The Month in Review
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Yale Law School 2010–2011
BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut Yale Law School 2010–2011 Yale Law School Yale 2010–2011 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 106 Number 10 August 10, 2010 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 106 Number 10 August 10, 2010 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 status as a special disabled veteran, veteran of the Vietnam era, or other covered veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer or gender identity or expression. Editor: Lesley K. Baier University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other covered veterans. -
2019-20 Annual Report
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT AND PROGRAM OF EAST ASIAN STUDIES Annual Report 2019-2020 1 COVER: The wooden doors to 202 Jones. Photo taken by Martin Kern. 2 Annual Report 2019-20 Contents Director’s Letter 4 Department and Program News 6 Language Programs 8 Undergraduates 11 Graduate Students 14 Faculty 18 Events 24 Summer Programs 26 Affiliated Programs 29 Libraries & Museum 34 3 Director’s Letter, 2019-20 In normal years, the Director’s Letter is a retrospective of the year in East Asian Studies—but where to begin? Annual disasters and upheavals are standard topics in traditional East Asian chronicles. By June of 2020 (a gengzi 庚子 year), we had already lived through more than our share: the coronavirus pandemic, severe economic downturn, government inaction and prevarication, Princeton’s shift to online teaching, dislocation of undergraduate and graduate life, shuttering of libraries and labs, disruption to travel, study, and research for students, staff, and faculty, the brutal murder of George Floyd, and the international renaissance of the Black Lives Matter movement. invigorate campus intellectual life, completing book This spring semester, the usual hum of summer manuscripts, or starting new projects. The heaviest burden, programming and plans for next academic year grew no doubt, fell on our language instructors. The faculty quiet, and many EAS projects were cancelled, postponed, in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean innovated non-stop to shifted online, or put on hold. As this Annual Report goes insure that, in the era of Zoom, students would remain fully to press, plans for undergraduate residence on campus engaged in all four language skills of speaking, listening, and the format for classes in fall of 2020 are still being reading, and writing. -
Issue Brief Template
9 February 2010 No. 3 WESTERN SAHARA Expected Council Action In February the Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara, Christopher Ross, will coordinate a meeting between Morocco and the Polisario Front. This meeting follows the UN’s proposal to hold informal direct talks over the status of Western Sahara. The Security Council is not expected to take any action in February, but members are watching developments closely bearing in mind that the mandate of the UN peacekeeping operation MINURSO, expires in April. Key Recent Developments On 2 February, the Secretary-General issued a statement welcoming the parties' decision to agree to the proposal for informal talks made by his Special Envoy. The talks will take place on 10-11 February outside New York and allow the parties to renew each other’s positions on Western Sahara, including: • Morocco's proposal that Western Sahara should be an autonomous region within Morocco; and • Polisario Front’s position that the territory’s final status can only be decided in a referendum that includes independence as a legitimate option. In December 2009 some Council members requested a briefing from the Secretariat on Western Sahara. The briefing was agreed upon just before Christmas but has not been scheduled as of this writing. On 30 April 2009, the Council extended the mandate of the UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) through resolution 1871. The Council also called on the parties to continue negotiations in good faith, with a view to achieving political solution. MINURSO has been in place since 1991. -
Hideya Kuratafrom Nonproliferation to Regional Talkes, Then To
From Nonproliferation to Regional Talks, then to Collective Security and Deterrence The Third North Korean Nuclear Crisis from a Historical Perspective From Nonproliferation to Regional Talks, then to Collective Security and Deterrence The Third North Korean Nuclear Crisis from a Historical Perspective Hideya Kurata (National Defense Academy of Japan) uring the past quarter century, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, North Korea) nuclear problem has posed an intermittent threat to the international community. The crisis in the early 1990s and that in the early to mid-2000s are respectively labeled the first and the second nuclear crisis, followed by the ongoing Dthird nuclear crisis, but the structure and dynamics of these crises are not uniform. The third nuclear crisis has come with issues that could not be resolved in the two earlier crises. I. Regional Nonproliferation Treaty Arrangements: Adopting NPT Regime Norms North Korea’s attempt to conclude a bilateral peace agreement to replace the 1953 Military Armistice Agreement with the United States – excluding Republic of Korea (ROK, South Korea) and China -- has been fairly consistent since the middle of the Cold War. The United States has refused to accept the offer, regarding it as a means to render the US-South Korea alliance impotent through the disbanding of the United Nations Command in Korea, a legacy of the Korean War, and as a means to provoke the withdrawal of US forces from South Korea. Breaking this precedent of no US-DPRK bilateral talks was what followed the declaration by North Korea in 1993 to withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). -
India-China Informal Summit, Inter-Korea Summit: Assessing the Outcomes
No. – 2 – 2018 India-China Informal Summit, Inter-Korea Summit: Assessing the Outcomes Maj Gen Rajiv Narayanan, AVSM, VSM (Retd) INTRODUCTION The two-day ‘informal talks’ that Prime Minister Modi had with President Xi Jinping on 27th and 28th April 2018 overlapped the talks between the North and South Korean Presidents at Panmunjeom on 27th April – both landmark events. While the future trajectory of China is impacted by both, for India the ‘informal talks’ held more importance. Yet the outcome of both talks impacts the future trajectory of Indo – Pacific Region (IPR). The main takeaway of the Wuhan talks was The other important takeaway the aspect that India and China agreed to work together of ‘Strategic Guidance’ to the respective on an economic project in Afghanistan, which defence forces and strengthening of existing would show that India and mechanisms to maintain China can cooperate and The other important takeaway peace and tranquillity the aspect of ‘Strategic Guidance’ not just compete in the to the respective defence forces along the border areas is neighbourhood.1 Presently, and strengthening of existing worth tracking carefully. It Centre for Strategic Studies and Simulation (CS3) and Simulation Studies for Strategic Centre both Indian and Chinese mechanisms to maintain peace is worth noting that it has and tranquillity along the Occasional Paper interests in Afghanistan border areas is worth tracking always been the PLA that differ considerably. It carefully. It is worth noting that has engineered a ‘stand- would, thus, be interesting it has always been the PLA that off’/ ‘face-off’ and never the to watch which economic has engineered a ‘stand-off’/ Indians. -
A Warm Friend of Israel
A War m Friend of Isr ael • A Warm Friend of Isr ael HERBERT W. ARMSTRONG The Ambassador Without Portfolio • a Climbing aboard the Gulfstream II aircraft on one of numerous trips in the 1970s to visit world leaders. The ‘Unofficial A m b a ss a d or for World Peace’ e had no political party, no royal office,• no government Hcommission. He possessed no personal fortune, nor was he backed by any state or corporate interest. Yet he met personally with dozens of heads of state: prime minis- ters, presidents, kings, emperors, princes and princesses—as well as legislators, ambassadors, cabinet ministers, first ladies, governors, mayors, generals, chief executives, judges and other leaders of government and industry. Flying across the globe in his plane like a shuttle diplomat, this private citizen met with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher; King Leopold of Belgium; American First Lady Nancy Reagan; Chinese Premier Deng Xiaoping; Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie; Jordan’s King Hussein; Egyptian presi- dents Anwar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak; and the emperor, crown prince and seven successive prime ministers of Japan. In between, he met the presidents, prime ministers, and/or kings of Spain, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, Thailand, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Lebanon, Bangladesh, South Africa, Kenya and Chile— and ambassadors from dozens more countries. Oftentimes at banquets and meetings between such luminaries and himself, it was the latter who was the keynote speaker or the guest of honor. Most of these leaders knew his work and his message, many 1 a Mr. Armstrong meets with First Lady Nancy Reagan in the White House in 1985. -
ABSOLUTE FINAL ONEIL Dissertation
UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Dealing with the Devil? Explaining the Onset of Strategic State-Terrorist Negotiations Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5td7j61f Author O'Neil, Siobhan Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Dealing with the Devil? Explaining the Onset of Strategic State-Terrorist Negotiations A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Siobhan O’Neil 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Dealing with the Devil? Explaining the Onset of Strategic State-Terrorist Negotiations by Siobhan O’Neil Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Arthur Stein, Chair Statesmen are quick to declare that they will not negotiate with terrorists. Yet, the empirical record demonstrates that, despite statements to the contrary, many states do eventually negotiate with their terrorist challengers. My dissertation examines the circumstances under which states employ strategic negotiations with terrorist groups to resolve violent conflict. I argue that only when faced with a credible and capable adversary and afforded relative freedom of action domestically will states negotiate with terrorists. To test this theory, I use a multi-method approach that incorporates a cross- national study of all known strategic negotiations from 1968-2006 and three within-case studies (Israel, Northern Ireland, and the Philippines). Initial results suggest that negotiations are employed in about 13% of terrorist campaigns, certain types of groups are privileged, and negotiations only occur when statesmen can overcome domestic ii obstacles, namely public and veto player opposition. -
Who Has a Voice in Egypt?
#Sisi_vs_Youth: Who Has a Voice in Egypt? ALBRECHT HOFHEINZ (University of Oslo) Abstract This article presents voices from Egypt reflecting on the question of who has the right to have a voice in the country in the first half of 2016. In the spirit of the research project “In 2016,” it aims to offer a snapshot of how it “felt to live” in Egypt in 2016 as a member of the young generation (al-shabāb) who actively use social media and who position themselves critically towards the state’s official discourse. While the state propagated a strategy focusing on educating and guiding young people towards becoming productive members of a nation united under one leader, popular youth voices on the internet used music and satire to claim their right to resist a retrograde patrimonial system that threatens every opposing voice with extinc- tion. On both sides, a strongly antagonistic ‘you vs. us’ rhetoric is evident. 2016: “The Year of Egyptian Youth” (Sisi style) January 9, 2016 was celebrated in Egypt as Youth Day—a tradition with only a brief histo- ry. The first Egyptian Youth Day had been marked on February 9, 2009; the date being chosen by participants in the Second Egyptian Youth Conference in commemoration of the martyrs of the famous 1946 student demonstrations that eventually led to the resignation of then Prime Minister Nuqrāshī. Observed in 2009 and 2010 with only low-key events, the carnivalesque “18 days” of revolutionary unrest in January-February 2011 interrupted what Rather than a conventional academic paper, this article aims to be a miniature snapshot of how it ‘felt’ to live in Egypt by mid-2016 as a member of the young generation (al-shabāb) who have access to so- cial media (ca. -
Who's Who in World Je First International Conference Jerusale Founders Assembly the Jewish Hall of Fa1-I.E
WHO'S WHO IN WORLD JE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE JERUSALE FOUNDERS ASSEMBLY THE JEWISH HALL OF FA1-I.E PATRON The Honorable Ephraim Katrir President of the State of Israel December 20 1976 Office of the President and EDITORIAL BOARD Chairman of the Editorial Board Dr. I. J. Cam-tin Karpman Chairman I. J. Carmin Karpman General Editor The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia Mr. Irving Louis ,Chairman Anatole A. Yaron Executive Director, Who's Who in World Jewry Dap* of Sociology Dr. Avraham Avi-hai, JerusaJem Livingston Collage Lecturer. Political Science Bar Han University Rutgers University, Mr. Irving Bernstein, New York Nev Brunswick N.J. 08903 Executive Vice Chairman United Jewish Appeal Dr Israel Bilecky, Tel Aviv Dear Sir: Lecturer, Yiddish Literature Tel Aviv University Mr. Solon Myles Chadabe, New York Member, Board of Directors You are cordially invited to join the Honorary Advisory Board of National Federations of Temple Brrtthertt-ootk the proposed JEWISH HALL OF FAME to be established in Jerusalem Mr. Bernard Cherrick, Jerusalem Vice President under the auspices of WHO'S "WHO IN WORLD JEWRY. Panels of experts Hebrew University Mr. Seymour Fishman. New York are being constituted to plan the monumental JEWISH HALL OF FAME Executive Vice President as a repository of Jewish heritage and knowledge and as an expression American Friends of the Hebrew University Mr. Arnold Forster, New York of the Jewish contribution to the progress of mankind in all fields General Counsel, A nti-Defamation of human endeavor. League of B'nai B'rith Mr. Bertram H. Gold, New York Executive Vice President The President of Israel, the Honorable Professor Ephraim Katzir, The American Jewish Committee Patron of WHO'S WHO IN WORLD JEWRY, endorsed the project, stating: I Mr. -
Who's Who Im World Jewry First International Conference Jerusalem Founders Assembly the Jewish Hall of Fame
WHO'S WHO IM WORLD JEWRY FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE JERUSALEM FOUNDERS ASSEMBLY THE JEWISH HALL OF FAME PATRON The Honorable Ephraim Katzir December 20 1976 President of the State of Israel Office of the President and EDITORIAL BOARD Chairman of the Editorial Board Dr. I. J. Carmin Karpman I. J. Carmin Karpman Chairman Mr. Artur Rubinstein,Pianist Virtuoso General Editor 22 Sq de L’Avenue Foch, The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia Paris, I6l eme, Anatole A. Yaron Executive Director, Who's Who in World Jewry France Dr. Avraham Avi-hai, Jerusalem Lecturer, Political Science Bar Ilan University Mr. Irving Bernstein, New York Executive' Vice Chairman United Jewish Appeal Dear Sir: Dr. Israel Bilecky, Tel Aviv Lecturer, Yiddish Literature Tel Aviv University Mr. Solon Myles Chadabe, New York Member, Board of Directors You are cordially invited to join the Honorary Advisory Board of National Federations of Temple Brotherhoods the proposed JEWISH HALL OF FAME to be established in Jerusalem Mr. Bernard Cherrick, Jerusalem Vice President under the auspices of WHO’S WHO IN WORLD JEWRY. Panels of experts Hebrew University are being constituted to plan the monumental JEWISH HALL OF FAME Mr. Seymour Fishman, New York Executive Vice President as a repository of Jewish heritage and knowledge and as an expression American Friends of the Hebrew University of the Jewish contribution to the progress of mankind in all fields Mr. Arnold Forster, New York General Counsel, Anti-Defamation of human endeavor. League of B'nai B'rith Mr. Bertram H. Gold, New York The President of Israel, the Honorable Professor Ephraim Katzir, Executive Vice President The American Jewish Committee Patron of WHO’S WHO IN WORLD JEWRY, endorsed the project, stating: Mr. -
August 4, 1977
.... ---~.. .,. .. _;::_::_:;:....:: .:=:::.::::::::==::::::-:--:-::===::!::;::::=-::--=""'"·-_-_-_-__~_,-::-. ..._- ::~.::--_-__- __- __-:- __-_~__ _..,_ .-~ _..._- __:_":_:_":_".'... __ __-__- _"!'_ -_-__:: _·_~ . =.::.:-_::_:-:_=-=·=--=--::::.:::..=--=-====~===:::::::=:::::::;:==- --,~ HISTORICAL ASSOC. 1,\ R.I. JEWISH 130 SESSIONS ST. P ROVIDENCE , RI 02906 v Support Read By Jewish ... More Than Agencies 35,000 With Your People Membership THE ONLY ENGLIS H JEWIS H W EEKLY IN R. I AND SOUTHEAST MASS. VOLUME LX, NUMBER 22 THURSDAY, '.",UGUST 4, 1977 16 PAGES 25¢ PER COPY Providence Hebrew Day ..School Appoints Assistant Principal The Providence Hebrew Day School has anno1U1ced the appointment of Rabbi Kopi Saltman as assistant principal of the Hebre,y Department. Rabbi Saltman comes lo the school with an extensive background in both Hebrew and secular education, hav ing served as principal of the Max Gilbert Hebrew Academy, Syracuse, ·New York, for the past five years. •-While in · Syracuse,- he was awarded a. N~ York State mini-grant for a creative teiching proposal, and also a grant from the local Roth Foundation to develop the Bi6Uh:urri'culum. Active in the educational community, he was a member of the Syracuse Jewish Principal's Association, and served as co-chairman for one year . Rabbi Saltman was born in Holyoke, Massachusetts, and attended Yeshiva University from high school through or dination. While at . Yeshiva University he was awarded the General Motors College Scholarship. He received his MA from Ber RABBIKOPISALTMAN nard Revel Graduate School in Talmudic Literature and bas taken graduate courses administrator's certificate in the fall, . -
China – Japan – South Korea. a Tense Ménage À Trois
SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Alexandra Sakaki and Gudrun Wacker China – Japan – South Korea A Tense Ménage à Trois RP 5 April 2017 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2017 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They reflect the views of the author(s). SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 34 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Tom Genrich (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 4/2017) Table of Contents 5 Issues and Recommendations 7 Introduction 9 Bilateral Relations: The Three Dyads 9 China and Japan: Relative Rise and Decline 9 Political Relations 11 Security and Perceived Threats 11 China and South Korea: One-sided Dependencies 11 Political Relations 12 Security and Perceived Threats 13 Japan and South Korea: Distant Neighbours 13 Political Relations 15 Security and Threat Evaluations 15 Public Opinion in the Three Countries 16 Trade and Economic Relations 23 The Role of the US in China-Japan-South Korea Relations 24 Conclusion: Prospects for Trilateral Cooperation 26 Trilateral Cooperation 26 Origins and Development 28 The Trilateral Format: A Balance Sheet 31 The Significance of the Trilateral Format 33 Bilateral and/or Trilateral: The Outlook 34 Acronyms Dr Alexandra Sakaki, an Associate in the Asia Division, is Senior Fellow with the Robert Bosch Stiftung for the project “Japan in the international system”.