DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment 6: Appendix 1 Auckland Unitary Plan Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment 6: Appendix 1 Auckland Unitary Plan Assessment Attachment 6 - Plan Change: Patumahoe South Strategic Analysis - Appendix 1 of the Auckland Unitary Plan: Operative in Part Appendix 1 specifies the contend and detail of a structure planning process, to provide the foundation for plan change to rezone land and to guide its future development. The level of analysis is required to be appropriate to the type and scale of development in the context of the objectives and policies in the regional policy statement: B2 Urban growth. The appendix sets out the following: (1) An explanation of the structure planning in the context of the plan change process; (2) A summary of the matters that the structure plan must identify, investigate and address; and (3) A list of specialist documents typically required to support the structure plan as part of the plan change process. 1.3 External documents to be taken into account Document: Summary: Comments: (1) Auckland Plan including The Auckland Plan 2050 (June 2018) The Auckland Plan 2050 proposes a balanced strategic the directions of the The Homes and Places section of The Auckland Plan 2050 (June 2018), contains four strategic directions: approach to accommodating business and housing growth in Auckland Plan 1: Develop a quality compact urban form to accommodate Auckland’s growth the Region. Clear principles are established around adopting a 2: Accelerate the construction of homes that meet Aucklander’s changing needs and preferences “multi-modal” model adopting a “quality compact” approach to 3: Shift to a housing system that ensures secure and affordable homes for all accommodating growth. 4: Provide sufficient public places and spaces that are inclusive, accessible and contribute to urban living The Development Strategy focusses on higher order growth To achieve those strategic directions Auckland is moving towards a multi-nodal model that accommodates growth within urban priorities, and makes limited reference to the growth of smaller nodes included Pukekohe and Warkworth. The principle is for nodes to service their surrounding rural communities, be connected to towns and villages. It does however acknowledge that “some Urban Auckland through state highways/rail and support business and residential growth. growth is anticipated” in towns and villages, such as Patumahoe. The quality compact approach means that: • most development occurs in areas that are easily accessible by public transport, walking and cycling The growth of rural towns and villages should be consistent • most development is within reasonable walking distance of services and facilities including centres, community facilities, with the multi-modal strategic direction and principles of employment opportunities and open space quality compact development. • future development maximises efficient use of land • delivery of necessary infrastructure is coordinated to support growth in the right place at the right time. In respect of the plan change for Patumahoe, it is noted that: ➢ The plan change promotes the development of a quality The Plan record Auckland Council’s commitment to provide on-going development capacity for housing and business growth, in compact urban form for the settlement that is easily accordance with the NPS: Urban Development Capacity. To achieve that outcome the 30 year target for Auckland (to 2048) is accessible from the town centre, community and 408,300 dwellings to provide sufficient feasible development, and to overcome the 35,000 dwelling shortfall recorded in 2016 and a recreational facilities, school and sports facilities. In this year 11-30 shortfall of 82,000 dwelling (noted on page 207 of the plan). respect the plan change represents a logical ‘rounding out’ of the existing village’s urban form around the main street In respect of rural areas the – the Development Strategy (page 208 of the Plan) explains that growth is anticipated in smaller towns and community facilities, and land that is already and villages in addition to the rural nodes of Pukekohe and Warkworth, as follows: ‘sandwiched’ between the urban village area and the very modified rail corridor and timber mill immediately south As part of the quality compact approach, future urban areas have been identified to provide for urbanisation. of that. Residential growth in rural areas will be focused in the two rural nodes of Pukekohe and Warkworth. ➢ Provides enhanced linkages to existing reserve and open Some growth is anticipated in the smaller towns and villages. space areas and establishes a new open space network Residential development in rural zones will be limited. with multi-modal access (walk, cycle, motor vehicle). Provision for residential growth will be focused in the existing countryside living zone. ➢ Efficient use is proposed to be made of land within the Limiting residential growth in rural areas will maintain their values and support ongoing rural production. plan change area, while providing for a development (emphasis added) outcome that is consistent with the established character and amenity of Patumahoe (i.e. 600m² lots within 400m of 1 the Town Centre, 800m² lots generally, and 1500m² lots adjacent to the railway/rural zone interface). ➢ Utilises available capacity within existing network infrastructure (in particular wastewater) and proposes a new internal network, established as part of the staged subdivision of the subject land, that does not necessitate any public expenditure. ➢ By providing for a minimum of 200-250 additional dwellings, representing an increase of approx. 600-900 people to Patumahoe’s population, will provide economic benefits (derived from an enlarged customer base) to existing businesses within the township of an additional $1.7m of local economic impact per annum. The plan change would be based on complementing the existing zone and rate of growth in Patumahoe but to provide greater choice and amenity to purchasers. It would take 10-15 years to be built out. In that context, the scale of growth proposed in the plan change is not sufficient to materially change the scale or function of Patumahoe as a small rural village or disrupt the role of Pukekohe as the dominant centre in the south. ➢ The scale and extent of new housing options being zoned and to be developed in the next 10-15 years across Pukekohe, Paerata, Drury and Hingaia (several thousand) is so great that the dwellings enabled by the plan change would be extremely unlikely to ‘compete with’ them, or to commuters seeking to live in the urban area. They will instead appeal to people wanting a lifestyle and social connections based around the existing rural environment. ➢ Will provide approximately 2.5ha of light industrial land, creating employment opportunities for approx. 80 people (approx. 100 overall). The light industrial zone will complement and reinforce the higher-quality character sought within the local centre zone and main street, by providing for local jobs that are less-suited for a pedestrian focused main street location. ➢ Will reinforce Patumahoe’s role as a local service centre, and further enhance it as a settlement with its own distinct character located close to Pukekohe. ➢ Will increase the patronage public transport services to Patumahoe, which is located on bus route 396 (a service between Waiuku and Pukekohe train station), with onward travel via train to Britomart (and other destinations on the southern line). (2) National policy The National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity (NPS-UDC) is relevant to provision of land (and associated While the NPS does not directly apply to settlements (such as statements and national infrastructure) to ensure that Auckland Council enables development capacity for housing and business to meet the needs of their Patumahoe) of less than 10,000 people, its purpose, objectives environmental standards communities. and policies provide relevant context for the consideration of the plan change. The rezoning request, that would provide for The NPS is about recognising the national significance of: approximately 200 -250 homes would have negligible influence 2 a) urban environments and the need to enable such environments to develop and change; and Auckland Council’s ability to meet the development capacity b) providing sufficient development capacity to meet the needs of people and communities and future generations in urban required by the NPS-UDC (on a Regional basis), but would be environments. significant at a local level in terms of providing housing and business zoned land to meet the foreseeable future needs of In particular, the NPS requires Local Authorities to provide sufficient housing and business development capacity that is feasible, the local community. In this respect, it is emphasised that the zoned and serviced with development infrastructure. NPS is not solely focused on housing; the light industrial / As detailed the plan change the subject land at Patumahoe is feasible for development, able to be serviced without any public employment land proposed is directly relevant to it. network infrastructure expenditure and can be zoned via the plan change. The NPS-UDC relates to urban areas, which is defined in the NPS as an area of land containing, or intended to contain, a concentrated settlement of 10,000 people or more and any associated business land, irrespective of local authority or statistical boundaries. 3 (3) This Plan, in particular B2 Tāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone - Urban growth and form the regional policy Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 2 statement. B2.1. Issues Auckland’s growing population increases demand for housing, employment, business, infrastructure, social facilities and Patumahoe, as a small rural settlement, is subject to the same services. community needs and aspirations as all other settlements and urban Growth needs to be provided for in a way that does all of the following: areas within the Auckland Region. As a settlement it is subject to (1) enhances the quality of life for individuals and communities; demand for land to provide the housing, employment and business (2) supports integrated planning of land use, infrastructure and development; needs of the community.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soil Information Inventory: Patumahoe and Related Soils October 2018 Soil Information Inventory 16
    Soil Information Inventory: Patumahoe and related soils October 2018 Soil Information Inventory 16 Soil Information Inventory 16: Patumahoe and related soils Compiled from published and unpublished sources by: M. Martindale (land and soil advisor, Auckland Council) D. Hicks (consulting soil scientist) P. Singleton (consulting soil scientist) Auckland Council Soil Information Inventory, SII 16 ISBN 978-1-98-858922-0 (Print) ISBN 978-1-98-858923-7 (PDF) 2 Soil information inventory 16: Patumahoe and related soils Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Dr Jonathan Benge Position: Manager, Environmental Monitoring, Research and Evaluation (RIMU) Date: 1 October 2018 Recommended citation Martindale, M., D Hicks and P Singleton (2018). Soil information inventory: Patumahoe and related soils. Auckland Council soil information inventory, SII 16 © 2018 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Air Quality in New Zealand Commentary by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment on the 2014 Air Domain Report
    The state of air quality in New Zealand Commentary by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment on the 2014 Air Domain Report March 2015 2 Acknowledgements The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment would like to express her gratitude to those who assisted with the research and preparation of this report, with special thanks to her staff who worked so tirelessly to bring it to completion. Photography Cover image courtesy of NASA This document may be copied provided that the source is acknowledged. This report and other publications by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment are available at: www.pce.parliament.nz 3 Contents Contents 3 Overview 5 1 Introduction 9 3 1.1 The reason for and purpose of this commentary 11 1.2 Air pollution in New Zealand – the basics 12 1.3 The 2014 Air Domain Report 14 1.4 What comes next 15 2 Assessing the 2014 Air Domain Report 17 2.1 A clear conclusion on the state of each domain 18 2.2 Indicators and other data – relevance and limitations 20 2.3 Reporting on location – where is air quality an issue? 21 2.4 Dealing with variation and uncertainty 21 2.5 Vehicle emissions – what is really happening with NOX? 22 2.6 The modelling of health impacts 23 2.7 Natural sources of pollutants 24 2.8 In conclusion 24 3 A closer look at particulate pollution 25 3.1 PM10 – How well is New Zealand doing? 26 3.2 PM2.5 – How well is New Zealand doing? 28 3.3 More on the WHO guidelines 30 3.4 Looking back and forward 34 3.5 In conclusion 38 4 Managing particulate pollution 39 4.1 Perceptions about particulate pollution 40 4.2 Keeping homes warm and dry 44 4.3 The other ‘air problem’ – greenhouse gases 46 5 Conclusion and recommendations 49 5.1 Improve environmental reporting 50 5.2 Review the PM10 rule 51 Notes 54 References 61 4 5 Overview I grew up in Christchurch when it was a city running on coal from the West Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Attachment 1 RLTP JUNE 2021 at Board
    VERSION TO AT BOARD 28 JUNE Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2021-2031 Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2021–2031 The Regional Land Transport Plan 2021-2031 sets out the land transport objectives, policies and measures for the Auckland region over the next 10 years. It includes the land transport activities of Auckland Transport, Auckland Council, Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency, KiwiRail, and other agencies. VERSION TO AT BOARD 28 JUNE 1 Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2021–2031 Contents 01. Introduction from the Chair 3 02. Context 5 03. Feedback from consultation 13 04. Purpose and scope 21 05. Transport funding 29 06. Auckland’s transport challenges 33 07. Responding to Auckland’s transport challenges 47 08. Measuring outcomes 77 09. Inter-regional priorities 85 10. Funding and expenditure 91 11. Appendices 99 VERSION TO AT BOARD 28 JUNE 2 Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2021–2031 01. Introduction from the Chair VERSION TO AT BOARD 28 JUNE To come 3 Introduction from the Chair Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2021–2031 VERSION TO AT BOARD 28 JUNE Introduction from the Chair 4 Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2021–2031 02. Context Auckland, Tāmaki Makaurau, is home to 1.7 million people – one third of all NewVERSION Zealanders – and TO is forecast to grow by another 260,000 overAT the BOARD next decade, reaching around 2.4 million by 2050. This 28rapid JUNE population growth presents a number of challenges in our quest to be a liveable, climate-friendly and productive city. Growth represents opportunity but Evidence tells us that Aucklanders Auckland needs a well-coordinated when combined with Auckland’s like the improved experience, and integrated approach to help challenging natural setting and particularly on rapid and frequent people and freight get around urban form the outcome has bus and train services where quickly and safely – one that been increased congestion and the number of trips has almost significantly reduces harm to the limited connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Geographical Differences in Road Traffic Injury in the Auckland Region
    Social and geographical differences in road traffic injury in the Auckland region Jamie Hosking, Shanthi Ameratunga, Daniel Exeter, Joanna Stewart Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland Produced for Auckland Transport, 2013. ISBN: 978‐0‐473‐24259‐6 Acknowledgements This report was informed by a stakeholder reference group, the members of which are listed below. This report does not necessarily represent the views of the host organisations of reference group members. Laura Ager ACC Moses Alatini Safekids New Zealand Melanie Bartlett New Zealand Transport Agency Andrew Bell Auckland Transport Julie Chambers Auckland District Health Board Angie Cheong Auckland Transport Juanita deSenna Auckland Transport Greer Hawley Auckland Transport John Kelly New Zealand Police Peter Sandiford Waitemata District Health Board The assistance of the following people and organisations with this report was greatly appreciated: Bridget Kool, Carol Chelimo, Sandar Tin Tin and Alex Macmillan, University of Auckland, for advice on hospitalisation and mortality data and analysis, census data, and travel survey data David Drodskie, Auckland Transport, for providing CAS data Simon Gianotti, ACC, for advice on ACC road traffic injury data Joyce‐Anne Raihania, Injury Prevention Network of Aotearoa New Zealand (IPNANZ), for advice on road traffic injuries among Māori John Wallwork, New Zealand Transport Agency, for advice on use of Driver Licence Registry data Ministry of Transport, for provision of New Zealand Household Travel Survey data Koordinates.com and the Local Government Commission of the Department of Internal Affairs, for provision of data on Auckland local board areas This work includes Statistics New Zealand’s data which are licensed by Statistics New Zealand for re‐ use under the Creative Commons Attribution‐Noncommercial 3.0 New Zealand license.
    [Show full text]
  • Pukekohe-Paerata Structure Plan
    19-PRO-0364 Pukekohe-Paerata Structure Plan August 2019 Pukekohe-Paerata Structure Plan 2019 August 2019 Table of Contents 1 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Update since 2019 consultation .............................................................................. 9 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 What is the growth challenge? .............................................................................. 11 2.2 What is structure planning? .................................................................................. 11 2.3 What is the structure plan study area? ................................................................. 12 2.4 How does the plan relate to the existing land uses and other features in and around Pukekohe? ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1 Existing urban areas ...................................................................................... 14 2.4.2 Existing rural areas ........................................................................................ 14 2.5 What is the structure plan process? ...................................................................... 14 3 The Pukekohe-Paerata Structure Plan 2019 .............................................................. 16 3.1 Vision ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KIA PUĀWAI a PUKEKOHE Unlock Pukekohe High-Level Project Plan
    KIA PUĀWAI A PUKEKOHE Unlock Pukekohe High-Level Project Plan November 2019 ABBREVIATIONS AT Auckland Transport BID Business Improvement District CCO Council-controlled organisation the Council Auckland Council HLPP High Level Project Plan LTP Long-term plan Panuku Panuku Development Auckland 2 PUKEKOHE HLPP CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 THE KEY MOVES – WHERE WE WILL 43 APPENDICES 83 Planning to unlock Pukekohe’s potential 7 FOCUS OUR ENERGY AND EFFORTS Appendix 1: 84 Mihi 8 Three precinct redevelopment key moves 45 Property map of town centre sites Panuku – who we are 9 Three public realm key moves 49 (excluding sites outside of the programme boundary) What we do – shaping spaces for Aucklanders to love 10 Two placemaking key moves 54 Appendix 2: 85 A range of partnering opportunities 56 ABOUT THIS HIGH-LEVEL PROJECT PLAN 13 Property map of all sites and the What’s in the plan 14 HOW WE PLAN TO IMPLEMENT THIS PROJECT 59 full extent of the programme area investment boundary Why Pukekohe? 15 Our approach to delivery 60 Appendix 3: 86 Developing the Kia Puāwai a Pukekohe story 16 Development of key properties 60 Property schedule Working with mana whenua 17 Funding 63 Our partners 18 Other resources 63 ABOUT PUKEKOHE 21 INFORMATION USED TO DEVELOP THIS PLAN 65 A strategic location 22 Other plans and policies 66 A diverse and growing community 24 Transport infrastructure 70 The Kia Puāwai a Pukekohe area and properties 26 Infrastructure capacity 71 Property market dynamics and demand 72 VISION 29 COMMUNICATING WITH THE COMMUNITY 75 THE PRINCIPLES
    [Show full text]
  • The Pukekohe Hub Prepared for Horticulture New Zealand August 2018 the Pukekohe Hub | Contents
    New Zealand’s food story: | Contents New Zealand’s food story: The Pukekohe hub Prepared for Horticulture New Zealand August 2018 The Pukekohe hub | Contents Contents Glossary 1 Foreword 3 Executive Summary 5 A food hub for New Zealand 12 Pukekohe hub in context 19 The value of the Pukekohe hub’s horticulture 25 Economic impact of constraining horticulture production in the Pukekohe hub 38 Looking to the future 50 Appendix A: Input-Output analysis 56 Appendix B: CGE modelling 60 The Pukekohe hub | Glossary Glossary Acronym Full name CGE Computable general equilibrium DAE-RGEM Deloitte Access Economics regional general equilibrium model EU European Union FTE Full-time equivalent GDP Gross domestic product HortNZ Horticulture New Zealand IO Input-Output LSF Living Standards Framework LUC Land Use Class NPS National Policy Statement PVGA Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Association RSE Recognised Seasonal Employer UK United Kingdom 1 The PukekohePukekohe hub hub | Glossary| Glossary “When you live in Pukekohe you can’t really see the urban creep because it’s a bit at a time – but it’s really obvious now.” – Bharat Jivan, Jivan Produce The Pukekohe hub | Foreword Foreword Horticulture is one of the success stories of New Zealand’s primary industries. In 2017, the industry generated $5.68 billion in value. Export revenue has grown nearly 50% in five years, illustrating the trust the world places in New Zealand-grown food, and the country’s ability to meet that demand. But the industry cannot rest. New Zealand faces opportunities with a growing population and the need to grow fresh produce. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Auckland, and its surrounding rural land.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Report Recommendation: That the Chief Executive’S Report Be Received
    Board Meeting | 12 February 2019 Agenda Item no.9 Open Session Business Report Recommendation: That the Chief Executive’s report be received. Prepared by: Shane Ellison, Chief Executive Corporate Finance Audit NZ two-week review engagement has been completed. The six-month reporting pack was presented to the Finance, Capital and Risk Committee meeting on 31 January. Work has begun with AC and Aon (AC group insurance brokers) reviewing insurance policies and coverage in place to support 30 June 2019 insurance renewals. Board endorsement will be sought at the June meeting. Detailed planning is in progress to support the completion of the 2019/20 Annual Plan. Auckland Unitary Plan Submissions were lodged by Auckland Transport and the New Zealand Transport Agency on Auckland International Airport’s Notice of Requirement, to extend its second runway, seeking to ensure that any transport effects generated by the proposal are addressed and that light rail is accommodated. Regional Land Transport Plan Funding The following activities were approved for funding during the period November 2018 to early January 2019: • Station Upgrades - Takanini Park & Ride (Implementation) – This activity has been approved for $4.4 million • Glenvar/East Coast Road Improvements (Detailed Business Case) – This activity has been approved for $0.5 million Page 1 of 60 Board Meeting | 12 February 2019 Agenda Item no.9 Open Session • PT Ferry Improvements - Ferry Services (Implementation) – This activity has been approved for $5.1 million, with an enhanced funding rate
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Assessment Report – Ngati Te
    NGATI TE ATA CULTURAL ASSESMENT REPORT Prepared for PW, SM & GM Askew Partnership Proposed Plan Change from Rural zoned Land to Residential Land “the striking with the mahoe branch” Patu , to strike or kill; mahoe , the whitewood tree (Melicytus Ramiflorus) JANUARY 2019 HE TIKANGA Ā TE RŌPŪ IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT WE, KAITIAKI THE GUARDIANS HAVE KI TE TIAKI TE SPIRITUAL AND WAIRUA-TANGA, CULTURAL COMMAND OVER TE AHUREA MŌ ŌNA AKE OUR TRADITIONAL LANDS, WHENUA WATERS, AND RESOURCES. ME NGĀ PUNA TAONGA. TĒNEI WHAKAATURANGA KI OUR INTENTION IS TO GIVE TE WHAKAMŌHIA IA KOUTOU YOU A GLIMPSE INTO OUR TO TĀTOU WHAKAPAPA, CULTURE, REGION, WHENUA, CULTURAL RESOURCES, WHAKAHAERE Ā MANA AND CARETAKER WHENUA RESPONSIBILITIES 2 | P a g e 1.0 BACKDROP Ngati Te Ata Waiohua are one of the two manawhenua iwi regarding the Patumahoe area. 1.1 Ngati Te Ata Waiohua have had a long history in resource management and environmental issues within their tribal rohe [area]. Many changes over the years have not always been in the best interests of the tribe. Such change has often resulted in the continual degradation of many of the tribe’s natural and physical resources, waahi tapu sites, and other taonga. 1.2 Ngati Te Ata descend from Waikato- Tainui and Te Waiohua. It is through these associations that connect us to the Kingseat, Patumahoe and Mauku area. With particular regard to the Manukau Harbour and its many tributaries. 1.3 The New Zealand Wars Author: James Cowan explanations the place-name of Patumahoe: The chief Huritini, of the Ngaiwi or Waiohua Tribe, of the Tamaki district, came to these parts to make war upon Hiku-rere-roa and Te Ranga-rua, the leaders of the Ngati-Tamaoho Tribe, six generations ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units
    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units For administrative purposes, Statistics New Zealand The first table lists the CAUs, as well as the codes for divides the country into about 1900 Census Area Units the District Health Board (DHB) and Territorial Authority (CAUs) of unequal population size. Each is made up (TA) to which each belongs, and for each provides the of many meshblocks. At the time of the 2006 Census CAU deprivation decile and the population-weighted there were 1927 CAUs and 41,376 meshblocks. The average deprivation value. As with the NZDep2006 small NZDep2006 index of deprivation was created from area deciles, the value 1 indicates a CAU in the 10 per 23,786 NZDep2006 small areas that were, in general, cent least deprived CAUs in New Zealand, and the value either one meshblock, or two nearby meshblocks. 10 indicates that the CAU is in the 10 per cent most deprived CAUs. CAU averages and deciles are missing For many purposes it is useful to have an idea of the – indicated by a period – for CAUs where the usually deprivation characteristic of CAUs, which are often linked resident population was insufficient to calculate any to natural neighbourhoods, such as suburbs. Users component NZDep scores. should be aware though that there may be considerable variation in deprivation among the small areas that make An alphabetical index of the CAU names is provided after up the CAUs. This variation will be hidden when using an this table for cross-reference. average deprivation statistic for the CAU. Each CAU is part of one of the 21 DHBs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aucklandrotorua Outline 34 Erosion Rates and Management at Pukekohe L.R
    ASHES AND ISSUES GUIDEBOOK FOR PRE-CONFERENCE NORTH ISLAND FIELD TRIP ‘ASHES AND ISSUES’ 28TH30TH NOVEMBER, 2008 SOILS 2008 AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND 4TH JOINT SOILS CONFERENCE MASSEY UNIVERSITY, PALMERSTON NORTH 15 DECEMBER, 2008 2 ISBN 978-0-473-14476-0 3 GUIDEBOOK FOR PRE-CONFERENCE NORTH ISLAND FIELD TRIP A1 ‘ASHES AND ISSUES’ 28TH 30TH NOVEMBER, 2008 NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY OF SOIL SCIENCE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF SOIL SCIENCE 4TH JOINT SOILS CONFERENCE, PALMERSTON NORTH 1-5 DECEMBER, 2008 Compiled and edited by David J. Lowe Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240 ([email protected]) Field trip sponsored by Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato Environment Waikato Scion With support from Soil and Earth Sciences, INR, Massey University & Landcare Research 4 General citation Lowe, D.J. (editor) 2008. Guidebook for Pre-conference North Island Field Trip A1 „Ashes and Issues‟, 28-30 November, 2008. Australian and New Zealand 4th Joint Soils Conference, Massey University, Palmerston North. New Zealand Society of Soil Science, Christchurch. 194 pp. (ISBN 978-0-473-14476-0) Specific article citation (e.g.) Charleson, T. 2008. Waipa Mill groundwater remediation: a success story. In Lowe, D.J. (ed), Guidebook for Pre-conference North Island Field Trip A1 „Ashes and Issues‟, 28-30 November, 2008. Australian and New Zealand 4th Joint Soils Conference, Massey University, Palmerston North. New Zealand Society of Soil Science, Christchurch. Pp.134-135. Note Some material in this guide is unpublished and authors or the editor should be consulted for permission before citing or reproducing it in any other publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Revision No: C Published Date: 21/01/2021 Author: T
    506207-0490-REP-NN-0058 The PAPAKURA TO DRURY SOUTH STAGE 1B1 Ecology Assessment Revision No: C Published Date: 21/01/2021 Author: T. Barnett, C. Wedding Copyright information Copyright ©. This copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the NZ Transport Agency and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Disclaimer The NZ Transport Agency has endeavoured to ensure the material in this document is technically accurate and reflects legal requirements. However, the document does not override governing legislation. The NZ Transport Agency does not accept liability for any consequences arising from the use of this document. If the user of this document is unsure whether the material is correct, they should refer directly to the relevant legislation and contact the NZ Transport Agency. More information NZ Transport Agency June 2021 If you have further queries, call our contact centre on 0800 699 000 or write to us: NZ Transport Agency Private Bag 6995 Wellington 6141 This document is available on the NZ Transport Agency’s website at http://www.nzta.govt.nz Document Control Rev No Date Description Author Reviewer Verifier Approver A 09/09/2020 Draft Treffery Barnett, Chris Wedding B 09/11/2020 Draft Treffery Barnett, Chris Wedding C 21/01/2021 Final Treffery Barnett, Chris Wedding This document remains the property of Waka Kotahi NZTA, Papakura to Drury South (P2DS) Project.
    [Show full text]