Skagit Wild & Scenic River Eligibility & Suitability Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Skagit Wild & Scenic River Eligibility & Suitability Studies APPENDIX D: SKAGIT WILD AND SCENIC RIVER STUDIES Skagit Wild & Scenic River Eligibility & Suitability Studies 220 Ross Lake National Recreation Area Draft GMP/EIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 222 Introduction 223 Purpose and Scope 223 Skagit River Watershed 225 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act – Criteria & Process 226 Previous WSR Studies in the North Cascades NPS Complex 226 Skagit River Management 226 Eligibility Evaluation 227 Free-Flowing Condition 227 Outstandingly Remarkable Values 230 Eligibility Determination 242 Ineligible River Segments 242 Classification 243 Suitability Evaluation 246 Characteristics that Make the River Segments Worthy of Designation 246 Land Ownership, Uses, Zoning, and Restrictions 246 Opportunities and Limitations on Hydropower Development 247 Projects and Plans that are Enhanced, Curtailed, or Foreclosed Due to WSR Status 247 Public Involvement 255 Management Intent 255 Conclusion 258 Selected References 258 Tables Table 1: Summary of Outstandingly Remarkable Values 224 Figures Figure 1. Skagit Wild and Scenic River Study Area 228 Figure 2. Eligible River Segments within the North Cascades NPS Complex 244 Figure 3. Eligibility Findings and River Classifications 248 Figure 4. Skagit River from Gorge Powerhouse to Ross Lake NRA Boundary 251 Figure 5. Goodell Creek 252 Figure 6. Newhalem Creek 253 Appendices 221 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY in the fish, wildlife, geology, history, pre-history, recreation and scenery resources. Goodell Creek This study report evaluates the eligibility and was found to have ORVs in the fish, wildlife, geology, suitability of the Skagit River, from Gorge Dam to and scenery resources. While Newhalem Creek the Ross Lake National Recreation Area (NRA) was found to possess ORVs in the wildlife, geology, boundary, and its tributaries for inclusion in the Wild history, pre-history, and scenery resources. The water and Scenic River (WSR) System. This report also quality of all eligible river segments were determined identifies preliminary classifications of eligible river to be high quality. Table 1 summarizes the ORVs. segments. The result is a recommendation to extend WSR designation to the 11-mile segment of the Skagit The Skagit River segment from below Gorge Dam to River and two major tributaries. Gorge Powerhouse does not meet the free-flowing requirement of the WSR Act and therefore was This analysis is being conducted in conjunction found to be ineligible. In addition, the remaining 21 with the development of Ross Lake National tributaries flowing into the study reach, though free- Recreation Area’s General Management Plan. This flowing, were not found to possess any ORVs, and study meets the requirement, under Section 5(d)(1) therefore are not eligible. This assessment was based of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, for agencies to on available information through staff knowledge and evaluate potential WSR rivers as part of their land literature research. Varying amounts of information management planning processes. were available for these creeks, with most creeks lacking thorough surveys of natural and cultural The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, passed in 1968, resources. Therefore, this assessment will be updated protects the free-flowing waters of many of our in the future if new information is found indicating nation’s greatest rivers, while also recognizing the the potential for a river segment to possess an ORV. potential for appropriate use and development. It ensures the public’s enjoyment of the river and Eligible rivers or river segments were classified as its resources for present and future generations; recreational or wild, as listed below: new dams and other water resources projects that The Skagit River was classified as: . would have adverse impacts are prohibited on WSR recreational - due to the hydropower dams segments. upstream and presence of the North Cascades Highway paralleling the river for this entire There are three different classification types based segment. on the existing level of human development or impact on the river –wild, scenic, and recreational. Goodell Creek was classified as: . To be eligible for inclusion in this system, a river must wild – headwaters to river mile one-half . be free-flowing and posses at least one outstandingly recreational – river mile one-half to its remarkable value (ORVs) or characteristic that confluence with the Skagit River is river-related and unique, rare, or exemplarily compared on a regional or national scale. Newhalem Creek was classified as: . wild – headwaters to upstream of the If a river is found eligible, the next step is a suitability diversion dam (river mile one) . analysis which assesses whether or not eligible recreational – upstream of the diversion dam segments should be included in the National WSR (river mile one) to its confluence with the System. The suitability study findings are based on Skagit River public input and an assessment of the ability of the river segment(s) to be managed to protect the The suitability analysis was primarily based on the outstandingly remarkable river values. Designation of following factors: . eligible and suitable river segments into the National The characteristics that make the river WSR System on NPS lands would be decided segments worthy of designation. through a Congressional Act. The ability of NPS and its non-Federal partners to manage the river segments to The Skagit River from Gorge Powerhouse to the Ross protect their ORVs, water-quality, and free- Lake NRA boundary, Goodell Creek, and Newhalem flow. Creek were found to be eligible. They all are free- flowing. The Skagit River was found to have ORVs 222 Ross Lake National Recreation Area Draft GMP/EIS . The compatibility of WSR designation with Therefore the National Park Service recommends other potential uses of the river segments. that Congress extend the Skagit WSR designation to . The public’s support for designation. include this 11-mile upper Skagit segment and the two largest tributaries flowing into it. The upper Skagit River and the two eligible tributaries in this reach – Goodell and Newhalem creeks - were found to be suitable for WSR INTRODUctION designation. The addition of this 11-mile upper Skagit River segment and its key tributaries would complete the Skagit WSR system from the downstream end Purpose and Scope of the Skagit Hydroelectric Project to the town of Sedro-Woolley and create more opportunities for This report includes the draft Wild and Scenic River holistic watershed management. (WSR) Eligibility and Suitability Study findings for the Skagit River and its tributaries from below Gorge The support for this designation from the general Dam to the Ross Lake National Recreation Area public and two other land management agencies, (NRA) boundary just upstream of Bacon Creek. In a Seattle City Light and the Washington State previous eligibility study conducted by the National Department of Transportation, was overwhelming Park Service (NPS) in 1989, the entire segment of positive. Only one comment was received opposing the Skagit River within the Ross Lake NRA was designation. Two more comments also expressed found eligible for inclusion in the National WSR concerns about the potential effects of WSR System based on fishery and wildlife outstandingly designation on new water resource projects, but no remarkable values (ORVs). As a result of this initial known proposals in the foreseeable future would be study, the Skagit River within Ross Lake NRA is prohibited by the WSR designation. located on the Nationwide Rivers Inventory1 list. The first purpose of this report is to update these Seattle City Light is committed to managing their eligibility findings based on new information and lands to protect fishery and wildlife resources changes that have occurred since 1989 and new generally consistent with the intent of the WSR Act. guidance and criteria that have been developed The National Park Service manages the majority of and adopted by the Interagency Wild and Scenic the lands in the study area and manages the river River Coordinating Council. The second purpose system to protect the outstandingly remarkable is to conduct a suitability analysis to determine values, water quality, and free-flowing character of whether or not the eligible river segments should be the river segments. recommended for designation. Existing protections are in place prohibiting This WSR study area includes the Skagit River below logging and mining, as well as limiting hydropower Gorge Dam to the Ross Lake NRA boundary and development. WSR designation would add additional the tributaries flowing into this reach. The evaluated protections from hydropower facilities and tributaries are identified by name or by an identifying encourage natural bank protection, thus furthering number from the Washington State Stream Catalog regional and national goals for recovery and System. Starting upstream and moving downstream, protection of salmon and bald eagle populations. the north tributaries are listed below: . #1965, River segments found eligible and suitable will be . Afternoon Creek, managed by the National Park Service in a manner . Falls Creek, that protects their free flowing character, water . Goodell Creek, quality, and ORVs as required under the WSR Act. #1865, . Babcock Creek, Designation would require the development of a . Thornton Creek, comprehensive river management plan which would . Sky Creek, allow focus on the river segments and their special . Damnation Creek, and resources. WSR designation
Recommended publications
  • North Cascades Contested Terrain
    North Cascades NP: Contested Terrain: North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History NORTH CASCADES Contested Terrain North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History CONTESTED TERRAIN: North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington An Administrative History By David Louter 1998 National Park Service Seattle, Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS adhi/index.htm Last Updated: 14-Apr-1999 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/noca/adhi/[11/22/2013 1:57:33 PM] North Cascades NP: Contested Terrain: North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History (Table of Contents) NORTH CASCADES Contested Terrain North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Cover: The Southern Pickett Range, 1963. (Courtesy of North Cascades National Park) Introduction Part I A Wilderness Park (1890s to 1968) Chapter 1 Contested Terrain: The Establishment of North Cascades National Park Part II The Making of a New Park (1968 to 1978) Chapter 2 Administration Chapter 3 Visitor Use and Development Chapter 4 Concessions Chapter 5 Wilderness Proposals and Backcountry Management Chapter 6 Research and Resource Management Chapter 7 Dam Dilemma: North Cascades National Park and the High Ross Dam Controversy Chapter 8 Stehekin: Land of Freedom and Want Part III The Wilderness Park Ideal and the Challenge of Traditional Park Management (1978 to 1998) Chapter 9 Administration Chapter 10 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/noca/adhi/contents.htm[11/22/2013
    [Show full text]
  • OFR 2019–1144: Preliminary Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Chemistry Near Goodell Creek, North Cascades National Park, Washi
    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Preliminary Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Chemistry near Goodell Creek, North Cascades National Park, Washington Open-File Report 2019–1144 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Preliminary Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Chemistry near Goodell Creek, North Cascades National Park, Washington By Rich W. Sheibley and James R. Foreman Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Open-File Report 2019–1144 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior David Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Sheibley, R.W., and Foreman, J.R., 2019, Preliminary assessment of shallow groundwater chemistry near Goodell Creek, North Cascades National Park, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2019–1144, 14 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20191144.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan Under Limit 6 of the 4(D) Rule of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
    Final Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment to Analyze Impacts of NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Consideration of the Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan under Limit 6 of the 4(d) Rule of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Prepared by the National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Region April 2018 Cover Sheet Final Environmental Assessment Title of Environmental Review: Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan (Skagit RMP) Distinct Population Segments: Puget Sound Steelhead DPS Responsible Agency and Official: Barry A. Thom Regional Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Building 1 Seattle, Washington 98115 Contacts: James Dixon Sustainable Fisheries Division National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 103 Lacey, Washington 98503 Legal Mandate: Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended and implemented – 50 CFR Part 223 Location of Proposed Activities: Skagit River Basin including Skagit Bay and Mainstem Skagit River in Puget Sound, Washington Activity Considered: The proposed resource management plan includes steelhead fisheries and associated activities in the Skagit Basin 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose Of And Need For The Proposed Action 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Description of the Proposed Action 13 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Action 16 1.4 Project Area and Analysis Area 16 1.5 Relationship to Other Plans, Regulations, Agreements, Laws, Secretarial Orders and Executive Orders 18 1.5.1 North of Falcon Process 18 1.5.2 Executive Order 12898 18 1.5.3 Treaty of Point Elliot 19 1.5.4 United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Witd Attd Scettic "Ri()E1t Stadr "Repo1tt
    Ri.;-~, vev.:i A-':> l/1711at'U'"vr /J<.va AerJl../G.. /IS'iii·r. 1/1;([~~c":.b;f.. (i..C../J,~T!vt,~l.{·s NG~ oF r.Jv1,.,r I~ 1'?'7$ THE /2£;; 'te.t ~IU { 0 /~yu,,,/:--(,/tit,.J> J~<t 1L10 Witd attd Scettic "Ri()e1t Stadr "Repo1tt TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - SUMMATION CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT ............................................2 AGENCY INTERPRETATION ...................................................2 STUDY RIVERS ..............................................................2 STUDY APPROACH ..........................................................4 CHAPTER2-SUMMARYOF FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................... FINDINGS ..................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................5 PART II - THE STUDY CHAPTER 1 - INVENTORY .......................................................... -8 THE DRAINAGE BASIN .......................................................8 THE STUDY AREA .......................................................... · 10 CHAPTER2-EVALUATION OF RIVERS &ADJOINING LANDS CRITERIA USED ............................................................ 13 ANALYSIS ................................................................. 15 OUTSTANDING CHARACTERISTICS ........................................... 20 CHAPTER 3 -CLASSIFICATION ALTERNATIVES, ANALYSIS & SELECTION OF STUDY PROPOSAL BASIS OF ANALYSIS ........................................................ 23 THE PRESENT SITUATION ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enchanted Salish Sea Dinner & Auction 2019 Catalog
    2019 ONLINE CATALOG ORCA LEVEL SPONSORS OCTOPUS LEVEL SPONSORS ENCHANTED SALISH SEA Scott Zeeman Certified Public Accountants SZ Nancy Scott & Laurel Zeeman [email protected] Dinner & Auction (360) 385 – 6070 BUSINESS PARTNERS March 16, 2019 Allstate Insurance Coldwell Banker Best Homes The Food Co-op Gale Investment Services Gooding, O’Hara, and Mackey Homer Smith Insurance Jefferson Healthcare John L Scott Port Townsend Kristin Manwaring Insurance Kosec Funeral Home Port Townsend Sails Stephen C. Moriarty Law Office Tarboo Fire Extinguishers 360.385.5582 | www.ptmsc.org Enchanted Salish Sea Dinner & Auction 2019 Catalog Table of Contents Please click on the listing to jump to the individual sections: Live Auction ................................................................................................................................... 2 Silent Auction: Section One............................................................................................................ 6 Silent Auction: Section Two ......................................................................................................... 17 Fixed Price .................................................................................................................................... 29 Table of Contents of Trips Commanders Beach House Stay for Two ....................................................................................... 8 Kalaloch Lodge One-Night Stay for Two ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Baker Ski Area
    Winter Activity Guide Mount Baker Ranger District North Cascades National Park Contacts Get ready for winter adventure! Head east along the Mt. Baker Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest State Road Conditions: /Mt. Baker Ranger District Washington State Dept. of Transportation Highway to access National Forest 810 State Route 20 Dial 511 from within Washington State lands and the popular Mt. Baker Ski Sedro-Woolley, WA 98284 www.wsdot.wa.gov Area. Travel the picturesque North (360) 856-5700 ext. 515 Glacier Public Service Center Washington State Winter Recreation and Cascades Highway along the Skagit 10091 Mt. Baker Highway State Sno-Park Information: Wild & Scenic River System into the Glacier, WA 98244 www.parks.wa.gov/winter heart of the North Cascades. (360) 599-2714 http://www.fs.usda.gov/mbs Mt. Baker Ski Area Take some time for winter discovery but North Cascades National Park Service Ski Area Snow Report: be aware that terrain may be challenging Complex (360) 671-0211 to navigate at times. Mountain weather (360) 854-7200 www.mtbaker.us conditions can change dramatically and www.nps.gov/noca with little warning. Be prepared and check Cross-country ski & snowshoe trails along the Mt. Baker Highway: forecasts before heading out. National Weather Service www.weather.gov www.nooksacknordicskiclub.org Northwest Weather & Avalanche For eagle watching information visit: Travel Tips Center: Skagit River Bald Eagle Interpretive Center Mountain Weather Conditions www.skagiteagle.org • Prepare your vehicle for winter travel. www.nwac.us • Always carry tire chains and a shovel - practice putting tire chains on before you head out.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Populations of Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-78 Independent Populations of Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound July 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS Series The Northwest Fisheries Science Center of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, uses the NOAA Techni- cal Memorandum NMFS series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible due to time constraints. Documents published in this series may be referenced in the scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-NWFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS- F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest & Alaska Fisheries Science Center, which has since been split into the Northwest Fisheries Science Center and the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. The NMFS-AFSC Techni- cal Memorandum series is now being used by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Reference throughout this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. This document should be cited as follows: Ruckelshaus, M.H., K.P. Currens, W.H. Graeber, R.R. Fuerstenberg, K. Rawson, N.J. Sands, and J.B. Scott. 2006. Independent populations of Chinook salmon in Puget Sound. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-78, 125 p. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-78 Independent Populations of Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound Mary H. Ruckelshaus,
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory for Fens and Associated Rare Plants on Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest
    Inventory for fens and associated rare plants on Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Looking west over cloud-enshrouded upper portion of the 9020-310 wetland/fen, Snoqualmie Ranger District. Elev. = 3140 ft. Rick Dewey Deschutes National Forest March 2017 1 Berries of the fen-loving, bog huckleberry (Vaccinium uliginosum) at Government Meadow. Note the persistent sepals characteristic of this species. Government Meadow is the only project site at which V. uliginosum was detected. Acknowledgements This project was funded by a USFS R6 ISSSSP grant spanning 2016-2017. Thanks to Kevin James, MBS NF Ecology and Botany Program Manager, and Shauna Hee, North Zone (Mt. Baker and Darrington Districts) MBS NF Botanist. Special thanks to James for facilitation during the period of fieldwork, including spending a field day with the project lead at the 7080 rd. wetland and at Government Meadow. Thanks also to Sonny Paz, Snoqualmie District Wildlife Biologist, for a day of assistance with fieldwork at Government Meadow, and to the Carex Working Group for assistance in the identification of Carex flava at the Headwaters of Cascade Creek wetland. 2 Summary Sites on Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie NF that were reasonably suspected to include groundwater-fed wetlands (fens) were visited between 8/15-9/28 2006. The intent of these visits was to inventory for rare plants associated with these wetlands, and to record a coarse biophysical description of the setting. Twelve of the 18 sites visited were determined in include notable amounts of fen habitat. Five rare target species and two otherwise notable rare species accounting for eight distinct occurrences/populations at six wetlands were detected during site visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Skagit
    A GUIDE TO PEOPLE AND PLACES OF THE UPPER SKAGIT BOB MIERENDORF AND GERRY COOK NORTH CASCADES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COMPLEX NORTH CASCADES INSTITUTE JULY 22–25 2010 1 CLASS FIELD DAYS ITINERARY PEOPLE AND PLACES OF THE UPPER SKAGIT RIVER JULY 22–25, 2010 FRIDAY 9 am Drive from ELC to Ross Dam Trailhead parking lot 9:15–10:00 Hike to Ross Lake (end of haul road) – Brief stop on trail at a Ross Dam overlook – Load ourselves and gear on the Mule 10:30 am Welcome to the Wild Upper Skagit – Rules of the Mule and other safety matters – Instructor and participant introductions Noon Lunch on the Mule near Big Beaver Creek 2:45 pm Second stop near May Creek (no rest rooms here) 6 pm Arrive at Lightning Horse Camp (our base camp for two nights) 7 pm Potluck dinner SATURDAY 7 am Breakfast 8 am–Noon Ethnobotany hike along Eastbank Trail – About a two mile hike, rolling terrain – Gerry will pick us up with the Mule – Lunch on the Mule 1 pm Quick rest room stop at Boundary Bay Campground 3 pm Arrive at International Boundary 3:15 pm Stop at Winnebago Flats – There are toilets here – Get drinking water and fill water jugs 3:45 pm Depart Winnebago Flats on return trip 5 pm Arrive back at our camp 6:30 pm Potluck dinner SUNDAY ABOUT THE COVER 7 am Breakfast U.S. Forest Service, Mt. Baker 8 am Break camp and load Mule Ranger District, 1931 oblique 9 am Depart on Mule aerial facing 182o (south), of pre-impoundment Skagit River 10 am Arrive at Big Beaver Campground flood plain; Skymo Creek canyon – There are rest rooms here in lower right, Devil’s Creek canyon – Hike up Big Beaver to old growth cedar grove emerging from middle left.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State
    Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Alabama Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama WILD William B. Bankhead National Forest 6,134 110 6,244 SCENIC William B. Bankhead National Forest 3,550 505 4,055 Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Arizona Fossil Creek, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 1,720 0 1,720 Tonto National Forest 1,085 0 1,085 RECREATIONAL Coconino National Forest 1,137 4 1,141 Tonto National Forest 1,136 0 1,136 Fossil Creek, Arizona Totals 5,078 4 5,082 Verde, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 525 0 525 Tonto National Forest 6,234 0 6,234 SCENIC Coconino National Forest 2,862 0 2,862 Prescott National Forest 2,148 25 2,173 Tonto National Forest 649 0 649 Verde, Arizona Totals 12,418 25 12,443 Arizona Totals 17,496 29 17,525 2020 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Arkansas Big Piney Creek, Arkansas SCENIC Ozark National Forest 6,448 781 7,229 Big Piney Creek, Arkansas Totals 6,448 781 7,229 Buffalo, Arkansas WILD Ozark National Forest 2,871 0 2,871 SCENIC Ozark National Forest 1,915 0 1,915 Buffalo, Arkansas Totals 4,785 0 4,786
    [Show full text]
  • Helmy Beckey, 1925 – 2019 Helmut Fritz Beckey, Known As Helmy, Was Born in Seattle and Died in Munich, Germany, at Age 93
    AAC Publications Helmy Beckey, 1925 – 2019 Helmut Fritz Beckey, known as Helmy, was born in Seattle and died in Munich, Germany, at age 93. In his youth, he established first ascents and new routes throughout the Cascades and elsewhere. Helmy learned the basics of climbing as a member of the Mountaineers, where his aptitude was recognized early. In 1940, he and his brother Fred, who was two years older, made two extensive excursions into the Picket Range. The teenagers climbed the west ridge of Mt. Thompson and made the first ascents of Forbidden Peak, Phantom Peak, Whatcom Peak, Mt. Challenger, Crooked Thumb, Luna Peak, Mt. Fury’s East Peak, McMillan Spire’s West Spire, and Inspiration Peak. In 1941, along with the numerous first ascents and new routes in the North Cascades he did with Fred, Helmy joined Lloyd Anderson, Lyman Boyer, and Tom Campbell in the Bugaboos of British Columbia, where they completed the first ascent of the South Tower of Howser Spire. In the summer of 1942, Helmy and Fred embarked on a six-week expedition into the Coast Mountains of British Columbia. Here, the teenage brothers famously climbed the remote and challenging Mt. Waddington. It was only the second ascent of the peak, which had repelled a multitude of summit attempts. Fred Beckey wrote in the 1943 AAJ about the descent: “Helmy was hit on the knee by one of a flurry of rocks that sped down the mountain side. All hope of reaching camp that night was gone because of a heavily bleeding cut. This was Helmy’s 17th birthday present, donated by Mt.
    [Show full text]