DOCSLIB.ORG

Language, Counter-Memory, Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Language, Counter-Memory, Practice MICHEL FOUCAULT LANGUAGE, COUNTER-MEMORY, PRACTICE Selected Essays and Interviews Edited with an Introduction by DONALD F. BOUCHARD Trandated from the French by DONALD F. BOUCHARD and SHERRY SIMON Cornell University Press ^ITHACA, ^NEW YOBK Copyright © 1977 by Cornell University Al rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the pub­ lisher. For information address CorneH University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 1977 by Cornell University Press. Second printing 1980. First printing, ComeU Paperbacks, 1980. Eighth printing 1996. Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (For library cataloging purposes only) Foucault, Michel. Language, counter-memory, practice. Includes bibliographical references and index. CONTENTS: ^Language and the birth of“literature.” A preface to transgresrion. Language to infinity. The father's "no." Fantasia of the library. [etc.J 1. Languages—Philosophy—Collected works. 2. Literature—Philosophy— Collected works. 3. Difference (Philosophy)—Collected works. I. Title. P106.F67 401 77-4561 ISBN 0-8014-0979-9 (cloth) ISBN 0-8014-9204-1 (pbk.) @The paper in this book meets the minimum requirements of the American Na­ tional Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Li­ brary Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Thought is no longer theoretical. As soon as it functions it offends or r^econciles, attracts or repels, breaks, dissociates, unites or re­ unites; it c^mot help but liberate and enslave. Even before prescribing, suggesting a future, saying what murt be done, even before exho^bg or merely sounding an al^m, thought, at the level of its ^exisence, in its very da^wning, is in itseH an action— a perilous act. Foucault The fact is that every writer c;reates his own pr^ecursors. His work modifies our conception of the part, as it modify the future. Borges & P r e f a c e This coliection arose out of the desire to come to teerms with the already considerable accomplishment of Michel Foucault. I had hoped that an examination of his essays on the writers who have inBuenced ^m would resolve the difRculties of his books. Not unexpectedly, the essays reveal some continuity of intention and the persirtence of certain preoccupations, but hardly the security of an origin. What could have s ^ e d in the past as solid foundations had b ^ ^ e , through Foucault’s archaeological retrospective, an open site: the. clewing away • of a new space for investigation and the opening of new questions. ^Where I sought a guide to the perplexity of Foucault's language and an understanding of the ' often lyrical enterprise that sustains his historical perspective, I witnessed instead the emergence of a form of language that questiorui present experience. The seven essays that make up the major portion of this book reB.ect Foucault’s attitudes toward language. Taken together, they exhibit the complexity and variety of the experience . of language, the insistence of those questions generated by lan* guage. Yet, because of. the richness of Foucault's response to language, I' faced a n ^ b e r of practical ^difRculties' in selecting essays. ^This was especially true for the ■ first group of' essays in which Foucault’s sense of language evolves out of the detailed analysis of literary authors and their works. My worlWfg prin- dpl^—to which I have made exceptions—was to omit essays deling with authors whose works are unavailable in tr^ la - 8 Pl\EFACE tion: hence the absence of Foucault's essays on Maurice Blanchot and Pierre Klossowski ("La Pensee du dehors” and “La Prose d'Act£on”). Moreover, the attitude informing those two essays is fully represented by the lead essay, “A Preface to Transgresrion.” I can only hope that if my choices appear arbitrary at times, the range and importance of the essays that are included offset the omissions. Following the essays, a brief concluding section records Foucault's most recent activities at the CoUege de France and his involvement in penal reform. In choosing a title, I adopted the descriptive labels that identify the three separate sections: e a ^ is meant to gain force and precision from its contextual relation to the other two. According to Foucault; the historical experience of language underwent a fundamental shift toward the end of the eighteenth cen^ry, when language took on a life of its own and became an “ob­ jectivity.” This new form of language compelled a series of com­ pensations, the two most important being the creation of the modem human sciences and the b^fc of ‘'literature" as a dis­ tinctive language in its own right. In fact, it is within literature that language finds itself embodied for the first time, and the writer now finds himself subjected to its alien logic. The h ^ a n ' sciences, on the other hand, arise from the elision of this ''liter­ ary” experience of language and from the subjection of language for the p^urpose of determ^ing the nature of h ^ a n identity, or for the fabrication of human memory. In developing a totaly opposed relationship to language, literature has been transformed, since the nineteenth century, into a counter-memory; and the subjects that naturaUy evolve from this language manifest the history of our otherness: violence, transgression, madness, sexu­ ality, death, and finitude. In the second section of essays, Foucault examines the ways in which this experience of language pene­ trates into the domain of discursive thought. Our understanding of counter-memory evolves in a practical fashion from Foucault’s reconsideration of the nature of the author, from Nietesche's exploration of the "long hieroglyphic record” of man's moral PREFACE 9 past, and from Giles Deleeuze’s "reversal of Platonism.” While counter-memory may superficially appear to be a form of nega­ tion, it becomes—with Foucault, Nietzsche, and Deleuze—the affirmation of the particularities that attend any practice, and perhaps the activity that permits new practices to emerge. Lon- guage, Counter-Memory, Practice is the name of an action that defines itself, that recognizes itself in words-—in the multiplica­ tion of meaning through the practice of vigilant repetitions. The task of translating these essays began in a straightforward way, but because of unexpected detours and often belated recognitions, it too experienced its own multiplication—of pos­ sibilities, debts, sources, meanings, cross references, friendly assistance. ^Throughout the preparation of the book, I have profited from Michel Foucault’s advice and assistance. Without his generosity, I doubt that it could have been completed. Bernhard Kendler, at CorneU University Press, has my apprecia­ tion for his patience and direction throughout the ^difrent stages of my undemanding of Foucault, as does Lisa for the final editing of the manuscript. Peter O^in, Donald Theal, and David W ilams, colieagues at McGil University, were always available for discussion and advice..Eugene Vance, at the Uni­ versity of Montreal, helped with an especialy troublesome essay. Eugenio Donato, at SUNY at Buffalo, initiaUy proposed this project and he is largely responsible for my original interest in . Foucault My ^wife, Bebe^m, helped with the final draft of the manuscript and in countless other ways. The McGil Graduate Faculty Fund provided a grant that assisted me in preparing the manuscript, and a Canada Council FeUowship afforded me the leisure to complete the book. Don^ ^ F. Bou^ ^ ot Montreal, Quebec C o n t e n t s Introduction 15 PABT I SLANGUAGE BIRTH OF A Preface to Transgression 29 language to InftDity 53 The Father's “No" 68 Fantasia of the Library 87 n CO^UNTEB^^^OHT: THE of What Is an Author? 113 Nietesche, Genealogy, History 139 Thea^trum Philosophi^cum 165 FAl\T m PRACl1CB: AND POWER History of Systems of Thought 199 InteUectuals and Power 205 Revolutionary Action: "Until Now" 218 Index 235 LANGUAGE, COUNTER-MEMORY, PRACTICE Selected Essays and Interviews Introduction Michel Foucault’s reputation was established in the nineteen sixties, at a time when Structuralism became, in Roland Barthes’ words, an essential “activity” of French intellectual thought.1 The publication of The Order of Things was seen, in this context, as one of many signs that structuralism had come of age.11 In its brief history dating from the tum of the cen^tury it had achieved early successes in linguistics, ^ethnology, and psychoanalysis, in precisely, those sciences of man which evolved as structural disciplines at their most rigorous level; and during the sixties, it appeared revitalized if for no other reason than its having found a fertile soil in France. It extended its range and seemed to promise, through the application of sound methods, an even more general integration of the ‘l ^ a n sciences": in the cultural and literary studies of Barthes, in the work of the Tel Quel group, in Critique, and in the publication of a series of ap­ parently structuralist texts such as De la grammatologie and L'6criture et la difference. Foucault's task, it seemed, was to 1. Roland Bathes, “The Structuralist - Activity," European Literary Theory and Practioe, ed. Vernon W. Gras (New York: Deli Publish­ ing, 1973), pp. 157-163. 2. See Ed^ward Said, “Abecedary Culturae: Structuralism, Ab­ sence, Writing,” Tri-Quarterly, 20 (1971), 3^^1. 'This essay - in a substantially revised form, which modifies and . extennds. Said’s .under­ standing of Foucault, is now an important chapter of Beginnings.* Methods and Intentions (New York: Basic Books, 1975). See also Said's “An Ethics of Language,” Diacritics, 4 (1974), 2^^7. 16 ^INTRODUCTION subdue structuralism’s most resistant foe: thus, those histories that are not history, the historical trilogy that Foucault, in a play on words, called archaeology—Madness and Civilization, The Birth of the Clinic, and The Or<ler of Things.* Given this contextual domain, this revitalized cultural space, it now s^eems quite natural that some were led to speak of the consolidation of the h ^ a n sciences as an active possibility.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 125 from the End of Man to the Art of Life: Rereading Foucault's
    © Kenneth Berger DOI: https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i24.5529 ISSN: 1832-5203 Foucault Studies, No. 24, pp. 125-150, June 2018 From the End of Man to the Art of Life: Rereading Foucault’s Changing Aesthetics Kenneth Berger, Brown University ABSTRACT: In Foucault’s writing throughout the 1960s, in which he foregrounds the critical function of language and signification, works of art and literature – and works of avant-garde art and literature in particular – appear prominently and are the objects of sustained theoretical investment. In the 1970s, however, as Foucault moves away from his earlier concern with language’s capacity to dissolve “man” and begins to concentrate instead on the ways in which man is governed, works of art and literature no longer possess the same political promise for him and drop out almost completely from his writing. Yet the question of aesthetics does not disappear for him entirely, and, in his final years, he returns to it, though with his analysis now directed at what he calls an “art” or “aesthetics of life.” In this paper, I examine these developments with the aim of drawing out the connections between Foucault’s changing view of aesthetics and the larger transformations that take shape within his overall project. Against this background, I argue that Foucault’s call for an art of life, in which the individual develops techniques for continually reinventing his or her existence, does not necessitate abandoning the avant- garde aesthetic practices that he had previously advocated. Rather, I assert, his conception of an art of life – when read in conjunction with his theoriZation of critique as a “permanent” questioning of the limits imposed on us – offers a new framework for reimagining both the function of those practices and their legacies in culture today.
    [Show full text]
  • Foucault Studies © Lisa Weems, 2005 ISSN: 1832-5203 Foucault Studies, No 3, Pp
    foucault studies © Lisa Weems, 2005 ISSN: 1832-5203 Foucault Studies, No 3, pp. 144-149, Nov 2005 REVIEW Sara Mills, Michel Foucault (London: Routledge, 2003). ISBN: 0415245680 One difficult task for educators is the struggle to decide what should be included in the curriculum. All teachers, regardless of disciplinary field or level of education, grapple with the selection of topics and texts to organize discussions of a particular subject. What is not common to all teachers, perhaps, is the problem that arises when the “subject” (multiple meanings intended) specifically writes against the academic practices typically utilized in making curricular decisions. Foucault rejected many standard academic practices, such as canonization, biographical reading, and attempts to totalize an author’s theoretical contribution by reading her “oeuvre.” Given these constraints, how does one write a book intended to serve as an accessible introduction to a critical theorist whose scholarship and political affiliations were prolific and complex? This was the challenge Sara Mills faced as she wrote the text at hand. Overall, the author has successfully produced a straightforward and instructive examination of the work of Michel Foucault that is mindful of the potential theoretical pitfalls of such an endeavor. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested the work of Foucault, but especially to persons who have little prior exposure to the philosopher, and/or who want a brief survey of his ideas. It will make an excellent textbook for undergraduate or graduate courses that deal with issues of power, culture and social problems. The book will also be a good sourcebook for policy makers or professionals in the human services interested in linking critical theory, practice and activism.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Critique Or Transcendental Critique in Foucault: Two Kantian Lineages Colin Koopman, University of Oregon
    Colin Koopman 2010 ISSN: 1832-5203 Foucault Studies, No. 8, pp. 100-121, February 2010 ARTICLE Historical Critique or Transcendental Critique in Foucault: Two Kantian Lineages Colin Koopman, University of Oregon ABSTRACT: A growing body of interpretive literature concerning the work of Michel Foucault asserts that Foucault’s critical project is best interpreted in light of various strands of philosophical phenomenology. In this article I dispute this interpretation on both textual and philosophical grounds. It is shown that a core theme of ‘the phenomenological Foucault’ having to do with transcendental inquiry cannot be sustained by a careful reading of Foucault’s texts nor by a careful interpretation of Foucault’s philosophical commitments. It is then shown that this debate in Foucault scholarship has wider ramifications for understanding ‘the critical Foucault’ and the relationship of Foucault’s projects to Kantian critical philosophy. It is argued that Foucault’s work is Kantian at its core insofar as it institutes a critical inquiry into conditions of possibility. But whereas critique for Kant was transcendental in orientation, in Foucault critique becomes historical, and is much the better for it. Keywords: Michel Foucault, Critique, Immanuel Kant, Phenomenology, Transcen- dental Critique. 100 Koopman: Historical Critique or Transcendental Crititique in Foucault ‚You seem to me Kantian or Husserlian. In all of my work I strive instead to avoid any reference to this transcendental as a condition of the possibility for any knowledge. When I say that I strive to avoid it, I don’t mean that I am sure of succeeding< I try to historicize to the utmost to leave as little space as possible to the transcendental.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilles Deleuze's American Rhizome by Michelle Renae Koerner the Graduate Program in Literature
    The Uses of Literature: Gilles Deleuze’s American Rhizome by Michelle Renae Koerner The Graduate Program in Literature Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Kenneth Surin, Co-Chair ___________________________ Priscilla Wald, Co-Chair ___________________________ Wahneema Lubiano ___________________________ Frederick Moten ___________________________ Michael Hardt Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in Literature in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 i v iv ABSTRACT The Uses of Literature: Gilles Deleuze’s American Rhizome by Michelle Renae Koerner The Graduate Program in Literature Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Kenneth Surin, Co-Chair ___________________________ Priscilla Wald, Co-Chair ___________________________ Wahneema Lubiano ___________________________ Frederick Moten ___________________________ Michael Hardt An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in Literature in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 Copyright by Michelle Renae Koerner 2010 Abstract “The Uses of Literature: Gilles Deleuze’s American Rhizome” puts four writers – Walt Whitman, Herman Melville, George Jackson and William S. Burroughs – in conjunction with four concepts – becoming-democratic, belief in the world, the line of flight, and finally, control societies. The aim of this
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Invention in Sartre and Foucault: Courage, Freedom, Transformation
    © Dr. Kimberly S. Engels ISSN: 1832-5203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v27i27.5893 Foucault Studies, No. 27, 96-116, December 2019 ARTICLE Ethical Invention in Sartre and Foucault: Courage, Freedom, Transformation DR. KIMBERLY S. ENGELS Molloy College, USA ABSTRACT. This article explores the concept of ethical invention in both Jean-Paul Sartre’s and Michel Foucault’s later lectures and interviews, showing that a courageous disposition to invent or transform plays a key role in both thinkers’ visions of ethics. Three of Sartre’s post-Critique of Dialectical Reason lectures on ethics are examined: Morality and History, The Rome Lecture, and A Plea for Intellectuals. It is shown that ethical invention for Sartre requires the use of our freedom to transcend our current circumstances, a willingness to break away from harmful ideologies, and directing our free praxis towards the goal of universal humanism. Examining several of Foucault’s interviews alongside his lecture series The Government of Self and Others and The Courage of Truth, it is shown that ethical invention for Foucault requires a rejection of necessities or inevitabilities in our current landscape, a willingness to reshape our current beliefs, and a philosophical way of life that results in an alteration of the relationship to self and others. For both thinkers, ethical inven- tion should be preceded by a critical reflection on ourselves in our historical moment. Both argue that ethical invention requires a rejection of the inherent value of our world and realization that the conditions of possibility for being subjects are malleable. Last, it is shown that both philoso- phers specifically call philosophers or intellectuals to invent.
    [Show full text]
  • Foucault's Subjectivity and Confucian Cultivation Wei Guan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 10-27-2017 Education as a Moral Responsibility: Foucault's Subjectivity and Confucian Cultivation Wei Guan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons Recommended Citation Guan, Wei, "Education as a Moral Responsibility: Foucault's Subjectivity and Confucian Cultivation" (2017). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4121. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4121 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EDUCATION AS A MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: FOUCAULT’S SUBJECTIVITY AND CONFUCIAN CULTIVATION A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Educational Theory, Policy & Practice by Wei Guan B.S., Northwestern Architecture Engineering Institution, Xi’an, China, 1996 M.A., The University of Iowa, 2005 December 2017 To Awen !ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first person I want to thank is my advisor, Dr. Petra Munro Hendry. She supported me from the beginning, when I started my Ph.D. in the Curriculum Theory program at Louisiana State University. Recognized for her significant lifetime achievements in Washington DC at the AERA Conference in 2016, Dr. Hendry is revered as an impactful leader in curriculum studies.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is an Intellectual? Gary Hall
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 6:22 a.m. Surfaces Answering the Question: What is an Intellectual? Gary Hall DISCUSSIONS DU PREMIER CONGRÈS INTERNATIONAL SUR LE DISCOURS HUMANISTE DISCUSSIONS FROM THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANISTIC DISCOURSE Volume 6, 1996 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1064857ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1064857ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal ISSN 1188-2492 (print) 1200-5320 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Hall, G. (1996). Answering the Question: What is an Intellectual? Surfaces, 6. https://doi.org/10.7202/1064857ar Copyright © Gary Hall, 1996 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Surfaces Answering the Question: What is an Intellectual Gary Hall University of Teesside School of Law, Humanities & International Studies Surfaces Vol. VI. 212 (v.1.0A - 22/12/1996) - ISSN: 1188-2492 Copyright for texts published in Surfaces remains the property of authors. However, any further publication should be accompanied by an acknowledgement of Surfaces as the place of initial publication. intellectual... a person possessing or supposed to possess superior powers of intellect. OED '...after '68 people were saying that nobody could speak for anybody else; expression was not something that could be monopolized.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, Human Nature: Justice Vs
    Asger Sørensen 2013 ISSN: 1832-5203 Foucault Studies, No. 16, pp. 201-207, September 2013 REVIEW Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, Human Nature: Justice vs Power. The Chomsky- Foucault Debate, edited by Fons Elders (London: Souvenir Press, 2011), ISBN: 978-1-595- 58134-1 This small booklet is a transcript (and in the case of Foucault, a translation) of what was said in a Dutch television program recorded in 1971, today allegedly accessible at You Tube. The edi- tor Fons Elders is the original organizer of the program. He was thus part of the conversation just as the audience was allowed to pose a few questions. Elders first published these tran- scripts in 1974 under the title Reflexive Waters: The Basic Concerns of Mankind, and first one could thus ask: Is it worth publishing them again? Yes, definitely. Does it reveal anything fundamentally new and surprising about Foucault or Chomsky? No, not really, but the con- frontation between them brings forth certain traits of their respective ways of thinking that may be worth a little extra scrutiny. The text consists of Elders’ introduction (iii-ix) and the transcript, which has two main parts. The first part of the conversation is about the question of human nature, knowledge, and science (1-42), the second is on politics (42-82), and it is es- pecially the second part I find interesting, both in relation to Foucault and in more general philosophical terms. I will thus focus on two points, namely how they relate to politics, and which implication this has for their relation to anarchism.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University Dissertation Template
    Beautiful Annoyance: Reading the Subject by Margaret A. Ozierski Department of Romance Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Hardt, Supervisor ___________________________ Fredric Jameson ___________________________ David Bell ___________________________ Françoise Gaillard, External Member Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Romance Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 iv ABSTRACT Beautiful Annoyance: Reading the Subject by Margaret A. Ozierski Department of Romance Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Hardt, Supervisor ___________________________ Fredric Jameson ___________________________ David Bell ___________________________ Françoise Gaillard, External Member An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Romance Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Margaret Alice Ozierski 2011 Abstract This dissertation examines the pair subject-subjectivity embedded in the problematic of the end of art, as it is figured in exemplary fashion by film and literature. The analysis examines critically the problem of the subject vis-à-vis subjectivity by opening a dialogue that allows the necessary double terms of this discussion to emerge in the first place from the encounter with selected filmic and
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Anthology of Western Philosophy: After Kant Table of Contents
    NORTON ANTHOLOGY OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY: AFTER KANT TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1: The Interpretive Tradition Preface Acknowledgments GENERAL INTRODUCTION PROLOGUE Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) "What is Enlightenment?" (Translated by Lewis White Beck) From Critique of Pure Reason, Preface (Translated by Norman Kemp Smith) From Critique of Practical Reason, Conclusion (Translated by Lewis White Beck) I. IDEALISMS: SPIRITUALITY AND REALITY Introduction Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805) From On the Aesthetic Education of Man Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814) From Science of Knowledge (Translated by Peter Heath and John Lachs) From Vocation of Man (Translated by William Smith) Friedrich Schelling (1775–1854) From Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature (Translated by Errol E. Harris and Peter Heath) From Of Human Freedom (Translated by James Gutmann) Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831) Introductions On Philosophy: From The Encyclopedia of Philosophical [Wissenschaften] (Translated by William Wallace) On Philosophy and “Phenomenology”: From Phenomenology of [Geist] (Translated by J. B. Baillie) On Philosophical “Logic”: From The [Wissenschaft] of Logic (Encyclopedia, part 1) (Translated by William Wallace) On Nature: From Philosophy of Nature (Encyclopedia, part 2) (Translated by A. V. Miller) On the History of Philosophy: From Lectures on the History of Philosophy (Translated by E. S. Haldane) On History and Geist: From Lectures on the Philosophy of History (Translated by J. Sibree) On Geist: From Philosophy of [Geist] (Encyclopedia, part 3) (Translated by William Wallace and A. V. Miller) Subjective Geist 2 On Subjective (and Intersubjective) Geist: From Philosophy of [Geist] (Translated by William Wallace and A. V. Miller) On Consciousness and Self-Consciousness: From Phenomenology of [Geist] (Translated by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Foucault and Judith Butler: Troubling Butler’S Appropriation of Foucault’S Work
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/1965 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Michel Foucault and Judith Butler: Troubling Butler’s Appropriation of Foucault’s Work by Kathleen Ennis A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of Warwick, Department of Philosophy July 2008 Contents Acknowledgements iv Declaration v Abstract vi Note on the Translation of Key Terms in Foucault‘s Work vii Introduction 1 Interpreting Butler‘s Work 7 Power-Knowledge, Discourse and Norms 10 Interpreting Foucault‘s Work 15 1 Butler: Power and Genealogy 23 Foucault, Hegel and Nietzsche 25 Foucault and Psychoanalysis 34 Genealogy and the Naturalization of Sex 41 Subjugated Knowledges, Genealogy and Discourse 50 2 Butler: Performativity and Psychoanalysis 63 From Inscription to Performativity 66 Power, Interpellation, Resistance and Hate Speech 77 A Psychoanalytic Critique of Foucault 86 Repression, Subject and Psyche 98 3 Discursive Practice and Archaeological Method: The Archaeology of Knowledge
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Collections at the University of the Arts
    The UniversiT y of The ArTs Non Profit Org 320 South Broad Street US Postage Philadelphia, PA 19102 PAID www.UArts.edu Philadelphia, PA Permit No. 1103 THE MAGAZINE OF The UniversiT y of The ArTs edg e THE edge MAGAZINE OF T he U niver si T y of T he A r T s WINTER WINTER 2013 2013 NO . 9 Edge9_Cover_FINAL.crw4.indd 1 1/22/13 12:50 PM THE from PRESIDENT A decade has passed since the publication In this issue of Edge, we examine the book’s of Richard Florida’s international bestseller theses and arguments a decade on, and The Rise of the Creative Class. This 10-year speak with a range of experts both on and of anniversary provides an opportunity to ex- the creative class, including Richard Florida amine the impact of that seminal work and himself. I think you will find their insights the accuracy of its predictions, some of them and perspectives quite interesting. bold. The book’s subtitle—“...And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, Following on the theme of the power of and Everyday Life”—speaks to the profes- creatives, we also look at the creative econ- sor and urban-studies specialist’s vision of omy of the Philadelphia region and the far- the impact this creative sector can exert on reaching impact that University of the Arts virtually all aspects of our lives. alumni and faculty have on it. You will also find features on UArts students, alumni and Since its 2002 release, many of the ap- faculty who are forging innovative entrepre- proaches to urban regeneration proposed neurial paths of their own.
    [Show full text]