DOCSLIB.ORG

Van Olmen Et Al. (Proofreading 3)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Daniel Van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens, Lobke Ghesquière (Eds.) 2 Aspects of Grammaticalization 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:58) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) pp. 1–4 1758 van Olmen_00a_FM (p. 1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Trends in Linguistics 7 8 Studies and Monographs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Editor 20 Volker Gast 21 Editorial Board 22 Walter Bisang 23 Jan Terje Faarlund 24 Hans Henrich Hock 25 Natalia Levshina 26 Heiko Narrog 27 Matthias Schlesewsky 28 Amir Zeldes 29 Niina Ning Zhang 30 31 Editor responsible for this volume 32 Volker Gast 33 34 35 Volume 305 36 37 38 39 40 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:58) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) pp. 1–4 1758 van Olmen_00a_FM (p. 2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Aspects of 8 9 Grammaticalization 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (Inter)Subjectification and Directionality 20 21 22 Edited by 23 Daniel Van Olmen 24 Hubert Cuyckens 25 26 Lobke Ghesquière 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:58) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) pp. 1–4 1758 van Olmen_00a_FM (p. 3) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ISBN 978-3-11-048969-9 26 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-049234-7 27 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-048976-7 28 ISSN 1861-4302 29 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 30 A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. 31 32 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek 33 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; 34 detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. 35 6 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 36 Typesetting: RoyalStandard, Hong Kong 37 Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck 38 ♾ Printed on acid-free paper 39 Printed in Germany 40 www.degruyter.com (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:58) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) pp. 1–4 1758 van Olmen_00a_FM (p. 4) 1 Acknowledgments 2 3 4 The present volume emanates from the “International Conference on Gramma- 5 ticalization and (Inter)Subjectification” (GRAMIS), held in Brussels from 11 to 13 6 November 2010. The conference was organized within the framework of the 7 Interuniversity Attraction Pole (IAP-Phase VI, project P6/44 of the Belgian 8 Science Policy Office on “Grammaticalization and (Inter)Subjectfication”, coordi- 9 nated by Johan van der Auwera (University of Antwerp). The generous financial 10 support of this research project is hereby gratefully acknowledged. 11 We are very much indebted to Volker Gast, editor of the series “Trends in 12 Linguistics – Studies and Monographs” for having included this volume into 13 the series. Many thanks as well go to Birgit Sievert, Acquisitions Editor at De 14 Gruyter Mouton, for her initial interest in this project. 15 While we, as editors, are responsible for the final choice of papers, the 16 assessments of the following external referees have been a tremendous help 17 in the selection process: Karin Aijmer, Kersti Börjars, Timothy Colleman, Bert 18 Cornillie, Hendrik De Smet, Dagmar Divjak, Matthias Gerner, Elma Kerz, Svenja 19 Kranich, María José López-Couso, Christian Mair, Tanja Mortelmans, Colette 20 Moore, Maj-Britt Mosegaard-Hansen, Muriel Norde, Helka Riionheimo, Lauren 21 Van Alsenoy, Sophie Van Laer, Alice Vittrant and Ilse Wischer. Furthermore, the 22 reviewers’ careful feedback and suggestions have greatly improved the quality 23 of the papers. 24 Finally, we wish to thank the contributors for developing their study pre- 25 sented at the GRAMIS conference into an article for this volume, for their efficient 26 cooperation and for their patience. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:59) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) pp. 5–6 1758 van Olmen_00b_Ack (p. v) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:59) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) pp. 5–6 1758 van Olmen_00b_Ack (p. vi) 1 Table of contents 2 3 4 Acknowledgments v 5 6 Hubert Cuyckens, Lobke Ghesquière and Daniël Van Olmen 7 Introduction 1 8 9 I Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification 10 11 Heiko Narrog 12 1 Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, 13 their dynamicization and a synthesis 19 14 15 Karin Beijering 16 2 Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification: The case of the Swedish 17 modals må and måtte 47 18 19 Adeline Patard and Johan van der Auwera 20 3 The French comparative modal constructions faire mieux de, valoir mieux 21 and falloir mieux 81 22 23 Gijsbert Rutten and Marijke van der Wal 24 4 Discourse continuity and the written medium: Continuative relative clauses 25 in the history of Dutch 113 26 27 Hilary Chappell 28 5 From verb of saying to discourse marker in Southern Min: 29 (Inter)subjectification and grammaticalization 139 30 31 Thomas Egan 32 6 The subjective and intersubjective uses of “fail to” and 33 “not fail to” 167 34 35 II Grammaticalization and directionality 36 37 Luisa Brucale and Egle Mocciaro 38 7 Paths of grammaticalization of the Early Latin per/per-: 39 A cognitive hypothesis 199 40 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:59) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) 1652 Fernandez pp. 7–8 1758 van Olmen_00c_Contents (p. vii) viii Table of contents 1 Andrzej M. Łęcki and Jerzy Nykiel 2 8 Grammaticalization of the English adverbial subordinator in order 3 that 237 4 5 Björn Hansen 6 9 What happens after grammaticalization? Post-grammaticalization 7 processes in the area of modality 257 8 9 Helle Metslang 10 10 Can a language be forced? The case of Estonian 281 11 12 Debra Ziegeler 13 11 Historical replication in contact grammaticalization 311 14 15 Freek Van de Velde and Béatrice Lamiroy ff 16 12 External possessors in West Germanic and Romance: Di erential speed in fi 17 the drift toward NP con gurationality 353 18 19 Index 401 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:59) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) 1652 Fernandez pp. 7–8 1758 van Olmen_00c_Contents (p. viii) 1 Hubert Cuyckens, Lobke Ghesquière and Daniël Van Olmen 2 3 Introduction 4 5 1 Grammaticalization 6 7 For more than three decades, grammaticalization has attracted great interest in 8 the domains of historical linguistics and typology. The work by Lehmann (1995 9 [1982]), the collective volumes by Traugott and Heine (1991) and the handbook 10 by Hopper and Traugott (1993) were crucial in the development of the field. They 11 generated a wealth of case studies applying the parameters of grammaticaliza- 12 tion laid out in these seminal works to (largely morphosyntactic) diachronic 13 change and cross-linguistic variation studies (Bybee et al. 1994; Ramat and 14 Hopper 1998; Fischer et al. 2000). Following up on some critical assessments, 15 most poignantly voiced in a special issue of Language Sciences (Campbell 16 2001), grammaticalization seemed to have found renewed vigor, with the con- 17 ference series “New Reflections on Grammaticalization” (Wischer and Diewald 18 2002; Fischer et al. 2004; López-Couso and Seoane 2008; Seoane and López- 19 Couso 2008; Davidse et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2014);1 with the publication of 20 such important volumes as Bisang et al. (2004), Stathi et al. (2010), Traugott 21 and Trousdale (2010) and Van linden et al. (2010); with special issues in 22 Language Sciences (Norde et al. 2013), Folia Linguistica (Von Mengden and 23 Simon 2014) and Language Sciences (Breban and Kranich 2015); and with the 24 publication of Heine and Kuteva’s World Lexicon of Grammaticalization (2002) 25 and Narrog and Heine’s The Handbook of Grammaticalization (2011). Further, as 26 Traugott (2010b) described and Himmelmann (2004) most clearly articulated, 27 linguists also became aware that grammaticalization should not only be viewed 28 as “reduction”, but also as “expansion” (see also Tabor & Traugott 1998). The 29 period after the turn of the century also saw grammaticalization studies spread- 30 ing out to the generative paradigm (Roberts and Roussou 2003; Van Gelderen 31 2004) and more recently to construction grammar (Traugott and Trousdale 32 2013). The importance of grammaticalization studies in nicely summed up in 33 Breban et al. (2012: 1): 34 35 36 37 1 It is uncertain whether the conference series “New Reflections on Grammaticalization” will 38 be continued, but a new quadrennial series has seen the light “International Conference on 39 Grammaticalization Theory and Data”, held in Rouen. Selected papers from the first conference 40 have been published in Hancil and König (2014). DOI 10.1515/9783110492347-001 (Unicode 9 19/11/16 17:59) WDG-New (155mmÂ230mm) DGMetaSerifScience (OpenType) pp. 1–16 1758 van Olmen_00d_Introduction (p. 1) 2 Hubert Cuyckens, Lobke Ghesquière and Daniël Van Olmen 1 It is unquestionable that the study of grammaticalization and related processes of change 2 has had an enormous impact on the recent linguistic scene.
Recommended publications
  • On Degrammaticalization: Controversial Points and Possible Explanations

    On Degrammaticalization: Controversial Points and Possible Explanations

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 On degrammaticalization: controversial points and possible explanations Viti, Carlotta Abstract: This paper discusses the problem of degrammaticalization, that is, the exceptions to the uni- directionality of grammaticalization. After analyzing the criteria that allow us to distinguish between various instances of counter-directional change, two principles underlying degrammaticalization are iden- tified; one is related to the type of language and the other to the type of target structures inwhich degrammaticalization occurs. Firstly, the targets of degrammaticalization are usually closed-class parts of speech with an abstract semantic component. Secondly, the languages in which counter-directional grammatical changes occur turn out to be deprived of an elaborate fusional morphology. These findings may also have an impact on the theoretical conception of grammaticalization, some of whose defini- tional properties are discussed. The paper ends with a discussion of a more controversial point, namely, counter-directional changes by folk etymology rather than by etymology proper. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0014 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-117203 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Viti, Carlotta (2015). On degrammaticalization: controversial points and possible explanations. Folia Linguistica, 49(2):381-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0014 Folia Linguistica 2015; 49(2): 381–419 Carlotta Viti* On degrammaticalization: Controversial points and possible explanations DOI 10.1515/flin-2015-0014 Submitted November 19, 2014; Revision invited November 2, 2014; Revision received March 6, 2015; Accepted May 14, 2015 Abstract: This paper discusses the problem of degrammaticalization, that is, the exceptions to the unidirectionality of grammaticalization.
  • Inflectional Morphology in Optimality Theory

    Inflectional Morphology in Optimality Theory

    Inflectional Morphology in Optimality Theory A Dissertation Presented by Zheng Xu to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics Stony Brook University August 2007 Copyright by Zheng Xu August 2007 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Zheng Xu We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation Mark Aronoff, Professor of Linguistics Robert D. Hoberman, Professor of Linguistics Alice C. Harris, Professor of Linguistics James P. Blevins, Assistant Director of Research Research Center for English and Applied Linguistics University of Cambridge This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Inflectional Morphology in Optimality Theory by Zheng Xu Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics Stony Brook University 2007 This dissertation proposes an inferential-realizational model of inflectional morphology (Matthews 1972, Zwicky 1985, Anderson 1992, Aronoff 1994, Stump 2001) within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993). Following Russell 1995, Yip 1998, Hyman 2003, MacBride 2004, I assume that the phonological information of inflectional affixes is introduced through realization constraints (RC) which associate abstract morphosyntactic or semantic feature values with phonological forms. I propose that rankings of realization constraints conform to the specificity condition, i.e. a constraint realizing a more specific morphosyntactic feature value set outranks a less specific realization constraint. I also propose that the unmarked situation in which one feature value is realized by one form (Wurzel 1989) is encoded in two universal and violable markedness constraints, *FEATURE SPLIT which bans the realization of a feature value by more than one form and *FEATURE FUSION which bans a form realizing more than one feature value.
  • A Cross-Linguistic Study of Grammatical Organization

    A Cross-Linguistic Study of Grammatical Organization

    Complement Clauses and Complementation Systems: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Grammatical Organization Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt dem Rat der Philosophischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena von Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, M.A. geb. am 26.06.1981 in Eisenach Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Holger Diessel (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena) 2. Prof. Dr. Volker Gast (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena) 3. Prof. Dr. Martin Haspelmath (MPI für Evolutionäre Anthropologie Leipzig) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.12.2014 Contents Abbreviations and notational conventions iii 1 Introduction 1 2 The phenomenon of complementation 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Argument status 9 2.2.1 Complement clauses and argument-structure typology 10 2.2.2 On the notion of ‘argument’ 21 2.3 On the notion of ‘clause’ 26 2.3.1 Complementation constructions as biclausal units 27 2.3.2 The internal structure of clauses 31 2.4 The semantic content of complement clauses 34 2.5 Environments of complementation 36 2.5.1 Predicate classes as environments of complementation 37 2.5.2 Environments studied in the present work 39 3 Data and methods 48 3.1 Sampling and sources of information 48 3.2 Selection and nature of the data points 53 3.3 Storage and analysis of the data 59 4 The internal structure of complementation patterns 62 4.1 Introduction 62 4.2 The morphological status of the predicate 64 4.2.1 Nominalization 65 4.2.2 Converbs 68 4.2.3 Participles 70 4.2.4 Bare verb stems 71 4.2.5 Other dependent
  • “Gender and Declension Mismatches in West Nordic” Ivar Berg

    “Gender and Declension Mismatches in West Nordic” Ivar Berg

    “Gender and declension mismatches in West Nordic” Ivar Berg Department of language and literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology [email protected] Note: This is a postprint version of an article in Historical Linguistics 2015. Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27–31 July 2015, ed. by Claudia Fabrizio & Michela Cennamo, pp. 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. The publisher should be consulted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form. Gender and declension mismatches in West Nordic Abstract: There has been a diachronic tendency to align gender and declension in West Nordic (Bjorvand 1972; Enger 2004), making it particularly interesting to consider “mismatches” that go against this general trend. This paper addresses such cases and discusses possible causes of the mismatches as well as the interaction between phonological and morphological changes in their diachronic development. It appears that the diachronic interaction of gender and declension forms complex patterns of processes related to semantics, phonology, and morphology. The West Nordic development corroborates the view that the connection of an inflection class to some extramorphological property, for instance a semantic or phonological one, is a favoured development (Wurzel 1989; Carstairs-McCarthy 2000). Key words: gender, inflection class, morphology, Norwegian, Icelandic, Old Norse. Running head: Gender and declension mismatches in West Nordic 1 Introduction In all Germanic languages, nouns are classified according to gender and declension (nominal inflection class), although the complexity of the systems and the degree of correlation between the two vary (Kürschner and Nübling 2011). In Proto-Germanic, most declensions comprised words of several genders, and inflectional endings then offered no clue as to the gender of a given word.
  • Information to Users

    Information to Users

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quaiity of the copy sulimitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6* x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Leaming 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI' WEAK OBJECT PRONOUN PLACEMENT IN LATER MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN GREEK DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Panayiotis A. Pappas ***** The Ohio State University 2001 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Brian D.
  • Humanity Fluent Software Language

    Humanity Fluent Software Language

    Pyash: Humanity Fluent Software Language Logan Streondj February 13, 2019 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Problem ................................... 4 1.1.1 Disglossia ............................... 4 1.2 Paradigm ................................... 5 1.2.1 Easy to write bad code ........................ 5 1.2.2 Obsolete Non-Parallel Paradigms .................... 5 1.3 Inspiration ................................. 5 1.4 Answer .................................... 5 1.4.1 Vocabulary ............................... 5 1.4.2 Grammar ................................ 5 1.4.3 Paradigm ................................ 6 I Core Language 7 2 Phonology 8 2.1 Notes .................................... 8 2.2 Contribution ................................. 8 3 Grammar 10 3.1 Composition ................................. 10 3.2 Grammar Tree ................................. 10 3.3 Noun Classes ................................. 10 3.3.1 grammatical number .......................... 12 3.3.2 noun classes for relative adjustment ................. 12 3.3.3 noun classes by animacy ........................ 13 3.3.4 noun classes regarding reproductive attributes ............ 13 3.4 Tense .................................... 13 3.5 Aspects ................................... 13 3.6 Grammatical Mood ............................... 14 3.7 participles ................................. 16 4 Dictionary 18 4.1 Prosody ................................... 18 4.2 Trochaic Rhythm ............................... 18 4.3 Espeak .................................... 18 4.4
  • Context, Contact and Development Editor: Laura Wright (Cambridge)

    Context, Contact and Development Editor: Laura Wright (Cambridge)

    Volume I: Context, contact and development Editor: Laura Wright (Cambridge) Introduction: English, Englishes and the English Language (Raymond Hickey) I The context of English 1. The Indo-European framework (Donald Ringe) 2. English in its Germanic surrounding (Wayne Harbert) 3. Key events in the history of English (Julia Cuesta) 4. The geography of English in England (Merja Steenroos) 5. Philology and the history of English (Haruko Momma) II Contact and external influences 6. Early contact with Celtic (Raymond Hickey) 7. Classical languages in the history of English (Olga Timofeeva) 8. The Scandinavian period (Richard Dance and Sarah Pons-Sanz) 9. French and English in the later Middle Ages (Geert de Wilde) 10. Code-switching and language mixing (Herbert Schendl) 11. Early standardisation (Louise Sylvester) 12. Neoclassical borrowing and influence on English (Letitia Vezzosi) 13. Typological reorientation in the history of English (Marion Elenbaas) III The long view by levels of language These chapters are intended to cover the entire period of the history of English and thus to satisfy the need for chronological overviews. To achieve this, the authors are to be given more space with a target length for the chapters of between 40 and 50 pages. Each chapter is to have sections on Old, Middle, Early Modern and Late Modern English (up to present-day English) to allow for direct comparison between chapters. 14. Historical phonology (Donka Minkova) 15. Historical morphology (Elżbieta Adamczyk) 16. Historical syntax (Bettelou Los) 17. Historical semantics (Kathryn Allan) 18. Historical pragmatics (Andreas Jucker) NewCHEL, Vol. 1: Context, contact and development Page 2 of 45 19.
  • The Grammar of Words

    The Grammar of Words

    www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Series editors Keith Brown, Eve V. Clark, April McMahon, Jim Miller, and Lesley Milroy The Grammar of Words www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com O XFORD T EXTBOOKS IN L INGUISTICS General editors: Keith Brown, University of Cambridge; Eve V. Clark, Stanford University; April McMahon, University of Sheffield; Jim Miller, University of Auckland; Lesley Milroy, University of Michigan This series provides lively and authoritative introductions to the approaches, methods, and theories associated with the main subfields of linguistics. P The Grammar of Words An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology by Geert Booij A Practical Introduction to Phonetics Second edition by J. C. Catford Meaning in Language An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics Second edition by Alan Cruse www.IELTS4U.blogfa.comPrinciples and Parameters An Introduction to Syntactic Theory by Peter W. Culicover Semantic Analysis A Practical Introduction by Cliff Goddard Cognitive Grammar An Introduction by John R. Taylor Linguistic Categorization Third edition by John R. Taylor I Pragmatics by Yan Huang The Grammar of Words An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology Geert Booij www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan South Korea Poland Portugal Singapore Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc.
  • A a Posteriori a Priori Aachener Förderdiagnostische Abbild

    A a Posteriori a Priori Aachener Förderdiagnostische Abbild

    WSK-Gesamtlemmaliste (Stand: Januar 2017) A abgeleitetes Adverb Abklatsch a posteriori abgeleitetes Nominal Abkürzung a priori abgeleitetes Verb Abkürzungsprozess Aachener abgeleitetes Wort Abkürzungspunkt Förderdiagnostische abgerüstete Abkürzungsschrift Abbild Transliterationsvariante Abkürzungswort Abbildtheorie abgeschlossene Kategorie Ablativ Abbildung Abgeschlossenheit Ablativ, absoluter Abbildung, Beschränkung Abglitt einer ablative Abgraph Abbildung, Bild einer ablative case Abgrenzungssignal Abbildung, konzeptuelle ablativus absolutus abhängige Prädikation Abbildung-1 ablativus causae abhängige Rede Abbildungen, ablativus comitativus abhängige Struktur Komposition von ablativus comparationis abhängiger Fragesatz Abbildungsfunktion ablativus copiae abhängiger Hauptsatz Abbildungstheorie ablativus discriminis abhängiger Satz Abbreviation ablativus instrumenti abhängiges Morphem abbreviatory convention ablativus limitationis Abhängigkeit Abbreviatur ablativus loci Abhängigkeit, entfernte Abbreviaturschrift ablativus mensurae Abhängigkeit, funktionale Abbruchpause ablativus modi Abbruchsignal Abhängigkeit, gegenseitige ablativus originis Abc Abhängigkeit, kodierte ablativus pretii Abdeckung Abhängigkeit, ablativus qualitatis Abduktion konzeptuelle ablativus respectus Abecedarium Abhängigkeit, ablativus separativus sequenzielle abessive ablativus sociativus Abhängigkeitsbaum A-Bewegung ablativus temporis Abhängigkeitsgrammatik Abfolge Ablaut Abhängigkeitshypothese Abfolge, markierte Ablaut, qualitativer ability abfragen Ablaut, quantitativer
  • Title: Certainty and Doubt in Academic Discourse : Epistemic Modality Markers in English and Polish Linguistics Articles

    Title: Certainty and Doubt in Academic Discourse : Epistemic Modality Markers in English and Polish Linguistics Articles

    Title: Certainty and doubt in academic discourse : epistemic modality markers in English and Polish linguistics articles Author: Krystyna Warchał Citation style: Warchał Krystyna. (2015). Certainty and doubt in academic discourse : epistemic modality markers in English and Polish linguistics articles. Katowice : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Certainty and doubt in academic discourse: Epistemic modality markers in English and Polish linguistics articles For Hania and Jasio NR 3375 Certainty and doubt in academic discourse: Epistemic modality markers in English and Polish linguistics articles Krystyna Warchał Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego • Katowice 2015 Editor of the series: Językoznawstwo Neofilologiczne Maria Wysocka Referee Piotr Mamet Contents Introduction . 7 1. Academic discourse and its rhetoric . 11 1.1 Academic discourse community: its genres and values . 15 1.2 The cultural factor in academic communication . 18 1.3 English academic discourse: Previous studies . 22 1.3.1 Academic register(s) . 22 1.3.2 Academic genres . 26 1.3.3 Principal themes . 32 1.3.4 English as an academic lingua franca . 41 1.4 Polish academic discourse: Previous studies . 44 1.5 Concluding remarks . 50 2. Linguistic modality . 53 2.1 Approaches and concepts . 53 2.1.1 Sentential, sub-sentential and discourse modality . 54 2.1.2 Modality and mood . 55 2.1.3 Modality and the propositional content . 57 2.1.4 Modality and subjectivity . 59 2.1.5 Modality and the realis/irrealis distinction . 63 2.1.6 Modality and relevance . 67 2.2 Modal meanings and values . 71 2.2.1 The epistemic/deontic distinction and related modal subdomains . 71 2.2.2 The root/epistemic distinction .
  • WSK-Gesamtlemmaliste (Stand: Mai 2017)

    WSK-Gesamtlemmaliste (Stand: Mai 2017)

    WSK-Gesamtlemmaliste (Stand: Mai 2017) A abgeleitetes Verb Ablativ a posteriori abgeleitetes Wort Ablativ, absoluter a priori abgerüstete ablative Transliterationsvariante Aachener Förderdiagnostische ablative case abgeschlossene Kategorie Abbild ablativus absolutus Abgeschlossenheit Abbildtheorie ablativus causae Abglitt Abbildung ablativus comitativus Abgraph Abbildung, Beschränkung ablativus comparationis einer Abgrenzungssignal ablativus copiae Abbildung, Bild einer abhängige Prädikation ablativus discriminis Abbildung, konzeptuelle abhängige Rede ablativus instrumenti Abbildung-1 abhängige Struktur ablativus limitationis Abbildungen, Komposition abhängiger Fragesatz von ablativus loci abhängiger Hauptsatz Abbildungsfunktion ablativus mensurae abhängiger Satz Abbildungstheorie ablativus modi abhängiges Morphem Abbreviation ablativus originis Abhängigkeit abbreviatory convention ablativus pretii Abhängigkeit, entfernte Abbreviatur ablativus qualitatis Abhängigkeit, funktionale Abbreviaturschrift ablativus respectus Abhängigkeit, gegenseitige Abbruchpause ablativus separativus Abhängigkeit, kodierte Abbruchsignal ablativus sociativus Abhängigkeit, konzeptuelle Abc ablativus temporis Abhängigkeit, sequenzielle Abdeckung Ablaut Abhängigkeitsbaum Abduktion Ablaut, qualitativer Abhängigkeitsgrammatik Abecedarium Ablaut, quantitativer Abhängigkeitshypothese abessive Ablautausgleich ability A-Bewegung Ablautbildung Abjad Abfolge Ablautdoppelung Abklatsch Abfolge, markierte Ablautkombination Abkürzung abfragen Ablautreihe Abkürzungsprozess
  • Paradigm Copying in Tungusic: the Lamunkhin Dialect of Ėven and Beyond Brigitte Pakendorf

    Paradigm Copying in Tungusic: the Lamunkhin Dialect of Ėven and Beyond Brigitte Pakendorf

    Paradigm copying in Tungusic: The Lamunkhin dialect of Ėven and beyond Brigitte Pakendorf To cite this version: Brigitte Pakendorf. Paradigm copying in Tungusic: The Lamunkhin dialect of Ėven and beyond. Paradigm Change. In the Transeurasian Languages and Beyond, pp.287-310, 2014. halshs-01179245 HAL Id: halshs-01179245 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01179245 Submitted on 16 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. John Benjamins Publishing Company This is a contribution from Paradigm Change. In the Transeurasian languages and beyond. Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang. © 2014. John Benjamins Publishing Company This electronic file may not be altered in any way. The author(s) of this article is/are permitted to use this PDF file to generate printed copies to be used by way of offprints, for their personal use only. Permission is granted by the publishers to post this file on a closed server which is accessible to members (students and staff) only of the author’s/s’ institute, it is not permitted to post this PDF on the open internet. For any other use of this material prior written permission should be obtained from the publishers or through the Copyright Clearance Center (for USA: www.copyright.com).