The Macedonian Politicians Proved Again to Be Serbian Colony

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Macedonian Politicians Proved Again to Be Serbian Colony FYROM will restore the Serbian graves. This act proves explicit that Macedonia is not independent country, but Belgrade's Colony. The Macedonian Politicians proved again to be Serbian Colony Prof. Dr. Bozhidar Dimitrov click on the flag for Bulgarian language Focus: Prof. Dimitrov how you will comment the news the Macedonian State will pay for the restoration of the Serbian military memorial in Kaymakcalan? Bozhidar Dimitrov: My comment is that this act of the politicians in Skopje prove explicit that Macedonia is Belgrade's Colony. The international law require from every country to take care of his own memorial by itself. The country on which territories they lie have to give approval and to allow it. Giving funds in the current economic situation is unacceptable and prove without any doubt, Macedonia act as a dependent from Belgrade territories. As a complete contrast present the Macedonian officials towards our demand since 10 years to restore Bulgarian graves. They remain silent and we are waiting for permission. According to the international law and the Macedonian law from 1996 we should be able to do so. For our disappointment we still are not allowed to do restore with our funds not from the Macedonian state. It is very clear why they don't allow us. Because Macedonia and current politicians in power see each other as a territories totally dependent on Serbia's will. It is more shocking, that not in Serbian but in Bulgarian military graves remains are the ancestors of the current Macedonian politicians in Macedonia. 20% of the Bulgarian army in Macedonia in the World War I and Balkan wars was from Macedonia, which at that time was Bulgarian. They first destroy the graves of their grandfathers, which was falling in battle for national unity. 120 000 Macedonian was in Bulgarian army and more than 20 000 were falling in Macedonia - they were Bulgarians from Macedonia at that time. And now they are not allowed to be restore graves and monuments of their grandfathers. Focus: In Kaymakcalan there where not only Serbian but Bulgarian graves and monuments? Dimitrov: In Kaymakcalan where fighting 2 Serbian and 2 French division and 3 Bulgarian, which gave also heavy victims of war. The Bulgarian graves where destroyed from the Yugoslavian Communist Officials. There are a lot, but it is not allowed to us to restore them. Focus: Why it is not allowed? Dimitrov: Because as I told you Macedonian is not a nationality but profession, and in this particular case means renegade in service for Belgrade. Focus: What need to do the Bulgarian government? Dimitrov: The Bulgarian government have to stop any help for Macedonia and furthermore to ask NATO and EU to discontinue any negotiation's with Macedonia as long this barbarian and anti- European politics towards Bulgaria continues. Focus: How do you comment the the Protest of the Union of the Macedonian in Albania to the Albanian Assembly with regard of the demand of the secretary of the Bulgarian Assembly Ognian Gerdgikov of recognition of the Bulgarian minority in Albania? Dimitrov: Above all I can describe this protest as a joke and laughing matter. This people obviously lives in other times, where belonging to a nation was decided from the Communist party, President or Prime Minister. The question of the national identity is strong personal and on this people from Golo Bardo, Mala Prespa or Gorna nobody can take the right to declare what they think to be - not even Macedonian Government or Albanian Government. They will remain Bulgarian independent if somebody will recognize that they are Bulgarian or not. This are remains from totalitarian times in Macedonia and Albania and nothing more. Focus: In the statement they claimed by the last demographic count they declare themselves as a Macedonians and EU have question with regard of this count. Dimitrov: I know at least 100 people Bulgarian in Albania, this means in Albania there are Bulgarian population. And we know how in the past west of Bulgaria on the Balkan our neighbor count. When there are people who claim to be Bulgarian it is obvious that this Bulgarian minority needs to be recognized. Focus: Why the Macedonisten are better organized and speak louder? Dimitrov: Because by them this is State Politics and the state give enough funds. And we in Bulgaria do not have clear politics with regard of Macedonia and Albania and also other minority in the world. We have Agency for Bulgarian abroad but, but they are not enough funded and do not have program. In Macedonia they spend a lot. It was state department before now is Agency and they solid funding to look for minority's. And where aren't any they pay to make it. Look OMO "Ilinden" in Bulgaria. Focus: Why till now there was no state politics in this matter? Dimitrov: I was not in by the politicians before and can't answer this question. Ask Jan Videnov, Ivan Kostov but also today's politicians why they don' t do nothing? I think this what Ognian Gerjikov said is very good, but I don't know if this is a new program or state politic. Focus: Do you think there will be new state politics in this matter? Dimitrov: I develop such a program and state politics for BSP. Focus: Do you expect to have people with interest to restore their Bulgarian citizenship? Dimitrov: There were 20 000 request from the beginning of 2004 till today. Focus: From which country? Dimitrov: From Macedonia in first place and from Moldova on the second and from Albania on the third place. Despite of the fact, that some people do not want to recognize there are Bulgarian minority in Albania. Focus: Are there other issue of this program too? Dimitrov: The agency of Bulgarian abroad need to develop in State department. In the monument there are 1 Million Bulgarians for economic reason abroad and 4 Millions by the historical development remain outside of Bulgaria. This is a big reserve for the nation. And we have to take care for our citizen abroad. Focus: Will the state funding this programs? Dimitrov: The state have to spend considerable amount of money. Focus: How do you come to the idea to publish your new book in Macedonian: "The ten lies of the Macedonism"? Dimitrov: The book is bestseller in Macedonia. More than 30 000 copies were sold. I understand the tragically reality that people are coping the book. Even in the village of Vlado Mokrov he saw people are writing the book by the hand, like in the Otez Paisii time. One wonderful appreciation gave Blaje Ristevski, who mentions that this book is the most dangerous for Macedonism. Focus: Do you target the young population of Macedonia with your books? Dimitrov: I am from Sozopol and in the summer young people come to Black see and they often question me on different topics. Most important was my meeting with two young people 13 years old from Strumica in Sozopol. I ask them if they know the names of two Bulgarians from Strumica. They told me that they are best friend of their father. I ask them is your father Bulgarofil. They answer our father is not Bulgarofil, he is Bulgarian. Focus: But you print the book in Macedonian. Do you recognize the language this way? Dimitrov: Not at all. If we have to clarify many things we have to write in Macedonian language for better understanding. And I recognize Macedonian language as a written norm of the Bulgarian Vardar dialect. .
Recommended publications
  • States, Societies and Individuals in Central and Eastern Europe
    FOUREMPIRES ANDAN ENLGARGEMENT States, Societies and Individuals in Central and Eastern Europe Edited by Daniel Brett, Claire Jarvis, Irina Marin FOUR EMPIRES AND AN ENLARGEMENT States, Societies and Individuals: Transfiguring Perspectives and Images of Central and Eastern Europe Edited by DANIEL BRETT, CLAIRE JARVIS AND IRINA MARIN Papers from the 5th International Postgraduate Conference held at the School of Slavonic and East European Studies UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL 2008 FOUR EMPIRES AND AN ENLARGEMENT STATES, SOCIETIES AND INDIVIDUALS: TRANSFIGURING PERSPECTIVES AND IMAGES OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE EDITED BY DANIEL BRETT, CLAIRE JARVIS AND IRINA MARIN Studies in Russia and Eastern Europe No. 4 ISBN: 978-0-903425-80-3 Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Daniel Brett, Claire Jarvis, Irina Marin 2008. Individual chapters © contributors 2008 All rights reserved. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Contents Mysterious knocks, flying potatoes and rebellious servants: Spiritualism and social conflict in late imperial Russia 1 Julia Mannherz The Ukrainian Stundists and Russian Jews: a collaboration of evangelical peasants with Jewish intellectuals in late imperial Russia 17 Sergei Zhuk “Forebears”, “saints” and “martyrs”: the politics of commemoration in Bulgaria in the 1880s and 1890s 33 Stefan Detchev Celebrating the nation: the case of Upper Silesia after the plebiscite in 1921 49
    [Show full text]
  • Activities in Favor of the People with Disabilities
    Activities in favor of the people with disabilities During the last years Sozopol Foundation responded to the call of the international community for improving the quality of life of people with disabilities, in order to provide services to ensure their social inclusion and equal human rights. In this regard, the Foundation has established the following main tasks: • creation a favorable environment in the micro-communities and development of opportunities for fulfilling lives of people with disabilities through their active involvement in community events, cultural events, recreational and cultural tourism; • development and implementation of special tools and aids to overcome the isolation that accompanies the people with disabilities and the difficulties experienced in interaction with and the adaptation to their environment in order to stimulate their active participation in public events; • change in the public perceptions of the people with disabilities as full citizens by placing them at the center of public attention through their direct participation in cultural life and cultural tourism, through which they can express their due place in modern society The Foundation has significant experience in the development and implementation of projects related to providing access to people with disabilities to cultural heritage and natural landmarks, and the appropriate use of EU funds and own resources for this purpose. Examples for this are the implemented and completed projects: 1. Creation and promotion of cultural tourist product in Sozopol through restoration of the southern fortress wall and tower and construction of public tourist infrastructure for people with disabilities in Architectural-historic Reserve The Old Town of Sozopol, funded under Project Development of cultural tourism in Bulgaria – EU PHARE Programme and co-founded by Sozopol Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Communism, Neoliberalisation, Fascism by Bozhin Stiliyanov
    Post-Socialist Blues Within Real Existing Capitalism: Anti-Communism, Neoliberalisation, Fascism by Bozhin Stiliyanov Traykov A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Alberta © Bozhin Stiliyanov Traykov, 2020 Abstract This project draws on Alex William’s (2020) contribution to Gramscian studies with the concept of complex hegemony as an emergent, dynamic and fragile process of acquiring power in socio- political economic systems. It examines anti-communism as an ideological element of neoliberal complex hegemony in Bulgaria. By employing a Gramcian politico-historical analysis I explore examples of material and discursive ideological practices of anti-communism. I show that in Bulgaria, anti-communism strives to operate as hegemonic, common-sensual ideology through legislative acts, production of historiography, cultural and educational texts, and newly invented traditions. The project examines the process of rehabilitation of fascist figures and rise of extreme nationalism, together with discrediting of the anti-fascist struggle and demonizing of the welfare state within the totalitarian framework of anti-communism. Historians Enzo Traverso (2016, 2019), Domenico Losurdo (2011) and Ishay Landa (2010, 2016) have traced the undemocratic roots of economic liberalism and its (now silenced) support of fascism against the “Bolshevik threat.” They have shown that, whether enunciated by fascist regimes or by (neo)liberal intellectuals, anti-communism is deeply undemocratic and shares deep mass-phobic disdain for political organizing of the majority. In this dissertation I argue that, in Bulgaria, anti- communism has not only opened the ideological space for extreme right and fascist politics, it has demoralized left political organizing by attacking any attempts for a politics of socio- economic justice as tyrannical.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Citizenship Report May 25 2013
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY COUNTRY REPORT: BULGARIA Daniel Smilov and Elena Jileva Revised and updated May 2013 http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Report on Bulgaria Daniel Smilov and Elena Jileva Revised and updated May 2013 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Country Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2013/22 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Daniel Smilov and Elena Jileva This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Bulgaria Daniel Smilov and Elena Jileva1 1 Introduction It is a well-known paradox that a polity cannot define its membership in a democratic way; there must be an already defined membership in order for a democratic procedure to take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernity and Tradition: European and National in Bulgaria
    MODERNITY AND TRADITION: EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL IN BULGARIA Marko Hajdinjak, Maya Kosseva, Antonina Zhelyazkova IMIR MODERNITY AND TRADITION: EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL IN BULGARIA Marko Hajdinjak, Maya Kosseva, Antonina Zhelyazkova Project IME: Identities and Modernities in Europe: European and National Identity Construction Programmes, Politics, Culture, History and Religion International Center for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations Sofia, 2012 This book is an outcome of the international research project IME – Identities and Modernities in Europe: European and National Identity Construction Programmes, Politics, Culture, History and Religion (2009-2012). IME was coordinated by Dr. Atsuko Ichijo from the Kingston University, UK. It involved Universities and research institutes from Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The project was funded by the Seventh Framework Program of the European Commission (FP7 2007-2013) Theme: SSH-2007-5.2.1 – Histories and Identities: articulating national and European identities Funding scheme: Collaborative projects (small or medium scale focused research projects) Grant agreement no.: 215949 For more information about project IME, visit: http://fass.kingston.ac.uk/research/helen-bamber/ime © Marko Hajdinjak, author, 2012 © Maya Kosseva, author, 2012 © Antonina Zhelyazkova, author, 2012 © International Center for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations, 2012 ISBN: 978-954-8872-70-6 CONTENTS Introduction, Marko Hajdinjak .......................7 Catching Up with the Uncatchable: European Dilemmas and Identity Construction on Bulgarian Path to Modernity, Maya Kosseva, Antonina Zhelyazkova, Marko Hajdinjak ..........13 Identity Construction through Education, State Promotion and Diaspora Policies in Bulgaria, Antonina Zhelyazkova, Maya Kosseva, Marko Hajdinjak ..........65 Living Next Door to “Europe”: Bulgarian Education between Tradition and Modernity, and between the European and National, Maya Kosseva, Marko Hajdinjak ....................
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of North Macedonia - a 'New' Country in the Western Balkans
    87 | RSC Volume 11, Issue 3, September 2019 THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA - A 'NEW' COUNTRY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Mira Šorović University of Montenegro, Montenegro E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The article tries to explain and define political processes and changes trhough history of the 'new' Western Balkans country - the Republic of North Macedonia. It is word about analysis of the political dispute between Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) and Greece, from its biginnings until the present day. This paper will try to give the real picture of political area in the Balkans and explore deeper roots of the 'Macedonian Question' controversy. Also, it will give the explinations of the resolution of 27-year dispute, (between the two neighbor countries), by signing the Prespa Agreement. Hence, leaving by side national identity and history, the North Macedonia will be able to join the European Union and NATO. Thus, in short period of time, a 'new' country in the Western Balkans has putted in the center of the regional politics, with clear purpose: promoting ethnic and cultural heritance in the edge of the European continent. Key-words: North Macedonia, Greece, the 'Macedonian Question', the name issue, the Prespa Agreement, identity, the Western Balkans, the European and Euro-Atlantic integration. 1. Introduction In recent time, North Macedonia has hold attention on the regional political scene of the Balkans, as a 'geopolitical fault line' (Armakolas et al. 2019, 1). Nearly three decades, the 'Macedonian Question' has been subject of many round-table discussions, descriptive articles and many analyses from diverse perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulgarian Monarchy: a Politically Motivated Revision of a Historical Image in a Post-Socialist Transitional Society
    The Bulgarian monarchy: a politically motivated revision of a historical image in a post-socialist transitional society Markus Wien American University, Bulgaria From its foundation in 1878, which was a consequence of the previous Russian- Turkish war, up to 1946 pre-socialist Bulgaria had a monarchic constitution. It was finally abandoned on 8 September 1946 by a manipulated referendum, which turned Bulgaria into a ‘People’s Republic’. The last king, Simeon II, had to leave the country, but did not abdicate formally instead, but he kept his title as a monarch in exile.1 During the years of communist rule, which lasted until 1989, it was unthinkable for Simeon to return to his home country – let alone resume political functions. The rejection of the monarchy and its representatives as reactionary and feudalist by the communists was too clear. On the contrary, they were eager to eliminate any positive memory of the monarchy in the public. They did so by creating an official image of history which blamed the monarchy for being the main reason, or at least, a very important precondition for all negative developments in the history of Bulgaria since 1878. Significant terms, such as “adventurism” for Bulgaria’s participation in the Balkan wars and the First World War under King Ferdinand or ‘monarcho-fascism’ for the authoritarian regime of Boris III, were chosen in order to make the period before 1944 a part of the public memory as a past which was dark but had been overcome.2 After the change of 1989 and the end of the communist monopoly on public opinion, all of a sudden the possibility of a historical re-evaluation of the Bulgarian monarchy occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime in Bulgaria: Markets and Trends
    ORGANIZED CRIME IN BULGARIA: MARKETS AND TRENDS ���������� ������������ ��������� The present report builds upon various studies published by the Center for the Study of Democracy throughout the last decade which have focused on specific aspects of organized crime in Bulgaria (contraband, the drug market, tax fraud, human trafficking, arms proliferation, etc.), the systemic spread of corruption, and the linkages between the two. The report presents the latest trends and manifestations (or “market niches”) of syndicate crime and its particularly damaging effects. It goes further to offer a historical review of the facts and available expertise in the area, and to draw conclusions about the origin, characteristics and developmental features of organized criminality in Bulgaria in the context of the transition to democracy. This report attempts to present an authentic picture of organized crime in Bulgaria, by identifying its constitu- ent features and major trends. The research team has used information from all available sources, analyzing it through several, complementary methods. Collecting empirical data about clandestine and hidden markets is a hard task, which can sometimes put the researchers at risk. However, it cannot be dispensed with, particularly as the so called objective data (police and judicial crime statistics) provided by public bodies is often incomplete and sometimes manipulated. This paper also furthers expertise exchange through a public-private partnership. This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Center for the Study of Deocracy and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. The report is published with the financial support of the US Department of Justice Editorial Board Ognian Shentov Boyko Todorov Alexander Stoyanov ISBN 978-954-477-150-8 © 2007, Center for the Study of Democracy All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential Political Consequences of the Bulgarian Scholarly
    The potential political consequences of the Bulgarian scholarly claims to the Macedonian ethnic origin, history and language for the present and future of the interstate relations between Macedonia and Bulgaria By Krum V. Kaishev Submitted to Central European University Nationalism Studies Program In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Adviser: Professor Bojan Todosijevic Budapest, Hungary October-November 2009 CEU eTD Collection Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Prelude to the Thesis Statement 11 3. Thesis Statement 12 4. Prelude to Chapter 1 12 5. Chapter 1. Relevant Theories on Nationalism 17 6. Chapter 2. Historical Background and “The New Macedonian Question” 21 7. Chapter 3. The “Macedonian” minority in Bulgaria 38 8. Chapter 4. Conclusion: The Potential Political Consequences for the Interstate Relations 51 9. Bibliography 54 CEU eTD Collection CEU eTD Collection [1] The potential political consequences of the Bulgarian scholarly claims to the Macedonian ethnic origin, history and language for the present and future of the interstate relations between Macedonia and Bulgaria Introduction The present work is a study of the potential political consequences, which the present day claims to the Macedonian ethnic origin, history and language have for the present and future of the interstate relations between Macedonia and Bulgaria. The still ongoing disputes between the Macedonian and Bulgarian scholarly circles are important for the current shape and direction of the intergovernmental relations between the two countries. The Macedonian and Bulgarian nationalist and conservative minded scholars argue about which side has the historical right to claim the Macedonian history, language and symbols.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek-Bulgarian Cooperation on FYROM Within the EU
    Greek-Bulgarian March 2017 _ Relations: Present State and Future Challenges Authors: Yorgos Christidis Ioannis Armakolas Panagiotis Paschalidis This report was made possible through generous funding from RESEARCH REPORT 2 CONTENTS ABOUT THE SOUTH-EAST EUROPE PROGRAMME ................................................................................................................... 5 ABOUT THE AUTHORS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 PREFACE....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION: HISTORICAL CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Traditional enmity and the gradual rapprochement .......................................................................................................... 8 Greek foreign policy after the end of the Cold War ............................................................................................................. 9 Bulgarian foreign policy after the end of the Cold War ..................................................................................................... 9 1. POLITICAL AND DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Influence in Bulgaria
    DR DIMITAR BECHEV RUSSIA’S INFLUENCE IN BULGARIA DEFENCE, FOREIGN POLICY AND SECURITY NEW DIRECTION The Foundation for European Reform is a Brussels-based free market, euro-realist think- tank and publisher, established in 2010 under the patronage of Baroness Thatcher. We have satellite offices in London and Warsaw. New Direction - The Foundation for European Reform is registered in Belgium as a non-for-profit organisation (ASBL) and is partly funded by the European Parliament. www.europeanreform.org Registered Office: Rue d’Arlon 40, Brussels 1000, Belgium. Director General: Naweed Khan. The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions Follow us @europeanreform expressed in this publication. Sole liability rests with the author. FOREWARD RUSSIA’S his report by New Direction comes in a very However, energy is only one of many ways in which Russia important moment in time, especially in light of interferes in Bulgarian domestic political and economical T recent developments taking place in Ukraine, in life. It has increased its role in the Bulgarian banking INFLUENCE Syria, as well as in different European countries. Using system and real estate market, with most recent purchase its old divide et impera tactics, Russia is challenging the of almost 64000 houses by Russian citizens in Varna and IN BULGARIA unity among EU Member States by taking full advantage Burgas. With regard to (dis)information, Russia exerts a of different factors, including economic links or support firm influence by generously funding Bulgarian media’s - Dr DIMITAR BECHEV from political parties which have especially strong ties with both at local and national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Fulbright Newsletter No. 78 July
    Bulgarian-American Commission for Educational Exchange No 78 www.fulbright.bg Newsletter July – September 2014 Sofia 1000, Al. Stamboliiski blvd., tel. (359 2) 981 85 67, 980 82 12, 981 68 30; fax (359 2) 988 45 17; E-mail: [email protected]; Internet: www.fulbright.bg, www.fisi-bg.info 13th Fulbright International Summer Institute www.fisi-bg.info Twenty-seven BA students from the University of Michigan (Ross School of Business) led by Professor George Siedel attended his course on Negotiation and Conflict Resolution and participated in a special program that involved meetings with prominent Bulgarian entrepreneurs and visits to business companies. The new group of American Fulbright scholars and graduate students had the opportunity to attend an intensive two-week course in Bulgarian language. FISI offered a total of 13 interdisciplinary courses conducted by 14 distinguished professors and experts from prestigious universities and institutions such as Harvard University, University of Michigan, University of Massachusetts Boston, Arizona State University, University of Dayton, Sofia University, New Bulgarian University, University of Veliko Turnovо, University of Peshawar, Monmouth College, Communications and Human Resources Development Center and the European Parliament. A visit to the Saeva Dupka Cave and a walking tour of Sofia gave FISI participants a glimpse of the beautiful nature and Bulgaria’s rich cultural heritage. Classical music lovers had the chance to enjoy the opera Don Giovanni (Rousse State Opera, conductor Martin Panteleev) and symphonic works of Mozart, Rimski-Korsakov and Official FISI Opening Richard Strauss (Sofia Philharmonic Orchestra, conductor Nayden From right to left, Dr. Julia Stefanova, Executive Director, Fulbright Commission; Natalia Miteva, Todorov) at the lake stage of RIU Pravets Resort as part of the tenth Director, Programs for Education and Libraries at the America for Bulgaria Foundation edition of the annual Mozart Festival.
    [Show full text]