DOCSLIB.ORG

Download This Article in PDF Format

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download This Article in PDF Format A&A 631, A7 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935922 Astronomy & © ESO 2019 Astrophysics Pebbles versus planetesimals: the case of Trappist-1 G. A. L. Coleman, A. Leleu?, Y. Alibert, and W. Benz Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bern, Gesellschaftsstr. 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] Received 20 May 2019 / Accepted 11 August 2019 ABSTRACT We present a study into the formation of planetary systems around low mass stars similar to Trappist-1, through the accretion of either planetesimals or pebbles. The aim is to determine if the currently observed systems around low mass stars could favour one scenario over the other. To determine these differences, we ran numerous N-body simulations, coupled to a thermally evolving viscous 1D disc model, and including prescriptions for planet migration, photoevaporation, and pebble and planetesimal dynamics. We mainly examine the differences between the pebble and planetesimal accretion scenarios, but we also look at the influences of disc mass, size of planetesimals, and the percentage of solids locked up within pebbles. When comparing the resulting planetary systems to Trappist-1, we find that a wide range of initial conditions for both the pebble and planetesimal accretion scenarios can form planetary systems similar to Trappist-1, in terms of planet mass, periods, and resonant configurations. Typically these planets formed exterior to the water iceline and migrated in resonant convoys into the inner region close to the central star. When comparing the planetary systems formed through pebble accretion to those formed through planetesimal accretion, we find a large number of similarities, including average planet masses, eccentricities, inclinations, and period ratios. One major difference between the two scenarios was that of the water content of the planets. When including the effects of ablation and full recycling of the planets’ envelope with the disc, the planets formed through pebble accretion were extremely dry, whilst those formed through planetesimal accretion were extremely wet. If the water content is not fully recycled and instead falls to the planets’ core, or if ablation of the water is neglected, then the planets formed through pebble accretion are extremely wet, similar to those formed through planetesimal accretion. Should the water content of the Trappist-1 planets be determined accurately, this could point to a preferred formation pathway for planetary systems, or to specific physics that may be at play. Key words. planetary systems – planets and satellites: formation – planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability – planet-disk interactions 1. Introduction (Anglada-Escudé et al. 2016) and Ross 128 (Bonfils et al. 2018b) each contain a planet that is very similar in mass and period The recent discovery of seven Earth-sized planets orbiting the to Trappist-1 g. More recently, planets have also been observed low mass star Trappist-1 (Gillon et al. 2017; Luger et al. 2017) has around Barnard’s Star (Ribas et al. 2018), LHS 1140 (Dittmann led to many questions about the formation and evolution of such et al. 2017; Ment et al. 2019), and GJ 1214 (Luque et al. 2018), a complex system. Not only are all seven planets orbiting close significantly increasing the number of planets observed around to their parent star (with orbital periods ≤20 d), but they also low mass stars. all appear to form a resonant chain, such that their orbital peri- Following the discovery of Proxima b (Anglada-Escudé et al. ods are near integer ratios of each other. The formation of such 2016), Coleman et al.(2017a) presented numerous formation sce- resonant chains are a natural outcome of interactions between narios for such a planet orbiting such a low-mass star. These the planets and their nascent protoplanetary discs (Cresswell & scenarios ranged from in situ formation, to migration of a sin- Nelson 2008). These resonant chains have been observed in gle or multiple planetary embryos from outside the iceline after other compact planetary systems (Lissauer et al. 2011; Fabrycky accreting either planetesimals or pebbles. They showed that each et al. 2014; Mills et al. 2016), and have also been formed in scenario yielded subtly different observational signatures such complex planet formation simulations involving multiple bod- as multiplicity, planet composition, and orbital architectures. ies (Hellary & Nelson 2012; Coleman & Nelson 2014, 2016a,b). In situ formation produced numerous volatile-poor Earth-sized Whilst Trappist-1 may be the most high-profile planetary sys- planets with little evidence for resonant chains; migration of a tem around low mass stars, it is interesting to note that a number single embryo from outside the iceline formed a single volatile- of similar planetary systems have also been recently observed. rich Earth-sized planet on a circular orbit; whilst the migration For example, two planets with periods less than five days have of multiple embryos formed numerous Earth-sized planets rich been confirmed around YZ Ceti, with a third planet still await- in volatiles, often displaying mean-motion resonances (MMRs) ing confirmation (Astudillo-Defru et al. 2017a; Robertson 2018). between neighbouring planets. More recently Alibert & Benz GJ 1132 (Berta-Thompson et al. 2015; Bonfils et al. 2018a) (2017) studied the formation and composition of planets around and GJ 3323 (Astudillo-Defru et al. 2017b) each have two low mass stars, finding that close-in planets have similar masses super-Earths orbiting close to their central star, whilst Proxima and radii (peaking at ∼1 R⊕), and also that the properties of the ? CHEOPS Fellow. protoplanetary disc and their correlation with the stellar mass Article published by EDP Sciences A7, page 1 of 24 A&A 631, A7 (2019) are important in determining the characteristics of the planet 2. Physical model (e.g. water content). Since these papers were either only aiming to form a single planet, or only involved single-planet-in-a- The physical model we adopt for this study is based on the planet system simulations, they did not address the formation of such formation models of Coleman & Nelson(2014, 2016a). These a complex system as Trappist-1. models run N-body simulations using the Mercury-6 symplectic A scenario that has recently been proposed for the formation integrator (Chambers 1999), adapted to include the disc models of the Trappist-1 planetary system through pebble accretion is and physical processes described below. outlined in Ormel et al.(2017). In their scenario, they assume (i) We solve the standard diffusion equation for a 1D that the planetary embryos form at the water iceline in the disc, viscous α-disc model (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973; Lynden-Bell after millimeter- or centimeter-sized particles (i.e. pebbles) have & Pringle 1974). Disc temperatures are calculated by balancing accumulated there. Once a planetary embryo forms, it accretes black-body cooling against viscous heating and stellar irradi- × −3 the surrounding pebbles before migrating in towards the central ation. The viscous parameter αvisc = 1 10 throughout most star. As the embryo migrates inwards, it accretes dry pebbles, of the disc, but increases to αactive = 0:005 in regions where ≥ further increasing its mass, whilst a new embryo forms at the T 1000 K to mimic the fact that fully developed turbulence iceline and goes through the same process. The planets then can develop in regions where the temperature exceeds this value migrate to the inner edge of the disc, where their migration (Umebayashi & Nakano 1988; Desch & Turner 2015). ceases, allowing the planets to enter into first-order mean motion (ii) The final stages of disc removal occur through a pho- resonances. As the disc disperses, the first order resonances can toevaporative wind. We use a standard photoevaporation model for most of the disc evolution (Dullemond et al. 2007), corre- be broken allowing the planets to dynamically rearrange into new sponding to a photoevaporative wind being launched from the configurations (Coleman & Nelson 2016a; Izidoro et al. 2017). upper and lower disc surfaces. Direct photoevaporation of the Recently Schoonenberg et al.(2019) explored this scenario in disc is switched on during the final evolution phases when an a more quantitative setting. They found that this method was inner cavity forms in the disc, corresponding to the outer edge unable to form planetary systems similar to Trappist-1. How- of the disc cavity being exposed directly to the stellar radiation ever, instead of forming planetary embryos one after another, (Alexander & Armitage 2009). they were able to form planetary systems similar to Trappist-1 if (iii) The N-body simulations consist of a number of planetary multiple planetary embryos formed at the iceline on short time- embryos that can mutually interact gravitationally and collide. scales (e.g. 1000 yr). These embryos could then mutually interact In addition, some models also include planetesimals (bodies and accrete dry and wet pebbles whilst slowly migrating closer to with radii either 100 m ≤ ≤ 1 km). Planetesimals orbit- the central star. The planets in the simulated systems then com- Rp ing in the gaseous protoplanetary disc experience size depen- pared favourably to Trappist-1 in terms of planet masses and dent aerodynamic drag (Adachi et al. 1976; Weidenschilling water fractions. 1977). Collisions between protoplanets and other protoplanets In this paper we used up-to-date models of planet forma- or planetesimals always result in perfect merging. Planetesimal- tion utilising either planetesimal or pebble accretion, in studying planetesimal interactions and collisions are neglected for reasons the formation of planetary systems around low mass stars, of computational speed. with a specific goal in forming planetary systems similar to (iv) We use the torque formulae from Paardekooper et al. Trappist-1. We used the Mercury-6 symplectic integrator to (2010, 2011) to simulate type I migration due to Lindblad and compute the dynamical evolution and collisional accretion of corotation torques acting on the planetary embryos.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Planetary Systems Imager for TMT Astro2020 APC White Paper Optical and Infrared Observations from the Ground Corresponding Author: Michael P
    The Planetary Systems Imager for TMT Astro2020 APC White Paper Optical and Infrared Observations from the Ground Corresponding Author: Michael P. Fitzgerald (University of California, Los Angeles; mpfi[email protected]) Co-authors: Diego) Vanessa Bailey (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) Takayuki Kotani (Astrobiology Center/NAOJ) Christoph Baranec (University of Hawaii) David Lafreniere` (Universite´ de Montreal)´ Natasha Batalha (University of California Santa Michael Liu (University of Hawaii) Cruz) Julien Lozi (Subaru) Bjorn¨ Benneke (Universite´ de Montreal)´ Jessica R. Lu (University of California, Berkeley) Charles Beichman (California Institute of Jared Males (University of Arizona) Technology) Mark Marley (NASA Ames Research Center) Timothy Brandt (University of California, Santa Christian Marois (NRC Canada) Barbara) Dimitri Mawet (California Institute of Jeffrey Chilcote (Notre Dame) Technology/JPL) Mark Chun (University of Hawaii) Benjamin Mazin (University of California Santa Ian Crossfield (MIT) Barbara) Thayne Currie (NASA Ames Research Center) Maxwell Millar-Blanchaer (Jet Propulsion Kristina Davis (University of California Santa Laboratory) Barbara) Soumen Mondal (SN Bose National Centre for Richard Dekany (California Institute of Technology) Basic Sciences) Jacques-Robert Delorme (California Institute of Naoshi Murakami (Hokkaido University) Technology) Ruth Murray-Clay (University of California, Santa Ruobing Dong (University of Victoria) Cruz) Rene Doyon (Universite´ de Montreal)´ Norio Narita (Astrobiology Center) Courtney Dressing
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multifaceted Planetesimal Formation Process
    The Multifaceted Planetesimal Formation Process Anders Johansen Lund University Jurgen¨ Blum Technische Universitat¨ Braunschweig Hidekazu Tanaka Hokkaido University Chris Ormel University of California, Berkeley Martin Bizzarro Copenhagen University Hans Rickman Uppsala University Polish Academy of Sciences Space Research Center, Warsaw Accumulation of dust and ice particles into planetesimals is an important step in the planet formation process. Planetesimals are the seeds of both terrestrial planets and the solid cores of gas and ice giants forming by core accretion. Left-over planetesimals in the form of asteroids, trans-Neptunian objects and comets provide a unique record of the physical conditions in the solar nebula. Debris from planetesimal collisions around other stars signposts that the planetesimal formation process, and hence planet formation, is ubiquitous in the Galaxy. The planetesimal formation stage extends from micrometer-sized dust and ice to bodies which can undergo run-away accretion. The latter ranges in size from 1 km to 1000 km, dependent on the planetesimal eccentricity excited by turbulent gas density fluctuations. Particles face many barriers during this growth, arising mainly from inefficient sticking, fragmentation and radial drift. Two promising growth pathways are mass transfer, where small aggregates transfer up to 50% of their mass in high-speed collisions with much larger targets, and fluffy growth, where aggregate cross sections and sticking probabilities are enhanced by a low internal density. A wide range of particle sizes, from mm to 10 m, concentrate in the turbulent gas flow. Overdense filaments fragment gravitationally into bound particle clumps, with most mass entering planetesimals of contracted radii from 100 to 500 km, depending on local disc properties.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Closest Stars Designation R.A
    100 closest stars Designation R.A. Dec. Mag. Common Name 1 Gliese+Jahreis 551 14h30m –62°40’ 11.09 Proxima Centauri Gliese+Jahreis 559 14h40m –60°50’ 0.01, 1.34 Alpha Centauri A,B 2 Gliese+Jahreis 699 17h58m 4°42’ 9.53 Barnard’s Star 3 Gliese+Jahreis 406 10h56m 7°01’ 13.44 Wolf 359 4 Gliese+Jahreis 411 11h03m 35°58’ 7.47 Lalande 21185 5 Gliese+Jahreis 244 6h45m –16°49’ -1.43, 8.44 Sirius A,B 6 Gliese+Jahreis 65 1h39m –17°57’ 12.54, 12.99 BL Ceti, UV Ceti 7 Gliese+Jahreis 729 18h50m –23°50’ 10.43 Ross 154 8 Gliese+Jahreis 905 23h45m 44°11’ 12.29 Ross 248 9 Gliese+Jahreis 144 3h33m –9°28’ 3.73 Epsilon Eridani 10 Gliese+Jahreis 887 23h06m –35°51’ 7.34 Lacaille 9352 11 Gliese+Jahreis 447 11h48m 0°48’ 11.13 Ross 128 12 Gliese+Jahreis 866 22h39m –15°18’ 13.33, 13.27, 14.03 EZ Aquarii A,B,C 13 Gliese+Jahreis 280 7h39m 5°14’ 10.7 Procyon A,B 14 Gliese+Jahreis 820 21h07m 38°45’ 5.21, 6.03 61 Cygni A,B 15 Gliese+Jahreis 725 18h43m 59°38’ 8.90, 9.69 16 Gliese+Jahreis 15 0h18m 44°01’ 8.08, 11.06 GX Andromedae, GQ Andromedae 17 Gliese+Jahreis 845 22h03m –56°47’ 4.69 Epsilon Indi A,B,C 18 Gliese+Jahreis 1111 8h30m 26°47’ 14.78 DX Cancri 19 Gliese+Jahreis 71 1h44m –15°56’ 3.49 Tau Ceti 20 Gliese+Jahreis 1061 3h36m –44°31’ 13.09 21 Gliese+Jahreis 54.1 1h13m –17°00’ 12.02 YZ Ceti 22 Gliese+Jahreis 273 7h27m 5°14’ 9.86 Luyten’s Star 23 SO 0253+1652 2h53m 16°53’ 15.14 24 SCR 1845-6357 18h45m –63°58’ 17.40J 25 Gliese+Jahreis 191 5h12m –45°01’ 8.84 Kapteyn’s Star 26 Gliese+Jahreis 825 21h17m –38°52’ 6.67 AX Microscopii 27 Gliese+Jahreis 860 22h28m 57°42’ 9.79,
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of the Solar System (Chapter 8)
    Formation of the Solar System (Chapter 8) Based on Chapter 8 • This material will be useful for understanding Chapters 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 on “Formation of the solar system”, “Planetary geology”, “Planetary atmospheres”, “Jovian planet systems”, “Remnants of ice and rock”, “Extrasolar planets” and “The Sun: Our Star” • Chapters 2, 3, 4, and 7 on “The orbits of the planets”, “Why does Earth go around the Sun?”, “Momentum, energy, and matter”, and “Our planetary system” will be useful for understanding this chapter Goals for Learning • Where did the solar system come from? • How did planetesimals form? • How did planets form? Patterns in the Solar System • Patterns of motion (orbits and rotations) • Two types of planets: Small, rocky inner planets and large, gas outer planets • Many small asteroids and comets whose orbits and compositions are similar • Exceptions to these patterns, such as Earth’s large moon and Uranus’s sideways tilt Help from Other Stars • Use observations of the formation of other stars to improve our theory for the formation of our solar system • Use this theory to make predictions about the formation of other planetary systems Nebular Theory of Solar System Formation • A cloud of gas, the “solar nebula”, collapses inwards under its own weight • Cloud heats up, spins faster, gets flatter (disk) as a central star forms • Gas cools and some materials condense as solid particles that collide, stick together, and grow larger Where does a cloud of gas come from? • Big Bang -> Hydrogen and Helium • First stars use this
    [Show full text]
  • The Subsurface Habitability of Small, Icy Exomoons J
    A&A 636, A50 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937035 & © ESO 2020 Astrophysics The subsurface habitability of small, icy exomoons J. N. K. Y. Tjoa1,?, M. Mueller1,2,3, and F. F. S. van der Tak1,2 1 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands 3 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Received 1 November 2019 / Accepted 8 March 2020 ABSTRACT Context. Assuming our Solar System as typical, exomoons may outnumber exoplanets. If their habitability fraction is similar, they would thus constitute the largest portion of habitable real estate in the Universe. Icy moons in our Solar System, such as Europa and Enceladus, have already been shown to possess liquid water, a prerequisite for life on Earth. Aims. We intend to investigate under what thermal and orbital circumstances small, icy moons may sustain subsurface oceans and thus be “subsurface habitable”. We pay specific attention to tidal heating, which may keep a moon liquid far beyond the conservative habitable zone. Methods. We made use of a phenomenological approach to tidal heating. We computed the orbit averaged flux from both stellar and planetary (both thermal and reflected stellar) illumination. We then calculated subsurface temperatures depending on illumination and thermal conduction to the surface through the ice shell and an insulating layer of regolith. We adopted a conduction only model, ignoring volcanism and ice shell convection as an outlet for internal heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: the Origin and Evolution of the Moon and Planets
    Chapter 9 THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF THE MOON AND PLANETS 9.1 In the Beginning The age of the universe, as it is perceived at present, is perhaps as old as 20 aeons so that the formation of the solar system at about 4.5 aeons is a comparatively youthful event in this stupendous extent of time [I]. Thevisible portion of the universe consists principally of about 10" galaxies, which show local marked irregularities in distribution (e.g., Virgo cluster). The expansion rate (Hubble Constant) has values currently estimated to lie between 50 and 75 km/sec/MPC [2]. The reciprocal of the constant gives ages ranging between 13 and 20 aeons but there is uncertainty due to the local perturbing effects of the Virgo cluster of galaxies on our measurement of the Hubble parameter [I]. The age of the solar system (4.56 aeons), the ages of old star clusters (>10" years) and the production rates of elements all suggest ages for the galaxy and the observable universe well in excess of 10" years (10 aeons). The origin of the presently observable universe is usually ascribed, in current cosmologies, to a "big bang," and the 3OK background radiation is often accepted as proof of the correctness of the hypothesis. Nevertheless, there are some discrepancies. The observed ratio of hydrogen to helium which should be about 0.25 in a "big-bang" scenario may be too high. The distribution of galaxies shows much clumping, which would indicate an initial chaotic state [3], and there are variations in the spectrum of the 3OK radiation which are not predicted by the theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Planets of the Solar System
    Chapter Planets of the 27 Solar System Chapter OutlineOutline 1 ● Formation of the Solar System The Nebular Hypothesis Formation of the Planets Formation of Solid Earth Formation of Earth’s Atmosphere Formation of Earth’s Oceans 2 ● Models of the Solar System Early Models Kepler’s Laws Newton’s Explanation of Kepler’s Laws 3 ● The Inner Planets Mercury Venus Earth Mars 4 ● The Outer Planets Gas Giants Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Objects Beyond Neptune Why It Matters Exoplanets UnderstandingU d t di theth formationf ti and the characteristics of our solar system and its planets can help scientists plan missions to study planets and solar systems around other stars in the universe. 746 Chapter 27 hhq10sena_psscho.inddq10sena_psscho.indd 774646 PDF 88/15/08/15/08 88:43:46:43:46 AAMM Inquiry Lab Planetary Distances 20 min Turn to Appendix E and find the table entitled Question to Get You Started “Solar System Data.” Use the data from the How would the distance of a planet from the sun “semimajor axis” row of planetary distances to affect the time it takes for the planet to complete devise an appropriate scale to model the distances one orbit? between planets. Then find an indoor or outdoor space that will accommodate the farthest distance. Mark some index cards with the name of each planet, use a measuring tape to measure the distances according to your scale, and place each index card at its correct location. 747 hhq10sena_psscho.inddq10sena_psscho.indd 774747 22/26/09/26/09 111:42:301:42:30 AAMM These reading tools will help you learn the material in this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN to BE HABITABLE? 8:15 A.M. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 A.M. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome C
    Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE HABITABLE? 8:15 a.m. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 a.m. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome Chair: Stephen Kane 8:30 a.m. Forget F. * Turbet M. Selsis F. Leconte J. Definition and Characterization of the Habitable Zone [#4057] We review the concept of habitable zone (HZ), why it is useful, and how to characterize it. The HZ could be nicknamed the “Hunting Zone” because its primary objective is now to help astronomers plan observations. This has interesting consequences. 9:00 a.m. Rushby A. J. Johnson M. Mills B. J. W. Watson A. J. Claire M. W. Long Term Planetary Habitability and the Carbonate-Silicate Cycle [#4026] We develop a coupled carbonate-silicate and stellar evolution model to investigate the effect of planet size on the operation of the long-term carbon cycle, and determine that larger planets are generally warmer for a given incident flux. 9:20 a.m. Dong C. F. * Huang Z. G. Jin M. Lingam M. Ma Y. J. Toth G. van der Holst B. Airapetian V. Cohen O. Gombosi T. Are “Habitable” Exoplanets Really Habitable? A Perspective from Atmospheric Loss [#4021] We will discuss the impact of exoplanetary space weather on the climate and habitability, which offers fresh insights concerning the habitability of exoplanets, especially those orbiting M-dwarfs, such as Proxima b and the TRAPPIST-1 system. 9:40 a.m. Fisher T. M. * Walker S. I. Desch S. J. Hartnett H. E. Glaser S. Limitations of Primary Productivity on “Aqua Planets:” Implications for Detectability [#4109] While ocean-covered planets have been considered a strong candidate for the search for life, the lack of surface weathering may lead to phosphorus scarcity and low primary productivity, making aqua planet biospheres difficult to detect.
    [Show full text]
  • A First Reconnaissance of the Atmospheres of Terrestrial Exoplanets Using Ground-Based Optical Transits and Space-Based UV Spectra
    A First Reconnaissance of the Atmospheres of Terrestrial Exoplanets Using Ground-Based Optical Transits and Space-Based UV Spectra The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Diamond-Lowe, Hannah Zoe. 2020. A First Reconnaissance of the Atmospheres of Terrestrial Exoplanets Using Ground-Based Optical Transits and Space-Based UV Spectra. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365825 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A first reconnaissance of the atmospheres of terrestrial exoplanets using ground-based optical transits and space-based UV spectra A DISSERTATION PRESENTED BY HANNAH ZOE DIAMOND-LOWE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE SUBJECT OF ASTRONOMY HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE,MASSACHUSETTS MAY 2020 c 2020 HANNAH ZOE DIAMOND-LOWE.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ii Dissertation Advisor: David Charbonneau Hannah Zoe Diamond-Lowe A first reconnaissance of the atmospheres of terrestrial exoplanets using ground-based optical transits and space-based UV spectra ABSTRACT Decades of ground-based, space-based, and in some cases in situ measurements of the Solar System terrestrial planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars have provided in- depth insight into their atmospheres, yet we know almost nothing about the atmospheres of terrestrial planets orbiting other stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Growth Histories of Exoplanets: the Saturn Analog HD 149026B
    Discovering the Growth Histories of Exoplanets: The Saturn Analog HD 149026b Short title: The growth of HD 149026b Sarah E. Dodson-Robinson1 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of Technology 770 S. Wilson Ave, Pasadena, CA 91125 [email protected] Peter Bodenheimer UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California at Santa Cruz 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 95064 1 Formerly Sarah E. Robinson ABSTRACT The transiting “hot Saturn” HD 149026b, which has the highest mean density of any confirmed planet in the Neptune-Jupiter mass range, has challenged theories of planet formation since its discovery in 2005. Previous investigations could not explain the origin of the planet’s 45-110 Earth-mass solid core without invoking catastrophes such as gas giant collisions or heavy planetesimal bombardment launched by neighboring planets. Here we show that HD 149026b’s large core can be successfully explained by the standard core accretion theory of planet formation. The keys to our reconstruction of HD 149026b are (1) applying a model of the solar nebula to describe the protoplanet nursery; (2) placing the planet initially on a long-period orbit at Saturn’s heliocentric distance of 9.5 AU; and (3) adjusting the solid mass in the HD 149026 disk to twice that of the solar nebula in accordance with the star’s heavy element enrichment. We show that the planet’s migration into its current orbit at 0.042 AU is consistent with our formation model. Our study of HD 149026b demonstrates that it is possible to discover the growth history of any planet with a well-defined core mass that orbits a solar-type star.
    [Show full text]