National Conference on Weights and Measures, Program and Committee Reports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Conference on Weights and Measures, Program and Committee Reports '/ ,0 T K, REFERENCE PUBL^TraNS A 11 10b EL271S NBSIR 87-3543 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE — NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES PROGRAM AND COMMITTEE REPORTS JULY 19 -JULY 24,1987 EXCELSIOR HOTEL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS QC too .U56 NO.87-3543 OLD STATE HOUSE 1987 THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES The National Conference on Weights and Measures is an organization of weights and measures enforcement officials of the States, counties, and cities of the United States. The annual meeting of the Conference brings together government officials, and representatives of business, industry, trade associations, and consumer organizations for the purpose of hearing and discussing subjects that relate to the field of weights and measures technology and administration. The programs of the National Conference on Weights and Measures and its committees explore the broad area of this economically important segment of governmental regulatory service. The Conference develops and adopts model laws and regulations, technical codes for weighing and measuring devices used in commerce, test methods, enforcement procedures, and administrative guidelines that serve as recommendations to enforcement officials in the interest of promoting uniformity of requirements and methods among State and local jurisdictions. A major objective of the National Conference on Weights and Measures is to foster understanding and cooperation among weights and measures officials and between them and all industrial, business, and consumer interests. The Conference has been cited on numerous occasions for its outstanding success. The National Bureau of Standards has a statutory responsibility for "cooperation with the States in securing uniformity of weights and measures laws and methods of inspection." In partial fulfillment of this responsibility, the Bureau is pleased to publish this document for the National Conference. UJ UJ (0 c 9E P h LU — CO 2 O S8 ui O N UJ 1“ Z Z CO o u CUT HERE HERE STAMP PLACE CUT HERE N8S RESEARCH INFORMATION CENTER DELEGATE REGISTRATION FORM QCioo ULZb Registration Fee c n /to. 6 The registration fee is $135.00 and includes membership in the National Wi Conference on Weights and Measures for one year, July 1, 1987 through June 30, 1988. Arkansas Weights and Measures officials who have never attended an annual meeting of the National Conference on Weights and Measures may register For $35.00. This registration entitles registrant to one year’s membership but not voting privileges during the Voting Sessions. Qualifying retirees may register at no cost. The registration fee may be sent with this form or paid at the Registration Desk in Little Rock. Pre-payment is preferred to save time at the Regis- tration Desk. In any event, we would appreciate receiving your Delegate Registration Form by June 15 in order for your registration to be processed. Special Events Not Included The registration fee does not include the cost of the Optional Events or the Golf Tournament. Please complete separate forms for those events. Detach Here Please complete and mail this form and a check made out to the "NCWM" for the registration fee, to: Ann P. Heffernan, Conference Coordinator National Conference on Weights and Measures, P.O. Box 3137 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 O My cheek for $ 135.00 is enclosed. O Please pre-register me; I will pay registration fee on-site. O My check for $ 35.00 is enclosed. I qualify for the special fee. O I qualify for the complimentary registration as a retiree. Name: Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: ( ) Circle membership category: Active Associate Advisory If Active, circle level: State Local If Advisory, circle type: Federal Retired ' GUEST REGISTRATION FORM I plan to participate in the Guest Program at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the National Conference on Weights and Measures Excelsior Hotel, Little Rock, Arkansas July 19-24, 1987 Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: ( ) Please complete and mail this form to: Ann P. Heffernan Conference Coordinator National Conference on Weights and Measures P.O. Box 3137 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 OPTIONAL EVENTS REGISTRATION FORM Please complete and mail this form, together with a check made out to the "NCWM" to cover the costs of the optional events you wish to participate in, to: Ann P. Heffernan, Conference Coordinator National Conference on Weights and Measures, P.O. Box 3137 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 We must receive this form by June 15 in order to complete tour arrange- ments. Please sign me up for the following Optional Events: COST PER TOTAL NUMBER PERSON COST GOLF TOURNAMENT Player(s) $ 20.00 TOURS Old State House No Charge Territorial Restoration $ 1.00 Arkansas Arts Center Decorative Arts Museum and Architectural Antiques $ 7.00 Maybelline Plant-Monday $ 10.00 (See page 18 for this tour) Maybelline Plant-Wednesday $ 7.00 CONFERENCE OUTING Marlsgate Plantation $ 32.00 TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED Name(s) Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: ( ) NBSIR 87-3543 72ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES PROGRAM AND COMMITTEE REPORTS Sponsored by the National Bureau of Standards Attended by Officials from the various States, Counties, and Cities, and Representatives from the U.S. Government, Industry, and Consumer Organizations Report Editors: Albert D. Tholen Carroll Brickenkamp Ann P. Heffernan United States Department of Commerce Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary National Bureau of Standards Ernest Ambler, Director Issued April 1987 Additional copies of this Book are available from the National Conference Weights and Measures, P.O. Box 3137, Gaithersburg, MD 20878. NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES FRANK NAGELE ALBERT D. THOLEN CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY WEIGHTS & MEASURES SPECIALIST P O BOX 3137 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND 20878 P.O. BOX 30017 PHONE: 301-921-2401 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 TO: Weights and Measures Officials Representatives of Business, Industry, and Consumer Organizations, Federal Agency Representatives, and Others with Interest in Legal Metrology. Consumer Involvement Fosters More Efficient Weights and Measures Enforcement" You are invited and encouraged to attend and participate in the 72nd Annual Meeting of the National Conference on Weights and Measures. The Conference is scheduled to be held July 19-24, 1987, in Little Rock, Arkansas. For our Conference to continue to be a success, we must all participate and become familiar with the national issues and work toward solutions to the problems in the field of Weights and Measures. If you are not already thoroughly conversant with the issues to be discussed and decided at the 72nd meeting now is the time to study and become knowledgeable about them. Our Conference has made great advancements in the last decade in two specific areas, The National Type Evaluation Program and The National Training Program. The training material from the Conference is advancing at a rate greater than our member states can assimilate and implement the materials. We will not solve this problem at this conference, but we must work diligently to develop a system for delivering the training material to our inspectors in an efficient and prompt manner If you bring your spouse or guest along, I can assure you they will have an enjoyable time too. The tremendous work load of the standing committees, work groups, task forces, and technical advisors to the committees is evident as we review this conference book of program and committee reports. We could not have our Conference without these dedicated workers. I thank them for all the work, study, time, and energy they have expended on our behalf. See you in Little Rock! f\ Frank Nagele Chairman ii CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT FOSTERS MORE EFFICIENT WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ENFORCEMENT PAST CHAIRMEN OF THE CONFERENCE YEAR CHAIRMAN 43rd 1958 J. P. McBride, MA 44th 1959 C. M. Fuller, CA 45th 1960 H. E. Crawford, FL 46th 1961 R. E. Meek, IN 47th 1962 Robert Williams, NY 48th 1963 C. Ho Stender, SC 49th 1964 D. M. Turnbull, WA 50th 1965 V. D. Campbell, OH 51st 1966 J. F. True, KS 52nd 1967 J. E. Bowen, MA 53rd 1968 C. C. Morgan, IN 54th 1969 S. H. Christie, NJ 55th 1970 R. W. Searles, OH 56th 1971 M. Jennings, TN 57th 1972 E. H. Black, CA 58th 1973 George L. Johnson, KY 59th 1974 John H. Lewis, WA 60th 1975 Sydney D. Andrews, FL 61st 1976 Richard L. Thompson, MD 62nd 1977 Earl Prideaux, CO 63rd 1978 James F. Lyles, VA 64th 1979 Kendrick J. Simila, OR 65th 1980 Charles H. Vincent, TX 66th 1981 Edward H. Stadolnik, MA 67th 1982 Edward C. Heffron, MI 68th 1983 Charles H. Greene, NM 69th 1984 Sam F. Hindsman, AR 70th 1985 Ezio F. Delfino, CA 71st 1986 George E. Mattimoe, HI iii # TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Excelsior Hotel Reservation Card Delegate Registration Form Guest Registration Form Optional Events Reservation Form "Consumer Involvement Fosters More Efficient Weights and Measures Enforcement" ii Past Chairmen iii Week at a Glance vi Organizational Chart viii The 72nd Annual Meeting 1 Registration 1 Registration Desk Location & Hours of Operation 2 Guest Registration, Optional Events, and Conference Outing 2 Hotel Information 3 Message Center and NCWM Office 3 Conduct of the Annual Meeting 4 Meeting Procedures 4 Guides to Committee Reports 5 Meeting Rooms 6 Standing Committee Meeting Rooms 6 Program Times and Locations 7 Optional Events Program 17 Interim Meeting Committee Reports Executive Committee 1-1 Appendices A. OIML-NCWM Participation 1-26 B. Draft Operating Budget 1-30 C. National Type Evaluation Program Policy and Procedures 1-34 D. Outline of OIML Update 1-54 E. Agenda, Issues and Roundtable 1-57 F. Committee Recommendation to the 72nd NCWM 1-59 IV TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Committee on Laws and Regulations 2-1 Appendices A. Uniform Motor Fuel Inspection Law 2-25 B. Recommended Test Method For Packages of Flour 2-30 C.
Recommended publications
  • Omni Hotel Atlanta, Georgia
    COUNTRY ATLANTA KAY HOTELS Omni Hotel Atlanta, Georgia 100 CNN Center, Corner of Andrew Young International Blvd, Atlanta, GA, 30303 The Atlanta Omni Hotel at CNN Center is a deluxe hotel located 15 minutes from Atlanta Hartsfield Airport. The hotel is situated opposite the Centennial Olympic Park and connected to the Philips Arena and the Georgia World Congress Center. The Atlanta Omni Hotel at CNN Center is the closest hotel to the Georgia Dome and its guests have access to the Turner Athletic Club, a well-equipped fitness center... Omni Hotel Atlanta Reservations... Sheraton Atlanta Hotel From: $57 USD pp 165 COURTLAND, Atlanta, GA, 30303 Centrally located in the heart of downtown, the Sheraton Atlanta Georgia Hotel boasts an award-winning design. The hotel is conveniently located near Atlanta's popular restaurants and a wide array of shopping venues. Many area attractions are also nearby, including the Georgia World Congress Center, the Jimmy Carter Library and Museum and Turner Field. All guest rooms feature a host of modern amenities, including hair dryers... Sheraton Atlanta Hotel Reservations... Best Western Atlanta Airport- East From: $30.8 USD pp 301 N Central Avenue, Hapeville, GA, 30354- 1601 The Best Western Atlanta Airport East, conveniently located to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport and Interstate 75, is newly remodeled and professionally staffed. Our guest rooms are well maintained and offer all the amenities to make your stay comfortable and enjoyable. Our complimentary 24 hour airport shuttle services will take you to the Marta Rapid Rail Station at the airport making downtown Atlanta, Georgia Dome, CNN Center and the World Congress Center.
    [Show full text]
  • City Branding: Part 2: Observation Towers Worldwide Architectural Icons Make Cities Famous
    City Branding: Part 2: Observation Towers Worldwide Architectural Icons Make Cities Famous What’s Your City’s Claim to Fame? By Jeff Coy, ISHC Paris was the world’s most-visited city in 2010 with 15.1 million international arrivals, according to the World Tourism Organization, followed by London and New York City. What’s Paris got that your city hasn’t got? Is it the nickname the City of Love? Is it the slogan Liberty Started Here or the idea that Life is an Art with images of famous artists like Monet, Modigliani, Dali, da Vinci, Picasso, Braque and Klee? Is it the Cole Porter song, I Love Paris, sung by Frank Sinatra? Is it the movie American in Paris? Is it the fact that Paris has numerous architectural icons that sum up the city’s identity and image --- the Eiffel Tower, Arch of Triumph, Notre Dame Cathedral, Moulin Rouge and Palace of Versailles? Do cities need icons, songs, slogans and nicknames to become famous? Or do famous cities simply attract more attention from architects, artists, wordsmiths and ad agencies? Certainly, having an architectural icon, such as the Eiffel Tower, built in 1889, put Paris on the world map. But all these other things were added to make the identity and image. As a result, international tourists spent $46.3 billion in France in 2010. What’s your city’s claim to fame? Does it have an architectural icon? World’s Most Famous City Icons Beyond nicknames, slogans and songs, some cities are fortunate to have an architectural icon that is immediately recognized by almost everyone worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle
    The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle By Stefan Johannes Al A dissertation submitted in the partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair Professor Greig Crysler Professor Ananya Roy Professor Michael Southworth Fall 2010 The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle © 2010 by Stefan Johannes Al Abstract The Strip: Las Vegas and the Symbolic Destruction of Spectacle by Stefan Johannes Al Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair Over the past 70 years, various actors have dramatically reconfigured the Las Vegas Strip in many forms. I claim that behind the Strip’s “reinventions” lies a process of symbolic destruction. Since resorts distinguish themselves symbolically, each new round of capital accumulation relies on the destruction of symbolic capital of existing resorts. A new resort either ups the language within a paradigm, or causes a paradigm shift, which devalues the previous resorts even further. This is why, in the context of the Strip, buildings have such a short lifespan. This dissertation is chronologically structured around the four building booms of new resort construction that occurred on the Strip. Historically, there are periodic waves of new casino resort constructions with continuous upgrades and renovation projects in between. They have been successively theorized as suburbanization, corporatization, Disneyfication, and global branding. Each building boom either conforms to a single paradigm or witnesses a paradigm shift halfway: these paradigms have been theorized as Wild West, Los Angeles Cool, Pop City, Corporate Modern, Disneyland, Sim City, and Starchitecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Modernism Context Study Our Special Mahalo Goes to the Peer Review Group Who Took Their Time to Review the Study
    Acknowledgements and Contributors This project was funded in part by a grant from the Hawaii Preservation Fund and Modernism + Recent Past Intervention Fund of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Additional funding was provided by Historic Hawaii Foundation and Fung Associates, Inc. The following people and organizations have contributed a great deal to this study: Historic Hawai‘i Foundation Kiersten Faulkner, Executive Director Lisa Palm, Director of Operations Wendy Wichman, Director of Field Services National Trust for Historic Preservation Christine Madrid French, Director, Trust Modern Fung Associates, Inc. Louis Fung Tonia Moy Mayu Ohama William Chapman Don Hibbard Claire Oshiro The success of this study depends largely on the encouragement and guidelines of many others. We take this opportunity to express our gratitude to the people who have been involved in the successful completion of this study. Hawaii Modernism Context Study Our special Mahalo goes to the peer review group who took their time to review the study. Pua Aiu, State Historic Preservation Division Suzanne Bott, National Park Service George Casen, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Joy Davidson, AIA Historic Preservation Committee Jeff Dodge, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Stephanie Foell, PB World Denise McGeen, PB World Ellyn Goldkind, NAVFAC Hawaii Loriann Gordon, Loriann Gordon Landscape Architect Anna Grune, Historic Hawai‘i Foundation Kimo Guequierre, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Tanya Gumapac-McGuire, Historic Hawai‘i Foundation Frank Haines , Architects Hawai‘i Anthea Hartig, National Trust for Historic Preservation Ken Hays, Hawai‘i Historic Places Review Board Wendie McAllaster, Helber Hastert & Fee Glenn Mason , Mason Architects, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Master DUO.Pdf (740.2Kb)
    Heaven Can Wait The Revolving Restaurant as Cinéma Trouvé Synne Tollerud Bull Master of Art History, IFIKK Dept. of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 13.05.2013 1 Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 A Brief History ....................................................................................................................... 9 Cinéma Trouvé ..................................................................................................................... 15 1. VIEW AESTHETICS ........................................................................................................... 18 2.1. The Oblique Image and Prospective Vision .................................................................. 19 2.2. The Ideal and the Picturesque: Landscape as a Cultural Space of Motion ................... 21 2.3. Technologies of Imaginary Voyage .............................................................................. 25 2.4. Travel Films and the World in Images .......................................................................... 30 2. KINETIC ARCHITECTURE: CINEMA BEYOND FILM ................................................ 38 2.2. Motility in Architecture ................................................................................................. 41
    [Show full text]
  • 40 Years of Change
    SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2002 605 feet Observation Deck OF CHANGE 40 YEARS 520 feet 138-foot diameter Revolving SkyCity Restaurant 500 feet, 94.5-foot diameter 1962Mercer Street 2002 Plans for a World Fair started as the hope In 1962, dinner and a cocktail Today, the structures that comprise 23 18 of local boosters to put Seattle on the averaged $7.50 per person. Seattle Center are often derisively Mercer Street map. It was a sign of civic zeitgeist and referred to as a hodgepodge of 1st Avenue North 24 forward-facing optimism that so 1st Avenue North 17 architecture without any coherent style. many buildings could be erect- 1 20 But, with 10 million visitors and more 1 ed in such a short time and 19 Elevator 16 than 5,300 free events a year, Seattle that we would invite The last of the original Center is still this city’s elevators arrived just one the world to our 22 2 19 cherished gathering day before the Fair began, doorstep for a April 21,1962, which was Thomas Street 15 spot. Thomas Street dazzling six-month show. also the day the Space What was built on the fairgrounds 2 21 18 Needle opened. New was all about the future of Seattle — elevators were installed in 14 creating a lasting gathering place. 1993 and can go up to 10 3 3 11 17 mph. A trip from ground 4 BUILDING TORN level to the top takes 43 DOWN AFTER FAIR seconds. 4 5 9 16 13 7 6 8 12 15 Background 8 6 North Built in 1962 for the World’s 7 9 5 9 5th Avenue North Fair, the Space Needle was 10 It’s no 10 then the tallest building west 5th Avenue longer a tribute of the Mississippi River.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 General Information
    SECTION 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Historic Name of District (see Section 3.B.1): Peachtree Center Historic District 2. Location of District: List principal streets, highways, and geographic features within and around the district (indicate whether highways are federal, state, or county routes): The north / south corridor of the district is situated along Peachtree Street from its intersection with Baker Street to the north to its intersection with Andrew Young International Boulevard to the south, and the east / west corridor of the district is situated along John Portman Boulevard (Formerly Harris Street) starting at its intersection with Courtland Street to the east, to its intersection with Williams Street to the west. City or vicinity of: Atlanta County: Fulton Zip Code of the district: 30303 Approximate distance and direction from county seat: One mile 3. Acreage of district to be nominated (approximately): 24 acres 4. a. Total Number of Historic/Contributing Resources in district (from Section 2.A. p. 6): Fifteen (15) buildings; eleven (11) structures; zero (0) sites; six (6) objects; b. Total Number of Noncontributing Resources in district (from Section 2.A. p. 6): There are two (2) noncontributing buildings, fifteen (15) noncontributing structures (sky bridges); zero (0) noncontributing sites, and zero (0) noncontributing objects within the district. 5. Are a majority of buildings in the district less than 50 years old? If yes, see instructions on page 29 and explain on page 14: Yes, thirteen (13) of the fifteen (15) buildings are less than 50 years old. 6. Property Ownership: See Attachment 1: Property Owners Does a federal agency (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Construction and Housing Firsts in Hawaii
    Some Construction and Housing Firsts in Hawaii Robert C. Schmitt In the two centuries since Captain Cook's arrival in the Islands, vast changes have occurred in Hawaiian construction and housing. Grass huts gave way successively to wood frame dwellings, homes built of masonry, and high-rise apartment structures. Elevators, running water, sewers, and air conditioning—all of which were unknown in Kamehameha's time—were introduced. So were public housing and condominium apartments. Unfortunately, the initial appearance of many of these innovations has gone unrecorded, or has become the subject of scholarly dispute. The following pages are an effort to document some of these construction and housing "firsts" in Hawaii.1 Building permits. Building permits were first required in 1886. The law covered all construction between Kalihi Stream and Manoa or Kalia Streams, for a distance of three miles inland, and also churches, schools, hotels, and other public buildings elsewhere in the Kingdom, but it excluded buildings costing less than $1,000.2 Brick building. "As early as January 28, 1809," wrote Walter F. Judd, "Archibald Campbell reported that he saw a brick building there which served as Kamehameha's house while in residence in Lahaina. This first Lahaina palace had been built by 'foreigners,' possibly as early as 1800, and was thus the first Hawaiian palace built of permanent materials." It was probably constructed of adobe bricks.3 Fireproof building; office building. On April 1, 1854, The Polynesian reported, "A fine new Fire-Proof Store, three stories high, erecting at the corner of Kaahumanu and Queen streets, by Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolving Restaurant - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Revolving Restaurant from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    10/19/12 Revolving restaurant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Revolving restaurant From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A revolving restaurant is a usually tower restaurant eating space designed to rest atop a broad circular revolving platform that operates as a large turntable. The building remains stationary and the diners are carried on the revolving floor. The revolving rate varies between one and three times per hour and enables patrons to enjoy a panoramic view without leaving their seats. Such restaurants are often located on upper stories of hotels, television towers, and skyscrapers. Contents Prima Tower (Singapore) dining area showing an example of a revolving 1 History restaurant 2 See also 3 References 4 External links History A barrel-shaped, but stationary, restaurant on Fernsehturm Stuttgart, a TV tower in Stuttgart, Germany, built in 1956, was noted as the inspiration for the idea of a revolving restaurant. A revolving restaurant on Florianturm, a TV tower in Dortmund, Germany, was brought into service in 1959. John Graham, a Seattle architect and early shopping mall pioneer, is said to be the first in the United States[1] to design a revolving restaurant, at La Ronde, atop an office building at the Ala Moana Center in Honolulu in 1961. Graham was awarded US patent 3125189 for the invention in 1964, and used the technology to build the revolving "Eye of the Needle" restaurant still in service at the top Patang Hotel, a revolving restaurant of Seattle's Space Needle, drawings of which appear in the patent that provides views of the city of application. Ahmedabad, India See also List of revolving restaurants Floating restaurant Googie architecture References en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolving_restaurant 1/2 10/19/12 List of revolving restaurants - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia List of revolving restaurants From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The following is a list of revolving restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism Resources
    THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Hawaii Modernism Context Study 4.1 Specific Building Types 4.1.1 Low and Mid-Rise Commercial and Office Buildings Many of the remaining one to six story commercial and office buildings today are perhaps the most endangered building type of the post-World War II period. They stand on business zoned lands capable of supporting greater densities than the current structures provide. As a result, a large number of these structures have already disappeared from the landscape, especially in Waikiki. Most of the post-World War II, low-rise commercial or office buildings are of masonry construction, often concrete block, with the wood State Savings Plaza (1973) in Kaneohe designed by Johnson-Reese & Associates being a rare exception to this rule. All are modern in style, displaying an assortment of variations related to the movement, ranging from the vestigial rounded corners of streamline moderne to mid-century modern to formalism and expressionism. Most fall under the stylistic classification of mid-century modern, but some employing folded plate roofs or curvilinear roof forms that are expressionist in character, while others with a strong sense of symmetry and pronounced columns represent formalist ideas. Distinctive architectural features include such elements as flat roofs, thin, flat cantilevered concrete canopies or awnings, strong right angles and simple cubic forms, rounded corners, aluminum framed store fronts and entry doors, and projecting vertical elements, which often carried the name of the building. Exterior walls may be smooth concrete, painted concrete block, or clad with veneers such as lava rock, sandstone or thin slabs of Arizona sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Issue
    CVB Update 12 | Sponsorship Trends: Keep the Message Going 24 | Las Vegas/Reno 36 A COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION PUBLICATION Volume 11 • Number 6 $13.00 NOVEMBER 2018 Texas Passion and Pride Welcomes All to Enjoy This Bigger-Than-Life Destination PAGE 44 Contract Negotiations Planners Can Bargain if They Know the Value CLICK HERE TO of Their Business and Show Flexibility DOWNLOAD/VIEW PAGE 30 TABLET VERSION Planning Global Meetings Convening in Destinations Outside of the On our cover – Mike Nichols, CAM, vice president, Operational Excellence and Professional Development, National Business Aviation U.S. Raises Educational Awareness Association set up the NBAA Schedulers & Dispatchers Conference at the Fort Worth Convention Center with nearly 3,000 attendees. PAGE 18 In This Issue 18 Planning Global Meetings CVBs: The Millennial Influence Sponsorship Trends Las Vegas/Reno 12 24 Entertainment Caesars Credit: 36 ISSN 21628831 | USPS 003500 | A COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION PUBLICATION November 2018 Volume 11 • Number 6 Departments Features 4 Publisher’s Page 12 CVBs: The Millennial 24 Keep the Message YOUR SUCCESS IS OUR BUSINESS. Influence Going News & Notes Advice for Planners Sponsorship Trends Are 6 Seeking Authenticity Leaning Toward Experiences By Cynthia Dial Rather Than Branded Items (866) 770– 7268 | wynnmeetings.com 9 Snapshots By Patrick Simms 18 Planning Global 50 Career Track Meetings 30 Contract Negotiations Convening in Destinations Planners Can Bargain if They Outside of the U.S. Raises Know the Value of Their
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form MAR 1 3 C015
    United States Department of the Interior RECE\VED2280 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form MAR 1 3 c015 This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in ati ~!.~~rjlu · Complete the National Register of Historic Places Regis/ration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being if~l)JtlUi a licablc." For fimctions, architectural classificat"ion, materials. and areas ofsi nificance, enter on! c-ato orics and subcatc or c. fror m~ NAi..~KGERU1C E 1. Name of Property Historic name One Hundred North Main Building Other names/site number Name of related multiple property listing ----------------------------------------------------------------------N/A 2. Location Street & Number: 100 N. Main Street Mall City or town: Memphis State: TN County: Shelby Not For Publication: ~ Vicinity: ~ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _x_ nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property __x_ meets _does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the foll owing level(s) of significance: D national D statewide W local Applicable National Register Criteria: Signature of certifying officiaVTitle: \)State Historic Preservation Officer, Tennessee Historical Commission In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of Commenting Official: Date Title: State of Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.
    [Show full text]