DOCSLIB.ORG

Summer 2018 Why Local Enterprise Partnerships Must Do More for Rural

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summer 2018 Why Local Enterprise Partnerships Must Do More for Rural FIELD WORK Summer 2018 Rural-proofing Local Enterprise Partnerships p.1 Tackling the plastic waste problem p.5 Supporting parish campaigns p.10 Improving wildlife in National Parks p.12 Giving communities a say on fracking p.14 The case for greener farming p.16 Shutterstock Why Local Enterprise Partnerships must do more for rural England survey published by CPRE in June shows that Local transport. This lack of housing and infrastructure for those who Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) are perceived, by almost work for and support rural businesses could hinder the growth Atwo-thirds (60%) of respondents, as having a negative of those economies. impact on issues affecting the countryside. Rural areas falling behind Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) are business-led partnerships between the private and public sector, designed to The absence of investment in rural economies, which provide support and promote growth in economic areas defined by local 13% of England’s employment, exacerbates issues facing much business interests and local government, and agreed with central of the country, such as the need for more regeneration, housing, Government. To inform our Next steps for LEPs report, CPRE asked sustainable transport, broadband connectivity and support its local groups (a total of 44 survey responses were received from for new entrants into farming. It also contributes to a growing 34 CPRE branches, covering 32 out of the 38 LEPs) how these inequality, which leaves many rural areas behind economically business-led partnerships were affecting rural communities and and socially. Furthermore, only 21% of LEP websites that were the countryside. While designed to support and promote growth surveyed appear to clearly provide evidence of their economic in their areas, the research found that LEPs may be entrenching activity and less than one quarter of LEPs hold public meetings. inequalities within and between English regions rather than CPRE believes that LEPs should be expected to produce and removing them, with investment three times more likely in an publish Rural Plans, particularly to help support and encourage already economically buoyant area than one in social need. smaller farms and land-based enterprises. The results demonstrate that many LEPs are failing rural Paul Miner, Head of Strategic Plans and Devolution at the communities by ignoring their economic potential, as well Campaign to Protect Rural England, said: ‘Local enterprise as social and environmental needs. Despite having a key partnerships are supposed to be more sensitive to the needs of responsibility in administering the Rural Development rural communities, businesses and economies than the regional Programme for England, only 21% of LEPs featured in the development agencies they replaced. But our local groups are survey were perceived as aiding the development of affordable telling us that too often LEPs are remote, back developments rural housing and just 14% work to address or improve rural that will happen anyway, and are not doing enough to support Continued on p.2 CONTACTS COVER STORY FIELDWORK Why Local Enterprise “LEP's should provide for Volume 15, Issue 2 Partnerships must do meaningful representation Editor: Oliver Hilliam more for rural England of the environmental sector ([email protected] ) Continued from p.1 on their boards” Contributors: Lizzie Bannister, Faye Morgan, Paul Miner, CPRE Lancashire, rural regeneration. Rural businesses, including Next steps for LEPs small farms, account for almost a quarter of CPRE Surrey, Christine Drury, all registered businesses in England – their CPRE are making 12 policy recommendations, Matt Thomson, Daniel Carey- importance to our economy cannot be ignored both for government and LEPs, based on the Dawes, Graeme Willis, Maddy any more.’ survey results. We believes that though taking sure Haughton-Boakes, Wildlife measures, rural areas will be better supported, and and Countryside Link. A lack of accountability their economic potential utilised. Firstly, we’d like LEPs matter because they are gaining to see a requirement for all LEPs covering rural Fieldwork is the newsletter of increasing responsibilities for public spending areas to produce and publish a Rural Inclusion the Campaign to Protect Rural on regional development across England. or Productivity Plan, setting out how agricultural England, published in April, Over the period from 2014 to 2020 they have and rural development fund money is spent, and how the LEP is contributing to the roll out of rural August and November. been given, in total across the 38 LEPs, £6.5 billion of European funding and £7.2 billion broadband connectivity and improved speeds. We also believe LEPs should provide for meaningful CPRE works locally and nationally across three successive rounds of Growth Deals concluded with the UK Government. representation of the non-statutory environmental to stand up for the countryside: The European element of the funding partly sector in their programmes and on their boards, to protect it from the threats it covers rural development, and LEPs are so that landscape and biodiversity concerns are faces, and to shape its future for also encouraged to work closely with Local considered in decision-making. the better. Nature Partnerships (LNPs) on delivering We called for LEPs to prioritise the most environmental improvement. sustainable development that will benefit most ISSN 1744-8905 (Print) But great concerns have been raised people, such as regenerating communities with ISSN 1744-8913 (Online) about the failure of LEPs to take rural and large areas of brownfield land and empty homes countryside issues into account, as well and buildings before investing in greenfield as their governance, transparency, and development. We argued that more investment accountability. All LEP boards are chaired by in sustainable public transport (including bus, a senior business figure and at least half (and cycle and pedestrian links to railway stations) over often more) of the boards consist of people road building projects could revitalise transport from the business sector, with the balance links in rural areas. Finally, to ensure continued coming from local government and few if progress, we suggested that performance on the any members from environmental groups or key environmental and social indicators for the other NGOs. This was borne out by findings LEP area are measured, and published, based that suggested LEPs take little interest in standardised output metrics. sustainable transport options, preferring The report prompted an encouraging reaction instead to promote damaging and expensive from the Chairman of the Local Enterprise road building schemes. Partnership for York, North Yorkshire and the East Riding, David Kerfoot, who spoke of its potential “Great concerns have to help farmers and rural communities boost their long term sustainability: ‘Whilst many LEPs may 5–11 Lavington Street been raised about LEPs have a focus on cities, as the largest rural LEP, our London, SE1 0NZ governance, transparency, focus is firmly on our agenda to build recognition Tel: 020 7981 2800 of the area as a rural powerhouse.’ The Sheffield Fax: 020 7981 2899 and accountability” City Region also responded by highlighting their [email protected] support to the ‘hundreds of exciting small rural On rural and countryside policy issues, businesses in this region [with] lots of talent and www.cpre.org.uk there is a clear feeling that LEPs are having fresh ideas.’ a negative impact (60% of responses). Confirming that CPRE’s report had raised an A company limited by guarantee, Many LEPs appear to lack a rural reach and important issue, we welcomed the LEP Network’s registered in England, number need to do more to address this deficiency. 4302973. Registered charity number Coverage of environmental and social issues statement that ‘LEPs are acutely aware of how 1089685. is inconsistent: we are aware of only 50% vital it is that all areas benefit from economic working with their equivalent LNP; only 21% growth, and have initiated a raft of programmes All the articles and features within on rural affordable housing; and just 14% to help boost rural economies.’ We hope that all this publication are copyright of the rural LEPs will build on such statements, and other CPRE and may not be reprinted or on rural transport. A potential example of good practice includes the work of LEPs in recent signs of progress, in order to both create distributed without the prior written thriving rural economies and help safeguard consent of the publishers. the South West to set up a Rural Productivity Commission, which reported in 2017. The our countryside. Fundamentally, we need LEPs Commission has come up with a number to become more sensitive to the needs of rural of exciting ideas for investing in affordable communities, businesses and economies than the housing, small farmers and natural and regional development agencies they replaced. cultural heritage and we look forward to the Find out more: Read CPRE’s full survey and report sponsoring LEPs taking these up. at www.cpre.org.uk/resources 2 Fieldwork Summer 2018 SUCCESSES IN THIS ISSUE featured BREAKthrough contents How our work is making a difference Next steps for LEPs p.1 Opposing the A victory for local democracy Arundel bypass p.4 Our response to the CPRE Sussex were celebrating in the other’, while the information a vast 95m chimney which, said food and farming June after plans for a damaging and assessment on pollution CPRE Sussex Director, Kia Trainor, consultation p.5 incinerator development in provided by the applicant was ‘would blight the natural beauty Horsham were rejected. ‘found wanting’. Local West Sussex of vast areas of rural landscape Sustainable rural West Sussex County Council County Councillor Peter Catchpole within Sussex and Surrey.’ motoring p.6 planning committee decided, described the proposal as a No Incinerator 4 Horsham said: in an 8 to 4 vote, to dismiss ‘visually colossal ugly incinerator’, ‘Democracy is alive and kicking.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 28 September
    Rudgwick Parish Council Weekly Clerk’s Update: 28 September – 4 October 2020 (Agenda October 2020) To: Parish Councillors c.c: Christian Mitchell (West Sussex County Councillor) Richard Landeryou (Horsham District Councillor) From: Jonna Foote ____________________________________________________________________________ The weekly update provides information regarding: • Announcements/delegated decisions by the Clerk • Planning information • Correspondence/communications from parishioners • Correspondence/communications from outside organisations List of organisations that communicate with the Council on a regular basis. o AIRS (Action in Rural Sussex) o APCAG (Association of Parish Councils Aviation Group) o CAGNE (Communities Against Gatwick Noise Emission) o CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) o HALC (Horsham Association of Local Councils) o HDC (Horsham District Council) o NALC (National Association of Local Councils) o SSALC (Surrey and Sussex Association of Local Councils) o WSCC (West Sussex District Council) ____________________________________________________________________________ Clerk’s announcements/delegated decisions: GENERAL REMINDER: Please note that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Parish Office staff are working their regular hours but not always in the office. If you wish to speak face to face to a member of staff, please contact the Clerk on 07927 702321 during working hours (Monday – Wednesday 8.30 – 16.00). • Staff and users of Rudgwick parish council facilities have been sent the following email: There is a QR Code on A4 posters on the main entrance doors and in Rudgwick Hall beside both fire exits to sides of buildings which you may be asked to use as an alternative entrance when office is in use. If you have downloaded the Government Track and Trace app to your mobile device you can check in to the village hall upon arrival by scanning the code on your mobile device.
    [Show full text]
  • North Horsham Parish
    North Horsham Parish HDC SHELAA Housing Land Report by Parish, December 2018 North Horsham Parish The following sites have been considered as part of the December 2018 SHELAA Housing Land Assessment for the Parish. A map depicting the entire site area and summary of each site assessment is included on the following pages. Please note that the classification of a site is based on the classification of the developable area within that site, therefore if part of a site is considered ‘developable’ 6‐10 years, the whole site would be coloured yellow, however in reality only part of that site may be considered suitable for development. The outcome of the assessment for North Horsham Parish is summarised as follows: SHELAA Site Name Site Address Outcome of Total Units Reference assessment Green (1-11 Years SA139 9-13 Crawley Road Horsham 15 Deliverable) Green (1-11 Years Deliverable) and Land North of Horsham, Holbrook Park and Chennells Brook- SA296 Yellow (6-10 Years 2750 Strategic Site Strategic Site and 11+ Years Developable) Green (1-5 Years SA533 The Fountain Inn 81 Rusper Road, Horsham 5 Deliverable) The Pavilion Graylands Green (1-5 Years SA582 Langhurstwood Road 7 Estate Deliverable) Green (1-5 Years SA605 Scout HQ site, Peary Close Peary Close, Horsham 8 Deliverable) Green (1-5 Years SA638 Land at The Holbrook Club Jackdaw Lane, Horsham 58 Deliverable) Novartis Pharmaceuticals Wimblehurst Green (1-5 Years SA688 28 Site (North) Road/Parsonage Road, Horsham Deliverable) Roffey Sports and Social Yellow (6-10 Years SA145 Spooners Road,
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter September 2013 Continued from the Front Page Runway
    64 Horsham Society Newsletter September 2013 continued from the front page runway. There was no prior consultation and virtually no analysis of the merits of the HORSHAM case. In essence it was simply asserted that a second runway at Gatwick was necessary Newsletter to maintain and increase economic growth and that the county would suffer if future airport expansion was to go elsewhere. The reason for haste was that it would be helpful SOCIETY for Gatwick to be able to tell the Davies Commission that it had WSCC support and by September 2013 being helpful now it would give the council a seat at the table in working out the details later. To us this seems simply naïve. Once again, despite a predominant north/south divide in the debate, Horsham’s position was compromised by speeches in support of the motion from the town’s three Liberal Drill Hall Democrat councillors and silence from the town’s Tories. It was left to Labour members New threats to our town from Crawley and a few brave Tories to make but fail to win the case that the motion was lthough long expected, the District Council’s draft District Planning e reported last time that we had premature and unnecessary, and the council should wait to see Gatwick’s proposals Framework Preferred Strategy has revealed its short sighted political applied to have the Drill Hall before expressing a view. A W expediency and lack of proper process. Inside we look in more detail at the registered as a Community Asset. alternatives that seem to have been ignored with little or no explanation but the The most depressing aspect of all this is that if Gatwick is successful in winning an early headline is simple.
    [Show full text]
  • 651 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    651 bus time schedule & line map 651 North Heath View In Website Mode The 651 bus line (North Heath) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) North Heath: 3:06 PM (2) Oakhill: 7:15 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 651 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 651 bus arriving. Direction: North Heath 651 bus Time Schedule 27 stops North Heath Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:06 PM The Forest School, Oakhill 67 Comptons Lane, Horsham Tuesday 3:06 PM Millais School, Oakhill Wednesday 3:06 PM 105 Depot Road, Horsham Thursday 3:06 PM Stirling Way, Oakhill Friday 3:06 PM 46 Depot Road, Horsham Saturday Not Operational Plovers Road, Oakhill 6 Redwing Close, Horsham Manor Fields, Roffey Leechpool Woods, England 651 bus Info Direction: North Heath Forest Close, Roffey Stops: 27 Forest Mews, North Horsham Civil Parish Trip Duration: 24 min Line Summary: The Forest School, Oakhill, Millais Birches Road, Roffey School, Oakhill, Stirling Way, Oakhill, Plovers Road, Church Road, North Horsham Civil Parish Oakhill, Manor Fields, Roffey, Forest Close, Roffey, Birches Road, Roffey, Shepherds Way, Roffey, Shepherds Way, Roffey Greenƒelds Way, Roffey, Hawkesbourne Road, Roffey, Luxford Close, Littlehaven, Littlehaven Greenƒelds Way, Roffey Station, Littlehaven, Brook Road, Littlehaven, Uppark Southdown Close, North Horsham Civil Parish Gardens, North Heath, Bartholomew Way, North Heath, Bartholomew Way Shops, North Heath, Hawkesbourne Road, Roffey Standen Place, North Heath, Hatchlands,
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Horsham District Council
    Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Horsham District Council Electoral review June 2017 Translations and other formats To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2017 Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 Who we are and what we do .................................................................................. 1 Electoral review ...................................................................................................... 1 Why Horsham? ....................................................................................................... 1 Our proposals for Horsham .................................................................................... 1 What is the Local Government Boundary Commission for England? ......................... 2 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 What is an electoral review? ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CSR Forest Road
    27/02/2018 Street History Report Page 1 of 5 Effective: 17/02/2016 to 17/02/2018 Display Action Officer: Yes Street: FOREST ROAD (17600308) Street: FOREST ROAD (17600308) Locality: HORSHAM, WEST SUSSEX Area: NORTH HORSHAM Customer Services Enquiry No.: Logged by: Contact Centre on: 03/01/2018 16:39 Officer: Horsham District Service: Carriageway Subject: Rubbish and spillages Classification: Request for service Desc.: Sx Police have phoned to report broken glass all over the road. #How large? : Outside 2 houses #Issue Type : Other #Extent of obstruction : Road users, cyclist and dog walkers #Is it causing an obstruction? : Yes Location: Outside 68-70 Contact: CONTACT CENTRE - SUSSEX POLICE 2018 Plot Number: 9,999.00 Feature Id - Location: Feature Type: Whole Street Feature Enquiry No.: Logged by: Contact Centre on: 15/11/2017 09:43 Officer: Thomas King (HS-Horsham) Service: Information request Subject: Callback requested Classification: Request for information Desc.: Relates to below case. Customer is grateful we have cut back overgrown veg, but he just wanted to check if the small wall there belongs to us as this needs repairing he thinks. #Case Reference : Location: Junction of Crawley Road Contact: Enquiry No.: Logged by: Love Clean Streets on: 22/08/2017 08:14 Officer: Thomas King (HS-Horsham) Service: Love West Sussex Subject: Road Condition Classification: Request for service Enquiry Ref: Desc.: This road breakup is part of yellow speed reduction humps. It has been reported before and repaired before. The trouble is the repair was of poor quality. Extra information supplied by the user Which of the following best describes the location? : Centre of Road The problem is best described as..
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH HORSHAM PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT and TRANSPORT COMMITTEE THURSDAY 30TH JULY 2020 at 7.30Pm at ROFFEY MILLENNIUM HALL
    NORTH HORSHAM PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE THURSDAY 30TH JULY 2020 AT 7.30pm AT ROFFEY MILLENNIUM HALL CLERK’S REPORT TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE AGENDA Numbers relate to those on the agenda. 3. Public Forum The Public Forum will last for a period of up to 15 minutes during which members of the public may put questions to the Council or draw attention to relevant matters relating to the business on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Business of the meeting will start immediately following the public forum or at 7.45pm whichever is the earlier. 5. Declaration of Interests Members are advised to consider the agenda for the meeting and determine in advance if they may have a Personal, Prejudicial or a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any of the agenda items. If a Member decides they do have a declarable interest, they are reminded that the interest and the nature of the interest must be declared at the commencement of the consideration of the agenda item; or when the interest becomes apparent to them. Details of the interest will be included in the Minutes. Where a Member has a Prejudicial Interest (which is not a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest), Members are reminded that they must now withdraw from the meeting chamber after making representations or asking questions. If the interest is a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest, Members are reminded that they must take no part in the discussions of the item at all; or participate in any voting; and must withdraw from the meeting chamber; unless they have received a dispensation.
    [Show full text]
  • North Horsham Parish Council
    North Horsham Parish Council Roffey Millennium Hall, Tel: 01403 750786 (Office & Hall Crawley Road, Horsham, Bookings) Roffey Millennium Hall, North West Sussex, RH12 4DT Heath Hall, Holbrook Tythe Barn Website: www.northhorsham-pc.gov.uk Email: [email protected] _________________________________________________________________________________ Horsham Blueprint By e-mail:- [email protected] 23rd March 2020 Dear Chairman, Please find below North Horsham Parish Council’s response to the consultation on the draft Horsham Blueprint Business Neighbourhood Plan (HBBNP). North Horsham Parish lies adjacent to the north of the area covered by the draft HBBNP, that comprises the three neighbourhood areas of Denne, Forest and Trafalgar. All the areas and issues covered by this document have a significant impact on the residents of North Horsham parish, as the large majority of this parish lies no more than a few miles from Horsham town centre. North Horsham Parish Council has considered many aspects of the HBBNP and appreciate the scope, depth and attention to detail contained within it. It is recognised that this was produced at a time when Horsham District Council (HDC) was formulating its own Local Plan and the requirement for the HBBNP to work within and support the parameters of the National Planning Policy Framework and the existing and proposed Horsham District Planning Framework. The Parish Council notes the scope and variety of community engagement and consultation along with the discussions HDC during the forming of this plan. Policy 5. Housing: North Horsham Parish Council strongly supports the vision and objectives set out on pages 11 and 12. In particular the Statements 5.6 and 5.7 Housing Cooperatives and Aim 1: in support, on page 1, as this is an area that is relevant and important to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment
    2019 NOVEMBER Northern West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report Iceni Projects Limited on behalf of Crawley Borough Council and HORSHAM HORSHAM DISTRICT ON BEHALF OF CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL AND COUNCIL Horsham District Council ICENI PROJECTS LIMITED November 2019 Iceni Projects London: Da Vinci House, 44 Saffron Hill, London, EC1N 8FH Glasgow: 177 West George Street, Glasgow, G2 2LB Manchester: 68 Quay Street, Manchester, M3 3EJ Northern West Sussex West Northern t: 020 3640 8508 | w: iceniprojects.com | e: [email protected] linkedin: linkedin.com/company/iceni-projects | twitter: @iceniprojects 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 9 HOUSING MARKET GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS ................... 13 HOUSING OFFER AND SUPPLY TRENDS ............................................................. 27 LOCAL HOUSING NEED .......................................................................................... 37 HOUSING MARKET DYNAMICS ............................................................................. 60 AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEED ............................................................................. 76 HOUSING NEEDS OF YOUNGER PEOPLE ........................................................... 92 NEEDS OF FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development - Land North of Horsham Part I
    Agenda Item No. 9 North Horsham County Local Committee Ref: N/A Monday 6 July 2015 Key Decision: N/A Proposed Development - Land North of Horsham Part I Information Report by Executive Director of Electoral Residents Services and Director of Strategic Divisions: Planning and Place Roffey and Holbrook Executive Summary This report outlines the nature and highway proposals associated with the development known as the Land North of Horsham. The development will be the subject of a planning application expected to be submitted during the summer 2015. Recommendations (1) That the Committee should note that any decision on the planning application is a matter for Horsham District Council. (2) That the Committee’s views are invited in respects of the potential highway works and traffic management proposals that may be expected as part of the development proposal. 1. Background to the Proposals 1.1. The development known as the Land North of Horsham has been identified within the draft Horsham District Council Local Plan, that is, the ‘Horsham District Planning Framework’. This will provide a planning framework that will contain the planning policies for the Horsham District and will be used to help decide what development can take place and where. This includes identifying key sites to enable Horsham District Council to provide further housing to accommodate the forecast growth in population. One such site is that on Land north of Horsham. 1.2. The Local Plan seeks to allocate the area that comprises north of the A264 between Langhurstwood Road
    [Show full text]
  • Erica Way, Horsham
    TRAFFIC REGULATION ORDER (TRO) CONSULTATION HON2003RC – Erica Way, Horsham 29/10/20 – 26/11/20 Contents Notice Page 2 Statement of Reasons Page 3 Draft Order Page 4 Plan “c_horshamtq1732sen” - existing restrictions Page 5 Plan “c_horshamtq1732sen” - proposals Page 6 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL ((HORSHAM DISTRICT) (PARKING PLACES AND TRAFFIC REGULATION) (CONSOLIDATION NO. 2) ORDER 2006) (ERICA WAY AMENDMENT) ORDER 202* NOTICE is hereby given that West Sussex County Council propose to make permanent Orders under the provisions of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, the effect of which will be to introduce lengths of prohibition of waiting at all times (double yellow lines) in and around the junction of Erica Way with Heath Way and the cul-de-sac junctions on Erica Way. The consultations for these proposals will start on 29 October 2020 and, AT THAT TIME, full details of the proposals in this Notice can be viewed on our website www.westsussex.gov.uk/tro. The website includes a response form for comments or objections. Due to current social distancing requirements, paper copies of documents will not be available to view in council offices or libraries. People without access to a computer who wish to view details of the scheme should telephone the West Sussex County Council Contact Centre on 01243 642105 to receive the documents by post. Any objections or comments about these proposals must be received by 26 November 2020. These may be sent via the response form on the website, in writing to: TRO Team, West Sussex County Council, The Grange, Tower Street, Chichester, PO19 1RH; or by e-mail to: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 4 07/02/2020 Street History Report
    07/02/2020 Street History Report Page 1 of 4 Effective: 01/11/2019 to 30/11/2019 Display Action Officer: Yes Street: NORTH STREET (17600218) Street: NORTH STREET (17600218) Locality: HORSHAM, WEST SUSSEX Area: HORSHAM Customer Services Enquiry No.: Logged by: Love Clean Streets on: 30/11/2019 18:56 Officer: Horsham Pothole Stack Service: `Love West Sussex Subject: Pothole Classification: Request for service Enquiry Ref: Desc.: Very large pothole that I consider to be very dangerous to cyclists and could cause considerable damage to vehicles Extra information supplied by the user The width of the pothole is best described as being similar to... : Please select The depth of the pothole is similar to... : A can of beans or larger (more than 10cm/4") Which of the following best describes the location? : Centre of road Location: 57 North St, Horsham RH12 1RB, UK Contact: Enquiry No.: Logged by: Love Clean Streets on: 30/11/2019 18:34 Officer: Horsham Pothole Stack Service: `Love West Sussex Subject: Pothole Classification: Request for service Enquiry Ref: Desc.: Pothole again. Incredibly difficult to avoid without going into oncoming traffic Extra information supplied by the user The width of the pothole is best described as being similar to... : A car tyre (30-60cm/12-24") The depth of the pothole is similar to... : A can of beans or larger (more than 10cm/4") Which of the following best describes the location? : Driving lane Location: 57 North St, Horsham RH12 1RB, UK Contact: Enquiry No.: Logged by: Firmstep Prod on: 30/11/2019 15:06 Officer: Claims Printing Service: Complaints Subject: Property damage claim Classification: Desc.: Vehicle or motorcycle damage: A very large and deep pothole resulted in a right hand tyre puncture Location: 57 North Street, Horsham, United Kingdom, RH12 1RB: Just after the roundabout Contact: driving up the hill of the B2195, almost opposite the station.
    [Show full text]