The Suspicious Death of David Douglas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Suspicious Death of David Douglas PlantsmanThe The suspicious death of Davıd Douglas Of the misfortunes that befell 19th-century plant hunters, the death of David Douglas in a bull pit in Hawaii is perhaps the best known. The circumstances were questioned at the time and Gordon Mason now re-examines the evidence avid douglas (1799-1834) Magazine Botanical Curtis’s was the pre-eminent plant David Douglas died aged 35 Dcollector of his day. Employed by the Horticultural Society (later, RHS), he travelled widely across North America and particularly the Pacific Northwest. many would have taken the By 1834, though, Douglas had But Douglas died young, only 35, opportunity to rest before experienced significant setbacks. in circumstances which excited embarking on the next ocean stage. He had enjoyed a long and productive suspicion at the time, and still do. It was not his first time in Hawaii. stay in California but had also fallen This article, on the 180th annivers- In 1830 he made a short visit on his out with his employers. In ary of his death and the centenary way to the Columbia River in the September 1832 he resigned from of the RHS’s publication of his Pacific Northwest and California. the Horticultural Society and journal (Wilks & Hutchinson 1914), He records in a letter to Prof. henceforth worked freelance. In re-examines the circumstances of William Hooker in Glasgow that practice, slow communications his death. ‘The season was unkind, very rainy, would give him a period of grace and being just the conclusion of but his precarious financial position Route to Hawaii winter I could only obtain Ferns and must have preyed on his mind. Douglas died in Hawaii, on his way Mosses. I am mightily desirous to And then it all got much worse. back to Britain. It was a journey have material for a Flora of that A plan to return to London via which could take nine months, and group’ (Douglas 1830). Alaska, Siberia and Russia had to ➤ December 2014 235 The snow-covered peak of Mauna Kea rises over the Hawaiian landscape near Kaluakauka, where David Douglas died. be abandoned when the scale of the But there was no let-up in his much speculation. We know that task emerged. Retreating, Douglas’s activities. He knew this was his last he left Kohala on the north shore, canoe was wrecked on the Fraser opportunity to explore Hawaii and accompanied by ‘John’, a servant River in British Columbia, Canada. he wanted to make the most of it. of the Revd John Diell. John, the He was lucky to escape with his life Within the space of a month he servant, was to accompany him on but his collections and his journal climbed the three great volcanic his hike over Mauna Kea to Hilo were lost. Disheartened, Douglas mountains – Mauna Kea, Mauna Loa where he was expected on 12 July. returned to his base at Fort and Kilauea. These were tough John soon dropped out, lame, and Vancouver and began planning an expeditions in poor weather and Douglas continued alone. He was exploration of Hawaii. Douglas pushed himself hard, unlikely to be deterred by this, When Douglas arrived in Hawaii, carrying a heavy load, making a host accustomed as he was to hard just before Christmas 1833, he would of observations and continuing to travelling in wild country. have seemed prematurely aged. A collect plants along the way. It is Early in the morning of 12 July witness at Fort Vancouver described hardly surprising that he paid a price Douglas breakfasted at the hut of him as a ‘fair, florid Scotsman ... for it; he records violent headaches Ned Gurney, a cattle hunter. Wild about forty-eight years of age’; he on Mauna Kea, possibly altitude cattle were a nuisance on Hawaii was actually 31 (Lindsay & House sickness, and his sight deteriorated and were frequently trapped. This 2005). Blind in his right eye, with further to the point where on Mauna was usually by digging a pit and double vision and blurring in the left, Loa blood discharged from his camouflaging the top with foliage. he was also subject to debilitating inflamed eyes. It was then simply a matter of attacks of rheumatism. Having After a few restorative months waiting until a luckless animal severed his links with the Society, in Honolulu Douglas returned to fell into the pit, and shooting it. lost his collections and journal, been Hawai‘i, the Big Island, on 9 July Douglas sought advice on the thwarted in his ambitious plan, and 1834. He had just three days to live. way ahead and Gurney, by his own with declining health, he was now on account, warned Douglas of three borrowed time. It must have pained Death of Douglas pits about 4km away. him that the one thing he really The circumstances of his death were What happened next is described wanted to do, plant hunting, might never wholly clear. There are some in a letter by the Revds Goodrich soon be beyond his capabilities. facts, considerable suspicion and and Diell to the British Consul. 236 December 2014 PlantsmanThe Cattle still graze in the area where David Douglas travelled in 1834 All photographs by Gordon Mason Gordon by All photographs ‘About eleven o’clock, two natives Edward Gurney came in pursuit of him [Gurney], Edward (Ned) Gurney had a and said that the European was chequered background. Born around dead; that they had found him in 1800, at age 12 he was convicted of the pit where a bullock was … Ned, larceny at the Central Criminal on arriving at the pit found the Court, Middlesex, and sentenced to bullock standing upon poor Douglas’ seven years’ transportation. It is body. He shot the animal and unlikely the sentence was carried out succeeded in extricating the corpse’ because at age 19 he was back in the (Goodrich & Diell 1834). Douglas’s same court in 1819, again convicted dog and bundle were found a little of larceny and sentenced to seven way ahead up the road. The area years’ transportation. This sentence where Douglas died is now called was carried out; Gurney went as a Kaluakauka, which means ‘the convict on the vessel Canada, arriving doctor’s pit’. in Australia in September 1819. He So we know that Douglas worked as a servant in Australia and breakfasted with Gurney and, later was described as having a ‘florid that morning, Douglas’s body was complexion and flaxen [fair] hair, found nearby in a pit dug by Gurney. height 5ft 2ins’ (Convict Indents The obvious question, which soon 1788–1842), coincidentally having a occurred to people, is whether passing resemblance to Douglas, Douglas paused to examine the pit, who was almost the same age. fell and was trampled to death; or In October 1821 Gurney was whether he was murdered by Gurney reported to have ‘embarked on His and the body thrown into the pit to Majesty’s Cutter “Mermaid”, to disguise the deed. Both theories are assist in taking the schooner “Prince plausible. But who was Gurney, and Regent” to Owyhee [Hawaii] and to A memorial to David Douglas at is his account reliable? return again’ (Colonial Secretary’s Kaluakauka, the spot where he was killed Papers 1788–1825). However, ➤ 237 Horticultural History Gurney did not return from this an experienced backwoods traveller. which he took to be gold. None of trip to Hawaii as there are no Even with failing sight, it is unlikely any consequence was found after his subsequent records of him in that he would have failed to spot the death’ (Greenwell 1988). Hall had Australia. It seems likely that, conspicuous hole left by the bullock ‘no doubt in his own mind that finding Hawaii more congenial as it fell through the camouflage. So, Douglas was murdered by Ned than Australia, he jumped ship and he probably did not blunder into the [Gurney]’ (Teggert 1924). led a precarious life there before his pit, although it is possible that he Local missionaries had Douglas’s fateful encounter with Douglas. fell. Mrs Lyman, wife of a missionary, body eviscerated and packed with records that ‘This is the story of the salt, but it was not until 3 August Early suspicions man [Gurney] and perhaps it is true. 1834 that the body arrived in Suspicion of Gurney’s involvement It looks very probable, but I must Honolulu. A cursory examination in Douglas’s death arose almost confess I am a little suspicious’ of the body, which by then ‘smelled immediately. Goodrich & Diell (Martin 1979). very bad’ (Greenwell 1988), affirmed (1834) record Gurney’s explanation Others were suspicious too. the view that the wounds were that it appeared Douglas ‘had laid Charles Hall, a hunter, obtained the inflicted by the bullock. Douglas down his bundle and returned to the head of the bullock and noted that was buried behind Kawaiaha’o side of the pit where the bullock was ‘the horns were blunt, the animal Church in Honolulu. entrapped ... and that whilst looking being old’, and thought it impossible in, by making a false step, or some that Douglas’s wounds – ten gashes Later speculation other fatal accident, he fell into the on his head – could have been But suspicions remained. Gurney’s power of the infuriated animal, which inflicted by those horns (Greenwell reputation as an escaped convict speedily executed the work of death’. 1988). Davis, another hunter and at went before him. People were not This is superficially plausible; whose house Douglas stayed on his predisposed to believe him, and Douglas was insatiably curious and last night, affirmed that he saw Douglas’s gold was missing.
Recommended publications
  • Multnomah County Oregon
    MULTNOMAH COUNTY VOTERS’ PAMPHLET SPECIAL ELECTION – MAY 19, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER CANDIDATES CONTINUED CANDIDATES CONTINUED Voter Information Letter .................... M-2 Corbett School District Reynolds School District Position 2 ........................................ M-12 Position 1 ........................................ M-23 CANDIDATES Position 4 ........................................ M-12 Position 2 ........................................ M-24 Multnomah County Position 5 ........................................ M-13 Position 3 ........................................ M-25 Auditor .............................................. M-3 David Douglas School District Position 4 ........................................ M-25 City of Portland Position 1 ........................................ M-13 Riverdale School District Auditor .............................................. M-3 Position 3 ........................................ M-14 Position 1 ........................................ M-26 Multnomah Education Service District Position 6 ........................................ M-15 Position 3 ........................................ M-27 Position 1, Zone 5 ............................ M-4 Gresham-Barlow School District Position 5 ........................................ M-28 Position 2, At-Large .......................... M-4 Position 3, Zone 2 .......................... M-16 Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue District Position 3, Zone 2 ............................ M-6 Position 4, At-Large ........................ M-16 Position
    [Show full text]
  • Phlox Douglasii Hook.)
    PLANT OF THE YEAR Columbia Phlox (Phlox douglasii Hook.) James H. Locklear 7431 Briarhurst Circle, Lincoln, NE 68506 Phlox douglasii is a subshrub, branching from a woody base with herbaceous growth that dies back to the woody tissue at the end of each growing season. Flowers are borne at the top of the new growth. Photo by James Locklear. hlox douglasii is a name covering…a multitude of in 1820, and helped develop the Glasgow Botanic Garden botanical sins.” So wrote Ira Gabrielson in his 1932 where his path crossed that of a newly hired gardener (David classic, Western American Alpines, and so I discovered Douglas). Hooker was so impressed with the young Scot that for“P myself some 70 years later. With grants from the Native he recommended Douglas to the Royal Horticultural Society of Plant Society of Oregon and the North American Rock Garden London as a botanical collector (Hooker 1836). Douglas made Society, I waded into a study of the genus Phlox in general and his first collecting trip under the auspices of the Society in 1823, P. douglasii in particular. While matters of nomenclature can be traveling to the northeastern United States and Canada. In 1824 he tedious to work through, the species in question is a prominent set sail for the west coast of North America, arriving at the mouth wildflower in a number of plant communities in central and of the Columbia River in April of 1825. In this vast watershed, eastern Oregon, and a clear picture of its taxonomic identity is Douglas collected seeds and plant specimens for the Society, and important to understanding and describing the ecology of these in the process, discovered scores of new species that today bear communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Conifers Network
    GENETIC RESOURCES OF EXOTIC CONIFERS 31 The introduction, evaluation and use of non-native conifer species in Britain C.I.A. Samuel Tree Improvement Branch, Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, EH25 9SY, UK; Email: sam. orestry.gsi.gov.uk Introduction As part of an island grouping separated from mainland Europe, the United Kingdom (UK) has only three conifer species: Pinus sylvestris L., Taxus baccata L. and Juniperus communis L. These species arrived between the end of the last period of glaciation and the disappearance of the land-bridge with mainland Europe. Only Pinus sylvestris is of economic importance and it remains naturally distributed in small populations in the Scottish Highlands. The development of techniques of artificial regeneration of managed forests therefore brought an interest in non-native conifer species to exploit the wide range of site conditions present and exotic species now account for the major part of commercial coniferous forestry. The introduction of exotic conifers to Britain A summary of the introduction of exotic conifers is given in Table 1. In the table the origin, date of introduction, person who introduced the species, where known, and date when the species was first used as a commercial plantation species is given. More details are given by Macdonald et al. (1957). Among the European species, Picea abies (L.) Karst., which was present before the last glaciation, was probably introduced as early as the 16th century and was grown commercially from that time. Larix decidua P. Mill. was introduced in the late 17th century and a number of individual specimens dating from the early 18th century are still standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas-Fir What Science Can Tell Us – an Option for Europe
    Douglas-fir What Science Can Tell Us – an option for Europe Heinrich Spiecker, Marcus Lindner and Johanna Schuler (editors) What Science Can Tell Us 9 2019 What Science Can Tell Us Lauri Hetemäki, Editor-In-Chief Georg Winkel, Associate Editor Pekka Leskinen, Associate Editor Minna Korhonen, Managing Editor The editorial office can be contacted at [email protected] Layout: Grano Oy / Jouni Halonen Printing: Grano Oy Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the European Forest Institute. ISBN 978-952-5980-65-3 (printed) ISBN 978-952-5980-66-0 (pdf) Douglas-fir What Science Can Tell Us – an option for Europe Heinrich Spiecker, Marcus Lindner and Johanna Schuler (editors) Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union This publication is based upon work from COST Action FP1403 NNEXT, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). www.cost.eu Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................9 Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................11 Executive summary ...........................................................................................................13 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................17 Heinrich Spiecker and Johanna Schuler 2. Douglas-fir
    [Show full text]
  • A Remarkable Garden: David Douglas on the Shrub-Steppe of The
    A Remarkable Garden David Douglas and the Shrub-steppe of the Columbia Plateau JACK NISBET 210 Rock Garden Quarterly Vol. 70 (3) IN LATE JUNE of 1825, Scottish naturalist David Douglas took his first peek at the arid world of the Inland Northwest. Traveling upstream on the Columbia River with a canoe brigade of fur agents and their season’s trade goods, he ventured through the Columbia Gorge and stepped ashore for the long portage between the two great rapids known as the Dalles and Celilo Falls. Like most first-time visitors, he was shocked at the scale of the massive basalt flows that hung over the Gorge, then stunned by the desiccated landscape that stretched off endlessly to the east. “Nothing but extensive plains and barren hills, with the greater part of the herbage scorched and dead by the intense heat,” he wrote in his journal. Despite such heat, the energetic Douglas picked up some wonderful plants during his hike between the rapids, including a sunny yellow blazing star (Mentzelia laevicaulis) that provided him with ripe seeds to ship back to England. He dug up two different kinds of evening primrose in flower that he transplanted into his turnip patch at Fort Vancouver, hoping to gather seeds from them as well. And he discovered enough mature samples of Clarkia pulchella, already named after explorer William Clark but not yet cultivated outside its native ground, to turn it into one of the hottest garden offerings at London's Royal Horticultural Society’s 1828 summer plant sale. 211 Born in 1799 in the village of Scone, Perthshire, as the son of a stonemason, Douglas’s behavior at the local school gave little indication that he might be destined for anything greater than fishing, the care of abandoned birds, and rambling in the nearby hills.
    [Show full text]
  • Choice of Douglas Fir Seed Sources for Use in British Forests
    BULLETIN 1 s Fir Seed Origins for Use Forestry Commission Forestry Commission ARCHIVE BULLETIN 1 2 9 Choice of Douglas Fir Seed Sources for Use in British Forests A.M. Fletcher and C.J.A. Samuel Edinburgh: Forestry Commission Forestry Commission © Crown Copyright 2010 The text in this document (excluding departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. First published in 2010 by Forestry Commission, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 7AT ISBN 978-0-85538-809-6 Keywords: forestry, genetic variation, growth studies, phenology, prediction of seed origin suitability, provenance, Pseudotsuga menziesii, seed origin choice. Printed in the United Kingdom l-'CIUI I 29/FC(C;B>/CLA/TP-7.S0AUG 10 Enquiries relating to this publication should be addressed to: Forestry Commission 231 Corstorphine Road Edinburgh EH 12 7AT T: 0131 334 0303 E: [email protected] Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the valuable assistance of colleagues in all field stations of Forest Research (and its predecessors) over a period of almost 60 years who are too numerous to name individually. They have contributed not only by careful assessments, but also by their keen observations and suggestions. Richard Jinks and Bill Mason made helpful comments on the draft. Duncan Ray, Tom Connolly and Michal Petr assisted in the development of the model and production of the suitability maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet
    MULTNOMAH COUNTY VOTERS’ PAMPHLET SPECIAL ELECTION – May 21, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOTER INFORMATION David Douglas School District Riverdale School District Position 1……………………..... M-19 Position 5………..………... M-37 Voter Letter………………..…… M-2 Position 2 ……….………….….. M-20 For Your Information…..…..…. M-3 Rural Fire Protection Dist #10 Position 3………………………. M-20 Drop Site Hours & Locations… M-95 Position 3…………..……….... M-38 Position 5………………………. M-22 CANDIDATES Position 6………………………. M-22 Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue District Position 1…………..………..... M-39 Multnomah Education Service District Gresham-Barlow School District Position 3……………………… M-39 Position 1, Zone 5……………... M-5 Position 4, At Large..………….. M-23 Position 2, At Large…………... M-6 Position 6, At Large……….….. M-23 Corbett Water District Position 3, Zone 2……………... M-7 Position 2…………..………..... M-40 Position 4, Zone 4……………... M-8 Lake Oswego School District Position 4……………………… M-41 Position 2…………………...….. M-24 Mt Hood Community College Position 3………………………. M-25 Zone 1………………………….. M-9 MEASURES Position 4………………………. M-26 Zone 2……………...…………... M-10 City of Portland Zone 4………………………….. M-10 Parkrose School District Measure 26-150………….…... M-43 Position 1………….………...... M-27 Portland Community College Arguments in Favor……….. M-44 Position 2……………………… M-28 Zone 2………………………….. M-11 Measure 26-151………….…... M-49 Position 3……………………… M-29 Zone 4………………..………… M-12 Arguments in Favor……….. M-50 Position 4……………………… M-30 Arguments in Opposition..... M-61 Zone 5………………………….. M-13 Position 5……………………… M-30 Beaverton School District Metro Zone 7...…………………….….. M-14 Portland School District Measure 26-152………….…... M-82 Zone 4…………………….…... M-31 Arguments in Favor……….
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of David Douglas in Hawai'i
    JEAN GREENWELL Kaluakauka Revisited: The Death of David Douglas in Hawai'i In the forest under the shadow of Mauna Kea I have seen the bullock pit where the dead body of the distinguished Scottish naturalist, Douglas, was found under painfully suspicious circum- stances, that led many to believe he had been murdered for his money. A mystery hangs over the event which we are unable to explain. From Life in Hawaii (1882), by Titus Coan.1 HIGH ON THE SLOPES OF MAUNA KEA, in the ahupua'a (land section) of Laupahoehoe, lies Kaluakauka, or the Doctor's Pit. It was near here that David Douglas, famous Scottish botanist, met his death in 1834. A mystery surrounded his death, a mystery that has persisted for 152 years, prompting many who have written about Douglas to speculate whether he was murdered, or whether he fell by accident into one of the bullock traps, or pits, which surrounded the watering hole for animals. After giving a background of Douglas's explorations on the island of Hawai'i, this paper traces the various accounts of his death from original source material (and preserves original spelling) that include letters and journals of the missionaries and Jean Greenwell, researcher and Hawaiian scholar, is a volunteer for the Kona Historical Society and a long-time resident of West Hawai'i. The Hawaiian Journal of History, vol. 22 (1988) 147 I48 THE HAWAIIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY others. As time passed, accounts of Douglas's death became garbled and more bizarre. Only 35 years old when he died, Douglas had already contri- buted greatly to science, particularly botany.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    200 Book Reviews Seattle certainly has reason for increasing pride In the achievements of this dignified citizen, Edward S. Curtis. EDMOND S. MEANY. JOURNAL KEPT BY DAVID DOUGLAS DURING HIS TRAVELS IN NORTH AMERICA 1823-1827. Together with a particular description of thirty-three species of American oak and eighteen species of Pinus. With appendices containing a list of the plants introduced by Douglas and an account of his death in 1834. Published under the direction of the Royal Horticultural Society. (London: William Wesley and Son. 1914. Pp.364.) The extended title of this volume gives a very good idea as to just what it contains. Its contents naturally fall into three groups. The first group consists of Douglas's own accounts of his Journeys. These are mainly day-by-day accounts of his expeditions and give lists and brief descriptions of the plants collected, notes on their habits, ac­ counts of his adventures, and interesting comments on the regions through which he passed. The first one deals with his travels in Eastern North America in 1823. The second is a general sketch of his journey made to Northwest America (1824-1827) under the auspices of the Horticul­ tural Society of London. The third is the detailed journal of this expedi­ tion including the overland trip from Fort Vancouver to Hudson Bay and the return from there to England in a whaling vessel. The fourth com­ prises a partial account of his second expedition to Northwest America (1830-33). This was the expedition on which he continued his journey to the Sandwich (Hawaiian) Islands, where he met his death July 12, 1834.
    [Show full text]
  • MIMULUS CARDINALIS Douglas Ex Bentham (SCARLET MONKEY
    MIMULUS CARDINALIS Douglas ex Bentham (SCARLET MONKEY FLOWER), AND WHERE IN THE CALIFORNIA COAST RANGES DID DAVID DOUGLAS FIND THE CLOSELY RELATED MIMULUS LEWISII Pursh? By David Rogers Due to its salient corollas, Mimulus cardinalis is one of the most conspicuous (and thus most well known) of the native wildflowers that occur in wet or moist habitats in western North America. Although this species is most often encountered along perennial streams, it can also be found at springs, seeps, and in other kinds of wet or perpetually moist habitats, such as in hanging gardens on seepy cliffs, or at the bases of cliffs where water from a overhanging seep drips. The first scientific specimens of Mimulus cardin- alis, along with the seeds by which it was intro- duced into European gardens, were collected by David Douglas, the famous botanical explorer of western North America, during his extended stay in California in the early 1830s. In a letter to his men- tor, Sir William Jackson Hooker, datelined “Monte- rey, Upper California, Nov. 23rd, 1831,” Douglas noted that “To Mimulus I have added several, among them the magnificent M. cardinalis.”1 Douglas was then on his second expedition to western North America on behalf of the Horticul- tural Society of London, to which he sent his col- lections of plant specimens and seeds; Douglas also made duplicate collections, which he sent to Hooker in Scotland. On the receiving end in London there were two gentlemen who, like Sir William Jackson Hooker, rank amongst the most famous botanists of th the 19 century: George Bentham, the secretary of David Douglas (1799-1834), as portrayed in volume two of The the Horticultural Society, and John Lindley, the Companion to the Botanical Magazine (1836).
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Plant Explorer David Douglas (1799 – 1834) Contributed by Vivien Clarke, Volunteer Guide
    March Self-guided tour 2017 The Legacy of Plant Explorer David Douglas (1799 – 1834) Contributed by Vivien Clarke, Volunteer Guide Please follow the black and white number and arrow signs for this tour. Famous plant explorer David Douglas was born and raised by the banks of the River Tay in Scotland. He began his career as an apprentice gardener on a local laird's estate before leaving to study at the Glasgow University Botanical Gardens, where he became a student and friend of English botanist Sir William Hooker. Hooker recommended Douglas to the Royal Horticultural Society as a plant collector, and so it began that David Douglas became one of the earliest and most influential plant hunters. Douglas explored regions of North America for plants that would be well-suited to Britain’s climate. He collected seeds from more than 880 species, 200 of which were original introductions and about 130 of which proved hardy and are still found in British gardens today. Douglas packed his plant specimens carefully and sent them by a variety of routes to ensure they reached London safely. Tenacious despite the incredible travel hardships he suffered, David Douglas undertook two arduous sea voyages to the Pacific Northwest, canoed and hiked from the Pacific to Hudson Bay, climbed the Rockies and the explored the volcanoes of Hawaii. He connected with the aboriginal peoples of the places he visited, recording their way of life before European contact. Those who spent a winter with Douglas at Fort Vancouver in Washington State described him with affection but as a “tad stubborn”.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii) Nebraska Forest Service
    Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) Nebraska Forest Service Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) is one of the most important timber trees in the United States. It is harvested for a wide variety of uses and is the backbone of the western timber industry. The wood has great strength and yet it is not a very heavy. That has made it most valuable as a raw material for all types of construction. In addition to being an important timber tree, Douglas fir is also a very popular tree for landscape planting and even for windbreaks. The tree is named for David Douglas, a 19th century Scottish botanist and one of the “fathers” of British forestry. In 1939 it was designated the state tree of Oregon. The scientific name (Pseudotsuga menziesii) translates as “false hemlock” (Pseudotsuga) and after Archibald Menzies, an 18th century botanist who collected plants in western North America. Douglas fir is not a “true” fir like white fir or balsam fir. It is in fact a species unto itself and is totally unique. In its natural range, Douglas fir can attain heights of over 300 feet and diameters of 15 feet or more. The national champion is 42 feet in circumference and 281 feet tall located in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Douglas fir is use frequently as a Christmas tree because of its lovely color and shape. It is native from Central British Columbia south along the Pacific coast to central California, central Mexico and also the Rocky Mountains to Arizona and Texas. It can be grown in most parts of Nebraska and Iowa.
    [Show full text]