Ending Corporal Punishment in Penal Systems for Children
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Cruel, inhuman and degrading: ending corporal punishment in penal systems for children “The vision of a world in which violent punishment of children is universally condemned and prohibited is now within our grasp. We cannot let more generations of children suffer these obvious and deliberate violations of their rights. We must not keep children waiting.” Professor Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children CONTENTS Human rights standards for juvenile justice ........................................................4 Progress towards universal abolition ..................................................................5 Making the violation visible through research .....................................................6 Law reform to achieve abolition ..........................................................................7 Advocacy for prohibition of corporal punishment in penal systems ................. 10 Legality of corporal punishment of children in penal systems (January 2015) .... 12 he aims of the Global Initiative – promoting the prohibition and elimination of all corporal punishment of children – are supported by UNICEF, UNESCO and many international and national organisations, including: This report documents that 38 states, which include just T under 40% of the world’s children, have not fully prohibited ActionAid International Individual supporters include: the sentencing of children to corporal punishment by their Amnesty International The Hon Madam Justice Désirée Bernard, Judge of the courts and 67 states have not prohibited violent punishment Association for the Prevention of Torture Caribbean Court of Justice, Trinidad and Tobago of children in penal institutions. It is being launched at the Better Care Network Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, Special Rapporteur on the sale of 2015 World Congress on Juvenile Justice, which “aims to children, child prostitution and child pornography and former Child Rights Connect – formerly NGO Group for Deputy Secretary General, Council of Europe become a milestone in the implementation of international the CRC Shuaib Chalklen, former Special Rapporteur on Disability of the norms”. How can these states, 25 years after adoption of Child Rights International Network Commission for Social Development Professor Paulo the Convention on the Rights of the Child, continue to ChildFund International Thomas Hammarberg, former Human Rights Commissioner, Sérgio Pinheiro ignore their international obligations and maintain these Consortium for Street Children Council of Europe The Independent Expert barbaric practices? For many children, I fear we are barely who led the UN Secretary Defence for Children International The Hon Madam Justice Sandra Mason, former Member and at the starting point in respecting their human dignity: we Human Rights Watch Chairperson, Committee on the Rights of the Child; Justice of General’s Study on Violence against Children must all redouble explicit advocacy. International Association for Adolescent Health Appeal of the Supreme Court of Barbados International Council of Nurses Professor Manfred Nowak, former Special Rapporteur on International Disability Alliance torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment Acknowledgements International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) Rosa María Ortiz, Rapporteur on the Rights of the Child, Inter- Photo on inside front cover from Middle East and North Africa law reform workshop, Beirut, 2010. American Commission on Human Rights Other photographs of children depict models and are used for illustrative purposes only. International Federation Terre des Hommes Mr Dainius Pūras, Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone Designed by Simon Scott International Juvenile Justice Observatory (IJJO) to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health Printed in the UK by The Russell Press Limited, Nottingham International Pediatric Association Maria Soledad Cisternas Reyes, Chairperson, UN Committee International Society for the Prevention of Child on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities The Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children is administered by the Abuse and Neglect (ISPCAN) Mrs Mary Robinson, former UN High Commissioner for Human Association for the Protection of All Children, APPROACH Ltd, a registered charity No. 328132. OMCT – World Organisation against Torture Rights Registered office Unit W (West) 125-127, Westminster Business Square, 1-45 Durham St, LONDON SE11 5JH, UK. Penal Reform International Kirsten Sandberg, ninth Chair, Committee on the Rights of the Plan International Child Save the Children The Most Reverend Desmond M. Tutu, Anglican Archbishop Note on facts and figures Emeritus of Cape Town The Global Initiative bases its analyses on a total of 198 states, all states parties to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child except Holy See, plus Somalia, South Sudan, Taiwan, US and Western Sahara. Child population figures are from UNICEF 2012 (2010 for Russian Federation) For a full list of supporting international and national organisations and prominent individuals, and, where no UNICEF figures are available, World Population Prospects 2010 (0-19) (Cyprus, and to sign up as a supporter, see www.endcorporalpunishment.org Montenegro, Serbia, Western Sahara), Statistical Yearbook 2012 (Lao PDR), Children Bureau Ministry of Interior 2005 (Taiwan); South Sudan and Sudan figures are estimates. The information in the legality tables (pp. 12-15) has been compiled from many sources, including reports to and by the United Nations human rights treaty bodies. We are very grateful to government PUBLISHED JANUARY 2015 BY: officials, UNICEF and other UN agencies, NGOs and human rights institutions, and many individuals who have helped to provide and check information. Please send any corrections or updates to Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children www.endcorporalpunishment.org [email protected]. For further details on all states see the individual country reports at www.endcorporalpunishment.org. Save the Children www.savethechildren.net, resourcecentre.savethechildren.se Human rights Progress towards universal standards for abolition juvenile justice Abolition of corporal punishment in systems of juvenile justice – both as a sentence for crime and as a disciplinary measure in penal institutions – is a fundamental human rights obligation. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child states in article 37 that “no child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” and that “every child deprived of liberty shall be treated with humanity and respect for the inherent dignity of the human person”. Article 40 confirms the right of “every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child’s sense of dignity and worth”. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has confirmed that corporal punishment is a violation of this article and since the beginning of its work has recommended abolition of corporal punishment in penal systems as in all other settings. Other treaties and their monitoring bodies similarly require abolition of corporal punishment in penal systems, including the Committee Against Torture, the Human Rights Committee, and the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In its visits to places where people are deprived of their liberty under The abolition of corporal punishment in penal systems across the world is at the forefront of progress the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture, the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture has towards universal prohibition of all violent punishment of children. As at January 2015, more states have several times documented corporal punishment of children in conflict with the law and has recommended prohibited corporal punishment as a sentence of the courts for juvenile offenders than have prohibited this its prohibition. The issue is raised in the Universal Periodic Review of states which have not yet achieved form of violence against children in any other setting – 160 have now abolished judicial corporal punishment abolition. (whipping, flogging, caning) compared with 131 prohibiting physical punishment as a disciplinary measure in penal institutions, 122 in schools, 50 in alternative care and day care settings and just 44 in the home. The UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile “Recognising that no child should be subjected to torture or other The drive to end penal corporal punishment of children is to be celebrated. But at a time when nearly all Justice (the “Beijing Rules”), the UN cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Member states have ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and when human rights treaty bodies Rules for the Protection of Juveniles States are urged: (a) To review, evaluate and, where necessary, are in agreement that all corporal punishment of children – wherever they are – should be prohibited and Deprived of their Liberty and the update their national laws to effectively prohibit sentences eliminated, why is it that there are still 67 states where children detained in penal institutions can lawfully UN Guidelines for the Prevention of be subjected to corporal punishment for breaches of discipline and 38 where juvenile offenders can be Juvenile Delinquency (the “Riyadh involving any form of corporal punishment for crimes