<<

The Latest Results from The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station

June 17, 2014 S. Ting AMS: a U.S. DOE led International Collaboration 15 Countries, 44 Institutes and 600 Physicists

FINLAND UNIV. OF TURKU RUSSIA ITEP NETHERLANDS KURCHATOV INST. ESA-ESTEC GERMANY NIKHEF RWTH-I. KIT - KARLSRUHE KOREA USA FRANCE EWHA MIT - CAMBRIDGE LUPM MONTPELLIER KYUNGPOOK NAT.UNIV. NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER LAPP ANNECY CHINA NASA LPSC GRENOBLE TURKEY CALT (Beijing) UNIV. OF HAWAII METU, ANKARA IEE (Beijing) UNIV. OF MARYLAND - DEPT OF PHYSICS IHEP (Beijing) YALE UNIVERSITY - NEW HAVEN PORTUGAL SWITZERLAND ETH-ZURICH NLAA (Beijing) LAB. OF INSTRUM. LISBON SJTU (Shanghai) UNIV. OF GENEVA SEU (Nanjing) SPAIN SYSU (Guangzhou) CIEMAT - MADRID SDU (Jinan) I.A.C. CANARIAS. ITALY TAIWAN ASI ACAD. SINICA (Taipei) IROE FLORENCE CSIST (Taipei) MEXICO INFN & UNIV. OF BOLOGNA NCU (Chung Li) UNAM INFN & UNIV. OF MILANO-BICOCCA INFN & UNIV. OF PERUGIA INFN & UNIV. OF PISA INFN & UNIV. OF ROMA INFN & UNIV. OF TRENTO D. Goldin, former NASA Administrator realized the unique potential of ISS for fundamental science and has supported AMS from the beginning

May 16, 2011 May 15, 2011

May 09, 1994 NASA support

Mr. William Gerstenmaier has visited AMS regularly More than 10 times, at CERN, KSC, ESTEC .

Mr. Mike Suffredini and Mr. Rod Jones have also strongly supported AMS. Their support has made it possible for AMS to collect data continuously

The construction of AMS was, and AMS operations are, supervised continuously by NASA-JSC team of Trent Martin, Ken Bollweg and many others.

4 Strong support of STS-134 (Mark Kelly, Gregory H. Johnson, , , Andrew J. Feustel, Gregory Chamitoff) Development of Accelerators 1612 2014

Energy: 0.0001 eV Energy: 7,000,000,000,000 eV = 7 TeV Galileo’s work on Gravity Study fundamental building blocks of nature Largest Accelerator on Earth (LHC) can produce particles of 7 TeV

Italy

the Alps

CERN LHC Accelerator circumference 16 miles However, Cosmic Rays with energies of 100 Million TeV have been observed. The highest energy particles are produced in the cosmos JEM-EUSO (A. OLINTO) Extreme Universe Space Observatory (EUSO) in the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM)

•Ultraviolet telescope to study origin + interactions of Extreme Energy Cosmic Rays (EECR) with E ~ 1020 eV 8 •ISS provides10 x more exposure than ground observatories. Study of Extreme Energies Sources and Interactions

JEM-EUSO

knee

ankle

1020 eV In the 21st Century,

We enjoy unprecedented advancements in technological development such as in the fields of communication, computers, transportation, medicine, etc … which have had

dramatic effects on the quality of life. 203 A/p10 10 Fundamental Research and Advancements in Technology

Television

Radio Super Aircraft Manned conductivity Space Laser Photography Stations

Neon tube

Steam engine

Skylab Fusion Transistor Steam turbine Prospecting Nuclear Semi conductor Electromagn. Weather Navigation p - beams reactors X rays Satellites Time Keeping Isotope techn. Pulsars

in Medecine Solid State Nuclear Fission Big Bang m - Chemstry Physics Optics Stable Black Holes 2 ( ?)SU(3) -Symm E = m• c Cosmic Background Quantum Thermo- Symmetry Radiation radiation Radioactivity mechanics dynamics Comets Strangeness Models of Models of the QCD Sun Quasars Radius p, n Atomic Nuclei Atom Mechanics Kopernicus Classical Quarks Particles Nuclei Atoms Physics Planets Stars Galaxies 10-17m 10-16m 10-14m 10-10m 1m 1011m 1017m 1025m

CERN Space Station

Higgs particle Space Medicine and Biology www Particle Physics 6

15ft x 12ft x 9ft 7.5 tons Fundamental Science on the International Space Station (ISS) There are two kinds of cosmic rays traveling through space

1- Neutral cosmic rays (light rays): have been measured for many years (Hubble, COBE, Planck, WMAP…). Fundamental discoveries have been made.

2- Charged cosmic rays: Using a magnetic spectrometer (AMS) on ISS is a unique way to provide precision long term (10-20 years) measurements of primordial high energy charged cosmic rays.

AMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Transition Radiation Detector iio Tracker Silicon Identify Identify electrons E AMS: A of

electrons Z,P

TeV

are charge( T

he he Charge and Energy (momentum) precision,multipurposespectrometer

measured independently by Z Particles Particles ) and and energy) detectors are their defined by 3 7 5

9 2 - - - ( 1 4 8 6

E

) ) momentumor ( Tracker

many P )

Ring Imaging Cherenkov Time Time of Flight

Magnet ±

Z Z, E , E Z

14

Tests and calibration at CERN AMS in accelerator test beams Feb 4-8 and Aug 8-20, 2010

27 km AMS

7 km p, e+, e-,π 10-400 GeV

θ 2000 positions Φ

19 January 2010 15 May 19, 2011: AMS installation completed. In 3 years we have collected 50 billion events. This is much more than all Cosmic Rays collected over last century. Administrator Charles Bolden inaugurated

AMS Payload and Science Operations Centers (POCC), June 23, 2011 17 The physics objectives of AMS include: The Origin of ~ 90% of Matter in the Universe is not visible and is called Dark Matter

Collision of “ordinary” Cosmic Rays produce e+, ...

Collisions of Dark Matter (, ) will produce additional e+, …

)

- m=800 GeV

+ e +

+

m=400 GeV

/(e

+ e

I. Cholis et al., arXiv:0810.5344 e± energy [GeV] M. Turner and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 1001

The e+ /(e+ + e-) = positron fraction decreases up to 10 GeV, as expected, but from 10 to ~250 GeV is steadily increasing

+ −

Positron fraction Positron AMS-02 (6.8 million e , e events) 2013

e± energy [GeV] AMS Positron Fraction 2013

Low energy measurements include HEAT, CAPRICE, TS93 … 20 Comparison with theoretical Dark Matter Models

AMS-02 data on ISS 6.8 million e± events, PRL 110, 141102 (2013)

m=800 GeV

m=400 GeV

0.1

)

-

+ e +

+

/(e

+ e Dark Matter model based on I. Cholis et al., arXiv:0810.5344 10 102 e± energy [GeV] On the origin of excess positrons If the excess has a particle physics origin, it should be isotropic

Galactic

coordinates (b,l)

Significance ( ) ( Significance

The fluctuations of the positron ratio e+/e− are isotropic.

The anisotropy in galactic coordinates:

δ ≤ 0.030 at the 95% confidence level 22

From: Matteo Rini [[email protected]] Sent: 02 January 2014 19:09 To: Samuel Ting Subject: your AMS paper as a 2013 Physics Highlights

Dear Sam, this is just to let you know that your article the first AMS data has been selected in our 2013 APS Physics Highlights (http://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/139).

Congratulation on this work, which has generated a lot attention among our readers, the press and the scientific community.

Best regards, One year Matteo

-- Matteo Rini, PhD Deputy Editor, Physics [email protected] http://physics.aps.org 25 Positron Fraction compared with

Collision of Cosmic Rays plus Dark Matter or Pulsar models

Pulsars Positron fractionPositron

m=700 GeV

e± energy [GeV] 26 Comment: 3 independent methods to search for Dark Matter

Annihilation (in Space)     e , p, ,... Scattering AMS (Underground Experiments c p, p,e-,e+,g World Wide):

LUX DARKSIDE XENON 100 c p, p,e-,e+,g CDMS II … LHC     p  p Production (in Accelerators) Physics of electrons and protons Annihilation e  e  p, p,e,e ,

SPEAR, PEP, PETRA, LEP, … Ψ, τ

- +

e p, p,e ,e ,g

, electroweak ,

 - + partons

Scattering e p, p,e ,e ,g SLAC … … SLAC

BNL, FNAL, LHC …CP, J, Υ, T, Z, W, h0 ...  e  e  p  p Production Latest AMS Results and Future Plans Cosmic rays Dark Matter Future Plans Proton spectrum Positron Fraction Positron Fraction Helium spectrum Anisotropy Anisotropy Electron Spectrum Positron Flux Antiproton Ratio Boron Spectrum Antiproton Ratio Photons Carbon Spectrum Search Boron/Carbon ratio Strangelets Search AMS Data Analysis Centers

FZJ – Juelich (2300 cores)

AMS@CERN – GENEVA (4000 cores) IN2P3 – LYON (400 cores)

CNAF – INFN BOLOGNA (1300 cores)

NLAA – BEIJING (1024 cores) CIEMAT – MADRID (200 cores) SEU – NANJING (2016 cores)

ACAD. SINICA – TAIPEI (3000 cores) Positron fraction 1. At much higher energy 1. Atenergy higher to much (up 500 New Results Results New on Positron Fraction e ± AMS2014 energy[ GeV

GeV

• )

]

Positron fraction Δ

Fermi PAMELA

2. 2. With much 6.8 6.8 million 11 million million positron higher positron statistics - - electron events electron events

AMS2013 AMS2014 e ± energy[

• •

GeV ]

Positron fraction 3 . Above. 206 line line equation: positron fraction = In the energy GeV region 206 , , PositronFraction is independent of e then b = –

500 - GeV (2.6 (2.6 a+b·E , we fit the Positron Fraction with a straight ±

18.4) 18.4) 10

- 5

e ± AMS2014 energy[ GeV

]

±

energy

New Positron Fraction results compared with models

AMS 2014 •

Pulsars Positron fraction Positron

e± energy [GeV] 33

New Position Fraction Results compared with Minimal Model

−e+ −s -E/Es AMS Fe+ = Ce+ E + CsE e −e- −s -E/Es Minimal Model Fe- = Ce- E + CsE e -1

1/Es = 1.48 ± 0.59 TeV Positron fraction Positron

e± energy [GeV] Positron Flux Data (before AMS)

Fermi data above 126 GeV are off scale. New AMS Results: Measurement of Positron Flux. The Positron Flux exhibits 3 unexpected behaviours

1. The flux increases up 2. From 10-35 Gev, 3. Above 35 GeV, there to 10 GeV it is nearly flat is a structure AMS Positron Flux Data Comparison with early work

Fermi data above 100 GeV are off scale Electron flux measurement before AMS AMS Electron flux measurement compared with early work

39 (e+ + e−) flux measurement before AMS AMS (e+ + e−) flux - New Understanding In the past hundred years, measurements of charged cosmic rays by balloons and satellites have typically contained ~30% uncertainty.

AMS will provide cosmic ray information with ~1% uncertainty.

The 30 times improvement in accuracy will provide new insights.

The Space Station has become a unique platform for precision physics research. During the life time of ISS we expect to obtain 300 billion events Examples of Future Physics 1. Ascertain the origin of the positron fraction

Pulsars

m = 700 GeV Positron fractionPositron

Collision of cosmic rays

± e energy [GeV] 44 2. Search for Antimatter Universe AMS on ISS The Universe began with the Big Bang. After the Big Bang there must have been equal amounts of matter and antimatter.

AMS on the Space Station for ~10 years will search for the existence of antimatter to the edge of the universe From accelerators results we found that every particle has its antiparticle:

Matter Antimatter (The discovery of the first antimatter) electron positron proton antiproton neutron antineutron helium anti helium p p K K

y95778aNew.ppt Question: is there Antimatter Universe?

Universe Anti-Universe ? He He C C

Detection of Antimatter Universe

He He 1. Cosmic antimatter cannot be detected on earth because matter and antimatter will annihilate each other in the atmosphere.

2. Matter and antimatter have opposite electric charges. We need a magnetic detector to measure the charge of antimatter. AMS Measurement of Periodic Table

H He

Li C Be B N O Ne Mg F Na Al Si S P Ar Cl K Ca Fe Sc Ti V Cr Mn Ni Co

48 Original purpose, Discovery with Facility Expert Opinion Precision Instrument

30 GeV Proton Accelerator (1960’s) Nuclear Neutral Currents -> Z, W CERN 2 types of neutrinos 30 GeV Proton Accelerator (1960’s) Nuclear force Break down of time reversal symmetry Brookhaven New form of matter

400 GeV Proton Accelerator(1970’s) Neutrino physics 5th and 6th types of quark FNAL Quark inside protons Electron Positron Collider (1970’s) Properties of quantum electricity 4th family of quarks SLAC Spear 3rd kind of electrons Electron Positron Collider (1980’s) 6th kind of quark Gluon PETRA Large Underground Cave (2000) Super Kamiokande Proton life time Neutrino has mass Hubble Space (1990’s) Galactic Curvature of the universe, Telescope survey

AMS on ISS Dark Matter, Antimatter,… ?

Exploring a new territory with a precision instrument is the key to discovery. The Cosmos is the Ultimate Laboratory. Cosmic rays can be observed at energies higher than any accelerator.

The most exciting objective of AMS is to probe the unknown; to search for phenomena which exist in nature that we have not yet imagined nor had the tools to discover.