DOCSLIB.ORG

Download PDF 8.94 MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download PDF 8.94 MB Foi man comp i who i According to the Swarthmore Alumni Census, Thuf mor( retui i t 1 - conti The typical 1 "• i year: Swarthmorean is... E | stror amoi total “I recently spent a day The typical Swarthmorean is likely to have as those above, do emerge about Swarthmor Cens at Swarthmore and, come from Pennsylvania, to live there now, alumni from an analysis of the informatioi Of allowing for all the change in undergraduate and to have spent four years at Swarthmore. provided by 6,080 alumni or 52.8% of t! half appearance and life He/she is likely to consider himself profes­ total 11,519 who received the questionnain en- M styles, coed dorms, etc., was impressed, gratified sional and to be involved in some aspect of Classes represented were 1901 through 197 ^ and quite enormously education. He has at least one degree granted and 1973. The other seventies classes willb pleased that so much of elsewhere than Swarthmore. He is active in a the Swarthmore included during the year of their first lil m ambience and attitude professional organization, in a nonpartisan, sequent reunion. pans and manner still political education group (like League of The biographical information is being use P°SS] prevailed. Not only did they prevail, but they Women Voters and Common Cause), in the not only to give the College a better idea« hr obviously attracted and Parent-Teachers Association, in a political what its alumni are thinking and doing bu sei were being sustained by party, and in organizations concerned with also to produce a new alumni directory, t ^Plc an undergraduate group that is an entire peace, or conservation and ecology, or social find good matches for the Extern Program ^rom generation younger than service. His family income is $24,533. and to find alumni to help in its admission here mine. It’s encouraging to encounter the continuity This profile emerges from the data culled program in various parts of the world. It i en^ 8 of those qualities that from the ten-page 1974 Swarthmore Alumni anticipated that new uses will develop in thi ^ asi made Swarthmore Census, mailed last October (with follow-ups future. ^ra* unique and in January and April). The data were put on What, then, are some of the data fron s^a^f meaningful.”—’45 the computer and then analyzed. There is, of which this crude picture of a typical Swarth course, no such being as the typical Swarth­ morean emerges? An analysis of the dati morean, and yet certain characteristics, such by classes is seen in the chart below left. ]y[( From this table we see that the returns « received from the Census, when looked at asiRank Total Number of Returns in Classes by Decades proportion of those in class decades, werf ^ fairly evenly distributed. The heavy weight ^ Presidential as % of as % of ing of representation after 1940, seen in thf ^ Reigns Decades All Returned Decade column "% of All Returned,” reflects thf ^ Birdsall (98-02) growth in the size of the College over the last Swain (02-21) 1901-1909 .6 51 three-quarters of a century, as well asi 1910-1919 3.8 48 larger percentage of survivors in, say, thf r Aydelotte (21-40) 1920-1929 9.0 49 Class o f ’70 as opposed to, say, 1901! 1930-1939 13.4 52 Since, obviously, returning the question Nason (40-53) 1940-1949 20.0 55 naire indicated feelings of involvement witl ---- 1950-1959 23.0 55 the College, respondents are not necessaril) Smith (53-69) 1960-1969 24.0 56 wholly representative of the alumni body. ^ Cross (70-72) 1970,1973 5.0 49 Others* 1.2 2 This article was written by Betty Nathan Eisler ’50, as 3 100%(6080) sistant director of development, with assistance frot a Edgar R. Mullins, director of computer education am ~ ^Special students, graduate students, activities, who established the datafile, and Gudmundl Navy students, and Chinese Naval officers Iversen, associate professor of mathematics, who helped analyze that file. SWARTHMORE ALUMNI ISSUE OCTOB For example, of respondents, 27.5% were New Jersey, then Maryland, Illinois, Mas­ married to another Swarthmorean. This sachusetts, Ohio and Connecticut. compares with 17% of the whole alumni body Of those who answered, 75% spent four “It was a tearing years at Swarthmore; about 25%, fewer; and experience, both , who are known to have a Swarthmore spouse. glorious and Thus being married to another Swarth­ about 2.5%, five or six years. horrible.”—’67 Of those who answered the question (75%), morean increased the likelihood of one’s "My relationship with returning the Census form. 82.6% said they over half consider themselves professional the College, because of - contributed at least once to the Alumni Fund, while a little more than 10% in each category my girls who have while the average annual percentage of consider themselves respectively top man­ attended Swarthmore, is agement, middle-management, self- very good, and seeing it donors to the Alumni Fund in the last ten from the inside, as it i years was 46%. Half said they give every employed, and "other.” We will consider our were, I have been most I year. So apparently, being a donor to the typical Swarthmorean, then, a professional, pleased. Under some Alumni Fund was strongly related to the most likely to be married to a professional very difficult circumstances, the likelihood of returning the Census. The (28%), or not to have answered that question College has acted in a j strongest positive relationship we found was (43.7%). The occupation claimed most often is way that 1 can only say among Alumni College participants: 143 of a "homemaker” (16.5%), with professor rank­ could not have been improved uponM-’38 total 145 who have attended returned their ing second at 12%. A few other top rankings noi Census forms! were "managers and administrators” (9.3%), “My dearest friends for tj0; Of those who answered, a little less than physician (5.7%), engineer (4.4%), lawyer the past 54 years have u half were men, and slightly more were worn- (4.1%), secondary school teacher (4%), scien­ been my Swarthmore friends.”—’20 en. (Among all alumni, the opposite is true.) tist (3.4%). All our categories received some ^97 This analysis of the survey data did not representation. The coders of the census "I think positive, practical career HI take into consideration the heavy weighting noted that there was considerable diversity counseling needs to be _ 1 of numbers biased towards youth, but com­ of opinion on the part of respondents and part of each student’s parisons will be made by decades wherever their spouses as to the proper classification of college experience. ^ possible. "homemaker.” It was described variously as Women in particular need to plan around the ,a j From these returns, we found it interesting "top management,” "professional,” "self- somewhat conflicting , ^ to seek a "typical” Swarthmore lifestyle. Our employed,” or "other.” Several respondents choices they face with as | typical alumnus/a is most likely to have come commented that the questionnaire gave no much foresight as ,ail from Pennsylvania as a student and to live opportunity for him/her to describe a life of possible. ”^’58 j0I1 here now (next states most popular for pres- non-paid but serious activity. There was, Tf | ent abode are New York and California, then however, a category for "volunteer worker,” ^ Massachusetts, New Jersey and Maryland.) and this drew 2% of the responses. Broken Trailing way behind Pennsylvania, home down by decade, most frequently professed 11 states were most likely to be New York and occupations are shown in the following table. roi J irth lati 1 MOST FREQUENT OCCUPATION BY PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS IN EACH CLASS DECADE s i ank 00’s % 10’s % 20’s % 30’s % verf 1 Homemaker 23.3 Homemaker 34.3 Homemaker 29.8 Homemaker 24.4 ght 2 Secondary Teacher 16.7 Secondary Teacher 11.1 Mgr/ Administrator 9.8 Mgr/ Administrator 13.3 . th( 3 Social Worker 10.0 Mgr/Administrator 6.1 Secondary Teacher 7.8 Professor 8.2 thf 4 Engineer 6.7 Elementary Teacher 4.5 Engineer 6.9 Engineer 4.7 last Owner/Partner 4.5 Owner/Partner 4.7 as i Professor 4.5 thf 5 Other occupations Librarian 4.0 Office Worker 4.1 Volunteer Worker 4.1 represented by ion only 1 respondent vitl irilj 40’s 50’s 60’s 70’s ly- 1 Homemaker 14.6 Homemaker 16.9 Professor 18.9 Student 37.5 2 Mgr/Administrator 10.5 Professor 15.2 Homemaker 9.8 Secondary Teacher 5.1 0,as 3 Professor 10.0 Mgr/Administrator 9.0 Physician 7.6 Lawyer 4.4 frot 4 Physician 6.0 Physician 7.3 Student 6.9 Physician 3.8 < ad 5 6.7 Civil Servant 3.4 ridR Engineer 5.4 Engineer 4.7 Lawyer elprt Elementary Teacher 3.4 Scientist 3.4 ISSUB OCTOBER 1975 1 Since 4% responding are students, 12% first Swarthmore degree was a master’s), 31 Time professors, 7.1% various kinds of teachers, are honorary degrees, and 1,311 are "other, and l "I entered college and 2.3% school or college administrators, it which, in 535 instances, meant a Bi jm younger than most of my peers, and very shy and is not surprising that the educational estab­ earned elsewhere than Swarthmore. To< immature. Added to the lishment is the "industry” most represented. From this graph we see that until the mil g e active sorority system forties, most alumni did not hold advance ge which excluded me, it was Manufacturing came in second, with legal devastating.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE INSTITUTE for ADVANCED STUDY Princeton, New Jersey
    THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY Princeton, New Jersey Some Introductory Information November, 195>1 HERBERT H. I AP£.rS N. Y. The Institute for Advanced Study is devoted to the encouragement, support and patronage of learning—of science, in the old, broad, undiffer- entiated sense of the word. The Institute partakes of the character both of a university and of a research institute; but it also differs in signifi- cant ways from both. It is unlike a university, for instance, in its small size—its academic mem- bership at any one time numbers only a little over a hundred. It is unlike a university in that it has no formal curriculum, no scheduled courses of instruction, no commitment that all branches of learning be represented in its faculty and members. It is unlike a research institute in that its pur- poses are broader, that it supports many separate fields of study, that, with one exception, it main- tains no laboratories; and above all in that it wel- comes temporary members, whose intellectual develop- ment and growth are one of its principal purposes, ^he Institute, in short, is devoted to learning, in the double sense of the continued education of the individual, and of the intellectual enterprise on which he is embarked. The Institute for Advanced Study was founded in 1930, by a gift of Mr. Louis Bamberger and his sister, Mrs, Felix Fuld, The Founders entrusted the general supervision and furthering of the Institute's purposes to a Board of Trustees of fif- teen members, and to a Director elected by them, who should have primary responsibility for its academic affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Honors Programs Make a Difference
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2012 Do Honors Programs Make a Difference during the First Year of College? The evelopmeD nt of Critical Thinking Skills and Exposure to Good Practices in Undergraduate Education Amanda Kay Moore University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Gifted Education Commons, and the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Moore, Amanda Kay, "Do Honors Programs Make a Difference during the First Year of College? The eD velopment of Critical Thinking Skills and Exposure to Good Practices in Undergraduate Education" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 566. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/566 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DO HONORS PROGRAMS MAKE A DIFFERENCE DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF COLLEGE? THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND EXPOSURE TO GOOD PRACTICES IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION DO HONORS PROGRAMS MAKE A DIFFERENCE DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF COLLEGE? THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND EXPOSURE TO GOOD PRACTICES IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Higher Education by Amanda Kay Moore John Brown University Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, 2004 John Brown University Master of Business Administration, 2006 December 2012 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT This longitudinal study analyzed pretest-posttest data to 1) examine the influence of honors programs on first-year college students‘ critical thinking skills, 2) to determine whether students in honors programs receive more exposure to good practices in undergraduate education than their non-honors peers, and 3) to assess the effect of good practices on critical thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounters with Genius Loci Herman Wells At/And/ of Indiana University
    Encounters with Genius Loci Herman Wells at/and/of Indiana University James H Capshew We are the children of our landscape; it dictates behaviour and even thought in the measure to which we are responsive to it. -Lawrence Durrell, 19571 Upon John grew that affection which no one can escape who walks long under campus trees; that naive and sentimental fondness at once fatuous and deep, that clings to a man long a.ftenvard, and that has been known, ofmention ofAlma Mater, to show up soft in gnarled citi::ens othenvise hard-shelled as the devil himself. To a peculiar degree the Indiana milieu was created to inspire love. It has the unspoiled generosity, the frankness, the toil, the taciturn courage and the exasperating ineptness of natural man himself. One listens to the winds sighing through beeches, or plods through autumnal dri::=le with ga:;e divided between the cracks ofthe Board Walk and that miraculous personal vision that for no two people is produced alike, whether it be conjuredfrom books, or from inner song, or from liquor, orfrom a co-ed's smile or from all together. Because ofthis one berates Indiana and loves her doggedly. -George Shively, 19252 Presidential timber stood tall on the ground at the verdant campus of Indiana University (IU) in June 1920. The occasion was the university's commencement during its centennial celebration. All of the living for­ mer IU presidents-David Starr Jordan, John M. Coulter, and Joseph Perspectives on the History ofHigher Education 28 (2011): 161-192 ©2011. ISBN: 978-1-4128-1859-9 161 162 Iconic Leaders in Higher Education Swain-had come.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Mission Ehad to Meet with Those in Many Interrelated Though Most Deeply Invested in the Distinguishable Ways
    89665_Layout 1 4/8/14 11:51 AM Page a1 B u i l d i n g O u r FUTURE A REPORT FROM THE PRESIDENT OF SWARTHMORE COLLEGE 89665_Layout 1 4/8/14 11:52 AM Page a2 Swarthmore College’s sesquicentennial is an ideal occasion to reflect and build on the solid foundation of Swarthmore’s past. very opportunity I’ve We pursue our mission Ehad to meet with those in many interrelated though most deeply invested in the distinguishable ways. future of the College, espe- A strong commitment to cially alumni, has confirmed financial aid reflects our what I’ve known all along: most fundamental values. Swarthmore’s mission Swarthmore’s founders extends far beyond the Col- sought to create a place lege itself. The Swarthmore where, in the words of our experience—memorable second president, Edward and life changing as it has Magill, “the great privileges been for thousands over the years—is which Swarthmore affords [would not not the ultimate end. The larger mission be] confined to the children of the has always focused on building a better, wealthy and those in comfortable cir- kinder, more just and compassionate cumstances.” By ensuring access to world. “Success” is defined by most high-achieving and highly motivated Swarthmoreans in terms of the positive young people from all economic cir- difference we are making in the world. cumstances, we enable them to expand BUILDING… 2 …ON OUR PAST 4 …SWARTHMORE’S GLOBAL REACH 6 …ENGINEERING 8 …SUPPORT FOR THE LIBERAL ARTS 10 …A HOME FOR WELLNESS, FITNESS, AND THEATER 12 …BEYOND THE CLASSROOM 14 …ON EXCELLENCE 17 …OUR FINANCIAL FUTURE 89665_Layout 1 4/8/14 11:52 AM Page 1 their minds and build the skills they This year’s report is structured need to do great things.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Term - 1948 - 1949 the INSTITUTE for ADVANCED STUDY
    Second Term - 1948 - 1949 THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY Princeton, New Jersey STAFF AND MEMBERS LIST Second Term - January 31, 1949 - April 30, 1949 DIRECTOR'S OFFICE Dr. Robert Oppenheimer (M), Director, Olden Manor, Olden Lane, telephone 2895. Mrs. John D. Leary, Aide to the Director, 6 Newlin Road (:rear), telephone 1661. Mrs. Katherine Russell, Secretary, Winant Road, telephone 1668. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Business Office: Mr. William Bradley (General Superintendent), 6 Maxwell Lane - telephone 3745• Miss Luella Trinterud (Accounting), 22 Dickinson Street - telephone 2240-W. Miss Catherine H. Higbee, 22 Dickinson Street- telephone 224o-M. Miss Sabina Modzelewski, 701 Strawberry Street, Trenton, N.J. - tele)hone Tr. 4-7255. Cafeteria: Miss Patia Carpenter, 30 Wiggins Street - telephone 2462-W. Housing: Mrs. John D. Leary, 6 Newlin Road (rear)- telephone 1661. Mrs. Margaret B. Stephens, 8A Cook Road - telephone 3820. Library: Dr. Judith Sachs (Librarian), 44 Vandeventer Avenue- telephone 1156-W. Miss Irene Mozgo, Box 11, Plainsboro, N.J. - telephone Plainsboro 2770-R. Switchboard: Mrs. William H. Lahey, 47 Murray Place - telephone 1509. EMERGENCY CALLS Mr. William Bradley - telephone 3745 Mr. John Marcus - telephone 2372-R Mrs. John D. Leary - telephone 1661 Mrs. Katherine Russell - telephone 1668 Mr. and Mrs. J. Stephens - telephone 3820 FULD HALL NIGHT CONNECTIONS 2580- Director's Office (Ext. Mrs. Russell) 2581- Director's Office (Ext. Mrs. Leary) 2584- Superintendent's Office (Ext. Mr. Bradley, Miss Iglehart, and Prof. Montgomery) 950- School of Economics (Ext. Prof. Earle and Miss Horton) 1250- School of Humanistic Studies (Ext. Prof. Lowe, Prof. Meritt, and Prof. Thompson) 1348 - School of Mathematics (Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Giving to the Institute
    Leadership Giving to the Institute While the Institute welcomes gifts of any amount, some donors find that they are able to make gifts of a larger size. Such contributions have a significant impact on the Institute’s ability to fund its programs and, in particular, the work of current Members. To recognize this exceptional support from its former Members and Visitors, the Institute has created three giving categories, the Flexner, Aydelotte, and Oppenheimer Circles. Flexner Circle ($500 – $999) Benefits include: • Donor’s name on a specially designed bookplate in an IAS library book • Priority ticketing for the Institute’s Edward T. Cone Concert Series • Listing in the Institute’s Annual Report as a leadership donor and Circles member Aydelotte Circle ($1,000 – $1,499) Benefits include: • All of the above as well as • Institute ID card providing access to the IAS Dining Hall for lunches and dinners (normal meal fees apply) Oppenheimer Circle ($1,500 and more) Benefits include: • All of the above as well as • Invitations to Friends of the Institute events, such as the Holiday Party and Annual Picnic hosted by the Director • Use of the Institute’s guest house, Marquand House, for overnight accommodations (as space is available, normal housing rates apply) For further information on making a leadership gift and on the benefits of joining one of the Circles, please contact Linda Geraci at [email protected] or (609) 734-8259. The first three Directors of the Institute for Advanced Study served a total of 36 years, from its founding in 1930 to 1966. Abraham Flexner (1866 –1959), more than any other individual, conceived and developed the idea that found expression as the Institute for Advanced Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Friend Papers RG6.D11 FHL Staff
    Theodore Friend Papers RG6.D11 FHL Staff. Last updated on May 14, 2021. Friends Historical Library of Swarthmore College Theodore Friend Papers Table of Contents Summary Information....................................................................................................................................3 Biography/History..........................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents....................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information........................................................................................................................... 5 Related Materials........................................................................................................................................... 6 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................6 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................... 8 Ser.1 Faculty and Staff Correspondence.................................................................................................8 Ser.2 Board of Managers Correspondence..............................................................................................8 Ser.3 Topical Files.................................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • The Adaptation of Mission at Two Liberal Arts Colleges
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons GSE Faculty Research Graduate School of Education June 2005 The Endless Good Argument : The Adaptation of Mission at Two Liberal Arts Colleges Matthew Hartley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Lawrence Schall University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs Recommended Citation Hartley, M., & Schall, L. (2005). The Endless Good Argument : The Adaptation of Mission at Two Liberal Arts Colleges. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/17 Reprinted from Planning in Higher Education, Volume 33, Issue 4, June-August 2005, pages 5-11. Copyright Society for College and University Planning. Note: At the time of publication, Lawrence Schall was affliated with the University of Pennsylvania. Currently (October 2006), he is President of Oglethorpe University. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/17 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Endless Good Argument : The Adaptation of Mission at Two Liberal Arts Colleges Abstract A meaningful institutional purpose does not just pop into existence. It must be constructed, with reference both to core values and to changing market or demographic conditions. This article examines three important moments in the history of two different institutions to better understand the development of such a process and explore how a sense of mission and the core values can survive over time, despite inevitable challenges. Comments Reprinted from Planning in Higher Education, Volume 33, Issue 4, June-August 2005, pages 5-11. Copyright Society for College and University Planning. Note: At the time of publication, Lawrence Schall was affliated with the University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Swarthmore College Bulletin | January 2014
    In the sesqui swing of things swarthmore swarthmore college bulletin | january 2014 c4-c1_2nd.indd 1 12/12/13 2:24 PM campus view A view from the dome of Parrish Hall in October reveals the Commodore Barry Bridge, which spans the Delaware River in Chester, Pa. Photo by Laurence Kesterson c2-01_View_2nd.indd 2 12/13/13 2:05 PM c2-01_View_2nd.indd 1 12/13/13 1:58 PM departments 4: FROM THE EDITOR 5: LETTERS Readers react 6: FROM THE PRESIDEnT By Rebecca Chopp 8: COLLECTIOn • Mural weaves College’s past, present, future • New center a good match • 150 years ago: Swarthmore seeks a charter 35 • Hidden in plain sight • Responding to Cupid’s arrow • ‘Remaking College’ paves new ground for liberal arts • 3 days to brainstorm—in Paris • College book to arrive in your mailbox soon 39: COnnECTIOnS • New group empowers black alumni and students • Join a Collection of service • Conversations on future of the liberal arts set for April • Attend the All-Alumni Reunion Weekend • Commitment to current students strengthened 41: CLASS nOTES The world according to Swarthmoreans 44: In MEMORIAM Farewell to cherished friends 68: BOOKS + ARTS Alumni Works Peter Biskind ’62, My Lunches with Orson: Conversations between 20 Henry Jaglom and Orson Welles, Metropolitan Books, New York, 2013. 70: In MY LIFE profiles Talking So People Will Listen, Listening So People Will Talk After turning around their own failing relationship, Laurie Gerber 54: A Tradition and a Gift ’96 and Will Craig ’96 became coaching gurus worldwide Yvonne Healy ’75 keeps age-old Irish stories alive onstage.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration, Freedom, and the History of the Institute for Advanced Study Fadi Bardawil, Thomas Dodman, Ian Jauslin, Pascal Marichalar, Klaus Oschema, Peter Redfield
    Immigration, Freedom, and the History of the Institute for Advanced Study Fadi Bardawil, Thomas Dodman, Ian Jauslin, Pascal Marichalar, Klaus Oschema, Peter Redfield To cite this version: Fadi Bardawil, Thomas Dodman, Ian Jauslin, Pascal Marichalar, Klaus Oschema, et al.. Immigration, Freedom, and the History of the Institute for Advanced Study. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, American Mathematical Society, 2017, 64 (10), pp.1160-1168. 10.1090/noti1596. halshs- 02388810 HAL Id: halshs-02388810 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02388810 Submitted on 10 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. COMMUNICATION Immigration, Freedom, and the History of the Institute for Advanced Study Fadi Bardawil 1, Thomas Dodman2, Ian Jauslin3, Pascal Marichalar 4, Klaus Oschema 5, and Peter Redfield 6 Communicated by Harriet Pollatsek In response to the January 27, 2017, US presidential exec- utive order initially banning travel and immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries, members of the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) mobilized a History Working Group. This article is adapted from their reports in the spring 2017 IAS Newsletter. The full articles, as well as a companion exhibit showcasing original materials from the Institute’s archives, are also available on the IAS website7 and in print/ebook as a booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of Economics at Swarthmore Joshua Hausman1
    One Hundred Years of Economics at Swarthmore Joshua Hausman1 Swarthmore class of 2005 This paper presents a history of the Department of Economics at Swarthmore College from the founding of the college until 1970. Two themes dominate this narrative. First, the history of economics teaching at Swarthmore is one of nearly continuous growth and professionalization. When political economy was first offered at Swarthmore in 1872, there was only a single year-long course in the subject. It was taught by Maria Sanford, whose post- secondary education was at a Normal School, and who doubled as the sole professor of history at Swarthmore.2 In 1972, in contrast, the Swarthmore Economics Department offered twelve semester-long economics courses and eight seminars. It had eleven full and part-time members, seven of whom had economics Ph.Ds. And members of the Department were specialized teachers, usually teaching only a couple subject areas within economics. Despite this dramatic growth, there is a notable continuity in the history of economics at Swarthmore: a devotion to Quaker causes and social justice that often superseded purely theoretical interests. Maria Sanford, for example, would become famous for her commitment to progressive causes; after leaving Swarthmore, she gave public lectures that promoted the University of Minnesota. In the 1930’s, Patrick Malin, a member of the Department from 1930 to 1950 and a devout Quaker, worked unsuccessfully to make Swarthmore admit African-American students. Malin left Swarthmore in 1950 to lead the American Civil Liberties Union. Sanford and 1 Research assistant in the Division of International Finance of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    [Show full text]
  • SPOINIS=IVGYNC-1-E-Ni.-- . PUB DATE .72 NOTE 271P
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 117 751 CS 202 506 ^a7 AUTHOR Parker, Will - IIa aTT-Dona1A-I:-; T . ITLE The Department of English. at. Indiana University, c e;. INSTITUTION Indiana Univ. Bloomington, Dept of English. -SPOINIS=IVGYNC-1-e-ni.-- . PUB DATE .72 NOTE 271p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$14.05 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS Doctoral Theses; *English Departments; English Instruction; Higher Education; *History; liniversities IDENTIFIERS *Indiana. University ABSTRACT The collection of articles 'in this book, covering some of the significant events and topics in thehistory of the Indiana University English Department, brings together some of the material assembled by William Riley Parker,especially the reminiscences of faculty members and former students. An introductory chapter by Parker is titled "Where Do English Departments Come From?? Other material consists of chapters by several authprs concerning the following periods in the department's history: 1860-1893, 1893-1920, 1920-1945, and 1945-1970. Additional material includes the Annals of the Department 1968-1972, compiled by Parker; a list of doctoral dissertations, 1914-1972; and a list of the directors' of doctoral dissertations. (JM) 0 \ **************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal'unpubl' * materials not available from other, sources. ERIC makes ever fort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * *. via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductionq * * supplied by ELMS are the best that can be made from the original.
    [Show full text]