DOCSLIB.ORG

Cret American Dip- Bic), a Settlement That Was Con- Lomatic Cables: No Groundbreaking Structed After the Oslo Accords

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cret American Dip- Bic), a Settlement That Was Con- Lomatic Cables: No Groundbreaking Structed After the Oslo Accords COUNTRY REPORT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES Back to square one? FELIX DANE JÖRG KNOCHA THE PUBLICATION OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS BY AL-JAZEERA AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS February 2011 www.kas.de/ramallah The publication of documents related proposals regarding Jerusalem, set- www.kas.de to the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks tlements and refugees. from 1999 until 2010 by the Arabic satellite channel al-Jazeera in January 1. Settlements : Concerning the ques- 2011 seems like a PR disaster for the tion of Jerusalem, the Palestinian ne- entire Palestinian leadership. The ene- gotiators – namely Ahmed Qurei (Abu mies of peace, especially the Islamist Ala) and Saeb Erekat – offered their movement Hamas, see the opportu- Israeli counterparts to give up nearly nity to improve their standing. But are all Jewish settlements in occupied these publications really a catastrophe East Jerusalem. One exception was or rather similar to the WikiLeaks Har Homa (Jabal Abu Ghneim in Ara- documents about secret American dip- bic), a settlement that was con- lomatic cables: No groundbreaking structed after the Oslo Accords. The new insights, but more of polemic- fact that Israel would never give up enhanced evidence of what everyone settlements such as Pisgat, Ze´ev, had suspected anyway? Neve Ya´akov, Ramat Shlomo or Gilo was manifest to Palestinians and in- On January 23, after al-Jazeera had ternational observers alike. This announced to unveil exclusive mate- shows the pragmatism of the Palestin- rial later that day, most Palestinians ian approach. It was in no way a sell did not expect the release of confiden- out of the Palestinian cause, as it was tial documents about Middle East described by al-Jazeera. It did show, peace talks. Over 1600 papers, rang- however, the explicit Palestinian de- ing from September 1999 until Sep- mand for the removal of those settle- tember 2010 and covering hundreds ments that reach deep into the West of meetings between Palestinians, Is- Bank. In addition, the documents raelis and Americans, have found their clearly verify, that the Palestinians in- way to the Gulf state of Qatar, where sist on a 1:1 ratio for any land swap, the headquarters of al-Jazeera is lo- meaning in exchange for settlements cated. The British newspaper Guard- east of the so-called “Green Line”, the ian also published the documents. It Palestinians would receive equal described the material as “biggest amounts of Israeli land. This idea was leak of confidential documents in the already discussed during the Annapo- history of the Middle East conflict.” lis Process 2007/08. Palestinian Presi- dent Mahmoud Abbas offered then Is- What the documents say raeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert a land swap that included roughly two The so-called “Palestine Papers” show percent of the West Bank. There is no fundamentally new concessions also nothing insincere in Saeb Erekat’s from the Palestinian side. Those who proposal to give the Israelis the “big- are following the peace process gest Yerushalayim in Jewish history”, closely already know the Palestinian using the Hebrew name for Jerusalem. 2 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. 2. Old City of Jerusalem : The issue of years. Compared to the numbers of the holy sites within the Old City was the Olmert plan this sounds rather PALESTINIAN one of the topics that then Prime Min- modest but then again anything more TERRITORIES ister of Israel Ehud Barak and former than a symbolic number was never FELIX DANE Palestinian President Yassir Arafat realistic. This again demonstrates the JÖRG KNOCHA could not resolve in 2000. How a pos- willingness of the Palestinian side, sible solution could look like was out- which had to negotiate with a state February 2011 lined only months later in the so- that is considered a military and po- called Clinton-Parameters of then US litically heavy weight. President Bill Clinton: What is Arab should be Palestinian and what is Jew- 4. Security cooperation with Israel : www.kas.de/ramallah ish should be Israeli. The offer from The WikiLeaks publication of classified www.kas.de Saeb Erekat was only a repetition of US State Department documents al- the very same goal. The Muslim, ready mentioned the close partnership Christian and also parts of the Arme- between Israeli and Palestinian secu- nian quarter of the Old City would fall rity services. Only days before Hamas under Palestinian sovereignty, the took control of the Gaza Strip in June Jewish and rest of the Armenian quar- 2007, President Abbas asked Israel ter under Israeli. Regarding the Mus- for help. Yuval Diskin, the chief of the lim Dome of the Rock, which is next Israeli internal intelligence agency, to the Jewish prayer site at the West- was quoted that the Palestinians ern Wall, Erekat proposed a “creative” shared nearly all of their security in- solution. formation with Israel. The documents show that on the eve of the Gaza War 3. Palestinian refugees : The fate of 2008/09 Israel tried to convince the the Palestinian refugees is one of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to cooper- most emotionally charged issues. Dur- ate with them. This implies that the ing the first Arab-Israeli War 1947– Palestinian leadership knew about the 49, hundreds of thousands of Arabs coming war which left 13 Israelis and left their home – either fleeing or be- as many as 1400 Palestinians dead. ing expelled. Until today the number The Palestine Papers contain nothing of refugees and their descendants new about the Israeli-Palestinian se- rose to several millions. Hundreds of curity cooperation. There was only thousands live in refugee camps one specific example that stirred me- throughout the region, while others dia attention: The case of Hassan al- are living in countries around the Madhoun, who was killed by Israeli world. It is perfectly clear to the Pal- forces. He was suspected of cooperat- estinian government that resettling ing with Hamas and preparing attacks millions of Palestinians to Israel is im- against Israel. Even though he was a possible because the state would member of the Fatah splinter group loose its Jewish character. No Israeli al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, Israel government will ever agree to that. asked the Fatah to assassinate al- The leaked documents show that the Madhoun. But the Palestinians did not Palestinian negotiators are willing to see themselves up to the task be- accept a smaller, symbolic number. cause the “environment is not easy”, The documents intended that Erekat which why Israel took over. But the could agree to Olmert’s plan to allow Palestine Papers do not offer any evi- the return of ten thousand refugees dence of an extensive collaboration over a period of 10 years. After the with Israel. They only show that the publication he strongly denied any Fatah has a genuine interest to such intention. Until now, the official weaken an enemy which has repeat- position of the Palestinian Liberation edly shown that it has no hesitation to Organisation is the return of at least a use violence against a political rival. hundred thousand refugees over 10 3 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. The Palestinian reaction cessions. The alternative would be a debate between all relevant political, PALESTINIAN The reaction of the political leadership social and media protagonists about TERRITORIES towards the publication was clear. The the results of past negotiations. Which FELIX DANE top leaders of the PA gathered behind demands are non-negotiable and JÖRG KNOCHA President Abbas to show their sup- where are concessions possible? As port. During the weekly cabinet meet- long as this discourse is not imple- February 2011 ing on January 25, the government of mented thoroughly, the discrepancy Salam Fayyad condemned the “cam- between a public declarations and pri- paign of incitement and deception vate concessions will prevent any suc- which the Aljazeera Channel has cess in future negotiations. www.kas.de/ramallah launched against the Palestinian Na- www.kas.de tional Authority.” The Cabinet also re- affirmed their “determination to end Israeli occupation of all 1967 occupied land, the establishment of an inde- pendent Palestinian State with East Jerusalem as its capital, the resolution of the Refugees issue based on UN Resolution 194, and the release of all prisoners.” This Resolution dates back to 1948 and, arguably, calls for a re- turn of all refugees “at the earliest practicable date.” The reaction of the population was similar. After his re- turn from a travel abroad Abbas was welcomed enthusiastically by more than 3000 supporters. He accused al- Jazeera of forging the documents and reiterated the official Palestinian posi- tion regarding negotiations with Is- rael. Many Fatah supporters argued that this is just the latest chapter of Qatar’s efforts to undermine the PA. It is widely known that Qatar has excel- lent connections to Hamas and has been accused to support them finan- cially. The question remains if Hamas can exploit the current situation to gain influence in the West Bank. Lead- ing Hamas politicians have already re- jected the concessions and organised Imprint demonstrations in Gaza. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung e.V. Implications on future negotiations Foreign Office Palestinian Territories Albeit the situation in the Palestinian International Cooperation Territories remains calm, the publica- tions could lead to a more difficult en- vironment for coming negotiations. PO Box 27242 | 91272 President Abbas and other officials de- Jerusalem clared that they would not retreat Phone from their official viewpoint. This di- +972 2 24043-05 minishes the chances for future con- Fax +972 2 24043-07 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel: Background and U.S
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Casey L. Addis Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs February 14, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33476 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence and was immediately engaged in a war with all of its neighbors. Armed conflict has marked every decade of Israel’s existence. Despite its unstable regional environment, Israel has developed a vibrant parliamentary democracy, albeit with relatively fragile governments. The most recent national elections were held on February 10, 2009, ahead of schedule. Although the Kadima Party placed first, parties holding 65 seats in the 120-seat Knesset supported opposition Likud party leader Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, who was designated to form a government. Netanyahu’s coalition includes his own Likud, Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel Our Home), Shas, Habayet Hayehudi (Jewish Home), the United Torah Judaism (UTJ), and the new Ha’atzmout (Independence) party. The coalition controls 66 of 120 Knesset seats. Israel has an advanced industrial, market economy with a large government role. Israel’s foreign policy is focused largely on its region, Europe, and the United States. Israel’s foreign policy agenda begins with Iran, which it views as an existential threat due to Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and support for terrorism. Achieving peace with its neighbors is next. Israel concluded peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, but not with Syria and Lebanon. Recent unrest in Egypt is rekindling latent anxiety in Israel about the durability of the peace treaty Egypt and Israel have relied upon for 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza-Israel: the Legal and the Military View Transcript
    Gaza-Israel: The Legal and the Military View Transcript Date: Wednesday, 7 October 2015 - 6:00PM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall 07 October 2015 Gaza-Israel: The Legal and Military View Professor Sir Geoffrey Nice QC General Sir Nick Parker For long enough commentators have usually assumed the Israel - Palestine armed conflict might be lawful, even if individual incidents on both sides attracted condemnation. But is that assumption right? May the conflict lack legality altogether, on one side or both? Have there been war crimes committed by both sides as many suggest? The 2014 Israeli – Gaza conflict (that lasted some 52 days and that was called 'Operation Protective Edge' by the Israeli Defence Force) allows a way to explore some of the underlying issues of the overall conflict. General Sir Nick Parker explains how he advised Geoffrey Nice to approach the conflict's legality and reality from a military point of view. Geoffrey Nice explains what conclusions he then reached. Were war crimes committed by either side? Introduction No human is on this earth as a volunteer; we are all created by an act of force, sometimes of violence just as the universe itself arrived by force. We do not leave the world voluntarily but often by the force of disease. As pressed men on earth we operate according to rules of nature – gravity, energy etc. – and the rules we make for ourselves but focus much attention on what to do when our rules are broken, less on how to save ourselves from ever breaking them. That thought certainly will feature in later lectures on prison and sex in this last year of my lectures as Gresham Professor of Law but is also central to this and the next lecture both on Israel and on parts of its continuing conflict with Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace
    Istituto Affari Internazionali IAI WORKING PAPERS 12 | 16 – May 2012 Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace Andrea Dessì Abstract While spared from internal turmoil, Israel and the Palestinian Territories have nonetheless been affected by the region’s political transformation brought about by the Arab Spring. Reflecting what can be described as Israel’s “bunker” mentality, the Israeli government has characterized the Arab revolutionary wave as a security challenge, notably given its concern about the rise of Islamist forces. Prime Minister Netanyahu has capitalized on this sense of insecurity to justify his government’s lack of significant action when it comes to the peace process. On the Palestinian side, both Hamas and Fatah have lost long-standing regional backers in Egypt and Syria and have had to contend with their increasingly shaky popular legitimacy. This has spurred renewed efforts for reconciliation, which however have so far produced no significant results. Against this backdrop, the chances for a resumption of serious Israeli-Palestinian peace talks appear increasingly dim. An effort by the international community is needed to break the current deadlock and establish an atmosphere more conducive for talks. In this context, the EU carries special responsibility as the only external actor that still enjoys some credibility as a balanced mediator between the sides. Keywords : Israel / Israeli foreign policy / Arab revolts / Egypt / Muslim Brotherhood / Palestine / Gaza / Hamas / Fatah / Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations / European Union © 2012 IAI IAI Working Papers 1216 Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace by Andrea Dessì ∗ Introduction The outbreak of popular protests throughout the Middle East and North Africa in early 2011 came as a shock to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Forces
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax : 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Palestinian Forces Palestinian Authority and Militant Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Center for Strategic and International Studies [email protected] Rough Working Draft: Revised February 9, 2006 Copyright, Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. May not be reproduced, referenced, quote d, or excerpted without the written permission of the author. Cordesman: Palestinian Forces 2/9/06 Page 2 ROUGH WORKING DRAFT: REVISED FEBRUARY 9, 2006 ................................ ................................ ............ 1 THE MILITARY FORCES OF PALESTINE ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2 THE OSLO ACCORDS AND THE NEW ISRAELI -PALESTINIAN WAR ................................ ................................ .............. 3 THE DEATH OF ARAFAT AND THE VICTORY OF HAMAS : REDEFINING PALESTINIAN POLITICS AND THE ARAB - ISRAELI MILITARY BALANCE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY FORC ES ................................ ................................ .......... 5 Palestinian Authority Forces During the Peace Process ................................ ................................ ..................... 6 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and Their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College 4-25-2018 The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts Daniel Bucksbaum Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucksbaum, Daniel, "The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts" (2018). Honors Theses. 3009. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3009 This Honors Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Honors College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts By Daniel Bucksbaum A thesis submitted to the Lee Honors College Western Michigan University April 2018 Thesis Committee: Jim Butterfield, Ph.D., Chair Yuan-Kang Wang, Ph.D. Mustafa Mughazy, Ph.D. Bucksbaum 1 Table of Contents I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 II. Source Material……………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 III. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 IV. Historical Context for the Two-State Solution………………………………………………………...6 a. Deeply Rooted and Ideological Claims to the Land……………………………………………….…..7 b. Legacy of the Oslo Accords……………………………………………………………………………………….9 c. Israeli Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution is Unfeasible……………………………………19 d. Palestinian Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution has become unattainable………..22 e. Drop in Support for the Two-State Solution; Negotiations entirely…………………………27 f.
    [Show full text]
  • Sid Re: "The Palestine Papers" and SOTU
    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05778249 Date: 09/30/2015 RELEASE IN PART B6 From: sbwhoeop Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 9:32 AM To: Subject: H: "Palestine Papers" & SOTU. Sid Attachments: hrc palestine & sotu 012411.docx; hrc palestine & sotu 012411.docx CONFIDENTIAL January 24, 2011 For: Hillary From: Sid Re: "The Palestine Papers" and SOTU I. "The Palestine Papers" So far this morning not a single word has been published or broadcast in the US press on the most extensive disclosure of internal documents on the Middle East peace process by Al Jazeera and The Guardian, a more significant cache than from Wikileaks. And already the Middle East is consumed with the revelations. I've enclosed below, just in case you haven't seen asap, the initial Guardian report and the Guardian column by Jonathan Freedland, the chief columnist on the subject in that newspaper, the Tom Friedman of Britain, a friend of mine, who also writes a column in the Jewish Chronicle, the leading Jewish newspaper in London. It all speaks for itself II. SOTU For what it's worth (with a full sense of duty and futility), the Democrats should respond to the Republican response to the SOTU in the following manner: The Republicans have designated Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Weird) to give their formal televised response, but La Pasionaria of the Tea Party, Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-Fringe) is also giving a response at the same time. Therefore, the Democratic talking points should be to characterize the President's SOTU as the program to meet the challenges the nation is facing while characterizing the GOP response as politically divisive cond confused.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Stage Presents the Winner of the 2017 Tony Award for Best Play
    NORTHERN STAGE PRESENTS THE WINNER OF THE 2017 TONY AWARD FOR BEST PLAY ABOUT THE PLAYWRIGHT J.T. Rogers is a multiple award-winning, internationally recognized American playwright who lives in New York. His plays include Oslo, Blood and Gifts, The ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Overwhelming, White People, and Madagascar. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ In May 2017, Rogers won the Lucille Lortel Award for Best Play, the Outer Critics Circle Award for Outstanding New Broadway Play, and the 2017 Drama League Award for Outstanding Production of a Play, all for Oslo. Oslo was nominated for ​ ​ seven 2017 Tony Awards, including Best Play, as well as two 2017 Drama Desk Awards, including Outstanding Play. It ultimately won the Tony Award for Best Play and the Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Play. In 2017, Oslo also won the ​ Obie Award for Best New American Theatre Work. “As a playwright, I look to tell stories that are framed against great political rupture. I am obsessed with putting characters onstage who struggle with, and against, cascading world events — and who are changed forever through that struggle. While journalism sharpens our minds, the theater can expand our sense of what it means to be human. It is where we can come together in a communal space to hear ideas that grip us, surprise us — even infuriate us — as we learn of things we didn’t know. For me, that is a deeply, thrillingly, political act.” TERMS TO KNOW ● PLO: Palestine Liberation Organization. The PLO represents the world’s Palestinians (Arabs who lived in Palestine before the 1948 establishment of the State of Israel).
    [Show full text]
  • Europe and the Vanishing Two-State Solution
    EUROPE AND THE VANISHING TWO-STATE SOLUTION Nick Witney ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: •A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over two hundred Members – politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries – which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. In the future ECFR plans to open an office in Brussels. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • A distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets. ECFR is a registered charity funded by the Open Society Foundations and other generous foundations, individuals and corporate entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatah and Hamas: the New Palestinian Factional Reality
    Order Code RS22395 March 3, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Fatah and Hamas: the New Palestinian Factional Reality Aaron D. Pina Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary For the first time in its history, the Palestinian parliament is set to be led by Hamas, which the United States and European Union have designated a foreign terrorist organization. Although some lauded the generally free and fair election in January 2006, others criticized the outcome and accused Hamas of “hijacking” democracy. This report provides an overview of the new political realities in the West Bank and Gaza after the election, the challenges Fatah and Hamas face, and possible implications for U.S. policy. This report will be updated as warranted. For more information on the Palestinians, see CRS Report RL33269, Palestinian Elections, by Aaron D. Pina, CRS Issue Brief IB91137 The Middle East Peace Talks, by Carol Migdalovitz, and CRS Report RS22370, U.S. Assistance to the Palestinians, by Jeremy M. Sharp. Background On January 25, 2006, Palestinians voted in parliamentary elections and Hamas emerged as the clear winner, with 74 out of 132 parliamentary seats. Fatah, the dominant party in the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), won 45 seats, and 13 seats went to other minor parties. Since then, several governments, including the United States, have cautioned that unless Hamas disavows terrorism, recognizes Israel, and accepts all previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements, diplomatic and economic relations with the Palestinian Authority may be circumscribed or ended altogether. Hamas1 During the 1970s and 1980s, Palestinians experienced a rise in political Islam, embodied in Hamas, founded in 1987 by the late Sheik Ahmad Yasin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinians: Background and U.S
    The Palestinians: Background and U.S. Relations Jim Zanotti Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 17, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34074 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Palestinians: Background and U.S. Relations Summary This report covers current issues in U.S.-Palestinian relations. It also contains an overview of Palestinian society and politics and descriptions of key Palestinian individuals and groups— chiefly the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the Palestinian Authority (PA), Fatah, Hamas, and the Palestinian refugee population. The “Palestinian question” is important not only to Palestinians, Israelis, and their Arab state neighbors, but to many countries and non-state actors in the region and around the world— including the United States—for a variety of religious, cultural, and political reasons. U.S. policy toward the Palestinians is marked by efforts to establish a Palestinian state through a negotiated two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; to counter Palestinian terrorist groups; and to establish norms of democracy, accountability, and good governance within the Palestinian Authority (PA). Congress has appropriated assistance to support Palestinian governance and development amid concern for preventing the funds from benefitting Palestinian rejectionists who advocate violence against Israelis. Among the issues in U.S. policy toward the Palestinians is how to deal with the political leadership of Palestinian society, which is divided between the Fatah-led PA in parts of the West Bank and Hamas (a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization) in the Gaza Strip. Following Hamas’s takeover of Gaza in June 2007, the United States and the other members of the international Quartet (the European Union, the United Nations, and Russia) have sought to bolster the West Bank-based PA, led by President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict 2010: Obama in Charge
    The Middle East Situation The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict 2010: Obama in Charge Christian-Peter Hanelt estinians, especially, hoped for a more “even-hand- Senior Expert - Europe and the Middle East ed” approach and an intensified engagement. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh In many regards, Obama meant to mark a turning Keys point in US-Middle East relations: he advocated for Maren Qualmann renewed trust and confidence between the parties Consultant, Hamburg and the US, while once again attempting to trans- form the image of the US into that of a serious and honest broker for peace and democracy. As a con- 2011 the Setting: obama’s new Middle East sequence, his unusual decision to tackle the Israe- Med. approach, His “Cairo-Vision” and the Second li-Arab peace process at the beginning of his term term of benjamin netanyahu by “actively and aggressively seek[ing] a lasting peace between Israel and Palestinians, as well as On 2 September and 14 September 2010, direct between Israel and its neighbours”1 became a lit- negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Benja- mus test for his new relations with the Middle East. 47 min Netanyahu, Palestinian Authority Chairman Mah- In one regard, though, Obama used the speech to moud Abbas and United States President Barack reinforce a strategic change undertaken by the pre- Obama took place in Washington with the ultimate vious administration. While the Bush administration aim of reaching an official “final status settlement” to did not give high priority to the Arab-Israeli conflict the conflict by agreeing on a two-state solution. At until the Annapolis Process, in her last year in office the end of the same month, the direct talks ended Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice did confirm when Israel failed to renew the 10-month settlement that solving the Arab-Israeli conflict was in the US freeze that had been in place since November 2009 administration’s strategic interest.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Forum to Mark Fifty Years of Occupation
    DIVISION FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS UNITED NATIONS FORUM TO MARK FIFTY YEARS OF OCCUPATION Ending the Occupation: The Path to Independence, Justice and Peace for Palestine 29 June 2017 Ending the Occupation: Creating the Space for Human Rights, Development, and a Just Peace 30 June 2017 (Civil Society Forum) United Nations Headquarters, New York 18-12873 2 Content Page Executive summary 3 I. Introduction 4 II. Opening session – Day 1 4 III. Plenary sessions – Day 1 5 A. Plenary session I 5 B. Plenary session II 10 IV. Key themes and recommendations – Day 1 14 V. Opening session – Day 2 17 VI. Plenary Sessions – Day 2 17 C. Plenary session III 17 D. Plenary session IV 22 VII. Key themes and recommendations – Day 2 31 Annexes I. Programme 35 II. Summary of the Chair 39 III. Statements of Member States and Intergovernmental Organizations 43 IV. List of Speakers 44 3 Executive Summary The United Nations Forum to Mark Fifty Years of Occupation was convened at the United Nations Headquarters in New York on 29 and 30 June 2017, under the auspices of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (CEIRPP). A day-long event “Ending the Occupation: The Path to Independence, Justice, and Peace for Palestine” was followed by the civil society meeting on “Ending the Occupation: Creating the Space for Human Rights, Development, and a Just Peace”. The Forum brought together political figures, academics, civil society activists, intellectuals and diaspora representatives, including many Israelis and Palestinians, based in the Middle East and elsewhere. Participants articulated a constructive analysis of the current situation and suggestions on how to end the occupation.
    [Show full text]