DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Biogeochemical Modeling: Recent Advances and Future Challenges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Biogeochemical Modeling: Recent Advances and Future Challenges Marine Biogeochemical Modeling: Recent Advances and Future Challenges Scott C. Doney, Ivan Lima, Keith Lindsay and J. Keith Moore National Center for Atmospheric Research • Boulder, Colorado USA Stephanie Dutkiewicz Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts USA Marjorie A.M. Friedrichs Old Dominion University. Norfolk, Virginia USA Richard J. Matear CSIRO Division of Marine Research • Hobart, Australia Introduction One of the central objectives of the Joint Global mod.htm (see also Doney, 1999). Specific topics covered Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) is to use data from the are phytoplankton production and community struc- extensive field programs to evaluate and improve ture, interannual climate variability, mesoscale biologi- numerical ocean carbon-cycle models. Substantial cal-physical interactions, data assimilation, export flux improvements are required if we are to achieve a better and subsurface carbon cycling, and responses to cli- understanding of present-day biogeochemical proper- mate change. ties and processes in the ocean and to predict potential future responses to perturbations resulting from Phytoplankton Production and Community human activities. We have made significant progress in Structure this regard and expect even greater strides over the Primary production in the surface ocean is the base next decade as the synthesis of JGOFS data sets is com- for almost all marine food webs. Biological oceanogra- pleted and disseminated to the broader scientific com- phers devote considerable effort to developing concep- munity. tual and numerical models of the controls on phyto- Marine biogeochemical modeling depends inher- plankton production. Evidence accumulated over the ently upon field data. The data sets from the U.S. last decade suggests that the micronutrient iron, rather JGOFS process studies, global survey and time series than macronutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, programs, together with products derived from satel- governs primary production and phytoplankton com- lite-based observations, are invaluable in two ways. munity structure, especially the growth of the large They serve as the basis for new and improved mecha- diatoms, over much of the world ocean. Shifts between nistic parameterizations of specific biogeochemical assemblages composed of nano- and pico-sized phyto- processes. They also provide a resource for evaluating plankton and ones dominated by diatoms, which are the overall skill of integrated system models through often responsible for seasonal and episodic blooms, detailed model-data comparisons. affect the production and export of particulate organic Ocean carbon-cycle models cover a variety of com- carbon (POC), a critical component of the ocean "bio- plexities and applications, ranging from simple box logical pump" (see Berelson, this issue). Other impor- models to global four-dimensional coupled physical- tant groups of phytoplankton include nitrogen-fixing biogeochemical simulations and from dedicated diazotrophs such as Trichodesmium, which provide a research tools to constructs able to generate climate- source of "new" nutrients to the subtropical gyres, and change projections with direct societal implications. calcium carbonate-forming coccolithophores, which We highlight some recent modeling advances and chal- can significantly alter surface-water carbonate chem- lenges for the future, drawing on results from the U.S. istry and therefore air-sea fluxes of carbon dioxide JGOFS Synthesis and Modeling Project, which are (C02). available at http://usjgofs.whoi.edu/mzweb / syn- The basic framework for most marine biogeochem- Oceanography * VoL 14 • No. 4/2001 93 Ecosystem Model ,.... _./) Insolation r m ~,% /Chl 1 I I NHrogen Fixation I ! I •"~1 I .-" '~ Chlorophyll) Photoada ptatlon , ~<lnla II, .] P-distoms,"~" ./i P-dlazotrophs t ......... /"/ I~ " .-" ..,¢k,.P_t~DOPlankl~njt ',..... P Mortality/" ./" - ............................ .Grazing Egestlon ./ ./" "%.... " Produ~lon /// /~" /" e/.// s"/' , Fe, SI, P04, CalcNIcatlon ,, NO3, NI'I4 ,,' Z Mo rta Ilty Nutrients ,," % 1'i];;ioI "" T ~j/'Grazlng Non-egestlon %% "l Remlnerallzatlon"-.. ".... / D-Dissolved,/ "/ D-taCOs / \ .... j Sin kl ng I- ~ MLD Figure 1. Diagram of a typical marine ecosystem model showing the simulated biomass compartments (boxes) and rates or fluxes (arrows) in terms of the concentration of nitrogen. In red are recent extensions of the model to incorporate multiple nutrient limitation, size structure and planktonic functional groups (Moore et al., 2001). Oceanography • Vol. 14 • No. 4/2001 94 ical models (Figure 1) has been in use for several The marine iron cycle must be included for this decades (Fasham et al., 1990). These models generally model to reproduce accurately the observed high nutri- aggregate plankton populations into broadly defined ent-low chlorophyll (HNLC) conditions observed in trophic compartments (phytoplankton, zooplankton, the Southern Ocean, and parts of the subarctic and detritus) and track the flow of a limiting element, such equatorial Pacific (Figure 2). The atmospheric deposi- as the concentration of nitrogen or carbon, among the tion of mineral dust is an important source of iron for compartments. Biological systems have no analog to the open ocean, especially near desert regions of North the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid dynamics; ecosys- Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, northwest Asia and tems models are by necessity highly empirical, non-lin- Australia (Figure 3). Subsurface iron contributes pro- ear and full of formulations based on poorly con- portionally more in regions of upwelling, such as the strained parameters. The various terms for processes equatorial Pacific, and deep winter convection, such as such as photosynthesis by phytoplankton, zooplank- the subpolar North Atlantic and the Southern Ocean. ton grazing or detrital remineralization are calculated The atmospheric contribution of iron input is generally using standard, though not always well agreed-upon, low in the HNLC areas, which tend to be iron limited sets of empirical functional forms derived either from during summer months. The model study indicates limited field data or from laboratory experiments. A that primary production in as much as half of the world number of groups are working to expand this genre of ocean today may be iron limited. model to include new concepts related to iron limita- Two main factors limiting progress on ecosystem tion and biogeochemical functional groups. modeling are our skill at conceptualizing key processes For example, Moore et al. (2001) present a global at a mechanistic level and our ability to verify model mixedqayer ecosystem model that explicitly accounts behavior through robust and thorough model-data for multi-nutrient limitation (nitrogen, phosphorus, sil- comparisons. The phytoplankton iron limitation story ica, iron), picoplankton, diatoms, nitrogen fixation, and offers an illuminating example. Atmospheric dust/iron calcification. The model has been tested against nine deposition estimates vary considerably, by a factor of U.S. and international JGOFS time-series and process- 10 or more in some areas, and the fraction of iron in study data sets drawn from a wide range of environ- dust that is biologically available is not well known. ments as well as with global ocean color data from the Surface and subsurface ocean iron measurements are Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) limited, particularly from a global modeling perspec- instrument (see Yoder, this issue). tive, and serious analytical and standardization issues remain. Organic ligands may play a role in governing both bioavailability and subsurface iron concentrations. Not enough is known about the effect Jonuory Chlorophyll (mg Chl/m3) of iron limitation and variability on species competition at generally pre- vailing low iron levels. The same is 20.0 true for a host of other processes, 10.o including iron release through photo- s0 chemistry and zooplankton grazing, 2.0 advection of iron from ocean margin 0 ° 90 ° 180 ° 270 ° 360 ° 1.0 sediment sources and iron remineral- 0.50 ization from sinking particles. A) Globol Mixed Layer Model 0.50 Jonuory Chlorophyll (m 9 Chl//m3) o. o Interannual Climate Variability o.20 A key measure of the usefulness of o.15 numerical biogeochemical models is 0.1o their ability to produce accurate 0.06 descriptions of oceanic responses to o.o3 natural climate forcing on interannual 0.01 to interdecadal timescales. Ocean 0 ° 90 ° 180 ° 270 ° 360 ° 0.0 ecosystems exhibit significant variabil- ity associated with cyclical climate B) SeQWiFS Monthly Composite mg Ch]/m5 modes such as the E1 Nifio-Southern Figure 2. Global maps of monthly mean surface chlorophyll concentra- Oscillation (ENSO), the Pacific tions for January from a global mixed-layer ecosystem model that explic- Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the itly accounts for multi-nutrient limitation and community structure North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). The (panel a) and the SeaWiFS ocean color instrument (panel b) (Moore et response of ecosystems to physical aI., 2001). conditions may be quite nonlinear; in the North Pacific, for example, a major Oceanography • Vol. 14 • No. 4/2001 95 Annual Atmospheric Iron Input Total Iron nputs / 1.0 90°N 0.9 0.8 45°N 0.7 0.6 0.5 OO 0.4 0.3 0.2 45°S 0.1 0.05 0.01 90°S 0.0 0 o 90 ° 180 ° 270 ° 360 ° Figure 3. Global modeling simulation of the fractional contribution of atmospheric mineral dust deposition to total inputs of bioavailable iron in the surface
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Limits of Iron Fertilization
    LIMITS OF IRON FERTILIZATION Anand Gnanadesikan1, John P. Dunne1 and Irina Marinov2 1: NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, PO Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542 [email protected], [email protected] 2: Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, [email protected] ABSTRACT Iron fertilization has been proposed as a cheap, controllable, and environmentally benign method for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. While this is in fact the case in simple, 3-box models of the carbon cycle, more realistic models show that these claims fall short of reality. The fact that the efficiency of iron fertilization depends on the long term fate of the added iron and on the carbon associated with it makes tracking the effects of iron fertilization much more difficult and expensive than has been asserted. Additionally, advection of low nutrient water away from iron-rich areas can result in lowering production remotely, with potentially serious consequences. INTRODUCTION The idea of offsetting anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions by fertilizing the ocean with iron has a number of superficially attractive features. A host of iron fertilization experiments have demonstrated that adding iron to surface waters leads to a local increase in productivity [see for example Coale et al., 1996]. Our own survey of the literature [Dunne et al. subm.] shows that this should be expected to lead to a local increase in particle export. It is claimed however, that this local increase in particle export would necessarily lead to an easily verifiable drawdown in atmospheric carbon dioxide. It is further claimed that the increase in export is controllable and environmentally benign, implying that the effects cease as soon as the fertilization stops.
    [Show full text]
  • An Iron Cycle Cascade Governs the Response of Equatorial Pacific Ecosystems to Climate Change
    Received: 19 June 2020 | Revised: 7 August 2020 | Accepted: 9 August 2020 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15316 PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE An iron cycle cascade governs the response of equatorial Pacific ecosystems to climate change Alessandro Tagliabue1 | Nicolas Barrier2 | Hubert Du Pontavice3,4 | Lester Kwiatkowski5 | Olivier Aumont5 | Laurent Bopp6 | William W. L. Cheung4 | Didier Gascuel3 | Olivier Maury2 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Abstract 2MARBEC (IRD, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Earth System Models project that global climate change will reduce ocean net pri- Ifremer), Sète, France mary production (NPP), upper trophic level biota biomass and potential fisheries 3ESE, Ecology and Ecosystem Health, Institut Agro, Rennes, France catches in the future, especially in the eastern equatorial Pacific. However, projec- 4Nippon Foundation-Nereus Program, tions from Earth System Models are undermined by poorly constrained assumptions Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, regarding the biological cycling of iron, which is the main limiting resource for NPP University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada over large parts of the ocean. In this study, we show that the climate change trends 5LOCEAN, Sorbonne Université-CNRS-IRD- in NPP and the biomass of upper trophic levels are strongly affected by modifying MNHN, Paris, France assumptions associated with phytoplankton iron uptake. Using a suite of model ex- 6ENS-LMD, Paris, France periments, we find 21st century climate change impacts on regional NPP range from Correspondence −12.3% to +2.4% under a high emissions climate change scenario. This wide range Alessandro Tagliabue, School of Environmental Sciences, University of arises from variations in the efficiency of iron retention in the upper ocean in the Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Stable Isotopes Track Pelagic Iron Cycling During a Subtropical Phytoplankton Bloom
    Iron stable isotopes track pelagic iron cycling during PNAS PLUS a subtropical phytoplankton bloom Michael J. Ellwooda,1, David A. Hutchinsb, Maeve C. Lohanc, Angela Milnec, Philipp Nasemannd, Scott D. Noddere, Sylvia G. Sanderd, Robert Strzepeka, Steven W. Wilhelmf, and Philip W. Boydg,2 aResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; bMarine and Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089; cSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom; dMarine and Freshwater Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; eNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington 6021, New Zealand; fDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996; and gNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Centre for Chemical and Physical Oceanography, Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9012, New Zealand Edited by Edward A. Boyle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved December 1, 2014 (received for review November 11, 2014) The supply and bioavailability of dissolved iron sets the magnitude (www.geotraces.org) process voyages (2008 and 2012) designed of surface productivity for ∼40% of the global ocean. The redox to study temporal changes in the biogeochemical cycling of Fe at state, organic complexation, and phase (dissolved versus particu- the same locality in subtropical waters (38°S−39°S, 178°W late) of iron are key determinants of iron bioavailability in the −180°W) within the mesoscale eddy field east of New Zealand marine realm, although the mechanisms facilitating exchange be- (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Iron Metabolism in Natural Environments Marianne Erbs & Jim Spain
    L I Microbial iron metabolism in natural environments Marianne Erbs & Jim Spain Microbial Diversity 2002 Microbial iron metabolism in natural environments Marianne Erbs & Jim Spain [email protected] [email protected] Abstract The aim of this project was to assess the diversity of iron metabolizing bacteria in several ecological niches by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. In particular, we wanted to determine whether non-phototrophic, anaerobic nitrate-dependent Fe(II)-oxidizers coexist with aerobic Fe(1I)-oxidizers and facultatively anaerobic Fe(III)-reducers in natural habitats. To this end, we sampled iron-rich sites in freshwater, estuarine and marine environments and enriched for non-phototrophic anaerobic and aerobic Fe(II)-oxidizers. The identification of the two environmentally most important facultatively anaerobic Fe(III) reducers and one aerobic heterotrophic Fe(II)-oxidizer in the sediment samples was carried out by means of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We were able to culture aerobic Fe(II) oxidizers in gradient tubes from each sample site. Nitrate-reducing Fe(TI)-oxidizers were only found in sediments from a Cranberry Bog. Geobacter, S’hewanella and Leptothrix coexist in Salt Pond at the oxic/anoxic interface. Microbial iron metabolism in natural environments Marianne Erbs & Jim Spain Introduction The significance of bacteria in the biogeochemical cycling of iron has been broadly recognized over the past two decades. In Fig. 1 the role of dissimilatory anaerobic Fe(III)-reducers as well as acidophilic and neutrophilic aerobic Fe(II)-oxidizers, anaerobic phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizers and facultatively anaerobic nitrate-reducing Fe(11)-oxidizers in the microbial cycling of iron is shown.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE Mission: Carbon Cycling and Sequestration
    APPENDIX C Appendix C. DOE Mission: Carbon Cycling and Sequestration C.1.1. The Climate Change Challenge ..............................................................................................................................228 C.1.2. The Role of Microbes ..................................................................................................................................................229 C.1.3. Microbial Ocean Communities ................................................................................................................................231 C.1.3.1. Photosynthetic Capabilities .......................................................................................................................................231 C.1.3.2. Strategies for Increasing Ocean CO2 Pools ................................................................................................................231 C.1.3.3. GTL’s Vision for Ocean Systems .................................................................................................................................233 C.1.3.3.1. Gaps in Scientific Understanding .............................................................................................................................233 C.1.3.3.2. Scientific and Technological Capabilities Required ..................................................................................................233 C.1.4. Terrestrial Microbial Communities ........................................................................................................................235
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeochemical Cycling of Iron and Phosphorus Under Low Oxygen Conditions
    BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING OF IRON AND PHOSPHORUS UNDER LOW OXYGEN CONDITIONS Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Mathematisch- Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts- Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Ulrike Lomnitz Kiel, Mai 2017 Referent: Prof. Dr. Klaus Wallmann Koreferent: PD Dr. Mark Schmidt Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 14.07.2017 zum Druck genehmigt: 14.07.2017 Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Doktorarbeit selbstständig und ohne Zuhilfenahme unerlaubter Hilfsmittel erstellt habe. Weder diese noch eine ähnliche Arbeit wurde an einer anderen Abteilung oder Hochschule im Rahmen eines Prüfungsverfahrens veröffentlicht oder zur Veröffentlichung vorgelegt. Ferner versichere ich, dass die Arbeit unter Einhaltung der Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft entstanden ist. 05.05.2017 Ulrike Lomnitz Abstract Benthic release of the key nutrients iron (Fe) and phosphorus (P) is enhanced from sediments that are impinged by oxygen-deficient bottom waters due to its diminished retention capacity for such redox sensitive elements. Suboxic to anoxic and sometimes even euxinic conditions are recently found in open ocean oxygen minimum zones (OMZs, e.g. Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems) and marginal seas (e.g. the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea). Recent studies showed that OMZs expanded in the last decades and will further spread in the future. Due to the additional release of bioavailable key nutrients from the sediments in such high productivity regions, several feedback mechanisms can evolve. The scenarios range from positive to neutral and negative consequences on the evolution of the ocean’s oxygen levels. This controversial issue makes it crucial to investigate the biogeochemical cycling of Fe and P in OMZs.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedbacks Between the Nitrogen, Carbon and Oxygen Cycles 1513
    Comp. by: RVijayarajProof0000836003 Date:4/6/08 Time:13:20:09 Stage:First Proof File Path://ppdys1108/Womat3/Production/PRODENV/0000000038/0000009008/ 0000000005/0000836003.3D Proof by: QC by: B978-0-12-372522-6.00035-3, 35 CHAPTER 35 Feedbacks Between the Nitrogen, c0035 Carbon and Oxygen Cycles Ilana Berman-Frank, Yi-bu Chen, Yuan Gao, Katja Fennel, Mick Follows, Allen J. Milligan, and Paul Falkowski Contents 1. Evolutionary History of the N, C, and O Cycles 1512 1.1. Nitrogen in the preoxygenated world/oceans 1512 1.2. Oxygenation of the early atmosphere: The influence of shelf area and nitrogen fixation rates 1513 2. Nitrogen-Fixation, Nitrogenase, and Oxygen. Evolutionary Constraints, Adaptations of Cellular Pathways and Organisms, Feedbacks to Global N, C, O Cycles 1515 2.1. Evolutionary constraints for nitrogen fixation and adaptive strategies 1515 2.2. Adaptive strategies. Oxygen consumption—The Mehler reaction 1520 2.3. Biological feedbacks to the global N, C, and O cycles 1523 3. Sensitivity of the Nitrogen, Carbon, and Oxygen Cycles to Climate Change 1524 3.1. Aeolian iron and stratification of the surface mixed layer in the future 1525 3.2. Interactions of the oxygen and nitrogen cycles: Nitrification and denitrification 1527 3.3. Ocean circulation and the global ocean cycles of nitrogen, oxygen and carbon 1527 3.4. Implications for the global carbon cycle 1529 4. Summary and Conclusions 1530 References 1531 Abstract p0090 The global cycles of nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen are inextricably interconnected via biologically mediated, coupled redox reactions. The primary reactions include nitrogen fixation, nitrification, denitrification, oxygenic photosynthesis, and respiration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Cycle (Fe), Also Known As the Ferrous Wheel, Is the Biogeochemical Cycle of Iron Through the Atmosphere, Hydrosphere, Biosphere and Lithosphere
    CLASS NOTES FOR SEMESTER –IV STUDENTS, Date- 6.5.2020 Dr. Harekrishna Jana Assistant Professor Dept. Of Microbiology Raja N.L.Khan Women’s College B.Sc (HONOURS) MICROBIOLOGY (CBCS STRUCTURE) C-9: ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY (THEORY) SEMESTER –IV Unit 3 Biogeochemical Cycling No. of Hours: 12 Elemental cycles: Iron and manganese Q. What is Iron cycle? Write the importance of Iron Cycle. Ans. Defination: The iron cycle (Fe), also known as the Ferrous Wheel, is the biogeochemical cycle of iron through the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere and lithosphere. While Fe is highly abundant in the Earth's crust, it is less common in oxygenated surface waters. Iron is a key micronutrient in primary productivity, and a limiting nutrient for the growth of plants and animal. Importance: 1. Iron (Fe) follows a geochemical cycle like many other nutrients. Iron is typically released into the soil or into the ocean through the weathering of rocks or through volcanic eruptions. Iron is required to produce chlorophyl, and plants require sufficient iron to perform photosynthesis. 2. Iron is the most abundant element on Eaith and the most frequently utilized transition metal in the biosphere. It is a component of many ceIlular compounds and is involved in numerous physiological functions. Hence, iron is an essential micronutrient for all eukaryotes and the majority of prokaryotes. Prokaryotes that need iron for biosynthesis require micromolar concentrations, levels that are often not available in neutral pH oxic environments. Therefore, prokaryotes have evolved specific acquisition molecules, called siderophores, to increase iron bioavailability. Q. Draw the Iron Cycle and briefly describe the Iron Cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Cell Response of the Pennate Diatom Phaeodactylum Tricornutum to Iron Starvation
    Whole-cell response of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum to iron starvation Andrew E. Allen*†, Julie LaRoche‡§, Uma Maheswari*, Markus Lommer‡, Nicolas Schauer¶, Pascal J. Lopez*, Giovanni Finazziʈ, Alisdair R. Fernie¶, and Chris Bowler*§** *Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 8186, Dept of Biology, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, 46 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; ‡Leibniz-Institut fu¨r Meereswissenschaften, 24105 Kiel, Germany; ¶Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Muhlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany; ʈCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Mixte de Recherche 7141, Universite´Paris 6 Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France; and **Stazione Zoologica, Villa Comunale, I 80121 Naples, Italy Edited by David M. Karl, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, and approved May 3, 2008 (received for review December 4, 2007) Marine primary productivity is iron (Fe)-limited in vast regions of Table 1. General cellular, physiological, and biochemical the contemporary oceans, most notably the high nutrient low characteristics of Fe-limited P. tricornutum cells and cultures chlorophyll (HNLC) regions. Diatoms often form large blooms upon Fe-limited/ the relief of Fe limitation in HNLC regions despite their prebloom Parameter Fe-limited Fe-replete Fe-replete low cell density. Although Fe plays an important role in controlling Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ diatom distribution, the mechanisms of Fe uptake and adaptation Growth rate 0.18 0.05 0.88 0.01 0.2 0.06 Ferric reductase assay, 0.717 Ϯ 0.03 0.020 Ϯ 0.004 35.9 Ϯ 7.3 to low iron availability are largely unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Proximity Proteomics in a Marine Diatom Reveals a Putative Cell
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Proximity proteomics in a marine diatom reveals a putative cell surface-to- chloroplast iron trafficking pathway Jernej Turnsˇek1,2,3,4,5,6†, John K Brunson6,7, Maria del Pilar Martinez Viedma8‡, Thomas J Deerinck9, Alesˇ Hora´ k10,11, Miroslav Obornı´k10,11, Vincent A Bielinski12, Andrew Ellis Allen4,6* 1Biological and Biomedical Sciences, The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States; 2Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States; 3Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, United States; 4Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States; 5Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States; 6Microbial and Environmental Genomics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States; 7Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States; 8Informatics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States; 9National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States; 10Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Parasitology, Cˇ eske´ Budeˇjovice, Czech Republic; *For correspondence: 11 ˇ [email protected] University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Ceske´ Budeˇjovice, Czech Republic; 12Synthetic Biology and Bioenergy, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, Present address: †Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, United States University of California, Berkeley, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Abstract Iron is a biochemically critical metal cofactor in enzymes involved in photosynthesis, ‡PharmaMar S.A., Madrid, Spain cellular respiration, nitrate assimilation, nitrogen fixation, and reactive oxygen species defense.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biogeochemical Cycle of Iron in the Ocean P
    REVIEW ARTICLE PUBLISHED ONLINE: 26 SEPTEMBER 2010 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO964 The biogeochemical cycle of iron in the ocean P. W. Boyd1* and M. J. Ellwood2 Advances in iron biogeochemistry have transformed our understanding of the oceanic iron cycle over the past three decades: multiple sources of iron to the ocean were discovered, including dust, coastal and shallow sediments, sea ice and hydrothermal fluids. This new iron is rapidly recycled in the upper ocean by a range of organisms; up to 50% of the total soluble iron pool is turned over weekly in this way in some ocean regions. For example, bacteria dissolve particulate iron and at the same time release compounds — iron-binding ligands — that complex with iron and therefore help to keep it in solution. Sinking particles, on the other hand, also scavenge iron from solution. The balance between these supply and removal processes determines the concentration of dissolved iron in the ocean. Whether this balance, and many other facets of the biogeochemical cycle, will change as the climate warms remains to be seen. ron is undoubtedly the most studied trace element in the ocean, budgets and models. Here, we review the oceanic biogeochemical having received widespread attention since the late 1980s1,2. The cycle of iron and explore the contribution of these sub-themes to Idisproportionate interest in iron stems from the control it was our understanding of this cycle. thought to exert on ocean productivity, the resulting sequestration of carbon into the ocean’s interior, and consequent modulation of Global patterns of ocean iron atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations in the geological past3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
    3 The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Co-ordinating Lead Author I.C. Prentice Lead Authors G.D. Farquhar, M.J.R. Fasham, M.L. Goulden, M. Heimann, V.J. Jaramillo, H.S. Kheshgi, C. Le Quéré, R.J. Scholes, D.W.R. Wallace Contributing Authors D. Archer, M.R. Ashmore, O. Aumont, D. Baker, M. Battle, M. Bender, L.P. Bopp, P. Bousquet, K. Caldeira, P. Ciais, P.M. Cox, W. Cramer, F. Dentener, I.G. Enting, C.B. Field, P. Friedlingstein, E.A. Holland, R.A. Houghton, J.I. House, A. Ishida, A.K. Jain, I.A. Janssens, F. Joos, T. Kaminski, C.D. Keeling, R.F. Keeling, D.W. Kicklighter, K.E. Kohfeld, W. Knorr, R. Law, T. Lenton, K. Lindsay, E. Maier-Reimer, A.C. Manning, R.J. Matear, A.D. McGuire, J.M. Melillo, R. Meyer, M. Mund, J.C. Orr, S. Piper, K. Plattner, P.J. Rayner, S. Sitch, R. Slater, S. Taguchi, P.P. Tans, H.Q. Tian, M.F. Weirig, T. Whorf, A. Yool Review Editors L. Pitelka, A. Ramirez Rojas Contents Executive Summary 185 3.5.2 Interannual Variability in the Rate of Atmospheric CO2 Increase 208 3.1 Introduction 187 3.5.3 Inverse Modelling of Carbon Sources and Sinks 210 3.2 Terrestrial and Ocean Biogeochemistry: 3.5.4 Terrestrial Biomass Inventories 212 Update on Processes 191 3.2.1 Overview of the Carbon Cycle 191 3.6 Carbon Cycle Model Evaluation 213 3.2.2 Terrestrial Carbon Processes 191 3.6.1 Terrestrial and Ocean Biogeochemistry 3.2.2.1 Background 191 Models 213 3.2.2.2 Effects of changes in land use and 3.6.2 Evaluation of Terrestrial Models 214 land management 193 3.6.2.1 Natural carbon cycling on land 214 3.2.2.3 Effects
    [Show full text]