Law School’S Vision
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions--And from Miranda Paul G
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 88 Article 2 Issue 2 Winter Winter 1998 Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions--And from Miranda Paul G. Cassell Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Paul G. Cassell, Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions--And from Miranda, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 497 (Winter 1998) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/98/8802-0497 TI' JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 88, No. 2 Copyright 0 1998 by Northwestern Unh-rsity, School of Law PrinW in U.S.A PROTECTING THE INNOCENT FROM FALSE CONFESSIONS AND LOST CONFESSIONS-AND FROM MIRANDA PAUL G. CASSELL" For most of the last several decades, criminal procedure scholarship-mirroring the Warren Court landmarks it was commenting on-spent little time discussing the guiltless and much discussing the guilty. Recent scholarship suggests a dif- ferent focus is desirable. As one leading scholar recently put it, "the Constitution seeks to protect the innocent."' Professors Leo and Ofshe's preceding article,2 along with ar- ticles like it by (among others) Welsh White and Al Alschuler,4 commendably adopts this approach. Focusing on the plight of an innocent person who confessed to a crime he5 did not com- mit, they recommend certain changes in the rules governing po- " Professor of Law, University of Utah College of Law ([email protected]). -
2016 Annual Security and Fire Safety Report Statistics for 2013, 2014, and 2015
NYU 2016 Annual Security and Fire Safety Report Statistics for 2013, 2014, and 2015 New York City campuses (Manhattan, Brooklyn, School of Medicine), and NYU Global Academic Centers Photo © NYU Bureau/Asselin TABle oF CoNTents (Click on any entry to go to that page) Message from the President . 4 Message from the Vice President, Global Campus Safety . 4 Message from New York City Police Commissioner James o’Neill . 5 Report on Security and Fire Safety at New York City Campuses . 6 Reporting Procedures . 7 emergency Phone Numbers . 7 local Police Stations . 8 Timely Warning/Safety Warning Notices . 8 Campus Facilities and Programs . 9 University Transportation . 9 Missing Student Notification Policy . 10 emergency Preparedness . .12 Crime Awareness and Prevention Programs . 14 Automated external Defibrillator (AeD) Unit locations . 18. Safe Haven Program 2016 . 19 Alcohol and Drug Use . 20 Alcohol and Drug Use Prevention and Awareness Programs . 20 NYU Wellness exchange . 20 Discrimination and Harassment Prevention . 22 Sexual Misconduct, Relationship Violence, and Stalking on Campus . 23 Sexual Misconduct, Relationship Violence, and Stalking i Prevention and Awareness Resources, Services and Information . 24 Sexual Misconduct, Relationship Violence, and Stalking Support . 25 Sex offender Registry Information — New York State’s “Megan’s law” . 26 Department of Public Safety Campus Security Report Preparation . 27 Command Center Crime Definitions . 27 (and NYU ID Card Center) NYU Department of Public Safety Crime Statistics Report . 31. 7 Washington Place, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10003 Washington Square Campus Crime Statistics . 32 Washington Square Campus Map . 33 emergency Call Box locations . 33 24-hour Emergency Number: 212-998-2222 Green light Buildings . -
Consequences of Failing to Admit Guilt at Parole Hearings Daniel S
MEDWED_TRANSMITTED.DOC2 2/26/2008 1:51 PM The Innocent Prisoner’s Dilemma: Consequences of Failing to Admit Guilt at Parole Hearings Daniel S. Medwed∗ INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 493 I. THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PAROLE ................................................ 497 A. HISTORICAL ORIGINS AND PURPOSES OF PAROLE ................................ 497 B. PAROLE RELEASE DECISION-MAKING: CONTEMPORARY STANDARDS AND POLICIES .................................................................................... 504 II. THE EFFECT OF PAROLE RELEASE DECISION-MAKING NORMS ON THE INNOCENT ............................................................................................... 513 A. PAROLE: AN INNOCENCE OPTION OF LAST RESORT ............................. 518 B. PRESSURE ON INNOCENT INMATES TO “ADMIT” GUILT ........................ 523 III. ADMISSIONS OF GUILT AND THE PAROLE RELEASE DECISION RECONSIDERED ....................................................................................... 529 A. THE DANGER OF ASSUMING THE LITIGATION PROCESS ACCURATELY FILTERS THE GUILTY FROM THE INNOCENT ......................................... 530 B. POTHOLES ON THE PATH TO REDEMPTION THROUGH THE PAROLE PROCESS ........................................................................................... 532 IV. SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM .................................................................... 541 A. LIMITATIONS ON THE SUBSEQUENT USE OF STATEMENTS FROM PAROLE HEARINGS ........................................................................... -
2018 ANNUAL MEETING from Imitation to Innovation
2018 ANNUAL MEETING From Imitation to Innovation NOVEMBER 10 – 12, 2018 DOHA, QATAR HOSTED BY INDEX WELCOME ………………………………………………………………………… 3 AGENDA …………………………………………………………………………... 4 GROUP BREAKOUTS …………………………………………………………… 10 GOVERNING BOARD …………………………………………………………… 13 DOCTRINAL STUDY GROUPS ………………………………………………… 14 UNIVERSITIES ATTENDING …………………………………………………… 15 BOARD OF GOVERNORS ATTENDEES ……………………………………... 17 QATAR UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE OF LAW ATTENDEES …………………. 21 JUDICIAL ATTENDEES …………………………………………………………. 25 ATTENDEES ……………………………………………………………………… 29 SECRETARIAT …………………………………………………………………… 58 SINGAPORE DECLARATION ………………………………………………….. 59 MADRID PROTOCOL ……………………………………………………………. 61 JUDICIAL STANDARDS OF A LEGAL EDUCATION ……………………….. 62 SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT ………………………………………………… 63 EVALUATION, ASSISTANCE, AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ……….. 66 2 WELCOME On behalf of all the members of the International Association of Law Schools Board of Governors, we want to welcome each and every one of you to our 2018 Annual Meeting. This is our eleventh annual meeting where over 115 law teachers from more than 30 countries have gathered together to discuss and formulate new strategies to improve legal education globally. Almost half of our participants are senior law school leaders (deans, vice deans and associate deans). We warmly welcome all the familiar faces from these many years – welcome and thank you for your continued engagement in advancing the cause of improving legal education globally. For those who are new, a special warm welcome from our community. Please meet your colleagues from around the world. We look forward to working with you in this challenging and engaging effort. The IALS is a non-political, non-profit learned society of more than 160 law schools and departments from over 55 countries representing more than 7,500 law faculty members. One of our primary missions is the improvement of law schools and conditions of legal education throughout the world by learning from each other. -
Rehabilitating Child Welfare: Children and Public Policy, 1945-1980
Rehabilitating Child Welfare: Children and Public Policy, 1945-1980 Ethan G. Sribnick Silver Spring, Maryland B.A., University of Chicago, 1998 M.A., University of Virginia, 2001 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia May2007 © Copyright by Ethan G. Sribnick All Rights Reserved May 2007 111 Abstract In the period afterWorld War II, a network of activists attempted to reformthe programs that supported and assisted delinquent, dependent, neglected, abused and abandoned children and their familiesin the United States. This dissertation examines their effortsto reshape child welfare arguing that it was motivated by the "rehabilitative ideal," a belief that the state was ultimately responsible forthe physical and emotional development of every child and a faithin therapeutic services as a way of providing for children and their families. This argument contributes to our understanding of the rise of a therapeutic state, placing this notion within a particular historical period and within the narrative of the changing nature of American liberalism. The rehabilitative ideal and the child welfare network emerged out of a confluence of trends within American liberalism, social welfare agencies, and social work approaches in the period after 1945. This study provides detailed examination of this phenomenon through the lives of Justine Wise Polier, Joseph H. Reid, and Alfred J. Kahn, and the histories of the Citizens' Committee forChildren of New York, the Child Welfare League of America, and the Columbia University School of Social Work. Investigations of the developments in juvenile justice, fostercare and adoption, child protection, and federalassistance to child welfareservices over the 1950s and 1960s demonstrate how the rehabilitative approach shaped child welfare reform. -
[Webinar] SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Singapore Cases in 2020
[Webinar] SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Singapore Cases in 2020 In conjunction with the Singapore Academy of Law's Annual Review of Singapore cases 2020, this series of webinars will evaluate the decisions of the Singapore Courts in 2020 as well as highlight the developments in the principal areas of the law that have taken place since. L I FTED by Legal Practitioner Specialisms Webinar In-House Counsel Specialisms Legal Support Specialisms SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Annual Review of 2020 Cases on: Wed, 23 Jun Land Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Wed, 30 Jun Confidential Information and Data Protection Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Mon, 19 Jul Criminal Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Thu, 22 Jul Competition Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Tue, 27 Jul Tort Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Wed, 28 Jul Intellectual Property Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Wed, 11 Aug Muslim Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Registration All prices indicated include GST. Annual Review Series 2021 Bundle A: SGD 385.20 SGD 267.50 1. Confidential Information and Data Protection 2. Competition Law 3. Tort Law 4. Intellectual Property Law Annual Review Series 2021 Bundle B: SGD 385.20 SGD 267.50 1. Land Law 2. Criminal Law 3. Tort Law 4. Muslim Law Price per session SGD 96.30 SAL Associate Student Member (To apply, click here) SGD 32.10 per session SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Tue, 23 June Annual Review of 2020 Cases on Land Law This session will encompass a discussion on selected cases decided in the past 5 years up to December 2020. -
Honoring Our Own the WWII Veteran Judges of the Eastern District of New York
Honoring Our Own The WWII Veteran Judges of the Eastern District of New York On Dec. 5, 2012, the Eastern District of New York Chapter of the Federal Bar Association held a program at the American Airpower Museum to honor the district’s distinguished World War II veteran judges. It has often been said that the World War II brothers-in-arms are members of the “greatest generation.” Assuredly, it is not an overstatement to say that our World War II veteran judges and their brothers-in-arms walk among the greatest men of any generation. Each of the honorees are briefly biographied in the pages that fol- low, describing how service to our country has affected their lives and careers. Hon. I. Leo Glasser Born in New York City in 1924, Judge Glasser graduated from the City College of New York in 1943 and then served in the U.S. Army in Europe during World War II. During the war, Judge Glasser served as a U.S. Army infantry technician landing in Europe a few weeks after D-Day at the small French town of St. Mere Eglise. His unit pushed east, eventu- ally crossing into Germany in Spring 1945. The horror of battle was constant. Judge Glasser was wounded while moving ammunition crates and was awarded the Bronze Star for bravery during his service in the European theater. In an article published by Newsday, May 27, 2012, Judge Glasser was quoted as saying: “I hope there will come a day when we have no more war and the lion will lie down with the lamb and we can have universal peace.” Upon returning from the war, Judge Glasser obtained a law degree magna cum laude from Brooklyn Law School in 1948, and then immediately began teaching at Brooklyn Law School. -
Support of Nomination of Vanita Gupta to Associate Attorney General at United States Department of Justice
March 8, 2021 United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Re: Support of Nomination of Vanita Gupta to Associate Attorney General at United States Department of Justice Dear Senator: On behalf of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (“Lawyers’ Committee”), I urge you to support the nomination of Vanita Gupta to the position of Associate Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice (DOJ). The Lawyers’ Committee is a nonprofit civil rights organization founded in 1963 by the leaders of the American bar, at the request of President John F. Kennedy, to help defend the civil rights of Black Americans and other people of color. For nearly sixty years, the Lawyers’ Committee has been at the forefront of many of the most significant cases involving race and national origin discrimination to secure equal justice for all. Our civil rights mission and our history, as well as our organization’s longstanding work with Ms. Gupta, make us uniquely qualified to support her nomination. Ms. Gupta has spent her career fighting for social and racial justice and championing civil rights and equality for all. Most recently, Ms. Gupta served as the President and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (“Leadership Conference”), America’s oldest, largest, and most diverse civil and human rights coalition. The Lawyers’ Committee is one of the Leadership Conference’s over 200-member organizations, and has had the privilege of standing with Ms. Gupta in her commitment to protecting the civil and human rights of all people. As such, we support her nomination and urge her prompt confirmation by the United States Senate. -
Original Print
Published by the American Academy of Religion October 2003 Vol. 18, No. 4 www.aarweb.org ❒ IT’S TIME TO RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP Annual Meeting News See page 11 for a membership form What’s On in Atlanta . 6 Eat, Drink, and Be Entertained Reel Religion . 6 Eight Exciting Movies To Be Shown AAR Announces New Strategic Plan......................3 Performances and Exhibitions . 6 Centennial Strategic Plan 2004–2009 Spirituality, Sacred Places, and Gospel Singing Atlanta Tours . 7 Election 2004 ..........................................................4–5 Five Important Sites Candidates for Vice President and Student Director Results of Surveys . 8 Special Topics Forum Three New Program Units . 8 Pew Awards AAR $560,000 to continue Animals and Religion; Childhood Studies and Religion; and Relics and Religionsource ..........................................................11 Sacred Territory (Space) Providing Journalists with Referrals to Scholars FBI on Panel at Annual Meeting . .8 FBI, Scholars, and a Journalist Look American Academy of Religion Awards ......12–13 at Religion’s Role in Crises Excellence in Teaching, Book Awards, Best In-Depth Reporting, Chairs Workshop . 9 Scholarship, Service, and Stress: and the Martin E. Marty Award The Tensions of Being a Chair Annual Meeting Focus . 10 Japanese Scholars and Scholarship AAR Surveys of Religion & Theology Marty Award Forum . 12 Programs in the U.S. ..............................................14 A forum with 2003 winner Robert Wuthnow The Study of Religion and Theology at the Undergraduate and Graduate Levels FEATURES Regional Meetings and Calls for Papers ............15 Beyond the Annual Meeting . .10 Regional Groups Meet in Spring 2004 An Interview with Manabu Watanabe Member-At-Large . .17 National Endowment for the Humanities ..........17 An Interview with the Templeton Laureate 2003 An Interview with Chairman Cole Passages . -
Legal Malpractice
Legal Malpractice Professional Liability Claims, Litigation Strategies, and Attorney Disciplinary Procedures Friday, March 24, 2017 Friday, March 10, 2017 New York City | Live & Webcast Westchester | Live Program Friday, March 24, 2017 Friday, March 17, 2017 Albany | Live Program Rochester | Live Program Friday, March 31, 2017 Long Island | Live Program 4.0 MCLE Credits 3.0 Ethics | 1.0 Law Practice Management Interactive Video Conference Formats are approved for MCLE Credit for all attorneys, including newly admitted. www.nysba.org/LegalMalpractice2017Materials Sponsored by the Law Practice Management Committee, the Torts, Insurance & Compensation Law Section and the Trial Lawyers Section of the New York State Bar Association. This program is offered for educational purposes. The views and opinions of the faculty expressed during this program are those of the presenters and authors of the materials. Further, the statements made by the faculty during this program do not constitute legal advice. Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved New York State Bar Association Program Description Lawsuits against lawyers arising from errors and/or omissions in the performance of legal services are on the rise. It is now an integral part of a law firm’s business practice to evaluate its legal risk and malpractice insurance needs. This program is designed to educate attorneys on how to prosecute and/or defend a legal malpractice action. In addition, this program will educate attorneys about their legal malpractice exposures, what they should do in the event that a lawsuit is filed against them, and what they should do when situations arise that indicate that a legal malpractice claim is likely. -
Housed Campaign Eviction Moratorium Emergency Rental
Volume 26, Issue 32 August 16, 2021 HoUSed Campaign • Take Action: Senate Approves Budget Resolution Calling for $332 Billion for Housing and Transportation • Recording Available of August 9 National Call on “HoUSed: Universal, Stable, Affordable Housing” • National HoUSed Campaign Call Takes One-Week Hiatus, No Call Today Eviction Moratorium • U.S. District Court Judge Leaves CDC Eviction Moratorium in Place • NLIHC and NHLP Urge Treasury, HUD, USDA, and FHFA to Implement Eviction Moratorium Directive Emergency Rental Assistance • U.S. Attorney General Garland Meets with State Supreme Court Justices to Encourage ERA Awareness- Raising and Eviction-Diversion Strategies • Updated NLIHC Resources Track ERA1 Spending Progress and More • Watch Recordings of NLIHC’s ERASE Webinars on Making ERA Programs Visible, Accessible, and Preventing Evictions Coronavirus, Disasters, Housing, and Homelessness • Register for NLIHC/PAHRC Webinar Series on Federally Assisted Housing and Natural Hazards • Additional Coronavirus Updates – August 16, 2021 • Disaster Housing Recovery Updates – August 16, 2021 Fannie Mae • Fannie Mae to Consider Rental Payment History in Underwriting Process Opportunity Starts at Home • New Study: Housing is Important for Heart Health Research • Study Demonstrates Importance of Proactive Rental Inspections • Case Study Documents Pre-Disaster Planning Challenges for Public Housing Recovery • Eighteen State Emergency Rental Assistance Programs Have Disbursed Less Than 5% of Initial Funding From the Field • Puerto Rico Advocates -
When Law Firms Go Bankrupt — What Secured Lenders Can Learn from the Dewey Bankruptcy
PLACE PDF @ 88% REPRINTED FROM THE NOV/DEC 2012 ISSUE, VOL. 10, NO. 8 BANKRUPTCY UPDATE When Law Firms Go Bankrupt — What Secured Lenders Can Learn From the Dewey Bankruptcy BY JEFFREY A. WURST, ESQ When law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf filed for Chapter 11 protection, it was obligated to its secured creditors, among many others, led by JP Morgan on a $75 million line of credit facility. Jeffrey Wurst explains what led to Dewey’s collapse and offers advice regarding key indicators of a potential creditor’s fiscal irresponsibility. ictims of bankruptcy come in many forms. Dewey filed for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy They include the debtors themselves, as well Court for the Southern District of New York. Many theo- V as their secured and unsecured creditors. When ries abound as to the causes of Dewey’s collapse, but, law firms fall into bankruptcy, the secured lenders are essentially, the crux appears to be that Dewey guaran- often among the hardest hit. Typically, these secured teed an unsustainable amount of compensation to both lenders take security interests in all assets of the law newly acquired and longstanding partners. Hoping to firm when funding operations. The assets with the generate enormous fees off these highly compensated most value tend to be the cash and cash equivalents partners, Dewey subsequently took on debt to fund the and the accounts receivable. The problem with many failing business. However, the economic impact of the recent law firm bankruptcies is that cash on hand is recession forced Dewey to consolidate its debt. Further JEFFREY A.