DOCSLIB.ORG

Gift-Giving, Memoria, and Art Patronage in the Principalities of Walachia and Moldavia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gift-Giving, Memoria, and Art Patronage in the Principalities of Walachia and Moldavia Gift-Giving, Memoria, and Art Patronage in the Principalities of Walachia and Moldavia The Function and Meaning of Princely Votive Portraits (14th – 17th Centuries) Laura-Cristina Ştefănescu Student number 3307115 Supervisor: Dr. G. Van Bueren, Utrecht University Second assessor: Dr. A. B. Adamska, Utrecht University Research Master Thesis in Medieval Studies, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Utrecht University 2010 Motto: “Iubitu mieu fiiu, mai înainte de toate să cade să cinsteşti şi să lauzi neîncetat pre Dumnezeu cel mare şi bun şi milostiv şi ziditorul nostru cel înţelept, şi zioa şi noaptea şi în tot ceasul şi în tot locul.” “My beloved son, first of all, it is right to continuously honour and praise God, our great, good and kind and wise creator, during the day and during the night, at all hours and in all places.” - Neagoe Basarab, Învăţăturile lui Neagoe Basarab către fiul său Theodosie (The Teachings of Neagoe Basarab to His Son Theodosie) - “Dirept acéia, feţii miei, mi vă rog să pomeniţi şi pre mine în sfânta voastră rugăciune şi nu uitareţi pre mine, cela ce sunt oaia cea rătăcită şi tatăl vostru, ca se priimească şi pre mine, păcătosul, Domnului nostru Iisus Hristos, pentru rugăciunea voastră […]” “For that reason, my sons, please remember me in your holy prayer and do not forget me, who am the lost sheep and your father, so that I, the sinner, may be received by our Lord Jesus Christ because of your prayer […]” - Neagoe Basarab, Învăţăturile lui Neagoe Basarab către fiul său Theodosie (The Teachings of Neagoe Basarab to His Son Theodosie) - 1 Table of Contents Introduction 4 1. The Subject Matter: The Problematic and Research Questions 4 2. The Approach 7 3. The Importance of the Research 12 Chapter I: Historiography, Paradigms and Concepts 14 1. Romanian Historiography 14 2. Western European Perspectives: Gift-Giving and Memoria 19 3. The Act of Founding – Definitions 28 Chapter II: The Sources: Methodological Challenges 33 1. The Sources 33 1.1. Architecture and Iconographical Sources 33 1.2. Written Sources 36 1.3. The Oral Tradition: Foundation Legends 38 1.4. A Broader Perspective: Other Sources 40 2. Votive Portraits and Their State of Preservation 41 2.1. Originals and Acceptable Restorations 42 2.2. Disputed Restorations 44 2.3. Complete Alterations 45 3. Restrictions 47 Chapter III: The Foundations 48 1. General Outlines: The Founders and Their Foundations 48 2. The Architecture 53 3. The Paintings 57 4. Conclusion: Motivation and Function 61 4.1. The Spiritual Function 61 4.2. The Funerary Function: The Princely Necropolis 63 4.3. Defending Christianity 64 4.4. The Political and Social Function 66 Chapter IV: The Votive Portraits 68 2 1. Location 68 1.1. Related to Architecture 68 1.2. Related to the Iconographical Program 69 1.3. Reception 71 2. The Background 72 3. The Composition and the Protagonists 73 4. The Inscriptions: The Relation between Image and Text 76 5. The Worldly Level 78 5.1. The Portrait: The Face 78 5.2. The Costume 79 5.3. The Hands: Attitudes, Gestures and Objects 81 6. The Religious Level 82 6.1. From this World to the Other: Divine Figures and Intercessors 82 6.2. From the Other World to this One: Receiving the Crown 84 7. The Political Level 85 7.1. Towards the Past: Succession Series 85 7.2. The Present: The Figure of the Prince 88 7.3. Towards the Future: The Followers 89 8. The Social Level 90 8.1. The Family 90 8.2. Women 91 9. Conclusion: Motivation and Function 92 9.1. The Liturgical Function: Remembrance and Commemoration 92 9.2. A Political and Social Statement 93 Conclusions 95 1. A Comparative Perspective 95 2. The Message and the Meaning 97 3. Questions for the Future 98 Appendices 101 1. Princely Religious Foundations from Walachia and Moldavia 101 3. Illustrations 134 Bibliography 190 3 Introduction 1. The Subject Matter: The Problematic and Research Questions There is an amazing quality about portraits, because they are an invitation to remember. When the dust of time covers the traces of the past, portraits act like preservers of memory, evoking those who have walked the face of the earth before us. If one of the many foreign vistors crowded in the small, almost claustrophobic, space of a church from a monastery hidden among the green hills of Northern Moldavia, looks around carefully at the interior walls, covered from top to bottom with paint centuries old, he might discover an image that would remind him of similar representations from his own country. The image I refer to is the votive portrait1 of the founder and his family, offering the model of the church he has build to God. The following research focuses on exactly this type of source. The present thesis is concerned with the votive portraits of princes of Walachia and Moldavia, from the 14th to the end of the 17th century that can be found in princely foundations. I intend to bring these sources together, in order to analyze them in the context of the act of founding a church or a monastery. I would like to decipher what were the functions of these votive portraits, related to those of the church in which they are to be found, as well as the motivations that have led the founder to build the religious edifice and to have himself portrayed on its walls, these being my main research questions. I am hoping to decipher the message that these foundations and votive portraits were intended to deliver, being guided by Western European methodologies, namely the paradigms of gift-giving and memoria, which, through their concepts, allow a holistic understanding of these phenomena. From a spatial perspective, my thesis focuses on sources from Romania, because up to now, for this territory, the votive portraits of princes have not been thoroughly analyzed as a whole, within the framework of a monograph. In the Middle Ages, on the territory of nowadays Romania, there were three separate principalities: Transylvania, Walachia and Moldavia. I chose to focus only on the last two, because of the similarities between them. I excluded Transylvania, both for the necessity of restriction and for its particularities. Transylvania had a different 1 The term votive will be defined in the third part of the first chapter. 4 history, being dominated by the Hungarian monarchy. Consequently, its culture has been influenced a lot by Western Europe, separating it, somehow, from the other two principalities that would more or less share a history. Surely, between Walachia and Moldavia there are several differences too, as I will explain later on, but, here, orthodoxy was able to flourish, as opposed to Transylvania, which became officially a catholic land. The chronological limits of this thesis might surprise the Western European medievalist, who might claim that the 17th century has nothing to do with the Middle Ages. However, for Romania, as for other countries as well, this artificial chronological framework is extended according to a different evolution, in which the characteristics that we define as medieval persist. The 17th century is not fully medieval. It is a transition period, in which the echo of the Middle Ages slowly fades away. However, the reason for choosing this timeframe (14th – 17th centuries) is another. This period is marked by the so-called earthly reigns (domnii pământene), characterized by the rule of local princes, from families of Walachia and Moldavia. In 1711 (Moldavia) and 1714 (Walachia), begins the Phanariote reign, meaning that, from now on, the two principalities were ruled by princes from the members of important Greek families, living in Phanar, the Greek quarter of Constantinople, from which their name derives. To sum up, my timeframe begins in the 14th century, when the principalities of Walachia and Moldavia were created and ends in the 17th century that emphasizes the end of the medieval period and the beginning of another political and cultural period, marked by the Phanariote rule. The research question of this thesis has been restricted in several ways, which I would like to point out in what follows, for a clear understanding of the subject matter. First of all, my primary sources represent votive portraits of princes, which can be found painted on the walls of the churches and monasteries they have founded. That is to say, on the one hand, that my main focus is represented only by the frescoes that show memorial princely portraits and, on the other hand, that these images come exclusively from their own foundations. I understand by this churches and monasteries built and painted by princes; built by others, but painted or repainted by them; and built and painted by others from their explicit order. I will not take into account the portraits of princes from churches and monasteries that have been built by other members of the society, like clerics or boyars2. My second restriction, of which more will be said in chapter two, regards the state of preservation of the frescoes. Even though I started with a number of over two 2 Boyars represent the highest rank of the feudal aristocracy in Walachia and Moldavia. 5 hundred princely foundations3, I ended up with around fifty painted ensembles. The others are either completely destroyed, a ruin, have never been painted or I did not find any information on them. From the fifty that were painted, some were repainted in the 19th century, some slightly modified and some remarkably preserved. Obviously, they were not equally useful for the purpose of my research and this implied a new restriction, reducing their number to half, for reasons which will be explained later on.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preda Buzescu – the Grand Ban of Craiova (1602-1608)
    SECTION: HISTORY AND CULTURAL MENTALITIES LDMD 2 PREDA BUZESCU – THE GRAND BAN OF CRAIOVA (1602-1608) Sorin Bulboacă, Assist. Prof. , PhD., ”Vasile Goldis” University of the West, Arad Abstract: During the 17th century, the grand ban of Craiova was the most important high official of Wallachia, most coveted by the big boyars, big dime with authority in the counties west of the river Olt. Preda Buzescu great dignity ban occupied briefly in the fall of 1600, called Michael the Brave Preda Buzescu Wallachian boyars filohabsburgice leader was an excellent military commander, who has proved his talent in fighting the Turks, decided partisan alliance with the Emperor Rudolf II. No other ban had the autority of Preda Buzescu, between 1602-1608, in the counties west of river Olt, during the 17th century. He had a chancellery that issued documents without invoking the authority of the prince regnant. Preda Buzescu has ordered the Wallachian*s army. For services faithful to the great dime Preda Buzescu full advantage of his generosity Radu Serban. Few months before his death Preda Buzescu, Radu Serban confirms his dominion over the villages Fauresti,, Novaci, Susani, Rudariu and Seaca. Keywords: ban, boyars, counties, millitary commander, Craiova În secolul al XVII-lea, în Ţara Românească, marea bănie a Craiovei este cea mai importantă dregătorie, cea mai râvnită de marii boieri, marele ban dispunând de o autoritate cvasidomnească în judeţele de la apus de râul Olt, cel puţin până la Matei Basarab. Marele ban al Craiovei este, de obicei, cel dintâi menţionat în lista martorilor din sfatul domnesc şi este singurul dregător care posedă o cancelarie proprie la Craiova, care emite documente, valabile în judeţele aflate la vest de Olt1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gidni 233 People and Places in the History Of
    Section – History and Cultural Mentalities GIDNI PEOPLE AND PLACES IN THE HISTORY OF TÂRGOVIŞTE Cristina Furtună, Assist., PhD Candidate, ”Valahia” University of Târgoviște Abstract: In history, Târgovişte has been an economic, administrative, political center but also a cultural one, particularly important for the Romanian culture. In Târgovişte, the topic of time returns obstinately (Prehistoric Time, Antiquity, Middle Ages, Renaissance Time, Modern Time), understood according to the definition given to it by St. Augustine – mobile image of eternity. Antiquity represented time symbolically as a circle, with 12 astrological signs on it and whose center symbolized the eternity of being. Similarly, Târgovişte is an eternal city of the Oriental Roman world. The symbolical passage from temporal to spatial involves the material evidence, seen as an adversary of extinction in the being’s fight for eternity, concept that permanently joined the terrestrial representation of the existence, so present in the area of Târgovişte. Keywords: Târgovişte, book, writers, places, history, culture, time Introduction In time, Târgovişte has been an economic, administrative, political but also cultural centre, particularly important for the Romanian culture. It was first attested by the documents at the end of the 14th century and culturally thrived at the beginning of the 15th century. Different writing and communication experts appear (grămătici, pisari, dieci but also logofeţi and princely emissaries/ soli domneşti), assuring the commercial and diplomatic connection with the neighboring countries. Târgovişte was also a princely residence and has preserved the marks of its cultural institutions. It is in Târgovişte that the first Romanian grammar appeared and it is also here that erudite scholars such as Macarie, Udrişte Năsturel, senechal Constantin Cantacuzino and voivodes who set up cultural institutions (such as Radu cel Mare, Neagoe Basarab, Mihai Viteazul, Matei Basarab) carried out their activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Hungarian-Wallachian Matrimonial Relations of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries
    MIHAI FLORIN HASAN ASPECTS OF THE HUNGARIAN-WALLACHIAN MATRIMONIAL RELATIONS OF THE FOURTEENTH AND FIFTEENTH CENTURIES Abstract: In this study my aim was to demonstrate without doubts the fact that even in the case ofîransylvanian nobility, from the end of 13th century and all along the 14th century, a pattem is present in naming the offspring of nobles. This model of giving name of the father to one of the sons, or from the grandfather to one of the grandson, or from an uncie to a nephew was identified by French and Italian scholars at the middle of the 90's, as existing in medieval world of nobles, studying the primary sources [documents from chapters, convents etc.]. In this case I tried to demonstrate with the help of 18 th genealogica! tables, drawn from published collections of documents, the fact that, in part, an unspecified amount of Transylvanian nobles knew this rule and tried it in the century proposed for investigation. The main idea it's that the rule of name giving doesn't represent afirm rule for Transylvanian nobility, but, with a retard, is tending to impose itselfin some major clans but noi only, at the halfofthe 14th century. Keywords: Dynasty, Hungarian wives, royal marriage, genealogy, intemational relations. The genealogy of the ruling House of Basarab, as well as ofthe House of Muşat, has stirred the interest of Romanian historiography since the late nineteenth century1 and, so far, the studies examining this issue have been quite numerous. An aspect that is not insignificant as regards the genealogica! evolution of our ruling houses is that of the voivodesses or princesses consort,2 and thus far, there are considerable gaps and ambiguities in this niche.
    [Show full text]
  • Arc Peste Timp - 465 De Ani De La Moartea Lui Vlaicu Piscanul
    MUZEUL JUDEŢEAN ARGEŞ ARGESIS, STUDII ŞI COMUNICĂRI, seria ISTORIE, TOM XVIII, 2009 ARC PESTE TIMP - 465 DE ANI DE LA MOARTEA LUI VLAICU PISCANUL TEODOR DINA* Sfârşitul domniei lui Neagoe Basarab, la 15 septembrie 1521, a marcat începutul unor îndârjite lupte pentru domnie, sprijinite de mai multe fracţiuni (partide!) boiereşti care căutau, fie să se menţină la putere, fie să înscăuneze un domn favorabil intereselor lor**. Nevârstnicul fiu al voievodului ctitor al mânăstirii Argeşului, Teodosie, un copil de numai 13-14 ani, a fost proclamat domn în locul tatălui său, sub regenţa mamei sale, Doamna Despina, şi a unchiului său, Preda Craiovescu, dar boierii potrivnici, mai ales pribegii din Moldova, socotind momentul prielnic au venit în ţară, şi cu ajutorul altor boieri din părţile Buzăului, îl alungă şi înscăunează domn pe Dragomir Călugărul. Boierii Craioveşti, care sprijineau pe Teodosie voievod, cheamă în ajutor pe Mehmet beg, paşa de Nicopole, răstoarnă situaţia şi restabileşte calmul pentru scurt timp. Dragomir Călugărul este luat prizonier de către turci, trecut peste Dunăre şi, la stăruinţele comisului Bădica (unchiul lui Teodosie) este ucis. Victoria de la Târgovişte împotriva lui Dragomir Călugărul, fiind efemeră, Teodosie vodă, ca şi alţi înaintaşi ai săi, este nevoi să ,,ia drumul Stambului” pentru confirmare de către sultan. Din păcate, copilul-domn nu s-a mai întors din capitala imperiului otoman. Având o constituţie şubredă, ar fi murit acolo de ciumă. ,,Întru aceste tulburări, ce erau între boierii ţării – cităm din cronica lui Radu Popescu – Mehmet beg a scris la Poartă de a cerut domnia ţării, zicând că-l pofteşte ţara să ia domnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Restitutio Daciae Ii
    Texte digitizate la Biblioteca Judeţeană Mureş în cadrul proiectului "Mai aproape de lectură: biblioteca publică în serviciul studentilor". Proiect realizat cu sprijinul Administratiei Fondului Cultural Naţional. ŞTEFAN ANDREESCU RESTITUTIO DACIAE * * RELAŢIILE POLITICE DINTRE ŢARA ROMÂNEASCĂ, MOLDOVA ŞI TRANSILVANIA ÎN RĂSTIMPUL 1601-1659 EDITURA ALBATROS BUCUREŞTI 1989 CUPRINS CUVÎNT ÎNAINTE Capitolul I - „MOVILEŞTII” ÎN ŢARA ROMÂNEASCĂ Capitolul II - RADU MIHNEA CORVIN, DOMN AL MOLDOVEI ŞI ŢĂRII ROMÂNEŞTI Capitolul III - TRANSILVANIA LA ÎNCEPUTUL SECOLULUI XVII: ACŢIUNI ŞI PROIECTE PENTRU UNITATEA SPAŢIULUI CARPATO-DANUBIAN Capitolul IV - GÎNDUL ŞI FAPTELE LUI VASILE LUPU Capitolul V - ŢĂRILE ROMÂNE ŞI „CRUCIADA” DIN ANII 1645-1647 Capitolul VI - MOŞTENIREA POLITICĂ A LUI MTHAI VITEAZUL LA MIJLOCUL VEACULUI XVII Capitolul III TRANSILVANIA LA ÎNCEPUTUL SECOLULUI XVII: ACŢIUNI ŞI PROIECTE PENTRU UNITATEA SPAŢIULUI CARPATO-DANUBIAN Tratatul de pace de la Zsitvatorok, încheiat la 11 noiembrie 1606, pentru viitorii douăzeci de ani, între Imperiul romano-german şi cel otoman, a fixat în bună măsură cadrul extern în care vor evolua politic mai ales Transilvania şi Ţara Românească.1 Acest eveniment de răscruce a fost, însă, anticipat de o primă reglementare a raporturilor dintre cele două mici state de la Dunărea de Jos şi Poartă. Radu Şerban, domnul Ţării Româneşti, care încă în 1603, prin biruinţa dobîndită lîngă moara de hîrtie a Braşovului (17 iulie), în dauna lui Moise Szekely, protejatul turcilor, contribuise decisiv la restabilirea
    [Show full text]
  • Materials of the Riga 3Rd International Conference on Hellenic Studies
    Materials of the Riga 3rd International Conference on Hellenic Studies Latvijas Universitāte Humanitāro zinātņu fakultāte Klasiskās filoloģijas katedra Hellēnistikas centrs HELLĒŅU DIMENSIJA Rīgas 3. starptautiskās hellēnistikas konferences materiāli Sastādītāji: Brigita Aleksejeva Ojārs Lāms Ilze Rūmniece Latvijas Universitāte University of Latvia Faculty of Humanities Chair of Classical Philology Centre for Hellenic Studies HELLENIC DIMENSION Materials of the Riga 3rd International Conference on Hellenic Studies Editors: Brigita Aleksejeva Ojārs Lāms Ilze Rūmniece University of Latvia UDK 930(063) He 396 The book is financially supported by the Hellenic Republic Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the University of Latvia Grāmata izdota ar Grieķijas Republikas Kultūras un tūrisma ministrijas un Latvijas Universitātes atbalstu Support for Conference Proceedings by ERAF Project Support for the international cooperation projects and other international cooperation activities in research and technology at the University of Latvia No. 2010/0202/2DP/2.1.1.2.0/10/APIA/VIAA/013 IEGULDĪJUMS TAVĀ NĀKOTNĒ Editorial board: Gunnar de Boel (Belgium) Igor Surikov (Russia) Thanassis Agathos (Greece) Kateřina Loudová (The Czech Republic) Valda Čakare (Latvia) Ojārs Lāms (Latvia) Ilze Rūmniece (Latvia) Nijolė Juchnevičienė (Lithuania) Tudor Dinu (Romania) Language editing Normunds Titāns Translating Rasma Mozere Cover design: Agris Dzilna Layout: Andra Liepiņa © Brigita Aleksejeva, Ojārs Lāms, Ilze Rūmniece, editors, 2012 © University of Latvia, 2012 ISBN 978-9984-45-469-6 CONTENTS / SATURS Introduction 8 Ievads 10 I ANCIENT TIMES SENLAIKI 11 Vassilis Patronis ECONOMIC IDEAS OF ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHERS: ASSESSING THEIR IMPACT ON THE FORMATION OF THE WORLD ECONOMIC THOUGHT 12 Sengrieķu filozofu idejas par ekonomiku: izvērtējot ietekmi uz pasaules ekonomiskās domas veidošanos Nijolė Juchnevičienė HISTORIOGRAPHIC SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE AND THE TRADITION OF GEOGRAPHY 22 Zinātniski historiogrāfiskais diskurss un ģeogrāfijas tradīcija Igor E.
    [Show full text]
  • Bram Stoker's Vampire Trap : Vlad the Impaler and His Nameless Double
    BRAM STOKER’S VAMPIRE TRAP VLAD THE IMPALER AND HIS NAMELEss DOUBLE BY HANS CORNEEL DE ROOS, MA MUNICH EMAIL: [email protected] HOMEPAGE: WWW.HANSDEROOS.COM PUBLISHED BY LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY ELECTRONIC PREss S-581 83 LINKÖPING, SWEDEN IN THE SERIES: LINKÖPING ELECTRONIC ARTICLES IN COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE SERIES EDITOR: PROF. ERIK SANDEWALL AbsTRACT Since Bacil Kirtley in 1958 proposed that Bram Stoker’s Count Dracula, the best known literary character ever, shared his historical past with the Wallachian Voivode Vlad III Dracula, an intense debate about this connection has developed and other candidates have been suggested, like the Hungarian General János Hunyadi – a proposal resurfacing in the most recent annotated Dracula edition by Leslie Klinger (2008). By close-reading Stoker’s sources, his research notes and the novel, I will demonstrate that Stoker’s narrative initially links his Count to the person of Vlad III indeed, not Hunyadi, although the novelist neither knew the ruler’s first name, nor his father’s name, nor his epithet “the Impaler”, nor the cruelties attributed to him. Still – or maybe for this very reason – Stoker did not wish to uphold this traceable identity: In Chapter 25, shortly before the decisive chase, he removes this link again, by way of silent substitution, cloaked by Professor van Helsing’s clownish distractions. Like the Vampire Lord Ruthven, disappearing through the “vampire trap” constructed by James R. Planché for his play The Brides of the Isles in the English Opera House, later renamed to Lyceum Theatre and run by Stoker, the historical Voivode Vlad III Dracula is suddenly removed from the stage: In the final chapters, the Vampire Hunters pursue a nameless double.
    [Show full text]
  • Dositheos Notaras, the Patriarch of Jerusalem (1669-1707), Confronts the Challenges of Modernity
    IN SEARCH OF A CONFESSIONAL IDENTITY: DOSITHEOS NOTARAS, THE PATRIARCH OF JERUSALEM (1669-1707), CONFRONTS THE CHALLENGES OF MODERNITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Christopher George Rene IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Adviser Theofanis G. Stavrou SEPTEMBER 2020 © Christopher G Rene, September 2020 i Acknowledgements Without the steadfast support of my teachers, family and friends this dissertation would not have been possible, and I am pleased to have the opportunity to express my deep debt of gratitude and thank them all. I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, who together guided me through to the completion of this dissertation. My adviser Professor Theofanis G. Stavrou provided a resourceful outlet by helping me navigate through administrative channels and stay on course academically. Moreover, he fostered an inviting space for parrhesia with vigorous dialogue and intellectual tenacity on the ideas of identity, modernity, and the role of Patriarch Dositheos. It was in fact Professor Stavrou who many years ago at a Slavic conference broached the idea of an Orthodox Commonwealth that inspired other academics and myself to pursue the topic. Professor Carla Phillips impressed upon me the significance of daily life among the people of Europe during the early modern period (1450-1800). As Professor Phillips’ teaching assistant for a number of years, I witnessed lectures that animated the historical narrative and inspired students to question their own unique sense of historical continuity and discontinuities. Thank you, Professor Phillips, for such a pedagogical example.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbolic Significance of the String-Course in Orthodox Sacred Architecture
    European Journal of Science and Theology, June 2007, Vol.3, No.2, 61-70 _______________________________________________________________________ THE SYMBOLIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STRING-COURSE IN ORTHODOX SACRED ARCHITECTURE Mihaela Palade* University Bucharest, Faculty of Orthodox Theology, Department of Sacred Art, Str. Sf. Ecaterina nr. 2,040155 Bucharest IV, Romania (Received 7 May 2007) Abstract A brief analysis of the decorative system peculiar to Romanian sacred architecture leads to singling out an element that distinctly stands out, being present in the overwhelming majority of the respective worship places. It is the string-course, a protruding ornament that circumscribes the median part of the façade and is made of various materials: stone, brick, plaster. At first sight it appears to be an agreeable, ingenious aesthetic solution, since the horizontal line it emphasizes enters into a pleasant dialogue with the vertical arches, windows, pillars and other upright elements. The present essay points out that this element is not a mere aesthetic device, but has a deep symbolic significance related to that of the church it girdles. Keywords: girding one’s waist with the belt, the Church – Christ’s mystical body, string- course, girding one with strength Motto: Thou hast turned for me my mourning into dancing; Thou hast loosed my sackcloth, And girded me with gladness. (Psalm 29/30.10, 11) 1. The presence of the string-course in the Orthodox sacred architecture; types and variations exemplified within the Romanian area In the Byzantine architecture, one or several horizontal profiles mark the outside decoration, surrounding the façade either from end to end or only partially.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania, December 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Romania, December 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: ROMANIA December 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Romania. Short Form: Romania. Term for Citizen(s): Romanian(s). Capital: Bucharest (Bucureşti). Click to Enlarge Image Major Cities: As of 2003, Bucharest is the largest city in Romania, with 1.93 million inhabitants. Other major cities, in order of population, are Iaşi (313,444), Constanţa (309,965), Timişoara (308,019), Craiova (300,843), Galati (300,211), Cluj-Napoca (294,906), Braşov (286,371), and Ploeşti (236,724). Independence: July 13, 1878, from the Ottoman Empire; kingdom proclaimed March 26, 1881; Romanian People’s Republic proclaimed April 13, 1948. Public Holidays: Romania observes the following public holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), Epiphany (January 6), Orthodox Easter (a variable date in April or early May), Labor Day (May 1), Unification Day (December 1), and National Day and Christmas (December 25). Flag: The Romanian flag has three equal vertical stripes of blue (left), yellow, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Human Settlement: Human settlement first occurred in the lands that now constitute Romania during the Pleistocene Epoch, which began about 600,000 years ago. About 5500 B.C. the region was inhabited by Indo-European people, who in turn gave way to Thracian tribes. Today’s Romanians are in part descended from the Getae, a Thracian tribe that lived north of the Danube River. During the Bronze Age (about 2200 to 1200 B.C.), these Thraco-Getian tribes engaged in agriculture, stock raising, and trade with inhabitants of the Aegean Sea coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldavia and Maramureş – Micro-Destinations for Relaunching the Romanian Tourism*
    Theoretical and Applied Economics Volume XVIII (2011), No. 10(563), pp. 45-56 Moldavia and Maramureş – Micro-destinations * for Relaunching the Romanian Tourism Aurelia-Felicia STĂNCIOIU Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies [email protected] Ion PÂRGARU “Polytechnica” University of Bucharest [email protected] Nicolae TEODORESCU Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies [email protected] Anca-Daniela VLĂDOI Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies [email protected] Monica Paula RAŢIU Romanian American University of Bucharest [email protected] Abstract. Since Romania holds a rich tourism heritage and a great tourism potential, the tourism division into zones was drawn up as “a possibility toward a superior and complex development of the tourism resources, in a unified vision…” (Erdeli, Gheorghilaş, 2006, p. 264), this representing a permanent concern of the specialists from all fields that are related to the tourism management. Although the criteria for selection and ranking of the tourist attractions have been the subject of some controversies, regarding the types of tourism that can be practiced in these areas, there were arrived almost unanimous conclusions. In order to ensure the representativeness and considering that all historical regions of the contemporary Romania are to the same extent micro- destinations with a substantial “tourism heritage”, the regions of Moldavia (including Bukovina) and Maramureş were merged into one for the elaboration of the research that presents, in essence, the main types of tourism and a part of the treasury of Romanian age-old heritage. Keywords: tourism destination; tourism micro-destination; destination image; regional tourism brand; type of tourism; destination marketing. JEL Code: M31.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents WELCOMING REMARKS
    EURINT 2018 | 18-19 May | Iași - Romania | 1 Table of contents WELCOMING REMARKS ................................................................................. 2 ABOUT THE EURINT CONFERENCE SERIES ............................................... 3 PRACTICAL INFORMATION ............................................................................ 5 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME ........................................................................ 7 PARALLEL SESSIONS ................................................................................... 10 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ABOUT ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA UNIVERSITY OF IASI ........................... 19 ABOUT THE CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES ..................................... 19 ABOUT IASI CITY ........................................................................................... 22 THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ..................................................................... 26 THE ORGANIZING COMMITEE & THE SUPPORT TEAM ........................... 26 2 | CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES | WWW.CSE.UAIC.RO WELCOMING REMARKS Gabriela Carmen PASCARIU DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES - ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA UNIVERSITY Dear guests, colleagues and students, On behalf of the Organising Committee, I am delighted to welcome you to the EURINT 2018 international conference hosted and organised by the Centre for European Studies of the University of Iasi. During the last years, the European Union has faced unprecedented challenges (Brexit,
    [Show full text]