DOCSLIB.ORG

William James's Early Radical Empiricism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
William James's Early Radical Empiricism WILLIAM JAMES’S EARLY RADICAL EMPIRICISM: PSYCHICAL RESEARCH, RELIGION, AND THE “SPIRIT OF INNER TOLERANCE” A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Ermine L. Algaier IV July, 2015 Examining Committee Members: Lucy Bregman, Advisory Chair, Temple University, Department of Religion Terry Rey, Temple University, Department of Religion Joseph Margolis, Temple University, Department of Philosophy Eli Goldblatt, External Member, Temple University, Department of English © Copyright 2015 by Ermine L. Algaier IV All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT In December of 1896 William James (1842-1910) penned the preface to The Will to Believe & Other Essays in Philosophy, announcing his novel philosophy of radical empiricism. Nearly one hundred and twenty years later, the metaphysical themes of his mature radical empiricist writings (e.g., his 1904-05 writings posthumously published as Essays in Radical Empiricism) continue to dominate the interpretations of the secondary literature. “William James’s Early Radical Empiricism: Psychical Research, Religion, and the ‘Spirit of Inner Tolerance’” offers a revisionist reading that prioritizes the epistemic, moral, and social elements of James’s early radical empiricism in light of his concerns expressed in the 1896 preface. By focusing on a close textual analysis that aims to historically and thematically resituate James’s radical empiricism within the context of his major and minor work in the 1880s through the late 1890s, I argue for a supplemental interpretation that emphasizes James’s epistemic sensitivity to the plight of the perceived “irrational” other. This project demonstrates that not only is James’s early radical empiricism concerned with epistemological matters of fact and perspective, but also their social and moral implications. It suggests that an alternative narrative is uncovered if we attend to particular historical, philosophical, and religious themes that reveal themselves as focal points of James’s work in the 1890s, particularly in the year 1896. By historicizing his 1890s defense of the epistemic underdog I develop the narrative that James’s early radical empiricism embraces all experience and that this is illustrated by his genuine interest in the point of view of the believer, the marginalized, and the “irrational” other. iii For you, you, and especially You. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This projected originated in the classroom. During my time at Temple University I was fortunate to teach “Death and Dying” on ten separate occasions. After my initial semester, I made the decision to bring in James’s 1897 Ingersoll Lecture on Human Immortality. The next semester I paired it up with his essay “The Will to Believe.” Every semester thereafter I committed myself to carefully rereading these texts, as well as additional sources of secondary literature, in order to deepen my understanding and to develop my lectures notes. Around the third or fourth time teaching these texts together I began to get a sense of the project that lay before you. This dissertation would not have been possible without the ongoing encouragement and help of my committee. To my adviser, Lucy Bregman, I cannot thank you enough for all that you have done for me. To Terry Rey, I am externally grateful for his keen eyes and excellent copy-editing skills. Also, because of Terry, I will never look at research in the same way: my love of archival work has grown beyond measure. To Joseph Margolis, I am deeply indebted for his kindness, support, and for imparting to me a glimpse of the joy that can be had in a lifetime of scholarship. To Eli Goldblatt, I am grateful for your excitement and willingness to join in on the fun. Throughout the course of my education I have been very fortunate to work with an eclectic, inspiring, and profoundly gifted group of people. Eleven years out from my undergraduate education and I am still in awe of my undergraduate faculty at Youngstown State University: Linda “Tess” Tessier, Bruce Waller, Brendan Minogue, and Tom Shipka. Despite the fact that nowhere in these pages will you find direct v evidence of my many years of training in East Asian religion and philosophy, Rohit Dalvi, Bill Allen, Monte Hull, Shigenori Nagatomo, and Marcus Bingenheimer have all distinctly informed my thinking and research. Special thanks goes to James Pawelski for his invaluable insights, delightful conversations, genuine support, and willingness to help me search for the proverbial gold nugget; to Colin Koopman for his generous comments and shared excitement for all things Jamesian; to Kyle Bromhall, Tess Varner, John Girodano, Justin Bell, and all my other SAAPers for warmly welcoming me as one of their own; and to Linda Jenkins for her gracious wisdom and gentle mothering of me through every stage of my education at Temple University. My education has been shaped academically as well as existentially by many people and in many ways. In particular, I am fortunate to have shared many meals and enlightening conversations with Steven Edelman, Anne-Marie Gincley, Jina Ashline, Blaine Warner, Christy Schuetze, Karen Schnitker, Adria Godfrey, Elissa Kranzler, Kime Lawson, Patricia Kolbe, Kin Cheung, John Krummel, Adam Valerio, Amy Defibaugh, and Sean Blucker. I am deeply indebted to all the staff, librarians, and archivists that have assisted me while researching this project. In particular, I would like to thank Fred Rowland as well as the members of Paley Library’s intra- and inter-library loan offices, the staff members at Houghton library, Harvard University Archives, Brancroft library, the Rockefeller Archive Center, and the American Society for Psychical Research. I would also like to acknowledge the generous financial support of The Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy, the William James Society, and Temple vi University. On account of the various grants, scholarships, and prizes that I received, I have been able to present drafts of this project at a number of different venues and to meet an exceptional community of like-minded scholars. I could not have done this without the enduring love and support of my family, closest friends, and partner. Unfortunately, there is absolutely no way that words can capture the depth of my gratitude toward Ed and Beth for putting up with the fact that they spent an uncanny amount of time listening to me talk about James: y’all will just have to learn to deal with the fact that you can never get that time back. Most importantly, I shall save myself the embarrassment of fumbling through words with the hope of articulating the depth of my love and respect for Hannah and her willingness to be my partner on this absurd journey; with all of my being, I thank you. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION .....................................................................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. vi ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... xi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ xii Orientation: Textual, Contextual, and Methodological Influences .......................... xviii Two Methodological Caveats .................................................................................. xxiv A Note on Primary Texts ......................................................................................... xxvi A Selective Overview of Relevant Literature ........................................................ xxviii Outline of Chapters ................................................................................................ xxxiii CHAPTER 1. EARLY RADICAL EMPIRICISM AND THE “SPIRIT OF INNER TOLERANCE:” A “DEFINITE PHILOSOPHICAL ATTITUDE” .............................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 The 1896 Preface of The Will to Believe .......................................................................5 A Manifest Reading of the Preface ................................................................................9 The Methodological Commitment ...........................................................................9 The Limits of Reason and the Perspectival Critique .............................................11 Approaching the Attitude of the 1896 Preface ............................................................15 “A Tolerably Definite Philosophical Attitude” ......................................................18 James’s Re-defining of Philosophy .......................................................................25 Early Radical Empiricism: a Latent Image ..................................................................28 The “Spirit of Inner Tolerance” .............................................................................29 Fringe Sensitivity, the Epistemic Underdog, and Rationalizing the Irrational .................................................................................................................34 Concluding Remarks ....................................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canadian Templar Newsletter
    The Canadian Templar September 2015 Newsletter News and Report from our Grand Prior I hope you all enjoyed your summer and had a chance to enjoy some time off and relax. Some of the Priories had events during the summer and you can read about them below. On the international front, the next OSMTH Grand Magistral Meeting will be in Cologne, Germany at the end of the month, with a few Canadians attending. One of the agenda items will be the approval of new Regulations and Orders as well as new Statutes. This will bring some greater standardization to our Order. OSMTH has had significant growth in the number of Grand Priories over the last decade; growing from a few predominantly English speaking countries to over 20 multi- lingual countries, each with their own traditions and organizational nuances. With this has come some challenges on our internal governance. Once all is finalized, they will be part of the framework to revise our own Canadian orders. Another challenge of our relatively young organization is the collection and distribution of charitable funds. As has been stated in previous newsletters, our Canadian Revenue Agency is just one of many countries changing laws and making it more difficult for legitimate charities to operate. We Page 1 (OSMTH) have been waiting on the European Union to show some guidance on how they were going to tackle this similar issue. One would think this an easier task to have the EU show leadership to the rest of the world, but apparently not. At the end of last year, the 28 Member States of the EU failed to agree a consensus on moving the draft legislation forward, and the EU Commission and Presidency have therefore now removed the draft law from the EU legislative agenda in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • William James' Radical Empiricism with Jeffrey Mishlove
    InPresence 0023: William James’ Radical Empiricism with Jeffrey Mishlove Video Transcript - New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove ​ ​ www.newthinkingallowed.org Recorded on March 13, 2018 Published to YouTube on March 24, 2018 Copyright © 2020, New Thinking Allowed Foundation (00:38) Hello, I’m Jeffrey Mishlove, and today I’d like to talk to you about William James’ concept of “radical empiricism”. And I’d like to encourage you, before watching this video, to make sure you also catch the earlier “In Presence” segment on William James. You’ll notice at the very beginning of this video, you had the opportunity to click directly to a list that would link you to every single segment thus far in the “In Presence” series. (01:13) Now, as I mentioned before, William James is really one of the great intellects of American consciousness, certainly one of my heroes, and someone with whom I seem to have something of a “synchronistic archetypal resonance” relationship. His theory of “radical empiricism” represents, I think, the culmination of his life work. In fact, he wrote five essays on the subject toward the end of his life. They were not even published until after his death. We have to appreciate that William James was a man of the 19th century, a period of rapid industrialization in the United States. A time of great progress in terms of mechanistic thinking. But, throughout his illustrious career, James largely stood against mechanistic thinking, and I think it’s fair to say he flirted with mysticism. That’s clear if you read his book Varieties of Religious Experience, for ​ ​ example.
    [Show full text]
  • Value in Experience, Thoughts on Radical Empiricism; Reflections on Frankenberry and Stone1
    Value In Experience, Thoughts on Radical Empiricism; Reflections on Frankenberry and Stone1 David W. Tarbell Modern philosophy, going back to Descartes and Locke, has given preferred status to the kind of judgments that we find within the mathematical sciences and has made it difficult to support judgments of value and meaning. In Chapter Four of his book, The Minimalist Vision of Transcendence, Jerome Stone describes what he calls a "Generous Empiricism." He is building on the tradition of radical empiricism, and presents a transactional understanding of experience that allows him to support empirically grounded value judgments. I argue that a critique from the perspective of Heidegger and others of the continental tradition may present problems to Stone's approach. I then propose a modification of Stone's notion that I think would answer such criticisms. This leads me to the notion that our value judgments have an aesthetic component, and that we can find pragmatic support for the belief that there is an aesthetic tendency in the world of which we are a part. There is something divine and possibly transcendent in that thought. I. The Value Problem: One of the factors affecting the moral, ethical, and political climate of our present culture is diversity of judgment on matters of value. Some have said that the presence of so much diversity argues against our ability to resolve questions of truth in these areas. Their positions vary among skepticism, denying that we can know moral truth, nihilism, questioning that there is such a thing as moral truth, or relativism, claiming that moral truth is conditional on social and/or cultural circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook02chic.Pdf
    41 *( ^^Wk. _ f. CHICAGO LITERARY CLUB 1695-56 CHICAGO LITERARY CLUB YEAR-BOOK FOR 1895-96 Officer* for 1895-96 President. JOHN HENRY BARROWS. Vice-Presidents. FRANK H. SCOTT, HENRY S. BOUTELL, JAMES A. HUNT. Corresponding Secretary. DANIEL GOODWIN. Recording Secretary and Treasurer. FREDERICK W. GOOKIN. The above officers constitute the Board of Directors. Committees On Officers and Members. FRANK H. SCOTT, Chairman. ALLEN B. POND, ARTHUR D. WHEELER, THOMAS D. MARSTON, GEORGE L. PADDOCK. On Arrangements and Exercises. HENRY S. BOUTELL,C/tairman. EMILIUS C. DUDLEY, CHARLES G. FULLER, EDWARD O. BROWN, SIGMUND ZEISLER. On Rooms and Finance. JAMES A. HUNT, Chairman. WILLIAM R. STIRLING, JOHN H. HAMLINE, GEORGE H. HOLT, JAMES J. WAIT. On Publications. LEWIS H. BOUTELL, Chairman. FRANKLIN H. HEAD, CLARENCE A. BURLEY. Literarp Club Founded March 13, 1874 Incorporated July 10, 1886 ROBERT COLLYER, 1874-75 CHARLES B. LAWRENCE, 1875-76 HOSMER A. JOHNSON, 1876-77 DANIEL L. SHOREY, 1877-78 EDWARD G. MASON, . 1878-79 WILLIAM F. POOLE, 1879-80 BROOKE HERFORD, i 880-8 i EDWIN C. LARNED, 1881-82 GEORGE ROWLAND, . 1882-83 HENRY A. HUNTINGTON, 1883-84 CHARLES GILMAN SMITH, 1884-85 JAMES S. NORTON, 1885-86 ALEXANDER C. McCLURG, 1886-87 GEORGE C. NOYES, 1887-88 JAMES L. HIGH, . 1888-89 JAMES NEVINS HYDE, 1889-90 FRANKLIN H. HEAD, . 1890-91 CLINTON LOCKE, . 1891-92 LEWIS H. BOUTELL, . 1892-93 HORATIO L. WAIT, 1893-94 WILLIAM ELIOT FURNESS, 1894-95 JOHN HENRY BARROWS, 1895-96 Besfoent George E. Adams, Eliphalet W. Blatchford, Joseph Adams, Louis J. Block, Owen F.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Empiricist Poetics in the New York School and Beyond
    Radical Empiricist Poetics in the New York School and Beyond by Maude Chanson Emerson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Charles Altieri, Chair Professor Eric Falci Professor John Campbell Spring 2017 ! Abstract Radical Empiricist Poetics in the New York School and Beyond by Maude Chanson Emerson Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley Professor Charles Altieri, Chair This dissertation contends that the first-generation New York School poets—especially John Ashbery, Frank O’Hara, and James Schuyler—develop the aesthetic possibilities of the philosophical stance that William James called “radical empiricism.” James followed the British empiricists in granting priority to parts, individuals, and unanalyzed sensations, but he radicalized the empiricist perspective by holding experiences of cohesion and relation to be as real as those of disjunction and discrete sensation. Schuyler, Ashbery, and O’Hara each practice an empiricist poetics: a poetics of the everyday, the felt, and the miscellaneous. At the same time, their poetries pose challenges to the conceptions of experience on which empiricism historically has been based, from the presumption of a unified experiencing subject to the relegation of sensation and abstraction to separate orders of reality. I argue that these challenges should not be seen as a denial of experience, as some postmodernist readings of New York School poetry allege, but as part of a careful and critical commitment to experience. As radical empiricists, these poets understand experience not as an inward phenomenon but as a field in which inner and outer are merely potential and constantly shifting divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Itue God As Its Head”
    Geow AOlmeS H~dS‘Iln CiOfGcdandthe ’Itue God as Its Head”: The Royce-Howison Debate over the Idealist Con ception of God McZnehlon Flowison’s Pluralistic Idealism: A Fifth Conception of Being? cesmz Royce and the Destiny OlIddsm I)lm Mysticism and the Immediacy (1If God:Howison’s and Hocking’s Critique of A loyce Aurier A World of DifTerence: The Ro:yce-Howison Debate on the Conception 0.r rd_-- The Middle Royce’s Naturalistic Spirituality The Power to Wilk Refiguring Selfiood in Royce’s Philosophy The Appreciation of Natural Beings and the Finitude of Consciousness The World and Its Selves: Royce and the Philosophy of Natum Reviews About the Contributors Randall E Auxier is associate professor of philosophy at Southern Illinois University. Carbondale, editor of the Personalist Forum, and editor of the Library of Living Philosophers. Jason M. Bell is a graduate student in philosophy at Vanderbilt University. Gary L. Cesan teaches philosophy at Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. He previously taught at the University of New Mexico, College of Santa Fe, and Chapman University. Besides his work in Royce, his research is in metaphysics, idealism, Aristotle, Kant, early modem and nineteenth-century philosophy, and topics in phenomenology. His publications have appeared in Husserl Studies, Ancient Philosophy, Southwest Philosophical Studies, and Journal of the History of Philosophy. Joseph P. McGhu is associate professor of philosophy at Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania. James M. MeLechlan is associate professor of philosophy and religion at Western Carolina University. He is currently a visiting scholar at the Claremont School of Theology. He is the author of The Desire to be God: Freeabm and the Other in Samand Bedyaev (1992) and several articles on personalism.
    [Show full text]
  • To Viv the Global Brain Becoming Material, Unfolding Experience Through Radical Empiricism and Process Philosophy
    From Her (2013) to Viv the Global Brain Becoming Material, Unfolding Experience through Radical Empiricism and Process Philosophy Evelyn Wan Abstract This paper reflects upon the methodological questions entailed by what digital media materiality could be, and how one could analytically approach it via theories of experience such as radical empiricism and process philosophy. I argue that for digital media, becoming material means to ‘enter into experience’. However, this notion of ‘experience’ is not defined in relation to the phenom- enological, distinctly-human subject. I offer instead an expanded notion of experience that resides in non-human objects, networks and other physical entities like mobile phones and computers. Oper- ating system (OS) and intelligent assistants such as Samantha in Spike Jonze’s Her (2013) and the next-generation Siri in develop- ment, Viv the Global Brain, can be seen as representations of what such a non-human experience could be like, as digital objects com- municate with one another. William James, father of radical empir- icism, argues that the definition of matter as something that lies behind physical phenomena is merely a postulate of thought. In his philosophy, the world is made up of only one primal material – that of experience. While James could not have anticipated our era of digital technologies at the time of writing in 1890, radical empiri- cism offers an interesting angle in approaching what digital mate- riality could be. Mark Hansen’s latest monograph, Feed Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First-Century Media (2015), turns to Alfred North Whitehead in an attempt to understand how 21st-cen- tury media operations feature in a world of objects where humans are implicated in, but not central to digital networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Hegel Talk English" — America's First Women Idealists Dorothy G
    Montclair State University Montclair State University Digital Commons Department of Religion Faculty Scholarship and Department of Religion Creative Works 12-1997 "Making Hegel Talk English" — America's First Women Idealists Dorothy G. Rogers Montclair State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/religion-facpubs Part of the Religion Commons MSU Digital Commons Citation Rogers, Dorothy G., ""Making Hegel Talk English" — America's First Women Idealists" (1997). Department of Religion Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works. 5. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/religion-facpubs/5 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religion at Montclair State University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Religion Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works by an authorized administrator of Montclair State University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOSTON UNIVERSITY Dissertation "MAKING HEGEL TALK ENGLISH" — AMERICA'S FIRST WOMEN IDEALISTS by DOROTHY G. ROGERS B.A., Gordon College, 1986 M.T.S., Boston University, 1991 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 1997 © Copyright by Dorothy G. Rogers, 1998 Approved by First Reader: James W. Schmidt, Ph.D. University Professor and Chair, Political Science Department Boston University Second Reader: Hugh W. Baxter, Ph.D. Associate Professor, School of Law Boston University Third Reader: Klaus E. Brinkmann, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy and Associate Chair, Philosophy Department Boston University Note: Minor editorial changes were made to this document before posting online. Introduction This is the first philosophical examination of the women of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Історія Філософії the Reception of the Philosophical
    ISSN 2227-7242 (Print), ISSN 2304-9685 (Online) Антропологічні виміри філософських досліджень, 2016, вип. 9. ІСТОРІЯ ФІЛОСОФІЇ UDC 141.144 (73) (09) V. O. PATSAN (BISHOP EULOGIUS OF NOVOMOSKOVSK)1* 1*Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University (Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine), e-mail [email protected], ORCID 0000-0002-8156-0143 THE RECEPTION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION AS A WAY OF FORMING AMERICAN PERSONALISM: THE POST-SECULAR VIEW The aim of the article is to define the way of expounding the authenticity of the experience of self-cognition opened by the personalist philosophy of the USA on the horizon of receiving the philosophical tradition established by B. P. Bowne to lay the epistemological foundations for overcoming the impersonalist modes of thought in the philosophical-humanitarian space of North America. At the emergent stage of the historical-philosophical process defined as its post-secular period the topicality of studying American personalism in the indicated aspect of its genesis is predetermined by developing the personalistic inspiration of post-non-classical philosophy into renewing the interaction of philosophical and theological discourses initial for the personalist thought and intended to reunite rationality with its spiritual sources in the course of reflecting the personal mode of being realized on the ground of theism. The further reflection of the meta-ontology of the personhood uncovered by the Scripture and expounded by patristic trinitology presupposes the retrospection of the trajectory of moving towards the Supernatural Revelation paved in the late nineteenth and the first half of twentieth centuries by the attempts of personalizing the ontology, in particular by the “personalized” ontological constructions made in the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Logic, Community, and the Taming of the Absolute Leslie Armour Et Suzie Johnston
    Document généré le 27 sept. 2021 13:45 Laval théologique et philosophique Logic, Community, and the Taming of the Absolute Leslie Armour et Suzie Johnston Phénoménologies de l’ange Volume 51, numéro 3, octobre 1995 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/400938ar DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/400938ar Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) Faculté de philosophie, Université Laval ISSN 0023-9054 (imprimé) 1703-8804 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Armour, L. & Johnston, S. (1995). Logic, Community, and the Taming of the Absolute. Laval théologique et philosophique, 51(3), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.7202/400938ar Tous droits réservés © Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval, Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des 1995 services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ Laval théologique et philosophique, 51, 3 (octobre 1995) : 507-528 LOGIC, COMMUNITY, AND THE TAMING OF THE ABSOLUTE Leslie ARMOUR and Suzie JOHNSTON RÉSUMÉ : Hegel a parlé de l'État comme de « la marche de Dieu dans l'histoire » et il a dit que « la fin rationnelle de l'homme est la vie dans l'État ». Certes, il avait ses propres idées sur la liberté humaine et sur la dignité.
    [Show full text]
  • Immediation II
    Immediation II Edited by Erin Manning, Anna Munster, Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen Immediation II Immediations Series Editor: SenseLab “Philosophy begins in wonder. And, at the end, when philosophic thought has done its best, the wonder remains” – A.N. Whitehead The aim of the Immediations book series is to prolong the wonder sustaining philosophic thought into transdisciplinary encounters. Its premise is that concepts are for the enacting: they must be experienced. Thought is lived, else it expires. It is most intensely lived at the crossroads of practices, and in the in-between of individuals and their singular endeavors: enlivened in the weave of a relational fabric. Co-composition. “The smile spreads over the face, as the face fits itself onto the smile” – A. N. Whitehead Which practices enter into co-composition will be left an open question, to be answered by the Series authors. Art practice, aesthetic theory, political theory, movement practice, media theory, maker culture, science studies, architecture, philosophy … the range is free. We invite you to roam it. Immediation II Edited by Erin Manning, Anna Munster, Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen OPEN HUMANITIES PRESS London 2019 First edition published by Open Humanities Press 2019. Copyright © 2019, Erin Manning, Anna Munster, Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen. Chapters copyright their respective authors unless otherwise noted. This is an open access book, licensed under Creative Commons By Attribution Share Alike license. Under this license, authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy their work so long as the authors and source are cited and resulting derivative works are licensed under the same or similar license.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idealist Philosophers'
    Document généré le 2 oct. 2021 16:48 Laval théologique et philosophique The Idealist Philosophers’ God Leslie Armour La question de Dieu Résumé de l'article Volume 58, numéro 3, octobre 2002 On tente de démontrer ici que les idées de Ralph Cudworth permettent de développer un concept philosophique de Dieu qui répond à plusieurs des URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/000627ar perplexités de notre temps. L’association de l’amour et du réel ultime s’avère DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/000627ar chez Cudworth une idée philosophique viable. Il y a lieu de se demander si la seule philosophie de la religion idéaliste réussie ne serait pas celle qui accorde Aller au sommaire du numéro la primauté au bien, et si ce n’est sa manifestation concrète comme amour qui seule puisse rendre intelligible le concept de Dieu, comme on le voit aujourd’hui dans l’oeuvre de Jean-Luc Marion. Éditeur(s) Faculté de philosophie, Université Laval Faculté de théologie et de sciences religieuses, Université Laval ISSN 0023-9054 (imprimé) 1703-8804 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Armour, L. (2002). The Idealist Philosophers’ God. Laval théologique et philosophique, 58(3), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.7202/000627ar Tous droits réservés © Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval, Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des 2002 services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit.
    [Show full text]