Challenges and Opportunities Director Chief Investment Office the World Is Deep in a Flood Tide of Debt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Challenges and Opportunities Director Chief Investment Office the World Is Deep in a Flood Tide of Debt Global Institutional Consulting Chief Investment Office Global Debt: MAY 2017 Emmanuel D. Hatzakis Challenges and Opportunities Director Chief Investment Office The world is deep in a flood tide of debt. Do we care, and what can we do about it? Debt is inextricably linked to economic growth. Whether in the form of government, business or household credit, debt can fuel economic growth, and economic growth can increase the propensity to borrow. And when growth is too weak, credit can be used to stimulate it. The cumulative effect of credit use by the various sectors of an economy is a rise in its overall debt. While economic prosperity is often credit-financed, higher levels of debt appear connected to lower future economic growth. Almost all debt accumulations have been hard to reverse, most have involved tough policy choices, and some notable ones have ended badly. In this whitepaper, we discuss the state of global debt, how it came to be, where it may lead, and what we believe portfolio implications to be. The state of global debt More than eight years since the 2008 global financial crisis started, the world seems to be drowning in debt. Global economic growth, meanwhile, remains anemic, after years of sluggishness. Some economists attribute it to high levels of debt1, reasoning that they have been preventing economies from realizing their full potential because governments, businesses and households have been devoting significant resources to debt servicing — resources that otherwise would have been available for productive activities. Global debt was on a steep rise before the crisis, and continued growing after it. The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that, by mid-2015, the world’s debt stood at $204 trillion — $68 trillion (or 50%) higher than it had been in 2007, immediately before the crisis, and $121 trillion (or 145%) higher than in 2000. Governments, businesses and households all contributed to the increase. (See Exhibit 1.) What is more, global debt has been growing faster than the world’s economy. As of mid- 2015, it stood at 294% of global gross domestic product (GDP), up 25 percentage points (pp) since the end of 2007 and 48 pp since the end of 20002. In many countries, debt has increased to levels not normally seen during peacetime3. In advanced economies, government debt has had several spikes associated with wartime borrowing or economic crises over more than two centuries, and is now at its highest levels since World War II4 (see Exhibit 2). Businesses and households have never been as indebted before5. Bank of America Merrill Lynch makes available products and services offered by Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith (MLPF&S) and other subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation (BofA Corp.). Investment products: Are Not FDIC Insured Are Not Bank Guaranteed May Lose Value MLPF&S is a registered broker-dealer, a registered investment adviser and Member SIPC. Please see important disclosure © 2017 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. information on the last page. Global Debt: Challenges and Opportunities | 2 Exhibit 1: Global Debt Outstanding, by Type Exhibit 3: China’s Outstanding Debt, by Type Household Business-Non-Financial Government Business-Financial Household Business-Non-Financial Government Business - Financial 250 300 290% $204 39pp 200 250 $40 + $121 + $68 200 150 $136 132pp $57 158% $32 150 20pp 100 121% $83 8pp $37 100 72pp $18 $58 51pp Debt as % of GDP 50 $25 $31 83pp 50 $21 42pp $36 $48 68pp $ Trillion, Constant Exchange Rates $19 23pp 24pp 0 0 7pp 2000 2007 Q2 2015 2000 2007 Q2 2015 TOTAL DEBT AS % OF GDP TOTAL DEBT, $ TRILLION, CONSTANT EXCHANGE RATES 246% 269% 294% $1.9 $6.9 $30.0 Source: McKinsey Global Institute and Chief Investment Office. Source: McKinsey Global Institute and Chief Investment Office. Note: Totals may be off due to rounding. Exhibit 2: Global Government Debt Outstanding — How this came to be Advanced versus Emerging Economies Debt has characteristics that make it attractive both to Advanced Economies Emerging Economies borrowers, as a source of funds, and to lenders, as an 140 investment. Borrowers may like its favorable tax treatment, 120 and the limited surrender of control rights it offers when 100 compared to equity; lenders often perceive it as less 80 risky than equity, and its contractually specified stream 60 of cash flows may serve their needs with reasonable certainty. A confluence of factors contributed to the global 40 Debt as % of GDP debt accumulation7: 20 0 • In many economies, robust real GDP growth and booming real estate markets and construction led to 1800 1809 1818 1827 1836 1845 1854 1863 1872 1881 1890 1899 1908 1917 1926 1935 1944 1953 1962 1971 1980 1989 1998 2007 fast increases in credit. Source: Reinhart, Reinhart and Rogoff (2012). Data through 2012 for advanced economies and through 2011 for emerging economies. • The liberalization of the financial sector over the last three decades opened up major financial markets, and innovative ways to engineer debt instruments with risk profiles Emerging economies alone contributed 47% to the growth in perceived to be suitable for specific classes of lenders global debt since 2007. China, whose government launched an fueled a self-reinforcing increase in credit availability. ambitious stimulus program in late 2008, in response to the global financial crisis, played a leading role6, with its debt more • A savings glut, mainly in emerging economies, and than quadrupling since 2007 (see Exhibit 3). China’s debt is declining real interest rates across the world made mostly domestic, held by banks, and has been used primarily to credit cheaper and more available. finance real estate and other investments. Continued on next page. Global Debt: Challenges and Opportunities | 3 Debt accumulations are historically associated with slower Continued from previous page. future GDP growth, systemic instability, and economic and 9 • Credit use increased as both lenders and borrowers financial-system vulnerability . The faster the debt build-up, felt more comfortable in a relatively stable the worse the ensuing contraction has tended to be. In the macroeconomic environment. years leading up to the global financial crisis, major advanced economies saw household debt spiral upward to unsustainable • The 2008 global financial crisis caused governments to levels along with housing prices, until real estate collapsed and increase their borrowing steeply to offset tax revenue domestic spending slowed, with more-leveraged households declines and stimulate their economies. experiencing larger spending slowdowns10. Faster private- sector deleveraging and quicker balance-sheet recognition of Debt levels can increase in both good economic times and losses have resulted in more robust recoveries11. bad. When growth is too weak, governments may attempt to The economic slowdown following debt accumulation is well stimulate economic growth by investing or spending borrowed understood by those familiar with the aftermath of the lending funds, as well as adopt policies that encourage businesses booms in the U.S. in the 2000s and Japan in the 1980s, and and households to invest or spend using credit. Several prior research findings corroborate it12. Exhibit 4 outlines an illustrative periods of debt accumulation were followed by severe economic example. When domestic demand is fueled entirely by credit, $1 contractions8, and what we are experiencing now may have of borrowing generates $1 of spending, and the stock of debt similarities to past cycles. The current secular debt cycle is now increases by $1, all else being equal. To keep demand at the same more than five decades long, with deleveraging pauses in the level through credit, debt needs to keep increasing. When the 1980s and 1990s. It intensified in the last few years, raising flow of credit stops, demand goes back to what it was before some critical questions: borrowing, and the stock of debt remains at a high plateau. To • Should we be concerned? decrease debt, we need to reverse the credit flow, which causes • Does this pose any risks? If it does, is there a way out? a contraction in demand. What is more, weak demand leads • Do we need to deleverage at any cost, or should we rather to disinflation or even deflation, which, in turn, triggers easier focus on learning to manage the debt and its growth trends? monetary policy, currency depreciation, and increased vulnerability of the banking system to crises. • Could it be that it does not matter as much as we fear? What if debt has become a structural element of the modern global Since debt overhangs have often happened during or after deep economy, with its deep financial markets, sophisticated risk recessions, wars, or other crises, it is not clear whether anemic or management tools, and steadily declining interest rates to negative growth can all be blamed on high debt. Also, the impact historically low levels that make debt servicing as easy as it on growth depends on each economy. Emerging economies, has ever been? as well as countries that lack inclusive political and economic • Finally, how should investor portfolios be positioned in this institutions, are considered to be more adversely affected13. environment? Some deleveraging has been taking place since the crisis14, but it has been uneven across economies. Global Debt: Challenges and Opportunities | 4 Exhibit 4: Debt would rise perpetually in an economy Exhibit 5: Corporate bond issuance and S&P 500 relying solely on credit to sustain demand (depicted by buybacks have been increasing at similar paces dotted lines). If credit stopped flowing, demand would S&P 500 buybacks Bond issuance stagnate while the stock of debt stabilized, and it would contract if the credit flow reversed in order to deleverage. 3,000 2,500 PERIOD 1 PERIOD 2 PERIOD 3 PERIOD 4 2,000 +$1 -$1 1,500 USD Billions $0 CREDIT 1,000 -$1 500 0 +$1 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $0 DEBT STOCK Source: Strategas Research Partners and Chief Investment Office.
Recommended publications
  • OTP Morning Brief
    22 JUNE 2021 OTP Morning Brief • Western Europe's stock markets picked up, benefiting from Christine Lagarde's words • The sentiment improved in the USA, despite Fed officials' continued hints at monetary tightening • The EUR/HUF sank near 353 yesterday, when the MNB governor's hawkish article was published. • The MNB is expected to raise interest rates today; its size may determine the HUF's exchange rate. • Most of Asia's indices headed higher today; Brent climbed to USD 75 www.otpresearch.com 1 22 JUNE 2021 Western Europe's stock exchanges shifted into higher gear on Christine Lagarde’s words Western Europe's stock markets started the week with gains: Germany's DAX jumped 1.0%, reversing Friday's fall, the UK's FTSE rose by 0.6%, and the Stoxx600 closed 0.7% higher. It was the words of Christine Lagarde, the ECB's President, that set markets in motion. Speaking at a hearing in the European Parliament, she spoke about maintaining loose monetary conditions and dispelled fears about the spill-over effects of US inflation in Europe. Cyclical sectors have risen; the winners of the day in the Stoxx600 were vehicle manufacturers, chemical, and materials stocks. Retail companies also did well: the UK-based Morrisons food chain skyrocketed 35% after rejecting a GBP 5.5bn takeover bid from Clayton, Dubilier & Rice. Their rivals also jumped: Tesco advanced 1.7%, and Sainbury’s surged 3.8%. The Stoxx600 Health Sector Index stagnated, even though CureVac plummeted more than 10% on suspicion of insider trading; last week, the biopharmaceutical's stock price of fell as clinical trials pointed to low efficacy of its covid vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • Inward Remittance — Quick Reference Guide
    Inward Remittance — Quick Reference Guide How to instruct a Remitting Bank to remit funds to your account with BOCHK Please instruct the Remitting Bank to send a detailed payment instruction in SWIFT MT103 format to us using the below SWIFT BIC of BOCHK. To designate BOCHK as the Beneficiary’s bank, please provide below details. SWIFT BIC: BKCHHKHHXXX Bank Name: BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LIMITED, HONG KONG Main Address: BANK OF CHINA TOWER, 1 GARDEN ROAD, CENTRAL, HONG KONG Bank Code: 012 (for local bank transfer CHATS / RTGS only) Please provide details of your account for depositing the remittance proceeds. Beneficiary’s Account Number: Please provide the 14-digit account number to deposit the incoming funds. (Please refer to Part 3 for further explanation.) Beneficiary’s Name: Please provide the name of the above account number as in our record. Major Clearing Arrangement and Correspondent Banks of BOCHK CCY SWIFT BIC Name of Bank Details Bank of China (Hong Kong) Ltd - RMB BKCHHKHH838 BOCHK’s CNAPS No.: 9895 8400 1207 Clearing Centre CNY BKCHCNBJXXX Bank of China Head Office, Beijing Direct Participant of CIPS (Payment through CIPS) BKCHCNBJS00 Bank of China, Shanghai Correspondent Bank of BOCHK in the mainland CCY SWIFT BIC Name of Bank CCY SWIFT BIC Name of Bank AUD BKCHAU2SXXX Bank of China, Sydney NOK DNBANOKKXXX DNB Bank ASA, Oslo Bank Islam Brunei Darussalam NZD BND BIBDBNBBXXX ANZBNZ22XXX ANZ National Bank Ltd, Wellington Berhad CAD BKCHCATTXXX Bank of China (Canada), Toronto SEK NDEASESSXXX Nordea Bank AB (Publ), Stockholm CHF UBSWCHZH80A UBS Switzerland AG, Zurich SGD BKCHSGSGXXX Bank of China, Singapore DKK DABADKKKXXX Danske Bank A/S, Copenhagen THB BKKBTHBKXXX Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd, Bangkok Commerzbank AG, Frankfurt AM COBADEFFXXX CHASUS33XXX JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, New York EUR Main BKCHDEFFXXX Bank of China, Frankfurt USD CITIUS33XXX Citibank New York GBP BKCHGB2LXXX Bank of China, London BOFAUS3NXXX Bank of America, N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of England List of Banks
    LIST OF BANKS AS COMPILED BY THE BANK OF ENGLAND AS AT 31 October 2017 (Amendments to the List of Banks since 30 September 2017 can be found on page 5) Banks incorporated in the United Kingdom Abbey National Treasury Services Plc DB UK Bank Limited ABC International Bank Plc Diamond Bank (UK) Plc Access Bank UK Limited, The Duncan Lawrie Limited (Applied to cancel) Adam & Company Plc ADIB (UK) Ltd EFG Private Bank Limited Agricultural Bank of China (UK) Limited Europe Arab Bank plc Ahli United Bank (UK) PLC AIB Group (UK) Plc FBN Bank (UK) Ltd Airdrie Savings Bank FCE Bank Plc Al Rayan Bank PLC FCMB Bank (UK) Limited Aldermore Bank Plc Alliance Trust Savings Limited Gatehouse Bank Plc Alpha Bank London Limited Ghana International Bank Plc ANZ Bank (Europe) Limited Goldman Sachs International Bank Arbuthnot Latham & Co Limited Guaranty Trust Bank (UK) Limited Atom Bank PLC Gulf International Bank (UK) Limited Axis Bank UK Limited Habib Bank Zurich Plc Bank and Clients PLC Habibsons Bank Limited Bank Leumi (UK) plc Hampden & Co Plc Bank Mandiri (Europe) Limited Hampshire Trust Bank Plc Bank Of America Merrill Lynch International Limited Harrods Bank Ltd Bank of Beirut (UK) Ltd Havin Bank Ltd Bank of Ceylon (UK) Ltd HSBC Bank Plc Bank of China (UK) Ltd HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited Bank of Cyprus UK Limited HSBC Trust Company (UK) Ltd Bank of Ireland (UK) Plc HSBC UK RFB Limited Bank of London and The Middle East plc Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited, The ICBC (London) plc Bank of Scotland plc ICBC Standard Bank Plc Bank of the Philippine Islands (Europe) PLC ICICI Bank UK Plc Bank Saderat Plc Investec Bank PLC Bank Sepah International Plc Itau BBA International PLC Barclays Bank Plc Barclays Bank UK PLC J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Consent Decree in United States V. Bank of America Corp., Citibank, NA, Jpmorgan Chase and Co., Ally Financial, Inc. and Wells F
    Case 1:12-cv-00361-RMC Document 11 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 86 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I LED APR - ~ 2012 ) Clerk U S District & BankruptCY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) court~ f~r the District of Columbia et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. ---- BANK OF AMERICA CORP. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ------------------------------ ) CONSENT JUDGMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, the United States of America and the States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia filed their complaint on March 12,2012, alleging that Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP flk/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Mortgage Ventures, LLC, and Countrywide Bank, FSB (collectively, for the sake Case 1:12-cv-00361-RMC Document 11 Filed 04/04/12 Page 2 of 86 of convenience only, "Defendant") violated, among other laws, the Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices laws ofthe Plaintiff
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Roadmap—Delivering Financial Life Benefits®
    Innovation roadmap GET STARTED Delivering Financial Life Benefits® Innovation roadmap Delivering Financial Life Benefits® LEARN MORE Personal Retirement Strategy is an online investment advisory program sponsored by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (“MLPF&S” or “Merrill”) that uses a probabilistic approach to determine the likelihood that participants in the program will accumulate sufficient total assets to achieve their annual retirement income goal. The recommendations provided by Personal Retirement Strategy may include a higher level of investment risk than a participant may be personally comfortable with. Participants are strongly advised to consider their personal goals, overall risk tolerance, and retirement horizon before accepting any recommendations made by Personal Retirement Strategy. Participants should carefully review the explanation of the methodology used, including key assumptions and limitations, as well as a description of services and related fees which is provided in the Personal Retirement Strategy Brochure (ADV Part 2A). It can be obtained through Benefits OnLine® or through the Retirement Benefits Contact Center. Merrill offers a broad range of brokerage, investment advisory and other services. There are important differences between brokerage and investment advisory services, including the type of advice and assistance provided, the fees charged, and the rights and obligations of the parties. It is important to understand the differences, particularly when determining which service or services to select. IMPORTANT: The projections or other information shown in the Personal Retirement Strategy program regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. Results may vary with each use and over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Bank of America Interest Checkingtm
    Sort_Audit: CC:00-53-5420NSB Bank of America® Clarity StatementTM Bank of America Interest CheckingTM Understanding Bank of America Interest CheckingTM An overview of key policies and fees Your Interest Checking account Monthly Maintenance fee $25.00 Each month, or no Monthly Maintenance fee when you maintain combined balances of $10,000 or more each statement cycle. Combined balances include: Average daily balances for the statement cycle in linked checking, savings and money market savings accounts, AND The current balances, as of the end of the checking statement cycle in linked personal CDs and IRAs, AND The current balance, as of two business days before the end of the checking statement cycle, in your eligible linked Merrill Lynch investment accounts. ATM fees Bank of America® ATMs No ATM fee For deposits, withdrawals, transfers or balance inquiries Non-Bank of America $2.50 In the U.S., plus any fee charged by the ATM's operator ATMs $5.00 Outside the U.S., plus any fee charged by the ATM's operator Overdraft policy • To help you avoid fees, we won't authorize ATM withdrawals or everyday debit card purchases when you don't have enough money in your account • We offer two overdraft setting options for how you want us to process your other transactions, such as checks and scheduled payments Overdraft settings and fees Option 1: Standard $35.00 per We may approve checks or scheduled payments that cause an overdraft. Use this overdraft or setting if you want transactions to be completed, even though you'll pay a fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Podcast Script Episode 4: the Systemic Risk Exception
    Podcast Script Episode 4: The Systemic Risk Exception Moderator Diane: Introduction Hello again. My name is Diane Ellis. Welcome to Episode 4 of the FDIC’s podcast of Crisis and Response: An FDIC History, 2008-2013. What This Diane: Episode Will Cover In our last podcast, we introduced the systemic risk exception, the authority used to create the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Today, we’ll look at how the systemic risk exception was used during the financial crisis for three of the nation’s four largest banks to help stabilize financial markets and stem the cycle of fear that had gripped the global financial system. Introduce Art and Diane: Fred Joining me again today is Art Murton, Deputy to the Chairman for Policy. Welcome back Art. Art: Thanks Diane. Nice to be here. Diane: Fred Carns, Principal Advisor in the FDIC’s Division of Insurance and Research, joins us again today as well. Hello Fred. Fred: Hi Diane. 1 Need for the Diane: Systemic Risk Exception As we mentioned in our last podcast, the systemic risk exception, or SRE, was authorized by law in 1991 but wasn’t used until the crisis in 2008. In late 2008 and early 2009, the SRE was used for three of the four largest banking organizations: Wachovia, Citigroup, and Bank of America. Art, we should probably remind listeners about what we mean by a systemic risk exception and how it was used. Art: Well Diane, since 1991, federal law has required that the FDIC resolve failed banks by using the method that would be least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of America in Asia Pacific
    . Translate: Simplified Chinese | Traditional Chinese Bank of America in Asia Pacific About Bank of America Our purpose as a firm is to make financial lives better, through the power of every connection. Across the world, we partner with leading corporate and institutional investors through our offices in more than 35 countries. In the U.S. alone, we serve almost all of the Fortune 500 companies and approximately 66 million consumer and small-business clients. We provide a full suite of financial products and services, from banking and investments to asset and risk management. We cover a broad range of asset classes, making us a global leader in corporate and investment banking, sales and trading. Connecting Asia Pacific to the world Our Asia Pacific team is spread across 19 cities in 12 markets. We are focused on connecting Asia to the world and the world to Asia, using our global expertise to ensure success is shared between us, our clients and our communities. Our regional footprint covers 12 currencies, more than a dozen languages and five time zones, placing us firmly among the region’s leading financial services companies. Our Businesses Global Markets Global Markets provides banking products and services through Bank of America and trading and other broker dealer products and services, including research through BofA Securities. Our institutional clients are across fixed-income credit, commodity and equity businesses. Global Markets product coverage includes securities and derivative products in both the primary and secondary markets. We also work with our commercial and corporate clients to provide risk management products using interest rate, equity, credit and commodity derivatives, fixed-income and mortgage-related products.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Execution Policy
    INVESTMENT SERVICES DOCUMENT B: ORDER EXECUTION POLICY 1. Regulatory Framework Within the framework of the Law (as defined below) and directives issued thereunder, the Bank of Cyprus Group (which includes the Bank of Cyprus Public Company Ltd, its subsidiaries as well as its branches, authorised in any member state of the European Economic Area ("ΕΕΑ")) has established this Order Execution Policy and takes all reasonable measures to obtain the best possible result for its clients when executing their orders in financial instruments, when receiving and transmitting their orders for execution to third parties as well as when placing orders with other entities for execution that result from decisions by the Bank of Cyprus Group to deal in financial instruments on behalf of the client when providing the service of portfolio management. For the purposes of this Order Execution Policy, "Law" means the Investment Services and Activities and Regulated Markets Law (Law 144(l)/2007), as amended, replaced, expanded or re- enacted from time to time. Any other capitalised terms in this Order Execution Policy that have not otherwise been defined herein, have the meaning given to them in the Bank of Cyprus Group's Agreement for the Provision of Investment Services and Activities and Ancillary Services and/or the Client Agreement for Global Custody Services, as applicable, with its clients. 2. Scope of Application This Order Execution Policy of the Bank of Cyprus Group applies to its retail and professional clients (as provided for in the Law and directives issued thereunder), when the Bank of Cyprus Group provides the service of reception, transmission and/or execution of clients’ orders as well as the service of portfolio management in relation to financial instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Tips for International Travel
    Tips for international travel When you’re heading out of the country, make sure you have what you need for sightseeing, souvenirs and more. 1. Order foreign currency If you have some foreign currency on hand when you arrive, you won’t have to worry about exchanging currency. And with Online Banking, ordering foreign currency1 is easy and secure. Go to bankofamerica.com/foreigncurrency and follow the simple on-screen instructions 1. Select the flag that represents the currency you need or select Order a currency not shown to get started. 2. You will be prompted to sign in to Online Banking. Get more rewards with your everyday banking® If you’re a Bank of America Preferred Rewards client², you’ll receive up to a 2% discount off the available exchange rate as well as no fee on standard shipping ($7.50 value) with all orders placed online. Learn more about Preferred Rewards at bankofamerica.com/preferred-rewards. Shipping options — orders are not shipped or delivered on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays • Standard delivery (1-3 business days): $7.50 (standard delivery fee is waived for orders of $1,000 and up) • Optional next business day delivery (order by 2 p.m.): $20 Order fulfillment details • Orders placed before 2 p.m. local time Monday through Friday will be shipped the same business day. • Orders placed after 2 p.m. local time Monday through Friday will be shipped the next business day. Note: Because we do not stock inventories of foreign currency at financial centers, delivery charges apply to orders picked up at a financial center as well as to orders sent to your account address.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Bank Mergers: a Case Study in Corporate Governance Issues During Acquisition
    LV10091 A Tale of Two Bank Mergers: A Case Study in Corporate Governance Issues during Acquisition Hoje Jo Santa Clara University Vivek Durairaj Santa Clara University Tim Driscoll Santa Clara University Andrew Enomoto Santa Clara University Joseph Ku Santa Clara University ABSTACT We examine the two recent acquisitions and their responses to offers. We suggest that while the managements at Bank of America and Merrill Lynch fail to exercise fiduciary prudence in their merger, the managements at Wells Fargo and Wachovia exercise fiduciary duty in their merger. We also compare the performance of the two banks, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, in terms of how corporate governance had an impact on their stock performance after their respective acquisitions. Wells Fargo’s effort in adhering to proper corporate governance, such as, no irregularities in executive compensation during and after merger, conservative credit practices, transparency of information, and proper due diligence in Wells Fargo - Wachovia merger, are relatively quite ethical and transparent. We suggest that Wells Fargo’s effective governance leads to better Wells Fargo’s stock performance than those of Bank of America and Philadelphia Banking Index, a benchmark used in the banking industry. Keywords: Corporate governance, bank acquisition, agency problem, stock performance INTRODUCTION Corporate governance is defined as “the set of processes, customs, policies, laws, and institutions affecting the way a corporation (or company) is directed, administered or controlled.” 1 Corporate governance aims to reduce or eliminate the agent-principle problem inherent in a corporation, thus helping to achieve the goal of any corporation, that is, maximization of shareholders’ wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • (An Indirect Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.) C
    CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.) Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition June 30, 2021 (Unaudited) CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.) Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition June 30, 2021 (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars) Assets Cash $ 648 Cash segregated under federal and other regulations 7,345 Securities borrowed and purchased under agreements to resell (including $123,107 at fair value) 213,459 Trading account assets ($42,376 pledged as collateral) U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities 43,527 Mortgage-backed securities 33,591 Equity securities 23,189 Corporate debt securities 7,786 Derivatives 1,035 Asset-backed securities 1,491 State and municipal securities 865 Foreign government securities 322 Other debt securities 12 111,818 Securities received as collateral, at fair value (all pledged to counterparties) 3,224 Receivables: Customers 14,307 Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations 20,270 Other 1,112 35,689 Goodwill 145 Other assets (including $72 at fair value) 5,839 Total assets $ 378,167 See accompanying notes to consolidated statement of financial condition. 1 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.) Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (Continued) June 30, 2021 (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars, except shares and per share amounts) Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity Short-term borrowings $ 9,942 Securities loaned and sold under agreements to repurchase (including $15,143 at fair value) 210,829 Trading account liabilities: U.S.
    [Show full text]