Translation Series No. 538

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Translation Series No. 538 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No. 538 . A comparative study on the fatty acid composition and cholesterol content of the dorsal flesh of fish by Yaichiro Shimma and Hisako Taguchi Original title: Gyorui Senikuchu no Koresuteronu-ryo to Shibosan Soshiki ni tsuite From: Bulletin of the 'Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 30: 179-188, 1964 Translated by Translation Bureau(GN) Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Fisheries Research Board of 'Canada 1965 16pages typescript • • DEPARTI4ENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECRÉTARIAT D'ÉTAT BUREAU FOR TRANSLATIONS BUREAUDES TRADUCTIONS FOREIGN LANGUAGES DIVISION DES LANGUES DIVISION CANADA ÉTRANGÈRES eiCk e .1+1 1-4 TRANSLATION SERVICES CANADA INSTITUTE FOR S. T. I. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL : TRANSLATED FROM - TRADUCTION DE INTO - _ t.ral)f.:121(.7`.E•0 Enaliteh flTT A IN SUBJECT - SUJET CANA Dg I--- ViGharies AUTHOR - AUTEUR Ynichiro 'Obitirna and Iliveko SYaguahL TITLE IN ENGLISH - TITRE ANGLAIS A Comarativo Study on the Yhtly Auld Oolapeatton nd ehoIcutorol Content of the Dorml Yleoh of noh TITLE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE - TITRE EN LANGUE ÉTRANGèRE Cyore SOnikueu no Kom3utorornleo to Shibœan Soshia ni tWito REFERENCE RÉFÉRENCE (NAME OF ' BOOK OR PUBLICATION - NOM.DU LIVRE OU PUBLICATION) . Bulletin me the Jamamlo.Sobiety of.0oiontiflo ViCaerim Vol„ 50, 'No. 2, 1964 PUBLISHER - ÉDITEUR . CITY - VILLE DATE PAGES 1964 179 . lsa REQUEST RECEIVED FROM gpherico RelJourch Board of Canada OUR NUMBER REQUIS PAR. NOTRE DOSSIER N° • " • - DEPARTMENT 0.(7.A10-riee TRANSLATOR G 1 .1.010231.11,A MINISTÉRE TRADUCTEUR. • • YOUR NUMBER • 769'1814 DATE COMPLETED ibb e VOTRE DOSSIER NO • REMPLIE LE 5. 1965 DATE RECEIVED Jan. 23, 1965 REÇU LE ‘-k a 3 Q, s- Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries Vol. 30, No. 2, 1964 A comparative study on the fatty acid composition and (179) cholesterol content of the dorsal flesh of fish* Yaichior Shimma and Hisako_ Taguchi** (Received October 4, 1963) The difference in fatty acid composition between two group of shell- fish, the gasteropoda and pelecypoda, has been dealt with in another paper in this issue, on the basis of which it may be inferred that the fatty acid com- position of non-depot lipids of fish flesh might also vary with living enviro- nments or feeding habits. Consequently, thirty-six species of fish including shark, bony fish, and their processed products, were obtained from a retail outlet to study the composition patterns. Lipids were extracted from dorsal muscles, which usually contain depot lipids in less amount than the flesh of other parts. The total cholesterol content and fatty acid composition of each were examined in the same manner as described for shell fish. The following summarize the finding from data shown in Table 1 and 2: 1. In dorsal flesh, cholesterol content varied from 9.5 mg in flying fish to 72 mg in pond smelt; while this content in the majority of salt-water fish fell in the 40+10 mg range, the figure for rainbow trout, loach and pond smelt was slightly higher at 70-72 mg. 2. Lipids of dorsal flesh showed a lower content of such fatty acids as C saturated acid, C C and and a higher quantity of C 14 16:1' 18:1' C20:1 226 than lipids of ventral flesh. 3. The pattern of fatty acid composition shown in Table 3 was ob- tained by averaging the results from seventeen marine bony fish and three cured products which had less than 1% of oil content in the dorsal flesh and more than 15% of fatty acid in the lipids. C22:6 4. With respect to inshore bottom fish, C226acid was found to be around one-tenth of the total acid content. Two species of shark had similar fatty acid compositions (Fig. 4), but they differed from the pattern indicated in Table 3. * Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory Study No. B 400. ** Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, Tsukishima, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 5. Fresh-water fish, such as loach and sweet smelt, contained 1.3 - 2.5% of acid with a distinct amount of C acid which was C22:6 183 scarcely present in salt-water fish (Figs. 1 and 2). In rainbow trout and pond smelt, however, C acid ranged from 14.9-28.9%, approximating the 226 quantity found in marine fish (Fig. 3). An analysis of the fatty acid composition of shellfish has been 1) presented by the authors in another paper, showing that there is a dis- tict difference in composition between pelecypods and gasteropods. In this paper, similar findings on the fatty acid composition of fish by means of gas chromatography are reported, along with cholesterol content observations using the Liebermann-Burchard reaction. The methods hitherto employed to analyze fatty acid composition had rendered accurate findings extremely painstaking and difficult; nevertheless, because of the high productivity and wide utilization of the preserved fats of fish - body oil and liver oil - a number of reports on the subject have been made by a number of researchers. On the other hand, because of the re- latively low oil content of dorsal flesh in comparison with other parts, very little is known with regard to its lipids. Although it is uncertain whether this applies to all fish or not, it is generally agreed that phosphoric lipids 2) contain many fatty acids of a high degree of unsaturabi1ity . The phosphoric 3) lipid content of dorsal flesh ranges from 0.5-0.9% , so that when the oil content of dorsal flesh is 1% or less, it is easy to suppose that the fatty (180) acid composition of dorsal flesh will differ considerably from that of pre- served fats. The purpose of this report is to show, by analyzing the lipids of dorsal flesh of a number of different species of fish, the comparative differences in oil and cholesterol content between species as well as between dorsal and ventral flesh. As for the cholesterol content of fish, it has been firmly report- ed as being 50-70 mg/100 g in the cod, haddock and rainbow trout, with other 4) fish presumed to contain similar amounts, which point we sought to verify. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION AND EXPERIMENT The 36 species of salt-water and fresh-water fish as listed in Table 1, including the three cured products, were obtained at Tsukiji whole- sale Fish Market in Tokyo and Mazuru Fish Market in Kanagawa Prefecture 3 Table 1. Oil and Cholesterol Content of Dorsal Flesh of Fish Cholesterol Cont. NO Sample Oil cont. In tissue 1 r acific herring (Clupea harengus pallasi) 0.37% 68 mg/g 25 mg/100g (Ventral 4.8 13.8 66) 2 round herring (Etrumeus micropus) 1.5 15.0 23 (Ventral 7.2 4.6 33) 3 Shad (Dorosoma thrissa) 0.75 35 26 (Ventral 10.5 4,7 49) 4 Pacific saury (Cololabis saira) 1.19 16 19 5 Flying fish (Prognichthys agoo) 0.17 56 9.5 (Ventral 1.82 13 24) 6 Jack mackerel (Caranx mertensi) 0.69 69 48 7 "Akaze" horse-mackerel (Decapterus muroads1) 0.91 34 31 (Ventral I 15.8 2.8 44) 8 "Muro" horse-mackeral (Decapterus lajang) 0.47 58 27 9 Saurel horse-mackeral (Trachurus japonicus) large size 1.17 38 44 small size 0.60 81 49 10 Butterfish (Centrolophus janponicus) 0.50 71 36 11 Sea bass (A) (Lateolabrax japonicus) 0.78 56 44 (B) 0:72 53 38 12 Bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoii) 1.3 27 • 35 13 "Sumiyaki" (Prometheichthys promethe 28 45 us) 1.6 14 Snapper (A) (Etelis evurus) 0.29 115 33 (B) 0.42 117 49 15 "Ki" sea-bream (Tail's tumifrons) 0.42 45 19 16 "Ma" sea-bream (Chrysophrys major) 0.29 114 33 17 "Nibe" (Miichthys imbricatus) 0.81 64 52 18 "Fusei" (Pesudosciaena crocea). 0.94 57 54 (Ventral ' 43 6.2 266) 4 19 MMegochi" (Inegocia meerdervoosti) 0.37 59 22 20 Goby (eicanthogobius flavimanus) 0.34 103 35 21 Gurnard (Chelidonichths kumu) 0.31 176 55 22 Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) 0.32 117 37 23 Conger (Astroconger myriaster 8.49 5.3 45 24 Puffer (Sphoeroides vermicularis) 0.70 63 44 (Liver 26 11.4 296) 25 Angler (Liphoimus setigerus) 0.48 72 35 26 Chum salmon (Oncorhynchuè keta) 4.5 9.5 42 (Ventral 44 2.4 106) 27 Rainbow trout* (Salmo gairdnerii irideus) 5.6 12.5 70 28 Pond Smelt (Hypomesus olidus) 0.73 99 72 29 Whitebait** (Salangichthys microdon) 1.3 102 133 30 Sweet smelt (Plecoglossus altirelis) 2.8 9.1 25 31 Loach (Misgurnus fossilis) 0.82 86 71 32 Dog fish (Squalus sucklii) 11.2 3.5 39 33 Porbeagle shark (Lamna cornubica) 1.91 23 44 34 Pacific cod salted' 0.33 79 26 35 Red fish soaked in Sake less (Sebastes sp) 0.21 212 45 36 Barracuda salted ..(Sphyraena .schlgéli) 0.65 78 51 * Instead of dorsal part, minced edible portion of cultivated fish was used. ** Includes visceral parts. between July 1962 and February 1963. As a standard rule, 5-10 g of tissue were sliced from the central portion of the dorsal flesh. However, in the case of the cured products as well as the tuna and shark, pre-cut pieces were obtained, while the rainbow trout used in minced form and the whitebait used in it entirety including its vesceral parts. For comparative purposes, lipids were also extracted from the ventral flesh of seven species as well as from the liver of the puffer. 5 The purpose of lipid extraction and all other steps including the a application of gas chromatography used in this experiment were identical with 1) those employed in our study on shellfish published earlier, as was also the quantitative analysis of cholesterol content using Niefts 5) method previous- ly reported.
Recommended publications
  • If I Catch It, Can I Eat It? a Guide to Eating Fish Safely, 2017 Connecticut
    If I Catch It, This pamphlet will give you information that will help your family avoid chemicals in fish and eat fish safely. Fish from Connecticut’s waters are a healthy, low-cost source of protein. Conne<ti<ut Oep.trtment Unfortunately, some fish take up chemicals such as mercury and polychlorinated of Public Health Can I Eat It? biphenyls (PCBs). These chemicals can build up in your body and increase health risks. The developing fetus and young children are most sensitive. Women who eat A Guide to Eating Fish Safely fish containing these chemicals before or during pregnancy or nursing may have 2017 Connecticut Fish Consumption Advisory children who are slow to develop and learn. Long term exposure to PCBs may increase cancer risk. What Does The Fish Consumption Advisory Say? The advisory tells you how often you can safely eat fish from Connecticut’s waters and from a store or restaurant. In many cases, separate advice is given for the High Risk and Low Risk Groups. You are in the High Risk Group if you are a pregnant woman, a woman who could become pregnant, a nursing mother, or a child under six. If you do not fit into the High Risk Group, you are in the Low Risk Group. Advice is given for three different types of fish consumption: 1. Statewide FRESHWATER Fish Advisory: Most freshwater fish in Connecticut contain enough mercury to cause some limit to consumption. The statewide freshwater advice is that: High Risk Group: eat no more than 1 meal per month Low Risk Group: eat no more than 1 meal per week 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Leather, Anyone?
    Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Aquaculture Department SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository http://repository.seafdec.org.ph Journals/Magazines Aqua Farm News 1995 Fish leather, anyone? Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department (1995). Fish leather, anyone? Aqua Farm News, 13(1), 16-17, 18. http://hdl.handle.net/10862/2458 Downloaded from http://repository.seafdec.org.ph, SEAFDEC/AQD's Institutional Repository Fish leather, anyone? SHARK LEATHER a) the existing leather tannery infrastruc­ Previously regarded as a by-catch of lim­ ture is well-developed especially around Ma­ ited potential, shark is now targetted by small- dras; scale fishermen in the Bay of Bengal for leather b) operating costs are relatively low; and production. c) offshore resources of sharks are not Fish, let alone shark, does not conjure up sufficiently tapped at present. images of leather goods unlike cow, goat or An environmentally significant point is that crocodile. shark and fish leathers in general are essentially The method of obtaining the raw material food industry by-products which would otherwise and the specialized nature of the market hamper be wasted. Other exotic leathers produced from success in this field and general awareness of crocodile and snake, for example, have negative potential. connotations in this respect in spite of their Shark is a hunted resource often captured increased production through culture. by small-scale fishermen only as by-catch, and primarily landed for its meat. It may therefore be Offshore resources difficult to obtain a regular supply of raw material The offshore zone is the realm of the large for what is a totally different industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean &Unclean Meats
    Clean & Unclean Meats God expects all who desire to have a relationship with Him to live holy lives (Exodus 19:6; 1 Peter 1:15). The Bible says following God’s instructions regarding the meat we eat is one aspect of living a holy life (Leviticus 11:44-47). Modern research indicates that there are health benets to eating only the meat of animals approved by God and avoiding those He labels as unclean. Here is a summation of the clean (acceptable to eat) and unclean (not acceptable to eat) animals found in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. For further explanation, see the LifeHopeandTruth.com article “Clean and Unclean Animals.” BIRDS CLEAN (Eggs of these birds are also clean) Chicken Prairie chicken Dove Ptarmigan Duck Quail Goose Sage grouse (sagehen) Grouse Sparrow (and all other Guinea fowl songbirds; but not those of Partridge the corvid family) Peafowl (peacock) Swan (the KJV translation of “swan” is a mistranslation) Pheasant Teal Pigeon Turkey BIRDS UNCLEAN Leviticus 11:13-19 (Eggs of these birds are also unclean) All birds of prey Cormorant (raptors) including: Crane Buzzard Crow (and all Condor other corvids) Eagle Cuckoo Ostrich Falcon Egret Parrot Kite Flamingo Pelican Hawk Glede Penguin Osprey Grosbeak Plover Owl Gull Raven Vulture Heron Roadrunner Lapwing Stork Other birds including: Loon Swallow Albatross Magpie Swi Bat Martin Water hen Bittern Ossifrage Woodpecker ANIMALS CLEAN Leviticus 11:3; Deuteronomy 14:4-6 (Milk from these animals is also clean) Addax Hart Antelope Hartebeest Beef (meat of domestic cattle) Hirola chews
    [Show full text]
  • Provision of Information on Place of Product Origin to Consumers
    Fishery Provision of Information on Place of Product Origin to Products Consumers ○Since October 2011, it has been recommended to display places of origin of fresh fishery products, mainly those caught on the Pacific side of eastern Japan, by dividing the sea areas into 7 zones and clarifying these zone names. Zones for migratory fish Display example [Migratory fish species] Salmon shark, blue shark, shortfin mako shark, sardines, salmon and trout, Pacific saury, Japanese amberjack, Japanese Indicate the water zone jack mackerel, marlins, mackerels, bonito and tunas, Japanese of catch on a label flying squid, spear squid, and neon flying squid Line of 200 nautical miles off the coast of Honshu (i) Pacific Ocean off the coast of Due east line extending from Hokkaido and Aomori the border between Aomori and Iwate Prefectures (ii) Off the coast of Sanriku Due east line extending from (northern part) the border between Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures (iii) Off the coast of Sanriku Due east line extending from (southern part) the border between Miyagi and Indicate the water zone (iv) Off the coast of Fukushima Prefectures of catch on a label Fukushima Due east line extending from Fishery Products 8.6 (v) Off the coast of the border between Fukushima Hitachi and Kashima and Ibaraki Prefectures (vi) Off the coast of Boso Due east line extending from the border between Ibaraki and Due east line Chiba Prefectures extending to the east from Nojimazaki, Chiba Prepared based on the "Responses at Farmland" by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) MAFF Since October 2011, the national government has been encouraging producers to display places of origin of fresh fishery products, mainly those caught on the Pacific side of eastern Japan so that consumers can easily understand where the relevant fishery product was caught.
    [Show full text]
  • Traceability Study in Shark Products
    Traceability study in shark products Dr Heiner Lehr (Photo: © Francisco Blaha, 2015) Report commissioned by the CITES Secretariat This publication was funded by the European Union, through the CITES capacity-building project on aquatic species Contents 1 Summary.................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Structure of the remaining document ............................................................................. 9 1.2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 10 2 The market chain ................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Shark Products ............................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Shark fins ............................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Shark meat ............................................................................................................. 12 2.1.3 Shark liver oil ......................................................................................................... 13 2.1.4 Shark cartilage ....................................................................................................... 13 2.1.5 Shark skin ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Examining the Shark Trade As a Tool for Conservation
    Re-examining the shark trade as a tool for conservation Shelley Clarke1 Shark encounters of the comestible Therefore, while sharks have become conspicuous as entertainment since the 1970s, they have been impor- kind tant as commodities for centuries. Telling the tale of public fascination with sharks usually begins with the blockbuster release of the movie “Jaws” In September 2014, the implementation of multiple in the summer of 1975. This event more than any other new listings for sharks and rays by the Convention on is credited with sparking a demonization of sharks that International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of has continued for decades (Eilperin 2011). In recent Wild Fauna and Flora (Box 1), underscored the need to years, less deadly but equally adrenalin-charged shark re-kindle interest in using trade information to comple- interactions, including cage diving, hand-feeding and ment fisheries monitoring. These CITES listings are a even shark riding, have captured the public’s attention spur to integrate international trade information with through ecotourism, television and social media. These fishery management mechanisms in order to better reg- more positive encounters (at least for most humans), in ulate shark harvests and to anticipate future pressures combination with many high-profile shark conservation and threats. To highlight both the importance and com- campaigns, have turned large numbers from shark hat- plexity of this integration, this article will explore four ers to shark lovers, and mobilized political support for common suppositions about the relationship between shark protection around the world. shark fishing and trade and point to areas where further work is necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Info Sheet
    Methyl Mercury The danger from the sea Report by SHARKPROJECT International • Aug. 31, 2008 Updated by Shark Safe Network Sept. 12, 2009 ! SHARK MEAT CONTAINS HIGH LEVELS OF METHYL MERCURY: A DANGEROUS NEUROTOXIN In the marine ecosystem sharks are on top of the food chain. Sharks eat other contaminated fish and accumulate all of the toxins that they’ve absorbed or ingested during their lifetimes. Since mercury is a persistent toxin, the levels keep building at every increasing concentrations on the way up the food chain. For this reason sharks can have levels of mercury in their bodies that are 10,000 times higher than their surrounding environment. Many predatory species seem to manage high doses of toxic substances quite well. This is not the case, however, with humans on whom heavy metal contamination takes a large toll. Sharks at the top end of the marine food chain are the final depots of all the poisons of the seas. And Methyl Mercury is one of the biologically most active and most dangerous poisons to humans. Numerous scientific publications have implicated methyl mercury as a highly dangerous poison. Warnings from health organizations to children and pregnant women to refrain from eating shark and other large predatory fish, however, have simply not been sufficient, since this “toxic food-information” is rarely provided at the point of purchase. Which Fish Have the Highest Levels of Methyl Mercury? Predatory fish with the highest levels of Methyl Mercury include Shark, King Mackerel, Tilefish and Swordfish. Be aware that shark is sold under various other names, such as Flake, Rock Salmon, Cream Horn, Smoked Fish Strips, Dried cod/stockfish, Pearl Fillets, Lemonfish, Verdesca (Blue Shark), Smeriglio (Porbeagle Shark), Palombo (Smoothound), Spinarolo (Spiny Dogfish), and as an ingredient of Fish & Chips or imitation crab meat.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Strain in Swimming Milkfish
    The Journal of Experimental Biology 202, 529–541 (1999) 529 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1999 JEB1633 MUSCLE STRAIN HISTORIES IN SWIMMING MILKFISH IN STEADY AND SPRINTING GAITS STEPHEN L. KATZ*, ROBERT E. SHADWICK AND H. SCOTT RAPOPORT Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine and Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0204, USA *Present address and address for correspondence: Zoology Department, Duke University, PO Box 90325, Durham, NC 27708-0325, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 10 December 1998; published on WWW 3 February 1999 Summary Adult milkfish (Chanos chanos) swam in a water-tunnel over that speed range, while tail-beat frequency increased flume over a wide range of speeds. Fish were instrumented by 140 %. While using a sprinting gait, muscle strains with sonomicrometers to measure shortening of red and became bimodal, with strains within bursts being white myotomal muscle. Muscle strain was also calculated approximately double those between bursts. Muscle strain from simultaneous overhead views of the swimming fish. calculated from local body bending for a range of locations This allowed us to test the hypothesis that the muscle on the body indicated that muscle strain increases rostrally shortens in phase with local body bending. The fish swam to caudally, but only by less than 4 %. These results suggest at slow speeds [U<2.6 fork lengths s−1 (=FL s−1)] where only that swimming muscle, which forms a large fraction of the peripheral red muscle was powering body movements, and body volume in a fish, undergoes a history of strain that is also at higher speeds (2.6>U>4.6 FL s−1) where they similar to that expected for a homogeneous, continuous adopted a sprinting gait in which the white muscle is beam.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • Should I Eat the Fish I Catch?
    EPA 823-F-14-002 For More Information October 2014 Introduction What can I do to reduce my health risks from eating fish containing chemical For more information about reducing your Fish are an important part of a healthy diet. pollutants? health risks from eating fish that contain chemi- Office of Science and Technology (4305T) They are a lean, low-calorie source of protein. cal pollutants, contact your local or state health Some sport fish caught in the nation’s lakes, Following these steps can reduce your health or environmental protection department. You rivers, oceans, and estuaries, however, may risks from eating fish containing chemical can find links to state fish advisory programs Should I Eat the contain chemicals that could pose health risks if pollutants. The rest of the brochure explains and your state’s fish advisory program contact these fish are eaten in large amounts. these recommendations in more detail. on the National Fish Advisory Program website Fish I Catch? at: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fish- The purpose of this brochure is not to 1. Look for warning signs or call your shellfish/fishadvisories/index.cfm. discourage you from eating fish. It is intended local or state environmental health as a guide to help you select and prepare fish department. Contact them before you You may also contact: that are low in chemical pollutants. By following fish to see if any advisories are posted in these recommendations, you and your family areas where you want to fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can continue to enjoy the benefits of eating fish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life Cycle of Rainbow Trout
    1 2 Egg: Trout eggs have black eyes and a central line that show healthy development. Egg hatching depends on the Adult: In the adult stage, female and water temperature in an aquarium or in a natural Alevin: Once hatched, the trout have a male Tasmanian Rainbow Trout spawn habitat. large yolk sac used as a food source. Each in autumn. Trout turn vibrant in color alevin slowly begins to develop adult trout during spawning and then lay eggs in fish The Life Cycle of characteristics. An alevin lives close to the nests, or redds, in the gravel. The life cycle gravel until it “buttons up.” of the Rainbow Trout continues into the Rainbow Trout egg stage again. 6 3 Fingerling and Parr: When a fry grows to 2-5 inches, it becomes a fingerling. When it develops large dark markings, it then becomes a parr. Many schools that participate in the Trout in the Classroom program in Nevada will release the Rainbow Trout into its natural habitat at the fingerling stage. Fry: Buttoning-up occurs when alevin Juvenile: In the natural habitat, a trout absorb the yolk sac and begin to feed on avoids predators, including wading birds 4 zooplankton. Fry swim close to the and larger fish, by hiding in underwater 5 water surface, allowing the swim bladder roots and brush. As a juvenile, a trout to fill with air and help the fry float resembles an adult but is not yet old or through water. large enough to spawn. For more information, please contact the Nevada Department of Wildlife at www.ndow.org Aquarium Care of Tasmanian Rainbow Trout What is Trout in the Classroom? Trout in the Classroom (TIC) is a statewide Nevada Department of Egg: Trout eggs endure many stresses, including temperature changes, excessive sediment, and Wildlife educational program.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SHARK and RAY MEAT NETWORK a DEEP DIVE INTO a GLOBAL AFFAIR 2021 Editor Evan Jeffries (Swim2birds)
    THE SHARK AND RAY MEAT NETWORK A DEEP DIVE INTO A GLOBAL AFFAIR 2021 Editor Evan Jeffries (Swim2birds) Communications Stefania Campogianni (WWF MMI), Magdalena Nieduzak (WWF-Int) Layout Bianco Tangerine Authors Simone Niedermüller (WWF MMI), Gill Ainsworth (University of Santiago de Compostela), Silvia de Juan (Institute of Marine Sciences ICM (CSIC)), Raul Garcia (WWF Spain), Andrés Ospina-Alvarez (Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies IMEDEA (UIB- CSIC)), Pablo Pita (University of Santiago de Compostela), Sebastián Villasante (University of Santiago de Compostela) Acknowledgements Serena Adam (WWF-Malaysia), Amierah Amer (WWF-Malaysia), Monica Barone, Andy Cornish (WWF-Int), Marco Costantini (WWF MMI), Chitra Devi (WWF-Malaysia), Giuseppe di Carlo (WWF MMI), Caio Faro (WWF Brazil), Chester Gan (WWF-Singapore), Ioannis Giovos (iSea), Pablo Guerrero (WWF-Ecuador), Théa Jacob (WWF-France), Shaleyla Kelez (WWF-Peru), Patrik Krstinić (WWF-Adria), Giulia Prato (WWF-Italy), Rita Sayoun (WWF-France), Umair Shahid (WWF-Pakistan), Vilisoni Tarabe (WWF-Pacific), Jose Luis Varas (WWF-Spain), Eduardo Videira (WWF-Mozambique), Ranny R. Yuneni (WWF-Indonesia), Heike Zidowitz (WWF-Germany). Special acknowledgments to contribution of Glenn Sant (TRAFFIC). Special acknowledgements go to WWF-Spain for funding the scientific part of this report. For contact details and further information, please visit our website at wwfmmi.org Cover photo: © Monica Barone / WWF Safesharks Back cover photo: © Matthieu Lapinski / Ailerons WWF 2021 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 SHARKS AND RAYS IN CRISIS 6 THE OVERALL TRADE VALUE 7 GLOBAL NETWORK ANALYSIS 8 SHARK MEAT TRADE 10 RAY MEAT TRADE 18 THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE SHARK AND RAY TRADE 26 A GLOBAL SELECTION OF DISHES WITH SHARK AND RAY MEAT 28 RECOMMENDATIONS 30 © Nuno Queirós (APECE) / WWF 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHARKS AND RAYS ARE IN CRISIS GLOBALLY Up to 100 million are killed each year, and some populations have declined by more than 95% as a result of overfishing.
    [Show full text]