The Japanese "Kokutai" (National Community) History and Myth Author(S): Joseph M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Japanese "Kokutai" (National Community) History and Myth Author(s): Joseph M. Kitagawa Source: History of Religions, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Feb., 1974), pp. 209-226 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1061814 Accessed: 22-07-2018 20:54 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1061814?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to History of Religions This content downloaded from 206.224.223.250 on Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:54:59 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Joseph M. Kitagawa THE JAPANESE KOKU TAI (NATIONAL COMMUNITY) HISTORY AND MYTH It has often been asserted by students of Japanese religion, cul- ture, and history that the Japanese have a unique sense of signif- icance regarding their National Community which is variously expressed as national character, national essence, national sub- stance, state structure, national polity, or kokutai, which literally means "national body." According to a Shinto scholar, Professor Motohiko Anzu: "If you regard a State as a form or container the contents that fill this form or container is the reality of a state, that is the kokutai." Anzu goes on to say that the reality of the Japanese nation is characterized by an imperial reign. In short, to him, kokutai means an emperor state.' This view has not been confined only to Shintoists. Throughout history, many Buddhists and Confucianists in Japan have asserted the uniqueness of the Japanese National Community.2 In the modern period, many Japanese Christians have echoed a similar view. It may very well be that every national group on every continent has a special sense of its national identity; in that sense there is nothing really unique 1 Proceedings: The Second International Conference for Shinto Studies (Tokyo: Kokugakuin University, 1968), p. 64. 2 See Hajime Nakamura, Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples: India-China- Tibet-Japan, rev. English trans. ed. Philip P. Wiener (Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1964), pp. 434-49. 209 This content downloaded from 206.224.223.250 on Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:54:59 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Japanese Kokutai about the Japanese. Nevertheless, I share Professor William Theodore de Bary's observation that "if there is anything distinc- tive about the Japanese in this respect, it is not that they have some such identity but that they are so self-conscious about it."3 My own concern is, however, not to discuss the extensiveness of this so-called uniqueness of the Japanese National Community, but rather how should a historian of religions deal with the phe- nomenon of "National Community" in which the sociopolitical dimension of religion and the religious dimension of sociopolitical order are inseparably interfused. I would like to reexamine how and from what perspective a historian of religions should go about the task of reconstructing the historic processes which resulted in the development of the National Community during the prehis- toric period of Japan. More concretely, I would ask whether some sort of a model for the National Community had been given in myths, as many historians of religions are inclined to hold, or if those myths themselves reflect the prehistoric and historic expe- rience of the people in Japan. While I do not claim to solve the complex riddle involved in the relationship between the "para- digm" and "history," I hope to clarify some of the issues involved in the early development of the Japanese National Community. I have chosen the "National Community" as the central issue in the attempt to understand the nature and history of Japanese religion because it incorporates all the major thrusts of individual and corporate orientation of the Japanese people to a sacral order of reality: the characteristic Japanese understanding of sacred space, sacred time and history, and sacred community, embodied in myths, symbols, and rituals. In this connection, it may be worthwhile recalling van der Leeuw's statement on community: '"Community' is not 'covenant.' Since the Age of Enlightenment there has operated the tendency to depict a community as a soci- ety: the church as a religious society based on confession or creed, the state as a secular society resting on a contrat social. But 'com- munity' is something not manufactured, but given; it depends not upon sentiment or feeling, but on the Unconscious. It need be founded on no conviction, since it is self-evident; we do not be- come members of it, but 'belong to it.' "4 I am persuaded that the Japanese National Community must be understood in van der Leeuw's sense of community. (How it developed is a difficult his- 3 Proceedings: The Second International Conference for Shinto Studies, p. 86. 4 G. van der Leeuw, Religion in Essence and Manifestation, trans. J. E. Turner (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1938), p. 243. 210 This content downloaded from 206.224.223.250 on Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:54:59 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms History of Religions torical question, which I will touch upon presently. It must be readily admitted that the external forms of sociopolitical order, which sustained the National Community, have undergone many changes, as I will also briefly discuss presently.) People in Japan throughout the ages took it for granted that they belonged, not only to the family and other kinship and regional communities, but more basically to one invisible National Community (with a capital C), however nebulous it might have appeared at times. Let me now turn to some of the major scholarly problems which con- front a student of the History of Religions in reference to the meaning and development of the Japanese National Community. PREHISTORIC BACKGROUND The first, and probably the most difficult and most fascinating, problem area of our study is the prehistoric period of Japan. On this subject scholarly opinions vary widely among prehistorians, archaeologists, ethnologists, linguists, and historians of religions. While there is no definitive theory about the chronological devel- opment of Japan's prehistory, it is more or less safe to assume that the earliest prehistoric "culture" may be traced to approximately 3000 B.C. when the mesolithic peoples of the Asian continent were driven to the Japanese archipelago as a result of the eastward migration of neolithic peoples of Europe.5 In dealing with the prehistoric development of mythology, reli- gion, language, and social organization, Professor Masao Oka has proposed a most audacious culture-complex hypothesis. According to him, the prehistoric and early historic Japanese culture, people, and religion were a synthesis of five major components, namely, those of (i) Melanesian origin; (ii) an Austroasian group from some- where in south China; (iii) a northeast Asian group, possibly of Tungusic origin; (iv) a southeast Asian group, probably of Micro- nesian origin; and (v) an Altaic-speaking, pastoral tribe that sub- jugated other tribes in southern Manchuria and Korea around the beginning of the Christian era and arrived at the western part of Japan in the third or fourth century. The last mentioned, the Altaic group, according to Oka, had a superb military organiza- tion and established itself as the ruling class-presumably the an- cestors of the imperial clan-over other groups which settled earlier. It was, however, converted to the agricultural culture of the conquered people.6 While Oka's hypothesis leaves many knotty 5 See my "Prehistoric Background of Japanese Religion," History of Religions 2, no. 2 (Winter 1963): 292-328, for major works on Japan's prehistory. 6 See ibid., pp. 308-10, for a brief summary of Oka's hypothesis. 211 This content downloaded from 206.224.223.250 on Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:54:59 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Japanese Kokutai problems unresolved, it takes into account some of the major fea- tures related to early Japanese religion, such as mythologies, cos- mologies, and sacred geographies; typologies of kami (deities and spirits) and an analysis of the pantheon; a plausible explanation of the transmission of Central Asiatic, Austroasian, and other types of symbols to Japan; the development of the clan (uji) system and occupational groups; the clan-centered religious pattern; the unique features of shrines and shamanic diviners, etc. These fea- tures, it should be noted, provide important ingredients to the subsequent development of the Japanese religion which in the historic period came to be known as Shinto. Understandably, Oka's grandiose hypothesis has been criti- cized and challenged by other scholars who propose various modi- fications and alternative conjectures. From our point of view, however, it is important to note that all these critics and scholars who hold diverse opinions agree on one essential point, that is, by the later phase of the prehistoric period those who inhabited the Japanese islands seem to have attained a degree of self-conscious- ness as one people. It was this consciousness which became the basis for the National Community under the leadership of the im- perial clan in the early historic period.