DOCSLIB.ORG

(CE: 1679A-1681A) MOSES of ABYDOS (Feast Day: 25 Abib), Fifth-Sixth-Century Monk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(CE: 1679A-1681A) MOSES of ABYDOS (Feast Day: 25 Abib), Fifth-Sixth-Century Monk (CE: 1679a-1681a) MOSES OF ABYDOS (feast day: 25 Abib), fifth-sixth-century monk. The SYNAXARION of the Copts and the Synaxarion of the Ethiopians give no information about Moses of Abydos, but only allude to him in the brief commemoration of MACROBIUS, "the son of Abu Musa, head of the monastery of al-Balyana," for 7 Baramudah. No Arabic manuscript of his life has been accounted for. At the White Monastery (DAYR ANBA SHINUDAH), however, he was celebrated on 25 Abib, as the typika testify: "Moses, archimandrite of Ebot [Abydos/Afud]," and fragments have been preserved of three codices containing his life and no doubt an encomium (Campagnano, 1978, pp. 227-30). A certain number of these leaves were published by E. Amélineau (1886-1888, pp. 680- 706), W. Till (1935-1936, Vol. 2, pp. 48-60), and H. Munier (1916, pp. 53-54). Eighteen others are unpublished. These fragments correspond roughly to half the original work. Two other sources give some information: the Life of his disciple Macrobius, founder of a community to the south of Asyut (Lycopolis), preserved in a Coptic fragment (Museum of Antiquities, Leiden, MS 30) and an Arabic version (two manuscripts indexed), and that of ABRAHAM OF FARSHUT, archimandrite of Pbow, deposed by JUSTINIAN. According to the author of the Life of Moses, SHENUTE is reported to have announced shortly before his death the birth of Moses at Abydos. The latter would put an end to the pagan sacrifices and destroy the temples, which Shenute had been unable to do. This would place the birth of Moses in the second half of the fifth century. His parents, Christians, were called Andrew and Tshinoute. Before the birth of Moses, they had three sons, Paul, Joseph, and Elias, and two daughters, Mary and Theodota. Impressed by the stature of the prophet Moses, they made a vow to God to consecrate to him the son whom he should give them, and call him Moses, which shortly after came about. The priest of the village, Theophanes, had a vision at the moment of immersing the child in the baptistery: he saw a dove on his head, and then a hand of light on his mouth when he gave him communion. At the age of five, Moses was offered to the church by his parents and entrusted to the priest. He learned by heart the four Gospels, which one day he recited to an astonished bishop, who in a vision the following night saw the child clothed in the monastic schema and surrounded by a multitude of monks. The beginnings of the monastic life of Moses are missing in the fragments we possess. Thus it is not known where or by whom he was initiated. We learn, however, that he persuaded his three elder brothers Paul, Joseph, and Elias, his younger brother Andrew, and his nephew Abraham to become monks with him. Some people of the neighborhood laid a trap for them, but Joseph learned of it and warned his brothers. Later Moses by his prayer provoked the destruction of the temple of Apollo (? Horus) at Abydos. Thirty pagan priests were overwhelmed, and other temples collapsed. The monastery established by Moses appears to have been near a place called Pehke. Overwhelmed by the crowds attracted by his cures, Moses preferred to depart into the mountains toward the south, but a heavenly voice commanded him to return to Pehke. So Moses and his followers returned toward the north. An angel stopped them a mile from Pehke and traced for Moses the site of the monastery enclosure. They were helped in the construction of the monastery by Serenes, the steward of a patrician named Komete. They dug two wells and built several "houses," one called "the house of Apa Moses" and another that "of the calligraphers," later a third called that of Apa Elias, and a fourth of Apa Andrew. This information about houses suggests that Moses founded a community of the Pachomian type. The text speaks of a journey by the patrician Komete to Constantinople, where he praised Moses and his monks to the emperor and his court and obtained for the monastery at Abydos annual revenues of wheat, no doubt part of the embole, an imperial gift attested by papyri for the monastery of the METANOIA. This event must be placed in 518 before the death of Anastasius, who was favorable to the anti-Chalcedonians. The Life indicates that Moses prophesied the interview with the emperor at Constantinople of Anthimus, Severus, and THEODOSIUS, archbishops respectively of Constantinople, Antioch, and Alexandria. By their discourse "God brought back the heart of the emperor to the orthodox faith." This meeting is attested by the historians and must be placed at the end of the summer of 535. The emperor of whom the life of Moses speaks is Justinian, but contrary to what the Coptic text says, Severus had to return to exile in Egypt, Anthimus was deposed by Pope Agapetus and banished, and Theodosius was driven out of Alexandria in 538. The story also relates various miracles of Moses, and several prophecies. He drove out a demon that lived in the temple of Bes, north of the monastery, which may correspond to the temple of Osiris, and he smote the people with various infirmities. Moses took seven brothers with him and spent the night in the temple to strive against the demons, whom he succeeded in driving out. The author speaks also of numerous conversions, and of the construction by Apa Reuben of a church for the nuns dedicated to Mary which presupposes a community of women under the direction of Moses. Here the biographer of Moses places the visit of the patriarch SEVERUS at a place named Pkorks. Also mentioned in the life of Macrobrius, Moses and three brothers came to welcome him there. The patriarch of Antioch stayed ten days at the monastery. Probably this visit by Severus must have taken place at the beginning of his exile in Egypt, starting in September 518. After his journey to Constantinople in 535, Severus lived at Xois (Sakha), where he died on 8 February 538. However, the Panegyric of Saint Claudius, attributed to Severus of Antioch, says that he stayed in the monastery of Abydos with Theodosius, patriarch of Alexandria (elected in 535), pursued by Justinian's police. The Life of Moses speaks also of a patrician who wished to please the emperor and joined the partisans of the COUNCIL OF CHALCEDON. He received the command of the Thebaid, which presupposes an emperor of Byzantium favorable to the Chalcedonians, no doubt Justin or Justinian; but this patrician later lost all his goods and was reduced to beggary. The author, to show the saint's gift of prophecy, mentions also the announcement by Moses of a raid by the Blemmyes as far as Antinoopolis, through the interior of the desert. In a vision, Moses is warned that he will soon die and will have to leave the direction of his community to his brother Paul. On 7 Abib, the day of the feast of Shenute, Moses is warned that death is near. On the 10th he falls ill, and on the 25th, in the morning, he assembles his disciples, entrusts them to his brother Paul, and dies at the third hour of the day, a Friday. He is buried at the tenth hour near the tomb of Apa Sabinos, according to his wish. The Life then relates some miracles wrought at his tomb. The Life of ABRAHAM OF FARSHUT reports that the latter, archimandrite of Pbow, was driven out by Justinian (527-565) at the beginning of his reign because when summoned to Constantinople, he refused to adhere to the definitions of Chalcedon. Thereafter he lived first at Atripe, in the monastery of Shenute, where he copied the latter's rules and had them taken in sealed vessels to the monastery of Apa Moses, then at Farshut, where he founded a monastery for men and another for women. The formula "monastery of Apa Moses" very probably relates to that at Abydos, and it seems indeed that at that time Moses was already dead. Did Moses of Abydos found a community of the Pachomian type? His Life does not speak of any relations with Pbow. Some indications, however, allow us to answer in the affirmative. The mention of different "houses," so characteristic of the Pachomian monastery, in the monastery at Abydos is remarkable. The author's care to have the birth of Moses announced by Shenute, and the quotations from Shenute that Moses makes in his letters (see below) should also be noted. The same is true of the links between Abraham of Farshut and the monastery of Apa Moses. The silence on life in regard to Pbow, the motherhouse of the Pachomian congregation, may be explained by the presence of Chalcedonians, of whom Moses must have disapproved. On the other hand, there is no indication in the life that hermits living in the neighborhood of Abydos were under the direction of Moses, as described in the life of his disciple Macrobius. But archaeology offers some additional information. There is at Abydos a Dayr Abu Musa to the west of the temple of Osiris and the ruins of another monastery called DAYR ANBA BAKHUM, according to C. Sicard; but Dayr al-Rum, according to G. Lefebvre (1911, pp. 239- 40), are to the south of the temple of Seti I (Strabo's Memnonium). Coptic inscriptions with invocations to Apa Moses show that a community of women lived in this temple. Hermitages were also fitted up in the tombs of the pharaonic necropolis to the south of the temples, but we cannot say whether these hermits were dependent on Moses' monastery.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abd-Hadad, Priest-King, Abila, , , , Abydos, , Actium, Battle
    INDEX Abd-Hadad, priest-king, Akkaron/Ekron, , Abila, , , , Akko, Ake, , , , Abydos, , see also Ptolemaic-Ake Actium, battle, , Alexander III the Great, Macedonian Adaios, ruler of Kypsela, king, –, , , Adakhalamani, Nubian king, and Syria, –, –, , , , Adulis, , –, Aegean Sea, , , , , , –, and Egypt, , , –, , –, – empire of, , , , , , –, legacy of, – –, –, , , death, burial, – Aemilius Paullus, L., cult of, , , Aeropos, Ptolemaic commander, Alexander IV, , , Alexander I Balas, Seleukid king, Afrin, river, , , –, – Agathokleia, mistress of Ptolemy IV, and eastern policy, , and Demetrios II, Agathokles of Syracuse, , –, and Seventh Syrian War, –, , , Agathokles, son of Lysimachos, – death, , , , Alexander II Zabeinas, , , Agathokles, adviser of Ptolemy IV, –, , , –, Alexander Iannai, Judaean king, Aigai, Macedon, , – Ainos, Thrace, , , , Alexander, son of Krateros, , Aitolian League, Aitolians, , , Alexander, satrap of Persis, , , –, , , – Alexandria-by-Egypt, , , , , , , , , , , , , Aitos, son of Apollonios, , , –, , , Akhaian League, , , , , , , –, , , , , , , , , , , , , , Akhaios, son of Seleukos I, , , –, –, , – , , , , , , –, , , , Akhaios, son of Andromachos, , and Sixth Syrian War, –, adviser of Antiochos III, , – Alexandreia Troas, , conquers Asia Minor, – Alexandros, son of Andromachos, king, –, , , –, , , –, , , Alketas, , , Amanus, mountains, , –, index Amathos, Cyprus, and battle of Andros, , , Amathos, transjordan, , Amestris, wife of Lysimachos, , death, Ammonias, Egypt,
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Image of Justinianic Orthopraxy in Eastern Monastic Literature
    The Image of Justinianic Orthopraxy in Eastern Monastic Literature 2 From 535 to 546, the emperor Justinian issued a series of imperial constitutions which sought to regulate the activities of monks and monasteries. Unprecedented in its scope, this legislative programme marked an attempt by the emperor to bring ascetics firmly under the purview of his government. Taken together, its rulings legislated on virtually every aspect of the ascetic life, prescribing a detailed model of ‘orthopraxy,’ or correct behaviour, to which the emperor demanded monks adhere. However, whilst it is clichéd to evoke Justinian’s status as a reformer of the law, scholars continue to view these orthopraxic rulings with some uncertainty. This is a reflection, in part, of the difficulties faced when attempting to judge the extent to which they were ever adopted or enforced. Studies of the emperor’s divisive religious policies have tended to focus instead upon matters of doctrine and, in particular, Justinian’s efforts to enforce his view of orthodoxy upon anti-Chalcedonian, monastic dissidents. This paper builds upon recent work to argue that the effects of Justinian’s monastic legislation were, in fact, widely felt.1 It will argue that accounts of the mid-sixth century by Eastern monastic authors reveal widespread familiarity with the rulings on ascetic practice contained in the emperor’s Novels. Their reception reveals the extent of imperial power over ascetics during this period, frequently presented as one in which the ‘holy man’ exercised almost boundless social and spiritual authority. I will concentrate on three main examples to illustrate this point, chosen to represent a suitable cross-section of the contemporary monastic movement: Cyril of Scythopolis’ Life of Sabas, the Life of Z‘ura in the Lives of the Eastern Saints by John of Ephesus, and the Coptic texts which detail the career of the Egyptian monastic leader, Abraham of Farshut.2 ORTHOPRAXY IN JUSTINIAN’S MONASTIC LEGISLATION Firstly, however, we must discuss Justinian’s monastic laws in greater detail.
    [Show full text]
  • C. 600) Texts and Contexts*
    A CIRCLE OF EGYPTIAN BISHOPS AT THE END OF ROMAN RULE (C. 600) Texts and Contexts* 1. Introduction It is perhaps not unfair to suggest that such persons as John of Paralos, Constantine of Assiut, and John of Hermopolis are far from well-known to late antique historians1. But each of these persons belongs to a wider episcopal circle which is witnessed in a striking range of extant media: in manuscripts, in documents, and even in some artefacts. The mem- bers of that circle all operated during the tenure of the Severan Damian of Alexandria (577-c. 606)2, of whom Damian’s extant biography, as now contained in the History of the Patriarchs of Alexandria, states the following: There were in his [Damian’s] epoch some people of miracle, bishops, who were admired because of their pureness and holiness. Among them [was] John of Burlus and John his pupil. And Constantine the Bishop [of Assiut] and John the blessed Enkleistos [of Hermopolis], and others with him who were taking care of the vineyard of the Lord of Sabaoth3. * I would like to thank Marek Jankowiak and Elisabeth O’Connell for their comments, and Johannes den Heijer and Perrine Pilette for their corrections to the text, and expertise on the History of the Patriarchs of Alexandria. 1 Note that I do not attempt to be consistent between Greek and Coptic toponyms when attached to different bishops, but offer the name which is most embedded in modern scholarship e.g. Constantine of Assiut rather than Constantine of Lykopolis, but Abraham of Hermonthis rather than Abraham of Ermant.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterway of Hellespont and Bosporus: the Origin of the Names and Early Greek Haplology
    The Waterway of Hellespont and Bosporus: the Origin of the Names and Early Greek Haplology Dedicated to Henry and Renee Kahane* DEMETRIUS J. GEORGACAS ABBREVIATIONS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. A few abbreviations are listed: AJA = American Journal of Archaeology. AJP = American Journal of Philology (The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Md.). BB = Bezzenbergers Beitriige zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen. BNF = Beitriige zur Namenforschung (Heidelberg). OGL = Oorpus Glossariorum Latinorum, ed. G. Goetz. 7 vols. Lipsiae, 1888-1903. Chantraine, Dict. etym. = P. Chantraine, Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. 2 vols: A-K. Paris, 1968, 1970. Eberts RLV = M. Ebert (ed.), Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte. 16 vols. Berlin, 1924-32. EBr = Encyclopaedia Britannica. 30 vols. Chicago, 1970. EEBE = 'E:rccr'YJel~ t:ET:ateeta~ Bv~avnvwv E:rcovowv (Athens). EEC/JE = 'E:rcuJT'YJfhOVtUn ' E:rccrrJel~ C/JtAOaocptufj~ EXOAfj~ EIsl = The Encyclopaedia of Islam (Leiden and London) 1 (1960)-. Frisk, GEJV = H. Frisk, Griechisches etymologisches Worterbuch. 2 vols. Heidelberg, 1954 to 1970. GEL = Liddell-Scott-Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford, 1925-40. A Supplement, 1968. GaM = Geographi Graeci Minores, ed. C. Miiller. GLM = Geographi Latini Minores, ed. A. Riese. GR = Geographical Review (New York). GZ = Geographische Zeitschrift (Berlin). IF = Indogermanische Forschungen (Berlin). 10 = Inscriptiones Graecae (Berlin). LB = Linguistique Balkanique (Sofia). * A summary of this paper was read at the meeting of the Linguistic Circle of Manitoba and North Dakota on 24 October 1970. My thanks go to Prof. Edmund Berry of the Univ. of Manitoba for reading a draft of the present study and for stylistic and other suggestions, and to the Editor of Names, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Caravanserai, Trade Routes, and Dark Mothers" (2016)
    Digital Commons @ CIIS Re-Genesis Encyclopedia 2016 CARAVANSERAI, TRADEO R UTES, AND DARK MOTHERS Eahr Joan CIIS, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/regenesis Part of the African History Commons, Cultural History Commons, History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Joan, Eahr, "CARAVANSERAI, TRADE ROUTES, AND DARK MOTHERS" (2016). Re-Genesis Encyclopedia. Paper 2. http://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/regenesis/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ CIIS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Re-Genesis Encyclopedia by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CIIS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 25,000 CARAVANSERAI, TRADE ROUTES, AND DARK MOTHERS Caravanserai. With the expansion of the Caravanserai, was the spread of black madonna temples, African rites and rituals, and dark goddesses. (RGS.) Dark Mothers. The veneration of the dark mothers began to spread throughout all continents following the african intercontinental dispersions including anatolian trade routes. (AO: 1-2.) The caravanserai (or Turkish kervansaray) was a roadside area, structure or inn for pilgrims, traveling tradespeople, and their animals providing lodging, substance, trade and marketing opportunities. In addition to providing food and temporary lodgings, many caravanserais also included a black madonna temple, shrine room, holy of holies, sacred cave or adjacent rock shelter. Tethered to the advancement of the caravanserai, was also the spread of African rites and rituals, black madonna temples, and dark goddesses. This was especially apparent with the Phoenicians. * Devotion to the great goddess of the Levant was prolonged by the Phoenicians who lived along the Syro-Lebanese coast in the first millennium BC and were great seafarers and traders.
    [Show full text]
  • Ewa Wipszycka Resources and Economic Activities of the Egyptian Monastic Communities (4Th-8Th Century)
    Ewa Wipszycka Resources and economic activities of the Egyptian monastic communities (4th-8th century) The Journal of Juristic Papyrology 41, 159-263 2011 159_263 Wipszycka po kor_OK_105 str.qct:009-020 DERDA 8/28/12 9:44 PM Page 159 The Journal of Juristic Papyrology vol. xli (2011), pp. 159–263 Ewa Wipszycka RESOURCES AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES OF THE EGYPTIAN MONASTIC COMMUNITIES (4TH–8TH CENTURY)* his is not my first article with terms ‘monastic communities’ and 1 T‘economy’ in the title. Therefore, I should begin with an explanation of the scope of this text to give the reader an idea of its content. It focus- es on aspects of monastic economy that I have not yet discussed in detail. Lengthy passages concern the baking of bread in monasteries and her- mitages, as well as pottery production. I devoted a lot of space to the sub- * Abbreviations: The apophthegms in alphabetical order (those of the so-called Alphabetikon or Geron- tikon) are cited as follows: after the name of the monk to which the tradition attributes the given apophthegm I give two numbers: the first one is the number in the group of apophthegms in which that monk is the central figure and the second one (in paren theses) is the number of the apophthegm in the whole collection (e.g. Antony 1[1]). Edition of the alphabetical collection: J. B. Cotelerius (1677), reprint in Patrologia Graeca 65 (71–440); English translation I used: Benedicta Ward, The Sayings of the Desert Fathers. The Alphabet- ical Collection, Kalamazoo 1975. o B - Vita Bohairica – edition: L.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen J. Davis Curriculum Vitae, P
    Stephen J. Davis curriculum vitae, p. 1 STEPHEN J. DAVIS Yale University Yale University Pierson College Department of Religious Studies 261 Park Street 451 College Street New Haven, CT 06511 New Haven, CT 06511 Phone: 203-432-1298 Email: [email protected] Fax: 203-432-7844 EDUCATION: Yale University -- M.A. (1993), M.Phil. (1995), Ph.D. (1998), Religious Studies (Ancient Christianity) Dissertation: “The Cult of Saint Thecla, Apostle and Protomartyr: A Tradition of Women’s Piety in Late Antiquity” Duke University, The Divinity School -- M.Div., summa cum laude (1992) Princeton University -- A.B., English Literature (and Hellenic Studies), cum laude (1988) Senior Thesis: “Visions of History: The Poetry of W. B. Yeats and C. P. Cavafy” EMPLOYMENT HISTORY/TEACHING EXPERIENCE: Professor of Religious Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT (2008– ) Affiliate faculty member in the Departments of History and Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, the Councils on Archaeological Studies and Middle East Studies, and the Programs in Humanities, Hellenic Studies, and Medieval Studies. Senior Research Fellow at the MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies. Associate Professor of Religious Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT (2005–08) Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT (2002–05) Professor of New Testament and Early Church History, Evangelical Theological Seminary in Cairo (ETSC), Cairo, Egypt (1998–2002, visiting spring 2005). ETSC is the official Arabic-language seminary of the Coptic Evangelical
    [Show full text]
  • 3161522761 Lp.Pdf
    Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum Studies and Texts in Antiquity and Christianity Herausgeber/Editors Christoph Markschies (Berlin) · Martin Wallraff (Basel) Christian Wildberg (Princeton) Beirat/Advisory Board Peter Brown (Princeton) · Susanna Elm (Berkeley) Johannes Hahn (Münster) · Emanuela Prinzivalli (Rom) Jörg Rüpke (Erfurt) 69 James E. Goehring Politics, Monasticism, and Miracles in Sixth Century Upper Egypt A Critical Edition and Translation of the Coptic Texts on Abraham of Farshut Mohr Siebeck James E. Goehring, born 1950; 1968 BA from UC Berkeley; 1972 MA from UC Santa Barbara; 1981 PhD in Early Christian Studies from Claremont University; currently Professor of Religion at the University of Mary Washington in Fredericksburg, Virginia. e-ISBN PDF 978-3-16-152276-5 ISBN 978-3-16-152214-7 ISSN 1436-3003 (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbiblio- graphie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2012 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. www.mohr.de This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Laupp & Göbel in Nehren on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Nädele in Nehren. The Greek and Coptic fonts in this work are available from www.linguistsoftware.com. Printed in Germany. For Linda Preface This volume represents an interest that has spanned my academic career. In 1983, I delivered a paper at the international conference on the Roots of Egyptian Christianity in Claremont, California, entitled “New Frontiers in Pachomian Studies,” in which I explored the nature of the available sources, noting their concentration on the movement’s early history and the relative dearth of information on its later years.
    [Show full text]