40 Years of Change
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Omni Hotel Atlanta, Georgia
COUNTRY ATLANTA KAY HOTELS Omni Hotel Atlanta, Georgia 100 CNN Center, Corner of Andrew Young International Blvd, Atlanta, GA, 30303 The Atlanta Omni Hotel at CNN Center is a deluxe hotel located 15 minutes from Atlanta Hartsfield Airport. The hotel is situated opposite the Centennial Olympic Park and connected to the Philips Arena and the Georgia World Congress Center. The Atlanta Omni Hotel at CNN Center is the closest hotel to the Georgia Dome and its guests have access to the Turner Athletic Club, a well-equipped fitness center... Omni Hotel Atlanta Reservations... Sheraton Atlanta Hotel From: $57 USD pp 165 COURTLAND, Atlanta, GA, 30303 Centrally located in the heart of downtown, the Sheraton Atlanta Georgia Hotel boasts an award-winning design. The hotel is conveniently located near Atlanta's popular restaurants and a wide array of shopping venues. Many area attractions are also nearby, including the Georgia World Congress Center, the Jimmy Carter Library and Museum and Turner Field. All guest rooms feature a host of modern amenities, including hair dryers... Sheraton Atlanta Hotel Reservations... Best Western Atlanta Airport- East From: $30.8 USD pp 301 N Central Avenue, Hapeville, GA, 30354- 1601 The Best Western Atlanta Airport East, conveniently located to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport and Interstate 75, is newly remodeled and professionally staffed. Our guest rooms are well maintained and offer all the amenities to make your stay comfortable and enjoyable. Our complimentary 24 hour airport shuttle services will take you to the Marta Rapid Rail Station at the airport making downtown Atlanta, Georgia Dome, CNN Center and the World Congress Center. -
City Branding: Part 2: Observation Towers Worldwide Architectural Icons Make Cities Famous
City Branding: Part 2: Observation Towers Worldwide Architectural Icons Make Cities Famous What’s Your City’s Claim to Fame? By Jeff Coy, ISHC Paris was the world’s most-visited city in 2010 with 15.1 million international arrivals, according to the World Tourism Organization, followed by London and New York City. What’s Paris got that your city hasn’t got? Is it the nickname the City of Love? Is it the slogan Liberty Started Here or the idea that Life is an Art with images of famous artists like Monet, Modigliani, Dali, da Vinci, Picasso, Braque and Klee? Is it the Cole Porter song, I Love Paris, sung by Frank Sinatra? Is it the movie American in Paris? Is it the fact that Paris has numerous architectural icons that sum up the city’s identity and image --- the Eiffel Tower, Arch of Triumph, Notre Dame Cathedral, Moulin Rouge and Palace of Versailles? Do cities need icons, songs, slogans and nicknames to become famous? Or do famous cities simply attract more attention from architects, artists, wordsmiths and ad agencies? Certainly, having an architectural icon, such as the Eiffel Tower, built in 1889, put Paris on the world map. But all these other things were added to make the identity and image. As a result, international tourists spent $46.3 billion in France in 2010. What’s your city’s claim to fame? Does it have an architectural icon? World’s Most Famous City Icons Beyond nicknames, slogans and songs, some cities are fortunate to have an architectural icon that is immediately recognized by almost everyone worldwide. -
The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle
The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle By Stefan Johannes Al A dissertation submitted in the partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair Professor Greig Crysler Professor Ananya Roy Professor Michael Southworth Fall 2010 The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle © 2010 by Stefan Johannes Al Abstract The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle by Stefan Johannes Al Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair Over the past 70 years, various actors have dramatically reconfigured the Las Vegas Strip in many forms. I claim that behind the Strip’s “reinventions” lies a process of symbolic destruction. Since resorts distinguish themselves symbolically, each new round of capital accumulation relies on the destruction of symbolic capital of existing resorts. A new resort either ups the language within a paradigm, or causes a paradigm shift, which devalues the previous resorts even further. This is why, in the context of the Strip, buildings have such a short lifespan. This dissertation is chronologically structured around the four building booms of new resort construction that occurred on the Strip. Historically, there are periodic waves of new casino resort constructions with continuous upgrades and renovation projects in between. They have been successively theorized as suburbanization, corporatization, Disneyfication, and global branding. Each building boom either conforms to a single paradigm or witnesses a paradigm shift halfway: these paradigms have been theorized as Wild West, Los Angeles Cool, Pop City, Corporate Modern, Disneyland, Sim City, and Starchitecture. -
National Conference on Weights and Measures, Program and Committee Reports
'/ ,0 T K, REFERENCE PUBL^TraNS A 11 10b EL271S NBSIR 87-3543 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE — NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES PROGRAM AND COMMITTEE REPORTS JULY 19 -JULY 24,1987 EXCELSIOR HOTEL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS QC too .U56 NO.87-3543 OLD STATE HOUSE 1987 THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES The National Conference on Weights and Measures is an organization of weights and measures enforcement officials of the States, counties, and cities of the United States. The annual meeting of the Conference brings together government officials, and representatives of business, industry, trade associations, and consumer organizations for the purpose of hearing and discussing subjects that relate to the field of weights and measures technology and administration. The programs of the National Conference on Weights and Measures and its committees explore the broad area of this economically important segment of governmental regulatory service. The Conference develops and adopts model laws and regulations, technical codes for weighing and measuring devices used in commerce, test methods, enforcement procedures, and administrative guidelines that serve as recommendations to enforcement officials in the interest of promoting uniformity of requirements and methods among State and local jurisdictions. A major objective of the National Conference on Weights and Measures is to foster understanding and cooperation among weights and measures officials and between them and all industrial, business, and consumer interests. The Conference has been cited on numerous occasions for its outstanding success. The National Bureau of Standards has a statutory responsibility for "cooperation with the States in securing uniformity of weights and measures laws and methods of inspection." In partial fulfillment of this responsibility, the Bureau is pleased to publish this document for the National Conference. -
Hawaii Modernism Context Study Our Special Mahalo Goes to the Peer Review Group Who Took Their Time to Review the Study
Acknowledgements and Contributors This project was funded in part by a grant from the Hawaii Preservation Fund and Modernism + Recent Past Intervention Fund of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Additional funding was provided by Historic Hawaii Foundation and Fung Associates, Inc. The following people and organizations have contributed a great deal to this study: Historic Hawai‘i Foundation Kiersten Faulkner, Executive Director Lisa Palm, Director of Operations Wendy Wichman, Director of Field Services National Trust for Historic Preservation Christine Madrid French, Director, Trust Modern Fung Associates, Inc. Louis Fung Tonia Moy Mayu Ohama William Chapman Don Hibbard Claire Oshiro The success of this study depends largely on the encouragement and guidelines of many others. We take this opportunity to express our gratitude to the people who have been involved in the successful completion of this study. Hawaii Modernism Context Study Our special Mahalo goes to the peer review group who took their time to review the study. Pua Aiu, State Historic Preservation Division Suzanne Bott, National Park Service George Casen, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Joy Davidson, AIA Historic Preservation Committee Jeff Dodge, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Stephanie Foell, PB World Denise McGeen, PB World Ellyn Goldkind, NAVFAC Hawaii Loriann Gordon, Loriann Gordon Landscape Architect Anna Grune, Historic Hawai‘i Foundation Kimo Guequierre, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Tanya Gumapac-McGuire, Historic Hawai‘i Foundation Frank Haines , Architects Hawai‘i Anthea Hartig, National Trust for Historic Preservation Ken Hays, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Wendie McAllaster, Helber Hastert & Fee Glenn Mason , Mason Architects, Inc. -
Bull Master DUO.Pdf (740.2Kb)
Heaven Can Wait The Revolving Restaurant as Cinéma Trouvé Synne Tollerud Bull Master of Art History, IFIKK Dept. of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 13.05.2013 1 Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 A Brief History ....................................................................................................................... 9 Cinéma Trouvé ..................................................................................................................... 15 1. VIEW AESTHETICS ........................................................................................................... 18 2.1. The Oblique Image and Prospective Vision .................................................................. 19 2.2. The Ideal and the Picturesque: Landscape as a Cultural Space of Motion ................... 21 2.3. Technologies of Imaginary Voyage .............................................................................. 25 2.4. Travel Films and the World in Images .......................................................................... 30 2. KINETIC ARCHITECTURE: CINEMA BEYOND FILM ................................................ 38 2.2. Motility in Architecture ................................................................................................. 41 -
Section 1 General Information
SECTION 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Historic Name of District (see Section 3.B.1): Peachtree Center Historic District 2. Location of District: List principal streets, highways, and geographic features within and around the district (indicate whether highways are federal, state, or county routes): The north / south corridor of the district is situated along Peachtree Street from its intersection with Baker Street to the north to its intersection with Andrew Young International Boulevard to the south, and the east / west corridor of the district is situated along John Portman Boulevard (Formerly Harris Street) starting at its intersection with Courtland Street to the east, to its intersection with Williams Street to the west. City or vicinity of: Atlanta County: Fulton Zip Code of the district: 30303 Approximate distance and direction from county seat: One mile 3. Acreage of district to be nominated (approximately): 24 acres 4. a. Total Number of Historic/Contributing Resources in district (from Section 2.A. p. 6): Fifteen (15) buildings; eleven (11) structures; zero (0) sites; six (6) objects; b. Total Number of Noncontributing Resources in district (from Section 2.A. p. 6): There are two (2) noncontributing buildings, fifteen (15) noncontributing structures (sky bridges); zero (0) noncontributing sites, and zero (0) noncontributing objects within the district. 5. Are a majority of buildings in the district less than 50 years old? If yes, see instructions on page 29 and explain on page 14: Yes, thirteen (13) of the fifteen (15) buildings are less than 50 years old. 6. Property Ownership: See Attachment 1: Property Owners Does a federal agency (ex. -
Some Construction and Housing Firsts in Hawaii
Some Construction and Housing Firsts in Hawaii Robert C. Schmitt In the two centuries since Captain Cook's arrival in the Islands, vast changes have occurred in Hawaiian construction and housing. Grass huts gave way successively to wood frame dwellings, homes built of masonry, and high-rise apartment structures. Elevators, running water, sewers, and air conditioning—all of which were unknown in Kamehameha's time—were introduced. So were public housing and condominium apartments. Unfortunately, the initial appearance of many of these innovations has gone unrecorded, or has become the subject of scholarly dispute. The following pages are an effort to document some of these construction and housing "firsts" in Hawaii.1 Building permits. Building permits were first required in 1886. The law covered all construction between Kalihi Stream and Manoa or Kalia Streams, for a distance of three miles inland, and also churches, schools, hotels, and other public buildings elsewhere in the Kingdom, but it excluded buildings costing less than $1,000.2 Brick building. "As early as January 28, 1809," wrote Walter F. Judd, "Archibald Campbell reported that he saw a brick building there which served as Kamehameha's house while in residence in Lahaina. This first Lahaina palace had been built by 'foreigners,' possibly as early as 1800, and was thus the first Hawaiian palace built of permanent materials." It was probably constructed of adobe bricks.3 Fireproof building; office building. On April 1, 1854, The Polynesian reported, "A fine new Fire-Proof Store, three stories high, erecting at the corner of Kaahumanu and Queen streets, by Capt. -
Revolving Restaurant - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Revolving Restaurant from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
10/19/12 Revolving restaurant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Revolving restaurant From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A revolving restaurant is a usually tower restaurant eating space designed to rest atop a broad circular revolving platform that operates as a large turntable. The building remains stationary and the diners are carried on the revolving floor. The revolving rate varies between one and three times per hour and enables patrons to enjoy a panoramic view without leaving their seats. Such restaurants are often located on upper stories of hotels, television towers, and skyscrapers. Contents Prima Tower (Singapore) dining area showing an example of a revolving 1 History restaurant 2 See also 3 References 4 External links History A barrel-shaped, but stationary, restaurant on Fernsehturm Stuttgart, a TV tower in Stuttgart, Germany, built in 1956, was noted as the inspiration for the idea of a revolving restaurant. A revolving restaurant on Florianturm, a TV tower in Dortmund, Germany, was brought into service in 1959. John Graham, a Seattle architect and early shopping mall pioneer, is said to be the first in the United States[1] to design a revolving restaurant, at La Ronde, atop an office building at the Ala Moana Center in Honolulu in 1961. Graham was awarded US patent 3125189 for the invention in 1964, and used the technology to build the revolving "Eye of the Needle" restaurant still in service at the top Patang Hotel, a revolving restaurant of Seattle's Space Needle, drawings of which appear in the patent that provides views of the city of application. Ahmedabad, India See also List of revolving restaurants Floating restaurant Googie architecture References en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolving_restaurant 1/2 10/19/12 List of revolving restaurants - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia List of revolving restaurants From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The following is a list of revolving restaurants. -
Modernism Resources
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Hawaii Modernism Context Study 4.1 Specific Building Types 4.1.1 Low and Mid-Rise Commercial and Office Buildings Many of the remaining one to six story commercial and office buildings today are perhaps the most endangered building type of the post-World War II period. They stand on business zoned lands capable of supporting greater densities than the current structures provide. As a result, a large number of these structures have already disappeared from the landscape, especially in Waikiki. Most of the post-World War II, low-rise commercial or office buildings are of masonry construction, often concrete block, with the wood State Savings Plaza (1973) in Kaneohe designed by Johnson-Reese & Associates being a rare exception to this rule. All are modern in style, displaying an assortment of variations related to the movement, ranging from the vestigial rounded corners of streamline moderne to mid-century modern to formalism and expressionism. Most fall under the stylistic classification of mid-century modern, but some employing folded plate roofs or curvilinear roof forms that are expressionist in character, while others with a strong sense of symmetry and pronounced columns represent formalist ideas. Distinctive architectural features include such elements as flat roofs, thin, flat cantilevered concrete canopies or awnings, strong right angles and simple cubic forms, rounded corners, aluminum framed store fronts and entry doors, and projecting vertical elements, which often carried the name of the building. Exterior walls may be smooth concrete, painted concrete block, or clad with veneers such as lava rock, sandstone or thin slabs of Arizona sandstone. -
Complete Issue
CVB Update 12 | Sponsorship Trends: Keep the Message Going 24 | Las Vegas/Reno 36 A COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION PUBLICATION Volume 11 • Number 6 $13.00 NOVEMBER 2018 Texas Passion and Pride Welcomes All to Enjoy This Bigger-Than-Life Destination PAGE 44 Contract Negotiations Planners Can Bargain if They Know the Value CLICK HERE TO of Their Business and Show Flexibility DOWNLOAD/VIEW PAGE 30 TABLET VERSION Planning Global Meetings Convening in Destinations Outside of the On our cover – Mike Nichols, CAM, vice president, Operational Excellence and Professional Development, National Business Aviation U.S. Raises Educational Awareness Association set up the NBAA Schedulers & Dispatchers Conference at the Fort Worth Convention Center with nearly 3,000 attendees. PAGE 18 In This Issue 18 Planning Global Meetings CVBs: The Millennial Influence Sponsorship Trends Las Vegas/Reno 12 24 Entertainment Caesars Credit: 36 ISSN 21628831 | USPS 003500 | A COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION PUBLICATION November 2018 Volume 11 • Number 6 Departments Features 4 Publisher’s Page 12 CVBs: The Millennial 24 Keep the Message YOUR SUCCESS IS OUR BUSINESS. Influence Going News & Notes Advice for Planners Sponsorship Trends Are 6 Seeking Authenticity Leaning Toward Experiences By Cynthia Dial Rather Than Branded Items (866) 770– 7268 | wynnmeetings.com 9 Snapshots By Patrick Simms 18 Planning Global 50 Career Track Meetings 30 Contract Negotiations Convening in Destinations Planners Can Bargain if They Outside of the U.S. Raises Know the Value of Their -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form MAR 1 3 C015
United States Department of the Interior RECE\VED2280 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form MAR 1 3 c015 This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in ati ~!.~~rjlu · Complete the National Register of Historic Places Regis/ration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being if~l)JtlUi a licablc." For fimctions, architectural classificat"ion, materials. and areas ofsi nificance, enter on! c-ato orics and subcatc or c. fror m~ NAi..~KGERU1C E 1. Name of Property Historic name One Hundred North Main Building Other names/site number Name of related multiple property listing ----------------------------------------------------------------------N/A 2. Location Street & Number: 100 N. Main Street Mall City or town: Memphis State: TN County: Shelby Not For Publication: ~ Vicinity: ~ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _x_ nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property __x_ meets _does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the foll owing level(s) of significance: D national D statewide W local Applicable National Register Criteria: Signature of certifying officiaVTitle: \)State Historic Preservation Officer, Tennessee Historical Commission In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of Commenting Official: Date Title: State of Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.