham 264 Joseph Smith–Matthew 283 Joseph Smith–History 313 The Articles of Faith 356 Supplemental Articles • Brief Biblical History of Abraham (Genesis 12-25) 376 • Abrahamic Lore that Supports the Book of Abraham 381 • Some Unique Contributions of the Pearl of Great Price to Our Gospel Understanding 388 An Introduction to The Pearl of Great Price ____________________________________________________________ Through the prophet Joseph Smith the Lord has mercifully revealed to us, in this last dispensation, priceless insights into eternal doctrines and into the lives and ministries of prophets of the distant past. Many of these insights appear in the collection of scripture we have come to know as the Pearl of Great Price.
    [Show full text]
  • Indices to Mormon Parallels
    ========= INDEX ========= ========= and other material for ========= MORMON PARALLELS: A BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE WORKS WITH EITHER EDITION, 2008 OR 2014 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BIBLIOGRAPHIC TABLE OF CONTENTS, p. 2091 SCRIPTURE INDEX, p. 2151 GENERAL INDEX, p. 2167 The following material is paged to be appended to the end of my Mormon Parallels: A Bibliographic Source (2008), adding (with blank separator pages) 219 more pages, for a total of 2307 pages for the complete, expanded work as published in the second edition, 2014. In that edition, this page [2089] is blank. Numerous minor changes, primarily typographic and stylistic, appear in the 2014 edition, but always on the original pages from the 2008 edition, allowing the indices which follow to serve for either edition. All contents © 2014 Rick Grunder RICK GRUNDER ‐ BOOKS Lafayette, New York February 22, 2014 The book is available as a PDF file (234 MB) on compact disc or by direct download at www.MormonParallels.com . ======== BIBLIOGRAPHIC TABLE OF ======== CONTENTS A SUMMARY LISTING OF THE FIVE HUNDRED ENTRIES WITH A FEW SELECTED SUB-HEADINGS 1 ADAIR, James. ADAIR'S HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN INDIANS, Edited Under the Auspices of the National Society of the Colonial Dames of America, in Tennessee, by Samuel Cole Williams, LL.D. [New York]: Promontory Press, [1986; "First published in 1930 by the National Society of Colonial Dames of America, in Tennessee . Second edition . ."]. p. 57 2 ADAMS, John G. MEMOIR OF REV. JOHN MOORE; With Selections from his Correspondence, and Other Writings. By John G. Adams. Boston: Published by A. Tompkins. [Stereotyped by Hobart & Robbins, New England type and Stereotype Foundery, Boston], 1856.
    [Show full text]
  • Sun, Moon, and Star
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1998-04-01 Sun, Moon, and Star Christopher Kimball Bigelow Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Fiction Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Bigelow, Christopher Kimball, "Sun, Moon, and Star" (1998). Theses and Dissertations. 4530. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4530 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. sun moon star thesis presented department english brigham young university partial fulfillment requirements degree master arts christopher K bigelow april 1998 thesis christopher K bigelow accepted present form department english brigham young university satisfying thesis requirement degree master arts av4v insinzdjsljs bruce wayne jorjorgensenr neinelensen committee chair I1ya ly U 0 john serge benmonbennioncommittee member j 7 uftw0 f- Wf douglas H thayer committee member 2&mzelzem ff U W date ririchardclardC lard Y duerden graduate coordinator 11 TABLE CONTENTS chapter 2 chapter two 7 chapter three 16 chapter four 23 chapter five 27 chapter six 33 chapter seven 38 chapter eight 45 chapter nine 58 chapter ten 63 chapter eleven 70 chapter twelve 76 chapter thirteen
    [Show full text]
  • D:\Study Material\IAEWP
    Please see the Cover and Contents in the last pages of this e-Book Online Study Materials on INTERFAITH STUDIES AND ECUMENISM 1 INTRODUCTION TO INTERFAITH STUDIES WHAT IS INTERFAITH? The term interfaith or interfaith dialogue refers to cooperative and positive interaction between people of different religious traditions, (i.e. “faiths”) at both the individual and institutional level with the aim of deriving a common ground in belief through a concentration on similarities between faiths. It is distinct from syncretism or alternative religion, in that dialogue often involves promoting understanding between different religions to increase “tolerance” towards others, rather than to synthesize new beliefs. The history of religion shows that conflict has been more the state of affairs than dialogue. The term inter-religious relations refers to relationships between religions, (rel. comparative religion). HISTORY • Early 20th Century—dialogue started to take place between the Abrahamic faiths—Christianity, Judaism and Islam. • The 1960s—Interfaith movement gathered interest. ¿ 1965—the Roman Catholic Church issued the Vatican II document Nostra Aetate, instituting major policy changes in gay rights in the Catholic Church’s policy towards non- Christian religions. ¿ Late 1960s Interfaith groups joined around Civil Rights issues for African-Americans and later were often vocal in their opposition to the Vietnam War. Michael Wyschogrod, an American professor of philosophy, has claimed that there are just as many theoretical or creedal reasons for Muslims and Jews drawing closer to one another as there are for Jews and Christians coming together. 2 Judaism Reform Judaism, Reconstructionist Judaism, and Conservative Judaism encourage interfaith dialogue. Interfaith dialogue is a controversial issue within the Orthodox Jewish community.
    [Show full text]