<<

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY SYSTEMS: A Review of Four Critical Reactor Core Safety Systems

Joseph Cummings Advisors: Nicholas Cerruti, Hillary Bennett

INTRODUCTION EMERGENCY CONTROL SYSTEM (ECCS) LIQUID FLUORIDE REACTOR (LFTR)

Reactor safety systems are designed to control reactivity, temperature, and radio- ☢ Response to a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) ☢ Utilizes thorium-232 to make -233 activity in order to complete the following goals: ☢ Critical to maintain core cooling ☢ Chemical separation refines uranium-233 from outer chamber ☢ Prevent the occurrence of a dangerous scenario ☢ Prevent loss of coolable geometry ☢ moved to central chamber ☢ Deescalate the severity of an unprevented accident ☢ input able to compensate for double-ended break of largest pipe Salt Plug ☢ Mitigate the negative outcomes from a situation ☢ Coolant can contain poison additives (boric ) ☢ Salt plug kept solidified at bottom of core by electric fan SCRAM ☢ Fueled material flows out of core in case of power outage or overheating Radioisotope Removal ☢ Most common reactor safety system ☢ Chemical separation

☢ Takes advantage of reliable control rods ECCS Response removes fission products Materials Process from core ☢ -10 ☢ Core reprocessing ☢ -113 maintains stable uranium Control Mechanisms LOCA Detected content, removing the ☢ Hydraulic piston need for refueling ☢ Electric motor Stable Coolant ☢ Pneumatic system SCRAM Initiated ☢ Fluoride salt coolant SCRAM Insertion Techniques remains liquid at high ☢ Electromagnetic decoupling temperatures ☢ Gravity HPCS Deployed ☢ Does not require boiling Hydraulic pressure ☢ water in contact with fuel SCRAM Signal Examples ☢ Reduced containment ☢ Seismic trip ADS Figure 4- LFTRs have very different conceptual designs than Activated pressure requirements standard nuclear reactors

☢ Electrical supply failure due to lower pressures Source: Hargraves, Robert and Ralph Moir. “Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors: An old idea in gets reexamined.” American Scientist, July-August 2010. ☢ High power level Figure 1- An example of a from Pressure ☢ High temperature the WSU TRIGA Research Reactor CONCLUSIONS Reduced

Source: Safety Analysis Report for the WSU Modified TRIGA Re- ☢ LOCA actor, June 2002. SCRAM ☢ Widely used for its reliability at inserting negative reactivity LPCS/I Engaged ☢ Successful at curbing reactor power quickly

☢ Reduces reactivity as temperature increases Incapable of addressing long term heat production in core ☢ Uses physical properties to prevent runaway chain reaction ☢ Cell Effect LOCA ☢ Delayed neutron precursors continue to generate even after shutdown Terminated ☢ Increasing moderator Prompt Negative Temperature Coefficient temperature decreases Unbroadened ☢ Provides a ‘frictional’ force counteracting power transients, increasing stability moderation efficiency LOCA Isolated ☢ All U.S. reactors are required to be under moderated ☢ Large magnitude in ☢ Increasing cell effect magnitude in power reactor fuel promises elevated safety TRIGA research reactors Doppler Broadened Emergency Coolant Control System

Void Coefficient Figure 3- Diagram of the in core coolant systems of a with acronym Abs. Cross Abs. Section definitions ☢ Necessary to counteract LOCAs in large reactors ☢ Steam pockets (voids) Neutron Source: Katana0182 at English Wikipedia, CC BY 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons lower moderator ☢ Introduction of additional systems provides opportunities for failure Figure 2- A generic plot of absorption cross section vs. en- ☢ Most prevalent in water ergy at two different temperatures demonstrating doppler REFERENCES ☢ ECCS failures have disastrous results, requiring heavy operations surveillance moderated BWRs broadening Hargraves, Robert and Ralph Moir. “Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors: An old idea in nuclear Source: DOE Fundamentals Handbook: and Reactor Theory. Vol 2. Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor power gets reexamined.” American Scientist, July-August 2010. Doppler Broadening Jan 1993. “Safety Analysis Report for the WSU Modified TRIGA Reactor.” June 2002. ☢ Contains extremely promising safety potential using molten salt coolant ☢ Thermal oscillations broaden uranium-238 neutron absorption cross section “Training Manual: Reed Research Reactor.” September 2014. “DOE Fundamentals Handbook: Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory.” Vol. 1 and 2. Jan 1993 ☢ Mobile liquid fuel slurry solves energy dissipation issues of fuel rods spectrum due to higher variance of relative velocities Hench, J. E. and D. J. Liffengren. “The Effect of Fuel Rod Failure on Emergency Core Cooling System Design for Boiling Water Reactors.” , 1971. ☢ Regulatory issues associated with processing fuel L. Wang, B. Chen, and D. Yao, “Reactivity temperature coefficient evaluation of uranium zirconi- ☢ Reduction of fuel and moderator density makes fission less probable um hydride fuel element in power reactor.” and Design, vol. 257. 2013. ☢ Reduction in waste output relevant to current waste crisis facing nuclear field