DOCSLIB.ORG

Case Assignment in Russian and Persian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case Assignment in Russian and Persian Intl. J. Humanities (200 8) Vol. 1 5 ( 2): (1 – 9 ) Case Assignment in Russian and Persian Mireyla Ahmadi 1 Received: 23/8/2006 Accept: 10/11/2007 Abstract Russian language, with regard to its gramma r, is a language with its ow n special complexities , hardly found in other languages. Although langua ges are different from each other, they have some similarities as well. The Iranian learner, while learning Russian, analyzes the sentences using patterns similar to his/ her native language patterns. Occasionally, such native patterns cause the learner to make glaring mistakes. Verb, in Russian language, is a word that grammatically conducts a noun and its modifiers ( падеж ). The difficulty , which the learners encounter is the lack of a complete agreement of verb conduction. That is to say, it is possible f or a verb in Downloaded from eijh.modares.ac.ir at 10:46 IRST on Tuesday September 28th 2021 Persian language to conduct its dependent word in a particular manner, which the very same verb, in Russian language , might conduct its defendant word in a different manner . It is even possible that the verb conduction by the same verb in the two language s might occur by means of two totally different prepositions. In other to avoid such errors, it seems necessary to make the learners aware of their occurrences at the very initial steps of language learning. Keywords: Russian language , Persian language , verb, grammatical case (manner) , mother tongue, student. 1. Assistant Professor , Department Russian Language, Tarbiat Modares university, E -mail: [email protected] 1 Case Assignment in Russian and Persian Introduction Russian is one of the languages whose Man has been engaged in t he learning of new teaching / learning have gained momentum in la nguages since the time immemorial , as the the past 15 years in Iran. Th e collapse of Soviet acquisition of a new language implies Union in 1990s and the fall of dividing lines familiarity with a new culture, history, customs, between socialist countries created new traditions and also the possibility of opportunities for more contact between Russia establishing communication with other people. and other nations. Iran as a neighboring Though language learning can be set off by country , was no exception to this rule and after different objectives or motivations, however, the disintegr ation of Soviet Union, the there are still numerous problems in the way of commercial, political and cultural ties and the language learners. Most of thes e problems are exchange of students became very common created by the patterns imposed by the learners’ among newly created Central Asian republics mother tongue. In other words, during L1 and Iran. The new republics enjoyed their own acquisition, each person stores a set of national languages; nonetheless, it seems that information and clichés belonging exclusively Russ ian is going to linger on for quite a long to his/ her mother tongue. As a person sets out time in these countries. to learn a new l anguage, particularly the first Grammatically speaking, Russian language is L2, s/he unconsciously evaluates and regarded as one of the most complex languages of comprehends the L2 in accordance with the the world , a fact which makes its acquisition as a fixed mental clichés and patterns of his/her second language a formidable task. Sad to sa y, mother tongue. Each language possesses unique despite the necessity of comparative works Downloaded from eijh.modares.ac.ir at 10:46 IRST on Tuesday September 28th 2021 features of its own , which are different from between Russian and Persian, few studies have other la nguages. The lack of complete semantic been done in this field. concordance, presence of unfamiliar grammatical Russian possesses a very complicated structures, sociolinguistic differences in the grammar and one of the issues which creates a encoding of messages etc are only some of these lot of difficulties for Iranian students is the case differences to name a few. sy stem and case assignment of the following Based on the above assertion, the noun phrases. comparative s tudies seem to be a common mechanism to reveal some of the obstacles on Discussion of the Problem the way of language learners, and manage to The case system (упр авление глагола ) is of produce worthwhile results. great significance in Russian grammar and is 2 Ahmadi M. one of the issues , which poses a formidable task The verbs “ гoвopит ь - c `азать ” meaning for foreign L2 learners. It should b e noted that “to say and to talk” assign a dative case to its case is not limited to verbs and other categories oblique: such as nouns, adjectives, adverbs, and numbers Я говорила Ни cе. should agree with the following structures in “man be Nina goftam” one of the complements , which is generally (I to Nina told) known as Case Assignment. This paper deals “I told Nina” only with ver bal case system which refers to the Here the word “Nina” has become a n assigning of an appropriate case ( па деж ) to the oblique (dative case) , which is indicated by the following NP or PP. For example the verb preposition “be” in Persian. (видеть – увидеть ) “to see” assigns an The difficulty that Iranian learners face in accusative case to its oblique . this regard concerns the lack of agreement between the cases in Persian and Russian ; in Вчера я увидела свою старую преподавательницу . Dirooz man ostade ghadimiyam ra didam. other words, a particular verb in Persian may (I saw my former professor yesterday) assign a special case to its oblique whereas in Russian the same verb assigns a different case Here the phrase “свою старую or the verb may require different prepositions преподавательницу ” ( my former professor ) for their oblique. has been a ssigned an accusative case by the As an example, the verbs “поздрав лять – verb (видеть – увидеть ) its counterpart in поздравить ” meaning “T abrik Goftan – To Downloaded from eijh.modares.ac.ir at 10:46 IRST on Tuesday September 28th 2021 Persian is manifested by the use of accusative congratulate ” require an accusative case as marker of {ra}. “ви cител ьны й падеж ” The verb “идти ” (to go) assigns a dative Я поздравляю Вас . (man shoma ra tabrik migoyam)٭ case to its oblique : (I you + accusative marker, congratulate) Я y шeл c Виктором . I congratulate you Man ba Victor raftam. This verb requires th e preposition of “be” in (I went with Victor.) Persian to produce a dative case whereas in In this example the word Victor “B иктор” Russian , as we saw , an accusative case is has been assigned a dative case by the verb “to required “man be shoma tabrik migoyam” go” which is manifested by its relevant marker “c” meaning “with”. 3 Case Assignment in Russian and Persian The verb “ Верить – поверить ” meaning “ nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, to believe in” assigns an accusative case to its instrumental and prepositional cases . One of the complement by th e use of preposition “ B” as cases acts as nominative and the other five “ви cитель ны й падеж ”: cases are oblique. Я веру в вас . There are four cases in modern Persian namely *(man dar shoma eteghad daram) nominative, oblique , genitive and vocative. (man be shoma eteghad daram) The nominative case of Persian corresponds I believe in you with the “именительньґй падеж ” in Russian. The verb “eteghad dashtan” in Persian “ to The oblique case is of two types: accusative believe in ” requires a dative case , which is case , which agrees with “ винительный падеж ” indicated by the prepositi on “be”: in Russian and dative case , which based on the (man be shoma eteghad daram) preposition used in Persian may agree with one of (I believe in you) the following cases in Russian: ( дательный Therefore, there are certain set of verbs in падеж , творительный падеж , предлож ный Persian and Russian , which require different падеж ” and sometimes even with “ родительный cases or prepositions and consequently the падеж ”. language learners as interference from their The genitive cases of Persian , which are of 5 mother tongue habit s, translate the patterns of different categories (possessi ve , exclusi ve , their L1 into Russian producing ungrammatical simile, metaphoric and expressi ve ) correspond and even unintelligible sentences. with родительный падеж ” in Russian. Due to the same reason, in order to produce What we emphasize here is that though Downloaded from eijh.modares.ac.ir at 10:46 IRST on Tuesday September 28th 2021 meaningful and grammatical sentences cases are present in both languages, yet they comprehensible to both readers and listeners, cause difficulty for language learners due to the learner not only should be familiar with the their different distributions a fact which creates meaning, spelling, usage, and verbs problems for L2 learners. conjugation, but should also know the case The cases of Persian are indicated by the “ra” assignment of different verbs. marker, vocative marker, the genitive morpheme Based on their role in a sentence , the words “e” and prepositions while case is shown in can have any of the 6 different cases in Russian Russian by the inflectional endings ( с`лон ение ) (all nouns, adjective s, numbers, pronouns and and prepositions. The same issue also cause s participles) these cases are indicated by the grammatical differences between the two addition of certain endings which include: languages leading to linguistic errors by learners. h Ahmadi M. As an example, let us compare and contrast (dokhtar ) the gir l the different cases of the word girl “ dokhtar “ (e dokhtar) the girl of with its Russian counterpart “ девоч`а” : (be dokhtar ) to the girl (Ba dokhtar) with the girl Она девоч `а. (u dokhtar ast) (she girl is ) she is a girl Отец девоч `и об этом с`азал .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Persian Compound Verb
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by K-State Research Exchange ON THE PERSIAN COMPOUND VERB BRIAN LEANDER O'NEILL B. S., Kansas State University, 1972 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Speech KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1978 Approved "by: LO CONTENTS osi C 2- Introduction 1 Preliminaries: Historical 3 Preliminaries: Grammatical 6 The Compound Verb 14 Conclusion 38 Notes 39 Bibliography kh Introduction Many authors have noted the preponderance of what we shall he referring to as compound verb constructions in the Persian language. In fact, the major portion of verbal forms in Persian are compounds, composed of some initial non-verbal element and a second purely verbal element. Perhaps because Persian has not been subjected to intensive analysis these constructions have remained poorly described. The aim of this thesis is to examine the compound verb and to determine its status as an element in the grammar of Persian. 1 In the past few years several analyses of various aspects of Persian have appeared, often employing a transformationally based theoretical framework. 2 Preceding these were a number of normative and descriptive works. Included among the former are the much older works by Hadley (1776), Jones (1771) and an anon- ymous work published in 1790 that was written for the Persian speaker learning English. More recently, Lambton (1966) and Elwell-Sutton (19^3) have written grammars to be employed by students of the language. Additionally, there have been a num- ber of phrase books of the type edited by C.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmony of Babel Harmony of Babel Profiles of Famous Polyglots of Europe
    In the late 1980s the distinguished interpreter Kató Lomb researched historical and contemporary lomb polyglots in an effort to understand their linguistic feats. Among her fellow polyglots she asked: “When can we say we know a language?” “Which is the most important language skill: grammar, vocabulary, or good pronunciation?” harmony “What method did you use to learn languages?” “Has it ever happened to you that you started learning a language, but could not cope with it?” of “What connection do you see between age and babel language learning?” “Are there ‘easy’ and ‘difficult,’ ‘rich’ and ‘poor,’ ‘beautiful’ and ‘less beautiful’ languages?” :Europe Polyglots of Famous of Profiles “What is multilingualism good for?” The answers Lomb collected from her interlocutors are singular and often profound. Grounded in real-world experience, they will be of interest to linguaphiles who are seeking to supplement their theoretical knowledge of language learning. kató lomb (1909–2003) was called “possibly HARMONY the most accomplished polyglot in the world” by linguist Stephen Krashen. One of the pioneers of simultaneous interpreting, Lomb worked in 16 languages in her native Hungary and abroad. She wrote several books on language and language of BABEL learning in the 1970s and 1980s. Profiles of Famous Polyglots of Europe http://tesl-ej.org KATÓ LOMB berkeley · kyoto HARMONY of BABEL HARMONY of BABEL profiles of famous polyglots of europe KATÓ LOMB Translated from the Hungarian by Ádám Szegi Edited by Scott Alkire tesl-ej Publications Berkeley, California & Kyoto, Japan Originally published in Hungary as Bábeli harmónia (Interjúk Európa híres soknyelvű embereivel) by Gondolat, Budapest, in 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø
    An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø Copyright © 2016 by Prods Oktor Skjærvø Please do not cite in print without the author’s permission. This Introduction may be distributed freely as a service to teachers and students of Old Iranian. In my experience, it can be taught as a one-term full course at 4 hrs/w. My thanks to all of my students and colleagues, who have actively noted typos, inconsistencies of presentation, etc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Select bibliography ................................................................................................................................... 9 Sigla and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 12 Lesson 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Old Persian and old Iranian. .................................................................................................................... 13 Script. Origin. .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Script. Writing system. ........................................................................................................................... 14 The syllabary. .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Logograms. ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Persian Basic Course: Units 1-12. INSTITUTION Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C.; Foreign Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 053 628 FL 002 506 AUTHOR Obolensky, Serge; And Others TITLE Persian Basic Course: Units 1-12. INSTITUTION Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C.; Foreign Service (Dept. of State), Washington, D.C. Foreign Service Inst. PUB DATE May 63 NOTE 397p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$13.16 DESCRIPTORS Grammar, *Instructional Materials, *Language Instruction, Language Skills, *Oral Communication, Orthographic Symbols, Pattern Drills (Language), *Persian, Pronunciation, Reading Skills, Sentences, Speaking, Substitution Drills, *Textbooks, Uncommonly Taught Languages, Written Language ABSTRACT This basic course in Persian concentrates on the spoken language, illustrated by conversation based on everyday situations. After a thorough grounding in pronunciation and in basic grammatical features, the student is introduced to the writing system of Persian. Some of the basic differences between spoken and written styles are explained. Imitation of a native speaker is provided, and the course is designed for intelligent and efficient imitation. Each of the 12 units has three parts: new material to be learned (basic sentences), explanation (hints on pronunciation and notes), and drill (grammatical, variation, substitution, narrative, and questions and answers) .(Authors/VM) co reN LC1 C) C=1 U-I Serge Obolensky Kambiz Yazdan Panah Fereidoun Khaje Nouri U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATINGIT. OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT POSITION OR POLICY. persian basiccourse units 1-12 it! Reprinted by the Center for Applied Linguistics 0 of the Modern Language Association of America Washington D C 1963 It is the policy of the Center for Applied Linguistics to make more widely available certain instructional and related materials in the language teaching field which have only limited accessibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf List of False Cognates, with Which Persian Chamizo Dominguez, P
    English and Persian Cognates/Pseudo Cognates-A Cross-Linguistic Investigation [PP: 21-34] Amin Marzban Department of Foreign Languages, Sepidan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sepidan, Iran Shahrzad Chahardahcherik Department of Foreign Languages, Sepidan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sepidan, Iran ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History Different world languages have a lot of contact with each other and have had The paper received on: different influences on one another. Cognates, words which are similar across 15/01/2015 two or more languages in some aspects, especially with regard to Accepted after peer- pronunciation, portray an interesting and relevant aspect of foreign/second review on: language translation and research. This study intended to identify a type of 28/02/2015 cognate words called false cognates in Persian and English, words which have Published on: the same form in two languages but represent different meanings, and tried to 07/03/2015 study and determine the historical relations between English and Persian words. It also aimed to trace their route back from Proto Indo-European Keywords: languages to the modern languages. To this end, the related literature was gone Back borrowing, through and a sufficient corpus of information has been revealed. Afterwards, Borrowing, authentic monolingual dictionaries in both Farsi and English languages were Cross-linguistic consulted to provide definitions for the cognates and allow for their cross- investigation linguistic comparison. The findings revealed that most of such problematic False cognates, cognates with different meanings in Farsi and English as found through this True cognates, study are likely to be confusing and deceptive for Farsi-speaking EFL learners.
    [Show full text]
  • Persian and Tajik
    DEMO : Purchase from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark CHAPTER EIGHT PERSIAN AND TAJIK Gernot Wind/uhr and Jo hn R Perry 1 INTRODUCTION 1 .1 Overview The fo cus of this chapter is Modern Standard Persian and Modern Standard Tajik. Both evolved from Early New Persian. We stern Persian has typologically shifted differently from modern Tajik which has retained a considerable number of Early Eastern Persian fe atures, on the one hand, and has also assimilated a strong typologically Turkic com­ ponent, on the other hand. In spite of their divergence, both languages continue to share much of their underlying fe atures, and are discussed jointly in this chapter. 1.1.1 Historical background Persian has been the dominant language of Iranian lands and adjacent regions for over a millennium. From the tenth century onward it was the language of literary culture, as well the lingua franca in large parts of West, South, and Central Asia until the mid­ nineteenth century. It began with the political domination of these areas by Persian­ speaking dynasties, first the Achaemenids (c. 558-330 BCE), then the Sassanids (224-65 1 CE), along with their complex political-cultural and ideological Perso-Iranianate con­ structs, and the establishment of Persian-speaking colonies throughout the empires and beyond. The advent of Islam (since 651 CE) represents a crucial shift in the history of Iran and thus of Persian. It resulted in the emergence of a double-focused Perso-Islamic construct, in which, after Arabic in the first Islamic centuries, Persian reasserted itself as the dominant high register linguistic medium, and extended its dominance into fo rmerly non-Persian and non-Iranian-speaking territories in the East and Central Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 the History of Linguistics
    The History of Linguistics 81 4 The History of Linguistics LYLE CAMPBELL 1 Introduction Many “histories” of linguistics have been written over the last two hundred years, and since the 1970s linguistic historiography has become a specialized subfield, with conferences, professional organizations, and journals of its own. Works on the history of linguistics often had such goals as defending a particu- lar school of thought, promoting nationalism in various countries, or focuss- ing on a particular topic or subfield, for example on the history of phonetics. Histories of linguistics often copied from one another, uncritically repeating popular but inaccurate interpretations; they also tended to see the history of linguistics as continuous and cumulative, though more recently some scholars have stressed the discontinuities. Also, the history of linguistics has had to deal with the vastness of the subject matter. Early developments in linguistics were considered part of philosophy, rhetoric, logic, psychology, biology, pedagogy, poetics, and religion, making it difficult to separate the history of linguistics from intellectual history in general, and, as a consequence, work in the history of linguistics has contributed also to the general history of ideas. Still, scholars have often interpreted the past based on modern linguistic thought, distorting how matters were seen in their own time. It is not possible to understand developments in linguistics without taking into account their historical and cultural contexts. In this chapter I attempt to present an overview of the major developments in the history of linguistics, avoiding these difficulties as far as possible. 2 Grammatical Traditions A number of linguistic traditions arose in antiquity, most as responses to linguistic change and religious concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the Parsi Scriptures Author: Martin Haug Subtopics: I
    Languages of The Parsi scriptures Author: Martin Haug Subtopics: I - The Language of the Avesta erroneously called Zend II - The Pahlavi language and Pazand, Texts of the Pahlavi Inscriptions at Hâjîâbâd H?J??B?D III -The Literature Extant ESSAY II. Languages of The Parsi scriptures The languages of Persia, commonly called Iranian, form a separate family of the great Aryan stock of languages which comprises, besides the Iranian idioms, Sanskrit (with its daughters), Greek, Latin, Teutonic (with English), Slavonian, Letto-Lithuanian, Celtic, and all allied dialects. The Iranian idioms arrange themselves under two heads: - Iranian languages properly so called. Affiliated tongues. The first division comprises the ancient, mediaeval, and modern languages of Iran, which includes Persia, Media, and Bactria, those lands which are styled in the Zend-Avesta airyâo danhâvô, “Aryan countries.” We may class them as follows: - (a.) The East Iranian or Bactrian branch, extant only in the two dialects in which the scanty fragments of the Parsi scriptures is written. The more ancient of them may be called the " Gatha dialect,” because the most extensive and important writings preserved in this peculiar idiom are the so-called Gathas or hymns; the later idiom, in which most of the books of the Zend-Avesta are written, may be called " ancient Bactrian,” or " the classical Avesta language,” which was for many centuries the spoken and written language of Bactria. The Bactrian languages seem to have been dying out in the third century B.C., and they have left no daughters. (b.) The West Iranian languages, or those of Media and Persia.
    [Show full text]
  • Persian As Koine: Written Persian in World-Historical Perspective
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Anthropology Papers Department of Anthropology 2012 Persian as Koine: Written Persian in World-Historical Perspective Brian Spooner University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] William L. Hanaway University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers Part of the Anthropology Commons, Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons, and the Reading and Language Commons Recommended Citation (OVERRIDE) Spooner, B. and Hanaway, W. (2012). Persian as Koine: Written Persian in the perspective of World History. In B. Spooner and W. Hanaway (Eds.), Literacy in the Persianate World: Writing and the Social Order (pp. 1-68). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/86 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Persian as Koine: Written Persian in World-Historical Perspective Abstract Persian emerged as the common language of court life and administration in the Islamic world east of Baghdad in the 8th and 9th centuries (2nd and 3rd centuries into the Islamic era). The process began in Khurasan, the large historical region of southwest-central Asia, which besides the northeast quadrant of modern Iran included most of modern Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan, and northern Afghanistan. Persian radiated out from the pre-Islamic cities that became new power centers, filling the vacuum left by the declining political (as distinct from symbolic) role of the Caliphate in Baghdad. Persian spread to its greatest extent five centuries later, under Mongol and Turkic administrations, when it stretched from the Balkans in the west to southern India in the south and along the trade routes into central China in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Grammar of Persian / Turkish As the First Language and the Grammar of English for Iranian Female High School Students
    International Journal of Language and L inguistics 2014; 2(6-1): 28-34 Published online November 18, 2014 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijll) doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020601.15 ISSN: 2330-0205 (Print); ISSN: 2330-0221 (Online) The relationship between the grammar of Persian / Turkish as the first language and the grammar of English for Iranian female high school students Maryam Dorosti, Fatemeh Behjat, Seyed Jamal Abdolrahim Zadeh English Department, Abadeh branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadeh, Iran Email address: [email protected] (M. Dorosti), [email protected] (F. Behjat) To cite this article: Maryam Dorosti, Fatemeh Behjat, Seyed Jamal Abdolrahim Zadeh. The Relationship between the Grammar of Persian / Turkish as the First Language and the Grammar of English for Iranian Female High School Students. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Innovations in Foreign Language Teaching. Vol. 2, No. 6-1, 2014, pp. 28-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020601.15 Abstract: Relationship between first and second language effects the learning of the second language. The more the target language is similar to the first language, the better language achievement can be observed. The present study was an attempt to investigate the relationship between the grammar of Persian/Turkish as the first language and the grammar of English for Iranian female high school students. To this end, in the present study 6o high school female students from Marvdasht were selected as the participants. Out of 60, 30 students had Persian as their first language (Group A) and 30 students had Turkish as their first language (Group B).
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Persian Within a Generative-Transformati Al Grammar
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 116 451 FL 007 110 AUTHOR Tahaian, Hessam TITLE Conjunction, Relativization, and Complementation in Persian. Colorado Research in Linguistics, No. 5. INSTITUTION Colorado Univ., Boulder. Dept. of Linguistics. PUB DATE May 75 NOTE 187p. AVAILABLE FROM Colorado' Research in Linguistics (CRIL), Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado, Woodbury Hall, Boulder, Colorado 80302 ($2.50) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Descriptive Linguistics; Form Classes (Languages); Indo European Languages; Language Research; Linguistic Theory; Morphology (Languages); *Persian; *Semantics; *Sentence Structure; *Syntax; *Transformation Generative Grammar; Verbs ABSTRACT . This study is concerned with the description of compound sentences, relative clauses, and comp went clauses in Standard Persian within a generative-transformatial grammar. Compound stntences are divided into conjunctive, diSjunctive, and adversativtypes on the basis of the semantic relations they express. A conjunctive clause is eithernon-emphatic or emphatic, a disjunctive clause is either alternative or ultimative, and an adversative clause is either contrastive (oppositive) orexceptional. Relative clauses are divided into attributive (restrictive) and appositive (non-restrictive) relative clauses with the conclusion that an attributive relative clause modifies an antecedentwhich has a multiple referent [-unique],while an appositive relative clause modifies an antecedent which has a unique referent [ +unique]. Both relative clauses result from the reduction of a non-emphatic, conjunctive compound with a coreferential noun. Ezafe constructions (Adjectival and genitive) are shown to be formed by the reductionof a non-emphatic conjunctive compoundwith a coreferential noun in which the second clause contains the verbs "budan"( "be "), or "dastan"( "have "). The complement clauses are analyzed as sentences that serve as an argument (supplement) to a specificclass of impersonal, intransitive, and transitive verbs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intonational Grammar of Persian Nima Sadat-Tehrani
    The Intonational Grammar of Persian by Nima Sadat-Tehrani A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2007 by Nima Sadat-Tehrani i Abstract This thesis is a detailed investigation of the phonology and phonetics of the intonation of Persian carried out in the framework of the AM theory of intonational phonology. Based on 2112 utterances read by a total of 8 native speakers, the work, on the one hand, presents a phonological account of the prosodic structure of this language, a structure that consists of the level Accentual Phrase with the pitch accent (L+)H* immediately dominated by the level Intonational Phrase, each level being marked by a low or high boundary tone. On the other hand, it scrutinizes the phonetic implementation of tones with regard to segments and shows how the phonology of Persian intonation is phonetically realized in the speech string. This research also studies the intonational patterns of simplex sentences, compound sentences coordinated with different types of conjunctions, subordinate structures, and vocative constructions. The sentence types include copular verb declaratives, sentences with unaccusative and unergative verbs, (S)(O)V sentences with and without adjuncts, null subject sentences, scrambled sentences, yes/no questions, leading yes/no questions, alternative questions, tag questions, single and multiple WH-questions, echo questions, imperatives, and single, double, and phrase focus constructions. ii Acknowledgement My gratitude goes to: My advisor Prof. Kevin Russell for his invaluable help in the course of thinking about and writing this dissertation.
    [Show full text]