CROCODILES

klc..dlngt of thc loth Worldtrg Meetiry of th. CmcodiL Spccialbt G.oup ol &c Sp€d6 Surviral CoDmisslon of IUCN . The World CoNervadol UDIoD

cooven€dat

Grln svtuc' Florirls, US-A.23 to 27 April 1990

Volud! 2

0jrcditcd .nd UntFiccd)

ruGJ - Th. woild Coffitid U.i6

AsE

1990. plcedings IAutho4. [Anicte ride]. pp. lnunbe6i. In Cuodites. o{rhc rorh working Mectingofrhe CModile Sp€.i.list Grcup, IUCN - The Wortd Con*frriod Uhio,, cr.nd, Switrerland, Vorume 2, ISBN 2332tu02!X vi + 95 p.

Celdilc pMccdirgs SF.iali$ cop. l99O_ CMrdilq. of rhc 10rh Worting Mccring ot $c Ceodite Sp.ciatist (i.oup, - IUCN Th. Wodd Co@frrion Union, cted, Swifzcrland, Votunc 2. ISBN 233274023-X vi + 34j p

- (c) 1990IUcl.{ Int dation.l Udon fo. thc Crns€Mrion or Naturc and Natuat Relous6

R.produ.tid of rhir lubri@iion for ed!€rionar .n,i olhcr nonedh€Ei.l purpG.s is aurhonrcd withour p.misd trcn thc .opyright p@ided bold.., lh. ouEc is citcd and rh. @prright holdcr r.cciv.. 6py oi rhc rcprcducd turcnzt

R.prcd*ti@ ad tulc o. orh.r @mncdiaj puipGs i5 prchibitcd sithout prio! wirten p.misid ot th. opFight hotdc.

ISBN 2S327{02}X

Publi$ld bt rucN/ssc cqo

knicra, Alsjadro. A prog.amof doditorirg aadreovcriq of Cainaa'spopulatioE in Argcatiaa witb thc ain of DaDagcmcol

Litdc, Pcry L Elogcnousvitamin C for captiE p.opagahdaligatori

McDalicl, trdEiq ard LiddscyEord" Spc.ializedaquipncnt andtecbaiqu.s us€d i, aligatof n.n,gcncDl andrescarch...... __.....-*...._..._,,,

Mas6cl H" aad F. Waync KiDg The status of Ct*odyhts por@ls n the SoLolrotrIslands...... -......

Morpurgq B. G" GearFhu and B. Robirzoa FoodFcfcrcocc and fish attradabnftyin young llilc crocodilc. m

Mos€g Richa.d D, and Robcrt Chabrc& Trarsportatio! and artificial incubation ofAdencar afligato.cggs..--....-. 81

Otsric4 TiEothy C. A coEpariso! of3 suvcy oethods for estimatingrelatirc abuadaaceof rar:e qocodilians.

Pachcco,Luis F. Fccdiog, rcproduc{iod ard g.oltth'm (,lpnve Melanofllcha, nlger...... 109

Poolet Tony. Basic ciocodile fafinin&/ratchirg Eethods h reDote ata:Ii...... ,...... 123

Rath, Rf, S!'igh LAIC atrd S. Kar. Wo.l plan for crocodiliar marageeent in Oriss4 Iadi4 during 19G-195.

S.rhDltc,Dara M" ad Robcrt tt Chabrc-cLEfrects of rcst andegg characterirtics on sizeand carly derclo!'dctrt of Aocricao aligafofi. tn

Saqr-,SI, andIra AJa Siryh. Rchabilitatiotrof Muggcrcrocodile (Opcodyru pahrs'.ir)i^ SiDilipal Tiger P!€serq,,O.iss4 India 188

Snitlo, Cl' andJ. Matatu Crocodilcfarmi4 ia SouthA.&ica- Thc impactoffannhg techrclog, on pioductionc6cictrcy. 2nr

Staro4 Mart A- Lalry McNcas.,Irisa Ttcriot rnd Ted Joar.r. pelletizcdallicator feed:ar updatc.--..--.------...... -...... --_-

Stato., Mart A", B.ian VerDoD,crcg Mitchel andRalph Sigap. proccssingyiel& ftom famed (rofldil€a (Auodyha po'ostrta d,Creodthts novaeguiteau) ftoE papuaNew cuitua...... Sraynghao,Thonar, Sout[ Carolidaaligator prograE updatc. n9

Vcrdadc,IJciano M" ardAbel lavo.edi Prelibinary sote.son thc statusand consorratiotr of einar laimstit tn the Statcof SaoPaulq Braziu DircclioB of thc captivcbrc€di!& rcirtroduction aDdEanagcocrt progr:u[

Waitlumit, Wof-Etbhard. Thc establishnflt of thc 6tst Eajor crocodilebrc.ding c€der rn Wc€rAiic5" a

l|l Waeo! P.A" L Ef.rts of bl.l.g o! Nilc qdib, C!uoitts nilotia!t, 24

Wcttlr, Ctaiasc J.W" S. Ctatlic Manoliaand Haney Coopcr-Prc,*otr"CrocodiL 6.n,g.pctrt aadrc*arcl ir thc Northcm Tcrritor!. 19{38-90.

Wilct, EN" addMilc Jdrdtrgs" Aa olcrvicw of alligatoroanagcmcat in Florid,a"

Zlbcr, A. Y. Yoa-Tov.d D. M. Popper.Thc eficd of high tcnlp.atutc and incrcarcdday lcogthoo growthad suvival of captiE Mc ('o(.d;lc, Owodih/s nildictlt, &Eirg thc cold scasooia K€[]'4.

Zlbcr, Aricl Daa lv! Poppe.aad Yoram Yon-Tov. Thc cficd of stocLiry deDsityod t[c suflival groqth andbody condirioo of captivcNrlc cIoc{diJc, Cr@odih6niloticus...... -...... ,2E8

Zlbcr, &ic! Yoram YoD-Tov andDd! lvl. Poppcr. Ttc cficxt of light regiDrcand tcfrpc.atuc oo thc growthrate, suwi L andbody cotrditioD of youig captivcNile Crocodilg Oocodrlro niloticLs.

7t .ng Zb.oSdolg ard Hralg Zhuiiaa. Thc rclatioc bctsc.n thc growthof rcigbt ard length *ith ttc cmrviatioosof the ]'ourg aligatorabcforc hibcrnatiotr a2

lvorl.3hop!

Workhop oo tradein cocodilian products" SuD-Eaiiesof presentatio$and trade statistics. Coopiled andedited by citrettc H€m]ey

Richad Lumorc. Intc.latioral crocodiliansE! trade Trcndr ald sorirces,...... T2

Dictric.hJcld€!. Updatc on rcgulatioD!:Hory irtcrnational rlrlcs arc changin& 306

Giicttc HeElcy, |llcC Fade i! crocodiliarslirs Currcrt probleo arcas 308

Pctcr Brazaiti& Illcgal t'a

DooAshlcy. Monito.idg tools:How far do wc go?

Joh! Bachc-Aurralisr crocodilcstitr Drodudiotr1988-1989.

Grcg Mr.hcll Papu. Ncw Guidcacrocodiliar stir p.oductiotr1988-1989. 314

JotrHutoo Afticaa Mlc qocodilc slir produdior 1990-199L 315

Ted --oaacr-A.lligator farn productiooitr tbc Udted Statcs1989-190. 3t7

DonAblcy. Marka productiooaad the IACIS rcview. 3ta

NoboruIshii Global Eartct pcrspa{aivcs:Jrpana$ Earkct idplicatioEsof spcci6 andsizc clals $,ngc( h thc crocodiliant adc. Kcvh V.atrJaars!€ldt (for Philipe Roggwiler). clobal marker perspectir€$ Europ€atr market rmplc3uotrs ot speoesand s|ze chs6 changesin the crocodiliartmd€. .------''''''''___...... ,...... 321

D"vlg Hdt. Global market persp€ctivesrU.S. market implications of speciesard size class cha.igesin the crocodiliatrtrade...... ,,,,,,,,,,,, ...... 328

Toshio Yamana-ka.The trade itr other exotics:Their effect on the aocodilian market;liard, snake,

Kevin van Jaarsveldt. The tlade i! other €xotics:Their effect on the crocodiliatr market ostrich

Dave Durland. The trade in other c{otics: Their effect on the qocodiliatr market; ostrich and elepha.nttrade h the USA...... ,,...... ::+

B. C. Choudhury. Indian oocodil€ coDservationsituarion report: Action platr for the 1990,s...... ,....337

FOREWORD lte tc,o volufics of ttir PRocEDrNcs are a rccord of thc presontatiodsard disculsio!6tlat ocorrrcd at tho 10thWo.tiry Me.ti4 of &c CrocodilcSFcialist croup i! cairc{vilc, Florid4 [J.SA.B - n April 1990,Thc Drnulcripts arc uorcvic*cd anduaciitcd. Ttc CSGpRocEEDFrcs, by de6nitio!, ate rcrords ol whaf ocoErcd at thc ncatilg. Ttey arc not tom€s6lled sitf, atticlasthat vcrc ditiquc4 editcq revisc4 ard polishcdsubd€qu€rt to thc m€€tiD&Apart froo prepariDga table of coracnaEcuF and-p'.iing caf'tionsto 6gurcs, coopilirg tho articlasalphabctically by aurhor,.nd mberiry thc pagc,3coDrcautivcly, thc papcrr arc publi6hcdjusf thc way aheync.c subofutei" For thir rcaso!, thcy apFar in a rariety of fornaai asd typcfacc,LJamcs Pcf,ran Ro6s v.s thc managirgcditor.

The opinionsoercss€d hercin arc thosc of t[c individualautbora ard are not tbe oDitrionsol ruCN - The World C.oDseryarionUdoo, or it! SFcics Survir"l Coomissioo.

ruCN - Thc World CoDr€ryatio!Udion wa5foud€d h 194E,ard has its hradquancrsin Clrn4 Ssitza.la!4 it i! an indcpcodentintdnafional bodywho6c ncmbcship conpriscs sratsi (irrcsFctivr of thcir political ald social systeEs),gwcr!f,eDt depanEeots,ard privatc iDstitutio8, ar eEll as inG.natiodalo.ganizatiol4 It rqrrascatsthola vho arc cofteraed about Ean's modiificatiorof tle utural elvirotrme througi tbc rapidity of utbat and industrial d€v€lopaent ard thc €lc€ssive exploitatioDof the earth'strdural resourccqupon wiich rest tha foundatioosof his suwir"al ruCNs main purDoscis to promotc or supportactiod which will ensurcthc pcrpetuationof wild traturc and latural rcsourccso! a *orld-wi& basiEnot only for &eir intriDsiccultural or scicntificvalucs but also for the lorg-t€rE economicand social welfarc of maatiod.

Thfu objcrtivc can b€ achicEd throwh aditr co.servationprogra.ms for the wise lsc of mtural Esourc€sin arcas*icre the flora and faula arc of panicular importanccand *hcre the landscapeis €spe.ialy bc{utiful or strikhg or of Lisrorical adtu.al, o. scientiEcaignificancc. ruCN b€lievcsthat its aim! canbc aclievcd no6t cficdirely by itrtcrtrltional efrort in coopcratioawit[ other international .gtcir., sucha! UNES@, FAq alld UNEP, and htcnr.tional o.gadzariolj, suc! a6Wo.ld Wid6 ftmd for Naturc (nWD.

Thc mission of ruCNs SpecicsSurvival Comnirsion (SSC) is to preve[t the crcincioa of , subsFci€s,and discrete populatiols ol fautraand flora, thcrebydaintaitiDg the gqrcdc diversityof the livirg .csourcasof thc planct To carry out its niisio!, tic SSC.elie,s on a detwork of ov€r a5m voluntc€rprofclsiolals worling tbroughmorc tban 90 SpecialistGrouF atd a large duaber of affiliale @garizations!rcgional rcprcscatativc,r, ad co!6ulta!t5,scattercd throwh &arly evcry couatryof thc eorld.

montEor].n cove! t rons Arqen a wlt a i![

Alej andro I/ARRfERA Boulevard Pellegrini 31OO (3000) - Santa Fe ARGENTINA

The north of ou! countly is tlre southeln limtt of the geographical distribution for two specles of caj.mans hj.storically overexptoj.ted eithe! legalty or 11l,egally, We are ta.lkrng about caiman latLrost!is and Caiman yaqare. The dist!ibutlon area fo! C.Iatirostrrs (Apendi; I cIfES), involves lhe provinces of MiEiones, Corrlentes, Entre Rj.og, Formosa, Chaco, Santa Fe, Santiago deI Estero,salta and Jujuy, up to 32 south Latitude. Fo! C. yacare (Apendix II CITES) the genelal alea is coincident bui j-t seerns .o .r.rr. a hj.ghe! concentratlon in the area of the count.ry noE further 9otn9 the 30 south Latj.tude. Anylray it is possible that provinces in many pl.aces of this ,here these species were commo!1,they have totally disappeared. Even though rt does not exist any population study as regards j.t this fact, is obvious that the numerj.ca] lelrocessj-on of the Argentine caimans has becone drarnatic in the l-ast yea!, although j.n certaj.n areas farrly abundaot populati.ons of one or othe! species can be foind as C. latj.rost!is in Chaco and Santa Fe o! C. yacate in Corrientes, in places that are not visj,ted by hunters ej.the! because they do oot know the place or due to its difficulty t.o arrive. Although fortunately, the ill-egal trade of both speqres up to noli i.s very not encouraged due to the i.;creasing applicatj,on of CITES at wolLd LeveJ., it iE also a fact that Che caplures continue in the forest, and thj,s couLd get lrorse with lhe pernj,ssion of guota€ to export skins in bordering countries, whj.ch could direct argentine ptoducts, due to budgetary and stluctural diff,iqu],tieg in puOfic agencies to contlol eithe! furtivism or fronliers. In addition to this, !,,e have Ene constant modification of habitat, favored by the lack of massive carnpaigns o! infolnatj.on as regards importance and potentl.ality of the !esourqe. It is mj.nj,malthe benefj.t that carmans blig to locaL inhabi.tants because. even though thei! neat i; edibLe and tasty 1t i.s not a usual dish in their dj,et and as reqards their leather the retribution ls mini.mal because there is not a market pllce, Sunming up \dhat haee been aLready mentioned, we j.f can say that this present situation goe€ on, ft is hi.ghly probable that the popuLat.ions of caj.nans in ArgenErna qont.inue belng exploited till its near extj.ngui shnent, benefitting only a fei{, and without any plofit for wild populations, tocal inhabi.tants or the countly.

I9ORKPROPOSAL

The management of anj.naL's 1j.fe under their diffelent modalities, is in genela1 the most feasi.ble altelnative to ensure the preselvation of these species. In no lray it will be feasible to keep endlessly lestrj,ction to th; use of i{j,Ld fauna, while at the sane time, huftan needs increases. This programme proposes a management alternative for cairnans whj.ch could be defroed as "SeLf_repopu.Lat]'on by Ranching with populatj.on monitoling of ienaency,,. Ii basically consists of j.dentifyin; caimans popu.lations, evaLuate them j.ndex wibh of relatj.ve densr-ty and appty the Ranchj.ng System, leplacing to their eivi.ronment at L possible specimens at nine nonth of age, nonitorrng the inpact of this experience on the populatron under d iscus sio.!. A_progranne like the one proposed in based on the a\dareness of the actual pogsible avaitabil,ity of neans and people, and what lt 1s even more inpartant, the potential. use that is going to given be t.o the infolmation got, in such sense it must be consrdered that:

1 ) Due to its actual volume and the populatlon statuE it is !ldiculous to think of a direct expioitation i"o.."r"r", hunting) in Argentina. 2) It is no posslbLe to start Ranching works, derivlng flom the bbginnj.ng e99s to the marl

GENERALMETHODOLOGY

the. sel f -repopula t ion program has three lrelI differencrated work Lines that nevertheless nust hatmonize perfectty and EhaE can weLl 'I be roughly defined asi ) Monj.toring to evaLuate Ene population 2) idenrj.flcation tendency. ^Nest ."d .;e"-;;;;J"ar'in-r=""ii. ,""" influence of the monltorj,ng alea. ", hatchlng il-1.:1t-:n:." and controLted nultulios of tne Dorn up lo their fleeino- lust 1 ) In order Eo monitore the populations j,n lhe chosen sanpling aleas, night counting shall be carried out irith high poeer lj.ghts from a small boat durj.ng three consecutive days in each alea and the information shal,l, be recorded accoldin9 to the characteristics of the place as anj.ma.Lper Irnear ki.Iometer !n (culrent's f lorr) or animals per hectare in lagoons o! marshy lands. Envl,romenc temperature, water temperatqle, direction and speediness of wind and I19h conditions shalL also be recorded. When possible, the size and species of the anina]s shalL be lecorded. Two visits each yeat shall be carried out to each area of the sampling, one j.n Novembe! (Decemoer to oEner one In Febluary) March. Before beginning lrith the plogramme In the months of September/October we are going co make a practrse vtsit in order t.o define the observaEron ci!cui t. 2) When making the frlst visit for nonitoring in each area Ehe oests shalL be ldentified i.n ,rhat !,re shall calL "influence area" of monitoring. this ineans lhat they mugt be wj,thin the alea in guestion, or near enough j,mpact to nake an on the counted populatj.on. when rnaking the second vj.sit eggs shall- be halves ted, narking them by nesc anO recolding the amounts of eggs, date and exact placement of Che nest. The harvested eggs shal] be moved in plastic bowls and shall be protected from excessive tenperatures up to thelr arrj.val to the provlncj-al, RanchLng station. 3) Each province shall have a ranching slation i.n which e99s halvested for its hatching at 30/32 C lrith a humj.dity of 95? shall be received. The just born anj.mals shall- be marked by nest and shaLl live in cllmatized environmenE with a temperature gradient of 25 C, to 33 C. Feeding thall. given be ad ]j.bitum three tineE a !,reeks and shaLl consist of meat and bovine viscera, river fish and conventional baLanced food for carnivotous. adding vitamins, nlneraL supplements. When going lhe second yea, to the sanpling alea (first visit), the feasible individuals shall be freed rn the exact point of harvest. In this moment the cycl-e begins agarn.

GENERAL PURPOSE

As a codcl,usion a program lj,ke thLs must ansver this Enree essential guestion s: the .anching 1l ls helpf,ul to lecover cairnan,s populations?- 2) It is possible to derive to co,nmercial ciranneLs a percentage of the harvested eggs? 3) If so, nhich is the percentage. that allows tg exploit caj.mans, keeping a rate gf population recoverv? ACI(NOWLEDGIiIENT f 'rant to tell thanks to Dr, Obdulio Menqhi from CITES , Dr. Jorge Cajal from Direcci6n Nacional- de Fauna Sl,lvestre , Dr. Juan Villalba !.,tacias and Mr. todas WalLe! (Sudarne!ica) fron TRAFFIC for hi.s encouragenent and suggestiong. r want to tell thanks too to the runaact5n Esteban Astort for the soupporting of first part of the studv,

Exogenous Vitamin C for Captive propagated Altigaeors Perry IJ. Little Division of Agricultural ScienceE p.O. Box 2088 - SHSU Euntssville, TX 1134I

INTRODUCTION

Vitanin C (L-ascorbic acid) is synthesized 1n sufficient amounts fo satisfy tshe needs of rnost non- primate animals, yet it is generally included in the diets of captj.ve alligators j.n rather large amounts (McNeaEe and Joanen, 1981; Staton, 19gT) . the more primj,tive species of birds (callj.formes, Anserifornes, etc.) have been shown to synthesize vitami.n C in the kidneys whi-le sorne species (passeriformes) produce the vitamin in Ehe liver only. ye! a few species appear tso be unabLe to slmthesize the wiEamin at all (Chaudhuri and Chatterjee, 1969) . Most fishes appear to sl'nthesi.ze vitamin C, but some cannot. Channel cat.fish, salmon, and trout require the addiCion of rather high 1eve1s of ascorbi.c acid co prevent scolioEis and Lardosis. (Halver, L972; Lo.qe:-L, 1973). Ibowledge of the vitanin C requirement in the diet of the aLligator and/or the abilj-hv of lhe all.ioator E.o slmthesize this vi.tamin is relevant since ascor-bic aci.d functions i.n collagen slmthesis and may contribute !o better quality hides. Ascorbic aci-d has been shown co fuIrction in the formation of procollagen and is nece€sary for tshe biosynthesis of collagen and cartilage, tissue fortnaEion and repaj.r and calcification of bone {titn and Lovell, 1978). Ascorbate has been reported to be the reducing agen!, involved in the hydroxylation of prol.j.ne and lysille in the formatj.on of collagen and cartiLage (vtiLson and poe, 19?3). This study was undertaken to determine the need for supplernental dieEary vitami! C when alligators are fed a diet consiscing of variouE aninaL by-products and minerals.

Materials anal Methods

Thirty-two alligators, hatched in August 198?, were tsaken from Che wild at the J. D. Mulphee wildlife Refuge near Port Arthur, Texas on October L, L9S1 . The animals !'rere kept together j.n tsemperature controlled pens at the Sam Houston State Utiversity poultry Center. they were fed ground frozen nutria during the adjustrnent period. On December 4, 1987, they were individual.Ly tsoe-tagged, weighed and measured (total lengtsh and heart.-girth) and distsributsed randomly inlo laJo adjacents pens of, equal sizer 16 .s per pen. The 8'x16' concrete floored, p1l&ood enclosed living quarterg were apportioned into equal dry and wets areaE witsh a water depth range of 5-10 cm in each pen. The water temperature in eaqh pen was rnaintsained at. about 30 alegrees CeLsius by circulating !'rater tshrough pipes from a Lalge gas water heater. A basal diet formulated from all-dry processed nutsrientss (Table I) mixed witsh water tso nake a stiff dough was fed with nutria until the aninal-s were gradually converted Eo the 54 percent crude protsein formulated dlef.

Tabl.e I. Composition of the basal die!.

Ingredientss Percent

Blood neal 10.0 Dextrin 6.0 Dicalcium phosphate 3.0 Feather roeal 30.0 Fish neal 10.0 ce1atsi-n 2.5 Mineral mi.x (Jones & FoEler ) 2.0 Poultry by-products meal 30.0

Sodium chloride 0.3 vitsamin pre-mix 7.2

Total 100.0

Prehension and deglucition of this tl4)e of feed by alLigators presented a problen. A workable solution was found by mixj,ng the dry powder - like feed wich water !o a sgiff-tlouqh and pressj.ng its down oo a tray lhen cutsting i! intso smaLl bitse-sized squares and piling ig upon the tsray for feeding. Animalg in each pen rrere fed the gane dry weights of feed. About 2 hours after feeding a1l the water was drained from Che pens, tshe area cLeaned and fiLLed wiEh warm freEh erater. on ,fanuary 26, 1988 ten (10) alirnals from each pen were picked at random and were checked wieh a ful,l"- length dorsg - veniri,cle x-ray for evidence of skelegal abnorrnaLity. .tanuary 28, 1988, aL1 ani,mals were weighed aod measured as before and 3 m1. of blood waE drawn from the _heart for analyEis. The animaLE were then placed on their respectsive experj.mental diets. AninaIE in Den 1 received the basal diets (Table I) while those in ;en 2 were fed the same ba9a1 diet plus added ascorbic ac-id at 1,000 rng/kg. The leve1 of ascorbic acj-d added was ecrual tso the vitanin C presents in a commerciatly prepared vitamin prenix sold to alligato! farrners in tne region (Table rI) .

Table II. Cornnercialty prepared vitamin premix sold to aLligaEor farrners in Ehe region less vitanin C.

SPECIFICATIONS TJNITS

Vitamin A 1,800,000.000 Tn Vitamin D3 200,000.000 Vitamin E 5, 000. 000 Ri.boflavin 1,000.000 Pantothenic Acid 2,160.000 mg. Niaci-n 4. s00 Choline Chloride 86.433 Vitamin B12 Folic Acid 90.000 mg. Biotin 20.000 Pyr j.doxj.ne H!'drochloride 1,000.000 Menadione Soalium Bisulf i-te 4, 283. 000 mg. Thi.arnine Mononitrate 1, 000. 000 5. 000

Fed ats 1.2t of tshe diet.

the animals were weighed and neasured as before on March 4, April 15, and ifune 1, 1988. The sa$e animals tshaE were x-rayed and sampled for blood analygis initialty qrere again x-rayed and thei.r blood sanple€ anaLyzed again a! tshe lerminalion of the study. At this ti-me, the tip€ of the tailE from 5 aninais in each treatment were excised alld frozen in Liquid nitrooen for hisEological cornparisons. Analysis of variance using the general linear model procedure (Statistj-cal Analysis Sys!ens, 1979) was applied Co all daua at lhe 95 percents confidence level. Duocans Multipl-e Range Test' wag uged a9 a means separatsion procedure. ReEultg aDd DiscugEioD

The data obtained unaler the condieions of tshis study showed no evidence thats the American alligator (A1lioatsor mississippiensj.s) benefitged in any way by the additj-on of L-ascorbic aci-d at 1,000 mg,/kg tso a 54 percent crude protein diet consiECing prirnarily of processed anj,mal by-groducts. There was no significants tlifference in vilanin C blood plasma 1ewels of L- ascorbj-c acid 9uplrleneoted alligacors over contsrols (Tab1e III). One may conclude tshat excesg vj.Camin C is readily removed by the kidneyE and thae al]j.gatorg are probably capable of, slmthesizinq sufficient vi tamj.n C to maintsain a relati,ve hemeogtati-c 1eve1 of the vitamin 1n the blood or that this particular diet contained hj-gh enough 1eve1s of the viEanin that it did noC becone 1itnitsing to alligator growth and development. the latster is not like1y Eince losEes of aEcorbj-c acid activity due to processing tsechniques of animal by product feed ingredientg is known t'o be excesEr.ve (Hi.l.ton et aL L977 ) .

Tab1e III. Mean plasma vicamin C levefs of alfigacors as affected by supplenentation with vita$in c.

Treatnents t/28/88 6/r/88

nS,/dt------control 1,.9429 Vitamin C 2 .2500

Higcological exanination rewealed no norphologic expresEions of a vitsamin C deficiency as described in man and guinea pigs (Fo11is, 1958) in any of the animals obgerved in this gests. ExanpleE fron specimens exhibited in Figures 1-4 shov, no morphol,ogic abnornali tsy in the connective tissues of the vertebrae of alligators fed diets wiEh no added viEamin c. The skelegal radiographs showed no evidence of laralogis or scoliosis in any of the 20 aninals x-rayed. There !,rere no abnornalities detsected io any of lhe in!erce1lu1ar gubstanceg such as co11agen, osteoid, alentine or vascuLar endoCheLium. There vrere no differenceE in the skeletal structure of anv of tshe animals x- rayed at tshe beginning (Figure 5) o-r at the end of the study (Figure 5) . Awerage weight gains, heart girth, and tsotal lengtsh of alligatorE were not significantly different over the 125 day experinental. period (Tab1e fV). Tables V, Vf. and VII show the average wej.ghts, total body lengfh, and heartsgirth respectj-ve1y, at the various dates o f neasuretnent, There was no indj,cation of elevated plasma cholesterol and/or triglyceride levelE of aninals in thj.s experiment as reported by Hil.con et aI., (197?) in vilamin C deficient salmon fish (Tables VIII and IX).

table IV. Mean treartsgirtsh, botsa1 length, and weiglrt increase over the 125 day experimenfal peliod.

t wf

------cm------

8.14 23.1r Vitami.n C 1306.96

Table V. Mean weight of a1li9ator6 as aff ected by supplementation with vitalrtill c.

Treatmenb L/28/88 3/4/88 4/!5/88 6/L/8e

'144.AA Control 4'13.94 7!96.41 Vitamin C 450.31 520.80 10?5.07

10 Table VI. Mean length of alligatorg as affected by supplenentation witsh vitamin C.

Treatment L/25/88 3/4/88 4/rs/58 6/7 /88

control 56.894 1),.081 80.500 Vitamin 80.700

Table vII. Mean heartsgirtsh of alligators as affected by supplementation with vitsanin C.

TreatmenC 7/ 28/48 3/4/88 4/ls /ea 6/L /88

27.0'733 Vitamin C 13.8000 14.4661 1?.4333 20.5200

Table VIII. Mean blood plasma cholesterol of alligabors aE affected by suppLetnentatsion of vitafiin c.

Date r/28 /85 6/L/88

Control 96.630 Vi.tami-n C 109.430 205.000 Table-IX. _Mean blood plasma triglyceride of alligaEors aa affected by supptementation $rith Vitanin C.

Treatmenl 7/28/88 6/t/ 88

tng/dl------

Control 50.750 Vi.tanin C 10.193 52.1IO

These findings appear tso indicate tbats captive reared alLigators do not require an exogenous supply of vitamin C ats tshe 1eve1 provided (1000 rng/kq) in this experiment, and tend tso supports the [email protected] lhat alligators can slmthesize sufficient Vitarnin C endogenously or that the basal diet used in thig study contsaj-ned sufficient levels to meet the needs of Ehis vitamin by the alligator. References

Chaudhuri, C.R. and I.B. Chatterjee. 1959. L-Agcorbic acid slmlhesis in birds: phylogenic trends; Scj-ence ro{: {J)-4JO.

FolIis, Richard H, Jr. 1958. Funclion & srructure changes in malr[nalia hrhich result. from exhogeoous or endogenous lack of one or nore essential nutrients .ln Deficienc.v Diseases, pp. 175-195. Charles C Thonas, Pub.Springfield, I]J.

Halver, J.E. 1972. Tha Vitanins, pp. 29-103. In J.E. Halver ed. Fish nutritsion. Acadeni.c press. New york. Hj-1Eon,J.W., C.Y. Cho, and S.J. Slinger. 7971. Pactors affeccing the stability of supplemental ascorbic acid in practical trout diets. ,t. Fj-sh. Res. Bd. Can 35:683 - 687.

Lim,C., and R.T. Lovell. 19?8. Patholoav of the vitamin C deficienqy slmdrome in chann;I carfiEh (ictalurus ounctaEus). Nutr. 108: 1137-1146.

Lovell, R.T. 1973. Essentiatity of Vitamin c in feeds for intensively fed caged channel . Nubr. 103: 134- 138.

McNeaEe, L. and T. Joanen. 1981. Nutritsion of alligatorE. Alligator Producers Confereltce. Gainsville, Florida.

Statistical- Analysis SyEtens {SAS) UEer,s Guide. 1979- SAS Incorporated. , cary, N.C. Staton, M.A. 1941. Personal Cormunication. poultry Science Department University of ceorgia, Athens. wj.lson, R.P. anal Poe, w.E. 19?3. Inpaired coltagen formatsion in the scorbuti.c chalnel catsfish. Nutr. 103: 1359 - 1354. Fio. 1. TX 5633, alligator fed no viCamin C. Transverse section of a tail vertebra. The Large whit.e space at top is tshe spinat cana1. The spinal cord is the dark ellipsoid structure. Below the canal is the cart.ilage nodel destined to become the body of that vertebra. At horizontal rrhite arrows are growth plates which fonn the ventral- part of the vertebral body. The tsi-ssue surrounaling the vertebra is crosE-sectioned muscle tissue. Note Ehat the cartilaqe is stained deepty basophilic with henaroxylin.

!l&!i. x z5-

14 Fra. 2. TX 5531- This is the area at Lhe lefE white arroir of Fig. 1 at higher resolution. The cartilage ce11a are developing nornal1y. They becorne ballooned and are penetratsed by vessels. Ab oblique arrow heads are nornal and abundant osteoblagtss. At vertical arrow head is an ogteoid sealn. Reerytshing is normal. H&E, x 180.

15 Fio. 3. TX 5548, al-tigalor fed no viEamin C. The pictsure shows the lower part of the cartilage nodel degtined Co becone the vertebral body. Convelsion of cartilage into bone is well under way. The degenerating cartilage ce1ls are pale, the ce11s enlarqe and become penetraeed by blood vessels. Bone is formed by osteoblasts (in front of arrow heads) . the osteobtasts are abundant and nortnal. This is a normal pictsure. H&8, x 180.

16 Fio. 4. TX 9460, aLlj-gator fed no vitamin C. The picture of the vertebral body shows plenty of bone trabeculae. Under polarized light, these trabecul-ae exhibit normal absorbance of birefringent light: the collagen in bone is normal. This is a nornal picture.

H&8, x 110. polarized light exposure.

17 r:::lll..1

of lwo alligators made (1/26/gg) previously fed n- ubria

a Eig---..1q- x-ray of the same two auirnals shown in Figure 5 fiade l6/L/a8) at Ehe t'ermination of Ehe test. A tl.pical alligator from pen l fed the basal diet wiEh no added vitanin C. A bt4)icat animaL flon pen 2 fed the basaL dier with added L-ascorbiq aci-d.

19 Sp€c1a11z6d Equlpuen! end Technlquos U3cd ln Alll.tecor llanet€Dent end Research

BY:

Jimle UcDanle1 Gane and Fresh Wager Fish Co@ission 620 South l{erld1an Stleer taLlahassee, FL 32399.1600

AND

Llndsey Hord Cane and lresh Water Flsh CoDrtrisslon 3991 Sourheast 27 Court okeechobee, FL 34972

Allltators occu! lr! hebicals that are often inaccessl.ble and inhospirable

to oan and theli irarl.ness and ablllty to subDerge when threatened necessitates

the use of speciallzed equlpoent and rechniques Co caprule CheD. The pulpose

of chls presetrraclon is co fa.ol11artze che reader l,lrh soBe of che rechniques

and equipDenc used by the Florida ca-me and Fresh Water Fish Coenis€l.on

(Co@ission). Alchough nany of che tools and techniques rre use ate also used

by crocodlllan bioLogists lrotldwide, we trope sone of oul. nodificaci.ons l'ill be

of use to oth€rs.

AIRBOATS

Alllgators lnhabit nost netels of the staCe, ranging frotr shallow energenr

oarsh co deep open !'ate! lakes and livers, However, nuch of an alligator

biologistrs €fforcs are concentrated in shallow rate! and eoetgent oarsh.

Outboard oocors and t)rplcal boats requhe at leest 24 inches (61 cn) of unvegetated rater to operate. Atrboats, on the oche! hand, requlte vircually no iraEet depth end can tl|atrsit dense eo€lgenc Darsh Chat lrou1d be virtualLv lopassible to en oulboeld.

Alrboats cone ln tlro basic q.pes, elther Detsl or flberglass hulled l'lch an autonotive o! eilcraft tlpe engine, Itu1l lentth norDally verles froD 11-1g

feet elth the €:atreDe beLog 36 feet (11 n) long, tel.r-engine !ou! boats operatint in che Everglades that can traasport 40-50 people. The pulcheser of an airboat shoulal oatch the hul1 and engine Eype, huII lengrh, horsepolrer, anal rittint co his needs. g1O,5OO Prices range froo for a 12 foot fiberglass bost lrirh a 150 hp al.rcrefc enSine and r!sj.1er to g18,5OO for an 18 foor flberglass hull r'lch

a 300 hp airclafc englne and trailer. l{etal hu11s are gen€lal1y nole expenslve.

Posslbl€ optlons that Dey iDcrease your efflcleacy a!e: po1)|ne! botcoos

(decrease drag), tool boxes, tlin tabs (boa! . haddllng), sprayers (decreese drag), hou! neter, tachoDeter, grass rake, bilge purlp, engine cowllng (engine cooling), seat covers, dlop axles (loading and unLoadlnt), suboersible clailet lights, electrical ourlets, dual bacteries, battery swlcch, large capaeicy fuel tank

(40 ga1.), and dual seats,

SOURCES

Apache Airboals Coobee Alrboacs 700 N. E. 4th Street P.0. Box 570 Okeechobee,FL 34972 Lake Haoilcon, FL 33851 Ricky Lightsey Janes Conbee 8L3/763-2326 8L3/439-52s8

Hoffnen Airboats ailboars unli[lted Inverness, IL Rt. 5, lox 1115 Dick HoffDan Bainbridte, CA 31717 904/726-7677 9L2,/246- 5760

ELECTRONICS

IrrCercoDs

l'e pridarily use alrboats to conduct night-Iight sutweys, however, lhe high nol,se level prevedls notual conveagatlon betueen the drlver snd passenger. Intercons ate used glthout to overco[e thLs paoblerr. an interco[, tlro skl.lled persons are needed, one to opetate the boat and on€ to collect deta. t{l,rh cho use of .m lntercoo, the boat operator can elso coLlecE &!a and transDlt lt !o

the passenger, rho ls requlred only Co recold the data. two types of itrCercoEs

are in une by CodDlssion alligator blologlsts. The nosr coDEon is a slandald

ailcraft intercor elth allcrafc headsets. fhe prirary nake and Dodel ls a Telex

TC 200 lntercoD. tlrc TC 200 comes fton the fsccory with a voice acclvatsd

lntercon, however, lre flnd thal rhe engtne nois€ continuousLy acllvates th6 i.ntelcou. Therefore, our radLo technicians corwett th€ TC 200 to a push to talk incercoo by lnstalling a PT-300 push to talk swlcch, nhich pernlts coDDuolcatioll only r.hen the ssitch is engaged. To coEpleo€nt ch€ inrercoo, tJe use tr,ro nols€ atEenuacint Davey Clark H10-40 headsets. Addiclonal passenger headsecs can be added by purcheslng expanslon nodules floo Te1ex. The cotal cosc of lhe intercoo syscem is approxieately $700. Less expensive cooponents are available such as che Sigtronics Model SPO-20 lntelcon, which cosc $160 versus 9225 fo! the TC 200 and heads€ts such a6 the Telex D-950 rhich cost 9100 each versus rhe tl10-40 r'hlch cost 9214 eech.

Ih€ second tlape of iotercon ls an FI{ radlo lnlercom which is available through electronlc and radlo outlets. A tlro radlo set can be purchased for approxinately 970. ltowever, lt does tlot cooe wLEh noise attenuating headsecs and consequently nust be uodLfied by lncorporaclng the ear speskels into coEDon noise protection headsets. Tbese systeDs are bettery opelaced but can b€ convelted to operate fton th€ boac,s electrical- systen by a radio/elecCtonlcs technician.

A wide variely of aircraft lntercons can be pulchased through nany avlation eleclronics supply codpenles. LORAN

I,RAN is a navigetlonal aLd used in the U.S. pri.Eatlly fot coaslal

navlgation. lt has recently been edopted for eeroneutlcal use anal ls being us€d

lncreaslngLy in land navlgaclon. Th€ LoRAI leedout csn be ln LORANnuDbets or

laticude and longitude. Ite use lt for aeriaL tlans€cls end nest locations lrhlch

can be tlsnsferred to a nap uslnt latitude and longltude. lJe use a larlne nodel which costs ap?roxfilately $600. Aviatlon nodels tenerally cost beBreen $1,500 and $3,000. Int€nded pulchasels should lessarch I,RAN tbeory and pelforEence befole purchesing e speclflc nake or node1. l{any oakes and ood€ls of I,MN er6 currently avallabl€ thlouth darlne o! allclaft eleclronlcs suppllers,

Additlona11y, a "Clobal Poslrlonlng Sysc€n,. (cps), url.llzlnt setellites ls slaled to coDe on-1ine ovet the next felr yeafs, Ite CpS ellL Likely replace lrMli and be avaiLable an)nrhere lrilhin lhe ctocodllians, range.

Radlos

Radios ale used !o co@rmicat€ betlr€en boals end ailclafC, boet-!o-b9at, and boat-to-truck o! oth€r glound stations, Ite pri.Darily use ladios to dlrec! egg coli.ectlons fron a hell.copter. One or fi.o airboets equipped rith al.rcraft corparible radios gleatly facilirare egg collections. We use barcery operared porcabl,e radios equi.pped with aircraf! headphones on boats thet are coDpati.ble tith exlstln8 eiicraf! radlos, ,hl.ch ello!. the allclaft pilot and observer co calk ove! the altcraft tadlo, to ocher alrcraft, conclo1 towels. co each othe!. and to the collectlon boat v1a a singl.e redlo. The only liniration we have encountered is that oul portable radios have lldited llfe balterie€ lrhich are not capable of excended use. Consequencly, conn€cclon !o the boac,s electrlcal sysren sould be very ben€flcial.

Addllion4lly, one-eay redlos ale used to reley Lnstructions to collection boets equlpped i'lth an Lnexpensi.ve tlanslsloi radlo that uLl1 recelve radlo

signals r,lthln the alrciaft frequency band. I,trls redlo ls evailable through

local eleccronlcs dlstllbutors for about $15. poltable allclaft frequency bend

radios can be purchased lhlouth aircraft electronlc suppllers for approxiDately

9400-$500 (Kenny RLce, Fish and WildlLfe Coop Unlr or Alan tfoodlrarat, Connlssion).

CAPTUREEQUIPXENT

Live Csptule

ID the course of vdrtous sludles, ic is necessary to capcure alligators

rangint in size froD hatchllngs to larte adult naL€s. the folloelng are vslloug

lechnl,qu€s $e use .

S!elSb-b9.9&S*- - Snatch hooks consisr of {eighred rreble hooks acteched ro

a restrainlng 1lne whlch are chlown over an alligator and snatched inlo ics hid€.

The aLllgacor ls subsequently pul1ed in and subdued. The slze of rhe hook and

Line should be nalched ro the size of the alligators to be captured.

Addicionally, snatch hooks can be used in conjunctlon l,rith a rod and reel for

lonter distance and rhe abiliry to play (r1!e our) a larte alllgato!. A

lidLlatio[ !o using snacch hooks ls chet rhe hook ray peflecrale and cause a

wound, Snalch hooks can be purchased fron fl.shing tackle outlets.

S!g!gg. --wire srurles atcached to a restrai.nint line and fascened co a pole

are used to capture alllgslors fror a boet. thls [erbod requi.les approaching

th€ alligato! sc€althily aod placing the snare over its snout and around lcs neck. Tte r€strainidg lln€ 1s then pulled, ehlch lighcens the snare, {hich detaches frod rhe pole. nr€ alligator can take out line , be played ( tired ouC) , pulled to the boa! and subdued. IJ€ prlnarlly use locking snares, shlch have a nechanisn chat preve[ts loosenlDt the snale l'hil6 tenslon ls belng applied. consequentLy, these can be us€d i.n conlunction r'lth a float attached to the restralnlnt llne \.hich does not have to be held or eccached co lhe boa!. LocLlnt snares cen also b€ sec ac cralrls and culvelt openints.

l,lumhw Traos. - -l{urphy traps are basically locklng snares used at a bait station (ATIACH}'ENT L). the advantate of sec snaies is that the capture !6:rr does not have to reDaln at che capture s!te, A proper set-up sill e1low the snaled alligetor to back off into the ,ete! and subEorte co alreit !.t€ capEols.

A Eodlflcetion of the standard Murphy tlap ls che {lgggl4g_!!g!pby (A1an

Woodnard, Coddisslon) nhich can b€ set ln !.eter, rhich greatly enhances the trap's effecciveness. Sneres can be purchased flon Ra)mond Thonpson, 15815

S€coad Place West, LJrnneood, Itashington, 98036,,U.S.A., telephone (206) 743-

0783, or ocher crapplnt suppLiers.

Ptlstron lonEs . - - Pilstloo tongs ere codronly used by horp€tologist f,or handling snakes. chel! rlgld construction also uakes lheD useful in cepturing aLLigators up to 35 inches (91 cn) font. Pilscron tongs conslsr of a tubular alunLnuD pole wlrh a plier-like attachnent on one end and a squeeze crigger on the othe!. The pllers ale clanped dotrn on the alllgalols aeck or tall atrd it calr be lift€d !o the hand or dlopped 1n a c6llection buck€c. fongs are avallable lhfouth Pllstroo Tongs, Inc,, Folt Sdith, Alkansas, for approxinately $40 for a 48 lnch (122 cD) Long tong.

gCggh_89-le!. - -An aninsl resClalnc noose pole can be used to capCule three. co six-foot alllgators. These poles are dade \rirh a heavy cable on poles fou!

(1..2r) to 12 (3.5i!) fe€t long (Ketch-All Codpany, San Diego, CA).

!!gX!99!t. --Sna11 harpoon darts o! heads are aLso used !o caplure alllgaaors over eighE feet (2.42D,. lhese darts ar6 s[a11e!, 1.5 inches (3.75cn), ln Ledgch than the heads descrlbed !n the harvest haeoon, but are [ade 1n the sene fashlon. Harves! Capture

le!-jgglg. - -Set hooks conslsr of a balted flshlng hook arrached ro a

restraining llne. lhe lescrainlng lLn€ can be actached to e flxed poinc or

f1oar. The balc ls suspended above che eate! at a helthc dlctaced by rhe

incended alllgator's size. Balt selecgion should be besed on the aniEels norraL

p!ey, hoeever, we hewe formd thet aged beef or po:.k lung sorks v€ry rre1l. Th€

consistency of the lung a11or.s it to float ohl1e aging increases the bai! scenc,

provldlnt gr€ater attlact1on. Additlonally, a floeting balg cen be thloirn out

!o a car8et aninal.

Tlte restrainj.ng llne is ettached to the suspenslon device uslng a nethod

that rill allo!. the alligator to pull the llne free, We have used clothes ll.ne

pins, rubber bands, tape, and norched sticks, IlIe restlaining 1ine length ls

detetuined by the situatlon, honeve!, enough llne should be provlded !o a11oo

the al1l.galor co subserge and lle otr che botton. Baired hooks nay aLso be used

in conjunction with a rod and reel.

ll€lpggqg, - -llarpoons ale used prinariLy ro cake alligarols at ni.gha by slealthy approach. Halpoons ale especially effective when a nuDber of specific slzed alligatots need to be collecred. We use a harpoon conprised of a d€taching head constlucced of 3/8 Lnch (9.5 Dn) diareter stainless steel rod apptoxinacely

2 lnches (5 ctr) Long, a dliver consclucEed. of L/4 inch (5.4 bn) stalnless steel rod appro:.l.rately 3 i.nches (8 ce) long, and pole constluc@a of I/2 inch (1.3 cn) gelvanlzed pipe o! 2.25 lnch (5 cn) diadecer wood doweLint approxlnarely tO feec (3 d) long (ATTACHIENT 2). If wood doreling is used, lreighc should be added to the harpoon ead to enhance halpoon penetralion. tte harpoon head is atcached

!o a restrainlng line lrith a short tentth of sceel cable. T}le restrainlnt lines length should b€ sufflclent ro al1on rhe a11lgaror to sink co rhe bocton and be str.ong enouth to pull lt to the surface and subdue iC, AddLcionally. a fl-oaC

?5 16 usually atcach€d to the end of lhe restralning llne. Colnonly, e tellon (4

liter) slze plasllc contalnel ls used- Hosever, the line can be atteched co the

bon of lhe boac and lhe boat,s weighc used co cire the alligero!. [o soulc€ of co@ercially conscnLcted harpoons ls available.

&e!gg!i.e&g. --Bantsllcks or pore! heads are priDarlly ussd by dlvels co klll

sherks ot othe! flsh by dlscharging a firealD cartrldga upon contact. Ite have

found tha! th6s€ r'eapons also can be very effectlve fo! k1IIing alllgacors.

Bangstlcks ere eval.lable !n a varlety of plstol, rlfle, and shotgun cellbers. we reconmend eithe! a .38/.357 tragnuo to .44 nagnum pl.sEol ot .12 gEuge shotgun

callber. Cautlon nust be exerclsed ohen uslng a bangstick: they should not be dischatged above the rater,s sulface. Although no benufactuler approved bangstlck ls offeled for use on alllgators, chey can be purchased through dlvlng equlpnent shops for 940 ro 975.

DATA COIIECTION

Length l{€asuaedent

Lentth deasuleroenr of alllgalors can be acco[pllshed by incorporatlnt e tape neesule lnto a nartor glove llr a boerd and applylnt fibeltlass resin over th€ tape. SDal1€! alligacors can be oeasured using such boelds lrlth a rlghc antle boald on the end. The a11lgator ls then stretched ou! alont the boald by holding lts snou! agal.nst the rtghc antle boatd and pulling lrs ra11 our along the lape Deasufe. StDllally, larger alligatols cen be meesuled u.sl.nt a tape reasure lncorporated inco a longer boald. lte often do Chls in conjunclion !ll.!h our rei.ghing epperatus. warghing

ll€lAhlnt of large alllgacors is accodpltshed by a nuDb€r of \.eys &pcndhg

on the facilitles availeble. A scaffold can be erecred at relatively perDAnenc j.s si.ces. The sceffol,d us€d ln conjuncClon i.ith a chain hoist, rdeighing boerd (ATIACHUENI 3) and coDblnarlon of sprlng scal€s. Fiv€ hundled pouod (227 kg)

scales are the lelgest \.e hawe been able to acqulte. CorlsequeatLy, w€ not-Dall.y

use l or 2, 500 pound scales to lreigh laige aLligators. Sprlng scales Dust be

attached by a Dethod the! allons lhen to pulL straltht. pulling ac an anSle l'ill

ceuse \relghing error (ATTACHHENT4). Another Dethod conslsts of a I,OOO potrnd

(454 kg) belance scele ln conlutrcrlon wich a 12 fooc (3,7 d) long, 2 foot (.6

D) nlde board. 8oth of th€se nelhods lequire a Lalge boat or glound slte. l,arte

elligators can be s€ighed h a relatively sEal1 boat using 2 to 4 bathloon tlrpe

scales in conjunctlon \ri.th a lrelghing board. A cape Deasure can be incorporated

ln the lreighlng board for neasuring total and snout-ven! lengrhs. Sdaller

alllgacors can be efflciently lreighed 1n a bag or sack and suspendlng fron an

aPPropllace sPrlng scale.

Spring scales can be pulchased fl.oD For€stry Suppty Co, 205 W. Rankin

Slr€ec, Jackson, l{S 39201.6126 o! Ben l.teedoirs, Inc,, p. O. Box 80549, Arlanta

(Charnblee), eA 30366 or olher sclentific, e:rgineerlng, or forestry supply

cotrpanies.

I.1ISCELLqI{EOUS

l{arsh Eoatds

we often find oulselves havLng to waLk in places noc intended for hu[ans co tlanslc. In locacions lrlth floatint Cussocks, dense energenC or floacing vetetatlon, [uck soll, or other locatioos lrhele the substrate iril1 Doc quire suPPort person's a w€i.ght I.€ une nalsh boe!& ehich ale aonstnrcEed floo 1 inch

a (2.54 cD) thlcL, 6 to 8 lnch (15 co 20 cn) it1de, and 5 to 8 feec (1.E to 2.4 r) long boalds. Additlonelly, short roPes are attach€d to both end€ for transport and letrleval. lte boards cen be Placed on th€ lntetrded Pech and rill, tn treny cases, suppot! a person's weighc. lle usually celry tlto ldentical boaEds and ley one in flodt of the och6!.

CONCLUSION

Crocodlllan resealch and oatrateEenc proS!:uls lequlrs sPecielized equlPnent and techn!.ques to gather dats o! ensule successful harv€sts. In Flollda, ree have found thac standardlzatlon of these techniques and equiPnen! is virtually iEposslble because of th€ \.lde varlety of alllgato! hebitac cyPes. As e r€sult,

\re have Dodifl€d nany existlng technlqu€s end develoPed ne\t ones !o achleve alligacor nanagen€nt and resealch objectives. Alchough ou! equlPnent and techniques day be only appllcable to Flolida setLands, we hoPe thls dlscusslon wiII stioulate you! interest ln crocodilian caPcule cechnlques and equiPEenc.

If you have questlotut o! coulents retaldlng sny Portlon of this presentatlo4, pleese contact arrY of the Comlssion's biologists. fhey should b€ able co answer you! que6tl,ons or refer you to soneone who caa.

E AttachDent I

INSERT

''- )''

:!,#./ // \-

iY ^tPsoN',t SlU.rOCXlr|O .. sxatl RtYtt0il0lil0ilPs0lt c0ltPlltf l58l5.2ndPt. Vrest t Y!,r,{w000.wasH. 9E0lt REnSeDSEPf.. t '|l (2oL )143.01E3 .LlsY'**'j

'uto)|l so]i's sELF.LocKtNcSNARS

fio. 00.?0" siilrk d sn.R tor smdl gnnc & birdr, ., . . .tara !io. 0.:i "!$irrlrd (n',3tr.t, mirt,nbbits'...... , .t?1, Io. o.Xlilo " e*itcl0d GIu6r, coor, !!c.r...... lt ra A dmpl. y.t .mlrin8ly cff.{Uvc dcyic. tot :'-o.l.S 10" strir"l(d (rp..id lor sarE)...... , . . . th.ao s|vl4 pfied pellt lrcn wrtng.ft. pr.d.. .\-D.t .xS{ o " tonslanstn (b.av.r, tynt, .t!.) ...... ar[ to4t.1s ioty uibd!, or lron posid€.tap tbi.r... .\-o.2 .S.r0 " s$n cl.d (specidb€.ver.r&d...... ttzrC !s thc |nl!n.l is h.ld bolow th. !!rld.. E!p€. lio. 2.\I.72 " lonslerglh(belernym). . . ..,, ..,, .trt la clrlly cff.clb. ln sh.tlow tr&i *!3 shen th. i\o. 3.\\.?2 " loag.tength.oyotG& bnllb vot0 . . . . . t6 JC <- tttp mry b. 5.t h I V-thrFd pocl.t wl r i\_o.t.\\.|o 11.long.le.glh.oug.r &rotf., . . ., ., ..ch tS.6l Drorvncr rviF cxlendiDg otrr brnt irto rrilr Io. 5 x\r0 fi. loog-l€ndhlor bl..t be|' . ., . . . emh t,t l: .-Cofip|lO *l!h l|'leni4 md rncho.i.t i"o. t-Sl0 il..ont€r s$ileled to! bl.cl b.|' . . , . . .rch ta J0 swivlh, dros'nir{ loct, ind hilh.rt trrd. ot \o. 6-XX.l0ft. lof be.r.rd trizry. .,,, ...... ,..ch t3 J| I! doubh awltt .t!d rln. )io.6.S l0 ft. crnrer s*ircl for big b€rrqri.zly. . . .&h t?.al NoJ.D lor 'i|Iikrl. hitrt. tEcoon. do2l8J0 (S dlnoreslqilel - XX denolEltedocr) No. r'D fo! B.!lc'l Olt ! ...... do!.115.90 SPDCIAL DROWNER,SMADE TO ORDER \o. SSKI Strnirai Snar! Kir-tor F.bbiq squirrltt, bbds er..2 sna.es.ticsand instructiorli, ...... ,. .., eichtt J! PLE.{SEADD O' OF ORDER FOR rDD IO' TOSTAGEAND HANDLING POSTACEAND ITANDLING sNAa: Pltt!

stand.&l d l.o.9 L.nrth Mod.L lig. 1 ihw! !h. laDo{! thoEpE! Srqr. l,c}- Flg 2 shwr method ol udng Ar.ho. or Enal f.!t.n.r. Sottd :lne3 show .rd ol Sn.rt |! lt voutat .rclrEl! |'€.' pol.. or 3r.kc. Dotrcd lrn€ show! m.ihod ol lns€Rlna P (fsrul.) t|lal W ($|3hct, lbrolgh touril ry. tn .lcyhol!,' lnd lnro tock. l.a {or. ?.l|slon ol .n!rc wtr. prlvlntt rny poirlbl. .h*lna locc. Fl& 3 s h o$'r FIG. sbo.ters$ileled snare s. Dopuler in sn.rinA rabbirs. rIG.4 c, 'nnES - to stondold length 'ith .,an.bo bc.l and nEPAIR cut l!ns: and ESPEC. ono ferrulc olr.odv fl.ttened on oaa end. To or dt6ncr reoove old or IALL:.ADAPTED r.poi! t.ct. dorog.d - ri;o. o.!.!bla pqrtl otr ntt rit. dd llott€n TO IEAVER and oD. fe!rul.. dr! lD.cict tto-Fv t'i3t .ir. Otr€r rnarin& It .-ro qr usd ill oiiqiMl .nd!.; coF.. i! cll rhc* srarcs. fro|n \/ .i:e. fror l€ 0 thtouih l0 3. ]-o. 0 lo No. 2/5

ina js b)' mcars ol \afi \'ire rhroueh th. .$1rd .te .nd .roun.l SNARES AND SNARING a book on a rr.c. role, or stak.. tn !l.I s.XX lnd No. professiotral Calladido & Alaskar, d SX 3narc., tor bla wolve. .nd b..rr, . I,.c. inaiing rnethods by Raymond Thompson inl sNtr.l ls bullt in thc Dtatdlc ot rh€ tO toot tDclude.ir latest methods of unde!-ice rrar.. and a 5,1t. €xrenston rnrle rrtr. w|lh !.Frla'ron tisrener ls added.wE slraring of Beaver, Mink, Otter, 'r€' ITANUFAC. ftl?E Sf,_ARES TRAPPER.SOWN SpECl. Musklat and Saccoon. . . . flCA'rlOr-S O:\.. SPECIAL OnDER A|l out With special tree and pole snaring rnarci. tio. o ro tio. 6.xx tnctu.iv., u!. htghei methoda. Fr.d. NO,lr'aY nrlsT (d?v.top.d by nr!f. hJid Th.mpson In 1926rSTEEL w]RE 31 s3.00 XETCH-ALLCOMPANY

PRICE LIST OF REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR KETCH.ALL POLES

Cablcscomplcte - with plastic Unirs Spring,Ba & Unit Pricc (f.o.b.San Dicpo)

ea, For J fi. SlandardPolc For 4 fi. sD.6i ea. For 5 ft. t6.00 tE.00 For4to6ft. ExtensionPolc 18.00 For 7 to 12ft.

(AbovcCablcs arE Complatc and Rcadyto lnstall)

Other Rcplaccmcntparts for Ketch_Allpolcs Dcrice- with llocking. Cag., Balt Bearings,Washcr & SprinS (dcsignarcifJor Srandardor ExrcnsionFote). e4...... Tooth Cuard (fils all polcs) s 8.50 2.70 e4..,...... ReleascKn_ob- - with Washcr{dcsignata if for Standard EXrCnSlOn POIC) - 5.40 Head corn-plctewith Hair Guald, Lock Ringand Set Scrcw (dcsignaie pole).... if for 7 lo 12ft. Extcnsion ,.. 16.25 Hand Crip (dcsignat.if for Srandardor ExlcnsionPolc c. Chuckwilh (fo. potc Lock Ring Extcnsion onty) 1t.70 - SEE REVERSESIDE FOR PRICESON KETCH.ALL POLES,ETC. _

REPAIRCHARGES

On StandardPolcs $10.00labor plus parrs On ExrcnsionPolcs l2.N "

Notc: Wirbrropcrcarq rhe Kctch-A polewill givc longand useful servicc; howcv€r. wilh continuous *o,!?lq lT:l1l T*,ronalty othcrparls may nccd rcplacin& lr isusualtyadvanragcous to rhc lh"."cccssaryparrs and make his own rcpairr, or Ketch_AIComiany wi bc glad::11.-,._l:r"l1:!ro malc rcpatni for laborplus pans. bBffiFa?ll 2537unNaf,srl'iva u! ritlPff;"?3i!"3#l1t"q

PRICELIST e!&q!rye&!rap!t!:L.19_8!)

Units Description O ,'....11:i"l'li:"*", 3 feet Standard Kcrch-AII Polc s 51.20 4 fcer 60.00 5 fcct 65.50 -e3.: :' 4 to 6 feet ExtensionKetch-All Pole 8t.50 / to l2 tect I r0.c{

ca. 9- x9" x 30- Ketch-All- All PurposeTran ,...... 6t.50 6"x6-x Kerch-All- Rodenr Trap ...... -17.0() pr. llrge or Mcdium LealhcrProtection Cloves ...... ,.... 15.00 arn'l 1 1986 O Priccs,'n rhisShccr iirm rULt- :.+ ; thereaflcr subjed lo Chrngc without Noricc - l0q0 Discounlon Ordersof Szl0O_00or more ShippingCharges will be prepaidand chargedro Cusromer CaliforniaSales subjecl to SalesTax ForeignSales payable in U.S. Ddltars

_ SEEREVERSE SIDE FOR PRICELIST ON PAR'I,S_

ORDER BLANK

Individualsmay usc this Form- ordcrs obligatinSMuniciparities, states, -fifiD.firrrE|T''E'rfizeo-iorrrr-- FederalGovcanments. etc.

ORDERNUMBER DATE--

To: Ketch-AltCornpany:

pleascfurnish it.ms a! checked(at cuffent prices) Purchaser\Name Ship to

Address Streei Addrass City & Srrtc 7ip------= Ciry & Srare Zip- Phone( (Pkasefumish O St.eci Addressfor Shipping)

AurhorizcdSignaturc Tirlc E:i= \fuff,fl

! I

16 /s

\, l/z L:"?/

v Airboat Speclficatlons

EOLtr

To be latest cottonrnouth design or equivalent. !gtgl![: 13' 5.

Transon rrldth: Eighty-eight inches {88r}. Sldes: tnenty inches (20.) at mld-shtp.

transoo Beight: torrest point needs to be not Less than Elghtoen ldches (19.).

1.5 Color: Camouf,lageot Dark cleen

1.6 Deckr Eave hinge stolage alea $ith tro (2) locklng f!anes.

I.7 lttaterial: ?he hulL eill consist of Iayers of rroveo poLyester-fiber glass !ate!1al.

1.8 Botton: Consist of no less than four (4) layers of llatt four (4) . stlingers thilty-seven i.nches (37") outsi.de usiDg five-i,nch (5- ) quartet by four-inch ({") fur,

1.9 ji:tg9g: Corlsisr of three (3) Iayels of polyesrer-fibergtass aC the gidesi no less than four (4) layels in the chines. l.1O tHUt{ PoltaneE: Shall be fastened to the botton of the hull l,tth poLldnet faaten€ls. I|he polyne! shall extend fron ttanso[ forward t{elve feet (12r) and a teo-foot (2,, piece attached to that sheet fo$rard. 2.0 ErcurB

2.1 Renanufactured O54OLyconing, no l€€s than 2dO horse power to include all acc€3sories, airclaft startet, benall,x,nagneto, carburetot, fly ,heel and flade artestot.

3.0 aIE ltsE

Stainless steel exhaust headels sith stal,nless steel exhaust flex !o erlt ebove tran!'on.

4.0 ALTEtrIASOR

Delcot not less than 60 ataps rith internal exciter.

5.0 PIDP

Seventy-four inches (74') instaLled to be no 1e9s than one lnch (1.) belov top of transon. 6.0 EACIBIC 'GI. POTO

llEG TrIlI

to be aounted uoder enginei not less than 30-9aUon capacityt intarDal fuel guaget coast guard approved.

9.0 RlCClrC

All oelaL rolk plineil ,Ith epoxy prloer and flnlshed coat. ehal1 be poLyurelhane paint (Iigh! green) .

9.0 E[@TB SIITD

9.f. uotor nounts EhalL be nourted at five points uslng one lnch (1") and thlee-qualter (3,/{) squale tubing not less than sixteen (16) 9ua9e natcr ial.

10.0 sEt?lfc

10.1 Trio seats in line - !ea! operator bottod seat to be treLv€ Lnches (I2') above [agnetor paslrengea seat to be foruarrl eight inches (8') loser. seating to be elected on tless design f!@ engine stand to deck bulxhead (no legs or bracing froo sealing truss to floor frod englne).

1r.0 SEATINC SAll|D IqTERIIL

ShaII be one-half tnch (l/2') and thlee qualte. {3/4) -E!'lt galvanized tubing. r2.0 ctrttFt 9trg.

12.1 sbau, ba noirnled on llght siale of seat.

12.2 Control, paD€l in6ttloents shal1 lnclude bendix al.craf,t starting switcht toggle srltch fo! btlie putrp, toggle sri.tch fo! davigatlo. lightst toggLe sultch fo! elecllic fu€I Pulgt fno"'$ay toggle $ritch lor electllc lrh tabt toggle svitch fo! lntelnal. huu. Light.

!2.3 Coattol panel guages shall include tackooete! ttlth hou! oete!, mcchanlcal oil plessuie, nechanical oi.1 tenpelatule vott deter.

13. O NI,.IG TIO| I.IGET'

13.1 coast gualal apploved lights installed. lt.o ffi3 SEE!-@F ClAra l,l.l Cablc dounted at contlol panel 3ha1l 90 to the carbureto! to rlch-lean ahut-off valv€ at carbnreto!. 15.0 E.ECTrIC EItd POIO

15.1 llo lees thln 1,,800 ph-ouu.et througb sld. of, boat.

16.0 EACIIIC tnIX IAB

16.1 Inctalled oD !ea! blanson in lhe c€ntet of the huII.

17.0 I.Iet

L7.1 Hourted unile! ope!a!o! floor. l8.o lccEsRlre Pmr.E

Shal,l be lounted fo! opelltor,s rlght foot using natlnc clble antt trottle lInkage.

19.0 Pt@ mtD

To b€ constructeal oC 3/l a.d I/2 EltT galeanized condult. Rear gualal to hav. (3/4.) 3/4-lich hopps. A11 J-bars shatt be one-half itrchlL/2.| , not oole than foulteen inches (14i) apalt on !ea! of hopps. J_bals extend forl'ard to fron! of englne flame of ptop gualit ls coveied rlth trro lnch (2') x fout inch (4") selded lJile and felded ln place. 2O.O AIIDBTS

Shall, be tro feet (2') by fou! feet (4,) allfoil design of t{etaling alutinuu flll rith urethane foan fo! support. Rudalels shalL haye adjuslable tlln tapst ruddels shall pi.vot on nylon contlol. 21.0 gfEllrc

Contlol ar[ shall be.t operator,s hard (uslog latest deslgns), cable glving full luddet coDtlol.

22.0 stcrca @torxltcttt

Tno (2) storrgc codpartdents Located under lhe t o (2) seaEs. 23.0 SEXI:I

23.I Shalt b€ o! fiberglass constnrction ulth vlnyL upholste!, including arletnal lalD covers. FOR YOUR INFORMATTON

Any Eontlon of brand naner or auppli€rr of .qqlpD.nt &scrlb.d ln Gh6 attach€d Lnfoltleltonel packegc do€s nor rept.a.ttt .ndors.r€nt by th. Flolida Ce|!. and 8r€sh Waga! Ftsh CotiDtsslon. An:/ such na!.a or suppllalt a!:c pa.s6nc6at nr€r€ly to tdcntlfy rh€ ry?6r of €qulpr.nr th.r corlslssl.n b!ol.ar.r. hav€ foulrd luitabl€ for Ch6la eorL.

3E

TIIE STATUSOF CROCODWUSPOROSUS IN TI{E SOLOMONISI.ANDS

H. Mcas.l Udversiryof Sydrey Sydocy2006 Au5tralia

and

F, lvrf,trc Khg FloridaMEcum ofNatural Hisrory cair€6villc,Florida 11.USA

INTRODUCTION.Uotil 19E9,!o systematicsurvry of thc aaltwatcrcrocodilc poptlatioos in the SolomotrIsLr& hadb€c! uadertaketrand \,€ry litdc wEsknowtr about the statusof the sD€ci€sitr thos€ islands.Duriry 1988,Melvin Boltotr was girrr a coEultancyby FAO wit[ terEs of referincewhich idclude& 'L reviewthc q'rrcrt situation*,itl rcgardto cocodilc utilizatior i! thc SolomotrIslards.

2 a&ite otr Eethodolog for cooducingsuncys of eocodilc habitatsard EoDitorirg GocodilepopulatioDs.

3. leviewlegislativc asp€cti of clocodileutilizatioa

4. a&is€ on implicationsand requirede s underthe CITES.

5. adviscoo feasibilityof crocodilefaming includingamongst others, econonical/socia.l viability,potc ial site{ hrndingimptications and ecotogical sustainabiliry of crocodile [email protected]

Boltotrrcportcd to FAO in Ftcld DocuDelr No. 1,TCP/SOI//6753, May 1988;'A Feasibiliry StudyofcrocodilcFarning;SolomonIslada'Thoughhc*93o y ableto tsit a fcw areasin tf,e islaadsand malc selcctcdspodight suacys os four eatcrways,h€ wasablc to corlectlyconclude:

"Itcsc s€le{tedswvcyE talen t ether\dth Iocalrepo(E erport figuresand the fact that skin- huntiDgir row b€ingconduatod i! tbe mo6rrcmote provi[cls alt iDdicatei€ry low ltunbets of crocodila6.Evideady, howcvcr, ttcy arestill vcrywidcly distribute4'

Aeong his ae€oEmcrdatiorsx,€ae: 'Inposc a tcmporarye.:eon baa fo.3 ]€ars"

"Locatesuitable arcas ard crcouragethe ideaof socodile sanctuaricsir supportof thc ralchilg s€letnc(c.& ku'i lagooa). 'Cafiy out r%ular spodighfcoutlts !o nodtor trcodsia crocodilenunbcrs.

Establisha smallbut etrcicnt'farm'at Mamaraspccifcally desigted to utilizc the ofral rcw bcirg p.oduced'

39 Itr July 1989,the s€rior autho.sas giw! a'no fcc' co.sulta&y by tlc CITESSecrctariat, eith thc tid. 'Sustairablcutilizatiod of thc aalteetcrcrocodilc Ododvhlt to&tus in lhc SoloEo! Islads.' Th€ objcdiiEs*Erc:

To assisrthe Goveltrm€ntof thc Solo'Bo!Isldds h astablishiDgtic conprchc8ivc lalagpmcnt platrfor tf,c spcciesthrough.

'i) a ficld sunry of thc disriburion atrdstatus oI thc saltwatercocodile in tho Solomoa Isla A,ard

'D a! a66crsEcrtol thc cfcds of thc otrlcDt reloitatiotr od the wild population.

To prepare,if app.opriat€,a p.opo6alto transfcrthc populatio!of thc SoloEonklards from AppctrdirI to AppctrdixU otr b€haf of t[c CITESPartiar.'

Tbc 6eld suwry wasmadc during the pcriod26 July-8 Septcmber1989 - sc. sailiq tiEes i! Appcdix I. It wasa.@plex andudsually difticult op.ration. Thejunior auttor paidhis oq|' fare to AusEaliaatrd assfued the scrior authorwith thc sutaey,at no fcc. Ttc prca€ntpapcr prcscDts ttc .csults,cotrdusiors a[d recoooeadationsresulting ftorn the sn.wy.

METHOIN. Thc survcymclhods for repGatablclight spodiglt ccnsusingof cocodilc pnpulationsare givenir ddail itr Moroglaph 1 of'Suncys of Tidal RiiEr SystcEsitr tte No(hem Territory of Autralia andTheir CrocodilcPopttlations.' llris publicatioais onc of 20 monoglaphson crocodile 3urrrts by M6sel atrdc!-\rorkcrs ad publishc-dby PergamonPrcss. Sim! th€ SolomodIslads crocdile suw€yc/as ooly conc€rsed {iti trumber,size dass, and distributioo of 6ocodilc6,it wasrot €ssertia.lto mcasurea.d recorda numb€rof parametersusually recorded in a survey.State of th€ tide, amounlof bad. expo6c4water salhity andtcEpcraturc werc donitored. Salidty ncasucments irdicrtc whcthcrthc aquatichabitat is a fteshwatersysteE o. otlerwGe. This matterb of idporta(€ asit gcncrallydctcrEitrqr the suitablity of thc partiorlarwatefi/ay as a potcDtialbrcedirg arca- sce MorographI, pagr 1m, No.Eally, with a tram of ttree, $fleys areeade al a speedof Z) to 30lor per hour ard co!€r fton 40 to 100td pcr righabcforc thc tidc risar andthc aEoutrtof exposedba* deceasesto less than60 co Dalirg it hardlr to i€e thc crocodiles,Thia dcfnitcly is not the clsc ro lbc SoloDod Islands,Tho Nmbcr of s/atcreays\rhich arc both wo.th*hilc suwcyi.gatrd arc suweyablearc few andltslla.lly scattcrcd wi&ly. Thcy nosr oftcn arc vcryshort bccause of hills or Eou,rtainsirland" Just gEttingto importantdocodile habitaBoftc! teke3dorc than24 hoEs, ard a dayor two lindiag and &gotiating \vith thc tradiaiolallandowncrs of thc arc4 but thcn only 15Di.utos arc.equted to survey it, pcrhaF 25 tE i! all O! r luobcr of oc(ssioDsa dugoutca8oc or a 3m aluminumdbghy wit! two paddlenw?l uscdto suvcy sEa lagoons.Err! with a 6m canocand a 9.9horsepower outboard motor, surlEying spce& w€ropabi ly slow. lagools witt dangqouscoral racfs aDd narrow strcaEs wittr rumcrous stlbm€rgcdobstacles prcclu&d suwctingat bighspcr/& suncy spec&on evcnrclativ€ly dcar *atcrvaF EErcoftcn veryslow whctr the canoccarncd 3 to I pcoplein additio! to tle 3-Ba. suwey tcan; 2 surEy lcahcr6,vilagc chiefqtraditiond ladot Ders,aad hunters, aI iDsislingon beiDg pr€sdrL

RESITLTS.Thcsc arc Frsc cd ard disorss€dscparaaely for cachof lhc gcrcral alcassulvcycal L TcEoto ProviDcc(Sant C.uz Islads).

Doiry thc dghts of 29-31July1989, tlc followiagwaterways lJrrc suflieyed(Ior zlro stanilg poiDEsc. S.rra Cnr Isbrd+ NcndoIslan4 1:50,0@s{llc Eap, shcct10/165/16):

40 Lotrgitude ktitudc Lucdoada Bay ard Rivcr 15959.6E (14635 MatiDi Ilgoon ard Lale IASTTE r47.6'S MblaEoli lrgoon ft646.6 E (r43.6'S Tepiai tagootr L66"0d2E 1f46.4'S Re.f (Alamboi) Island 166Vt.aE r427S

Midstream distalccs sufi€ycd ard the trumtrcrsof crocodiles sighted\rere:

tE [umbcr sighred LurEoaada Ri!€t 2A 2 Luldoatrda Bay 22 0 Crcct A' at lm 55 on LlraEoa!& RirEr 05 0 crcd 'B' arto 32 on LJemoan& Rivcr 05 0 Creet 'C' at bn a9 or LucdoandaRiv€i OJ 0 cr€€t 'It ar ld L8 o! LucDoandaRivcr o

MatiDi kgoon z6 2 Mafimi LaIe p€rirnetcr z0

Mblamoli Ilgoor 43 0 TQiai I4oon 7 Rccf Islaad Lagoon 0 2

21.8 10

Shorcliacdistsnce,s survcycd wcrc suct greater.Tlough thc suweyabledistaacca app€ar sdall, it csscdtiallyrcprcscDtr all ofttc surecyablEaililablc habitatin tbe systchs"Ody Matimi Late whic! ii ftcaf,vaie.,ald Lu€ooandaRivr. ald thc {rects ir LucEoan& Bay,which havc a large fteshwateroow, contain good crocodilc brcldiry babitat. Thc sizcclssses of thc 10aliIrals sightedwcrc: 1(H), 1(2-3), 1(34), 1(5{'), 1(7-8), 4(EO<6'), l(EO), whcrcH standsfor 'tatcblirgs' altd EO sra.n&for ,cycsorly.' EO arettose aaioals for whicha sizcestinate could rct bc obtairc4 A sli& of a (fu') (rocodilcwEs sighted on thc northcmb€ach of Luemoaa&Bay. Morris lrub4 nc,r Matioi Llcj had5 haachlingsard 42-3') aaimalsin a pea. In additioo,w€ sightedand Deasured11 ftaahly salted cocodilc sldls froE admalsranging il sizefron to 7 in length. Matimi klc 19asshot out jusr prior to our surrEy,.ev€dthoogh tic sldls wcreless tha! " the mininum siz! aad apparcntlyilcgal utrderFc6crl SohEotr Islads law. Ttc abovcrcsults spcat for thcms€lv€s"lt appeatsthat weviewcd a remnantpopulation otr thc vc.gc ofcrtitrdior. Ircal pcoplercportcd thaa creek etrtcringGraciosa Bay and strcams or the trott! coa6tof NcsdoIsland oftc supportedsub6taDtial Gocodilc populatioDs, but tlesc wereshot out. Bot! Utupuaard Vardtolo Islaa& of thc S.nraCruz group in Tcdotu Provircc arc also trom to co aio roEc crocodibs(hudcrs hayErrcrndy shipFd bidesfton thcrex hoecr,€r,habitat therc i6 lcss€dedsive thatr od NendoIslatr4 Wc c,rrc unablcto obtah uarlportation to ard ftod thcscislan& within a rcasonablctimc framcand thus could not surveytbeD.

2. Malira (Sar Cristobal)Provitrcc.

DuriDgthc trightsof 7-9August 1989, thc folowitrgwatcnrays *crc survclcd(for z€.o startirg poirG sc€Sar Cristobalt50,000 scalc Bapq s[e€6 1O/l6Ln, LO/l6l/L\ and10 /1A/B).

f.olgitu& ladtu{tc Naluraghcna Passagrbgoon 161'14.9€ 1(P475S Marau I6lard kgootr ftam3E 1tr48.9'S Maror Bay arca fiL"n2E 1f28.l',S

Midstrcam distancqrsu.r,€yed atrd thc rumbcrs of crocodilesBightcd wcrc:

td nuEber sighted NasuraghcnaPasagc lagoon 32 2 Mar r Islald llgood 53 0 Marcu Bayarca L4.6 2

The 23.1tm sutl€yedrepreserts the bcstrcnainilg crocodilehabitat on Malira Islald a!4 acco.dirgto localhuterq qocodilesare rarely seetr elsewhere. Gcnerally speakin& Malira tsland contaiEsonly marginal babitat for c.ocodile$Saili.ug tiEe to andfrom the wid€spr€adareas surveyed wasZ hr 30 mia. Thcsize classes ofthc 4,'in.l. si8lteds/etq 1(+5), 1(5{'), 1(7-8'),ad 1(8-9').One (3a') crocodilewas bcitrg.-aptivcly rcarcd on Malaupahakla[d of the Thee SistersGroup of islards. Vy'e alchoredat MalaupaiDaand exrEined tc/o frc6hwatcrswamp nestbg arcas od the northemesd of the islald. Thc swamFx,€re Eocrly dry .nd no old ncsta*rrc sightcd No suitablcaachonges exis otr Malaulaloor A.li'ireIslandq the two othcr iilard ir thc Three Skrcr8group. Noncof thr traditionallatrdown..s o. eldersof tbeseislalrds werc preseDt (they were awayoo UlawaIslar4 somc50 t n di$arr) *hcn ec visitcdMalaupaina Islatrd ad w€were inlormed that Ali'itc Islandhad b€€! cloccdby policefor inr$rigation- Habitatotr all thee of thcscislands is rcry oarginal for crocodiles.Storiss about large populatioos of ciocodilesod Ali'ite Islard Eusl rcdair ju6t that,hea$ay, util confroed.

3, MalaitaProvinc!.

Doring thc dghts of U-14 August1989, tf,e fol,owingwatererays were suweyed (for z€ro startiry pointsscc Maiaita L50,000scale nap6, she.ts9/16l/5,9/161/6, ?.r.d9/161/10)l

l,oqitude Latitude TabaRivcr arca 161 .rE 927.45 Mara Masitc Passagc 161"85E yzt.4s ktc Korca 1j'"?63E r3.1'S Si'uaRirEi L6ti.4E 917.9'S

MidsFcam d;stalccs and thc mbers ofcocodtles sichled were: lb dumbci sighted Mate Masitc Passagc ns 0 TaLaRirE , tm 0 to 24 0 TaramatrCre€L at tln 1.9on thc TatraRiicr, tm L9 !o 5.0 3,1 0 Crccl bchhd Marihotc Isla.n4 Im 0,7to L4 o:7 0 HuIo River,tt[ lJ to 35 1 Marrfi Macro Charn4 lm 2J to 59 Su'uHorihori C.eeL,tm 4.9 o'nMaatili Ma€roCt|..ncl to tm 6.7whcrc it cotracctswiti th€ Huro Rivcr 1f 0 l:lc Korca pcrimeter 5 Si'uaRivcr 73 1 Totd 0.7

TaLa Rivcr, Taramata Crcdq latc Kor€4 and thc Si'ua fuvc! provide crccllc crocodilc babitat W€ sltrcr&d Eo6l ofthe b€st cocodilc habitat tttowu to peoplc on Malaita and where rcportcdly there used to be laryc ciocodile populations. Tbe odd crocoalileis sightcd sporadicaly itr ttc Darginal habitat wtich domidatesth€ wateflr.aysof Malait& Sailing times to thcse are usually loDg and as *c foutr4 lot ftuitful Kwaimbaita River oD the castordside of Malaita was,reported'to lEve 6,), ald 1(EO). Ooly in lake Korea did *e sight a small range of siza dass€s It app€arsthat oo thc island of Malaita *€ were viewiDga wry sEall rerLnant populatiotr, rapidly approachingod8ctioD" Al thc Tala River, bunters prcscdcd stitrs of3largc qocodiles fot sale. SliDs also haw b€€n scrt iD rccat Dontls ftoh thc Si'ua Riv€r arca. At Elioae vilagq ofr the MaIa Masilc CbaDneLwe vie$/Ed11(+t) crocodiles ir captivity. thryx,€re i! exccllc cordition The villagcrs told us that in 1986 they capturc4 U[c4 atd at. th€ mothcr. thc cggs itr het nest r€rc takcn atrd batchedand the U Lcalfhy aniEals camc ftoE the,sr" Thc vilagcrs 6tstcd thcy otrly hu cf,ocodiLsi! tbc Febmary- Msrch dc,stiDgperiod- Ttcy *ait uatil the nest is built; thcD sufiound t[e dother and n€st with a stale Icncc. The molher b thcn ldlled and eater- The eggsarc tatel for hatchi!& h Fcbruary 1989,three femal€awcrc ldlcd i. this fashior- Norc of their eggshatchcd. A more effectivc method of destroyirg thr crocodile r€sourcc is di6cult to ilnagiac.

4. Ilabel Pr@ircc.

Durirg &c dighrs of 1620 Augusf 989, the folowiDg *aterwa),s vcrc survey€d(for starting ,cro poh6 s€c Sarta Ilabcl t50,m0 napr, she.ts 8/159/1 ed 7/L:A/tO)l

I4ngitude Iditudc BaravalgPas6agc atrd Ortega Ch"nn€larca 69:BAE Havi Bayarea ltlz).4€ 73.4$ Vcrao Bayarca L*lltE r37.9S Gbahimhobolslard 158 3E 738.dS

43 Dist!&ca su.r,EFd ard lumbcrs of crocodilc6sidtcd slrc:

tD rumbcr siqhtcd BaravalcPassagc and Oncga ahrnn.l 9.0 0 LoghaiRiver at tD 3.9o! OrtcgaChatrcl 0 Nalihc Crccl at lm 6.4otr sar JorgcIslard sidc of ftcgr Cbamcl L1 1 Tutsaliu RiEr at l'3 2.4 oo BaravalcPassagc 11 1 Toutoro Riler at kn 25 on TutEssiu Rivcr 0.6 Kokoibut! Rivcr at lm 3.1 o! Toutoru Rivcr 13 U RavihiCrclk at lm 3.1on ToutoauRivcr 1.0 0 Kabbud Crcct at lE 1.7 o! BaravatrcPassagc 0 Havi Bayand its.iecl of 0J tD at tm 45 5.1 1 SutuFda Crccl at t r 27 oa Havi Bay 1.8 0 MalasuCrc€k at lm 4.0 on Hari Bay 0.9 0 GhabirahoboIsland kgootr pedm€te. LO VcoaoBay 4.L 2 OgasaB.y at tm 02 on VcnaoBay L6 I HulaghiBay at lE 13 on Vdao Ba,, 0.9 0 Ctccl'.{alh25on Vcrao Bay L1 0 Totd 53 21

Sada kabcl Isla4 lite Malaita,contains oocrly margiralcocodilc habitat,althowh . lumbcr of thc rivcrsabdc haE goodto €ncclcdthabitat. Pradicaly aI of the ctccksa.nd rivcrs have a largr il0ow of frashwater. Thc sizcdasscs of tf,c 21qo.odil€6 sidted wrrs ?(I{),3(2-3'), 1(34'), 1(55),4(EO<6'), a(EO>6), ard l(EO). The l5 cro@dil€ssightcd in chahiralobo Lagootrco.stitute a sEall but inportant populatioaprobably rcsultiog ftom a sirylc pair ofbrccdirg adult clocodilcs.wc sighted ttc b. y slidc of a (910') crocodilcb€twecn the lagootraod tbc sea" Thc rcEaiDderof tb€ .e,sulbitrdicale a ridely scattc.edreDnant nu.Eber of crocodiles. Ar Kia vilagq s/cvis*cd 3 trtchlirg! cipturcd i! Gbr.hirahobokgoon 6nd 1(34') ard 1(+ 5') aainalr caporc! ia ttc Allard],ccBay arca"

5. WestcmProvilca

A- Chois€ul wc $hrcycd t\,o saEplearc.r itr choiscul cbosenby a koocrtedgcablehunter, duringthe ligtns of 23'24AugusrO89 (fo. ze.o staningpoidtr scr Choiscr L50,0mscalc dapg t\*ts 7/157 lr.d 7l15t lql

4 Longitudc l,atitu& O& llarbour area 1571&6'E 72UlS Ndorolo RiiE and l,elerygahna Llet arca t5t9.6E rr9as

Di*aaccs surrcyerl aad numbersof crocodilessightci wcre:

Ln rumbc. sighted Oala Ha6our 2 Ve!&lc Crcck 1J 0 Kasu River 05 0 Oala Rivcr 0 klenggavana InlEt 3,0 0 Ndoroko River L7 0 Total 14.4

Tbe amourt of remainiDgsuitablc, availableqocodile habitat or Chois€ul appca* ro oe very limitd ad cvca that is disappcaringquiclly as Eorc and Eore ger&rs are pla.ded along tf,e rratcrraF. Thcic arc a fcw bmckirh fuooos iolad fton the seawhich havc dif6cult acccssaad are rcpo.t€d to co[tair a f€w remaiairy crocodiles We visitod onc of thesc durirg the day but lr,cre unable to surveyif al ghL A 2 m dogout canoc *ould haveto be draggedh to surey it. This would mt ttc a iafc operatioq especiallyifa largc docodile did i!.habit thc lagoon. It is apparcd that the salt$"tcr crocodile is or t[c verge of disappcariagftom Choiseul ard that *€ viewed two of the remruEt ones. Both of ttres€(&9') a.dnals were sighted duing the day. We also vict|d 3(3-a) docodilcs iD captivity at Kcal4 taletr ftom thc lagoo! on t_hem.amed island a.f,ossfroE Arariti oa VaghenaIslatl4

B. Vella lavcla. We srtvcyed one area oo Vela tavell4 requ€sredby the Minister of Natural Resourccs. Ngolosoli Clcclg draiaiog tle ticrnat area od Vella Lar€lla into paraso Bay, thc Bay and thc vilagc ficsbwater lagoor wcrc sun€,€d oE ttc dight of 5 August 1989(for zero startitrg poiDtss€e VcIa lavcla t50,(m scab nap6, shert 7/156/11):

foagitudc Iditudc Ngolodoli GccL area L56"392E 737J'S

Distanc€ sorrc!€d atrd mtrbers of qocodiles sightcd wcre: tB numbersighted Ngoto6oliCrccl LO 0 Para6oBay 0 Vilage Irgoor 03 0 Total 7I

\rrlagersliviDg on thc lagoonncar t[e mouthof NgokosoliCreek reported sighting a larye ctocodilch thc vilage lagoo4 a bclly slidelcadhg ftom NgokosoliCreelq ard tf,e taling of a d,ogaDd chictem by thc crocodile,They also rcponed the lilling ofa lctrtalecrocodilc and its 'outrg some4 ],carsago. We viqrcd wiat mayball bcro as old b€[y slidcbut couldnot confumit. Thc w.tcr temperatucof frarhwaterNgokosoli Crect wasa high3-f,C anda highsulfur snell prerailed-Thc streae (.n oDly.bcnegotiated by $r\rcy caloe for oneka upstreambccaGe of rapid shoaliDgand evcl this ca. ody bc dorc witl safetyat highlNatcr. Thc s&camis heavilyftiDgcd with cocodutatrd sago pals3 andthc arcais un&r i ersivccdtivatioa. Thc vilagc lagoon,also

,t5 idtcDrcv ftirgcd witt p"l-s sas suriEycdat nighrusitg e smalldwout canoc.No qocodilcswcre sightci h,yu3 a6dr€ cenoDly condudc that thc vilag. lagooak visitedoc.asioraly by thc odd rcmlatrt crdilc ir ihc arca- Wc wrrc told tiat other arcaron Vclla lavclla wrrc rcDortedto havcevea fewcr cocodilc thrn thc Paftso Bayarca

C. Rcndoea Thc two sD.ll isiand ftcsheatcrlatcs ard thc tsrolagoons od RenardCovq Mburara Bay,wcrc survcycdon th€ nidt of z/ Awust 1989(for zc.o startingpoiDt! sec Rerdova 150,000sc.jc dap., shcct8/15710):

Irngitu& lrtitude Renard Corc '.Jr21.7E 833.7S

Tnis arcahad bccD visitcd by BeldeDPitu i! 1986whe! hc took soEc 20 crocodilesftoE thc lalc,r. He dr.larcd ihat hc aaw'trlrdcrous'crocodilcs largc atd soal, especia.lyin thc largcrof tte two lal6" We rere told by locai! that tu onc hadbccn hurtiry i! the areasbce his visit ir 19t]6.they *cre wrong somcoachad dcarcd the largelale of crocodiles,somctimc before our arrival. DistalcassurlEy€d and lumb€is of crocodilcsightcd wcrc:

ltn lumber sighted Flrst lagooa 0.9 0 Sccod lagootr l3 1 falgc latc 05 1 Soall lalc 03 9 Total 3.0 11

Thc sizc classcsof the 116'), ard 1(Eo). Udortunately, thcrc arc few &esltwate. lales, such as the abovq ard mary of these have beer cleared of crocodiles. Note that sui,cy of such lakes is a di6cul! matter. Accessto lhcm is often throug! lougl, $[aEpy, ard d€rse terain ard cithcr a sEall dugout catroeor aluDi.u|r diDghymust bc caraicd itr and ou! Rcldoit r Islan4 lke mo6t of thr SoloEon Islands, contains only marginal habitat for .tocodil,ai StrctEs appcarirg oo thc oap arc usully shon and urnavigable. kte Ratra oo the southe.lt Ftrir6Dla ofRcDdova is reponcd to havehrd crocodilcs. No suitablc atrchoragesexist in the arca and acccssto tic lalc is ulusualy difEorll Wc ate uuable to saywhcthe! or not hunters trar€ clcared thc crocodilcs ftoo this area

D. Tctiparc. B€cau!€ of rrfortcd docodiles itr the sdall lale at Tavara on Waugh Bay, the latc rld bay pErc surEycd oa ttc nighaoI28 August 1989(for zcro starting poiit see Readoi.a t50,0m s[,b Eaps, sh€et 8/1tl10).

l,lgitudc lltitude Tavlre Lalr lsrnE 8r4L8'S

Distarccssultryed arrdNmb€rs of .rocodil* sighred*crc:

tn uusbcr sightci Tavara klc 1.0 0 Waugh Bay 0 Total

46 Tar€raLaj(c has good habitat for crocodilqs,thoogh thc presenc€of nnEcrousworteis od tic suroundingcocorut plattatioD could account fo. thc zcrocoud This is ar cisrllent lale for co$iderationfor r.stockiDgrritf, socoditcs.

E OtherArcas Sailcd Tq But Food Not Worth Suveyi.g We *rrc givcatic namcsof Gocodilehurters iu thc NewGeorgia Group of idandswho wc co aded for sugg€stcdareas to be suweyc4 Thisiclded rc ncw areas*'orth suri€yiD&but did alow us to vicw four g'ouF of capti\€ crocodileswiich the olr|rers,id d€spcratioD,hoFd *ould prwide the nuclerxfor four crocodi[ farms. The placs aadindividuab virited werc: - , HoDbupcl(a K. Yalata ii a hidc atrdBlell d€alerwho buys crocodile stin6 browht to hin from lvesrer[ Provitc€dcas ard sp€ciallyfrom aroutrdthc NewGeorgia Group of islaads"Wc sightcdhis 10captiec ."iq"l., 7(2'3),1(34,), and4+t He is hopingto userharc as a tourist attlactroD- Nu6a Hopc - Sac Ola is an eldcrly and Lno*lcdgcabtc fo.mer cocodilc hust€r whq six years agq rerognizcd tfat thc ciocodilc resourcca|as di.sappeariry rapidly in the SoloEon klands. He obtaircd eggsfroE tf,c wild.nd rcarcd ia c.privity 46.7) and 1(7{) crocodiles.wiich *cre ia excellcrt codditiotr He also obtaind froo thc wil4 ir 198q [GD, a|1d7(]4') admats. He sratcd that 6ocodilc6 wc.c dow sighted only sporadicallyaad usually tjllcd by individuals sightiry then. He srated that suveying would provc unrewarding Mborcho - Romld Davis, a ciocodile huoter ir tlis arca, had two captivc crocodile4 1(5{'), ad 1(7-8'), both in excellentcondition His arca had b€etr shot out and siace tbcrc no longer were aay docodiles to hu , hc gaic u,r a 12 giugc shotgunto retum to Bcldetr pit|r PcaiB, NggatokaeIsland - Geffty Natc showrd u5 t[e lj socodile,s hc and his fathcr were raising for a crocodile farming op€ratiotr- D.. Coli! McQueen of the Vet€rinary Division in Honiara originally etrcorraged them in tlis undertaling All 15 animals wcre in good coodition ard a new erclo6ue was beirg €rcctcd for them. TIie r:,(+t), 1(5{'), and 1 (67) a.d,rats had all beer obtained ftoE tbe Russcl Islands. c€frry staled that soodiles *€!e row rarcty sightedia the arca of NggatokaeIsland ad that it was dost uriik€ly that a.oywould bc sighted during a surrcy. He said he wished hc could tell us othcrwis€. This *Es why they bad to obtaid thei gocodilcs ftoE the Russell Islands, which they did h $a?. Apparcrtly, only a widEly s{attered reEDart number of Gocodil€s .emain in the Wesrem Provinca

6. C€ntral Provim!.

A. RusscUIslalds. We surve'€d the otrc area h the RussellIslandq where it was believed lhat a small rcmnant populdiotr of oocodilcs stif existe4 evcd though the area had b€etr heavily huded duriDg 1 E ard 10 qocodiles shot therc. kl.c Tataq Modoluon rrh'4 w"s suvc,€d od tbe night of l Septsob€r l9E9 (for zcro sraniry point sc. Russ€UIstads tt),od) scaledaps, shect 9/159/1):

Lngitude lltitude Lalc Tatac 159d0558 9()85S

This lalc provcd to codtaiI! thc secondb€st populaaionof crocodil€sthal e€ cncoude.ed itr our sulr/cy oftf,c Solodrod Islands. Tte, qocodilas sightedalorg the 15 km perincter of the lske were ilr thc followitrg sizc dasscs: 18(E), 1(&7), 1(7-A), (EO<6),4(EO>6'), ad z{EO). Hutrtirg of Gocodiles on thc lakc durirg 1988could account for thc abscnccof ttc (2{) size classcs

B. Florida Islads Arcas worth suneying for cocodilcs atc few od the Florida Isla.n&. AccordiDgto Pcte. Beat4 ar old timc cocodile hurt€r on thc blands, the best reEaidirg arca was Utuha Prssagcwith a numbcr of small creels ruoaiag ilto it. Our dayrinc suvcy of thc arca rcvcalcd that thc Dain dclt draiairg tlc Passagclad a vilag. oo it Therc *rrc gar

o upatrcaf oI thc EaDgrovcs€diotr" Wc wcrc plcnsantlysurpriscd whetr xrc survcy€i tle arcaon thc trightof3 S€ptember19E9 (for zcrostartiag points se.c Florida Lland6 t50,0m scalemaF, sheet 9lrfi/2)l

Lorgitudc ktitudc UtuhaParsaga arca ftTl&4'E 9045

Midst caE di.stamrssurvet€d and nunbcrs of crocodilesighted sere:

LE trunrbcrsighted Utula Passagc 9.9 1 Tambfi Crcct aaLE 0.0 on UtubaPassagc 050 Knidi Crt.L at ln 9A or Utuha Pas6age 1.0 2 Total 11.4

Thc sizcclas:cs of the 3 animabsigbrd wcrc.47-8) ard 1(&9). It i.rirtcrestiDg to lotc that\rc spotrcdmo.c crocodilesb Centlal Provircctha! in anyothcr, erccplfor Guqddc&al

7. GuadalcanalProvincc.

Duri.g the nighb of 4 6 and? Septemb€r198q we survcycdtlree areas(for zerostaning poiDa!scc Gradalcanal t50,000 Eapg shc.ts9/10 /r1\ 9/l@ /A, Md 9/Kn /$)l

Longitudc Latitude ljkoro l-agood' 160p36'E 934.1'S lauvi taSoon rtr?3.gE 9P53.1,S Mati[a-warclau area ff(r€3E 9P49.81S

Distalc.s suvryEdard noEban ol crocodilessightcd were:

fo dunbcr sighted l.I

Thc lumb€r and sizc drarer of thc qocodilas sighted in l,auvi kgooo *crc 9(H), 31(2-3), L0(34'),1(+r),1(>7),)6(EO<6'), 4(EO>6 ), ad 10(EO). Thc 43 pcrccnr of rhe aaimals rhat cor d not be approachcdto allory an accuratc sizc estimatiot rcsultc4 firsq from thcir beiEgvcry wary, which cou.ldbc accourted fo. by thcir continurd hultbg a!4 s€cot4 bccauscthcrc verc floatirg Eats of grassalong thc lagoon shors which could not bc pcDctratedby a sEall dirghy atrd kcpt us awayftoo the aninal& l,awi Ilgoon tumcd out to b€ tbe last Dajo. sooDgholdof thc saltwatcr crocodile in the SoloEor klald& Thc tx,o olhet arc.s survcycdon Guadalcanalproduced r€sults simila. to thcse fourd olr mo6t of th€ othcr Solomoa klands - do animab fouad or orly 6caftcrcd rcmratrts ofa ford€r population foond" Wo siShtci captiw ali!|ais otr Cuadalcanalat threr places. Ch. es Rickon has 1(ru') cocodile ar Kopin vilagc; Betikama High School rcar Honiara has 1(910') docodile; ard Beldcn Pitu hrs 54 crocodil€s itr thc foloeiDg sizc dasser: 14(2-3), 21(14), 6(+t), 11(5i), ad 2.(G7).

€ DrsctssloN.

,q" Habitat. Gcrcrally spcalir& thc hatritat for cocodilcs i! the Solomon klands b at bcst. margitrai, Thcra alc rc encDsivcc,Etiands ard few loag EcanderiDg rilcrE thc p.ef€rrcd homc of the saltwatcr crocodile, a6 thcrc are h PapuaNew Guirca and Australia" Most island riirrs and cf,eet6 dse ia thc stecp hils and nountaiDs inmediately behind a ra'tow corstal fthge ofvcgctation drd a3a conscqueftr ale unusuallyshort. Becauscof h€avyrailIall the input of froshwater L high ad the rivcrs, cree\ ad sprirys are normally ftesh dowa to *it!i! a fcw hudrcd Ect€rs of thlr mourns. Somc of thes€ providc good habitat fo. crocodilesand the alluvial soils are exclllcnt a!:e€sfor rillace garde8. Fanncrs ucat thc crocodil* as itrEin and quicly clear them ftom the area. rMth an anlual huma.dlropulatio! growtf, of over 3 pqccat, pressorcfo. use of fertilc soils is grcat Thc crocodilc hrs urue of tro cnancclor sutvtv{l ltr such arces. Ttc coastsof Dost of thc isla.nd.ai! the Solo6or Islatrd cbab arc ftinged by coral rcefs, arrd maay shalloq maagrove-fritrgcdbays contair ruoerous patch recfs as !rcII. For crocodilc.s,this is formidattle tcrrai!.trd is uscd wheo thcy arc excludcdfrom morc fa\rorablc a.€as or l,hcn travellinr iom one arca to a[otbca. Thowh thc Solomon Islads lacks erceDsivefteshwater swamDs.it doesharc a $na.ll number of fteshwatcr or bracLbh lalcsr often shown oa oaps as bgootrs. Tteie are touad ou smalt islaadg soDe 50 to 1m E from thE scashore'or up to 2ln idand or ttc larger islads. Accessto these lales cd bc vc.y difrodt. Thcy are oftc! &aided to thc sea by rery small creel(s. Thcse lakes app€ar ro nw provide the last havctrof refugc and breedirg areasfor the rcmainbg cocodiles ia tbe loboon Islads. U ortuately, there are oDIya few of thesc lal@sscatleied throughout the island chain that are rcmotc etroughtrot !o b€ Degatirclyiopaded by rcarby villagas. Hutrters are also well ac,are of 'ciocodilc thc lakes, as arc hop€fuI famc.s who obta;n tlEir docodil€ stock hom th. lakes. Most have bccn dcared of docodiles or arc s€v€relydeplet€d-

B. Status. It is appare that there remai.s o y oDesarall real populatior of saltwater (rocodiles in tl€ Solomor lslaads; l,auvi Lagootr or Cuadalcaral The no( rwo largest populations are in l,ale Tatac in the Russell Islandsadd i! Chalirahobo l,agoon on Sa.ntaIsab€I. In 6eparatelobsrs in th€ Tablc below e/€ show thc du'lbcrs and sizs classesof crocodiles siCt€d in Lawi Irgooo, i[ lake Tatag in Chahirahobo t agooo, ard tbose foutrd ilr all other localities, and thc to{al& Tho6c sigbrcdir other localities cotrsisredof a nudbe! of suagglers- the widcly scattered$rnivitrg.eDltaot ota oace helthy population Sadly,the ctocodile rcsourc€ ofthe SoloDoB Glan& csscatiauybas becl dastroyed

Numbcr of Crccodil€s

lruvi Ghahira.hobo Tatac Other l,ocalcs To(al

2-!3L3539 (0.fi.9 n) 3-4' 10 1 (0.9-1.2n) 4-9 G2-1Jn)

(15-1.8n)

(1.&21d)

4) (>zIqI EO<6 (<1.8E) EO >6' (>13 m) EO 10 16 15 n

Aaothcr *ay ofviewingthis is showtrir thc Teblcbelow where wc havedivided thc aaterways sutwyedilrto enclos€dlagoou (virtuaUyftcsbc,afer lates), saltvratcrlagoons with op€oingsto thc sca, ri\,€i! andarccls (Eo6tlyftcsf,wate.), atrd saltwarer baF ad chr'lcle Thc nuobe. of thesesurvcyc4 distance.surrc,,E4 and nosbcrs of c.ocodilassight€d ir th€6 i! shov/Dalso.

Nurb€i Distamr (k a) Crocs sighted surrc,€d Etrd6cd hgoonr 10 m3 1l3t Saltwaterlagoons 8 7 Riiras andcrccls T 47.7 8 Baysaad chamcls m 815 9 Totd 17J.0 t77 4\

Ovcr86%, 153 out of 1Z of the crocodileswerc sighted in the freshwaterlagoons and from the FeviousTable it is cvided that aldost aI (f4) of thescwerc sighted in threelagoors osly. Of rh€ fl crocodilessighte4 41 werc hat.hli.g., denotedby tie subscriptfigtlle i.nthc Tableaboi€, and evcryotrc ofttass hatcbling6werc sightedh thc etrdos€d&eshwater lagooDs. Not onewas sighled id the 30.iveG aadcreels sufl,e'c4 Eary olwhich hadexclllent breeding babitat. The,scwatorwa's had b€.r .<.€nti.lly clcal(d of brc€dirg stocl abdody srragglcrsrcEaidcd. It i6 Ft[ap6 surprfuingthat 7 arimalswrrc sightedin the saltwaterlagooDs ard 9 in the bats andcba![cb, Ttcsc arcasarc aorDallyused by idmatulc socodilcstnat the largebreeding animals cxcludc,wil trot tolcratcia ttc brcedingarcas, or th€yaro a.trinabnoviry AoD ooc areato arm{her. Thc aumbcrr€ fotrd i! theseare$ i! probablyi icatirc ofthc huding pressureitr the breedidg arcasin ftcshwaterlagmns aad rirprs aadcrccks. Notealso the few animalssighted in the (47) classe,s.Though Me,rscl ha6 poiDfcd out rcp€atedlythat tbc.c is a severebiological 'botderccl' for ariEals i! tlcsc sizcclasser f,'hich rcrsally wouldac.ourt for thcir scarcity(for iDstancc,s€e tlre populatioDEodcl i! ModographZ) of hb suvcy s€ricspublishcd by PcrgamonPrcss), tte populatioDs sightcdin tlc SoloDo! Islalds areEo saall that it rould bc slrprising of this wasso here. It is litely that a numbcrof ttcse animalsare includcd in the thrcc EO classcs" Onc ney asl whal ftadioa ofthc cocodile corrailritrgLabitar wBr sun€ycd by u5, It is difrcut to araw. this with prccisio!- AlEo6t aI of thc arcas,wbich Ltrowlcdgeabl€ hunters felt were worth suw€yin&wclc suflcycd I! thc c.sc of ctrclo6cdltgoo.s, some80 percentof tlos€ worthsurveyi[& v,€re surveyed. Thc 6amcappli.6 for saitratcr lagoou, althoughtlclc wrrc maaynorc whichcou.ld harc bccn suncycd,had local tuatcn andidabitarB lot statcdcEphatically that thc arcahad bccn cssentiatly clarcd of (ro(odilcs, Wc p.obablydid lot $rwcy Dor. tha! a fcw pcrccrt of suweyablcbrF a.rd chan&La Sirceody tdnnart stragglcrcrocod;Ies rcrraiD, one might occasionaly bc sightedin almost atrybay or cvc! thc opcBsEa. Uddcr thcsccircumst&cc! all tinds of concdio! fadors - dcpctrdiry oa an iadividual'simaginatior - clr bc applicdto ttc dumbcrof crocodilcssigtrtcd durbg tf,c course ofthc aunry.

50 BecauseoI thc lew animalsvE cdcountq..4 usiDgstatistical eeaDs to gain atr estimatc of thc adu.l ludber of crocodilesin thc SoloEor lslands is Wc belie\rethat there Eay be arothcr frc,shwEtcrlagoon or t*o c4uiv6lent to Gbahirabobo or Lalc Tatac that wBsrot surlcyci, but tlerc c€rtai!.ly is not anot!€r cquivEle to kuvi LagooD. Basfd or suvcyirg cxperiencc in Australi4 wr can gsrerously assumethat th€ sighting ftactioD for crocodilqsin thc ercloscd lagoou l{as only 5t) pe.ceDt. Itr additioo to cov€r the ursurveyedwaterway\ the number of cf,ocodiLe,jsee! i! tbe saltc/ate! lagooE, and riiErs ard crcclE caa bc libcrally nultiplied by 10 atrd that of tbe bays aDdchannels by 20. Ttfu produccaa'guesstimate' of [2(153+42)+ (10/) + (1m) + (z!d)l = 720 crocldiles, a5a maxiEun. It should agah be srr€ss€dthat, other than i! the sDall eacloscdlagoors, thc rcmaining af,ocodil€sarc widely scafteredthroughout t[e somc 9O islandsof thc chah ad Lhcchancc of brelders meltiDg dust be sdall

C. 'Custom Crocodiles' At s€verallocatiors during tiis $rvet we were told by local petple that thc rcalon we {€rc aot Endirg Eany crocodileswar b€caus€tles€ were'custod crocdilcs'which caa oaly bc scca by a fw traditioaal SoloEon klandcrE that tbe crocodileswere the.g but that wc could not scc theE. Siglifidnrly, these coBmerts .lwaF c.Ec from villag€ft and not froE local crdilc huDters. If the ability to s€edocodil€s is a trait unique to 'cuslomary islanders' thar the lcad€rs of t[c survoytcam, vho co[cctivcly havc 40 ycars cipdiclce studyiDg17 of the 25 tecogDizcd spccic6ard sub6pc.icsof docodilians iD dorc than 15 natiooE du.iDg which they havecersuse4 captuic4 and handled dorc tha! 1m,0m [rr cocodiliaDs ard haw cxamiftd orcr 1,000,000 crocodilian hides, havc su.ely eamed the right to s€€atry crdilcs customaryor rot.

D. Numbcr oI Cfocodiles ia Forncr Tines. How daDy cocodiles were there in the Solomon Islads in former tides? ode will never know for certain because,as elsewhere,ro previous systeBatic suvcy ofthe docodile population bad beeo carri€d out. Furthormor€, ir former timeg recortls of qports of crocodile slios wer€ no! maintained and cven in rcccnt timcs records hare been sca.nt.We .rc this coap€lled to rely upon bformatiod provided by former and presert day crocodile hunters. It is ditEcult to a.6s€ssthc reliability of such bforEatiod othet than by obtaining it from many hutters on difrcrcDt blands, This we di4 Thc folowing broad pidurc cmcrges" App:ready thc ('(rodile, evetrthough it, alotg with thc sharlq app€arsoD thc ratioDal cEblcm of tic SoloEon Islands, has b€eDlooked upod gpdc.aly as rrrsi! ard trcatcd as sucL Thus whcn Australiaa cxpatriatc hunters,who b€comewcll acquahted *itl thc Solomon Llards dudng t!€ secod rio.ld war, startld shooting Gocodiles i! tlc late 1950sand durbg the 1%& and early 1yl0s tlcy wcrc w€lcoEcd. Many ofthc oldei hudets atld grudeswho helpcd us witf, tic prascdt sufl/Ey,*orftcd gladly with thc expatriatar to help shoot out thc Gocodilcs. One of the MastcB of our sunryvessel Harry Maeata, wasone such itrdividual who helped. otr all the islad! rc suri€yc4 the mme of DeDnisRorne caEe up timc ald time again as one of the cxpatda6 shooteis, Frcddic ForsytheKa,€ was anoth€. nam. which was meDtiooed Every ore of tf,o irdigca€s statcd tiat tle crocodilc resourc! had bcc! largc ard could be gaugedby tf,e fad that h the 195G ard 19@3thc hurtcrs obtairc4 otr avcragq 4to5 stils of IargF arinals eacb night. od som€ nigLt!, thcy ob{aine! as l|raoy I20 largc admals. Duirg thc Fcsedt sorvet only i! lanrvi l,agoon did we sight a few largp aniEals ard beausc of thcir l|rliDers ody one could be approachcd- Apparcndy, ev€r ttowh the majority of thc habitat for socodilcs ir tbe Solomor Islands is narginal thc populatioa siz! was largc ard dust havc talc! a i€ry long time' Ecasutcd iD cenrufles,to icacL thatsiza We are unablc to saymorc than pcrhaF it w'! a latge as the crocoalilepopulatior of Austftli4 bur lcs3thatr that of PapuaNew Guinca. we camot substa.ntiatcthis estimate fiuther.

E Protectivc Measurcs. By the nid-19?0s, thc r,rluablc crocodile .esource had bccn scverely depleredaad tf,e expatriatc hu crs dcprn.d- Thc indigeoes howEver,cotrtitrucd to hutrt tie aDimal both a3vcrmir that occa3iodaly attacled humanE lgE dogs, and chickenE and becausccrocodile hide

5l Ficls PErchigL Thcyprovided ialuabtc supPlcmcEta.y frrnds for individualsofa locallutaistetrcc papoa ccodony._.-By iht tidc, India,AuEtrali4 alrd NcrvGuiaea had rccogized thc daagErof losing atrj tTt stcF :le.croc{iq to implcoeat naragemmr ptaq enruriogric survivalof til sp.aer ala lncu€EnaDarutrrrzatior otr a sustaircdicld ba!i& The solomodIslands was at this timc is the thro€s or rahing indcpcadeftaad did mt foflowrhc lcadof Indi4 Aust ali4 ard papuaNew cuirca. Thc glipg €ontinue4-*ithoutgncral rccogaitionthat a valuablccconomic rcsour; *as bciDgd€st oycd Evctras larc as 1982,an ryatriatc hutrtcrel6 r€lcodcd to hclp clca, the lcmainirg o.-L clo"oal"* Hore!€r, iD 197elegi5latioo v€5 cnactedto p.ohibfutf,c exportof skis snaller O"i SO *ia. io tl" bclicfthat it Eiqlt h€lpprotcct rhc crocodilcresourc.. By a[,o*irg tbc adultbreeders to "- b€ tillcd ofr, it did thc oppo6itc. Ia the SoLomoaIslaads, crocodilqs.rc goup€d rith 6sh i, tlc F,shefiaiAd of 1972 TLh, is defilcd as.'aryaquatic -in4 ehctherpiscilc or dot andincludes...crocodilc aad tuttlc, andyoulg aDd€gga thcrcof ...."

Regulafiot10 of thc Act colr.s crocodilesand in ql7 wascLargcd to rcad: 'Ary persodwho s€lls or o(pos€sfor sale-a.nycrocodile or crocodileskia the bcllv width of whicl ir lesstian 50 centimeteB..ltall be guiltyof an offence...," 'Prolidcd ttat thi! rcgulationshall tut applyin rclatiooto a.nycrocodilg o. skid of ariy crocodilc..re.rcdh a hrm liccnsedunder any Regulatioas....'

As far asx,€ ha@ been ablc to aacertai.,thie,cgulation had aot bceneaforced. Tte cxpo( of skiu ol cocodilesof dl sizls tater ftom th€ wild ha\r'cbccr, andcodinue to bc, sanctioncn.Aiaay rate,sincc saltwater cocodil€s do not stan bre€dhgUntit they arc at least2 m (iemalcs)to 3j m (nal€s) loDga.d havea bcly width of 45(d, crfo.cedert of tbc Iegislatiouwould ensurc t[at txe crocodil€sbreeding resourcc would bc s€verelydepleted - asit hasbeen _- and p€rhaps, fmally b€ totally dcstroyed-

youicti _ F. C.ocodileSti! Erports. Mr. Talehara,MaMging Director of HoriuchiTrading gTeary_o{ Tgkyq Jary'l tindly supplicdfigures for cro-al*t i.po.t"a UyU" companyfrom rhe SolomodIda.ds - sc! Tablcbclow. Mr. HcEy ka, Pri&ipailCorsrr%tio! Ofnccrof thc EnviolmeDt andCoos€ryatiod Divisiotr, SolonotrIslarjs Ministry of NaturalResourccs, provided the folos,iDgfigurcs fo. the crpo.t of crocodilcsti!3 froE tlc SolomotrIslads:

Bellyitrcte.i Value(S.Lt) 1985 4163 10,405 1986 4350 10,873 1 1 6445 !1cp3 1988 47n

SruE of tte blolmatiod suppliedby Mr. Taleharaand Mr. Isa iodic.r€sthat Eoriuchi TradingCo. basbcetr inponiry rowhly oic haff ofthe.f,ocodilcstj!3 e4|ortedfroE th€ Solomotr lslands. Fllntc.morc, the TalcharaTablc iadicares that t[e lumb€r of idport€d stins *ith bellv widt!6 20 irchcs o grearcr(> 50 d) hasde.rcascd boo 63 i.n1983 to ?a ir 1988.Tbc 19896gues could bc abcrralt sincchullers c/€rccocouraged to gct crory stis theycould thi! Fa.. At sevcral p|acc4duflng t[c corrscot our 6utvcy,wD rcra r[clcomedbecaus! villagcrs bcliei€d *€ hadcoEe to clcarout tlc rcn'ining fcw ctocodilcs Cmcdthts pdo&$ hidrs inportcd &om thc Solomo! Islaads by Horiuchi Tradiag width ,E3 'u ,E5 ,86 a7 ,88 'E9 Total 2 2 t 1 4 5 t2 41 51 1 8 15 8 19 6 J) 1 44 44 16 48 T' 10 10 8 1!) 614 90 11 715 7 72 t2 v 2, 14 2, 15 11 151 $ 12 10 16 19 613 12, 14 30 810 75 15 N 18 614 7 90 16 5 62 15 512 76 15 8 64 U 47 18 99 IL 411 61 t9 16 6 75 6 87 55 m 107 9 2l 7 44 7 46 ti 49 65 45 E 62 6 46 1 2 35 19 5 62 1 2l 2L 26 I 2 1 11 1I n 2 1 I l1 10 1 1 3 I I 7 a z 1 3 1 31 2 I 2 I 1 v I t2 4 35 I 0 I 38 1 1 40 0 4l 1 1 43 1 4 1 45 0 s L 47 0 48 t rB 92 150 tT3 192 r08 14 |3?3

53 'FarD6' G. Crocodilc .nd Ralchirg: Duriq tlc courscof . 'farm&' tf,e surrcy,c\rry opporturysms tal€d to visit crocodilc Tbcscl2 socallcd farEs conrai&dfron I !o 54 ,ni-,i. eacL Thc lusb€r ard sizeclaascs of the captivcadnals s€€[ in cacf.farn'arc givenil thc Resul6. The Teble bclowshows thc sizcclassar a[d total captivrcrocodil€6 s€cn

Capti!€ Crocodiles

Sizc in Fe€t Nurbcr of Crocs (octers) Eatchlirg

(0.6{.9) 34' A (0.e12) +! (12-15) ft' (1513)

(1.&2.1)

111

_- _, CfTFS lefi.R captive propagatior as inle$ive matragedeat under captive conditioos which r€liably will produce ar Flgercratior (secoddgEreralio[) &oDr parents born o. hatched in captivity. Such an operation which prodtccs ofrspring from parcrts bred itr captivity is defucd as i.farm., gry._d.p *Id or,ou.g ftomtie wil4 ror froD capriveparertq for rcarhg 'rancL'"!91e88! h captivity is defacd asa FarDsarc clo6€d-g,clco!'e.atio!s indepeadeatof tie wild popubtlons,white ralchcs arc opc!-cycleoFatioDs &pendcnt on *ild eggsor youag. Ttcrc is no viablcaocodile farE in thc SolomonIstatr& rt thc presenttime atrdthcre |s urlil@lyto be o|ren.less a Euch Do.e profc6siolalapproach is taken. Oaeor two,or cven54, intmatllrc alimals docsnot coDstitutca docodile farm. It tales 8 to 10,Ears for a fcmaleaDd 15 to 16 yearsfor a Eale Cpor"nr to reac! b.eeditrgsizc. Nole of tic c€ptivearimals seen ia the,farms,had bred in captivity,and siDce mtre of the.farm,cnclosutei contaidcd pools sufrcieatly largc aad&cp (> lJ tn), it ir ullitely tlat thcy evcrwil b.ccd udcr qrtrcDt 'farE6' t[e husbandrycoaaitlons. nc cxisting ca$ot c!€r oFEratcas ralches sircE, wi&out a hcalrhywild populatior,ncithcr cggsnor hatclding caabc collcacd &on tlc wild for stoctiagthe rafthcs. - Prartic.Ily cvcryhop€frrl crocodilo falmcr x,€spolc to €xpr€ssedgreat interest in Gocodile farDi[g alrdwaDted Eorc idoroatior ot it Tbcyscrc eost alrdousto comdcrciallyfarm thc very rcsourc€wticl somany of tleE ashurtcrs bad bclpcd to d€stroyid thc wild. Most of themexpressed so..owat not haviogrcalizld wtat iEpad tleir hortiDgwas havirg Elrry "oEmerciallysucces.sful crocodile cnterp.isc ia tbe *orld dependsto a ryi8g degce upoarourism and/or ranching.Lauvi kgoon is thc o!.lysitc i! the SolomodIslar* wlicl in OJ uear futurc '.nigb!wirl propcrprolcctioo and eEcctivc Eanagcaett, bcco8e a tourisD/ra&hing eoterprirc. Otbcr lagoonsitcs wil rcquirestdngcnt protectiotr for at least5 to 10yca.s b€fore th.ir popu!.tion6*ill bavcr.covsed sufrcicdly to allo\r ary sustainedyicld cxploitatio!- HowEver,this will .cquir€ c.rcful amual chcckiDgbcforc atryanima& arc taLer.

I H. Concluions atrd RecoDmedlatiotr&

1, Crocodilca i! thc Solobon Islad! havc bccl ard stiU arc gcdcrally looLed upo! as \,€rmi!, and not as a valuablc rcsourc€. 2" Thc crocodilc rcsourcc of thc Solomoo klatrds hasbecl severelyileplcted aad oDly. very sBaq $idcly scatteft! rcEDant population rcnains 3. Unlars urgcot and staict meariuncsarc talcn to proted thc spccicE thc salt{,-atcrGocodilc may soon bccoE€ cdiftt in tf,c Solomon Islaads 4. Thcrc i5, af prcsc4 ao commcrcially viable crocodilc farm or ranch b thc Solomon Islands ad this wil rct clanga unlcssimmcdiate actiod is talea oow to cooservethe wild populatior- 5. Ttc rcneiriDg crocodilc rcsourc! is so sdall that a crocodile raffhing proposal b out of thc qucatiod for e lllDbcr of ycnrs, 6. There do€snot erisr id the Solomon Islan& any efrectivc legislatior to protect and cors€rvo the crdilc. 7. Fcw Solooor Island€rs,with thc cxceptioo of the cocodilc huntcrs, are awarc that thc crocodilc populatioB arc so drngarously dcplet€d

We recoeEetrd tlat:

A" Thc wild crocodile populatioa of thc SoloEotr IslatrdsrcmaiDs or Appcndix I of CITES. B. A total cxport bar o! crocodile skios of all sizesand from all sourccsitr the SoloEoa Islar& iEncniatcly bc cstablishcdatrd efiedively iEpledeDted. Suct a ba.nsbould remain in effecr for aminim m of 5 yca$, after which it should bc rcviewed. C. A permare ban o! stins taken &oo thc wild, whoocbely widtl is greater than 45 cm should bc impoGcdto proted thc b.eedbg stocl. D. The Solomo! Islald ce[tral govcrnmetrtand provhcial authorities imm€diat€ly comm€ncethe task of educatingthe public about tie vital importaice of conservirg their latural resouces :rdd national heritagp,irdudiDg {rocodileq for the tutore benefit of tleir citizlls. E, Thc ccntral aad/or prwircial govcmmentslind some way to protect and corr,enc tie r€mrining socodilc rcsourcc. We rccognizc tlat ia thc Soloood Islalds, wildlife belongs to the traditional landowncr, but if the *ant rasourc! is to b€ savedthe gor€rsmeits must 8l1d a way of codvinchg thc landoercE to proacctthc wild populations atrd their habitats. Spccial ar€as such as thc ftcshratcr lagooosshould b€ given prioritt co8idelation. F, Thc gwcrDEcDts discouragctaling crocodilas from ttc wild to stock so called 'farms' which are ulilcly m bccomc cconomicallyviablg clcrpt as a tourist att actio!. G. Thc statuBof thc crocodile populatioDri.n Ilwi ard Ghatiralobo kgoo[s, and i! lales Tatae, Korr4 atrd MatiEi atrd those i.n Renard cove b€ noaitorcd annually.

Actnwlcigcneats

Thcrc arc Eany agcDcieqorganiatiods, a.ndp€oplc to Galrk ald without who6chelp the clceediDglycooplex and diffiqrlt suwey could trot har€ b€er codpleted, Fust G the CITES Secretariat which laborcd hanl to raisc t[c t|nds for a surveywbich it felt v,asurg€nt ad long ov6due. Sccord i3 tte soLomonIslaB& Minislry of Natural Rcsourccse.hich *holeheartedly encouragedthe suftey. wc sil.acly thart cach ard cwry onc of thc nuEcrous i.dividuals h thc dozcDsof placls wc n€ye4 though tl.jy arc siEply too Eary to daEc individualy. For thc e irc sDrvcyperio4 thc suvey ship, thc 'MV Meoor/, bad the followirlg staft

Master- Jots Jobrso! Hiru S€@rdMastcr - Harrt Marnata Eogh€€r- DebcrerFoli C.cw - GeorgeWaletofg Silvaror Dodq JohsSorova and Ludavico Albcn

55 Ew ti.6€ ildividualssailcd tle rEss€lat right tbroughrccf st ewnwaterg orcr thou$rd6 of hlod€terg sithouf an cchosourdcr o. .adar,rcaairs a dFtery to us. perhapsthc traditioral woodet sajLlilgt4isDan ehich Harry MaEatahad boutrd to thc uF[rcrEa$ of the rcssll badsomcthiDg to do c,ithil Iapas giH to him by hi! fattcr manyycars ago and haj stoodttis incrediblcsailor in good steadevcr sidcc" GcrryWhcw€ll Corlcriatioa O6ccr in thc Midsfry of Natual Resourccs,in additionto b€iDgthe adive rcprcs€Dtativcfroo tic Minisfry,fi'sr aded asa.survey-lcamer obG€rvctr atrd soon mastcrcdthc basicsofthciltricatc techdqucofdocodile suveyirg. He i5 ihe oDlyiddividual in tlc SoloEonIslads todaywho sf,outd b€ ablcto carryor tf,c firture tas! oI oodtoriry the cocodile populatiotr&Srn.on Dioko ir nowa wcll-traincdsurvcy caroc driver andpaddler. Hals Wag&r, *€ll tnwtr naturopd[ froE Sydn€ytept usit goodhcaltf, wit! his prcparatioBsof cxc€llentSoloDo! kladr fruit ad \€grtabl€sdurins thc lasttc,o w€cLsof the survcy.

56 ApFndix 1.

SriIog Tlm.r To &rd I'roD SurrcyAI€€s

SANIA CRT,Z Sat29 Jul - l,ata - > Dcdu on Ncldo kland by caroq 06fiI09m hr Tue 1AW - Lr|emoatrda-> llta bt canoc;06304q30hr 3hr

MANRA Sun6 AW - l(aonasugla-> Na MWl4 StarHarbori (1745{930br 6br Tuc 8AW - Na Mugha-> Marar Islard Bay;070G0030ht 2 hr 30 nia Wcd 9 A g - MarauHarbor -> ManawaiHarbor; (B10{850 br 5hr 40nin Thu 10AW - Mana{ai Ha6or - > Tawarogha.> MalaupainaIsla!4 ThreeSisters Group;0m(X)830 hr ad 090G1250 hr 12hr z) nir

MAI.AIIA Fri 11Aug - MalaupainaIslad .> Apiq 01fi)-0800br Apio -> TahaRiicq 100GUm ht 1bt Satla Aug - TahaRivcr - > Apio; 19f-2058 br thr 40Eir Sunt3 AW - Apio - > Su\p€inc Bayfor klc Korca;O71t0835 hr 1br z) Dir Su'uFinc Bay.> Ahonawai202L2135 hr 1k 15nin Mon 14Aug - Alenaesi .> Apio; 062G065hr 5 min Apio - > Rutaorea;fil39104{) bi 3br 5dir Rutaorca-> Rohioariin WaisGiHarbor: U05-125 br z) nid WaisisiHaftor -> Si'uaBay; 82G1}() br z) nir Tue 15Aw - Si'uaBay - > Talatali 0300'0715hr 4 br 15mitr Talalali -> Auti; 0830-094hr 50 dir

SANTAISABEL Wed 16AW - Auki -> Irleghia 00m4805hr 8hr 5ei! lrlcghia . > villagcaear Potofa'a Cre*;085(H910 br 20min Potofa'aCrccl .> Kael,alga;0925-1000 hr 35 min Kaoeaiga-> KaipitoRivc8 1025-1045hr KaipitoRivcr -> Kacvaiga;1UG1250 hr z) Dit Thu f Aug - facvaiga .> Irlegb4110G112Oht 20 Bit L.lcghia -> KaevaDga;195S2110 br 20 min tiacvarg -> Kia; 22l&1430hr 15 hI 50 nid Fri EAug - Kia -> gavi Bay;161tr17mht 50 nin Sunz) Aug - Havi Bay-> Imautu Bay;083G1005 hr t hr 35 aitr Inaulu Bay-> HulaghiBay; r05t1130 hr 35 nin Mon 21Aug - HulagbiBay -> Kia; 063fi960 hr 2 hr 55 mia Kia -> Andti Vaghcnaklan4 Choiscul 11G1610hr 5hr 10nin

WESTERNPROVINCE CHOISET]L Moo 2l AW - Arariki -> First Unaamcdcovc north of A.ariB 1640-1655h. 15 Eid Tuc 22AW - UrraEcd cov€-> KealE06.{} m5 ht 3tu 5din K.ala -> Ruraval 1(Bt1040hr 5 Di! Rurarai-> Oala Harbouq 1630-1650hr 20 mio Thu 24Aug - Oala Halboor .> Posarae;OdlO-OR0 hr thr P6arac .> Ndo.oto River;0815-0845 hr 30 ni!

57 VELLI IAVELI.A Fri 25AW - Ndoroto Rircr .> r Iengri;04fl!640 lu 4 hr 40 ditr Liengai. > ParasoBay; (85G1060 hr 40 nin Sar26 AW - ParasoBay -> No.o, Newc.o.gia; lEfll0}z) hr 6h. 25lnin Rf,NI'OVA Sunz, Aug - No.o -> Mbun|lu; (b20{900 hr 2 hr 40 nia Mbu.uLu- > Rcna.dColc, MbusanaBan 1045-1220br t hr 35 nin TETEPARE Mon 2EAug - Rerard Colc . > Taedr.,Waugh Bay; 0655-0810 tr thr 15nir Tarrr4 Y/aughBay -> Mburutu, Redov4 200G2Zmhr 2hr GHXTX) Tuc 29Aug - Mborutu .> cizo; 101G,1t35bt 5hr 25Eitr NE'TVGEORGIA Wcd 30Aug - Gizo-> Noro;640-1t:}5 br 2 hr 55 ni8 No.o -> HoEbupelo; 1145-m hr thr 15dia HoEbuFta -> Nu3aHope; tjtul5zJhr 2h, NusaHoF.> [eDi 163G1930hr Thu 31Aug - ncmi -> Mbarcho;050G0810 br 3 br 10dir Mborcho- > Patutii"a;0925-1010 br 45 nitr Patudva- > MbtuaDa;1015-1210 hr thr 55Ein Mbisuana- > Mb.tuna; 1UG1250br Mbatura -> Peav&Nggatokae lsla.nd; L335't53O br 1b. 55nin Pcava-> Yardha, Russe lslands;1605{055 hr 8 br 50 Ein RUSSELLISIANIN Fri 1 S€p - Yalditra -> l.outr,t,oulr Istatr4 (ts30-085hr Loua -> Kaclcrg&A.lokan Isla!4 085tm0 hr Ibr 5 lriD Kaclcrga-> IaI(e Tatag Momoluonislald ; 105G1105hr 15min MoDoluonIdand .> Yandhr; 2t3r?2L0br

FIORIDA ISIANIXI Sal 2 Sep - Yardira -> Mboromole;U&0715 ht 8 hr 45 nia Sun3 Sep - MboroEolc -> Siota;O9{5-{D50 hr 5 nin Sbta - > UtuhaPassagc; 100G1m5 hr 5 ein UtuhePasragc .> Sal€saF;14(x1.1450 br $ nin SalcsaF- > UtuhaPa&ragc; 1530.1620 hr 50 Eir GUADAICINAL Mo! 4 Scp - Utu.haPassagc -> Rerc;(BoG. mbr Tuc 5 Sep - Rcrc .> Manitaralu;063&D15 hr 2br 45dn Fri 8 Sep - Manitaratu -> Mbarandc;f40-0730 br 5 br 30 nir Mbaraade-> Honiare 0815.1030hr 2 hr 15 rdiD

Total Sailiry T.rmc 178 ht 40 Eir

Total Drsalcc Sailed 2,818tIn

58 AppcDdh Z

L&t ot Lo.alld.s lDrticatcd by Nuubcltd Arroflr or thr Maps b trigucr 2{

1) NENDOISIAND, fata - 26, July,1-5 August 2) Dcdo Statio4 n ar Narggu- E-31July ReefIlgoon TepiaiLagoon lvlblaDolil,.goo! 3) l6rd Howr lsland- 28JuIy Lord How€Islad lagoo! Matimi Lale 4) Luenoam& River - 31Jdt-1AWus LucmoaladaRiver Othcr rcafu rivers t MAXIRA ISL{ND, Kira Kira - 6 Awusr 6) XaonasugbaHalbout - 6 Awust 7) Na MWba Archoragc. &8 August NasuraghcnaPassagc and lagooa 8) MaranIsland (mar 16?OA€, lf.$.gs) - &9 Awust lrgoor behindMarau Idand 9) Malau Island(rcar 1613('E' ffi1s) - 9-10August MuraeraBay Maro'u Bay Unnamcdbay atrd stream behhd MarauIsla.od SoaI...-aed lale or MarauIslard MaaawaiHarbour 10)THREE SfSTERI| ISLINDS, Malaupaidalslar4 Su,uta,ara'aHarbour - 10-11August U[[ao€d ilterior salt Darsh 11)MAIr\ITA ISIiND, MaIa Masite Pa$agc,Apio - 11-12August, 14 August O) MaIa Mrsikc Passagc,Taha River - O-13 August Tabarivrt TaraEalaclcak Huro crect Su'uHofiori dc.L Maarfi Macro Channel Maarili PacnaCha.ntrel Mara MasikoPassagc '3) Su'uFisc Bay,klc I6.€a - 13Awust 14)Waisisi Harbour, Rof,irari vilagc - 14AWUst Hauatcni latc lt Si'uaRivcr - 1,L15Awust Slua Ricr 16)Talafat vilagc (oppositcLaulasi) - 15Awusr 17)Auti - 1t16 Awusr A) SANTAISABEL ISLAND, Thousaad Ship Bay, telcghia - 16'17August BaralElcPassagc Ortcgr Challel Thlmasiu river Toutori rivE t(ol@ibuturiiEr Raiihi.ivcr Katabururiwr Nasi'tc.rect 19)Xia . 18Awusr Z)) Havi Bay- 1&4 August Havi Bay SutuFda crcrl Mala$rcacct 21) GhatiranoboGlsnd - 20Awust cbahinhobo lslard 22) HulaghiBay - 2G21Awust VcaaoBay Hdaghi Bay OgalaBay Utrnamcdbay 3) CHOII;EITLISIAND, VeghcnaIslaud - 21-22Awurt 24) Keaiaklad IGal4 Rorahboko klan4 Ruruiai O& Habour - 22-Z Awusr Oala Haftour Oal€ Rircr Kr$r RiEr Vandcb qad 25) Poearac- 24Awusr 26) NdorceoRitrc. - 24Zt Awurt Ndoaotoaiver 27)SEaI urDaDedlatc ofr ToBggoaChanncl de3r SaDbe PoiDr - 24Auglst 28)VELLA L{VELIA ISL{'ND, Liargi Vilrgc - 5 August ,) PararoBay - 25-26August PaiasoBay Ngotosolicreet Unnrm.d lagoonnear villagc 30) NEIV GEORGIAISLAND, Noro - 27Aug st 31) RENDOVAISLAND, Mbusalr Bay,Huntsuzu Cove (Remrd Cove)- 27-28Awusr Unnamcdsaltwater lagoors Ltgc u[ramcd &asbqatcrlatc Snall ulraned &cshiEterlakc 32) TEIAPABE ISLAND,WaWh B.y, Tavara- 28August WaWhBay Unumcd ftc.shwaterlalc 3) RENDOVAIIILAND, Mbuuku (Ughele)- 2&29August 34) Gf ZO ISI,AND,cizo - D-30 AuSust 3t NgW oEORGIA ISLTND,HoDburela Islard - 30August 5) Nus! HoF . 30Awust t/) \/"lruHarbour, neni - 30-31Awust 38) MbarchoLIan4 MbarehoVilage - 31An$st 39) Patutivavilage - 3f August ,O) I{bisuala vinag. - 31Auglst 41) Mbatura - 31Augnst 42) Nggatolactrlan4 Pca\6. 31Awltlt 43) PUSSELLISLANIN, MbanikaIsla!4 Yaudina- 1-2Septcmbcr aO A.bfan Isla4 IGel€Dga- 1 Septcdbcr 4t MomoluonIdrd - 1 ScpteDber Tatacktc 46) FLORIDAISIANDS, NggelaPile klan4 Sal€sapc- 3 Scptcmbcr 4? NggclaSulc ad NggclaPile IslandqMboromole - 14 S€ptesber Utuhe Paa6aga Kirighi dttr Trabac.hi.ivct

60 ,A) GUAITALCANALISLAND, Re.c . +5 Septcdbcr 1"-"-g"oa rivcr Uforo lagoor 49) MaDitaraku- 5{ ScptcEb€r Darac Bay Passagrbctwees Datrac Bay ard North-WastBay $) Iawi kgooo - &7 SepteDbcr Iaur/i kgpoo 51) Mbarandc.8 ScpteEber 9)tloniar - ?-E Jnly,&14 Septcmb€t

61 ,:" !EB :;t d t *FAt 9i o f!5 t. \J Ee 2 v) o z , 5 L z3-E

- ', 1""c,:-:: g -.^ I " F

62 &*o^ _uen O finakula

Nendo N

^

SantaCruz lslands

(.7 Utupua

Q Yanikolo

Figurc2 SaaraCruz Islaads (= TcEotu prdirc.), Numbcrcdloeliiics arc tisrcdid App€dix z 'l tl\ ul"*" N V A

o.. @ ,^1J €./r

Makira' 14 I 4 @

Frgurc3. Matira Islaud(- SatrCrist6bal). Numbdcd localitiesarc listcd i! Apperdix2 \ oaitstano

&cAc Oceea

N

|.

@> Malaita

Figurc4. Mahita Island Nurnbcrcdlocalitics arc listcdin Appcrdix 2. 'gfu)J ';\ z<

0) (! o

G U'

z

n

,,'3. (d I\e)

\a/ \s/

6 o 6- o h]' o ^\-, o E- +o- z<

.9

g

z 5!a$

9o$S?i\$'il\\a ,s 6

c

U) Or

67 (50) = zo

a z<

o Y

/6\ \q!/ :tA€rc, |al \|:/ a \, { + z

q)

J

68 z< o 3 -\,,. 6) O ^2c :\A?,'-^[ s "t td;a ^o) >1t -r' L IL €- ti- .v \ /? tJ (>i :. I ( tr {"' a\s"@ €.t

o q)

E e il?.,"

@

Food pre+erence and fish atractability in young Nile Crocodile.

r.1orpurgo,B., Gan-Shouel Crocodile farll|, Isra€l Bvaryahu,6., and Robln:on, A. , Department of Ani.nal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, the HebreR University o{ JeruEalem. POE 12 Rehovot 76loi:, Israel.

Introducti on

Fish is Eonsic,€red to be an inportent element in the diet o+ younq NiIe Crocodiles in nature ( Cott, 1961). On crocodile fa.ns, Nile Crocodile6 are lLsually {ed a meat mixtsre containinq +ish, bEeft and a vita,nins and mineralE supple,n€nt (Hutton, 1947t La(rance & Loveridge, 198E,. A diEtlnct preference exiBt +or live +ood (Pool.ey, 196:), and young Nile CrocodileE eat nore live +ish and +rogs than sliEed ineat. Crocodylus johnEtoni pr€{erred dead }hole {ish to chopped +ish ( ulebb et. aI., 1983) . In the preEent Etudy by using a ca+eteria experimgntal rqgimen, thF pre+erence +or +our dif+erent tyFes o+ +Eec, was deterrnined: 1. Live fisht 2. Dead {isht l. A Ehoped meat nixture; 4. Live chicke. Importance of notion, freshnesE, color, Ei!e, chapr and particular specips o{ {ish r{as testpd as to its attractability +or the NitE Errcodi I e.

A flock of 5OO, 13 month old NiIe Crocodiles at the Edn-Shmuel Crocodil.e +armr were usEd for thi5 experim€nt. The {loek was naiFtained in a round 75 n: erindot.1e6s chanber in which the niddle area a67Z) wat cove.ed wlth water. Water te,nperature N/as controled at lil.C. LiSht waE provided on]y durlng feeding times. Food attractability {as examined Ltsing a two choice €afeteria pre+erEnce test ( Robinron et. al., 19BO) where follo{ing each obgervation, the fieldE o+ .aood FreE€ntation were 1AO. rotated. The follo|,|ing +eeds wEre asEayed! Live {ish, dead +ish iboth ornaftental {ish o+ the Ciprinid€), live newly hatEhed broiler Ehicks and chopped neat rith a vitamines anct ninerels supplement. Each {eed was tested when paired to each of the otherE,

?0 Four repetitions o+ each pair rere conducted in randome order. Follo*ing the terminatlon o+ this stage, the same experinentat design y{as used ln order to deterfiine thr rolr o+ freshness, Eize, cotour and shape/species aE deterninants in fish attractabitity. The first three factors were exanined by using cotorect ornanentat Ciprinids of :_A Ein in rength. Ir| the +reshness Etudy {resh drad +ish {grade A), deact {ish Etorrd in OoC +or:4 h before presentation (qradE B) and fisn storec, at -:OoE +or a week and defrosted before prEEentation (qrade C) wer€ used. For the fish'E si:e effect we usect frelh dead tish scattered to "snall., (?-A ',big,' (A-15 cn) and cm) si:e group6 were used. The color effect waE examlned usrng tyro typeE o{ ornamental CiprinidE: Red_orange (colored) and black-gray (dark). The e{+ect o+ the species types was derermrned in a cafeteria test using dark Ciprinids and dar-k Tilapias, Date waE analyzed using the non-parametrical Mann-Whitney Ll_test (Siger, 19J6).

In qeneral, live +ish were significantty preffered to all other +eed. Dead fish were the second choi.ce, white Lrve Ehicks yrere to chopped meat (Fig. 1). FreshneEs played a siqnificant role in {ish attractabi lrty and a5 ihe grade declined so did the pre+erence (Figs. :,1!4), The crocodlles prefer.ed (Fig. "small,' to "big', fish S) and colorEd to dark (Fig. 6). Ciprinids Rere significantly pre{Errect to Titapia, hokever preference '/ras not im,nediately demonstrated e,rithin thE fir5t mlnule DLtr +oLloHing severat oinute€ of consunpiion inetead {FiE. 7).

Discus5ion

The crocodil.eE preferred fish, both tive and dead to chicks o_ lroLrnd meat. Since +ish, but not chicks or ground ,nedt are present rn the crocodrles naturat habitat, it is po€sible that the pre+erence {or fish is the nani{estation o+ an innate attraction {or thi5 +eed (ncFartand, l9A7). |loti on Eeened to be a Eomponent in the +ish attractabitily. sinEe tiver jrrking fi5h Eeened the choice {€ed.

7L The ground oeat ,ras the teast prefe.red. Thj.s iE in accordence with Webb et. eI. ( 1983) obsErvatj.ons of Crocodylus jhonstoni. In an experinent where qrolrnd lneat }|ith vitamins and nineralE supolanent was compared to fich and chicks, no di{ference in gro*th .ate and general appearence of lhe crococt!1.es wa6 noted (l4orpurgo et. at., in preparetion). Thusr the value o+ work invested in the Iaboreo,.rs prepiretion of thE €round meat is questienable. The {reshnesE o{ the dead +ish affected tnnediatly pre{erence anct the crocodilps allways pre+erred the fresher fish. This agrees with previolrs obEErvatlons both in the naturat habitat (Cott, 1961) and in €aFtivity (De-Vos, 194:). As +or the nature o+ cues by which the crocodile detects the {reshnessr {urth€r Etudy iE needed. As Hutton (1987) has deinongtrated I the crocodiles prE+errec, fish of a suit;bt€ 6ize {or i,nmidiate sl.dllowing ovEr the larg€r ones. t4hen presented with dark Ciprinids and Tilapias, pre{€rence {or the Ciprinids was demonstrated {ollowing thF tirst +ive minutes. Since the Tilapias bave hard back +rns and the CiprinidE are coftFlptly snooth it is reaEonable to aEsune that the crocodiles prFfer the lattFr to the former. Hohever, it Eeems that the crocodiles have no method to di+{erentiate between lne ._wo Epecres and they had to +igure out the location of the more agreeabte fiEh, whenever the fieh Lrere preEented, The crocodiles j.n the presEnt experiment Here accustomecl to Til.apias and ornamental EiorinidE which were provided to then on a regular basis. Since, thE ration o+ ornainental CiFrinids useually contained ftany colored speclments dhilE that o+ the Tilapias only dark dneE, it is poEsible that the €.ocodtles lftmEdiate attraction to colored Ciprinid5 over dar1." on€Er {as the nanr+estatt6n a+ the previoqs experience and that the cotor Eerveo a= an aEqL(i..ed cLre for their ability to dif+erpntiate betreeF Ciorinids and Iirapiis, thiE.ue wa5 lacking when both the CiprinidE and the Ttlaptas Re{erenceE:

Cott' H.B. Scienti{ic res|tltE o+ an inqLLiry into the ecology and economic status of the Nile crocodile in Uganda and Southern Rhodesia. Trans. Zool .soc. Lond,, ?9: ?11-356, 1961. De-VoE, A. A Manual on CFocodiIe Concervation And Manageoent in India. F.A.O. t Dehra-Du.nrn, India, 198!. Hutton, J.l'1. Erowth and feeding etrology o{ the Nile crocodite at Ngeey, Zimbabwe. J, Anio. Ecot., 963 ?g-Sg, 19g7. Lawrpnce, P. & Loveridge! J.F. Carbon, nitroqen and energy balancEs' o+ young crocodiles fed meat. FhysioI. Zctol., 61r 3F1*f,6f,. 198A. HcFdrland, D. Food selection. In: The Oj<+ord Conpanion t6 Aninel BEhaviollr, Or+ord LJniversity Fre5s, 19g7. PooLey, A.E. The Nile crocodile, noteg on incubation pEriod and groq,th juveniles. rate o+ Laomergeyer, ?! 1-Sg. l?62. Robi n:on B. Fiare, , , I'1.R. & BEauchemp , 6. l.l, ComparaEt ve aspects of sal j_- pl.eferance and intake in birds, Ina Biological and Behavloral AEpFctE o{ Salt Intahe. h:are, M,R. , FragIy, l'1.8. !u Bernard, R.A. (eds). Acadenic pres5, New-York, 198atr pp 69-7A, Sigel S. NonparametriE , StatlstiEE +o. Behavioral Scrences. f,lEgrawHill, New-YorU! 1?56. l4pbb, 6,J.1^t,, Bt_rck.north, ,? R,, tlanolist S.C. CrocodytLrs johnstoni in a controled environment chanbert a raising trial , AuEt. I^ii1dl . Res. 1i): :o1-:o5. 19A2.

It Eating cro codiles/minute of observation

60

50

40

20

l0

DT'cu rn CM Dtr'G u' DF LF Gt{

Fi oRre 1. Nuhber of Eati (average ng crocodileE for a minlrtr o+ observation, in a total period o{ 1i) min. ) in a caf+Pria regimEn whEre the {oI I owi ng Jeeds were (DF) .ooparEd: Dead fiEh I Live +ish {LF); Lr ve chicks (LC) and Eround m€at (GM).

71 Eating cro c odiles/min u te observation

El c..a. r Nl cnd. c

3158?8 Obsereation period (min)

F!oure:. Number of eating croEodj,leE at each minute o+ observation rn a Ea+eteria regrm€n where +ish of grade A and C rere conpared. Eating crocodiles/minute observation

t4

12

to

6

1

2

0 45 I ?8 ObE€rvation period (mln)

Number of eating crocodites at each 'ni.nute o+ observat!on in a.afeterla regiinen where figh of grade B and c w€re coftPared.

16 Eating crocodiles/minute observation

E ctar r Nl cner r,

34667A ObserYation period (min)

Ei.scrc-L. Nunber o+ eating crocodi les at each minute o{ otsservstion in a ca{eteria regimen wher€ fish o{ grade B and A were comPared. Eating crocodiles/minute observation

316a7a Obsernation period (r!iD)

Fioure 5.

Nuinber o{ eating crocodilEs at each ninqte o{ observati.on rn a cafeteri a reginen wherE big and snall fi sh were compared.

1A Eating crocodiles/minute observation

I

2

34567A Observation period (min)

Fioure 6. Nunber o+ eating crocodiles at each minute of obEervation in a ca+eteria regihen rhere colored and dark Cierinids were conoared,

11, Eating crocodiles/minute observation

46 6 ?6 Obs€rvEtion period (mln)

Fioure 7. Nuftber o+ eating crocodi les at rach ni nlrte of in a Ealeleria re9inen where dark Ciprinidg and Ti lapiaE Her€

&,

?RANSPORTATION AND ARTIUCIAL INCI'BATION OF A}'ERICAN ALL]GAIOR ECCS

Rlchard D. Moses and Robelt H. Chabreck School of Foresrry, wildtife, and Fisheries Louisiana StaEe University Agricultural Center Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA

Absttact. - -Ona hundred twenly-eight Arerican alLigato! (Alligatot rrississippiersis) eggs l'ere collecred and iicubaced co Cest the effecls of four incubatlon naterials and rransDortatlon oeChods on hatching success. The four nes! nalerlals cesced were oarshhay cordglass (Sparrjna parers), maidencane (panicum henito')on), grass hay (paspajun notacon), end sphagnum peat (sphaglun sp. ). No diffelence in harching iouna amoug the nest naterials. Slxty-foir! eggs were rransported cushioded (10 cn foan lubber under rhe cransporrarion concalner) and 64 vere transported nodcushioned (no cushioning under the txansportatioo container); no dlfference in hatchint success was found bec\,,een lransportation nelhods. Thircy-rwo eg8s rrete collecCed to tesr Ene erlec!s ot weE and dry incubation units on egg harchabitity. Hatching success did nor vary bet\reen the incubarion unics. Severty-eighc eggs were collecred on 5 d.ares ar biweekty inrervals duling- the incubation period to resc rine of collection on egg hatchability. Harching success of alligaror eggs did not aiiiar among collecCioa dates.

Alligacor farming is increasing in Louisiana as an economic veoture. In 1986, 14 corDnercial fams were operating in che srace (Sheldon and Joanen 1985). By 1988, rhe nunber of co=runercial fatrls had groi,rfl co 64 and further expansion of the industry was expecced (La. Depr. Agri. 1989). A major problem for con:nercial opelalions is obraiaing hatchling alligacors fo! use as growing stock. In the pasr, alligaror farners nainrained breediie alligators in enclosures, collecred eggs from nescs ,richi; rhe encLosures. and arcificially incubared che eggs co produce growing stock. Maincenance of breeding allitators is expensive and laoor incenslve. In 1988, Laador.nels begaa to collect eggs fron nescs of oild alligarors and Co sel1 then to aLligator fainrers (ta. Dept. Agri. 1989).

Several studies have been conducted on artificial incubsrlon of alligator eggs (Chabreck L97I, 1978; Fetguson and Joanen 1982; Joanen and UcNease 1975, 1971, L919>. Srudies have dealc wlth collection techniques, incubarioD tenperatures, cenperature dep€ndent sex deterninacloll, and col.lection tiee.

81 Advantages of artificial lncubation lnclude lhe elinination of natural losses and pledation (Pooley 1973, Blake and Lovelidge 1974, Chabreck 1978), aod elininarioo of lreacher related moltality (Joanen and McNease 1977, Chabreck 1978). Addirionally, rearing young alligators in concrolled environments reduces hatching year nortality as conpered to that expell.enced in the \ri1d (Joanen and McNease 1979).

Stud:.es do nor aglee on the prope! tine of egg co11ectior.. Pooley (1971) reconnended eatLy egg coltecrion. Conversely, Blake end Loverldge (1974) indicated lhac collection shorrly aftet laying had a detlinental effect on harching success conpared to later egg collection. Chabreck (1978) concluded char che hatchins rate of alligacor eggs could be naxinj.zed by deLaying egg collection uncil the fourth lreek of incubacion.

Tlre objecCives of rhis scudy wele to derelline che effects of differeot incubaclon materials on hatching success of alLigator eggs, to test the effects of cushioned and noncushioned llansportation oil hatching success, !o evaluate lhe effects of tiroe of collectioi on hatching success, and to detelnine if different types of incubatols influence hacchlnt success.

The authors are glateful ro pelsonnel of the U. S. Fish and I,lildlife Service for assisrance during rhe invescigarion,

DESCRIPTTONOF STUDY AREA

Allitator eggs for this srudy lrere coLLected on Lacassine NacLonal Wildlife Refuge (I-MflR) in sourhr.resrern Louisiana. The refute contains a 6,478-ha flesh\raler i[poulrd$enr referred ro as Lacassine Poo1. Eggs rere collecced floe the norrhe!:n portion of Lacassine Poo1.

SeLective, cornnercial harvesring of alligarors is conducted on the refuge under scricr legulacions. Alligator harvesting was resumed in 1983 after 32 years lrith no halvesr. In thaE inreran, the alligator populacion increased from an escinared 500 to 10.0OO individuaLs (Brown and Yakupzack !983:27).

The 30-year (1951-1980) averege annual temperarure fo! rhe area (soutbrirest dlvision of Loutsiana) uas 19.7 C with llonchly nean tempetatures ranging fron 10.2 C (January) ro 27.8 C (JuIy). Mean cemperatule for 1988 was 19.0 C, \rirh a mean 1ow rempelatlrle of 7.1 C in January and a mean high cemperacure of 27-5 C Ln Augusr. l,Ionthly temperalules fot lhe study period were l4ay (22.3 c), June (25.3 c), Jui.y (27.1 c), andAususr (27.4 c) (usDc1988).

The 30-yeat (1951-1980) avelage annual preclpication for rhe sCudy area was 145.6 cru, wlch nean oonthly precipltatlon ranging

I fron 8.8 cn (ocrober) ro 16.2 cE (July). precipirarion for 1988 l'as 145.8 cD, and Donthly ?reclpiCation for the sCudy D€riod was MaJ (7.3 cn), June (16.4 co), Juty (13.26 cn), and A;gusI (8.5 c.i) (usDc1988).

The cwo r0ajor plan! connuni.ties ln Lacassine pool ale lhe emergents and floating- leafed,/sub!0ergenCs . l{aidencade and bulltontue (Satittatia Tancifolia) ale lhe oost abundanc specles i.n_the_ emetgent cotrmunity. Other emergents include spikerush (E-Teochatls spp. ) , warerhyssop @acopa spp. ) , giant c;rgrass (Z-izaniopsls fri7aceae, and pennlvort (HydrccotrJe spp.) ( Carbonneau 1987:7) .

ETEODS

Nest lfaterlals and TlansDoltatlon Studv

Egg Collectlon

Alligato! eggs nere collected on July 1, 19gg fron nests on LNIJR, Nesrs nere locaced by aelia1 searches of rhe Lacassine pool and narked by dropping a nark€r at rhe approxinare nest locacion. Nests were rhen locared by ground searches fron an airboar.

Fou! nesrs were locared and 32 eggs vere collecred from each nest. Eggs were selected from various posirions in.lhe nesE and clacked eggs wele not selecred. Each egg was narked. ro indicate the upllght position as deposiced in rhe nest (Chabreck 1978). The eggs fron each nest wele randomly separared inti: 2 groups of 16 eggs each. The 2 groups lrere placed uptight tnro sefaraie lletal contalners (1.30 L) containing marelial renoved fr;rn rhe nesc to cushion and stabillze the e8gs. Thus, 15 eggs frod each nesc ttere placed into one of 2 contalners, with approxinacely 10 cm of nesC nateriel placed beBreen each clutch.

Tlanspottatlon

Eggs nere clansporced fron the Lacassine pool in an airboaE and transpotred 160 kn by a covered 1/2 ton pickup rruck co l-ouisiana Scate Universiry, Bacon Rou.ge, on che s;oe day as collected. one of the conrai.ners nas cransporced on a 10-cn thick foan rubber pad (cushioned) and the orher vas rranspoired rilhouE padding (Doncushioned). Transpoltalion from lhe coilecrlon sire Eo Bacor Rouge took apptoxinately 4 bours. Upon arrival, eggs weie stoled overnlght in a tempelature contlol roon at 32 C. Ttle fo11oolnt day, eggs wele separated inro groups as described later and placed in iacubators.

8g Incub4tloll l{sterlals

Four incubatiolr decerlals nele tested; narshhay coldgrass, naldencane, ttass hay, and sphatnum pea!. Ilarshhay cordgrass oas collected flom alligacor nests found in bracktsh narsh on rhe Rockefeller Refuge (ca. 30 kn sourh of lhe scudy area). Maldencane lras collected ftom narural nests a! lhe same time egAs wele collected. The grass hay had been baled at the LSU farn, Baco[ Rouge, Louisiana the previous year and stored in a dry area. The sphagnun peac riras uncur, long-fibered peac purchased fron a codsercial source. Malshhay cordglass arrd maidencane xrere nolst aC the liee they \rere collected. They wele further noistened wilh narn tap lrater fron a aist-t).pe spray boCtle before being used for incubation nediuo. crass hay and sphagnun pear were dry when obtained and rere thoroughly saturated by soaking Ln \dater apploximately t hour before belng used as incubacion nedlun, The sphagnum peat had a high 'rarer holding capacity and excessive rdate! was reooved before !h€ peac nas placed alound rhe eggs.

Idcubetlon Contalners

Eggs were incubated tn pLastic corrtainets (30 x 30 x 15 cm) each ficted t'ith a wooden lid co help slow evaporarion. l,tarer was pLaced 2 co deep in the conralnels !o provide noisture. A 2.5-cn Chick lrooden board l'as placed in rhe bollom of each container Eo keep the eggs above \rarer. Moistened nest narerial ,as Dlaced Eo a depch of 10 mll under dnd IO nrDover che eggs.

The 16 cushj.oned and 16 noncushioned eggs fron each cest ,rere divided into 8 groups of 2 eggs eaeh. The 2 eggs from each group lrere placed in separate plastic mesh bags (10 x L0 x 30 cnr) ihen placed in separate incubation containers. Bass nere labeled to identify nesc and Dethod of cransporracion. ihe 8 concainers ,ere sepalaCed into 4 ttoups of 2 replicarions each and 1 group rras assi.gned to each of rhe 4 nesting nacerials for testing. The reroaining cushiooed and noncushioned eggs were divided and Arouped in the sane manne! and placed in rhe saoe 8 conrainers so rhar each container held 2 eggs fron each of rhe 1+nescs.

Incubatlon

Eggs wele incubaced in Loe cenperatule iacubatots (preciston roodel 81.8). Ihe incubators !'ere equi.pped l'ich a solid srare hear proportionint circuit ro achieve seTlsirlve Cenperalule conCrol (+ 0.1 C). locubators irere equipped trlrh a circulacl.ng fan ro ploviale even air disrri.buCion lhroughout lhe chanber and to assure tenpelature unifoftity. Mercury Eaxlnu&-mininud lhernomelers i.rere placed in the incubacors to Lndl.cate temperature and Co j.ndicate nechanicaL failure of the inCernal temperature themometer.

&r A11 eggs nere lncubated in low Ceepelacure incubators at a constant temperature of 31.5 C and checked t!'ice weekly to ensure thac proper noislure (decernlned by visuat obsefiarion) l'as maintai.ned. Llhen the nest nacelia1 was drying lt uas apparent l,rhen tbe 1id \.as renoved floo lhe incubatlon conlainer. fhe sutface of che lrest Daterial oould be light in colo! and appear- dry and blict1e !o the touch. Nest naterials were danpened as needed lriCh a dist-type spray bottle. Ar the escinated line of hatchint, approxinately che third neek of August, eggs lrere i:lspected at 2-day intervals and young thar had hatched wele

Date of Collecrlon Study

A study ras conducted to deternine if tine of al_ligetor egg collection influenced hatching success. Ti,ronesrs were locareo, adjacen! to a perlnete! levee of l-acassi!1e pool. Eight eggs were randonly collected fron each nest ac cwo-\,reek lnrervals for 8 weeks. Eggs nele collected on 1, 14, and 29 JuIy afrC,12 arrd 26 August 1988. The eggs vere n€rked, cushioned, tiansporced and incubated as previously descrlbed. The 16 eggs fton each collection perlod Fere incubated in lhe sane container tn sphagnun

Incrbarlon Onlt Srudy

Eggs were collected on 1 July 1888 and sere marked, transported as previ.ousLy described, and placed in incubacion unlls. Two tLpes of incubarl.on units, a dly unit and a wer uni!, nere tested. The dry untr was a lon tenpelalure incubaror (Preclsion nodel 818), and th6 l,ec unir Iras e hunidirv chamber (Corwilon model E-15)- The dry unit had no free warei in rhe unit and che air \rilhin che chamber l,/as nor hurnid. The wer uni.t circulated flee \ra!er, and rhe air ithin rh€ chamber ras saturated witb moisture so that the huridity 'ras maincained ar 100t.

Thilty-lwo eggs rrere placed in the 2 r)?es of incubators. Sixteen eggs fron each of 2 nests wete landonly setecred, and 8 eggs f!o[ each nest lrere placed in each type of incubetion uniE. lncubatlon containers eere sieilar co chose previously described. No cove! \ras placed on conlainers in the wer unir, bur incubacion concainers in Che dry unit \rere eovered wi.!h a lid to naintain a high noiscure level uithtn the co[taj.ner. Eggs were incubared !n sphatnuxo peat at a coosranr renperatule of 31.5 c.

85 RESULTS

Incubatlon llat6r{e1s and ttansoortatlon Sttdv

N6sts and IncubatLon ltatelials

Thilty.firo eggs fron each of 4 nescs were incubated in 4 differenc incubatlon dacerials, and hatching !a!es xrele conpaled. Of che 128 eggs incubaced, 82t hacched. The Nrnber of eggs harched did nor dtffer among oescs (F - 0.5172; 3, 21 df;-p - 0.574) or i.ncubation macerials (F - 2.263i 3, 21 df; p - 0.068)

Table 1. Nueber of eggs hatched froD each nesta accordins ro incubarion narerlals. Eggs collected I July 1988 on Laca;sine National Wildlife Refuge, Careron parish, Louislana.

Incubation Marerials

Nest Spartina Panlcun Paspalur Sphagnum Nes! Nunber patens hemitomon sp. Mean

t" 6 8 8 5.5 2 7 8 7 6 7.0 3 6 6 7 5 6.O 6 7 7 7 6.8 llean 6.3 7,3 6.5

"Thi"ty-tro egts were lncsbeced fron each nesc lrith g eggs in each incubation nate!ial.

Cushl.oacd vs. Noncushloned

fhe 128 eggs used for rhe incubarion darerial studv \re!e also used for the cransporta!ion study. Stxcy-four .gg" transported cushioned and 52 of rhese (81.3t) hetched.""ru Ihe orher 64 eggs lrere transported noncushioned and 53 (82.8t) hatched. Data analysis showed no diffelence in hatchabiLity beclreel1 eggs crarrsported cushioned and noncushioned (F - 0.205; 1, 21 df: p - 0.638).

Collectton Date Study

Seventy-eighc eggs for che collecrion dace study irere coll.ected at 2-week intervals for 8 \,reeks beginning on I JuIy

86 1988. fhree ferclle eggs did not harch and in 2 of rhese enbryos eele dead before the collecllon date, thus their death could n;c be atttibuted to the clne of collecrion. Wirh only 1 fercile egg not hatching, i! ls obvious tha! collecrlon dates did noc influence the hatchtng rate. Because of the si[ilarlry of hacching success anong collectton dates, dala were not cesred staCistically.

Incubarion Udit Study

Thirty-cwo eggs l,ere i.lcubared ! t et and dry incubation unils to delernine if the unirs affecCed egg hatching success. Sixteen eggs were incubated in each unir. Fourreen egts hatched. ln che wer unic and 15 eggs halched in rhe dry unir. tecause of the simllari.ty of hacching success between unics, differences ln hatching success nere noc resced stati.scically.

DISCUSSION

Incubation lla!erlals

Nes! matealals used for this sEudy included oarshhay cordgrass and naidencane, r'hich are conmon nes! oaterial; in lhe wi1d, and txass hay ard sphagnun pear rhich ale incubarion natelia1s readily available ro alligaror farrners. Chabreck (1971) lndicated that olganic naterials are besr for artificiat incubation naterial.

Hatchlng rates did noc differ anona lhe 4 nests or the 4 incubation narerials used in che study. However, eggs in grass hay and ioaldencane had a 90.61 harching ra!e. Oggs in narltrtray cordg?ass had a 81.3t batching tate, and 68.8t of rhe eggs halched in sphagnrid peat. fhe halching rale tn che sphagnun peii was affected by the high nulbe! (10) of faulry eggs. whether che eggs lrere infertile or lhe enbryos irere ki11ed by excessive moisCure rn sphagnun peat ar the onseC of lhe study couLd not be deCermined. However, eggs incubaced in sphagnun pear ro lesc dlfferences becueen i.ncubatlon unlts had a 90.6t hatchin8 race.

Differences in drying tine aDong Earshhay cordgrass, grass hay, and naldencane nere not observed. Ttret! Fater holaline capacicies appeared equal, and Ehe incubaEion meterials re;uired noisrentng abouc Eiiice each Beek. SphagnLn peaE held more Eoi.stule, held it longe!, and required noisceninS only once eaco

Care shosld be taken when using s?hatnun because of irs high traCer holding capacity. If an excessive aDount of wate! is Present, the er0bryos Eay not ploperly excha[8e resplrarory gases

a7 and lrey dle. WlCh prop€r iretoess, sphagum peac ]'i1l not contain surllus irace! tha! can be squeezed fron che naterial.

Felguson (1981) reporred that the sclucture of the alligetor egtshell is not very porous at the lide of laying. Ihe lack of pores increases shell stleogth, prevents damage as the eggs are dropped in the nesc, and helps prevent dehydlacion of rhe eggs. As incubacion progresses, extrinsic acidlc degradatlon of lhe egtshell increases che shell porosity. The increased porosiry a11ows fo! che exchange of respiracoty gases and water vapor from the enlalging alllgatot ernbryo. Fertuson scared that thls nay explain why alll.tato! eggs artlficially lncubated oithou! proper incubation nediu$ failed to hatch or died \rhen abnolnlally coucir eggshell did noc allow the baby alligator co escape from- rhe lgg (Ferausor 1981).

Cusltloned vs. Noncushloned

Pooley (1971) suggesced thar Ni.le crocodile (Crocodylas njloclcus) eggs be cushioned durinS cransporcacion. He reconneoded chat tlansportatlon containers be placed on a bed of dried grass 30 cm deep. lhe 128 eggs used for the incubaclon dateriels study lrere siei.Iarly handled and placed in transporlation containels that were transported cushloned and noncushioned. The cushioned eggs rrere cransported wtth a 10 cm fosr rubbe! pad unde! lhe cransporration container fron the time they l€ft the nest uncil teaching the laboracory in Baton Rouge. The only padding the noncushioned eggs received was from nest rnaterlal renoved froo the nacural nes! at rhe tine of collection and placed in the concainers. This natural nes! nacetlal was used in cushloned. end noncushioned contalnets and uas placed becneen clutches to protec! the eggs aDd prevenr excessirl drying. one hundred and five of 128 eggs hatched t'irh alnosr equal harching lates in eggs froo each transportalion merhod. Stacistical anelysis indicated lhat cushloDing as provj.ded in chls study ras not effective ln increaslng rhe hatching rale of eggs.

Collectlon Dates

Prevlous studies indicaced rha! egg collection after the fourch week produced the beEt harchj.ng success (Blake and Loverldge 1974; Joarren and McNease 1975; Chabreck 1978). However, Chabreck (1978) reported Chat adequace harching resulcs could be oblained from early collecrion if ploper collecrlon mechods nere used. Later studies by Ferguson (1981), Joanen and l4cNease (1981), Feltuson and Joaoen (1982) also fouod rhac eggs could be collected early itt the incubatlon perlod with acceptable harehtng

tt Eight eggs were collected fron each of 2 nescs durlns 5 collection periods; however. l nest had only 5 eggs che 1;sr colleccion date. ?tree felti1e egts ala not hatih and only 1of these could hsve been affected by lhe rlne of collection. IC was collecced 1 Ju1y. The ocher 2 ferttle eggs rhar dld not hacch ttele colLected 24 August, aDd the age of the dead enblyos revealed that death had occurred in the second or rhlrd week of developnent, which was 5 to 6 \reeks prior to che collection dace (24 August). No difference was found in harchinS success between eally and late etg collection. Ho\,rever, we followed the reconmendations of Chabreck (1978) and nalntained eggs after collectlor in Ehe position as found in rhe llesr.

Incubdrlon Itnlts

fhilty-two eggs uere collected 1 July 1988 !o tes! rhe effeccs of wet and dry incubation units on egg harching success. The eggs were collected flom 2 nests trith 15 ;ggs renoied from each nest. Egts rrele incubaced la sphagnun peii. fhe wec untt provlded hlgh hunldlry (100t), aDd rhe incub;rion narertal atid nor lequlle Chat water be added du.ing the study period to keep rhe eggs fron drying. The free lraler tn the bottom of the inc;batlon containers in the uet uni.t dld not lequire refiLling. The incubation naterlaL in the dry unir requiled that 'iter be addeo bitreekly even though egg conrainers rere covered to decrease evaporation. Free warer in lhe botton of the incubarion contalners in rhe dry unit had to be refiLled evetv 2 Feeks because of evaporaEion. Fourceen ferrite eggs in itre uec unic hatched and 15 fertile eggs in rhe d.ry uni.t iarched.

I:re: nunber of eggs is being . .If " incubared. a wer uniE woulo grearry decrease Che workload because biweekly noisrenins oF lncubation darelial is noc required. Ho\revet, a ;"i; ,;;-;.. ".'. be available !o lrost farners, and if a telperature concrollei dry loon is used, it !s idperative rhat proper noj.scure be maincained in the incubation nedlun. Oprimu.n ooisture level was nor quantified, but e:

1ITEMTURE CITED

B1ake, D, K. and J. P. Loveridge. 1974. The role of comnerci.al crocodile fanning in crocodile conservarion. Bio1. Consers. 8126L-212.

Brolrn, B. and P. M. Yakupzack. 1983. Annual narrarive reporr - Lscassine Refuge, calenda! year 1983. Submicred co UafitS Regional Office, Atlanra. 62 pp.

&t Chabreck, R, H. 1971. Atllgaror llesr narelia1s. pp. 71-72 ir La. W11d1. and Fish. Com. 14th Bienn. Rep., New Olleans, Louisians.

Chabreck, R. I{. 1978. Collecclon of Amertcan alligacor eggs for alciflcial incubatlon. Wi1d1. Soc. Bu11. 5(4):253-255.

Ferguson, !4. W. J. 1981. ltte value of che American allisaror (AlligaEor oissrssippiensis) as a model for research in crenlofacial development. J. Craniof. cenec. Devl-. BioI. Ltl23-144.

Felguson, M. W. J. and T. Joanen. 1982. TerDperature of egg incubation deternines sex in el.iigaao! lliss iss ipp iens is. Nature (London) 295:850-853.

Josnen, T. and L. llcNease. 1975, Notes on the reDroduccive bioloty and capEi.ve propatarion of rhe A-meric;n alligaror. Proc. Armu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. of Ca.oeand Fish Conn 29.407 - 4L5 .

Joa[en, !. and L. McNease. 1977. Artiftcial incubati.on of alli.gator etgs and posr hacching culcure in controlled environmental chambers. Ptoc. ltorld ttaliculrure Soc. I t483 -49O.

Joanen, T. and L. McNease. 1979. Culrure of rhe Anerican alLigacor. Internarional Zoo yearbook 19.6I-56.

Louisiana Deparcmenr of AgrlculEure. 1989. Louisiana: The source, La. Dept. Agrl, and For. Bacon Rouge, Louisiana. 9 PP.

Pooley, A. C. 1971. Crocodile rearing and resrocking. Crocodiles. IUCN suppl. Pap. No. 32. Morges 1:104-130.

Pooley, A. C. 1973. Conservation and nanaeement of crocodiles rn Aflica. J. Souch Africa WiIdI. Managel Assoc. 3(2):101-103.

Sheldon, B. and T. Joaoen. 1986. Alligarors: Louisiana,s ne\resE gladou! clop. l,a. Conser. 38(6)t4-7.

U. S, Deparcnent of CorDnerce. 1988. CLidacoloEical alara: Louisiana annual su.nnary. NaEl. oceanic a;d Atmos. Adm., Asheville, N.C. Vol. 93. 30 DD.

90 A conparj.gon of 3 survey Dethods for estiriating rel,ative abundance of rare crocodilians

Tinothy c. orBrien Dept. of wildLife and RanEe Science 118 Nelrins-Ziegler Ea11 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32601

INTRODUCTION Night count surveys are used videly to census crocodilj.an popul-ations. Night counts are used for relative abundance estinates and for actual populatlon estinates (l.Iagnussen et aL 1978; uessel 1981; o'Brien 1983; o'Brien and Doerr 1.986). other tnethods of surveying include aerial day and night counts (Graham 1968t Parker and lilatson 1970), aeri.al counts of nests (McNeaseand Joanen 1978) , daytine surface counts and counts of basking anilla1s (Thornpson and Gidden 1972). Each af the above nentioned nethods has its own advantages and di.sadvantages. Problelrs invol.ving costs, logistics, and anatytical interpretation nust be lteighed in deciding the best Dethod to use. Although niqht count surveys bave been successfuL, alternatj.ve techniques are noterrgrthy. Nj.ght counts are burdensone for trildlife personnel. accustored to rdorking with diulnaL species. Daylight counts are !!ore convenient but Eay have problens lrith visibility

91 of aninaLs that nove away froD the nater edge to bask. Daylight aerial counts can cover larqe and inaccessible areas in a shor! tiDe perlod but lay be expensive 1n uore redote parts of the sorld. In vierr of the advantages of each nethod, this study was developed to cornpare surface day and night counts and aeriaL day counts for surveyinq crocodilian populations' I considered the alligator population in North carolina as represantatiwe of a 1ou density crocodiLlan population. North carolina is the northern liuit of the alligator' range, and densities ranged froll 0.15/hl, in the southern part of the state to 0.o75/kn (O'Brien and Doerr

1936) in the northern Part of the range. UETHODS Survey routes lrere established in 2 areas of the North carolina coast (Fig. 1): 10 routes in the southern part of the

state and 4 routes in the central Portj'on. The l-4 survey routes consisted of 3 river, 5 lake and 6 estuarj.ne routes ranging- in length fron 5.5 to 16kJr. survey routes rrere established arbitrarily to: 1) uge routes rtith knovn presence of alligators based on prior surveys and 2) to clu0p survey routes for aeriaL counts. Each estuary and river route was surveyed tvice lrith each nethod. Lake routes were surveyed tvice by air but onLy once by gurface day and night eounts because of tine and access constraints. Aeriaf, surveys nere nade in a Piper super cub fron approxinately 90 u altitude and at a sPeed of approxiDately 130 lo/hr. Height and speed tere checked every 2 Dinutes to assure consistency. I counted vlsible alligators and recorded gtart and Btop tines for each survey. Air surveys ltere gonducted betveen 0900 and 12oo on 4 days froD 17 - 23 Aprj-L 19s0. surface day counts and night counts for a gj.ven route nere conducted on a single day and used similar procedures. I used a 3m flat-bottoned johnboat \rith a 9.9 hp outboard notor in all surveys.

The boat uas operated at 10-15 kr,/hr dovn the midd]e of a river, or approxinately 100 D fron the shoreline of a lake or estuary. Tota] tine of each survey depended on route length arld averaged 1.3 hours. Day counts began between 0900 and LL00 and night counts began t hour after sunset. A l2-voLt, 200,00o candlepover was used on night gurvays to detect eye reflectj-ons of alligators. Day and night count surveys ltere conducted froD 24 ApriL to 14 May 1930. Data analysis conpared tbe 3 survey netbods using Loglo transforDation of the density of observed all-igators as the dependent variable in an anal-ysis of varianee nodel (snedecor and Cochran 195?). The 10910 t-ansfornation vas used to reduce heterogeneity of variance. The design treate survey nethod and lrater type as closs-classified factors, wilh survey routes nested lrithin vater tlT)es and lrith repeated neasurenents on survey routes. The data set lras analyzed as a whole, partitioned by nater type, and partitoned by survey nethod. In lhe overaLl nodeL, factors itere tested uging the appropriate Dean square, deternined by partitloning the conponents of variance, as the erlor tenD.

coDpoDents of variance vere also exauined. ALl data analyses used procedures of the StatisticaL Analysis Systen (sAs 1985).

RESUI,TSAND DISCUSSIOX survev ltethod combarisons visibility vas considered excellent under alL conditj'ons except rrhen aerial counts were conducted on riverg travergj-ng vooded areas. Here, canopy c]osure over ttater ocqasionally nade observation difficult or iDpossible. An average of 0.15 (range 0-0.63) aLligators/\olroute/survey sas obgerved on aerial countg, 0.047 (range 0-0.50) all, j.gators/lcn/route/survey on surface day counts, and 0.29 (range O-1.86) alligators/kn/route/survey (Table 1t Fig. 2). Although survey routes were selected to nininize the flequency of 0- observations, 36* of aerial, 52* of surface day, and 3ot of night count surveys resulted in no alligators being observed. Zero-

observations tended to be Paired for repeated observations on individuat routes, reducj.ng nean nurober of alligators abserved, lrithin route variability, and the abiLity to detect factor differences using F-Tests. Analysis af variance indicated no significant differences (P>0.05) in observed all.igator densities for the 3 nethods, and no signiflcant differences (P>0.05) in alligator densities for the 3 nater types (Table 2). The conparison of survey nethods by lrater tlrpe (Tab1e 3) shoved no significant differences in al'ligator densities (P>0.05). the conparison of vater types by survey nethods (fab1e 4) also shorred no significant differences in alllgator densities. slEnifj,cant differences (P<0.05) in density vere detected for survey route and for the survey rethod by survey route interaction (Table 2. 5). obserlted alliEator densities atere Eignificantly different betlreen survey routes on rivers, but not on lakes or estuaries. varl,abi}ity betlreen route within !,ater t)Pes accounted for 3?t of the total sul! of squares (Table 2). indicating high spatial, heterogeneity in afligator densities betveen routes lrithin vater t)rpes. The survey nethod by survey route lnteraction accounted for 42t of the total- sun of squares and j.ndicated that rithin certain routes. the survey rnethods yieLded different results. Day surface counts on estuarine routes vere extrelely lov coupared to other nethods. Niqht counts on lake routes nere very high coupared to other Dethods (Table 5). Advantaqes and Disadvantaqes of the 3 Methods There ara several logistical and biological considerations that nay j-nfluence the choice of survey rnethod appropriate for a particuLar situatj.on. crocodilian behavior, season, agency resources, and babitat differences nust be considered when choosinq a nethod. Sulface day counts require the least equipment and are the nost easily schedul-ed. Although highly desilab1e froh a logistical vlewpoint, there are nany o-counts (521 of all surveys) associated rith surface day counts in this study. This suggests that alligators nay be fess visible durj-ng sulface day counts than dqringt aerial or night counts. Several explanations for reduced visibility exist. Alligator activity chanqes seasonally (snith 1975) fron priDaril-y diurnal patterng early in the geason to prinarily nocturnal in late sPrinq and guElner (Hagan :.982). Duri-ng the day, alligators Day readily terninate basking if the sky turns cloudy or when body tenperatures approach optiDat leve1s. Alligators in the I'ater are Dore difficuJ.t to observe fron the qround durinq the day because of surface

95 reflection fro[ the sun and because of the lorl profile usually exiibited, fhese congiderations suqgest that season, tine of day and veather conditions are critical in schedul,ing surface day counts. Aerj.al counts and surface day counts are subject to nany siDiLa! problens. ActLvity patterns and lreather shouLd be congidered vhen scheduling aerial counts. zero-counts durj.ng aerial observations (36t) nere not significnatly different fron O-counts during night counts (301), indicating that visibil.ity is satj.sfactory j.f the alligators are active. Aerial counts have a distinct financial advantage of beinE capable of covering larEe areas in a ginqle f,light and are advantageous when a large sanple is reguj.red in a short tine period. The aerial- count is nost effective in open Farsh and lake habj.tats and least effective in svanps and bottonland hardvoods vhere canopy cJ.osure can block visibil ity. NLght count nethods are preferable because they lrork in all habitats and colncide uith the nocturnal aetivity pattern of crocodj,Lians. Eye refLections are excellent targets at night, visible at long distances and in situations vhere the aninal night otheFrise go undetected.

Desidn considerations Because thig study t as conducted j-n areas of very Lo!, aLllEator densities, the resuLts nay not be apP)-icabl.e to couparisons of Dethods for censusinq nore abundant PoPulations. The lov densities and large betlreen-route variance observed in this Etudy uade Lt diff,icult ta detect differences due ta nethods.

96 Although the choice of Dethod gives sj.uilar results in thj,s gtudy. higher densitLes and Dore uniforr0 distributions of crocodilj.ans t0ay result in differences in census nethods. Experiments sueh as thls shou.Ld be replicated to detemine if census Dethods are sensitive to the density and distribution of tarEet populations. A second consj.deration for establishing qensuses of crocodilj.ans is the deteroination of the nuhber of survey routes and the nuuber of replicatj.ons per route. Bay]iss (198?) recomnends that 'rhen conducting surveys to determj.ne relatj.ve abundance, precision of estinates is especially ihportant. Assuning a repetition on a single route costs approximately the sane as conducting an additional survey on a new route, the deciding factors becone the cost of establishi-ng a nev route and the reduction iD warj.ance resuLting fron repeated neasurements versus additional survey routes. An anaLysis of the cotlponents of variance (Tab1e 4) for each survey nethod shoi,rs that the betveen route varj.ance conponent (var ( Route fwater Type] ) ) tends to be nuch hiqher than the \rithin route variance cotlponent (var(Error)) for lov dengity populatj.ons. The ratio of bet\reen route variance to within route variance is 6.5:1 for aerial counts, 3:1 for day eounts, and 5.4:1 fgr night counts. Because there is nuch less vari.ation t ithin than betveen routes for each nethod, little is gained by repeatingr gurveys on the sane route unLess the cost of establihing a new route becones prohibitive. This point is illustrated by deternining the sensitivity of the standard error (sE) to changes in the number of routes and the nuDber of repeated leasurenents on routes (Snedecor and Cochran

n L967. pp 531-534) . sE is calcuLated as the squareroot of var (Route llfater type])/r + Var(Error)/nr, \there r=the nulDer of routeg and n=the nunber of replications on a route. sE falLs draDatical-ly (!'iq. 3) in response ta increasing the nutnber of routes surveyed by any of the 3 Dethods. The reduction in SE due to replication, hovever, is relativeLy insignlficant at any of the levels evaluated. For exanple, 10 routes surveyed 4 titles at night (4o surveys) re5ult in a SE of 0.236. but 14 routes surveyed onLy once at night resuLt in a sE of o.212 (Fiq. 3). The cost of developing a new route Dust be very high before it becobes economj.cal to consider repeated surveys on existing routes as a lray to increase preci-sion. An oplinaL allocation of sanpling

effort, therefore should attetnpt to daxitoize the nunber of routes surveyed in order to baxinize the precisj.on of the survey. coNclusroNs 1. No signif,icant differences in observed alLigalor densities tere detected betrreen 3 survey nethods lrhen conpared over 3 vater types

or nhen conpared by water tltte. 2. No slgnj-ficant differences in observed al-lj'gator densj.ties vele detected betlreen the 3 ltater types lthen cornpared over all survey Eethods or vhen codpared separately by each uethod. 3. significant differences vere detected in routes atithin !'tater type, suggesting a high degree of spatial heteroqeneity j.n alLigator observations. 4. signlficant differences nere found for the survey Bethod by route interaction, l-ndl.cating that !0ethods may perforn differently in dlfferent habitats.

9t 5. NiEht count surveys nay be the best choice of the 3 Eethods if behavior, ease of observation, and non-zero counts are considered.

Aerial counts are best for surveyi.ng large areas rapidly and for surveying open habitats.

6. when surveying lolr density crocodilian populalions, the nuDber of routes surveyed should be uaxiEized and the each route should be surveyed only once. LITERATI'RE CITED Bayliss, P. 1987. Survey netbods and donitoring i{ithin crocodile Danagenent progranmes. ln: WiLdlife Uanagenent: CrocodiLes and AlLigators. G,J.W. Webb, S.C. Uanolis, and P.J. Whitehead, eds. Surrey Beatty and Sons Pty Ltd. Chipping Norton, Australia. Gratrad, A. 1968. The Lake Rudolph crocodile (crocodvlus niloticus Laurenti) population. Unpublished l.t.S, thesis, Univ. College, Naj-robi, Kenya. Hagan, J.l,l. 1982. ltovenent habits of the American alligator (Allidator nississitriensis) in North carolina. Unpubli.shed U.s. Ihesis, N.c. state Univ., Rateigh. 203 pp. }lcNease, L. and T. Joanen. 1978. Distribution and relati.ve abundance of, the alliqator in Louisiana coastal Darshes. S. E. Assoc. Ga!0eand Fish Cotnt0.Conf. 32r182-186. t{agnusson, W.8., G.J. Caughley, and G.C. Grigg. L978. A double- survey estinate of popul,ation size fron inconplete counts. J. Wj,ldl,. ltanage. 42tL74-L76. ltessel, H,, c.c. vorlicek, A.c. welfs, and Ii.J. creen. 1981. Surveys of tidal river systens in the Northern Territory of

I Australia and their crocodile populations. Monogr. No. 1. Perqanon Pre39: SYdneY. orBrien, T,G. 1983. Alerican alligator (Alliqator nlssissiniensis) surveys in the qoastal counties of North CaroLina. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh. ?7 pp. o'Brien, I.G. and P.D. Doerr. 1986. Night count surveys for aJ-ligators j.n eaastal counties of North Carotina' J. Herpetol. 20r444-444. Parker. r.s.c. and R.l'1. watson. 1970. crocodile distribution and status in the Dajor ltaters of vestern and central' Uqanda in 1969. E. Afr. liildl. J. 8:85-103. st0ith, N.E. 1975. thernoregulation of the tuDerican alligator. Physiol. ZooI. 4a.L77-L94. snedecor, G.w. and w.G. cochran. 1967. Statistical l'Iethods. 6th ed. Ioua state University Press, Ares, Iova, 593 pp. Thonpson, R.!. and c.s' Gidden. 1972. Territorj-al' basking counts to estinate alligator populations' ,7. I{ildL. Manage. 36:1081-

1088.

100 table 1. ltean afliEator density, range, and numler of surveys (N) for aerj.al, surfaae day and night counts on rivers, lakes and estuari,es. Survev Uethod N ltean Range Aerial- 0.o - 1. 02 Day o.14 o. 0 - 0.80 Niqht 0.0 - 3. 00 water Tvpe

River o. 13 Lake 20 0.30 0.0 - 1.86 Estuary 36 0. 13 0. 0 - 0.87

101 fable 2. Analysis of variance of the logrc transforned alligator densj.ties using aerial. surface day and night coun! surveys in river. J.ake, and estuary habitats. variable F-valuel

Water Type 1.804

Route (water Type) L.444 L3 . 422

Survey Uethod r.979 2.57 Survey Hethod x Route (Water T).pe) o.744

0, 108

TotaI

F-tests are calculated usj-ng Water qrpe vs. Route(Water Tlrpe), Route (Water Type) vs. 8rror, Survey l.lethod vs. Route(Water Tlt)e), Survey Method x Route(water Tl'pe) vs. Error. P < 0.0001

112 Table 3. AnaLysis of variance of the Logro transforDed alligator densities by \date! tlrpe for aerial, gurface day and night counts. River variabLe u.s. F-vaLuel survey uethod o. o89 Route -^ ^-2 survey }lethod x Route 0.046 0.40 Error Total Lake variable l{.s. F-Value survey Method 2.r52 3.L2 Route o.924 1.34 Survey l,lethod x Route o. 590 6.803 Error 0. 102

Estuarv va!iabIe d. f . F-Value survey Uethod 0.7t2 0. 64 Route 1.138 r.02 survey l{ethod x Route 10 1.121 LO . 622

o. 106

TotaI

F-tests are calculated using survey Method vs. Survey Method Route, Roqte vs. survey t{ethod x Route, and Survey l.lethod x Route vs. Error, P < O.OOoL P < 0, 05

1(B TabLe 4. AnaLysis of varj,ance (lncluding estinates of variance) of the logro transforned alligator densitj-es by survey Dethod, for river, lake and estuary habitats- AeriaI variabLe d,f, t{.S. F-valuer Valiance Estinate liater TlDe 2 0.066 0. 05 Route (Water TlPe) LL L.32g L3.922 var (Route (water TlFe) )= 0. 617 L4 0.095 Var(Error)- 0.095 fotal 27 Surface Dav variabfe d.f. u.s. F-value variance Estillate Water T)pe 2 0.664 0.42 Route (viater Type) 11 0.806 5.983 var (Route (water TYPe))= 0.410 Error 9 o.l-35 var(Error)= 0. L35

22

variabl.e cl-r. l{. s. F-value variance Estinate Water r!T)e

Route (water Tlltr)e) 0.954 9.61" var (Route(water TYPe)= 0's32 Error 0.099 var(Error) = 0.099 Tatal 1F-tests are calculated using water Type vs. Route (water TYPe) and Route(Water TYPe) vs. Errol.

" P < o.oool " P < o.o1 ' p < o. oot

104 Table 5. l{ean density of aLl,iqators (per l.D) by survey nethod for each waEer tYPe. survey ltethod Rj-ver Lake Estuary

Aerial. 0.13 o.19 0.13

Day o.14 0.044

Night 0.2t

105 ic

>:

;,!

.'!n z1--

106 14 AERIAL 12 I DAY NIGHT 1n tr2R f L!O lL

o246810 12 14)15 NUMBEROFALLIGATORS OBSERVED ON ROUTES

Figure 2. Frequency of alligator oDservatj.ons on aerial, surface alay and night count surveys.

10 AERIALCOUNT NUMBEROF REPLICATES nln ...... N=2

0.20

0.10

0.00 SURFACEDAY COUNT 0.30 E E E 0.20 o v. o z 0.10 f o.) 0.00 NIGHTCOUNT 0.J0

o.20

0.10

0.00 10 20 30 NUMBEROF ROUTES

Fiqure 3. Reductj,on in standald error'due to increasing the nurnber of leplications per survey loute (n) and due to increasing the nudber of survey routes for aeriafr surface day and night count surveys. TEEDING, RIPRODI'CTION AND GROIi'I8 IN CASIIVE Uelanosuchus nioer

Luis F. Pacheco A. Universidad Uayor de San Andr6s Casilla 9541, La Pa1 BOLIVTA

ABSTRACT

A captive population of tttelanosuchus niqer uas studied in northern Bolivia. fhe feeding status of the population lras evaLuated both by quantity and quality of the food. Data on reploductive biolog"y and grolrth were colLected and conpared vith data fron literature about l{elanosuchus niqer and ather species, and analyzed to evatuate the success and perspecti.ves of the prograrn.

IIIIRODUCAION

Crocodilians include some of the rdost valuable and heavilv lraded species in international- con$erce because of thei; high quality skin, this Ied to lrorldwide species depletion and extensive illegaI trade (caski & HenIey I9d8). AE the peak tine for the denand of these goods i; the 1950s and 1960s, nunerous species becane endangered (Hen1ey 1989), I'lelanosuchus ligeg anongr then.

Eunting of llelanosuchus began in Bolivi.a in 1942 (lteden 1983t cit. by King and videz-Roca 1987). It is estihated that an average of 585 skins of Uelanosuchus (cainan) and Caipan crocodilus (lagarto) were extracted each day between 1940 to 1955 fron the Beni plains in Botivia (Claure I9a6) . In 1951 the Suprebe Decree No.05912 established a mr.nlrtum sj-ze of 2.1 n for cairnans hides and prohibited hunting of the specieg fron 31 JuIy to 1 January (Kj-ng and Videz-Roca 1987). Nevertheless. hunting conti-nued. A niniuum of 31691 cainan hi.des Lrere exported between 1978 and 1985 (Claure l-986). Recently (1.990) an ',EcoLogical pauser was declared by the covernnent of BoLivj.a, bannj.ng aI1 wildl-j.fe trade. we hope that this nev governhental guideline wilt be enforced with strong actions and heavl. sanctions against the illegal trade.

Knolrledge about tr(elanosuchus is not very good. The bost conpl.ete work about morpholog-y, physj-ology, ethology and ecology of the species has been done in peni (otte 1979). Meden (1953, 1981, 1993) reports on sone aspects of its 109 distribution, ecol-og'y, norphology, growth and parasites. Information about i-ts di.gtribution and conservation i,s reported by Plotkin et aI. {1983). l{erron (1985) provides nore recent infornation about status, qlo\rth and spatial, relationships of the Peni populations. King and Videz-Roca (1947) nake the nost recent revielr of the population status in Bolivia, and there iE a report about the nanager0ent of the gele@SgebfE popuLation at the hacj-enda (El Cainanr, the farn nhere this study took pl.ace (croves 1988). The nain goals of this L'ork uere to get sone infornation about the reproductive bj.ology and grovth for l{elanosuchus !!igCE. The study had to be conducted in captivity because of the Loitt population densities in Bolivia which wogld require too nuch tine and budqet to get sone infornation. The captive nanagenent of crocodilians for conservation and connercial purposes is very iDportant vorldnide at presen!, so the importance of these data for the conservation of llelanosuchus is high and !riI1 be useful for future captive rearing progralls and conservation efforts.

sruDY ansA

The study area j.s Iocated at the Hacienda rrEl cainanr, which is a colrnercial purpose farn situated in the departnent of La Paz, in northern Bolivia. The clj.mate is sinilar to rnost tropical regions of the ahazonian part of Bolivia, so it is siuilar to the ge.te4ggggbgE natural habitats clirate. The farn had, at the time of the study (Novernber 1988 to september 19a9), five pens (Table 1), and a total population estinated at 130 adults and subadults and a nuidrer of juvenil-es aDd hatchlings vhich chanqed sharply during the gtudy. These changes l'iJ.l be described in the results. Table 1. Description of the pens.

Pen Iot. Area Pond area # cairnans TL range

r 1.5 Ha. 0.25-0.75 Ha. 30 ,1.5 - J.5 m rr 0.87 Ha. 0.35-o.50 na. III 0.95 Ha. 0.35-0.45 Ha. rv 200 u L4-30 r0 TIJ < 1n v 0.40 Ila. 0.003-0,40 Ha. 2 3.5 - 4.2 n

Notes.- Pond area is described as a range because it depends olt t-he season. ** this nunber changed during lhe tine of study. It rya9 not possible to catch the cainaDs in pens I, II, and III, because of the big size of the ponds, the big size 110 of the caiDans and the l-ack of help. so both the exact nunber of anirnals and the sex ratio are unknovn. The nunber of aninals j.n each of lhese pens lras estinated by spotlight counts during several nj.ghts and the nurnbers given j.n Table L are the naxiltuD nunber of aninal-s ever counted in each pen. Al.so the TIr uas estirnated by estinating the length of the skuLl (St) and/or the distance betlreen ahe anterior corner of the eyes and the tip of the nose (HL), and transforning these data to total Length by the equations:

TL = -67.45 + 8,39 SL thrtrl (1) = TL 105.28 + 15.69 HL fnml (2) (Pacheco, not publ-. ) These relations have an r:0,99 and significance to 99,5 ? accordi.ng to the ,rtt. test of Student (Spiege1 1969).

The tlro caiDans in pen V are. naLes and were separated because of their large size and their botential- danger for the other caimans (uonroy, pers. coDrItl.).

Pen I is the I'breeding pen", although pens II a.nd III have both adult caimans.

Pen Ms never cfeaned up, not even changed the rrater.

T{ETIIODS

The feedj,ng Etatus vas evaluated by the food quantity and qualj.ty Eiven to the cainans at the farm. For ttre juvenites, special attention rdas given to the quantity of food consutned. For this purpose, the food vas rreighed before being offered to the cainans and the renains were veighed the day after, duri.ng three nonths. A witness quantity of food was left to the sane !.eather conditions, but out of the reach of the cainans and other aninal.s, to test the weight loss or gain of the food attributable to lhe lreather, which vas considered in the calculation of the food consurned. It was not necessary to do this for the adults, because they never left any food. The weight (W) of the caimans of pens f, II and III lrere estirdated by the equat_ion (3):

loE w = 1.0753 + 0.0029 TIJ (3) (Pacheco, not pu-bl. ) This relation has an r=0,97 and significance based on the ftn student test of 99,5 ? (spiegel 1969). The data to build the equations (1,2, and 3) r{as strengthened vith data fron specinens colLected in Bolivia by Jose !,obao Tello (JTB 233, JQB 234, JAR 235, Jtg 236, JTB 237. a'ld JIB 238), studied at the Florida uuseum of Natulal HiEtory ln cainegviLLe.

ll1 The reproductive success qras eval-uated based on available data from past years (Eiven by the caretaker of the farn), and data collected during the reproductive Eeason of 1998- 1989.

For the grolr'Ch study, the cainans were narked by clipping one or tuo dorsal tail scales (Bustard and Choudhury 1981), and the following [easures taken: body Iength (BIr) frou the tip of the snout to the anterior end of the cloaca [nn], total length (TL) frod the tip of the snout to the end of the tail [nn], and !,eight (w) [g]. ueasures \rere taken in Novenber L98a, February 1.989, and Septenber 1,989. The 1989 hatchlj-nqs lrere not Darked until they reached 7 Donths of age. This study lras seri.ously affected by the high nortality of the juveniles, but the data are good enough to draw sone preLininary conclusions.

REST'LTS

a. Feeding status.

The estimated bi.omass of adults and subadults (caimans fron pens I, II, and III) vas 6762 K9. The food offered was about 200 Kg per lreek (slaughterhouse renaj-ns, r'ed meat and occasionally fish) at the beginning of the study, and 450- 5o0 Kg per \reek since June L989 (alDost only fish). This neans 2.95* of the body nass per lreek at lhe beginning, and 6.65 - 7.39 t of the body nass l-ater. usually the cainans renaj.ned very excited and visited the feedinq station long after the food had been fini.shed,

The cajJ0ans rere seen catching fish (rrhich live in the pond) and trying to capture bj-rds (casmerodius albus, Jacana iacana, and AEtsiEqe anhinqa) which visit the pond frequently. The initial biouass (uay L989) of juveniles was 7443 g (fifty L989 hatchlings, seven juveniles fron 1988 and one of unknorn age). The final biomass (Septenber 1989) vas 6640 g (34 hatched in 1989 and 1 of unknovn age). The average quantity of food consumed lras 7 * of the body Dass per lreek, ranging fron 5.1, to 8,3 t of the body na99 per veek. The food offered consisted alvays in fresh red meat, although sj.nce April-, a light trap vas put in the pen. about L5 cn above the uater leveI, for about 4 hours each night, to attract , but thj.s light trap did not lrark properly every night, Besl-des the insects attracted by the light trap, the juvenil.eg, except the oldest (830 nm TL) uere seen catching ingects during the day and eating frogs and toads ( Leptodactyl idae and Bufonidae) !,hich lrere provided by the observer (dead or alive) or catched by thenselves al,ong the shorel-ine of the pond.

The farn is located very far fron the urban areas (see Study area), The food for the cainans was provided until 1987 fron the relrains of the slaughterhouse. the cattle vas sacrifi-ced at the ltacienda and transported by plane to the consune centers. Since 1988 the cattle is brouqht alive to the cities, so the food becaue scarce and ver; exDensive. Red meat is provided (vhen available ana in suaLl quantities) by the slaughterhouse of the Hacienda 'rE1 Dorado( (part of which is ,rEl Caidan() at Bs, 2.5/Kg (about 0.8 SUS/Kg). Fish is provided by the people at Bs. 0.75lKg (about o.24 SUS,/kg). Neither the adults nor the juveniles are ever given added vitarins and ninerals.

b. Reproductive biology and success.

Data froh past years rere provi.ded by the caretaker, Mr. Rolando Monroy, and are described in labLe 2: Table 2. Data on reproductive success frorn years prior to the studl .

Year f nests Eggslnest (Averg.) Natality.*

64,7 37 7A,O t-983 ro,2 t-9s5 34 7T,L

In 1987 tvo nests uere found and of an unknown nurnber of eggs, only 12 hatched in 1988 (ltonroy, pers. cornm.); seven of those cai&ans still survived in Novenber L988. but died in June 1989.

The nest building occurs sone days to near a nonth prior to the egg laying, lthich occurs betrireen rniddle October to early Decenber; The incubation lasts 93 to 95 days and the hatching takes place fron late January to early ltarch (Table 3. ) . Seven nests r,ere found in 19S8, six of them (A to F) in the 'rbreeding pen'r (pen I) and one (nest c) in pen II. The eggs of all but the nest c r,ere collected by the caretaker 4 j.ncubated to nore than 20 days after laying (tabLe 3), and.froo in an artificial nest bqllt up by hinself. E99s nest c vere not touched until the hatching tine, when we had to 113 renove them fron the nest because hatchj-nE could not take pLace, because of the nest naterial eonpactation. The hatchlings sere vocalizing fron ?:OO a.n. to 5:30 p.to, but could not hatch. Just after the eggs uere retnoved frorn the nest, hatching began. For alnost all nests, hatching occurred lrith a felr days or even tvo lreeks betveen the first and the last hatching (eggs froD ttle sane nest): The nests found during the study are described in Table 3. Table 3. Nest characteristics and success.

A 19Ox15Ox55 26-Or. 35/4 04-N* B 22O\.22Ox6O 05-N* 23/ 4 10-N 180x180x5O t 0-o* 4t,/2 04-N* L0 D 190x190x5O ? 3e/ 12 04-N* 180x1-70x5O 38/3 04-N* F 180x170x5o oi-o 35//O 08-D 17 0x15Ox47 oa-N 37/L

Notes.- Ne=nest; D and d=dianeters at the base Ic!tr]; h=height fron the ground to the top of the nest Ic!l]; L.Da=egg layinq date; Et=totat nurn-ber of eggs; Eb=eggs broken; Collt.=date of egg collection; Ha.=number of hatched eggs; F.H.=date of first hatching; L.H.=date of Last hatching; N= Novehber, D=Decenber, J=january; F-february and M=urarch i *=data provided by the carelaker.

The eggs are vhite and the shell is rough. llleasurenents of six eggs are provided: 47 x 86i 49 x88; 50 x 88; 5t- x 89t 52 x 92i 52 x 93. OnLy one egqr was veighed (just before

The average hatching success for nests A to F (the eggs incubated in the artificial nest) uas 15.6 t, and 70,3 A for the nest c (fron which the eggs uere not renoved untj-I the hatching tine). lrost of the eggs fron the artificial- nest rrhich did not hatch contained onl-y decodposed naterial, only a few of tlten contained dead enbryos. A1l. the eggs not hatched frot0 the nest c contained conpletely developed dead enbryos, it night be possible that these eggs had been dauaged during the collectj.on. A11 but the nest D received sone kj-nd of protection by the fenaLe, they stood near the nest (5 to 20 n fron it) all the tide for 2 to 4,5 tlonths. Except fenal-es of nests C and c, all the other fenales attacked nan uhen aDproached their nesEs.

The tenlrerature in the nests (in the egg chanber) was recorded for sone nests and as uany tines as lras pogsible and/or the feuale a]Lowed. The resuLts are described along 114 with neasurementg in the artificial nest in Table 4l Table 4, Average ternperatures in the egg chamber. Nest Artif.AcFG

Avg. tenp. 30,14 2a ,5 24,59 29 ,25 2A,4a Std. dev. L.2A 0,9 3 0,55 o,25 0,53 f of obs. tl. 11 11

The Table 4 sholrs clearly that the tenperature in the artifj.cial nest was higher than those of the nests built up by the fenale cainans. The variations in the egg ehadber teDperature were also greater i.n the artificial nest, as is shown in Fj-g. 1., where the tenperatures of the nest C, the artificial nest, the environhent tenperature and the water tenperalure in the pond at a depth of 5 cn are conpared.

Temp. o C

- --F Env, T, Pen | (water) --x- Artit. nest ---e--nest C

Fig. 1. variations in the tenperatures of the artificial nest, one of the natulal nests, environnental temp. and water temperature in one of the ponds at a depth of 5 c!ll.

c. Grosth.

The cainans hatched in 1989 vere lleasured and narked (in Noveuber 1988) at the age of 9 nonths and Eeasured aEain at lhe age of 12 nonths, after lrhich they died. Sotle of the r1< hatqhLings of L989 lrere neasured, but not narked just after hatched (age of O nonths), and neasured and rdaried at the 19: I roonths,. Finally. the two juveniles of unl

The average, standard deviation, naxinuttr and ninilrun neasurenents for body length (BL), total length (T!) and lrei.ght (W) of the individuaLs of knovn age are given in Table 5.

Table 5. lteasurenents by age.

Iileasurenent 0 Months 7 Months 9 l,lonthg 12 l,lonths

BIJ [u!o] L3L,42 L78,24 L82,11 189, 14 std Dev. 3 ,07 8, 83 7 t74 a ,47 I'laxinun BL 135,00 205,00 193,00 203,00 Uininum Bt 125,OO L50, 00 t-70, 00 179, 00 TL [bn] 243,6l 36'7,27 4O4,7L 4L5,29 std Dev. 8,86 t9 ,92 2!,78 Maxrnum tL 30o, o0 422 tOO 431,00 44'7, OA Ui-ni.num fL 266, OO 325, OO 37Lt 0O 383,00 w tlrl 75 ,6L 1.30,59 2t-0,00 223 t29 std Dev. t-3,15 24,30 43 t75 46,4L Itaxr-nun W. 93, OO 186,00 29OtOO 288,00 llininun W. 57,50 75,0O 1GO,0O 152, 00

Based on the data presented IN Table 5, we can calculata t'he average increment in BL, TL and !,reight for our sanple (Table 6):

Table 6. Average increnents in the neasurellents, consi.dered by age.

Age Totaf average incrernents I Average/nonth uonthE BL TL weidht I BL TL weight

0 46.4 s4.6 54.9 L2.L - 7.4 ? 4.5 2.2 9 6-4 0 -L2 57 .7 L31.7 L47.1 4.8

The differences between the iltcrenents in TL and BL are attributed to individual diffarences in the BL,/TL relation, and the different sanple size for the different age classes. The data for the tro juveniLes of unknor,.n age are presented l-n Table 7t grosth data are presented only for the specj.rnen nunber 09, because the other one (S/N) died shortly after the first neasurenent. Increnent/nonth (I/no.) ia given in [nn] . Tabl.e 7. l,leasureuents for the juveniles of unknown

Nunber BL l/no. TL I/no. w I/no.

s/N 1000 09: Initial 367 798 2100 3 Donths 11.0 2139 13.0 10 nonths 4.8 875

The average grorth in TL for the first 12 Donths of age is 1O.9 Dtn/nonth, very sirtrilar to the average groeth of cainan nunber 09 (unkrown age) , at least for the first three nonths after the initial neasurenent. Based on thig apparent regular grolrth, we can assune that this individual (09) had been groving an average of 11 hb/nonth. Then, if -we iake the average TI, of the hatchllngs (283,5 nm) ve could expeet that an average aninaL, vi-th an average growth rate vould reach a lenqth of about 812 nlm i.n four years, so ou! individual nunber 09 miqht have been four years oLd, and the otber one (S/N) niqht have been 3 years otd.

DISCUSSTOIf

The diet of both the adults and juvenj-Ies seem to be poor in quality, at least at the beginnj.ng of the study, nonodiets (only fish or neat) do not fulfill all nutritional requi.renents, and usual.]y lack A and D vitanins, and ninerals, special-Iy Ca (Whitaker et a1. 1979). The quantity of food offered to the adults at the begj.nning of the study (2-95 Z of the body nass per veek) rras poor. The quantity offered later (6.65 - 7.39 t of the body masE trter week) lras within the tinits suggested by Joanen and UcNease (1987) of 5 t of the body nass per ireek plus vitauins, and 10 * (Groves 1988). ye! this diet lacks vj.tanins and dinerals sugEested. Likeuise we have to be cautious about the esti.lrated bionass of cainans at the farD, because ve do not knov the exact nunber of aninals (see Study area). We have aLso to consider.the unkno\dn allount of food catched by the cainans in the ponds, even if i.t i9 not large.

The quantity of food consuned by the juveniles (7 i of tlre body nass per lreek) is very poor conpared vith the amounts guEgested by other authors, 25 * for the first year and 18 * tL1 for lhe second and third year for Allidator llississippiensis (Joanen and l{cNease 1987), 20 * for llelanosuchus 4ige! (Groves 1988), and 24 - 34 t of the body nass per lreek for Caipan Crocodilus (Rodri.guez 1989). But as stated above, the juveniLes uere always fed in excess, this neans that the juveniles alrrays left sone food. Eogever rre have to consider the food catched by these cainans (specially insects and anphibians) rdhich could be a great supply of food for them and also a better source of vitanins and ninerals than the red neat alone. The egg laying period found in this study coincides lrith that given by Eelron et aI., (in press), lrho report eEE laying occulring in October in Peru, and slightly differs fron that given by Uedern (1963) vho says that Uelanosuchus lay eggs frou septenber to Novenber in Bolivia. Nest sizes are sinilar to that found by Herron et al.. (in press) 22O x 190 x 50 cm, but different fron the 150 x 80 cn size reported by Haglann (1902); cj-t. by Ueden (1953). The egg sj-zes given by the sane author (52 x 86 - 56 x 9? tllml) are alnost sihilar to those found in thj.s study. Herron et al. (in press) report a incubation tide of 88 days, 'rhich differs only slightly frolt ours (93 - 96 days). Meden (1961); cit. by Vasquez (19a1) reports a j-ncubatj.on tine of .52 - 93 days; we never found such big range.

The reproductive success in years prior to the study lras irregular (Table 2), lrith hatching rates ranging fron 10.2 to 78 i, and the nortallty of those cainans lras near 1O0t (only two aninals older than one year vere found at the beginning of the study). This problen continued lrith the L988 hatchlings, all of lrhich died before 15 nonths of age. It al.so affected the l-989 hatchlings: fron 55 batched fron January through March, only 34 gurvived by Septeuber 1989, observations during the collections of eggs fron the nests, and the higher and nore variable tenperatures in the artj.ficial nest nhere the eggg 'rere incubated, suggest that the irregular hatching rate in years prior to the study and the year of study itself couLd be attributed to iDproper nanageuent of the eggs during both the collection fron the nests and the incubation. One proof for this hypothesis is the fact that nest c (froE lrhich the eggs lrere not removed) had higher hatching success.

The grorrth of the UgleEggggbgg (L.1. cbldonth for the first four years) at the fart! is poor conpared !,ith the growth of other species in captivity, CrocodiLus uoreleti reaches a TL of 105 cn in three years, (Hunt 1980), this lleans an average of 2.27 qt! per nonth. Joanen et al. (1987) observed that Allldator uississiooiensis reaches a TL of 933 - 1041 cn in 12 Donthg and 1035 - 1181 cr in 18 nonths, For gEgggdylgE 11E acutuF, Rodriguez and Rodrigmez (1999) reported an average groq.th rate of 2.2 culnonth for the first 1ez days of fif;. Rodliguez -(1989) reported a growth of 2.03 ntvday, about G.1 cm/Donth for cainan crocodylus.

There are fe\r data about the groreh of felanosuchus niqeri data of a caj.nan lrhj.ch gres frbn 90 cn E6-llE-6-Tn Iegs ls provided by Dowling & Brazaitis (1966), cit."",r", by [eden (1983); this neans about 2.2 cn/nonth, Data fron another aninal are as follovs: Sept 1977 Uay 1979 TIF55. 9 crtr uay 198 L TIF79. O cu Jan L9I2 Water telrperature was 19 - 24 "C (lfedem 1983); this neans an increroent of about 0.4 cmlnonth.

,Otte (L972) _separates ltelanosuchus niqer in size classes, grvrng a Daxitrulr tota.L length of 49 cn for the L year speci.nens, a range of 50 - ?9 crn (TL) fa.r 2/3 - ,ear specrhens, and 80 109 cn (TL) for 3/4 - 5/5 ,eat specimens. These data support the eslinate of 4 years for the individual nuhber 09, inir.ially of unknownage.

- In Peru, wild xelanosuchus ranging in size (b;dy length) frorn 25 cn - 116 cn showed an average gro\,rth rat; in body tength (BL) of 8.6 cnlyear (this neans O,TL cn,honth), uitil f_ange 5.5. to 12.0 cm/year, lrhj-ch is 0.46 to 1.O cn,/honth (Herron, in press). Then, our data of O.49 cn/nonth (BL), ranging fron 0.21 to 0.67 cnlrnonth for year j.ndividual.s, the one and O.4g to 0.53 cnlnonth for the four year individual are near the lower linit gj.ven by Herron,s obserwations.

The nortality and lorr grolrth rates night be attributed to the poor food quality and quantity, and to the Lack of hygienic care both of which contribute to iLlness propelsity. Bacteri.al infections, Iike EglEele.Lta can destroy a_captive rearing program by reducing growth races, skrn quality and increasing nortality (crocodiles as a Resource for the Tropics L9g3).

ACKNOWLEDGETiTENTS

I at! very gratefuL to ltario Baudoin and Eduardo Forno for their encouragement and valuable conmentaries durinq the realization of the gtudy.

This lrork irouLd not have been posslbLe lrj.thout finantial support given by the Instituto de Ecologla of the Universidad Uayor de San Andr6s. 119 Thanks again to l'{ario Baudoin and cecil"e B. de uorales, they have revieved a previous draft of lhis vork. and Dade many coEmentaries, specially in lanqmaqe skills, but any nistake nust be attributed onLy to the author. I also thank to John thorbjarnarson and Kent Vliet, they provided ne loading, and prepared a guided scienti,fic tour during riy stay in Gainesville. John Thorbjarnarson also Dade the arrangedents that allolred ne to revienr the Florida State MuseuD specj.mens.

IJTERATI'RE CITED

Bustard, H.R., and B.c. Choudhury. 1981. Uarki.ng crocodiles for rel-ease back into the wild for subsequent identification, Reprint fron the Indian Forester LO1(el | 477-4a5.

Claure, D. 1985. Fauna sifvestre en busca de otro "Arca de No6tr. Irinidad - Bolj.via. 66 p. Ad. Hoc. Panel. L983. crocodiles as a resou!;e for the tropics. Report of an Ad Hoc Panel of the advi.sory conmittee on technology innovation. Board on science and technology for i-nternational developrneit. of f ice of internaaional af f airs. National Resealch Councj.l. NationaL Acaderny Press, washington. 55 p.

Gaski., A.L., and G. Heuley. 1988. fhe ups and downs of the crocodilian skin trade. IRAAFIC (U.S.A.) 8(1):L,5-16. Groves, J.D. l-98S. Repoft on Che manaqement of the black cai!0an l{elanosuchus EiSIgE at the hacienda EI cainan. Project operations. Mineografiado. 10 p. Henl.ey, c. 1989. International lrj.ldlife trade. rn: Audubon lrj.Idlife Repore 1988/89. Acadenic Press, Ne!, Iork. 337-374. Herron, J.C. 1985. Population status, spatiat relations, gEolrth and injuries in bl.ack and spectacled cainans in cocha cashu. Unpublished thesis, Erinceton University. 71 p. Herron, J.C. (in press). Grovth rates of black cailoan (uelanoguchus 4!gCg) and spectacled caiDan (94@B crocodi].us), and the recruitment of breeders in hunted cainan populations. Herron, J.C., L.ll. Ennons, and J.E. Cadle. (in press). The natural history of, reproduction of a black cainan (lilelanosuchus niqer) . tm tlunt, R. II. 1980. Propagation of tl{orelet,s crocodile. In. contributions to herpetolog-y Nunber 1. Reproductrve biology and diseases of captive reptiles. 161-165.

Joanen, T., and L. McNease. 1997. ALligator farning research in Lor.risiana, U.S.A. In: Witafite ltinagenent: Crocodiles and Alligators (c. Webb, C. Uanolis and p. whitehead, eds.). surrey Beatty & sons, Australia. 329 - 340.

;foanen, T., L. !,lcNease, and l{.W. ferg.t]son. 1987. fhe effects of egg j.ncubation tenperature on post-hatching grorth of anerican alligators. In: wildlife Mantgenentl Crocodiles and Alligators (c. Webb, C. l.{anolis and p. Whitehead, eds.) Surrey Beatty & Sonsr Australia. 533-537 -

King, F.w. and D, Videz-Roca. 1982. The cainans of Bolivia. A preliminary report on a CITES and Centro de Desarlol.1o Forestal- sponsored survey of species distribution and status. Report to the CITES qa^ra+r7i.+

Medeh, F. 1963. Osteol.ogia craneal, djstribuci6n geografica y ecoLogia de I{elanosuchus nioer (SPIX) (Crocodylia, Al-ligatoridae) . Rev. de la Acad. Colornbiana de Cien. xII(45): 2sp.

Meden, F. 198L. Horse flies (Diptera: Tabadidae) as ectoparasites on caj.nans (crocodylia: Alligatoridae) in eastern colonbia. cespedesia ri G7 / 39). Li3- J-47. l'ledem, F. 1983, Log Crocodylia de Sur Amdrica, Vo1. If. Universidad Nacional de Colonbia, Bogote. 270 p.

Otte, K.C. 1972. Inforne finaL del plan de investigacion rrllelanosuchus EijIqE,' en el gran parque Nacional del Manu/Peru. I'tj.Deograf iado. Liha. l-G p.

Otte, K.C. 1978. Untersuchungen zur biologie des nohrenkaiEan (Uelano6uchus nioer SPIX 1825) aus den NationaLpark Uanu (peru): Beitrage zu morphologie, physiologie, ethologie und 6kologie. Tesis: Mdnchen und Lina, Peni, 311 p.

Plotkin, M.J., F. ltedem, R.A. Uitterneier, and I.D. Constable. 1983, Di.stribution and conservation of lhe black cainan (Iitelanosuchus niqer't, In: Advances in herpelology and evolutionary biolog"y. (A. Rhodin and R. _Uitaya, eds.). lituseun of Comparative Zoo]'oqy, Canbridge.595-705. Rodrj-$rez, U.A. 1989. Tres nodelos de creciniento en Iongitud de neonatog y juvenil-es de Cailan crocodilus lgEqlg (cope, 1968), (Crocodylia: Alliqatoridae) en cautiverio. Trianea (3) :61-65.

Roatrr.guez, E. y I{.A. Rodriglez. 1989. Evaluaci6n del creciDiento y levante de neonatos y juveniles de Crocodvlus ggIEgE Cuvi.er, (Crocodylia; Crocodylidae) durante L987-L988 en eI Centro Experirnental de fauna Silvestre de San !'larcos (Sucre). Trianea (3):53-60. spiegel, l.t.R. 198 . Estadlstica. I.tc cra!,,-Hill, Nexico. 375. Vasquez, R. P. 1981. Bases bioecol6gj.cas para eI nanejo de los Alligatoridae en Jenaro llerrera (Requena - Peni). Tesis, Universj.dad Nacional Agraria, ta Uolina . (Lina) . 205 p.

Whitaker, R., Z. t{hj-taker, and A. Vauqhan. 1979. The food of captive crocodj-lj-ans. Ind. For. t05(12) rgAS-887. BASIC CROCODILEFARMING RANCHING METHODS IN RXMOT! AREAS

TONY POOLEY Crocodlle Consulta'l)t Pooley Wildlife productlons. P. O. Box 295. Scottburgh,4I80. NataI, South Africa.

CONTENTS:

lNTRODUCTTON

1. LOCATION OF A CROCODILE FARM OR RANCH 1 . 1. WAIER 1.r.(a) volume 1.(b) Storage 1.(c) Quality 1.(d) Clarity

2. EFFLUENT DISPOSAL 2. (a) Liquld Effluent (b) Solid Efftuent (c ) Utlllsarlon ol Efftuent

3. FOOD SUPPLY

4. CLIMAI!

5. REAiING PONDS 5.1. Type of pond 5.2 - Slting of poncls

6. BUTLDING RIQUIREMENTS 6.1. Cenerat Offlce 6.2. Roon for F.eezers 6,3. Food preparatlon Room 6.4. storeroom 6.5. Labour Force 6.6. Offal Dlsposa1 pit

7. RECOMI4ENDEDTYPES OF REAR]NG PENS t.Ii) Single Unt! CemenERearins pen IrlcKte ,o, Sysrem Cemenc RearinA pen r Isol.ateci .(: earln cearing pond,;en rd) Double_unit Cement pond 8. HATCHERY DESIGN

9. LOCATION OF NESTS AND EGGS to. HARVESTING OF EGCS

11. IRANSPORT OF ECGS

PRE INCUBATION PROCEDURES

ARTIFICIAL NESTS

I4. POST HATCHLING CARE t5, POST HATCHLING MORTALITIES

STOCKING RATES

DIET AND NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

FOOD PREPARATION

FEEDING

24. REARING AND HYGIENE 20. 1. Col lection of Labo.ato.y Specimens Sterl le SanpLes 1,(b)

2\. COMMONAILMENTS, !OSSIBLE CAUS'S AND TREATYENT 2L.la) Recomnended Dislnfec tants and Drugs

22. ACKNOWLTDCEMXNTS

23, LITEMTORE CITED. INTRODUClION

Crocodile farming in Africa and in nost other countries started 1n the mid !96O's. As the popula!1ons of wild c.ocod1llans contlnued to decline through over- expLoilaEion ard haoitat oes!rucrion, faffrrng and ranchlng became an acceptable fom of 'rtlllslng a vaLLlable natural resource. Inevitably too, because the leather Lndust.y.equlred rhe most val.uable h1des, narely of crocodylus porosus, c. niloticus and AlLlgglg! rnlsslsslpolensls, the major proportion of the research effort focussed on ecological studles and management prograrnmes designed to safeguard these chree species. and, over the years, lnto all aspects of husbandry and captive propagation. Some lnpaessive technologlca.L advances have been nade in this f,ie1d. aLso inDo.tant managenentrelareo aspects of lne species bio-chemlsrry. physiology and behaviour. There 1s now avallable an iopaesslve vol,une of data contained in nunerous sclentlflc Jou.nals and in three books that have been publlshed 1n .ecent yea.s. There is no doubt that the Crocodile Specialist Group, th.ough the hoLding of nine meetlngs ln several councries over rhe perloo 19-1 ro 1990, has nanaged to generate conslderable .eglonal input and enthuslasn into many avenues of crocodllian research, and the numbe. of delegates attending this, the loth CSGneeting is proof of that.

Scraceq!es Cor Ehe I99O's' organiseo oy rre Amer-.ai Alligator Farmers Associ,ation at Tainpa, Florida, in February 1989, was afso a ve.y lrnportant nilestone in crocodilian conseavation. Howev;r, if one analys;s the research findings and reports that have appeanecl in recenr years, rne bulk of these are conce!.ned with and favour capila] intensive, hiSh technology, hlgh production commercial farming and narketing strategies which are p.edo,nlnantl.y First !/ortd Agrlculture- Snal1, capltal poor, 1oe Level technotogy or subsistence farning projects, which are mainly Third vo.ld Agricul!ure, have been largely neglecled. My vi,ews on this \nere re-inforced when Ln a letter dated 19 January 1990, P.of,. Wayne King {.ote that a paper I had p.esented at the 1st lro.klng Meeting of the Crocodlle Speclalist Group, held ln New York, March 1971 hacl beeo identlfled as one that should be lncluded and tiansLated hto Spanisir, for a conpendlum on crocodite farnlng to be made avaitable for the 1OO or so new fains that are Lrnderway h Cent.al and South Amerj.ca. My presentatlon for thls wo.kshop has been vrrltten fo. :i':-3s!1r3nt. f$Ters .Llvlns 1n.emore reslons, perhaps w1lnou! e-rectricl!y, fefrigerarion, incubators and contlol]ed envl.onment rea.:ng units, or the benelit of a nearoy.veterlnary laboralory and/or knowledgable personnel :: !""9. r? advlse on husbandry and management p.obtens. In racr, 1t !s an update of the I9?1 paper rcrocoijlle Rearina and Restocki.nc't.

L. LOCATION OF A CROCODTLEFANM OR RANCH.

Vhen selectlng a s1te, severa] lactors shoutd be consldered.

1.1. I/'ATER

f.1.fa) The volume of warer avartable rhroughouc the year, especrat-y o-;Er clcoushr perlocis. Th. di";;";- ;o';i;; \rater to the ponds, or via l..igatlon ftrrows. wneiner a bo.e-hole, a windfiill or mechanical pump is requlred and the retative efficlency anci costs of in.s".yst"ri. I.I.(b) The stolage cf eare. should be consrdered, l,rovtsron ol ceservo.Lrs oc supply lanks can oe rmportant and ln the event of fallure of punipina equipnent such a reserve suppty nay prowe-viiat-lo the hea_Ith and survlvat ol the stock. A systen of recycllng water nay be practicat {hereby w;ter punped Irom a alver to storage tanks is gravit:/ ied back tn.ough the ponds, drained into a series of inter_ connected weIl vegetaleo ponos. or rhrougn 4n area of narurar swamp back to the source of suppty. 1.1.(c,) lrater gggLLlI shou.Ldoe lnvesrrgareo. sdmpres snourcl be tested for salinrty, acroity, effluenr from industrlal operations, agrlcultural p;srrcides and rert!tisers. on for chemlcals thar may be undesi cable f.om natural mlne.af springs. Rlwer ;ater that ftows rron:rn area densely populated by hunans and livestock may well be contaninated. Samples should Oe sent for bacterial, analysis. t, I . (d) l{a!-.r cIa.i!y is also a factoe co be consioereo especlally rf pumpeddirecrly - from a river carrying a neavy sltt Load srralghr to rhe ponds. Aparr f;om-rhe manaSementprobtens of not belng able to see the pe.hajs :i?:!d:]"r, o. flnd dead anirnats ln rhe water, poo.rs becone nore dlfftcult to clean, and plpelines become clogged wlth sltt anct studae. This'p;;;i;;-ca. be ellrninated by drawlng water fr;rn a wert crose io so that warer punped percolaces !hnougn the sand o. mud and is thus flttered. F11te.ed bed; of gravel, or pumping water into settting tanks ;;y b; requlred.

126 2. EFFLUENT DISPOSAL.

2.(a) Liquid Effluent. In renote sparsely populated areas the dlschaige of Iarge volumes of contamlnated water faom crocodlle ponds back into a r1ve. system may not be a p.obtem. On lhe olher hand 1n sone locatities it could Dose a health problem ro humans. This aspect has b; oe investlgated and discussed with offlciats of lhe departments concerned wlth water affaias. and heaLth before the proJect 1s built. Provlsion oay have to be made to. the building of eff,luent t.eatment dahs. 2. (b) So]id Effluent. Apa.t from wate. from crocodtle ponds, there 1s solicl efflueot frorn food processing. Offal dlsposal plts a.e recommendedfor thls purpose. (see Fig. ). They are an efficlent ano inexpensrve -rethod of dealing with this problem, as opposed, for, instal]ce, to fuel buaning inclnerators. 2. (c) Uti.lisation of Effruent. As prevlously mentioned the provlslon of a series oi shallow effluent dans fo. the disposal of waaer r:ch rn nutrients dlrecr from rhe crocodite Donds has adwantages. Firstty, because Large votunes can be disposed of. by evaporali.on. Secondly, these ponds, when stocked wi!h f1sh, can produce substantiat and regular harvests of fresh. flsh foi. the crocodiles. Thj.rdly, alte. filterlnA through natural wett_ wegetated ponds, thls water can be re_cvcled.

3. |OOD SUPPLY

The econonic vlability of the proJect depends !o a Ia.ge extent on the avaitability and regular source of good quallty food. (See section on DIET). This falts lnto thaee categories: Red lYeat i Donkeys, horses, mufes, goats, w11d gane etc. Flsh: Freshwater, maalne and taash flsh. deeD-frozen flsh etc - !99!!Il: Day-old chicks and morta.lities of adutt bi.ds from f,oultry tarms, poultry condemned for human consumptlon etc. The cost of food, must al_so inclucle transport and/or qeep freeze costs pe. Kg lhat is pu.chased _ bone meal, carcass neal or vltanj.n supptements i.f these are to be

costs sholrld take into account that 40 - 45 Kc of fooct 1s requlred to grow a harchllng up to culling s!ze.

121 CLII4ATE

Crocodile hatchfings do best at 30 - 34.C foa naxlmum grouth and beLow 2OdC growth is nlnlmal. Thus the locatlon of the proJect ls most tnpo.tant and lf available, temperature data for the proposed area should be studied carefully. t'/inter tenrperatures and ihe duration of cold or cooler weather, ihe lncj,dence of frost, and prevailing v/1nd force and chill factor are of partlcular importance.

5. REARINGPONDS

Type of pond The type of rearing ponds to be bulli depends on the nature of the soils and the availability of building mateaials. Natural ealth dams are suitable wheae the soll type is of clay o. heavy loan Bith good water .etaining prope.tiesr and these dans are inexpensive to build. In sand areas it may be feasible to use a heavy grade oi plastlc lr.lgation sheeting, or a cemen! Lining to seal ponds, but in sha-Ie or sites rilhere underground rock fo.mations are :ound, .emei: dans wil I be required. 5.2. Siting of ponds The ponds shoul,d be sLred co receive lhe maxrnum alnount of sunshlne, palticularly over the winter months. The dlrectlon of Local prevatling wlnds should be taken Lnto account and the dralnage of the poncls 1s lnportant. If these a.e built on a sloping hllLsl.de dralnage is far easie. than if lhe g.ound is level. The dralnage systenr must be effj.clent as it is not desirable to atlow water fouled in lhe ponds !o stagnate near to the aearing pens.

6. BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

In oadea Eo mainlain up Eo 2OO0or moae crocodile hatchlings lt is useful to have lhe f,o1lowing:

6 .1. Gene.af offlce A structure of about 4,5 m x 3 m x 2,1 m for keeping of records, storage of drugs and as a general offlce for the olener of nanager. A toilet and wash basln is built adJacent to the offlce. 6.2. Roon fo. freezers A structuae of 3nx 3n x 2,1 m for houslng x paraffln.or gas operated deep freeze uni.ts of 10 cu.ft. capaclty each are useful for storage of fresh frozen food.

LA 6 .3. Food Prepa.atlon Shed A slmllar size structure buitt over a 3 x 3 m snooth- plastered concrete s.Lab wtth the ftoor sloplng to a central, Claaln whlch acts as a food paeparatlon shed. This 1s open on one slde and thls and the door should be f]y-screenecl. The dralnage pipe sunk inro the centre of the floor can be ted to undergaound soak pits, but p.eferably to effluent dans stocked with f1sh, and into which effluent from rhe hatchtlnc Doncts is afso drained. In this shed, sawn off logs, or robust cutting bl.ocks are needed and woodencur!in8 boards for cucEing on and to serve as feedlng trays. Heavy duty butcher.,s steak knives, neat saws and machettes are used to process anlnal caacasses, poultry and f1sh. Hooks suspended faom a roof beam are usefut for hancinc and sklnnrng carcasses. cut up fooct for immectlari eieoinc ls packed onco the feed-ng rrays. Ene renaincter oackea lnto plastlc bags fo. freezing. 6.4. A fourth building fo. the storage of loots, fish netting equipment, curboa.d moto.s. soades etc. is aLso useful.

These buildings can be const.ucted of cement btocks and good ventilation via wlndows and ai. b.icks is necessary. Roofing can be corrugat6d asbestoF or iron. reeds or g.ass, or aLternativel,y the entlre conpl,ex can be constructed of bush poLes wrth reed walll and roofed with aeeds or palm leaves. 6-5. Labour force A ]abour force of three v/o.kers is needed for the preparatj.on of food, actual feeding, pond malnlenance, fishlng and gear. maintenance etc, fo. thls numbe. of anlrnals. 6.6. Offal Dlsposal Plt This is a stmple but effectlve way of clisposing of unt anted offal i.e. the intestines, rumen anci stomach contents of Laage a.rllmals, skulls, hoovesr poul!ry feathers, fish heads and lnnards. This unit (Ffg. 1 ) shoutd be sited at ]east 1OOm dtstant from the iood processrng area or neaaest ponds and serves the purpose of deallna with dl.sposal of offal, a.rld eLinlnates fl,1es a.rld the odou. of.ottinc material from, for exanple, an open pir. These u;i!s can be made by r.rsing pLastic o. rubber refuse bhs if the reacry-made flbre glasmodels are not Localfy avaifable.

18 RECOMMENDEDTYPES OF REARING PENS

7.(a) SLng.leunlc cement reartnc Den An hportant.equlrenent Ls that the poots should be at least 60 cn 1n depth, otherwlse the watea becornes too hot l.n surnme., The poot floor should be stopeal towards the draln outl.et pipe, to facitltate cteanine and washlng ai{ay of uneaten food pafrlcles. Ictea.IIy the outlet pj.pe shoutcl be 10 cn 1n dlaneter. with a stopcock outside the enclosure, so tbat the pool c€n be cleaned and efiptled both efflclentty and quj.ckty. It is essenti.al to place a screen 1n the drain oloe to prevenE c.ocodltes escaplng oc from belng sucked;u! of the pool durlng cteanlng. Afte. some tlrne. sragnailt ponds nay becone difflcul,t to ctean because of the rlch groyth of algae on their sj.des. Hard_ brlstle scrubblng brushes are needed to dlsloclge this groleth. Snall amounts of coppe. sutphate 1n the water w111 help controL algae, lf used regularty. The entire pond and apron of the enclosure must be snooth.Ly plastered to facllltate cteaninc. It ts useful to have a v/ater supply polnE clos; Co each pool from lvhlch a hosepipe can be 1ed to pressure_ sp.ay and clean the entire poot and its acron. An r.mportant par! of the deslgn is a partly_subme.ged and gentLy-s]oplng Iedge, some 45 cm in w1dth, a.ound the perimeter of the poot. thj.s p.ovicles a sha.tfow restlng zone for the crocodl,Ies a]rd aI]ows easv access into the water, Thls ledge 1s a-tso rmportan! in that the crocodlles rest there when feedinS, al]cl it also prevents thern scraplna the1. bellies and daftacinc their claws on entering or leavlng Ehe pool. Th; anount of space afound each pool is calculated to affow ample basklng roon foa each aninaf, ancl an area ot shade nust ltkewlse be providecl. It i.s advlsable !o .oof, ove. the entlre pen with w1.e nett1n8, or crlss-crosaed strands of, w1re, agalnst predato.s. The wlre nettlng sldes of the pe;s shoutd not be Larger than 1 cn nesh, othervrlse hatchll.ncs will rnjure themsetves by try1ng !o cltnb rhrougi rhts, Young cfocodlles can cllrnb vertlcal wire nettin; with ease and wi]l escape un.Less Ehe enctosure rs eiiner aoofed or its slde wa.L]s stoped inwards at an ancle of 2Oo. A skirtlng board (planklng, sheet 1.on, tt; or plastlc sheetlnS) placed agalnsr the wlre neiting fl.ush w1!h the floor p.events then from clrrnbing uf) ttre fence to a height, a.rld lhen dropping back o;to the concrete befow. These pools are useful foi sunrner because ttrev can b€ scrubbed ctean and because the volume of waler used 1s sna1]. Normalty they need only be enptied, cteaned and .efl]Ieal every thtrd day ejld there 1s no wastage through 3eepa8e.

r3) The main dlsadvantage is that cement 1s a cotci surface in wlnter and caocodll,es ul]l be prone to resDl.atorv a1lments. rf local. winre. nlght lemperatures'of th;" water or of the alr are Ilkely to fait to the 7.2;C. thls type of pond would not b; sullab]e. Care musi u" exercised while cleanlng these pools, to avold a crocodite inJu.i.-ng ttself by fattlng lnto the empty poot. See F!9.2.

7.(b) Trickle system cenent rearlng pen The advantage of thls systen is that durlng hot summe. weather, when crocodiles are feeding at thelr maximuin cate. small unearen food particles, faeces ancl urlne. are nor rrapped in lhe poo]. The conslant drlullon of lne pond,s water ensures a low bacterla ]evel. poot The 1s drained and scrubbecl clean weekty, as is ltre entlre floor of pen 'rne the wnich is smoothli pfastereO. enctosure embodles lhe sa,,nedesign requlrements as seen 1n F1g, 3 . The pool should be ci.cutar or cone shaped, at Least 50 cn deep at the edges and 60 cm fn trri centre. en earthenware bend of 10 cm in di.arneter is sunk ftush into the cent.e of the f1oo. and into this fiis a rubber plug. In this a 5 cn dia.nete. hote is bored. lh.ough wnlch a 66 cm tengrh of po_yrhene pi;e _;--' rtrted vertlcatly inLo the plug so !ha! !r cdn pushed be ln or pulled ou! as required. A wire mesh shieLd is f,ttted ove. the top of this outte! pioe p.event to the escape of smalt crococllles. rvater is i.a constantly into !hls pooI, c!rculates, ana is siorronea out a! the sane rale as Ene lnflow- It 1s he]!'fu1 to attach st.1ng w1.e handtes to the .!rbbe. draln plu8, so that it can easily be pulled ou! when the pool is to be ct,eaned.

7.\c) Isolated earth rea.lnA pono pen These are tdeal, foa use in cl,i,nates (here low winter temperatures are likely ro cause respira!ory !IIness rn lne young anlnals. Earth pools are easv and cneaD to buito 'nalural, and are a n"oi.". *n.."'""o"."|i"i --' can be pIanEed. s|nalI Iive fish introctucect, lnsectsr f.o8s and other creatures att.acted "iii"to dans the w111 be an impo.tanr actctltion to the diea anl- hea.lth of the crocodites. Du.lng cotd weather the crocodiles wltt burrow into the nudbanks and thus survive nights of hea!,y taosts. Because of lhei. bur.owlng capabillties it 1; provlde :ligi:*!. to a srrip of rand, 4 m wide, oeEween the pool's edge and the bounalary fence. fnis 1s pa.ticul.arty important 1f tire poot ri situatea the ai- botton ol a hitt such that ita louer bank is artif1c1ally. burlt up. Where pools are excavaled on a tevel slte thts precautlon - 1s not necessarv. The crocodlles bumow lnto the bank above normir water t]1 1eve1 and may lunnel beyond the fence 1ine. Nornatly thls w1ll not natter since the burrows wllL be wel,I below grouncl Level, but 1f the pool stands on a hill slope the 1owe. fencel.lne shoutd be burled deep enough to lnteacept the burrows. The enclosure fence should be of ! cn dlaneter mesh nettlng for young caocodiLes, bur'1ed !o a depth of I n, to exclude burrowlng predato.s. Because these peds are a oatural habltat, blrds may becooe a nulsance, elther as a threat to the crocodll,es oa as food competllors. The pens lhecefore snou.ld be roofed, for which a broacl-mesh grld made of 14 guage wlre is sultabIe. In areas wheae the so1l is porous or sandy the floor of an earth dan cart be sealed l,1th concrete or ptastlc lr.lgatton sheets. A Layer of earth conceals this a.tificiaL !1oor. Draldage ls eflected by a centra.I pipe and the water siphoned out as In rhe paevlous systenr. The dlsadvantages of earth danrs are that they requl.e a larger volume of water to aflow fo. seepage, ard .equ1.e mo.e maLntenance. Earth dans cannot be

a syslem of constanily crrcu-ating wa-er lney eventually becomefouled. partlcularly during hot weatbea when f,eeding rate is at lts maxlrnunr. Ideally, one shou]d have only half of the availabLe number of pools occupled at a t1ne, so that they caJ| be used in aotatlon. In thls system, the anlnaLs calr be moved to fresh pools when necessary, leavlng the 'usedi poofs to be drained and aLLoued to dry out and bake in the sun. After a period of rest lhese will be clean and ready for use aga1n. (See Figures a and 5). When the caocodlles are to be renoved from a.n ea.th daln they wiII prove dlffl.cult !o capture \rlth a hand net slnce most wlll take aefuge in their bufows. A slmpLe capture method ls to nrake tubea faom 1 cnr mesh wire nettlng about 45 crn in length whlch are firmly pushed lnto the buFow entrance and thelr bases Dacked around wj.th nud. The tubes are tilted upwards at a sllght angle ancl helcl 1n place by prop-sticks. The pool ls then dralned cordpletely and when the crocodttes venture out, they can be easlly caught.

7,\d) Doub]e-Un1t CementPond Systen

?hls system (See Flgure 6) was found to be the most efflclent for managementplriposes. A naJo. advantage 1s tnat wlth tlvo ponds, they can be dralned and refll.1ed on alter.nate days, whlch 1s less stressful to the crocoCllles whlctr soon ]earn to move over to

ts) the full pond when the other sta.ts emptylng.

Secondly, the lnftowlng rater may be colde. tha.r| ihe water 1n rhe ponds, so that by movlng to the fuII poncr, the crocodlles are not subJected !o a sudden chanSe ln tempeaature whlch 1s harnful.

Thirdly, the design al1ows for normai dralnage of ponds, but the floor of the pen stoplne towa;ds the lowea sectlon wheae the overflow sklm welf€ are set lnto the concrete, al]ows for better hyglene. The entl.e pen can be ft,ooded so that the indlvidual ponds overflov/ over the perlmete. Iip and gcease, rac and o1I, is skimmedoff the surface of lhe wacer a.rld the entlre pen ffoor hosed do\rn and cleaned. ?h1s imp.oves overalt hyglene and reduces the incidence ol eye lnfections and fungal infectlons.

Wlth the gentty sfoped access area, the crocodites can energe easily from the pond, and thls reduces the .lsk of inju.les caused by ,pilin8' when a wocker commencessc.ubblna rhe empty pond tloor. rne anLma.rsa-tso do nor atrempt ro junp or cltro one ove. the other to escape from the pond. a pr3ct]-se that results in lnjLr.ies.

Anothe. advantage is that during cold weather or a! n1ght, heavy transparent plasttc sheeting can be overlald on a f.amewo.k or potes ove. one ol the poncls, about 30 cm above the surface. This ralses the- temperature considerabl,y and afso provldes shelter from cold wind and eain

Note also that as wilh rhe othe. units, the corners a.e rounded and this reduces the tendency of hatchllngs !o fo.m plles.

8- HAICI{ERY DESIGN

The hatchery nust be slted a eood ctlstance f.om the rearlng ponds to avotd rne oanSer of ctisease cFans_ ported by ff1es, attracced Eo discarded egg_snetls ii!-ll !r1". to fooo rn ihe pens. rr must-iave a sunny aspect and be situated away f.om footpaEhs and roads ror the reason Ehat developj.ng embryos are sensrtive ro vloratlonr and undue dlsturbance near nesrs cErn cause prenatuae hatching. The hatchery of L1 n x 10 n i.s suitabLe for accomnodatlng25 clutches of, eggs. (see Fig.7 ) It can be conscructed oy usrng 12 cn diameter poles' spaceclat 2,5 m incervals, burled Eo a deptn of I T' wh!1e prolrudrng above around to a height of I'85 m. calvanlsed wi.e 4 mm dlameter ls nalfed around the franeerork of poles at roughly 30 cn levels between the floor al]d the roof as a frame f,o. chlcken or bl.d mesh (1.5 cn diameter lrlre nettlng). The wlfe netthg ls buried to a depth ol 60 cm around the pe.imeter to exclude burrowing predators, and tled ro the galvanlsed wire. Along the rop of the perimete. fence a 30 cm strip of wlre nerting prevents crocodrles froin cllnbing out and escaping. It may also be necessary to use rl,re criss-cfossed over the hatclrery to exclude avlan predators. The gates, 90 cm wlde anal about t m 1n helght and openlng at a height ol 60 cn, can be lelt open when the hatchery is lnspected wlthout .isk of hatchllngs e scap 1ng. If desired, the passaSeways nay be roofed ,rlth 70% shade cloth, reeds, or paln leaves to provide shade and shelter during rain fo. pe.sonnel checklng and \ralklng ,rlthi.n. Du.lng heavy rains and storms each nest shoutd be covered over wi!h a sheet of plastic, canvas, cubber mar o. sinilar nalerlal e.a. empty fe.tlLlser bag to prevent excesslve nest floodlna and loweaed nest temperatures. The hatchery ca.r be constrlrcieC by using pLaslic sheers, shaoe cIorn, a chrck layer cf c?eds .. trcr.boo. or poles if wlre nettlng is not available,

9. LOCATIONOF NESTSAND ECCS

9.(a) F.on a boat, crocodlles nay be seen plunging off the riverbank or from lake shore at the approach of a boat oa the sound of a motor and the slte 1s then investigated. 9.(b) CIaw marks and scrapes on lhe rlp of che river- bank caused by crocodiles emerging or entering watef usuall.y lndlcate nest sltes during the breeding season. 9.(c) walking along a rlverbank o. lake shore, crocodlles may either be found ]ying up owe. nests, 8ua.d1ng thern from neaaby, seen rralklng or running off, or heard crashing through the undergrowth or splashlng lnto lhe

9.(d) Nest sltes are generally characterlsed by a bare palch of so11 (for hole nesting spec!es1 surrounded by flattened vegetatlon. The surface soil is sonetlmes found to be molst, may have a strong odou., or lnprints

tv r claws |nay be seen. Tapping with one s flnSers on the surface and over a suspected nest n y indlcate wheiher there aie 1n fact eggs buried. Tr reveabeaatlon above the nest 1s dlstinguishable aon the more sol1d, densely packecl surroundlng subs However at color al nestl.ng sltes where several femal,es may hav€ laid close logerhen, or have scraped away rne grass c vegetation sonre 2 - 3 m ln length, 1t becones more ifficult to locate the eggs. Here a rnetal, aod, such s 1s used 1n weldlng, some 40 to 50 cm and 4 mm in di.ar ter is used to probe the soil. By Problng, lhen !. ping gentl.y on any obstruction beneath the surl ce one carn quite easily distlnguish whethea 1t 1s a rot or a cluEch of eggs. Employing thls method sav€

10. HARVESTINC I 35

co collect eggs soon afler berng laio especlal"ly if tt Jou.ney back to the hatchery involves a cons: --.ab1e dlstance over rough roads. With eggs ln an lvanced stage of :ncubatlon ri^e-e :: the danger that 1e delicate iyster oi olooo vess-lj or the yolk sac iIt .upture. Excessive j01ti.ng, bumPldg and nols can also brlna about pienature hatching and th€ e crocodl.les have a poor su.vlval

Unfo.tunately 1: is seldom possible to determine when w1]d ]aid eggs i ve been laid. apart from oestroyrrg one faom each ci tch to examlne its contents and this is wastefuf. tac 3ver lhe foi.lowing p.ecautions shoutd be observe

11. TRANSPORTOF EGGS

Corrugated cardboard boxes, plastic crates, wooden boxes or polystyrene boxes are a1I sultable for egg co]l,ect1on. The lattea type have the advantage of belng lightweight, !/ate.proof and maintain the eggs at

the boxes must contain slaaw, dry grsss, oa even leaves, .ushes or aquatlc vegetation gatheaed near the nest sl,te onto which the eggs are carefully packed a]1d wlth lhick padding bet,ireen each layer and between lndividual egSs to cut down on movement or denrlng if eggs roll a.ound inside the box. The packtnA can be llbera]Iy sprinkled w!ch water unril almosr soggy :o rnaintaln a high humidlty 1n the box du.1n8 transport. Alternatlvely eggs may be packed in sand irom the iest but the ,/ergh: of a i rIL box, :he d-:scanc: :! :ay 'rave to be carried from the nest siies ic a vehlc1e. boar. canoe oa other c.ait is not very practicat. Also lhe vlbration during vehlcular or boat transport, causes the sand to shift leavlng the eggs to rub one against another, a.rtdbaeakages or dented eggs are the resutt. Once packed, eacn conlaine. wlth a separaEe clurch nust be clearly ma.ked! and a note of the dale of collection a]ld clutch size reco.ded, For transpo.t by vehi.cl,e it 1s essential to 1ay at least a 30 cnr thick layer of drled grass or sln11ar padding as a nattress on the back of lhe vehicLe io cushion the bumping and jolting of t!.avel ower rough roads o. terrain. The boxes too should be flrntv wedged ).n positlon. If necessatY with packlng bei!./een them to prevent movement of these. Shade i.s again rhporrant and a vehlcle canopy is useful, or cut, weff-Ieafed branches may se;;e the

It ls obvlously berter !o r.ansporc eggs back to rne nalchery as soon as posslble, buc rhis larSely depends on prevai.llng tenperatures. Suj.tabty packed eggs can be lranspo.ted by alr, boat or road foi severai davs. but when the tnterna] air lemoerarLrres of the tran;port boxes fa]l to and betow tbe ?a-3OoC teve1, the.e i; llkely to be a hlgh mo.tallty of eggs.

15 t2. PRE-INCUBATTONPROCEDURES When the eggs have been transported to the hatcherv. and before artj.flcial lncubatlon starts, the folloivinq procedures should be foll,owed:

12.1, A nest .ecord card for each ctutch of eggs collected snoulct be prepared. recordlna seiiar numoer. oace corlected. toca.Llty and ctuEcn srze- 12.2. The eggs from each clutch cotlected shoutct be carefully examlned for the follo1,tng: the number pie.ced, of dented, ftattened, rolten ar cracxea egls, Rotten or addted eggs can generally be derected b_y odou., a glazed o. dlscotourecl, opique, or greytsil, btue-green shetf cotou.ation, or beCatrse fll-se" eggi wetgh less than nea.lthy eggs, or because rhe con;;nrs or cnese suspect eggs wnen gently shaken, arA obviousLy fult of tiquid, 1n comparlson to healthy egas. HeaLthy eggs develop an opaque \,rhite spot ;n the upper surface withln aa hou.! of being l;i; ii-' they aie fertlte. Eggs, or some of the eigs exanlrned rn each clutch tha! do not show this spot-;ay be considered to be inferti_Ie. Thls whtt; spo! extends Iacenally. al]d forns a conplere OanOtV aotuc a aays, ano cnrs bdnd expands Llnrr- i- :s f e".. -i 9 - 10 days. "1._1

I2-3. Record de;aits of the number of da,naged or suspect eggs on tne nest record card. Atl cracked, pierc;d or rolten eggs shoutd be removed f.om lhe clutch to incubated be because lhese will go .otten in the nest an; apa.t f.om attracting anrs anct various insects, ca! contamlnate and spoil heatthy eggs, particurariy if they leak f1u1d onto ourers 6er6i ini,,. v""i"""" growrhs i".""r may devetop and sp.ead. arso s""." *;i;; ;;;.* harnful to heal rhy esss. 13- ARTIEICIAL NESTS !i/irh1n the-hatcheay. artiflcial nesEs are excava!ed 1n lne so1-r in parattel rows, allowlng a foorparh 1,5 rn,wide.between rows, and spaclng ;ests I ; apart. A nest cavlEy of 45 cm tn dlaneter ts adeouate. 1."" for targe cturches and shoulct be d"8 t;-;';;;;; ;;'' about 50 cn. The esgs are then burted posrtion in tn! sane as found and .emovecl f.on the witd ne;;;. Packlng eggs one tayer on top of the other att;;; ana pronotes fo. humidlty. The solI shoul.d be osmp enouqn co squeeze a handful into a form. The ctepEna; ;;i;;''---- tne top layer should be burled betow the ;urfa;e depends. on the solt rype. In heaw roan ." shoutd .n.V be 15 Eo 20 cm deep and tn ftne rlver "i.V. :O " !o 40 cm deep. It ts advlsable 1f possrOre ".i.rO rhen to bu{ ln the same solt type as was f;uid h the wii;.

131 A sultabl.e nest telnperatu.e range is ln the.eglon of 280 to 34oC at an average depth of 30 cn. Thla shoutd be checked at lntervals. In the early norning anci at two-hourly inte.va.ls ih.ough the day ti1l dusk- Froo these temperature .ecordlngs it w1lt be posslble to establlsh whether soil should be renoved, or addecl over the nest site to achleve the deslr.ed nest tempeaature.ange. Each nest slte must be ldentifled by 1ts serlat number arld preferably date of col,Iectiod ancl clutch size as wel.l. Thls 1s essentlal so that the p.ogress of individual. clutches can be monltored e.g. the date on which hatching comnences, as some eggs irom a ctutctr may hatch earller than others, some prematurely, whllst otnels may requlre up to an additionaL 14 days of lncubatlon. ceneralty, once hatching commencesand the hatchlings are seen to be normal, !h; nemarnlnc escs are not left ro rrcubace rore EhaJ|IO oays. Ii the_ hatchllngs a.e premature (1,e. wlth extended abdomens) the remaini.ng eggs may be left up to 14 days, afte. which period they a.e manually opened and;houtd suavive even if stitt premature. Often perfectty developed unhatched crocodiles becone entangted ,rith the unbilj.cat cord wilhin the egg and are unabte to hatch out, of the actuat shetl may be abno.natly thick. l]nless these eggs are opened the young witl pe.ish. In areas of tow summer rainfa_tl or ove. drouAht periods it ts advlsabte to check the moistu.e contena of the so1l of one or two sarnpte nests weekly. If necessary che nests can be sprinkled hrlth wate. unt11 the sol] around tl]e eggs is suitably danp foa it 1s essential to nraintain a hurnidj.Ny levet in excess of 80% and preferabLy hignec. These lnspecrrons snoulct be oone eithec in lhe early morning or tace afcernoon. In facc even if the young are hea.d croaking in a nest durinc the heat of a very hot day, rather teave them ancl r:;en open the nest when it ts cooler. As lncubatlon progresses, che egg sheLts ,nay crack pieces :I.:n"ty:ty and nay peer off. provldins rhe nest so1.l ts sultably daflp lhls !s not harmfut: should !ne.soll becomedry, rhe inne. rubbery skin of rne ece-"' wlll.harden and adverse-ty affec! hatcilns uneo out eggs sho\rld be Enoroughly lrected "".;.;;:Eo soften

The incubatlon period and nest tempe.atuaes vary from one specles to another. For the Nile crocooire'_ lrom 84 - 90-days at 2ao to _O 3zroC,on avecage. rhe spectacled-Ca).man - 90 days at 2go to 32oci American Alli8aloc 65 - 70 ctays at 28" to 34oc. Bul :nl pe.1od of lncubatron depends on weather conctltions and nest temperatures, and lncubarron may thus extend foc up to 7 to ta days beyond the normal_ Derlocl.

t38 If afte. collectj.ng newly 1a1d eggs lhe normal lncLlbation perlod lor them elapses, \rlthout any slgn of hatchlng, the nest should be vlsited rwj.ce clailv ano rne surface gently patred. Thls actlon often trlggeas a response faom the young who then comnence croaking of yelpinS to lndlcate that they a.e ready. The soil is then sc.aped away and the haichlings pl.aced lnto sui.tabte containers and renoved t.on lhe hatcheiy. The reason for lhis 1s that othef nests of eSgs not quite .eady, may also be stlnulated to c.oal and when dug up are found to be paenature. Eggs that do not immedlatety hatch may be covered over aealn a'rld the paocedure repeaEeo over successlve oay; unEiI either they do hatch naturatty, or need !o be manuatlv opened. Thr,s is the .eason why nest recoro cards. .ecordlng dares, numbers natchect, and rhe number of eggs renainlng ln each cLutch, are essentlal to management.

No attempt should be made to break the umbilicat cord of a hatchling stllI atlached to the enpty ega_shelt. This cord will soon dry out, become brittte and snap off of ics oljn accord. After openrng a nesr a_I che egg shel]s, rotten eggs or dead enbryos nus! be renoved from the hatchery as well as soil irnDrecnated wi:h fluids. :o avo:d d-:rac:.nd :nsFcLs. Inltial trlals involving colLection, transpo.t alrd artlflcial incubation of eggs as described, .esulted !n a hatchidg success of 76,62% ar.d wilh experience a hlgher percentage shoutd be feasibte.

14. POST I{ATCHLINC CARE

Hatchllngs are nornally kept for at least 24 hou.s befo.e being placed in the reartng pens, and then only lf the umbilicus has cornpletely ctosed and the cord has come avlay c]ean]y. Any that may be premacure (shown by the exlended yolk sac) are retained rnr.il such tlme as the yolk sac has been absorbed and lhe unblIlcus closed. It is advisable to malntain these newly hatched animats in a d.y roon or, if 1n an outdoor enclosure, lhis must be predator proof, and attow for suntighr as wetl as a.rt adequate area of shade. Newty hatched and young crocodiles tenct to for.m pites and death by suffocaiion connonl,y occurs if too many are placed 1n one aaea. Smafl conpartments houslng a naximun of AO to 30 hatchllngs ellminates this hazard, ancl also makes it easier to grade the crocodlles lnto size Sroups. Hatchllngs fron young f,emales may only me,sur; A5 cm, whtlst. Iarger-females Iaylng b18ger eggs can procluce .r4 cm .tong ot r sprinS. The floo. of the post hatchllng area should be kept as clean as posslble and tho.oughfy rasbed w1!h a strong

139 solutlon of Potasslun pernanganate or' chlorlne ancl scrubbed alter renoval of each group of young, as unbili,cal lnfections are a cause of mortallty of newly halched yolrng, As a precautlon the umiiflcal area of each hatchllng can be sprayed wlth Centlan Violet aerosol when they cone in f.odr the hatchery.

15. POST HATCHLINGI,IORTALITIES

Mortallty often i.s refated to enbryo devetopnent causecl by too Loll, or too hlgh tenperatures durtng incubation. It appears to .un in cLutches anct heredltary factoas may be responslbl,e. Eggs lncubated at hlgh tenperatures of 35oC and over may ,roduce hatchllngs wlth arched or Iateratty twisled sprnes, spl.a] taltst stump tails and Jaw defo.rnitles. ert ir lhe farner has cottected wlld laid eggs atready in an actvanced stage of devetopnent, fron nests inadeouatelv-progeny covered by so11, he has tittle controt over the faom these e8gs. Likewlse, a high p.oportlon of embryo failures ,iav be attrlbuted !o tov/ nest remDerarures as we as hu;id.:.,. Levels and the impo.tance of incubating w1:hin ihe recoftnended range - particuta.ty safegua.ding againsr sudden fluctuations of temperatures, cannot be over_ empnasised,

16. STOCKINGRATES

The.e is usually a tendency on co.rnrerclat farms to over-stock .earing pens. This teads to greater conpetitlon fo. food, an increase in flgitlng and 9:llyilg py lhe srronger, nore aggressive rndivrduars, wnrcn ln turn .esu]Es rn a greater nurber of inJurres and eounds €nd possibfe sources of wound lnfection;. A louer, oa sensible stocklng aate aesul,ts 1n a ftore even-grolrth rate pea crocodlte, but most important is the fact that the overall health of trre croi:oaf:.es of is a hi.gher standard th€n in an ove.crowded pen. Thus dlsease paobfens aae reducect anO ttre symptorns easier to detect, as are inJu.ed aninals in a- s;atfer gr-up. Joanen and McNease (1929) a.Iso comment that careful attentlon nust be glwen to keeping stocking clenslties rever,-1.e. no nore lhan one arrisaro. per u,3:.,._:"1: m' per anlma]. For 91 nilg.ticus optnions differ. B]ake ( 1974) conslcrers that each young of the year shoufd have avartabte a nlnlhum afea of 0ro9 rn?. After a vear. u,la m'. Van der_Riet (1992) prescrlbes a stoi,t inc . denslty of 0,56 nr, per €nlmat. The stocklng densltles as clescrlbecl for types of oens recomnended herein for c. were iouna to ue "llgjlscg l4o An advantage of houslng young stock tn incilwidual pens from 5 !o 8 m apa.t, as opposed to poncts adJacent io one anothea, is that there 1s }ess danSea of an infectlous di,sease spaeading rapldty from one pen !o another, The cteaning of pens, the staess and disturbance when capturinS s1ck, lnjured, or sick aninals for grading puaposes and transfer !o other pens, ls much reduced. But 1n. the plannlng and deslgn tayout of ttle .earing pens the cost factor has of couase got !o be considered. Even so, there shoutd be additlonat pens atloweci for inlensive care of stck, injured or weake!, aninrats. no matter what overall layour !s decicled on. It is essentlal to naintaln a registei of nunbers of animals per pen, includlng mortalitles, and also to keep track of numbers and movements when anlma]s are size graded during the first yea. of grovrth.

17.

The dlet, growth and nut.itionat requi.enents of rhe Nile crocodile has been reported on in nunerous pLbLicatlons dnd cne oietary deficrenclFS, ojseases ano errecr on growth .eported on in sone derar.t. The.e.are basically two classes or slze g.oups of ciocodlles for the conmercial tarme. to be cbncerneO about. These are: .a)-Hatchtlngs and up !o the 1,S d slze group ready for'cultlng and b) Adult breedlng stock, or those anina.Is in excess of 2,5 n in rocal length. In the naturat state the f1.st g.oup subslst on aqualic and snore-Iine insects, sptders. snaits, laopotes, tld flsh rrv. Later. takrns crabs. snrrmps prawnsrrrogsii:q: and and flsh as yeI.L as some of tne sml:.ter

AduLrs.on the other hanct reqLrire a much .Larger vo_une or tood and tn nature wou-id take a grealer percenrage of flsh, c.abs, .eptlles, bircts ajlo maJnmals_ from small to qui!e large prey. In facr, a consicierabte cnange rn diet. For the commerciat falner who may house uf, to 3OOO_ 5OOO-crocodltes1n caregory (a) j.! ts a]m;st !mpossible Eo oola.rn. or even approxtmate tlre dlet and volume rooo of nonnralLy eaten by chese young anrmals. seve.al us nave of t.ied vaalous kinds of lnsect and ]lght traps, :l:, I1:l-:9T:yh"! unsatlsfac!ocy resurrs. r6e rarsl sca.r_aoreedrng of nealu/orms, crrckets, fresh waler snarls, froSs such as platannas, flsh etc. are a]l scnefies lhat have been thought of from ltme arr to t1me. are tabour lntenslve, and at best !,,outd be a 141 vaLuable dletary addltl.ve to feedl.|1g a few thousand hatchlings - but neve. by $e18ht be sufficient to feed a laage populatlon all year round. Sornecrocodile farmeas are fortunate ln that they llve alongslde lakes, .lwers and pa,ls \irhere flsh can be readlly har.vested or where flsh can be farmed. Others live 1n aaeas clinatically unsultabfe for flsh farmlne :rnd are lnus depenoanr on artifrclal foods. In thls category are lncluded poultry in a variety of forns. Day-oId chicks, brolLers, adult futly feathered or plucked blrds etc. Usualty the nortalltles fron poultry farms - culted hens or deep f,rozen chlckens that have exceeded shet.f l1fe. Secondly, varletles of comnerclatly available salt water flshes can be purchased faon tine !o tine froo the faige. distrlbuto.s, at falrly .easonabte Arices. But, Ilke the poultry industry, the supplles are ]1kely to be seasonal and cannot be relled upon. The third category ls that of red meat, which inctudes horses, donkeys, beef, goats elc, Thls is atso not a Suaranteed supply, usuall.y the most expensive food to buy and deep freeze facllirles for butk consienments may be necessany. Otherwtse Eransporr and Labour ccsts can be very high mereLy to process a srnai!

Most of ihe commerclal farmers f,eed a butk diet or- poul!ry - and lnclude a certain amount of oftal such as lungs, oesophaegus, spl.een and donkey meat. A few have access to venlson by-producrs, but thrs is nonnally low A.ade food. Nut!:itional deflciencles result fron these diers. The most frequently encountereci belng calclum cieflcl,encies from feeding a mono diet ot chicken, It ls also doubtful whelher adults extract sufficient catclum from chlckens alone foa egg productlon and calclun in sone forn shoul,d be added. Bone meal oa carcass meal whlch is inexDenslve and commerclally avallab]e 1n 25 kg baes haa oeen founo to be satisfacto.y. Lack of catclun in the cllet may only becone apparent 1n young stock towarcls tlre end of their f,lrst yeaa and is often iraeversibLe. Conrnonsynptoms are permanent posteri,or paraLysis, klnking of the spine, uner'en growth of the Jaws, and f,a:tu.e to recenerate

Another' Frobfem frequently encountered is gout. j,s Thls often caused by overfeedlng.rno encounteaed more conmonly during the winter months. It ,nay be caused by fatty fooals - some breeds of pouttry seem to be paltlcularly fatty or frorn o1ly f1sh. It 1s aecomfiended that fat shoulct be cut from red neat poftLons when feeding to crocodiles.

LA Coulson and Hernandez (1983) descrlbe the metabolic depression that occurs \rhen temperatlraes falt to below 20oC. The aninrals then cannot synthesize protein efficiently. Gout ensues, normatty seen as pa.alysis of the 1lrnbs, enlarged or distended tlmbs and dlgits, and unless food 1s withheld until the aninat recovers, an accLmulation of ufates can be cteposlred rn the kidneys and lolnts leadlng to organ natfunction, locornotory difflcu]tles, and eventually no.tality. Bloat is very sln11a. and no food should be offe.ed untll tne antmals .egaln a nornal appearance. llt/allachand Hoesste r196a .apo.ted fioatality of a]l1galo.s fron steatllis. In all cases the cause was attributed to low vltafiin E content in the diet compoundedby the presence of a hiah percentage of Iong chain pofyunsatu.ated fatty acids o. rancld tlsh oils in their diet of snelt, a rnaalne fish sDecies. They found evldence rha- .ancio or unsarurat;o farrv acids oxtdrze vltanln E makrng !E unavallable -o tn; anlnaL. Vitanin E has the function of Dreventinc oxldatlon of adipose tissue. Lance er aI (I983) are of rhe oplnr.on Ena! as _n other aninals fed dlets of marine f1sh. .eDroductive farlure almosc !nvariaolv ocru.s ard rhis.s attrlbutable !o a Low vitanin E level. Thev Dostutate Lhar an anj.mal thar p.oouces a clutch of ro -,1o eegs each welghi.ng approxlmatety 60 g in one night, wou.Ld have to nobl-l.ize a considerabte arnount of vitamin E to en€u.e embryonlc survival of the entire ctutch. Seve.e vitamin E deflciency is fair,ty comnon in c.ocodilians held in zoologicat collectlons. Two palrs of Morelets crocodiles C. noretetll hetd at Atlanta zoo lalled to proouce-iTEETE-6ffi utiL taken off a diet ol narine flsh (Hunt t98O). McNease and Joa,.ren (1981) .epo.ted that a varietv of qualiry food in the cl.iet is berter than a nonooi;t. And that fish a.lone oay not be suitabte for a hlch degree of reproductive success tn alligarors. one of the questlons to be answered is {What is the diffe.ence 1n patatlbllity and nut.itlonat value between deep-sea, narine, estuarlne al]d taesh wate. fish species?n In warious trlats conducted, it was found that a deep-sea 'snall-Jac,(s, flsh known comnie.c:attv as was co!a.lLy unacceptable ro ari size and age classes of crocodifes. Even though the anlnals we.e deprlved of any food for. sone days prlor to the triaLs. Yet, other specles of 'sattwate;, or 'narine, and/or estuarlne fish species such as muftet, grunter, pe.ch, kob slinger etc. were very acceptabte. (See Pooley 1982) . A marlne species known 'Hake-no. in the commercial, trade as 6' was readlly eaten and obvlously acceptabte to all si,ze and age classes of crocodlles.

143 ll/hat of freshwater specles? Is there any dlffe.ence 1n nutrltional val,ue betrreen the va.ious indlgenous specles !n our lakes and r1ve. systems? Apparently the.e 1s, for accoidlng to Blake (1974) an analysls of the naln food (vundu) a catflsh (ln Zlmbabwe) lons1f111s sho*ed 1t to be extrenely Low 1n vltamins, especial.Ly vltamrn A. The fLesh was found to have a hrgh fat conten! which lnh1b1ts the absorption of fat contenr whlch lnhibiEs the absorptlon of fat-soluble vltalnlns, such as A, D, E and K. Thls sugSested that the hlgh lnci.dence of enterltis on Zinbabwean farms was caused by a low nutritiona.l diet and consequent lack of aesistance to eoterltls. In Rei chenbach-K]lnke (1965) contained in Brake (1.974), nention is nade that a lack of vltanin A can inhibit the action of the tear glands from producing the sallne wash which normally lubricates the eyes and nasal passages of some reptlIes. In other words vrhitst a dlet of flsh such as catflsh, t1lap1a, tlger fish, mudflsh and kapenta nay be suitabte for growing out young stock, flsh are not suitable for adult animals. Behler and Joanen (1980) also commented that a change ln dlet from marine fish to an equal dlxtu.e of fish and a sma]l na.sh aninal, Nutrla, pius a multivitanln mlneral additive dramatlcally increased featlllEy rates of Chtnese alI.LgaEors unoer study. Several workers have conrmentedon the inportance of, nlaintal,rllng young stock at high temperatures e.g. 1n ihe 30 to 32oC .ange. In controlled rea.lng units or open ponds where anlnals ale lying on a col,d substrate such as cement, rheie temperatures may fa11 to as low as 2OoC ove.nlght! problens are bound to occur. Food lntake is Sreatly reduced. The actlon of certaln dlgestiwe enzymes and body metabolism is impa1.ed. Digestive disorders generalLy lead lo a loss ln condition and quite frequently to a susceptlbltlty to bacterlal and even .espiratory lnfectlons, partlcula.ly if tempe.atures fluctuate conslderably between nlght and day. Anothe! problem encounteaed 1s that of nutrltionaf toss of lrozen foods th.ouSh lncorrect feedlng methods. In this case red neat was frozen 1n large blocks 1n open containers at nlnus 3O.C. Da11y a bLock of neat was removed, thawed unt1l sufflcient f,or a meal coutd be cut off fo. lhat day's feedlng, tren lhe block retu.ned to the deep f.eeze, and thls was repeated loa several days. The outea layer of meat was freeze buaned. The loss of blood and f,lulds was considerable altd af,ter some six weeks of lhls practlse, seven-month-otd a.rtlmals developed paralysls of the hl.nd 11nbs, a bunching of nuscfes over the lowea splne ajld 1n severe casesr arching of the spine, Death occurred from drornlng. The slck anlnals .esponded .apldty to lnjectlons of vltamln 81 and paralysed anlnals regalned the use of

t4 thei. linbs- It is reconnended that a]l f.ozen food be packed 1n strong plastic bags to retain fluids ancl !o avoid faeeze bu.n, that food should not be thaweal qulckly by lmmerslon in hot water - a process that atso leaches out nutrlents and the use of fans to thaw fooci is reco.rmended. Partlally frozen foocl shoutd of cor,rase

As Foggin (1981) and others have poinred out p.otonged use of a monodlet is tikely to lead to deficiencles: lly personal reconmendation is to leed a diet of SO%red meat includlng live.s and hearts if avaltabte. 25% poultry and 2594frsb,. r^'hol.eday old chlckens a.e recomnended for young slock and easity manageable pieces of bone lor adults, Ca.e shoutd be exerclseci wlth ribs and these should be chopped into sna]t sections as thev swallow)ng problens. ,alligator tried tbe premix' reconmended by McNease and Joanen (1981) the foltowing is the fornuta. Added to the food at the fate ot 1%: Specifications Per 1 ]b. 1,800.000.00usP u 200,000.oo Ic u Vi tanrin E 5.OCO.OC:-.i Riboflavin 1.C00,00 uc d-Pantothetlc Acid 2.760.O0 c Niac Ln 4. 50 cl.l Choline Chlo.ide 86.43 GM vitanin Bt 2 1.35 MC 90.00 llc Blotin 20.oo MG Pyrldoxene Hydrochloride 1, OOO.OO Mc Menadione Sodium tsisulflte 4.283.00 l'lc Thi.alnine mononit.ate L.COO.O0 MG Inositol 5 . OOO.00 llc Pa.a-Amlno Benzoic Acid 5.OOO.OO MG 45.000.o0 MG Ethoxyquin 5,00 cM Any crococtite farmer w1]t know that his aninals .esDond to l1ve prey such as f.esh fish, wlth tremendous entbusiasm. Hatchllngs 1n partlcutai can be induced to commence feedlng more easLIy by feed.ing Ij.ve prey tnan oy p]aclng cut up oc minceo fooo ac Ehe watecs edge. I) /r'y mind the lrinclng of food. whrls! less laboLr. iirensrve lnan chopping tt up inlo small pieces. of conrec! partrcre slze, !s not sallsfaccory. There is a consrderable loss of fluids, the animals tenct to tra,nDle it and then cannot pick 1t up. It also c.eates a g.eate. deal of fouling, c.eates nrore work ln maintalntnc p--n ';;;---' hygiene and consequently can tead to bac te ri;i cllsease Drobfeos -

There 1s an argument as to the merlrs of feectj.nc plucked, Doutlrv or whole and compreiery feathered. C;;.;i;--'' compaction cern occua fron accumulatlon of featheas

145 whlch belng light do not afwaya pass easily through the systen, buc thts has not yet caused problems !n my

feed sna1l anltnals l.1ke .abblta and gulnea pl.As has surp.islngly not been lried on any scale and thls would be a valuable addltlon to any dlet. Presunably though these animals a.e conmerclally too valuable to feed io c.ocod1les. However when one consldeas the cost today of an adult female crocodile, lhe fact that she only produces one clutch of eggs annua11y, that the eggs may all be inferti,Le, or tha! she doesnlt Lay at al] because of a dlet def!ciency, Ehen the feedlng of rhese animals nay not be as expenslve as 1t seems. Flnally, lt seems lhat of all the pfoblens tha! can occur 1n commerctal rarmlng of crocodiles. our Iack or understanding of what constituies a balanced diet is paobably the avenue requiring the nost research. I! also seems that as ln nature where all slze g.oups of c.ocodillans feed off a wide variety of o.ganisms, captlve aninals roo snould be fed wnenever possrole rn the sanle nanner.

18, FOoDPREPARATIoN In prepar!ng fooo i! rs inporranL -o ceduce -- Lo pieces that can be swallowed withou! difficutty. La.ge f,lsh should be cut lnto elongated .athe. than squa.e pl,eces since the bones can cause damage du.ing swatlowlng. Sinllarly, Live whole fish shoutd not be too 1a.ge les! the dorsal ilns cause drmage to lhe .eptlLe's throat and gullet. Befo.e deep freezlng large flsh shoutd be scaled and gulted, their heads and fins removed and washed before belng deep f.ozen. The heaais and Ilvers a.e excellent food but feeding of intestlnes and othe. lnnards is not recomrnended. All food must be comptetely thawed out before feedinc a]ld surplus, or uneaten food must never be re-f.ozen; since repeated thawlng pennlts bacterla to multiply rapldly so that eventually the crocodlles are being fed bacteria-laden contarninated food. The concrete slab should be hosed down and scaubbed \r1th ha.d b.istle broons after food processlng. A sprhg balance ls useful for welghing food and a record book for recording lhe date, prevaj,llng a1r tenperatufe, flrass fed, pen number, percentage wastage, and remaaks ts moat lnportant.

19, FEEDINC

The nost deslrable method 1s to estinate the amount of - food that each 8r.oup lvill consume at each neal. bv

146 establishing a regufaa patte.n, feeding at the same time each day, it becones easler to calculate how much 1s required, particularly when lhe nass fed, and anount wasted per pen 1s weighed and recor,ded. The crocodl.tes Oecomeaccustoned to the routlne and food is then consuned whl1e still fresh. In the hot surnmernonths crocodiles w111 feed dalLy, but feedlng .ate wlL] stacken off torards the onset of the cotder months when temperatu.es start to fluctuate each day. It is then wise to start reducing the feedlna frequency a..rd quadtities fed untll food 1€ .equlred perhaps only eveay second or thlfd day, according to locaL cltmatlc conditlons. Gene.ally young crocodlles !r1It refuse fooct when the air o. water tenperatu.e fatt6 betow 60oF (15,6"C) and it is wlse !o dlscontinue feedj.dg rhen, as cearaln enzy'nes necessary fo. dlgestion are not activated. Even in m1d-sunner sudden cotd spetts may occur and at these llnes it ls not worthwhite offe.inc food. o. t.ylng ro coax tnen inro feectlng unril tie weaiher. wa.ms up again. During hot \,/eather conditions it 1s p.efe.able to feed 1n the late afteanoon o. evenlngs, after the animafs have basked, their body tenperatures are raised, and they wi 1l be hungry. The use of flat planks, or siniiar ieeding boards resutt:s in l.ess wastage of food, cuts down on rhe anount of uneaten lood lhat remalns in the sand, gravet or g.ass verges of the ponds, which soon becones contaninaied, o. elimlnates the p.oblem of spreading food out onto the not cemented perineter of the pond, which is obvioustv an undesirable prac cise. When feedlng, the boa.ds should be spread around the pool pe.imete. (up ro 8 to 10 indlwidual boards) so that lhe crocodlfes do not have to cllmb over one anothe., or coinpete, blte or fight unnecessarily to .each it. Because.of the more rapld evening Eenrperalure drop 1n winler it nay be necessary ro feed aE an earl-er hour or tne alternoon- fn cemented ponds the aaea wheae food is laid out shoutd be cleaned and sc.ubbe

20. REAR]NGAND HYGIENE

Young crocodiles are moae dellcate lhan ls generally real.lseal and a thorough knowtedge of thelr Eehavi;;; and requlreoents under captlve aatlflclal condltlons is essentlaf 1f reaalng 1s to be successfut, Ma.|rydlsease symplona are easl]y overfooked 1f the observer ts not ram!,r,1ar with the normal behaviour of caocodrles uncter a varlety of condltlons. It ls essentlal to know how thev

r47 normally walk! swin, bask, thermo- re gulate , sleep and feed in relation to the tine ol day, the ai. and water temperatures, and du.1nA cold condltlods, raln and at nlght, and how thelr behavlour may change at dtfferen! seasons of the yea!. The no.e tlrne the owner or ftanager spends observlng the anlna]s, the greatea are his chances of successfully .ea.ing them. He wiLl soon ootice that ffom a clulch of eggs hatched, sone lndividuat s wlll be agSressive, otheas less so. Others may be shy and sohe extredelv timid. There nay be a conslderable diffe.ence in slie range, The grovth of sonre will be .apid, lhe majority at a fairly eveo rate and that a few hardly grow at attt and may be classed as runts. The regular grading of.aninals lnto slze ctasses is lnportant to eliinlnate unnecessary bultying whlch can Lead to slunted g.oeth of the weaker animals. iut 1t must also be bo.ne in mind tha! the young a.e extrenety sensltlve to stress as fron loud noises, sudden dlsturbance, excesslwe movement and activity in r:heir pens, and especially f.om handtlng as ln captu.e fo. measurlnS, gradlnS or movlng to other quarters. An advantage is to train staff ,rho work daiiv with the anina]s and who by experience Learn io recosnlse aor insEance. rne appearanceof no.ra- faeces fior rearrnv anlmafs, as opposed to diarrhoea in sick specimens, Who da1ly prepa.e the food into portions of suiiabte slze, ensu.e that the food is fresh, rhat uneaten food is remowed fron the ponds, and that water 1s chanced regutarly ard rhe ponds scrubbed cIean. rne enpnisLs should be on observing strlct hyglene to the exient of using only one scrubbing baush oa broon and the same feedlng boards per pen. AIso using footbaths containing a strong dlsinfectant at the door to each oen to elimrnare rhe possrbiliry of c.oss transfer of bac-erla. Even wlth the strlctest of hyglene procedures, young crocodlles are stllt susceptlbte !o a va.1e!y oi aileases and dlagnosls is often dlfficutt and onty Learned by

It is recodlrended tha! staff should becone thoaouchlv aquainted wlth rhe antmal's lnrerna.L anaromy co OE a6Le to disthguish between healthy and cllseased organs. If lne.e is a veterlnary or palhotoglcal taborato;y, o. if contact with a veterinary offtcer in the region'1s possible,.samptes should be despatched for ;xaminatlon, or. the veteainaalan consulted. ALso that anlmats (not foun; freshly dead ftoacing in the waler) should be autopsied. The nerhods reco,nnended are those outllnecl by Verseput (1986) and are as folfows; 20.1. 2O,I.(a) SterlIe SanDles. 1. These should be taken es soon as trre carcass has been dlssected. 148 2. They shoul.d be taken with sterile fo.ceps ancl scissors. (Ftanlng of the instruments just befoae use will suffice ) . 3. The speclnen size shoutd be about 5 x 5 x 2 cn. 4. The speclmen shoulct be dropped tnto a sterl]e contalner and the container lmnedlately sealed. 5. A sepaaate containe. must be usect for each orcan

6. A sepa.ate set of instruments shoutct be used for lhe stornach and the intestlnes as these will become contaninated with gastro-intestinaf conten!s. 7. The containers rnust be narked with the caococlite,s identification, the date, the organ ancl nane of the faam. 8. Specimenswhlch are not sent off immediately nust be kept in the refriaerator until despatch. 9. If the specimens are to be sent a tong distance they should be packed in ice in an insulared c;ntaine.. 20.1.(b) Formalinlsed Samptes Blocks of tissue, no thlcke. than t _ 2 cn shoutd be.ut from the o.gans rith a sharp knife and piaceC in viats of a 10% forma.Iin conceniration wirh waie., and the sanples nust be comptetely immersecl. The viats or contarners must also be suitabty labe.Lted. For furthe. deralts on nethods of rearlng, hygiene, nutrltlonal requirements, the collec!ion anO'freparation of labofatory specinens, cornnon ailments, Aisiases and rreathents, refe. to Blake (1974), Foggin (1987). Joaien and McNease(1979), Frledland (1986), Foorey (19s2), Van de. Riet (1987) and Verseput (!997).

149 EA b0 +Di -c lD I o .c o d,c9 oc(6 .)! od.E,!.1J 5 C >O0!+ Od 6C4O 4c E doc ;coo " .c Eo I o.i j r.*c o t.c o- r ot -J s!.04 c 1r oE -ooE d oa, a'< j.c! ;Eeoo oo>Joo ! 9.'c { -c o 9 t 9: : I 9 r ! . op rr > 6*i E i qic{l 6 o pi> 'ioobooocpc 6otoop *r ri>c >* dd Po co dt "!] co pot|i!co op o o oJ6o oooenodci-o pJ !r !cc,io t id oorlo> ! Ed cl o€!j(coE €o > o:J dl L d of p o o d -E c ocf c o qr o c El o - ?l a60doLd durs- - ocoE 6l ooEocoo€>o Er--cJ Lrd-od ol c o - d, Ccr < q/- !l irc- oocEoo E6.r Fl o a60.

o3q .o r. Ca

o0 i dcr d i d! o ; ra c 'io66sc o: cl! (o -o-o ti Elo€oo 4ae , "i -c ! o o> o o c c (!l o ' D- c. oi -3Eoof .a oo o o! o d >i^ r o o o E c Edoid "oc ECOo t Oi.Oo.O i iooo (ioco Eoo bat.o q)r..dcrr'io!

150 n>: .r Ed ;o o *. ia o oE r. o.>!r€ (! >o ]jq)tr o oD rroo - o Li o bo.c ot !-(r Cr o o ,:ro- r cEE d4.oo -c Jo>c,ooc o!d o EOO!oCOLCr!- Jo'!oq 60i.i_ (eo!qr 9qo!_ cc.4Laol3rr!o o Jo !i5.q.0j J >p olJ b0- E or o !E! ^4e9"!9q-" 9-o+- -! q-- )O d'rC c!oro cl 15L .dtoc)< - !00.--f ot coLEE, J,c el oF o: o !, j!: J! O dC r! c,t o 4r !l .c 6 > :. Ld u tu\ a)a a e> rrqr c1 14.6c > .g o: L Fi e,3-HO rOproo. E.iri*o

"-C o o ,L-o - $ i 3co , .a.aa - {i J! (0 c cp d d> -c p6obon - c!o !) i0 >,:oi! 6 3c 4 oc E6iOarOO t r. i.0.d -aEcp - o.i.0-oo o.i - otr.iceo o@ o ooo!.--r-l!l- 6O:6Oot!1o E.asC€C.idC15! oa-codi.!(6do r0J >-a o o, boc ! 6 0'c q c o o: -EA. ao .0a o> .d o t I 6 c c o o c o o c o ca t! g ia(i > i. > (i!1 o;i o.:oo.i!l o 'io.oJ,cio6ii .0d!alr!@, a oEroP ool! ceood!o!ooE o+o 60qr>oo 6rroo o.o@ooo oCti>oCCodC aOCXot!xiOtr d6d.oloiric(! 0cor.rdoollrqia :t .rld a tr(! *c cooo >oooo o d-c ba E (si E (!>!A Oo!€ oO o g r c o c car o o !: or o c< oo cooo arGordpc o E > -o 6 < o ! ep.i oocL- joa00 c@4,roE !!c a.4aad4 J- q.-t coo(d c.oro , o o'rYid o pocd e .ioob0 o -rroot o: a c r.: ie+ .cdo! !.i q coo(ao> ara C 'n? L oo.OCci!o.,r 'i !l oor'r e !@^roo>ic c,l - ut 6 coEondo dd!-o-o ol rroE E-oJoe l! E-oo: r.- El O! o rd o > ! ! --- c !: o ) (d o- !: Ll I aLa rt o L oo E L: ! r Fl E a< ' -

o o D0) c€pE (! C b0 >.! c oc oori (!!l) r. oorio: coo E Jf >qr 'i30 -c !ln>Cre .i dlio> to .d :! . - o >o d i r E >- :: tasy < L rlc.-o f (!ox! ^ ,-Ec c{. !6 ot ccL o ooqrtro-!, oc--! ol oEoo o,o(Jc-c> o- ot o(!orb0 oo- :l o o ,- >Or . t o a i (!t d >ri: 0a.od6o ajt co-oqo -cDoo-.Jf b0!oE> I OO-COO 606C lJoo ol ori(!o!o i36 "o b0i-4 > dic rt ntoc cJ 0J>c-oo -o3ro ol toc oqr 'irn>-!-c c o@co-. ,rt !o,rl o .drrro.4L

.,; !tod EO

cr >c . ci (! b0

ci ! oe o! o t c .d >0) Oc4 orr6c) oStL 60 0 !1< d

oEd, EO6! riirr > Fl< OE

'j cc oo 6 0.d c dE > 0r .- o o o t ! iorio o E co ,cE>cY d (!<^ t ( 6 f 'n r L (!! o o oE > 6- ! >o30c 6c cEc,ooot4nca c a o o: E r3 0 0 E !oo6!6iar! iEqf oo od!oo !o {!ocoo,crotrp !-c: !iodr.d.i d o .ooloxo o> -.rc :, ! i i i.c >>! !0L o d >.:! eer!3oro00 :o:.0a ooc t,naE ,c or.o!o..oc@o o.booJ+ .c.ri:r, o I roo b0.!dri6o(!:oE orcodo co a.o (6 oiaoco o.dsrc6ct o>6: .o!oo cun 7 d d o L oreor c . i d!>i ac Jt oJor o.6! o cl >Jr c.dac!o0 o:c-o>o!Lr- c>e lrl Jooo ', oco -ae!oJ ,lc r..o ol o E - c - E E FI ()ln6rEraOi .00'oo3a

lpoi ! D0 o, h. aaa@r .: ci o a/1arcc : boL . . or .0.! c ceqo,o c Si i o o oa r oaaP, a Ecr ! o .i c o o oo tooq{p bop4po @e o C 6qi {!ico !o *d.oic .c on.cl o- 00 !) eo ,o. '.ipo C^to o -oP i()6oo.c9 , rio> "6 Co C,ooJr.b0 ooid ,CO a cAl !F.O(!dCCrC >e,i Oqi ovf,o E (6i o 6 o do E-

;l o-q cl Er& b0 t. pa o !o oE o>c x 3 6 oio t do E o ELq >Gd cp >d,,i f6 a p o0 o ^x 60! > 6Or!.d $q.i(!.i Eqr-!i\ E 'Oor,t P>.d, ov: o o c c 3i Luo>E c o i!>o.0 f do.i+! c o F'i E i!rl iopi o 6 (,\ o e <) r t boc i o o c 'JEpon: ttacaa4 oo co j > io!io! o C o ">o @ o o o >< i i !t o i i 6 c r! q 4 E E Lrc.or r.o cl- o! !o oo cil @ oeOii.c{r '!dio0 -o 6 6 4:9:S Ei!\c !.:rc rrrJ Fl *:::-9?C t P!!o0 lJ >6O :l ^::-: o, o E.J i- ooeriod:!> !l urccodEo.6i ,EC!!aoc F@::O!r'i4q!ood

c\iotE4.di 0Joocrts]o.i4: "6es4.ioc: o O !0 qr

(! d dl o > I oiof,lopooE rpi'rltiiro o! ct6 4 c 6 c . (tOrel ! od.d , orltrEt'a 4LO(!t60Cd.o! > o,o L'lo E 6: o !

i>, o c dD r > . loo oEo6- " c €..4r o- E d J >- (J E OOd 1:r c oco>..c6 - o.r- .roc I !3C q M-Co !>O= - EOOb0@rpo-od€ qc-.-<, .ooor ooJo> !4 c do ! o ,oolc dl :.d Er! @t o cu>->c o o oo.!ccod!ooot !t o0r'a(!€o6-oqqE o.co qr -dJoocro ct -rap o oJE -b0> oot4r o c qt o-LL.o ooHog6r El >- 6 0 6 t o o c o-o o o E a o c -t o,Jooto!>ood o ,o- dood>!o> iisro t a-rq, .oLo-r.do - ol ! €ro .or(06d o-ooo r.ocEe_c- I oo>c o o.r.or dJd cliS-oat ,Ja x { o d > rr d o - o o < r. a ,i Sl ! - o Et E>OOOdoOC!6t EO Jo €>oc,E> oo Et{oroLoDEor c0.>6co>,4-cool ot cLoooorr4>oo6 c c c .n o d o o d o c o c o 6 ol < ootlG*$(!lo to <{ (! o.d e-C o|!o<1Jdo-

154 iit 6 i .d< b0! o o @! o >o > i,rJ."o q.c o3(!n (0 r.c o n o ool o c o o o e -o-! lL aL. EJUO@!Cro0 o (! 0 o-0., ! c J I -a 15() .coi riop< >c0 p>o oo!r:oo! c!o6rorr c < oEaJ t-- r ! -cn-d J- n) .5 oc-F !ooo06o-4-' art ot . -c cl -! e o . .-r5 EoE !E o 1-< o{ oo(!oEqrc, oO- o 1!.- !t L! !ocoq/o -!lccn3cc Fl LlEirdco.L L Po}

h c r, p! 6!! b0 t ! o qi c o ; n. (j i ! f !l r, o 6 bg ooor oooEf o> .!> " '.cdocp ^c o>loL- ooi -i" $c o s-.) ,i!-oo9 c-ro! oD -:'roc-:> 4l ocloooc c3o(iLf o ot L o o o o- ql a: Jo E-oe! -.do )tJc-!oq-o., ooE.a -r (!l co!codoo crxocr.cicJ o.roocc ol olor oLoo. it rooooo!(! oococo ?itcJ.rJc !t k it q - . I o! E o > r o -c alt))L c6do d- r.o.-aeaalc o 3>sLcldc c!ocr-ocro 3{(!J r&coo.doo- Lt(Jo-ooa-o!

D00 C ^ t> O 6d o ,c "c i !p ! .0 ! rao 5.orr d co!.f.coooo --oooJqco tdr o.o -c!i>o€ o o d! 6 >: !. c -DA CaE4 4r€oEo-ic orJ!O(!EC o qrod! >ii o!0!rri.oic! ,oi.i o.o o >x o! 4 OACa -O-o r{rr}!C!oO i Ei ' q O .cDCOC. t COrrC oc i/rco 6i -o{rod4di . i c oi o rlo ooorrc>oo>6 i>d>oo o !3:!!: '4rJ6COOEoi!Oip oEooodo 'c {i u {) t lr d oqr >f. =,oo>oPi o.o o El o

155 2L.\a) BIqOMMENDEDD]SINFECTA}ITS AND DRUGS.

21.(a]1. l,]outh,.Patate Infectlons anctFungus Lugors Iodlne. spfay on with plastlc aarden spray or Chloranphenlcot 5% gentlan vlote! aerosol. 21.(a)2. llounds on Adult Animal.s coop6iE-T

21. ( a) 4. -E6Ti6GEwderCoccidiosis ESB' ( ciba-ceisy ) contains 30% sutpha_ chloropyrazine. Dose 1,5 A/kg with food x 3 days, or nrr.x rn warer as per instructions. 21(a)s Vi raI Hepatltls Enterl tls Di afhoea, Respiraro

Te.ranycln SoIubIe powoer (pfize. contalns oxytetracycfine hydro-chtoride 55 mglg. Mix powder with food 500 figlkg x S days or mix 1n wate. as oe. dl.ections. 21.(aJ6. V1lanin Deficrencles Abldec drops {Parke-Davlst contalns viranins AsOOOlu, D,4OOOlu, 81, 1ng, 82, A,4 ng,86, 0,5 mg, nicotinamlde s ms, asco.bic acld 5c mtlmt. Use a; direc ted. 21(a)7. Oprhalmla , Eye Infectlons/ ch I o ran-FE;i1i;r754-itE--E;;ii an v r o I e ! - a e ro s o 1 s p r a v (CAPS) o. Chtoranide ohtnent (contalning 5% chl o.anEEenlc 01 , 15% sutphacetamld and 15OO iu vitajnln Ag. Use dally. 2] (a)8, Skin(Fungal) tnfecrions ee roi6T-c n i6i6iIEifEE r-lee n-t1an v iore c spray. Dlslnrect pon.t water wlth potassium per.nanganate 10 p.p.n. or Chlori.ne at 4 p.p.m. 9! Coppe; Sutphate aT-10 p. p. dr.

2? ACKNOTI/LEDGEIIENTS

My partlclpatlon at the loth Wo.king Meeting of lhe IUCN/SSCCrocodlle Speciatlst croup, and the presentatlon of this paper, {ou1d not have beeo possible wrthout the very gene.ous flnanclal support of Mr. and r4rs. H.R. and L. Fletz of Kusnacnt, iurlcn SlrlEzertand. or, of my olo frienct ancl colleague. Mr. R6ne Honegger, of Zoo Zurich, Swltzer.tand, who

156 helped to oake the trlp posslbte. Once-aga1n I anl also g.eatty tndebted to prof. Wayne and Sherry Klng and fafl1ly, tor lnerr ,rarm hospltallty wh1lst tn Cainesvitte, Ftoricia. Finalty, I an as a.lways deeply indebted to my wife E1sa. fo;' preparatlon of d1a8rans, for Eyplng my pape. ror rnls paesentatlon as wel] as for hea continued support ard encouragemen! in a1t avenues of my work.

LITERATURECITTD.

Blake, D.K. 1974. The rearing of crocodites fo. commerciat and conservation purposes in Rhodesia, Rhodesia Science News B:315_3A4. Coulson, R.A. and T, Hernanclez!9e3. A_tIigato. Metabol.isn: Studies on Chenicat Reactions IN VM Perga,nnronpress, Oxford England. 182 p. Foggin, Christopher M. 1997, Diseases and Disease Control on Crocodile Farns in Zinbabwe (p.351_ 152 lN: WllclIif- yanagemen!: :rocoor:es and ArrrEarofs. Ediced by c.J.l'J. webb, 5.c. Manotis and P.J. whilenead. Surrey Beally and s"." i;t. un.rpp!ng. No.ton, N.S.W. Auscralla. (.v. 5:Zp. F:iedIano. Ricnard H. I986. o. I5-20 A cev_ew )t olsease in youna NiIe crocodlles, c.?codvlus 3i19I19us. nearecr i:r Eensrvery in Leb-6;;;:'.Iii- ^wena uardens c.ocod!-e workshop: Sun C!ry. Eophutatswana. 4a p. Hunt. R. Howard 19e0. pfopagatlon of More.Le!s rrocool-re (p. 161_165r IN Reproduc!1ve Bto.Iogy and Drseases of Capcive Reprrles. Edlced by Janes 6. Mlr.phy and Joseph T. Co]lins. SSAR Hnrnred by Meserau.lI prlntlnS Inc . Ldwrence, Kansas, U.S -A. Joanen, T. a.rld L. McNease 1979. Cutture of the Ane.lca.rr A11lgato.. Internationa.t Zoo yearbook. Vo]. 19. p. 62-66. 1987. Al ligator Farning u.s.A.{p: jra_3;;;';fi ulrotlreI9::?a* in-GniclanE. Management: Caococtiles anci AIIlgaro.s, Edlted by C.J.W. !/ebb, S.C. Majlolis and 5;i;"Ill l'i3ii;.l"i::t":"ii::.:,::t";,il,;,!Il . Lance,-V., T. Joanen a.rldL. McNease.I9a3. iiiSllT;Iilfltl"';,ill"::::: tne :iiT;:::.:."J::""-- .epioductlve cyc1e. can. J, zool .- at t n aq - st- *"N.?::: L: and T, Joanen (1981. Nutrlllon of At.rtgators. proc. AlIlgator procl. conf. {Lralnesvltte. Ftorlda) 31: 36 _ 40.

151 Pooley, A.C. 19a2. the Ecotogy of the Nite Crocodite 9I9S-93I-l-g:--E-+-9-91s!E in zulut ancl. unpub] I shecl MSc Inesrsr universlty of Natal, p1e!ernarltzburg, South Afrlca. p.333 Reichenbach-Kl inke , H. and E. Elkan 1965. The p.1nc1pal dlseases of tower verteb.ates. Acaclenic Press. London & New york. Va']'lder Reit, M.R. The Economicsof Crocodite Farming/Ranching . (p. 133 _ 137) IN: proc. SADCC workshop on Management and Utitlsation of Crocodiles ln the SADCCRegion of Atrica. Karlba Zimbabwe. IJne r987. p. I9a. Verseput, Mark 1986, Antibiotic Therapy in Crocodiles (23-24) IN Kjrenaca.dens Crocodile Workshop, Sun City, Bophutaiswana. !8 p, 1946. The proper Cottectlon of Laboracory Speciners. . p.25 IN: KwenaCa.oens Lrocoorle wo.kshop, SJn Clrv. BoDnucdEs\aar1a.agD. Wal.lach, J.D., C. iloesste ancl J. Bennett 1967. steatitis in captlve crocodjlians. J.Am.vet.Assn. 153(7)p.845-847-

158 Flies ente. through noles under c i rcu1a. Funnel a_llowi.ng 11d flies access only to pi.t Doorway of 15cm dianeter through which offal is dropped. Rubber flap is used to Fibre glass, seal it. rubber dome.

Ground

30cn

1Ocm

2m i I J

159 lltll'lhl 4qq lllllll

L .iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:.i:.:.i:.:.:.:.:.iii:. e.- q- o- :.:.:.:.:.:':.iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:.iiiii:.e:

smooth cemented fLoor

Figure 2, Single-Unlt CementRearins Pond (P1an View)

Pensizegx6m (540 sq.) Pool slze 7 x4n (28o sq.) Inclined 45 cn wide smoothly plastered ledge. Pool depth of 50 crn to halfway up the ledge. Shade of .eed screens o. 7096Z.een shade cloth supported on a frame x 75 cm off the floor. ow = ove.flow weir, so tha! oil. or grease can be flushed off the su.face water via the drain Dioe to whlch 1t Ls connected undeag.ound. Vlnd screed of reeds x 2 m in height. Stocklng denslty = 1OO hatchlinas to the aAe of 1year. Perinrete. fenclng of L cm dianeter wire netting, .eeds o. potes. Note that co.ne.s have been el.iminated to prevent p1l1ng.

160 5

161 Lo.)Eo

o o @ oo b0

I >a o

ogc N O >! .c

o

ccrr>

oocoo B O. OE rl NJti!ic)

lr I

162 -*_S..5'-. An. example of a rearina pono made Iron bush po.Les, with a nuci ponu dno suostfate. NoEe chat there is no ctry, oasklng area for the crocodj,.Les, ano no snacre _provlded. The wet, nudcly condltions aie ideal fo. a bullct up of bacLerla. rnere.ls a hlgh tncldence of dlsease ano mortallCy ln ponds of thrs cype. :l ^:l , : 02 .- 61 "5 .. ni eE F i & ot :1 0 | -: ut 6 o E o o !r o! oJ - cl : - - o--E c < arl^- € t (! E -c(rDr rJ. Ei ! E^O o Oo0 l) arl E la a EE >-!,! o-c o Lr 6 (6 ol 6 E ocoroa o! c>noc tc, l<.q! o.o>qo - !l to4 o J. a!ocr< /ro!! troo o . ! c oo o o o cl x, o E , o e o E o o fl E Eo I c o c .dd c o r, o d q ( o , c o ll Ecoh0 a ala- o -o-{Joor ot .o'.o o .0 o N o o. ! o o o o E > o o 4 o > L !l -16roor - tofc o!.dl__o ot tnoo-b06 ra>4 cf Jeo oooL-\ ft ! - o E I o E 9! @ | ot I ir@ ! .l o ! L ot oN cr o 3 E 36 | ! o0 I Nr o e o @ 00o o c 9l :d o 9 . c-!) 2 - rt ! o bq cc c :t l) 0 0 g > (&l o. o, 0" o. o Lci o< o o

<- 8m --> t

r ,t

til a; o0> :o c()b0oeero ; oooqro o r-o.)a E

>o- e o -

eN o xi E

otc E a0 116 rt :ll o t- d!! il!o> t o(0 r.tc,)66 <2=

U OT

165

rr./ORKPI-AN FOR CRoCDILIAN mANACEmENIIN ORISSA, INDIA DURING 1990-1995

1)a R. L. RATH., L. A. K. SINGH- ANDS. KAR- lChi.f ,lildlif" 'Jrard6n,Crissa' 315-Khdrabel,a Naga!, Ehuban6soat orlssa' India-751 001. 'Regsarch off 1c.s (ull,ldlifa), striilipal Ti96r R6s€rv6, Khai.!i-f,ashlpur' 0!issa' India-757091. 'Research off i.ca! (utldri?e), a/o ch j.ef Ji.Idltfe i'Ja!den, cri,ssa, 315-Kharab€Ia Naga!, thubanesu,q!' 0!issa, lndia-751 001.

A ' 5T R A CT

In purguanq6 to th6 bload guidelinas of a flational Action Plao, th6 p!6sent urolk plan for th6 etat€ of Orissa h!.ghlights thg pr iollt i6 s.

I iTTR OD UCT ION

Th6 crocodilian nanagam€ntploglafine ln lndia uas la unched fi!st in tha stat6 of orLgsa uhele aLl th€ thlea native sp€cieg sti.Ll accullsd ln th€i.r natural habitats i,n 1974. The three species ar€. th€ chariat (!3gb!Ll qanqaticug)' the mugger GC""€-94-C9-tr-l!g!.Ilg) and the €stuaaino crocod1.1€ (St.""d"ltC -pry). Th6 habltats uhich !re!e ldentif ied f o! the oanagaDent ol ghaslal qr€86Ln the rive! mahanadi and fo! tha Estualln€ srocodlLe {r€!e in tho astuar199 of rlve!9 Blahnani and Eaita!ani. The EgsosiatEd ganctta!les qr€re the Satkoshia Gor96 Sanctualy (?95 eq.kd.) and th€ Bhitallanlka Sanctuary (672 sq.kn.)' !99p6ctively. Iiluggetsursae knoun to occur in several places but E gyst€tDatis statuc gurvey uas not conduqted. Th€ Hadgalh Sanqtuary (1 91 sq.kn.) ovqa trj.butary of liver Baitalani oas id€ntj,figd to folrl the major as€a fos nugg33s. In du€ coulss the Sioitipal Tlge! Res€rv€ (2?50 sq.km.) oith its pelennial riv6r sygtBns has eosrEed as the,Dain muggg! area ln th€ stat€'

t6 The conservatlon approach uas to mininise losses of egEE and hatchlinqs and rehabilltate juvenil6 crocodiliana ln th€ proteqted identifis d areas (Bustald, H. R. !! F.A.O., 19?S). Th6 captl,vE rga!ing uoits !r€!o locatgd at Tikarpada, Dangnal and Ramatlrtha fo! the gha!ia1, Egtuarin6 e!ocod119 and nuggE!, respectlv6ly.. Froo 19el the unit at Tikalpada hae elso b€con6 a nugg€a-p lod uclng qnit. From 1976 captive breeding ploglamme fot all th€ tht:e€ gpecies ur6re lauochgd in phased nlanne!at the Nandankamn Biological, Palk.

S IT UATIOII - (n,lERVlE|l'

1. prqtectlon of remaining popqlation and habitat! ThE ini,tlaI populations of diff€sent elocodill.ans in osl9so uretlEi (Singh' Kar and Choudhusy' 1986) Specie g Y 6a! Locatl.on Adult(IrlrF) Suvenila Total Ghar iaI 19?5 Gahanadi. A (222) mug9Et 'l 975 filahanadl 1 ?? 1979 Sirll1pal v ilt uall,y ax-tinct . Est.Croc. 1977 Bh. Kanika 34 64 98

The statets Uildlife (protection) RuIB, 19?4 ls enacted in llne !,ilh the plovisione of ths !ifdlife (psotectj.on) Aci., 1972 of the Govgrnlleot of Iodla. Th€leforB, all thrE€ gpeci€s ale t8eat€d E9 SchedulE-I gpeslEs. gr€ation of the spEcial clocodlliao sanctuqlies aod the launching of the coneeavation gsheme96n€aat9d gseatsr auaren€3s and bett€! Plotection tg al'L th6 Ep€cles. The b€et prot€ctgd ep€clEs and habi.tlt ErE th6 nuggels in Simtllpal u,herr! 'ptoject Tige!r ls ln opetation. ThE lstuE!1n6 cloqodilee ale uEll protEcted in Bhltatkanika but uith off 6nd on hqdan-based conflicts. Both :1nillpal and thitarkanlka are Danaged?o! f ltEl elgvation floo thg status of aanctuariee to natj.onal paake. That shal'1 vilt!ally €liminats nan-croqodi,l€ confliqt flom th€ linits of thEse protBsted alea9. tn ths Satkoehla Golge sanctuary and tho adjoinlng !lver filahanadi gharlals havs ne oote baeo klllsd and the habltat plsssur€s hav€ been legulatsd. rcj 2. REbuilding natural populations: l]Jild-laid eggs u,e!e collectsd and incubated in hatchery 3Et-up9, th€ yourE clocodirians ue!6 leared in sLmulated '1 natural qondltigns and urhon attendEd a LEngth of about .2o (reduced to 60c.nfor mugg6s)thgse u,Ere 36habllitatad in thg ideniifle d plot€ct6d aleaE. The follou,ing I'nformation le an updato of Kat (1 989). ReL€asB of vounq g Sp€qies Egg-so urc Young-sourcE Place nO3.

Gha rlal Gandak T ika!pada ' R. mahanad i Ql0- (Btha!) , Kate!niy a- Naravani- shat(U.P.)' Kali(Nepal),. N.kanan. trhaobaI(t{.P.)' Captiv6- bre6ding at Nandankanan.

ll|ugg 6! TaniLnadu, T amilnadu, R.inahanadi f53 Capt1ve- N. kanant R.Budhabafanga 99 breBding s at Raoat irt ha ' R.,Jest O9o 72 N.kananr Rana- T ikarpa da. R. Khairi 67 t lltha ' Total 591 T lkatp ada.

gtgrng Est.croc. Bhitalkanika, Dangnal Riv€! sy CaP t lvE- in 'l breedLng at Bhlta!kanita ,050 N.kanan.

pgrlodic dtooltorlng of the tEIEasEd c!ocodillans hav€ b€6n qaslied out i.n mahanadiand Bhitalianika' Regular rDonitoriig of ths ouggets is cartied out ln Similipal (Sagar and Singh, 1990). Duri'ng 1988 Janualy 25 gha!1413 !Bspective and 433 sstua!in€ clocodil6e u,ers countEd in theii of 4o5ff refeased habitate. Th€se lndieato a sightlng success fos muggesin and Ao,A{t reeP€ctlv€Ly. The slghtit€ lat€e throqgh 51ol1ipa1 havg langEd tton 12.1$ ln !'Budhabalanqa to fihlch 34.7$ Ln s.ul€et D€o to 71.6{ ln E Khalri accolding 1990 !6eort e.

168 The ptasent Btock of sleqodllians in captlvlty are aa follolre: -@!.ie.s Gharla f lll!aqer Est.Crocodil.e N.kanan ' E .18 T i karpada 12 89 Dangoal Ramatlrtha 109 Total n9, l3>

B! eeding feiBleg 10 ma16g

Th€ EtatE of Orlssa no no!€ obtaios its Eupply of 6993 or young crocodlllans f!ot! outsid€. Captlvg bresdit€ haa besn Dalntaln6d at a nodsEt leval kaeping 1n Pace urlth the releEse lEquitemEnts. search for addltl'onaI elt63 for r61€ase of gharial and rnugger1s maintained. Th6 stater hourBvs!' do not have any oth€r si,te fo! the leleas€ of estuarine clocodile beqause o? thB very gpeqiflc nanglove habitEt lgqutlisment by the 90eci69. Ths Bhita!kanika sanctualy i3 plopoggd to be sxtended flom th€ BlahdE nl-B eitaran i astuaties to th€ mahatEdl e|stuasi69 urhels an arsa of manglovEhablta! 13 belng dEclased a9 the Batlghas Sanctuasy. Th€ 6ddition r8ayoffer scops fo! the grouth of the existlng Population in Bhitaskanila' l,lalqraf bro€ding ot ghaslal reeuFed in 1984 aftB! a lapsg qf ov€! t€n yEarg in llvgr lbhanadl. Sighting of younE nugg€ag in Sioilipal and lttrahanadiindicatE thai th€ species have !esettl€d in thEs€ habitats. N€eting incidence in Bhita!kanika have incseag€d ovEa the y€alg flon 91x nests a ysal t'o ovB! qrocodil€ tqn n€ets and thg populatlon of the egtuatine have gtopped' lBqovErEd ur91I. Coll6ction of urlld-laid eggs havE been for alf gp€siE9.

t69 The sightlng sllccassgs havB been palticulalrly Lo!, for gharj.al (4.5ia) and nugger in r.Budhabalanqa (1 2.1tr). rhe situation for gharial is r0or6 complex, thE sanctuary incLudes only about 30kn of thE rive!, the streiches of the liv€r urhj.ch can folm good juveFli.l,ezoneg a!. outgide the linitg of the prEsent ganctuaty, the ganctuaty 6xpeaienc6e dLstqtbances due to navigation by large eouitty boats End fishing, and fishing actlvlties in€luding rivei-bank-canpiog ate mgrg outgid6 th9 sanctualy thug prohibittiog any fulthar extension of the timlts of th€ €xigting sanctualy. After declalation of the Banctuaty in 19?5 detlimBntal fishing practicEs lrese stopped and othe, f olrns of trad.l.tional, fishing fo! livalihood uJast:egulat6d. BEnboo rEfting thforjgh th6 ganctuary uras sonsidered nogt dEtrlmental and havB b€6n stopped. lnsp1t€ of the best possible positive 6ffolts, gharial rehabilitation in |ltahanadl, i.n thig pa!t' i.e., th€ palt dournstleamof Hllakud Reservo].r have rBsulted urith only LiDitBd guccssg. The futule of gharial re0|ains to be expe!idented in the upst!€an oi Hirakud and in ths Brahmani riv€!. Ths manag€o€ntof Sj.nil,1pa.1,have com6 to a decj,eion to rEk€ a 1a9t release of 15 muggers in r.Budhabalanga in thE iourlgm zone. Rslease o? rnuggerin th€ Satkoshia Gorg6 Ssnctuary cannot bE continu6d fulthe! b€eaus6 the rEl6aged ouggEre h6ve sEttled urell in an otheluisely desi.gnatEdghalial sanet(Fry. Inspits of the pressnt regulatj.on of captive braedl,ng p! ogaafilt|s th€re i9 a standing pot€ntlallty of ploducing 10U llv6 yearlinge every year. The futu!E !6quir6- m€nt fo! the specLesr therefotB, is to locate alternate ref€ass gitEs o! avenues fot channeling aoay the captive br€Eding paoducts.

fn Theegtrpline elocodils do not cleats a problem of .plentyr in captivity because r!i.ld-1aid eggs arE oot sollEqt€d and captlve brsedir€ lesults hav€ not been encouraging b€causg 'l of the u,ant of i|al€ crocodll€s (Ka!, 989). 0n the qontrary' the probl€o af rplaniy' ln natur€ l,e often hlghlighted in the DresE b6cau9€ of tnul.gance csocodllesr appeallng n6a! villages outgld€ th6 sanctualy. Th19 has resultgd Ln sq€nes ln tho State Assenbly. Ths follouing ll.st shou,stha type of clocodilE neursin thB Local Ianguage n€lrs papg!s. ThE List for th€ oeliod concelned, L.€., DEcembe!1987 to Julv 1989' ie only guggestLve and not co|nplgte because ule have not mad6 a gystedtatic sulvqy of all the focal n€os paPEle.

DatE Neuispaoet l_Vlg_g!,_ r'9'! s DEc.21'87 Prejata nt !a hurnan-ki11 P!ajata ntla hunEn and cattl€ kills Aug.'l8' 88 Prajatant!a cattle ki1ls: s!oc nenacE Aug.24r88 Prajata nt !a sevBn human kilts end sevelal cattle klILs...urhy comme!ciel' fa!ming not tak6n up as snvigaged in oligirBl plan...Rs.4.35 clores spent since 1975 s6p.01 '88 Prajatant!a in 3-monthg sevelal huflan kills and 4-pails cattl€ ki1le...pEople to levolt if nuisanqe qroc not klll€d sEp.18'88 P!ajatantra c toc-menacB sep.29 t eg Sambad h uiE n-k j.l.L (? ish erman ) oct.ul | 88 P!ajata ntla in one y6a!. 15 human-ki11s and sevEral catt16 -k j,lIs ganbad authoriti,Es "!,o!!iedD because of too many qro cod i16 s.

ThE situatlon u,ith !egpect to th€ estua!ine €!ocodilE uaslant9 continqa!ion of astivE 'rabiiat manaEail€ntand attendanqe at nuisa nce crocodiLe 9Pots.

t7l MANAGEMENTPR IOR TT TEs

. Ghalia I (!4blis.S-e.!g-4&,C.9)t -g]Li.g!ji!.g 1. Inlplov€ nranagenent of the Satkoshia Golge Sanctua!y fo! qontLnuad b!egding and eulviva1 of gharial ln mabanadidounst!eam Hirakud Reservo ir. Action 1 .1 . Supgoat th€ p!6s€nt psoposal und€! rPloiEct Elephant Schgoer to promote the sanctualy as an El,epha nt !69etve. This uri.ll snsur6 inplovsd contloL and dEnag6nent of the liv€rins h6b itat. [email protected] 1.2. Commsnca!esealch to highlight the gigniflcant o6tl'and 6cosystam in the Sat koshia Gorge t!ans-Iahanadi. g9i-e,!.ic,e2. REstose the o!191n61 d Lst! I b tlt ion patt 9rn. Action 2.1 . As a t6sealch project !e16ass and monito! ghari.al ln th€ mouth of Daodhara nallah in HIlakud Reselvoi! uith necessaly habitat inp!ov€Bent. of !.B!ah$ani to locatg E!!g! 2.2. Conduct eurvey possible release srt E9. -g}j.4.s 3. Promote captive bleeding at Tikarpada' .&,3.i99-3.1. Allange an adult rla16 thasial" a .&,9.19.!3 .2. Take uP caPtivE blsedlng as rese6!9h p!qjEct to highligbt holDonal Ievels' ei.gnifiqance of vita.nin-E th6!apy and imoloved saptive blg€ding !esults' !6s€alch ploglaome in Nan'lankanan -49.3g! 3.3. fnitiate ae in Act ion 3'2' gharial ThsrEfore, backed by 3tlong lesealch inputs llverg leleasEs shall contlnu8 in f'lahanadiand othar suitable at by obtai,ntnq rEleaseable gtocks from captlv€ brseding Nandankanan and T lkalpada.

{D 2. musser(gg!v 1uoEl5jrig): rgene -q!,j-ec!!xg1. l|]aintain pool lesetvesr in thE !,il,d in at Least three placEs. Action 1 .1 . Sj.tnilipal Tig€! R6s6rve: -peliodicaJ.l,y moni,to! the status of the rshabiLj.tatEd populati.ong in riv6 rs Khaiiir UJsstoeo and Budhaba]anga. -R€l,eas6 upto 15 ou€gs!s Ln !.Budhabala- nga . .&!.!9.n1.2. SatkoEhia colge Sanctuary (trtahanadi) r -monito! the statrjg of th6 generated populatl.on. Action 1 .3. Conduct survey in Koraput and ralease Juveni.lBe in sui.table r€eervoi!s, back6d !,,j.th a syst6matlc fionito!1ng p!og!a$ftEt. 34act iv.g 2. Jmptove on th6 !esul,ts of captiv6 b!eeding.

Initiat€ !esearch plog!amm6 simi]ar to Actione 3.2. and J,3. (Gharial), at Ranratiltha, jandankanqn a nd Tikalpada. fioni.torj.ng of !6habiLj.ta!€d popul,ations Lrj.iLLassume significanc€. This uil,L be adjuncted urith !6habiLitation in Kolapu! and lesealch plogramme fo! better results flon captive brg6ding.

3. Estua!ln€ cloqadile (Srcggjy.lCg porosus): Objectiv6 1. Ioprove th6 level of ranageftent of Bhitarlanlka sanctualy for b6tt€! habltat !e storat ion. pursue the pl|opo€al to nanag6 Bhitarkanika as a Nati.onal Pa!k. !bJgctive 2. GEneratE a 9y9t6fi to better attgnd ih6 call€ lBlating to 'n(Jlsanc€ srocodilesr. Develop a lel€vant unlt und6! the manaq6m- Ent of th itar kan ika. Launch a canpaign on lgarni.ng to .Iive again urith s loc od ilgs r .

173 th€ estua!ine qsocodil,s, habitat managernent,public educat ion and ggneratlng publ,ic aupport shall assurD€ irnpolta nce.

UORK SCHEDULES

Th€ uroskplan ln ths above lnclude th!e6 broad aspectst (i) habttat nErnag€ment,(ii) research for monitoring and coptive breedingr and (tii) handling InuisancB crocodiler call€. A11 th€ge aspects Ele not neu but hav€ be€n oaintained at a lo!, key duling ths 1 980s. Any Effolt to qulcken th€ pac€ of progross of any of thes€ aspBcts shall lequlrg addltional I:egoulc€ in termg of nan po{,e! and finaoce. lvgn to take up !€96a!ch p!og!a8!mesflesh rBcluitments hav€ to bo made because the €xpellsnced lesealch pelsonnel of the statg ato nou, 6ngaged i.n lEsearch on broade! aspBcts of urildlifE managEmEnt, and a tim6ly lequisltioning of th€ir s€lvices ?or crocodilian qrqrk 19 olten a probfen. The!sfote, thE tj'ne echeduIBg indicated befou, depend largeLy on ultinate adrninistrative sanctj,on follolred by f i,nancial allocaticns.

Y-sc.r-gss&r .A.*.U@5&.L .4.@r-U!s.e-s e4er.l$.E' 1990 2nd,3rd Administratlv€ and fi.nancial approval of thB bload gcheme and th€ annual plan 1990-91 . 4th 19Sl 1st 1 .2.,2.2. 1 .3, ,2.1 . 4th 3.3.,3.2.

FTMNCIAL IMPL ICATIONS The aspect of lmplovements in habltat ttanagementie handl€d by the lrildlife uring o? th6 StatB in d phased fianne!' In p!inclple Govelnment of India have also suppolted the moveg of th6 state govslnment ln th936 rEgalds. A spgcific nantion is lsquisad fos the other ltsltls undEs the u,otk plan' Groes finanqtal rsqqitBments a!9 as foll'our9.

t14 1. SuEvey of n€tll habitats for tehab ilitat ion of gharlaL ano nugge! r Rs.30,000 2. monlto!iig of nEnaq€ d populatione o? croiod ilja ns r 7,00,000 7 a!ea9 fo! 5 g6asonE. 3. Exp6!l,tnontal !e1€ase and monitoling o? gharial in DEodhara ( per up Hirakud) 3 00, 000 '.jr , 4 . et la nd Bcoloqy atudv in Sat koehla Gorg- Sanciuary 1 , 20, 000 5. Captiv6 breed ing lDplov€nent s!Uo l€t3. 1 , 00,000 6. l.irri.ssancEc!ocodile cont!o1 J ' )U, UUIJ inc 1!d ing pubLic educati.on Total j.ng dur 1990-1 99S! Rs. 16 ,00,000

S U M MA R Y O!is9a have all th!6e specles of Indian crocodi.Lian6. Du!ing 19709 therE ur6rE € ghariaJ.er 9B estuarine crocodilsg and vely i.ou,populations of muggsr. By the beginnj.nq of 1990 1r050 estuallne clocodiles, 6tE gha!ials and F91) rrluggE3sh6y6 be6n !eleas€d Ln protect6d habitats. :oLLection of eSgs f!om natule hav6 been stopp€d and captive breedings have b6€n kept at a Loq, k6y. YBt, fig €stua!ine clocodils, tEC Shari.al and 21-6' mugger ar€ available aE captlvB stock. Sighting guccese ?qr rEl€asEd clocodiLians have langed from 4.5f, lou fo! ghali,al to 34.7-71.6f, for mugger. The !ate for thg estuaring erocodite i3 40.0F. Bload [!anagement p!io!i.ti€9 hav6 bean id€otl,fled: (i) irnproveoEnt Ln ths older of habl,tat marEgErnent, (il) survey of n6q, a€lEase sit€s for ghalia1 and mugge!, (iii) pBriodic trtgaitoring of sel€a5ed stqcodillans, (l,v)ExpErimenta] retease and monito!lng of 9harla1 i.n mahanadl upst!Ban Hirakud !Es€lvoir (v) str.rdy to highlight Satkoghia Golg€ Sanctuary as an rnpot:tant u,etLand sanctlary, (vt) study to improue captive bleedln€, (v1l) generate publlc suppors nea! Egtua!inE crocodiLe habl.tat throlgh publi,c 6duqatlon and handling Inulsance clocodil€9'. A financial requisementof RupeesSixteen Lakhs is Bnvisaaedfor aspeqts othg! than habltat managenEnt,

175 A C K N O 1! L E DG E M E NT S

Ue are glateful to th€ Forest Depaltmant, EovElnment of 0!1ssa fo! facl].ities. Srl S. R. Saga! (Fi6ld Di!Ector, SlmlLipal T19Br Reserve), Sri B. N. Nayak (dildlife UraloBn, Bhitarkanika Sanctuary), Sri S. K. f]1ishra (uJi.ldtit€ lltarden, Satkoshla Go!96 Sanctualy) and Sri S. K. pattnaik (Direc!or, Nandankdt|anBiological Park) have pt'ovided ael6vaot iofordta- tion for the prepalation of thi.s P1an. .ile arg thankful to th6m and th6i! field staff.

NLI LNLNLL> Busta!d, H. R. 1975. fndia - Gharial and Crocodile Conse!va!lon rfbnagementin driesa. Ini6rim R6polt. F.l,ttND/71/033, F. A.0. ' Rong. Xarr 5. 1989. CI'gcodile Conser'vatlon p!og!ammein 0ris9a: An Ov€!vielr. C.S.G. N€urslette!, vo1.B, Oct-D€c. 1969t16-18. Sagaa, 5. R. and L.A.X. Slngh. 1990. Rehabill,tatton of mugge! Crocodile in SimiLlpal Tige! R6selv€, 0rissa. ft6s. Singh' L.A.K.' 5. Ka! and B. C. Choudhury. 1986. Indiar Status of iIild C!ocodiles. Inr Crocod:Iss: Proceedings of th6 7th Uloskiog meeting of the CSC ol the 55C of the IUCN, Caracas-V€n€z uE fa 21-28 0ct. 1984. ILJCNpublication N6o s€rl,€s IsBN-88032-306-1: 355-361.

176

EFFECTSOF NEST A]ID ECC CHARACTERIST]CSON SIZE AND EARLY DEVEI,OPI.IENTO!, MERICAN ALIIGATORS

Dena M. Schulre and Robert H. Chabreck School of Foresrry, Wildlife, and Fisheries Louisiana Scare Universiry Agriculrural Cenrer Baton Rouge, Louisiana 7OBO3 USA

- Abstracr. The effecrs of incubacion tenperarure, egg wohune, and nescing habirat on tengrh, ,eighr, and or"i.".i."" ".* alligator (AL_llgator .nississ.ippiensts) naccntings and on lengrh and weight of 13-nonch-old alLigators was derer.nined. l"rean rncuoaElon renperarure differs by habirar and ,as highesr in 1ow narsh-nesrs and louesr in high narsh nests. Variables mosr highly cortelated with nean nest cemperarure we!e egg voLune, clurch anbienr rernperacure, and nes! voLume. {ean eqs volune of lewee nests uas la(ger chan chac of hiqh marsh lia 1." marsh "".." nests, suggesring rhar older, targei females selecEed levee nescing habirar. lengrh and weighr lrere posirivel]. related -Harchling to egg volu.ne and incubacion cenperalure. Egg wolurne and incubation renperacure,rere reLarect co nesaing habicai ana nest richin habirar. Alligaror size ac L3 monEhs;f ase differed bw nesE, suggescing chaE genecic fac:ors also influence grow:h i:l alligarors. Fenales 'ere produced fr.om eggs :n.ubacei at to, cenperatures and atpeared to be handicapped by a iarge amounr oi absorbed abdominal yotk thac hindered rheir nltiri:y"ano increased lheir r.ulnerabiliry ro predation

Several _ studies of tenperarure sex dererninarion (TDs) in repti.les revealed rhat incubarion lenperarule is ofren influenced by the nicrohabirac chosen as a nesr sice (Ferguson and Joanen 1982, L983; Webb and snirh 1984; Standora and Spocila 1985). SEudies . conducced by Ferguson and Joanen /to82. L98j -nd. Joanen ec al. (1987) cooprise rhe only published research on TSD in the Alleri.can alligator. Their experiDeors ,ere conducled in bra.ckish n.arsh; hosewer. addicional research is needed in orher areas. since alligarors occupy a warieEy of vectand habiEaEs (NeiI1 197I:197-205)

The . .. gbjectives of our scudy l'ere Eo invescigaEe nesring habitat of alligators in a freshrarer narsh and to aetermtne rhe effects of egg and nest characrerisrics on hacchline sex and gro!,,ch.

The aurhors are grareful ro personnel of rhe U. S. Fish and Itildlife Sereice and Lacasslne Land Conpany for assisrance provided.

tn STI,DY AREA DESCRIPTION

The study was conducted on Lacassine Pool, a freshwarer impoundment on Lacassine NationaL Wildlife Refuge tn sourhuestern Louisiana. The refuge consists of 12,869 ha of marsh a.nd warer bodies, and Lacassine Pool \ras cleated by enclosing 5,478 ha wirh a low levee. Dense, energenc stands of naidencane (Panicun henito/;,o'r), butLtonaue (sag iccar ia latc if o lia) and spi.kerush (Eleocharis spp.) dominated che marshes. Large open ponds were present and contained undervater and floating plancs.

Avelage nonchly temperatures for the study period l'ere June (27.3 c), July (28.4 c), and Ausust (27.6 c). The 3o-year (1951-1980) average nonchly temperatures for rhese nonrhs l'ere June (26.7 c), July (27.8 C), and August (27.5 C) (USDC1985). Average nonthly precipication for the study period {as June (17.0 crD\, JuIy rI0.2 cm), and August ,8.5 cm). The J0-\ear average nonthly precipicacion for the same nonths ras June (10.7 cn), July (15.2 cn), and August (13.s cn) (UsDc 1985).

I,Iithin and bordering the pool, 3 habitats on {hich alligacors couLd construcc their nests rele disringuished, i.e., 1evee, high marsh, and lov nalsh. Ile used the cerns high marsh and low marsh to desctibe dry marsh and \rer marsh, respectively. Ferguson and Joanen (1982, 1983) used the terrn "wec marsh" ro describe habiiac "where the base dnd central core ,egg caviEy, of cne nesE are al-\tays very moist". TFica11y, lol' marsh is rerier and noc fiffr fflounr) Thev I

METHODS

Six alligator nests were monitored and included 2 levee nests, 2 high narsh nests, and 2 low malsh nesrs. Tenperacures \tithin nests were r0easured si.ch onega Type T thermocoupLes and hand-heId diSital thermordeters (Onega 450 ATT Ehennocouple ?hennometer). Thts equipmenc utilized a copper - consranran altoy and had a. resolution of 0.5 C and of + 0.8 C nich + O.1t readings. Fichin each nest, 5 Ehermoco;ples ir'ere posicii;n.d around the eggs ac the follol,ing locacions: one was placed aE the bocEor0-centerof Ehe clurch: one ac lhe Eop-cenEerof Ehe clucch; ooe on the north side; one on che easc side; one on the south side; and one on che lrest side.

1?8 Tenperarures were nonicored in 12-hour shifcs, aLcernaEins frorr noon to midnighc and midnighE co noon shifEs wirh 2a hour; bedreen shifrs. Therefore, nests were nonirored 24 hours out of every 72-hou! period. Duling each 12-hour shift, incubation temperarures uere recorded three to six rines, and rre acrernDcedEo obEain at leasr one reading every a hours. The nesrs \rere nonitored ove! a period of approxinarely 60 days during incubatiol1.

Oo 14 August 1986 eggs \rere rernoved fron nest 3, beeause rhe yec udhatched young could be heard calling fron rhe nesr during the previous shifc. Eggs were lenoved fron the reoainins five nesEs on 15 Augusc. The egg cawicy was parriEioned wercicallv into quadrants corlesponding wirh norch, east, south. and wes!: each quadranr I'as divided horizonta|.y into an upper and tot e, layer. Thus, each egg caviry consisted of eisht secrions or units. The eggs of each uniE 'ere placed in J plasr-ic.mesh bae. and each bag was ragged to idenrify rhe s€ccion of rhe egg cawity. The bags wtth egss !'ere placed in 40-t nerat containers ;;d were cushioned pirh and eowered nest oacerial for transporrarion ro che la.boratory.

At the _ laborarory rhe lengch and ,idrh of egBs {ere neasured, ano cne eggs were relurned ro che necal conrainers, coveled lritt, i[or'st nesr marerial, placed in a tenperacure,conrrolLed roon, and held at 32 C until rhey harched. The vohr]le of each egg ,as calculated fron lengrh and widrh measuremencsusing lhe equarior for wolue of an ellipsoid (Jamesand Janes 1976:ij1).

Length (rip of snouc !o rip of EaiI) and,neighc of harchlings ,rere rneasured, and . - harchlings lrete indiwidually r3gged in che ir'ebbing of each hind foor wirh snall monel tags. afproxtnarery once each week during che hatchina period, young hacched rhe previous week were tlanspolted co a comnercial allisaror farn ano brooded untiL chey reached a size lhaE pernirced aciurare sexing, i.e., a total lengtb of approxinarely 63.5 cm (Joanen and McNeale 1978). [ost hacchlings had reached a size (53.5 cn) Ehac €.1loveo reliable sexing by Augus. 1987. On 20 November 1987 all alligators in rhis scudy vere weighed and measured, and individuaLs less chan 53.5 cm oere larer dissecred and sexed in the Iaboratorv-

Eqq Nurber and Size

Clutch size in rhe six nests varied fron..]2 !o +5 eEss (nean - 17.3r. {ean egg volue langed from 41.8 cm) qn - 26t iiom nesc 5 co 70 cm- (n - 14) from nesc 2. Mean etg volume differed anong

t79 nesring hsbirars (F - 459.22.,1+, 90 df; p < 0.0001). Mean egg voltule fron htgh marsh nesrs was snaller rhan mean egg volure fiom 1ou marsh nests, and m€an egg volume fron levee nesrs was larger than dealr egg volume fron either narsh nest. AddirionalLy, mean egg vorune differed anong individual nesrs by nesring habitars (F - 318.68; 4, 90 df; P < 0.0001). Mean egg wolune also differed amonAindlwidual nesEs (F - 346.31 2,90 df; P < 0.0001). The six nests contained 224 eEgs arLd.produced 141 (52.9*) healrhy hacchlings. UnforrunareLy, cags were losr fron 102 harchlings before sexing and final neasurements, and furcher idenrificarion ras not possible.

Tn.,'hrii^n Tanna..F,!ra

Mean incubation tenperarure differed by nesring habicar (F - 102.42; 2, 522 dft P < 0.0001). {ean incuba.ion tempelarure was highest for low marsh nesrs, inrerinediate for levee nescs, and lowest for high marsh nesrs. Mean incubarion cemperarure differed by nest (F - 9I.82; 5, 519 df; P < 0.0001). Highesr nean lenperacures were found in nesrs 3 and 2, resDecriveLv. rhile Iower temperacuresdere recoroed from nesrs., .. L. ano.. resPectively.

In one correlacion anaLysis rhe onty wariable highly correlated with nest renperarure by hour by nesr was cLurch size (0.56153). In anocher correLarion analysis lhe variabtes mosc highly cotrelated ,ich mean nesi: ienperaEure bw ies. aor i:,e entire incubation per:iod were egg volurie (0.9228;), c:urcrl si:e (0.82354) , mean ainbienr lemDeracure by nesc for lhe enrire incubation period (0.70614), and nesr voLl.l.1le(-0.50298). The .variables most highly correlared irith mean quadlanc rernperarure oy quadrant \rithin nest fo! Che entire incubarion period l'ere egg volune (0.91225), clurch size (0.80120), and meanarnbienr cemperature by nest for rhe entire incubation period (0.68264).

Size of Hatchlinss

I'lean length of hacchlings fron slx nescs ranged froro 21.5 cro (n - 23) froo nest 5 to 24.4 ctn (n - 20) from nesr 3. Mean hatchling weight ranged from 31.9 g (n - 23) fron nest 5 ro 55..] s (n - 20) fron nesc 3. Harchling lengrh was nosc srrongly correlated wirh harchling reight (0.70711), egg volume (0.67174), and mean nest temperacures during the enEire incubation period (0.65334). Interestingly, egg volune ras scrongly correLaced,ith mean rlesc tenperatures during the encire incubarion period (O.92287> and wi.rh hacehling $eighc (0.92245). HaEchLing weight 'tas also highly correlated l,rich &ean nesr rernperatules during rhe entlre incubacion period (0.86973).

1g) _- ,Yean hatchling lengrh differed among nesring habirars (F _ I55.39); 2, 98 df; P < 0.001). The longest hatctrlings were produced in 101' marsh nesrs rirh a mean incubarion ttrnperature of 32.5 C. Uediun-sized hacchlings w€re produced in levee nesrs wlrh an average renperarure of 32.I C. And rhe shortesc hatchlines were produced in high earsh nesrs rrrith a mean lncubacion ter0perature of 30.7 C. Addiriona1ly, nean length of hacchlinas differed anong nesrs eirhin nesrirg habirats (i - t2.5a;3, 9i'df; P < 0.0001) and quadranrs wtrhin rests by nesring habicar (F - 2.79|' 40, 98 df; p < 0.OOOr). l,reanharching len;rh diffeled slightly anong incubarion renperarures (F - 5.31: l. 137 df: p - 0.0227), but lhe grearest difference lras among nesrs of origin (F - 47.45) 5, 137 df; p < 0.0001).

|{ean harchling 'reighr differed anong nesring habirars (F _ 199.14; 2, 97 df; P < 0.0001). Heaviesr hacchttnes were Droduced from Io!, marsh nesEs. medi.m-sized hacchlings from fe"ee nescs, and lightesr harchlings fron high marsh nesrs. Add.irionaltv. meaE l'eight, of_hatchlings differed aEong nescs wichin nescing hatica.cs - (F 34.56; 3, 97 df; p < 0.0001); however, nean hacchling veight did not differ anong quadranrs 'irhin nesrs by nesrins habitac: Meanhacchling veighc was also sLighcLv affecieo oy iicubacion tenperature (F - L44; 1, 136 df; p - 0.0072). buc was mosr affecced by the nesr of origin ( F - 8.23; 5, 136 df: p < 0.OOL)

Si"c at Ase 13 Monrhs

[ean length of juvenile alligacors fron ihe six ies:s a! L_] to 14 nonths of age ranged from 64.3 cn (n - 21) tront nesr 5 co - 94 1 cn (n 6) fron nesr 3. yaxinum juvenile lengrh ras 109.2 cm and ninimun juvenil.e lengrh ,nas 46.L cn. Mean iuw;nile weishr ranged. fron (n - 982.8 e 21) from nesr 5 Eo 2924.5 A t^ - 2;) fron ltest.2. lrlaxinun juvenile weight vas 4162.8 g and minimun juvenile weight was 453.5 g.

MeaD juvenile lengrh ar 13 ro 14 monrhs of age differed among nesting habitats (F - 48.52; 2, 45 d,f; p < O.00Ot). The lareesc individuals Fere produced fron Io!! marsh nescs and shorter individuals t'ere produced froro tewee and hiAh marsh nescs. respectively. Mean juvenile lengch also diifered amons indiwidual nesrs within nesting habitars .F - -.2-; 3, -5 df; p - O.OlOtl but nean juvenile lengrh did nor diffe! by quadranrs \riEhin nestin8 hablrars by nesc.

Mean juvenile I'eighr ar 13 to 14 nonths of age di.ffered anong nesting habitacs ( F - 35.51; 2, 45 d.ft p < 0.0001). The heaviesE individuals ',rere produced fron levee and low marsh nesrs, ,hite Iighter individuals were produced fron bish natsh nests. Mean juvenile veight also differed arnongindividual nesEs Lithin nescing habirats ( F - 4.11; 3, 45 d.fi p - 0.0115): but nean

181 juveniLe weight did noc differ significantly by quadrants rithin nesting habitats by nest.

lncubaEion Tenperacureand Sex of Al l igacors

The sex ratio of haEchling5 flon every nest i{as significancly different fron che expected 1:1. Hatchlings produced flom levee nesc I and the hlsh nsrsh nesEs 4 and 5 erere all fenales. The sex ratio for hacchlings produted floo levee nesc 2 was 11 nales: : feoale (8.31 fenales) (Chi- - 16.7, df - I, P - 0.005). Low narsh nesc 3 produced hatcblings ich sex ratio of 7 nales: 1 fenaLe (12.5t females) (chi- - 4.5, df - 1, P - 0.05). And 1o\,,'marsh nest 6 hatchtings had a sex ratio of I nale: r+ fenales (80.0t fenales) (chi- - 5.4, df - 1, P - 0.025). Moreover, the sex rario of all hatchlings ploduced fron the si>. nesrs conbined was 32 males: 55 fenaLes ,63.21 femaIes,. qnich !'as significantly differenc from rhe expected IrI ,Chi" - 5.08, df - I, P - 0.025

Characteristically, tenperarures of nale-producing quadranrs lrere < 30 C only up to 1.2! of rhe incubarion period. They ranged fron 30.1 C co 33.9 C from 8.r.2 ro 91.42 af Ehe incubarion period, and they trele > 34 C fron 2.5 ro 15.8r of che incubacion period. More importancly, for maLe-producing quadianrs, rhe r0eanpelcenr flequency (n - 15 quadrancs) of time spent incubacing lras 0.2r ar 3 30 C, ras 89.8$ at 30.1 C ro 33.9 c, and was 10.0t ac > 34 c.

Tcmnc /, r!! ra c ^F €an-r---/^i 'qq! -i- ] ||g 9ucL!al'l: 0.0 co 42.0t of the incubaEion period. They ranged fron 30.1 C ro 33.9 c flom 58.0 to 98.7t of the iine, and Ehey were > 34 C fron 0.0 Eo 10.51 of rhe rime. Moreover. for rhe female - Droducins quadranrs, Ehe oean percen! frequency , n - 28) of cinre spenc- incubating was 15.58 at < 30 C, 81.7c ar 30.1 C !o 33.9 C, and 1.01 at > 34 C. AIso, rhe nean incubarion remperarure of nesr quadrants with oales sere produced at an awerage incubarion teoperacure of 32.8 C, r'hile females uere produced ar an average incubation cempelacure of 37.2 C

DTSCUSSTON

Ess Number and Size

Levee nests contalned large! eggs than high narsh nests anc p€rhaps lon' darsh nesis, but too few eggs *ere measured in lo\t marsh nesrs to accuraEely ascertain Ehei.r size. WiEhin nesEing habiEaEs. egg volune of levee nesr 2 Eas greacer Ehan Ehar of levee nest 1. Fo! 1ol' narsh nests, data \rere collecced only fron nest 6, and no conparison coul,d be made of Chat habiEac. For dry narsh nests, egg volutre of nest 4 was larger than that of nest 5.

1& Anong individuaL nests, nesc 2 had rhe largesr egg volune, follol'ed by nests 1 and 6. Nescs 4 and 5 concained rhe smaltesc eccs.

Fersuson (1984) and Ferguson and Joanen (1983) reporred a relationship be&reen age of rhe fenale alligaror and clucch and egg size. They nored rhac young (< 15 years oId) females laid small clutches of snall eAgs, middle-aged (15-20 years) fenales laid large clutches of large eggs, and old (> 30 years) fenales laid snall clutches of very large eggs. Chabreck and Joanen (1979) reported a posiciwe size-age relarionship for Louisiana alligators. C1utch and egg size, therefoie, are indicacive of aee and size of the nesting female Sinilarly, Wilkinson (1985r53) reporced a positive reLationship betveen rhe aver:age egg size. clutch volune, and body length of femate alligarors in Sourh CaroIina.

Our findings indicate rhar a relarionship may exisc between nesting habitat and age and size of rhe nesrine fenales. OLder and larger fenales, i.e., fenates in peak repr;ducEive condicion, may be selecting levee habirar for nes.ing. Other sr,rdies (Joanen 1969, Deixz and Hines 1980, and lnilkinson 1985:49) reDorred thac lewees vere ofEen uEitized where avaitable: however, iarbonneau (1987:18) found no levee nescs in his srudy area, {hich incLuded 9.08 kro of levees ac Lacassine N\{R.

Several researchers in l,ouisiana o{cllhenny 1935:39, Joanen 1969, Carbonneau 1987:i8) ha.re docurTren.ed:he pror.inaL Loca.ion ot the nest Eo the fenale's den. Thus, ',nesi siie selecrion' is dependent upon the type of habiEar the fenale selects for her houre tange. Levees are generally associaced 'irh deep-varer canats on l,aeassine NUR, and large femares may be rhe only fenales rhar are abLe co survive in deep-\racer habirar. Snaller fenates lhar occupy chis habitat nsy soon be elininared. Large male altigacors are knor'n to inhabir deep-ware! canars (Joanen and McNease, 1972l, and Rootes (1989) reporEed thar large nales in canats ofcen consune other alligators as large as 2.1 n long. This {ouLd explair why snaller females are nor inhabiring deep-warer canats_ Canal habicac provj.des an abundance of prey but appears ro be under-uti.lized even by large fenaLes at Lacassine NI,IR. Faccors thac llay be liroicing rhe urilizarion of rhis habirac are che gteacer vuLnera.bility of alligarors ro harvest (Rooces 1989) and disturbance by large nale alligarors and hunans.

Size of Hacchlines

Hatchling length was affecced by nesring habirar, by nescs \rithin nesting habiCacs, and by quadla.ncs wirhin nests by nesring habiEats. AdditionalIy, harchling lengrh was slighcly affecced by incubation cenpe.alule bur was primarily affected by nesE of

183 origin. Hacchling l'eighr was also affected by nesring habirai and nests idithin n€stlng habttars, bur not by quadranrs pithin nescs by aesting habirats. Although, hatchling weighr was oore affecEed by incubation tenperarure rhan was hatchling lengrh, rhe nest of origin had rhe gleacesr affecr oo harchling weighc.

Hacchling lengrh and weighc dtffered among nesting habiracs. Lol' marsh nests produced rhe longesr, heaviest hatchlings; lewee nests produced hatchlings of incernediare lengrh and Feighr; and high narsh nests produced che shortesr, tighcesr harchli;gs. This relaclonshj.p nay reflect a correlaEion berlreen nean incubation cenperature anal nesti.ng habirar or nean egg voluoe and nestlng habitat. Inreresringly, egg vo1u,"0ewas srrongly corretared lrirn nean quadranr lemperarure and harchling veighr.

l,Iithin nests 1 and r. chere as no significanc difference irl hatchling lengch by quadtanr. Howewer, rhere were sisnificant differences in harchling lengch by quadranE in che reiainins - nesrs. No dtscernible relacionshLp or Erend was found becseen nean quadrant teoperature and hatchling length. Ferguson and Joanen (1982, 1983) teported thar wirhin 5 nests nonirored in rlLe fie1d, heawiesc harchLings 'ere obcained wirhin nesrs from low tedperatutes, while lightesr harchlings rere produced at high tenperatures. In our scudy, harchling .reighr did not differ significancly by quadrants !.irhin rhe nesEs.

For che four desrs rrirh sufficient egg dara (nests l, 2, 4, and 5), ha.chling 'eight ras oosiciwel.r corr:eiacec ,i:;1 egg woLume. The highesr mean incubarion remperaiure ,u".ii.a r.". the nest hawing the largest eggs, and che 1o6esr mean"". incubation cernperarure \ras recorded fron rhe nesc having ihe snalles. eggs. However, because of linired sanple si.ze,.rhe relaEionshiD fo;;d in our study beEween egg volune. incubaEio., ."rp".u.rrr". uni hatchling Beighr certainly I,arrancs furrher scuay.

Size at Aee 13 Monrhs

Mean lengrh and lreighr of juvenite alligarors a! L3 ro 14 months of age differed among nesring habitars and berreen nesrs wiEhin nescing habiracs, buc did noc differ anong quadranrs Firhin nests by nescing habitats.

Juvenile _ length by nest fol1o{ed rhe pactern of hacchling length and wetght. The longesr and heawiesr hacchlings subsequentl.y were the longesr and heaviesc juvenifes ar 13 co L4 months of age, lrhile rhe shortest and li.thcesr harchlings becane the shortest and lighcesr juveni.les.

Moreover, {ithin rhe group of nesrs (nescs 1, 2, and 5) rhat had idencicaL nean hatchllng lengchs (23.5 crD), ir is inreresrins

1B4 to note lhat rhe heaviesr harchling Sroup becane rhe lonSesr of the luvenile group, the group of nedlun weighc harchlings became incernediaEe in lengrh, aad rhe tighcesr harchling group becane the shortesr of rhe juveniles.

Incubalion TemDerature and Sex of A11i?ar6rs

The tenperacule rhar ploduced nales differed from Ehe tenpelature chat produced females. Males isere produced ar an average incubacion rempelacure of 32.8 C, and females were produced ac an average incubacion remperacureof 3L2 C.

Ferguson and Joanen (1982, 1983) reporred Ehar levee nescs (34 C) yielded L00t ma1es, high narsh nests produced borh males and females, and 1ow marsh nescs (30 c) produced alnosr all fenales. Tn out study, nales rere produced from rhe warBresr nests; ho\rever, the waxDest nesrs included firo lov narsh nesrs and one Levee nest. Alrhough the rwo levee nesrs ,ere sinilar in several respects (e.9. located on rhe same slope of the sane Ievee, sinilar in size, madeof lhe sane nesr mareiiaL. erc. ). incubation lenperarures of nesc I were consisrenEly lorer rhan those of nesr 2. One difference beEveenEhe Eironescs was ess wolurne.with nesE 2 havtng che largesr egg volune. rhis wouil support the idea chat embryonic meEabolic heac is a concriburing faccor of incubarion .enperaEule within nests. If lhe meEaboLi; heat of the enbryo was conrributing io the incubarion iemDerarure. ahen large eggs generaiing ihe most hear, and uLiimateiT larse fenales Iaving Iarge eeAs. ,ou;d produce nate haccnLires . fh s reLationship cerEainLy requires Errcher inves::garion.

In our study, rhe sex rario of hacchlines nas 63.23 fenates SimiLarly, Fergusonand Joanen (1982, 198J) ieported a sex racia ac hatching of l nale:5 fenales (83.3* fenales) in rheir srudy area. A sex ratio skewed tooalds fenales ar harchins I,ould be expecced in Ehe Anerican alligator. because male tracihl:nes apparent.ly are produced from egAs incubdEed ac a sm.lLer iange or nore stable tenperacures rhan females.

Int€restingly, lhe sex ratio of sub-adutr and adulr alligatols lras reported ro be skesed heavily ioEards mates (37s femaLes for alL size classes conbined; -.AfOl ac Lacassine trruR (Rootes 1989). This furcher supporls rhe" cheory by Schulce (1989) thac female hatchli gs conraio nuch absorbed yolk, are Less active, and are heavily predaced che firsc year afrer hacching; trhiLe male hacchlings are nore acrive and are becrer able ro

lAt I,ITERATUREC1TED

Carbonneau, D. A. 1987. Nesring ecology of al1 ArDerican alligaror population in a freshtracer coastal na.lsh. M.S. thesis, La. State Univ., Baron Rouge. 53 pp.

Chabreck, R. H. 1953. Merhods of capcuring, rnarking and sexing alLigacors. Pr6c. Sourheasr Assoc. catle and Fish Comn. I7 i41-54 .

Chabreck, R. H., and T. Joanen. 1979_ Clowrh rares of tunertcarL alligators in Louisiana. Herpetologica 35:5L-57.

Deirz, D. C., and T. C. Hines. 1980. Alligaror nesting in north-cencral Florida. Copeia 1980:249-258.

Felguson, tl. W. J. 1984. Craniofacial devetopnenr j-I, Alljgator l,ississ.ippi er1sis. S)rnposiumZool. Soc. LolLdor!52:223-2/3.

Ferguson, M. W. J., and T. Joanen. 1982. Tenperarure of egg incubation deternines sex in AlljgaEor n.issjssipprensts. Nature (London) 296:850-853

rJ. Ferguson, l.I. J., and T- Joanen. 1981. Temperarure - dependenr sex dererminarion in Alligatar fiississ_ippjensjs. J. Zoo1. (London) 200:143-177.

James, C. and R Janes. i9i5. Ialhenarics riic.:onarv. i]an \osLrand Reinhold Co :reu \oci<. ),o pp.

Joanen, T. 1969. Nesring ecology of aLligarors in Louisiana. Proc. Sourheast. Assoc. Cameand Fish Cbmm.23:141-151.

Joaneo, T., and L. McNease. 1972. A relenerric srudy of adulr oale alligaEors on Rockefeller Refuge. Louisiana. proc. Southeast. Assoc. Cane and Fish Comln.26:252-275.

Joanen, T., and L. McNease. 1978. The cloaca sexinE nerhod. fo! immacure alligacols. Proc. Sourheasr Assoc Fish and. LiitdL. Agencies 32:179-181.

Joanen, T., L. McNease,and !1. W. J. Ferguson. 1987. The effeccs of egg incubarlon on post-harchling growth of American alligacors. Pages 533-537 & e. J. rr. L1ebb.s. c. t4anolis. and P. J. Ithirehead, eds. rtildlife nanagemenc: crocodiLes and alligacors. Surrey BeaEcy and Sons pty Lirniler, Sydney.

McTllhenny. E. A. I9J5. The aIlLgacor,s Life hiscory. Christophe! Publ. House, Bosron. 117 pp.

186 Neil1, U. "1. L971. lhe lasr of rhe ruling reprilesr alligarors, crocodiles, and their kin. Columbia Univelsi!v press. Neu York. 485 DD-

Rootes, \,1. L. 1989. Behavior of Anerican allisacors in a freshwacer marsh. Ph.D. DissercaEion, Louisiana scace Univ Baton Rouge. 107 pp.

Schulte, D. M. 1989. The effecrs of habicac tenperatuxe-dependent sex determinaCion in the Anerlcan alligator. !{.S. rhesis, Louisiana Srare Univ. , Baton Rouge 150 DD.

Standora, E. A., and J. R. Sporila. 1985. Tenpetarure dependenc sex deterninacion in sea Eurrles. Copeia 1985:711-722.

U. S. Deparrnencof Commerce. I986. cltmarological data: Louisiana annual su.nnary. Nacl. Oceanic and Armos. dm., Asheville, N.c. vo1. 91, No. 13. 30 pp.

eoo. G. J. U., and A. M. A. Smich. 108.. Sey rrc o dnd surviworship in ihe AuscraLian fresh{ater clocodile Cracodylus jahnstoni. Synp. Zoo1. Soc. Lond. 52:3L9-355.

Wilkil1son, P. M. 1985. Nesting ecology of rhe American alligacor in coastal Souch Carolina. S.C. Mar. Resour. Depr. Srudy Completion Rep., Charlesron. 113 pp.

181

REHASILlTAT ION 0F fnUGGERCR0CL'DILE GB.oC.CpyLLE IN STiilILIPAL T IGER RIsERVE, ORISSA,J]\,ID IA

5. R. sAGARl AND LALAA. K. gIi.lcH2 1.'FieId -Research Directo!i ijff ic€ri at: SinilipaI T j.gB! Rese!v9,

Batipada' 0.issa, Jndla 757001.

SUMfiARY

CrocodvIq! gaLuq!!is uJe!€con6:dered tc be 6xtinct in the 'tlge! peaennial uratels of 5imilipal. Reserve by 19e0. The tertesi!ia1 and aquatiq habitats, encompassingan ar€a of 2750 sq km, are undsl active conservatLon manag€ment.since 1973. AetureenAp!i1 198'l and February 1990 a totaL of 238 captive learsd juvgnil.e muggE!shav6 been leleasBd Ln the Reselve, out of 99 muggers released j,n !i.ve! L"udhabalanga,12.1:1, excluding uild-bred hatchlings a!e seen at p!€,s€nt. lo rive! ;est Deo 34.7'.1of 72 released ale seen Lrith sone 'l uJiLd-bred ha!chL:ngs. In rive! hhairi (Fi9. I' uil.ere 25 nugl€!s uJ€le re.Leasedin ApriI 1989 at Ransagudar16 uie!e seen after 44 ureeksurithin a stretch of 900 mt upstleam and 1400 mt dournstleam the point of !eleaBe. Sightj.ngs urele only I to 3 duli.ng the monsoon(Fig. 2). The future plan for nugge! in Similipal' include (i) a last lelease in river: Eudhabalangain January 1991' (ij.) legula! monitoting of the uri.Id populations' (iiiJ continuation of captiv€ breeding plogramne at Ranati,ltha fot tesearchr educa'uion and to mak6availab16 juveniles for !estocking elseuhele.

188 I NT R O D U C T t O N

lhe 5j.mlliptr.l.T lgor Itocolvo ie ono of tho eightoen T lgo! itos{rrv09 to snsuro p,€!pstuatlon. of tho tlger in it6 trtrditlonal- scosystsm. Ths Ploject Tige! uras launched in India in 19?3. Tuo y€ars laterl in 19?5, the crocodilo ccnseqvatlon projsct uras launched in tho etate of Olissa 6s a part of the joint effo!t of the. cov€!nment of Indlo, U.N.D.p. ond F.A.O. of the plojoct United'Nations. .The mugge! nanagemsnt uras estab]lsh6d at Ramatirtha 1n ths outskllt of SimilipaL Tlger nss6rv€. It op6lated undeB thg diroct supervision of thB FieId 01!6cto! of the Tlge! R9aglve. ,lt.th6t tlme mano!€ftont01' muqqsl {6 natural habltats !r6re vlolr€d fo! Hadga!h 5anct ualy and Simili- pal Tlge! Rese!v€. Th€ p!esent pap€!, ovs!vieurs the maneU6n€nt snd DonltorLng of the muq!€r crocodilo G:ggg$!S paluetrls) 1n Sinifipal TigEr REsErve.

STATIl5 IN 1 979 - The Similipaf hlfls f orrn on€ of th€ Ino€t rich ulatsr-shed qroqo.of tho 0rlEEE 8iot9.. Tho rnaJor Poroonlul' !ivot eyotorns consiitutsr Budhabalangs in the noathr Khadkoi and Khaltt- thqndE.n ln the north-ueotl tl,oei, oeo in tho eouth-u,ost' SEIandl ln the squth End East Oeo qnd SahJo ln the east. Re6ults of esrv€y condustsd in NovEm'rber-oecEmber1979 had indlcatail that the tiugge! had viltualLy becomB Extlnct ln th€ Sinillpal TigEr RaselvE a!e6. The exact tBasons fo! thE extinction gf muggsrgflom Slmilj.FaI uete not c1€a!. Houievclt tha' survey pasty had taken note of adversg factors like (i) ftshing by u3lng exPloEivee and nyLon nets' (tt) file in the Div€r bankE ?oroing nestlng eit63, and (iii) natulal effects of actl,vitLe3 of orild boar and mooito! lizolda'

189 C,IPfIVE TJRTEDIIJ6 AT ,RAIIIATIRTHA

Ramatirtha ls located on the banks of riv€r lil)arl't- Bhandin, 1.5km uest oi NationaL llighurayno. 6. The nsarsst loun 1s Barlp6dA(100k'n)ln tho earn.rdlEtrlct ltayurbhcnJ. Alrports et Calcutta and Bhutlanggura!are 2BOkmEnd 3OOkn, r€spsctiuely, Neasest milkBt ls at Jashi,pu!, 4km auray. The place eiperienceg upto 155cmannuaJ. rainfaif and a temperoru!e oC lange of BoC ln December-Janualyto 41 1n may. The facilities available includs (i) ollg €gg hatchery, (i.:.) one gBt of tan hatchlinq p€ns-- each urith a conclels pooI, measurir€ 2i2x0.3m {,tth 1m uidth vegetat€d basking Iand aIL E!ound, (i,i1) ons s€t of tuJolve ysa!ling p6na, oach hoJ.dtng about 361000 litres uratsr over E sulface ares of 32 sq.m. and having baskLrigaleaa of 1.5 to 2.orn u,idth s.Ll alound, (iv) ono b!6eding ExcLosrJ!€urith land over 974 9q.ll|. and uat€r over 1910 sq.n. and holding over 2.263 oi.l.J.ionlitree urater in throo Pools of O.826, 0.233 snd 1.189 nr11l,1onll,t,ors €onnoctsd urith narrdu channolsr (v) trLrourato! pump houe€.son th6 !iv6r bank, (vi, t!,o uat6r tanks u,lth holdlng capasltlse of 1r45r000 litels and 40r000 liters' (vii) ong small labolatoly, (vtli) four hall,s,, Bnd (lx) elevon reeidentia] bull.dings. Tho coptlvo broocilfiJ p!o0lanrmo uos staltsd uith yLiung $ruggore blouOht ln phasoo fron tho Taml1 Nadu For6st Dopartnent and llladlas Crocodlle tiank. Capttve rqqrlng u,6E coomBncEd ln 19?9 and first bla€dlng took placg i; 19e4. Yoar Tota 1 Total 5 u ! v i. v. a I E9ES hatch Llng s Numba!s lfron it flom eggs hat chIing s

1984 1.4 26 74"7 1986 20? 1.0? 74 1947 79 1988 110 54 45.4 110 51 45.4 . eu.0

190 . lrrrr.lrxt t.lro l|i,!L turo ,tr Vo,rru (r.ri.or,ot.t.rrr|tlr)n lrlvu pard t)orrn to ilrplrJvod. husb.rrrdry conditlons. loriodic health chsckg, study of oach nrortolity toport and approac; to rscti.fy phy sic.r I d6formitiss i'lt revealecjpossibr.o ti:il.;i:"i:il""' ",.,r.rjl,.'r"ilrtl";::::":: supplsments urdre uscd .rnd survivaL !at€s.have O"r" ,ro"orlo. Iho nrain.suppl,qrncntsuru, (i.) a nrinoral o"rr_rr"-rn ,nu . prol)ortion of 30-359 psr K9 of pork fod to broc.iing aduLt6 on( ouror jr.rvoniloo, (Ii) ond. ono 500mg ost6colciui tag:,et fot Etesy juv6ni]s ovely 1S day€. In older to implove lne lat€ of feitllity of eggs and the hatching suacess,bgfore the 1990 brBeding seagon vitamln-E hav€ b€eo adtninista!ed at.a doog of. 1t00m0pgr odult for ton doys. Tho broocllng group nou qonEtl,t[rt6s' turo maIs6 and four fonales. Dut:ing 1906 r,nete !,ets uptg 13 adult fearales. asp€cts of resaalch . _0th6r at th€ captlve brooding center arer (1; t6!!ltory occupatlon in !olatlon !o ELl pha9e9 of b!Eeding to drau attention to spacio_temporal control m€asu!e9 os€ded to,hu&an activitieg ln a mugge! sanctualy, (1i) 9lourth end surrivol of young muggere living in El.mulatednatu!6L conditione rrlith the group ol breedlng adults, snd (i1t) gox_ ratlo 1n muggels urh6neggs a!e incubatod in_situ unds! shad6 and und€r direct sunlj.ght.

ItLsT,rCl(lNli tti '; IinILtl,AL Thlse riv€! gystoms have boen usod fo! the restocking ptogramrne. ThB€e.a!e !iv0rs 0udhabolanga, ujost D60 and Khai!1. Slnce ths natural populatlon6 had vlrtually becom€oxtinct, the attgmpt uragto !69toqk ul,th anioalg from any palticula! geogtaphic legion. Thorofolg, a11 lefoases havs boan urith Dugg€r9 directly procured flom thg statE of Tamll.Edu o! produced through captivo breeding of Tamilnadu strains at Ramatirtha and Nandankanan. There Ls, hour6ve!, a possibillty thrrt etraine frdm diffbrent loca.lltles ln Tanil,nadu h6ve 9ot mixed Inatulal lqr serloction. to play tts rol€ thlough offspli_ ngs or the lestocl

Plac s Ln 5tock fron ScutE Dt. of R1v o!,/ Total .WF5ex raloa ss STR urhslg urhlctr nos. c lipp thg . !eleasod placE re I6a sod usgd

t81Apt.1I 'R.BuclhabelangaTN 60 '85may Z6 ' Jun.U9. n.uJgstDoo TN 18 8/10 r€6Nov.30 n. Uoot Doo rr 26 TN 16

.87Dec.6 R.B udha balang a RI 39 1J Jambub ridq e

.rB oFEb. 24 R.UJestD6o ! NK 12 1/11 L4 ( ry.r1,:,1 PEtabl,l rurllE R4( f omale)

.8gApr.24 R.Khaitis RT L5 REnsagudE '|5 .90Feb.0 B R. Khal!1r RT' 10/32 ( male) R6(f emale KuItapu! total 238 )

Stoqk. NKr f{ondonkanantRTt R.rnatistha; TNt Tamilnadu' S€xl Er fgmoloi .mr mol€ SEuLo cllpblnu cUdo on doubl'o-rou tqII uhollst L! Iaft; Rt. righti dtglt3 3' 4r 5 and 6r the 3€!!aI numbo! or , th€ eautos on lgft or rlght countsd fron bohind to ftont.

192 INdI,ITTJRINC fIESULTSFRUIN 'RIVER KHA]Rt

AIl riv6!s i.n SlmiIlpal, havs rapi,ds dott€d urith srlalt rtrotchso of dosp pools. Tho3ri doGp poola have folmed the Inain t€rrLtorios of !ho !eh.b1Iltat6d muggBre. Becauss of rocky natule' the rivsrg a!e unssitabls for nevigation. LJaIking alqng tho banks ls goneEaLLydilfisult becEuea of th€ t6r!ain. F!!thormo!6, bEceuggof e hlgh cancontlatl(Jn of tho tiger and elephants monitorinq sxpodltlons hrv€ aLuraysplescnted riskE of Encountsrl,ng ulth thsss aoirruLs. !uring th9 monsoonrf-rom June through octobar ground l6eches arg innumslable. UndEr guch cilcumetancs8r itonitoring hcs bE6n keot limited to a gtlEtch of 1okm ln sives Khai!1. Flom the poj.nt of muggqr leleas€ tha st!&hes are 6km in tho dournstlean and Akm in the upstfaam. ThE river banl hae been marksd along both thB dj.lection at evely 100 metres interval uith incleaging nungtafs. Counting of muggels have been dona by Ualking aLong the banks durlng thg poak knoun houte of basklnq during the dav. At the tlne of preparation of thls !6Port datE on legula! nonito!lng !16r€ lEcoiv€d fo! 44 ueek9. Thera ruere, in ari avelaqo.3-4 obEervatl'on days €vely t!6€k. No obeolvatlon could -: be lecold€d dullng th€ ureoks €tad'i^€ July 241 Sept€mb€r 11, 0ctobe! 02 and-octob€! 30. Rainfall' dulLng tho studv period' mEaeur6dat Uppe! Ealha Kamdain ths Eouth and Ramatiltha in thE north-urest ol nonltorjnq zone (F1g' 1), tuere 252cmand 166crrrrispectlvoly. The qflrbiont tompEraturs du!jng ths Etudy r_41oCat pgriod ranged ovEr 4-41uC at lJpp8r Bqrha lamdE and 9 RamBt irtha. ourtng the fiist u,l€ekof moniioring, that is' 25 Ap!iI fro|n 2 to to,O1 tl]ay198d the nunbe! of nuggels eightgd !an96d 11. Only 1 to 3 |I|u99E!9!,€!e sight€d duling the monsoon pgliod of 2s :uty to 25 Octobe! 1989. Ths!€aft€a' the lates on oi. sightlng !,6re bstter. Dtlring the 44th ueAk' beglnninq 't5 glghted of thg total the 20th Febtualy upto nugggle urslB out 25 3sl.eased on 24 APril 1989 (Fig. 2). ,lJith !s€p€ct to tho placo of release, the locati.ons of 16 mugg€rs j.ghtod s du!ing tlre 44th u6c k of monito rj.ng ale as follou,s (dr. 2g Feblualy 199U.).

Ui.stancB from the Nlmbelg of nugg€r gightod pluco. of rulooso Ln nrotoru UfJgE lou'rl dOUrnU!rur.rm

0 - 1 00 1 't 00 - 200 0 200 - Joo o 0 300 - 400 1 t. n 500 - 50u 0 600 - 700 n ) 700 - Bou n 800 - 900 1 n 900 -L000 U 0 1000 -1100 0 n 0 1200 -1300 0 n 1300 -1400 ,| 1400 - boyond 0 0 ( r.rpto 4000 rnoLors) (lJP!O IrUUU InOtOf9,

. I nudb ol:o I nos. T otal (f so'n 100 - 900 'rot,6rs) (frcirnO-1+a0m.).

Aftar ihe ?l!st tsn Donthe of releasa 16 of ths 25 (64S) nrug9ererotorlnsd !r1!hla q atretch of 2.3km-' 900m ln the upgt!€ao and 1400n ln ths douinetrean. plgvioua lsqolds ol movemontof muggelg back ln th6 qlld qro,thoso qf (l) one 170ctnyoung that noved ovet 1.sktn Ln nlno.nontha, (1t) t'!o nuqgorol 56.9cn 6nd 54.3ctn long uhich movEdover 1O.Bkmin 1B months, end (ttl) sevan of eight muggers conflning to a stretch of 3k0t ln s post-felaase duaation ranging frorn 3 Dohths to 4 yearg. Thsss msvg|nantg 191 r.rf a! to a lako lrabitat in i)ris$a (Achorjyo and lilahapatla, 1928, Sinfh' 1985), rivo! tiloholrsdlln t,lro So iosillo.Gorgo 5,onct.uary (Singh, 1983) and rLvo! Krl,sh.rr in Andhra prddssh (choudh,rry and Busial:d ?982)1 36spEq11vely. The dat6 from Khaili in Sirnilipal Tl.ge! n€se!v6 ala fo! a much larger numbE! o, n(€gels and the donitoring uas dono contlnuouoly ft.orn Lh,. dt|to of lsls€rao. A lou, rot€ of sighting ln ths study oroa durinu Lhs monsoonInaV bs bscaugs of mov€mentof the juvsniLsg into ul€ gma.l,l€!trLbutalles 6nd cro€ks to avoid the cu!!ant of ths mdin folldu .!1\ior End tho movonset of p!6y-ftsh, 3s hovo baen 9uggEst€d fo! similar movementsof gharioL (Busiard snd Singh,

A iompa!ison of th€ data on noveflrentof mugg€!,lndB! differenc studies cited in the above, ulith thos€ of gharial (Bustard and Singt-t1983t Sinsjh, 1985.) suQgost ar,ua ou" of these tuo syEpatrlc speciesn mr.Lggelsmove less. It 1s tru€, holuover, tbat the first feu, ueoks ofter releass Ls a rurand€rj,ngor €xplo!lng phBss. for both the Bpeciss. The 6bsencs of 9 of the lttuqge!s 25 !sleased 1n rlvor Xhai,rl indlcateg that th€s€ navs thi.fted oqt of thE study areE olth€r du!1n9 the inltlal .€xplorlng phase. o! during th; dtDnEoonfloodg. Soon ofte! the monsoon urs had rEportg about tlro Juvenile nug.g6rsthqt entelsd a. villaqE pond situated close on the banks of, and getting flooded urith uratels f! on, tive! Khaili at about 4Skm dolrnstreom fl:on ths point of !elea9€. ThE muggorghad returned back to th6 rivor b€folq more infor;lrtion coqld bs collected on thee€. The. socond roleess. in rlvor Khalri uJcr6 conductod du!lng 'l Fabrua!y, ths 8th, 990 u,1th 42 jtivonllea. After one mon!n, i2 (76.1f.) of the juvsnllge u,er€ locaLiEed Uithin a st!6tch of 2km of thiJ poj.nt of lelea9e.

195 s IGIITtNG nEc,ORD FRtJfII IITHER RIVERS (January 1 990)

In river BudhabaLang3a total of 99 mr_rj'gershuve been released betuJ66n1B ApriL 1961 and 05 Dec6mb€l19g?, Tlretve of thoso aaB si.Ulrlrodut l)!saunt, The J.c.:caLionsof thess o!s ot .larlbubridg€,2, dounslro.j,I ro b]..idUo3 1, lj.rIIdu!ha:3, Chhata darha: 2 and filanikidalnai4. ln lj.vor Uest.Deo a total of ?2 muggers havg b€en .l ,l roLeabed betu,oEl 25 may 9BS End 24 Fsbrualy 9Bg. Locations knoq,n fo! 25 of thes6 ar€ at Tlnadiha (6), mankoda-dalha near Sapagha!a fiefd (4), €hhuagada (?) and patabll brldi!e (B). Compa!6d uith th6 data from (hairl., Urhere 71 .Ef of the re.L€ased muOgors a!e sighted, th€ data fo! Budhabalanga (12.1fr,) and Uest D6o (34./t{,) a!B lou. Navortheloss, hatchling muggess have..besn eight6d in the latte! turo rivor eyst€ms suggestLng that the rel]abilItat6d huggo!s havs s€tt16d dourntB r}3tut.al breoding 1n 51n111pa1,TlqE! n€solva.

FUIUNE PLAN FOR MUGCERIN SIMILIPAL 1. Ther€ slll, be no further relaaso in rlvers I]Jegt060 and Khai!i. 2. , tn ri.v€r uudhabalanga 15 juv6niLos.urill bo !s]oo66d 1n tho lost urook of Jtrnuuly 1991 . Thls u11j, constltuts the Iast release of captiv€-r€ared mu!ger ln Sirlilipal, Tigs! HESelve. 3.. T.heulld populations in a1I the lj.vers sj,Ll be monit o red to a9s€ss thB trend €v6ry yea!. 4. Round-th€-y6ar monito!1ng uiLl contlnue for the re l6a s€ 3 conduct€d in rlver Xhalrl, urlth baso canpe flom Kabatag hai and 3enab11. 5. The captivs_b!Eeding unit at Ranatiliha shall co ot 1nue until, the Stat€ Govelnoont dscldEe othe!|'IEa. ThE p roduct 3 of captl,ve b!€Eding uj.ll bB suppli6dr uJhennot !6quLled f o! Slmil.ipal, for relgas€9 Elseuhelg ln th€ etats purposeg to. b€ decided by the Govsrnment. 6. [tes€arch and €ducatl,on activitl€s at Ram:ltlltha sha 1l cont lnqe.

196 !UITIl]ARY Cloqod,/1us pal,ust!is !r.,!€ consid€r!sd to b€ Extinct in pe!enniaL lha uraters of 9inili.pal, Tjge! Reserve by 1990. The terrestri.al ancl aquatic habi,tats, encompassj,ngan a!,Ea of 2?50 sq.km., a!6 qnd6!.actLv6 consctlvatl.on mensgement s1nc6 'l 9?3. Beturoon ApliL 1981 and FEbluary l99O a total of 238 captiv€ !6a!sd juvenilE mugg6!s havs been r6leas€d in Ene Regorv€. 0ut of 99 muqgeis released 1n. !ive! BudhabaLanga, 'l 2.1$ excJ.uding uild-bled hatchlings a!B s€En at p!es6nt. In river Ui€st Deo 34.7fi, of ?2 released nuggere and u,ild-br6d hatchllngg a!e 96on. In rlvs! Khairl, urh€rE !e16as€s have 'l.989t'11 be6n mqde sinc€ Ap!i1 .6fl aro seen urhen !spolts Last cam€ in . Du!ing a tholough monitoring ov6r 44 ur6ekE, out of 25 muggel:g leleaeed at Rangaguda io si.v€! Khairl 16 y or.rng on€9 could still be 9€€rl uithin a stletch 900flrupstleam and 'l4OOri dounat!eao thb point o? release. Du!ing th€ monsoon sightings ur6!e flon 1 to 3 mugq€rs. Th€ futuls plao fo! ougger include (i) Iast refoase 1n fanuary 1991, (il) regular |ttonitoring of the pop'rl,ations 1n the 'rild' (j,i,i) contl.nuation of th€ coptlvs bro€d1ng unl,t at llorratlltha fo! lea€arch, educatlon and supply of captlvE rsa!6d juv€n1I€s fcr .estockinq els€'rhe!6.

AC K N OIX LEOG E ME NT S

Lts ar6 g!atsf u.l, to arri fi!. C. Dash' IfS (F'rincipal Chi€f cons€lvato! of Fo!ests, o!i33a) and 5!i R. L. Rath' IF5 (Chiof uli!dIife uJa!den, 0rissa) fo! th€i! suppo!t to tha u/ork rEldtEd to Dsqger msnaqenont and !6soalch jn 5imiliPa1 Ti,gsr Res6!ve. Th€ State Folest D€paltmont of Tamilnadu' bdsas Crocodifs Sank and NanclankuoanBlologicaf Pdrk' 'rissa have EuppLigd u9 uith |ltuig€lg fo! !€ar and !eleass purPos€3' :!l eovlndrl Tudu and S!1 86.lsndls tlliihaotc havs cat!ied out |nost of lrs caPtiv€ lea!ing and post_r€J'€45€-monlto!inq uro!k' !esp6cti.vEly. SEi S. D. Rout, ll|.gc.' UJtldlife Technician hag helpod ln caotlv€ husbaodry and dats analyslb. Al'l other staff of tho Rea€lve have Ext€ndsd thel! supports duting ths study'

91 Ii E F E R E N C E :,

echarjyo, L, N. and 5. tilahap.rt!a. 19?0. 1.191u1601. the ccptive m3rsh c!ocodile (C!ocodv 1us ga Iusttls) into ihe uild. Ind iirn Fo!cate!, 104 (5):3B5. 0uslJrd, lt. n. and L. ll, K. :,ingh. 1983. Iltovoneot of ui,!d !h3rieI 6avioLis qanqeticrrs (Cnrolin) in !ivo! trlrheor,li, dris:ro, Indid. iJ!itj.sh :ournaL of llorpetoloqy, 6(U): 287-291 .

!-hdudlrLr!J/, Il. u. alxl lt. Lr. LjusLdjad. 19B2. Lte.Locl.

Sifflhr L. A. K. 1tb3. dbs6rvationg on th€,t|ov€m€nt ot tuo cJptivo reat€d muggo! crqcodil,es, Clocodvlus !e,j!gq4g L6:json uih€n I:etu!n€d to the uJild. J. Bonbay nat. lli.st. Soc., ed(1 ) r85-90. 5in9h, L. A. K. 1 985, cha!i.al, popul.atloo t!end j.n Natlonal Cha.nbal Sanctuary uri.th not6e on radio tracklng. :rudy Report, D€c. 1985. Crocodllo Ros€alch Contle, uJil.dIif6 In6t1t!to of Indla, ydo!abod. 167+v1i1 pp.

198 TIGER RESERVE

\.buJ-rer l'a..r z o n

\ t-

t

/l ,l T i

release point

19 c

-

o z E

u z

o {r- c E o. ul !t' rt {, t o'

r

{l

9Z: (isv"a!d rvro! ro r^o roN ^vw lo-'!dr/ 9Zl F

zn

CROCODILE FARMING IN SOUTH AT'RICA -

THE II4PACT OF FA3.!{ING TECHNOLOGYON PRODUCTIONETFICIENCI

G.A. S.nith*

Departme[t of Anj.lral Science

Universj.ty of Pletoria, pretori.a 0002

Republic of Sour.h Africa

.t M:7: i ei

P. O. Box 414

Botha's Ei11 3600

Republic of South Af!j-ca

the Nile ciocodile (crocodyLus niloticus) , ?,/hichis indigenous to

Africa and Madagascar, used to ilourish i. ia:ge nrxlber.s from t5e

Cape o: ccod Eope northwards i.+-c ?3lasi::r€. Thr.:gj.r ite l/ears the c:occiiie poou-Lations in Africa duinifed, l:rgelr because cf manrs intelve$tion. Ir', areas where Iarce numicers used to "artai.n roam only a few animals may be found today. It ls estimated that the total wild population of the Nil.e croccdiles h South ;_frica today nuttlbea about eight thousand irdiviCua:s, a ij.gure lrhich includes the populations within protecteC aleas such as the National Parks.

In South Aflica the populatj-on of Nife crocodi.les !s cn Append.i:<

I of CI?ES and protected by provincial legislation, plospec+-:ve and present clocodile fa!fters are the!efore not permitted to

*Coordinators: Crocodilj.an Study cloup of Southern Afrj.ca halvest e99s, hatchLings or broodstock fo! conmercial pulposes.

FL^,,^h I h6.6 ran+ i 16. rra prolecled in the wild lhere are, at plesent, no Plogranmes rn motion to restock any areas.

Crocodil-e falnj-ng as a cornEercial venture has howeve! becohe popula! j-n South Aflica !ri.th about 25 farms bej-ng opelated at plesent. the industly as a whole is hoireve! stilL in its infancy with a limited ounbe! of hi Joc l-.ai nd n./La+a7r

Numbe! of crocodvlus ni I^ri-". hi,,lac narketed flom

south Aflica during 1989

Yea! Nunbe! o!_ hi.des malketed

1979 - 1984 0

1985 5i9

1985

1987

1988 1884

1989 4523

crocodiles greae initially inPorted from zj.nbab!,e and late! from

Botsnrana \".heie, according to the cITES classification, these

reptiles \tere listed as Appendix 11 aninals. The lack o!_

suitable stock, nith resPect to both hatchiiDgs and blooCstock

has Lately become a najo! Plobfem fo! farmels. The demand by ltew

entlants, who are obliged to Purchase caPtive bled stock flon a

few of the existing fams, has caused p!ices to rocket' The

price of breeding fenales has iDcleased flon about uS 5225 only four years ago to an excess of S3800 at present. Fatchlings up to 3 nonths of age that \irere sold for S19 a few yeals back are

nolr reported Eo seLl well in excess of S75 each.

the data presented in Table 2 reflects the times !,rhen fams where

estabLished indicating that, !,rith the exception of three farns, development took place nainly during the last decade. plou thj.s

Table rre presen! sj.zes of Ehese :ar:ns, wiCh regards to the

number of breeding females, can be deducted. Fourteen of the

:arms are at present legistered 'rith cITES nith a fifteenth application being processed at the noment.

Time of establishing the faln and the cutlent numlet

of females

aalns estabiishei

Yea! Nunber of Cumulati./e Nunbei Cumulative

farns

1 I 460 450

1975 - 1980 2 3

13 1:0 7 1829

1985 - 1989 I 24 392 2227

It is of inEerest to note the dj.verse backgrounds of the people investing in or r,/ho is involved !r,i.th the management of the crocodile falms. lhei.r primary activities may be as medj-ca1 docto!s, propelty develope!s, bakidg technologist, persons involved in the building j.ndustly, gane, pig or poultly fannilg, fruit, vegetable or suga! cane production. Vely often their experience in tbe various professions o! industlies ale teflected in the clocodi.1e fams n,ith which they ale involved.

Consequently, the technoLogy employed at the various farns'day diffe! substantialLy. the faqls fulthe! diff,e! !.rith respect to the extend that tourisn is util-ized as a source of levenue, some realizing a highe! income :rom tourism than frorn the ploduction unit. fir develoDi.ng the present productioo technology. tro broad approaches are no\,, being established:

P.imary producers, irith t5e:: own brooCstock, rea!1ng thei!

hatchlings until slaughter or selling them to other

Producers.

Secondary proiuceas, r/ho buy hatch::rgs :or t:e scle ou:trose

-€ r:i ci rd rha6 F^r -'r1_____-., I I nd ?ur;oses.

Specialization of thj-s nature nay cont!ibute si.gnificantly to the success of the industry in the future.

The managetnent approach and the lechnology enpioyed by the primary produce!s nay dj.ffer substantiaJ.Iy, an aspect which is

^fran FAFIa-+-?r ih +ha ^F^^rt^+i^F -FFi-iah-., ^F l-Fa aF.ar-rica

Examining che different farming dethoas edployed at these unj.ts

u BROODSTOCK ENCLOSURES

A nale to femal.e ratio of rouqhLy 1 to 5 is favouled on most

farns. Some bloodstock enclosules ale desiqned to accohmodate

one male with an avelage of fj.ve fenrales, I'hile others nay house

ouly two females with one na.Le. Other farms have vety 1a!ge

enclosures uith as nany as ten males and fifty o! more females in

a single enclosule. There are diffelent schools of thought as to

irhich of these approaches ate the ideal. No compalative data is

however available from rhich reliable conclusions can be drai/n ot1

ih.i r rF6r^.lrr.r-i rr. -a.a6rn:n-a n!l^',dh c,,nh^r'orl ia!,

scientific evidence it does seem as if a higher conception rate -L- n:v hF .hiFr-c.i :- -ra da.: -r o: r:lese

enclosures is of palamount importance in order to prevent naLe

dominance, thus excluding certain maies f!on tte breed:.!g plocess with a resul:ant lower percentage o: :erales 1a!,!r9 :e:!ile egcs,

a factor which add :o the numlcer o: ncnria,/i:rc resiie.is ::r iie

encl-osu!e.

The desj.gn of the enclosules va!'y lrith some beilg a single pond with concrece enclosed Iaying areas, each 1alge e:lough :or or:e

female to entet at a time, q/hile othels are multiple ponds with

nesting aleas of soft sandy stlips well above the water line,

Sone eoclosures may be t.otally functj.onaL while others nay be

beautifully landscaped oatula1 aleas wit.h watertalls and

cascading !,ate!. ft is of inte!est to note that conlrolled

r.,rrie- ^.i-ivrrw \re r^ m:-ked effect on the feflafes.

I!!espectj.ve of the choj.ce of enclosure it is essential that the

allj,nals ale propelly tagged and the fenalers nest site identi.fied

N so that accurate lecords can be kept of the fenalers leproductive

Table 3 Fenale record card

OEigin of Ferale:

srze (:otai le.gch)

;icubated 3at.!ec

ra!ks/scars:

M Without plope! lecolds i.t is possible that a celtain fenale may contribute nothing at all to the productivity of tshe unit, without the falnels even knowino.

At present the fo11owing situation preva!1s in the breeding units (Table 4) .

fable 4 Reproductive efficiency du!ing the I989 - 1990

h,aad i nd c-.c^-

Nunber of Nunrber of Nunlcer of feanalei

Fa!m females int erva I h atchl j.ng s

in unit index

130 100

732 55 2AA2

c 300 14

D 1.9 2 4/89

*Female productivj.ey index = Nunber of llatchlings / number of

Fenales keDt

INCUBATION MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY

A11 the ploducers are making use of altificral incubators. The eg:gs ale lemoved 1{ithin 24 hours of Iay, .rla.eC into hatchr-ng contaj-lels, be it baskets or boxes lrj.th ve!:niculite as the nost popula! incubating mediun. Incubatols vary from fairly prinitive, yet effective systetns to very sophisticated fticro-plocessor coatlo1led uniCs within rhich tenperature is naintained at 31 +

al 0.1-C and Rg at 909. Though vallous falruers expetienced p!ob1e6s with incubatols in the past with hatchlng pelcentages valyi.ng between 0t and 701, lesults seem to be nole plonising ar present with the avelage hatchability of + 751 with the 1989-1990 hatch.

Tab:.e 5 Hatcbing efficiency during 1989 - 1990 hatch

Nunber of Ave number Ave hatcha= Nunber Falrn nests of t

100

B 2402 c 1n 1175 D 2 50 93

AATCHI,ING YANAGEMENT

The successful rearing of harchlj.ngs wiII be derermined by the naoagenent and Dutritional progralunes to which the young reptj.les ate subjected. Farmers aim ro slaughcer s:ock a: ej.ght.een Eo twenty fou! months of age but due to a lack of proper recolds at most falms it is difficult to quantify the Cegree of success achieved in this respecl {TabLe 6) . A general gronrth period of

24 - 30 months seedrs to be a norm.

2!B Table 5 lime lequiled fo! hatchliogs to leach slaughter length of + 1,35 mete!

Falln Range (months)

LA-24 c

The tleatment of the hatchl indc :c .7^- 1r however be

crucial j.n orde! to shorten the rearing perioC, The apploach

adopted does however va!y substaDtiallly between fards.

While some entelprises place hatchlj.ngs in water irmediateiy

after hatch, othe!s keep the hatchIr.ig dry :or a few days to _ "harden up'. Food is often withheld :or rhe 5::sr - 10 days of

:hei! lives. These praciices na./ a:::ct :jle ?ttal:t.,' o:

crocodiles significantly 'rith a dlamat:c a:fac: on the:-r

subsequent gro\"rch. No scientifically based daca on the prois and

con's of these practices has been located.

The effect of hatchlitlg pens must not be undeaestimated. :! has been shown with valious other sDecies that qlouD size and populali.on density may effect the perfolmance of animais in an

inr_.h

stockj.ng deosity. fn genelal a norh of six leptiles per slfrare mete! until 6 months of age nay suffice. Some unj.ts utilize cj.lcula! buildings \dith holding aleas of 8 neters in dianreter and a a sulface to vate! ratj.o of 1:1, using heated wate! to conlrol temperature. Others use 1arge, specially-designed buj.Ldings, capable of acconmodating several thousand hatchlings unde! one roof with approximately 150 leptiles per pen. Scientific evidence on the optinal group size and/or stocking density for

NiLe crocodile hatchLings aod tearing stock is lacking.

Most of the producers strive to naintain the tenperature within the grorir-oul unj.ts at around 3l-C. There are some Droducels who dlF.- l_hFir rFi'jnd qt^.k /)ut inco open aar camps at the age of

9 - 10 rnonths lrhere they are kept untj.I cu11ed. This practj-ce nay have a significant effect

Eeat is generated by means of eLectric fan heatels, wate! heated by coal, diesel or electricity and heat exchange pumDs. :he ccs: e:fecti.veness of the various scurces must be ccns:de!:eC. thouch l'-a' 6:\, ha fha ^hrin:1 not . be optimal when growth rate, feed conversion, slocking dedsity and heatiig costs are taken into coosid.e!ation.

!ab1e 7 Running cos! of heating the realitrg uniis

lleat source

(Cent. kwh

coAt

DIESEL

ELECTRICITY

Heat E:

hai hd :++.i.6.1

RECORD KIEPTNG, TAEGING AND MARKING

Growth pelformance can only be Ronitoreal accurately if hatchlings ale PlopelLy tagged. This, unfortulrate].y, is seLdom done lrith only a few hatchli:rgs being tagged by Ehe producers aE plesenE, makj.ng i.t rmpossible to describe and evaluale the gioerth pe!formance on the va! ious fards. Results obtained flom t!.o producers who were ma!king their hatchlings are presented in

Table I Glowth performance of tagged hatchlings

Fa!n LengEh at 90 iays of age ,mlll

Ave!age Longest

3 48 530

Wj.th regards to females, the situation i.s very much the sane. If fetlales ale not indivi.dually tagged, nests cannot be ploperly identj.fied and it is then dj-fficult to link nests to specific fenales in consecutive years. Linki;19 haechlings to fenales to mollitor fertility and hatchabiLity is often j.dpossibte.

zAL Those fenales that are malked ale usualLy marked irith nunbeled Aussie cattle tags nade of plastic. Unless great care is taken lrhen applying the tags, they do oot stay on fot note than a yea! or ewo. The Ioss of tags contribute to poor record keeping.

NUTRITION

nFa :\rril:hilifv ^f hF^+cih i. ha-^hiFd , ari^7 lihi+iFd F'^+^?

!,rith sources diminrshing every year as moie crocodile farrnets e:rter the industry and wastage is be:nq miniftized or betEer ucil.ized bv the other industries.

Only a few fariners have access co a legltla! source of red nea!,,

Fha n:i^ril-v ^f ahFcrhricac h-ind dah-F.laFr irr' ^hi-lza6<

:c F^^.1 c^!,r-6 a^.e6dtr6n'1!' tsho .ri6r ^F-- --^--,li-----,--:s 1. on any

?aftr,cu_a: -ePef,c , e:1 .iL,.. - i reac: -l' availabie in the area. Due to the l-acl< of su:ficLe.t .rotein soulces in cettain areas, farme!s have to travel fulther to collect calcasses 9ai.tb some farmels sendillq vehicles as fa! as

120 miles !o coLlect even moderate loads of Dlotein.

In situations vhele an actual diei i.s cohoiled it mav consist of a nixtule of muscle and live! with some ploducers including fr.sh.

A typical diet vith tbese ingledj-ents \".ou1d have the foLLowi.ng

..nn^eit-:.F ie .-a

212 Table 9 Typical diet fed to hatchlings and juvenile clocoitiLes

Components s

Bone meal 2,00

Beef muscle 50 ,30 Liver 5,00 Fish (e.9. C1alias qarieDinus )

Fish meal 7,84 Cooked starch

Minefal and vitamin mix 3,00

Conposirion on d:v-maEter basis

-) (MJ.kq

Clude protein (r) 45,00 aa! (t)

Cal s i.ulrr (s) (s)

We ale at present conducting tlia.Is lrith r*iIe clocodiles using n'et and dry diets rrith protein levels of be+,ween 45 and 4g?

on a dly-matter basis. In these d!ets cooked mal.ze starch is utili-zed as an enelgy source with seemingly satj.s;actory results.

713 GENEIAL

At presen€ sone of the farms are situated in areas rehele wate! is scalce, tempelature extlemes ale unsuitable for clocodile falming and availability of plotein is a lilriting factor. Othe! factors such as disease control, ilregular glading of the growing hatchlings and rearj.ng stock as ne1l as ineffectj.ve managernent plocedures have negative effects on the overall productivity of the units.

when lhe productivity of the units is measured in Cedns of the nunbe! of hides narketed, a distor:ed figure may be obtainea aue to the facE Lhat new eneranrs are at presenr re:?ing heavily on existing ploducers for stock, It is also possibLe Chat existj.ng producers are relying on the sa.Le of stock to nerr, ent!ants and ir. rh.raFdra n^f -w-l^irr-- ^r ;o!'6r^Fir- m:-ra-.-- - -,.: ---:FOr_-U:lrr:es f^ rhci r .1rl I av.ahr

Many falrne!s are also reCaining animals for futule breeding projects or mereLy as an investment. AlL these factots nave contlibuted !o tbe inclease in the price of lrve anlmal-s whj.ch has been so dramatic that it is no\d virtually imDossible fo! riew entlants to ventule into this type of farminq 'rithoul substantial financial backing.

2t4 CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that mole than 916 n has been invested in the

South African industry in recent years, the industry is sti11 vely linited $rhen measuled in terms of hide output. ploduce!s wilL have to become more refj.ned in thei! faln1ng methods lritb

!espect to husbandly techniques anil general. sound nattagetnent principles.

Better comrnunicatj-on amongst the different produce!s and the sharing of knowledge could enhance the development of clocoaile farmj.ng i.n South Africa and the profi.tabj.Ij.ty of the individual

215

Pelletized alligator feed: an update

Mark A- Staton

I'lainland Holdings pty. Ltd. P. O- Box 196, Lae, Papua Neli Guinea

Larry Mcfleas€, Leisa Therj.ot, Ted Joanen

Rockefeller wildli.fe Refuge, Rt- I Box 2OB crand Chenier, Louisiana, USA

INTRODUCTION

The daveLopment of practicaL feeds for farmed alligators (ATTigator /Dissj.5sippiensis) has been the objective of research conducted at or sponsored by Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge for many years (McNease and Joanen, t98l; Joanen and McNease, 1985a; Stalon, 1988; Staton et al., l98a; in press a,b,c,d) - Unti.l recent years, vitamin-supplemented nutria (l,lyocastor coypu) has been considered the best gracti.cal die! for the large-scale feeding of aLliga'tors under intensive cul"ture. In a previous report (StaLon et al-, i.n press a), a detailed analysis oi nutria meat t4as presented along with aIlrgator aesponses to the supplementation of nulria mear with a semi-practical and commercially prepared, pelfetized alligator feed (Eurris l!iIIs & Feed, Inc- , Frankllnton. LA). In these studies, exceLlent growth was achi.eved with relatively high levels of supplementation (50-70% of dietary dry matter) of nutria meat with the dry diets-

The Burris MilI produci is now in widespread use as a feed supplemenl in the alligator industry- Nevertheless, lhe availabilily of a comhercially prepa.ed diet l"lhich can provide the total nutritj.on of farmed afligalors i.s still a high priority. The experiments reported on heTe were conducled in an effort to yield information qrhich could lead to Lhe improvement of commercial aIIigator feeo- Specifically, we detail alfigator responses to modification of lhe protein and ami.no acj.d composition of thj.s diet-

METHODSAND I1ATERIALS

Anim,als--end.-hQgsin9 - - - - T hese exp€ r j.men ts h/ere conduc ted at Rockefeller l.lildlife Refuge, Grand Chenier, Louisi.ana, using pens and feedi ng/cLeani ng procaduras which hava been previously described (Joanen and McNaase, 1975; 1977; Staton et al., j.n press a)- In each experinent, twelve tanks containing aLli.gators r{ere assigned to each of four diets such that theie were three reolicates oer diet- 216 AIl experiments were conducted with alLigators urhi.ch orj.ginated from eggs that were artificiaLly incubaled according to methods described elsewhere (Joanen and l'lcNease, 1976; l985a,b)- At the initiation of experiments I and III, alligators were 6 months old and averaged 595 and 662 g body wej.ght, respeclively- Experiment II was conducted with 6 week old alligators averaqing 1O8 g body weight at Lhe beginning of the experiment- The three experiments Iasted I, 18, and I Beeks, respectively.

Qie-i-S'.---1n exp€riment I, Eurris l4ills 45e protein alligator feed (described in detail in Staton at a1., in press a) was fed either as a total ration oa srJpolemented with methionine (DL-methionine as O.2Jkof diet), lysine (L- lysine, O.9!l of diet.), or both methioni.ne and lysine (O-2 and O-9t of diet, respectively).

In Experiment II, the Burris I'tiLls 452 prodrJct- was modified by sLrppl.ementinq with a high-protein premix (TabIe l) tlhich raised the prolein composilion of the supplemented diet to 54% of diet vrhile mai.ntai.ning methionine and isoLeuci.ne composition (expressed as a gercentage of protein) constant. Both the 452 and 54% protein diets we.e then fed laith or without further amino acid supplemenlation- The resul! of lhese ami,no acid supolementations was to raise methionine conLent by O.4? of dietary proLein and isoleucine content by 1.O% of protein-

Table L. Experiment II: High-prolein supplement used to raise protein content of the 45% protein Burris llills afligator faed to 542 -

In9 redien t

Fish Meal 37 -AO Feather Maal la. 90 Elood neal 13.40 IsoLated Soybean Protein 9.90 Gelati n a.oo Cystei ne o.30 DL-ltethionine Poultry Fat a. oo carboxymethyl cel lu lose 2.OO Vi tami ns t.oo Potassir.rn Carbonate o- 50 Sodium Chloride o,50 Traca Mineral Premix o .20 Selenium Premix o-05

x7 In experiment III, a Eurris f,lilLs 56% protein alligator feed was tested- The control diet consisted of the b}end of nutria mea! and the 45% protein Burris f,tills alli.galor feed currently used in the alligator industry. The 55% protein product was feed either as the sole diet or supolamented with either chicken liver or a piemix (Table 2)-

Tabl,e 2- Experiment III: Contri.butions nade to 56% protein experimental diet by a preftix used as 38 of dry ingredients.

Contribuli.on to I ngredi ent Experimentaf Diet (%)

Isoleuci. ne o.4 Potassium Carbonate o-6 Argini.ne o-9 vi tami ns o.6 Tau ri ne

In all experiments, dry diets we.e used by adding {^raler (5O% by ureight) prior to feeding or mixing with the meat comoonen!. ldhere necessary to ereaLe dj,e!ary tiealmenEs, the anino acid modifications described above were made bv di lu tion -

RESULTS

Fx!.eli'Iell&,1. ---The greatest source of variation tn alligatoa production crileria was tha particula. tank in which alli.gaLors were .aised- Diet did not significantly j.niluence alLigator performance in this experiment" The effect of methionine on feed conversion and of lysine of feed consumption approached significance, and it is possible thal such effects uiould have proved signifi.cant in an experiment -f l^^^a. ^i,.rri^^

ExQ-e-ci.OejLl_ll.---Protein levels was the single factor influencing al.ligator production cri!eria in Lhis experiment. Gaj.ns in body weight and total length rJere significantly improved by increasing the protein ]eve] of the diet. The infl,uence of protein level on feed conversion approached significance (p>O.063). Signj.fican! differences beteJeen tanks did not exist as in the orevious exoeriment-

2A Exre.r,im,e=nl-Ll-l. ---The control diet, consisting of the 45% Burris allj.gator feed,/nutria meat blend supported greatl,y superior performance compared uri.th other diets (Table S). This l^|as true despite the fact that consLtmption of lhe control diet was significantly less than other diets- However, q,astage of the aemaining diets was apparent. Hence, consumption and feed conversion data many not be reflecE Erue cOnsumptj.on- Oespite feed wastage, feed intake of alliqa!ors in this experiment did no! appear to be restrieled-

TabLe 5. Experiment III: Performance criteria of al l igato rs as influenced by diets consisting of the nuL.ia neat/ 452" protein Burris MilIs alligator feed or a Burris 14iLLs 56% Protein alligator diet, fed as the sole ration OT supplemented as shown.

-- Gain in --- Dry Matter Eody ToaaL Dry l"lat te r Feed: gody Diet l.,Jeight Length Consumpti,on Weight Gaj.n

- cm - __-- g ---- s/s --

453 Burris/Nutria 7432 l65a 1.20: 2726 106b 11743b 56U + Chicken Live r 345D I l9b 1225a b 5. O3b 56% + Supp lemen t 280 b l13b 11367b 1 .zAb

------l,tean ------410 L26 I O381 4,98 ------sEtt ------56 5 t-30

ANOVAP>F ( Oiet ) . oo1 .oor. .oor. .046

DISCUSSION

The diata.y protein requirenent of a_lligators is apparenEly greater than 45"

LITERA'URE CITED

Joanen, T. and L- llcNease- t976- Culture of immature American alligators in controlled environmental chambers. Proc. 7th AnnuaI I'leet. World t4ariculture Soc., San Diego, CA, Jan. 1916. pp. 20l-Zlt.

Joanen, T- and L- l'!cNease- 1977. Artificial incubation of alligator eggs and post-hatchi.ng culture in controlled environmenlal. chambers- Proc- 8th Annual l1eet. WorId l'lariculture Soc., San Jose, Costa Rica, Jan. 1987, pp. 439- 490 _

Joanen, T. and L- l'lcNease- 1985a- Alligat.or f3ir.!irq research in Louisiana- In: Webb. G- J. W-. S. C. l'lanolis, and P. J. llhitehead (eds. ). Wild1i.ie Management: Crocodiles and affigators. Sur.ey Beatty & Sons, Pty. Ltd-, Chipping Norton, NSW, Ar.jsEralia, pp_ 329- 340 , ioanen, T. and L- McNease. 1945b- The effects cf incubation temperature on American aLligator hatchlings si:e anc grokth rate- In: Webb, G. J. W., S- C. l'lanolis, 3nc P- J- whitehead (eds.). wildlife Management: Crocodiles and a-lligat.ors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, pty. L!d. Chipping Norton, NSr,l,Australia, 9p. 533 - 537.

I'lcNease, L- and T. Joanen. 1981. Nutaition of alligators. In: Cardeilhac and R- Larsen (eds)- Proc- altigator production conf., GaihesvilIe, Florj.da, Feb. t98L-

Staton, M. A. l9AA- Studies on the use of fats and carbohydrates in the diet of American alligators ( Af 7i ga to r mississ jppiensis) Ph-D. Dissertation, Univ of Georgia, Athens, 151 pp-

Staton, M. A,, I. L. Brisbin, Jr-, and G- tt- Pesti.. 19AA. Feed formulalion for alligators: an overvi.el.| and inilial studies. Proc, 8th working t4eeting IUCN CSG, Quito, Ecuador, Ocgober, 1986.

Staton, l'1, A-, L- l'lcNease, T. Joanen, I. L- Brisbin, Jr-,3nd H, M, Edwards, Jr. Supplemented nutria meat (nyocastor coypu ) meat as a practical feed for American all.igaLors (Afl.igator mississippiensis) - Proc- 9th Working lteeting IUCN CSG, Lae, Papua New cuinea, In press a.

Staton, - A., H M. Edwards, Jr, I. L . Erisbin, Jr., T. Joanen, and L- McNease. Protein and ene rgy relationships in the diet of the Ame.ican alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) - J Nutrilion- ln press b

Staton, !1. A-, H. f4- EdHards, Jr, I- L. Erisbin, Jr., i, Joanen, and L. l'lcNease- Fatty acid nutrition of rne American alligator (Al).igator mississjppiensis). J. Nutri tion - In Press c-

Stalon, l'!. A-, H. M- Edwards, Jr, I- L- Erisbin, Jr., T. Joanen, and L. McNease. Dietary energy sources for the American al I igator ( Af I i ga to r ftississippjensis Daudin ) . Aauaculture- In oress d. Processing YieLds From Farmed Crocodiles Crocodylus porosus and Crocodylus novaeguineae) From Papua Nela Guinea

I'lark A- Staton, Brian Veanon, creg l'1itche11, Ralph Sigap

mainland Holdings Pty- Ltd - P. O. Box 196, Lae, Papua New cuinea

INTRODUCTION

Over 3OOO sal.twater crocodiles

14ETH ODS

During 1980-1982, .ecords of the size (total length, Iive and salted bel1y width, body weight) and growth of thousands of crocodiles on the farm were co1lecled- Additional dat.a on t.housands of animals t,lere obtained during culls of the past year- t^lehave used random samoles (Table L) of these daLa to develop species-specific predi.cti./e relationships belween length, ureight, and belly width(s), withi.n lhe samDfe limits defined below-

lleat processing yields were determined for a total of 44 C- navaeguineae and 36 C- porosus. Immediately after skinning, the heads, feet and viscera t,tere removed to produce a "dressed carcass''. The Legs were removed at the shoulders and hips and *ere not further processed- The remainder of the dressed carcass eras divided into tail and "upper body (tcrso) portions before deboning and defatting, Tail girth l.|as measured al the base of the laiL a! the point of maximum diameter, usually 3-4 scale ro!{s from the rsar edga of lhe hind leg. Descriplive statistics of the sample are given in TabLe 2.

Records on l9A9-199O feed consumption and live body |"|eights in pens, each containing severaL thousand crocodi.les, have allowed precise estimates of feed conversi.on and body weight gain- These estimates of growth, combinad with hide and meat yield infordation have made possibLe predictions of fu !u re product availabitity-

RESULTS

Sj-re,Rel,ali.a-ns-hip.s- ---In terms of farm nanagemenE and the ability to make size estimates from feed consumptr.on ano conversi.on data, we have found body weight to be the nost usaful overall indicator of crocodil.a size- Therefore we have analyzed size relationships in terms of body weight. Table 3 shows that belly u/idth (both liva and salted) ano to!aI body length are quadratically relatad to body oeighL within the limits of our sample. Taj.l girth (TG) }.as directly related to body weighE, Across species, the predietive relat.ionship was TG : 23.6 + 1.O95iBW (P

l-'tp,at..-Y.ie-ld's.---t'1eat yields, expressed as pe.cenlages of body weight, aTe presented in Tabla 4- yields were generaLly simi.lar for the two specj.es and sexes, buf stati.slically signifi.cant differences existed. Some, but not atl differences $rere due to a species-related size difference in lhe samples. For exampLe, legs comprised a smaLler pereentage of body ureight for C. porosus than C- novaeguineae. This is a function of greater body size in the saltwater sample and lhe fact that, expressed as a oercent of body h,eight (Bt^l), hindlegs (HLp) and fo.elegs (FLp) were smaller for larger animals (HLP:6-434 - O.19txBW + O.OO3*B2: P<0.0O1; R2 : 0.388; FLP = 3.744 - O.2O2*BW+ O.OO5*BW2;P

DISCUSSION

Using the regression equa!ions deveLoped above, it j.s possible to determine the amount of skin or meat oroducEs available given some knowledge of the liveweight of crocodiles in a pen. However, we do not regularly weigh crocodifes during growout as lhis reduces food consumption and grogrth- Instead, bre can make use of or.1r records on feed consunption and feed conversion to estimate average body weight of crocodiles in pens, Using these estimates, the potential yield of m6at and skins can than be calcuLaled- For exampLe, gi.ven (1) a pen stocked with 3OO freshwater crocodiles with an average eJei.ght of 5.O kilograms; (Z) dry matter feed consumption of SOOOkilograms over six months; (3) dry matter feed conversion of 2:1; and (4) zero mortality, a new averaga body weigh! of 10.O kilograms can be calculated. Based on an average body weight of 10.O kilograms, it can be estimated from the equation (1999 sample) i.n Table 3 that 3L-2 x 3OO = 9360 cm of safted belly skin are availabla- Likewise, from average yietd figures in Table 4, it can be estimated that 3OO x 6.55: 1965 kg of dressed carcasses can be produced.

Similarly, it may be desirable to prsdict the futsure markat value of a pen of 3OO saltv.ater crocodiles averaging 5-O kilograms body Height - say, in 5 months- Our growth .ecords suggest that these animals would average 8-5 kilograms !.rith 5 additional monlhs of gror^rlh- From Table l. it can be calcuLaled that an 8-5 kilogram saltBater crocodile would average 29-5 cm in salted belty width- Thus the pen could be expected !o produce approximately 29,5 x 3OO: A8SO cm of saftwater beLly skins. Similarly the 3OO x 4.5:2550 kilograms of live body weight in the pen should (using average saltwater yield percantages from Table 4) produce approximately 157O kilograms of dressed carcasses. 153 kilograms of legs, 581 kilograms of bone-in tait, 372 kilograms of deboned/def at ted tail meat, and so on. These calculations take on meaning, of course. in the estimation of futuTe economic retuTns to the farmi.ng operati.on.

To ensure gogd management practices as well as to increase .the accuracy of the estimating p.oceduTes discussed here, it is important to maintain variability in body weights as low as possj.ble. This has been done by segregatinE crocodiles according to species and size (O.5 kg si.ze classes for most pens)- In the future it mav be oossible to segTegate sexes - Table l. Descriplive statistica on samples of crocodiles used to determine size reLationshios-

----C- novaeguineae------C- poaosus--- Females lrlales Fehales Males

19aO-19a2 SAMPLE

Body Weiqht ( kg) Mean (N ) 8.4(97) e-O(96) ro.4 ( 91 ) 12."(eo) Range o-9-27 -4 r -7-26.4 t -2-27 -O 1- 2-39-A Std. Dev. 5.4 5.6 7-6 9.8

Total Length (cm) Mean (N ) 11A(97) 1.2t.s(96) 135.O(er ) r37. .r( eO) Range 66-744 77- 165 ao-191 76-213 Std. Dev. 27 -7 24 -5

Live aelly l^lidth ( cm) I'lean ( N ) 29 (97 ) 30(96 ) 33(90) Range t4- 49 \5-47 Std. Dev - 9 tl t2

Salted Bel1y width (cm) f,lean ( N.) 36t 29 ) 37( 30 ) 4.jl lol rr/rn) Range 2A-43 Std. Oev. 3 2

].949 SAMPLE

Body Weisht (k9) l*lean _-___7.1( 77 )____ -----9.4 ( 75 ) ---- Range ----2 - 4- 16 .3------2 . 5-25 - O-- -- Std- Dev. ------3.4------6 _7------

Salted AeIly Wj.dth (cm) lY!ean -----27 \77 )------29( 7s ) --- -- Range ----- ta- 55------14- 44------Std. Dev. ------4------7------lable 2. D€scliplive sCatigtica o! saqrleg o! crocodil€g ussd to detglDite Deat ProcegginE yielils.

---c. DOVaelJUi!€ae------C. porosus---- F€8a1ea Ualeg F6tlal6s ltrles

Body neiEht (kE) x€aD (N) 9.5 (20) 9.7 (231 1r..3 (26) :'s.s (10) Ralge 6.9-12 . a 6.3-13 .2 7 .5-15.3 10. 3-21.0 std. Dsv. 1.4 2.L 2.3 Eail cisth (cD, U€a! (l|) 35.7 ( l,t ) 3s.6 (2,1) 36. O(221 {o.a(10) RaugE 30 .5-{0. O 31.5-39.5 31.0-{2.0 35.5-{5. O gtil. Dev. 2.7 2.4 2.9

Aabl. 3. Reg!:e8sion equatj,oBs fo! tb€ lrr€dLctLo! of total l6!gtb, Iiv€ belly l.ldth, alat salt€d b€lty triatth froD live body reight of ctocodil€s, Clocodylus uovagglriDea€ alat C. porosus, vltbi! salplE Ihits descrl,bed h Iab16 1.

Depe!al6!t va!iablE EquatioDl P>F

-----clocodylus Dova6glitt€ae--- rotal L€rgth (c!) 69.7+? .734.BrJO.158rBn2 O.OO1 o.9Ga

Live Ee11t ridth (cDt L2.2+2.655.81-0.052.8W2 O.OO1 0.96,1 sa]'t€d Belly rl,attb (cu)

19AO-19a2 Aarp!.€ 20.5+1.310.8r-O.O:,8rBr|2 o.ool o.a{?

1949 SaDpIE 12.2+2.aoo.B'tt-o.o95rBr2 o.oot o.9s4

------crocodylug porogug_____

Total L€ugth (ca) ?9.2+7.OO9rBr-0.11o.8tr2 O.OO1 0.966

Live B6I1t rldlh (cD' 13.5+2.273r8W-O.O3srBrf O.O01 0.966 salteil Be11y ridth (c!)

19aO-1942 gd!p16 21.6+1. o92.Br-0. o to.Br|2 0. oot 0.aa6

1999 Sallrle 15.7+1.9OA.BW-o. 03{.Bf2 0 .001

t Yarlable (ar ve boaly kg. Table 3- Experiment I: performance criteria of alligaEors as influenced by the supplementation of the 45t protain Eurris l''fills alligator fe€d |{ith DL-methionine and/or L- Lysi ne.

4l,leek 4 Wesk Dry Added Added I lJeek Body Dry Matter MatterF6ed: Methionine Lysine l{eight cain Consumption Body t{t. cain

---- t of DiEt ------9 ------g ----

o 474 4974 o.2 o 445 4950 4e4 53aO o.9 474 5096

------Mean ------4AO 5099 ------sE|t ------130 a!"sya_!->F_ Tank .oo2 . oo1 -o2r Methioni ne . 914 .260 .loa Lysine .424 -o75 l.lethionine X Lysine . ao9

TabIe 4. Experi.ment II: Ferformance criteria of atligators as influenced by the supplementati.on of the 452 proteln Burris MiIls alligator feed with protein and amino acids (melhionine and isoleucinel .

Protein AddEd -- cain in --- Dry Matter LeveL Amino Body Total Dry llatter Feed:8ody ? of Diet Acids Weight Length Consumption Weight cain

------g cm ---- s ------9/g --- 45 439 t47 45 -i. 433 150 7439 r -43 54 474 6452 r.20 54 + 490 307 7196 I .30

------t4ean ------459 220 7151 1.30 ------SEl.r ------22 r30 o-12 ANOVA P>F

Protoin . OO2 . ool .601 - 063 Amino Acids -349 -464 -4o4 Protein X Amino Acids .259 ,9A2 m laDl. a. Lt..t yl,.late (rs I P.!c.!taEs of boaly velght, floa ClocoCylug !or'..9ul,nel. atd ClocgCylur porosng.

C. nova€qlriDeao --c. poaoauS-- F.oal.. Ifrleg tr€aal€s N.I.a Ov.rall

t i t *t

Dtessad Ca3gags 66. 1 64.9 66.3 61.7 Gs.9L.2'3

116g9 Slril legs 5.2 {,3 1.L ..8:'? lor.le9s 2.1 2.5 1.9 1.A 2.2". ral,1 Eotal 20.5 19.t 22.4 zs.s zt.t!,2- !.l6at o!1I 13.{ :,3.1 1{.3 1t.9 13. a. '. Upper Body lota]' 34.1 37 .3 37 .A 36.9 37.c3 Uoat oDIt 18.5 L7.3 18.5 tg.t ts.r3 total !.rort{ 3t .9 3o .3 32 .4 g2.g zt.aL'2,3

'gigDllicalt ili!!€r€Dc€s (p<0.05) €rlst b€tt'gea gpgci6a-:s€x - coD.bhatious. :Sigliflcaltt aliftsrelcgs (P

6

SOUTH CAROLINA ALL I GATqR PROGRAT1UPDATE

Thoras Suaynghao - Soutb Carolina l|,iidtife and lla!ine iesources DepartrBent, P.0. Dral{er 190, Bonneau, SC 2943f-0190 nn Apri i !, Laea, lhe South Carol ina ,Ji lll iie and llerine ' Pr,io.:fl r e"Blua(e anC resol/e nuisan!-* a..!je:or rornplsin'-i. The prcBrs:r also ove.sees any .omme..ia i business invDt,/ing sliigstorE :nd rr P. rg.3m .:L.:.-iviri:s. lhe 3ii!:itir in ::urn la..lina h3e m3:1e f, r.e:re:1.i:,r! :.me!a:r s-1:e ::mi-1l rrder pr rte.r.ien in -:r- jre !r '-:r:-a: :_ ev'inctirn. ThF:, have ce4.ve.ed to r-he pDint /n=re F 1.A, .ensus estimared r si:terrde pcpulati-.:f L06.0il raine.j. :re al ligr'-Dr uas fecLassifieC in i,rLy I'r87 as I i . e 3 1 e r E,i .-l,.r p r,!i 5imj larirT rI appe3ran.e 5:a,:eride, "f P.io. .,,. :-rai time r'- rar been :lesErrrEo aE :.1ra.1gerec a.ong :re :oac.. rr: inlano. lhe r3nge trf ihe alii93rar in iauih taroiiila iprefr:l _i.: rrom r-he eoasr- in13nd ro the iaL I iire. i3ii li:r -: .:1i: ":F.ig:bl: rc:e:: i.4 ri -_+:.is -:1 lhe Pi::mcnr- Fh],.sio!::Fhir ..girn. iF!f.y:n!-.r:' -+.- - -:::::': r. :j:::: !: -:i:::- : :-.: : arrcii:-=n ::-a::ai ue',isncis. :brut;aa.i --:.s" 3.?1: :np.'-'ndmEnts Dnc-c useci l.r t h E ,rll i i i , a t i : n : a r::=. 5 ha./e been rps!Dred f ::a rrs€ 3s !s:rrf r'r: imFoirnrmpn::,

::+ .--- -- resiieni i3l anci .escj:t leve I tEmenr :r :ca3i-i .:?-_.. ::s...r:: i:l':ira:e,i i,.rmoef 5 ci .ei,een p€:-Fl.! :i:r 3:.:a::.

;r-i .l..e 9,E_. : r p i i :. : i / .:n + i - jr :r:i!n:: =.::;"::-_ :=.::i_. pr:or'-s iue r! lhe re:-usai .i animais t-a E--3.' ii :iel. .=! i\:= o:r3:3m i:rrDl+me.:ed , r:n:r':.:+r .]a: =E: :r ::e1::r::-- lha a:as--ai Piain ai Souih aaroiina has be-.n ,ri.l,le'l -r.,i: ;i-_ l-;r::i- _.3i , ::::r:_?::: .:: -::e-,+s Jl.l :,n. -r-:i:rts::r

:|P..pe|rv3ncne9'ltr..?.Em':?+j''j'nen3n3'l1j!r:: :.3.::::i+o 35 .r ri.ed:, :r.e :jorr:iF::: -f :r:: : ::.:::::-.; pe.rnit and forwards it lo an alligator 3geni, wno :FFtures and kiils:he animal. Alligaror ager!s are Fri/r.. iirr/iou3.j !crking under special con+,ract irilh the i,epartrnenra, Tne./ re.eive nn Eal3.y L'ut may sel I lhe meat end any Dther produ,rrs, exc=Fting the hide, from the aninals they take. The hide is E..ici by the leFarlinent- ,i r,r :Cz Dt' ,:hp pr.e€"j5 j!ing i:c !he 3gsnls. :r:. ah g.'ine ia ihe DePartmEn! t. 3nd -{ going :e tnE ni:Je gr:ae! 3nd

.r ir:3r,r. :.mpiain!3 numbereci 5,ii in i9A6 and .i58 in Ljig in 5L.uih.Carolina. Three h!ndfed and seventy-4ne ,:tt/ atiig3!crs wEre qete raken in 1;88 and 266 tak?n in !969. This lecrpase in .onplaints is probabty +-he resut! Di two tniitssi rhe 5;I all iAalo!s renoved in 1?Ag ,/ere not prespn! to cause Frcblems in l?8:_ and. i.here ,as mrrre pubiicity aboui !he pr!ig.am in 1.96e uhich p.obabty generated inore cofiplaint_E. It ,iii be interestin? ta see the etfect tbat H,lrricane Hugo ,i L I have on ih€ numbe! ,i :cmFiiint! :his t/e3., :i.ce 3 g:r.C .leat .r_ cf i:1]e a tti:-3-.f .otr' ha.iiB!.es oeen 3dv=r-:ei)/ aiie.ted the s1:!n, Frelirni.n"rr9 r.)(rtes on the sLatLrs alrd corrseI,,-,atr.t]n ol Canaatrr latiFostris irl the State Bf Sdo F'aLltor Er a:il, 1-1ire,:tions of the captive bre€ldilr9! rei11trod ction and manaqefielrt pt-oEt-a,,,"

LUCIANO m. VERDADE .lrrd ABEL LAVORE TIt

Cerrtro I |l ter depar_tdmu, ru.. L de :ootearrta c tstrr"rqL1 dE A,rrmarj - Si lvestres EsEo.la SLrpeir(rf de AsricultLrr,R "Lr.ri: ile OLreiro:" - Ur'|iversidade de Sao F"iLrlo - - (.'a jLF . CI:EAS ESALO IJSF Dr:F 1 )... : ,ru r --a:.r I;F Er ar i l

I ntroduc t ion

The iitL-r-Est olr b|-L"eij1ns trroad-s|.JlJt{--.]-rcr1,na,r l C.niiolam latirostris) ilr c"rptivrt,l hrs irrcr--ased ir trr,i: L I ri th€i lEEt gear-s. It mag be dLre to bl.tter auJarerr.:;: of re lrr.rLll.lr: {rpr||.rrfr abolrt thp 6r)iviFoF,nent"rl probli_.'n.r of tire roL rt;r!. , j.i,ili[,] l,hi., r15L of *E'liriflctioD ol' ,n.r|g jpecieE" .ll1d |r.) rLr.:i,:ir nr ,r{Jrv Fr_ociuctive sPEcies for .1 crrti1:a1 mar_f,et. !]i1)i:, rl1_! i le i"rr-lnej-s have or'11.sLrtili;ed the allrErator-i':rrm 'nod.,!t. i l ,lr.FprtE oi. th(: diffel-encps bEtween boLh of tire sFJecies ir rElabior-l bo uuu! sL:e. growth caFaci bs! El;ir1 teatLlres and .o,nnel'Eiil1 rrIuF. , ftrr"i issLre L:an be responsible for nranage'I|eftL ' rsb.:ll,e,j. il(!,]Lh of .: tir,r:L!i, waste of resouFces dnJ di.icrLlclit or- wi ldliie rranJgE,rrel]l; as !tr.] eronomica I cho.icc' rrl F,-a:ir-

Status

-lhe Historial: hLrman colorri:atiofl b*rEdrr iIr Br ;r::rt .rq L:tri.rF)t;tr11!;LL:: sh€l-e and Sao Fl_ar]ciliEo/FaI.i{na rivef qgste'ns. wtr,j,,r-Ellr[r b1g9r]:.t cities f.lolo-ished and most t]f lhe popLrl"ltji.r 9r-il!,JLrp. Thlr !.r"i*. however. the origil]al dj.strlb|.ltioi ;:one of thE: brlj)a,r-=,rcrlrcofl- Iherefo)_e. bhis speEies Ltlrderw€:r1t Lhe f),.rnb:rt 1mp;ic:h cr.t Era:i.lian huflen Eoloniralior.r, Ihe hunL irrd tr.r:tri tat ili+6trlrc.tion wer-e the conseqLtence's thett broLtgllt Lhe sI]Fct(is Lo the threab oi e;,t rnctroflr - r) ) g;lll-ves Current! Our crtrrent in the St:rtjE of Sao F;ur1|] h"1s b.:ern trased on nighL co|.rnts airrl pe(JF'le acct]rrnts in the distriEtj!i of Anhembir AsLrdos. Aau'-Lr, Lr,ieir.qt ftocoes dt1ci Frr.acicaba. We havF groLrps folrncl fr6m 1 to 15 arli.mals it] h.rt itafs lirctr as open Fiversr dans, r:1r_qhesr sr^ramps and even 1n deE"rrrbillg Foliil$ rJ,: ir.ldustrial oI huinan {lrainEisE:. t/i? h"1v€r al "jr:J iruL!nd E prnLrE-Leal nests whiEh l,er-e bhe orrls availalrte matel' ial ijo tle nl'.srrri! female. pre]inirli\r-rl Thi.s I E.j lts sho!,r th..r p()tr5ihilih,t of bhe Epecres beirie colorli:ertl Lfr Lhis neF habltats a ri .1cl

Conservation!

The broad-snouted-cai'ra is .i11el]dan€L,r ,:d srrec!esj (,,/ANIOLlNl j 1973i IUCN' 1g8e alrd BERNAFDESet atli. lq.ri!i . Tlr," hrLnt rE Frohibited rr Era:il b! Lile Fecter,,i1 t_,rk t\to, 5.19" f,-cJfl{)3.1r1.1967 and the captive bFeeding is reqLrLdLl;edb9 thr: gc.rvernnent"rl ,lr,.c r- --,,n,; Nos. 13e/eg f rom {:)5.r:Js-1989 aricl aS(!,/Bf:t r-rDn ee.1:)A.t9AA. Ttril, rrrteFnatior';{1 tr-ade ol ii.1 prrr{:tLlctilr r$ |.efir!;l:,.Jb.J Utt-$.S ,:ING. 1973).

The decre,r1nr of indrllirjri,rl. e.rixijj!| j,rt5 p,,,-,nri. L.ar|t .L :,rj t:!rjl I ecovel- lis of bhe Epecie.r L I sotrr€! !r F "rrr:i ${() F.,ir.L1oSt!{tL!. He: have been tolcj the .lrrFear irrg L)f bi r:rrd-::|oLLtj{rij-,:,i ii.irr Fir-.rcic.rba river, rle)rb ttr btre L:iL9,,rt bljL, .,rj,tlll!rjr,|,! ns rrE w;i [L?r Pol Lrt ion decreeses.

qbj.lI j.n The hLo'lt occLrrs hhe State in despite i)1. tjtrtr l.rw. It i!; na1n.l9 done ds a hEbbs b9 nrerll f ro,n 1i t lrl,i or ritiddlc I r ?e.arr.r jll EoLrnts! whD |(sei rifles i:o l. c"rimarrq! :itsjLr.ir:::i! Lj,ri,,ifr-j E!r,:: ilr n19hb. Ihe! utili:e ihe me.{b itr lipriicri.i I !lji:hlrri d rL.1t,ir thij sl. r,l ga.ne "r 3|5 a ll-ophrp. lhe f eal ddor,lage of th j.6 .1,:Li!i,;rl Dir rrie cain.ln reoair.1irlq popLrl:LLicjr i:.jtill Lrlri,nowrjr trr.rt r,_i L{ndoLlbt;1,J considerable, The privabe pr-oper-tji€:s h.irve ctril Fr.otechtijn ig;\1115b hLrntEf s besaLlse of the si:rrne li{ ci or-Jner-r+' r |rci r-rairji rq ,:1!!;r ,Lrfles5 o l env i ronmerr baI ilsslrrls.

Directions of the catrtive breeding, rei nrtroduc t jir)n, alntdtindmrq€en,ellrllt Pr 09r- a,n

Captive breedings l.Jear'e carrgirrg oub 4 1 t/e !f|.lr -old caPtivE PfoPagetlcrn pr'osrarn! aiming dL the rL.introriL|cti rrr i )r ri.r'LLr|E --,rrd the furnishmetrt of c.rp tive bor-n irrrj:iviJ("116 for cdifirafl--far oilr|'g, I'r 19S9 ee had 34 hatchlings in e nestg at oLll_ qLri:\l-tFt-g 1r Pirecicaba. From l99r:) on we ar e 9c]rn9 ro manqlge tJreeder groLrPs ir-1 inost of the Bra;iliarl :(]oE. rro(lgh bhe SnEi€_:d"rctr:dos:l0otlr']il:os - (Fra:ilirn do Frasil Sftr :iocipts of r-ooe;) r cor-r3ioerrr.lq cne demcJgraphic al]d gefletic aspectE o.f thF capi.rive p$pLrl.'i{ti{rnl]r accor-dins Lo FOOSE et alti (19H6), Asr ner,rtrl! l;o btr€i Rnrrbit'" CeirsL(Efrom SiBt ther-e are e79 brodd-sntrLrt(1d-{_-ainan irr .apu1y1is (6Cr /rB iD Bra:il 'na.Lest ieinal€is ar-iil 146 incje.terriinetl). Other 1A (9 arri,nal5 ,ralps! 3 fprnaleE ,rrrd 6 i nd€ltr-,r,ni nF{,1) ,nu!it tjle adcled because th(ig were rob li"jte.l b9 ttre De|r)sus. FrDiri t;hrgri. toLarl nemter 55 wprr? born in c.lptivits taEt ql"ar"

Rei.ntroduction: l,Je are atri.r L:ar-i-gifrg oLrt a sor vca or most prilJritg arjLrqLlate and p.l.rcfn:i for- the r.l]intl-odLrcliorr {tf |ie specres rn the SLate of SaE F"qL{L1r. thiE i:tltds rriclrLderj r.r.Lrii t})e arlal.sspEi "\.d J.:scr-iptrior) ot, brot,ic _rfril -rbi.,ri,ic iit.,s i:.nrrrorr.ur.rr' pnvir_o F to the '.er|baI iflF']rt evalLrdti1:] r d iJrtr Ln 6YSEL_?, LYON { 1980) . ",(::1ji,r

purposes: l'lanageoent The eEDllonicErl potr:rltial t:f tli€;l lirirad- srlolr Eed-Eil i rnan ir.rcl-eagie!: 1 Dr:r in:iDag€lrripnt ,rjjd c'rr reEr-vd I i orl Pel_pec c 1veg. llc'wev€-'r' iL.; seosr.aphiEal .li!rLr ifrL.rj L'r quit hecer-ogenolts 111 6ocial-econornri:al ter-ins. lhia ::f]|lErr rrc I ude$ ir |]'l hrishls indLrsbriali.:ed .qresEj tLr L rdEr'-ilevitrlopiiid il9 i 1cLtl LLll'a1 l. egi,ot.rg, CoiseqL(enti:lgr bhEr m.l Age'l!rrrt sgej Letin i,o b.: .r.l {)p tf.'d i|Lr€t: be a f(ncLion Df bhe feaLLrre .rbove].

The avian Er-op of tl.te Stiil:E) gener-;rte:. a .fr-.r{tt itIn!Lrrl rjf ,j{::t-.:ip:; drld clisEai_cls 111!-- car,:,r,:i"_,.rrof (:,r. er-r.1:1 .,t,r{ rie i.i dEr,l tr r 1jr.J prodLttivf? the clc1tr, drrd ,n.:i.e !oL1n9 i:triclt:rr:r ri .,.1!rrrrj.,rerrr lineages. TljlE in"lterial L:ern bF offere.J cn:;L foo,t :o [;ici caiman-i"1rml9r!!. ir"r ther of I L,rFififlirnf_j!.rt allir press). "i!:j.nj.t9 "1vi.r|l-r=,]r-{rerr Ilr lrhere tfrer e ie ro lew ro3r, itrrrj ,i!"1Llabler thh: best mallagement sgstjern pr-otrtabls is re i]]lr Ljdl.lcl1Dn rerntroductiol1 of the sFei:res 1n oans (€tvclrr r|ll,,cr t;he Eou.r_.oi- agl-icLrltural-fal-mE) arlcj hgdIelt:tr-i(: p{:rr{pr-sta{r j.il,rr,5" r;(Jre ,Jir,rr5 later the pcipLrlaLior"l ejiEeedilss l:ould be erxFloi b..rcl. T,e jlreqLrdrE, maiaseflrenE !:gstem accor-d1ng tcr l.rc.rl. .ondrtri]llE ljr](LJd tr,. .l posEible LrcilDo'nic Lrtrli:"11'iorr oi ttre br-L-..r-err{:r-(ed-,:,1r,riti, thl-ough the tr.ide of sl:i , ,le,!|L! goL,vi:Firl:lli. l rriJ,in,lrro rl],irliE, assur-ir'rE r th j.e i,{as r its i:cIr15r.,:rvatiot].

Angwag' rt is i,nportant lcr Ei:reEs that srr! ncrrrclg emi.Irlj a,l,rn,r(jjl; begtn e{ith the caFti.ve pr-opasatior'r! tresides Etrar L-ter,n captj !vits stlrdies aboLrt fe€di.nsr rel]r-octLrcti(:Irr LrFjh,rvii)r, ar,l !,rrrr us, .1|rrr IonE-te)-a l'ielcl studies alroL(t ecotoqs ilnd hetr.rv j!:, ftrL: ii,-:it -)r orleli mlr!:t 1r,ct-(!,rsi_: ttle r(PFrodl.l{-l-i l]tf.ici! j !:! h.:rtcfrling,lgoLr|1g 9l-o!!in9! ttrr olrgh tfrF trr]tr:1|.:r, ,-it |1Lr_qt1l1efl:lnr:rt.es, decrease Dt- tificL(bat;,flE eggE IBs!5r and col-r-FlcL a irnalE fea?ditrql, Geographicaf dlstribution of Caiiian latirostris (BRMAITIS, 1973 and rucN, 1981)

ir'1-' E

(i

t

2. .5

0. ,8

o 9a 6 E o

I Aknowledgements:

FL|rtdacao dE: 'inlp.irro a Fe:.jqu i]'€r do E',itado cle siaL.r FiiLrll] - FT,iFEBF C{ri]sPlho Nac it)n;rl dEr F.:!:iqLri 1i3"1e D.-.-.qe)1!!]1y i 'ner Ltl T€r:no I o€ i E.r CNF q Sociedade iltJE r-oolog iL-oei do Br-asi I - SfEi

Li teratLrre:

EER|iARDEISiA. t"; flACHADT:1. .a"ji i:i.tt.m. E rrYLiAl.lDS,A .8., F in,rn:, hf te i r-€i Rineacada dli' err t i l-iclio. FL'r,cldc,ru fi i,trdi,iiI ii L"r!i. Bi.l1|r Hnri: bi:. IFAlvlAr Fr-.rirlr;t" 19s(;J:I -65.

BFIA:AITI9, Tfif3 F. rLJGnL r fii:at1r)r) L 1., Ir'9,:r rt.rrdt. l i.rfrgr. :foo l|rg i: i ":t 5B l9;3:5!'-lt,t.

-ANDET tr- :l-Esf.lEGS i . t\r.f-r" i fiitFrE . ia- :, FiEijtr r F )_opaqAt i.,ri p l.1rrs. Joo [!i l] I cr3! 5 l9Bir : t ":10- L4l,. ,

.. t t-Yof.J.L. J" l1..iirr f.il rir.,,l.-!!:r ) rtlrd ,:,,,:1tr1:ll:rirr r, Fr 3e? " Inr 1JIFIE}INIT:.s.ri, ti:-d.1. ildl rl"s in,lL rnr"'rrl,-ri lr LrLr.lirr j. Tli€: tJildlifi: e oc |: i;Lj, l,Jadr i Dg1;.)n D.{:" 1 ;-f}r:,i i ,t,61r,

I LlCAl. Th €.r i:\rnphiL!ia-Repbilrri r(',|clJdtid hirrl: " Ilt[i\t f:(blic,rb1,Ii: SFr i.e-- ! G1*|1d. l.9Aer 1-rrP6.

ri;IrlG, -i|i4 F"lJ. The 'rfl I)tIi.?rti,i rr.trn,rii | i r FPPEieE o,' i_lltri iri "i r€ll.,!:i,i,r 1,,, EOltSLErVatronr rr: Proc, irld '!Drl' - iret:. IUCN PLrbI . NS

VANaDLII\lI F'.E" " tlr}pbEi!t e d|1i'itr i.r]:i ,rnre.:!(:,rti1:!:t,:lf? e;tLr|lc,,rr, firr Bra]3i I . p. 155-157. In I E::,pec i es rl:r i,r n.:i br .rr:ii lt: LI r-r 4l I ri !r ': 1'rJ !:i:r dl-. e)1lrin':ao, Acadpini,r B,_d".ii I Eii r.:i .lf Ci,'!|'lcl"r-.:iir.:l d.r -l.rri rl'i. L97arl-1:7i. sOCIEDADE DOS; eooL0Gruos DO ERASIL F:'rFte r.',; g+" 199O:1-e3.

4 VERDADE. 1..I'1. & LAVOtiEN-t-lr i\. FctEnci._i1 d,.- .-'Fri.trE j. tr-,tr1erto de c,cr-EaE;{- €r r-elFL{go!! d.i lf,rodur:ae flvirol;i rta alifi(+lrtitcJLo do JaEal-e-de-PaP0--R,r|'iire-to ( Caiman latirostr_is) fln E:rt.-iir!r ,lr! Srio F.rL(1,r, [, r p) --ii-i.

The Es!ablishment of the First Major Crocodile Breeding Center in West Africa

WoIf -Ekkehard Wai.tkuwait Projet Crocod i 1es Zoo Nalional drAbid i a!l 01 B. P. 932 Abidjan 01 CoLe d r Ivo ire

It was exactly ten years ago, in ltta.ch 1980, that the crocodj.le project in Ivory Coast begao. Thj.s projecl was unciert,aken under the authofity of the Mj.nistry of Agriculture, Water and Forests !o conserve ttle three species of crocodiles native to Ivory Coast by integratj.ng thel! into the econooic developrdent of the country.

I would like to give a brlef overview of the resulls gathered during field research and by running an experimental croc faro which lead finally to the establishnent of a breedina center in the Abidj an Na!ionaI Zoo.

The'comparative biology of the lhree species reveals a clear sepaaalion of their ecological niches, reducing interspectftc concurrence.

CrocodylLrs niloticus prefers areas of land and water exposeo ro open sr-rn1ight, basking oo rocks in rivers and lagoons, and living in burrows besi.de remaining walerpoo1s. Crocodylus catapbractus prefers shaded areas, living in rivers under dense vegetaLj.on in Nbe rainforest and in savanna rivers surrounded by extensive 8al.1ery forest. Feoales rely upon abandoned leaf litter nearby permanenl water courses for nest construction. 0steolaenus teiraspis prefers snall stagnant pools in swanpy areas. They are nocturnaL ierrestrial hunbeas and have been observed feeding on large annelids and other inveftebra!es. The fenale constrLlcts a nount. nest sidilar to C.cataphractus, but often far from wat,er couages.

The typical habitat of each species can be founct atL over Ene dj.stribution area of crocodiles in lvory Coast, but with differenC frequencies. This neans on lhe otle hand thag bhe frequency t,o nreet, a certain crocodile species in a given biotope depends on the percent,age of ils habi.tat represenled there, and on !he olher hand Lha! none of tbe three species will coopletely Lack in a given area. These findings have been verlfied by telemetric s!udies,

Since 1981 nProjet Crocodilesrr has had its base at the Abidjan National. Zoo. Rearing and b.eeding facilities have been constructed on the Zoo grounds. Between 1981 and 1984 crocodiLes of the three species where hatched at the zoo fron eggs produced by captive females and from nesta collected in the wi1d.

8 wi.Ld zoo

C.n ilot i cus 44 r) C.c a taphrac tus 88 50 0. tetrasp 1s 34 0 In January 1990, iL was deternined bhaL the zoo reared crocodiles had reached potential breeding size. The former wifd captured, t^eproductive males were renoved froo bhe breeding enclosure in order to a1low for the establiahment of Larger breeding groups. These groups are noritcompaised of the zoors remaining breedi.ng fenales and those raised in lhe rearing enclosures,

sex C.niloLicus M 2.0 n 11 1.7 n C.cataphractus M 2,0 n F '1 M .3 n F 1.3 m

We hope that we have creaLed, a permanent base for future crocodile conservatj.on in lvory Coast. It is our goal to provide olfsprj.ng for reslocking purposes and for lhe possibl.e future developmenl of j.ntegraled managellent. It j.s also our goaL Lo esLabl-ish a network for continuous research in lhe nalj.onal park systeros, that would be accessible to international researcheas and provide tl"ainlng and education for Ivoriana and parties from other african countriea.

We would Like to suggest that the CSC consider the potenlial for crocodile conservatiod and research in Ivory Coast. We ask for bhe support of the IUCN-CSGin our efforts towards these goals and partj.cularly for Ivory Coast becooing a nember of CITES. l,Ie invile you to consider Abidjan as you selecl LocaCions for future meetj.ngs such aa !hi3 one.

a9 ElTectsof Blastingon Nile Crocodiles,Crocodylus niloticus.

P.A. I. Watson

Crocldile Geeb P.O. Box 178 Maidstotr€ 4380 South AJri.-a

10ti workiDg Meerirg of the IUCN/SSC CrocodneSpecialisr croup.

24 E'PECIA O' BLAAIIIIIG OII TIIJOIICUS

Nine yeals after entering the fascinating lror1d of the Nil,e CrocodiLe, 1949 looked to be a year of great proDise at Crocodile Creek. 72 adult, captive-bred, feDales ranging froD 2.4 leters to 3.2 neters, 10 to 15 yearg of age, r'ere likely to produce in the region of 2655 eggs. A1lolring for 15* infertili.ty, a crop of. 2257 vlabLe hatchti-ngs vaa expected, these calculations having been concluded by Dave Blake and Tony Pooley independently. Construction of the (N2) National Highway vas due to couEence, i.hich lrhen coDpleted lrould provide sp]endid viees of the farn, river and su.btropical environs lrith iDproved accesEi and an increase in touri.sm. Everything i as about to go rrith a trbanqtr aDd so it dld. Within 2 kiloDeters of th€ fan! on Uay 22nd, Contractors detonated 1220 kgs of expLosive foltoared by 925 kqg, less lhan 1 km alray June 14th, and 2850 kgs ,tune 27th (in all 5270 lbs). By the evenj.ng of 29th June 1989, 26 juvenile, fenale, crocodiles in 1 E to 1.2 n range were dead. Our inmediate though! rras that local early-vinter teuperatures coDbined lri.th a virus rras causing t'he probleu. Deaths of this aize over the I preceding years ranged fron 0 to 2 per annum average. Blasting continued. By plotting a graph of deaths and superinposing a graph of blasting dates, a pattern energed indicating that blasting could indeed be responsible. Inspection of, stock in open ponds revealed the foLlor,ing: 1. Bite narks on javs and heads 2. Cegsation of feeding 3, Dilated pupils, no response to light stinul.! 4. ReptiLes extreDely skittish 5. Iate! reptiLes becane very sluggish and lethargiq and renained in fixed locations day or night. 6. Paralysis of one hind teg. After a l-apse of a veek or so despite having been relocated in a controlled envilodtent at J 32'C nini.DaL feedingi occurred. 7. Qurlity of skin deteriorated, breaking betneen segEents into septic lesj.ons. 8. Dehydration of body and apparent anorexia. 9. Loss of balance, inner ear rras obvj-ously danaged, necks j.n spasll, sorre crocodiles staggering Like drunjcs. 10. Pink to reddish discol.oration of the Ekin under the crocodile belly. 11. Diarrhea in a nuDber of cases.

AI Results of veterinari.an exaDinations and autopsies of aniDals that died bettlree 22/27 June revealed nothing. The reptiles appeared in good heal.thy condition but vere suffering frortr a rsevere lack of life. n

Subsequent detailed autopgies indj.cated:

1. Aerononus hwdrophilia ras isolated ft'ou an organ. . 2. Non-Specific except for hvperepia and acute ulcerations of t-he gastric Ducosa. 3. Severe €gp:!!ge4ia lrith generalj.zed abscessation, whj.ch lras subsequently found to be Salnonella and concluded to be a secondary pathogen that had entered the body systeD fron the gastro- intestinal tract as a resuLt of chronic stress. At this point treatinq the entire aiLing sto;k for salnon6lla, involving, a fi.ve-day oral progran r.as consj.dered, I rejected the idea as the additional stress of handling reak juveniLes vouLd have nore likely killed theu. Fortunately, this danagenent decision nas correct as no further Salmonella laas detected in autopsies. By now, ve rrere convinced that blasting lras causj-ng chronic stress in the crocodj.le populatj.on at Crocodil-e Creek. Obviously one could not obtain an order to halt construction of a National Road wi.thout scientifj.c proof, so a study of

BIOOD COLLECAIOT IIID IIIAI,YSTA {as ulalertataD by DR. G. D. TEI'R}I.III BIOIPGTCIE RESEIXCE CETTRE ulrrvERarlY oF DIIRSNVTESTVILLE xt3LE. R.a.A.

1o Dr. Thuman and his associates ny grateful thanl

very little infomation is available as to bl-ood saDpLing techniques in crocodil,eg, and even less j.s availa.bl,e for the blood henatoLog:y and cheDistry values. A project !,as therefore undertaken to establlsh a Dethodology of blood collection, and to detertllne the nomal blood values of crocodiles.

u2 t I|ATEAIAIA l!|D UEEIODA E frl|AL toDE& To deterDine noreal blood values, fi.ve crocodiles vere selected at randon fron a group of trro year crocodiles that vere ltoused under optiDal conditlons at the University of Natal. These crocodiles lrere accustoued to frequently handling and vere part of grorth Etudy experi.lents. To deterDine the effects of stress on erocodiLes- five crocodiles lrere selected froD the affected tqo yea! old group at t-he crocodile farB. Selectj.on was based on signs of il-l-heal-th naDe1y, dilated pupils, sluggish reaction to external stiinuli, and the presence of diarrhoea in sone cases. ErooD collrractrotr Due to the hard, Leathery integuenentun of crocodiles, palpation of peripheral veins was unsuccessful and cardiocentesis vas selected as the uethod of choi.ce. On autopsies, j,t vas noted that the heart ltas situated centralLy on the nid-Line and reLatively caudal to lrhat one vouLd expect in a baDDal. The derDal plates in tbe crocodile nake a V-shaped pattern on the ventral axillae region betveen t'he fore- legs. Using the caudal nost part of this V as a refereoce, the heare in juvenile crocodiLes (n = 10) lras located on the nid-line and 5-6 dernal plates caudaL to the reference poj.nt. At a later stage, adult cracodiles (n = 2) nere bled by cardiocentesis using a silila! Dethod, the heart rras a19o located 6 derDal plates caudal to the reference point. The heart could not be auscultated or palpated in any of the crocodil.es. fn the uost enaciated sick crocodil-es, an apical hearC beat was soDetiEes observed. No cheuj-cal resistant lras necessary in tbe juvenile crocodiles. the aniral i 9 j arrs were taped cl.osed and then ttere held in dorsal reculbency, In this position, they a1l- 1ay perfectly still during the entire procedure. Cardj.ocentesis in all aniDaIE !,as perfoned using a Venojet ulti-sanple blood collecting needle (22G x 1t) and a Vacutainer Tu-be lrith or Pithout anticoagul.ant depending on the blood tests required. Plior to cardiocentesis the area lras disirfected nith a solution of 58 chlorhexidi.ne in alcohol (Hibitane). the needle \das inserted betrreen the denal plates and dj,rected cranially at an angle of approxluately 45' for about 2 sD, Once located, the dovement of the nyocardj.un nas refl-ected to the needle conflning cardiac puncture. A voluDe up to 10 ul- of blood nould be rapidLy lrithdravn fron all aniuals by this uethod. tha co;trol Eroup shorred no adverse effects foll,olrj.ng this nethod of sanpling and no pain reactj-on lras observed on cardiocentesiE. EETIATOI'CI

A11 reptiles possess nucLeated erythrocytes, leukoqytes, and thronbocytes. For this reason, the use of autouated lrhite-cell counters vill gi.ve spurious results. The nunber of red cells can be approxibated rrith autouated counters, but accuracy is best obtained rrith the he!0ocftoneter and standard coutting procedures. white blood ce1I counts and haenoglobin lrere ueasured by nanual Dethods. ltost Ronanonsky-tlT)e stains vi.ll give satisfactory resu]tst Lugolrs, wri.ghts stain, Kleineberqer-Nobel., and Jenner-Giensa are preferred for perDanent nounts. Metlrylene blue nay be used for non-pernanent, quick- screening exaaination of blood filns. In this parti.cu.t ar study, both wright's and Jenner-cieruas stains lJere used. The Wriqhtts stain !.as Dreferred rrhen exanining the red bl.ood ceIls, whilst the Jenner- Giensa stain nas preferred for the differentiation of irhite bLood cel-Is. BTOCEEUISTRY

seru.D electrolytes !,ere deasured using the folloirj.ng:

Sodiu! and potassium - Astra Analyzer vhich eDploys ion selective eLectrodes.

Calciu.u - Cobas Uira Analser and the Roche catciun MIB test kit. Magnesium - atohic absorption.

Osnolality lras leagured usinE an automatic t0icro- oEDoueter lrhich enploys the freezing point tecb.!rique.

Glucose was Deasured usj-Dg the Astra Aralyzer and the glucose oxidase nethod.

Lactate rras leasuled by the ltonotest vhich uses 'the enzldatic lw-Dethod. Cholesterol ald triglycerides vere lleasured by the enzylatic colorDetric test using the Boehringier Uannheir Hatachi 737. Total protein lras Deasured by the biuret Dethod uEing the BoehrinEer annhein Hatachi 737. Iactate dehydrogenase and Alkaline phosphatase rrere tleasured by the rroptiDized standard Dethod'l usinE the Boehlinger I'lannlreiD Hitachi 37. Creatj-ne kinase vas Deasured by the kinetic t'v teEt and the Cobas Uira Analyzer. REAI'LTA

Under the nost enl-ightened conditions of captj.ve hugbandry, a certain bj.as resulting fron the streEs of captivity must be inposed on the Nile Crocodile. This nay introduce artifacts into the data obtained in the case of ltild crocodiles but lrould suggegt our figures are accurate for farDed crocodiles. Etl|Arotscr The nean hel0atological values obtained fron the control group (n = 5) are given in table 1. Fron these val-ues it is apparent that the NiLe grocodile has a very lo!, leucocl.te count (x 1,5 x l-oe l-1) in coupari.son to naDnals. The haeuoglobin level (X 11,3 g 1-1) approxilates those values found in nannals. The henatacrit is approxiDately haLf that of naumals (x o,25) . The red blood cell.s are biconvex, oval and with a centraLly located nucleus, Reticulocytes, polychronati.c juvenile RBc, and negakaryocytes nere identified partisularly on the blood suears of stressed aniDaIs. th€ lynphocyte is variable in size but is approxiuately that of the RBC. With the Jenner-Giensa stain, the nucleqs is large and staing dark bl-ue. the sytoplas[ is finely granula!; stains 1i9ht b].ue and lrill so[etioes contain azurophj.lic and,/or hya].ine inclusions. The honocyte contains a single, indentad nucleus arld is frequently Large than the l]'[phocytes; the cytoplasu is fiDely granular and stains light blue to blue-grey. the neutrophil is characterized by its usually non-segDented nucleus vith scalloped edges i a basophilic cygoplasn that contains basophilic, eosJ,nophiJ.ic granules, and fibrillar strands.

A5 The heterophil is a granulocyle \rith fusifon, red or fibril-shaped intracytoplasDic inclusj.ons or granules that stain internediately betlreen those of the eosinophil and those of the basophil. The nucleug is eccentricall.y located. The eosinophj-L has spherical, bead-like eosinophilic glanules, the nucl-eus i9 pate bLue and is usually centraLl,y located. The eosinophil Bay degranulate i.n response to a systeDic disease process rrj.thout Lysing. The basaphil is coDlonLy obsert/ed and is characterized by intensely staining dark blue spherj.caL or rod-shaped granules. The throubocyte is an elliptical ce1l that is stlaller than the RBC. The cytoplasE stains a pal.e blue. The large, dense, centrally located nucleus stains a dark blue. The throDbocyte is capable of phagocytosis of haene pighent, bacteria, and aDorphous ce1lula! debris. The plasda of crocodil,es j.s colourless but if a blood is collected after eating, the plasDa nay be very IlTraemj-c due to the higtr level of triglycerides. on exatlination of the henatoloqy results fron the stressed group the follolring uas apparent: a) There was a lorrered WBC. b) The haenogl-obin values rere lower than the control- group. c) The henatocrit tended also to be stightly Io!,er than the control group. d) A pronouitced decrease in the basophil coult rras noticed in the stressed group. e) the neutrophils in the stressed group vere classified a9 toxic neutrophils due to the exteDsive vacuolation of the cytoplasn. f) Atntical donocytes vere present in the stressed graup. E) A generaL shift !o the right !,as apparent in the stressed group. h) In the red blood cells of the stlessed group, anisocyCosis and nacrocytosi,s l.as present, the RB crocodile also stained irregular, nitotic figures and juvenile RB crocodile were present. i) There vas al-so a narked decrease in platelets.

26 IABLE 1 t|8llf Erll|alo&ocl vltltEg FRol| EEtt tEt lso lllR oLD rsIIA cRocoDI&Ea (D = 5)

PTNAXETARA lf I AD cTi

-1 B-wBc x 1oe 5 o,37 24 t7 -1 B-Fc g 5 11, 3 t,7 15,0

B-IIt o,25 0, 01 4 '5

DllfElertial l'tit6 c611 coults

( L€ucocyte ) L&c - NeutrophiLs 5 0,50 o,o7 13,3

D

Lkc - l{onocytes 5 0, 05 0, 03 64,8

IJ

IJ

u7 !l3IJ8 2

colPtatsod oF EtlttAtoLoctcA! vAIJuEa OETIIIi:ED 'ROTI TIB EEILfTT VS STREAAED I|ILE CAOCODTTES

PI.RAXETBNS CONERO& GROT'P ATRESSED CROCODII,ES I L2t4

't B-wBc x 1oe 1,0 1,6 1,0 1,0 -1 B-Hb g 7,O 9,O 7,2 8,8

B-Ht ot22 o,24 o,22 Ot29

Differ6ltial ltbite CElL Couats (L€ucocyte) - Lkc Neutrophils 0, 50 ot24 o t52 o t'73 0, 35 - Lkc Llonphocytes o 121 o, 50 o,30 o,23 O,47

Lkc - l{onocytes 0, 05 0,11 o,02 0, 01 o, 05

IJrc - Eosinophils o,02 o, 0L - 0, 01 - Lkc Basophils ot22 o,03 o,L2 o,02 0 . 04 AtlTrical uonocyteE o,04 0, 01

Feterophils - 0, 0a couuENTs: Itacrocytosis + ++ + Toxic Neutrophils +++ ++

24 attlE 3 XEII| AERI'II CIJITTICAL BrocEu{ratnv IJUEA FROII EEII'AE:ir IIIO YEAI OI.D ICUrE CROCODII,ES ( ! = 5)

PIIIIIEEER N x SD cvt

'1 sodiu! D nol L,4A 1 -r Potassium D nol 0,54 L4 '1 calciut! D rool 2 ,97 0,09 '1 uagmesj.u! rl uol 5 o,92 o,o6 -r osnolality n nol 5 3,4 1 '1 cholegteroL u rol 5 5,4 TrigLycerides n nol 5 -1 TsP g 5 50,2 2,4 5 LD u'r 5 3 01- 32,4 10 -1 ALP u 5 64,2 27 cx u'1 5 2L7 33 -t clucose D DoI 5 15 -J Iactate u nol 6,4 30 -t cortisol n DoI <27

TSP = Total seruD Protein Iactate Dehydrogenase AI,P = Alkallne Phosphates (Liver Danage) CK= Creati-nine Kinase ( Liver Danage)

24) rtala { coltPARlsol| oF XEttt cl,ll|tct! ErocEEuIaEn'y VAI.UEA OBTITNED FROT,I 'IE COT'IROL VA SIRBSSED CROCODILES

CONTROI.GROI'P ATREASED PIRA}IETER xx

-1 Sodium n nol 107.8 Potassiun D nol'l 5, 7 (A) 'l caLciun ! uoL 2 ,9? -r fagnesiu.D n rloL '1 osnolality D nol 25L,a -l ChoLesterof n nol 6 ,2 (B) .1 Trj.glycerides u DoI o ,92 (C't -r TsP g 69 ,4 LDu-1 301 74 -I AI,P u 64 t2 437 CK U.] 2\a sL8'7 ( D) -1 clucose n uoL 6,4 -r Lactate ! loL 3,11

(A) Potassium readj.ngs of 3,8 to 5,7 indicated celLular danage sinila! to leveled found in stressed sharks. (B) Cholesterol: Dr. Thurrnan initially thouqht this lras sigTri.ficant but Later discarded theie resrflts as oe felt the rnethod of obtainj.ng this particular data coufd be inproved. (C) Triglycerides readings of 7,05 to 0,92 indicated a lack of feeding. (D) Creatine Kinase readings of 2Ia to 9lg7i This fi.gmre was checked 5 timas and lras found to be corlecE. A reading of 2OO/30O is sinil,ar in naDnats. In antelope capture prograns if figures approaching looo are recorded, aninals are released j.rnEediately fcr fear of Etless related deaths.

2fi EIOCEEI'IgIR'

The resuLtE obtained fro[ the control anina].s are glven in Table 3. The suall standard devi.ations and co-effi.ci.ent of vari.ati.on obtained for nost values gupporls that thege re9u1t9 lay be taken to approxiDate norDal. biocheDistry values for crocodiLes. In the coDparison of the biochenistry values betfeen the tvo groups the folloving lras observed j.n the stlessed Eroup: a) A pronounced lolr hl'ponatlenia ( I07, I n nol I-l) b) A high h)Ferkalenia (5,7 n nol. l''), c) A lou osnolality (5,7 n nol I''). d) A lov cholegterol (6,2 E noL.I'') and triglyceride (0,92 n nol 1'') Ievels. e)' An increase i-n serum alkaline DhosDhatase (437 uI'1) f) ,A Darked increase in ceratin kinase (9187 ul-') . S) Lon lactate level 3,1- (3,1 D nol I-r).

DIACUASION The generaL appearance of the red blood cells in the stressed group is typical of vhat one would see in a !0egai-oblastj-c anaeDia due to a foLvate/Vj.t BD-of deficiency. This can be ascribed to the state anorexia that vas present in the stressed group. This can be further su.bstantiated by the lo!, senu total lipid val.ue observed. The wBc crocodile observations !,ere conEi.stent nith that of a general stressed condition. The biochernistry values obtained betlreen the tiro groups were again characteristic of the tlrpe of values one lrould expect in a group of aniDals exposed to proLodged stress. Blasting havi.ng ceaeed at this point the i]I animals continued to die lri.th a peak irhen heavy eafth vibrating equip[ent'ras operating in c].ose proxinj.ty the farn, Further deatlts occurred durinq capture and relocation to five separate localities. only three further deaths occurred between october and Deceuber 1989. No furlher Dedicatj-o-r \Jas ueed, By 3l.st Uarch :,99o a qonsiderable inprovenent lras observed in the stock lrith only two exceptions. The reloaininE adult fenale breeders that vere in poor condition looked healthy and actj.ve. cottc&usIox

1. The death of 123 Niloticus crocodiles, a1l- feuales, (this is not significant for aII juvenj.Les on the farD lrere fenales for saLe as breeders at a l-ater stage) betreen approxitnately 80 centineters and 2,18 ueters \ras a direct result of bLasting !,hj.ch caused chronic stress, thig debiLitated the systeu and secondary infectiong kj.lled tbe anirals.

ACTUAL i aggs 2555 712 26* Hatchlings 9.83

The nuDbers of hatchlinqs in the 1990,/91 and 1,991/92 seasons could weII be far under nornal expectations.

It lras necessary to relocate, in 8 days, tsOO reptiLes 80 centi[eters to 4 Deters over 5 farns 1OO to 9OO kiloneters froE Crocodile Creek. Our heartfelt thanks to the noted Natal Denbers of tbe Nile Crocodile Association and Crocovanqa for their help and assistance. Education and tourist facilities have been cLosed, but ve hope to reopen then at soDe undetenj.ned tine i!! the future. Thj.E experience has opened up further examples of stress in crocodilians lrhich lre intend to investiqate-

nECOUllEl|DArIol{!

tly strang reconnendation to consultants and existing farDers is to be uindful of najor developnents in the iEnediate vicinity of new or existing faros.

Watson P.A.I. 19OO rrEffects of Blastj.ng On NiLoticus" 1OTH Working lteeting of the IV_CN/SSCCrocodile Specialist croup.

Paper Presented at the 10th Working Meeting of the IUCN-SSC Crocodile Specialist Group, Gainesville, Florida, 2l-27 A,oril 1990

CROCODILEMANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH IN THE NORTHERNTERRITORY: 1988-90.

by

Grahame J.W. Webb. S. Charlie Manolis and Harvey Cooper- Pr eston

G. Webb Pty. Limited, P.O. Box 38151, Winnellie, N.T. 0821.

Tel: 61-89.221 355 Facs: 6l-89-470 678

Consultants to the Conservation Commission of the Northern TerritorY

E3 CROCODILE MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH IN THE NORTHERN TERRITORY: 1988.90.

Grlhame J.W. Webb, S. Charlie Manolis and Ilarvey Cooper-Preston

G. WebbPty. Limired,P.O. Box 38151,Wimellie, N.T.082li and. CotrservatiotrCommission of the Nonhern Territory, p.O. Box 496, Palmerston,N.T. 0831

In this paper we summarisethe progress that has been made wilh crocodile research and management in the Norrhem Terrilory since the previous Crocodile SpecialistCroup meeting (Lae, Oc[ober 1988).

MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Both speciesof crocodilian(Crocodylut porosus andC.jornrtoaj) in the Nonhem Territory are on Appendix lI of CITES. Crocodylus johnstonl has always been on Appendix lI, whereasC.porosus was lransfeffedfrom Appendix II to Apperdix I in 1979, and t}le Ausrralian poputarion was transferre; back to Appendix II afler the meering of lhe Panies of CITES in Buenos Aires (1985). A limited experimenlal ranching operation was proposed (Webb et al. 1984; CCNT l986a,b), which has now been testedthoroughly and deemedlo be both praclicalto operate and to have a minimal impact on lhe wild popularions(Webb ei al. 1989; Manolis and Webb 1990)

ID line with lhe thrce-year review procedureourlined (Webb et al. 1984), lhe managementprograms were reviewed berween 1988 and 1989, and in January 1990 a new managcrientprogmm, covering both C.johnstoni andC.pofoJar, was approvedby ANPWS (CCNT 1990).

The moniloring programs for bolh species continue, and the slringeot regulatory system remains ulchanged. The new program expands the areas from \rlhich C.porosut eggs can be collecred (originally restricted ro three river systems), and esEblishes a[ overall limir on the maximum numbers of each age group, oi each species, that can be removed from lhe wild, for any pu4,ose (including problem crocodiles and research), each year. In ihe first year (1990) these limils are:

C. porosus C,johnstoni Viable Eggs 10,000 4000 Hatchlings 400 6000 Juveniles 400 1000 Adults 200 200

Thc new managemen!prcgram establishesthe flexibility needed !o extend the cornmercial value of crocodiles back io landowneN, regardless of whether their paldcular parcel of land contains nesting habitat or not. It is eavisaged that all animals will be caughr alive and relocated to farms, atld that thc number of faEds (curctrtly 4) will expand gradually - commensurarcwith rhe availabiliry of srock. L9 ATTACKS

Since Oclober 7988,C.porosus has been responsiblefo, serious anacks on fout people in the Northem Territory (Howard River, Daly River, Croker Island). Ahhough none of these attacks was falal, they received considerable meora coverage, and activated a small "anti-ctoc" lobby, calling for the "culling'' of wild populations to reduce aumbe6 and improve public safity.

Overall, lhe respoDsefrom fte public was objective and ralional. It is now widely accepted lha! crocodiles are an imponani economic rcsoulce, and culling for lhe sake of reducing numbers per Je is not as desirable as the currcnr management piogram, which aims !o keep wild populations high while selectively harvesling limited numbers !o suppon fte industry in a susrain;ble way. There is no doubt that the economic value of crocodiles in lhe Northem Territorv rs the single most imponant incentivefor having large wiid populationsof C.po.osus throughout lhe coastal wellands.

PROBLEM CROCODILES pan ',problem,, ..As of the public safery campaign wifiin lhe Nonhem Terrilory, crocodiles are rcmoved from the wild and assigned to crocodile farms. Such animals are broadly defined as those a!!acking livesrock, or residing in seftled areas, ot areas of priorify recrcationai use where !heir presence constitutes a risk to people (CCNT 1986a).

During 1988 and 1989,278 probtemC.porosus were dealr wilh (146 and 132 in each year respectively).Of these.221 (19.sCa)were distribured!o crocodilefarms. 52 (18.77a)were relocaredin lhe witd, 4 (l.,lqo)died at caprurcxnd I (0..17o)was shor. Most of t}le animalscame from Darwin Harbour(66.57r) and Gove (18_3qo). ,'problem,' . ?ur!g fte sameperiod, 13 C.johnstoni were also rcgarded as atrimals, Four were relocated back into the wild, 6 died a! or soon after capture, and 3 were taken to a crocodile farm.

C. POROSASEGG HARVESTS

-. TheC.porosus egg harve$ was againcaried out largelyby G. Webb piy. Limited on behalf of the Conservatiot CommissioD.In additi_onro the manasemenr areas, which have now been harvested since the 1984/85 season, preliminaf,, surveys and halvests were caried ou! in new areas. AttemDls were maoe ro aeacn nests before significant monaliry occurred. bur of the 6497 eggs examined, 26.32, were dead before collecrion. This is similaa to prcvious nesting seasons(2g.7Ea aad 25.0.Eoin 1986187and 1987/88 respeclively). The majoriry of ;ggs coilected wirh dead embryos had ei.her f'looded(>33Va) or overheared(>29qar. i; addirion, 6.52, of eggs were inieftile (7.0 and 9,3Vo in previous seasons).Of the viabie eggs incubaled, 90.570 produced hatchlings; incubation success was 94.8qo in 1986/81 and 89.3qoia 1987/88.

Crocod.ylus porosus egg harvests have now been carried out as research cxercises for 5 successivcsealons. To date, no significant impac! on lhe size of the C.porosus population io harvested aleas has beei detected (Fig. l). For rnls reasort, thc revised.managemel! program (CCNT 1990) allows egg harvesting- in ne$r' areas and the major research cffon will now be directed at th-oie areas. 600 rr93 1629 lE53 2945 1984 1861 I I i +. i + + a 500 z I 450 :E I 400 z z 350

300

250 z 200 1976 1978 19E0 19E2 19E4 1986 1988 1990 YEAR

Figure 1. Annual spotlighr counrs of non-hatchlingC.porosus in rhe mainsrream of the Adelaide River, Nonhem Territory, have increased from around 250 in rhe lele 1970's,to over 500 in the late 1980's.Yer berween1983 and 1989, tl.{65 eggs have been harvested from the DoDulalion.

C,JOENSTONI EGG AND qATCHLING IIARVESTS

Itr 1989, 1910 C.johnstoni eggs were collected from rhe Finniss and Reynolds Rivers. Of these, 1625(85.17o) were consideredviable and incubaled. The remainder were eilhcr infenil€ (2.97o), Vobed (1.1Eo)or de^d before incubarion (10.8%). Eatchlings (N = 964) were distributed to the crocodile fa.ros. Ir addi.ion, 78? eggs were collecled from lhe Mary-McKinlay River for incubation expe ments (see below): 524 halchlings rcsuhed whose post-harching performarrce under falrtr conditiorls is being moni!ored.

In addilio& C.johnstoni harchlingswere collectedfrom lhe field in 1988 and 1989 (1813 and 3400 respectively).Mosr (79.4Eo)came frcm the Daly River-

Arlalysesof spotlight count survey dala (see below) indicale no signilicant negative impacl of the egg and/or halchling harvesls.

POPULATION MONITORING

Crocod!lat johnstoni

Antrual spotlight surveys werc carried out in all C.johnstoni management areas (CCNT 1986b) in 1989. Helicopte. suweys of most of these areas were also 6 caried out, and preliminary analyses indicate lhat lhis merhod is a viable allemativ-e to the time-consuming and more expensive spolligh! surveys. The results ol the C.johnstoni surveys have now been analysed, and they are consistent with their being a minimal impact of lhe harvests.

The Daly River is one of the main rive$ from which C.johnstoni hatchlir-gs have bee! haryested. The river was subdivided inro 9 survey segments separated by rockbars and ',vaterfalls (total distance = 196.3 km) aDd harvesting was rest cted to the upstrcam 91.9 km and lhe downsueam 68.5 km; lhe centtal atea of 35.9 km has been sufteyed bur not harvesred.

3400

3200

3000

2t00 o 2600

2400 f z 2200 J J 2000

1E00

1600

1400 1982 1983 19t4 1985 1966 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEAR

Figure 2. Total numbersof C.johnstoni countedby sportightin the annual surveys of lhe Daly River berween 1983 and 1989.

Overall, the populationof C,johnstoni in lhe Daly River has continued ro increase (Fig. 2) regardlessof rhe harvesr of some 866 eggs and 9627 harchlings between 1983 and 1989 (Table 1).

Regardlessof the annual varialion in counls, the exponential rate of populatiotr increase (r) was positive in all 9 survey sections within the Daly River (Table 2), although only i[ 3 (rwo harvesredand one noo-harvesled)did ir reach significance aL the 5Eo level. The natural logaridlm of numbels sighted was regressed against yea. io estimate r (the regression line slope)(Caughley 1980). To express r as a tdean percentagechange, the exponent of r was used lperceotage change = (et- 1)*100]. Among the halvested sections, r varied from O.34 (a 40% iacrease per year) to 0.02 (a 2Vo irlcreaseper year), indicating that different sections of the harvested population are increasing at vasrly differeDt ratcs. Table l. Numbers of C.johnstoni hatchlings and eggs hawesred from lhe Daly River between 1983 and 1989.

Year Hatchlings Eggs

1983 825 548 1984 318 1985 0 0 1986 928 0 1987 2297 0 r988 1560 0 1989 2700 0 Total 9621 E66

Table 2. Annual spotlight coun(s in 7 harvested and 2 non-harvesaed sections of the Daly River. r = the exponenliallate of incrcase; SE= standard error; P= rhe probability thar r is due to chance.

Non-harves!ed Harvested Sec tiotr t2 3 567 km 14.3 21.6 31.0 ll.l 22.0 18.9 39.4 t7.L 16.5

1983 171 216 448 139 r72 205 95 1984 240 tg'l 70 233 400 95 283 l6:1 1985 r09 r9'7 297 I 14 t77 210 t32 1986 203 346 112 199 263 r13 413 2t0 206 1987 220 331 229 303 s20 91 303 201 t66 1988 303 470 383 422 567 165 423 235 223 1989 195 358 275 393 150 330 200 165 t 0.02 0.19 0.34 0.0E 0.03 0.04 0.12 0.02 0.rr SE 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.04 P 0.65 <0.01 <0.01 0.11 0.62 0.47 0.08 0.34 0.03

Wheo harvestedand flon-harvestedsections are combined (Table 3), it is clear that the populations irt both sections of river have increased significanlly since 1983; the tron-harvestedpopulation at approximately l2Eo per year, and the harvesled population at l0 per year. There is almost cedainly interchange of adDals betwee! ihe harvested and non-harvestcd populations, which confounds detailed itrterpretation of results. 258 Table 3. Exponential rates of increase (r) and their sla[dard errcrs (SE) for tlre harvested and non-harvestedsections of the Daly River. p = the probability mat I is due to chance.

rtsE P

NoD-harvested 0.ll r 0.03 0.02 Harvested 0.09! 0.03 0.03

Total 0.091 0.03 0.02

Ia both harvesled and non-harvesledareas of lhe Daly River. lhe percenlageof juveniles in the population(

Tabte 4. Changesin $e size srruclureC.jornrronl populaaionin fte Daly River berweenthe firsr (1983-84)and Iasr (1989) surveys,ai reveatedin spotlight surveys. ResulF refer lo the percettage composition of crocodiles th;! were bofi ,,eyes sighred and had their sizes estimated (those sighred as only,, have been i gnored).

Juvenile Subadults Adults Sample (1.5m) Size

Non-harves led t983/84 68.7Vo 28.97o 2.5E 201 1989 71.2qo 27.2qo r.67o 191 Harvested r983/84 55.3Eo 38.71o 6.lVo 690 1989 65.2Co 32.8qo 2.01o 64'7 Total 1983184 58.28o 36.57a 5.zVa 891 1989 66.69o 3l.5Vo l.gqo 838

Taketr rogether, the results flom rhe Daly River demonstmteulequivocally lhat the harvcsts have trol resulted in a populatioo decline. 2l9 The results for all river systemsmonitored regularly by spoaligh! counts are m Table 5. The meatr exponential.a!e of increasefor all rivers is 0.050 ! 0.018, indicating that (he popularion has been expanding at abo\rt sqo per year ove! the period of sludy. The mea[ ratc of increase in the harvesled rivers (0.082 ! 0.015) was grearer than that in fie non-harvestcdrivers (-0.031 ! 0.018), which suggests that harvesting may have a positive effect on the population size,

Table 5. The exponential rates of increase (r) and lheir standarderror (SE) for C, joh^ttoni spotlight counts in harvested aDd non-harvested .ivers in the Nonhem Territory. N = oumber of yeais surveyed; P = lhe probabilily $at r is due to chaocc.

River System Years r!sE P No!es

East Bai!€s River E2-E6 3 -0.002! 0.039 0.91 Non-harvesled Katherine Gorge 80-88 9 -0.084r 0.03? 0.06 Non-harvested Mary River (D/S) 84-E8 5 -0.014! 0.086 0.88 No n- harve sted Moyle River 84-88 4 -0.025! 0.200 0.91 Non-harvested

MEAN (Non-harvested) -0.031! 0.018

West Baines River 83-88 6 0.045r 0.069 Harvested Daly River 83-89 6 0.091t 0.025 0.02 Harvested Finniss River 83-89 7 -0.004i 0.071 0.96 Harvested Mary River (U/S) 84-89 6 0.048t 0.051 0.40 Harvcsted Reynolds River 84-89 6 0.075r 0.113 Harvested viooria R. (D/S) E2-86 5 0.154i 0.085 o.r7 H arv ested Victolia R. (Mid.) 82-88 7 0.094t 0.055 0.15 H arv ested Victoria R. (U/S) 83-86 3 0.159r 0.040 0.16 Harves!ed Victoria R. (Pigcon) 82-86 4 0.084r 0.047 0.22 Harves ted Wickham River 82-87 5 0.070i 0.066 0.36 Harvested

MEAN (Ha.vested) 0.082! 0.015

MEAN (All Rivers) 0.050! 0.018

Crocod!lus porot4s

Amual spotlighr surveys werc carricd ou! in 8 rivers in 19E9, including those from which eggs were harvesled. For each river or creek surveyed, the natural logarithm (to the base e; ln) of density was plotled agaitrst years silce proreclion, atrd thc slope of the rcgression line used as ar estimate of the exponential rate of itrcrease (r). This was done in two stagestfirstly using data up to 1988, which was then used to prcdict a densily for 1989 (which can be compared with the observed density) and then for all data up to 1989, which will now be used to prcdict a densily for 1990. Table 6. The expo[ential raie of incrcase (r) ard predicted densities for 1988 and 1989 using the data in Appendix II for rivers in which there have been more th:!n 3 suweys. In the few instances where no crocodiles were spotted in a panicular creek, in any one year, I sighting has been added so lhat a logarithm value could be compured. P = &e probability tha! r is due to chance.

Survey Area N Years P Pred. Obs. Total Den. Den. 1989

Adelaide R. mainst.eam: 0-64.5 km 1 71-88 0.042 0.05 1.99 4.26 307 Adelaide R. mainslrean: 0-64.5 km 8 77-89 0.044 4.2'/ '7',l 0.02 AdelaideR. mainstream:64.5-117 km 12 -88 0.063 0.0r 4.69 4.82 289 AdelaideR. mainstream:64.5-117 km 13 11-89 0.064 <0.01 1.93 Adelaide R. sidecreeks 8 77-88 0.032 0.29 l. r2 0.95 ll3 Adelaide R. sidec.eeks 9 71-89 0.026 0.29 1.10 Blyth R. maitrstrcam 14 75-88 0.015 0.26 3.87 5.l9 4',78 Blyth R. mainstream 15 75-89 0.022 0.08 Blyth R. sidecreeks 12 75-88 -0.011 0.69 1.41 1.26 ll Blyth R. sidecreeks 13 75-89 -0.009 0.68 t.20 Cadell R. mainstream 14 -0.002 0.89 3.00 2.46 166 Cadell R. mainstream 15 75-89 -0.007 0.58 2.84 Daly R. mainstream 6 79-88 0.095 <0.01 3.43 3.29 Daly R. mainsrream "l 79-89 0.093 <0.01 't.36 Finniss R. Bullcoin 5 84-88 -0.0s5 0.58 8.50 34 Finniss R. Bullcoin 6 84-89 -0.035 0.59 FinnissR. Parj P j 5 3.+-8 8 -0.112 0.63 4.36 6.06 40 Finniss R. Patj Pau 6 84-89 "0.065 a.6'7 ,1.86 Liverpool R. GudjeramaCreek l1 76-88 0.035 1.58 '7 0.33 r.97 13 Liverpooi R. Cudjerama Creek 12 6-89 0.043 0.14 t.79 Liverpool R. mainstream 12 76-88 0.048 <0.01 2.42 2.43 202 Liverpool R. mainstream 13 76-89 0_048 <0.01 Liverpool R. Maragulidban C.cek 12 76-88 0.051 0.06 1.90 1.81 t7 Liverpool R. Maragulidban Creek l3 7 6-89 0.050 0.03 1.97 Liverpool R. Momgarrie Creek 12 76-88 -0.082 0.03 0.71 2.50 10 Liverpool R. Momgarrie Creek 13 ?6-89 -0.043 0.?4 0.96 Liverpool R. Mungardobolo creek 12 ?6-88 0.078 0.01 2.5',7 1.80 19 Liverpool R. Mungardobolo creek l3 76-89 0.067 0.01 2.49 Liverpool R. Toms Creek 9 16-87 0.127 0.06 1.09 0.38 2 Liverpool R. Toms Creek 10 76-89 0.086 0.12 0.08 Reynolds R. Deep Hole Billabong 5 84-88-0.184 0.52 0.40 0.6'7 3 Reynolds R. Deep llole Billabong 6 84-89 -0.1I I 0.55 0.47 Reynolds R. Horseshoe Billabong 5 84-88 -0.r40 0.52 1.74 6.88 3 Reynolds R. Horseshoe Billabong 6 84-89 0.056 0.76 3.79 Reynolds R. McEddy's Lagoon 5 84-88 0.149 0.45 1.56 12.25 51 Reynolds R. McEddy's Lagoon 6 84-89 0.218 0.14 t2.t l Reynolds R. Noaklies Billabong 5 84-88 0.187 0.32 2?.30 30.00 39 Reynolds R. Noaklies Billabong 6 84-89 0.183 0.15 Reynolds R. Welltree Lagoon 5 84-88 -0.122 0.31 5.06 11.60 59 Reynolds R. Welllree Lagoon 6 84-89-0.003 0.97 7.79 Tomkinson R. mainstream 12 76-88 0.044 0.02 2.89 2.57 ))9 Tomkinson R. mainstream 13 76-89 0.040 0.01 2.9r

6L Clearly (Table 6), the numbcrs of non-hatchlingsseen in spotlight coutrls has fluctualed gEatly from year !o year, aDd fcw of the areas thaf have been surveyed receDtly (silce 1984) are showing a significalt increase ot decrease in deosiry. The mean value of r, for all areassuryeyed by spodighr in 1989 is 0.037 ! 0.016 (SEi rangc 0.218 to -0.lll), which is appreciably less than rhe mean derived from all rivers which have beerl surveyed iD all years t0.081 i 0.008 (Webb et al. 1989)]. This indicates that the sample of rivers atrd creeks sporlight surveyed annually were ones with relatively high densities of non-halchlings when lhe suwey proglams were initiated.

The relarionshipbet$r'eetr rhe densitiesprcdicled for 1989 (from data up to 1988) and those rccorded in 1989 are on Fig. 3. Tte slope of the regressionline [LnDENSobs= 0-20 + o.g7LnDENSp.ea(R2 = 0.?4: P = O.OOOI)is ctosero unity, indicating thar lhe dala now available can be used to predict Inean results reasolably precisely: it may trol be necessary to survey these rivers and creeks annually.

F z 1,5 1

0 z I

.l

-1.5 .1.5 -l

Figure 3. The relationship belween predicted and observed densiries for lhe nvers and creeks snrveyed by spolligh! in 1989 (Table 6).

The major rnonitoring effon irr 1989 was devoted to a helicopter survey of l0 km sadple segments,ia 70 tidal rivers aDd crecks, around lhe complele coast of the NortherD Territory (betwecn lhe Westem Australian and QueenslaDdborders). As poiDted out previously (Webb et al. 1990), C. po.osus is a highly mobilc animal, and a total populatiotr monitoring program should ideally be based oo anoual samples from a large Du6be! of rivers rather thatr dctailed surveys within a few dvers, eactr ycar. In ordea that the extensivehistorical data base of spotligh! counls no! be lost with the changeover to helicopter surveys, a procedure was adopted for cotecting the spollight counls to helicoptercounl equivalenrs(Webb er aI. 1990). This meant that prior to lhe helicopter survey carried out in 1989, a predicled result was available from |he historical data: in lhis case, a mean detsily of 0.635 ! ,yea!' 0.066 (SE) crocodiles sighled per kilomelre (predicled ftom alone), or 0.599 'Year', 'Rainfall' 'Halchling ! 0.042 (predicred from and Densiry' using a mulriple regression formula). The mean helicopter count from the sample areas was 0.666 ! 0.084, which was consistent wilh lhe predicred result (Fig. 4). It is also constsrenr with our assumption that the procedure used to correct lhe historical sporlight coun! databaseto a helicopter count data base, had not resulted in grc,ss er.o6.

.7

ts .6 z

E c-).45

z

I s.t o (.) 1974 1976 l97t 19E0 l9E2 19E4 l9E6 19EE 1990 YEAR

Figure 4. The relationship between the mean density of ooll-hatchling C. porosus (helicopter count equivalents) and year. Values belween 1975 and 1988 were derived by correcling spotlight counls; ttle 1989 value is the firs! real helicopter count. The rcgrcssioDline, using all dara, can be used to predicl a mean helicoptercount densily for 1990 (0.676 ! 0.064 crocodiles km-r).

Ttrese results can be used lo eslima(erotal populatioDsize. If ir is assumedtiar over long pedods of rime lhe tidal poputadon represenrsa coostant proportion of lhe total population, then the meao trend (rhe regrcssion line) should be a good index of rhe rotal population size, This assumesthat annual fluctuations rn me mean deosity from year !o year (Fig. 4) reflect short-term changes in !h€ ploporlion of the total populalion visible in tidal rivers in panicular years. In 1984, the lotal wild populalion (hatchlings and non-hatchlings) was eitimated to be at least 40,000 (Webb et al. 1984). As mean density has increasedfrorn 0.50 km-l ro 0.65 ka-l between l9E4 and 1989 (s 30% increase),the toral popularion in 1989 is now esliEated as at le6st 52,000 C- porosus.2B SKINS AND FLESH

During the two year period (1988-89)2367 C. porosLt and 1543 C.joinsronj skins $r'ereexponed frcm the Nonhem Territory, mosrly to Japad. A toral of 20,49? kg of flesh was produced and retailed, dainly to the rcstaurant ttade. Most flesh was sold itr lhe ldrm of whole calcases(Manolis and Webb 1990).

CROCODILE FARMS

Details of crocodiles held on the four crccodile farms in lhe Nonhem Territorv. at 31 December1989, are in Table 7.

Table 7. Numbers of crocodiles held on Nonhem Terrilory crocodile farms, as of 31 Decembcr 1989, accordinglo monthly repons.

Farm C. porosus C. johnstoni

Farm .1803 t41l Farm B 2566 7025 Farm c lEt4 398 Farm D 0 6707

Total 9183 15,60r

At one farm, 6I C. porosus nests were laid during lhe 1988/89 seasonand 64 duritrg the 1989/90 season,and at another, ll nests were laid in each seasoll. One additional C. poroJl,6 nes! was laid at a local Darwin zoo each year. Combing all data, fot the 1988/89 season lherc was an average of 12.2 harchlings produced per uesr.In 1989,23 C.johnttoni ncsN were laid in capdviryin one farrtr,wirh an additional nest at a local Darwin zoo; 6.8 hatchlings rvere produced per nest.

RESEARCH

The prog&ss made with valious resefich programs being undcnaken in the Nonhem Territory is discussed briefly below. Most of lhis work has been funded by the Northern Territory Govemmen! lhrough the Conservalion Commisiol of the Northem Teritory, but o!her establishments are involved in collaborarive programs (Macquarie University; James Cook University of Nonh Quecnsrano: University of New England; Universiry of New Sourh wales).

1. Life histo.y strategies of C , johnttoni

Harvey Cooper-Preston'swolk on C.johnstotti life history strategies!s now winding up. A considerable effon has been devoted to using growth lines in fte leg botres and nuchal osteodems as morphological agc-iDdicators.This is by no deans a straight-forward exercise, and it heralds cautiod for those anernptitrg to use the samc method on other species.Her study is now able to use sarnplesfrom fr.atked C,johnstoni in the McKinlay River, recaught after l0 and ll years. 2Q 2, Predicting the time of nesting for C.johnstoni

Smitn (1987) analysedtime of nesring in rhe McKinlay River area, using dara collecred in 5 seasons;h€ demonstratedthat the median day of nesling (whicb ranged from 13 August !o 12 September)could be predicred from the mean maximum air tempen[ure in May - ftree oonths before nesting. His data also allowed the mean day of nesling to be predicred from lhe same May remperatur€s. In 1989, rnean maximum May temperaturewas 32.3oC, which predicted a mean and mediurtr day ol nesling of 21 utd, 26 August respectively.The obseNed mean and oedian day of nesring in 1989 (Fig. 5) was 22 Auglst 1989, indicaling a prediction erroi of 4-5 days.

F a- z

l.l - aaJ

20 2s 30 DAY OF LAYING

Figure 5. Date of laying for 62 C.johnstoni nests localed ir the McKinlay River, in 1989.Day 5 = 5 August,etc.

3. Sex Determination

Resealch conlinues into the histology, hisrochemistry and developmenl of lhe gonadof C. johnsto[i andC. polorar embryos.

The relatiolship between incubation temperatureand sex in embryonic C. johnstotti is different from that in most crocodilians: no constant incubatiotr temperaturcproduces 100% nales (Webb et al. 1987), even though 10070 males are produced itr sotne wild nests. An obvious hypothesis which could explain this result, is thit the mechanism of temperature-dependenlsex deterrnination is sensitive to daily fluctualions in tempemturc as well as to the mean temperature. This possibliry was tested in 1989 (Table 8).

265 Table 8. The rcsults of incubating C. johnstoni eggs at three constatrt alld one flucluating temperature. Individual clulches were split betweel the four trealments; excess eggs werc placed in the fluctuating temperatule trea[nent.

Temperature (oC ) 33

No. of viable eggs 148 148 151 t77 Died during incubation (%) 8.8 9.9 16.9 Hatched- total (7o) 76.4 9r.2 90.1 83.1 Hatched- trormal (7o) 73.0 86.5 80.1 Hatchcd- abnormal (%) 3.4 r0.0 9.6 Mean incubation time (d) 75.8 70.2 67.2 70.8 Sex ratio (proponion males) 0.00 0.39 0.07 0.4r

The results indicate a series of temperatureeffects on harching successand hatchling qualily. There was no significan! difference berween tha sex .atio from ahe fluctuating (31-33oC;mean = 32oC) and co.respondingconslanr rempe.arure (32oC)- Although a possible influence of llucluating temperalurc per sz on sex determinationcantrot be torally.ejected with rhese daaa (i! may need larger fluctualions, or fluctuations around a different mean lemperarure), there may be other reasons why no constant temperature produces 1002o C. johnstont mares.t significant difference between field incubarion arld laboratory incubarion with tiis species, is that in the field nesl lemperatures increase th.oughou! the incubationperiod Ifrom around 28-29oCa1 taying to 32-36oC3t halching (Smirh 1987)1.A sreadily increasingincubalion !empera(ure may be needed!o Lnouce "maleness",as is suggesreda swirch expenmengscarried our;n the laboraro.y (Webb et aI. 1987). Placing young, cool eggs into a high consrant temperarure itrcubator (as is usually done) may also induce a degree of thermal shock, which could iD lum affecr sex dererminarion.

4. Predicting the annual extent of C. pororts nesting

Usilg the accumulaledd^ta on C.porosus nesdng(1980/81 season lo lggg/89 season)from Melacca Swaop,40 km east of Darwin, ar arlempt was made to predict the number of nests (containing eggs) made annually. from i variery of environmental variables. The most accurate predictive relarionship was wirh the Southem Oscillarion Index (SOD in June-July (Fig_ 6). The SOI is j measureof the cyclic panem of air pressure movement across the pacific Ocean. and it is used !o predict the onset of lhe wet seasod in nonhem Ausualia.

The SOI is correlaled wilh local air pressuresand waler heighls, but neirher of dese, as independen! variables nor in combination, gives as piecise a prediction as the SOI. The amounr of unexplainedvariation is so little (Fig. 5) rha! ir is diflicult to avoid rhe conclusion tha! female C.porosus ate risponding-onset to edvironmenlal conditions in June-July, some five monlhs befori the of nesling (Novembdr) and six months before the peak of nesting (DecemDer- Janu ary ). 2E y=0.557x+23.295 z6

zh" 820

,oltl I E z 16

l4

l2

l0 .20 -15 -10 -5 0 MEANJUNE.JULY SOI

Figsre 6. The relationship belween rumbers of C.porosus rests in MeLaccaSwamp each year (laid between November and May) and lhe mean June-Juiv Soulhem Oscillation Index (SOI), five months earlier.

The SOI in June-July 1989 (+7.5) predictedrhar the 1989/90season would be one of ihe "bcst" ycars for nesting (prcdicred 27.5 nesls) since rhe study began. Up until April, some 32 nesls havc bcen localed and ir is possible rhat a few more will be made in April-May. That the predicted value undereslimatedthe real nesting efion loay reflect random variation not yer accounled for, but ia is wonhy of note thar durilg 1989 the water buffalo were eradicared from Melacca Swamp. There has been a sEiking revegelation of open channels within lhe Swamp, and |his season,for the first time in a decade,nests were being made in new areas. The redoval of buffalo may have contribuled to the increased flesring effon.

5. Husbandry research on C, porotus hatchlings

As reponed prcviously (Manolis and Webb 1989; Manolis et al. 1989), a seriesof expelimenls have been undertaken on lhe factors that affec! growth ill newly halched C.porosrr, wirhin the firsr monlh of life. The resulN indicate dislinc! preferences lor cenain lood types, and slrong clutch specific effects orl lhose preferences,and on the extetrl of feeding and growth (Table 9).

These same trials we€ uscd to lest a variety of differenr raising parzrmeleni, atrd as a conscquctrccwe adopted a sEndard diet and f€cding procedure [32oC warer tempeiatu.e; dght-fccding; constant sound (radio): semi-darkness: hide-boards: 75% wild po'.k me t + 25ok chicken heads: 2% calcium-phosphoruspowdec 17o multivitamitr supplcdetrt). With this procedure we then tesred one-day versus two-day feeding, at five different ledperarures (Table l0). Table 9. The percentageincrease in body weight, within lhe first monrh of life, of C,porosLr hatchlingsfed a varietyoI different foods. CH = chicken heads; Pork = feral pork Fish = marine fish. s ')r

gLr1r' 11. \ /, 3il {k t" Clu!ch Fish/CH rrsn l,urralo Po rk Prawtr Chicken

3 l. q A36 53.4 57.0 64.6 48.I 437 50.6t l7_.32 6.0 13.13 F40 r ei.z 44.8 z M92 1 29.6 ,r--,L B1 -12.0+ 24.6| 21.2L 11.5 - F9 10.4k -t1a 2.'7t 30.1 1 }t{t2 J O.J -19.9v 20.2 | F19 35.9z 39.0 1 F29 Z),1z 28.2 \ 2:9 i-I i1 % 2 >,1 Atralyses of food conversion rales indicales fiar ih€ efficiency wirh which hatchlings conven food wirh lwo-day feeding (mean = 407o) is greater than !ha[ with which they conven food with one day feeding (.28Vo\ ("fabte 111. f.urn orre ro lwo monlhs of age the differences in colversion rates betweell on€ and lwo day feeding were still very appareni (mean difference = 56Eo). At 32 and 33oC, conve6ion rares wilh rwo day feeding were ov€r two limes higher than wrrh one day feeding (25.9 a d 24.2Vaversus I2.l ^ad tI.3Ea for 32 and 33oC respeclvely.

6. Feading, growth and food conversion rrtes of wild, juvenile C. porosus

Although numercus studies have descdbed rhe types of prey taken by wild crocodilians and the rates a! which wild crocodilians gro,", none have anepled to quanlify the food conversion rates in lhe wild. We quantified growth rares. raaes of feeding and food conversion rares for wild, jwetile C.porosu3 (30-120 cm TL) in a ddal river (Adelaidc River) (Webb and Hollis 1990).

Results indicale that the mean corversion .a!e was 82.4qa$.e. g2,4Voof lhe wet weigh! of food earen was converted ro body weight). This is appreciably higher (2- 3 !i!des) than convercio! rates obtained for sioilar-sized animals raised in captivity under conlrolled conditions. Wild, juvenile C. porosts eat much less than fteir captive counte.pans (47a body weighr per week versus 27-27Va), blt $e rhe food they eat fa. more cfficienrly (Webb and Hollis 1990).

28 '/L.,) ,,. t. v. zt ,t'\ v t/ '' on; ' "rl \hL""ut// Table 10. Perceniage increase in body weighr and head length afrer one monlh, for C. porotus halchlings raised under five lemperature regimes (see above). Atrimals were fed eilher each day (lD) or every secondday (2D). For 31 ro 34oC each trcafinenaconsisled of rhe same mix of 5 clutches (13 hatchlings). Data for 30oC are from 4 of the 5 clutches(10 harchlingsin lD and 12 in 2D).

10c % Itrcreasc in body weighr % Increase in head letgrh Mean SE Min. Max. Mean SE Min. Max.

ID 30 66.8 12.80 13.8 12'7.6 21.2 1.07 r'7.3 25.9 ?D 30 63.2 1.35 i4.6 . 92.3 20.r r.35 11.3 26.8

ID E9.3 9.90 3t.2 t2'7.0 0.88 r9.2 30.2 2D 47.3 10.58 -1.6 100.0 19.1 l.l5 13.2 25.7

ID /103.1) 199.6 26.9, 1.37 19.5 1?O ll 2D \ 93.3 ,/ 5.21 I19.9 25.5 1.12 20.7 32.t ll 1D 86.1 15.38 161.6 25.8 t.14 16.7 34.0 2D 7t.7 6.10 39.4 109.0 24.2 0.'7'7 1'7.6 2',1.2

ID 85.3 17.00 -6.4 25.5 1.1'l 14.8 2D E?.0 7.',l3 33.3 12'7.'7 24.9 0.97 19.I 30.2

Table 11. Foood conversion rates (CR; percentageof we! weight of food convened to body weighr)of C.porosus harchlings,wirhin the firsr monrhof life, raised at different temperatures,and fed eirher each day (daily) or every second day (2

FC cR (7,) cR (7,) Difference Daily 2 days (q. )

27 44 61.0 3l 10.5 29 44.5 43.I 38 46.0

Mean 28 40 4l.l

269 7. Use of development rates to predict hatching dates for C. poroJ4s eggs

In a previous study (Webb et al. 198?), we presenleda merhod of giving unknown-aged C,porosus embryos a "30oC Age" (lhe age rhey would be in days had they beeo incubaled at constant 30oC), and presenred development rale coefficients for predictilg hatching dates at temperaturesbetween 28oC and 34oC. During the 1987/88 and 1988/89 we! seasonswe tesled these predictions a1 32oC with 152 wild clutches collected from lhe field when berweetr2.I ald 93.0 days (87.5% Iess than 40 days) of age [30oC Age; mean incubarionlime ar 32oC is 80.1 ! 2.1 (SD) days (Webb er al. 198?)1.The developmemrare coefficienr used was 1.261 (Webb et al. 1987), which mcans rhar at 32oC th€ amout! of developmentthar rakes place in I day is 1.261 times rhe amount rhar rakesplace in I day at 30oC.

The results indicated thar smaller eggs lended ro complele lheir development earlier than larger eggs (Table l2). Without correcdng for this bias, fte mean erior between predicted and observed hatching dates was 0.72 days, which was rcduced to 0.01 days afier correction (Table l3). The varialion aroud this mean is expressedin Table 14.

Table 12. Correction factors to be added lo predicted dates of hatching, for C. pofosus eggs, to accoun! for egg size.

Egg length Correction range (mm) (d)

67.6-70.0 - 'to.1-72.5 1.8 72.6-75.0 75.1-11.5 -1.0 17.6-80.0 -0.7 80.1-82.5 -0.4 82.6-8s.0 -0.1 E5.1-87.5 +0.2 87.6-90.0 +0.4

7n Table 13. Mean difference between predicied and real days of halching for clutches of \,ild C.porosus eggs before and afler correclionfor egg size. SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error.

Se ason Mean Difference SD SE Range No.of (d) (d) Clulches

Uncorrected 87l88 0.84 1.98 0.25 -4to4 88/89 0.64 0.25 -5to8 89 Both 0.72 2,18 0.18 -)to6 t52 Corrected 87/88 0.11 1.96 0.25 -4to3 63 88/89 -0.07 2.tE 0.23 89 Both 0.01 2.09 0.t1 r52

Table 14. Proportion(Eo) of C.porosus clurchesfor which halching predicted wiihin cenain time periods. For example, after corrcction for egg size, 91.47a of clutches hatched within 3 days of ihe predicled da!e: had lh€ predicled dates been corrccted for eEg size, 92.lqo would have halched wilhin 3 days. Numbers in bnckets are cumulativeto!als.

Days Uncorrected Corrected

0 18.4 ( 18.4) 15.1 (15.r) I 29.6 (48.0) (50.7) 2 27.0 (75.0) (78.9) 3 t6.4 (9t.4) 13.2 (92.r) 4 3.9 (95.4) (e6.7) 5 (98.0) 1.3 (98.0) 6 0.7 (98.7) 1.3 (99.3) 7 (98.7) 0.1 ( 100.0) 8 t.3 (100.0)

iL, BIBLIOGRAPHY

With lhc exception of fte papers and repons rnarked (r), which arc refefied to in the text, the following- 15 pap€rs, I repon and I book are based on work carried out in collaborationwirh fte CCNT frcm lare 19E8 to 1989.

Astheimer, L.B., Manolis, S.C. and Crau, R.C. 1989. Egg lormarion in crocodiles: aviatr affinities in yolk deposition. Copej,a l9E9(l): 221-224.

Beal, A.M. and Webb, C.J.W. 1989. Effect of idcubariotrtedDetaturc otr rooth eruprionin embryosof Crocod.rlusjohnstori. Copeia l98i(2): 325-331.

Blair, D., Brooks, D.R., Purdie, J. and Melville, L. 1989. Timoniella arsira Il. sp. (Digenea; Cryptogonimidae) from lhe saltwater arccodile (Crocodylus porosut Schneider) from Australia. Can. !. Zool. 66: 1763-1'166.

*Caughley, G. 1980. "Analysis of Venebrare Popularions".John Wiley and Sons: New York.

*CCNT 1986a.A managementprogram for Crocodrlus porosLs in &e Nonhem Territory of Australia. Conserv. Comm. N.T.: Darwin.

*CCNT l9E6b. A managementprogram for Crocodylusjohnstori in the Nonhem Territory of Australia. Conserv. Comm. N.T.: Darwin.

CCNT 1990.A managementprogram for Crocodylusporosus and.C/ocodylus johnstoni in lhe Nonhem Terrirory of Australia.Conserv. Comm. N.T.: Darwin.

Manolis, S.e. and Webb, C.J.W. 1990. Crocodile managememand researchin the Northem Territory: 198?-88. Proc. 9rh Working Meering IUCN-SSC Crocodile Specialists Group. Papua New Guinea, Ocrober 1988. (in press).

Manolis, S.C., Webb, C.J.W., Barker, S.G. and Lippai, C. 1989. Nurrition of crocodiles. /r Proc. Intensivc Tropical ADimal Production Seminar. Townsville, July 1989. Qld. Dept. Prim. Ind.: Townsville.

Manolis, S.C., Webb, G.JW., Pinch, D., Melville, L. and Houis, C. 199O.Satmonella in captive crccodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni atrtdC. porosus). Aust. Ver. J. (in prcss).

*Smith, A.M.A. 198t. The sex and survivorship of embryos and harchlings of lhe Australia! freshwater crocodile, Cr oco d, I us j o hnstoni. Unpublished ph.D. Thesis, Australian National University, Carlbena.

Thomas, A. 1989. An overview of crocodile managemenlir Australia 1985-86. with panicular rcference !o the Nonher{ Terrilory. Pp. 185-199 in Proc. 8th Working Meeting IUCN-SSC Crocodile SpecialisrsCroup. Quiro, Ecuador, October 1986. IUCN Publ.: Cland, Switzerlanq.

Webb, G.J.W. 1989. Crocodilian research in lhe Nonhem Ter rory, 1984-86. pp. 16- 21 ir Proc. 8th Working Meeling IUCN-SSC Crocodile SpecialisrsGroup. euito, Ecuado., October 1986. IUCN Publ.: Gtand, Swirzerland.

Webb, C.J.W. 1989. The crocodile as a production unit. 1, Proc. Inrensive Tropical Animal Productioo Seminar. Towosvillc, July 1989. Qld. Dept. Prim. Ind.: Townsvillc. Webb, C.J.w. 1990. Utilising wildlife- rhe ecooomic incentive for conservation. Proc. "Environment '90" Conference. Darwin. March 1990.

Webb, G.J.W., Bayliss, P.G. and Marolis, S.C. 1989. Populaliol res€alch ou crocodiles in the Norlhem Terfirory, 1984-86. Pp. 22-59 in Proc. 8th Working Meering IUCN-SSC Crocodile SpecialistsGroup. Quito, Ecuador,October 1986. IUCN Publ.: Gland, Switzerland.

1webb, G.J.W., Beal, A.M., Manolis, S.C. and Dedpsey, K.E. 1987.The effects of tedperaturc on sex determination and embryonic developmen! rale in Crocodylus johnstoni and,C. porosus. Pp. 507-531 ir "Wildlife Managemenr: Crocodilcs and Alligators". Surrey Beatty and Sons: Sydney.

Webb, C.J.W. and Cooper-Preston,H. 1989. Effecls of incubation temperatureon crccodiles and the evolution of reptilian oviparity. Am. Zool. 29t 953-911.

Webb, G.J.W-, Dillon, M.L., Mcl-ean, C.E., Manolis, S.C. and Ottley, B. 1990. Moniloring the saltwaler arocodile(CrocodyLus porotus) populalion ilr the Nonhem Territory of Auslralia. Proc. 9th Working Meeting IUCN-SSC Crocodile Specialists Croup. Papua New Guinea, Ocrober 1988. (in press).

Webb, C.J.W. and Houis, G. 1990. Feeding, growth and food convelsion rai€s of wild, juvenile saltwatercrocodiles (Crocodllus porosus Schneider).(submitted).

Webb, C.J.w. and Manolis, S.C- 1989. "Crocodilesof Ausrralia". Reed Books: Sydney. 160 pp.

*Webb,C.J.W.. Manolis. S.C.. Whirehexd. P. and Letls,C. 1984.A proposalfor lhe transferof the Australianpopulalion of Crocodylus porosus Schneider(1801), from Appendix I to Apperdix lI of C.i.T.E.S.Cons. Comm. N.T. Tech. Rep. No. 21.

Whitehead, P.J. 1990. Yolk depletion and metabolic rate of hatchlingCrocodylus johnstoni. Copeia 1990: (iD press)

Whitehead, P.J. and Scymour, R.S. 1990. Pa[ems of melabolic rate in embryonic crocodiles, Crocodtlus johnstoni aDdC. porosus. Physiol.Zool.63(2): (in press).

Whitehead,P.J., Webb, G.J.W. and Seymour. R.S. 1990. Effects of incubatron lemperature on growlh and developmen! fttes of Crocodylus johnstoni embryos. Physiol.Zool. 63(5): (in press).

An OeervLe\r of Alltgator Uanagenedt in Ftortda

E. N. Wiley, II, FCFOFC,520 S. Meridian Sr., Ta1lahassee, FL 32399 Mike Jennings, FCFIiFC,4005 Sourh ttain Sr., Cain;svil1e, FL 32601

INTRODUCTION Since 1977, rhen che Anerican aLligaror (Altisaror mississippiensis) eas reclassified ia Florida flon rhe federal starus of endansered ro threarened. che Florida Cax0eand Fresh lJarer Fish Conx0ission (Conmisston) has established and supporred oanagerlent plograns thac provide for linited consuxnpcive urilizarion of rhe alliaaior resource ohtle contributing co long rerm conservalion objectives. Through suscained'yield harvests, Ierhal control of nuisance attigarors, aod alligator farning, progians and induscries have been deveioDed ,hrch are coEnltted to rhe wise nanagenenc and susrained ucilizarion of alligators in Florida. The CorDnission's a1ligalor nanagenenr proglae, rhe Comtrission,s nuisance alligacor conrroL progrE-m (NACP) and che alligaror farning industry function as the necbanisn for utilization of itorida,s alligator lesource. The Comnission,s alligaror nanagenenr program has inplenenced harwest sttaregies which a1loq rhe ucilizacion of ;itd alligators at several denographic leve1s including cotlecrion of eggs and hatchlings and direcr harvesr of alligarors > 1.2 n in lenerh. tlte NACPserves as an effective mechod for Lechal reoowal of s;ecittc sild alllgators thar presenc a porenrial lhrear ro hunans ot aomestic aninals. The alligator fafting indusrry, in addirion to captiwely Propagatin8 alligators, urilizes ranched alligacors Ehrougl Comnissron prograns that perrnic rhe colleccion of eggs and harchLings from puolic and private eetlands. The purpose of rhis paper is co provide an overview of these progran elerDenrs and to surrna.ize the associaced. harvest or produccion leve1s.

TIIE COI{I{ISSION'S ALLTGATOR }IANAGET.IENTPROGRA. An alligator nanageEenr progran proposal sas implemenred by rhe Coonission in 1987 (David, FIa. cane and Fresh l,tarer Fish comn!., unpubl. reporc) foll.owing che enaclllenr of srare legislarion rhac established an aLligaCor harvest licens€ and cae fee strucrure. 4s ouclined in lhe proposal, monies generared rhroJgh comnercial utillzatio[ of alligators suppotr nanagenenr prograns and provide economic incentives for user groups ro becone acriwe i suppolt of alligator and vetland conservation issues. This concepc, whereby rhe econoEic value of a wildlife resoutce is directed back into owerall nanagemerit and conservalion has been rerned ',waIue-added conselwarron, (nines and Percival 1987, Hines and Abelcronbie 1987). The concepc of value-added consereacion was fundanenral to che deveLoDinenr and inplemenEation of che Conxdission,s alligacor rutr"g.r"'i progr"r. Currently this prograd is ln rhe early srages of growth and developnenc, and, as a resulr, the overalt benefics of value-added conservatioo have not been fully reaLized. Someposicive effects, hoeever, are being seen. Revenues generaled from license and rag fees alleady serve as a oajor source of funding for nanaSenent prograns, and the constltuency of users with a vested interest in conservatlon

774 of alligators and their oetland habitat is increasing substanclally

Operational harvest prograns, I'hich faII under the unbrella of rhe al1lgacor tranagenenr progran, focus on 2 distincr deDographtc segnents of alllgator populations tncludi.ng alligators > 1.2 D in len8th and alligator eggs and batchlings. Harvest straregies are organized inlo che following 4 progran cordpoienrs: (L) rhe har,rest of allisators > I.2 n tn length frod public waters; (2) Ehe colleccton of ailieacor eggs frod pub1lc lratels; (3) the colLection of alligator hatchiings floD public saters; and (4) che coLlection of eggs and harchlings and the harvest of alligarors > 1.2 n in length fron privace Lands.

Harvesc of Alltgators > 1.2 o fron Public ltaters This progran component vas inplenenred srareside in 1988 on 25 publi.c wetland systens and expanded in 1989 xo 32 public werland systems. Connlssion rules require that werlaod syscens or alltgaEor EanageDent utics (AMU) open to harvesr musr be t'conprised of specified retlands, lakes, rivers or orher warer bodies that nay be reasonably grouped for the pulposes of srudy, aoalysis or managenenr" (FIa. Came and Fresh Water Fish Corod. 1989) The nechodology for decernining sustainable harvesc lewels on A.t,tU,s was deveLoped chrough experiBental harvesrs cooducred on 9 Florida lakes during the 1980's (Hines and Abercronbie 1987, Woodwarder a1. 1987). Results of these studies indicated chat approninacely L5i of alligators > 1.2 n tn length could be harvesred annually sichout measurable inpacts on population levels (TabIe 1). Uslng experinental harwest results as a basis for escablishinl harvest levels, Comnission rules Linir harwesr quoras on each _\MliEo no nore lhan 15t of lhe estir0ated harqesrabLe populacion (Fta. cane and Fresh water Fish Conn. 1989). HarvesEabLe populaEion Levets are estinated for each AMUbased on annual nighc-lighc sur,./eys conducred durtng May by Comisslon biologists. Trappers are selected randonly each year fron alligator harvesr perni! appllcations. In 1988, 5,855 applicacions I'ere receiwed, and 238 trappers rere selected. Incelest in rhe progran increased substantially as a result of publicity generared the first year such that, in 1989, over 20,000 applications irere received for 228 avaiLable harvest perEits. Following selection, each crapper i.s required !o conplece a Connission- sponsored training progran prior co issusnce of harvest petuits and hareest cags (F1a. cane and Fresh Water Fish conn. 1989). A $250 resident alligacor trapping license (91000 nouesidenc) and a 950 trapptng agent's LicetFe (for an assistant) is required for harvest and possession of alligators. Alligacor halwesr perrnirs authorlzlng harvest of up to 15 alligators > 1.2 o in lengrh fron designated public i{acers and 15 nuxnbered barvesc rags, ro be atcached to each alligaco! iEnedtately upon harvest, are issued ro each lrapPer. During the harvest seasor (Sepcenber 1 through September 30), trappers are perdi.lted to take alligators 1/2 hour before sunse! ro 1/2 hou! after sunrise using leslllcted nethods that will secure a lestlalnlng line co the aninal (Fla. caoe and Fresh Waler Flsh Conn. 1989). Experinencal harvest data suggest that the tiEing of the harvest as r'ell as the hafiesc oethods direct hervest pressutes away fron reproductively active fenales. Addtrlonal regularory controLs alesigned to stlictly lnpede any illicit trade developing as a resulc of letirinate alligator harvest inctude rhe folloeing: (1) alllgacors dust be kiLled and cagged innedlacely; (2) a harvesr report fo!:! !rusr be conpleted and acconpeny rhe alligator hide unril validacion (3) hides nust be skinned according to specific skinning insrlucrlons provided L'ith the harvest pernit; (4) a1I hides nusc be preseDred ro the CoDnission fo! validation (validarion involwes inspeccton of hides for conpliance with skinning insEruclions, applying a iederalty issued CITES lconvencton on International Trade ln Threatened and Eddancered Species of Flora and Faudal tag in place of rhe harvesr rag, and assessing a validatton fee of 930 per hide); (5) hides nusc be validated within 30 days of rhe close of the harqesr season; and (6) all.igator neat lntended for sale nust be processed ar a ticensed proeessing facilily (IIa. Cane and Fresh Water Fish Coon. 1989). Trappers harvested 87t (2,988 alligarors) and 91r (3,118 atligarors) of the scatewide quotas in 1988 and 1989 respectivety. t{a1e alltgators were leported by trappers on harvest repor:t forns ro coroprise 70t of lhe harvesc in 1988 and 55t in 1989. The averase Iength of all alligacors harvesred in 1988 and 1989 was 2.3 m.

Egg Collection from Public Waters In 1.988, the Connission conducted a pil.oc alligaror egg collection progran on 3 retland systens. This pilor study vas inptemenred ro assess the operational feasibiliry of aurhorizing egg cotlecrion on publlc \raters by farming indusCry represenraciwes . The tesulcing eaAs nele lrarrsferred to petuitted falos for artificial incubarion, rearingr and slaughter. The piloc progran demonsrraced char proposeo brological and regulatory conctols uere adequare to moniEor egg col.lection accivities and ensure thar eggs collecred froo che !'ild could be equitably distributed to licensed alligaror farns for captive rearlng. ' In 1989, che egg colleccion program \ras fu11y implerdenred under CoEnission regulations governing the collecrioo of alligaror eggs from che wild (F1a. Cane and Fresh Ltater Fish Conxn. 1989). The ml.nber of alllgato! fanDs pernitted !o receive eggs frorn the trild tr'as limited co the filst 30 applicancs meeting special faciliry requirenenrs. This Iinic 'ras establi.shed co ensure rhat enough eggs could be discributed to each particlpating farn to oake !rl1d egg coLlections econonically {orthlrhi1e for the farner (David, Fla. Cane and Ftesh Weter Fish CorDn., unpubl. report) . Studies conducted on Florlda lakes fron 1981 rhroush 1986 fTable 3) tndicated chat 5Ot of rhe artnual produclion of relacively dense alligacor populations could be harvested on a susrained basis (Percival and Jennings 1987, Hines and Abelcronbie 1987). As a resulc of lbese findings, Conmission regularions prohibic che annual" collection of eggs fron nore rhan 50E of rhe nesrs on any colleccton area (FIa. cane and Fresh Wacer Fish Com. 1989). Egg collecrion areas are estabLished annually by the CoEnlsston afrer on-site lnventories are conducled by Conntssion biologists to assess each area's potentlal fo! egg renoval. Nest collection quotas are subsequencly decernlned each season based on rhe nunber of nesrs obs€rved by Coorrission btoloSists during aerlal nesr surveys. Regulatory guidelines faciLitate organized egg collections by establishing 2 egg collectlon gloups and desigaating one indlvidual for eacb group as lhe egg collection cooldinator (na. eane and Fresh [ater Flsh Corm. 1989). The egg collection coordtnator reptesencs his group in all aspecCs of directiog and conducti.ng pernitted actlvities. OnLy licensed alligator farnets or their agents are f,erEirted !o palticlpate in the accual collection of eggs. The follor'ing regulatory requilenencs provide for btological and operacional conrlo1 during egg collection activiclesi (1) egg collections nust be conducted und€r the supervisior of Cofinisslon personnel; (2) che nunbe! of nescs opened cannoc exceed the coral nest quoca; (3) all eggs fron each opened nest sust b€ collected; (4) eggs ousc be presented for inspection and invenlory by Conrdisston personnel before exltlng the coll.eccion area; and (5) a fee of 95 per egg is assessed for everJ egg retained by rbe parcicipanrs (Fla CaItre and Fresh l,rater Fish Conn. 1989). In the first 2 years of operarion, over 12,OOOeggs have gone to alligalor farns as a resulr of harvest fron public 0etlands (Table 2).

Hatchling Collection fron Public i,Iaters In 1987, che Comnission implenented a prograxn conponenr rhar pemirs ellgible alligator farners to collecr alligaror hacchlings flon pubt-ic lraCeEs. Establishxnent of conservarive harvesr Levels for juve[i1e alligators was based on research findings that indicare rhis populaEion segrent can vithstand significanr annual har.'esr pressure (Perctwal and Jennings 1987). consereaciwe harchling collecriod quotas were established for each counry in Florida based on an ewaluacion of U.S. Fish and irildlife Serwice 'rrerland invenrories (U.S_ Fish and l,lildlife Service 1982) and esrinaEes of associared alligaror occupancy rates (Neal 1985, FIa. cane and Fresh Water Fish Corun.. unpubl. daca). only licensed alligator farroels eliglble !o receive atligator hatchllngs fron the \rild and lheir licensed agents are pernitted ro participate irl this progran. Hatchling quocas for each counry are randodly asslgned to perriitted fams based or chetr specified preference of colLection areas. Harchling collecrions are pernitred fron Septernbe! L5 through Novenber 1. Addirional regularory concrols over collection activj.ties are as follows: (1) harchlings can not be collecced until after the CoEnission has conducted a Eoral caDriwe hatchling production invenrory on ch€ pernicree,s farn; (2) cire CoDnission nust be nocifled in advance of collecrion acrivittes; (3) hatchlings nusc be cagged inxnediaceLy upon capture tirh Connission issued ireb tags; (4) a fee of $15.00 per cag is assessed prior co issuance of hatchlirg tags; and (5) a harchling collecrion forn nusr be coripleced prior to leaving the collection site and nusr acconpany hatchlings unEil delivered to rhe pernitree,s fatu (Fla. carne aDo Fresh Water Fish CorDn.1989). After 3 seasons of alligator hatchling collecrions (1987 rhrough 1989), hareest rates have averaged only about 40t of the annual slalelride quota of 10,200 hatchltngs. Collecrion lotals lncluded 3,904, 4,062, and 4,415 hatchlings io 1987, 1988, and 1989 !espectively.

m Alligator Manageroenr on Prlvate lands In 1988, alllgaror harvest prograns l'ere inplemented on private - pilor lands tn F1o!lda, srudies on 2 prtvate ranches begi;ing tn 1985 provided rhe operarional and biological basis for cii. p.ig.".' conponent (woo&.ard er al. 1987). The potenrial benefics frorn realizing value-added conservatton are probably grearest utder rhis progran co&ponenr relarive ro other progran conponencs. Ic aLlows participatlng landowners ro susrain dtrecC econonic benefits fron retlands previously consldered a liabtlicy unless drained or alcered for agricultulal, ittdustrlal_, or residencial develop[enr. These positive econoEic incentives for wecland conserwacion on private lands can be iealized thlough tanchlng o! sale of access ro alligatot eggs and hatchllngs and harvest of atltgarors > 1.2 m in lengch (Woodward et al. 1987). The CorDEission establishes harvesr quoras on private lands fo1lolring evaluation of habirat inwenrories and populacion surveys conducced by consulring wildlife biolo8iscs enptoyed by rhe landow;r. To conducr o! verify habirat inventorles, aest and hatchling pod surveys, and surveys of atlltarors > 1.2 n in length, rhe witalife biolo;ist nusc oeec the cerrlficacion requirements of The l,Iildlife Sociecv (Fla. calle and Fresh r,rarer Fish comn. 1989,. Quoras for removal of egls anc harchlings represenc up to 50* of lhe observed nest ot nallrrring poa lnveocories. Harvest quoras for alligarors > 1.2 s in lenqrh represenr up ro 15t of the estiEared populaEion in rhis si;e range. To initlare an - alli8aror managerDenrprograo on priwate 1ands, rhe landosTle! ousr subnit a lrricteo application which requiies selecEron of nanagemencgoa1s, harvest oprions, and a verified atligaEor habitac inventory. Fron 1988 rhrough 1990, applicanrs rere requiied co orn o! have under lease ar leasr 405 ha of alligacor habicac ;n one propercy or adjoining properries (Fla. cane and Fresh ,,Iater Fish Co&n. 1989).' However, recelrt changes in Connission rules rilt altow. in 1991_ pallicipatio! of landoi.'ners or'lessees wirh a surveyed popularlon of ac least 100 aLligarors > 1.2 xn in length (Fla. Admin. tre;kLy 1990). If che lando$ner neets rhe applicarion eligibiliry requirenents, cne €oonisslon will lssue an Alligator l{anagenent prograll permic. To harvest and possess alligators, lhe pereitree or his desisne€s and their agents nust pulchase an altigacor rrapping License i$250) andlo! an alligator tlapplng agenc,s license (S5O). A harvesc period of Kay 1 rhrough May 30 lras esrablished for alLigatots > 2.7 tr in lentth in 1988. This hareesr period was extended to July 31 in 1990. The.harvesr peliod estabtished for f!]!e"t.r" > 1.2 n in lengrh ras september I rhrough September 30 in 1988 and extended co October 15 in 1989. Addirion;l rec.fatorv requirenenrs for harvesr prograns on privare lands incfiae: rri restricted Eerhods of rake for aLtigarors > 1.2 n in lengrh; (2) itnrned{ate cagging l'irh Coenission issued hawesr t:gs; (!) conplerion of harvest reporc for&s .rhich nusr acconpany hides ;r all rine; until validation; (4) Coxor0issiodvalidarion eirhir 30 days of rhe close of lh6 harvesc season arrd paydent of a g3O per hide w;tidarion fee; (5) fee palaenc for egg colLeccton petuits (92.50 pe! egt) alld harc;itng tats (97.50 per cag) prio! ro collecrion; (6) innedi;te ragging of collected hatchlings; and (7) rdandatory tlansfer of colfeciea iggs ana hacchli.n_ts to alligaror fanns perDirted as eligible to receive !!g. and hatchlings fioo rhe I'11d (Fta. cane and Fresh ltacer Ftsh Cons. 1989). Eags and hatchlings can be retained for capcive rearlng by the landoener only tf he is licensed and pernitted as an alligator farr0 e1ltlb1e to lecei.ve eggs and hatchlings fron tbe vi1d. Al.ligator d:rnagernent prograns \.ere impl€nented otl 7 properties eoconpassing 29,543 ha of eeclands tn 1988 and 2! properties enconpassing 54,346 h^ of rellands in 1989, lrhile 36 applicattons enconpassing 70,812 ha were subnitCed in 1990. The nqobers of eggs collected and alllgacors > 1.2 r in length hareested increased beBreen 1988 and 1989 (Table 4). The nunber of parclclpanrs is expecced to inclease again in 1991 and 1992 as longer harvest seasons and less rescrlctlve applicaclon requirerients are inplenented.

NIIISA]{CE ALLTCATOR CONTROLPROGBr|I{ A pilot progxan cooducted duriDg 1977 denonstrated the efficiency and feasibility of lechal redoval of nulsance alligators by conrracred private ttappers (Ilines and lloodl,ard 1980). Prio! to this pilor progra.E, nuisance alligators trele relocated by connission personnel ar Sreat expense and with lii0iCed success (Hines and ltoodlrard 1980). In 1978, lhe Coonission inplenented the nuisance alligator conrrol program (NACP) state\ride by contraccing approxim3tely 55 privare ttappers for renowal of nuisance aLligators under the superwision of CoEnission personnel (Jennings ec al. 1989). Through conxnercial utilizacion of nuisance alligators, NACPtrappers receive stgnificant ecooonic letulns a'hile providing a valuable ser','ice at relacively 1oI' adnintscratlve cost to the state NACP crappers are regulated by Connoission rules chac requlre specific qualificacions including residency within the region of operalion. abilicy ro capcure and handle uiLd alligacors. dnd having available the necessary EiDe and equipnent (F1a. cane and Fresh tatet Fish Cono. 1989). If crappers meec quaLifications, they nust enaet Into a contlact vi.th lhe Coonission and annually purchase a 5250 llcense to take and possess alligators. In 1989, 45 NACPtlappers rere undel contract and li,censed to harvest nuisance alligators thlough pernics issued by the Co&nission (Jennings ec aI. 1989). The operational activiCies of !hi.s progran are dlrecced and coordinaced by Connlssion personnel (NACPcoordinalors) in each of 5 regional offices. Hhen nuisance aLligato! coEplaints are received by CoEnission personnel in regional offices, inforEation on rhe behavlor and size of the alligator along l'ith deglee of percelved threat is recorded and evaluated prlor co lssuance of a harvest peroit. lf CoDnission persoonel decerditre che alllgator ls a potential threat to hunans or dorDestic aninals o! is creating a public safecy iazatd, a harvesC perDiE is issued co a NACP Crapper reslding near the conplaj.nt location. The harvest perotc allor^'s the trapper 45 days to rerove the speclfic nulsance alligator. As irl other harvest prograns, aLligacors dust be tagged iEnedlately upon capture with a Conniss j.on- i-ssued harvesc cag. Withio 185 days of harvest and before hides can be cransferred to llcensed hide buyers, NACP tra?pers nust have al1 hides validated by the Coeoission and pay a 930 validacion fee for each hide (Fla. Galle and Fresh Water Fish Co.@. 1989). Flon 1978 to 1989, the oumber of nulsance alligator conplalncs increesed frorn 4,914 to 9,867 (woodward et sI. 1987, Jennlngs ec al. 1989) (Table 5). During this perlod, lhe nunber of nuisairce alllEators harvested increesed fron 1.871 to 4.230 rith a nean of 2,655 raken annually (Woodl'ard er al. 1987, Jennings ec al. r9S9). Woodwardet a1, (1987) and Jennings er a1. (1999) dtscuss posslble reasons fo! these increases nhich include huaan populacion glowth in close proxlnity to alltgaror habitat, gradual itrcteases in alligacor denslties, greater public a\rareness and acceprance of rhe NACP, and lncleases in publi.c perceprion of alligator threa! in response to rale, isolated attacks.

ALLICA1OR FARIIING IN F],ORIDA Although alltgator farntng is noc adninisrered direcrly under the unbrella of the Conmission,s alligaro! roarEgement prograro, the industry plays an lnportant role itt the productlon, rearing, and utilizatlon of alligators in Florida. Licensed attisator farms are pernitted by che Coonission ro capcively propagare ailigacors provided they neec oodest faciliry and housing requirenenrs. Addirionally, up to 30 alligacor faras rhich have ar leasc 186 n, (2,000 frr) of draioable rearing pens nay qualify foi a permir ro receive eggs and/or hatchlings produced in rhe rri1d. For further regulatory requitenents and escablishnent of collection areas and harvesr quocas, refer !o previous sectlons in this paper on egg and harchling coltecrion froB public and private waters. Additional alligators fron rhe 'rild are available ro farms rhrousn ongoing research activities. Since 1987, the alligaror farning industry, has been supporring a scudy on alligaror egg wiabili€y. The U.S. Ftsh and wildlife Sewice, Florida Cooperariwe Fish and wildlife Resealch Unit, is conducring rhis research using eggs collecred annually fron 6 Florida I'erland systens. In rerurn for funding Ehis project, the alligator farning induscry receives lhe hacchtings produced flon arcificiall.y incubared eggs ar rhe end of each annuai research period. Fron 1987 rhrough 1989, 14,187 harchlings wexe ploduced and subsequently distribuled ro alligaror farns as a resulr of these actlvities (Table 3). CurlenCLy, 48 farns are Iicensed ro capcively propagate aLligators in Florida includi g 30 farns \.'hich are penoirced ro receive eggs and hacchlings produced in rhe iri1d. Hisroxical1y, statewlde production of juvenile alligarors from caprive breeding efforts has been lov (David, F1a. Cane and Flesh tlaEer Fish Comlr unpubl. repo!t). Ho\rever, rirh an !8* annual increase in rhe number of licensed fatus since 1982, expansion of exiscing farms, and inproved incubation and husbandry rechniques, production has lncreased fron 1,000 in 1981 to a currenr level of abour 1O,0OOharchlinas per year (Dsvid, F1a. ca.ne and Fresh Warer Fish Conn., unpubl. reporr). As a result of ranchtng proglaos, che nunber of pild-produced hatchlings placed on faros has lncreased ro a level of approxinacely 20,500 tn 1989 (Davld, Fla. eade and Fresh Wace! Iish Conxn., unpubl. repolt). Harvest levels on alligator farns have increased substanCially ln lecent years in resporse ro these incleases in luvenile stock (Table 5): Thts rieod is expecred to co$cinue over rhe next several years as producrlon levels increase and nore harchtings becone available froin l.'ild sources in Flollda and ocher sourheasce.n states (Davld, Fla. cane and Fresh Warer Fish Corin., unpubl. reporE).

N stn uARY Though producrioD levels are expected to contlnue !o inclease on al11gator farns in the near fucure, rhe nunber of nuisance alligatols requiling renovaL and che nu.nbe! of wild alliqetors available for susEain€d coonercial harwesr on publlc lands is li!0ired. The nunber of nuisance aLligators hafiesced annually I,i11 plobably concinue to irKrease gradually as Florida.s huean population conCinues Co encroach on alligaCor habltat, but !'rograns airned at infornlng and educaCilrg the publtc oo hol' !o ltve witb alligarors could oininize these incleases. The nu[ber of rild a].ligacors available fo! harvesr fron public t'atels wlll probably stabilize berlreen 4,000 to 5,OOO duri[g the trext few years as public I'atels sulrable for sustained hawests become fully utl1ized. The a.roouncof private properry suirable for harvesr of wild alLitacors also ts linited; however, only a sna1l percenrage of rhese lands ale cutrently involved in alltgaror nanagenent. As a result, chts relatively young component of rhe alligaror managemenr prograE has the gieaCest gro\rth potenCial. l{ore rhan Clro rhirds of Flortda !.eClands are under private o'rnership. As oore Landorners becoroe farniliar wtth this prograr and recognize che value of alligarots, participatlon and subsequent hareest levels shouLd continue ro

In conclusion, che coEnission,s alligacor manageDencprograrns and the alllgato! indusrry have denonsriated rhe ieasibility of nanagrnA alligators to provide irurediare and long rerm ecologicat, aescheric, and econonic benefits. The high economic value of produccs derived fron aLligators should continue co stirnulate broad inreresc in nanaging uild and captiwe alligacors for sustained uriiizaEion in F1o!ida.

LITERAII'RE CITED

Florida Departnenr of Srare. 1990. Florida Adminisrrative l,leekly. L5: 659- 568. Florlda Gane and Fresh Water Fish CoEnission. 1989. Florida l,lltdlife Code Title 39. F1a. cane and Fresh Warer Fish Conn., laLlahassee, F1a.256pp. Itines, T. C., and H. F. Percival. 1987. Alligacor nanagenent and value-added conservation in Florida. Pages 154-173 i! D. J. Decker and c. R. Coff, eds. Valui.ng wl1d1ifei econonic and social perspectlves. I{eswiew Press, Bouldet, CoIo. _, and C. L. AbercroEbie. 1987. The dewelopmenr of Florida,s alligator proglaxi. Pages 43-41 4 c, J. W. llebb, S. C. Uanotis, and P. J. Ithitehead, eds. Wildlife nanagenenr: crocodiles and alllgators, Sulley Beatcy and Sons, Chipping Norron, Austr. _, and A. R. I.loodward. 1980. Nuisance alligarrr conrrol ilr Florida. Wlld1. Soc. ButI. 8:234-241, Jenntn8s, l{. L., A. R. Woodward, and D. N. David. 1989. Florida,s Nutsance Alli8ato! Concrol Progran. Pages 29-35 :4 S. R. Craven ed. Proc. fourth eastern wildlife danaEe conrrol conference. lIadi.slon, wis.

8l Neal, W. 1985. Eddangered and rhreatened wildltfe and Dlancs: reclassificarion of the Axnerican allisaror in Florida co lhreatened due ro similaricy of appeaiance: final rule. Fed. Regist. 50:25672-25578. Percival, H. F., and M. L. Jennings. 1987. Evaluarion of alttgaco! hacchling and egg renoval fron 3 Florida 1akes. F1a. Coop. Fish and Wildt. Res. Unic Tech. Reporr No. 29. 67pp. Woodward, A. R., D. N. David, and T. C. Hines. 1987. Anericsn pages aLligator nanageEent in Florida. 98-113 & R. R. Odoo, K. A. Riddleberger, and S. C. ozier, eds. proc. Chird souCheasE nong,me and endangered wildlife sFryosiuE. Athens, ca. U.S. Fish and Wlldlife Servtce. 1982. Dlaft trend analysis atata fron national retlands idvenrory. U.S. Fish and Wildt. Serv.. Sr. Petersburg, Fla.

Table L. Annual harvest of alligators > 1.2 n in lenglh fron experinental harvest areas in Florida, 1981 lhroueh 1989.

Year Nunber harvesced

1981 350 t982 319 L983 277 1984 27r 198s. |,172 1985. L,242 1987: 1,015 1988",b 836 1989",b 1,059

' Experlmental harvest expanded froo 3 harvesr areas co t harvesr b Expelirdencal harvest included snder regulatory and operarional prolocol of stalelride harvest oo public Lands.

242 Table 2. Alltgator et8 harvests froE public \racers in Florida durint 1988 and 1989.

r988 L989

Nunber of egg colLeccion areas 3 5 Nesc collectlon quota 296 Nuxober of eggs collected 5,707 Eggs retained by parcicipants 4 ,302 7,884 Hatch rate of retained eggs 79$ 82r Nurber of iesulting hatchlings 3,410 6 ,434

Table 3. Wild hatchling alligators tiansferred to connercial alligator farns in Florida as a resuLt of research acrivlries.

Sludy

Egg and Harchlings hatchling Egc H,r.hl i noc viability colLected fron eggs Harchlings

1981 2,037 0 2,03r t9a2 1,308 L82 1,490 1983 2,273 3 ,1!24 1984 50 2,9L4 2,978 1985 0 3 ,449 3,449 1985 0 4,O15 4 ,415 t98l 732 4,400 4,532 1988 0 3,964 3,964 1989 0 5,10r

Totals 4,682 26,952 3r,634 /+. Table Alligator harvests fron privaCe lanats in Ftorida, 1988 and 1989.

1988 1989

Egg collectlon quora 2,050 1,350 Nunber of eggs collected 768 1,L66 Hatchling collecrion quota 80 Nunber of hacchlirlgs collected 80 160 - Harvest quota alllgators > 1.2 nin length 255 599 - Nurnberharvested al.ligators > 1.2 n in length 180 577

Table 5. Harvesc of nuisance alligacors in Florida, 1977 throush 1989

gacors Conplaints Alligators Year complaint

19774 749 53s 0.75 r918 4,9L4 1,871 0. 38 L979 4 ,639 L,679 0.35 1980 4,O24 1,590 0.40 1981 4,93L 1,871 0.38 t982 5,L24 2,t69 0.35 1983 1,871 0.31 L984 1,289 2 ,201 0.30 1985 6,432 3,O23 1985 5,018 3,049 0.51 t987 7 ,288 0. 53 1988 10,30s 4 ,464 0.43 1989 9,867 4 ,230 0.43

' Harvests resulting fron lhe pilot nuisance alligator conrrol progran inpleoenced in an 11-counry area in FLorida.

& Table 6. Harvest of farn-reared alllgators in Florida, 1978 thtough 1989.

Alligators Year Harvested

t9t s 335 1919 220 1980 89 1981 284 t982 244 184 t-984 738 1985 1985 1987 6,479 1988 I ,512 1989 t6 ,482 'the etlect of hlgh tenperature and increased day length on growth and survlval of captlve l{lle crocodtle, Crocodllrs nll otlcus during the cold season in Kenya.

Ry

L 2 A. Zi l ber, Y. D. Il. Porper

the experlment took place at Manba ViIlage, a cr:oco(lile farrn near lionbasa, Kenya a d corrceded n'ith the cold season in Kenva. 'li() nonths o1d crocodltes were re^re,t in srouDs of rI) an1m.ls each iir round 2.2 m2 concrece ponds with 0.8 n Irist, uaLis. rhe |,,or ctoped gently toirerds a ceirtral drain ohich was 15 cm below tlre level ot rhe walt basis. .rhe floor i,as conptetety covered to a Ievel 1,lhjchenablell the crocodiles to ralse thelr body above the oater only near the w.tls. The ponds,ere covered bv a roof madeof I: I ratlo of glass and asbestos vrhich prevelred a1r fto!.?bur enabted dlrect solar radlatlon. An ad llbitum food, a mtnc.d nlxrure of fish, chlcken aud red meac suppltmenredwlth nrLnerrts and vlcamln.j was provtded once daity at sunset on ralsed trays whlch were removedbetore sunrise. Afrer rhe rrays i'ere removedthe ponds were drained, washednnd refilled wlth clean well

llre anlmals were reared under I trearmenrs !,'irtr 4 r(:petiCions:-

l. Anbient diy lerLth rlrho(c he.rifs (Ilaicr Lemper^cures:2l)c l2.C) 2. Anbient (lay lenBrh rrirh hearine (qiter rcrnr)erat,,res.29.C - l4'C) Extendedday length and hearlng (1./;rrerremperarlrres: 29"C - l4.C)-

Iieat ing 0.s provtded by aquarirn heaters place,l in r he centre of ench pond. 1Ile day was extended by tno,0.6 n long neon tlbe hmps in each pond which operated from I hour before until 2 hours afEar sunriet for rhe enrire

i\11 the animals wete deighed an{l rocal Iengrhs were measured at the beqlnning of the €xperlment and afcet 2, 4 and 5 nonrhs. Dearl anlnals were removed count€d and replaced by equat slred crocodiles in order to naintain the experlnenral densiry.

The result were as follows:-

(a) 1lr€ aeighc/lengrh rarlos were highly corr{rlateil olthout slgnificanr differences betlreen the r:eperttions and rreatnenrs 1n heared ponds, bur the cofltrol anlmaLs had W/1,rario ohlch vas significanely sn.ller than exp€c ced-

rb) Extendedday Length had no eflecr on grorth and survtvat,

(c) tleatlng had a posirive effecr on borh Srowth and survlval. Slsr'lftcantly, high€st nortallty vres observed nr the unheated Ponds.

2K The above demostrated the re11 knowneffect of renprarure on crocodtles and retElles ln genetnl, but the facr rhar extended day l.€neth dtd nor effecr grooch or survivaL may.be associl1redlrirh tbe teedlIs hablts of Nile crncodtles uhtch ar€ active,luri|'g diy and njqtrt. 'Ihe fulL results of thts study wilt lje published elpswhere.

L A. Zilb€r, Clal Crocodile Farm Lrd., ManbaVi11ase, P.o, Rox 85723, tlombasa,Kenya.

Y. Yom-lov, Zoology lleparrmellt, lel -re Aviv Universiry, I Av i.v tsrae L a)9978.

3. D. I'1.Popper, National Cenrre for trarlculctre P.0.8ox 1212, Elrt, tsrael 88txl0.

a7 The effect of slocking densiry on survlvat grori,lh and body condiri.on of captlve Nlle Clocodile, Crocodilus niloticus

(t) (2) (3) Ar1e1 Z11ber, Dan M. Popper and yoran yoin-Tov

T\to months old Nile Crocodlles, Crocodllus nllorlcus \rere reared rn rouno concrete ponds of 6 m radlus, each divided inro 8 equal seccions, under 4 d€ns1Cytreatments elrh Cworepetltion each- The experinent vas dlvlded into 2 petlods: -

Tha denslty lreatn€nrs rere as follors:-

(I) Inltlal densltles rere of 6, 9, t2 and 15 tndlviduals per n2 and th€ nunbels I'ere reduced by tOZ at the end of each 2 rnonchs trrerval, The experlnent Iasted t0 nonchs and rhe final denslties were 3. 94, 5. 9I , 7.80 and 9.78 hdlvlduals per m2.

(b) Durlng the second period, rrhich starred wlth one year o1d crocodlles the 1nlt1al denslries 'ere 7.5, 10, I2.5 and I5 lndividuats per n2. . The numbe.s \re!e reduced as in experinent (a) and th€ final densities after l0 monrhs rere 4.94, 6.57, B.2L and 9.85 lndlvtdua.Ls Der n2. r€sPecrlvely.

The bottom of the ponds sloped genrly rowards the cenEral draln and the oater level \rras kepr so rhat a radlus of 5 n iras uarer covered. The ua.Lls were 1.2 n hlgh and the ponds were covered by a sloping asbestos roof. I"lat€r was supplled rhrough taps at the cenrre and ar rhe water pe!1meter. "iri"tf"" Food, fresh mlxture of chlcken, flsh and red near \ras provided once dally ad 11bltun. Ilater remperature ranged bet,eeo 26 _ 34"C and alr t€mperature 24 - 40'C and were equal tn all trearnenrs.

The aninals ftom each tepetltlon \rere sampled bt-oonthly. T\renty five animals lrere randomly raken, weighed and neasured for r;ca1 tength, Dead anlmals were rernoved and tecorded.

The results were as fo11ot"/s:-

The welght/length ratlos rete hlghly correlated without any signiflcant dlfference berween the repetl!1on and rreatnents. 2. the above stocklng densltles had no effeci on grosth race during any of the perlods.

3. S1ldlary thete ra€ no effect of blonass on grorth rate durlng any of the perlods. a 4. Survival was slgnificantty and negarlvety affecced- by densiry-"6;, rhe first cold (4 during season nonths, J"ry _ ir."",l.i r ss6t, ii. crocodlles rere undet 8 nonths old.

5. of densi!y on survival vas observed ::":::".. durlns the renainlns r6

The results suggest rhar Ntre crocodlles can be successfully reared'ith ro ill effects at rhe above densiEies and rhar Cenperatur€ has a clecerlnental effect on survlval at high densiries .r y.".g ".r" "."".iir"", FuI1 resulrs of thls experl ent w111 be pubushed els€where.

l. A. Zl1ber, C1al Crocodile Farms, MambaVillaee . P.0. Box 8572j, Mombasa,Kenya.

2. D. lt. Popper, National Cenrre for r4arlculrure, P.O. Box 1212, E1ar, Israel 8800U.

3. Y. Yoo-Tov, _ Zoology Departmenr,Te1-Aviv Unlversity lel Avlv. Israel 69978.

a9 The elfect of lighr r€gine and renperarure on growth rare, survlvat and body conditlon of young captive Nl1e Crocodiles, Crocodilus niloticus.

By

(I) (2) (3) Ariel Zl1ber, yoram yom-Tov and Dan M. Popper

T\relve groups of 8 months old crocodites were kepc for 2.2 5 monrhs 1n round m2 concrete pondsrlEh 0.8 n high warfs. rhe p""a"-t.it.r",.." stoped ro'ards e""try a centrar draln and iurly covered b;;;;";-;;"; enabled r".,.,", the crocodlles ro lals€ their u.ay .t."" ;t"";;;".-;J"'"",. "nr"i, waffs. Ar ."" ad llblrum minced mlxrure of chickens, fisn r.u of.vrtanln ana iei,near togetner l1jl,l:909 D per r2.ker".a on €xposed ..iy., which l{ere placed "." "ir"."J;;;"-;;ti, :::-.::.: in the ponds ;;;-..,.""" Derore sunrlse. After the "fr". "";";; travs were renoved rhe ponds t ele dralned, and r€ft1led arif",-,- \rashed

The anlnars were reared under 4 rreatrnents (t repetirlons each) as fol-Lors:_ l. Completecover of asbesros and g1ass, L;t area ratlo, whlch prevenred alr f1oir, and a.Lloi'ed direct solar radiarion_

2. Conplete asbesros cover, prevenred air itoa an.l lighc penerrarion. These tl'o .."u..un." inct'ded continous warer flow of 28.5"c _ kept both \rater 3t"c, \rhich and alr tenperature slnilar in both. 3. Exposed ponds wlth a conplere shade of plyvood placed of the 5 cm aDowe rhe r1m wa11s, enabfed ali flow and partiat ifluminarlon. 4. Exposed ponds enabted free airflo{", and direct sunlighr.

Al1-the aninals rere vejghed and.tocal lengths Eere measured at rhe beginning of the experlnenr and after I and-5 nonths. D""d .";;i;-;;r; renoved, counred by equal slzed ctocodires 1n order :*"1::.."0 ro *.i.i.r"-ii"'""p..,rn.".,.I.

The results lrere as follows:-

resulled 1n signlficanrly .rhe I::i.i:1..1 berter srowth and survival. nexr oest resulrs in srowth were obtalned froln tre;trnents t; ;-il';'r" rhls order. SlSnificaDrly hlShest nortaliEy was obserwed urra"t tr".t..r,f t. The above suggest that a comblnstion of high temperature lllunlnatlon and direcr sorar result in lrnproved groorh and survival.

a0 These resulrs contradtcr corunonbet.ieL by crocodile that and a,tliagtor farners darkness ls essenrial tor optrmar groerh.

Fu1l results of thls expertnent \ritI be published elserhere.

t. A. Zilber, Clal Crocodlle Farns, Mambavi.Llage P.0. Box 85723, Monbasa, Keoya.

2. Y. -Yom-Tov, Zoology Departmenr,Tel-Avlv Unlverslry rel Avlvr lsrae1 69978.

3. D.-M. Popper, Natlonal Cenrre for mariculture P.O. Box I212, E1ar, tsrael 88000.

al The Relations Between the Growth of Weight and Length Wlth the Exuvlatlons of the Young Alli- gators Before Hlbernation Zhang Zhengdong ( Anltul Research cente. of chlnese Alligator Reproductlon, Xuancheng'Anhui , cuna ' ) Huang ZhuJlan ( [uang chu-chi€! ) ( Institute af Zoo\ogy, Acadenla Slnica' Beiiing'China'

ABSTRACT This article discussed the reason why during the feeding of the young all"lgators the gro!'th of body weight dj'd not sychronize wLth the growth of thelr total- length' The reason for this phenomenonis exuviations' Before young chinese hlbernatlon, there are trro exuvlations in the Alflgators. At that tlne the groltth mode is a perlod of the j-ncreese srolrth of skeleton and epidermj.s with a proninent ln total length. lthile in the other periods a'e princi?afly ''leight' for the increase of thelr body

'1984 for A batch of l4O young all-j.gators of was selected the early stage' the prlmary inspectLon of their grc'tth in lvo maJor phenomenawere found in thls inspection: 1. Durlng hlbernatj'on' the bcdies of young alligators stltl kept gro!,1ng slowly ' grq'dth in 2. In the feedlng, we found that the cl-imaxrof wej.ght and ln length were at lntervafs'!" For the further clarlty of thls phenomenon' another batch of young alllgators of 1985 was taken out as the materlal for And a mlnute insDectlon on lhelr growth durlng hibernatlon' 19A7:"' report on thls result had been written out Ln of 1986 was taken Stll] another batch of young alligators hlbernation' out for the tr"8t5itX their grc"'Jth before law of growth this paper wllL report tlre young a1l1gator's before hlbernatlon' and appearlng this phenomenonrs cause

EZ Materlal and Method of This Inspectaolt young aLLj-gators of hatching 1. Materlal: A batch of 108 nests for this in- in 1968 vas taken at random from 5 spec!1on. the differen- z. Method: With the precaulron of avoidlng the material are tlation fron thelr birth orlgin' to their orlgj'naf dlvided j"nto 5 groups according -hen 'nd measure them sepa- nests. feed, insDect' of food taken and ratelyi make .ecord on the anount totat Length ' and make weekly records on we.ight' on tall' on the lengths of the trunk and the

Results obtained nume- 1. In all of the perlodlcal" measurements veloclty of the body-weight r1cal val,ues' !f accordlng to the group can be divided into 5 gxowth for crlterlon' then every stages. and i'n }ength' and The increase's t-value test in weight in Table 1 and sho'{n dates i-n 5 groups on 5 stag9s were fisted contrastlvelY. out the relationship between 2. wlth the purpose of flndj-ng dl'fferent grot'tlng stages' the growth of the trunk and the tall on tail lrere also listed in T.le measurements of the trunk and the trunk and tail was Table 1. But obvi.ously the growth of the irre gul-ar. j'n that the young alligators J. It was found the inspection But there !i/as a underwent 2 exuvlatlons before hibernation' exuvlu|d process was also variation in exuviun tlDe and dates of j't in all nests that dLffered ln every nest, hovever was common and al-l could be the exuvlun process was a process in notj'on divided lnto J stages. stage of exu- 1) First stage (free stage): At the first young begin viation the epldermis of the alligators of the skin to be loosen fron the understructure in appearance and prepare to drop away' thls tj'me was exuvl-um there wag no slgn of exuvlun or there 1n sone only 1n a fev places and a fevt crackages grey places. However the whote body turned lnto the colour and the colour was nuch deeper at ioin- tsof the scales ' 2) Second stage ( ll ourisl- -exuviati on stage'): The elj-dermls 1flron the lower iaws 2i on the abdominal Parts of necl(' tn nk and taiL Jt' on the 2 sides of neck' trunK anr tail 4r on the aL1 Parts of Limbs exuvi- ALI keDt cracking into snall pieces and bony scal-es ating.But in the 2 e uviaticns the thick on the dorsal part e :uviated very late' the head ])one ciid not exuviat ' instead lt grew thicke' 'nd The larger' onLy exuviat'd very thin epidermls' young alligators lik to soak in water with exuvi- much ated skj-ns iloating round thetr' looked very like grey l,/oolly hai growing alL over thei' bodies' tril:h nost qart l) Third siage: This was the last stage of the body covered ilth a sheet of new skin' only er

' Di scussl or Table f it can 1. Fron the values of weight and length in the be seen clearly that stages f ,1lI'V are the clinax for clinax for the growti'I growth of weight and stages 11'l'y' are the of ten€:th. And the grorvth of we-ght and length uere at intenal

a4 i,rlth a regular order. It I's because: 1) Not only a1I mean body weights in the 5 stages proved in confornity wlth the above-mentioned law, but the magnitudes in t-test (rnainly i.n I'1II'v stages) all Proved dlstlnctlon existence. 2) In the values of the cl-imax of total l-ength increase, the I stage of group No' 5 was the only exception among the 5 groups. Because 1n that stage the cL-imax of body lreight and total tength turned out at the same tirne; as to the mag:dtudes of t-test (rnainly in I1 ,IV stages) there was no difference only in the stage II of group No.6 and in the stage ]v of grou! No.2. In stage Iv of group No.1 even though t t ' but in stage v, t t ,so it inversely proved that there ,/tas existence distinction. so' as a whole' in alI sl?ges' rhey complied to this l'1w. ^ r. -hc .tso 'ine for J cLirdax of ilcreasins bcdy weight started 24-52 days, 45-'1O'1days, and 8C-1J2 days,wj.th the feedlng of young al11gators. Conpared v/ith the 2 cUmax of 1984's batch (2o-4o days and 84-91 days) the time relativel-y conforned lrith each other. Being itl before hibernation' so there was no third climax in 1984' s batch.(1) J. Fron the observation of feeding' the tine-tnterval between the 2 exuvlatj.ons before hiberiatlon varied greatly. The longest tine-interval lras 21 days ( group No.16)' whlle the shor- test only 1 day, in which there was almost no inte.val aod one exuviatlon iust continued on to the next. It was an exception. ( see laote 2., 4. There was a grest tine dlstinctlon and with no law in each exuviatlon in every gToup of young all-i'gators. It seemed that there was a law from the tlDe taken in the 2 exuwiations ina nest. If the former was a long exuviation' then the later phenomenoa was a short one, otherwlse lt reverse. May be this was for to ad,apt the hlbernatlon of the young al'ltgators vrlth help of seu-biologlcal clocl( make adJustment on secretlon' ( see Table 2) 5. Table I proved: whether the stages \rere dj.vided according to the increase of body weight (Table 1) or divided according to the amount of food consuded by the young alligators, Eventhough there was no regular formula, but as usual we can get ao appro_ xlmate resul,t: 5 stages. 5. ]f the total time of days i.n the, periods of the 2 exu- viations listed in Table 2 were to be compared with the stages in Table '1 then the , total trne of stage II ,I n Table t , aDDroximately colncided with the tille in the 2 exuviations in Table 2. 7, As nentioned above, we deened that before the coming of exlvj.ation (including also a fev days at the beginnilg and in the end of exuvlatlon), the growth node of the young alligator was mainly for the lncrease of 1ts body weight. While durlng the exuviation almost all the nutritions were used up for the growth of a new larger spldermis and skeleton. So there was llttle increase of body weight, and sonetimes ewen a decrease. But there was a rapiC inc!'ease 1n the tength of the young alli_ gators. T?rat vras why the gro,wth of body weight of the you]ls al-Li_ gator did not synchronize with growth of total lensth.

Reference Lit eratures

[1] Zhang Zhengdonget al.: The Growth Rates of young chtnese Alllgators in Captlvity, Acta Herpetologica Slnica 5(f): I 217-222 (19A6) l2) Zhane Zhengdonget al.: The crowth of young Chinese A1liga- tors During Hibernati on. Acta Herpetologica Si.nica 5(J): 16-20 (19e?)

a6 lable 1. Every groulrs nuierlcal values of length we!.e be surveied rn the 5 etaqes, rhich wel'e dlvlded uDon the velocity for Crowth of the body-t:e].eht. beginning

DATE seet.4 Oct.4 Cct.18 IIov.8 Now.r5 SeDt.2? --oct.1€ F19 --llov.8 n=19 --ttow.15 >53t4! iSoo (22-29\ 7t'l ":,::tl, /.tt) 6.t:r4! 0,,3 l',:ti:l\ LerEth engl|r - Se.t.2, ct.2a SeDt.29 't,21 '=zl ro21' --Oct.16 --Dec.4 --Dec.'l l --Jan.J +'1":":'i .t 7r6. ?t2 LL1

it9l Seot.22 n=21 :i;.',5

6 't::,1::;, lencth ).et4 t ;':l::;",\'^ 5_33) 3ct.7 oct.7 --Oct.21 --Oct.28 n-22 --Nov.2A'-' ll;;it,u,'-., body wei cht 6..11 '.1'7 a .r5lta.t13 7"L7':::J t.'7" lea --Qct.2t --Oct.29 i!i;;..0 "=:; el tlt i::Ji ";:{i:f, h'u "liL!:;ii t.,,1)rr'H;Ht E$, 1*"Aiii,i i *t I*'.:i:i n'.-, ,/) .).1t1t'(t E!t;p.u4

t,.-.a-,"tu L,,,.-).otc t-6,,t-).ttt t.6.,-r.a. tqd.4-r.'!,4

vn E OJ

o, \olco o\ \o 3! a t< o qJ o t- @ o {!c z z

(! !0 \o @ a N z o o € F o z @ \o o I I I I E a I o ol @ ! OJ c o z a a z z o

q\ (ol -,1tnl n @Pl \ol c{c NOI '71 RA o o o ]Jl i? o I I 6 I I o t] til ol I I 3'l ol z n cr1 F- (.) o € .q .cx o d ? o o o q1 |.' o I + + fi'+ {}q o+ 'c rcl ,o P !lPI o c N o 9rJ \o @

Er No. of group

298 o3 b0 b0 b0 b0 bb NOGlf.-fr

o

rEo :< :< >< >< >.. 60 !0 b0 b0 b0 \o\om@ir\ lnNO-tx., Or r\ \O F- Ol (! \omoN- Fln@\O- \o t\ \o co F 0) nmm!-itn b! b, ho b0 b! c- L..J@\O o F \O ra\ N F.- o !O F- O\

b0 b0 h0 !0 b! QO@\o|J,\ bi \oo,-fQ|r\ !o F )6 (00 -F- f.- o\ o!,.gno >q(!> NN q\

r--(\rN30 m-J @ @ mc-!nm(\ 6 F'-Ll\F o ! - ool ,c >q :< ;q >i >< b! o! b0 b, b0 o o o5 -J -S @ C- -f gns56 F.' -J F \O 6 o c!\o3cr\\o n\o r\ r.l @

I boboh0bob! .J tr- \O tn -J f.- \O O.\ o\ o\ !- >qe> @|J\ \o E \o \o r\ t\ b! 3 ..1 b0 b! b0 b0 !! (! o\o\mr\o m@-f (rl cQ or ! -c ..r Ooj@mm (D \o mo\ o\ F

(\J \o @()

o. of gl"oup F IUCN/SSCCROCOOTLE SPECIALIST GROUP llorkshop on T.ade in CrocodJ I ian Products

Pr6sented Sudfiaries and Trad€ Statistic5

24 Apr i .L90

!0th work I ng Meetl ng of the CSG Gai nesvi l 1s, Florlda ApnI I 1990

300 lhis section tas sdited and compi led by 6in€tte Hemley, csG vlcE Chairnan for Taade Monitoaing, Andraa Gaskj of TRAFFIC(USA). Kevln van Jaarsvetdt. CSGVice Chai.fian for Trad€, and tn€ fol loring ro.kshop paaticipants:

0on Ashloy, Ashley Assocjates, Inc., united StatEs John gache, Australia Crocodjts Fa.ne.s Associatlon, Austra I i a Peter Brazaitls, Centra I Pal.k Zoo, Un.lt6d States oave 0ur l and, John G. Mahl6. Co., Llni tEd Stat€s 0avid Hai re, Un'itad Sta te s Jon Hutton, CSG VicE Chairman for Afrtca, Zinbabl{€ Noburu Ishl i, Takara Tosusho Co. , Ltd. , .lapan 0ietrich ielden, Federal eepubl ic of Ge.many Ted Joanen, CSG Vice Chai|.man for Nortn Am€rica. United States R'Jchard Luxn1oore, CSG 0eputy Vice Chairran of traqe Monltorlng, Unlted Kingdon Greg Mitch€11, Mal,nland Holdtngs Ltd., paoua Ner Guinea Toshio Yamanaka, CSG0€puty VicE Chairl'1an fo|^ Trad6, Japan

CSG/Apr i 1 1,99O

301 INTERNATIONALCRocootLIAN SKIN TRAoE: TRENosANo SoURCES

RI chard Luxnoor e CSG 0eputy VjcE-Chai.rnan for T.ade Monltoring

CITES annual rEports give an estjmata af the internatlonal trade legal ly ca|.rled out uncler th6 terns of th€ Conventlon. Tabie 1 shors thE nlninun net trad€ in classjc crocodltian skins (i.e. jgators a l I al I and crocodj les except cainans) indjcateq oy cITES r6ports. Th€ data for 1987 indicated a total trade of some Ll5,00O skins rhi l6 thos€ fo. 1988, whlch are as yet lncomplet6, show a trade of a.ound !f2.000. Vh€n the full data ar€ availabl6 It is llk6ly that this rtlt riss to a.ound 140,OOOctassic skins. jn Th€ total has be€n increasing rec6nt yeaas, and hds moie or I ess doubled since 1984.

ConsicleratJon of the soecies involved shors that most of th€ rncreas€ has been attaibutable to skins af Alliqatol. j mi ss 1s s i op en s i s obta t ned fron ri ld ha.v6sts and aanchi ng in Louislana and Flo.ida. Supoty of Crocodvlus nilot.jcus has atso lncr€asgd, oring $ainly to the n€r systems ol anag€nent, ranchjng and quota schemes, int.oduced in a vafi€ty of Afrlcan countri6s. The nunber of Skins of CroCOdvlus pOrosLls haS alSO incaeased to a lesser extent uD to arouncl 1O,OOOskjns from aanch jn production Austral Ia aad the ouota schen€ ln Inclon6sra. js Caocodylus novaequiaeae the main classic skln in tfaoe and the supply has rernain€d fai.ly cons!ant.

In !he 1970s the trade ras fluctl higher, probably in the aegicn of 300,000, oring nainly to the largef Export of C. nj lottcus f.om Afiica. many of rhich ent€.6d Europ€ und€r th6 terns of the reservations held by !taly and France. These ,€r6 d|^appeo rn 1984, and !he resultinE r6duction in tracle can clearly b€ se€n in Table l. Today ther€ js very titile evidence of jljegat trade in C. nr'loticus skins, and the majo. ill6gal trad€ is b€lieved to oE in sk{ns of gj-lglgsgs and C. novaequineae from Solrth East Asia, iradE in Calnan sk ins is very much larg6r, and CITES annual ropoits lndlcat€ that it ras up to 400,000 in 19Bg (Tabt€ 2). thE maJo.lty of th€se came from Venezuqla yith snal l€|. quantjiies fron 8olivla, Guyana, Arg€ntjna. Hondu.as and Co'tonbja. There is a'lso knorn to b6 a substantial llleEal trad€ in Ca.imanskins, orlncipally to Sr'ngaporEand lhailand, taking the total to Som6thing over. a ni I l iAn S(rns a /ear.

CSG Ap. i I 1990

T2 uloFo('0.t(.'0FOrfOO oFao ?rjl6t Fl ro < rtNot ao lii \o rr at F o a!'{o ar@F ot (\it €r or .t OCn i'l d AA

Fi6000FoFFoFOO .to

i6t@ o! t,l z a. s9 o H qI Ot Ol tt !t otltqrl otdt ol 6 Ol-g Elll-d dl Jl tl (lrl.'4 d !l 6l T,l6. 1q !l olrl Ol ol utldi -Ol ol @lol o +l|'q qIqOl '!l tOl !I el d dlJ tl.Jl JJl.ClHl > -q !.i trl Ol d q -el ol q q ol*l ol ol ol ol-d,rl .dl ol o?t Q _{ ..,t q at.-ri'l q E| ql ol q H ot dl ol lr Q.'.{ tttttllttittl t a9 al ol ()l al el Ql ol ol al (Jl(Jl ol E"l I 6 Ut ? U'

Q o a E< e .l) o (D AF @ o (g (! o. o>, 6 E!d tr .:l o. = =r E !fE o * * u< o co o co oL o Oo OP t\(o Fo) ft-a

o -S Xe E > 6co (! ,\o) L f '-^ v) |- zr\iA t- rtso ti< z .= t\ 83eg :- F F ,!i x

J 'o !5d F :<-:

ooA or.|J x ta 9r llrCrO\O;€idroo 833 SS33 SeSC €o

(,<9.^ &aD ('(J

oEr t {g . 3 I Er >o F ,< Hg { (9 El Fi -o6 Ool . oa 2 t. q) (tE r-.i {(a>.:ax H t Flr a a<

305 UPOATEON REGULATTONS: Hor !ntErnational Rul€s are Chanqlno

Presented by Dietrjch J6l dOn

In 1975, rhen the Conv€ntion on Int6rnat.ional Traoe rn Endanger,ed Specjes of t/.ild Fauna and Flora (CITES) en!e.ed into. force, fo. the fi.st ttme all 23 species of crocodilians were affo|"ded some legal protection by m€ans of ro.td\.jde tradE regulations or trade r.estrictlons.

or{EJnally, C!TES I ist6d 18 taxa jn Appendlx I and 9 taxa .ln Appendlx II. At that tims. Apo€ndix I crococll.l tans rBre classr'f tsd as species threated rjth extjnction and are orohjbited lrom connercial trade. ApDenoix II crocodllians could have be€n ', comr'rercially taade under a CITES I lcenslng,, systen.

0ver th€ y€ars, CITES has unoergon6 a evoI ut.lonary pr.ocess rn .egard to the rat.lonalE on crocodJIlan utiIlzatlon. Thts is an encoura9lng slgn fo. CITESsince it shors that CITES, rn some ways, js quite able to adjust to changJrjg pol jtical c r acums!anc6s.

!n chroaologjcal order, tha fol lowlng js a brief summary of the CITES evolution on crocodilia. utiliza!ion and traoe tn !he1r pnoduc!s,

r) Son6 species aave been dornl isteq fran Appead.ix I io II .j (Al I iqato. mi ss i s s i oo en s i s ) and othe. spec i es or pa|"tlcular populatlons hav€ been upl jstEd fron Appendi.< II to I (Crocodvlus acutus and C, porosus). Specific c.iteria, also cal led th€ ',Berne C.iteria.,, have to be fulftll6d foa such transfers and rere described in tro resolutions (Resolutjans Conf. 1.1 anq !.2) adopted at the flrst ne€tlng of the Conference of th6 Paitles (CoP) of CITES in 1977.

At th€ second neettng of the COp in Costa Rica (1979), the so-callEd "farning,, rgsolution, ResoIqt.ion Conf, 2.12, was adopt6d regulating !he conmercial Erads of captlve-bred Appendix I cl"ocodl I jans as rel I as other non-croqodllan taxa and Jnqluded narking, F-a gen€ratjon requiren6nts, 6tc, Thls resolution was fol lored by other resolutions at other COps (Resolution Conf. 4. 15, 6.21, and 7.10) d€flnjng the cont.at of caotive-br€€ding operations (reEistration), c.lt6ria to be met for nelJ op€ratlons, €tc,

306 the parties at the thlid COp h€ld tn N€r Oe]hl adoptcd rhe "ranchlng" rEsotLrtton (R€solut.ton conf. 3.15) that later p€rmltted countr'les such as Zlmbabre, Austral la and Just recentlyr Eotsrana, Malari, Mozambique, and Zambia, to sqbnit proposals to dornl ist theil. crocodi le populations f.om Appendix I to II.

In !985. !he partles at th€ fifth COp in Botswana 'cl"cpplng" adOpted a .6solution (Resolution Conf. 5.2!l al loring sp6cific c.lt6ria such as status |"€ports and manage|nentprograms (in son€ resp€cts, I b€liev6 that these rerE quEstlonable critl€ra) to transfer s6ve.al African crocodJle populations froltt dppendix I to App€ndix II. At th6 same CoF, basic |.equjrements for a uniform marking systetn wer.e introduced (country code, identif jcatjon nunbe., yea., etc).

Last y€a. at the seventh COP, th6 parties adopted further .6solutlons affectlng crocodjlians and thei. taacle:

ReSo'L!ion Conf. 7.14 .eolaces !ne "croopjng', resolu!ion by thoroughly revjsing thE old resolution (Resolution Conf. 5.21) such as pe.m{ttjng no res€rvatjon on a specJes dornl isted u1de|. tie -eSo--tioa, -eou'-'-g a cocJien!eo Tanagenen! sJrveys aad sta:-s -epor!s. e!c.

Resolution Conf. 7,12 .ecommencls,fon the first tim€, th€ ma.king of I iv€ capttv€-bied and high- value Appendlx I species such as a trJal narking syst€m qsing codes microchlps jn specinens of 63yi a I is qanqeticus.

All of th€ abave m€ntJon€dresoluttons can b€ obtain€d by contactJng thE IUCN/SSCtradE Sp€ctaltst croup, 1725 Oesates Stl.E€t NH, Suite 500, lrashinEton, DC, 20036, USA.

CSG/Apr i I 1990

N1 PROBLEMAREAS ILLEGAL TRAOEIN CROCOOILIANSKINS: CURRENT

Presented DY Gi nette Heml eY cSG vlce Chairnan for T'ade I'lonitoring

skins The rapidly-growing internatlonal trade in crocodllian trade over the last has presented a mixed picture of i llegal in ranched and farmed three to fjve years. The increasing trade 'egulations aimed at skins has brought 'rith it a growing body of same time indicating control led harvest ano export, vlhi le at the to enforce and an overal I deregulatlon of trade' The capacity general ly improved in monitor the expandrng movement of skjns has Community' Japan' the principa I consumlng regions of the European in most of the and the USA, while remaining woefully vJeak and l./ell- producer regions. Singapore, an entrepot country cont i nues to undercut estab 1i shed tracle and smuggI l ng center ' u/or.]dl,lideenforcementeffortsbynaintainingclTEsreserVa!]ons porosus' novaequineae on three spec'ies, crocodvlus crocodvlqg narkets are novaequineae' and caiman crocodi lus consumer in countries that are expinilng;pioly in the Far East, notably Korea ' not party to CITES such as Taig/an and South

note areas of On a regional basls, rhe fol lowjng sumnarjes 'jmoortance v/ith regard to cLlrrent i I legal trace:

proDlem \rith regard to Southeast Asia: Probably the most urgent the smuggling of q' trade in classic crocodilian skins involves Sinqepo'e v/ell- pqlSgs and c. novaequlneae fron lndones{a to policy of non- inI"n"n"a trade channels and s'ingapore's biggest "b1ack hole" in compliance with cITES nave maclethis the of illega'l trade' the classic skln market. Current estimates reports' indicate that at based on customs statistics and field to singapore least 1o-15, ooo sKlns are moving fron Indonesia ending up in the unnuuffy, ',iith a nunber of them eventually nade important moves to .:up.ne." ,n""ket. Indonesia has recently all reptlle skln stop tne illegal flor by officially banning singaporean traders to trade with slngapore, aPParently causing coLlntries I ike begin expanding tn6lr operations to neighboring its cITES eaiua t'tewouinea. until Sinqapore rithdraws continue and vlill greatly reservations, this problem is likely to rnanagementprogram' undercut Indonesia's burgeoning crocodlle

extenslv illegal trade rn Singapore has also beenlinked to recent ca I man sk l ns,

Thai.]andhasrecentlydevelopedintoamaJorsmugglingcente.for Ane|ica, p|imarily from Brazll and Sg-l!g-D Srclg!|lll]S from South Paragqay. It ts €stlmat6d that at l€ast 75O,OOOcatInan sKlns yere lnpo.ted to lhal land ln 1989 (Lqxnoore, p€rs. conn. ) i tne traOe naS apparently cofintinued in 1999. CustOnS statiStlcS suggest that a nqnb€r of these eventually ended up on the Japan€Ss markot, rhjle the 6xport fr,on Thal land to the US of nanufactured cainan pfaducts has plcked up ma.kedly. Thai land is a pa.ty to cITES but lacks tegislatlon to jlnptement tne Conventi on,

Jaoan: Japan has mad6 jnportant p.ogress ln the last th.€e years in tlghtEning lnport trad€ contl"ols, lncludtng the r€novat of its CITES r6s6rvatJon on g. porosus in lats 1989. Horev6r, contjnuing strong tradE fron Singapo.6 (up as much as 40 percent fron 1988 to !989) and That land are caus€r for conce.n

A1'r'ica: Trad6 controls fo|. expoat of Nl le crocodi le from Afr.lca to Europ. havo lmpioved notably slncE 1994 when France and Italy dropped thei. CITES ressrvation on thE spgcj6s. !/hl l€ En6iE qo not app€a. to b€ sjgnificant p.oblems in thls taad6, a number of Afrlcan countrt€s stj I I fat l to neet thelr CITES |"6porting aequlrenents.

South AneriCa: BaaZl I and Paraguay contlnu€ to Serve aS the j naJor centers for I legal Cainan export out Of the regioni both ccun!rres ban expoats of vlrtLjally all tlldlr'ie. picgress .aS been made in Calombia and Venezuela io tjgh:en €xpor! controls; 'siockpi rni le so-cal led led', skjns ccnt.inue !o be exoorted frcm A.gentjna.

Mexicoi Mexico remalns thE only country ln Latjn Anerjca not yet 'l,ql pa|.ty to CITES. l-€6tabl ish6d leather yorking cent6rs and close economic ties to both the US and the EC via Spaln aontinue ,, to fiake this country an jnportant skin launde|"ing,, canter for crocodl I ian skins, primarily ca.tman. q-!!t \{lth th€ boomJng Export t.ad€ of both atttEator skJns and meat hav€ conq incr€asJng reports of abusg and smuggllnE a!t'empts; hot€v€r, thes6 problens are thqs faa laagely undocunclntEd an

CSG/Apr i ] 90

w ILLEGAL TRAOEIN CROC00ILIANSKINST CURRENTPROELEM AREAS . Current Trends in US Connercjat Imports of Crocodi I ian Hides and pfoducts

PrEs€nted by Pet6r 8.aza I t i s Curator in Cha|"ge, Central pa.k Zoo

Calman crococli lus vacare, the yacare cajnan, contirlues io cominate a5 tne sp€cies most inportEd into the uni!€d states as rnanufactuaed products, despit6 the fact that !he soecres rs I Jsted as €ndangefad !nd€r the U. S. Endangered Sp€ci es Act. The rac€ ls found prinarily in Braztl, BolJvia, and Faraguay rhere 6lther hunting or expo.t is bann€d.

Tanned as tell as.ar skins of yacare and Cainan latirostris, the broad-snouted cainan, hav€ been smugElEd ln larg6 numbel.s throLigh Colombia to south6ast Asja and to th€ tlnited States. Tens of lhousands of yacare shoes are imported directly faon southeast Asia o|^ the same shoes and sty I es are jmported from Italy ritn ;tat ian lab€ls. pFcCr_rctsare often made of poorly oa barely tanned skr-ns and are riisleadjngjy labeted 'genujn€ 'genuine alligatcr" or caocodjl6, and ar€ sold ofier] at ihe sao6 prices as genuine al l jgator and crocodi le. gl jmlnation of skin tagElng and mark'jng piior to tanning and p.oduct manufactu|"e aids i I l6gal trade and hanp6rs wi ldl ifa lar €nforcem€nt.

CSG/24 April 1990

310

MONITORINGT00LS: dos FAR 0O vE GO? Education of the u.S. Consun€r

Pres6nted by oon Ashley Ash I ey Associates, Inc.

In 1988, A coope.atjv€ all lgator point-of-sale narketing |.esearch project was started in the U. S. to 6valuat€ the effectiveness of djstributing iniormation and promotional matsr l a l to tannErs, manufacturers, and .eta i l €as about alligators and alligator praducts. About 1,000 Alllgator 8ookl€ts r€re distrlbuted th.oughout th6 lndustry and on-st!e evaluations at noae than 50 retail s:ores rers made in l,ter ycrk. Callas. Ner 0aleans, 0rlando, and Miamj. Th€ painary goal ras !o .each retail sales clerKs rho are in daily contact rith potential cLJsEomersfor al I igaror products and !o bettea inform !h€m about:

r,) thE avai labi l ity of classic Am€l"lcan al llgator Prod|.lcts; 2) the regulated ri ldl ife nanagenent and far$ programs that contro I the harvest i ng, process i ng, and o' str'oJt i on oi a' : 'gato. orooucts: 3) the natural hista.y of tne .epti le and the uniqu€ coase-va!,'o'1 sJccess sta-/': aeoreseats ttsro-gl rn4 .-rl a -enerao'e ,1a!--d- aesourc6.

Easeo on t1€ signi'ican! sLpport and -esoonse of manufactur6rs,retal lers, and other produc6rs in the jnoustry, an uodatect veision of !ha Alligator Bookl6t was produced in 1989 and is currently being distributed to al1 maJo. U. S. arkEts for al I igato. oroducts. In add'ition to the original, its emphasis ras on th€ fact that alligator products r6re:

1) l.gal: 2) nq! endang€reoi subJ6ct to nunerous state, federal, and intorrational r€gulatlons requiring tagging and annual l.ePorting; farn-raised on the product of a governnen! regulated halv6st of a .enerab I €t resour"ca; an econonlc incentive to 'tlanagEand conseave botn ine spec I es ancl its habitat; 6) qual'jty pioducts rith long lastlng value.

The cu..ent p.qject ls distributing 5,000 free cog i es of tho LrpdatedAlllgator Booklet jn th6 us and making another 5, 000

3Lr copJ€s avallabl€ at prlntlng cost to tannat s, nanufacturqis, anal .etall€rs rho rant to provJd€ bookl€ts dJractly to cuslon€as rng prucnase ol. might puachase an al l lgatol. p.oduct. in addl!ion to doubl ing oarticipation by manufacture|"s in the second edttlon of !he booklet' additlonal information ras inclUded as a r6sult of the jnltial su.vey that incldued ner info.natlon on:

r.) I eathel.; differences betre€n al I igator and crocodi 1ei creat 1v6 n€r products.

th. next phas6 of th6 a1llgaotor point-of-sal6 project ,riII be to d€slgn lndlvidual product tags that rl11 provld. key infornation to th6 custonei on al I igator managen€nt and marketing progralns. Also, an international edjtjon of the bookl€t is planned rhich lncludes information on al I foul. of the prrmary class'ic cl"ocodillan skins in tfad€. The inte.natlonal edlt.ion ri I I b€ ln five languages and distrtbut€d first 1n France, Italy, England, Germdny, J.:pdn and th. US a3 \i.tt rc ln !tt h1d. Produc l ng coqntr I €s.

Th€ best long-term marketing st.atggy for croqodi l ian Pnodqcts ls to first procluce the high6st quality products and then hav6 the best i fnform6d sales force at r€tail, Over ttme, ths l"eputation of the classiq product is 6nha.ced and the publjc is bett€r jnformeo about the concept oi managing c.ocooj I ians as renerable natLlral resources. Th€ economic iacentive tc an.age and mark€t caocodi I r'ans can enhance efforts ic conserve both the sD€cies and lts habitat. Contra.y to many aninal .ights arEuments--thls ls real consorvatlon. That is an inportant oart of th6 nEssago as consun€is becon€ more Envlronn€ntal ly araae in the future. A point-of-sale harkst'inE proJect is a useful flrst steg toward these goals.

CSG,/AprI | 199O

31:2 AUSTRALIANCROCOOILIAN FAFM SKIN PROOUCTION

Pr6sented by John Bache President, Austral ja Crocodi le Farners Associatjon

1989 1ota I Fl, Tota 1 %Vari ance

HATCHLINGS

li ld Harvest iarn Ered 5017r- +39. 45

5695 14r83 +66. 42

SKIN SALES++

L229 1008 2237 518 1846 -17,48

NOTSS:

SW- CrocodyI us pol^osus FW- C. iohnstoni

' Covers !9A7/tgee nestlng season + Covers !988,/t,989nesting season !nclLldes Austral tan rl ld haiv6st ln Ves!6an Austral la ++ Inclqd€s €xpoft and don€stic skln sales

PAPUANEI/ GUINEACROCOOILIAN SKIN PRODUCT]ON 1988-1989

Piesen!ao oY Greg Mi tche I I Mainland Holdlngs Ltd'

c. nolaqqllL-!!3.e'

L i v€ purchases ( hatch I i ngs/ Year

Egg Producl l on FARM

Ski n produc ! l on !i!LD FARM

TOTAL

Live piJrcnaseS ( hatc h l i ngs/ Year lngs)

Egg Produqt lon FARM 1500 2500

Sk1n produc! 1on FARM 3065

TOTAL r.1984

the end of 1990 is Total f a.n stock in PaPua N€r Gui nea by h6ad. estinated to be appaoxjmat6ly 42,5o0

CSG,/Ap.i 1 199o

314

AFRICAN NTLE CROCOOILESKIN PROOUCTION I 990_ 199 t

Pr esented bv Jon Hut ton CSG Vi ce Cha.irnan fo. Af|. i ca

At th€ !989 CITES meeting, Zinbabre, hjtherto the ontv Af.ican country {ith a CITES approved ranchjng prog.am, ra; joined by Eotswana, Malarl, Mozanbjque, and Zambja which .eceived approval for th6ia ranching pro!Iaaos. In addltion, Etnlopta obtained a CJTES export quota for .anched sklns foi the ft.st tln€ rhl le Kenya and Mozaobiqu€ obtained a s€cond round of expoit qllotas for aanched skins only. only somal ja, sudan, and Tan:ania quolas received exoort for rj ld skjns, Sudan,s only Fcr oae yea. to clear stocks.

Product jS, i on of aanched skins accordjngly, expec!eo to i ncreasa, whlle yild skins dec I ine nark €d I y.

Unfortunats I y. export quotas gJv6 I lttle iidlcation of Bhat may actually b€ produced. The fol loring schedul € is aovanc6o as a tentat ive prediction ior exports fron Afi.jca in l99O and !991.

PROOIJCTIONOF NILE CEOCCOILESKINS III AFRICA

FarmlRanch !i td

Botstana 2000 r000 00 Ethiopia 2600 (enya 2500 2500 Madagascaa 0 300 00 MaI arl 2000 2000 Moz ambI qu€ 300 !000 00 NanJ bia 0 South Afr i ca 4000 8000 Sonalla 0 0 Sudan 0 0 Tanzania 0 0 Zambi a 3000 Z J|rlbabw e 20000 28000 00

TOTAL 34900 48700

CSG/Ap|.i 1 1990 315 EXPORT QUOTAS FOR CROCODIIIANS AGE.EED UTOIT AA gltE sEvEMlll MEETING OA flI! CONFIRENC! OF THE PARTIES IO CITES

!990

CrocodvluE cataDhractus conq|o 600 it 500 u 600 v 600 v ClocodvluE n11ot1cus CaEeroon t0o ConEo Ethlopla rr 8800 rr 20 \, t Kanya r 5oo0 6000 r 8000 1000 !{adagaEcar 1000 SoDalla

Tanzania 2000 4000 6000 g Clocodvlus Eorosus Indonasia 40OO rt 3000 3000 2000 r Osteolaenus tetlasDig cong0 500 !,

ranchEd spec1D6n9 ltlld halrrest huntLng trophtes j,lcludlng 2500 live hatchlinEg

Sourcei I&IFFIC BuLletin 11(2/3) Cualch 19901 ALLTGATORFARI.{ PROOUCTION IN THE UNIIEO STATES

Presented by led Joansn CSG Vice Chairnan fo. North Am€rica

Fa|"n6cl-iaised skins did not entea the Louisiana orogram until !984. lhat year approximately 2,OOO fa.n-ratsed sRtns were sold. lhe average sj:e of al I farn-rajsed sk.ins sold in LOuiSiana slnC€ L984 measured ras 4 foot, 4 inch€s (N=69,944) rith a.ange of 3 to 6 feet. Most of th6 Louisiana farm-.ais€d alllgatol.s t'eached na.ketabt6 size in lEss than t.do years of ag6. Loulslana's 1989 farn product.ion js 6stinat€d at SO.OOO sklns alonE with a 25,000 rild skjn harvest. Loutsiana state harvest from both farn and ri ld account6d for 77 o€rcent o1r the U,S, alligator skin production. The ecOnonic value Of th€ 1|ild ano ia.m harvest to the slate amounts to about s1g million annuaI I y.

Al I igator farm p.oductron rn otner stat6s sqch as Florida and lexas is expected to Jncreas€ r'n th€ nea. future. Th€ 1.989 far|ll skin production from F]orida farns ras 16,389. Thes€ sktns averaged 4 to 5 fe€t long.

Teras nas jus! app|.cx, ra!eo tn egg collection or ograrn. In ' : !988 aoo.ox i ra!e I y 2.0C0 ^a !cr -gs rere Sold to Floadia f aarils. Sk jn prcduc: i on on Texas fa.:ns r1l l antor :ie narket iaa:fe ii.

AI I igator ml Ssi ss'oo jensis SKIN PROOUCTION

LoqiSiana FARM 50, 000 75, 000 25.000

Florlda FARM WILO 8, 000

lexas FARM 20

South Caro I 'ina

TOTAL 10!,495 r.35.0oO

CSG/Ao. i I t 990 3tl

MARKETPROOUCIION ANO THE IACTS REVIET

presented by oon Ash.lEy AshI ey Associ ates, Jnc.

Since 1987, the goal of the Inte.national Al l igator/Crocodi le Traoe Study ( IACIS) project has been ..ro obtain a bette. unde.standing on jnte.national classic jan crocodi I !rade and evaluatE lts effect on the managenen! and , conserva!ion of crocodi I jan resources. Through an annual r6pont compi I ing CITES trade statistlcs and informatjon f|.om reglonal cooperators, and hide deal€rs, IACTS provides a yearly trade analysjs on past, pres6nt, and futu|"e classlc skJn trade.

In the 1989 IACTS annual report, minjmun net trade in classic skins was 115,49! hides cased on l9g7 CITES Annual reports. No CITES report ras .eceived that year ffom Indon6sia and the volLrme of that unreported trad€ is astimated !o b€ 30.000-40,000 classic skins. thes6 est{nates coincide rith hide dealers information that total classlc skin tradg .is app.oxr'mat61y !50.000 hides a year. This lev6l of traqe r€natns at about half of the estimat6d tiad6 trenty years ago (3OO.OOO) and about one-thi|^d of the peak trade in the earty t960,s ,h1ch -eacheO nay hav€ 500,00O s

ihe number of classic skins in rorld tradg.ri:l rncreas€ signifjcanrly in f990 to more !hal,120O,OOO skjns pe. fear. And a :i.jrther inc|'ease to about 3OO.OOOhides is expected jn !991, returnjng rarld trade productt'on to the es!imateo I97O lev6ls. js ihe increase due almost entirely to expandEd productlon of farned and l.anched skJns. Aftel" l,99L th€ rate of expanslon in classiq skln production ,rill nod€.ate to 2S.OOOto 5O,OOOeach year and rould return to the eaaly 60s l6v€ts of estimated p.oductJon ai 500,000 betreen 1995 and the year 2OOO.

Based on thes6 findings, th€ IACTS pan€l reconn€ndsi

r) AI1 qrocodlIIan skIns shouId b€ tagged. IndonEsla should inprov€ its hJd6 tagging and CITES |"eportI ng systEm, 3) Japan and Slngapoie should drop their CIIES reservatjon on crocodvlus po.osus. (NotEi Japan drapp€d tts .Es€rvation in latE 1989.) 4) Praducer cguntri€s, Eqtsrana and Sudan, should drop th6lr r€s6rvatlons on C. ni loticus. ThaJland imm€diately lmpl€nent a hJde tagging and trad€ repo|"ti ng systeln.

318 SlnEapo|.e should reElst6. lts crocodl l€ farns, tnlttate a h{de taEgJng syst€m, and Establlsh a tiad€ rgportlnE proceduae for crocod'i I 1an sk { ns. 7) cITES expo.t quotas should only be approved fn9n ad.quat6 crocodj le nangenent plans ( lnc ludi ng habi tat survey and population monitoring components), nave b66n estab I i shed. Strjct enfo.cenent of nanaqed ri ld harvest |.egulations shoqld be irnplen6nted to bEtter p|^otect rl Io slocKs.

CSG/Apr J I 1990

319 TASI€ I

ESTIMA1EN NUMBER OF C' {SSIE CI']CONLIAN SKIN.S lN waPt n iainF rN rorar

By SFi.f

A lnid

By Rl8iorr

Unird Saat€a .!5.000 ATtb :3.000 PtFr. Nc'cllinci rJ.fixl :.!{xl j4.000 CdF i-tffl L-<0.lm T"\BLE:

ESTIMA1'FD \UVFFR 'F- {SSIC '-IC"DIL],AN iN "rATC-tl:!cs s?cctin orr

8y St!.d.s st ftt?rrr I

A. nii.i!.i6i6ri< r5.000 90.000 i05.000 C ril6ria. r0.000 i8.000 r8.t){x). C idran|!4 :5.0(X) :5.000 c- 66ar r.J00 r3.J00 rJ.000 e ldhr6ni J,rxx) Oh.t !@ :ilo :tJm I7l.J00 :00.000

Th? €.in tld nurnblr of qluijqlgt! har.i ing! .nry bc conscrr,rlvc duc (o unqcrEin c!al..rior! hldrlidg rrd (aonati.y E4s in s.vqd Af.ien c!unIn.3

By Reqod; CTPfF/E RANCIIED

Unir.d&ra. 15.000 9{}.ofi) 10J.0fl) Afri.. r0.0qt -18,0, 18.0m. Plplja N€w Cuina l.ofit :0.000 2t.000 730 J.J(N IndorEir t7.0(x, t7.0ut OfE UEq TOTAL 28J00 r7lJ00 :00.@o page three

ESTIMATEDIUMBER 0F f"tlLO HAFVESTED

onited States AIligator 30,000 Af r lca Nile crcccdile r2,000 ?apua \ew cuinea Freshwater and SaItwa ter c rocodi 1e 24,000 I ndones ia Freshwa!er and Sallwater 24,000 90,000

:R.\DE IOREC.\ST:I C:.rSS:: S3:IS

?O1AL ?RADE

1990 200,000-250,000 100, 000- 125,000 100,000-125,000 r991 250,000-100,000 125,000-150,000 125,000-r 50,000 t992 300,000-350,000 150,000-175,000 150,000-175,000

Prolected increases in cLassi€ hatqhling and skin suppLies beyond 1992 is nore diff i.cuLt becaqse of variables like farn expansion, haechl,ng success, nest fLoodj.n9, larlll failures, tu)rtal,iry rates anl j.nteanacj.onal, iegr:lat:,ons. lloweve!, if narkeC demand and hide prices do noc become a di.sinceniive after lhe 300,0C0 hj.de annsal, prodqction plateau is reached, then supplies !,i1! continue to increase at 25.000 to 50,OOOadditi,onal classic skins a year thlough tbe 1990,9. fhe eatLiest 5OO,OO0classic hides a year irould be produced j.s 1995 and the 1onger view ,rould be by the year 2OOOto reach a half nillion classi,c akins annualLy.

J. Oon Ashley GLOEALHARKAi PERSPECii VAS: JAFANESEMARKET IMPLICATIONS OF SPECIES ANO SIZE CLASSCHANGES IN THE CROCOOILIANTRAOE

Presented by Nobo.u Ishli Takara Tsusho Co. Ltd'

Al I kinds of classic crocodi I jan skins are inported rnto Japan. The total value inported in !989 for classic crocodilia skins and hides ras about $uS 16 'nil11on. Anong these' 84 p€rcent oi about 3US l3'5 nlllion) 16re f€t salted rai skins' This figure excludes skins of caiman crocodi lus'

Mark e! Shar€ bv sPeci 6s

Th€ largest quantities imported into Japan in 1989 anong cJassic crocodi I Jan sklns \verE of Crocodvlus nova6duineag novaequineae (C. n. novaequjn€ae), thJch is also cal led the 'large scale crococll lE. " Thes€ cofip|^is€d about 60 to 65 percent of tota I j mpo.ts.

The second laagest quantities s after C' n' novaequjnoa6 hava been Crocodvlus porosus' also called "small Scal€ jnports i' crocodr'le.' These comprlsed about !5 percent of all i 939.

ihe lhird la'.gest quantities impor!ed rere oi Al I ica!o' jgator), j l5 mI s s i s s i pp i en s i s ( Ane. i can al I rh ch' conpr i seo about perc6nt of all imPorts.

(N1le Th6 fourth species inPorted t,as Crocodvlus nl lotlcus imports' crocodi le), comp.islng about 5 to 6 percent of th€ 1989

Market sha.e bv oroducinq countrles

jan sklns camB tn !989, th€ largest share of classic crocodi I rar fron SJngapor€, vhich slrPpl i6d about 39 peicent of total ras Papua crocodi l6 sklns ioported in Japan' The s€cond country la|.gest Ner Guln6a, rhich -supPlled 2O Pe'cent' The third p€'cant' rnl le supplylng count|"y ras the Unlt€d Statss rith L5 parcent cf all th€ fourth country ra5 Indonesla, rhJch suPpljed I skins i mported to JaPan.

of skins tn f988' Papua Ner Gulnea \ras the leadinE supplier ras follovEd bv to.Japan, tlth 34 p€.cent of th€ mark€t' This 15 parcen!' Singapore Ylth 28 PercEnt' and the USA rith about Farm€d skln vs. rild skln suppllas

t6rms of demandand the use of farm€d skins v€asus ri sk i ns, i n g€n€ral, th€ fol lorlng po l nts should be constdar€d:

Vllld sklns exp€rcti ng l6ss suppIy tn conI n9 y6ars var I €ty of s 1z6s ( I arge. ) h l gher priqe than'farm€d not d€pgndable foi stable nanufactui I nE sch€duI e lmage not so p|.6fefable {n t€ams of conservatJon

Fa.med sk i n stab I6 and sufficjent supply s tab I e pa i c€ llmit€d slze s€l€ct.ton haJor supply sourc€ for future ous1 ness legal I rnage

Both rjld ancl l.aamedskihs each hav6 advantag6s, ancl th6 d€mand fo. both typ6s varleg d€p6ndjng on fash.loir ano customt'r' s needs.

llorever, it is inc.easligly djff jauli::c ge! sui;icjBnt supplias of ,jld skinS, and jt js 6xp€ct6d r:hat ferer and fer6a rr-ld skins rl I I b6 avai lable in comjng y€ars to ineet denand. In addltjon, high€|" prlc€s are expEct€d. It is llk.ly that custorne.s (nanufactul"€.s) rlll b€ consldsring more utJllzatlon of fa|.ned sktns in the futur 6. ilor I d proclrrction vs. demand

Consld€rlng currEnt total rol.ldride production of classlc crocodJllans at appraxlmately l50,0OO sk.lns (accordtng to IACTS), Japan lrnports about 50 p€rcgnt of rorld p.odqctlon as rar fiat€r I a 1s.

B€sld€s rar ma!erlals, therE are hug6 numbers of manqfactur€d l€ather goods nad6 from classlc caocodj l lan sklns rhich al"e importsd jnto Japan p|.jnarl ly fron Eufaoean countrt€s, particularly Italy, Franc6, and F.R.. Gginany.

tn addltlon to thls, larg€ volunes of finish€d leath6r goods a.e purchas.d by Japanes€ tour'lsts vlsiting Europ€. !n conclusion, ra €Stlnata that apProxlmataly 70 Fafcant of total roild pl.oductlon of classlc crocodl Ilan sklns arE currently taken by the denand of Japan. In othor rorclsi thlt jan oresent nat'ket of classic crocodl I SkJns is vary fiuch oepend€nt on a sing'e nar(Et.

i/e conslde. this is not a partlcula.ly healthly situation for the crocodiljan industry. Although re hope and rill try our best !o Keep our.lapanese market st€ady in grorth in coming years, re hav€ to avoid th€ [arket b€lnE danaged by any €xtiene mark6ting chang6s ol' novenents by Extornal forcds slrch as anlnal r I ghls actIvlsts'

1t is r'mportant to note that Jaoan6se consuhe's are o€comlng increasingly sensjtive and concerned abo'Jt natural 6nvironmen! and the conserva! i on ol natura I r€souaces.

ltith this in mind, r€ consjder it vefy impo'tant for al l oal.ties concern€d rith the crocodi 1e industry, lnclqdlng both produclng and consuning natlons, to rork tog€th€' not only ln Japan oLr! rorldrlcle on oositiv€ oromotlonal efforts aim'd at products educating the consum€r that buvinq caocodi I lan h€lps conseavaton of c|"ocodiles and natuaal resou'c€ts'

CSG/Aor i I 1990

rL4 .:=

E.t a qYo+< ix z att o> o =- uJ J 't5=Y x\< o.F IJJ

E co L .t, rr 6) T< bCO no) t^- l- =i<=:<:<)-:x - =xxxx-= -:<===:<= SC.lOcO\O\l(\ x'= solty'sNtxslAVa i.t E Ei

4) l.q-l E.*i 9Jr lv za ilffiNi Y U) tu J () o.F uJ E =colr €) no) rt. r-o f, It o) o- t- o- q- a- = 6: E cnIJJ o; uJ co - z oii=i- -a<9= o- tT x> ? $oroco\or+c.lo BNonlN$'sn ?n1vA'1clo x'; IA ac) 325

GLOaALMARKET pERSPECT !VES:. EUROPEANMARKET IMPLICATlONS OF SPECIES ANO SIZE CLASSCHANGES IN THE CROCOOTLlANTRAOE pr€sented by Kevin van JaarsveIdt CSGV.tce Chal rnan for Trad6 beha1f of oeputy Vice Chai.han Phllippe Roggui I le|^

Skirt Sizes

18-24 cm A snall markEt exists fo|" very expensrve sma.ll leather goods and to softe €xtent ratchs:raps. 9eceat discLsslons rr!n l€ao:,1g ra!cas:,ep manufac !uaeas i nd i cate that pr i ces are too hiqh bv 50 percent.

fhis size range is Jncreasing consjderably jn the rnarket, as farne.s tay to ha.k€t snal.l€r skins to conbat the higher f€ed.lng costs and accomodation problems associated Hlth ralsing large. aninals.

ihe increas€d numbea of sklns of th.s slze I n !f a market make fjnish€d goods v€ray expensive, as tro sKrns aae needed :o nanufac!!ae a fcnan,s rhereas oaly cne skia is neeced rhen large are u5ed,

These sizE skins are nornal ly included tn th€ 25 -29 cm rang6, and although bettsr, arE often a SiralI oercsntag€!of pa.c€r.s.

34-40 cm There are not enough of !hase sKins in the marketplacei th6y do d€mand a nl gner pr I ce.

40+ & uP Th6se slz6s are alnost conplgtel y out of the fiarketp I acE, r.jth !he €xceptioo of those froii wild al l lgators.

EECOMHENDAT ION: Farned p.oduc t. on of crocooi I ian skins snouI d att6npt la att€nd to the ful I .ange of .eqLrired skins, 18 to 55 cnr, and not to COnCentratO Fr i mari 1y On tne 25 to 33 cm size ranEe.

CSG/Ap. i I l99O

GLOEALMARKET PERSPECTIVES: U.S. MAFKEI IMPLICAIIONS CF SPECIES ANO SIZE CLASSCHANGES IN IHE CROCCDILIANTRAOE presented by Cavid Haire

U. S. trends jn the usa jan of crccodi I skin in the tast 2O years nave tak en nunerou s to years. six r'.e,estern ;:::",:::"::;':;,,?::;":":::.lii:: """ skins, hjsiorically focusing on 7 foot animals. Later, the i nduStry tur ned j ts :oCUs Anericanar I isators aval lable other ""0'"::':::"::".H";"::"::JJ,:::;'::1",:]]' crocodr. I lans. But as prices soired for al I igators and other crocodJ I ians and comp6tjtion for taager SKlns has jncreased worldride, the {ndustry substjtuted other exotjc skr'ns jn th6 last few years.

yet croccdi I ian sKins are sti I I ,lsod in the U. S. skin irdLlstry ii only a on sinal t-scate. lhe snarle. skl.ns ere oe. j1g !sed by a nunbea 9.o,,/jng of skit lec leathe. araftsman orodLJcr.c. classjc ciccoq.iljan hancbags anq i,lai goods. And irie skjn industry uses !.arned skins as wel I au: h jgl.ea prjaes, axcess scar.rng, and bacterial danage foound in some farmed sKtns nas I intited their growth tn the .tndustry.

CSG/Ap.i I l.990 I L;

{ E E .gi : E.Sr $i rws%i --- -__ _--___ _-- -J cf, (u z o () a ca lIJ H< J Yt! F :: n ;;6) co *+ rra co co ir o) t5= (J O) $ F cc R- e*g .:IAF o SE"e>u_ o. ox ' = . =<< r- \o iES 5 ESE 6 a =rlI €.ES *:Fii:F

:<--- --== 3+5 --x- -=== -=?= E8€ 6l oo SW]JI SN/YS]1OH/vl @O THE TRAOE!N OTHEREXOI:CS: rHEIR EFFECI ON THE CROCOO!LIANMARKET Li zard, Snak€, anCl Shark

pres€nted by Tosh.io yamanaka 0eputy Vice Chairman for Trao€ o1: CSG

Th6 stat€ of the mark€t for llZard skirls in Japad in 1989 9reatly expanded coDoared to the previous year. The total value ,.as appJ"oxima!aly I.9 tines that of 1988,s figure accor.otnE to JapanesE custon statistics. som€ of this may be €xplained by producing countries' price increases during that period. For exanple, th6 orjce of rlng-maaked I izard (Vaaanus salvator) skins lncraaseo iroln g7 per jn skin January t989to Sg-l;l;cemoer ano is noH about 5!O oer skin.

\ear I y 60 perce.r! of :l Zard sk i ns, the core of the Jaoanese repti le skin I ndustry, came f.on I ndon6s.i a durtng !989. -he Japan6se rept i lo sain industry ,ou1d tjk€ to see the dornllsting of tro App€nd j i x I sp€c es of I Jzards, BengaI moni tor (V, benqalensis) and yel lor monltor (V. flavesc6ns), Fron a conse.vat i on point j of vjer, thjs ndustry b6l ieves that sucn a. dor.l jsting coutd ja- be benefic 1n !ia! ir roulq l6ssen the !radE on v. sa I vator.

The iapaneSe .epti le Skin inCustry bet,eveS ina! !fe Japanese governnan! is .o!l creoar i ng to coocera!e rilh aie gangladesn governnent and provjde funding for additionat investigation into the populatiohs, habitats, ecology, and blology of thEsa trq varanids. \rith th6sE data, the Bangladesh CiTES management autho|^ity should be able to determine if the !nese tro soecJes shquld be doHnlisted io Appendix iI.

Python skin trad€ is nelatively stable jn Japan. setting at constant prjces at a mod6ia!e riarKe! clamand. Python skjns are prirnari us€d ly foi nore casual ronan' s handbags fo. th€ younger consLrm€l^.

VJhilE shark sklns ar6 not produced in great quantities in Japan, thesg skins are extrenely popular for use in handoags for the Japanes€ rnarket rh.j le t.hey are used mainly for ratcnstraps tn !h6 European maaket.

Sharks are a secondary catch of th6 Japanese tuna flshery and are usually taken only rhen tuna are not availab.le. ,1ot so there is a constant supply of skins. Fin.lshed shark skins lable avai in Japan have an estimat.d valu6 af about $10o,ooo monthly, for both th6 domestJc and fo.eJgn r.larket.

330 ln concluslon, the thre€ typ€s of skJns oentloned above _ jzard, I snake, and shark -- gsneia I I y do not affect ths crocodlllan mark€t at all b€causa th6 prjc6 Structuaes aae dlffgrEnt and the class€s of consun€rs vary according !o tncans .atE. Tho Japan€sE rept l l6 sk i n. j nduStry be l i €v€s tha! crocodi I ian sklns and theSg thfEe othe. €xqtics are ful ly canpati b 1e in th€ na|.ketDlace.

CSG,/Apr I I 1990 THE TRAOEIN OTHEREXOTICS: IHEIR EFFECTON THE CROCOOILTANMARKET 0st|i qh and EI ephant

Present€d by K6vin van Jaal.sveldt CSGVice Chairman for Trade

At a tlne rhen signif i cant grorth in Cracodi J ian fa.n I ng activities is l j ncreasI ng P.oduct on, rhat rs hapoeni ng rith other exot i cs?

ostr i ch

Currently percent l0O of al l ostr i ch skin trade is contro I led by South Af rican fariners through their co-op in 0utshoorn and major shaaehoI dlng 1n a gOtswana tanne|^y.

Kl€in Karoo Landbou Coporasj f

Buyers/ Markets Est. Skins Ao€nts

South Af : ica USA 2 Europe 30. 000 1 iapan 3 Hong Kong :. coo I iaiwan 600 I Si ngapore Aotswana :

i3 js It Jmportant to note that i ncreased cst.jch farring activiti6s ln th€ USA, Zi rnbabre, Namlbia, BopuEsrana. Eotsrana, and Tanzan.i a could increase th.ls figurE consfd€rably by 20,00O inStoTy6ars.

An adu'lt ostrich proclucesan av€ragq of 14 sq ft of skln.

Estirnated annual p.oductjon Js 1,037,400 sq ft valued at t25,935,000 (bas€d upon an avg. oinimum of !3 sq ft pei aninal x 79,800 skins per annun x avg. finished leather p.ice of $25 per sq ft for 7O/ZO/LOgradlng). El ephants

Although out of t]'ade due to the reqent cITEs ADp €nd j x I listing, it is questionabl€ that this leathei will come back jnto trade in the next tto lo fou. yoars.

Traditional sourcE of supqLr:

Produc6r An'inals/Annun Est. Sq. Footaq€

ZI nbabr6 350,000 South Af r i ca Nanibia

80 kE dry salted hid€ = !00 sq ft leather

unti 1 ths CITES ban, 6stimated annual Pl"oductjon was valuecl a! 55,346,500 (based upon 314'500 sq ft per annumx av9' finlshEd leather price of 517 pE. sq f!).

t{lth this leather possibly back in trade ln 1992' the actual numbers a.6 djfflcult to predict unlj 1 neY cITES rules are adopted. !i- shorild b€ noted however ihat under nornal annual QrcclJct:on prograns. these prevlous numoers 'increased could be and may jnclude other ccuntrleS.

Marke!s Maak6t Share

USA 85* corboy boot manufacturers 1oi snall Ieather goods & luEgag€ Europe 5r small leather goods & lLrggag6

CSG,/Apri I 1990 r8E TRADE IN OTHER EXOT:CS: TI{EIR EFFECT ON Tt{E CROCODTLIATIMARREI Ostrich and Etcghan! Trade in th. USA

Presenled by Dave Durland Joh! G. Mahler Co.

Due to the ulriqu6 chalacler of each of bhese leathers there seellls go be:es5 colllpeti,tioo foa consumer dollars i-d the US nark€! lhan yoq might exp6c!.

Crocodilialr and 6Iephane lealhe!s seen lo have !eached a pri,ce resistar1ce .l.evel in the US re3te!n boot markel. This resiscance lehe lrrtce on !,he parr- of US congume! s€ems co iave ino!e impacl on crocodilian producls Ehan compeliton wi.!h other exoc1cst.

El ephanl

Currsnl llarkec: The cullenl el€phanC na!k6t !s vsay clouded by the recent CTTES ban on i.rtetnational trade !n elephant proilucts. llorever, sales of elephant groducls in USA are_stloog eoough Co a.bsorb oresent' stocks in thi.s countly,

l,larket T:ends: ?he scalclty cf ra? maae:1al d!.ve pri.ces past a level !.heae voiu;ne busioess colild :e done in the US. When elephant Leather agaiD beco[res available, once aqain th6 pricc {i]i De a very inportant factor.

Curraot, Market: Oslrich is still very much in demand !,orldttid6. Supply has not yct caught up ,rith d,6nanal. Duc tso thc rec.nt ilrouqh! sj.luation in Soulh A!!ica, i! i,s €rpecially d,i.ffi,cult now to anaat market detnand,s. priccg ar. aalvancing,

Market ilcnds: Raachiog of oslrj,ches is axpa!:d.ing ilr South Africa. Flockg are also g!.or.i,ng i.n o!h6E palts of Afrj.ca, AusUlalia, Israel, and, the US. Substanlial producls flon hhase na{sr a.eas are still a nurnb6r of y.ars ar.ay, hot €ver.

CSG/April 199O 334 E + 6 !-x F p g e -i,;i;A d* oli o. N%WZ tr

ct) co o € r-J -(ll ?o 46 t= Ao)': ca :; ttt co l! -qro *+ rFro O roe s otF I.LJ

J's a\ (g a P*E E .= -1 F o >!_ L S (E OxE"1 - o e- €5t o =e5 :l== o Erl* 5.ES a = ii:F *.:F x d:> E -F: al 6l -:!t x \r '= =tr g ?nlvA a1av1c30 :^-

35 Q F ||l a € -c o) '=oco o) .FF vco4.5 66) FF .:aFl os^O clt = F€e LU aiEa.l 5 iTi g nHH ;g oo gE"a (Dx - trA =<< = 6Y< a> s-Eo asr :il,J- E

l\o ii;-5.83 a -:F I x x {*3 - - ;,8.E 5 X'!''= $ EnTvAo1av1c30

INDIANOROCODILE CONSERVATION SITUATION HEi OHT: ACTIONPLAN FOR THE 1990's

B.C.CHOUDHURY

WILDLIFEINSTITUTE OF INDIA NEWFOREST, DEHMDUN INDIA

ABSTIIACT

Sincethe ilitiation oI ClocodilcConscNarion p()jcct in tt75. Tle populatioDof Iddia. CrocodiLianis on an incrcase.Ai,sencc oi suirableAcrion Phn has hina.rcd in rhe nLnaB..rc.r onon(.d decisionnaldng for rhe consciva(ionot IndianCrocotitcs. .\c(ion Plar lor the consenationmlnagcncnr ol ru rhrccstccics or rndttrn Crocodilesviz. Gayulr gxscticts, Croca.t\h6parai$, c. rftljtti! : !s becnproposed wirh r brjcl lis.u$ir!, on rhc prescrrsrr(us or eachspecies in (hocounbv. INTRODUCTION

Since the lirst meeting of th6 Crocodile Spccialistcroup that dised rn alam od lhe ondangered shtus of the *ocodilians in India (Honnegcr, 1971).nd the last official status reporr presentedin rhe 7th *orking meeti.g of the CSG (SjngheL al. 1986),rhere appear io be a suddcn chango.both in c.ocodiliad co.senatron approachand lttitudcs in lndia. Th.!c is an "illfounded fc.ling iow thrt thc Gharial (Caq?rr qater 8d'r8*,,tlrr ), Salt *o.odi,le (Gocotlyhs pororrr ) and the nDgge. (Cncodrhts poh$nis ) ue ^ll safe and even surplus in rhe country.

With over thirty six Goler.nenl managcnrcntqocodile rcaring ccnlrcs sl'cad adoss rhe counuy (Fi&l), holdidg aboul 20.000- 22,000qocod;lcs, the leeling appeaGro bc jusLified. There a.o cven debares in the co$eflatioD cncles to .emove the l.dian docodili..s frod rhc schcdulc I list of the Wildlife (P.otcdion) Ad t9?2, which tuw providcsthcn tolal lcgrl p.otcction. Thcsc loies n|!' .d!oc e that Indian crocodiliansbe conmelcially hapcstcd . Wnh no guidclineor enena slic guard srrarceyof trolccrion ro rhc *ild lr.publion. foll.\liig jucr r. ,(t th!^.ning) rh. Govcrnmnr hrs ior hrcn rdc ro rilc .uy dccisron on thn issue.Bur how safe irc (hc InJi.in do(xlilirds in .o.llrv?

STATUS OF THE GHARIAL

Thesc\ensmillisolircd *ikt pf!]lrion.r (;hrritr]rcforrcd i.'sfgh:( il rrLrs/,r.lilc incr.J\,,i m.nv fold by re-inttoduction.Th. sub-ddlltsiTc ! rs\cs in ptut3cicdlrcr iI. r.crL(.d in(o rlie ir.ccuu! grolp. l.creains nunbcr ol ncsrslrc now bein.q'cp.rred from chrmbll (Rro, t,r$), aj;wa (B!su pca coft.), Mahanadi(Kar andSi'gh pe^. com.),wirh uiconfirnrcd repons ol brcc,tnsiI rhcwitd in Ramganga (Corbe( NationalPark aurhoritiet.

The overauprogreB. of Gharialre-inlroduclion into the wild onrinucs.From 116,rindividuals releas€din 1984101520 in 1986(Choudhury and choudhuly, 1986), tho nunhc. so rn, rcloascdsraods around 2000in 1990.While thesrares of Madhy!Pradesh rnd Urta. Pradcshstill contiiuerhc relcxsetrogr.dnes, tbereappears to be do irterestby othergharial hahitat statc$pxnicul.rly Rihrr rid rhc No.th-casre.nslares (in Brahnapura river sysren).Th. limirednumbc. o{ wild habitarsid rhc cangcs rieer srstcn cannot pe.hapsdow aeomnodatemore Gharial.Thc lack of suney tor locatinsslirable habiraBhas created a su.plussrocks in oprive reari.g GDties.

The silration appearseven worse looking ar rhe nunber of Gharialsrhar are bred erry l,ear. Nandankananprodlca over200-250 caprive bred sharial, Madras Crocodilc Brnk lnd the Klkr.il Centr€ar Lucknowas w€ll as BanraghattaZoo havealso srarted breedi.g gha.ial. Ir is now expecrcdto breedin aptivity at Tik.rpada,Orissa and Mysore zoo. wherewill all thesego? A systomaticsuncy of th.ec rivcr systensiGangos! B.ahmapufa a.d Ind$ pill heh loote placesfor aU Lhesharirl now beingreared in

338 The Srgg.sredAction Platr for Gl'lrial 1. A gharialhabirat sudey i! the Brahmaputrariver slst€n on priority basislo find suitabre rehabilitalionsiles ior the captivogharial with tho objectiveof .esto.ingthc sp.cieslo its former dktdbutionallinils. 2. Helping nanagene.t authorilicsof Gh.rial Slnctu!ry lnd Naliond Parks to draw up proper nanagenenrp'an. 3. HelpingGharial brecd'ng/rearing ccdLrcs to nake furure llans tor .onscdatio. oricntedstock

,1. Helpi.g to develop'alternarc livclihood' lor pcoflc who h.vc lost right ro uscriv*ine hrbnarstor Charialco.senation.

STATUSOF SALTWATERCROCODILE

Tbe lasttpo remai.inghabitats ot rhc cb.,4'rr /,D@ru ir thc lndirn nrrid Iandis nowsarurarcd with relcrsc. The Bhitrrkanikasan.ruary hls becnrc(.ckcd wi(h ov* l:on srLtsrl$ crocodilcin i area oi 176sq. km. The Sundarb.nan nay (ill acconnodrte! la.genu,nbcr oI thcm,unlik0 Andaman lnd NicobarIslands wheie thc exrrcmelymrrsinll csrurinc/mangrovehabirar make\ it dilficulrli,r anv fulther

The m.n-crocodilcconflict is r*hxts rhc flx\i.run *nh !hiss!.ci.s. ^nrhmrn .nd Nicob.rklands and Orissr,bolh havereto(c{l ciscs. wilh Sundr.brnrkcrdv notodousJt its rnrn ertin! tigetr,anDriiur carnjvore'manconflid snuarioncrnnot evcn be rhouj:htor.

ln recentyed at leasttour sub'adultc' poD J havebeen rcpo(cd rnd crlght i. the carte.ncoarl of lddia wherethey were looM to be cxti.cl. Docsthis mcan, the lwo 'nlnrlan.lsrllwalor crocodile babitat are now over crovded?

In captivity,the prdr4r now breedsin Nrndanka.anand Dangahrl in O,is., Vishrkbaprranamin Andlra PradesLMadras in Tamilnadu,Bhrgabarrur in west Bengal.and Kukrril in Uttar P,ndcsh.wherc

TheSugSesled A.tion Plcnfor s$ltartc. Crocodile 1. Con5iderbringing further hangrole arcasunder tho ProtectedArca Ncrworkot lndia and seled releaselocatiotrs. Areas in westcoast havc ro be sulerd- 2. Minimiseman-crocodile conflict situalion in thc lonB-tcrnintqcst of tho sfccics. 3. ManagoBhitarkanika S.nctuary .nd suirablelocations in And.nli rnd Nicobarklaids as rhc NationalSaltwater Go@dile R€servcs. 4. Cocider posible utilLationof the speciesunder tural economyimprcvencnl progranne.

T9 STATUSOF MUGCER

Mlgser is perhapsnuch more*idely occtiiingnow $an before.Followins Lhe protectiod sin@ 1972 andconsenation prograohe after1975 snall rennantpopulalions have re'esrrblished thd$lves. The b€st eMdples are Ranthanbhore and Java resedoir in Rajasthan. The ofter shrcs where sild lopulations de doingwell are U(tar Pradsh, Gujarat,Oftsa, AndhraPradesh, Maha.asbtr.. Taoiln.du, Klmrhka and

Followingthc rcinboductiodof over2000 c.ptilc r€arcdM!ggc6, (hk cxlrcnclyrdaptive species l5 knom to havestarted breeding at Ieasrin 10-12locarions.

It nowbreeds in captivityat le6t in 25 locationsand tbo numbcr of ncsts(bolh ir aptivity andwild) nry bc over300 pcr yea..Thcre are lkc.dy ovcr 12,000juvcnilcs bcing rc..cd ir crp(iviry.

This hasbrought in x fccliig of loo m.nr- mlggcr rn thc couill-v.Looliig rt lhc rdaltibilryof the spcciesthele maystill be wild habitatavailablc in llmost aU stltcs for this spccics,In ovc.500 protected arcas,thcrc arc wat- bod;csas aho nun*ous n.n-nade rcscnons wirl'in Rcscnc fdesrs rhat can !ccomnodaremugger.

Tte Suggest€dA(tion Pbn fo. Mugge. r. Wild cgghlrvcn'.g tor captivchi(cling b bc sloffd by all slrlcs 2. Statesto suoeyprotccted aieas for rchlbilitnrionof nuggc..(St.tc wiscoc{iod plln m.y be tbebesr

3. Eachstal. to manageat leastof,c modcl Mnggc.Rc*pc'. (An cx!'cn comnittccof the Central Govemnontio pr.pareguidc lines and hclp prcparcoanagcocnr tlan li'r suchrcscru). 4. Th. Cont.alCovemmert co-ordinalo a rco-opcrative'intcrstltesurl,lus stocl disloslt .cintroduction

5. Fornulateeridelines and cortrol of cnptivcbrccdi.s ior Musger.(Emrhrsizing on ohjcctiveof eacb captivebreeding contre).

,A,CTION PI-AN FOR 9O'S

Siiglt el. al. (1910) proposedin 1988 an elaborate action plan for the Indinn docodiles. Thir has been e*esively comm.otedby variousagcncies. A gencralfeeling of thisaction plar is thatit is too b.oadbased ralherthan prioriry specific. The prcscntfroposed action plan attompls to bc morespecilic. 1, Tho Minislryof Envi.onmentand Foresr,Covernnent of India hasnl.cady ci.cularcd guideli.es ro docodile prcSramne operating nates to stop collecling wild laid egg.sin an attenpt to nininise aconulating stocks. Fina.cialsuppon has aho becnprovided lo makc room tor over crowded stocks.States [ave b€en advisd to cerateadditional roariig tacilitios whcrc rhc nocl(s cad b€ ntilzed for educalionalpupose.

A 2. Tie wildlife olfi.iais have bccn asked to sudcy watcr bod;eswithin prolecled Aracs and r.scre forestsfor f.asibilityoI furrherinrroduction. A ci..ula. hd goneto stat€sto prcparcprojeds rhat *ill loot ioto thetrosl)ecr of'nuggo. oocodile utilisalion'by tribalsand olher ethnic groups who werefadiLio.ally rhc usc6 of crocodite-borhfor consumptivcand non-consunplionpurposes. Statesnot operatinga crocodilcconsedarion prosramnc but havcconsidcrablc areas with (ocodile habila|saro to initiatcprogranoes lor rcl,abilirarionof (ocodilc with surplusstocks fron orher

5. North-easre'nIndia and rhe Bohmaputrr rivq s$rcm ro be mnsidcrcdns the prnrny a.easfor c.ocodileconse*ation duling the 1990\.

DISCUSSION

A cursory look al rhe re-introductionlo..rbis (Fi8:) and thc in(cNi.g srcceslul brecding of rhe re.in(roduccdslock in the wild ju(incs lhc p.ogdmmc ro bc rcrmcd as $trccslul' Howcyc.j wc llavc r oplMty nany more c.ocodilesm.anl for rc-stockinglnd nor m y loclrions idcnrii:lcdwhcc these opdle nock car go. It .ppears hcncej rhc unsurvcycdwild arcas h.vc ro bc su^oycd imncdit(cty as atso the slitablc habitar wirhin ProrecredArcas should b. idcn(ificd rs c.!ly as posib1.. t his howevcris nor withour p(oblcms. In a popularedcounrry like Indir nan,rocodilc conllicr situarioncm becomea c.nsranr probtcm sincc habit.ts are shnredbv fc.ph, -ocodilc rnd Livcnock. Hrbirlrs wirbin th. fdccr.d i.0:s arc ako icr ftce from danages causedbv nooding lnd *osnr oi nrsLioglrens. A .csult .l rLjc.rli.n ol rilcr courcs by consrucrion ot dan for irrigation, hydoclc(ric frojcct crc. dcrradcd rh. hrbi(rt qlalirr considqabh Add€d to this also lhe fast dcvelofmcnr ol conhc.cial fish{rics on all }v or bodi$ *ilh vcry liulc conrroj on the use of sdlable fishing gcar thar are de{rinctrhl ro othcr aquarictdunr pose conrinuousrhrear to the suFival of these endargored specics.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

My colleaguesin thewildlife Institutcof lidia, Dehradunhclpcd n,c in prefnringlhis prp* rhrough constantdiscussion and codne.tg Fundsfor lhc tr.vclto aucndrhc 10rhworking mccting of(he Crocodile SpeciatistsGroup was p.ovided by FAO-UNDPproject in India.

REFERENCES

Choudhury,B.C. and Choudhury,S. (1986). L.s.n loh CrocodilcRc-inr.oducrlon Projccr in Indi.. Tbe Irdiaa Fo.este.,Vol. u2 No. 10.pp. 881-8t0. Hom€ge.,R.E. (1971).The statusof fou. threatenedoocodilian species of ,\sia. In 'Gocodiles'.IUCN publication NoJz, pp. 42 50. Rao,RJ. (1988).Nesting ecology of charill ii Nrtioial ChanbalSancLu.ry. Mnncosr.ph rcpo(, Mldlifo

341 Captlyo Clocodlle Fea!t!8/€!e€dl!S IDcatlo!! ln Indla (1990) (lrcatloD Dab6t glvsD oD the lactls page)

MrJggcr 36 a o Ghddol o SW Crocodile ri n-fi40 {'o ,de-

0-200 LB Fig - r. Cap(iveC.ocodilc Rearins/B.e€dingtocafi,n in India (1990), (G = Gharial, M = M!ggc.. SwC = Salt waLcr(lrocodilc)

S.LNq Locrrion 5!!!!!!

t_ 2. M 3. Dclhi M M 5. M M. CJ 7. M 8. M 9. M 10. M 11. M 12. Bhopal 13. v, (i M,(i, swc 15. \t 11. 18. tt). :0 21. \1. (;.5\\C t. 23, 24_ M 25. M 26, M n. M, (;, SWC 24. 29. M, (i, slvc 30. M. SWC 31. M, O, SWC 32. 33. M 34. 15. lll x. N' 17. 38. 39. M, (i 40.

u3 Rehtroduction lrcation o! IDdiaD Crocodilials (1990) . Locatior:s vihere Ldtroduced crocodilian haw bred iD the ]fild (location names given oD the faci:rg page)

2

3

24

30 a Muggcr o Ghflol E SW Crocodilo Kr' Solld legends lndlcqtes '(; bro€dng ifl tho wild 1:.' followlng re-htroductlon I 0 200 lm fig.2 . ReintroducliontoQtnr of thdiun C.moditirtr 09ql), (C - Chdial. M = Muggar, swc = Satt War* crocoditc)

SlXe. Location SoccicsRclc!sed

1. c,M ?. (;. M t, Kukrail G,M c,M 5. c,M M o 8. TI (; 10. tl. N1 12_ Nl 13. \1

15. 5W(i simlitrl t1. NI 18. G,M 111. stvc :0. 11. 24. cn 23, Borinllie NI 24. ]\1 25, Itl 2n. IrI 27. M 24, N' 19, swc 30. 31. 3Z NI 33. ]\i

35. NI 36. 37. M 38. M 39. swc

345