DOCSLIB.ORG

Witd Attd Scettic "Ri()E1t Stadr "Repo1tt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Witd Attd Scettic Ri.;-~, vev.:i A-':> l/1711at'U'"vr /J<.va AerJl../G.. /IS'iii·r. 1/1;([~~c":.b;f.. (i..C../J,~T!vt,~l.{·s NG~ oF r.Jv1,.,r I~ 1'?'7$ THE /2£;; 'te.t ~IU { 0 /~yu,,,/:--(,/tit,.J> J~<t 1L10 Witd attd Scettic "Ri()e1t Stadr "Repo1tt TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - SUMMATION CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT ............................................2 AGENCY INTERPRETATION ...................................................2 STUDY RIVERS ..............................................................2 STUDY APPROACH ..........................................................4 CHAPTER2-SUMMARYOF FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................... FINDINGS ..................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................5 PART II - THE STUDY CHAPTER 1 - INVENTORY .......................................................... -8 THE DRAINAGE BASIN .......................................................8 THE STUDY AREA .......................................................... · 10 CHAPTER2-EVALUATION OF RIVERS &ADJOINING LANDS CRITERIA USED ............................................................ 13 ANALYSIS ................................................................. 15 OUTSTANDING CHARACTERISTICS ........................................... 20 CHAPTER 3 -CLASSIFICATION ALTERNATIVES, ANALYSIS & SELECTION OF STUDY PROPOSAL BASIS OF ANALYSIS ........................................................ 23 THE PRESENT SITUATION ................................................... 23 ARRAY OF ALTERNATIVES ....................................................26 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................ 36 EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ..................................... 43 CHAPTER 4-JURISDICTION ........................................................ 45 CHAPTER 5 - RECREATION DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE, ADMINISTRATION &ACQUISITION COST ESTIMATES RECREATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ............................ 47 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM ........................................ 48 ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM ...................................... 48 ACQUISITION PROGRAM ..........................................48 APPENDIX A - LEGISLATION & GUIDELINES ......................................... 56 APPENDIX B - INVENTORY DATA .................................................. 12 APPENDIX C - VISUAL RESOURCE ................................................. 126 APPENDIX D - USE INTENSITY INVENTORY ........................................ 152 APPENDIX E - RIVER AREA BOUNDARY AND LAND OWNERSHIP .................... 164 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................. 177 PART SUMMATION 2 INTRODUCTION A. THE WILD AND SCENIC sheds or shorelines essentially primi­ Copies of P.L. 90-542 and P.L. tive and waters unpolluted. These 93-279 are presented in Appendix A of RIVERS ACT represent vestiges of primitive Amer­ this report. ica. Congress enacted Public Law 90- 542 on October 2, 1968. This law, Scenic river areas - Those rivers or 8. AGENCY INTERPRETATION known as the Wild and Scenic Rivers sections of rivers that are free of impoundments, with shorelines or Act. es tab I ished a National Wild and In February 1970 the Department of watersheds still largely primitive and Scenic Rivers System; named eight Agriculture and Department of the shorelines largely undeveloped, but rivers as ''instant" components of the accessible in places by roads. Interior jointly signed a document National System; named the Skagit as entitled "GUIDELINES FOR EVALU­ one of 27 "study rivers" for potential Recreational river areas - Those ATING WILD, SCENIC AND RECREA­ addition to the National System; and rivers or sections of rivers that are TIONAL RIVER AREAS PROPOSED set up criteria for the addition of other readily accessible by road or railroad, FOR INCLUSION IN THE NATIONAL rivers to the Nat ion al System. that may have some development WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM along their shorelines, and that may UNDER SECTION 2, PUBLIC LAW The intent of Congress in establish­ 90-542." ing a national system of Wild and have undergone some impoundment or diversion in the past. Scenic Rivers is stated in Section 1 (b) These guidelines, a copy of which is of the Act: "The Congress declares Other provisions of the Act, as included in Appendix A, supplement that the established national policy of amended by Pub I ic Law 93-279, which the criteria listed in the Wild and dam and other construction at appro­ are pertinent to this proposal include: Scenic Rivers Act and Define mini­ priate sections of the rivers of the. mum criteria for the classification and United States needs to be comple­ Section 5(b) which stipulates that management of free-flowing river mented by a policy that would the study of potential additions to the areas proposed for inclusion in the preserve other selected rivers or National System (study rivers) may be National System. sections thereof in their free-flowing carried out as a joint study, in condition to protect the water quality cooperation with the state involved. of such rivers and to fulfill other vital C. STUDY RIVERS national conservation purposes." Section 6(b) which precludes con­ The Skagit River was one of 27 demnation for fee title acquisition The Act set up three different study rivers named in the Wild and once 50 percent of the entire acreage Scenic Rivers Act. The Act designated classifications for rivers and their is owned by public agencies, but that the Skagit and three of its major adjacent shorelines. Depending upon allows condemnation for the creation their degree of development, rivers tributaries should be studied for of scenic easements and public possible inclusion in the National may be classified as Wild, Scenic or access on 100% of the area. Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Recreational. Section 2(b) of the Act Rivers named include the Skagit, from describes the characteristics of the Section 7(b) which prohibits the the town of Mount Vernon upstream to three classifications. licensing of any water projects under Bacon Creek (67.3 miles); the Cas­ Wild river areas - Those rivers or the Federal Power Act, on any study cade, from its mouth upstream to the sections of rivers that are free of river, for a period of ten years plus the junction of its North and South Forks, impoundments and generally inac­ time necessary for Congressional and up the South Fork to the Glacier cessible except by trail, with water- review of any recommendations. Peak Wilderness (20.8 miles); the ~auK, rrom its mouth upsteam to 3 1 Eliott Creek, and up its North Fork from its mouth to the Glacier Peak Wilderness (50.8 miles); and the Suiattle, from its mouth upstream to the Glacier Peak Wilderness (27.4 miles), a total of 166.3 miles of rivers. t. ITa T.IT•. Map 11 shows these rivers . ..... _.!:,•-·-----~~-- .... + PARK T.HM. T.H .. ~ .... T.11 ti. + T.3011. T.IOll. It.ell. 11.91. T.na. MAPl STUDY RIVERS 4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS D. STUDYAPPROACH 2. Eligibility - This element was A. FINDINGS concerned with determining the class­ The approach applied to the study ification eligibility of the study rivers, The study finds that th~ Skagit of the Skagit River and its tributaries under criteria established by the Wild River. along with its Cascade, Sauk was directed toward two major as­ and Scenic Rivers Act. This analysis and Suiattle tributaries and their pects of the Wild and Scenic Rivers will be found in Part II, Chapter 2. immediate environment possess out­ Act; (1) River classification , and (2) standingly remarkable fish, scenic administration and management. This 3. Alternatives - In this element the and wildlife values, and exhibit the involved a step by step process to potential economic, social and envi­ potential for the future development determine the degree to which the ronmental impacts of a series of of recreation sites of significant value study rivers were eligible for a Wild, classification alternatives were an­ to local, regional and national popula­ Scenic or Recreational Classification alyzed, and one of the alternatives was tions. These values are of such qua I ity under Section 2(b) of the Act. selected as the study proposal. This is and magnitude as to warrant their Administration and management re­ discussed in Part II, Chapter 3. protection tor the use and enjoyment sponded to Section 1 O(a) of the Act, of present and future generations. 4. Administration - In this portion which states that, "Each component of the study process, various admini­ of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers In addition, the rivers meet the strative options were examined, and System shall be administered in such criteria established by the Wild and an option was selected as the manner as to protect and enhance the Scenic Rivers Act and the Supple­ proposed method for administering values which caused it to be included mental criteria jointly agreed to by the rivers recommended under the study in said system without, insofar as is Department of Agriculture and Depart­ proposal. Part Chapter 4 presents consistent therewith, limiting other 11, ment of the Interior. The rivers are this analysis. uses that do not substantially inter­ free-flowing within the study area, and are suitable for water sports. fere with public use and enjoyment of 5. Implementation - Estimates for these values. In such administration the cost of public recreation develop­ The Skagit River is eligible for a primary emphasis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FALL 2016 Newsletter of the Washington Chapter of the Wildlife Society
    Page | 1 The WashingtonTHE WASHINGTON WILDLIFER Wildlifer FALL 2016 Newsletter of the Washington Chapter of The Wildlife Society MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT meeting. During the banquet at the annual meeting each year Danielle Munzing we give out awards to biologists, organizations, and landowners. The last couple of years I have been involved Happy Fall, Wildlife Society with WA-TWS, I have been surprised that we haven’t members! Time for wool socks, a hot received more nominations. Last month during our board drink in the thermos, and dark skies at meeting, I asked everyone to do some homework and I would 1630. Across Washington, wildlife like to ask the same of each of you. biologists will be busy with their winter work, whether it’s surveying Do you know someone who deserves to be recognized? big game, writing reports, or planning Consider nominating that person for the 2017 awards season. the 2017 annual conference. That’s right, your Washington There are EIGHT different awards available from the Chapter is hard at work with the Washington State Society of Chapter. American Foresters to bring you an incredible 4 days of I think many of us know someone who: workshops, speaker sessions, delicious food, and opportunities to socialize and network. All of this will be Does more than they need to taking place in the heart of Central Washington, at the Red Makes valuable and unique contributions to wildlife Lion Hotel and Convention Center in Yakima. The theme for conservation this year is Forests and Wildlife: Responding to Change. Uses foresight to address problems early As you can imagine, there will be a lot to talk about and we Shows their dedication are bringing together experts in both forestry and wildlife to Shows exceptional leadership inspire discussions ranging from white-nose syndrome to Established partnerships that would not have existed forest health and ecological integrity and so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Map6-1 Priority Species Table
    Conservation areas sorted by quartile for conservation value and vulnerability, and weighted toward species factors. Low, medium low, medium high, and high correspond to the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively. No marine areas are included in this list. Vulnerability Low Medium Low Medium High High Basket Butte Camp Creek Ridge Bald Hill Black River - Mima Prairie Central Texada Island Cranberry Creek Blackjack-Harewood Camassia Dunn Forest EE Wilson Ebey's Landing Corvallis-Philomath Oaks Grays Marsh Fern Ridge Reservoir Fidalgo Head, Burrows Island Drews Prairie Indian Head/Horse Rock Ridge James Island Fidalgo Island Green River Mt. Maxwell Jones Island Fort Lewis - McChord Lacamas Meadows Snoqualmie Foothill Forest McDonald Forest/Soap Creek Forest and Golden Valley North Santiam River Riparian Upper Siuslaw Site Balds Kingston Prairie Rocky Prairie - Beaver Creek Wasp-Yellow Islands Mt Pisgah Luckiamute River Riparian Sandy River Cypress-Sinclair Islands Reginald Hill Muddy Creek/Finley Satsop Watershed Lasqueti Island Rocky Point, BC North Texada Island Sauvie Island Saturna Island Rocky Point, WA Scatter Creek High Shumocher Creek Stout Mountain South Fork Yamhill River Trial Island Thetis-Frances Washougal Oaks - Steigerwald Weir Prairie and Forest Tuam-Bruce West Eugene/Spencer Creek Active Pass Willamette Narrows Comox Macrosite Discovery Island Ladysmith-Yellow Point Cowichan Pender Harbor Moran Deception Pass Conservation Value Quilcene Sea to Sea Greenbelt Discovery Passage Sucia-Matia-Patos Islands Thorndyke
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Campsites at Waptus Lake, Alpine Lakes Wilderness
    BACKCOUNTRY CAMPSITES AT WAPTUS LAKE, ALPINE LAKES WILDERNESS, WASHINGTON: CHANGES IN SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, IMPACTED AREAS, AND USE OVER TIME ___________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ___________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Resource Management ___________________________________________________ by Darcy Lynn Batura May 2011 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis of Darcy Lynn Batura Candidate for the degree of Master of Science APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Karl Lillquist, Committee Chair ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Anthony Gabriel ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Thomas Cottrell ______________ _________________________________________ Resource Management Program Director ______________ _________________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT BACKCOUNTRY CAMPSITES AT WAPTUS LAKE, ALPINE LAKES WILDERNESS, WASHINGTON: CHANGES IN SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, IMPACTED AREAS, AND USE OVER TIME by Darcy Lynn Batura May 2011 The Wilderness Act was created to protect backcountry resources, however; the cumulative effects of recreational impacts are adversely affecting the biophysical resource elements. Waptus Lake is located in the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, the most heavily used wilderness in Washington
    [Show full text]
  • Map6-2 Priority Landscape Table
    Conservation areas sorted by quartile for conservation value and vulnerability, and weighted toward landscape factors. Low, medium low, medium high, and high correspond to the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively. No marine areas are included in this list. Vulnerability Low Medium Low Medium High High Basket Butte Cowlitz Forest Corridor Bald Hill Black River - Mima Prairie Central Texada Island Cranberry Creek Blackjack-Harewood Camassia Indian Head/Horse Rock Ridge EE Wilson Clear Creek Clackamas Lilliwaup Forest Park-Coast Range Coast Fork/Middle Fork Willamette Corvallis-Philomath Oaks Mt. Maxwell Lower Skookumchuck Riparian Drews Prairie Snoqualmie Foothill Forest McDonald Forest/Soap Creek Forest and Ebey's Landing Eola Hills Upper Siuslaw Site Balds Fidalgo Head, Burrows Island Jackson Fraiser Wetlands Cypress-Sinclair Islands Mt Pisgah Fidalgo Island Lacamas Meadows Lasqueti Island Reginald Hill Fort Lewis - McChord North Santiam River Riparian Nelson Island Rocky Point, BC HABECK Oaks Rocky Prairie - Beaver Creek Saturna Island Kingston Prairie Satsop Watershed Shumocher Creek Lane Community College Basin Sauvie Island Sultan Foothill Forest Luckiamute River Riparian Scatter Creek High Timber Grove Muddy Creek/Finley Washougal Oaks - Steigerwald Trial Island Rocky Point, WA West Eugene/Spencer Creek Weir Prairie and Forest Thetis-Frances Comox Macrosite Active Pass Toutle Forest Corridor Cowichan Discovery Island Tuam-Bruce Deception Pass Quilcene Willamette Narrows Discovery Passage Conservation Value Tarboo-Dabob
    [Show full text]
  • Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future
    Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future As more and more states are incorporating projections of sea-level rise into coastal planning efforts, the states of California, Oregon, and Washington asked the National Research Council to project sea-level rise along their coasts for the years 2030, 2050, and 2100, taking into account the many factors that affect sea-level rise on a local scale. The projections show a sharp distinction at Cape Mendocino in northern California. South of that point, sea-level rise is expected to be very close to global projections; north of that point, sea-level rise is projected to be less than global projections because seismic strain is pushing the land upward. ny significant sea-level In compliance with a rise will pose enor- 2008 executive order, mous risks to the California state agencies have A been incorporating projec- valuable infrastructure, devel- opment, and wetlands that line tions of sea-level rise into much of the 1,600 mile shore- their coastal planning. This line of California, Oregon, and study provides the first Washington. For example, in comprehensive regional San Francisco Bay, two inter- projections of the changes in national airports, the ports of sea level expected in San Francisco and Oakland, a California, Oregon, and naval air station, freeways, Washington. housing developments, and sports stadiums have been Global Sea-Level Rise built on fill that raised the land Following a few thousand level only a few feet above the years of relative stability, highest tides. The San Francisco International Airport (center) global sea level has been Sea-level change is linked and surrounding areas will begin to flood with as rising since the late 19th or to changes in the Earth’s little as 40 cm (16 inches) of sea-level rise, a early 20th century, when climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Branta Bernicla) in HOOD CANAL and LOWER PUGET SOUND
    Washington Birds 10:1-10 (2008) BREEDING ORIGINS AND POPULATIONS OF WINTERING AND SPRING MIGRANT BRANT (Branta bernicla) IN HOOD CANAL AND LOWER PUGET SOUND Bryan L. Murphie Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, Washington 98563 [email protected] Greg A. Schirato Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, Washington 98563 [email protected] Don K. Kraege Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501 [email protected] Dave H. Ward U.S. Geological Service, Alaska Fish and Wildlife Research Center 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 [email protected] James C. Sedinger University of Nevada 1000 Valley Road Reno, Nevada 89557 [email protected] James E. Hines Canadian Wildlife Service Suite 301 - 5204, 50th Ave. Yellowknife, Northwest Territories X1A 1E2 [email protected] Karen S. Bollinger U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management 1412 Airport Way, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 [email protected] Brant (Branta bernicla) migrate and winter along the west coast of North America (Reed et al. 1989). These geese originate from breeding colonies in Alaska, Northwest Territories, Yukon, and northeastern Russia (Einarsen 1965, Palmer 1976, Bellrose 1980, Reed et al. 1989). The population was recently estimated at approximately 130,000 birds (Trost 1998, Wahl et al. 2005). Mexico has been recognized as a major wintering area for 2 Murphie et al. Brant (Smith and Jensen 1970) and Washington, especially Puget Sound, supports the largest concentration of Brant north of Mexico in winter and >90% of the Brant during northward migration (Pacific Flyway Council 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Umatilla National Forest
    A BRIEFHISTORYOFTHE UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST1 Compiled By David C. Powell June 2008 1804-1806 The Lewis and Clark Expedition ventured close to the north and west sides of the Umatilla National Forest as they traveled along the Snake and Columbia rivers. As the Lewis & Clark party drew closer to the Walla Walla River on their return trip in 1806, their journal entries note the absence of firewood, Indian use of shrubs for fuel, abundant roots for human consumption, and good availability of grass for horses. Writing some dis- tance up the Walla Walla River, William Clark noted that “great portions of these bottoms has been latterly burnt which has entirely destroyed the timbered growth” (Robbins 1997). 1810-1840 This 3-decade period was a period of exploration and use by trappers, missionaries, natu- ralists, and government scientists or explorers. William Price Hunt (fur trader), John Kirk Townsend (naturalist), Peter Skene Ogden (trap- per and guide), Thomas Nuttall (botanist), Reverend Samuel Parker (missionary), Marcus and Narcissa Whitman (missionaries), Henry and Eliza Spaulding (missionaries), Captain Benjamin Bonneville (military explorer), Captain John Charles Fremont (military scientist), Nathaniel J. Wyeth (fur trader), and Jason Lee (missionary) are just a few of the people who visited and described the Blue Mountains during this era. 1840-1859 During the 1840s and 1850s – the Oregon Trail era – much overland migration occurred as settlers passed through the Blue Mountains on their way to the Willamette Valley (the Oregon Trail continued to receive fairly heavy use until well into the late 1870s). The Ore- gon Trail traversed the Umatilla National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan Under Limit 6 of the 4(D) Rule of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
    Final Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment to Analyze Impacts of NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Consideration of the Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan under Limit 6 of the 4(d) Rule of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Prepared by the National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Region April 2018 Cover Sheet Final Environmental Assessment Title of Environmental Review: Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan (Skagit RMP) Distinct Population Segments: Puget Sound Steelhead DPS Responsible Agency and Official: Barry A. Thom Regional Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Building 1 Seattle, Washington 98115 Contacts: James Dixon Sustainable Fisheries Division National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 103 Lacey, Washington 98503 Legal Mandate: Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended and implemented – 50 CFR Part 223 Location of Proposed Activities: Skagit River Basin including Skagit Bay and Mainstem Skagit River in Puget Sound, Washington Activity Considered: The proposed resource management plan includes steelhead fisheries and associated activities in the Skagit Basin 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose Of And Need For The Proposed Action 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Description of the Proposed Action 13 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Action 16 1.4 Project Area and Analysis Area 16 1.5 Relationship to Other Plans, Regulations, Agreements, Laws, Secretarial Orders and Executive Orders 18 1.5.1 North of Falcon Process 18 1.5.2 Executive Order 12898 18 1.5.3 Treaty of Point Elliot 19 1.5.4 United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Umatilla National Forest 2019 Personal-Use Firewood Maps Attachment–Part 2 (Part 1 Is Your Permit Form)
    United States Department of Agriculture Umatilla National Forest 2019 Personal-Use Firewood Maps Attachment–Part 2 (Part 1 is your Permit Form) Is Today a Cut Day? INSIDE......... It's Your Responsibility to Important News for 2019.................................2 Find Out Before You Head Out! Heppner District Maps................................5-6 An updated recorded message will let you know if firewood North Fork John Day District Maps.…..............6-7 cutting is allowed, restricted to certain times of the day, or Walla Walla District Maps.............................8-10 closed completely due to hot, dry weather conditions. Pomeroy District Maps...……..….......…....11-12 21" Ruler for gauging diameter............................8-9 Call Toll-Free 2019 Firewood Season Calendar……...….….13 1-877-958-9663 Where to call for information .…......................16 Page 2 Umatilla National Forest's 2019 Program GENERAL INFORMATION: COMMERCIAL FIREWOOD: To purchase a firewood permit, you must be 18 years of age or older and All commercial activities on National Forest System Lands require a present a government-issued photo ID. commercial permit. If you wish to cut and sell firewood commercially, you must purchase a commercial firewood permit through the local The minimum cost for a personal-use firewood permit is $20, which buys Ranger District office for your area of interest. District contact four-cords. Anything over four cords will cost an additional $5 per cord. information is provided on the back page of this guide. Each household is allowed a maximum limit of 12 cords per year. HEPPNER DISTRICT OFFERS LIVE JUNIPER CUTTING: Firewood permits are available at all Umatilla National Forest Offices and at several local vendors.
    [Show full text]
  • Laconner Bike Maps
    LaConner Bike Maps On andLaConner off-road bike routes Bike in LaConner,Maps West Skagit County, and with Regional Bike Trails June 2011 fireplaces, and private decks or balconies, The Channel continental breakfast, located blocks from the Lodge historic downtown. Ranked #1 Bed and Waterfront Breakfast in LaConner by TripAdvisor Members. boutique hotel 121 Maple Avenue, LaConner, WA 98257 with 24 rooms 800-477-1400, 360-466-1400 featuring www.wildiris.com private [email protected] balconies, gas fireplaces, Jacuzzi bathtubs, spa services, The Heron continental breakfast, business center, Inn & Day Spa conference room, and evening music and wine Elegant French bar in the lobby. Transient boat dock adjoins Country style the waterfront landing for hotel guests and dog-friendly, visitors. bed and PO Box 573, LaConner, WA 98257 breakfast inn 888-466-4113, 360-466-3101 with Craftsman www.laconnerlodging.com Style furnishings, fireplaces, Jacuzzi, full [email protected] service day spa staffed with massage therapists and estheticians, continental breakfast, located LaConner blocks from the historic downtown. Country Inn 117 Maple Avenue, LaConner, WA 98257 Downtown 360-399-1074 boutique hotel www.theheroninn.com with 28 rooms [email protected] providing gas fireplaces, Katy’s Inn Jacuzzi Historic building bathtubs, converted into cozy continental 4 room bed and breakfast, spa services, business center, breakfast with conference and 40-70 person meeting room private baths, wrap- facilities including breakout rooms, and around porch with adjoining bar and restaurant (Nell Thorne). views, patio, hot PO Box 573, LaConner, WA 98257 tub, continental 888-466-4113, 360-466-3101 breakfast, and cookies and milk at bedtime, www.laconnerlodging.com located a block from the historic downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 Colville National Forest
    Colville National Forest - Salmo-Priest Wilderness Page 1 of 2 United States Department of Agriculture Colville National Forest Forest Service Forest Service Home About the Agency Contact the National Office Search Go Salmo-Priest Wilderness Site Map Area Status: Open Colville National Forest Home Tucked among the Selkirk Mountains in the extreme northeastern corner of Washington, the U-shaped 43,348 Special Places Low Fire Danger acre Salmo-Priest Wilderness extends its borders along those of Idaho and British Columbia. Its most prominent Recreation Quick Links features are two very long ridges, generally running Bicycling southwest to northeast, connected near their northern Salmo-Priest Wilderness Camping & Cabins ends by a ridge crowned by 6,828-foot Salmo Mountain. Winter Recreation in Washington State Climbing The eastern ridge stands lower, more wooded, more rounded off and more Upper Columbia Children's Forest Fishing accessible than the steep-sided, rocky-crested western ridge. Streams have cut Hiking deep drainages into both ridges. Water from the eastern side of the eastern ridge ends up in Idaho's Priest River. The remaining wilderness drains generally westerly Areas & Activities Horse Riding & Camping via Sullivan Creek and the Salmo River into the Pend Oreille River. Find An Area Hunting Below the ridge tops of this well-watered Wilderness (at 50+ inches of precipitation Highlights Nature Viewing annually) you'll find the largest growth of virgin forest left in eastern Washington: western red cedar, western hemlock, Douglas fir, grand fir, larch. The forest houses Recreation Passes OHV Riding & Camping mule deer and white-tailed deer, elk, black bears, cougars, bobcats, badgers, pine Recreation Passes martens, lynx, bighorn sheep, and moose.
    [Show full text]
  • Heaven in Hell's Canyon
    Northwest Explorer ONDAL ONDAL M M EN EN K K Left: Hiker at the boundary of Hell’s Canyon Wilderness. Right: Approaching Horse Heaven, elevation 8,100 feet on the Seven Devils Loop Trail in Hell’s Canyon Wilderness. June and July are good times to explore Washington’s southeast corner in the Wenaha-Tucannon area and in the nearby Hells Canyon area of Oregon and Idaho. Heaven in Hell’s Canyon Hiking two wilderness areas near Washington’s southeast corner By Ken Mondal finding places to backpack when the high jaw-dropping views. This hike can be country is snowed in. The Imnaha River done comfortably in 3-4 days. Seven Devils Loop in Hell’s is hikable virtually year round. An excellent description of hiking the Canyon is Heavenly On the Idaho side of the recreation Seven Devils Loop can be found in Hik- There is no question that the Grand area is a 215,000-acre wilderness area, ing Idaho by Maughan and Maughan, Canyon is one of the natural wonders which includes the Seven Devils Moun- published by Falcon. For the other hikes of the world. However, if one measures tains. The premier hike within this I would recommend Rich Landers’ 100 from the Snake River to the summit of wilderness is the Seven Devils Loop, a Hikes in the Inland Northwest. 9,393 foot He Devil Peak in the Seven rugged 29-mile round trip offering mag- Devils Mountains, this makes Hells nificent views into Hells Canyon many Choose Forgotten Wenaha- Canyon the deepest canyon in North thousands of feet below and equally Tucannon for Solitude America.
    [Show full text]