JUNE 2018 an Open Resource Brought out by NEO IAS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JUNE 2018 an Open Resource Brought out by NEO IAS Exhaustive Exclusive Coverage Prelims Focus Current Indicative Affairs Questions Grandmaster Challenge Prelims Current Affairs Digest Standalone Source to compliment static books Join Prelims Telegram channel for Daily Newsletters and videos JUNE 2018 An Open resource brought out by NEO IAS www.neoias.com www.youtube.com/neoias www.fb.com/neoias 0484 -4030104 9446331522 Follow us on: Prelims Telegram Channel https://t.me/NEOIASPRELIMS Economy Telegram Channel https://t.me/NEOIASECONOMYPRELIMS You Tube Channel www.youtube.com/neoias Brief Note on NEO IAS Current Affairs Digest Digest Affairs IAS Current Brief NEO Note on eam NEO IAS brings you a unique and reliable current affairs digest to streamline your prelims preparation. With its exclusive and exhaustive focus on Prelims, the digest is your trustworthy T companion to score well in UPSC CSE Prelims 2019. The digest is a compiled, organized and improvised version of NEO TPS 2019 daily current affairs series. Under it, detailed videos on daily current affairs are uploaded on a regular basis on our YouTube channel. Hence, it is a tutorial backed current affairs material – the first of its kind. The document is unique method of content preparation– Locate, Extend, Explore and Explain (L3E) Method. Locate accurately the most probable areas Extend from those areas to cover portions left out by the standard books, Explore further for precise content Explain it in a reader friendly format. One can distinguish the normal current affairs material and NEO IAS Current Affairs Digest as follows: Neo IAS Current Affairs Normal Current Features Digest Affairs No. of Prelims relevant 180- 230 70-80 topics Prelims specific content Yes No arrangement Revision quiz challenge to Yes No check learning Videos on the same topic Yes No Relevant past years Yes No questions on the topic Wide use of photographs and tables for smart Yes No learning For promising result, you are required to read the digest three to four times along with your standard textbooks. NEO IAS monthly digests are prepared by a proficient team. But we are also hungry to improve ourselves in terms of content, style and presentation to suit your study methods. Feel free to contact us with you suggestions at: [email protected] Happy Learning! © Neo IAS 0484-4030104 | 9446331522 | 9446334122 | www.neoias.com 2 www.youtube.com/neoias | www.fb.com/neoias | http://bit.do/neo-upscprelims INSIDE THE DIGEST Brief Note on NEO IAS Current Affairs Digest ......................................................................................................... 2 Inside the digest ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Current Affairs Grandmaster Challenge ................................................................................................................... 6 1 Economy .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Inside the digestInside the 1.1 STRATEGIC DISINVESTMENT ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (IPO)................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.3 CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY AND UNCITRAL .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.4 LIBERALISED REMITTANCE SCHEME ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NETWORK (GSTN) ............................................................................................................................ 10 1.6 MARGINAL COST OF FUNDS BASED LENDING RATE (MCLR) .......................................................................................................... 11 1.7 BANK BOARDS BUREAU .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.8 REGIONAL RURAL BANKS (RRB) .............................................................................................................................................. 12 1.9 FUGITIVE ECONOMIC OFFENDERS ORDINANCE ............................................................................................................................ 13 1.10 RUPAY CARD AND NATIONAL PAYMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA .................................................................................................... 14 1.11 WHOLESALE PRICE INDEX (WPI).............................................................................................................................................. 15 1.12 CABINET COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AFFAIRS (CCEA) ................................................................................................................ 16 1.13 PUBLIC CREDIT REGISTRY ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.14 MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE .............................................................................................................................................. 17 1.15 WITHHOLDING TAX ............................................................................................................................................................... 18 1.16 BASEL III NORMS .................................................................................................................................................................. 18 2 World Affairs ............................................................................................................................................ 18 2.1 INTEREST GROUPS IN WTO .................................................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY (UNRWA)........................................................................................................... 19 2.3 COUNTERING AMERICA’S ADVERSARIES THROUGH SANCTIONS ACT (CAATSA)................................................................................. 20 2.4 GLOBAL SOLAR BANK AND INTERNATIONAL SOLAR ALLIANCE ......................................................................................................... 20 2.5 FEED IN TARIFFS.................................................................................................................................................................... 21 2.6 INDIAN TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC COOPERATION (ITEC) PROGRAMME ........................................................................................ 22 2.7 FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE (FATF) .................................................................................................................................... 22 2.8 ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK (AIIB) ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.9 ORGANISATION OF PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES ............................................................................................................... 23 2.10 INTERNATIONAL YOGA DAY ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.11 UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL ................................................................................................................................................. 25 2.12 INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES (ICD-11)............................................................................................................... 25 2.13 SAARC DEVELOPMENT FUND ................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.14 ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS (OPCW) ....................................................................................... 26 2.15 BIMSTEC (BAY OF BENGAL INITIATIVE FOR MULTI-SECTORAL TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC COOPERATION) .......................................... 27 2.16 UN SECURITY COUNCIL .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.17 G7 BLOCK ........................................................................................................................................................................... 29 2.18 SHANGHAI CO-OPERATION ORGANISATION ................................................................................................................................ 29 3 Geography ................................................................................................................................................ 30 3.1 SEYCHELLES.......................................................................................................................................................................... 30 3.2 MONGOLIA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Other Contributions
    Other Contributions NATURE NOTES Amphibia: Anura Incilius luetkenii, Smilisca sordida, and Lithobates forreri. Predation by birds. Predation on adult anurans by tropical birds has been recorded on numerous occasions, where birds of various families (e.g., Accipitridae, Striigidae, Momotidae, Turdidae) have preyed on anurans of different families (e.g., Centrolenidae, Dendrobatidae, Hylidae, Leptodactylidae, Rhinophrynidae; Hayes, 1983; Master 1999; Toledo et al., 2007; Acosta and Morún, 2014; Ramírez-Fernández and Solís-DelValle, 2014). The majority of these events are opportunistic and associated with diet-generalist or invertebrate- and vertebrate-predator bird species (Toledo et al., 2007; Amézquita et al., 2013; Paluh et al., 2015). Here, we present information on the predation of Incilius luetkenii (Bufonidae), Smilisca sordida (Hylidae), and Lithobates forreri (Ranidae) by birds in Costa Rica. On 26 May 2013, at Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa, Provincia de Guanacaste, Costa Rica (10°50'N, 85°37'W; WGS 84; elev. 298 m), we observed a Roadside Hawk (Buteo [Rupornis] magnirostris) feeding on an individual of Incilius luetkenii. The hawk was standing on the ground pecking and eating a dead I. luetkenii along the edge of gravel road in Tropical Dry Forest, but once it was startled flew across the road without the toad and perched on a tree approximately 5 m from the ground. We cannot determine if the hawk captured the toad or found it dead (the toad remains appeared fresh), but either of these behaviors was likely because the previous evening breeding aggregations involving I. luetkenii had occurred in the area. Although frogs and toads are import- ant dietary items for this hawk (Haverschmidt, 1972; Beltzer, 1990), this observation is the first to report I.
    [Show full text]
  • Armand Bayou Watershed Plan Cover: Top Left Photo Courtesy Armand Bayou Nature Center; All Other Photos © Cliff Meinhardt Armand Bayou Watershed Plan Phase I
    Armand Bayou Watershed Plan COVER: TOP LEFT PHOTO COURTESY ARMAND BAYOU NATURE CENTER; ALL OTHER PHOTOS © CLIFF MEINHARDT Armand Bayou Watershed Plan Phase I A Report of the Coastal Coordination Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA170Z1140 Production of this document supported in part by Institutional Grant NA16RG1078 to Texas A&M University from the National Sea Grant Office, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, and a grant from ExxonMobil Coporation ii PHOTO © CLIFF MEINHARDT Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................2 The Armand Bayou Watershed Partnership ..................................................................................................................2 State of the Watershed ..............................................................................................................................................2 Institutional Framework ..............................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN Chicago Herpetological Society
    BULLETIN of the Chicago Herpetological Society Volume 53, Number 8 August 2018 BULLETIN OF THE CHICAGO HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 53, Number 8 August 2018 Notes on the Herpetofauna of Western Mexico 19: An Update to the Herpetofauna of Volcán de Tequila in Jalisco, Mexico . .Juan Rubén Rojo-Gutiérrez, David Jaimes-Rodríguez, Daniel Cruz-Sáenz, Laura López-Fernández, Enrique Chávez-Uribe and David Lazcano 165 Toad Stools: Part Two . Dennis A. Meritt Jr. 170 The Digital Age and Herp Lit: An Evolving Playing Field in the New Millennium . R. Michael Burger 171 Deputy Louie . Roger A. Repp 174 What You Missed at the June Meeting: Daniel Parker . .John Archer 178 Herpetology 2018......................................................... 181 Advertisements . 184 New CHS Members This Month . 184 Cover: Coral-bellied ring-necked snake, Diadophis punctatus pulchellus, Tuolumne County, California. Photograph by Stephen L. Barten, DVM. STAFF Membership in the CHS includes a subscription to the monthly Bulletin. Annual dues are: Individual Membership, $25.00; Editor: Michael A. Dloogatch --- [email protected] Family Membership, $28.00; Sustaining Membership, $50.00; Copy editor: Joan Moore Contributing Membership, $100.00; Institutional Membership, $38.00. Remittance must be made in U.S. funds. Subscribers 2017 CHS Board of Directors outside the U.S. must add $12.00 for postage. Send membership dues or address changes to: Chicago Herpetological Society, President: Rich Crowley Membership Secretary, 2430 N. Cannon Drive, Chicago, IL 60614. Vice-president: Jessica Wadleigh Treasurer: John Archer Manuscripts published in the Bulletin of the Chicago Herpeto- Recording Secretary: Gail Oomens logical Society are not peer reviewed. Manuscripts and letters Media Secretary: Kim Klisiak concerning editorial business should be e-mailed to the editor, Membership Secretary: Mike Dloogatch [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Association of Naturalists 65Th Annual Meeting 65Ava Reunion Anual
    1 SOUTHWESTERN ASSOCIATION OF NATURALISTS 65TH ANNUAL MEETING 65AVA REUNION ANUAL HOST/ANFITRION DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, ST. EDWARD’S UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY, TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSORSHIP/PATROCINADOR Texas State University Equity and Access Committee Texas State University Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Texas State University College of Science & Engineering Texas State University The Graduate College Texas State University International Office Texas State University Center for Diversity & Gender Studies St. Edward’s University School of Natural Sciences San Marcos Convention & Visitor Bureau Real Ale Brewing Company 2 LOCAL COMMITTEE/COMITE LOCAL CO-CHAIRS/CO-JEFES: Raelynn Deaton Haynes, St. Edward’s University Paula Williamson, Texas State University MEMBERS/MIEMBROS: Andrea Aspbury, Texas State University Ivan Castro-Arellano, Texas State University Mike Forstner, Texas State University Sarah Fritts, Texas State University Hayley Gillespie, Texas State University Aaron Haynes, St. Edward’s University David Johnson, Texas State University David Lemke, Texas State University Matthew Milholland, Texas State University Flo Oxley, Austin Community College David Rodriguez, Texas State University Butch Weckerly, Texas State University STUDENT MEMBERS/MIEMBROS ESTUDIANTES: Texas State University St. Edward’s University Carlos Baca Claire Adams Jessica Bernardin Ana Hernandez Austin Bohannon Fiorella Hernandez Diana Digges Sam Kenyon Krystin Dyer Briana Martinez Mireya Escandon Sarah Morton Jared Haney
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Hybridization Between East Pacific Green Chelonia Mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys Olivacea Sea Turtles in Northwest Mexico
    Offcial journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(2) [General Section]: 174–180 (e202). Possible hybridization between East Pacifc Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico 1,2,*Catherine E. Hart, 1,2,3Cesar P. Ley-Quñonez, 4F. Alberto Abreu-Grobois, 5Luis Javier Plata-Rosas, 6Israel Llamas-Gonzalez, 1Delia Karen E. Oceguera-Camacho, and 1,2,3Alan A. Zavala-Norzagaray 1Grupo Tortuguero de las Californias A.C., La Paz, Baja California Sur, MEXICO 2Investigacion, Capacitacion y Soluciones Ambientales y Sociales A.C. (ICSAS), Tepic, Nayarit, MEXICO 3Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa, Guasave, Sinaloa, MEXICO 4Laboratorio de Genética y Banco de Información sobre Tortugas Marinas (BITMAR) Unidad Académica Mazatlán Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia UNAM, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, MEXICO 5Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, MEXICO 6Eco Mayto A.C. Playa Mayto, Cabo Corrientes, Jalisco, MEXICO Abstract.—Photographic records of sea turtle neonates and embryos which show characteristics of both East Pacifc Green Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas) and Olive Ridley Sea Turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) are presented. These turtles were produced from nests laid by Olive Ridley females in the states of Nayarit, Jalisco, and Baja California Sur. Their discovery further suggests the occurrence of hybridization between these two species, and potential implications for conservation are discussed. Keywords. Black sea turtle, Gulf of California, morphology, conservation, hybrid, Testudines Citation: Hart CE, Ley-Quñonez CP, Abreu-Grobois FA, Plata-Rosas LJ, Llamas-Gonzalez I, Oceguera-Camacho DKE, Zavala-Norzagaray AA. 2019. Possible hybridization between East Pacific Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Important Bird Areas
    North American Important Bird Areas A Directory of 150 Key Conservation Sites Table of Contents This publication was prepared by the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). The views contained herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the CEC, or the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of Table of Contents America. Foreword . v Acknowlegments . ix Reproduction of this document in whole or in part and in any Introduction. 1 form for educational or nonprofit purposes may be made with- Methods. 5 out special permission from the CEC Secretariat, provided Criteria . 9 acknowledgement of the source is made. The CEC would appre- Conservation and Management of Important Bird Areas . 17 How to Read the IBA Site Accounts. 29 ciate receiving a copy of any publication or material that uses this document as a source. Canada . 31 Introduction to the Canadian Sites . 35 Published by the Communications and Public Outreach Depart- United States . 139 ment of the CEC Secretariat. Introduction to the US Sites . 143 For more information about this or other publications from Mexico . 249 the CEC, contact : Introduction to the Mexican Sites. 253 COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 393, rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200 Montréal (Québec) Canada H2Y 1N9 Tel: (514) 350–4300 • Fax: (514) 350–4314 http://www.cec.org ISBN 2-922305-42-2 Disponible en français sous le titre : Les zones importantes pour la con- servation des oiseaux en Amérique du Nord (ISBN 2-922305-44-9). Disponible en español con el título Áreas Importantes para la Conservación de las Aves de América del Norte (ISBN 2-922305-43-0).
    [Show full text]
  • Torres Galeana Luis Enrique Matricula
    4LUMNO: TORRES GALEANA LUIS ENRIQUE MATRICULA: 91334920 TELÉFONO: 0445522014875 LICENCIATURA: BIOLOGIA / DIVISION: CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS Y DE LA SALUD TRIMESTRE LECTIVO: 02 - P TITULO DEL PROYECTO DE INVESTIGACION DEL QUE DEPENDE EL SERVICIO SOCIAL: “PROYECTO DE ACTIVIDADES DE PRESTADORES DE SERVICIO SOCIAL DE LA DIVISION DE CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS Y DE LA SALUD, COMO APOYO AL DESARROLLO DE PROGRAMAS DE EVALUACION Y PROTECClON DE TORTUGAS MARINAS MEXICANAS’. /TITULO DEL TRABAJO DE SERVICIO SOCIAL: MORFOMETRIA DE NEONATOS EN LA TORTUGA “GOLFINA” (Lepidochelvs olivacea) PAEU LA DETEFWINACION DEL SEXY ASESOR INTERNO: Dr. Manuel Castillo Rivera ASESOR EXTERNO: Biol.. Lilia Durán Salguero LUGAR DE REALIZACION: CAMPAMENTOTORTUGUERO NUEVO VALLARTA; UBICADO EN NU-EVO VALLARTA, BAIHADE BANDERAS, NAYARIT. CLAVE DE REGISTTIIO: B.0.043.00 Casa abierta al tiempo UNIVERSIDADAUT~NOMA METROPOLITANA - 1- DlVlSlÓN DE CIENCIAS BIOLóGICAS Y DE LA SALUD Departamento de Biología México, D.F., a 10 de julio del 2002 Dr. Gerard0 Saucedo Castaceda Director de la Divisi6n de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud. Presente. Estimado Dr. Saucedo: Pormedio de la presente, me permitomanifestar que el alumnoLuis Enrique Torres Galeanacon matrícula 91334920, estudiante de la Licenciatura de Biología,concluyó satisfactoriamente el trabajo de Servicio Social, que lleva por título: MORFOMETRIA DE NEONATOS EN LA TORTUGA“GOLFINA” (Lepidochelys olivacea) PARALA DE‘TERMINCION DEL SEXO. Este Servicio Social se presentó con fecha de inicio del 10 de noviembre de 2000 y de terminación el 10 de julio de 2002, y fue desarrollado en una primera etapa en el campamento tortuguero Nuevo Vallada y en una segunda etapa en el laboratorio de Peces, del Departamento de Biología.
    [Show full text]
  • Berry, J.F., Seidel, M.E., and Iverson, J.B. 1997. a New Species of Mud Turtle
    \RTICLES ;) Ltntl Biultt,qt'. 1997. l(-l ):jl9--1-17 : i, rrtiirn Rcsc-nrch Foullcllti()lt A New Species of Mud Turtle (Genus Kirtosternon) from Jalisco and Colima, Mexico, with Notes on Its Natural History hvrBs F. Bnnnvr, Mrcu-rel E. Snmnr,2, ano Jorn B. IvnnsoN3 tDepurtment of Biologt', Elmhurst College, Elnilrrst. Illinois 60126 IJSA IFcrt: 630-617-3735; E-mail: [email protected]]; 2Department tf Biologic'ul Sciences, Mur.rlull Uuiversin', Huttfingtott, West Virginiu 2570t USA; 3Departnrent of Biologt', Earlham College, Ricltntontl, hrclianu 47374 USA Assrnlcr. - The Jalisco mudturtle,Kinosternon chimalhuaca,sp.nov. (Cryptodiral Kinosternidae), is described from the Rio Cihuatldn to the Rfo San Nicolas basins in Pacific coastal Jalisco and Colima, Mexico. It is a member of the K. scorpioides complex, and differs from other Kilrcstenton species in its reduced plastron, narrow bridge, axillary and inguinal scutes always in contact, and narrow first vertebral scute. It occurs in a variety ofaquatic habitats, and is an opportunistic feeder. Females reach sexual maturity at a carapace length of 97-107 mm (7-8 yrs), and males at about 100 mm (5-7 yrs). Females collected in early May and late June had maturing ovarian follicles but no oviductal eggs or fresh corpora lutea, suggesting that eggs are laid in July or August. Average clutch size is 3-4. Kinosternon chimalhuaca is most closely related to K. integrum and K, oaxacae based on both phylogenetic and phenetic analyses of morphological characters, and probably represents a derivative of an integrum-like ancestor that was isolated along the southwestern \Iexican coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Egg-Laying Between Long-Lived Reptiles
    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 15 (1): 96-100 ©NWJZ, Oradea, Romania, 2019 Article No.: e182501 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Putting eggs in one big basket: communal egg-laying between long-lived reptiles Armando H. ESCOBEDO-GALVÁN1,*, Ruth M. ELSEY2, Frank MC CANN3, Fabio G. CUPUL-MAGAÑA1 and Marco A. LÓPEZ-LUNA4 1. Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Av. Universidad 203, 48280 Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, México. 2. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 5476 Grand Chenier Highway, Grand Chenier, LA 70643, USA. 3. Condominio Girasol Departamento 12, Carretera a Mismaloya Km. 8.5, C.P. 48390 Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, México. 4. División Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Carr. Villahermosa-Cárdenas km.0.5 s/n, Entrq. Bosques de Saloya, 86039 Villahermosa, Tabasco, México *Corresponding author, A.H. Escobedo-Galván, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 09. November 2016 / Accepted: 31. January 2018 / Available online: 18. February 2018 / Printed: June 2019 Abstract. Understanding communal nesting has provided a deeper insight into reptile social behavior. Conspecific communal nesting has been reported frequently, while interspecific communal nesting has remained somewhat opaque. Here, we report communal egg-laying involving long-lived reptiles (American Crocodile and Ornate Slider Turtle). Our results from both field observations and literature reviewed indicate this is the first known case of communal nesting between these two species, and could suggest that crocodilians provide secondary nest attendance for nesting turtles. In addition, we present a brief review of commensal egg-laying between crocodilians and other reptiles. Key words: Crocodilian, Crocodylus acutus, nest attendance, nesting ecology, reptiles, testudines, Trachemys ornata.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History Notes
    108 NATURAL HISTORY NOTES NATURAL HISTORY NOTES The Natural History Notes section is analogous to Geographic Distribution. Preferred notes should 1) focus on observations in the field, with little human intrusion; 2) represent more than the isolated documentation of developmental aberrations; and 3) possess a natural history perspective. Individual notes should, with few exceptions, concern only one species, and authors are requested to choose a keyword or short phrase that best describes the nature of their note (e.g., Reproduction, Morphology, Habitat, etc.). Use of figures to illustrate any data is encouraged but should replace words rather than embellish them. The section’s intent is to convey information rather than demonstrate prose. Articles submitted to this section will be reviewed and edited prior to acceptance. Electronic submission of manuscripts is requested (as Microsoft Word or Rich Text format [rtf] files, as e-mail attachments). Figures can be submitted electronically as JPG, TIFF, or PDF files at a minimum resolution of 300 dpi. Please DO NOT send graphic files as imbedded figures within a text file. Additional information concerning preparation and submission of graphics files is available on the SSAR web site at: http://www.ssarherps.org/HRinfo.html. Manuscripts should be sent to the appropriate section editor: Sean P. Graham or Crystal Kelehear Graham (amphibians; [email protected]); James Harding (turtles; [email protected]); Ruchira Somaweera (crocodilians, lizards, and Sphenodon; [email protected]); and John D. Willson or Andrew M. Durso (snakes; [email protected]). A reference template for preparing Natural History Notes may be found here: ssarherps.org/ publications/herpetological-review/.
    [Show full text]
  • A Distinctive New Species of Mud Turtle from Western M´Exico
    Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2018, 17(1): 2–13 doi:10.2744/CCB-1292.1 Ó 2018 Chelonian Research Foundation A Distinctive New Species of Mud Turtle from Western Mexico´ 1, 2 2 MARCO A. LO´ PEZ-LUNA *,FABIO G. CUPUL-MAGAN˜ A ,ARMANDO H. ESCOBEDO-GALVA´ N , 3 3 1 ADRIANA J. GONZA´ LEZ-HERNA´ NDEZ ,ERIC CENTENERO-ALCALA´ ,JUDITH A. RANGEL-MENDOZA , 4 5 MARIANA M. RAMI´REZ-RAMI´REZ , AND ERASMO CAZARES-HERNA´ NDEZ 1Division´ Academica´ de Ciencias Biologicas,´ Universidad Juarez´ Autonoma´ de Tabasco. Carr. Villahermosa-Cardenas´ km 0.5 Villahermosa, Tabasco 86039, Mexico´ [[email protected]; [email protected]]; 2Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Av. Universidad 203, Puerto Vallarta 48280, Jalisco, Mexico´ [[email protected]; [email protected]]; 3Coleccion´ Nacional de Anfibios y Reptiles, Departamento de Zoologıa,´ Instituto de Biologıa,´ UNAM, Circuito Exterior. Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Ciudad de Mexico,´ Mexico´ [[email protected], [email protected]]; 4Division´ de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, Guanajuato 36050, Guanajuato, Mexico´ [[email protected]]; 5Instituto Tecnologico´ Superior de Zongolica, Coleccion´ Cientıfica´ del ITSZ. Km 4 Carretera a la Compan˜ıa´ S/N, Tepetitlanapa CP 95005, Zongolica, Veracruz, Mexico´ [[email protected]] *Corresponding author ABSTRACT. – The genus Kinosternon in Mexico is represented by 12 species of which only 2 inhabit the lowlands of the central Pacific region (Kinosternon chimalhuaca and Kinosternon integrum). Based on 15 standard morphological attributes and coloration patterns of 9 individuals, we describe a new microendemic mud turtle species from the central Pacific versant of Mexico. The suite of morphological traits exhibited by Kinosternon sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecoregions of North America
    Marine ecoregions o f n o rth a m e r i c a Marine ecoregions o f n o r t h a m e r i c a This report was written for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation as a collaborative effort with the following authors of the Marine Ecoregions Project Team. Its publication has been made possible thanks to the generous support of its copublishers. Numerous individuals have contributed to the completion of this work (please see the acknowledgments section for additional information). The information contained herein is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the CEC, or the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of America. Authors Tara A. C. Wilkinson, McGill University, Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) Ed Wiken, Wildlife Habitat Canada (WHC) Juan Bezaury Creel, The Nature Conservancy Mexico (TNC Mexico) Thomas F. Hourigan, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Tundi Agardy, Sound Seas Hans Herrmann, Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) Lisa Janishevski, Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) Chris Madden, Natureserve Lance Morgan, Marine Conservation Biology Institute (MCBI) Moreno Padilla, Canadian Council on Ecological Areas (CCEA) Co-Publishers Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Parks Canada Instituto Nacional de Ecología Reproduction of this publication, in whole or in part and in whatever form, may be done without seeking express authorization of the CEC, provided that the reproduced material is to be used for educational or nonprofit purposes and that it cites the source of the original.
    [Show full text]